WEBVTT - Ep11 "What does dreaming have to do with the rotation of the planet?"

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.239
<v Speaker 1>What do your nightly dreams have to do with the

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>rotation of the planet. Why are so many musicians blind?

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Can blind people learn how to echolocate like a bat?

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Once we find alien life on other planets, should we

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>expect that aliens have dreams at night? Welcome to Inner

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Cosmos with me, David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and an

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>author at Stanford University, and I've spent my whole career

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>studying the intersection between how the brain works and how

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we experience life. I sort of personally have a love

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>hate relationship with dreaming because we take it so seriously.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 1>We find ourselves in some biziz situation that doesn't make

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>any sense, but while you are there, you buy it,

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>hook line and sinker. You are emotionally tossed around and

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>buffeted in the winds of situations that the moment after

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you wake up you realize weren't real, and more importantly,

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they typically make no sense at all. So why were

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you so caught up in that situation? I've always called

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>dreaming sticking my head in the night blender, by which

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I simply mean that I don't necessarily look forward to

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it because I don't know where it's going to take me,

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and I generally feel that all that emotional energy I

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>expend isn't that useful. But whatever your take on dreaming is,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those absolutely insanely bizarre facts about our

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>existence that we totally take for granted. You wake up

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and you say, oh, wow, I was just having a

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>dance party with a pack of why monkeys. Or I

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was just at work where I forgot to put on

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>pants and I was trying to hide behind my desk.

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Or I was on a river cruise and begging a

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>person not to break up with me even though we're

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>not even dating. And I find this absolutely stunning that

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even bother us that we've just transitioned from

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>one reality to another, Like in one second, you went

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>from being in some bizarre situation to lying horizontal in

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>your bed, and we're so used to it that we

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just say, oh, that was interesting. I just dreamed that

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I was on a hang glider riding over Istanbul and

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to figure out how not to crash

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>because there were a lot of pigeons swirling around me.

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 2>And if there's somebody there, then maybe we tell them.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Our dream and Otherwise, we just get up and we

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>brush our teeth and go about our day without even

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>giving a second thought about what just happened. We were

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in one reality and totally emotional invested in it, and

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>then a moment later we said, hmm, I guess I'm

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>in this other reality now. Now this is a testament

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to the human mind's ability to accept the absolutely amazing

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and bizarre as something not even worth investigating.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Think about it this way.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Just imagine if dreams happened right in the middle of

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>your day. So you're on a walk, or you're sitting

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>at your desk or eating at a restaurant with friends,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly your reality morphs to a completely bizarre other reality,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and now you're on a street you've never seen before,

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>or you're flying, or you're falling from a building, or

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you're being chased by a monster. You would be terrified

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>by this lack of cohesion in your reality, the fact

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that you just flipped from one to another. And as

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>soon as you were back in this reality, you'd presumably

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>run to your doctor and say you just had this

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>bizarre hallucination and thought you were somewhere else or maybe

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>someone else, and you'd be terrified, But because we're so

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>used to dreaming, we wake up and we think, oh,

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that was weird, and then we go.

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>About our new reality.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, one of the evergreen questions among philosophers

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is whether we live in a simulation. And I'm going

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>to dive deep into that question in a different episode,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>but for now, I'll just mention the question, which is,

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>how would you know if you are a brain in

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a vat who is being stimulated in just the right

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>way to think that you're listening to a podcast and

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing the world around you and eating.

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Delicious food and so on.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Or the modern version of that is whether we are

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 1>living in a computer simulation. So I suggest the mere

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>existence of dreams is sufficient to prove that all this

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>could be a simulation, because dreams demonstrate to us so

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly that we completely buy what ever reality we find

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in, and when we find ourselves in another reality,

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we say, oh, I guess that one wasn't real.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 2>I was fooled, but this is real.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>But let me leave that as a teaser for the

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>episode on whether we're living in a simulation and how

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we'd know. For today, I want to dive into dreaming

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular, and from the brain's point.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Of view, why do we dream?

