WEBVTT - Bloomberg Radio Special: A 2020 Election Update

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>We have no doubt and when the counts finished, Senator

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Harris and I will be declared the winners. We think

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot of litigation because we

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>have so much evidence, so much proof. I ask everyone

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to stay calm. The process is working. It's going to

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>end up perhaps at the highest court in the land.

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>This is special coverage of the election from Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is a Bloomberg day Break special report. I'm

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Hagar, I'm Amy Morris. The votes are still being counted,

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>legal challenges remain, but the path to the White House

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is there for Joe Biden. Coming up over the next hour,

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we examine the vote, the legal battle, and the path

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead for a White House policy, plus how the next

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>steps could play out in the days and weeks to

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>come leading up to December's electoral College vote. That is

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>all straight ahead for now. Let's bring in Derek Wallbank,

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's senior editor for breaking news. And Derek, of course,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Biden team was hoping the news would break last night,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that they'd get to that magic number of two seventy.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>What are the chances we see that news actually break

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this weekend? Well, Nathan, I think that the chances of

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>getting a real sign of of where this is actually

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>going this weekend are actually fairly good. Um, you were

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>looking now overnight as you wake up in America. The

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thing to know is that everything kind of kept pushing

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the same direction that it was going. In Pennsylvania, you

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>saw the Biden lead expand again a little bit. It

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>expanded again in Georgia a little bit. In Arizona narrowed

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but not by enough that Donald Trump

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>needs to go and take over that state. So you

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>still see as as America wakes up today, Joe Biden

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of standing on the precipice of victory with any

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>one of a couple of states possibly putting him over Derek.

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>The Trump campaign has already said it would pursue all

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>legal path in a vote fight. So catch us up

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>if you could about how many more paths the president

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>might have. Well, in terms of the legal challenges, you

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>are seeing a lot of things start to be filed

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or threatened or or somehow previewed. Um And and it

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of is. It's every single state. There's something going

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on to various levels of severity. I think the biggest

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>one probably and where where a lot of the focuses

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is in Pennsylvania, where um, the Supreme Court has gotten

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit involved to say that some of these

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>uh late arriving ballots need to be kind of put

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to the side. And that was a fight that we

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>knew was coming, we we knew would be there. But Amy,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I noticed here is it

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>might be a fight that's actually numerically irrelevant. And what

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is it's very, very possible that

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>when Pennsylvania stops counting all of the votes that everyone

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>agrees are regularly cast um, that the Biden margin is

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so large there that the total votes in question in

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this in this dispute, um will be will be less

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>than the Biden margin, and in which case it wouldn't

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>change the outcome. So that's when I think we're following,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>though in Pennsylvania were definitely following that. UM. I think

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that both sides are kind of agreed on the idea

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that every vote should count, but Republicans are trying to

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>make a distinction to say every legal vote should count,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and then they're making some different definitions of the word legal.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>But in practice, I think I would sum up by

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that Biden right now is on track for a

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>victory that would be large enough to offset any of

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>these potential challenges that we have seen seriously filed. Assuming

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers continue trending where they are, it does seem, Derek

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>as though Pennsylvania could very well be the decisive stay

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>as we do the math up to to seventy. But

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we also know that there is probably going to be

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a recount in Wisconsin. The margin is uh slim enough

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>there that it could trigger a recount should the Trump

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>campaign ask for one. And Georgia's secretary of state has

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>already said that the margin is so tight they're at

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>current count only about four thousand votes. There's definitely going

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>to be a recount. How could that sway things? Well, yeah, Nathan,

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And and in Georgia, the overnight numbers are are ticked

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>up enough that when the AP updates it's totals, you'll

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>see that rise to about seven thousand for Biden, but

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>still well within that recount territory. UM. I do think

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that that is a thing that's definitely in play. If

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a recount. You're unlikely to see the AP call

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those states because they tend not to do that,

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>uh in Pennsylvania. This is the one. This is the

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>one that I think we're all watching very very closely. There.

