WEBVTT - 2017 U.S. Open Preview

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I miss the green.

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:02.560
<v Speaker 2>For example, I'm already upset.

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a fried egg,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg, the.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Dreaded Friday Egg, Frida Egg, Frida Egg.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off of

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the course.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 2>All Right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to another edition

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Friday Egg Podcast, and we have our three

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 2>man weave back. Unfortunately, Tron Carter is out. The Spicy

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>curmudgeon Ate some bad meat or something tonight had to

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>bow out late. So we've got a, you know, a

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 2>much better replacement. We have sp Nations Brendan Poor Wrath

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and then also uh scratches, DJ Paiowski.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Welcome on, Hey man, it's up. I wouldn't uh wouldn't.

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 3>It's an honor to be here. I wouldn't claim that

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I can fill in the take shoes of one Tron Carter.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Though it's not a lot of people in the corners

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 4>of the Internet saying Tron might be suffering low tea

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Low Takes had to do a big week.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 4>It's it's kind of upsetting to hear needed to issue

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 4>a statement to see what's going on?

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, since since the flip flopping, the fatoa lifting,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and then the flat fatah placing on coucher, he just

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a lost man.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 4>He just he needs to start seeing some putts good.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>I think, just kind of get his get his feedback

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 4>under him.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 3>He uh, he was telling me he's kind of been

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>bogged down with real world stuff. But uh, he did

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 3>find time to parachute in and give his take on

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the Niked Blade collar lineup for the week, which I appreciated.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Like I just couldn't go, couldn't go untaped, you know.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy can I can?

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 4>I just say I'm excited and a little nervous to

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>eventually find out what kind of hackers are listening to

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 4>this podcast as we record it, to see who's gonna

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 4>who's gonna infiltrate me next?

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's it's been a bad, bad week for

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the pod, bad ten days. I apologize to all the listeners. Uh,

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're having a little internal issue here. I

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>use squarespace and they have no clue what's going on,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>but I keep getting infiltrated by other squarespace customers.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>The leakers are the real story here.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Internal issue.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>So after today, you know, I know how to fix

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 2>it now, but today's I mean, I I rarely get

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 2>got very upset with people, but I was quite. I

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>sent a strongly worded email to squares Space, who doesn't

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>have a helpline. Otherwise I would have been on that

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 2>line with giving some choice words to the to the

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>support people over there. But yeah, sorry, Well hopefully we'll

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>have it all strained out here. I think I think

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>they're they're working on it. They've escalated the situation.

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But.

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Infiltrating my golf takes, you know, on the.

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Better things, you know, as a Bulls fan, I sit

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 2>here and you know, I just wonder how how cavstans

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>are doing. What's up with Caves foro ref all.

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>We're doing fine. I mean, it's a crooked Warriors team atting,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, tipping the balance in just kind of a

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 3>dishonest way, and it is what it is.

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>We we have our championship after fifty two years. I

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 3>can't complain we ruined their attempt at sixteen and now

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and I saw Sean Martin just tweeted something about it.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 3>The Warriors, add in Durant is like Rory Payne money

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 3>to play from the white teas from the forward teas,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 3>which is a take I didn't know Martin had in it,

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 3>but I think Rory is like, you know, too much

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>credit because we would have wiped the Warriors out and

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 3>without KD. It's more like, you know, Troy Merritt or

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 3>somebody paying to play the forward tees upgrading.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>It's, uh, it'll be an interesting offseason, see what happens,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I think, and then it's going to be a bad

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 2>thing for the NBA. It's gonna I listened to a

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>really interesting Howard Back Zach Low podcast about how yeah,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>you know it's gonna hurt at the local ratings, and

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I know, I'm like, I'm a huge Bulls fan. I'm

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 2>less interested because we have absolutely no chance of competing.

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it wasn't It wasn't fun. I mean, I mean,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 3>I think that's like a legit not hot take. You

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 3>know that there is that's a legitimate concern.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 2>So all right, So DJ listening in Jack's you know,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 2>not much, not much.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been kind of bouncing around a lot.

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 4>We've been shooting a series, a travel series for AVIS.

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 4>So I was out in Denver with Shane Bacon and

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 4>hashtag Chad, a couple of friends of the pod shooting

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 4>some golf travel stuff, and then was in New Orleans

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 4>last week with Bacon and the take Smith Sean Martin.

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 4>So I actually haven't seen I haven't seen much of

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Jack's recently, but back, glad to be back.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It's steamy. Play a little golf today.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>It was it's nice and sweaty out there, and yeah,

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 4>it's significantly warmed up since you guys were here.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just beautiful in Chicago. My my depressing low energy

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 2>vibes are gone. You know, it's but you know, speaking

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>of Midwest, you know weather good segue south. Then Aaron Hills,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>just just a couple of hours north of me. Got

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 2>a little rain yesterday and I think a little bit

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>more rain on the way tomorrow. But here in the

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 2>course is handling the rain really well. What are you

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>guys most excited about for the week?

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Pretty goodhead, Yeah, I mean I think just seeing seeing

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 3>a new venue. Like you said, all the natural land movement,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I think is the term you used, and I've heard

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>quite often watching all the coverage. I think it's always

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see a new venue and the drama that

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>surrounds the US Open. I think sometimes it can get

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 3>a little tedious to watch it, which I thought, you know,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>and follow it because it is like, you know, just

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.799
<v Speaker 3>par golf or hanging on. So I like the drama

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>that surrounds it, whether it's rules drama or players screaming

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>about the course and the USGA trying to justify the course.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 3>And I think kind of there's always that uneasiness going

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 3>into a new venue like this, especially after Chambers Bay.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't seem like we're going to approach anything like that.

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 3>But I'm always interested to see players complaining and screaming

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and yelling, and that's that's always an intrigue to whe

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>who thrives off of that kind of stuff. Yeah, I

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 3>think I'm in the same I'm in the same boat.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm most excited about the venue, I think, just because

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, I have liked a lot of what we've

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>seen at the US Open in the last five years

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 3>or so. I've we can talk about this later, but

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I really like Chambers Bay. I thought was awesome, and

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that this year kind of just feels like

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the best of kind of like.

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 4>They finally hit like the right formula and kind of

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 4>the best of a lot of these different things.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like a you know, a unique golf course.

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 4>It's not necessarily like they're playing it on a you know,

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 4>real lynksy place, but it's it's got a lot of

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 4>those kinds of vibes, but with a lot of kind

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 4>of this softish American kind of style of golf. I

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 4>don't know, it just feels really like, it feels like

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of kind of converging trends that really,

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 4>like you know, have all kind of met up into

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 4>this same place this week, which which I'm into.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Since both of you guys like yelling and I mean,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we got to dive right into fescue Gate

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen. I mean, I have never seen Grass talks

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>so much about then.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's one of those I think it's one

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 4>of those things where it's just a really easy like

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 4>argument to understand, Like the rough was there and then

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 4>they cut it down, and so it's like easy for

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 4>people to talk about and like get really worked up about.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 4>But you know, I know, Andy, we were talking earlier today,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 4>like they only cut it on what four holes.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just devoted a whole reporter to it,

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 2>just following around the mowers and then saying, rip to

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 2>the fescue. It's like, are they cut? Like they cut

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 2>like probably two percent of the total fescue on the

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 2>golf course or maybe even less, maybe one percent.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I love it. That's what the US US Opens for.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 3>It's just like getting worked up. I wrote something today.

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I was like the USGA, the USJA mowed the lawn

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 3>and everyone lost their minds. Basically. You know, it's like

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 3>we talked about grass and like you know, at Pioneers

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>are talking about wire grass and native sandy areas, like

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>all these terms of art that you just never hear

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>the other fifty one weeks of the year. You hear

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 3>a million times during the US Open week and people

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 3>just start screaming about fescio. It's it's fantastic, oh man.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the the overspray drama with Shackleford and like

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 2>every super intendent way and I mean, it's just been unbelievable.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I will say, you know, I did hear some some

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>different uh some players on Sunday. I was walking around

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 2>up there and they were complaining about how thick it

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 2>was in certain spots.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, what do you so let's get to

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>it then, like, what is it too thick if the

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>fairways are sixty yards like Rory is saying, what's.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 2>Here's my issue with it is that, like in championship golf,

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I believe that the further you miss, the more you

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 2>should be penalized. And in this situation, the thickest rough

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 2>is the rough right off like the primary cut roff,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>So five yards off the fair away is the thickest

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>rough and then it gets thinner ten yards in fifteen

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 2>yards in So that to me is an issue where

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 2>if I just barely miss my target, especially if you

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>know you're trying to hit it down the left side

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 2>of the fair away, you missed by ten yards, you

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 2>know you are severely more penalized than somebody that misses

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 2>by twenty yards.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 4>That makes sense, and I think that, you know, from

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 4>everything I've read, I mean, that kind of sounds like

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 4>it was a mistake if that was the case, right,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 4>like like that they didn't really want that to be

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 4>that way anyways, kind of the way that that turned out.