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Why does our consciousness go on these bizarre flights every

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>ninety minutes during the night. So as a neuroscientist, I've

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>always been fascinated by dreaming, by what.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>The heck this is all about.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>So in this episode, we're going to talk about the why,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to tell you about some hypotheses that

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>people have proposed over the centuries, and then I'm going

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about a new hypothesis that makes quantitative

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>predictions across animal species. So let's start with an interesting fact,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>which is that all animals appear to have dream sleep,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>also as REM sleep. REM is spelled r EM, and

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it stands for rapid eye movement. So in this stage

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of sleep, the eyes are darting back and forth under

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the eyelids. And if you haven't really watched someone while

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they're sleeping, you should in a respectful manner because you'll

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>see how amazing this is. Every ninety minutes or so,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>their eyes start jiggling back and forth. Now here's the

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>cool part. If you wake them up right when this

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is happening and you say, quick, what were you just

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>thinking about? They will tell you that they were just

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>riding a camel in a shopping mall, or they were

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>running from a pack of leprechauns, or they were flying

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>around their house or whatever. And this is how we know,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>from years of experiments of waking people up at different

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>stages of sleep, this is how we know that rem

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>sleep is when dreams happen. Because if you wake someone

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>up during a deeper stage of sleep, what we call

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>stage one or two or three, when their eyes are

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>not moving, and you say, quick, what were you just

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, they'll generally say nothing at all, there was

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing going on in my consciousness. Now, for completeness, I'll

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>just flag that some people will point out there can

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of dreaming during non rem sleep, but

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a very different type of dreaming. When it happens,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just a feeling of something like a simple thought,

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>rather than a vivid experience like we typically think of

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with dreams with its whirl of color and activity and

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>magnified emotions. Now, just a quick side note, some people

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>say I don't dream at night, but in fact you do.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody does. It's just a matter of waking up at

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the right time. So if I snuck into your house

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and woke you up right when you were having rapid

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>eye movement sleep. You'd say, WHOA, I was just dreaming.

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But what often happens is that we enjoy a round

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of dream sleep and then we sink back into a

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>deeper sleep, so by the time we wake up, we

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>don't remember the dream. So some people get up in

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the morning and they're convinced that they didn't dream at all,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>while in fact they did, they simply don't remember it. Now,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the question I want to address is why we dream?

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And the first clue comes from a simple observation that

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this is not just a human thing, but something about

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>brains in general. You've seen your dog have dreams where

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>she kicks her legs around and barks like she's chasing

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>a rabbit. But it turns out that all mammals dream,

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and all birds and reptiles they all exhibit rem sleep.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Even fish have a form of rem sleep. So why

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is this so conserved across the whole animal kingdom. While

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>there are various ideas that have been proposed for why

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we dream, some researchers point out that dream sleep seems

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to be important for memory consolidation, which means nailing down

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the memories that you take in during the day. So

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you run around during the day with your eyes open

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and you experience all kinds of new things.

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 2>And the idea is that when you sleep and.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Dream, you are nailing that down and taking out the

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>neural trash in a way that's necessary and useful for

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>locking down the memories.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 2>Another popular idea has been that.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Dreams help us solve problems because the brain is able

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to process information and make connections that are not possible

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>during waking hours. So the idea is that the brain

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is in a more relaxed state during dream sleep. It's

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not as focused on the external world, and this allows

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it to focus on internal thoughts and ideas, which can

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>lead to new insights and solutions to problems. And in fact,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>studies have shown that if you are trying to solve

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem and you go to sleep, you're more likely

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to solve it when you wake up than if you're

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about it during the daytime. And if you're

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>deprived of dream sleep, you have more difficulty solving problems.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But of course this might be related to problems of

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sleep in general. Others suggest that rem sleep is involved

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more generally in creativity, and others talk about its role

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in emotional processing. And finally, several thinkers have suggested that

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>dreams help us prepare for new situations like fighting or

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>escaping from situations, because these are things that we experience

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in real life very rarely, and so the idea is

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that dreams give us practice at these rare situations.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>They keep the wheels greased.

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to be clear that these are

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>all hypotheses for why we dream, and they're not exclusive.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Dreams might serve multiple roles, so it's not as though

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one of these has to be right at the expense

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of others. But the first thing that I hope is

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>clear is that there's a lot of speculation about dreams,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>but we don't really have a single theory that would

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>qualify as the answer to why we dream. And certainly

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a theory that allows us to look

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>across the animal kingdom to answer a different question, which

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is why do different animal species, even those who are

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>closely related, dream different amounts. For example, if you look

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>at the vervet monkey and it's total sleeping time, it

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>only spends six percent of that sleep time in rem

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>In other words, having dreams, whereas another monkey, the Reesus

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>macaque monkey, spends eighteen percent of its time in rem sleep,

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>three times as much, even though they're both primate species.

