WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 5/11: Better, worse or same for the Patriots offense, schedule release

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex bar.

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 2>Lazar.

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Everybody nailed it has always bara.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex bars Now he did

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>also play no, No, I want you to take that

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>back right now. Don't get sult that's so insulting to

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Malie Cunningham. He is another. Can we just Danny is

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>closer to me athletically.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 3>That can we just have a team where Malik Cunningham

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 3>is not gonna make or break the season? That's what

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I think I said after after that, I think that's

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 3>what you said.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Why does Mollie Cunningham have to be a thing?

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Why does it have to matter? Okay, but but there's

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the difference between do you.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Think do you think the Eagles who are on the

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 3>TV behind me? So that's why I just thought of it.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Did you think that Eagles are going into training camp

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the UDFA quarterback that they might switch to

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver who might switch to running back, and they're

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 3>going in there saying this guy could be it. This

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 3>could be the first that puts us over the Chiefs

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.279
<v Speaker 3>next year. First of all, because they have DeVante Smith

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>and they have Jalen Hurts playing quarterback, so they they

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>have first world problems. This is we're better than this.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>First of all, we're better than this.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the Eagles quarterback that they might switch

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to whatever is a quarterback who might switch to tight end.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't drafted, not this year, but he wasn't drafted.

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>His name is Tyree Jackson, who at one point was

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 1>one of your favorite playoffs. So you would talk about Jackson.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 3>He was you buff Cam Newton, Yeah, like he was.

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 3>He was that level.

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>There's somewhere out there in the internet. I don't have

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the picture anymore. Somewhere on Twitter. Something is a picture

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of like six foot nine Tyree Jackson standing next to

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>five foot seven.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 3>And it's kind of like the people that have seen

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 3>like the Trent Brown Mike Reese photo. It's similar to.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That, but it's better because you don't have the steps tool.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is, I don't think anybody's sitting here

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>saying Malie Cunningham is gonna make or break this season.

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>But he's a fun story. Yes he is. No, I'm

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>sorry it is. It is a fun story. He's a

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>very athletic guy, totally unknown how they're gonna use him.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a little interesting. It's a lot, Evan, you know

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this as well as anybody. Do you know what's interesting

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>out It's a long spring, it's a long training camp.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>You can't just talk about the top ten players on

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the roster. You gotta find those other stories.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but do you know what's interesting? Keishan Butte is

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>interesting to Mario Douglas is interesting, Evan, there's Wily Cunningham

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 3>is not interesting. Thirty days of training camp. We're gonna

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>get another six spring practices, three preseason games.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>The indoor practice is gonna be the schedule tonight. There's

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be we know, well, no, this is the this

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is the schedule leading up to that, there's gonna be

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time. We got a lot of time to

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot of players. Nobody's saying we can't

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about those guys.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna talk about a lot of players to day.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna preview kind of the reset, I think is

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 3>a better word. Reset, the offensive side of the ball

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 3>play a little better, worse or sam. This is an

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>idea that I think Mike Reese did it first, so

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 3>we're kind of taking it from Mike, but it's a

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>good idea we're going to do. We're gonna do offense

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 3>today and then next week we'll do defense because Alex

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and I can get long winded and if we try

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 3>to do both sides of the ball, we'd be here

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 3>for three hours. So that's the goal is to do

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 3>offense this week, defense next week. We will touch a

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit on some schedule stuff. We're in kind of

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 3>a we're in a little bit of a gray area here,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Alex that we can talk about the things that have

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>already been announced, we can talk about some rumors, but

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>we're a little it's a little bit of a touchy subject.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And well, look, the reality is, and we truly appreciate

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody who watches the pod live or listens to it live,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and we thank you. But there's a lot of people who,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe we'll listen to it tonight or tomorrow.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>At that point we'll know the schedule.

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>So right, and it's not exactly it doesn't have a

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 3>very good shelf life to talk about schedule rumors.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>As long as the show is just one day a week,

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 1>we kind of want to make it as ever green

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>as possible and discussing schedule possibilit when the schedule will

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>come out tonight. You know, Kills Kills is still six hours.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>So a couple of things about the schedule. First of all,

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 3>just for me personally, not being you have the whole thread.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not this team, it's.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Not that I call it schedule sudoku.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.559
<v Speaker 3>That the fact that I don't need to worry about

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>that anymore because we just don't do that around here

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 3>is actually refreshing. I'm actually glad that I am not

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>sitting here refreshing my phone every thirty seconds. Thing, what

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 3>game do we get leaked this time? The second thing

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 3>is is and I really genuinely want to put this

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 3>out there for two reasons. One, I want to give

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 3>kudos to the people that worked on our schedule release.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 3>That's all I'm gonna say that worked on our schedule release,

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 3>because I'm not gonna get in trouble of telling giving

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 3>any hints of what it is worked on our schedule release,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>because I'll tell you this has been months in the

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 3>making and it took.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>A ton of work.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>You know a lot of the people that were involved.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 3>It's it's really going to be a cool thing. And

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 3>I think you fans are gonna love it. So I

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 3>want to give all those guys props that and gals

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 3>that worked on it, because it's really gonna be awesome stuff.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 3>And the second, the last thing I'll say about the

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 3>schedule is we do know a couple of things that

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 3>we think we know right and one of them in

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 3>concretely is obviously cold patriots in Frankfurt in Germany. One

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of the things that I'm gonna find fascinating. Though, just

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>as a general topic on the schedule. We talked a

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 3>little bit about this offline yesterday. OLEX. Last year was

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 3>my first year. I missed one game Miami. Remember I

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 3>had COVID, couldn't go to Miami, But they traveled for

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>the whole week to Miami, and we traveled the whole

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 3>week to Vegas in the preseason. Yeah, we traveled the

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>whole week for Miami. Then we traveled that week out

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 3>out west with Vegas.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And Arizona, Arizona then Vegas.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>This year, we already know we have Germany, so that's

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>already gonna be time change, long flight, probably four or

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 3>five days out there. I would assume that's just a guess.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying anything. I do wonder based off of

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>how this schedule is structured. I'm really fascinated to see

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 3>if they maybe go back a little bit on all

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of the let's call it extended travel, right, the extended

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 3>stays not. Look, you can't control who you play. We

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>know that the opponents. You can't control that. You gotta

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>go out to Vegas this year again. You gotta go

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 3>to Denver, gotta go to Dallas. You gotta make those

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 3>trips that that's what's on the schedule. By the point

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting at from a competitive standpoint is, I'm not

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent sure that all of the extended travel

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>that we did last year truly benefited the team. And

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 3>I think you can go one way or in the

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 3>other with these things. I think sometimes those those West

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Coast trips where we stayed out at in Arizona at

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>a great resort out there and in Tucson, I think

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>it was for the like that could be a team bonding.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>You could rally around it, everybody could really you know,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>you could sing Kumbaya before bed every night, and all

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, you're you go on a run because

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 3>you you you did that. I think what the fourteen

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 3>team right, I think had that it was like Chargers

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>or something like that out out west, and they did that.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>There are some pockets of this schedule that are set

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>up that you could potentially get one of those trips again.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 3>We know the rumors that they could be doing quite

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 3>a bit of joint practices on the road during the summer,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 3>in the preseason in training camp. I'm interested to see

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 3>how they set up this schedule with those West Coast

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>games or the you know, the time zone change games.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>How much of that are we are we gonna be

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>staying out there for an extended period of time, both

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>selfishly because I want to know what my life's gonna

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 3>look like, but also from a team competitive standpoint, I

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>do wonder if they reverse course on that a little bit.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I know that we've both heard in various ways Miami

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the trip out west late in the year that it's

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 3>threw some people off. It did it threw some people off.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 3>So I'm interested to see how that goes with this

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 3>schedule this year. Are there any like things in the

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 3>schedule that you look for in particular, though, Alex, like

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I know the bye week obviously is a big one.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Primetime games but is there one thing in terms of

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 3>trends or anything like that that you're you're kind of

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>honing in on.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So every year, the only thing I want from schedule release,

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>because we know the opponent's right, the one thing I

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>want above all else is week twelve by And I

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>know that's not like the ideal bye week. I Earnie

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>or Adams said in the schedule release last year it

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>was week ten. I think like that nine to twelve

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>range is probably the best. But yeah, it's Thanksgiving. Be

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>nice to have Thanksgiving off?

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Also selfish?

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, no, it is totally selfish. It is on

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>my bucket list to go to the Iron Bowl Alabama.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>This is what is like the only way I'll ever be.

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 3>Able to do for the Patriots in terms of the

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 3>competitive I look for. And you're just talking about how

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you want to go to the Iron Ball. So you

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 3>hope that the bye week is the week of the

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Iron Bowl?

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>No, just in terms of no, honestly, this is like

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way I already know who they're playing

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the stuff early look at. Yeah, obviously du bye week

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and how many weeks are going to row? Are you

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on the road? When do they go down to Miami,

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>but the stuff like specific to this year, more out

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the box stuff, because that's what's more fun. Anyway,

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jillette Stadium hosting Army Navy December ninth, which would be

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>week fourteen. I can't wait for that, so but like

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>say it seriously because it's I'm also a company man,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So I can't wait for that. You going, I don't

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>know if I have to go?

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Do I have to go? You should go.

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible. I was there last. Everybody should go. It

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is unbelievable. And I'm not a company man. I'm saying

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it is unbelievable.

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 3>You're kind of company.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, that December ninth, Week fourteen. Yeah, in theory,

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you could have back to back, like they could play

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that game here Saturday and the Patriots could play Sunday.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that would be there. They didn't Washington

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 3>But no bigger slap in the face to Bill Belichick

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 3>than putting the Patriots on the road the week of

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 3>So that's what I'm saying.

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no way we're on the road for that, or

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is it like do they play Thursday night?

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So he's just back and he can enjoy it, you

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>know something like that.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I whatever the way the schedule is structured, Bill is

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 3>gonna be at that shit.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think that means either home game Sunday or Monday,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>or just a game Thursday Homer road right right, because

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>if they're on the road Thursday, he'll be back. They'd

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be fine.

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we come back right after the game.

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Some of the other intricacies. Do you know the stat

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>about the Niners from last year? No, the Niners teams

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>last year the week after facing the Niners were zero

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen. The Chiefs won after they played the Niners,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>made a bye week in between. Okay, so no team

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>one after playing the Niners. Whatever you want to make

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of that, you can make of it. But the Patriots

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and Niners have five common opponents this year, the entire

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>NFC East and Pittsburgh, So obviously you know if they

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>play a team week one, that wouldn't count. But you know,

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>see where those teams are in the schedule. Are they

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the week after the Niners? And I thought I had

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one other thing, but I guess that's it. It's gonna

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>be awesome.

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 3>Man, I'm horrible, all right. So we'll keep an eye

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter, as we always do. If there is an official,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 3>not a rumor not a leak, we're not going to

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 3>touch those. But if there is an official announcement of

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 3>any kind about a Patriot game, well we'll obviously break

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>in and talk about that. We're going to get to

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 3>the better worse for same. I'm gonna take this call

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 3>from Patty from Agawan first though, and then we can

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 3>clear the calls and and things like that, and then

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 3>we can we can get into better worse same. So

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 3>we don't have any any breakups in the in our

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 3>flow here. So Patty, what's going on? Man? How you doing?

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 2>What's going on?

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Jan They.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 2>So, I know Todd in North Carolina said at last week,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>if you guys were going to do position by position breakdown,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>and I guess if if you do, I'm just I'm

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>interested to hear how you guys would evaluate Mac and

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Bailey in the quarterback position and like where you would

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>rank that in terms of position groups on the team.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>And if you feel like Max with Bill O'Brien, I mean,

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have the number one guy, that quote unquote

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 2>number one guy. Do you see him surpassing what he

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>did in this rookie year two. That's all I got, guys.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for the call, Patty. It's a good segue that

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 3>sets this up perfectly, because I was going to start

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 3>with the quarterbacks for better, worse, same, and I was

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>read I'm gonna read off everybody on the roster so

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>that everybody knows all the names. I think everybody knows

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 3>the names on this one. Mac Jones, Bailey Zappy, Trace

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 3>McSorley currently still under contract in the quarterback room, and

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I do have Malie cunning him with the quarterback.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Until we see him run around. I think he's a quarterback,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so we'll find out. And that's another thing, kind of

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>housekeeping thing. In a couple of weeks, we will be

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>out at Ota, so if he's with the receivers at

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>that point, then I will obviously move him from the

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterback room to the wide receiver room. But right for

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, I'm Elie cutting him there, Alex, Are the

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Patriots better or worse or the same at quarterback? I

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of hard to say that.