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>If that's why they.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Were kind of knocking it down, I think then that's

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 4>a good move for for what they're doing. I mean,

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 4>I think that makes sense, but I don't think that

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 4>they would. I don't think they've changed it because people

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 4>were complaining or anything like that. I mean, I was

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 4>pretty checked out of Twitter today, but I'm guessing that

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 4>some people had that take.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh everyone, everyone had that take. Brandal Brandell was on

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 3>like the coverage tonight saying like, nah, basically.

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Cause this, you know, saying it was.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 3>All you know, Kevin Naz like deserves a byline for

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 3>this championship from here on out. It's like I couldn't

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 3>believe it. I mean, I think it was only four holes,

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 3>but it is like dramatic to see them just wholesale

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>changing the course and hauling away these like truckloads of grass.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, so, Andy, what do you so? What do you think?

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 4>So go into your favorite two words with an angles.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, when they're moving these pins around and like

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 4>you're making you know, you're making one side of the

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 4>fairway so much more of a premium than the other,

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, how to how does that make you feel? Like?

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 4>I kind of feel like if you're if you're really

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 4>trying to hit the left side of the fairway to

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 4>get a good birdie chance, bringing that gnarly ass fescue

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 4>into play is like kind of awesome.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, it's totally odd. I think, like you can

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>need to be, but there's enough width at this course.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 2>And then the other thing is the natural land movement.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so like there will be sides of fairways

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 2>that have like severe undulation and other sides that are

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, flatter, so you'll have this risk where one

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>side of the fairway isn't necessarily right and the greens

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 2>are really big. So you've got these massive greens where

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 2>a back left pin. And then and you couple that

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>with the five different t's that can play the holes

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 2>from and the flexibility is unbelievable here in terms of

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 2>the ways they can play holes, and I mean Speed

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 2>hit on it today in his press conference talking about

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 2>how it's almost hardly because there's so many different ways

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 2>that the holes can be played. So I think that's

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the cool things. And I think there, I mean,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 2>from what I saw when I was out there, there

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 2>could be as many as three driveable par fours. And

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>if they set it up a certain way the second hole,

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the if they play way up on the fourth hole,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>which the fourth hole could be just the ejector hole

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 2>of all the ejector holes. When they put the pin

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>on the right side the green, it is so nasty

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and anybody that shoots that pin is you know, if

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a perfect shot, they could be playing

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 2>like ping pong back and forth. I mean one of

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the caddies I was talking to that that's from Aaron Hills,

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>was like, when the pin's right, you need to aim

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>at the very far left edge of the green and

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 2>just let it funnel in to the middle. So it's

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 2>interesting that'll be that'll be an interesting hole to watch.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 4>And then the flexibility you're talking about kind of reminds

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 4>me of another Midwest of course, rich Harvis Farms.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, there are many T boxes there. There's someone

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I found, you know, one thing I held back on,

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, I made a truce at then, I mean

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>at the end to stop on that golf course. I

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>found an abandoned T shot a T box and I

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>couldn't figure out where it went, and I took a

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 2>picture that I haven't ever hosted it. So on the

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:35.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, of course, with some wan strategy and options.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>So do you think do you think those options get

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, sometimes the us GA tries to get like

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 3>a little too cute out thanks themselves. Do you think

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 3>there's too many options to get in trouble?

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean I think this is what you what

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 2>you described at the beginning of the the podcast as

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the beauty of the US open like watching the u

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>U s G a like fumble like different things and

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>everybody overreact to everything I do. So this course should

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>set up quite well for that.

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but by and large, you know this rescue

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Gate aside, like I don't think we've seen this is

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>an annual thing, like whether it was I don't know.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 3>I was looking to day at his like some of

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 3>the past posts I've done, like Lee McCoy, like dribbling

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 3>his ball down the fairway at Chambers Bay.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Remember it was like.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 3>And like h Graan mcdal finding like fake clumps of

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 3>grass and the like native areas that Native areas that

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Pinehurst and fourteen. It's like fake news, fake grass. It's

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>these big, like huge clumps like and just picked it

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 3>up like it was like a hairball. There's just like

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 3>always this social media outroar and if like the worst

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 3>we get is like Kevin nah yelling into his phone,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 3>like that's not that bad because this video is better

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Nah or.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Westwoods, They're both good. I thought not I'm team Nah.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I just loved how you the last thing you expected

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>was somebody to crawl out of thee.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Maybe the best the best way I heard this put,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 4>I think was your boy Michael Clayton was talking about it,

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 4>and like it kind of reminds me of the par

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 4>argument and the fact that par Is kind of just

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 4>a number that people.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Freak out about.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 4>But if if this fescue was a water hazard, like

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 4>literally nobody would even think twice about it.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Or mention it, And just the fact that it's not is, like,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, just makes everybody lose your mind. Yeah, Rory

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>said that today.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 3>It's like if they put you know, red steaks and

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 3>red lines up the side of it, like they wouldn't,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 3>we wouldn't be getting Instagram videos about it, right.

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, you know, if golfers like they're gonna complain about something,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 2>because most of them have so much confidence that like

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>nothing is ever their fault that goes wrong on the

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>golf course. So you know, that's part of why they're

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 2>the best in the world is that they never hit

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a bad shots. You know, the USGA stand fault that

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the rescue was there.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't that mess you up? Like the whole week though,

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Like that's what you're focusing on going into the week.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, yeah, that couldn't have helped Kevin Na's preparation that, like,

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden, he's in these headlines.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I also think that that was mostly a joke, you know,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and it probably just got completely best construed, as things

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 2>often do in society today.

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 3>So Kevin Nah as like analogy for all that's wrong

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 3>with society.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I like it, you know. Yeah, So where do where

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think?

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Like I was watching some of like The Flyovers and

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Noblo and stuff like that, and I heard like Baba

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 3>drove number two. That sounds like a cool hole. Just

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 3>seems like there are a lot of options going on.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Where do you think it could get away from him?

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Seems like nine. I'm intrigued by that, Like weg shot,

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 3>if it could get a little crazy.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Nine nine could be like a double or a six.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, somebody can make big numbers there. The par

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 2>five fourteenth and then the par four fifteenth could be

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 2>big swings. Like I think the fourteenth is like a

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>longer par five. If for the long hitters. It's a

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 2>really tough driving hole if you want hit driver, because

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 2>there's some bunkers that shrink the fairway and there's a

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 2>center line bunker which I love, and it makes you

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>know two small fairways, and then you know there's like

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, they basically give you this layup. It's like,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, a longer hitter, it will be like a

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 2>seven iron, Like you can hit the seven iron here

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and you have a wedge in but it's semi blind,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 2>you know. Or you can go for this crazy shot

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>in two and if you don't hit in the exact

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>right slope, everything just funnels like way down to the

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 2>right and you're left with like the short sighted pitch

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 2>shot up a fifty foot mountain. So that hole is

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 2>really cool. And there's some there's some very long fescue

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>that kind of cuts up the kind of the middle,

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 2>so some more thick rescue that you could lose the

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 2>ball in. So that one's really cool. And then fifteen

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 2>to that short part four that everybody that they've they've

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>shown a lot of flyovers of where you've got a

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 2>lot of bunkers. I think I'm guessing most players are

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 2>going to hit a four iron. I was thinking about

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 2>writing up the whole feature about a guess thing. They'll

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>hit a four iron right and then just take the

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>free wedge. But you might see some guys, you know,

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>try and drive it depending on where they put the tee.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But if I were playing it, I'd just hit four

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>iron wedge every day.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it sounds like I was watching some highlights of

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 3>the AM like can't lay I guess blew it, Like

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 3>you hit an eight iron off the one with tea

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>into like a well. I think that's central one of

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the bunkers in the middle of the faraway Like it's

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 3>sometimes laying up or you know, taking being safe off

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the tee can get you in trouble, like he hit

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 3>an eight iron some ridiculous distance that carried into this

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 3>faraway longer.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that hole that whole like fairway runs really hard

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>to the right right end to fest too, so like

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>you can hit a good shot like I was talking

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to a player who said, oh, you can hit a

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 2>really good shot here and it could still go in

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the fescue.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh you should.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I think you were talking about it in uh maybe

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 4>your preview thing. But I think one of the things

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm most excited about too. It just is all the

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 4>bunkering and the fact that like there's basically no flat

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 4>lies out there, and a lot of these bunkers how

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 4>there's so much slow inside the bunker, which is awesome.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 4>I love watching guys hit like weird crouching kind of

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 4>like uncomfortable shots above their feet, shots below their feet,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 4>like that's that's the best, and then just seeing how

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 4>close they put it most of the time, Like that's awesome.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's like like a bunker, you know, like I've

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 2>never seen where like you could visibly see like a

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 2>like almost like when you see like a big hump

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 2>or a roll in a green, you could see that

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 2>he's in bunkers. So like in the middle of a

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 2>bunker there's sometimes like a uphill and downhill undulation right

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of it, so so that that's kind

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>of interesting. I think a lot of the bunkers also,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 2>like especially with the fairy ones, that are less penal

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the closer you are to the fair away, So the

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 2>further you miss into them to the right, the more

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 2>penal they get, which is really cool. I think that's

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 2>a interesting, unique little design twist for championship golf where

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 2>they get a little bit tougher the further you get

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>into the bunker. So I'm I'm excited. I think the

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 2>the courses gonna stay pretty firm and fast. From what

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I've gathered, it's drained really well. The greens still have

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of bite after a good amount of rain,

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and uh, you know, I think that's the only concern

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I would have is if it if it rains too much,

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 2>that that that it softens up, because then it will

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 2>really kind of reduce I think it's unbelievable design because

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>short hitter short straight hitters legitimately have a chance. Everybody

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 2>just looks at the yardage. But it plays so short,

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 2>not like so short, but it does not play long.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a loss of downalty shots.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you would you rather? Would you rather

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>get a ton of rain? Uh and not have it

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>played firm and fast or have Phil play.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Either? Or I'd rather have philm play.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's you love furm and fast though?