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's never been clear to me how any of

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the hypotheses previously proposed would account for any of this.

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But recently, my colleague and I proposed a very new

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of theory about dreaming, and it's one that I'm

0:11:56.160 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>very excited about because it gives accurate quantity tative predictions

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>across species, something that no other hypothesis even strives to do.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But before I tell you about that, I need to

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>lay some foundation. So let's start with the story of

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a young boy named Ronnie who was born blind. He

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>was born in North Carolina, and when he was just

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>past year old, his mother abandoned him. She said that

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>his blindness was her punishment from God. So he ended

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up being raised in poverty by his grandparents until he

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was five, and then he was sent off to a

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>school for the sightless. When he was six years old,

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>his mother came by just once and she had another child,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>now a little girl, and his mother said, ron I

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>want you to feel her eyes. You know, her eyes

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are so pretty she didn't shame me the way that

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you did. She can see, and that was the last

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>time he ever had contact with his mother. So most

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of us can't even imagine a childhood this hard. But

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the silver lining became the fact that Ronnie had a

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gift for music. His instructors spotted this talent and he

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>started to formally study classical music with the violin, and

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in no time, this kid was a virtuoso.

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 2>And from there he went.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>On to master guitar and piano and several other string

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and woodwind instruments, and by the time he grew into

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>young adulthood, he became one of the most popular performers

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of his day. His name was Ronnie Millsap, and you

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>may or may not have heard of him, but in

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the seventies and eighties he dominated pop music and country

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>western markets. He released thirty five country music hits at

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the number one slot, and he.

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Earned six Grammy Awards.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Now you might think it's amazing that Ronnie Millsap could

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>be blind and have such an amazing musical career, but

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this is actually not such an uncommon story. Think of

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Andrea about or Ray, Charles Stevie Wonder, or Diane Shore

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or Jose Feliciano or Jeff Healy. All of them are blind.

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>For all of them, their brains learned to rely on

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the signals of sound and touch in their environment, and

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they became better at processing those signals then cited people.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>As I write about my book Live Wired, Musical stardom

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is not guaranteed for people who are blind, but brain

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>reorganization is guaranteed because if a sense is not getting used,

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like vision, it gets taken over by neighboring senses. There's

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing special about the cells, the neurons in the visual

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>cortex at the back of your brain. They are simply

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>neurons that happened to be involved in processing edges or

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>colors for people who have functioning eyes. But if you

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>go blind, these exact same neurons can process other types

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of information, So the territory gets redeployed. It gets taken

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>over by hearing and by touch, and you get better

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>at those other senses. For Ronnie Millsap, his visual cortex

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.479
<v Speaker 1>was not getting used because his eyes were not functioning,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so these other brain areas took over and he got

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>better at those as a result. Perfect musical pitch, for example,

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is much more common in the blind population, and blind

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>people are up to ten times better at determining whether

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a musical pitch is subtly wobbling up and down.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.119
<v Speaker 2>Why, it's just because.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They have more brain territory devoted to the task of listening.

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>There was a recent experiment in which people who were

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>sighted or blind had one ear plugged up, and then

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they were asked to point to the locations of sounds

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in the room and pinpointing where a sound is coming

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>from normally requires a comparison of the signals at both years,

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So it was expected that everyone would fail miserably at

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this task, and that's what happened with the people who

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>could see. But for the blind participants, they were able

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to generally tell where the sounds were positioned. How it's

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because the exact shape of the cartilage of the outer ear,

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>even just one ear, it bounces sound around in subtle

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>ways that gives clues to location, but only if one

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is highly attuned to pick up on those very subtle signals.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So people with sight, they have less cortex devoted to sound,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and so their ability to extract subtle sound information it's underdeveloped,

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But with blind people that skill gets developed. And this

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of extreme talent with sound, this is common among

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the blind. Take a young man named Ben Underwood. When

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he was two years old, Ben stopped seeing out of

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>his left eye and his mother took him to the

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>doctor and they soon discovered that he had retinal cancer

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that was in both eyes. So they tried chemotherapy, they

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>tried radiation, but that didn't work, and finally the surgeons

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>had to remove both of his eyes. And you can

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>imagine the pain that the family went through here. But

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>by the time Ben was seven years old, he devised

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a technique that was totally unexpected and unbelievably useful, which

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>is that he would click with his mouth and he

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>would listen for the returning echoes. And in this way