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 3>They're better or worse when it's it's basically the same

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 3>two guys, right it's Mac Jones and Bailey Zappy. I

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 3>mentioned Bill O'Brien and kind of getting back to twenty

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty one or maybe even better for mac Jones. So

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess you could make that argument that just by

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>nature of Bill O'Brien being here, that the performance or

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the play of the quarterback room should be better. But

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 3>the names of the names, like the players themselves, are

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 3>the same for the most part. But I'm willing to

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 3>say better because of Bill O'Brien, So maybe that's a

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a cop out.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, yeah, I wasn't thinking about it in

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>that sense. I was thinking about just the players. I

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>think the quarterback play will be better with yello'brien. If

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I had to just evaluate the room, I'd actually say

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a little worse because they lose that veteran presence of

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Brian Hoyer.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree here, what you're soa They ask me,

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 3>how much does that matter? I'm gonna I don't know

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>how much it mattered to them, because Brian Hoyer to

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 3>should have mattered. Brian Hoyer to me feels like somebody

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 3>that they kind of viewed as someone that was asking

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 3>too many questions.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Who's them?

0:13:58.559 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean? Who's them?

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the other quarterbacks appreciated having him there. Let

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>me put it that way.

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't disagree with that, Okay, I don't know. I

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 3>think some of the pushback on the offensive coaching staff,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>which we are both on the record saying very warranty, yeah, okay,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 3>but I think some of the pushback on the offensive

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 3>coaching staff last year came from certain guys that are

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 3>no longer here.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>That's fair, But yeah, I don't wouldn't necessarily say it

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was the right move to get rid of those guys.

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's fair.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Having Brian Hoyer in that room, a veteran quarterback who's

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of football, I think brought inherent value.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>How much value you can say, it's not a lot.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. But and again i'm parsing here, like really

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>splitting here is here?

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Right? Like if I have to pick one, you know how,

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I also try to do the outside of the box Amsons.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually trying to stick to the exercise this time.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>If I have to say better or worse, I think

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's worse because I think, even if it was very minimal,

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there was value in having Brian Horror's experience in that room.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't have it anymore. That's pretty much Yet. I

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like what McSorley, and we'll see with Cunningham bring his

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>potential scout team guys. But you can you know they

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>had corners playing scout team quarterback to get that athletic

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>guy in there, right. I think Brian Hoyer's knowledge and

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>experience is valuable.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>That's fair. That's fair. I didn't really think of it

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 3>that way, because again, I don't think the the ambiguous day.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't necessarily think they think of it that way

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>based off of last So I'm just thinking why because

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 3>they it cost them money to.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Not to be here, But I don't think it was

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the right move.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 3>That's fair.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'll say I I am and you you so

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>your factor getting a lot of the coaches, Bill O'Brien.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I am just looking at the four guys in the

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>room or however at whatever position. I'm just looking coction

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of right. You know, when when you know they go

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>into that meeting, not who's at the front of the

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>room leading it, who's sitting in the chairs. Yeah, and

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that is you went from Mac Jones, Bailey, Zappy, Brian Hoyer,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Gilbert to Mac Jones, Bailey, Zappy, Trace McSorley, Malie Cunningham.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are un comparing A to B.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>That's it, okay, So so we don't get too caught

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 3>up in the in the minutia here and as we

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 3>tend to do. I guess the other question with the

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks before we move on is do you feel as

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 3>though we will get out to training camp in August

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and it will look anything like a competition. Like remember

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>in twenty one we were both here covering the team.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones and Cam Newton were clearly in a competition,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>and I would actually say that they they tried their

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 3>best to make it look like Cam was QB one

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and it wasn't really a competition. But what would happen

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>just so that when we get into this people will

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>remember us kind of breaking this down, Cam would get

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 3>that first drive. So whenever Cam, whenever they broke into team,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>like whenever it got into eleven on elevens or even

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 3>seven on seven, we all had to say that Cam

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Newton was the first quarterback in the huddle, right. But

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Cam would lead a single drive, He'd run like four

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 3>or five plays, and then Mac Jones would run the

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 3>next twenty five or whatever the number it ended up

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 3>being and you'd get to the end of the day

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 3>and Cam would have attempted twelve passes in practice and

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 3>mac Jones would have attempted thirty in practice. And that

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 3>was our first in a lot of people's first taste

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 3>because Brady was here and there was no quarterback competition.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>In the summer. But the most we did it with

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback, right, Remember was it Stidham and nineteen.

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I was I was here for the COVID

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 3>year in twenty with with Cam and Dam but that

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 3>was but that was also just neither one of them

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 3>were great. It was kind of just picking at straws.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 3>So what do you think that this would resemb because

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 3>now I think we know a little bit. Okay, if

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 3>Bailey is reps wise, if they're about even and a

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 3>he's throwing with some regulars, you know, if he's breaking

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the huddle and it's Taekwon Thorton going one direction and

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 3>Kendrick Bourne going like right, you kind of have an

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 3>idea of all, right, you know this is sort of

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 3>a competition. Do you feel like that's gonna happen this

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 3>summer or do you feel like they're gonna commit to

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 3>Mac and we're gonna go down that.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Right, I think they're gonna go back and forth, and

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>you just hit on it. It's not necessarily about the

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>number of reps. Yeah, And it was easier to explain

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>away in twenty twenty one because oh, Mack's a rookie,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>he needs the reps. Cam's been here, right, and if

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you looked at.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 3>That's how they got us though.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, but even though Mack was running more reps, he

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was running mostly with the second team, so's yeah, he

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>threw twice as many passes, but he was out there

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>with the second offense right right. None of the starter

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or all the starters had half as many reps as

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the backups. Yeah, so like it's it. Maybe from a

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>bird's eyeview, it looked like a competition, but it sort

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of clearly wasn't until that practice against the Giants when

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Cam missed it, Mac tore him up.

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a little less clear this year because you

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily come in and say, well, Bailey needs the

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>reps right right, about the same experience. So it's gonna

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be harder for them to hide whether or not it's competition,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because the other thing is, you know, it's gonna come

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>down to who's working with who, Right, If mac Jones

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>runs ten reps and Bailey's Appy runs twenty reps, but

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones is throwing to Devonte Parker and Juju Smith Schuster,

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and Bailey's Appy's throwing to you know, Trey Nixon, right, Well, okay,

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>he ran twice as many reps, but he's throwing guys

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't gonna make the team, yeah, Right, So it's it's

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>always it's gonna be about who they're throwing to, not

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the number one.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 3>And I would also say a dead giveaway for people

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 3>that come out to training camp, and hopefully there will

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>be plenty of those opportunities this summer. The offensive line,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 3>because it's starting five, is the starting five, right, And

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 3>and I know that we're not necessarily supposed to report

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 3>these things specifically, but like, who's David Andrews snapping the

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 3>ball to?

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if David Andrews ain't snapping the ball to Bailey's Appy,

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they both getting steps from guys named Andrews.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 3>If it's Jake Andrews or it's co Russiers James Farrence,

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>and David Andrews is attached to Mac Jones as himp

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 3>as the only center that snapping the ball to Mac

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Jones all summer long, then we know who's QB one,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 3>right like that, those are the types of things that

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>we look for as well. I actually come on the

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 3>other side of this. I think that this is gonna

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>be and this is just gut. I have no inside information,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 3>but I think that this is gonna be a commitment

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to Mac Jones at least to start the season. And

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the only way that you can properly do that.

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>And I say that because, let's face it, we both

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 3>talked about this enough, but they did not properly handle

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 3>the position last year, right. The only way that you

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 3>can properly commit to Mac Jones in the summer and

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 3>really try to hit the ground running and basically act

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 3>like last year didn't happen and just kind of make

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 3>it feel as much as you can, like you're picking

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 3>up from the end of twenty twenty one and you're

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 3>going into you know, a fake year. You're two, but

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 3>year three is to really just go down that road

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 3>and not make it as any sort of question. Now,

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's how it's gonna start. If Mac

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Jones gets into the regular season and struggles, then I

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 3>think that that will open the door for Bailey Zappy.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's mac Jones's job to lose. I

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 3>think it's his job to lose for the time being.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 3>I think year three of Mac Jones with Bill O'Brien

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 3>here is a big year for the organization to figure

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 3>out what they have in mac Jones. So I don't

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to be a truly full scale competition

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of any sort in training camp, and I think that

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 3>they're committed to Mac. I think that Bill Belichick tried

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 3>to when Greg Bdard asked him during the draft, it

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 3>was it bouquets of flowers, throw it at mac Jones

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 3>and no, not necessarily, but I do think that he

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 3>tried to say some things to kind of squash a

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 3>little bit of that, you know. And I think that

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 3>there's gonna be a real quick, clear message once you

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>get out to camp. And the last thing I'll say

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 3>about the quarterbacks, and you can weigh in on this too,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 3>but I feel really strongly about this. Isn't that what

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 3>you want? Like as a Patriots fan, isn't what you

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 3>want is for us to get out there, even in

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 3>the spring, even in a couple of weeks and see

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones like commanding things like Mac Jones being a leader,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones having that swagger back, having that remember even

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>before I know everybody and I myself include sometimes falls

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 3>into this, Travis saying Mac wasn't on board with what

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>was going on last year from the jump in the

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 3>spring he was. He was kind of bouncing around. Remember

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>he's making some good downfield throws, obviously without pads and

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a live pass rush. And then we all learned as

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 3>soon as the pads came on in August that kind

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of went out the door. But isn't that what you want?

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Don't you want Mac to take the QB one job

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 3>by the reins and the bowl by the horns, whatever

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, cliche you want to use and not have

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 3>question marks about that position. I feel like that's a

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 3>big thing for me. Is like a lot of people,

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 3>I think just love the drama, and I get that

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 3>we're in that business right of the drama feeds the beast.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 3>But isn't it better as a Patriot fan than Mac

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 3>Jones actually works out and has a good year and

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 3>like is the man from the jump and there's no

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 3>questions and we're not in August talking about quarter because

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 3>if we're in August talking about quarterback competitions, and this

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 3>is my whole take on this, Right, they don't have

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 3>a quarterback. Right, Guess what, they don't have a quarterback.

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 3>It's not Bailey Zappy, it's they don't have a quarterback.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 3>So I hope that Mac Jones proves that they do

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>have a quarterback. That's that's what I'm optimistic about.

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the easiest path forward.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I hope that's the case. So that's your quarterbacks.

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 3>You think it's gonna be a little bit of competition

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 3>though you think that door is is old.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they want it to be. I think Mac

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>can win it, but I think they want it to be. Yeah,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you think we've gone through this whole summer and they're

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna come out and Max's gonna be the young question

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>starter or sorry, this whole winter of.

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I like to think that cooler heads will prevail. Maybe

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.479
<v Speaker 3>that's just the optimist in me, but I like to

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 3>think that cooler heads are gonna prevail. And what you

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 3>just mentioned, it's the cleanest path, it's the cleanest path forward.

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think last year and I hope that they

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 3>would agree. Last year, the Bailey Zappi, the Zappi fever.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's face it, Zappi fever did nobody any favors. It

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 3>did nobody any favors. It didn't make the team better,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 3>It didn't make Mac Jones better, It didn't make any

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 3>of it better. It caused drama, and quite frankly more

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 3>importantly internally, it caused friction. Right, So that did nobody

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 3>any good. So going and setting up that again, and

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that was what was so bonkers about the

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>situation last year. We always go back to the Chicago game.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 3>They set it up like they did it to themselves

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 3>to an extent to create all the noise about the quarterbacks.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah.

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 3>So avoiding that this year by you know, coming out

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 3>in camp and kind of putting the weight behind Mac Jones,

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 3>I think is important. All right, let's move on to

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the running backs. And if you want to weigh in,

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 3>eight five five, Pats five hundred is the phone number

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 3>you can email in web radio at Patriots dot com.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 3>And uh, we'll love your opinion on all this this stuff.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 3>And I know some people acus don't feel the same

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 3>way I do about Mac Jones. They want to see

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 3>they want to see the competition, so maybe maybe you

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 3>feel that way. All right, Uh, moving on to running backs,

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>This one was interesting because there is some turnover here,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe a little bit more significantly than the

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 3>top of the quarterback depth chart, Grimandra Stevenson, the guy

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 3>we just spoke to this morning, James Robinson, Pierre Strong,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Harris, Time Montgomery, and JJ Taylor. So historically speaking

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 3>obvioust they keep four running backs.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, four guys. It's been three a time, so because

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll throw somebody in the practice squad.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>But four guys I think is safe to assume out

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 3>of this group because I think there are gonna be

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 3>four rosterable running backs to come out of this group.