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, no, I'd rather have firm and fast. I

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>thought the question was, like I could Oh I misunderstood

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the question. I thought it was it was it was

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 2>going to rain or Phil was going to play, and

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 2>it was one or the other.

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's the same thing.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm just an idiot. See, it was a very complex question,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 2>far too much for my brain to understand. I'd rather

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>have it be firm and fast than Phil play. Yeah,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I get lit up about this, but it

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 2>just gives Ernie, my boy Ernie, another chance to catch

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Phil on the Career Majors List.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 3>No, but what you were saying is I found it

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 3>interesting reading your like primer of the course. Basically it

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 3>seemed like a voice in the wilderness all alone, talking

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 3>about how you didn't necessarily think, you know, like everyone

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 3>keeps saying Bomber's Paradise, long hitter, long, hitter long, You

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 3>were more of like, hey, like the uneven lies might

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 3>make this more like. It might be more of like

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 3>the best approach game is that people who went in

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 3>the short and stray guys can still hang.

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I think I think, like any US Open, you have

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.479
<v Speaker 2>to hit the ball really well to win. Like almost

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 2>any golf tournament, you have to hit the ball well

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to win. I think what you'll see is like I

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 2>would look at guys that are high on strokes gained

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that aren't necessarily long, you know, like Bubba's always in

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the top five because he just hits it so far.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 2>But find guys that drive it really well, who are

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>also really good iron players, because you see it at

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>at at Augusta, you know, like Speed plays so well

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 2>there because he's so good at hitting off uneven lives. Yeah,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 2>And I like that about Speed this week. Is that

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 2>because it's a little wider, it lets more drivers into it,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, like that that's another aspect of it I

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 2>think is going overlooked because it's a little wider it.

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, like when the fairway's twenty yards wide, everybody's

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna miss fairways. And that's what kills the short hitters

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 2>is when they're hitting out rough, you know, and they're

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 2>not hitting it out of the fairway is and that's

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 2>why US opens typically, don't, you know, short hitters don't

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 2>win them because everybody misses five fairaways, like you know,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>like a short but really good driver of the golf

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 2>ball could hit fourteen to fourteen fairways here like and

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that that's legitimately in play for anybody that drives the

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 2>ball well. So from there you can attack and you

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>can play well, like I mean, I think the wind

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 2>is really going to be the big question. Like if

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the wind blows, that's when scores.

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Will go up.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>But if it doesn't blow, you know, like early morning

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>rounds are gonna you know, the draw. It's going to

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>play more like a a British Open where you know,

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a or an Open championship where the draw could be

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>a legitimate factor.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 4>That's what I think I was saying at first, is

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 4>like it's kind of this like confluence of all these

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 4>factors that are like the best parts of all the

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 4>other majors almost, and it seems like we're going to

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 4>get like a lot of them this week all in one,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 4>which is really cool.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Speed said that exact thing. That is Kapalua, the

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 3>home of ralph Press conference. At the top of the year.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 3>He's like, I succeed that Augusta. I succeed at the

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Plantation Course, I think, because you know, I think a

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of the modern players, the guys coming up don't

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 3>really hit it as well off different eyes and on

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 3>even terrain as well as I did, which is weird

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 3>for a Texas player to say, you think, But yeah,

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 3>he said that at the top of the year, so

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe he's the guy to go for this week.

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to slide in and take the speed pick first,

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>says it.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 2>I put it in that course, thoughts. I just I

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>put a gift of speech just so the uh the

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's like the one of the best

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 2>design tricks of how to really create difficulty for the

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 2>great player without you know, stretching out the average player.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>What other courses are like that? Besides those? Those two

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>come to mind, But.

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm just William Flynn did a lot on his courses,

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So Cherry Hills, there's a course I played of his

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>rolling Green that like, you're never hitting off an even

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 2>lie and it always seems to be like a fade

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>lie hit into a draw green and it just drives you,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>drives you nuts. But what it does is it really

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 2>separates the great ball strikers. So I'm you know, sitting

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>there hitting high fans into draw pins and grind him

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 2>for pars. But like somebody that's really good is just

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 2>hitting him right at the pen still, So I think,

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, you got Kapalua. You have to have some

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 2>land movement to do it. It's hard to do it

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>with a dead flat site, and this place has just

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess the story of it being like some sort

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 2>of glacier. I'm sure somebody's gonna do, you know, one

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of these telecast glaciers. Yeah, the glacial movement in blockage

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>or whatever happened here. You know, it's an interesting study.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, we've we've now talked it touched a little

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 2>bit on speed. But you know, I think something that's

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 2>an interesting narrative that's going on is that McElroy has

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 2>been kind of stuck at five majors and you've got

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>this whole and he's got the you know, the stranglehold

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 2>on generation's best player of this post Tiger generation, but

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you've got all these other guys that are lurking that

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 2>could go on a run and get to him because

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 2>of this you know, almost three year stall he's had now.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I'd love to hear what you guys

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 2>think about, you know, some some of the other big guns,

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know, who could be the guy that could

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>could get close to his major count.

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think that, like I think Speef is

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 4>the guy in my head. But of course that I'm

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 4>saying that, as you know, Dustin Johnson's the number one

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 4>player in the world, who looks pretty much unbeatable every

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 4>time he is teed it up over the past year

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 4>or so here. But I mean, I think speF is

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 4>the guy that, like, in my mind, I think when

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I was watching him in twenty fifteen or even before that,

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 4>probably like kind of when he was a rookie.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's easy to get sucked into.

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 4>The narrative of kind of like, oh, he's just he

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 4>makes every putt and blah blah blah. And like I

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 4>think when you get sucked into that, you kind of

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 4>start to think, like, Okay, well that's gonna that's going

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 4>to dry up eventually, and like he's gonna he's gonna

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of drop off. And I think what we've seen

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 4>just over the past few years, as people have gotten

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 4>deeper into his game and just watched him more closely

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 4>and watch him when he struggles more importantly, and watch

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 4>him when he plays, well, it's that like that's not

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 4>the case, and that he is like an all world

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 4>ball striker too, And like I think what I I

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 4>see from him, I mean, I don't know, he just

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 4>makes me excited about the fact that he contends at

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 4>like he contends at every venue. He kind of like

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 4>just has all these different ways to get it done,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 4>and like that is I think that's what impresses me

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 4>the most.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't know. I think just the

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's got what.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Ten years on Dustin Johnson nine years something like that

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 4>is the fact that makes me lean towards him. But

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm just like freakish, you know, talent of

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 4>like being able to just kind of take over for

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 4>a decade, like Dustin's the guy that has the tools

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 4>to do that. But I don't know, it's kind of

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 4>a rambling answer.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean he's got he's got or Bryson, the i A,

0:30:51.840 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the Changelo, He's definitely it's the most airtime about it.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, he's at zero right now, but

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't rom got to be thrown into this from what

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 3>we've seen so far with like you know, like DJ

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 3>was just talking about different styles. He handled himself fine

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a colonial or whether it's you know, Austin or Toy.

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 3>It kind of doesn't matter where he plays, putting, driving,

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, iron game. It seems to be pretty solid

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 3>through the bag.

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I just it's kind of I think like he's someone

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 3>if you're Rory. He might be, you know, thinking like

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 3>that's the guy for the next era. It's hard to

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 3>argue with DJ Dustin Johnson that is being I think

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 3>the most immediate threat. But there's that age thing, like

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 3>he just seems DJ seems like the guy who could win,

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, a Major every year for four straight years,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, elite get one a year, and but I

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 3>think like rom is the kind of the biggest threat

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>He would he would he would scare.