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a little bit of math that I

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>did during my day uh here overnight, which is which

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>is to say that under Pennsylvania rules, um, if the

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>margin is within point five of a percent, then you

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>can get to a recount. If it's above that, you

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily have to have that. So what does that

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>mean in raw votes? Somewhere in the ballpark of forty

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand votes as a margin between Biden and Trump, and

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>right now it's in the upper twenty thousands. So it's

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a reachable thing for Biden to be able to get

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to a recount proof uh majority in the in the

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. And if that happens, that helps there.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>The other things that we're watching really really early, I

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think in the day are that Nevada and Arizona should

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have some additional numbers for us and those if those

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>put the counts in both of those states to bed,

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>then Pennsylvania is academic Derek Wallbank. We have quite a

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>lot to watch in the hours and potentially days to

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>come in these battleground states. It's just amazing to think

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that so many battlegrounds remain in flux this far after

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>election day. But we knew with a pandemic on it

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>very well could have been like this. Derek Wallbank, Bloomberg

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Senior editor for Breaking News, Thanks so much for being

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>with us this morning on this special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nathan Hager alongside Amy Morris, and this is Bloomberg.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>This is special coverage of the twenty election from Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is a Bloomberg Daybreak special report. It is

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>seven seventeen on Wall Street. I'm Nathan Hager, I'm Amy Morris.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>The votes are still being counted, Legal challenges remain, but

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the path to the White House is there for Joe Biden.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Kevin's really now. Kevin is the chief

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington correspondent for Bloomberg Radio and Television. Kevin, good morning

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to you. Let's get caught up on what we may

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>have missed overnight. Joe Biden remains ahead in four key states,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ballots still being counted as we speak. President Trump continues

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to push the idea of stopping the count that there

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are some conspiracy theories surrounding this election. Where are we

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>right now? Good morning, Amy. Last night, Joe Biden speaking

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>from Wilmington, Delaware, delivering what largely what he was his

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>team was hoping would be an acceptance speech or a

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>declaratory speech of sorts. It turned into another speech urging

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>patience and calm, But he went on to say that

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he is going to make sure that every vote is counted.

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>He also said that he believes he will win in

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the battleground states of Georgia as well as Arizona, and

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>if he were to do that, Amy, he would be

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the first Democratic candidate to do so since Bill Clinton. Meanwhile,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign, they're saying that they're willing to take

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this all the way to the Supreme Court if they

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if they want to. But behind the scenes, yes your day,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>when I spoke with Republican members of Congress, they were

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the President was met with a deep source of skepticism

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about what the strategy is and how long the President

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was willing to continue onward with this approach. Well, in

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, as the president pursues this approach, Kevin, we

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>do have this very slow, protracted counting of mail in

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>votes that many of these states hadn't been equipped to

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with up until now. Give us a sense of

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>where we are in terms of where the count is

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>in some of these battleground states, particularly Georgia, where the

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>where the margin is so razor thin right now, precisely

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>so Georgia, it's a it's it's incredibly a razor thin margin,

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's something like less than a percentage point

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>according to some counts. But they're headed for a recount,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and recounts typically take at least several days. And that

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very optimistic estimate. Uh, it can take several weeks,

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and so we could be in mid November by the

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>time Georgia gets gets a result. Uh. In terms of Nevada,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>UH that we're anticipating new vote counts from Clark County

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, that's where Las Vegas is. We're anticipating new

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>vote counts sometime Nathan, within the next couple of hours

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and throughout the weekend. And then in Pennsylvania where Joe

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden yesterday surpassed President Trump in the vote total. Uh,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they're waiting for military absentee ballots and they're continuing to

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>count as well. To be frank with you, the Biden

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>campaign had wanted there to be one more state called

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>before he spoke at Wilmington, Delaware last night. He was

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna speak at like seven o'clock at night. And then

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I checked in with the source on the campaign and

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what they told me was, well, they're still, you know,

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're waiting and optimistic that when he spoke, he would

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>get to that magic number, or at least one of

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the networks or ap would have put him at to seventy.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>But that just didn't have in and you know, and

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>now it's becoming a situation where you very much could

