WEBVTT - Ep 179 Fluoride 2: Fighting tooth and nail

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Ouch. It's nineteen sixty four and I'm at the Fight

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Century and I just lost I got my

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>tooth pulled. And why did I lose my tooth? I

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't really know then, but I do now. It was

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>bacteria versus floride, and I didn't have any It was

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>bacteria poop to be exact acid. I'm eating candy. My

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>mom doesn't really know how much I'm eating cereal that's

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>called sugar smacks or frosted flakes with a sugar bowl

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that we got to use sugar because my mom was

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>sleeping and we didn't want to wake her because we

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>were five kids and my mom needed her sleep in

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the morning. So hiding in plain sight in nineteen sixty

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>four was fluoride. It had just entered the water in

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>New York City and it was in some toothpastes. Blord

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>knows if I brushed my teeth, I can't remember. We

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>probably did, but we certainly didn't have fluoride treatments at

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the dentist. And so why did I lose my teeth

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at that time? Because it's not one thing, It's not

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>one quantity of one thing. It's an approach to health

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>reasonable amounts of sugar fluoride in the water to build

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the teeth strong. And I know that. And why do

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that? Well, I don't remember if I said

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this is Rafael, and it is, but this is doctor Santore.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Also in nineteen seventy four, about ten years after I

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>got my tooth pulled, I went to dental school and

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot about how to fix broken teeth.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't learn as much how to keep them from

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>getting broken, how to keep them from getting decayed. That

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>came with time and maturity. And after forty five years,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of stories, but I only want

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to tell you one or two. So what happened In

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty I was treating patients and I was finished

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>with all my resus and sees and things. And I

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>noticed that I would fix teeth that had cavities on

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>top of the fillings on top of the teeth that

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>just had cavities. Boy, that lactic acid and all those

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>things that bacteria produce and they erode teeth were working

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>really hard against me. And I started to see a

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>change in the late eighties. And in nineteen eighty seven,

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Willibrook closed and that is where we saw lots of

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>patients who came to the hospital I worked at where

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I did anesthesia and taught pediatric residents how to do

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>dentistry and how to think about healthcare for the handicapped.

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And we saw over about ten years before Willibrook closed

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and even after, while we were treating the handicapped in

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the larger New York area mostly Brooklyn, but larger New

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>York area, that the kids were getting less cavities. We

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>started speaking to the parents and we start looking at

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the data, and we realized that there was a revolution,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that the bacteria was starting to lose the battle. And

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we weren't quite sure why. It seemed common sense that

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>people brush their teeth, but it had to be more

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>than that, because the handicapped kids could not brush their

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>teeth well, their parents were always exhausted caring for them,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was a difficult environment. In about nineteen ninety one,

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>varnishes came out that we dentists could use in the

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>teeth and before we put the restorations in them. And

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety six, my son, my firstborn son, was

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>six years old and he had no cavities. And I

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>noticed because I treated the kids in his class that

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they had no cavities. And I started to put together

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between good healthcare and systemic fluoride as well

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>as topical fluoride, and they do different things, and we

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>argue to this day about which one is better, and

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they are both important. But the thing about systemic fluoride

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is it's the quiet giant that works behind the scenes.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I came to realize as a dentist

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in the trenches, so to speak, trying to prevent teeth

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>from being destroyed. In the year twenty twenty five. I

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>can tell you without a doubt from treating different communities

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with different advantages and access, that fluoride in all its forms,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>properly used is a gift to children. And I share

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that with every parent that comes in and I show

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>them X rays. I have so many X rays that

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>show such a long history that we went from decay

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and fillings to very little decay or almost mos none

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and no feelings. And I thank you for listening to this,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and I hope you heard a simple message with all

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the honesty that I meant for you to have and

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to hear.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>I've that so good.

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Ray, Thank you so so much for sharing that with us.

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank You're the best, the.

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Best, A man who goes by many names, Raphael, doctor Santore,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Uncle Ray, my husband's uncle Ray. So but I really

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 4>did appreciate that perspective of like, here's a noticeable difference.

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 4>I feel like sometimes big public health measures we don't

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 4>see the impact right away, right, we only see the

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 4>impact when they're taken away. But I love that with

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 4>that additional fluoride to the water, it was like, here

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 4>is a very clear night and day difference.

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Right, we can really see the effects. And from someone

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 6>who's on literally the front line of it, right, holding teeth.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Day in and day out.

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, we really appreciate it, super super appreciate it.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 7>Hi.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm erin onmant Updike And this

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 4>is this podcast Will Kill You.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Part two of Fluoride Part two. Yeah, it's on me today.

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 4>I am just thinking how weird it is, and like,

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if I get it. I don't know

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 4>if it's like nice, if I'm like comfortable not having

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 4>anything to say, you know, nothing to hold anybody. I mean,

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 4>it's not I get to just like sit back and relax.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I liked it last week.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 6>I would love to do more of those. Very nervous

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 6>about this week. But so last week, if you missed it,

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 6>we went through Aaron Welsh went through the history of fluoride,

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 6>how we figured out what it does, when we started

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 6>putting it in our water, slash when it was always there,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 6>we stopped.

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Putting it in our water in some places.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 6>And the history, yes, of the anti fluoridation movement. So

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 6>today I am going to talk to us about Honestly, Erin,

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 6>this is going to be just a very long winded

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 6>episode for me to end with essentially the same conclusion

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 6>that you stated last week that as of right now,

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 6>there there is no data of harm to our health

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 6>from drinking water with fluoride added to it at the

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 6>specific concentrations that we add to it, right that's the

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 6>TLDR TLDL tld listen.

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Yep, there you go.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 6>But let me tell you it took me a very

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 6>long time, quite a lot of research and a real

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 6>emotional journey to get to that conclusion.

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 4>So okay, I'm curious about the emotions. Number one. Number two,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that that illustrates how challenging it can be

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 4>yes if you have questions to get to the bottom

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 4>of one hundred questions per.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 6>But we will do our best to do that today

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 6>with first going into some detail on like what a

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 6>carry or a cavity like we talked about last week,

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 6>really is how it forms?

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Quick question, is it ya carries?

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 6>Erin, I still don't know, and I'm probably just going

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 6>to call it cavity because that's my word.

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm finally carries seem so weird, I know, I

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 4>kept I kept trying to like adjust the verb noun.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 6>It's like the dental carries. Okay, how dental carries form?

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>How about that?

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 4>How dental carries forms? What carries carries is? What's the

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 4>singular of carries? Yeah, we need we clearly do. I

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 4>think it's like deer and deer.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 3>No that I can't accept that. I think it might

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 3>see the end, but carries is plural and singular whatever

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Aaron listen is.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 6>We're going to talk about how they form, how fluoride

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 6>actually works to protect against the formation of dental carries,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 6>where we're getting that fluoride from, and then of course

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 6>all of the controversies if that is the right word

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 6>about the supposed or.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Possible negative health effects of fluoride.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay, okay, so we're gonna talk about today, but first,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 6>but first, it's quarantine.

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 4>It's quarantine. Ay time, we're drinking the same thing we

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 4>did last week, and that is pulling.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Teeth, pulling teeth. Yeah, yeah, okay.