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Me if I was looking for a guy thrown Rory

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 3>so to speak, Mm.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Hmm, yeah. I mean, now that you've touched into ram,

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 2>so do you do you put him as you know,

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the next first time major. I mean, even though I

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>asked this really because a Japanese reporter set in that

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>press room all day and asked the same question to

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>every player, you know, asking if the deck he could

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 2>win this week, all of them said yes. I love that.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 3>The question was always do you think the number four

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 3>player in the world could win this week? It's not

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 3>like newanced thing, It's just like can he win? Is

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 3>he okay at golf?

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not.

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I wish I wish that golf would get some sort

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 4>of like performance artist up there that would just like

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 4>basically lean into all this stuff and kind of have

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 4>like a handshake agreement with every other player that like

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 4>just so you know, like I'm just messing with you guys.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm just kind of spewing this off. But like when

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 4>somebody asked that question, do you think he can win?

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Just say, you know, no, I don't. I don't think

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>he has what it takes. I think he's destined for

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>just a life of just miserable shortcoming next question. But

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>until that day comes, I.

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Guess we'll have to keep suffering the same, the same

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 4>pointless hypotheticals.

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 2>The monotony. It's the whole SIS conference thing needs a

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>major shakeup. I'm so loud. It was.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Like I parked on the cosh today and just watched

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the whole cycle. I was having a field day with it.

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm very kind of like deep in the game, just

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 3>know who's asking the questions and kind of having fun

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 3>with the the bias and fake news angles of some

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 3>of these guys are thrown out there.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty pretty interesting.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>You had the Japanese woman asking about if Deki could win,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>and then you had another guy asking about Wisconsin culture

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.479
<v Speaker 2>every single time, like, tell me about what you think

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 2>about Wisconsin people, you know, and it's just you're all

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 2>just writing a story and getting these quotes for this story.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 4>It's like that's that's the bad part, is having the

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 4>story ninety percent written and just saying like, Okay, cool,

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 4>I just need some quotes I can plug into these holes.

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I mean that's I don't know.

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 4>I guess that's how you get to do it on

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 4>the deadline. I know a lot of times, but like

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 4>it's just that's how you wind up with these like

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 4>milk toasts kind of, you know.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Asking Rory about Wisconsin, he's like, I don't know. It's

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 3>a state and I've been here a couple of times

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to play golf, Like I can't what insight can you?

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually?

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 2>People are nice? Yeah, it's like you know, I think

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 2>you know with the NDA, how they have like a

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 2>ref score, you know, and and people get graded on there,

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Like I think that should be the same way for media. Yeah,

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 2>dumb question out.

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>My favorite. I was watching Adam's God.

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I think somebody from the Australian Press, I don't know who,

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 3>like asked him, like, you know, said he was almost

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 3>he'd be almost unbeatable, right, He's let's just let him

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>right into it, because like if you make a couple

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>of putts, you're almost unbeatable, right, So what Scott's supposed

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 3>to say, like, yes, I am unbeatable. I don't know,

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's just you know, pretty leading question.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.919
<v Speaker 2>It's uh, well, before we got sidetracked.

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're talking. We're talking about Ron Yo.

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's say, next guy, who do you guys think next

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 2>guy to win a major of this of this young crap.

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna leave my boy Westy, who's going to get

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 2>it done this week out of it. But everybody out

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 2>at the you know, the younger guys who's going to

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 2>get it done first? You know, jt Ricky Rahm Hadki.

0:35:51.719 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Stricker said, you said short straight hitters this week. It's

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 4>good short games.

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:04.479
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm sticking with the ram just I know that's like

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 3>we just went over it. But he seems like the

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 3>most unburdened by things. I don't know, if it's like

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 3>just you know, culture change, he doesn't you know, it

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 3>seems he seems pretty embedded in American culture. I should say,

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 3>but like I don't know it just this is kind

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 3>of just looking at intangibles and you know, trying to

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 3>discern something that may not be there. But he just

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 3>doesn't seem burdened by the same kind of like hype

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 3>and pressure, and it just doesn't seem to affect him

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 3>in a way that some of the other young major

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 3>list guys look like they start clenching up.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I agree.

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 4>I think my power rankings I think would be like

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 4>rom Ricky Matsuyama, I think, and Matsuyama last, just because

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I don't know, Maybe maybe I keep

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 4>I keep riding my I uh uh. J T and

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy Walker have the same game narrative, which you think

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 4>is a bad take.

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>So horrible they couldn't like Jimmy Walker is the guy

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that like grind his way to PGA tour at age

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 2>thirty two, and.

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.399
<v Speaker 1>They have the same art, they have the same twenty one.

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 4>This is what happens when all my takes get bastardized

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 4>because you're not listening to what Web's saying. Uh so,

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 4>but massa young I think the knock on him is

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 4>always his putting, and like you know, if he puts,

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 4>he's one of those guys that like can finish first

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 4>or second with kind of negative stroke skin putting has

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 4>happened a couple of times, and like, I don't know,

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think these majors just like completely exposed

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 4>that in every way.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think him winning you know, Phoenix is a

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lot different than him winning at Aaron Hills feels.

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Like that's that's a good point.

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh, how's at first? Okay, take who's your guy? Andy,

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just checking from the cheap seats.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm all in on the I'm all in on the

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 2>thumb long term. That's John Rahm for those of you.

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, the initiated, But.

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 2>I'd say i'd say rom for like the long term arc.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 2>I think I kinda I kind of like Ricky even

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm not a huge Ricky fanboy, but I

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 2>just love the way he's playing this year. Like the

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 2>thing that he's done so well this year is putt.

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 2>And I know everybody says putting doesn't matter, but he's

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 2>having like the best year of his career, and he's

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.919
<v Speaker 2>like top five or ten in strokes game putting after

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 2>being fortieth or something like that the year before. And

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:53.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you chart it out. That's the one

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 2>thing that's really taking a big jump, and he's been

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he's been in the hunt at every

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 2>big golf tournament that he's played in. So I think

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Ricky is most likely. I wouldn't be surprised

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 2>if round one though, you know.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Like he's you can't like people are like, yeah, by

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>any of these guys.

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.919
<v Speaker 2>I had somebody chirping at me about not having rom

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 2>in my sleepers article.

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, I like, the number nine player in

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the world, Can we talk about another sleeper?

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Real quick? Rory, No, No, just real quick, So.

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 3>Like you're talking about how he's been stuck or whatever.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 3>On five, Chambly was also saying before I came over

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 3>here to this pod that like, this is his best

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to win since like the fifteen Open at St. Andrews,

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 3>which you know he didn't play because of that kick

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 3>About what what do you do you think, like obviously

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Quil Hall is going to be a big opportunity, Like

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.439
<v Speaker 3>do you think he's like gotta do this this week

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and or August? It seems like I don't know, the

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 3>farther you get out, does that just kind of amplify.

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, DJ, I don't know.

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it's his.

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know expectations. I mean, like the cliche is

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 4>going to be the expectation is to win every week.

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 4>But like at the same time, he hasn't played what

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 4>in like six weeks because he's been hurt. I mean,

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't I don't think he's going to be like

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 4>win or die this week. I don't think by any stretch.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 4>But I mean I think that I see what you're

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 4>saying that, Like, if you know, he keeps going to

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 4>he keeps going to all these these venues where everybody's saying, like,

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 4>you should win, right, you should win, you should win,

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 4>And he goes to the Masters, and like, why don't

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 4>you win here?

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>This is crazy?

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 4>But like eventually that has to it has to kind

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 4>of feel like you've never done it before, after after

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 4>so long. I mean, if he gets to you know,

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 4>if he gets to the twenty nineteen US Open or

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 4>whatever and he hasn't won a you know, he hasn't

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 4>real I guess it'd be the PGA at twenty nineteen

0:40:58.280 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 4>PGA and he hasn't won in five years.

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a long time so yeah, I don't know.

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think I do think he'll he'll get

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 4>one of these before then, but I think he doesn't. Like, Yeah,

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 4>I think what you're saying is is got to be

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 4>a factor that like it's got to kind of start

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 4>to creep in.

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I think the other thing that goes unnoticed,

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't get talked about that much, is like how

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:24.399
<v Speaker 2>much better the depth of talent is now than when

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 2>it was like even three years ago. Jordan Speth was,

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, just getting started, Like Dustin Johnson wasn't this

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Dustin Johnson, Jason Day wasn't this Jason Daydecu Massuyama wasn't here.

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 2>And you still have Adam Scott, Sergio, all these guys

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 2>playing at a high level Westwood. All right, that's the

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 2>last one. I want to do that again. But you

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 2>have all these guys that are still still playing at

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 2>like a high level that are that generates justin Rose,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.919
<v Speaker 2>and we're in this era where like it's really really

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 2>really hard to win.

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, we'll go back to like I mean, who was

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 4>the last kind of like quote unquote dud major winner.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just like it just doesn't happen, Like it's.

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Not like Danni willis just playing.

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I mean he was still like number fifteen

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 4>in the world or something like that when he won.