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 3>We know Ramondre Stevenson's a lock. I would like to

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 3>think we can confidently say that Pierre Strong is probably

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 3>a lock too, just because of his draft status last

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 3>year and cutting a fourth round pick in year two

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 3>seems a little bit unrealistic. But from there it's really

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 3>anybody's game. And I look at a guy like James Robinson,

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 3>who I think could add some things to this team,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'm a little you know, I'm interested to see

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 3>what he's got in training camp. I think that he

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>could help. James Robinson has basically no guaranteed money given

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 3>to him on his contract. He's a very, for lack

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 3>of a better word, cutable player at the moment. If

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't look reinvigorated, if he doesn't look like he

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 3>has any juice, he's a player that they could move

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 3>on from pretty easily. So I look at this and

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 3>I think Ramondre Stevenson and Pierre Strong are really the

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 3>only two guys that I feel like are definitely going

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 3>to be on this team. I think the three and

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 3>four spot are kind of up from grabs at that point,

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 3>so better worse are same At the running back position, I.

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Think worse, you know, starting off, there's a chance they

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>end up better because if Pierre Strong emergence is a

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>pass catching back, now you don't have to run Ramondra

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Stevenson in the ground like they did last year, so

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he's fresher down the stretch. You have a good pass

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>catching back. If Kevin Harris develops, you have that, you know,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>bowling ball short yardage, secondary, early down back behind Ramandre

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you just need one of James robinsoner Time

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery to develop as an option right as just a

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>depth player, and I don't think any of that's unrealistic.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But coming in they lost Damien Harris, they don't have

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a clear cut pass catching back. They have candidates between

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Strong and Robinson and Montgomery, but that's got to be

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>sorted out. So I'll say initially they're worse, but there's

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>upside there. That's kind of where I'm at with it.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that I don't want to say they're

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 3>better because I do feel like Damien Harris was a

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 3>good patriot and I don't want to undersell him in

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 3>terms of what he brought to the table. I know

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 3>he was injured a lot the last couple of years,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 3>especially last year, that that hurt right, that that hurt

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 3>his patriot tenure. I actually love I criticized their roster

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 3>management a lot. I actually really love how they handle

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 3>running backs. I think they do it exactly how you

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 3>should do it. For the most part, third and fourth

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 3>round picks, recycle them every three or four years. Never

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 3>get married to any of these guys, right, You never

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, commit you know, big money dollars or years

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 3>to a running back. I think that they do a

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>nice job of recycling that position because for the most part,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 3>they understand that that position is replaceable. Like those guys

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 3>are kind of a dime a dozen and you can

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of cycle through them. And that's that's what we

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 3>know now in today's NFL and the way that things

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 3>work nowadays. So I like how they handle the running

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 3>backs position. The one guy that I'm really bullish on,

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I am. I really think Pierre Strong is going to

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 3>be something. I think we saw enough, especially in that

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Era Zone A game obviously, but even in the Raider

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 3>game he had a couple of good carries too, and

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 3>that West Coast swing last year for me to be

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>optimistic that Pierre Strong is going to bring something to

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the table. I want to see Pierre Strong on the field.

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 3>And I look at a guy like Bill O'Brien and I,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, him, being the coach that he is, he

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 3>loves to think about matchups like how like who's a problem,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Like who's a matchup weapon, Who's a guy that can

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 3>win foot races or is so quick that a linebacker

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>or safety is not going to be able to cover

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 3>them in the slot or you know, coming horizontally across

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the field. This guy is gonna win races this way

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 3>or that way or whatever, and I look at a

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 3>guy like Pierre Strong, and I look at that forty

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 3>time and everything, and I just just get that guy

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the football and try to get that guy into space

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>a handful of times a game. It's similar to how

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>everybody feels about Marcus Jones or like Taekwon, right, just

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 3>just get the ball in their hands and see what

0:29:57.720 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 3>they can do with it. I think Pierre Strong is

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 3>going to to be a really good player for them

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>this year. I'm optimistic that he is just following in

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 3>a very similar path to a lot of other running

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 3>backs in that mold, right, the Shane Vereens, the James Whites,

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 3>those players, and we'll see him. Your two really take

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 3>off and you.

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Make a good point there. Sorry to cut your nose,

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but I've seen a lot of people say, well, if

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they were good, the Patriots would have played in last year. Yeah,

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily. I know they needed a running back last year.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>They did. They played Romandre Sevenson way too much. But

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this is just what they do. Even in twenty nineteen,

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember who it was, but a couple guys

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>got hurt and they still didn't play Damien Harris, who

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>was a rookie at the time, Like they I forget

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>what they did, but they went out of their way

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.959
<v Speaker 1>to not play rookie Damien Harris, And that was kind

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of the case last year. I feel like they went

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>out of their way, right, and.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Then Zon had good games.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I was gonna say, right from what

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we did see, and I'm not saying they're gonna both

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>come in and be Pro Bowlers right right, right, but

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>from what we saw, I'd say they they handled themselves.

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>They looked at the least capable. Yeah, So I don't

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have if you have, like actual football reasons to write

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>them off. I guess we could have that discussion call in,

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, simply saying well, they didn't play last year,

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're not good. That's really not how it generally

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>works in New England. If you're a rookie running back,

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>unless you were picked in the first round or your

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>name's were Andre Stevenson, you don't play. You mentioned James

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>White fourteen touches as a rookie, Yeah, and I remember

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>people were riding him.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>On Stoverreen was similar, right, Like.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's a couple more. I think he had like fifteen.

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 3>But he didn't play a ton.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He didn't play a ton as a rookie. But the

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>James White one I always go back to because I

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>remember people were thinking like that, you're the use of

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was, third fourth round pick on this guy

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play as a bust ye as a fourth round

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could barely get on the field last year.

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>They turned out okay.

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, So I'm optimistic about Pierre Strong, and I think

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 3>that in general, you gotta hope that at least one

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 3>of those guys Harris or Strong ends up being a

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 3>good player for you that should at least, at the

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 3>very least be able to back up and spell Ormandra Stevenson. Right,

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 3>because if you go back and look at the draft

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 3>last year running back, if those guys can't play, then

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 3>they missed badly at that spot. I mean, it's not

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 3>just Isaiah Pacheco in the seventh round. Oh that was

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 3>my guy, right, So you know the guy down in

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Houston was a damn Damian here peers right around that

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 3>range too. There's a bunch of guys there, and if

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.959
<v Speaker 3>they got one of the guys that can't play, and

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not I think Pierre Strong can play I think

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Pierre Strong can play too, so I'm not saying that

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 3>he can't, but if they got one of those guys

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 3>that can't play, then we got some questions to ask.

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So they Pierce was not on the board for them,

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at least they took Pierre Strong in the fourth round,

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>like late fourth round. He went early. They missed Hassan

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Haskins for Michigan, who's good, but not that kind of player.

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Aljeer from BYU, I mean, these are power backs,

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>these aren't receiving backs, but they're both good players. A

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>couple more went than they took Kevin Harris, Tyler Batty

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I liked, he's in the USFL now though, Trestan Ebner

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I liked. I think he's yeah, he's still on the Bears,

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh, who else? And then Isaiah pe Go in

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the seventh.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Round, right, So I guess Isaiah, but Checko is really

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the one.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Especially everybody missed him, but that's the one.

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Pierre Strong and Isaiah Pacheco, they both had tied for

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the fastest forty in the draft, right and running back,

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 3>so if you're looking for that speedback that those were

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of your option. So it was sort of him

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 3>or it was Checko, But I'm not going down that

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 3>road because I think he can play. Montgomery and James

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Robinson I think are interesting players for different reasons. I

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 3>think Montgomery is sort of this mythical creature to a

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.479
<v Speaker 3>lot of Patriots fans because frankly, we we hyped him

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 3>up a lot in the in the training camp get

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 3>it out training camp last year, he had a good camp,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of time. Yeah, there's a lot

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>of talk about him being a contributor and somebody that

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 3>was going to step in, maybe not on a James

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 3>White level of production, but maybe something like a Brandon

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Bolden level of production, right, somebody that could at least

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 3>hold down that receiving back role. And he had some

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>versatility because he played wide receiver and running back in

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 3>his career in Green Bay and New Orleans had a

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 3>similar system the way they use their running backs in

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the past game with some conversion there from from his

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 3>year before that. So I still am not completely out

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.959
<v Speaker 3>on time Montgomery being a contributor, and I think James

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Robinson the biggest question with him. It's kind of similar

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 3>when we get to wide receiver here in a second week.

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good calls, splitting up offensive defense, cut to forty

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't even gotten a receiver Kishan Butte.

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>It's about injury, right, Like James Robinson tore his achilles

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 3>two years ago, you hope that a year and a

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 3>half removed from that achilles, he's gonna get the juice back.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 3>But last year with the Jags and the Jets, quite frankly,

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 3>he did not have the juice. He did, he just

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 3>didn't have any any burst to his run his running game. Yeah,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 3>So if he's not gonna have that, then I think

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 3>that he could be somebody that ends up not making

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 3>this team simply just because he he just doesn't have

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 3>it right right now, A guy like Kevin Harris I

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 3>think should make the team over both those guys that

0:34:58.360 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 3>I just mentioned as well.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>The other thing you have to remember, and this is

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like the whole new thing that's really changed the way

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>we do roster projections. Who do they have the best

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>shot at getting on the practice squad, Because even if

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Harris is a better player, they might have a

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>better shot at waiving him getting into the practice squad

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and then they can elevate him versus a guy like

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson who they might lose if they can James Robinson.

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I'm just using those two. You can

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>throw a Time Montgomery in there.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 3>If he's in year five, correct, so he might be

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>a vested VET at this point, so he might not

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 3>pass through waivers. Time Montgomery definitely doesn't have to pass

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 3>through waivers.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So Thig Robinson would.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 3>It's it's four or five years. I always forget how

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 3>many years it is.

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It's some of it. It's not years. It's like playing time,

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a whole thing.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 3>So anyways, the biggest thing to me with the running

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 3>back position, I'm gonna say, Jen, I'm gonna say same

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 3>from last year. I think it's different, certainly because Pierre

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Strong is a much different runner than David.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Different, but it's the same.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 3>It's different in terms of their skill set, I know.

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 3>But I'm optimistic that Pierre Strong is going to bring

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 3>a good element, like something that they could you really

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 3>utilize with his ability to his speed and even his

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 3>agility in the open field, like we saw him make

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 3>some really devastating cuts as well. He's quick and he's

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 3>got some suddenness to his movements. So I'm really excited

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 3>to see what he brings to the table. And I

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 3>think that they still have a really good running back room.

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 3>I still think that's the strength of this team. Let's

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 3>do tight ends really quickly and then we'll take some

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 3>calls and we'll spend the next forty five minutes on

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 3>the wide receivers and the offensive line, which, by the way,

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 3>I think they have sixteen offensive line.

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>With the offensive line and linebackers, that's like half the

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>ross sixteen.

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 3>It's unreal tight ends. So in my initial projection, I'll

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 3>read the tight ends off first, Hunter, Henry, Mi, Kasiki,

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Matt Sokele Scotti, Washington, and your guy Johnny Lumpkin.

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's our guy after last week, don't think.

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.760
<v Speaker 3>So those are your tight ends right now. My roster

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 3>projection last week I did, and I know you did

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 3>one too, only had Hunter, Henry and Kasiki on the

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 3>final roster. That's what they did last year with Johnny

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 3>and Henry, and they only have those two guys that

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 3>made the initial fifty three. To me, it feels like

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 3>the same thing, where those are two veteran guys that

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 3>you invested some money in, you invested resources in. Those

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 3>are the two guys that are gonna play assuming they're healthy.

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Nobody else is. I know you like Johnny Lumpkin, Alex,

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 3>but Johnny ump I had them on. Johnny Lumpkin is

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 3>not is not taking away playing time for Mike Kasicki

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 3>or Hunter Henry.

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But let me ask you this. We both know the

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>utf A streak is important to them that they keep

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that going nineteen years ago for a reason.

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 3>I kind of hope it's not like I kind of

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 3>hope it's like.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>What Takobe Meyer said as a rookie that I think

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you're the one who asked him this question that a

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>big part of the reason he signed in New England

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>was they had you think it's important to them because

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it gravitates towards you know, he helps the crude essentially.

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's important, but oh, we've got to

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>do this because it's cool. I think because they can

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>go to a guy and say, nineteen years in a row,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you've had a rook and look they've kind of, you know,

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>maneuvered it in the past, like remember the year that

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>quin Quinordine and Nick Folk technically on the roster, right,

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something they care about who's the most

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>They got three guys, Jordan, Heli, Malik Cunningham, who you hate,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't hate. I don't say that Jordan Jordan, he

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>like Malik Cunningham and Johnny Lunkin. Realistically, of those three,

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>who's the most likely to make the roster?