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>have someone declaring at to seventy uh, Joe Biden saying,

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, thank you, I'm we're looking forward to being president,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and President Trump not conceding. Let's talk about the mood, Kevin.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You've talked to operatives on both sides at the aisle,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporters and Biden supporters. Have you been able to

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>gauge the mood, the sense of optimism or the sense

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of determination. What's the temperature now? As I mentioned yesterday,

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with several Republican members of Congress and and

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they actually had a a a call with the Republican

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Conference yesterday uh in in what would have been on

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>Capital Hill. But this obviously because of covid on via telephone,

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's a sense amy of, well, we we made

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>gains in the House of Representatives and we're still competitive

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate and when everyone was predicting a blue wave.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But at terms of the press residential level, I would

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>say that while publicly you're hearing potential candidates like Senator

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz, Tom Cotton and others deliver statements saying every

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>legal vote must be counted, what you're not seeing is

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a rush to a campaign war room or a legal barroom.

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's where there's a lot of division. The president's

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>inner circle, his members of his family, they are in

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>contact very much and in some cases on the ground

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>in these battleground states. The president's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>still very much briefing the president, talking to the President

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on. But again, they it they don't

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>appear to necessarily have the entire Republican Party fullheartedly behind them, um.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's a that's a marked difference from other fights

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that the president has been in, including impeachment and Mueller

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and all that. And in terms of the legal strategy

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>that the President's team is pursuing Kevin. During the campaign,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about how there had been such a

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>cash drain on the Trump side. Is there enough resources

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>for the President's side to mount the kind of multi

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>pronged legal fight that they're hinting at that they want. Well,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they have said that there is, and that that their

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>attorneys are are willing to file, you know, a state

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>by state claims and and they ultimately do feel that

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>if it should end up in the Supreme Court, that

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be in their favor, you know. But it's

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to talk about the multi state legal approach, Nathan,

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>as you and I have talked about before, because we

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have any source material in front of us, and

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we and we there have not been briefings in the

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sense typically with with this type of situation, you would

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>anticipate round the clock briefings and updates coming from the

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>President's re election campaign, and that just hasn't really started yet.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's unknown if they're working on that now. We

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>got reports yesterday Maggie Haberman at The New York Times

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>reporting that David Bossey had been hired to be a

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>lead figure on the legal fights by the president's re

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>election campaign. He had fallen out a favor at one

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>time with the President. Now apparently he's back in based

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>upon those developments. But that's what's going on on that side.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>On Joe Biden's side, they are continuing to have meetings

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>about COVID nineteen updates. I can tell you I've spoken

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>directly with sources who are connected to his transition team.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>They're having transition meetings. Yesterday, Uh, dal Jones reported that

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Gary Gensler is going to be in a Biden administration,

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street oversight advisor. Uh So they're they're continuing

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>onward in terms of a transition. But it's interesting because

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they also have to be careful because he still hasn't

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>reached two seventy and we got a lot more to

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>come as we continue to dive into the legal challenges

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and just the simple vote count itself. As Uh, this

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>election certainly has gone into much more than overtime now.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Cirelli, Chief Washington correspondent for Bloomberg Radio and Television,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being with us this morning. We're gonna be

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>checking back with you throughout this special edition of Bloomberg

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak on the election process. Coming up, we'll have more

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on the vote, the legal battle, and the path ahead

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for White House policy straight ahead on this Bloomberg Daybreak

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>special report. I'm Nathan Hager alongside Amy Morris, and this

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is special coverage of the twenty election

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. And this is a Bloomberg day Break

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>special report. I'm Nathan Hager, I'm Amy Morris. The votes

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>are still being counted, but the path to the White

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>House is there for Joe Biden. Coming up, we'll look

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>at the future of policy at Pennsylvania Avenue. Let's bring

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in Greg Valiate now. He is the chief US policy

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>strategist at a g F Investments. Greg, good morning, do

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you always a pleasure to have You want to pick

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>your brain a little bit this morning about Joe Biden.