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean he's he's super good. Yeah, Like like I

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 4>get what you're saying, but like, you know, when was

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 4>the last Like I'm trying to think, you know, Darren

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Clark is not like swooping in and winning another major

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:36.839
<v Speaker 4>right now, or anybody or like you know who who

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 4>else kind of before that.

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean even.

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I'm just trying to think. I mean,

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 4>I know, we went through a stretch where it was

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of like it was Kegan and it was Web

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 4>and it was some of these guys that like kind

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 4>of looked like they would be around forever, and you know,

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 4>it just pans out that like Daupher was in there.

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's got a good shot this week actually though, Yeah.

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I think so too.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 4>But the point being, like for any of those guys

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 4>to win outside the top ten, now, I mean this

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 4>is like the most obvious statement.

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Ever, but like for any of those guys to win,

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've got.

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 4>To be This goes into a whole other thing that

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:15.439
<v Speaker 4>like you can kind of extrapolate out on the whole

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Tiger thing as.

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, es, but she didn't think we're gonna bring him up, but.

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 4>You can you can bring out with Tiger Too's like

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 4>in order for like anybody who says like, oh, I

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 4>think he can get it back and he can win

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 4>a major, It's like, Okay, cool, that sounds great, but

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 4>just FYI like he's got to be Ricky and Dustin

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 4>and Jason Day and Rom and Rory and Spieth and Adam.

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Scott and Justin Rose like all of these guys like

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on the same week. Like it's just so crazy to

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think about it like that.

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I think. I think that this brings up, you know,

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 2>so you have your young guys that are trying to

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>get there first, and then you've got this this kind

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 2>of class class as superstar that are kind of you

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 2>know that somewhat have separated themselves just because of this

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 2>one major, you know, where you have you know, In

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Speith has two, but all these other guys have one

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 2>but have shown, like I think DJ, Spith, Day and Rory,

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 2>those four have shown that they can dominate golf for

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 2>like an eighteen month stretch, which nobody else has been

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 2>able to do. And then then on the other side

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of the spectrum, you have these guys that played in

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the shadow of Tiger, where you have Sergio, Justin Rose,

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Henrik Stenson, you know, Jim Furick to a certain extent,

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 2>all who have one major and like, you know, the

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the when you think about remembering players, you have, you know,

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.279
<v Speaker 2>one major guys to two major guys and that's that's

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a big difference, or three major guys. So like, you

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 2>know who of that group could you see getting one

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:53.399
<v Speaker 2>more major? And maybe one this week?

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Adam Scott's like the main one that sticks out.

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, I mean, Sergio is probably a pretty

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 3>easy answer there. I mean, I just I think he's still.

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Like on you know, doesn't feel like that was like

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>five years ago that he won the Masters. Yeah I

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote that.

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.479
<v Speaker 3>I actually wrote that today. I was like, it feels like, yeah,

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 3>five years ago.

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I've ever seen like a Masters

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 2>champion seemingly fly under the radar.

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, right, especially like a better fitting golf course.

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Right Uneven lies like it's like is made, Like that's

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 2>a guy that if you look at strokes game driving,

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you know he can rip it far. But for the

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 2>most part he's such a great driver that he has

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the ball on the string. You know, he might not

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 2>miss a fair away for you know, he could probably

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 2>go twenty seven holes without missing a fair away out here,

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>which is interesting. But you know it's because Steve Stricker

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:00.760
<v Speaker 2>is eating up all the headlines.

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll he plays well this week. It would be so fun.

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:11.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of on team knee Burgie this week.

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to I wanted to ask you that.

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Just kind of there's like a pretty strong am crop

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 3>here this week between whatever Dalkey and Big Hag and

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 3>slender McNeely and I don't know, I heard this knee

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:30.879
<v Speaker 3>burg He is like, you know, knows the course better

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 3>than everybody anybody else. It sounds like it want to

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 3>play there. So it seems like you think Ams could

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, not win it. But he seems like

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of firepower.

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>He was like the last group at the end. Yeah,

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 1>is a pro. Yeah right, he's on McKenzie Tour.

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he won and the McKenzie Tour two weeks ago

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and then uh or no, he came a second to

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 2>McCoy when he won. But yeah, he came in six

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and he could I mean, he could play well, you know,

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 2>you never know, but I mean he was a two

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 2>time Walker cover. But the the ams are incredible. Joaque Neeman,

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 2>this kid from Chilly, he's the new number one in

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the world amateur. You know, he overtook McNeely, who you know,

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you look, if I rated out the amateurs,

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 2>like I think McNeely would probably be like four or

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 2>five on the list, which is crazy because he's like,

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, the the Golden Boy. But like you know,

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the a couple that will won't get a lot of

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 2>headlines are John Oda from U n l V, who's

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 2>gonna definitely be on the Walker Cup team. And Cameron Champ,

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 2>who I guess I don't know if this is a fit.

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 2>He's transferring from Texas A and M to Texas.

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:53.839
<v Speaker 1>News.

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not sure if it's been reported, but give.

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 3>A message board war. Yeah, textagg or Bloods.

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Podcast is gonna get tons of hits at minute forty

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it is. But he all of a.

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Sudden, all of a sudden, your account's going to be

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:13.280
<v Speaker 4>hacked by Big Aggie.

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 3>To take a break from the Tom Herban recruiting trail

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 3>to got many.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Porter might be you know, diving in from Oklahoma state.

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 2>You know there might be some golf fans on there

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 2>and Sooner Nation, just they're not in Calvoy Nation coming

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 2>at me. But he uh the thing about Champ he

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:37.399
<v Speaker 2>murders the ball like he hits it forever. So that's

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 2>a that's a guy that you know, one day somebody

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 2>will see how far he hits it and it'll go

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 2>viral on on Twitter. You know, sure he hit it

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and eighty yards.

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of which, just slip in and mentioned that I'm

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 4>going to get your reaction to your boy Tom Peters

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 4>this week, heard his name bandied about a little bit.

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, he didn't. He just didn't come. I don't

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 2>know why. I just didn't didn't get on him this week.

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Pauli's been giving me a lot of ship about not

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 2>being being banging the Thomas Peters drum, and I don't

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:17.919
<v Speaker 2>know why I'm not. He's a great, great driver, hits

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 2>it forever and awesome with iron.

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean, but who's who's gonna be lower

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>running this week?

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Corrupted by the Blake collar mafia.

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Though fortunately that could be you know, he might have

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 2>gotten too mainstream for me, That's true, lower LINI it's

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be Peters. I think there's only two right,

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Stricker and him probably. I think you know what bugs

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>me about Stricker? I like the guy. I love him.

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>He went to Times.

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Somebody goes off on this guy. He went to do

0:49:57.120 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it well.

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 2>He went to Illinois. But every time you see him

0:50:00.520 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 2>in pictures he's wearing like Wisconsin gear. It's like, what

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the hell, man, you didn't go to Wisconsin. You went

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 2>to Illinois. The regular.

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very Zach Johnson move. He ain't good, didn't good

0:50:12.400 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to Iowa. I h side note.

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I did a radio interview with a with an Iowa

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 3>radio station today like just we're hitting the usual, you know,

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:27.320
<v Speaker 3>DJ Speed, you know all this stuff, Rory, how's everybody

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:30.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna do? And they sign off and they asked me,

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 3>like about Zack Johnson, how he how he's been like struggling.

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Why we think he's struggling it? And with this new equipment.

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I was like, man, I don't have notes on Zach Johnson.

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, Like I just threw some cliches. I just

0:50:45.040 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 3>got I usually handle these radio things fine, but oh

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 3>threw me for a loop.

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, back to your strict beat.

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 2>But no, that's it, that's it. But yeah, then Illinois

0:50:56.200 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 2>will be playing Wisconsin and he's wearing like Wisconsin stuff

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, what.

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>The hell, dude, Yeah, let's crooked something that wait to

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>take a stay and take a stand stand up to strigger.

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get into some Twitter questions here. We

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 2>got a ton of good ones. You know, we'll we'll

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 2>stick away from stay away from the ones that are

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 2>directed at the spicy crimudgeon unless you just want poor

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.320
<v Speaker 2>have to sit in and answer them as if he

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 2>was Tron.

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's possible for anyone to be a

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 3>proxy for Tron heavy lies to crowd.

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh so uh, Geronimo Jackson wants to know, is the

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:54.359
<v Speaker 2>U s G A woke? Uh?

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I don't. I don't know. We haven't

0:51:58.640 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 1>talked about this one.

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't know where you are going to fall on this,

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 4>but I'll kick it off and say that I think

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:08.280
<v Speaker 4>they are woke. Some of this, of course, probably depends

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 4>on your definition of the word, but in my definition,

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's it's uh. I think you look at

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of their body of work. I think what they

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 4>did with Chambers Bay recently, I think what they did,

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:23.000
<v Speaker 4>what they kind of you know, what they pulled off

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 4>with Pinehurst. I think what they're doing with Aaron Hills,

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I think from a from a just different kind of venue.