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I look, I think that there is definitely an argument,

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.800
<v Speaker 3>And I would say, just for better words same, I

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 3>would say better because I think inherently speaking production wise,

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 3>like how is how is Mike SICKI worse than Johnny's?

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're better Kasicki's an upgrade. Yeah, I

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>also think they might like Scotty Washington. And I'm not

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>saying that overly shifts it. But if you get you know,

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you elevate him off the past squad for a couple

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of games. He gives you something.

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 3>He's a really interesting like he's huge, he's yeah, and

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 3>he's athletic. No here, there's a lot of interesting a

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 3>little bit. So I'm not saying he's gonna come in

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 3>and make it difference again. Elevated for a couple games,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 3>he gave you something.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But the thing with Lumpkin to me is I don't

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna take playing time away from Hunter Henry

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>or Mike Sicky. But what happens when you get in

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the red zone and you want to go with that

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>big formation. Plus he plays special teams, They'll find a

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>role for him. It's not going to be expansive. But again,

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of those three guys, Heleigue is just special team. He's

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to help you on defense or offense. Malie

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Cunningham's role is going to be have to be highly

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>specialized or you get a blocking tight end who will

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>help you cover kicks. So it's it's easy.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 3>The thing that you just mentioned about is blocking, I

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 3>think is important because I look at this group right now. Yeah,

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 3>and if there's I don't I'm I'm not going to

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 3>call people out by names. I'm not going to do it.

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 3>There's some people that feel like John new Smith was

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 3>a really good blocker. I'm not necessarily in that school.

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 3>I think he was a adequate NFL blocker, like he

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 3>was starting caliber in that category. Do I think he

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 3>was on the scale of starting to Rob Gronkowski. He's

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 3>definitely just more towards the starting side of things, right,

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 3>But he would he could hold his own in that respect.

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Neither Hunter Henry Nor. Mika Sicki gives you much in

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 3>that regard, and I think that Mikasicki will be a

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 3>better blocker here than he has been in the past

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 3>because I think two things. One, I think they'll demand

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 3>it out of him. I think Bill O'Brien will demand

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 3>it out of him, and Bill will too. And secondly,

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 3>he's on He signed a one year contract for a

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 3>guy that's been like, this is a really proven year

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 3>for him, So I think he's gonna go out there

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and he's gonna give it as all in all phases,

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 3>but it all doesn't mean that he's all of a

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 3>suddenly going to become you know, Mark Bavarro right Like,

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 3>he's still gonna have a some short So it's a

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a low key hole in the roster.

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to sit here and say that it's

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the most important thing in the world, but a little

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 3>bit of a low key hole in this roster right

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 3>now is they don't have a true difference making in

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 3>line blocking tight end and they don't have a fullback,

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 3>so they don't really have that in their repertoire. Like

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 3>if they have to go into a period of the

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 3>season where they really need to pound the rock and

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 3>run the football effectively. They don't really have that. They

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 3>don't have that guy. They don't have a traditional full

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 3>back like a James Devil or a Yakub Johnson. They

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 3>don't have like a versatile blocker more like a John

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 3>new Smith. They don't have the hand in the dirt,

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, third tackle tight end. So the question is,

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I guess they have sixteen offensive linemen, So can one

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.240
<v Speaker 3>of those offenses. Do they do more tackle eligible stuff

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 3>and do they get away with it that way or

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 3>does somebody like your boy Johnny Lumpkin make the roster

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 3>as a you know, Michael Kumamana.

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Even if I think I got it, I think I

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>nailed that just for a couple of weeks. Even if

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, something that he comes on and then

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to pull somebody off. I r right, start

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>season whatever. But he'sn'ta be around. I think he's gonna

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>be around. I think he's gonna play.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I do. I'm really That's the one thing that I

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I I know a lot of people are surprised they

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 3>didn't draft a tight end with tight end one upside,

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, like a Darnell Washington or a Tucker Craft

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. What I'm what I'm like so

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 3>surprised about is if they didn't even take one of

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 3>those guys that was more of like a specialized blocking

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 3>tight end. A little bit later, Yeah, you know, they

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 3>just completely passed on the position altogether. Maybe it's Johnny Lumkin.

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I tell you, I think that's he. I think

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:36.919
<v Speaker 3>he makes the team.

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I think he makes the team.

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I just keep going back to like if you go

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 3>into the week and it's Tuesday, and you feel like,

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 3>all right, we're playing this defense that's fast.

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Look at week one or what we think is gonna

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be it's rumored to be Week one.

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Maybe maybe them. But you go into the week and

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you're just like, this defense is undersized. It's fast, but

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 3>they're light, and we want to just run them over.

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Like that's how we're going to play this game. I

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 3>guess twenty eighteen Super Bowl run right, Like we're just

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 3>going to run these people over. How do they really

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 3>get into that personnel right now with the tight ends

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 3>that they have Johnny lump with the last lack of

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 3>full back, Like, how do they really do that? That's

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the game plan. Maybe it's Johnny Umpkin. All right, let

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 3>me take some of these calls and then we'll do

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the the meaty positions at the wide receivers in the

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.800
<v Speaker 3>old line. Max and SEACNK. What's up? Max?

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Hi doing?

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Guys?

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 6>Really enjoy you guys working together. Hoppy, you guys got

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 6>on catch twenty two after your upgrade there, Evan, I

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 6>thank you. Question for you guys. I know that Evan,

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 6>you are sorry. Alex you and you mentioned this with

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Mike Kadlick. The line for mac Jones is four thousand

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 6>yards this season. I think something that everyone's missing is

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 6>that if you average out mac Jones over seventeen games

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 6>last year, he was only down about one hundred and

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 6>fifty five yards. Curious you guys thoughts.

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Thanks, no problem. So this is definitely a Catholic angle

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 3>his lines. His line is four thousand yards passing.

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Thousand yards, twenty five touchdowns. That's a lot. That's the

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 1>over under on the touchdowns twenty five. That's a lot.

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean last year he had what.

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Twenty one, but it was in fewer games.

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 3>He had twenty one passing touchdowns last year.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 1>It sounds right, no, is it less than that I

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>feel like it was less than that. Maybe it was

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>on pace for twenty one. Anyways, he had pad four teams.

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, I knew something bad I took. I said

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>over on yards under on touchdowns.

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I could see that. I could see that. I like

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 3>we were kind of just talking about. I still feel

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 3>like at their core, and this kind of goes back

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 3>to like Dante's Scarneki and I have and fears and stuff.

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 3>So maybe not so much anymore, but I still think

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 3>at their core they want to be a team that

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 3>when it's like third and two from the goal line,

0:44:57.520 --> 0:44:59.439
<v Speaker 3>they can run the ball right like they don't want

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 3>they would rather, in my opinion, they would rather. And

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I think this is some other red zone issues that

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 3>they had last year that they got too far away

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 3>from this. When they get first and goal from the

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 3>five yard line, they'd rather run it three times into

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the end zone right and not have to throw it.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 3>And I think last year they kind of did get

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 3>a little pass happy down there, and that would be

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>a big bonus I think this year of getting back

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.760
<v Speaker 3>to their roots of being a good short yardage running

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.720
<v Speaker 3>team and being good in the trenches and Adrian clam

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and Bill O'Brien, Yes.

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>No, it's I actually think they're they're okay running in

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 1>from like the five. My figure is shoes like the

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>five to the fifteenth.

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're like mid or high. Red zone numbers are terrible,

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 3>ye last year.

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So and that's why I took the under on touchdowns.

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Think they're gonna get down to like the one or

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>two yard line a bunch and.

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Just yeah yeah, all right, So four thousand yards that

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 3>seems like a lot. Now, I guess with the extra

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 3>game it's not. It's not quite as much as it

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 3>used to be, But four thousand yards seems like a lot.

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 3>Was he four thousand his rookie year?

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he was like just shorty thirty eight hundred.

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 3>His rookie year. Yeah, doesn't that seem like a lot?

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, in theory two hundred yards over seventeen

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>games he was that's eleven more yards per game. Yeah,

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that's one more completion and he completed uh sixty seven

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 1>percent of his passes. That's I guess that's pretty high. Yeah. Well, look,

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>how about this. We've talked about the and this will

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>segue I send the receivers. We've talked about how the

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>big difference between Jacobe Myers and Juju Smith. Schuster's that

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>yard after catchability and they find eleven more yards per

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>game and Juju creating after he catches the ball.

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Out just to say, yeah, if he hits on those

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 3>marks four and twenty five touchdowns, we're talking about forty

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars a year.

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 1>No, they have a quarterback. No, they have a quarterback.

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're talking about giving back Jones. Daniel Jones said.

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>At beginning, what did Daniel Jones do last year? He's

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>probably yeah, probably pretty compar right, hang on, let's see,

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they probably just took it right from Daniel Jones' box,

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>probably like four thousand. No, Daniel Jones is actually not

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 1>even close to that. Last year, Daniel Jones was thirty

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifteen touchdowns and now he only threw

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>five interceptions and he ran and he ran find like

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred yards. Yeah, so if you but even if

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you include the rushing, he didn't get to four thousand parts.

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, Eldrid, what's going on?

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Hey man?

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 3>How you doing good? How are you?

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing pretty good? Question out at the wide receiver spot.

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Do you think later later going hold of this spot?

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Have a special teamer like he'd been doing, instead of

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 4>putting somebody in that can play special teams and maybe

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:44.360
<v Speaker 4>contribute and catching pastes.

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm glad you brought this up, because somebody brought

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 3>brought this up in my mentions yesterday too. I don't

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it was you, Elder. I think of

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 3>somebody else. Uh, And I don't understand the thinking like Slate,

0:47:57.600 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 3>so you because they're going to carry at least five

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 3>widers receivers, not including Matthew Slater, right, So Matthew Slater's

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 3>spot is not He's not taking up somebody on the

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers depth chart, like he's not. How is he talking?

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 4>They're going to carry specialty but reiver spot.

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But but they're not carrying Eldred. What if I told

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you last year Bill Bellich? I think was Bill Belichick.

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe with Steve Bell Belichick referred to him as a safety.

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately what I'm getting at is with Slater, And

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 3>this is like a real like semantics argument here. They're

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 3>going to carry five real wide receivers, not including Matthew Slater, right,

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 3>They're going to carry five guys at the wide receiver position,

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 3>just like every other team. So he's not going to

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 3>take anybody's spot at the wide receiver position. Like that's

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 3>like what I can't wrap my head around the spots

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 3>that he's taking up. Are you know guys that are

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 3>at the back end of the roster, Like, are we

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 3>all gonna are we all gonna lose sleep because Matthew

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Slater is taking you know, Raleigh Webb's roster spot.

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's basically what you're talking about here is Roley

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Webb making the team over Matthew Slater.

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 3>Right, So they're gonna carry five real wide receivers and

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 3>if they wanted, and now we can get into it

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 3>and thanks for college or because we were gonna segue

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 3>into this anyways, right, Uh, if they wanted, they could

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.439
<v Speaker 3>carry six, like they could. Matthew Slater is not gonna

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 3>prevent them from carrying five to six, to four to

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 3>whatever wide receiver number they want to. They'll figure out

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 3>the numbers with him in the in the equation. And

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:44.280
<v Speaker 3>if you look at like my roster projection, your roster projection,

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 3>the guys that they are cutting, do you really think

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 3>that those guys are bringing more to the football team

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 3>than Matthew Slater like, do you really believe that they

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 3>especially on game day, like not even talking about Yeah,

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I get it, Like they could maybe keep an Isaiah

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Bolden or a mere Speed if you know, one of

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:03.360
<v Speaker 3>those guys could end up making it, and that's developmental player.

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 3>But you're developing a mere Speed to hopefully develop into

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Matthew Slater, right, So unless he's just better than Matthew

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Slater at this point.

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Of Slaters than the greatest ever do it?

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>The only way Slater's not making the team is if

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he gets in a camp and decides he wants to retire.

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>That's it. He's gonna be here. They want special teams guys.

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>He brings that leadership ability. He's going to be here,

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:27.799
<v Speaker 3>So that brings that segues us into wide receivers. They

0:50:27.840 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 3>currently have seven wide receivers signed after releasing Lynn Bowden yesterday,

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 3>they have seven.

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>They Juju Smith shoes eight.

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 3>You have eight? Yeah, who's your eighth? Are you counting

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.919
<v Speaker 3>Rolly web No, Rolly Webb counts as a special teamer,

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:49.760
<v Speaker 3>all right, Juju Smith, Schuster, Taekwon Thornton, Devonte Parker, Kendrick Bourne,

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Kaishan Boudi. But I keep doing that to Mario, Mario

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Douglas and Tree Nixon.

