WEBVTT - Ep115 "What is color? Part 1: Why hunters wear orange"

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is about color. What is the very specific

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>reason that hunters wear orange? Why do birds and bees

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>go to different flowers? Why do most mammals look like

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they've evolved at least in part for moving around at night?

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And what does that have to do with hairless humans

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>getting angry? And what does any of this have to

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>do with road signs or camouflage or mantis shrimp or

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the sun or the dress that broke the Internet or

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>women who can see more colors than you can. Welcome

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and an author at Stanford, and in these episodes we

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the world inside us and around us to

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>understand why and how our lives look the way they do.

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode and next week's as well, is about the

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely amazing and often underappreciated topic of color. And if

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I do my job right, this is going to allow

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you to see the world around you with.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Totally fresh eyes.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>As a neuroscientist, I've always been obsessed with color, what

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>purposes it serves, how different people see it differently, why

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>some people or some animals see more or fewer colors,

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>or why kings and queens always love to wear purple,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Or why some birds evolve to be red, or why

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>blue animals are so rare, or what having to scavenge

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>at night two hundred and fifty million years ago means

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for my dog's color vision. Today, in my laboratory, I've

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>studied color illusions, and next week I'll show you how

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to see impossible colors that you've never seen before.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>So let's get started.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Of all the qualities of our experience, color is one

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of the most intimate and vivid. It's tied to our

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>emotions and our memories and our reactions. We remember the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>red of a childhood wagon, the green of summer leaves,

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the yellow of a favorite sweater. Color feels fundamental, like

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>something that exists out there in the world, waiting for

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>us to notice it. But of course it doesn't exist

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in the outside world. The weird thing is that color

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is not a property of light itself. Photons the particles

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of light. They don't carry color. They carry energy defined

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>by their wavelength. The sensation of orange or cobalt blue

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>or chartruse that only happens inside your head. Color is

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a construct that your brain invents based on electrical signals

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from your eyes. The world reflects and emits different wavelengths

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of light, but it's your brain that assigns those wavelengths

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>different experiences, and we give these different names and feelings

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and meanings. So we live in a colorless world until

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a brain comes along to paint it. This episode and

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the next is a journey into that strange truth. We're

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>going to explore what color really is and the strange

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and idiosyncratic ways that we and other animals perceive it.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But we're not going to stop just with the biology.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Color also shows up in language and culture, so next

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>week tackles several surprising aspects about that, and along the

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>way we'll meet animals with very different visual worlds. Color

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be a relationship between physics and perception,

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>between the wavelengths of light and the circuits of the brain.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It's part physics, part neuro So today let's look at

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>what we see, what we don't see, and how our

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>brains fill in the gaps with stories painted in light. Okay,

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so starting at the beginning, light is electromagnetic radiation, which

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is a traveling wave of electric and magnetic fields. Now

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. These waves can span a huge range

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of wavelengths.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>You've got radio waves that.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Are kilometers long, to gamma rays that are subatomic, and

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>things even outside of that. But of the entire spectrum,

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.679
<v Speaker 1>our eyes are sensitive to just a very narrow band,

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>really narrow, less than a ten.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Trillionth of the spectrum.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The human eye is able to pick up on wavelengths

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>roughly four hundred to seven hundred nanometers, and this narrow

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>little band is what we label visible light. This little

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>band includes all the colors of the rainbow, and it's

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the only part of the spectrum that we can directly see. Now,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>what that means is that all the rest of the spectrum,

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>microwaves and radio programs and X rays and cosmic rays

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and infrared and ultraviolet, that's all passing right.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Through your body.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is totally invisible to you because you don't

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have the receptors to pick up on these It's all

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic radiation, it's all light. But you can't see these

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>other things. So we're just going to concentrate on that

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit that you can see, which we call visible light,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>which spans ROYGBIV red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the important thing which I mentioned before. Electromagnetic

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>radiation has no intrinsic color. A photon doesn't know that

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it's red or blue. It just has a certain wavelength.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.799
<v Speaker 1>When that photon hits the back of your eye, your retina,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it interacts with particular cells depending on its wavelength, and

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>then your brain starts the journey of constructing the experience

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of color, that perceptual quality, that private experience synthesized by

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>your neural networks. It's your internal model's response to the

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>frequency of the incoming light. So when we look at

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a red apple, what's happening. The surface of the apple

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>absorbs most wavelengths of light, but it reflects those around

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred nanometers, the long waves that we associate.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 2>With the color red.