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>he could hear the locations of an open doorway, or

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>of a person, or of a parked car, or a

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>garbage can and so on. He was echo locating. He

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was bouncing his sound waves off objects in the environment,

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and he was listening to what returned. Now, I saw

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a documentary about Ben a little while ago, and it

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>kicked off with the statement that Ben was quote the

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>only person in the world who can see with echolocation. Now,

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we don't really know if he's seeing

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that you and I might.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Think of site.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>But much more importantly, Ben was not the only one

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>using echolocation. Thousands of blind people do this. In fact,

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the phenomenon has been discussed since at least the nineteen forties,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>when the word echolocation was first coined in an article

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Science, and this was titled Echolocation by

0:18:54.800 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Blind Men, bat and Radar. The author wrote, quote, many

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>blind persons develop, in the course of time a considerable

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>ability to avoid obstacle by means of auditory cues received

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>from sounds of their own making. And this included clicking

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>or their own footsteps, or cane tapping or finger snapping.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So the author demonstrated that their ability to echo locate

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>was drastically reduced if you put in distracting noises or

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>put ear plugs in them. Anyway, the general story is straightforward.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>If a sense is not getting used, it gets taken

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>over by neighboring senses. So, for example, if you're blind,

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the territory gets redeployed to hearing and to touch. There's

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>nothing special about the neurons and the visual cortex. They

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>just happen to be involved in processing vision if you

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have functioning eyes, but if you go blind, these exact

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>same neurons can process other types of information. Now, in

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>recent decades, there have been thousands of papers demonstrating brain plasticity,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that is, the brain's ability to reconfigure and adjust its

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>own circuitry, And in my book Livewireed, I attempt to

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>build up frameworks to surface the big lessons from these papers.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But to my mind, the biggest surprise about brain plasticity

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is its speed. So some years ago, researchers at McGill

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>University took several adults who had recently lost their site,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and they put them into a brain scanner and the

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>participants were asked to listen to sounds. Now, not surprisingly,

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the sounds caused activity in their auditory cortex, but the

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds also caused activity in their occipital core.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Text that's at the back of the brain.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's normally what we would think of as visual cortex,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and that activity would not have been seen there even

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks earlier when the participants had sight. Now,

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the activity wasn't as strong as that scene in people

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>who have been blowing for a long time. But it

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was detectable in the occipital cortex nonetheless, and this demonstrated

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that the brain can implement changes rapidly when vision disappears,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>but how rapidly so. Next, my colleagues at Harvard, led

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>by Alvaro pascal Leone, began to wonder about the speed

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at which these major takeovers can happen, and they noted

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that instructors at a school for the blind were required

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to blindfold themselves for seven full days so that they

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>could gain a first hand understanding of their students' living experiences.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So when these cited instructors blindfolded themselves, they became aware

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>of enhanced skills with sounds. They could orient to things better,

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>and they could judge their distance, and they could identify things.

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Several described identifying people more rapidly and accurately just as

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>they started talking, or even just given the cadence of

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>their footsteps, And the instructions learned new things like how

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to differentiate cars just by the sounds of their motors.

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>So this god pascal Leone and his colleagues, considering what

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>would happen if a sighted person were blindfolded in.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>The laboratory for several days.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So they launched this experiment and what they found was

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>nothing short of remarkable. They discovered that when you were

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>temporarily blinded, there was neural reorganization, just like we see

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>in blind subjects, and it was rapid. In one of

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>their studies, people who could see normally were blindfolded for

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>five days and they were put through intensive braille training,

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of the five days, the subjects

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>had become quite good at detecting the subtle differences between

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>braille characters, much better than a control group of cited

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>participants who had the same training without the blindfold. But

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>what was especially striking was what happened to their brains

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 1>when you measured them in the scanner. Within fire five days,

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the blindfolded participants had recruited their occipital cortex when they

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>were touching objects. So control subjects, not surprisingly used only

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a different part of their brain called the somatisensory cortex,

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and the blindfolded subjects they were also showing these occipital

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>responses to sounds and words.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, you.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Could disrupt this new occipital lobe activity by magnetic pulses,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the braille reading advantage of the blindfolded subjects

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>went away, so that indicates the recruitment of the brain

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>area was not an accidental side effect, but this was

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>a critical piece of the improved behavioral performance. And importantly,

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>because of the plasticity of the brain, when the blindfold

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>got removed, the response of the occipital.