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>What did you keep calling to Mario Douglas during the

0:50:56.000 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Shrine Bray Week? I remember you couldn't get his name right.

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember what it was. Oh, it was Dallas Daniels,

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 1>who was like he kept getting Dallas Daniels.

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 3>So tomorrow it was like Zay Flowers, So I'll just

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.800
<v Speaker 3>do the tears. Zay Flowers with the top tier to

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Mario Douglas was the second tier and then Dallas Daniels

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 3>from where was where did you go again.

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Jackson?

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was Jackson Jackson State was the third

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 3>tier and the Patriots just say, didn't only practice the

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 3>one day? So Damrio Douglas and Dallas Daniels were just

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 3>interchangeable in the slot. And they both had the you know,

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the little it'll eliteration there we go, Yeah, with the

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 3>d's and every it just I couldn't do it. Dallas

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Daniels end up with the cowboys out there you go.

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.400
<v Speaker 3>So I think this is Elder's point and why he

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 3>called in, and I get it. In theory, they have

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 3>six guys that have the talent to be on the

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.799
<v Speaker 3>roster sorry, Trey Nixon. Uh, six guys that have the

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:55.760
<v Speaker 3>talent to be on the roster with realistically five spots.

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 3>They could carry six, but they don't normally carry You

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 3>remember what we did last year, and the reason why

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 3>they don't can normally carry six, just like the reason

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 3>why they don't normally carry extra bodies elsewhere is you

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 3>could relate it and say that it is because they

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 3>tee Matthew Slater and they keep Cody Davis, and they

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:15.360
<v Speaker 3>keep Brendan's right, like they keep the guys that are

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 3>only going to play the kicking game. But they have

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.280
<v Speaker 3>they have a spot for one of their rookies.

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember what we did last year? We had

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that big debate about who was it? He was Trey Nixon,

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Christian Wilkerson, and little Jordan Humphrey. Ye, And it was

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:33.839
<v Speaker 1>three guys for the fifth receiver spot. Yeah, and then

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they only kept for receivers. Do you remember that? So

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 1>who knows how many the keep I had six on

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>my first roster projection. There's a way they can do it. Now,

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have to be thin somewhere else. I had

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>them then on the defensive line, I had them thinn

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>at corner.

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but.

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>What helps them is the six guys we're talking about here,

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 1>who again are and I haven't listed alphabetically, so Kendrick Bourne,

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Kaishon Butte to Mario doug with Devonte Parker, Juju Smith, Schuster,

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Taekwon Thornton.

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, those six.

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Guys all have six pretty different skill sets. If there's

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>one overlap, it's Kendrick Bourne to Kaishon Bute. But the

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:17.919
<v Speaker 1>reality is, if Kaishawn Bute plays well enough to earn

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a roster spot, you can't expose him by waiving him

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:25.959
<v Speaker 1>because he will get claimed. So unless they're gonna trade

0:53:26.000 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Bourne, you have Parker, who's really your one true

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>X receiver on the roster. Even the guys were not

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about here, like they don't have a backup, you know,

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>roster fodder.

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Especially a guy. I mean, you could make the argument

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 3>that somebody like Taekwon could play the X, but in

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 3>that that body type, they don't have any right exactly.

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Juju is you know the slot he's made, He's making

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the tam right, he's making it, but his his skill

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>set is Is there another guy on the team that

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>has the same skill set as the same prototype of

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Juju Juju Smith Schuster.

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 3>He's not as uh, he's not as thick, But I

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 3>think there is some overlap between. Like we just did

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 3>the slot receiver Shrine Bowl tier is Juju Smith Schuster,

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Kendrick Bourn, Kishan Bute, so a little.

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Bit a little bit of it, but like I think

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Juju Kishon Bute and for what for the role we

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna play here, Yeah, Kashawan Bute and Kendrick

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Bourne are not the big slots, the power slots that

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster is right in that regard, you lose

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that element. Obviously. Taekwon Thornton's the speed guy, Kendrick Bourne

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is your kind of move wide receiver, and then Douglas

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is your like speed slot, your shifting slot, or your

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>gadget playget player. Right, So it's not like you look

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:40.719
<v Speaker 1>at two guys and say, well, they're both competing. Even

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 1>if they're competing maybe for one spot, like you said

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that that fifth receiver, they're different roles, right, There's not

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot where two guys are competing for the same role.

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>So unless Bat is excellent, Born is bad and they

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>can trade them, I think there's a real path to

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:58.839
<v Speaker 1>them keeping all six and I think, to go back

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to the exercise, say better at receiver, and I think noticeably, I.

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Think they're better at receiver too. I think that I

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 3>still will pound the table that Juju is an upgrade

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 3>over Jacoby Myers, and I'm gonna still stick to that.

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>For what they need, he is better. And there are

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:18.239
<v Speaker 1>there are spots like.

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:21.840
<v Speaker 3>There's there's certainly elements of Jacob. Jacoby is a better

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 3>natural separator.

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 1>For what it's worth, I think Juju is a better

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fit in New England than Jacoby is at this point

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in time, I think Jacoby is a better fit for

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders than Juju been you really get down to

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 1>system when you talk about you know, these two guys.

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 3>And I really think that Jacoby has elements of his

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 3>game that are better than Juju's. But but I think jujus,

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 3>like you said, uh, in particular after the cat, that's

0:55:45.200 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 3>what it comes down and his ability to create some

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:49.759
<v Speaker 3>bigger plays, so that that's I think a big thing.

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 3>I am really really excited, not I'm not. I wouldn't

0:55:56.600 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 3>use the word optimistic, I wouldn't use the word bullish.

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I am excited about to see how Bill O'Brien is

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 3>going to use Taekwon Thorton. I'm just excited about a

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 3>real offensive coordinator coming in here and having a guy

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:13.279
<v Speaker 3>with four two eight speed like that can run like that.

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 3>How does he get him off the line of scrimmage?

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 3>How does he use him in motion? How does he

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 3>use different alignment tricks like stacks and bunches and things

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 3>like that to get him off of press coverage or

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 3>away from contact. In the first you know, five to

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 3>ten yards of the route, there's a lot of potential

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 3>there for Bill O'Brien to create foot races for Taekwon Thornton,

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:38.240
<v Speaker 3>going this way, going that way, going up the field,

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 3>going horizontally across the field. That could really make Taekwon

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:44.799
<v Speaker 3>Thorton an extremely fun player for the Patriots. I'm not

0:56:44.800 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 3>going to put yards and touchdowns and catches on it.

0:56:47.680 --> 0:56:49.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how productive it's going to be, but

0:56:49.920 --> 0:56:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's gonna be a lot of elements

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:54.799
<v Speaker 3>and that for that reason, I'm really thinking this could

0:56:54.800 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 3>be a lot better if I'm if Bill O'Brien can

0:56:59.320 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 3>get Tai k Kwon to be the player that was

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:07.799
<v Speaker 3>a game changer at Baylor using similar tricks of the Trade.

0:57:07.840 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 3>I think that they have a really really fun room

0:57:11.280 --> 0:57:13.399
<v Speaker 3>in that regard.

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a breaking schedule news from the Patriots

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:19.960
<v Speaker 1>twitor account itself? Oh, what's that breaking? The Patriots will

0:57:20.000 --> 0:57:22.360
<v Speaker 1>play here this season. It's a picture of Julette Stadium.

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's a good one because people have like the

0:57:25.040 --> 0:57:27.320
<v Speaker 1>alerts on their phones, so they're breaking the Patriots will

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>play here and not click it so the pictures let

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that's well done.

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Good job Neil and Veronica and everybody like that is funy.

0:57:33.600 --> 0:57:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That's my kind of humor. It's funny.

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Anyways.

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Just a shout out to the guy in the comments

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>who says we're not entertaining. That's entertaining.

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Someone said we're not entertaining.

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Some guy is very upset. The first he said, we're

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not entertaining. We don't know anything, and now the other

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 1>people in the chat have talked him down to just

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not entertaining, which I will admit the show gets

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a little dense at times, but I think that's why

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>people are.

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Disappoint Exactly do you want entertaining? Then you know at

0:57:57.200 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the place for you, we're talking football here to a

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 3>certain kind of persons. Okay, the rookies. The argument to

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 3>me for keeping both rookies, I have a hard time

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 3>thinking that both rookies are gonna fully play themselves into

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:12.440
<v Speaker 3>roster spots.

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I think somebody else would have to have a bad camp.

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:18.959
<v Speaker 1>It's being too realistic, too optimistic. Their six round picks

0:58:18.960 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for a reason. I think it'd be really optimistic to

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 1>think both guys are so good in camp. Nope, no, no,

0:58:25.680 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But now, what is the reason Keyshan Boute is a

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>six round pick.

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Reasons? We know the reasons, I know. We know the

0:58:32.080 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 3>character concerns, injury concern Tomrio Douglas I love as a player,

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:38.880
<v Speaker 3>we know that. But at the bottom line is is

0:58:38.920 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 3>that he's small and undersized and making a big leap

0:58:42.200 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 3>in competition. There is a chance that his play strength

0:58:45.040 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 3>and his ability to run through contact isn't good enough

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 3>for this.

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know else with small and undersized and uh leaving

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 1>play strength and something competition? Whatever the hell you just said?

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 1>What Mark Jones? Yes, but that's what tomorrow Douglas's role

0:58:59.960 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. I think, yeah, and I and

0:59:01.880 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I really am high on him. I think he's

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:04.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good player here.

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying that it's very optimistic to think both

0:59:07.320 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 3>of those guys are like studs in training camp to

0:59:10.120 --> 0:59:13.320
<v Speaker 3>the point where they're both they have to make the team, right,

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 3>you can't part with either of them. The argument to

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 3>me that's better for it is that you really don't

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 3>have very much on your contract pass this year at

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:28.520
<v Speaker 3>that position. So just looking at those two guys as

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 3>developmental pieces in the pipeline for twenty twenty four and beyond.

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important because Devonte Parker is a free

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:38.439
<v Speaker 3>agent after this year, Kendrick Bourne's a free agent after

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 3>this year. You have Juju, you have Taekwon, and that's it.

0:59:44.040 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 3>In terms of proven NFL.

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Talent, I think Trey Nixon's in the last year.

0:59:48.400 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And and I know Taekwon proven NFL talent is

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 3>a little strong right now. But potential guy that it

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 3>was the second round pick. Yeah, So Taekwon's going to

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 3>be here in twenty twenty four. Juju is going to

0:59:58.920 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 3>be here in twenty twenty four. And so if you're

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 3>looking at the depth chart next year, one of these

1:00:03.480 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 3>rookie wide receivers is going to be kept, regardless, but

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:08.439
<v Speaker 3>keeping both of them and keeping six or carrying six,

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 3>or trading Kendrick Bourne or trading DeVante Parker in the

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 3>summer to keep five, including both rookies. There is a

1:00:14.960 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 3>contract argument to be made there that they need They

1:00:18.040 --> 1:00:20.360
<v Speaker 3>just need bodies for twenty twenty four. They just need

1:00:20.400 --> 1:00:22.760
<v Speaker 3>to have guys around that have been in the system,

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:25.480
<v Speaker 3>that have played football here for twenty twenty four. I'm

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 3>not ready to put six on the roster. I cut Booty.

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I did. I know that was as tough to do

1:00:31.360 --> 1:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>because I think that they could go either way with

1:00:33.000 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>him tomorrow. Douglas feels like an easier projection to me,

1:00:36.640 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 3>just feels I know what he is and what he

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 3>isn't and there's a role for him on the team

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>as that Marcus Jones gadget player type of guy in

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 3>year one. Yeah, if they want to use him that capacity.

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Kishon Boude is, like you were saying, a little bit

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:55.800
<v Speaker 3>redundant to guys like Juju and certainly Kendrick Bourne. He's

1:00:55.840 --> 1:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna have to push Kendrick Bourne either completely off the

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>roster or just at least push for playing time to

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>make the team. Like he's gonna have to be really

1:01:03.600 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>really uh in Kendrick Bourne's rear view mirror.

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think, even if there's not a twenty twenty

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>three football reason for keeping keishon Bute, I think exposing

1:01:13.000 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>him as risky and you remember you burned that contract,

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you cut him, he's no longer signed for four years.