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Those photons hit your eye and they activate this cascade

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of cells, and your brain interprets that signal as red.

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>But it's not the apple that's red, it's your brain

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>painting that surface with meaning. So to get everything set

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>up for this episode, let's start at the beginning. The retina,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>which is the lawn of cells at the back of

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>your eye. This has two types of cells that are

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to light. These are called photoreceptors. These two types

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of cells are rods and cones. Now you have tons

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of rods, like one hundred and twenty million of them,

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're extremely sensitive to light, but they don't give

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you any color information. They're what allows us to see

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in dim light, but all the air information is just

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>black and white. It's just telling you how much light

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is there at that spot, whatever the wavelength. But the

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>other type of light sensitive cell is a cone, and cones.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Are at the center of our story today.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Because these are the microscopic cells that lead to our

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>experience of color. Now, first, there are many fewer cones

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>than rods. There's only about six million of them, and

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they're all concentrated at the center of your vision, not

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the periphery.

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>And cones come in three flavors.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got those that are most responsive to red, which

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is a long wavelength.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Then you've got those that are most.

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Responsive to green, which is a medium wavelength, and those

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that are most responsive to the light that we perceive

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>as blue. These are short wavelength, so what you are

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>picking up on is essentially red, green, blue, And your

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>perception of color doesn't come from any one cone, but

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>from the pattern of activity.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Across all three types.

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, if both your red and green cones are activated,

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you will perceive yellow. Now what I just described with

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the cones, that's only the very first layer straight away.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Even before the signals get to your visual cortex, other

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cells begin to compare and contrast the signals.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>So colors get analyzed in opposing pairs.

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Red versus green, blue versus yellow, black versus white. And

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this is why you can't see reddish green or bluish yellow.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Those combinations cancel out in our visual system. Okay, Then

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the signals get to the visual cortex and an enormous

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of further processing takes place. I'm going to skip

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>all the details here. I'll post a chap from my

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>textbook on the show notes. But the point I want

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to make is that you might wonder, wait, why is

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there so much computation involved here? Why don't you just

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the wavelength hitting the retina and have your

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>perception that way. Well, it turns out that wouldn't be

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>nearly enough because the lighting conditions totally change what's bouncing

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>off an object and hitting your eye. But if you're

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going to assign colors to things and that's going to

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>carry some sort of information, you need to somehow account

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>for the lighting changes. In other words, one of the

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>most important tricks that the brain pulls off is color constancy.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>This is your brain's ability to perceive and objects color

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>as stable even when the lighting changes.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's say I'm wearing a white T.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Shirt that looks white to you out in the sunlight,

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>and it also looks white when I'm in the yellowish

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>light of an indoor lamp, or when I'm standing at

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a campfire, or when I'm in the.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Bright lights of a store.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But technically the wavelengths bouncing off my white T shirt

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>are very different in those conditions. Your brain accounts for

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the context by looking at all the other colors in

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the scene and subtracting that to keep your perception stable.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>This is, by the way, in the laboratory why we

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>can make so many color illusions. If you manipulate the

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>surrounding light and shade, you can make two identical patches

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>appear wildly different in color. If you're interested more on this,

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm linking a paper I wrote in Nature Reviews Neuroscience

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>on visual illusions.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>But here's the.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Point I want to get to how weird it is

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that we can study all the pieces and parts of