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 4>It's we don't quite remember the ingredients. But that's okay

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 4>because you know what, you know, it would have been

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 4>so easily accessible in my notes. Yeah, but that's okay

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 4>because you know where you can find that on our website.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this podcast, podcast.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 4>Or all of our social media channels.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 6>We're there, Instagram, this podcast will kill you Blue Sky.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't remember either tpwky or this podcast will kill

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 5>you Facebook.

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 6>We still exist there, TikTok. Also, you know what I mean,

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 6>just just follow us.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Check it, check it out.

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 6>There's mint in it, there's elderflower. It's like it's delicious.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 4>Let's let's do a web a website spiel. We've got transcripts,

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 4>We've got sources. Because I know that you're gonna want

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 4>to re up more on floride.

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you are.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 4>We've got some. We've got some sources. We've got a

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 4>link to where you can submit your first hand account.

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 4>We've got links to the books that we feature on

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 4>these episodes, and our book club episodes and more things

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 4>that was a terrible website should beel You did your best.

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 4>It's all I can do.

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 6>It's all I can hope for rate review and subscribe

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 6>on your favorite podcaster.

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you can.

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 4>We're on YouTube.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>YouTube the let's go, let's go. Okay, after a break,

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 3>we'll do it.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 6>I just want to also set the stage really quick, okay,

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 6>and remind us of what a global public health prop

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 6>Dental carries are.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Gonna use them as a plural.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 6>It's both a plural and a singular. So you're in

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 6>the clear, okay, I cannot get it wrong. So the

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 6>World Health Organization estimates, and this is a little bit

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 6>old data, but it's still what is cited that two

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 6>point four billion people across the globe have untreated dental

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 6>carries in their permanent teeth, and six hundred and twenty

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 6>one million kiddos have untreated dental carries in their primary teeth.

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 6>So this is a huge public health problem. There was

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 6>a really great Nature review Nature Reviews Disease Primer's paper

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 6>from twenty seventeen that I used heavily for the carries section,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 6>and it estimates that sixty to ninety percent of children

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 6>and the vast majority of adults are affected by dental

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 6>carries at some point in their life, and they're actually

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 6>considered the single most common chronic childhood disease.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 5>Like what I mean, I'm not surprised, I know, And

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 5>like many chronic infectious diseases, we do see disparities in

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 5>prevalence as well as access to care, with children of

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 5>color and children in lower income areas having significantly higher

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 5>prevalence and difficulties in access to care.

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 6>Although globally it is still the case, though this is

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 6>changing due to dietary changes. Higher income countries actually tend

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 6>to have slightly more carries than lower income countries, So

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 6>that's largely dietary differences and how much sugar we eat. Okay,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 6>and that's the end that I'm going to say about sugar,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 6>because today is about fluoride. Okay, Let's talk about how

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 6>dental carries form. There's two main components that exist for

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 6>the formation of dental carries. First is issues with the

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 6>enamel itself, and the second is the components of the

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 6>oral microbiome. So let's start there. Our oral microbiome is

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 6>just so varied. We have so many different things that

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 6>live in our mouth. We've got bacteria, yeast, viruses, protozoa,

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 6>even our did you know that I did.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Not know neither.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 4>How did they get there?

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 6>How did they get there? Many of these organisms are

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 6>commensals or even beneficial to our mouth and to our health,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 6>but some are what we call kryogenic.

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 3>And all of.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 6>These helpful and unhelpful organisms, because I can't just say bacteria.

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>It's more than just bacteria.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 6>They live together, and they grow and form this very

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 6>complex biofilm on our teeth surface that.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 3>We call plaque plack.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 6>And each surface of each one of our teeth is

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 6>its own little micro environment, with its own little microbiome.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 4>So there's like there's like whole mouth.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 6>And then there's like each little surface of its tooth.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 6>It's going to be a little bit different. Yeah, isn't

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 6>that great to think about?

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 4>I am very curious, Okay, And so I assume that

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 4>there's like a fairly there that there's a gradient from

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 4>front to too, like if you're closer to the back

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 4>of your mouth. What's going on there?

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 6>For no idea? We should do a whole episode on

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:09.239
<v Speaker 6>the oral microbiome.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Really we should, though, we should like flossing. Listen, we

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 4>should talk about floss.

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've talked a lot about floss.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 4>You and I you talked a lot about more than

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 4>you would expect.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Okay, but listen, let's get back to the oral microbiome

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 6>in the contee.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Of visual teeth, et cetera.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so, under certain environmental conditions, for example, high concentrations

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 6>of fermentable carbohydrates like sugar, or conditions like say a

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 6>reduction in saliva, we can see a shift in this

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 6>microbiome to favor certain bacteria, including various species that are

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 6>more either acid producing, so they make more acid from

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 6>these fermentable carbohydrates, or they're just very tolerant of this acid.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 6>And it's not just like one, one or two species

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 6>of bacteria. We used to think it was just like

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 6>maybe a couple different species that were the main causes

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 6>of dental carries.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 6>It's this whole ecological community that shifts to favor acid production,

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 6>and that is the first step in the formation of

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 6>dental carries. Is this shift in the oral microbiome to

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 6>favor acid production, and we most often see this due

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 6>to things like regular exposure to sugars.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Okkay, so we've got this. The first thing, like the

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 4>inciting incident, is the sugar, and then that just sort

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 4>of selects for this ecosystem exact acid or caryogenic.

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 6>Then we have the hard stuff, our enamel. So as

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 6>the acid production from these bacteria starts to build up

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 6>in our mouth, the pH of course is going to drop.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 6>Acid has a low pH, and that drops the pH

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 6>at the surface of our enamel, which is the outermost

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 6>part of our teeth that surrounds the denteene right. Enamel

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 6>is mostly made of a substance called hydroxy appetite, which

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 6>is basically just a compound of calcium and phosphate and hydroxyl,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 6>which is like oxygen and hydrogen. And in the presence

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 6>of acid, what happens is that this becomes soluble. So

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 6>there's a partial demineralization of this outer surface of the tooth.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 6>And as this hydroxy appetite starts to demineralize, then you

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 6>have an increase in porosity, right, So then this acid

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 6>can diffuse even deeper and cause further demineralization, releasing more

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 6>calcium and more phosphate from this enamel. Right, and this process,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 6>don't ask questions yet, aarin.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 4>I can see you take a see me up.

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, this process and the fact that, like we have

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 6>saliva in our mouth which serves as a buffer. Eventually

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 6>we're gonna wash out some of this acid. Eventually you

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 6>will have remineralization, right because the calcium and phosphate are

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 6>being released, Your saliva is coming into buffer and eventually

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 6>things even out to where the calcium and phosphate is

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 6>gonna redeposit and you can remineralize this unless you can't

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 6>because if you continue to have acid production, if you

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 6>don't have enough saliva, et cetera, then this demineralization process

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 6>can continue until you end up damaging the pulp of

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 6>the tooth, which can then damage the canal, the root canal,

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 6>and then you end up meeting a root canal or

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 6>an extraction. But this process demineralization and then remineralization, mineralization,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 6>it's hard word to say this is happening in our

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 6>mouth all the time. I think that we think of

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 6>our teeth as like static, right, they're just like little

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 6>bones sitting in our mouth, But they're not. They're alive

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 6>and they are constantly changing in response to the environment

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 6>of our mouth.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, can you tell me about why low saliva is bad?

