WEBVTT - Surveillance: Deutsche Bank Cuts, Restructures

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Ye. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jaily.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. This

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is the interview of the day on Deutsche Bank and John.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I say that because we go to the bond market

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and all of the debt dynamics of any bank in

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>any bank has a ton of debt. Filippo already with

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>their messes with us UH today their senior credit analyst, Filippo,

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>when you sort out the glide pass of all of

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>these dynamics, particularly over time out to two thousand twenty two,

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>what's your enthusiasm for this set of a now expends?

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Can they do it? Yeah? Well, Tom, as you said correctly,

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it's it's quite interesting because this time and so it's

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a restructor who is not going to be financed by

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the shareholders, as you can expect given the thorough state

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the where the equity of Dutch Bank is trading.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>This is it financed by internal resources. Essentially is financed

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>by reducing the capital capital target or the bank, and

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the idea of DOTCH. A bank is

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to go to the regulator and say, listener with the

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>risk in the balance sheet of the of the group

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and the four So we think if you can execute

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>on that strategy, then we're gonna bud less of a

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>problem to you and before we can lower the capital target.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit of an ambitious plan.

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But the least we can say that the measurement has

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>listened to the Sharold because Charolder one anyday a the

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>bank to undergo a regime to reduce the balance sheet

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time not to tap the shelder because

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>such a banquet as raised thirty billion euros in twenty ten. Well,

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about how likely that is. How do you

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>fund the bill which is seven point four billion euros

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>by twenty two that's the restructuring bill FELLI for as

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, with internal resources alone. What's your judgment called

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>this morning? Do you think that's achievable? UM? I think

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. If you look at the seven point four

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>billion is actually only five point four because that's all

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in termo car because there is an element of right

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>down on the decade the fair taxas set but without

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>going to match into the technicalities. I think it's of

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>course also they're not going to pay dividend for the

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>full year twenty twenty nineteen and twenty twenty. They reducing

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>effectively the city one ratio by more than under a

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>business point because it was thirteen point seven now they

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge will go as as twelve point five billion. I

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's the most important things is that there won't

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>be any say, attrition from the on the revenue side,

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's good to control the cost base. That they

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>want to reduce the cost base by six billion by

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>two But of course so these uh discount a not

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a material deteriation on the revenue on the revision side

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of the basiness, which of course it is difficult when

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you're closing all the equity business outside. Yeah, it's the

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>difficulty with this bank has always over the last five, six, nine,

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe even ten years, was the self fulfilling spiral downwards

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that they try and retrench, but then the revenue growth

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>never comes and we just chase everything lower. Can we

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>cut that death spiral with this turnaround plan. I think

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a possibility. I think that's all we have to

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>say that the recognized to the to the new measurement

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that finned that. So they put in the awards where

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the the mounts and I mean they attempting this, uh,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>them backing very this and very ambition restructurally. It's a

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very rough with the first one and probably fifteen years

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that a bank is undergoing such a deep restructurally, and

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's uh, it's probably the way to go

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for them. And time we tell whether they can achieve

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the starget. Let's let's um step back and they ask

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what is it in the bad bank? I mean, you've

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>got a wonderfully detailed note Filippo. Do do we really

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>know what's in the bad bank? Can we actually price it? Now?

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a very good question. Actually it is quite key

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>or the afternoon strategy up in the management dissolving with

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>investor on the world. I think I saw it's allowed

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in this so called bad bank seventy four billion or

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>our w A and I think that saw a lot

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is linked to the UM so some equity derivative, there

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is some long term there. It is also there is

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>something which is called operational risk, which is something that's

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>what they can as long as the regulator is in favor,

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they can shed relatively easily, but we don't know the

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>displte between say, sale and run down of the stuff

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the bad bank. And what's interesting, folks, through all

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of the starting when the press release I believe it

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>was on Saturday, and on and on, what's interesting to me, Filippo,

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>is how the regulators fit into this, how the government

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of Germany fits into this. Am I wrong to say

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that Deutsche Bank is being run this morning by the

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the general statement by the German government. Um,

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe I wouldn't go as far, but I think I

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>see the sense of your question and it is fair.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that Dutch Bank is the largest financial group

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in Germany, and you would say the German government and