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the brain and the physiology, but that doesn't really tell

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>us anything about why you experience the color a particular way.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Why don't our brains just register something about wavelength like, oh,

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that's four hundred and fifty animeters, instead of experiencing purpleness

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>or a yellowness or a greenness. So consider this thought

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>experiment called Mary's Room, which was proposed by the philosopher

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Frank Jackson in nineteen eighty two. He was essentially asking

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>how our private, subjective experiences like color can be reduced

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to physical information. Here's the setup he proposed. Mary is

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant scientist who knows everything there is to know

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>about this science of color.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 2>She understands the wavelengths.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>The neural processes, in other words, the physics and the biology.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But Mary has lived her entire life in a black

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and white room, and she has never actually seen color.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>She reads about red in the sense that it's a

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred nanimeter wavelength. She understands how it stimulates particular

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>cones in the retina, how it's processed in the visual cortex,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but she's never experienced red. Then one day she steps

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>outside and sees a ripe tomato for the first time. Now,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's question is does Mary learn something new when she

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sees red for the first time. If she does, then

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>there's something about the experience of color, some qualitative first

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>person knowledge that isn't captured just by the objective physical facts.

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>And that thought experiment illustrates the difficulty in explaining subjective

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>experience just in terms of physical mechanisms. And the weirdest

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>part is that the way the brain constructs this subjective

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>experience is not necessarily the same for you and me.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>This is why the dress broke the Internet. You remember

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that viral photo that you might have seen as black

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and blue, or you might have seen as white and gold.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It comes down to the assumptions that eat brain makes

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>about the lighting in the photo. Your brain sees this

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>little picture of the dress in a shop, and it

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>makes dozens of assumptions totally unconsciously. What is the light

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>source in the photograph? Is the dress being lit mostly

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>by fluorescent lights or by sunlight? Is the dress facing

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a window or is the window behind it? What time

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of day is it, what season is it? The wild

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>part is that you just open your eyes and there

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it is. There's the color of the dress. But under

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the hood, your brain is doing an enormous amount of computation,

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>asking questions and making assumptions you never have any awareness of.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And you believe the colors that your brain tells you.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But illusions like the dress tell us that your head

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>may be making those assumptions differently than the head sitting

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>next to you, and therefore the color you're seeing isn't

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>something true, it's just your brain's result of the computations.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>For more on the dress, listen to episode thirty one. Okay,

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more to say about color perception and

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>how different people see things differently, and we're going to

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>return to that next week, but for now, I want

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to see how this gets even weirder when we compare

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>against other species. Because while you think you're just seeing

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>what's out there, what you're actually experiencing is one evolutionary

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>solution among many. For example, we humans have three types

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of color photoreceptors, these cones, but most other mammals have

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>only two types. Now, why do mammals tend to be

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>limited in this way? One idea about this is what's

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>called the nocturnal bottleneck hypothesis.

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>The idea is that the.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Common ancestor of mammals and reptiles and birds had more

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>photoreceptor types, but we he lost them.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Why.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's because two hundred and fifty million years ago, during

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Mesozoic era, the ancestors of mammals had to become

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>mostly nocturnal to avoid getting stomped and eaten by dinosaurs.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The large predatory dinosaurs dominated the daytime, and so early

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>mammals adapted to nocturnal living to avoid them. So these

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>many tens of millions of years of nocturnal activity led

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to several adaptations that reflect nighttime living. So, for example,

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>mammals developed excellent senses of hearing and smell, which you

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>need for navigating and foraging in the dark, and they

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>evolved eyes optimized for low light conditions, like large pupils

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and lots of really good rod cells which allow them

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to see better in dim environments. So, in other words,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>when we look at mammalian eyes today, they seem to

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have been shaped during this prolonged period of nighttime activity.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And here's the key for today day since detailed color

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>vision is less useful at night, mammals lost their capacity

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for trichromatic vision, in other words, seeing three primary colors. Instead,

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they got a deeper reliance on senses better suited for

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>nocturnal activity, like better hearing and smell. So this is

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>presumably why modern mammals retain nocturnal traits even after the

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>extinction of dinosaurs, which allowed them to diversify into daytime niches.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 2>In other words, evolutionary pressures.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Can shape an entire class of animals, leaving a long

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>lasting imprint on their physiology and behavior even after the

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>environmental conditions change.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So just as an.