0:18:56.000 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 6>Saliva is a buffer in power in that acid base system,

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 6>and so with out the saliva, then you don't have

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 6>that buffer. Yeah, and then why there's probably more.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 4>But the short answer why acid? Like why do these

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 4>microbes produce acid? Is it like a competition thing with

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 4>other microbes that's just to kind of like stake out

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 4>more space and claim that's a deeper dive.

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 6>Is it just that that's like a byproduct of the

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 6>production of sugars, right, That's what it seems like. It's

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 6>like they produce mostly lactic acid as a result of

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 6>the production or the digestion of sugars. So it's just

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 6>like they're poop right right, Yeah, Okay, but that's just

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 6>like all of that was just dental carries. That's just

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 6>what's happening in our mouth. Where the heck does fluoride

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 6>come in? I haven't even said the word fluoride yet.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 4>It's just lurking in the background.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 3>It is. It is erin.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 6>So it is like you said last week, Aaron, you

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 6>kind of went into this fluoride is it's just a

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 6>mineral salt that's present in our environment. Like all of

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 6>us are being exposed to fluoride through various sources. Fluoride

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 6>is like the ion form of fluorine, the element which

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 6>is I learned, the thirteenth most abundant element in our

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 6>Earth's crust. It's just there, it's around, it's in a

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 6>lot of different mineral compounds, and it's absorbed very well

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 6>via our GI tract when we are.

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Exposed to it.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 6>But how does it work in our teeth to protect

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 6>them from dental carries. There are several mechanisms that we

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 6>know of now. How fluoride works. First is that it

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 6>delays that initial demineralization process. Basically, fluoride itself you can

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 6>think of as acting like a buffer it because of

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 6>when fluoride precipitates versus becomes soluble compared to calcium phosphates

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 6>and the hydroxyl groups that's in hydroxy appetite. In the

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 6>presence of fluoride, you have to have a lower pH

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 6>a more acidic environment before that de mineralization starts.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Does that make sense.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, like lowers or it raises the bar

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 4>or like you got to be even more acidic if

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 4>you want to do damage.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Here exactly exactly.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 6>And then on top of that, again because of the

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 6>chemical properties, it also hastens that process of remineralization. It

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 6>returns that neutral pH faster to favor remineralization. Right, so

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 6>you're like less demineralizing and more remineralizing.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Wow, Okay, so it's like a twofold. It protects you

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 4>and it also helps to repair fast exactly.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and there are more mechanisms too. It also can

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 6>interfere with like the bacteria themselves that form this biofilm,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 6>they can fluoride can interfere with glycolysis, so some of

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 6>the specific like metabolic processes in that bacteria that live

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 6>in our mouths, especially those carryogenic ones, so that they're

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 6>just not as efficient. It's thought that this is probably

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 6>not like the most important mechanism, but it is yet

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 6>another mechanism by which fluoride is helping the oral microbiome

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 6>of our teeth, which is cool. And all of these

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 6>events happen even at very low levels of fluoride in

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 6>our mouths, like less than one part per million. At

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 6>high levels of fluoride, it can also penetrate through the

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 6>plaque and then be incorporated into our enamel itself. So

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 6>instead of that hydroxy appetite, you can have fluoride there

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 6>instead of the OH group. So it's called fluoro appetit.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 6>Did you know that shark enamel is made almost entirely

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 6>of fluoro appetate?

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 4>All like what they.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 6>Don't ask watertails are like, is there a lot of

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 6>fluoride in salt water in the ocean. There's like one

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 6>to one point five parts per million in saltwater. So nah,

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 6>not really, I mean there's so amazing Okay, Yeah, So

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 6>that that's some of the other ways. And like we

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 6>talked about last week, erin if we are ingesting fluoride

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 6>systemically in our water, in our food, whatever pre eruption

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 6>i e. When we are little before our first teeth

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 6>pop out, it also has been shown to make our

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 6>enamel more resistant to the development of carries later on,

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 6>especially the deep, craggly bits of our teeth that aren't

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 6>ever going to be exposed to topical fluoride.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Ah okay, And this is both for baby teeth and

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 4>permanent teeth.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 6>All these mechanisms. Yes, yes, And I want to actually

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 6>stop here for a second and take a pause, because

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 6>this already what I have said, is one of the

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 6>points that many of the papers and the rhetoric that

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 6>pushes back against the idea of community water fluoridation really

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 6>tends to stick on because it is true. And we

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 6>talked a little bit about this last week. We know

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 6>now that the primary mechanism of action of fluoride is

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 6>actually topical, so it is what is happening in on

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 6>and around our teeth, in our saliva, in this dental plaque,

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 6>et cetera. There are, though, these so called systemic effects

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 6>in that there is data, pretty clear data that there's

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 6>a pre eruptive benefit to having exposure to fluoride before

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 6>your teeth even form, but the primary way that it

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 6>works thereafter is by existing in our mouths and around

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 6>our teeth. But when you really then think about all

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 6>of the different ways that we could be then exposing

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 6>people to fluoride, that fact that it is topical, that

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 6>it is low levels, that it is a constant exposure,

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 6>actually favors water fluoridation because we're drinking it multiple times

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 6>a day every day compared to say milk or salt fluoridation,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 6>which are other more targeted strategies that other countries use,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 6>for like large scale fluoride distribution. Right, because drinking it

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 6>in our water is this constant low concentration flow. Plus

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 6>than anything that's absorbed systemically is then going to be

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 6>re secreted into our saliva, although at even lower levels,

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 6>right right, right.

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's it's that the fact that it's if

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 4>it's if you're drinking it, then it's then you have

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 4>the systemic fluoride in your saliva, bathing your teeth right

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 4>in fluoride.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 6>Right, it's also when that water is in your mouth,

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 6>So it's not just like having to be absorbed by

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 6>your giatract it's also every single time I've been swishing

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 6>my water a lot more since reading about this, Probably ridiculous,

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 6>but really.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Okay, so I have a question about the development

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 4>of teeth when.

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, Aaron, Yeah, ask me questions about things they

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 6>didn't research.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, go ahead, I.

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Mean take it away, like when do teeth develop?

0:25:54.520 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I pass, Okay, I'm sorry.

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I was just thinking, like, at what level when is

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 4>exposure to systemic fluoride? Yeah, for tooth development, Like, really,

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 4>what is that critical time period?

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't know, and I didn't see the specific

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 6>data on that. They all just say like pre eruptive,

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 6>because I think by the time, so like six months

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 6>to twelve months is when your first baby teeth usually

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 6>start to appear, and then the obviously adult teeth you

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 6>start to lose. Your baby teeth usually by six years

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 6>old is like the earliest, sometimes a little bit earlier,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 6>So it's sometime in that time frame, like before the

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 6>eruption of especially your adult teeth. But yeah, I don't

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 6>I don't have an answer to that, Aaron.

0:26:50.800 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 7>Okay, okay, But so what are the different ways that

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 7>we have used this knowledge that we now have about

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 7>how effective Florida is and the ways that it's effective

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 7>to prevent dental carries?