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>also the central Bank, the European center Bank, they do

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>at a stake in this aubidity of the institution. So

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what their point of view is, that

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so they make sure that the bank is solid enough

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to withstand even choppy waters. And I think this measurement

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>plan attempt to go in that direction to make dodger

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>banker's or leaner but maybe more solid. Philippa, do you

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>see this plan is quite a positive this morning. Um,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit on the fense in the sense,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, for for that to be in very great

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>positive would have involved a capital raise. But of course

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that's so. I'm aware that since the bank has raised

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so much money thirty billion over the last nine years,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's actually quite tough to go back to the Shilder

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>say would you mind stamping it? I don't know. I

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know another five six billion eur in order to

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>found this restruction. I think that's so something got a given.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>And in the sense that so is the reduction on

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the city one Racio Dodger Bank. I would love give

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you on the regional strategy here as well, focusing on Germany, Philippa.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Focusing on Germany. It's not a good or a bad

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>thing right now, Well conjunctory is maybe it's not a

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>great thing. So, because that's what we know. The German

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>economy is in slowdown. But at the same time, so

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you would think that the the German economy needs a

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>strong bank. They wouldn't make the case of forces or

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>lots of the world street bankers or the government, the

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>dripping Morga and the Bank of America. The well, very

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>well established in Germany. But I think as the Germans perceived,

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they do need a so called national champions one able

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to accompany the say the large German export around the world. Okay, exactly,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but the John's good question to those people need sophisticated

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>or less than sophisticated fixed income strategies. I mean, all

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to do is affect commercial transactions in same Malaysia,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, I think so, yeah, there is an element

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of that. So they want to be also the bank

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to accompany them, saying trades in ants program,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to build I don't know, a factory in

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia, or they want to finance a the acquisition, say,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, of a manufacturer in Brazil by a Japanese

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>company or German investments, I don't know. In Canada, I

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>think so they the German you have to think they're

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>very conservative nature and they like to have a bank

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to speak the same language. Philippa's I mean in London

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and New York is maybe maybe a bit more difficult

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to or understand, but I think it's very peculiar to

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the German nature. Right. This has been wonderful, Philippa, al already,

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We now get perspective after someone

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>who's really worked seven last three or four days. Alison Williams,

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Publishing with Bloomberg Intelligence. Allison, what you say to the

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>people down in Wall Street today with Deutsche Bank? I

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think that, uh, saving is made sort of the best

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of some bad choices, right, so there's really no good choices.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>You had to do something sort of big and bold.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think, you know, there's a lot of talk

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>about exiting the US, not having a US, but the

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>headlines don't say that. They don't because I think that

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>would have been a mistake. So, you know, instead of

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>editing a region, they're exiting a product. The question for

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>US remains, you know, they're going to keep some business there.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>How big is what they're keying exactly? Why is it

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>stock down this morning? I mean we had the pop.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean you bought you bought it? What three am, John?

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Keep me out of this, you know, but you bought

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the pop and we're it's not pretty The stock price

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>is not pretty. Well, I think it's two things. Um,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, I guess it really it's one thing.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line is the fact that, um, you know,

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of the one of many plans that's

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>come out. Yes, it's a bigger, broader plan, but I

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>think that it requires patients and it will take time.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's very positive that they put this

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>plan together, um, which should avoid a capital raise. But

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's probably um, you know, perhaps a

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>lack of confidence in that, and that concern is going

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>to linger for a while, just given the past history.

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>What's the best news of the morning? A Torso just

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>purtably no Torsten slut just published at Deutsche Bank. We

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like the fantastic news for Torsten Slack, and I hope

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it stays that way because we all enjoyed reading this research. Alison,

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>outside of avoiding a capital race, what are the positives

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for shareholders this morning? I think the positives are that

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>again it's a big change. Um, the cost targets, the

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>profitability targets are all reasonable, so I think, you know,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not heroic if you compare them to competitors.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, however, you know, given where Deutsche Bank is,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it still is sort of a tough slot. And that's

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>why you know, we talked about you know, more patients required. Um,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's been a show me story

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. The key concern for us is really,

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're exiting equities, you're focusing on the things

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're good at, But how about big do you

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>have to be in equities to sort of keep a

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>presence and not hurt your competitive positions? And there's adjacent businesses,

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, researches is an area UM that they've said

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna stay in, so equity research, MAC research.