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Example, my dog and your dog, they are di chromatic.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>They only have two types of cones, and their vision

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>resembles red green color blindness in humans. They see a

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>world of muted blues and yellows, and they can't distinguish

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>reds from greens. This is the same with cats, with horses,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>with rodents, and over ninety percent of mammals. Okay, so

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the nocturnal bottleneck hypothesis suggests why a lot of mammals

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have not so great color vision, but some mammals, like humans,

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 1>have evolved better color vision. We have become trichromatic again.

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Now why would it make sense to regain the ability

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>to distinguish red and green. Well, one common argument is

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that if you can distinguish red and green, then you

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>can see a ripe fruit against a tree canopy at

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a distance, and that's really useful.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>But maybe it's something even deeper than that.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>So let me tell you one of my favorite hypotheses

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>about why we humans re evolved red green color vision.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>This comes from my colleague Mark Changizi, and it flips

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the usual story.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 2>On its head.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It suggests something deeply social. He argues that we didn't

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>evolve red green vision to forage better.

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 2>We evolved to read each other better. So here's the idea.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Human skin is packed with tiny blood vessels just beneath

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the surface, and when your emotions shift, when you're embarrassed

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>or you're angry, or you're afraid or you're aroused, blood

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>flow changes. Your skin flushes red or it pails. It

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>happens in fractions of a second, and we pick up

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>on this in other faces without even realizing it. So

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Tchannghisi suggests that our color vision system is tuned to

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>detect these subtle changes in oxygenation of the hemoglobe and

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>under the skin. The spacing of our red and green

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>cone sensitivities is almost perfect for distinguishing these tiny shifts

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>in skin tone. In other words, we're not just seeing

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>red and green on apples and trees. We're seeing it

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in faces, in ears, in emotional states, and those social

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>signals is why CHANGESI suggests we evolved the ability in

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the first place to track the emotion of the other. Now,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this potentially helps explain something I mentioned that most mammals

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have trichromatic vision, but about two thirds of primates do,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and these animals, including us, tend to have less fur

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on their faces. Less fur means more exposed skin. More

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>skin means more visible blood flow, and more reason to

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>evolve a visual system that can pick up on the

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>language of color as it plays out in living flesh.

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So maybe red green vision isn't about navigating the jungle,

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>about navigating each other. By the way, you might wonder

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>does this apply to people with more pigment in their skin,

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Because in people with darker skin, melanin absorbs more light

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and that can make those blood float changes harder to see.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But the signals are still there, They're just more subtle.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Even with darker skin. Changes in coloration can be seen

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in eras where the skin is thinner, like the lips

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and the.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Eyelids and the palms and the cheeks.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So we see the world differently than most of our

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>mammalian cousins, and understanding this sort of thing can clarify

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the world around you. For example, why

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>do hunters wear bright orange vests? You might correctly assume

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it so they can spot one another, right, But why

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>don't they wear chartreuse or bright yellow or any other

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>equally detectable color. Well, as we just saw, the ability

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to detect reddish colors was lost during the Mesozoic, and

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the great apes, including humans, regained it.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Deer did not, so deer.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Can only see two ranges of color, blue and yellow green.

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Deer have great smell and hearing, and they've got great

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>night vision, but they're not sensitive to red or orange light.