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We know he has a slight lead now, and if

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he does hold on to that, and if the count

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for Congress does remain the same, we could have a

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrat in the White House, a democratically held House, and

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a Republican Senate. I want to ask you about that scenario.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you see gridlock, a divided government, potential for cooperation?

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.359
<v Speaker 1>What do you see, well, good morning, Amy, I'd say

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>primarily Gridlock. I think that if the Republicans hold onto

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and we can't be positive because of runoffs

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on January six in Georgia, But if the Republicans control

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate, I don't see a lot getting done,

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and I certainly don't see big tax increases. Although, Greg,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we heard from Biden last night, of course, uh saying,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, expressing a message of patients, while at the

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>same time trying to look ahead, saying that he has

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work to do on the pandemic, on

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy, racial justice, and climate change. He's obviously laying

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>out an agenda. There is it possible for him to

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>pursue something of that agenda? Does he have a mandate

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to do so? He might, Nathan, But at the same time,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the proposals that he's talking

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about would run into stiff opposition from McConnell and McConnell's

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican truths. So maybe a few things. The real tip

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>off will be how quickly we get confirmation of Biden's

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>cabinet secretaries. That could That could be a rocky process.

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Now this count Greg is taking a very long time,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get your thoughts on what that

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>means for the nation. What I mean is, on the

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>one hand, it seems like it would be a good

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that is taking a long time. It means a

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people voted, they participated the elections. Officials are

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>being exceedingly careful. But on the other hand, everybody's in limbo.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>The whole country is just holding its breath. Is this

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>good or bad? It's bad. I think talk about how

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this could be fraudulent, that the the election was rigged.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Some of the rhetoric from the President and his aids,

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think are not helpful. I do worry a little

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>about social unrest. If this UH persists for weeks without

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>any final resolution by the courts, I think that you

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>could see a lot of protests. Joe Biden has tried

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to pitch himself as the kind of president who can

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>cool the temperature of the country and try to reach

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>out to those voters who supported President Trump. What kind

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of challenge could he face if he does get those

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>two seventy key electoral votes and make it into the

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>White House. What kind of challenge does he face two

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>try to bind the nation's wounds. Well, primarily, I would

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>say from the Senate. Again, the most intriguing angle here,

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, Nathan, is the relationship between Biden and McConnell.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>They've known each other for decades, they've worked together pretty well.

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Both are known as the expert dealmakers. So to be

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a little optimistic this morning, I do see a glimmer

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>of hope that the two of them could get together.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>And it would have to be close to the center,

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>not on the far left or far right. But I

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>think the two of them could get things done. So

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that speaks a cooperation between the White House and the Senate.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>But what does the next president, whether it's Trump or Biden,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>face immediately on day one, what is the very first

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>job for that president? Covid, covid, covid. I think that

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is by far the number one issue. I think that

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Biden will bring back Dr Faucci from

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been in Siberia. I think Fauci thought

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>she becomes a be a big big player once once again.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>They'll have to be a debate internally whether you shut

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>things down. I don't think that Biden would. I think

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>there'll be much tougher guidelines on masks and social distancing.

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's more than anything else. It's COVID

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and just quickly, Greg, I mean that raises the question

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of stimulus as well, doesn't it. Yes, it does, big

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>issue for the markets. There will be a stimulus bill

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>steerless forecast. I can't tell you when, I can't tell

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you how much it will cost, but I do think

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of months we have to have

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>another stimulus bill. All right, Greg, I want to build

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on something that you said earlier about civil unrest. It

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>does seem like what the electorate wants to know is

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>not just who wins, but then what happens when one

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>candidate is declared the winner. Because businesses are still boarded up,

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>folks are not letting their guard down. What could possibly

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>happen over the next few weeks, Well, there could be

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>protests that there already are protests in New York, Portland's

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>many cities. And if the rhetoric over a rigged election

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>gets more harsh if a final winner has not been determined,

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think protests could spin out of control. Does it

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>make a difference that there could possibly be a split

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>within the Republican Party over whether to fight this vote

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>count and how far to take the fight. The key

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is of the centrist Republicans. Will they start to speak