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Cortext to touch or sound.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>That disappeared within a day, and at that point the participants'

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>brains returned to looking indistinguishable from every other sighted person

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>out there. Now here's the key study that really influenced me.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>These same investigators very carefully mapped out the brain using

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more powerful neuroimaging techniques. So volunteers were blindfolded really tightly,

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were put in the scanner and they were

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>asked to perform a touching task that required really fine

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>discrimination with their fingers. And what these investigators saw was

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>activity emerging in the primary visual cortex the occipital lobe

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>after an hour. And the shock of these findings was

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>their sheer speed. So the reorganization of territory that brains do,

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the glacial drifting of continental plates, but

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it can be remarkably fast. The brain is always sprung

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tight like a mouse trap to implement rapid change.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 2>So the key is that the brain's changes.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Are even fast sure than even the most optimistic neuroscientist

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>would have dared to guess at the beginning of this century.

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's zoom back out to the bigger picture. So

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for survival you need things like sharp teeth and fast legs.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You also need neural flexibility. This is what allows brains

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to optimize their performance in a variety of environments. But

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the competition in the brain has a potential downside as well,

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>which is this, whenever there's an imbalance of activity in

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the senses, a potential takeover can happen, and that can

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>happen really rapidly, So a redistribution of the resources that

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>can be really useful when a limb has been lost

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>or a sense has been lost. But the rapid conquest

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>of territory, you might have to actively counterbalance this in

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>other scenarios. And this consideration led me and my former

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>student Dawn Vaughan to propose a new theory for what

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>happens to brains in the dark of the night. So

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>now we're back to the main question of this episode.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>What does dreaming have to do with the rotation of

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the planet. And this is one of the unsolved mysteries

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in neurosciences.

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 2>Why brains dream?

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>What these bizarre nighttime hallucinations are about.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Do they have meaning?

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they simply random neural activity in search of a

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>coherent narrative? And why are dreams so richly visual igniting

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the occipital cortex every night in this conflagration of activity.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 2>So here's our idea.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>In the chronic and unforgiving competition for brain real estate,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the visual system has a unique problem to deal with.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Because of the rotation of the planet, we are cast

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>into darkness for an average of twelve hours every cycle.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, I'm referring to ninety nine point nine nine

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of our species evolutionary history. I'm not talking

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>about the current electricity blessed times. So it used to

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be really, really dark at night. And I just told

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you about how sensory deprivation triggers neighboring territories in the

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>brain to take over. So how does the visual system

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:28.479
<v Speaker 1>deal with this unfair disadvantage? And we suggest that it

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>does so by keeping the occipital cortex active during the night.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We suggest that dreaming exists to keep the visual cortex

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 1>from being taken over by neighboring areas. Because the rotation

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of the planet doesn't affect your ability to touch and

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>hear and taste and smell, only vision suffers in the dark,

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, the visual cortex finds itself in danger.

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Every night of takeover by the other sense is just

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like with the blindfolded subjects, and given the amazing speed

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>with which these changes in territory can happen, this is

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a real threat. So dreams are the means by which

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the visual cortex prevents takeover. So to dig into this

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>idea a little more, let's zoom out. Although a sleeper

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>looks relaxed and shut down, the brain is fully electrically active,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>so during most of the night there's no dreaming. But

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>during rem sleep there's a lot of things that happen.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So the heart rate and the breathing speed up, your

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>small muscles twitch, and your brain waves become smaller and faster,

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and dreaming happens.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>REM sleep is triggered by a particular set of neurons

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in the brain stem in a structure called the ponds,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and that travels to a small nucleus in the thalamus,

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and from there, these waves of electrical activity come banging

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>into the occipital cortex at the back of your head.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that's the area of your brain where your visual

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>system is. So when these visual areas become alive with

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>activity in their cells, that is experienced as visual we see.