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's why hunters wear blaze orange, which is easily

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>spotted by the other humans but not by the deer.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>This color that helps hunters spot each other at a

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>distance makes them nearly invisible to their prey. In this case,

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>our evolutionary divergence from other species our trichromatic vision, and

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>their dichromatic becomes a tactical advantage. We can design ourselves

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to be invisible to them. And by the way, this

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>is why you see nature red birds. It's the same idea.

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>The red birds can be there against the green leaves

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and they don't have to worry about getting spotted because

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>their predators are red green colorblind. And it turns out

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>its getically easier to express red than green, So expressing

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>red feathers is a perfectly good way to go. Now,

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>let's come back to the deer hunters. Note that they

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>never wear blue jeans. Why not because deer are much

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>more sensitive to blue even than we are to them.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Blue jeans shine like a warning beacon, so the hunters

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 1>wear camouflage or earthstone pants to blend in. Okay, So

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>back to humans with their three types of photoreceptors. It

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out that's most humans. A small fraction of humans

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have some forms of color blindness where they're missing one

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>type of color photoreceptor, or two types, or all three,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can guess what their experience is. They can

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>distinguish fewer and fewer colors. What you might not know

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is that a small fraction of the human female population.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They have a fourth type of cone. They are called

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>tetrachromatic instead of the typical chromatic vision.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 2>With three types, these women can.

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Distinguish something like one hundred million shades of color, so

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for them, a sunset contains hues that the rest of

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>us have no capacity to see and no words for.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it's only women because the mutation in

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the photoreceptor is on one of the X chromosomes and

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>not on the other. And it's not just the rare

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>human female who's tetrachromatic. A whole lot of birds and

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>reptiles and insects are tetrachromats, and in animals, the fourth

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>cone type often extends into the ultraviolet, so bees, for example,

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>can see ultraviolet patterns on flowers that are completely invisible

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to us. These patterns help them locate the nectar. They're

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like little runways on the flower pedal that don't look

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like anything to us. And then there's the mantis shrimp.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>This little crustacean has sixteen types of photoreceptors. These photoreceptors

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>can detect ultraviolet and polarized light, and presumably colors we

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine, but are useful in their niche. Of course,

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible for us to know exactly what the experience

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of the shrimp is because it depends what its brain

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is doing with that data. But what all these examples

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>show is that color vision is about usefulness. Millions of

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>years of evolution tends to equip species with the ability

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to perceive what enhances survival and reproduction. Our color vision

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>is not what a mantis shrimps is, but it was

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>good enough to spot ripe fruit, and detect emotional signals

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and flushed skin and navigate a multicolored environment. Okay, now

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the birds and the bees.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 2>For a moment.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. We usually think of a flower as

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just a flowersome color and nice scent, But every petal,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.239
<v Speaker 1>every hue of the flower, every tiny detail is a

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>carefully c afted advertisement. It's a billboard designed to say hey,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm open for business to a very specific clientele. And

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the best part about this botanical dating game is how

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>birds and bees have entirely different preferences when it comes

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to the colors that they find attractive. So imagine you

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>walk into a store and some of the products are

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>completely invisible to you.

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 2>That's what happens in the floral world.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the bees. When a bee flies

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>into your garden, it's not seeing the same spectrum of colors.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 2>That you are.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>For the bee, red flowers are a complete no go.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like a black screen. Bees see in shades of

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>blue and purple and violet and yellow, So those are

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the flowers they go for. And as I mentioned, many

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>flowers that look plain to us have hidden ultraviolet patterns

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that act like glowing landing strip for the bee, guiding

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it straight to the nectar. It's like a secret map

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that only they can read.