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 4>I think they're way woker than the public is ready for.

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 4>And so I think you saw a lot of backlash,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 4>which I loved all the like this golf course is brown.

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Some of that coming from the current president of the

0:52:41.880 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 4>United States. People not understanding like the motives behind something

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 4>that's like the wokest thing there is. When like somebody

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:54.399
<v Speaker 4>doesn't understand your art, I think is great. I think

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 4>sometimes they're woke and not woke at the same time.

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 4>I think you look at their handling with the birds situation.

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:53:03.680 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 4>WHI on one, on one hand, you know, belittling uh

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 4>the four station, you know, forestation of the rainforest is

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 4>very unwoke. But at the same time, Mike Davis actually

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 4>being the guy who yanked him off camera.

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>When I think when you're when your head honcho is

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>also strong arming people, I think that's very woke. Literally yeah,

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>just super woke. I think that, uh man, what else

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean?

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:40.240
<v Speaker 4>I think the anchored anchored Putter decision was pretty unwoke,

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 4>uh that wasn't.

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 2>The con that the ball in distance has an increase

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 2>was extremely Now, yeah, but.

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Some of it's so not woke that it might be woke,

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:52.359
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean.

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 2>That's like when you said if nobody stinks, does everybody stink?

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the busy curbudget said that, So all right.

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to back that up. Do you do

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:07.280
<v Speaker 2>you have anything behind?

0:54:07.640 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like DJ really wow, undid Yeah, I think

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I think I think they're woke. I got

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 2>a great question from Joe Mayberry for for Poor rap

0:54:26.120 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Here Early Bets on how many awful versions of red,

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 2>white and blue apparel we see this week?

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's already out. You know.

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 3>It's just these it's so heinous, it's so wrong. It's

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 3>like just kind of like, you know, they're trying to

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:49.839
<v Speaker 3>appeal this you know, this low hanging fruit, and it's

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 3>just really this I don't know, it's this bass and

0:54:55.719 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of I don't know, really discouraging, you know, false

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:01.760
<v Speaker 3>sense of patriotism.

0:55:01.960 --> 0:55:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just like an easy sell for commercial reasons. You know.

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 3>It's just everybody's got to release the bag, everybody's got

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to release the shoes, the outfits. You know, why why

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 3>does Sergio have to be in red, white and blue.

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 3>He's from Spain. I mean, I know he's you know,

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 3>big Texas now he's like big tax or whatever. But

0:55:24.280 --> 0:55:26.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, I don't understand why we got a drape

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Sergio in red, white and blue. It's just just like

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 3>commercial kind of you know, hollow commercial attempt at you know,

0:55:33.800 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to capture on people's patriotism.

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:38.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't like the brands getting involved in my issues,

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:44.320
<v Speaker 4>right yact keep your keep your brands off my issues.

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Let it be an organic, organic decision to represent yourself patriot.

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I wish players still picked what they wore, you know,

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:57.640
<v Speaker 2>like who would be wearing the blade color voluntarily?

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I got a buddy. I got a buddy, Jason.

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Jason Day would do that. Your buddy loves it.

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 1>He loves it.

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we make fun of him constantly. He played golf

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:10.919
<v Speaker 4>with Tron the other day, and Tron just mercilessly was like, dude,

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Blake callers got to go.

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>He's like, no, it's good. He's kept popping Tron right

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the face about it. It was admirable.

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Actually, the Blake collar is good.

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, here's another question from Will Knights, What is

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 2>more likely Coocher snakes his way to a top ten

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 2>in a major that doesn't suit his game or an

0:56:36.360 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 2>actual snake attacks Kevin.

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Nah, A lot of moving parts on that one.

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I will say this, I'm surprised that snake didn't attack

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Kevin when he spent like an hour making a nineteen

0:56:56.080 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 2>in San Antonio. That one?

0:56:57.600 --> 0:57:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sixteen? What was that? What? What about the colf

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 1>course doesn't fit Coacher's game?

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's in a major, Like I actually like

0:57:09.520 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 2>when when I think you're just going heavy on the

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 2>snake pet there, I think.

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Which I respect trying to fit trying to shoe hardest

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:20.280
<v Speaker 3>narrative into question.

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I actually think Coacher is a guy that that could

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 2>play well yea like a shorter hitter that hits it

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:30.440
<v Speaker 2>really straight and is a really good iron player. Like

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 2>that is him. Cooch might be might be h somebody

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that's really flying under the radar. Let's see what else

0:57:42.720 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 2>we got here? Whose career Steve Stricker or Jim Furick.

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh Man? Who did this question come from?

0:57:57.360 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Ken Ryan from Milwaukee?

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's what That's what I was gonna get at,

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 4>because I was like, I don't think that this is

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 4>this doesn't just feels like a very biased question.

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think it's close, right, like seven and

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:15.680
<v Speaker 1>six at least.

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Alight. Alright, here's a good one, and I promise.

0:58:19.800 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I will letting the biases show through.

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't bring this up, I promised earlier, but this

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 2>question is so good from the tour saucy air. How

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 2>many putts inside three feet little LESSI mess, Oh.

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the thing. If they get some rain, maybe

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that maybe some of that spice will be taken out

0:58:38.520 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of the greens. I don't know.

0:58:42.080 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I I'll whatever it is, I'll take the over, whatever,

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 4>whatever the number is. You said it that I'm gonna

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 4>take the over.

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say he's gonna have he's gonna have a

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 2>great week. He's gonna have less than four messages, less

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 2>than one around.

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I just watching him last last year with DJ,

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:08.720
<v Speaker 1>who was just like a fan.

0:59:09.080 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Him and like Billy Foster were just there to like

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:14.680
<v Speaker 3>run interference with the USGA, Like I mean, he was

0:59:14.760 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 3>ejected by like the seventh pole, so they literally served

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 3>no purpose out there. He's like a marker, just running

0:59:20.720 --> 0:59:23.040
<v Speaker 3>interference on the USGA felt bad for him.

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, I's a very incriminating text from Andy that

0:59:28.160 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to roll out with the times appropriate. Feels

0:59:31.480 --> 0:59:34.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of like the like Koby to the alleged Koby tapes.

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to roll out there right at the right time.

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 4>So you guys follow me on Twitter at dj PI.

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want to see some of this stuff come out.

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not always cracked, and he's not always cracked up

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to be.

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:52.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was. I was rolling through last year's

0:59:52.240 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 2>open on Wikipedia and it had like, you know, all

0:59:56.720 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the leader's cards and at the bottom it was west

0:59:59.360 --> 1:00:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Woods and it was just it was ugly to look at.

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:06.640
<v Speaker 2>But I really think Westwood could play well here.

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. Actually I think he will too. Actually I'm

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous about it.

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Again, the point still stands at like, I don't do

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:18.360
<v Speaker 4>not see a universe in which he wins, but I

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 4>do think he'll play well.

1:00:20.480 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, so we got our we'll kick off overrated, underrated,

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>we got our first write end and back to Westwood.

1:00:29.240 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I was already onto this. But maybe a thirty six

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>hole leader bet would be good for Watswood.

1:00:37.560 --> 1:00:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally, But again that's not the point. That's not

1:00:40.480 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 4>what started this whole thing. Like I think he could

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:45.400
<v Speaker 4>take the thirty six hold lead at every tournament he plays.

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not the issue. You keep ducking the real issue.

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll see what happens on Sunday.

1:00:56.000 --> 1:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>We will.

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, overrated it underrated and Barry w coming in

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>hot with a write and overrated underrated. I love that.

1:01:07.080 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You know the NLU mergans are yeah, yeah, he.

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 2>He wants to know the USGA overrated, underrated.

1:01:18.560 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh well, I'm gonna go back to my original point

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:22.680
<v Speaker 4>and say underrated. I think they I think there's a

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:26.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of Look, they in a tournament that should be

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 4>like one of the least exciting, you know, just based

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 4>on kind of like fireworks and and uh, you know,

1:01:33.080 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 4>fun stuff happening on the golf course. It should kind

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 4>of be the least exciting thing, and it's always like

1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:40.160
<v Speaker 4>the most exciting week. And I think that's because of them.

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, I think they know what they're doing.

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>As as someone who bathes himself in content every day,

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>it's good for good for content, you know, they just

1:01:50.600 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>one week a year, can't take this every week. But

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I think they know what they're doing.

1:01:55.200 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Underrated all right, and then he wrote he gave us

1:02:00.000 --> 1:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of them here.

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, great, all right.

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The Thumb's nickname, I'm very underrated, underrated, the Thumb's chance.

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Big Randy.

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the Thumb is John Rahm. For anybody that's

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:21.080
<v Speaker 2>made it this far that doesn't know who the Thumb is.

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>That's the stroke of genius by Big Randy.

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:27.080
<v Speaker 2>The Thumb's chances this week?

1:02:28.640 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Can John Ram win? It was a joke. Yes, he

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>could definitely win. Underrated, I'm gonna say slightly overrated.