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's why dreams are pictorial like a film. If

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the activity we're banging into a part of the cortex

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>involved in smell, then dreams would just be a smell story,

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>but it hits the visual area, and so we find

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>ourselves thrown into a movie. Now, if you're seeing all

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stuff, you might wonder why you're not reacting

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to that with your body, And that's because the circuitry

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>involved in dreaming also paralyzes your major muscle groups so

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that you don't act out your dream. You shut down

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your muscles so that you can simulate world experience without

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>actually moving your body around, and that combination crafts the

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>experience of dreaming. The electrical waves slamming into the occipital

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>cortex make your visual system alive with activity, and the

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>muscular paralysis keeps you from acting out the dreams. Now,

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we theorize that the circuitry behind visual dreams is not accidental. Instead,

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to prevent takeover, the visual system is forced to fight

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for its territory by generating these short bursts of activity

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>every ninety minutes or so when the planet rotates into darkness.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a self defense system that evolved in the face

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of constant competition for sensory real estate. Dreams are a

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>screen saver. So the idea is that vision carries mission

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>critical information for the brain, but vision is stolen away

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for half of our hours. It's like we're blindfolded for

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>half our time here on Earth. So dreams, we say, suggest,

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are the strange love child of neural plasticity and the

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>rotation of the planet. Now, one key point to appreciate

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is that these nighttime volleys of activity are very anatomically precise.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>They start in the brain stem and they end up

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in only one place, the occipital cortex. If the circuitry

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of randomly grew its branches, we'd expect it to

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>connect with all kinds of areas in the brain, but

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It aims with anatomical precision at one area alone,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a tiny structure called the lateral geniculate nucleus which broadcasts

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically to the occipital cortex and through a neuroanatomous lens.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>This is really specific circuitry and that suggests an important role,

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and we suggest that role is defense of the visual system.

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So we call this the defensive activation theory. Now, I

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>want to address a question that might be coming up

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for you, which is what about dream content? Why did

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>dreams seem to be about something rather than just random

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dots of light? Well, the important thing to understand is

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that the brain is a natural storyteller. When there's activity

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in there, it shapes that into a story of what

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's seeing. For those of you who know about latent

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>diffusion models in AI, that's exactly the same thing. So

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Dolly two and stable diffusion. These are image generators, and

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>they work by starting with random activity and that coheres

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>into a picture of something in exactly the same way.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>The brain can't see random activity. It has to wrap

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that into something particular that it is seeing. Now, why

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>are dreams a story instead of just a picture? The

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>key is that everything in the brain is linked by association.

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So when you think of a rabbit, that's linked with

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>everything you've ever associated with. Rabbits carrots and shadow puppets

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and the velveteen rabbit and Easter and Alice in Wonderland,

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and maybe a French restaurant that serves rabbit and Roger Rabbit.

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 2>And so on.

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>This is how an associative neural network is structured. Everything

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is linked by association. So what happens during dreams is

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that this random activity gets shot into the visual system

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and synapses that are hot from the day will tend

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to get activated again. But from there the activity will

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to drift along these associative pathways, and that's why

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>dreams seem to have a unifying thread, but they're also

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>characterized by bizarreness. The storyline drifts from thing to thing

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in a way that's not quite like the real world

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's activity that's moving through this associative neural network,

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and we experience whatever is getting triggered in whatever world,

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.719
<v Speaker 1>So it's tied to our experience from the day and

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of the world we know. But it's a very loose

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of story, and the brain is a natural storyteller,

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>so things get tied together as best they can, and

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't overlook the fact that we are storytellers.

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Even after we wake up.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So when you tell your spouse or your friend, wow,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this happened, and then this happened, we can't help but

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>impose a narrative over the images we saw. And so

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the series of images we experienced gets even a

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>stronger storyline put on top of it. And by the way,

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I just want to mention one other thing. You might

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder how it makes sense that sometimes you hear sounds

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or feel touch or have a smell in a dream

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>if the activity is only going into the visual cortex, well,

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that seems to happen sometimes. And that's because although the

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>activity is only going in the visual system, it can

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>cascade out and keep going to other parts of the brain.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Everything is connected to everything else with pretty short pathways.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's important to note that dreams are almost entirely

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>visual because that's the only place where the activity is

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>getting injected. Now, something you might wonder, given this defensive

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 1>activation theory.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 2>That I've described so far, what about blind people?

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Do they have dreams or do you think they have

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 1>no dreaming at all because their brains don't care about

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the light in the dark. The answer is that people

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>who are blind, of course, they have dreams. But if

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been blind from birth or from a very young age,

0:35:54.960 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>they have no visual experience in their dreams because their

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>visual system was taken over by other senses like hearing

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch, and so they have those sensory experiences in

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>their dreams because the activity is still going into the

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>occipital lobe. It's just that that's no longer visual. So

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 1>their dream is something like, I was feeling my way

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>around my living room, but it was weird because someone

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>had rearranged all the furniture.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And then I felt something strange in the corner.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And I realized it was a bear, and I ran

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and I could hear it behind me, and so on

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing. All their experiences in the dream

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>involved sound and touch, but not sight. In those born blind,

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you still have these volleys of spikes blasting into the

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>back of the brain because that's where the circuitry is going,

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but that part of the brain is no longer visual,

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 1>and their experiences are not visual. And this tells us

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that the circuitry underlying dreaming it's very basic, low level circuitry.