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>out more forcefully. We saw on the Wall Street Journal

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this weekend and editorial saying that perhaps Donald Trump passed

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to gracefully concede, but if the president does not gracefully succeed,

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going to raise the temperature all around the country.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Greg Valier, chief US policy strategist for a GF Investments,

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being with us UH this morning. Greg on

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this election special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak, and coming up

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll get more on the legal battle for the White House,

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>how the pending and current lawsuits could play out potentially

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on their way to the High Court. I'm Nathan Hager

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>alongside Amy Morris, and this is Bloomberg. This is special

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the twenty election from Bloomberg Radio. And this

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is a Bloomberg Daybreak special report. I'm Nathan Hager, I'm

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Amy Morris. The path to the White Houses there for

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, but a protracted legal battle could be in

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the offing. Bloomberg Law host June Grasso is with us

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>now our resident legal expert. We take a look at

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the flurry of legal activity that has accompanied this election.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Count June good Saturday morning. What are the cases? Good morning,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the cases that you're watching right now?

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we've had quite a lot of them. What's got

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>your focus this morning? Well, the main case that we're

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>watching is the case in Pennsylvania. First because Pennsylvania is such,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a swing state and so important in this election,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>but also because that's the case. And by the way,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>when I say Pennsylvania, there are several cases in Pennsylvania,

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but there is one in particular, several cases, one that's

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>already been dismissed. But the case that I'm talking about

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is the one that probably everyone has heard, and that

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is about the ballots that come in late. And this

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>has already gone to the Supreme Court once. So the

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania Supreme Court said it's okay to count ballots that

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>come in that three days after election day as long

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>as they're post my Violet and day. That went up

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court in a four to four decision.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>The justices said we'll leave that in place for now

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>because the for the for the conservative justices said, you know,

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>we're open to leaving to discussing this later, maybe after

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the election, because you have those ballots segregated, so that

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>makes it easier. Even so, that's why people are so

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>focused on Pennsylvania, because the Supreme Court has left the

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>door open to considering that again. And then there was

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>also an order by Justice Alito yesterday. This is sort

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of kind of odd because the Republicans went to the

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court again and said they're not keeping those ballots segregated.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>And Justice Alito was the justice for that um that

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>handles uh any special requests from that area, and he said, okay,

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he ordered them to keep it segregated to the state officials,

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>which the state officials say, well, we're always already doing that.

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of it's unclear why the Pennsylvania Republicans

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>went up to the Supreme Court again. You know, it's confusing,

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a little Well, that's what I wanted to ask about,

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Jin because my original question to you was going to

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be about the trip to the Supreme Court and how

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court may receive a case like this. But

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>from where you're from, what you're telling me, it sounds

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like it may not be just one trip to the

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. We may see this go over and over

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court because our system of election is

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>decentralized all the way down to the district level. So

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if the Trump campaign has cases it wants to bring

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>from district you know, just hypothetically one thirty nine out

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.959
<v Speaker 1>of Nevada and District one seventy eight out of Pennsylvania,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, these different districts, we could see trips over

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again to the Supreme Court. Could

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>be not well, theoretically you could, but remember something else.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't just go automatically to the Supreme Court. You

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>just can't. You know, even President Trump can't say they

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>did they they're not counting correctly. In Michigan, justices take

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>my case, you have to go through the steps. You

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the lower court, and then the

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>lower court has to usually send it to the higher court.

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a process. And also not every kind

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of case would go to the Supreme Court. Then the

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court has to decide are we going to take

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this case or not. It takes four justices to decide

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not to take the case. So it's a

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>process and it's not quite as easy as President Trump

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>makes it sound when he says, I think the highest

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Court is going to decide this, there's a lot of

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>steps in between. And also the question has to be

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a question that the Supreme Court will deal with. Remember

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Bush by Gore, that was the one case in our

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>history where the Supreme Court decided the outcome of an election,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was such a odd Your combination of circumstances

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>where you had five thirty seven votes in the state

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that mattered in the election, the pivotal state, So that's

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a very unusual circumstances. And I hope. I heard an