1:02:43.440 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 4>And I'm gonna say that because, like I know, he's

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:49.120
<v Speaker 4>won at Tory Pines, and I mean it's it's not

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 4>like he's, you know, not gonna win. But the last

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:54.439
<v Speaker 4>couple of times I think he's gotten in contention, he's

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>gotten a little he's been running a little too hot,

1:02:57.480 --> 1:02:59.720
<v Speaker 4>I think, and he just like it's been kind of

1:02:59.760 --> 1:03:00.440
<v Speaker 4>a bad luck.

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, light up dot com ye thoughts the Central

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Ohio Fitness Regimen.

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Not a fan.

1:03:10.280 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 4>And that was even on like Thursday, I mean, like

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:15.960
<v Speaker 4>at even at the match play where like he looks

1:03:15.960 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 4>like he couldn't lose. He came out in that match

1:03:18.200 --> 1:03:20.840
<v Speaker 4>against DJ and just like pressed way too hard or

1:03:20.880 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 4>something and just was making these mistakes he wasn't making

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>all week. I think that stuff just like takes time

1:03:26.360 --> 1:03:27.560
<v Speaker 4>to get comfortable with.

1:03:27.680 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure, yeah, I agree some somewhat. Yeah, I don't know.

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I think he's he hits it so good and drives

1:03:38.840 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>it so well and touched pretty well and the irons

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 2>so well. It's you know, he's it's gonna be a

1:03:45.680 --> 1:03:49.240
<v Speaker 2>very rare week when he's not in contention, you know, yeah,

1:03:53.000 --> 1:03:53.439
<v Speaker 2>let's see.

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

1:03:54.120 --> 1:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the big thing with rom is starting to

1:03:56.080 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>cash in more, you know, yeah, but he's so young.

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And then uh, you know, I came up with some

1:04:03.560 --> 1:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>overrated and underrated moving on from from big part.

1:04:07.960 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>The freelance.

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Brass, oh just brought worst Yeah, underrated, overrated?

1:04:19.280 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You think overrated? Yeah, I think.

1:04:21.320 --> 1:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>I think like the ratio of finding a good bra,

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Like when you find a good one that's been cooked

1:04:27.040 --> 1:04:29.960
<v Speaker 3>properly for a long, low and slow, it's like, you know,

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:32.840
<v Speaker 3>it exceeds anything else that you know I could do

1:04:32.920 --> 1:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>on it.

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Grow, but like you's so rare to find them.

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's just a lot of riff raff too

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:39.440
<v Speaker 3>often overrated.

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so yeah, that's a that's a fair take. I'm

1:04:43.680 --> 1:04:45.400
<v Speaker 4>still gonna say underrated. I think that a lot of

1:04:45.400 --> 1:04:48.960
<v Speaker 4>people uh poo poo them a little bit too much

1:04:49.520 --> 1:04:51.840
<v Speaker 4>without really giving them the due course.

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But uh yeah, I mean I'm a huge fan.

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll go with uh I would say with Bratt. I'm

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with my uncle. If he was listening to this,

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 2>he would hate it. But I'm gonna say they're overrated.

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, it could be my proximity to the Wisconsin border,

1:05:15.760 --> 1:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>but you know, like, you know, I was at Aaron

1:05:18.800 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Hills on Sunday and you know, this is very very

1:05:22.760 --> 1:05:27.600
<v Speaker 2>nice Wisconsin volunteer like rolled up on me and was like,

1:05:28.440 --> 1:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you gotta try one of these brats. They're the best

1:05:31.240 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>things ever.

1:05:32.280 --> 1:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You know.

1:05:32.840 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, I noticed that with a lot of things.

1:05:35.080 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>If you ever noticed how people like will just be

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:40.280
<v Speaker 2>like this is the best burger ever, or this is

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>the best red wine ever. It's like, what does that

1:05:43.760 --> 1:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>even mean?

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 4>People have no capacity for context? Yeah, yeah, so what's

1:05:50.320 --> 1:05:53.440
<v Speaker 4>the best what's the what's the best Wisconsin thing?

1:05:55.880 --> 1:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>See? In general, I love Wisconsin, by the way, I'm like,

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm in there more than anywhere.

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Else way in Wisconsin, like a little micro brew up there,

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 3>a little light. Yeah, totally, it's just totally totally underrated.

1:06:13.160 --> 1:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, Ribbon Blue Ribbon Award winner that comes

1:06:18.440 --> 1:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>out of there that I really like to let me tell,

1:06:21.440 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 2>drinking in Milwaukee, like going to Milwaukee for a night out.

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>If like you're looking for somewhere that you can just

1:06:29.000 --> 1:06:33.040
<v Speaker 2>go have a great time Milwaukee, that's awesome.

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>My brother went to Marquette, don't man plenty of times.

1:06:36.640 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>That's great, great things.

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to go out, That's might be one of the

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>best things about Wisconsin. But their their golf is really

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:50.920
<v Speaker 2>good too, very very underrated. The thing is is that

1:06:51.000 --> 1:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>everybody looks at you know, Aaron Hills and now sand

1:06:56.520 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Valley and Cohler, but Lasonia. Uh, it's like that hidden

1:07:02.280 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 2>gem of the of the golf world. It's like this

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:11.479
<v Speaker 2>fantastic Golden Age golf course that is just so good

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and for some reason, it's probably because they don't pay

1:07:14.680 --> 1:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>any magazine to cover them, but they just go unnoticed,

1:07:19.160 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>like and they get overlooked time. Everything is so good.

1:07:23.000 --> 1:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'd rather I'd rather play there than Whistling Straights. Yeah,

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>so that's my that's my Wisconsin delight. Lasonia is the

1:07:37.440 --> 1:07:39.520
<v Speaker 2>most underrated thing about Wisconsin.

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Great, you guys got any over underrated?

1:07:47.000 --> 1:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>The straight list got thrown out there because this is like,

1:07:51.040 --> 1:07:54.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, the week of a pro Tracer. Pro Tracer

1:07:54.960 --> 1:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>overrated or underad Actually sorry, it's not top Tracer. I

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:00.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know if you knew that they're there, or just

1:08:00.560 --> 1:08:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the technology in bed with big parlor games, Top golf,

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Pop Tracer.

1:08:08.880 --> 1:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Man.

1:08:10.040 --> 1:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>That just might have swayed my answer.

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I am yeah, that's right.

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Or no Torons, the one that hates top Golf. I've

1:08:24.520 --> 1:08:27.720
<v Speaker 4>so this is one of those things that like I think,

1:08:27.960 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 4>you know, everybody has a tendency to like freak out about,

1:08:31.600 --> 1:08:34.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, to kind of latch onto this one thing

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 4>and just adopt it.

1:08:35.439 --> 1:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>As like their their rallying cry, you know.

1:08:37.960 --> 1:08:40.360
<v Speaker 4>And I feel like pro Tracer kind of seems like that,

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 4>where everybody like it's something that you know, people start

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:48.120
<v Speaker 4>talking about and then everybody just loses their shit about like.

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we need it more, we need it more, we

1:08:50.000 --> 1:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>need it more. Yeah, and it like seems like it

1:08:53.080 --> 1:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>loses its punch.

1:08:54.720 --> 1:08:57.720
<v Speaker 4>But I totally disagree, and I think we do need

1:08:57.800 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 4>it more and I literally can't get enough, like it

1:09:00.600 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 4>just Bacon was talking about it last week, and I

1:09:03.400 --> 1:09:07.559
<v Speaker 4>mean it's like watching I mean, it'd be like watching football,

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 4>like without the first down line when you could have it,

1:09:10.760 --> 1:09:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Like yeah, it's like totally changes everything, Like it changes

1:09:15.000 --> 1:09:17.680
<v Speaker 4>everything for the announcers. It changes everything for like, you know,

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:19.560
<v Speaker 4>rather than just like kind of watching the ball like

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:21.760
<v Speaker 4>shoot out to the right of the player because the

1:09:21.840 --> 1:09:23.320
<v Speaker 4>cameraman's kind of slightly.

1:09:23.080 --> 1:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>To the right, like you know, it just gives the

1:09:26.439 --> 1:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>whole thing just so much more depth and context.

1:09:30.000 --> 1:09:33.599
<v Speaker 4>Like the perfect example was Dustin last year on eighteen,

1:09:34.880 --> 1:09:37.120
<v Speaker 4>his second shot that he hit, like as soon as

1:09:37.160 --> 1:09:39.800
<v Speaker 4>it left the club face, like you knew it was

1:09:39.920 --> 1:09:42.400
<v Speaker 4>right at the flag, and then you're just like there's

1:09:42.439 --> 1:09:44.720
<v Speaker 4>just that much more anticipation building because you know it's

1:09:44.760 --> 1:09:47.240
<v Speaker 4>going right at it, rather than like you know, just

1:09:47.320 --> 1:09:49.479
<v Speaker 4>kind of waiting to guess and going to the wide

1:09:49.520 --> 1:09:51.560
<v Speaker 4>shot and just kind of seeing where it lands. Like

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:55.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't know again rambling answered, but like I'm all

1:09:55.479 --> 1:09:57.919
<v Speaker 4>in underrated somehow.