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 2>So if you're a.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Bee, that vibrant red rose might just be invisible. Now

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>turn to our feathered friends like hummingbirds, which are big pollinators,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and guess what their favorite color is. It's red and

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>orange is a close second. So think about this. Hummingbird

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>feeders are always red, right, that's no accident because birds,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.479
<v Speaker 1>unlike bees, can see red perfectly and they're drawn to

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it like a magnet. And you'll notice that these bird

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>pollinated red flowers often have long tubular shapes, perfect for

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a hummingbird's beak to dip in so why this color divide.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Over millions of years, flowers have evolved to attract the

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>most effective pollinators for whatever their needs are. If a

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>flower wants a bee to carry its pollen, it's going

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to evolve to be blue or yellow, and it'll have

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>those secret ultraviolet patterns. If it wants a bird, then

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it flaunts reds and oranges, knowing that the bees won't

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>even notice.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 2>This kind of.

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Color specialization ensures that the pollen gets where it needs

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to go. It's the botanical equivalent of targeted advertising. So

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the next time you're outside, take a closer look at

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the flowers around you, and you can guess their intended

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>audience by their color.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 2>If you didn't.

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Already know this, it gives you a new way to

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the intricate dance of life happening all around us. Okay, now,

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>even though the human eye is limited to a narrow

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>sliver of visible light, we've spent the recent century trees

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>building tools that let us see beyond that. So we

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have infrared cameras that reveal heat signatures of animals at night,

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or we have X rays that show us our bones,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>where we construct telescopes to pick up on microwave or

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ultraviolet frequencies, and that shows us a very different universe

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>than the one we can see with our eyes. But

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>now that we know that that huge spectrum of wavelengths

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>is out there, why don't we see all the rest

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>with our eyes. The answer to that question lies one

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million kilometers away. It's the Sun. Our

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>star emits light, electromagnetic radiation across the whole spectrum.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>But when this sunlight passes through.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Earth's atmosphere, shorter and longer wavelengths, light, gamma rays, and

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>most ultraviolet that's all filtered out, and much of the

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>infrared is absorbed as heat. So what punches through all

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the way to the surface where we're hanging out is

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty narrow window of light wavelengths between about four

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seven hundred nanimeters. Of all the energy that

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>gets released from the Sun, only this tiny sliver reaches

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>us in abundance, And.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>So that's what evolution seesed on.

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Our ancestors' eyes evolved to pick up on what was available.

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>This little band of light provided enough data to distinguish

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>edges and shapes and motion and color plants reflect the

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>particular wavelengths we see as green, right, fruit often reflects

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>another set of wavelengths we see red or yellow. Blood

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>looks red, fire looks orange, and presumably our ancestors who

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>could detect these sorts of distinctions had a better shot

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>at survival. Color perception had nothing to do with esthetic pleasures,

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get into in the next episode, at least

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not originally it was about spotting. What mattered is that

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>fruit ripe, is that animal bleeding, is that flash of

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>color over there, a flower or a threat. Over tens

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of millions of years, animal brains became color detectives. It's

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>not that we wanted to marvel at rainbows. It's that

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it was extraordinarily useful to decode a layer of information

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>bouncing off objects in the world. We extract meaning from

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the reflected light. I suspect that berry

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is full of sugar and calories because it's reflecting a

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>wavelength that I see as red. That yellowing leaf tells

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>me about decay. The flush in that guy's cheek reveals anger.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>In this way, we.

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And other animals learned to read the mood and state

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Now I want to circle back to

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the deer hunter or the red bird to double click

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>on this issue of camouflage and also the opposite of camouflage,

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because color can serve a couple of functions in nature

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it can allow animals to blend

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in like camouflage, or to stand out like warning coloration.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Both blending in and standing out rely on exploiting the

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>visual systems of other species. So take a tiger in

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the jungle. He's got these really bold orange and black

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>stripes that might seem like a terrible disguise, But most

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of the tigers prey don't see red well, so the

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>orange appears as a muted gray. The stripes help the

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>tiger's body dissolve into the dappled shadows and reeds. Now

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>flip to the opposite strategy, what's called warning coloration. So

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>picture the bright yellow and black stripes on a wasp

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>or the super bright red of a poisoned dart frog.

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting some pictures in the show notes on Eagleman

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast. The point is that these colors

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>serve as honest ad advertisements. It says don't eat me,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm dangerous, and other animals learn very quickly not to

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>mess with those patterns.