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Now you have to keep sign even the futures deals

1:01:20.280 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and becomes an EERFA an RFA. Yeah, I think you

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta find a way to hold on him. Now. There's

1:01:26.000 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's also injuries are gonna happen. It's unfortunate,

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so maybe there's another way it happens. But even if

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't think both of those guys are gonna be

1:01:34.200 --> 1:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>locked down contributors this year, and I think Douglas who

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>contributes some, I think Boute can contribute maybe more in

1:01:41.080 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four to twenty twenty five. But if you

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>think those guys are gonna be pieces, that four year

1:01:46.400 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>contract is valuable, especially in a sixth round four year contract, right.

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think in that sense alone, they find a way

1:01:55.440 --> 1:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep both guys on the roster, even if they

1:01:57.280 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have to do some serious juggling. I think they're gonna

1:01:59.160 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>keep six receiverses.

1:02:00.600 --> 1:02:03.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a it's a good point. It's the contract in

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the longevity of the other contracts in that room. We

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>talked to Matt grow I don't know if it's during

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the draft or before the draft, when he mentioned it

1:02:09.880 --> 1:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>would be foolish to not look ahead at contract situations

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty four and beyond when you're drafting.

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you have to.

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>And certainly some of the drafts the picks that they

1:02:19.120 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 3>did make, I know they didn't in certain spots like

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 3>tackle and tight end, but an interior offensive line, they

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 3>certainly have it the pipeline ready for their stucked. They're

1:02:27.880 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>they're ready to go for if Mike on Wenu walks,

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:33.720
<v Speaker 3>if David Andrews retires, like they got guys so they

1:02:33.800 --> 1:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>they definitely looked at it in some places. And I

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>think the six round receivers are potentially guys that they

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>look at as twenty twenty four and beyond assets as

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:44.840
<v Speaker 3>well to keep around. So are you better on wide receivers.

1:02:44.880 --> 1:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm better on it?

1:02:45.440 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, no, I think noticeably better. I think both

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the short term and in the long term. I

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>know people are down that they didn't take a receiver

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>high in the draft, but sorry, just saw the Patriots

1:02:54.080 --> 1:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pop up on it. Yeah, that worked there.

1:02:55.640 --> 1:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>No, oh that's the old news.

1:02:57.600 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>The Tom Brady thing.

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we very we can touch on that in No.

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You listen to public service announcement ten times today on

1:03:04.080 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the drive. I think they're they're better short long term.

1:03:07.480 --> 1:03:11.440
<v Speaker 3>All right? You ready for me to read the sixteen

1:03:12.800 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 3>sixteen offensive lineman currently have under contract?

1:03:16.960 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Can I try to do it six Can I try

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it by I.

1:03:20.040 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Mean you probably have a different order than me, so

1:03:21.520 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>this might be hard. But well, you have the depth chart, right,

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing I have my version of it.

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So at tackle you have Trent Brown, Riley Reef,

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Anderson, Andrew Stuber, Calvin Anderson, Andrew Stuber.

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>At guard you have missing some tackles.

1:03:41.000 --> 1:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But I know I am Trent Brown.

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we don't have time, Okay.

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Just go ahead.

1:03:45.000 --> 1:03:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Trent Brown, conjuiced, James Farrence, Jason Hines, Bill Murray, Mike

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>On went Now, Cody Russy, Cole Strange, Andrews Duber, Calvin Anderson, Connoment,

1:03:52.800 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Riley Reef, David Andrews, Jake Andrews, City Sow, and Antonio

1:03:56.240 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>moff I, miss Connrac Dermott sixteen offensive linemen under contract.

1:04:01.920 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's really three positions. That's only like Adrian

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>five players per position.

1:04:07.560 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that they like have to go and

1:04:09.360 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>do their like their their meetings in like the auditorium

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:14.280
<v Speaker 3>or something like that, Like do you think the O

1:04:14.440 --> 1:04:17.840
<v Speaker 3>line room is big enough for sixteen three and twenty

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:19.760
<v Speaker 3>pound human beings to sit in one room?

1:04:19.760 --> 1:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, look if they do the tackles meeting, it's only

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>six players, right. How many linemen did they have last.

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Year at this point? I don't know about it. At

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>this point, they only ended up carrying eight, eight or

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>nine guys last year on the initials.

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>No, but at one point they had like four or

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>five on the practice squad.

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a lot. So it's always a lot.

1:04:39.160 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It's always.

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I think what's different about this year in terms of

1:04:42.480 --> 1:04:45.160
<v Speaker 3>it being a lot is that there there's so much

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:50.160
<v Speaker 3>uncertainty at tackle that they might just carry the bodies

1:04:50.200 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 3>just to have different bodies to throw at it. Right,

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Like there's because there's no real concrete other than I

1:04:55.320 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>think Trent Brown, who after they didn't draft the tackle early.

1:04:58.160 --> 1:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's safe to say that Trent Brown is

1:04:59.840 --> 1:05:02.560
<v Speaker 3>is now on this team like, I understand that there's

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>cap things that they could cut Trent Brown and save

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>some money or trade Trent Brown and save some money.

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>They don't without drafting a tackle in the top fifty.

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I did. They got it. Trent Brown is the only

1:05:12.400 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>guy that's played the NFL games for a long period

1:05:14.800 --> 1:05:16.640
<v Speaker 3>of time and done well. And here's the thing besides,

1:05:16.680 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess Riley Reef.

1:05:17.520 --> 1:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>When we were there y for a long time, when

1:05:19.960 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about like back in March, right, Oh,

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>if they cut Trent Brown, it's whatever it is, seven

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to ten million. I apologize Pat's gap. I got it wrong.

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I got it all spring. The idea was they were

1:05:30.280 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>going to take that seven to ten million and use

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it in free agency to tackle or then a drafted

1:05:35.400 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>tackle in the first round. Right, remember remember sign one

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Draft one. Yeah, those are the days that they did

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>draft on Alex they drafted City South. They gad, you're right, right,

1:05:44.080 --> 1:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I should be. I stand corrected. Yeah, I'm not saying

1:05:47.400 --> 1:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that there's nobody they can sign now, but yeah, seven

1:05:50.360 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to ten million dollars means a lot more in March

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>than it does in May. Yeah, right, So at this point,

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>are you going to beat can those seven to ten

1:05:59.320 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>million dollars make you a better team with players other

1:06:03.000 --> 1:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>than Trent Brown, just based on who's available, unless they're

1:06:06.360 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe opening up money for some sort of trade or something,

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>which rabbit hole, how do they do that? So I

1:06:13.720 --> 1:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think Trent Brown's safe with this.

1:06:15.000 --> 1:06:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the the the drill is better worse saying,

1:06:17.720 --> 1:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's a little bit confusing with this

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>because there's so many button names and some are tackles,

1:06:23.440 --> 1:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>some are guards, some are centers, some are tackles, slash guards.

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:28.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's all over the place. But I think

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 3>the biggest thing that I would say, I'm gonna say

1:06:32.680 --> 1:06:35.600
<v Speaker 3>that I'm gonna talk, I'm gonna contradict myself because I'm

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:40.120
<v Speaker 3>allowed to do that. I think they're better on paper.

1:06:40.800 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>But I have some real legitimate concerns about this, about

1:06:44.440 --> 1:06:51.160
<v Speaker 3>this tackle group, some real concerns that I I am fearful,

1:06:51.960 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 3>just like last year when right tackle and at times,

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>let's face it, with Trent Brown, left tackle too, Alex

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>was a little bit up and down. I am concerned

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:03.960
<v Speaker 3>that this is going to be the demise of this offense.

1:07:04.040 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Not past catchers, not the Latin, not that oh they

1:07:06.880 --> 1:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>don't have the number one receiver, like, none of that.

1:07:09.960 --> 1:07:15.000
<v Speaker 3>My biggest concern right now is protection pass protection mainly,

1:07:15.040 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I think they'll figure out how to get it blocked

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>up in the run game, and I think a lot

1:07:18.880 --> 1:07:22.040
<v Speaker 3>of that assignments is so important when it comes to that,

1:07:22.080 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 3>and I think Bill O'Brien and Adrian Clem being here,

1:07:24.520 --> 1:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>it will be so much cleaner in terms of mike

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>points and angles and who has who and that sort

1:07:29.240 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 3>of thing that I think their run game is going

1:07:30.720 --> 1:07:34.479
<v Speaker 3>to be fine. Pass protection and tackle play in pass

1:07:34.520 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>protection is a big concern of mine. I think the

1:07:36.760 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>main reason is because I think they're rolling with Riley

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Reef at right tackle, and I had serious range and

1:07:43.000 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>foot speed concerns with him based off of his film

1:07:45.640 --> 1:07:48.040
<v Speaker 3>last year with Chicago, and now we're even a year

1:07:48.200 --> 1:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>ahead of that. You look at reportedly.

1:07:53.640 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Reportedly the matchup in week one, yeah, which reportedly reportedly

1:07:57.760 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is the Philadelphia Eagles, and reportedly reportedly and Riley Reef

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>against Hassan Reddick, Like that's a mismatch, right, And then

1:08:06.200 --> 1:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the next week he goes up against Jalen Phillips and

1:08:09.120 --> 1:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Chubb, and then the next week it's gonna you know,

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>could be Von Miller and Greg Russeau with Buffalo, you

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Like, there's just so many of

1:08:17.400 --> 1:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>these talented edge rushers. We know statistically speaking that Mac

1:08:21.479 --> 1:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones is like all quarterbacks regresses under pressure. But Mac

1:08:26.400 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in particular last year had a ton of issues against

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the blitz and a ton of issues with pressure. Now

1:08:31.640 --> 1:08:35.479
<v Speaker 1>with a better coordinated attack and metter hots and better

1:08:35.520 --> 1:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>blitz pickups and like, all, yeah, it should be cleaner.

1:08:38.000 --> 1:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>We get all that. I'm very I'm not like that

1:08:42.600 --> 1:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>bullish on this offensive line group. I am coming around

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>on some of the rookies. I think that some of

1:08:48.800 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>these rookies can play in spots that they have skill

1:08:53.040 --> 1:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sets that fit spots that they need. You know, Antonio Maffi,

1:08:56.479 --> 1:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is a classic if they don't end up

1:08:59.200 --> 1:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>paying Mike on Way. I knew like he's going to

1:09:00.840 --> 1:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>start at right guard in twenty twenty four and he's

1:09:02.680 --> 1:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be a fine player for them.

1:09:04.360 --> 1:09:07.040
<v Speaker 3>City Sao is exciting, you know. I watched some of

1:09:07.080 --> 1:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>his film, Poor U Mass. I really learned like the

1:09:11.040 --> 1:09:14.840
<v Speaker 3>difference between City Sao and and the guys they had there. Well,

1:09:15.000 --> 1:09:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I think he legitimately, I think really did some damage to.

1:09:18.920 --> 1:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Him and to Mario Douglas Tomorrow.

1:09:22.600 --> 1:09:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it probably tells you a lot about that program.

1:09:25.640 --> 1:09:31.519
<v Speaker 3>But City Sao does have some some suddenness, some movement skill,

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>some foot speed. Certainly. I still look at him though,

1:09:35.400 --> 1:09:37.679
<v Speaker 3>and still I still see a guard. I still see

1:09:37.680 --> 1:09:41.519
<v Speaker 3>a guard ideally, but I guess in theory they've moved

1:09:41.520 --> 1:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>that player to right tackle before it's Mike on Wnu.

1:09:44.400 --> 1:09:47.160
<v Speaker 3>It's to a degree, Marcus Cannon right, Marcus Cannon was

1:09:47.160 --> 1:09:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a little bit taller than Onnu. Marcus knn' is a

1:09:49.720 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 3>big guy. I didn't realize Cannon's like six ' five

1:09:54.439 --> 1:09:57.600
<v Speaker 3>three thirty. Yeah, so he's you know, on why it

1:09:57.640 --> 1:10:01.280
<v Speaker 3>was stouter he's yeah, and when it's like six one, yeah,

1:10:01.439 --> 1:10:03.880
<v Speaker 3>City sounds a little bit closer to that with Marcus Cannon.

1:10:03.960 --> 1:10:07.559
<v Speaker 3>So I think City South can play tackle at right tackle.