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not dependent on the experiences you have during your lifetime,

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and the fundamental nature of this circuitry is also consistent

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that we find it conserved across the

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>animal kingdom. Now, like any scientific idea, the defensive activation

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>theory could be correct or could not be.

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So how would we know.

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, we can start looking at the predictions that come

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>out of this hypothesis. First is just a general observation,

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>which is that you can look at the fall off

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in REM's sleep with age. So the fraction of our

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>sleeping time that we spend in REM steadily decreases as

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we get older. So as an infant you spend half

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>your sleeping time in REM, and as an adult you

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>spend only ten to twenty percent of sleep time in REM,

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and when you're elderly you spend even less. And this

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is consistent with the fact that infant's brains are much

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>more plastic, and so the competition for territory is really intense,

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and as you get older, things settle into place and

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>cortical takeovers are harder to do. So the fall off

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>in plasticity parallels the fall off of time that you

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>spend in REM sleep. And by the way, this fall

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>off in REM is seen across species, so puppies and

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 1>kittens and every kind of baby has more rem sleep. Now,

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this observation by itself isn't proof of anything, but it's

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>an interesting correlation.

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 2>But could we look.

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Across species to see if we can make meaningful predictions

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 1>about which species dreams a lot and which a little.

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>In other words, how much time each species spends in

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>dream time. So the idea is that for a brain

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that is born with a lot of plasticity, a lot

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of flexibility, you need to keep the visual system well

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>protected at night. But some animals are born with a

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>lot less plasticity, Their brains are more ready to go,

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and so the need to have this defensive activation at

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>night would be less. Take primate like the vervet monkey.

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Within three weeks, it learns how to walk, and it

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>stops weaning within four months, and it reaches adolescens in

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>four years and it can reproduce. Now, look at a

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>baby human. We're primates also, But in contrast to the

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>vervet monkey, the human primate doesn't walk for a year,

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't wean until three years, and it doesn't

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>reach adolescens for thirteen years. Why it's because human brains

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>drop into the world half baked, and we're incredibly flexible.

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>That's how we absorb the language and culture and the

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledge around us. We're super flexible, and the consequence is

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that we have an unusually long childhood. But other animals

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>arrive more let's call it pre programmed, and they're just

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>following more basic instructions of eat, mate, run, approach and

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so on. There's no vervet monkey culture to absorb. They

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>don't go to vervet monkey schools so that they can

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>learn about the discoveries of other monkeys before them so

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 1>they can springboard to the next steps. Instead, they live

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.399
<v Speaker 1>essentially the same life as all the generations before them.

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>So different species, even closely related primate species, can have

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>very different levels of plasticity. And the question is how

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>does this translate to the amount of dreaming they do

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>each night. And our hypothesis is that the more plastic

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>species need more dreaming at night to make sure that

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>big changes don't happen and the visual system doesn't get

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>taken over.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 2>If you are a less plastic.

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Species, the brain is essentially more fixed into place and

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there's less risk of takeover of the visual system in

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the darkness. So we studied twenty five primate species and

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 1>we research the plasticity of their brain, or at least

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>correlates of plasticity, like how long it takes for them

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to walk or to wean from their mothers, or how

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>long until they reach adolescence. And we also research the

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>percentage of their sleep time that each species spends in

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>REM sleep. Typically, this is measured by setting up infrared

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>cameras and watching the animals sleep through the night and

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what percentage of their sleep time they have

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this rapid eye movement going on underneath their eyelids. And

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>what's striking is that this varies pretty widely. So the

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>vervet monkey spends six percent of its sleep time in

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 1>REM and then you have a spider monkey spending seven percent,

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and a yellow babboon spending eight percent, and a barbary

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>macaque monkey spending nine percent, all the way to a

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bornean orangutan spending twelve percent, to a chimpanzee spending sixteen percent,

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to a reeseus macaque monkey spending eighteen percent, to humans

0:41:55.640 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 1>spending twenty one percent of their sleeping time in REM. Now,

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>we compiled all this data and we found statistically significant

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>correlations between plasticity and the amount of remsleep In other words,

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the less plastic an animal is, the less remsleep it

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>has during the night, and animals with brains that are

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>more plastic, whose brains have more territory shifting around, they

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have more rem sleep. And by the way, as a control,

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we gathered four other variables across these species, like weight

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and length and how many offspring they have and average lifespan.