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 6>What are the different ways that we've been using this

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 6>to improve public health? And you kind of set the

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 6>stage for us for this a lot last week, Aaron.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 6>In the US community, water fluoridation is the way that

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 6>we as a society, I guess, I don't know, as

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 6>a what's the word nation? Yeah, country, the word I

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 6>was looking for, Okay. It is the way that we

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 6>as a country have decided to do oral health right

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.959
<v Speaker 6>is community water fluoridation. We've been doing it for almost

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 6>eighty years. It's had tremendous and very measurable public health impacts.

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 6>And it is not just the US. Countries around the

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 6>globe have been using widely admitted stirred fluoride for the

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 6>prevention of dental carries for a really long time. Some countries,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 6>instead of using it in the water, have decided to

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 6>use milk supplementation, the way that we fortify milk with

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 6>vitamin D in the US. Other countries have used salt,

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 6>like the way that we fortify salt with iodine here

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 6>in the US.

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Are we sensing a theme here?

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 6>And then community water fluoridation or CWF is the most widespread.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 6>It's covered an estimated four hundred million people in twenty

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 6>five different countries worldwide.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 4>It's actually less than I thought, Fewer than I thought.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Okay, yeah, I mean that doesn't account for everyone who

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 6>just gets it from naturally floridated sources, which we'll talk about.

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 6>But I also just want to do a plug real

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 6>quick here, and I have a paper to back this

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 6>up that our water fluoridation systems are very, very impressively

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 6>good at keeping the concentrations at that point seven parts

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 6>per million or milligrams per liter that they are expected

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 6>to like better than I expected, honestly, like very verging

0:28:58.440 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 6>at it.

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's a talk point of some anti

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 4>floridationists where they're like, they're not really measuring the water,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 4>it's just like a ballpark.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 3>They actually do a very good job of it.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 6>Yea, the US Public Health Surface and the ADA report,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 6>their estimate is that drinking fluoridated water at the level

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 6>that they recommend, which again I'm going to say this

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 6>a million times zero point seven milligrams per leader, which

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 6>is the same as parts per million, reduces dental carries

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 6>by twenty five percent in children and adults. And that

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 6>number already is now contentious because recently some papers that

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 6>have tried to look at, like, what is the benefit

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 6>just of floridating our water, specifically in more recent years,

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 6>since the advent of other dental hygiene options, like we

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 6>didn't used to have fluoridated toothpaste, we didn't used to

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 6>have fluoride sealants, et cetera. So some papers that have

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 6>tried to look just at more recent data estimate a

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 6>lower benefit, maybe like a three to four percent reduction

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 6>in carries. And this is based on a Cochrane review

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 6>that came out last year as well as a paper

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 6>out of the UK that looked at like ten years

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 6>of UK data.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 3>But at the same.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Time, other recent papers, including one out of Australia from

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 6>twenty seventeen and one out of Brazil in twenty twenty one,

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 6>actually had much higher carry reduction estimates from their water fluoridation.

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 6>So we don't know the exact amount, but the data

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 6>is clear across the board that there is a reduction

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 6>in dental carries, and every paper that has looked at

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 6>the financial impacts consistently finds that community water fluoridation is

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 6>a cost effective intervention even when its impacts are less.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, So I just I really want to understand

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 4>why there are such discrepancies and so like, Historically those

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 4>numbers were much higher even than twenty five percent, right,

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, even the.

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Brazil paper from twenty twenty one at like was a

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 6>fifty percent reduction.

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 4>So right, yeah, So what can account for that three

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 4>to four percent?

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't know in all honesty, Aaron, I mean, is

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 6>it just that we have so many other options that

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 6>are doing a very good job. And so we've seen

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, because it's not like we've seen reductions

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 6>and carries like carries are, if anything, on the rise.

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 6>So I don't know, Okay, I don't have a good

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 6>answer for you. I just can tell you that is

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 6>what the data shows. Yeah, so we we grains of salt,

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 6>all of this, okay, okay, but consistently a reduction and

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 6>like what level of reduction in carry's prevalence do we

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 6>have to hit for this to be considered important if

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 6>we know that it's cost effective. That is like so

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 6>far beyond my expertise, right, this is like these are

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 6>the big questions.

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's still it's still to me comes down

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 4>to the fact that, like this is a community public

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 4>health approach, correct, versus you have to go then go

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 4>to the store and buy mouthwashing and buy the right

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 4>toothpaste and go to the dentists and all the things

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 4>that cost a lot of money. Whereas floridated water.

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 6>It's just yeah, yeah, yeah, and I will take a

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 6>reasonable solution, doesn't it. And so that's what we've decided. Okay,

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 6>So now we have to get into what I know

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 6>that everyone probably really wants to know is there's a

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 6>lot of people talking about that fluoride is actually quite

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 6>harmful to us. So what does the data show? What

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 6>are the risks, if any, of having fluoride in our water?

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 6>There are only two potential harms that are worth talking

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 6>about in detail today, So that's what I'm going to

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 6>focus on. But I do just want to point out

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 6>that there are an endless array of things that fluoride

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 6>has been blamed for and.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Continues to be blamed for.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Kidney dispruption, kidney stones, bladder cancer, all cancer, sex, hormone disruption, ADHD, diabetes,

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 6>liver dysfunction, infertility, muscular skeletal pain. Throw a dart at

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 6>your Path of physiology textbook. Someone has made a claim

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 6>that florid has caused it.

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, last week, what did I say?

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 5>Undo?

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 6>Financially, there's actually data that fluoride in the water people

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 6>work more and they have better income and stuff. There's

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 6>some papers that say that, which is so interesting.

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, yeah, you're not having to go to the

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 4>dentist to like for emergency dental it carries repair all

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 4>the time.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Whatever, what does the data show?

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 6>Okay, let's let's look at this. Yeah, there are some

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 6>things that we know for sure. There is very consistent

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 6>evidence of absolutely no association between fluoride exposure and cancer

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 6>or cancer related mortality, or bone cancer specifically, or hip

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 6>fracture or down syndrome or kidney stones, so that we

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 6>can say definitely no.

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Association, no association.

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 6>Thyroid dysfunction is another thing that people say is caused

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 6>by fluoride. There is really limited evidence for any association

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 6>one way. There are papers, some of which show an association,

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 6>some of which do not show an association. At this point,

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 6>we cannot make any solid conclusion for thyroid dysfunction and

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 6>most of the rest of these claims. There is simply

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 6>no data to even evaluate these associations, which just means

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 6>that anyone who says that these associations exist is lying.

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 6>It does not mean that, for sure, there's absolutely no

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 6>way that this could ever be related, but there's literally

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 6>no data to support these ideas. Okay, but there are

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 6>two outcomes that are worth digging into a little bit

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 6>more because of the wealth of information that we have

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 6>on the subject and all of the controversies that exist

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 6>right now. And those two are skeletal fleurosis okay, and

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 6>impacts on intelligence as measured by IQ, but which is

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 6>often conflated as just this blanket idea of neurotoxicity.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmm.

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 3>So let's get into these too, shall we.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm very excited for this.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, excited. It is not the word I would use.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I am.