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Certainly not a left tackle in this system, but I

1:10:09.800 --> 1:10:12.839
<v Speaker 3>think you could play right. It's a lot of bodies

1:10:12.880 --> 1:10:14.479
<v Speaker 3>and we'll see what ends up happening in camp. And

1:10:14.479 --> 1:10:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the last one I mentioned because I was higher on

1:10:17.840 --> 1:10:20.240
<v Speaker 3>him when they made this who's free agent signings, and

1:10:20.479 --> 1:10:23.519
<v Speaker 3>I think Riley Reef has gotten a lot of buzz

1:10:23.600 --> 1:10:26.040
<v Speaker 3>as kind of the guy because of his experience and

1:10:26.040 --> 1:10:29.200
<v Speaker 3>his steadiness and his leadership and all that. I really

1:10:29.240 --> 1:10:33.320
<v Speaker 3>like Calvin Anderson as a player. And Calvin Anderson, to

1:10:33.439 --> 1:10:36.640
<v Speaker 3>me is the guy that could allow you if he

1:10:36.680 --> 1:10:38.400
<v Speaker 3>has a good camp and he looks the part and

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:41.040
<v Speaker 3>all that kind of stuff, Calvin Anderson could be the

1:10:41.080 --> 1:10:43.320
<v Speaker 3>guy that allows you to move Trent Brown right back

1:10:43.320 --> 1:10:46.320
<v Speaker 3>to the right side. Because Calvin Anderson's an athlete, you know,

1:10:46.600 --> 1:10:49.840
<v Speaker 3>that's the one thing that he certainly has foundationally, really

1:10:49.840 --> 1:10:53.759
<v Speaker 3>really good athlete, A great explosiveness out of his dance.

1:10:53.800 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 3>He's got the range. He's just inconsistent with his technique.

1:10:57.200 --> 1:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>If they can coach him up and Adrian Clem can

1:10:59.040 --> 1:11:01.679
<v Speaker 3>get him to be more consistent. And he's a left tackle,

1:11:01.880 --> 1:11:03.800
<v Speaker 3>so you could play him on the left side Trent

1:11:03.880 --> 1:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>on the right side. That could steady things maybe a

1:11:06.040 --> 1:11:08.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit more. But better words were same on the

1:11:08.640 --> 1:11:12.800
<v Speaker 3>offensive line, and it's confusing, is the names.

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it weird that I feel better about him? And

1:11:16.000 --> 1:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean I don't have concerns. I very much

1:11:17.720 --> 1:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>have concerns. I echo a lot of what you said

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>about the tackle position. Yeah, but Isaiah Winn just didn't

1:11:23.360 --> 1:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have it last year, and their right tackles were terrible, right,

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and Connor McDermott, like Connor McDermott, was serviceable.

1:11:32.120 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Connor McDermott saved the day.

1:11:33.880 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And he was replacement level. Yeah, right, And you know,

1:11:37.439 --> 1:11:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Cannon loved him when he was at the Patriots,

1:11:39.920 --> 1:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>was a great player. He's not that guy anymore. So, Yeah,

1:11:43.360 --> 1:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they have options. It's almost like the running back thing.

1:11:46.760 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Although I said worse at running back, I guess I don't,

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:51.639
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't have the optionense last year. Like there

1:11:51.720 --> 1:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was no Damien Harris at the tackle position last year,

1:11:54.360 --> 1:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just that sturdy veteran that you know, maybe wasn't great,

1:11:57.240 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but gotcha there. I guess that's what Connor McDermott was,

1:11:59.320 --> 1:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but not to.

1:11:59.720 --> 1:12:01.479
<v Speaker 3>The same I think the I think they hope that

1:12:01.479 --> 1:12:02.680
<v Speaker 3>that's what Riley Reef is.

1:12:02.920 --> 1:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I think so, like again, like they didn't have a

1:12:05.040 --> 1:12:06.519
<v Speaker 1>guy like Riley Reef. They didn't have a guy like

1:12:06.520 --> 1:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Anderson last year after Trent Brown. You're really just

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>going with you know, you're really just kind of hoping

1:12:13.200 --> 1:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not saying that Yodney could just Isaiah Win.

1:12:16.600 --> 1:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that Riley Reef or Calvin Anderson is

1:12:19.280 --> 1:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily great, but if you're gonna take a lottery ticket,

1:12:22.200 --> 1:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they're better lottery tickets than what they have

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yeah, So I do feel I don't feel great.

1:12:26.960 --> 1:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if I feel good. Yeah, but

1:12:29.280 --> 1:12:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I do still feel better than last year, which maybe

1:12:31.640 --> 1:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>shows how bad their offensive line was at times last year.

1:12:34.439 --> 1:12:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. That it's it's really a it's kind of remarkable

1:12:37.479 --> 1:12:40.680
<v Speaker 3>that and they feel good about this tackle room. They

1:12:40.680 --> 1:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>told us, They've told us right to our.

1:12:42.080 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Face, and Macro said it.

1:12:43.280 --> 1:12:45.879
<v Speaker 3>Macro said it, and I think that, you know, Belichick

1:12:45.960 --> 1:12:48.600
<v Speaker 3>said it too when he he mentioned that all the

1:12:48.680 --> 1:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>offensive additions in free agency and they didn't really add

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>to the defense and free agency and that's why you

1:12:53.840 --> 1:12:56.519
<v Speaker 3>got the defensive picks at the top of the draft

1:12:56.600 --> 1:12:59.559
<v Speaker 3>instead of offense. But in general, they feel good about

1:12:59.600 --> 1:13:02.080
<v Speaker 3>this tackle. I think that they think that they're better

1:13:02.160 --> 1:13:05.200
<v Speaker 3>on paper there than maybe the outside noise suggests. I'm

1:13:05.200 --> 1:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>willing to give them the benefit of the doubt going

1:13:06.960 --> 1:13:10.160
<v Speaker 3>into the year because maybe they know something that we

1:13:10.280 --> 1:13:13.439
<v Speaker 3>don't shock her, and maybe they they're you know, seeing

1:13:13.479 --> 1:13:17.160
<v Speaker 3>it differently, shocker, and I'll give them the benefit of doubt.

1:13:17.240 --> 1:13:21.719
<v Speaker 3>But on paper, from the outside looking in, it looks

1:13:21.800 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 3>like a group that has a lot of names but

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:29.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really have a lot of guys that you can

1:13:29.479 --> 1:13:34.120
<v Speaker 3>fully count on. If you were to configure, they're starting

1:13:34.160 --> 1:13:37.000
<v Speaker 3>five right now on the offensive line, I think is

1:13:37.040 --> 1:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the best way to do. You know who's starting at center,

1:13:41.400 --> 1:13:44.880
<v Speaker 3>you know who's starting at left guard, and barring something

1:13:44.920 --> 1:13:47.320
<v Speaker 3>weird happening, you probably know who's starting at right guard too.

1:13:47.360 --> 1:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And when I say one of the guys who's starting

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>on the right side, And when.

1:13:49.880 --> 1:13:52.759
<v Speaker 3>I says starting at right guard, barring something weird happening,

1:13:52.840 --> 1:13:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean if on when who ends up being some

1:13:56.080 --> 1:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of a trade situation, which I don't think is

1:13:58.400 --> 1:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. You know who's starting at right guard,

1:14:01.960 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think you know that Trent is starting at

1:14:04.040 --> 1:14:07.960
<v Speaker 3>one of the tackle spots. That other tackle spot's wide open.

1:14:08.200 --> 1:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>It could be you could tell me right now it

1:14:09.960 --> 1:14:12.559
<v Speaker 3>would be Riley Relief, Ryley, Riley Reef.

1:14:12.640 --> 1:14:13.639
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be a tough one.

1:14:14.200 --> 1:14:15.679
<v Speaker 3>You could tell me that it was gonna be City

1:14:15.720 --> 1:14:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Soal at this point, you could tell me it would

1:14:18.320 --> 1:14:19.960
<v Speaker 3>be Mike gon Winnu and they're gonna play one of

1:14:19.960 --> 1:14:22.559
<v Speaker 3>the rookies at guard right, Like you could tell me

1:14:22.600 --> 1:14:25.479
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of different configurations and I would believe you.

1:14:25.760 --> 1:14:27.800
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know if that's necessarily a great day.

1:14:28.360 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>And this is the one sort of biggest i'd say,

1:14:31.640 --> 1:14:33.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe even more so than wide receiver that I have

1:14:34.040 --> 1:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>with their current roster, is I want an offensive line

1:14:38.080 --> 1:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Like I missed the days when week out into camp

1:14:40.800 --> 1:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>alex and we just knew who the starting offensive line was, right,

1:14:44.040 --> 1:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>those were the days like that that was That's what

1:14:46.240 --> 1:14:48.360
<v Speaker 3>you want because you don't want to talk about your

1:14:48.400 --> 1:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>offensive line. If you're talking about your offensive line more

1:14:51.880 --> 1:14:55.400
<v Speaker 3>times than not, it's because it's a weakness. You don't

1:14:55.479 --> 1:14:58.559
<v Speaker 3>usually talk about an offensive line. That's that doesn't give

1:14:58.600 --> 1:15:00.559
<v Speaker 3>you a lot of reasons to talk about them. So

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>we'll see what ends up happening. Hopefully they're right and

1:15:04.680 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>we're all wrong about the tackles and ends up being good.

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>These rookies are interesting players, though I did uh Jake

1:15:10.320 --> 1:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Andrews and Antonio Maffi. We have profiles up on them now.

1:15:13.439 --> 1:15:16.719
<v Speaker 3>We talked to some of their coaches, Mike did City Sow.

1:15:17.200 --> 1:15:19.639
<v Speaker 3>But with Jake Andrews, I think a couple of things

1:15:19.680 --> 1:15:22.240
<v Speaker 3>just quickly that his coach has told me about him.

1:15:22.280 --> 1:15:26.200
<v Speaker 3>He's a really really good high school wrestler, Like I

1:15:26.479 --> 1:15:31.479
<v Speaker 3>love that All American and state champion in Alabama.

1:15:30.960 --> 1:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Copan, the one who was the college wrestler.

1:15:32.760 --> 1:15:38.439
<v Speaker 3>Well Steven Neils Steven, So he was an all time

1:15:39.400 --> 1:15:42.360
<v Speaker 3>uh you know, kind of almost like a legend wrestling

1:15:42.800 --> 1:15:47.919
<v Speaker 3>in in Alabama. And it was a really good offensive

1:15:47.920 --> 1:15:50.400
<v Speaker 3>lineman to All State all that kind of stuff in Alabama,

1:15:50.439 --> 1:15:53.799
<v Speaker 3>so all state football, and uh he went to Troy,

1:15:54.320 --> 1:15:56.719
<v Speaker 3>which I get isn't It's not Alabama, it's not Georgia.

1:15:56.760 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>I get that. But he's got that that wrestling not

1:16:01.160 --> 1:16:03.640
<v Speaker 3>only from a technique standpoint that he's got that you know,

1:16:03.720 --> 1:16:06.920
<v Speaker 3>understands rules of engagement and leverage and like all that

1:16:07.040 --> 1:16:09.559
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff, but he's also just got that like

1:16:09.720 --> 1:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>snarl and that that grittiness and that toughness. He's a

1:16:12.960 --> 1:16:16.879
<v Speaker 3>really strong, stout player, and I think that he's definitely

1:16:16.880 --> 1:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna be somebody that factors in that center in the

1:16:20.280 --> 1:16:23.439
<v Speaker 3>long term. And I look at Antonio Maffi basically a

1:16:23.479 --> 1:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>carbon copy of Mike on Winnu from a body type standpoint,

1:16:27.080 --> 1:16:30.519
<v Speaker 3>how he's built played nose tackle, switched over to guard

1:16:30.880 --> 1:16:36.240
<v Speaker 3>now plays guard really just block of a man like this,

1:16:36.840 --> 1:16:40.840
<v Speaker 3>massive dude, powerful, strong, a lot like Mike on winning.

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:43.120
<v Speaker 3>So I can see where they're going with all those picks.

1:16:43.120 --> 1:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see what ends up happening interior scene. They

1:16:45.760 --> 1:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>might have the best interior line depth in the league

1:16:48.439 --> 1:16:51.360
<v Speaker 3>after taking three of them in the draft, Like nobody's

1:16:51.400 --> 1:16:54.120
<v Speaker 3>got more guards in the Patriots, So we'll see how

1:16:54.120 --> 1:16:57.799
<v Speaker 3>that ends up happening really quickly before we sign off, Alex,

1:16:58.080 --> 1:17:00.479
<v Speaker 3>what are your thoughts on Tom Brady coming back for

1:17:00.600 --> 1:17:03.599
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots? Said opener, home opener. It sounds like it's

1:17:03.640 --> 1:17:06.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a weak one. Sounds like rumored, not confirmed. Well,

1:17:06.880 --> 1:17:08.479
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be the home opener whatever it is. Yeah,

1:17:08.520 --> 1:17:10.120
<v Speaker 3>it sounds like that's gonna be in week one, is

1:17:10.640 --> 1:17:14.000
<v Speaker 3>what I was getting at. Okay, Tom Brady coming back,

1:17:14.479 --> 1:17:17.720
<v Speaker 3>the prodigal Sun returning, how do you feel about it?