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And as expected, all of those measures show no significant

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>correlations with the amount of remsleep, but the measures of

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>how plastic an animal was did correlate, And if you're

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>interested in the details, you can read our scientific publication

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>linked to the podcast website. Now, there are several ways

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to test this framework further. For example, what happens if

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody doesn't get the normal amount of dream sleep. Well,

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, sleep can be suppressed by certain antidepressants.

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>For the cognianty these are monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Anyway,

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the defensive activation theory would predict that if you're not

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>getting adequate rem sleep, you're going to have some sort

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of visual consequences, and so it's interesting that patients on

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:26.760
<v Speaker 1>these medications characteristically get blurry vision. Now this is typically

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>marked up to dry eyes, but I want to note

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>our alternative hypothesis here, which is that it might be

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>related to more takeover of the visual cortex. I don't

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>know for sure that this is true yet, but this

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is a direction the research is going to go. And

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>also we can test across a huge variety of animal species,

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>not just primates. For example, some mammals are born immature,

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they're unable to walk, or get food, or

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>regulate their own temperature, or defend themselves. These are animals

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like humans and ferrets and platypuses. Other mammals are born mature,

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>such as guinea pig or sheep or giraffe. They come

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the womb with teeth and fur and open

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>eyes and ability to regulate their own temperature, and they

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:11.959
<v Speaker 1>walk within an hour of being born, and they eat

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>solid food. So here's the important clue. As a general rule,

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the animals born immature have much more rem sleep, up

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to eight times as much, and this difference is especially

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>clear in the first months of life. In our interpretation,

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>when a highly plastic brain drops into the world, it

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>needs to constantly fight to keep things balanced. But when

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a brain arrives mostly solidify, there's less need for it

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to engage in this nighttime fighting. I just want to

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 1>mention as a caveat that there's likely to be many

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>surprises here because an animal's sleeping and dreaming can be

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>very different depending on lots of other things. For example,

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>take the elephant. They have a really surprisingly small amount

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of rem sleep a few minutes at most, and it

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>first blush, I thought this weighed against our hypothesis, But

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that elephants sleep very little, around two

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 1>hours a night, and they have excellent night vision because

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of specializations in their retinas, and as a result, their

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.800
<v Speaker 1>visual corettix is active during almost all hours of the

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>day and the night, and so that doesn't face the

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>same threat of encroachment from the other senses. So the

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis predicts that elephants should have very little rems sleep.

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So stay tuned on the future of this hypothesis. But

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to take the chance to walk you through

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a few of the details about how you might think

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>about a question like dreaming and come up with new

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>frameworks and then test those. Now, one last idea to

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>close this out, what does our defensive activation theory mean

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for aliens on other planets. In Live, wied I proposed

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>a hypothesis that we won't actually be able to test

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>until the very distant future when we discover life on

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>other planets. Some planet, especially those that are orbiting red

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>dwarf stars, become locked into place such that they always

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have the same surface facing their star. They have permanent

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:12.919
<v Speaker 1>day on one side and permanent night on the other.

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>If life forms on that planet were to have plastic

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>brains that are even vaguely similar to ours, the prediction

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>would be that those on the daylight side of the

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>planet might have vision like us, but they would not

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:30.959
<v Speaker 1>have dreams. They wouldn't need them because they never get

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>plunged into darkness, and the same prediction would apply for

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 1>very fast spinning planets. If their nighttime is shorter than

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the time of a sensory takeover in the brain, then

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>they also wouldn't need dreams. So thousands of years from

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>now we might finally know whether we dreamers are in

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the universal minority.

0:46:57.840 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>That's all for this week.

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 1>To find out more and to share your thoughts, head

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>over to Eagleman dot com, Slash Podcasts, and you can

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>also watch full episodes of Inner Cosmos on YouTube. Subscribe

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to my channel so you can follow along each week

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for new updates. I'd love to hear your questions, so

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>please send those to podcasts at eagleman dot com and

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I will do a special episode where I answer questions.

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Until next time, I'm David Eagleman, signing off to you

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Inner Cosmos.