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's excited. We're excited. Listen.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 6>Skeletal fluorosis Okay, Aaron, you talked to us a lot

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 6>last week about dental fluorosis, and that is when we're

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 6>exposed to a lot of fluoride and then our teeth

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 6>get modeled enamel from it because of the fluoride actually

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 6>accumulating in our teeth. So much like fluoride can accumulate

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 6>in our teeth, if we're exposed at high levels, it

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 6>can also accumulate in our bones. And this can lead

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 6>to deficient mineralization, essentially because fluoride is getting taken up

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 6>in our bones instead of the other minerals that would

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 6>normally get taken up in our bones. So then you

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 6>just have a change in your bone structure and potentially

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 6>weaker bones. Now, remember that we have very strong data

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 6>that there's no association between community water fluoridation and hip fractures,

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 6>which is one of our main metrics to look at,

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 6>like the strength of bones. Okay, but skeletal fluorosis is

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 6>something that definitely can happen and does happen. It generally

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:07.959
<v Speaker 6>happens at long term intakes of six to fourteen milligrams

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 6>of fluoride or more per day.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So what is that in terms of parts per million?

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 4>What should we should?

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 5>We?

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Err in math a little bit, Yes, we should.

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait.

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 6>Okay, if you this is Aaron Math trademark, I could

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.479
<v Speaker 6>be wrong, but I did the math.

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 6>If you got all of your fluoride from drinking water

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 6>in the US, from optimally fluoridated sources, then you would

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 6>be drinking water that was point seven milligrams per liter

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 6>or parts per million. Okay, you would have to drink

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 6>eight and a half liters of water per day. If

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 6>you got all of your fluoride from water, you would

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 6>have to drink eight and a half liters of water

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 6>per day just to get six milligrams of fluoride in

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 6>your diet. I don't know about you, but I can't

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 6>even get myself to drink two leaders eight and a

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 6>half liters of water per day. That would not be

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 6>a healthy amount to drink, okay, And.

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 4>So that just remind me again the range that leads

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 4>to that is suggested to lead to skeletal fluorosis.

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 6>So six to fourteen milligrams per day puts you at

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 6>higher risk of skeletal fluorosis. It does not mean that

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 6>you will have it, but ingestion of six milligrams or

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 6>more per day puts, like, at a population level, some

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 6>people are going to end up with skeletal fluorosis.

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 6>Now, no one is getting one hundred percent of their

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 6>daily fluoride from water. It's estimated that in the US

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 6>we get like forty to seventy percent of our daily

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 6>fluoride intake from our water and the rest from other

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 6>bottled beverages.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Food. Black tea has so much fluoride in it. Who really?

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? And you know toothpaste, especially our kids who are

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 6>just like chugging that stuff. Yeah yeah, yeah, so annoying

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 6>that they do that.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Personal delicious though, right, Yeah?

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 3>Why do they make it so delicious?

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Is it delicious?

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 6>But they think it is. It's like bubblegum flavor, and

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 6>it's so gross.

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 4>Anyways, bubble gum flavor. Toothpaste grosses me out.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you'd say, but I buy it.

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 6>If you assume, then, on the low end, that you

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 6>get forty percent of your fluoride from water, we can

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 6>air and math this as well. In order to get

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 6>to that six milligrams a day, you'd have to still

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 6>be drinking like three and a half liters of water

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.720
<v Speaker 6>three point four liters of water, and somehow getting another

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 6>two point six milligrams from somewhere else. And you'd be

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 6>hard pressed to get that from your other dietary sources.

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 6>Eating a lot of toothpaste, I guess might get you there.

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 6>So the math just does not work out. And there

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 6>are some pretty large meta analyzes that have estimated like

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 6>what does water have to be at for someone to

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 6>have an increased risk of skeletal fluorosis from their drinking.

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Water from just daily drinking.

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah right, you've got to be looking at higher than

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 6>three point seven to three point eight parts per million.

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Which in water, if you were getting something from like

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 4>deep well that has not been evaluated.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 6>Then you definitely could be drinking that. So realistically, bottom line,

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 6>skeletal fluorosis is not something that is a concern from

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 6>drinking water at the levels that we see in optimally

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 6>fluoridated water systems.

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Question, Yes, how is skeletal fluorosis diagnosed?

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 6>Oh, that's a really good question. I don't actually know

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 6>the full answer to that.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah, So do we know the prevalence of skeletal fluorosia?

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 6>No, in areas that like the highest prevalence in areas

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 6>that have like really high levels of water fluoridation. I've

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 6>seen like maybe ten or eleven, twelve percent, but like

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 6>across the globe, it's pretty low. But it certainly is

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 6>a risk in areas that have really high fluorid levels.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 6>And I think there are probably some populations somewhere that

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 6>have much higher levels than that, But I don't have

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 6>like global estimates or anything.

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 4>And so this would be like in areas where you

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 4>see higher like maybe there are geographic areas with higher

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 4>hip fractures than you might suspect there's higher levels of

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 4>fluorid in the drinking water something like that.

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 6>I don't know that I would even go that far, honestly. Okay, Yeah,

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that we have any data to support

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 6>those kinds of estimates. No, Okay, Yeah, Now on the

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 6>other hand, mild dental fluorosis, which again dental fluoresis you

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 6>get from having higher levels of fluoride in your water.

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 6>We do still see some degree of mild dental fluorosis,

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 6>which is it's considered mild if it's not enough to

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 6>cause significant cosmetic concerns, but like a dentist would see

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 6>it on your teeth. Depending on the study. There's some

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 6>estimates of like ten to twelve percent of the population

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 6>in areas that are like optimally fluoridating their water can

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 6>still have a mild dental thorrosis. So that is real,

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 6>but that's it's not real for skeletal thluorrosis at the

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 6>levels of optimally floridated water.

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 4>It's not like having health impacts, correct, it's having teeth,

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 4>like the appearance of teeth, correct of your teeth.

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 6>And only in a small proportion of the population, right right, right, correct.

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 6>So now a very quick diversion a little bit more

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 6>numbers before we get into the possible neurotoxic effects of fluoride,

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 6>because these numbers are going to get really important because surprise, surprise,

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 6>we need a little bit of nuance here. Okay, I've

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 6>said one hundred times already. The US Public Health Service

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 6>recommends that if communities are going to add fluoride to

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 6>their water, they do so at a level of point

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 6>seven milligrams.

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Per leader or parts really parts realion.

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 6>Now, the EPA, which is the body who is in

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 6>charge of regulating and enforcing standards for things like our

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 6>drinking water, their standard for the maximum amount of fluoride

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 6>that should be in our drinking water is four milligrams

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 6>per leader. That is the level at which they can

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 6>actually enforce something. Their recommended maximum is two milligrams per leader,

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 6>but it's not actually forable. So if a community, for example,

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:08.280
<v Speaker 6>has fluoride naturally occurring in their water between two and four,

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 6>the EPA can be like, hey, listen, that's a little high,

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 6>but they cannot do anything about it unless it's above four.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Okay. This this brings to mind a question about the

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 4>fluoridation laws that are currently being or anti fluoridation laws

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 4>that are currently being discussed or have already been passed,

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 4>like in Utah and Florida. If there is naturally occurring fluoride,

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 4>and this is maybe this is like a question that

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 4>maybe you can't answer.