1:17:17.760 --> 1:17:19.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you remember when we were doing shows, when

1:17:19.640 --> 1:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>when we first started working together and he left. My

1:17:21.880 --> 1:17:23.559
<v Speaker 1>whole thing with him leaving was like I don't necessarily

1:17:23.600 --> 1:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>mind watching him in another uniform.

1:17:25.680 --> 1:17:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:17:26.000 --> 1:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>My issue was you only get Peyton right, where Peyton

1:17:28.320 --> 1:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Manning's now more part of the Broncos than the Colts,

1:17:30.280 --> 1:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>even though he, you know, is the greatest player in

1:17:32.680 --> 1:17:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Colt's history. Yeah, And I was like, I don't want

1:17:34.600 --> 1:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to lose Brady in that sense. I want him to

1:17:37.439 --> 1:17:40.559
<v Speaker 1>be a Patriot for life. And look, we're probably gonna

1:17:40.600 --> 1:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>have to share him with Tampa to some extent one

1:17:42.320 --> 1:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>where or the other. But coming back for something like

1:17:45.160 --> 1:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this is big. I'm glad he's doing it. I'm really

1:17:46.760 --> 1:17:48.479
<v Speaker 1>glad he's doing it. So I'm looking forward to it.

1:17:49.000 --> 1:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be really fun day, you know. Hopefully they

1:17:52.320 --> 1:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>play up to it. Yeah. The other question here is

1:17:55.520 --> 1:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like do they wear to throwback uniforms? And then do

1:17:58.120 --> 1:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we because they normally give the guy the jersey, right,

1:18:00.520 --> 1:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll give him the current jersey, they won't give him

1:18:03.080 --> 1:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the one with like the silver shoulders, right the dynasty era.

1:18:06.040 --> 1:18:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Do we get to see him in the pat Patriot

1:18:07.600 --> 1:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>throwback one last time? That could be cool? So No,

1:18:09.600 --> 1:18:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm super excited for It's gonna be a lot of fun. Yeah,

1:18:11.560 --> 1:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad he's doing it. I'm glad the team's doing it. Yeah.

1:18:15.320 --> 1:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Robber Craft seemed super excited about it on NFL Network

1:18:18.280 --> 1:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this morning, which I mean, of course he is, but

1:18:19.960 --> 1:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like it was kind of cool to see that, like, oh,

1:18:22.720 --> 1:18:25.559
<v Speaker 1>it felt like a high school union. So looking forward

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to better than the high school re union, you know,

1:18:27.200 --> 1:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean.

1:18:27.800 --> 1:18:29.479
<v Speaker 3>But that, like, I think a couple of things.

1:18:29.640 --> 1:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>When you see these people hanging out together, you haven't

1:18:31.439 --> 1:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>seen hung out together in years, and it's like, oh yeah, yeah,

1:18:36.040 --> 1:18:36.759
<v Speaker 1>so yeah.

1:18:36.560 --> 1:18:40.160
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of like I imagine how my parents feel

1:18:40.760 --> 1:18:43.880
<v Speaker 3>when my high school friends like come back around, Like

1:18:43.920 --> 1:18:46.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, if we're like all home for things that's

1:18:46.120 --> 1:18:48.640
<v Speaker 3>good or something like that, and like, you know, the

1:18:48.680 --> 1:18:51.240
<v Speaker 3>people my high school friends that like grew up in

1:18:51.280 --> 1:18:53.479
<v Speaker 3>my house as kids and stuff like that, my parents

1:18:53.520 --> 1:18:55.639
<v Speaker 3>get all excited when they when those people are around

1:18:56.160 --> 1:18:59.519
<v Speaker 3>really quickly. With Brady, I guess two things for me.

1:18:59.640 --> 1:19:03.840
<v Speaker 3>One and it's great that we are opening the door

1:19:04.280 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 3>to him being a part of the Patriots again with this. Yes,

1:19:07.600 --> 1:19:09.600
<v Speaker 3>it's not gonna be the only thing. It's certainly I

1:19:09.640 --> 1:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>don't even think it's gonna be the biggest thing. I

1:19:12.320 --> 1:19:17.120
<v Speaker 3>think that there's gonna be bigger monumental type of moments

1:19:17.240 --> 1:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>or ceremonies, you know, Patriots Hall Fame.

1:19:20.080 --> 1:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Jersey Craft said kind of that, right, yeah, Jersey retirement,

1:19:24.439 --> 1:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this is you don't think that retires Jersey when he's here.

1:19:28.320 --> 1:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of hoping that they would.

1:19:31.000 --> 1:19:33.479
<v Speaker 3>I don't know anything, So I just want to put

1:19:33.479 --> 1:19:35.439
<v Speaker 3>that out there because I think sometimes people think that,

1:19:35.560 --> 1:19:37.479
<v Speaker 3>you know, we we know things around here about this

1:19:37.479 --> 1:19:40.880
<v Speaker 3>type of stuff. I don't know anything about that. I

1:19:40.920 --> 1:19:45.519
<v Speaker 3>don't think so I think that this is remember after

1:19:45.560 --> 1:19:48.120
<v Speaker 3>the COVID year, they brought Julian Edelman back and they

1:19:48.160 --> 1:19:51.160
<v Speaker 3>just allowed They just gave him a moment at halftime

1:19:51.200 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and allowed the Craft. That's what this is, I think

1:19:54.080 --> 1:19:59.000
<v Speaker 3>in theory, So Jersey retirement. I wouldn't rule out them

1:19:59.120 --> 1:20:02.240
<v Speaker 3>announcing that they are retiring his jersey because that's a given.

1:20:02.840 --> 1:20:06.320
<v Speaker 3>It's that's an easy one, right, So I wouldn't rule

1:20:06.320 --> 1:20:09.479
<v Speaker 3>that out. But I think that ideally they have separate

1:20:09.560 --> 1:20:12.040
<v Speaker 3>occasions for all of these things. You know, this is

1:20:12.120 --> 1:20:14.960
<v Speaker 3>just kind of a way to bring bring him back

1:20:15.120 --> 1:20:20.040
<v Speaker 3>and reintroduce him back into the Patriots organization and also

1:20:20.160 --> 1:20:22.759
<v Speaker 3>just to quite frankly show him off right to the fans.

1:20:22.800 --> 1:20:25.559
<v Speaker 3>A little bit and get fans fired up. Then I

1:20:25.560 --> 1:20:29.240
<v Speaker 3>think there's gonna be Jersey retirement, and then there'll be

1:20:29.240 --> 1:20:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Patriots Hall of Fame. Now there could be a situation

1:20:33.960 --> 1:20:36.320
<v Speaker 3>where the Patriots Hall of Fame voting and all it

1:20:36.400 --> 1:20:39.240
<v Speaker 3>might not go through the typical hoops for the Patriots

1:20:39.240 --> 1:20:39.719
<v Speaker 3>Hall of Fame.

1:20:39.840 --> 1:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they got to put him in like specially.

1:20:42.840 --> 1:20:46.960
<v Speaker 3>For two reasons. One, it's silly to put Tom Brady

1:20:47.040 --> 1:20:49.800
<v Speaker 3>up against like poor Logan Makings and Bill Parcells in

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:52.760
<v Speaker 3>a fan vote, because it's just gonna be one hundred.

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Like, oh my god, it takes from you. If it's

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Brady against Barcels.

1:20:56.479 --> 1:20:59.599
<v Speaker 3>It'll just be like, it'll be ninety nine percent Brady,

1:20:59.640 --> 1:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>because some trolls will vote for somebody else just to

1:21:02.360 --> 1:21:05.479
<v Speaker 3>throw off the numbers. But obviously he's gonna win in

1:21:05.600 --> 1:21:11.920
<v Speaker 3>a absolute landslide in a fan vote. So it's kind

1:21:11.920 --> 1:21:14.920
<v Speaker 3>of unfair almost in a way to put two guys

1:21:14.960 --> 1:21:17.240
<v Speaker 3>up against him in a fan vote like they traditionally do.

1:21:17.720 --> 1:21:20.200
<v Speaker 3>And then secondly, he does deserve it, of course, to

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:22.320
<v Speaker 3>be you know, just put right in and not gone

1:21:22.320 --> 1:21:24.439
<v Speaker 3>through the whole voting process. So I think that's in

1:21:24.479 --> 1:21:27.559
<v Speaker 3>play I think that there will be some sort of

1:21:29.760 --> 1:21:34.559
<v Speaker 3>statue road named after like something like that, right that's

1:21:34.600 --> 1:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>around the stadium. That's sort of a showing, you know,

1:21:38.640 --> 1:21:41.880
<v Speaker 3>love to Brady in some sort of way, so that

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:44.960
<v Speaker 3>there'll be a bunch of different check marks here, you know.

1:21:45.000 --> 1:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I think there's gonna be a lot of different benchmarks

1:21:47.000 --> 1:21:49.800
<v Speaker 3>here of what they're gonna do with him. So that's great.

1:21:49.840 --> 1:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>But this is to me is really just like the

1:21:53.040 --> 1:21:57.200
<v Speaker 3>first step of hopefully many steps to honor Tom Brady

1:21:57.800 --> 1:22:00.680
<v Speaker 3>from this point on. So that'll be fun. Let's just

1:22:00.720 --> 1:22:04.439
<v Speaker 3>really quickly, really really quickly does do better where it's

1:22:04.439 --> 1:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>the same rapid fire here. Just to everybody that just

1:22:07.040 --> 1:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>listened to us talk about seventeen hundred different names for

1:22:09.840 --> 1:22:12.400
<v Speaker 3>an hour and a half, knows where we're at. So quarterbacks,

1:22:12.400 --> 1:22:13.639
<v Speaker 3>we're both. Are we better?

1:22:14.320 --> 1:22:17.519
<v Speaker 1>I said, very, very slightly worse? Worst? I think I

1:22:17.560 --> 1:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>said same, Okay, I didn't know, same as an option.

1:22:20.240 --> 1:22:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, better, worse, same?

1:22:21.400 --> 1:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, just keep going.

1:22:22.360 --> 1:22:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Running backs, I said better.

1:22:24.280 --> 1:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You said worse with potential to be better.

1:22:27.120 --> 1:22:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Can you not walk the fence one time? You said?

1:22:30.200 --> 1:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>You keep saying that's the most walking defence. Yeah, at

1:22:32.760 --> 1:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>least I admit it out loud wide receiver.

1:22:35.200 --> 1:22:38.639
<v Speaker 3>We're both better noticeably better. Tight ends, were both better.

1:22:38.720 --> 1:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Better offensive line, we're both bet better. Yeah they got

1:22:43.040 --> 1:22:46.160
<v Speaker 3>better in some places. Yeah they did get better. See

1:22:46.160 --> 1:22:47.880
<v Speaker 3>how much it matters in a couple of months. But

1:22:47.920 --> 1:22:50.600
<v Speaker 3>we'll be back next week and we'll talk about the

1:22:50.600 --> 1:22:54.080
<v Speaker 3>schedule and it's full capacity once we have it tonight.

1:22:54.360 --> 1:22:56.880
<v Speaker 3>So next week we'll do a schedule recap and go

1:22:56.960 --> 1:23:00.439
<v Speaker 3>over some of the usual things, you know, the the

1:23:00.479 --> 1:23:04.040
<v Speaker 3>meat of the schedule and the bye week and Christmas

1:23:04.080 --> 1:23:06.400
<v Speaker 3>and all that type of stuff, and we'll also do

1:23:06.479 --> 1:23:08.760
<v Speaker 3>a better word same for the defense, which I think

1:23:08.840 --> 1:23:11.400
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit easier quite frankly, than the office.

1:23:11.400 --> 1:23:13.760
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of names. Defensively, I think it's a

1:23:13.760 --> 1:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit easier. So we'll do that next week as well.

1:23:15.760 --> 1:23:19.040
<v Speaker 3>But until then, signing off for Alex Bartham, Evan Lazar.

1:23:19.120 --> 1:23:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for watching and listening everybody, and we'll see you

1:23:21.360 --> 1:23:22.200
<v Speaker 3>guys next Thursday.

1:23:24.960 --> 1:23:28.800
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for downloading this podcast, Subscribe on Apple, Google Play,

1:23:28.840 --> 1:23:31.920
<v Speaker 5>and everywhere else you listen. Like the show, Please rate

1:23:31.960 --> 1:23:35.080
<v Speaker 5>and review us. Listener comments and ratings help keep us

1:23:35.160 --> 1:23:38.280
<v Speaker 5>high in the podcast rankings, So new listeners can find us.

1:23:38.439 --> 1:23:41.519
<v Speaker 5>Be sure to check patriots dot com for more news

1:23:41.560 --> 1:23:42.920
<v Speaker 5>and more podcasts.