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>They're going to keep enough of an equities effort to

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>support M and A, to support equity underwriting. Um So

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>how big is that and and can they still be

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>UM successful on that smaller scale? The stock is down

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>four percent the lows for the session. We've rolled over

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of minutes. Again, the headlines that

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I keep reading is radical change, radical restructuring, eighteen thousand jobs,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 1>and it certainly sounds radical. Is this radical enough for

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank? Kallison? I think we need to have more

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>details in terms of where the eighteen thousand is coming from.

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And I should flag the fact that they started a

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>presentation at eight am, so I'm not sure um if

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>there was something said early in the call. UM. I

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know that there was a media call earlier where there

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of questions about where the eighteen thousand's

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>going to come from. You know, management is not giving

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>detail on that. I think the fact that they're not

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>giving detail, the fact that they outlined one point four

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>million of costs in the private bank signals that some

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of those could be coming from retail, some could be

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>coming from Germany. Why did they decide to not do

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a cash call? It was that dictated to them by

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>large shareholders, was a dictated to them by the German government.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that they, obviously for their shareholders, want to

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>avoid this cash call. They are cutting the dividends, so

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 1>there is some pain to shareholders. But there definitely are

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>some smart money investors in this company, some former bank managements.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Presumably any company UM where you're going through such a

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>big change, UM would would talk to your major shareholders

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and think about how they how they think about Well,

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I just want to explore this a little bit further

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>with you, just to wrap up the conversation, Alison. I

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>do wonder whether this narrative starts to take hold that

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the profitability targets are bold, the restructuring costs is so

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>high that yes, they may say we don't need a

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>cash call now, but I wonder whether the market is

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>making an assumption now that they won't be able to

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>avoid one because of those reasons. I think the market

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is sort of telling you that or and that seems

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to be with the sock is signaling I think, because

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bank can can say all day long

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't need capital, but given past history, UM, you know,

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with banks, with this company in particular. Also, we don't

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>know about the environment, so there's still a lot of

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>environmental risks out there. And I think that UM would

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>be my concern as an investor UM. And you know,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>let's give it some time and see how things UM

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>play out. Alison Wilson Williams, thank you so much, greatly,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate. It has been an extraordinary day and we

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>see that now with further erosion in Deutsche Bank. Let

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>me get up the chart here right now, because it's

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not a pretty chart. We can describe an eight percent

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>moved down from the peak this morning seven point four

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>eight ish seven point four nine and the peak that

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was in the three am hour, and now we break

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>down to new lows moments ago. Marcus ashworths with us,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe with a good summary after talking to bond experts,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that airms, if talking to Allison Williams, the equity and

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the strategic fundamentals, let's talk about the human condition of this.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>We can do this with Mr Ashworth with years and

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>years on Global Wall Street. What a miserable day, Marcus

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen thousand plus at Deutsche Bank. Indeed it is

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been a long time coming on. In essence, what

0:14:54.960 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing here is international Messem banking employees being like, oh,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>though some will be transferred to other firms, possibly um

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>at the expense of domestic German retail employees, which is

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what would have happened or more of if the Comments

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bank um merger had come through. But you know, Deutsche

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>has kept too many options open for too long. It's

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to be in filman sacks of Europe and

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it had finally to take the domestic and go back

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a bank rather than investment bank. Let's take

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a broader conversation the people that will be looking for jobs.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the state of Global Wall Street right now? And

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly the state of your London. I have to say, um,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's a Brexit element to it, though I don't

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's anything near as important as Meford two. And

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>indeed the whole robotic AI switched to doing UH finance

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and in a in a more efficient manner and with

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.359
<v Speaker 1>less body count. And I think that this is a

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>another big crunch akin to the global financial crisis for

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for for employees around the world and investment banking, because

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there simply isn't any money to be made in a

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>negative rate environment. That Feds cutting rates as well, so

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got no upside and people do not pay for

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>trading stocks. I mean, I mean you, and in folks,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I should say that if you read Marcus Ashworth and

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion, it's extremely visceral writing about the moment. In