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 3>But if it is, the questionnaire and it is.

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 4>It is the question if there is naturally occurring fluoride

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.240
<v Speaker 4>in one of these states where if you're not allowed

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 4>to add fluoride to your water, is there anything done

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 4>to reduce the fluoride in that water?

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 6>That is the question, because it also is who is

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 6>checking it and who is enforcing those regulations? Right, because

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 6>the EPA is in charge of detecting this and of

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 6>enforcing these regulations. What teeth do they have to be

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 6>able to enforce those regulations? The more that we defund

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 6>the EPA, what ability do they even have to be

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 6>doing the water testing that they need to be doing

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 6>to make sure that our florid is at a safe level,

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 6>especially in places with naturally occurring fluoride.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure a corporation would love to know, hop in

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 4>and charge a great deal of money for that.

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 3>That's a great idea.

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 6>Privatization, Yeah, listen for what it's worth. The World Health

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Organization recommends that drinking water should have no more than

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 6>one point five milligrams per leader. That's their maximum that

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 6>should be allowed in drinking water. And they say that

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 6>for any place who is adding fluoride for community water fluoridation,

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 6>they should do so at a level between point five

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 6>and one milligrams per leader.

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 6>And these numbers, especially that World Health Organization recommendation of

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 6>no more than one point five miligrams per leader. That

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 6>number is important, So keep that in your brain.

0:43:58.400 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:43:58.760 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yep.

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 6>Back in twenty fifteen, so like a decade ago, now,

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 6>the recommendation in the US for optimally floorated water was

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 6>a little bit different. It was like a range you

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 6>could go anywhere from point seven to one point two, okay,

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.760
<v Speaker 6>But then because of the incidents of dental thuosis being

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 6>higher at levels above one, they decided to lower it too.

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 6>Point seven. Back in twenty fifteen. That same year is

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 6>when they established a task force through the NIH actually

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 6>not the CDC, but through the National Toxicology Program to

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 6>look into the effects of fluoride on neurodevelopment and specifically

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 6>on IQ.

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 6>The results of that have now been published just ten

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:48.919
<v Speaker 6>this year.

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 6>There was a monograph by the National Toxicology Program that

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 6>came out in August twenty twenty four, and then in

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:00.959
<v Speaker 6>January of this year a like subsequent an additional meta

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 6>analysis that was published in Jama Pediatrics. Okay, so I'm

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 6>going to tell you the conclusions of this study. Aaron, Yeah,

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 6>there is a dose response relationship between exposure to high

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 6>levels of fluoridated water and lower IQ scores in children

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 6>plain English.

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, kids who are.

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:27.879
<v Speaker 6>Drinking water that has higher levels of fluoride, specifically, kids

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 6>who are drinking water with more than one point five

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 6>milligrams per liter of fluoride may have slightly lower IQs

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 6>than kids who are drinking water with less fluoride. And

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 6>it's like it goes up with the amount of fluoride

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 6>above one point five milligrams per lid.

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 4>Above one point five and there's a like the more fluoride,

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:59.240
<v Speaker 4>the higher the reduction in IQ, which, as we maybe

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 4>know is is not a the best metric for things,

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 4>but it is a metric. Yeah you have? Do you have?

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 6>There's so much and bursting to say, and it's it's hard, okay, Yeah,

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 6>And I cannot get too in depth on the exact

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 6>effects size of this because we don't have those exact

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 6>numbers from drinking water itself, Like what is what are

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.439
<v Speaker 6>we talking about? How much of a reduction in IQ?

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 6>They didn't actually estimate those numbers from drinking water, but

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 6>they also looked in this meta analysis at urinary fluoride,

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 6>which is it's a little bit problematic to use because

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 6>we excrete most of the floor that we drink in

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 6>our urine. But the like concentrations are going to vary

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 6>depending on the time and how much water are you drinking,

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 6>blah blah blah. But in any case, for every one

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 6>milligram per liter increase in urinary fluoride, we saw in

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 6>this meta analysis a one point six y three points

0:46:57.960 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 6>decline in IQ.

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Okay, just again to like set just so that

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 4>I understand this is in Okay, maybe i'll phrase it

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 4>this way. Yeah, which communities in the US have water

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 4>that's higher than one point five parts per million.

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 6>Before I can even get into that airin. None of

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 6>the studies that were in this meta analysis were in

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 6>the US.

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 3>None of them.

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.959
<v Speaker 6>Almost every single study that was included in this meta

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 6>analysis were done in places that had naturally high levels

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.919
<v Speaker 6>of fluoridation. None of them were in places that were

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 6>adding fluoride to the water at optimum fluorid concentrations.

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the.

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 6>Studies that were a lot of the studies that had

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 6>you know, like low fluoride versus high fluoride their low

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 6>fluorid concentrations were actually at levels that are consistent with

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 6>what we consider fluoridated water, right because like across the board,

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 6>everyone's got higher fluorid. So high fluoride was like above

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 6>two and low fluoride was zero point five point eight. Okay,

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 6>I know this is so it's too much.

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, no, okay. So so this this, this review,

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 4>this meta analogy, this, I guess, this this task force. Yes,

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:13.439
<v Speaker 4>that was established in the.

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Part of the National Toxicology Program. Yeah, I guess.

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if it was a tech task force.

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Feels official, but yeah.

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, okay. But there was not a single study

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 4>that it was included that was done that was based

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 4>in the US. No looking at water that is community

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 4>fluoridated in the US.

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 6>Another meta analysis from a couple of years ago, published

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 6>in twenty twenty three, which one could argue might be

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 6>more relevant to the question of like, is fluoridating our

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 6>water two point seven parts per million potentially harmful, found

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 6>no reduction in IQ between unfloridated water, which had an

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 6>average florid concentration of point two parts per million, and

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:56.720
<v Speaker 6>optimally fluoridated water, which was at point seven parts per million.

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 6>And if you look at this, that is actually entire

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 6>highly consistent with this newer meta analysis from twenty twenty five.

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 6>Because all of the data in this meta analysis showed

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 6>that there was a potential for reduction in IQ at

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 6>levels higher than one point five, there was no association

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 6>scene for IQ at lower levels than one point five

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 6>milligrams per leader. That association broke down and fell apart.

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 6>There was no data to support it in this large

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 6>meta analysis.

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:34.600
<v Speaker 4>So if you're looking at a graph of this, maybe

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 4>this is a terrible thing to do on a podcast,

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 4>but hey, we're video now. I'm just gonna use my hands. Yeah,

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 4>But if you're looking at a graph of this, and

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 4>on the x axis the bottom, it's fluoride levels in

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:50.280
<v Speaker 4>the water, and it's on the y axis is IQ

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 4>reduction and IQ or something. Yeah, it's a straight level

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 4>from zero from like no fluoride in the water all

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 4>the way past what the point seven optimally fluoridated water,

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 4>keep going still straight line until you get to like

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 4>one point five above, and then it starts to you know,

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 4>change exactly.

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that's the conclusionaryan So you asked, sorry, you asked earlier,

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 6>how much? How many people are getting more than one

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 6>point five?

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay.