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>So a young.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Bird who eats a monarch butterfly and becomes violently ill

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>learns to avoid anything.

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 2>That looks like that.

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>In the future, we humans, of course, have co opted

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the same idea and our own signaling systems. We have

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>road signs and hazard labels and life jackets and construction gear.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>We build these all with high contrast, high saturated colors,

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and this taps into our built in alert system designed

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to grab our attention and to hold it. Now, just

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>note that not all warning colors are truthful. Nature has

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>its con artists. Some animals mimic the colors of toxic

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>species without being toxic themselves. So think of the viceroy butterfly,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which looks like the monarch butterfly. Predators who have tasted

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a monarch and regretted it are.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Likely to avoid both.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is deception through color, using color as a

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of costume. And then let's not forget about the

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>theatricality of sexual selection.

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Charles Darwin.

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>At first he found the peacock's tail to be a

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>headache for his theory of natural selection, because it seems

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to hinder survival. But then Darwin realized that traits like

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the peacock's tail could provide an advantage in the competition

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for mates. In other words, it's for sex appeal. Now,

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this apparently scandalized many scientists when he first proposed it,

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but the evidence holds. In many species, the brightest, most

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>colorful individuals are auditioning. They're working to signal health or

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>genetic quality or dominance. Just think about a male mandrill's

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>brilliantly colored face and rump. Those are just for decoration.

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>They're billboards of status. I'll also mention that in some species,

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>color shifts with mood or with context. So you may

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have seen a cuttlefish who can change their skin pattern

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 1>in seconds, and some fish develop intense coloration only during

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>mating season. These color changes serve as social cues. They

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are visually broadcasting their intentions. So what we see is

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that color is one of evolution's most versatile tools. That

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>can hide, it can warn, it can deceive, it can seduce,

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and it can do all of this differently depending on

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>who is watching and what their color capabilities are. So

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to zoom the camera out to see what

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we've covered today. Color isn't something out there in the world.

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 1>It's something our brains create. Photons have no color. It's

0:34:55.880 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>our brain that absorbs the raw wavelengths and transfer forms

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>them into experience. This transformation starts with light sensitive cells

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in your retinam goes all the way to your brain,

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and the color you perceive ends up being shaped by context,

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and your brain's best guess becomes your visual reality.

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 2>And we saw how.

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Our color vision is a patchwork of evolutionary trade offs,

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>shaped by ancient nocturnal life, and by the need to

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>spot fruit, and perhaps by the need to read each

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>other's emotions. We looked at how different animals live in

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>very different color worlds, and how our narrow window of

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>vision was sculpted by sunlight and survival. And we saw

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>how evolutionary pressures shaped the palette of our world. Flowers

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>evolved colors not for us, but for the eyes of pollinators.

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>The natural world is performing for eyes. Now that we

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>have the basics down, next week we're going to move

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to deeper levels, include beyond biology into culture and language

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and art. Because once we understand how color is made

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in the brain, it opens up all sorts of new questions.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Why was purple the color of royalty.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>How do we see colors that are recent ancestors never

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>saw in their lives. Why are you unable to imagine

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a new color? Are there, in fact new colors that

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you could see? Could you lose.

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Your color vision? And many other questions.

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>So to wrap today, the main lesson we see is

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that color is a construction. It's a useful fiction of

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the brain, a mental model painted on.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Top of physics.

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's also one of the richest and most emotionally

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>resonant parts of being alive. So just take a moment

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and look around at the light. What you're seeing is

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what your brain makes of that light. The colors aren't

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>out there, they're in here. Your brain isn't just perceiving

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the world, it's actively constructing it. Go to eagleman dot

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash podcast for more information and to find further reading.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Join the weekly discussions on my substack and check out

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>on Subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos of

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>each episode and to leave comments until next time. I'm

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos.