WEBVTT - Everything Is ESG Now

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Wegner Trains. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Marriic Bell Tunis.

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>We got a couple of guests and we have a

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>theme that we've hit on before and we're gonna come

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>back to because I think it's actually a really important one.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>It is there's a lot to unpack with this. There's

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>layer upon layer. I've been in it for like the

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>past few months and it's uh, there's so many dimensions

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and conflicting pieces of information and a little hypocrisy. And

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I were going to dive into it today and try

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>to get further than than we did in the last one.

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's not your personality that we're talking about. We're

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.959
<v Speaker 1>talking about e s G. It's pretty good, like you're

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on today, Environmental Social Government Governance. Uh. E s G

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>assets where are they? Uh, they're underwhelming at least in

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>e t f S maybe about twenty billion two billion,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that's about point five percent of the assets compared to

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the press they get. That's not a lot because it

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot of press. It does get a lot

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of press. And but there's well we want to do

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is breakdown into two levels today, just two things. First

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is looking at the high level black Rock and Vanguard

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of voting power. Larry Fink came out

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about wants to get more green with things, So

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about Yeah, that's a huge announcement. Yeah, they're

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the two biggest uh for almost every SMP five under company,

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they're the two biggest voters. Uh. There's some stuff to

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>unpack with that. That's like the macro level. Then we'll

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>shift to the micro level, which is, Okay, there's all

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>these E S G tfs, how do you make sense

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>of them? What are the pros and cons? And we'll

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of try to go through, uh, you know, how

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to do due diligence on those. And to help us

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>do that, we've got any Masa from Bloomberg News regular

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Graham Sinclair who's on Twitter as at E S G

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Architect he's been on the on the show before and

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the first time, or a Shahem contractor who's an analyst

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg Intelligence. This is also a big week at

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and a perfect one for this episode because we've

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>launched a new vertical called Bloomberg Green Go to Bloomberg

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>dot Com slash Green, which is going to be the

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>new go to destination for all kinds of great stories

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>about climate change, all back by data. There's some amazing

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>stories already and the tools are just going to be sensational.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You can follow us on Twitter also there at climate

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this time on Trilliance, everything is E S. G. Annie.

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>How big of a deal was this black Rock announcement

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>or what was it? What was your joke? I called

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it the pr coup. It definitely drew a lot more attention,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>even a lot more attention than usual. What was the announcement?

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So the announcement that happened was Larry Fink came out

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with his annual Letters to See letter to CEOs, and

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>he generally uses this as a way to come up

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with some big message for the year. In the past,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>he said you should pursue purpose and profits at the

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>same time. This year he decided to go big with

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this message on climate change, and he told CEOs that

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>every single business is going to be affected by climate

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>change and they should all be really thinking about that theme.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And alongside that message, he put out this note to

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>clients that laid out exactly how black Rock will address

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change in its own business, and that includes both

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>active and passive products. Let's break this down real quick.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>What really is going on here? Of course there's a

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 1>nice letter, he cares he's been under pressure a little bit.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But what are they actually doing that will is real.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So they laid out a couple of things that they

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>will do that our concrete in their active funds they will, oh,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>they will divest from thermal coal producers for example. So

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one step on the passive side, though, it's where

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it gets a lot more tricky, really tricky because as

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>an index provider and player like, they basically have to

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>do what the index tells them to do. Yeah, and

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this has always been black Rocks kind of push back

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>on M E. S G themes. They've said, well, we

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>can only do so much because we're a provider of

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>passive products. We don't dictate what's in an index. And

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we're a fiduciary. So when a client tells us to,

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, put a certain amount of money in an

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred tracking fund, we have to

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. We can't play around with, uh, what's in

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that index. So so this is a company that has

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of its au M in passive products, it

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>does have some ideas for what to do on the

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>passive product side when it comes to E S G.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So they're going to double their lineup of M E

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>S G E T F s for example, to A

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>D and fifty products. The question is will the investor

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>money follow? And that's really what we're gonna hit in

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the second is there's now going to be hundreds of

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>E S G T F s. Um Let's go to

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the active divestment and I want to bring in Shaheen.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Shaheen talked about you analyze the coal companies like Peabody,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of them that black Rock is going

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to pull out of in their active mutual funds. Can

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you talk about exactly what we're talking about here in

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.239
<v Speaker 1>terms of their ownership, what percentage that is active? Of course,

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>so this message that black Rock puts across, first of all,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is a strong message, but it has very limited impact

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the day, as you mentioned,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>black Rock is a large passive investor. So about if

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you actually look at the data about of black Rock's

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>holdings and coal companies are passively hell, so these will

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>remain untouched just in ninety just you know, eat for

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund data, so not it's inceditional money that could

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>change things, but still largely undoutched Graham E s g

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is your whole world? What did you think of Larry

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Fink's message? I'd start very quickly by getting back a

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>year and a fantastic interview at Davos, where Larry Fink

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>was kind of grilled when he came out with his

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>purpose letter, and remembering too, for your audience, he had

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>already done three years before that where you focus along

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>on a lot on long term investing. So I just

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>saw that as the next logical step, although given some

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of his comments from January at all surprised on haw

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>far it come. Subsequently, yesterday there was a great interviewer

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Live. We unpacked some of his reasoning. You

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>went fishing in Alaska and a whole bunch of stuff

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>happened in December. For me, very quickly, I need to

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>drill down to the footnotes and look at the details.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm checking the receipts. Yeah. First of all, it's the

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>distinction between the passive and active sides of their business. No,

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong. According to their self reporting a

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion and active last year, they've got a decent

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>sized business. An you wanted to love that business, but

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it's still the smaller part of what black Rock is

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.679
<v Speaker 1>famous for. Um sercondly, if you look at the line items,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's thermal coal, but it's or more in revenue. So

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there's enough wiggle room there for businesses that are kind

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of changing the shape of their business. For me, the

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger part of what they're saying, including comments by their

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>vice chairman and and other people who are representing them,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is that these words around finance has fundamentally changed. Climate

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>risk is on a par with every other thematic sick

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and concept that we're going to be looking at. So

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think philosophically, as a house to be sending those

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>messages is almost more important than saying them will call

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it or ten or eighty or what have you. And Annie,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about if you are holding a shares or

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard Passive fund. You're going to hold Exxon, but you're

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna hold Apple, You're gonna hold all of it. Right.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You wrote something before the black Rock article about Vanguard

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and black Rock and voting. They are going to have

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some some power in their voting, and can you talk

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about any plans they have to change

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>how they vote on some of these issues that come

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>up with these companies. That's right. We wrote in our

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>story last year that the scrutiny around the voting practices

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of black Rock and Vanguard has really stepped up in

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years. And you see nonprofits like

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Majority Action running analyzes showing that UM they tend to

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>vote relative to their asset management peers. They tend to

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>vote more in line with management at UM. Fossil fuel companies,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for instance, tend to vote against shareholder proposals that are

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>around UM climate change type issues. So the big question,

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>while the activist community has been happy that you have

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this symbolic message coming from Larry think, the big question

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is will they change their voting practices accordingly. And we'll

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have to wait for the next proxy season to really

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>see how it will affect their voting practices. And what

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>about the investor reaction, because that's obviously going to be,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one that they're you know, black Rock

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is gonna really be listening to Yeah, and not everybody

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>lives in Manhattan and agrees on all these issues, right,

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>take guns for example, yet or Berkeley. UM. There's a

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of little hot spots there, phone places to go,

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>but not everybody lives there. Their investors are all over.

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>They get investors in Texas, Alabama. That's a really good point,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>right Like you, if you're black Rock, you basically are

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to create like this massive vanilla product that every

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but he can use you like the president in a way,

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to take in all these constituents, a certain president,

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain type of president. But so how does it

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That's true? Black Rock has just by virtue of being

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>black Rock, it has so many different kinds of clients.

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And you're absolutely right, not every type of client is

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be happy with this message that Think is

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>even sending or even changes behavior accordingly. So that comes

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the idea that there's only so much black

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Rock can do, especially when it comes to index products.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>They can offer all kinds of index products that have E.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>S G values. The question will be whether investors respond

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to that. And um, you know, Think has said that

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they did this, they came up with this, these changes

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>related to climate change as a result of client interest.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But we still have to see to what extend the

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>assets follow That was really interested in the comments when

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he did the blue book, Clive interview from Davos. He

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>said maybe ten maybe of his investor base, and he

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned clearly global investor base. We're asking these questions. So

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this clearly demand, you know, when one in five clients

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are saying, hey, what do we do? And to be clear,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't say you must do a B or C.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>They said this is a big ticket item. You know,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in my view, climate change is overshadows all other business

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>strategies for the foreseeable future. But these investors were saying,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you're black Rock, You're the experts and an investment especially

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you've been telling us about long term investment and corporate

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>governance and purpose and so on. We've got this big

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>ticket item. We need help. You're on go to vendor.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>What's the plan here? Are you going to do for us? Exactly? Well,

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's just how much does this really matter

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>black Rock whether they buy the stock of this peabody

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>or sell it isn't really what what's going to get

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>changes consumers demanding or changing their ways and not demanding

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>oil based products or coal and or regulation. Aren't those

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>really the way things? Because let's say you don't, let's

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>say black Rock divest from Peabody isn't another investor going

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to maybe make out on that because now the stocks

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>undervalued because of this artificial reason they're selling. Look, they'll

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely be pricing pressures. There's some commentations already appointed to

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the diversions between oil price and the price of the

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>energy sector as the first inklings of the long term

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of money out there. There's institutional money out there.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not so keen to hear the story about hey,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll be oil forever and we're the best producer. We'll

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>find you another field and executed most efficiently. So there's

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>already you know, at the margin. Yes, it will matter

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>when a significant investor says, we've got all these opportunities,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you're over here. You've got too many complications, you've got

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>too much baggage and too many issues. I'm going to

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>put overweight in this sector. Yeah, but again that just

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>makes the price the stock go down. They can still

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>make a ton of money because people can still keep

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>demanding oil flying all over the place, Like, isn't that

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the route? Isn't if we're gonna do a root canal here,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>don't we need to get to demand? Oh? Absolutely, but

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>don't divorce investor demand from consumer demand. There's all these pieces,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>these all stakeholders in the community. So when the regulators say, well,

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you can no longer pollute here, then that's going to

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>change the cost of doing business. When you've got consumers

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>are saying I don't like this product and it's got

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>too much sugar, and it's got too much salt, and

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's got too much hydrocarbons in it. Change your product mix,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>then they'll change it. But the voice of the investor

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very significant, long term strategic voice. So one

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>comment at a board meeting from an investor is worth

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many thousands of consumer investors, but

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it does remind me of a question I asked in

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four, two thousand five of Hannah Jones, who's

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sending up sustainability at Nike. I know one of your

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>favorite sustainability topics, Eric, and I asked that fundamental question,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are you more afraid of the activist consumer or the

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>activist investor? And the answer was, I'm going to say investor. No. Unfortunately,

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the activist consumer who triggers all the other parts of

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle. Right, So the so, for example, as you're

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that set up, I almost debate. Yeah, you're very good.

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We've done that before. They're talking about table stakes. I'm

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>here to play. It's a land worth. We spoke about

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>NGOs and the influence they have right as you saw. Awesome,

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>small little ngo out on the West coast, San Francisco, underpaid.

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>They do a ton of research. They tracked proxy voting.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>They've been tracking Vanguard and Black Rock of the proxy season.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>February the report will come out. They've basically called those

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>big fund houses outliers and being so poor at voting

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>their proxies. Now, some people will argue, yeah, we have

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>conversations behind the curtain and we have cups of tea

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>over here, but it doesn't really matter what the no.

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>It matters at the end of the day, a vote

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>goes through and if Vanguard or State Street or black

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the huge houses, especially in the passive side,

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't voting those proxies to deal with in this case,

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at executive pay, which is way out of whack,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and then then we've got a big problem systemically to

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>land with. In Davos. Of course, it's going to be awkward.

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You have Larry Fink speaking and his colleagues and so on.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>He's probably gonna be shaking hands with the cfs a

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred biggest companies in the world. It's gonna be a

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>little awkward. And he says about that pay package last year,

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we really need to dial that down. But

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the role of the investor. And you know, I

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you disagree on executive pay, but it's

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly out of kilter without companies. That's been one of

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the other things that has been, uh you know, a

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>talking point about how passive let society down. I guess right, well,

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>let me rip off of this with what Droll said,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>because as somebody who has tried been tracking passive and

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is so sensitive to how brutal investors are about driving

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>their cost down. Everybody wants all their investments for like

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>three or four basis points now, I mean, and now

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they want all this on top of it, the media

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is dumping on them. I kind of feel a little

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for them because how much And they build out a

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.119
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance team that could look through all these statements

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and vote in certain meticulous ways that are aligned with

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>their investor when they're being squeezed to compete with Vanguard

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>or vanguard itself at two three basis points. I mean,

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>there's just not that much money. Yeah, there's not a

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of wiggle room there. And black Rock really does

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>promote its stewardship team as part of its whole effort

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to like engage with companies. They say behind the scenes,

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they say, this is the biggest stewardship team anywhere. It's

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:32.479
<v Speaker 1>forty five people for you know, thousands of companies worldwide.

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's where you get critics that say, how can

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you possibly meaningfully tackle these issues behind the scenes with

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so many companies to cover, um, you know, even with

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a team that big. So that's something that they've come

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>under fire with on the activist side. But back on

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the pr side, I would really say that Fink has

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>been followed around by activists and and there's been this

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>increasing drumbeat of adgetation. So I think that as far

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as this message goes that he sent it will at

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>least help, uh, you know, offer an olive branch to

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of protesters who are you know, are showing

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>up outside is speaking engagements outside Black Rock offices. And

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that by sending this message, black Rock is

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at least trying to say hey, like, we're trying to

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be on your side, and that feels to me more

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like activist consumers than activist investors. Right, So Graham, maybe

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're ouno upthing there. Okay, So another place that

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>pressure could come down is on the index providers. Any

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what about that? That's right? One other piece of the

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>passive um plan that think laid out for climate change

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is to pressure the index providers. Those are like the

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>m s c I s of the world to create

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>black Rock basically basically almost licenses. Yes, there are a

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>customer of m s c I s. They use those

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>M s c I indexes for their index products, and

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is where they said they'll they'll start to

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>apply more pressure to the index ers to create more

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sustainable UM indexes, which would allow them to make more

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sustainable products. Does that also mean that there might be

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>more self indexing, because that's another place that black Rock

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>could say, Hey, we can just do this ourselves, we

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even need you. That will be really interesting to watch.

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They've always raised like there could be problems with self indexing.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't. We don't want to go too far down

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that road necessarily, but it will be an interesting pope

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to watch, yeah, exactly like it will. It will be

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see if if they decided to pursue

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that more if the index providers don't fall in line. Well,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, M s c I, S and P. They

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>have a whole suite of different types of E s

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>G indexes. That's not really the issue. The issue is

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the main indexes, like the SMP five hundred. Do you

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>ever change that because that's beta and I think a

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people probably won't don't want that changed, but

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they're good news is there are options. You could just

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>use something that's a little like barely um it's like

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the SMP with a little less fall so fuel, and

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>then you keep going into waves till you're down to

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe something that's really aggressively E s G. But I mean,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's really interesting is back when M S

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>C I and the index providers were trying to come

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>down and exclude UM dual class shares UH share companies

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>with dual class shares from indexes, black Rock actually came

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>out and said, it's not on the index providers to

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>say what the investable universe should be. And so this

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>seems like a bit of a reversal in that way.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So just one point to add on sort of investorsis

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer demand is don't underestimate the impact that an investor

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>has on a company's cost of capital. I mean, that's

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happened to Cool. It's this mix of demand pressure

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but also investors in short as saying they're not going

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to underte such assets. You guys, I'd like to pick

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>up on what Annie was speaking about around the black

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Rock announcement. There's much to be admired about it. It's

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>signaling it's important. They're going to make internal changes. That's great.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>They've got forty five heads. Larry actually promised to think

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I promised in January last year, there'll be seventy one.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>They're still hiring, you know, throw your resume there. But

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on I think the comment around the indexes, uh, that's

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit soft because, as Eric pointed out earlier, indexes

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>will build you whatever you want. That's my business. I mean,

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>st architect, someone walks through the door, they say, build

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>me an index. The shape of the strategy that looks

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like this, I'm going to figure it out right now.

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm working at Harvard on an Arctic strategy. How we're

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>going to build an Arctic strategy using five sectors in

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the geography. So the comment on the indexes index construction vendors,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't really buy that, but it is very, very

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>significant that a major player is saying this is core

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to what we're doing and it's going to affect what

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we're doing across the house. Now, how do we check that?

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>As any suggested at the end of the proxy season,

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>don't you worry every NGO that's tracking this and any

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>cynic like some of the people in the room here

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>again and be saying so what so how did it

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>play out? And then there's also going to be the

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>aspect of what happens in the marketplace. I don't know

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>if you saw the news about a quick spike and

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the E t F inflows the day after the day

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of the announcement, I don't know if it was time.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>If there's a partner going in with money, well, I

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know what happened there. Yeah, this wasn't a bunch of

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>millennials who got excited about Larry Fink's letter and all

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>bought into E s G because they were excited. Was

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet money? Well, black Rock has E t

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>F models and they just put E S G E

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>t F s into the emerging markets and the U

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>S slug and that right, there was billion dollars. So

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that's black Rocks doing it still counts, but that's not different.

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>That's different. That said, we did look, there was about

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty E S G T F that have taken in

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>money this month. So there's the grassroots is there. It's

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just tiny little piece of grass. Black Rock moving in

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of money is Mortalizer, Intertalizer. So here's why strategic.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a whole new field. Frankly, more than that is

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>because one of the promises about a hundred and fifteen

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a t S is that basically cloning you want it?

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you want it green or brown? So that is

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. When you go and buy your cherios.

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>How many types of cherios are there? I'm a parent,

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I know you are. How many types of cherios? Only one?

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>That's idea like dor coal position with Bloomberg, we need

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to be more in minded. I think coke is a better.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>There's diet coke, zero coke, cherry coke. Yeah, and so

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>these are all good. They're gonna be all these versions

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of the SMP. Excuse me, there are twenty flavors of cherios,

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and there's one type of cheer thank you, especially because

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>General General Mills back the Beast. Remember do you remember

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the cheerios box? Yeah, because that was an important social missage.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>That's why landing with there'll be clones of everything that's

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome. But then what happens next, that's what we're

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>watching and who cares? Like, are people gonna uh migrate

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from the SMP to the SMP fossil fuel? So far,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not too much. And I think that brings us to

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>our second part of the conversation. And just on that,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I've already heard whispers from Hana worth Side who's saying

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he's seen some of the black Rock models that he's

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>got clients in have already flipped over that was the

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>money that you're So as those play out, as everyone

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>does their quickly updates, that's going to be very interesting

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch. Okay, So we started by saying that there's

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>relatively little assets center management in this space, Graham, how

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>many more products do you think we're about to see

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>enter the field and what's that going to do from

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an a N standpoint? So, last time I was visiting

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>with you, gentleman I said, any shop is trying to

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>launch E T F strategy that it's probably the asset

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>gathering for will continue to be maybe even because of

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this announcement, they're going to rampant and push it forward.

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So any shop is looking to roll E T S

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if they've got any inkling of the marketing nows and timing,

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they will figure the trend and map two. We need

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the E S T version of whatever we're going to

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>roll out before E M growth. What have you choose

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>your thematic? So your phone's ring so exactly um um.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd just like to remind the team though again E

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>s G. Environment Social Governance. There's environmental, social and governance

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>factors in every investment decision. And bring it all back

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to this is what they put on the label. That's

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>a marketing decision. Every investment on planet Earth relying on

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>humans and the rule of the law has e s

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>G in it. What Black Rock has done and helps

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>realize and from the front page and have us talking

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>about today is they're just reminding people that it's in

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>there and now we're going to take it seriously. The

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>more interesting question is, especially if you're having a grumpy afternoons. Hey, guys,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>what did you do do for the last twenty years? Lord

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Stearn did his paper in two thousand and seven about

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the cost of climate change and how we're going to

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>adapt for that. If you any kind of long term investor,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you've been watching this play out and Larry Frank talks

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about were institutional investors. We're trying to pull forward risk

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and deal with it now so we can mitigate through it.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Many questions have to be asked, is it well we

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>saw this coming ten fifte years ago. So the solution

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is there's all these alternatives for people who want to

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>do it right. So we've got if you want to

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>numbers here, it's about hundred number s gts with black Rock.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>There could be one fifty by the end of the year.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>All but with the hundred there's only about twenty billion assets.

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That's two million per e t F. Just to give

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>an idea of how low that is. The average is

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>about one point one billion for all ets, but categories

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>like growth value like growth there's four billion per e

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>t F. So two dred million tells you there's too

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>much product for the assets now and now there's gonna

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>be more product there's gonna be more products, so she

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>why don't you talk about um all the product out there?

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Part of sheen and my job is to sort of

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>sift through them. What's your take on just how good

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of a job these products do? Sure? So that that's

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a that's a great question on sort of these assets

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>being very small, and I guess the E T F

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>would when it comes to E S. She is getting

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>divided into two things. One is these large as that

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>managers like black Rock One is these small thematic niche strategies.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's where it gets interesting, because what's interesting is

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this sergeant assets. So it's it's the delta. Now assets

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have doubled, but with that are going to come it's

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>challenges like you mentioned, it's going to be more liquidation,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>more sort of the big expansive guys crowding out these

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>small ones like you mentioned. So we saw that last

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>year and we think we're going to see it continue.

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say that one thing that's helped E S.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>G s's double last year was a lot of them

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>got cheap vangarded black Rock Wall coming under twenty basis

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>points like the magic number UM and that almost all

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the money goes to those because I do think to

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Graham's point is like, if you put a green product

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and a brown product next to each other and you

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>play up what's in it? I do think that the

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer is gonna say, it's pretty easy for me to

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>take the green, especially when cost is flat. Okay, let

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>me challenge this. This is my big thing. I've been

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>on this like a dog on a bone for the

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>last three months. What's in it? What isn't in it? Okay? Okay.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So we looked at s U s A. This is

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>the M s c I E s G Social Index

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that this one has been around fifteen years. So it's

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the only s G t F one of a couple

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that have been around a long time. It's trailed the

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>SMP by about thirty five percentage points. Why, well, it

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>tracks the hundred best scoring E s G stocks. That's fine, right,

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't have Amazon, doesn't have uh Netflix MasterCard.

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of hot hot shot. Those of

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>all returned over a thousand percent in the past ten years.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So and this is something I find through and through

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>um take something, and there's many other examples. You'll look.

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You'll be like, why is Nike right in the top ten.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Yet Berkshire Hathaway is in literally none um or why

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is Facebook in here? Um? But then you have a

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>company like um, I don't know that you might. Netflix

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't and there's a lot of questions on what gets

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>in and what gets out? Graham, I mean, what do

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you think of this? I mean, is this going to

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>be baffling to people? Because you have to recognize most

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>people have images of companies. I don't argue Apple's image

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't that great, but that's in all that makes it

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>into most of them. Also as an investor, like I

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:04.959
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss out in a thousand percent returns

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as part of an Indian who doesn't want Amazon. But

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is like bad, like they have their are in

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the dirty dozen, right Gene, So they get excluded from

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So, uh, there's no easy answer. It's complex.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>So picture graphic equalizer. Yeah, your music, guys, that's why

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I listen to trillions, It's for the music references. So

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's complicated like an equalizer. Even song are you

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about right now? How soon as now? As soon

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>as we'll take awesome guitar intro? You hear that at

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>any club? Anywhere around the world. You know what's coming,

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's coming. Um So, so E s G in

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>itself is a simplification so we can put a handle

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on this complexity of sustainability. Why is why is it complex?

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Because the world is complex? Ione just calm down, Okay,

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>any investment decision, you're just trying to make a simplification

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>by hold cell decision based on the complexity of many

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>things you can put your money into, yeah, including your

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>kid's career. So so when it comes to environment social

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>governance factors, there's always going to be complexity in the

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>same way that your motive vehicle is complex. For example,

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 1>all your iPhone is I bet their features on your

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>iPhone you haven't even found yet. Yeah, so does it

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>do what you needed to do? Is going to be

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the fundamental questions that are asked. This is

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>why we love E t S as a methodology. Big fan.

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of E t S as a technology.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>They help they roll things back to the acid allocator

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>level where you can make some of these investment decisions

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and then implement them at lowest cost, with greatest diversity

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and great transparency, which is a core tarrant of anything

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>around s G. You said that better than Erica. It's

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Yeah, but not, I mean, thank you. I'm

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the South African clone. You know something happened over the Atlantic.

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not clear. It was very well eloquently put. Thank you.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll try so. So, when we think of a motor vehicle,

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>some people just want something to get you from A

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to B. Okay, I want to get from A to

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>B with zero tail pipe emissions, so I'm able to

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>get in a different direction. I want automated. I want

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the best software on the and it I have that

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>unable to buy that particular vehicle. So there's gonna be

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>some humans who just and their advisors, frankly, because the

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>first sale is to the advisor, who are just going

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to say, you want global exposure. Great. I know this

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is important to you have a childhood special needs what

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>have you? Or your dad was treated poorly at the factor,

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>what have you. It's very important to hear about fair

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>wages or you know, a childhood education so on. You

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a tilt for that, and the tilter

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is blah blah, particularly E t F. So I think

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that I think of it there in terms of the

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that are available. And one of my favorite things

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that I know Eric is looking to track and maybe

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it will be a future episode for you, is the

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>E t F Graveyard like the Ben and Jerry's grave

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>food graveyard up in Vermont, And there's going to be

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a long list of these E s G branded E

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>t fs that no longer no longer live. There's a

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>graveyard for in Jerry flavors. Oh you gotta come, yeah,

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but what does that look like? Oh, it's just you know.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>First they'll talk about it, then they'll take you. But

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>let's there's all. I'll show you up there, zero tell

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>pipe permissions. We'll get you up there on a given day.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>There's also a great interview. He drove a tesla and

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>took a train, so he went full Gretta to get

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>here and I appreciate that. No planes and um, but

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Alec Boland does this great interview on here's the thing

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with Ben and Jerry's where they explain some of how

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that came to be. It's a great episode. I'm always

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>here for the E t F grade. Um, let's just

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. There's she in two camps of E

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>S G. There's one where they just try to carve

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit and keep you close to the

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>S and P, which I think is probably better if

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you're looking to clean up your portfolio sleep at night

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of deal because it won't deviate too much. But

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then there's one that aggressively go after E. S. G.

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It is kind of hard sometimes to tell the difference

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>based on the name. Can you talk about this and uh,

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know the idea that you're supposed to like replace

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>your whole equity position with one of these products, which

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is why I really stressed due diligence, because if you're

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking of selling your Vanguard five hundred to buy one

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of these, man, you better know what you're doing and

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>really look through the holdings. Yeah. So so that's an

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting point. So there are two sort of schools of

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>thoughts with investors, one who just want tracking, who just

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>want minimal tracking error. And that's where different kind of

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>strategies come in. Just so, for example, a low carbon

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>index is literally almost going to replicate your main parent index. Actually,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the government pension the chief investment officer said, okay, low

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>tracking error. I can stomach that. I don't mind moving

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of my money into that. But then you

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>have the flip side, people who actually truly believe that

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>she is going to outperform. They don't want that minimal

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>tracking at it. They actually want that tracking error. So

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the strategy, the school of thought, all

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>these different things. But what we see lower tracking arrow

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>typically it is cheaper, So potentially money is going to

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>flow into these cheaper things. Of the potential audience for this,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>where do you see more of it the people who

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>want to just clean up their portfolio and track the

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>market pretty much, just maybe carve out some of the

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>carbon and whatnot, or do you see people really putting

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>more money in because they think, really, this is gonna

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>be the way to outperform. I think in the short

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>term you're gonna get a lot of people moving from

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a dB they want to go to the less brown versions.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I also think there's a huge untapped demand almost Model

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>three style four K reservations within a week. There's a

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>huge untapped demand for investors who can investment houses who

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>can say I've got this new widget and it's heading

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in this whole new direction, and we've set it up

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and here's the entry point, and you don't need a

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>huge ticket size. We've kept cost low. I think this

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>huge unmet demand for any investment houses who can figure

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that all the way down frankly to a little piece

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of an impact fund in in some way, more people

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>want urgent answers. It's a question of speed and the

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>reframing of what's happening in the climate space. For example,

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not is it real? Everyone knows it's real. Check

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the science. If you can't read, it's not my fault.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a question of speed. Either going to be slow

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll still miss it, or you're gonna be fast.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna hurry up and get there and we're gonna

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>have to hustle because we're already late and behind agile.

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's more, there's more need, and there's more opportunity.

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say this unmit demand for new and aggressive

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>green strategies. So I want to bring that back to

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a thing that you brought up the last time we

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>had you on, which was the amount of alpha that

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>might be trapped in these strategies and the potential for

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>investors to get on that. Talk about how an investor

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>might approach alpha through the E s G lens Alpha

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>through their E s C lens. The first appreciation of

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that is understanding you're comparing apples and oranges always and

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, because you're adding a new factor, third

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>dimension risk return. Now we're looking at impact. So we're

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>adding a third dimension to how you look at investments.

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So even before you start your due diligence and lead

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>yourself down to executing on whatever fund technology you're looking

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to do, you're looking at things differently, which means if

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a conventional index out there, your answer, your

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>number may be wrong over time. So for example, UM

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the I shares KLD ticket that changed in seventeen, that

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that Eric s USA, Yes as yours that that changed

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen. That actually began as this experiment on Way

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>one May, Cambridge, mass where there was a shop that said, hey,

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>what if we tracked a different group of companies and

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>how would we do it? They took the five hundred

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>cutter to two fifty, UM rolled it up to four

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred total companies. And that's why some of the companies

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the constituents are so different because they make active index

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>selection decisions on this company less better than this company,

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>therefore you out. So so we had an index that

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>tracked over time. Now, in some periods that outperformed the

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and some periods that underperformed. There was immediately

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a mismatch because there's four hundred companies place five hundred. Yeah,

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So fundamentally, when it comes to E s G LPHA,

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.959
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be periods of outperformance and underperformance. Any

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>E s G product last year that did not have

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>excellmobile looks fantastic. If it had some of the solar

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and wind assets, they look fantastic last year. I'm not

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna predict what happens going forward, So I like to

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>shatter the myth you're gonna underperform because of E s G.

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You may outperform, you may underperform. There's a whole lot

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of factors that go into that performance argument, but the

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that definitely shatters look at s G factors, including

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>that in your investment decision, developing the strategy is going

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to lead to underperformance. That was a myth. You need

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to shadow that. So I'll just add to that level

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of nuance that is that it's not about outperforming under

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we do see that E SG tends to

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>outperform during market downtourn So it's got this risk mitigation

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>angle to it, but it underperforms during a bullmarket. So

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to your point, Rik on Amazon and all the sound

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of performance, it's not the opportunity side. Although when it

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to clean energy and things, we are moving towards that,

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but traditionally it's been more of a risk mitigation. Yeah.

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And that um, in s USA's case, the ball was

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about the same, but that was only a hundred stocks.

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean I've heard that, and we try

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to track the Stannard deviation. That's another field you can

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>look at if you're looking at one of these things.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But one other thing I have and and this is

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>just brings up some of my tweets about Davos and

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the private jets and all this is, you know, if

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't I pulled people. Um, you know, some people

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are are okay not owning an Amazon. They're like it's

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>worth it. But then of the people who weren't okay,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>who were who are okay not owning Amazon, only a

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fifth of them were willing not to shop there. Four

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 1>fifths we're going to not own it and yet shop there.

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Help me with the hypocrisy, because there's that then there's

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just you still drive your car. You you're not going

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to stop your vacations the Disney World. Um, how much

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of this is just like the organic avocado that you

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>pay double for a Whole Foods. It's really just to

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>feel good without having to do much, which is frequently

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>called slacktivism. Am I the bad guys? I'm sorry, it's

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.959
<v Speaker 1>just it's my observation. Go Eric, Eric is the number

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>one guy. I wanted a cocktail party. Here's my date,

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>throw me out the window. Yeah, that's fine. So I

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>think that that is some amount of sort of what

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>do you what? What do you feel good effect? Feel

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>good effect about ativism? Fa activism? Okay, but there are

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>those two schools of thoughts. At one school who thinks that, yes,

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.280
<v Speaker 1>she is just a better investment. It's a resmit against

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>So they don't care about their personal life or what

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they do. They just see it as an investment objective.

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like saying, as a value investor, would you only

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>shop discounted items. It's it's like that in that case

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I made. It's more for the people who were supposed

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to be cleaning up, like the you know, sleeping at

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>night kind of thing. Tune. Pickens was pitching wind energy

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 1>for accident. Texas is the biggest wind energy state in

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the US. I mean, there's so many opportunities, there's so

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>much work we have to do around climate and sustainability. Yes. Absolutely,

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>humans make a terrible mess of this one planet we

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>live on. I would love to see them aligning better

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>what they say with what they do. I want what

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>they do to be less brown, more green. I want

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>fewer suv s, more bicycles, all those things heading in

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a direction. Please be at my cocktail parties and ask

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>us all good questions, because I agree with Eric. You know,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>if you go to the car park, someone will walk

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in and they'll buy the organic groceries out to the suv,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, was idling because they wanted to

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>be warm when they came in. That's a feature that

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>mates will handle by. And and so where tom Yorke

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>going on like world tours with all the equipment they

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>got a log around. Okay, no, but in fairness Chris

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Martin said, we're not touring this album. I like that.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That was That's why I like Greta. Greta took She sailed,

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But like Larry Fink, doesn't have time for that. And

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where I think some of the hypocrisy. It's tough

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>for me not to see it. I can't unsee that.

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Eric at a cocktail party, what's the curving footprint of

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>this vodka? And in America, if they got a one

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more cocktail party and they said of me in plastic

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>containers like I'm nineteen again, I'm just gonna throw his

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sefort not just on the plastic factor. She he Graham.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>How should consumers go about due diligence questions in this space? So?

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there are so many different ways to do yesday,

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to pick one certain way. I do

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>think the market is moving towards what one calls materiality,

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which is actually looking at what esgu metrics are financially materials.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>So that's how I would do it, if I were

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to do it right now. Every consumer should check their

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and say in what can you have access to?

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You have so many more options and all of those options,

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a green option where you don't just have to

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>choose the brown option, and all the way to what

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have you aggressive? You want to do? You want to

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>sail across the Atlantic there's a company that's trying to

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>launch sailboats again. So all the way from less brown

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to most green, there's opportunities. You need to speak to

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>your advisor because the other gap in us as the

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>intermediaries underinformed and they're behind the curve on what's actually available. Annie, Sheheen, Graham,

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us and Tracks thanks thanks for listening

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions until next time. You can find us on

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever else you'd like to listen. We'd love to hear

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Call Tunas. You can find Annie at

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Antonia b Massa, Shaheen at Shaheen Underscore c and Graham

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>at E S g Architect. This episode of Trillions was

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>produced by Magnus Hendrickson and edited by Gerald Dillard. Francesca

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Levy is the head of Bloomberg Podcast Bye