1:09:59.280 --> 1:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>It's under until they start putting on chips.

1:10:05.400 --> 1:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. That's fair, you know, it's underrated.

1:10:09.600 --> 1:10:13.559
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of putting it on chips was Golf Channel would

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:16.320
<v Speaker 4>do the I think it was like it was sponsored

1:10:16.360 --> 1:10:19.680
<v Speaker 4>by one of the financial advisory firms like whoever has

1:10:19.760 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>the green line, like TD and Meritrade or something, and

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:26.240
<v Speaker 4>they were doing for like a long time. They were

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:31.519
<v Speaker 4>doing like the Putt projection line like before they putted

1:10:31.920 --> 1:10:35.160
<v Speaker 4>that was the coolest. That's like the coolest aspect of

1:10:35.160 --> 1:10:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the broadcast. It never gets used anymore. And just like

1:10:37.680 --> 1:10:40.240
<v Speaker 4>watching the ball, like actually follow that line and like

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:42.760
<v Speaker 4>as soon as it waivers from it, it misses, like

1:10:43.040 --> 1:10:43.679
<v Speaker 4>that was awesome.

1:10:43.720 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

1:10:46.000 --> 1:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. It's underrated.

1:10:47.439 --> 1:10:51.400
<v Speaker 3>It's just like a ubiquitous and obvious take that you know,

1:10:51.479 --> 1:10:55.439
<v Speaker 3>you kind of you know, ruins it for everybody. But yes,

1:10:55.520 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 3>you can never have enough of it.

1:10:56.640 --> 1:10:58.880
<v Speaker 4>I think without with all the without all the content

1:10:58.920 --> 1:11:01.559
<v Speaker 4>about it, it would be you write so much more

1:11:01.640 --> 1:11:02.479
<v Speaker 4>underrated about it.

1:11:03.200 --> 1:11:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is my first Fox broadcast I watched. I'm

1:11:06.160 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 3>pretty pumped to see it. I'm really pumped.

1:11:08.880 --> 1:11:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Bacon was was telling us about all the tricks

1:11:11.640 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 4>they got out their sleeve. It's gonna be gonna be

1:11:13.520 --> 1:11:13.960
<v Speaker 4>really cool.

1:11:14.439 --> 1:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>What a what a company? Man just just pumping pumping

1:11:18.280 --> 1:11:19.799
<v Speaker 2>influencers like DJ.

1:11:19.760 --> 1:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Paia exactly you. I'm like one of his surrogates, just sitting.

1:11:26.880 --> 1:11:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Here spewing the fox.

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>No, it's gonna be great, man. That was like one

1:11:31.040 --> 1:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of those.

1:11:32.560 --> 1:11:34.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was kind of the thing everybody lost their

1:11:34.560 --> 1:11:37.640
<v Speaker 4>mind about the first The first year was like, you know,

1:11:37.720 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 4>the small everything that they got wrong was like such

1:11:39.880 --> 1:11:42.519
<v Speaker 4>a small thing that was like such an easy fix,

1:11:42.800 --> 1:11:45.400
<v Speaker 4>and like if you just looked at like the bones

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:47.080
<v Speaker 4>of what they had, it was clear that like they

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:50.080
<v Speaker 4>were gonna they were gonna get so much better so quickly,

1:11:50.160 --> 1:11:52.360
<v Speaker 4>and like last year's badcast was awesome.

1:11:52.560 --> 1:11:54.599
<v Speaker 2>Like getting Greg Norman out of the booth.

1:11:55.000 --> 1:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Just it wasn't great. Immediate op rated, underrated.

1:12:03.560 --> 1:12:08.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh this is a tough one. I almost say he's

1:12:08.800 --> 1:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>underrated because of how much people hate him.

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:15.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't get him. I love I'm all in on it,

1:12:15.800 --> 1:12:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I like him.

1:12:17.560 --> 1:12:20.639
<v Speaker 3>I think he's underrated because of like Andy said, although

1:12:20.720 --> 1:12:23.000
<v Speaker 3>like everyone thinks he hates their team.

1:12:23.080 --> 1:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just ridiculous.

1:12:26.120 --> 1:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I go back and forth because sometimes

1:12:30.200 --> 1:12:32.840
<v Speaker 2>he just annoys the crap crap out. I mean, I mean,

1:12:33.280 --> 1:12:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I am a Cubs and Bears fan, and he is

1:12:37.560 --> 1:12:41.799
<v Speaker 2>a Cardinals and Packers fan, like those are known things,

1:12:43.960 --> 1:12:47.799
<v Speaker 2>so like literally when he does games, he's rooting against

1:12:47.920 --> 1:12:48.400
<v Speaker 2>my team.

1:12:48.800 --> 1:12:52.360
<v Speaker 3>But that being said, well, I'm an Indians fan, and

1:12:52.560 --> 1:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>everyone in Cleveland thought, like, you know, he and Kyle

1:12:56.280 --> 1:12:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Schwarber had inappropriate relationship and just had to weed through

1:13:00.040 --> 1:13:00.679
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff.

1:13:00.800 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 2>It's funny because stop everybody, he hates our team. Everybody

1:13:05.479 --> 1:13:08.000
<v Speaker 2>in Chicago said the same thing about the Indians.

1:13:08.800 --> 1:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, it's I.

1:13:11.720 --> 1:13:16.679
<v Speaker 4>Think people always people always say he's he's smug or whatever,

1:13:16.800 --> 1:13:19.720
<v Speaker 4>and I think what really resonates with me is just

1:13:19.840 --> 1:13:22.559
<v Speaker 4>kind of his like he's almost got this like kind

1:13:22.640 --> 1:13:25.720
<v Speaker 4>of nihilism about the fact that like sports don't really

1:13:25.760 --> 1:13:29.400
<v Speaker 4>matter all that much, which just speaks like directly to

1:13:29.520 --> 1:13:29.920
<v Speaker 4>my soul.

1:13:30.160 --> 1:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And I love watching it.

1:13:31.720 --> 1:13:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Just everything he says is just kind of like, oh

1:13:33.439 --> 1:13:37.760
<v Speaker 4>my gosh, what an possibly huge moment this is.

1:13:38.080 --> 1:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's like it's just all dripping with sarcasm. It

1:13:41.080 --> 1:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>feels like I love it.

1:13:42.400 --> 1:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm all in on that, all right, well out on

1:13:47.640 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Joe Bach. I think we'll rap it here.

1:13:51.960 --> 1:13:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Do we want to make predictions or no? Yeah, sure,

1:13:55.920 --> 1:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>make your prediction. I already said Speed. I'm in on speed.

1:13:58.760 --> 1:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I just want to hear who you be like when

1:14:00.360 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you distill it down one name, I was gonna say speed,

1:14:05.080 --> 1:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>let me let me you can take Speed, go for it,

1:14:10.560 --> 1:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>drink the numbers, crunch the numbers. How about Rosie? Second? Yo?

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So I love that I'm sitting, you know, telling you

1:14:24.120 --> 1:14:26.599
<v Speaker 2>how much I like Speace all week DJ and then

1:14:26.680 --> 1:14:28.800
<v Speaker 2>you just take my pick right from me?

1:14:29.840 --> 1:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? And now what am I?

1:14:32.000 --> 1:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>What am I supposed to do?

1:14:34.920 --> 1:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'll go, I mean I'll take I'll take who

1:14:39.720 --> 1:14:41.559
<v Speaker 1>would you take? Dustin or Speed? Straight up?

1:14:42.160 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I take Speed, but I uh, I'll take Dustin. That's

1:14:46.040 --> 1:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>who I'm gonna pick for my one and done because

1:14:47.800 --> 1:14:51.679
<v Speaker 2>I already burned speed, So I'll take Dusty.

1:14:52.720 --> 1:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, there you have it.

1:14:54.920 --> 1:14:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Hey, what are we betting on this? On this Westy Leashman?

1:14:59.200 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I kind of really like a Polishman this week too.

1:15:01.600 --> 1:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I like Leachman this week too. I think it would

1:15:03.400 --> 1:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be good bet. I think just let it roll the

1:15:06.439 --> 1:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>standard bet.

1:15:07.479 --> 1:15:12.559
<v Speaker 2>All right, just just be expecting a venmo yeah exactly

1:15:12.680 --> 1:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>from me. Yeah? Alright, alright, guys, hey enjoyed it. Thanks

1:15:19.000 --> 1:15:21.479
<v Speaker 2>for coming on. You were you were an admirable, if

1:15:21.600 --> 1:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>not superior, replacement to the all right.

1:15:26.200 --> 1:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I could never be, could never fill that void, but

1:15:29.120 --> 1:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you have me on