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the moment of the last two weeks into this Deutsche

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Bank announcement, Marcus is price up, yield down, and they

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>keep buying. I keep telling people this is not a

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>yield analysis, it's a price analysis. The desperation to own paper,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>What is the why of the desperation to own notes,

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>bills and barns. It's simply because you have an index,

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>or a lot of people have indexes to perform regardless

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in some senses. If you can see it's going one

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>way traffic, you have to be part of it, and

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's hold your close your eyes, hold your nose, whatever

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is and buy. Because in essence, this is going to

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>be a terrible year for people after possibly a bad

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty team in certain ways and getting caught out in

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly the bond markets by not being long enough stock

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>or long enough of maturity. Is is going to hurt

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you badly. What is your understanding of if Deutsche Bank

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>slims and trims in New York and London and everywhere else,

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be quote a German bank, what does

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that mean to Marcus Ashworth? What it means that they

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>were once seen, obviously is for many years as the

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>titan of German corporate um industry, and not that where

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps as where Comets Bank has maintained it's it's it's reputation.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank then went outside around the world and tried

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to take on Wall Street, and it very nearly succeeded.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you could argue succeeded brilliantly for many years.

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But the domestic business is something which they obviously feel

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.239
<v Speaker 1>they can make still make good money on on on

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>deploying capital into using the weight of German industry and

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the weight of German banking and combine it together as

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a powerhouse of Europe. And that's what they are. They're

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a powerhouse of Europe Germany, and they need a bank

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to reflect it. And they've not had it. They've had

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a underperforming um not quite up to bulge back at

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>status US investment Bank. And then there's that little article

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Marcus of BMP Perry bar making clear they're going to

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>go after their prime brokerage, their hedge funds, servicing business

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, on a game theory basis, everyone

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in continental Europe un credit BMP Perry, but all of

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>them Commerce bank. They all react to this news. What

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of meetings are they having today? Is their adversaries struggles. Well,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll find that that some of the Deutsche

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>businesses will switch to BMP in the sense so much

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to be sold or what they're gonna

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>get from the point is is that Deutsche Bank is

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>making a clear statement here. It fell in love with

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the hedge fund, it fell in love with America, and

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they are moving away from both of those types of business.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It's become a much more of a corporate bank, focusing

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>on European and and it's it's industrial strengths and moving

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>away from hedge fund clients. Those people stay with Deutsche

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Bank or continue a part of their business or marginally

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>add business with Deutsche Bank out of national duty. Yeah,

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of course they do, and I think I think some

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>will increasingly if they feel that they're being loved, whereas

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps they may be ignored. And I think that there

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>will be more emphasis on trying to unify a European

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>banking presence, which is overall in a pretty poor states

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. Basically, they couldn't make any money trying

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>to sell stocks to hedge funds and that that that

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is a very simplistic way of putting it. But there's

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>no money in stocks anymore. You don't get charge any

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>brokerage for it. There's not They're not getting enough m

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and a business to to justify having the secondary presence.

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And they can probably do a lot of this anyway

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>regardless without having about a massive equise union. That's the

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>whole point. They can dip in and dip out, and

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>some of their captive corporate clients will do business with

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>them regardless. Tell me about the asset management, Marcus, you

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and I had a conversation X months ago. They were

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>going to sell the Crown Jewel. That didn't work out.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't get the price, and now their trumpet in DWS.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Their asset management business is the future. But do you

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>see active management as a future right now for anyone? Well,

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I think what they're trying to do is less than

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the pain of the fact they're moving out the invest

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in banking side to to such a large degree, in

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>particularly obviously focused that I would be on equity that

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to emphasize they are still a broad brace bank.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>They have private wealth management to have asset management because

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>they did have to raise some money from DWS. But

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the point is that DUS is worth more to than

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment in house, and they're emphasizing the fact it

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>has these managed to grow some assets. So it's you know,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>asset managed being a terrible business to be in for

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two three years. Going to suffer from that,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>but at the moment, relatively speaking, it looks better than

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the others. Tell me about your London. Let's finish up

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>here in Marcus, with the city. I mean it is

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the wall, it is historic. Full disclosure, folks. I've been

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a guest of Deutsche Bank a number of times in London.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Is Well, we're talking to Shinelli Basak about downtown New York,

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>downtown Manhattan and the sadness that will be there today.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>How does that work culturally in London? How do they

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>handle the layoffs at the Wall? Well, I mean, it's

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a difficult day for many. Um. I

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>think that we know that this is going to be

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a process which like when Lehman Brothers, will be a

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of media attentions are focused on and I think

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you'll find that will be a good a good effort

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>done by a lot of head hunters to try and

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>get the best, the cream of the crop. So for

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>some people this will be it will be relief. There'd

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>be probably not been joying the life of some while,

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and there'll be a lot of tension on trying to

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>grab the best out of Deutsche Bank. So some some

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 1>they'll this will be a good day. For some it's

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of a career. Interesting. Thank you so much,

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Ashworth. Great perspective there, Lisa rom woids here in

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for Paul Sweeney. The big question bond markets today is

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>can U S yields go lower at a time when

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the U S economy seems to be pretty good? I mean, Tom,

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that seems to me the fundamental issue here. And uh,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Christian Momany is going to give us a sense of

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>what invest goo and Christian I think in dovetail in

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>here the up down, the back of the fourth of

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Christian, you're going on Monday morning, what do

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you do? You guys are long term? How casual are

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you on this Monday? Well, so we are not casual

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. This is investing and this is serious business.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, one has to be somewhat amused with

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the gyrations that we have had so far so far

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. Our bottom line in this regard is very simple.

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We think the U S economy is going to pick

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>up in the second half of the second quarter was

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>just a soft patch, a payback perhaps for the inventory

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>bill that we had in the first quarter, and things

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to get better and as a result, rates

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are probably going higher rather than lower. And I think

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the employment report on Friday was a proof point in

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that regard. However, the markets will do the equity markets

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>will do better, and on the SNP is what I'm

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at. Can we just pause and say, I believe

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I heard optimism there, well, optimism about equities, but the

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>implication here for bonds is potentially dire. I mean, how

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>how much higher could rates go given the fact that

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>duration levels, the sensitivity of investors fixed income assets is

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the highest it's ever been to an increase in interest rates. Sure,

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>so I think that that certainly is a problem, and

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that that particular issue may cause a bit of this

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>location in the marketplace. Having said that, our outlooking rates

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are probably our u S tenure rates probably end up

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>closer to two fifty, not a whole lot higher from

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now, but you know, the fifty

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>basis point move, and that could be a significant movement

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>as the market adjust. That may cause a bit of

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a dislocation. As I mentioned, however, that this location in

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>our view is a buying opportunity rather than a reason

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for us to kind of get discombabulated and panic. What

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sector is most attractive right now? If it's a buying opportunity.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't talk individual stocks, but what sector

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is particularly opportunistic given the cacophony of news. Well, so

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk about what the first what sectors are

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>probably not a good opportunities and the defensives the sectors

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>that do well when interest rates rally, of the reeds

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and other safer asset classes utilities, those are not the

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>sectors that you want to be in. The sectors that

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to be in are the typical sectors that

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>do well because the economy is improving and the outlook

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for the economy, certainly in our view, is improving, and

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>therefore industrials, uh and uh, you know, sectors that are

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to the overall economic growth. Pictures and tech. The

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I would say is that a lot

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of people who get very worried about tech valuation and

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>concentration and things like that. But from my standpoint, if

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets are going to do well, and I firmly

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>believe they're going to do well, the likelihood that they

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>do well without tech doing well, that just doesn't fool.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So tech remains a favorite sector of of mine and

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>probably will remain favorite sector of mine for the rest

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of this cycle. Christia, one question I have is can

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the US tenure really moved two and a half percent

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>given where we are in Europe, and given the fact

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that people are still speculating that the ECB may even

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>add quantitative easing leader this year, well so, no, that's

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a very valid point. If the policy action in

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Europe end up being very, very prolific, and with the

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>change in leadership, that may indeed or at least some

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>version of that may become become reality. If that's the case,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>then the two fifty may not may not pan out.

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, the key point that I'm trying to

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>make is direction of rates is higher rather than lower,

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>primarily driven by US economy doing better. Christian MoManI with

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>this with investoral. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.