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 6>In the US, it's estimated that two point nine million

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 6>people are served by groundwater or private wells that have

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 6>concentrations greater than one point five, and several hundred thousand

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 6>having concentrations higher than two point oh which is again

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:55.240
<v Speaker 6>the EPA non enforceable maximum recommended, or even some above

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:57.920
<v Speaker 6>four point oh which is above what is even supposed

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 6>to be enforceable by the EPA. Globally, it's estimated that

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 6>fifty seven million people at least receive water that is

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:09.360
<v Speaker 6>naturally fluoridated, which means who heck knows what the concentration

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 6>of fluoride is.

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 4>Right right, right, fascinating compared to.

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Two hundred million people in the US who are estimated

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 6>to get their water from optimally fluoridated community water fluoridation

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 6>sources at point seven parts per million.

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean this just to me speaks even further to

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 4>that the point of the anti fluoridation movement is not

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 4>to actually like protect health, it's just to deregulate and

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 4>be anti expert. Because I really do want to know

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:49.720
<v Speaker 4>whether these states that are introducing these anti fluoride bands

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:54.960
<v Speaker 4>or these fluorid bands are doing anything in the communities

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 4>that are served by naturally floridated water at levels that

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 4>are shown to have any sort of health impact.

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And I also want to point out a big

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 6>difference that I noticed, because again, I there are so

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 6>many papers on this, and there are so many papers

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 6>that have a very clear bent to them, right, because

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean even scientists, like we all have our own biases,

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 6>right totally, and some of them have a very clear bent.

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 6>Some of them it's maybe less clear. And I mean

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 6>in both directions, right, Like, some are very clearly like

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:29.839
<v Speaker 6>pro florid, and some are very clearly anti florid, and

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 6>a lot are somewhere in between, but from the scientific

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 6>side and not from like the social media side or

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 6>the political side or the like we like it is

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 6>a neurotoxin, it's killing us side right right. All of

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.319
<v Speaker 6>the papers, even the ones that are very concerned about

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 6>florid in their water, the main concern that I took

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 6>away from those is the potential effect of maternal ingestion

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 6>of high levels of fluoride. Yeah, infant ingestion of high

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 6>levels of florid, especially in the context which I will

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 6>say I had not thought about before of formula use,

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 6>like if babies are not breast fed and are fed

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:09.320
<v Speaker 6>by formula, because some formulas actually have relatively higher levels

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 6>of fluoride. So then if you are also using fluoridated water,

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 6>whether naturally fluoridated or optimally fluoridated, because infants are so tiny,

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 6>could you potentially be getting too much in those tiny humans?

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 6>But even on those points there has been very mixed

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 6>results from even like long term studies. There was a

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 6>paper from twenty nineteen in jama Pediatrics that cut a

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of press and it seems was very controversial that

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:43.799
<v Speaker 6>showed a for looking specifically at maternal ingestion of fluoridated

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 6>water in Canada where they optimally.

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Floridate their water.

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 6>Okay, they showed a reduction in IQ in those babies

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 6>born to people who are drinking floridated water, but only

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:57.359
<v Speaker 6>in boys, and that was not true in girls, and

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 6>it was not true if you looked at all babies.

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:03.240
<v Speaker 6>So that was a little bit like, we don't understand

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 6>how that could be. And then another analysis on I

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 6>don't know if it was the exact same cohort or

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:12.360
<v Speaker 6>but like using that same study because it was like

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 6>this really huge study in Canada that came out a

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 6>couple years later actually did not show any difference in

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 6>IQ once they accounted for exposure after birth. So even

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 6>kids who are drinking fluoride in their water did not

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:29.839
<v Speaker 6>have lower IQ than those who were not drinking floridated water.

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 6>So again the data is still a little bit messy,

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 6>like there's not a clear there's not a clear association

0:54:35.719 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 6>there at optimally floridated levels.

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Right, Okay, I think I'm just confused by those studies

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:45.839
<v Speaker 4>are like what they're what the conclusions are. I mean,

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 4>basically it sounds like it's noisy and a mess and.

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 6>A mess and there's still not like there is not

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:56.439
<v Speaker 6>the conclusion that optimally fluoridated water has an impact on IQ.

0:54:57.680 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 4>And I think here that's that's the message that gets lost, yes,

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:05.840
<v Speaker 4>because people will just say fluoride, right, and there is

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 4>a big difference between fluoride and optimally like naturally fluoridated,

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 4>right and optimally fluoridated or like managed fluoride.

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Level, manage fluorid levels.

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:18.919
<v Speaker 6>And just just to make this drive this point home

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 6>with regards to any of the other so called neurotoxic effects,

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 6>because sometimes fluoride just gets labeled as like a neurotoxin.

0:55:26.640 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 6>There is not any data to back up any of

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 6>the other claims headaches, insomnia, lethargy, autism, ADHD. There's no

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:39.840
<v Speaker 6>data whatsoever that positively associates fluoride in our water with

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:43.760
<v Speaker 6>any of those other neurologic effects. Only IQ, and only

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 6>at levels that are higher than the World Health Organization

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 6>maximum recommended level twice as high as what we see

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.040
<v Speaker 6>in community water fluoridation.

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:54.759
<v Speaker 4>Twice as high.

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So for me, I one of.

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 6>The main conclusions that I come to when we look

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 6>at this debate on fluoride is that there is always

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 6>going to be a certain degree of uncertainty in science.

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 6>We've talked preached a lot o Yeah, and that can

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 6>sometimes feel really scary. But the nature of the scientific

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:22.799
<v Speaker 6>process and scientific inquiry is to keep asking questions, could

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:25.439
<v Speaker 6>we do this better? Can we make this safer? Can

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 6>we improve on our processes? What changes do we need

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 6>to make, What studies do we need to do to

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 6>gather more data?

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's why we revised the optimally floridated level

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 4>two point seven.

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly your secondly revised it. Right.

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 6>At the same time, we have to function as a society.

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 6>Our governments are regulatory bodies. They have to make the

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 6>best decisions that they can based on the data that

0:56:47.560 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 6>we have. And that is exactly what has happened and

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 6>continues to be happening when it comes to fluoride. No

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 6>one is not looking at this problem. There is so

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:01.800
<v Speaker 6>much data now that we have that at the levels

0:57:01.880 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 6>of fluoride that exist in some of the naturally fluoridated areas,

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:08.640
<v Speaker 6>we need to figure out how to lower fluoride levels

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:12.959
<v Speaker 6>in those communities because we could potentially be causing harm. Yeah,

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 6>and there is data that at the level of zero

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 6>point seven milligrams per leader, at less than one point five,

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:22.920
<v Speaker 6>there is a significant improvement in our dental health and

0:57:23.040 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 6>no adverse effects other than a slight increase in mild

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:28.760
<v Speaker 6>dental fluoroesis I mean?

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 4>And some of this stuff, Like, I think it's hard

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 4>because and we talked about this a little last week.

0:57:34.280 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 4>We've been fluoridating water for eighty years and things have

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 4>and we've learned a lot in that time, and we've

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 4>made adjustments accordingly in that time, and we've been open.

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I do think I think there's sometimes an accusation from

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 4>certain individuals or people with certain agendas to say that

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 4>science just barges ahead without thinking of the consequences.

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Twice we do.

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes we do there. I mean, there's this is this

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 4>podcast will kill you. I talked about a lot of

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 4>instances where that's happened exactly. But I think when it

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:11.960
<v Speaker 4>comes to florid, like just like you said that the questions,

0:58:12.000 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 4>the fact that there are still some unanswered questions is

0:58:15.760 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 4>not cannot erase the fact that we have answered many, many,

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 4>many questions about floride and optimally fluoridated water.

0:58:23.240 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exactly, I do think it's It's not this is

0:58:28.480 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 6>not the end of the floride story. There's going to

0:58:31.000 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 6>be more data, more studies that keeping done, especially at

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 6>like trying to pull apart the nuances. Should we go

0:58:36.760 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 6>from point seven two point five two point.

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Six two point six five? I don't know. Can we

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 3>keep doing better?

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think some of the data will come from

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:49.560
<v Speaker 4>these states that are choosing to stop fluoridating.

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 3>We already have data.

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned last week Aaron in Calgary in Canada, where

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:57.480
<v Speaker 6>they took florid out of the water. There was a

0:58:57.560 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 6>ten year analysis that has looked so far and seen

0:59:00.640 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 6>a slight not like a huge, but a slight increase

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:06.320
<v Speaker 6>in dental carries there compared to Edmonton, which still has

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 6>floridated water. There's also a few other studies that I

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 6>cite that are looking at exactly the same thing. So

0:59:12.480 --> 0:59:14.360
<v Speaker 6>in places where they've taken floride out of the water,

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 6>what do we see, We see worse dental health. The

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 6>other thing I think that for me this really points

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:26.440
<v Speaker 6>out is like the importance of our federal regulatory bodies

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:31.840
<v Speaker 6>and how essential they are in keeping our drinking water safe.

0:59:32.240 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Because if we're talking about, oh my gosh, we're looking

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 6>at this potentially extremely harmful chemical and all of these

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 6>effects then and like our community water systems are actually

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 6>poisoning us. First of all, we got to look at

0:59:43.080 --> 0:59:45.160
<v Speaker 6>the data. So we need some scientists to actually look

0:59:45.200 --> 0:59:47.960
<v Speaker 6>at the data and explore all of this nuance, which

0:59:48.040 --> 0:59:51.960
<v Speaker 6>they've done, And then we need our regulatory agencies to

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 6>be able to identify what the limits should be and

0:59:57.760 --> 0:59:59.640
<v Speaker 6>enforce those limits.

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, it was going to fund that, right,

1:00:03.040 --> 1:00:07.440
<v Speaker 4>these jobs should exist, and some of them no longer

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 4>exactly take it away, right, what pathogens are in milk? Right,

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 4>like what bird flu in milk. You know, it's just

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 4>there's so much.

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 6>That's the thing that's so I think frustrating about the

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:21.439
<v Speaker 6>discourse surrounding florid right now is it's like, we'll take

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:25.560
<v Speaker 6>this out of our water when it's like what then who?

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:26.080
<v Speaker 3>What?

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 6>First of all, who is going to do that? Second

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 6>of all, who who is going to enforce this? What

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 6>about all the places that are already have it there?

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 6>Like the politics of it are just so different from

1:00:37.320 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 6>what the science shows right now.

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh and I think that's the whole point, right, I know,

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:46.560
<v Speaker 4>florid is a tool to you know again, deregulate and

1:00:46.640 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 4>privatize and change who the experts are.

1:00:50.200 --> 1:00:50.440
<v Speaker 7>I know.

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, if you want to become an expert on this,

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 6>let me tell you where to read. Okay, yes, I

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:58.640
<v Speaker 6>already mentioned there was a great Nature Reviews Disease Primer's

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 6>paper just about dental carries. It was called Dental Carries

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 6>from twenty seventeen. A couple of other great papers that

1:01:05.400 --> 1:01:08.800
<v Speaker 6>I had on the mechanism of action of florid. Actually, Aaron,

1:01:08.840 --> 1:01:10.720
<v Speaker 6>did you read this one from the Journal Dental Research

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 6>on twenty nineteen. It was called florid motive action. Once

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:15.080
<v Speaker 6>there was an observant dentist.

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Uh no, I didn't.

1:01:16.640 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>I really it was quite historical, but it was really

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:20.040
<v Speaker 3>really fun.

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:24.120
<v Speaker 6>Then when we get into the you know, the meat

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 6>of what people want. The paper from twenty twenty five

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 6>from Gama Pediatrics was by Taylor at All Florid Exposure

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 6>and Children's IQ Scores, A systematic review in meta analysis.

1:01:36.640 --> 1:01:38.360
<v Speaker 6>The one from a couple of years earlier that looked

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:41.480
<v Speaker 6>at more relevant florid levels was by Kumar at All

1:01:41.600 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 6>in the Journal Public Health. That was titled Association between

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:49.320
<v Speaker 6>Low florid Exposure and Children's Intelligence A meta analysis relevant

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:53.040
<v Speaker 6>to Community water floridation. There was another one I actually loved.

1:01:53.080 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 6>Sorry I'm giving shout outs longer than I usually do,

1:01:55.280 --> 1:01:58.080
<v Speaker 6>but this one was super great from twenty twenty four

1:01:58.160 --> 1:02:00.919
<v Speaker 6>by Tayhar at All. I'm sorry if I'm pronouncing that wrong.

1:02:01.000 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 6>In Critical Reviews and Toxicology. This paper looked not just

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:08.560
<v Speaker 6>at IQ, but this one looked at every claim that

1:02:08.560 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 6>people have made about fluoride. What is the evidence epidemiologically,

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 6>what is the toxological evidence, what is the evidence in

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 6>animals in vitro? And it came up with this really

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:23.840
<v Speaker 6>comprehensive table to look at all of these and so

1:02:23.920 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 6>that is a really great paper. You can check out

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:28.720
<v Speaker 6>the list of sources from this episode and every single

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 6>one of our episodes on our website, this podcast.

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Will kill you dot com. There do you kill anymore

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>any more?

1:02:36.520 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Thank you again so much to doctor Santore for sharing

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 4>that story with us. We appreciate you so much.

1:02:43.720 --> 1:02:44.360
<v Speaker 3>We really do.

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:47.680
<v Speaker 6>Thank you also to Bloodmobile for providing the music for

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:50.080
<v Speaker 6>this episode and all of our episodes.

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 4>All of them. Thank you to Tom and Leanna and

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Pete and Brent and Jess and everyone at exactly right

1:02:55.640 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 4>who helps this to happen, helps this to happen, helps

1:02:59.200 --> 1:03:01.680
<v Speaker 4>us make this happen. Yeah, there we go. We'll go

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:01.960
<v Speaker 4>with that.

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 6>And thank you to all of you for listening, for watching,

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:08.000
<v Speaker 6>for joining us on this journey.

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>We're talking with journey for now, but we're not done

1:03:11.560 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 4>with teeth or gums or flossing or whatever. Wait anyway.

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Thank you also to our wonderful patrons. We appreciate your

1:03:21.840 --> 1:03:23.080
<v Speaker 4>support so very much.

1:03:23.800 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you well.

1:03:25.520 --> 1:03:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Until next time, brush your teeth, you filed the animals,

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 4>and wash your hands.

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Boom