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>election law expert in one of the panels I was

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>listening to, said, I just hope for the sake of

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the American people that it doesn't come down to Philadelphia,

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to Pennsylvania because the laws there are the Republicans legislature

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>didn't really take care of the pre election laws the

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>way they should have. It didn't pass enough laws to

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>make it easier. And of course, the big difference this

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>type around June is that we have the potentiality of

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 1>having a number of states that could be decisive as

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the as the vote county continues. And when you mentioned

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the steps that have to be gone through. As you've

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>been watching this legal process play out, we know you've

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>already seen that the Trump side has been stymied and

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a number of the steps that it's already tried to take.

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>The lower courts have thrown out a number of the

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump sides complaints on the merits. What is the Trump

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>strategy right now? Is there a consistent legal strategy that

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is being pursued at the moment, as far as you

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>can say, not that, And I can see and not

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that any of the election law experts I've spoken to,

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the many election law experts I've spoken to over the

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>last month, I can see what happens is they're what

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be doing is just throwing everything at

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the wall and seeing what sticks. So you have a

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of these suits are about election law observers. So

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you have Trump campaign observers that want to see what's

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>going on as they're counting the votes. Well they're allowed

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to be there, but they're complaining about the access that

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they have. For example, President Trump the other day said

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 1>we want a great victory in Pennsylvania. That victory was

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>that they got to get to within six feet of

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>where the uh the counters were the people counting the

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ballots were as opposed to they were about ten or

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty feet before. And remember something else, this is all

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>being live streamed, so the public can actually see what's

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>going on in these most of these places where they're

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>counting ballots. So that was the big victory that he

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>referred to. Those are the there's all there was. Also,

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and you talked about cases being thrown out. The case

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan was thrown out for that reason, and um,

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>these cases don't come back. You can't come back later

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and say my people didn't get close enough, so let's

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>discount all the ballots. That's so that's sort of a

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>dead issue now. And in Georgia, one of the issues

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they raised was someone claimed where the election observers claimed

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that he saw a worker put ballots that came in

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>late with ballots that were on time. That was there

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>was no evidence of that when they took it to

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the court. So there has to be evidence to support

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>these claims, and so far, in none of these cases

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>has there been an evidence. Legally, can the loser in

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a presidential election continue the court fight even after January,

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>even after the inauguration, Can they amy that's a good question. No,

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they probably after January. He's not the president

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>anymore and UM any so, any kind of lossy you

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.959
<v Speaker 1>have to bring would most likely be dismissed by the

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>court because you have to say, well, what's the what

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>do you have at stake here? What's you're standing in

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this case? You have to have a There has to

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>be a case or controversy for the court to consider it.

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So what's the case or controversy at that point? I mean,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you could file the lawsuit, but I believe that it

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>would be dismissed outright. And at what point do you stop?

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, that's a great question, because you know

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and UM an election expertise I spoke to,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Justin Levitt, said that President Trump, if a doctor hit

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>him on the knee with a rubber mallet, would sue.

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's been his history. I mean, that's he's sued

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>so many times in the past, and a lot of

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>those suits have gone nowhere. So would he suit. Possibly

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>he would, But at some point it's time to stop

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuits and and move on. We have about a

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>minute left here. June. Of course, the president has been

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>questioning the validity of mail in ballots, at least rhetorically

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of that being a legal strategy. What kind

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of threshold would the president have to meet to question

0:29:56.160 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the validity of a mail in ballot in court? Well,

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole issue here is that they have to show

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>evidence that there were some kind of fraud involved with

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the mail and ballots. And I do have to say

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that there is a mail in ballots are a little

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>more difficult than regular ballots, So there is a slightly

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>higher percentage of them that may get tossed or discounted

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>because people forgot to put it in the right envelope

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 1>or sign it. There are a lot of different steps

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people are not used to it,

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So there is that. But the point is that he

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>would have to have a state where the number of

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>mail in ballots it's called the marginal litigation, so the

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>number of the mail in ballots has to be enough

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for him to have victory in that state. So that's

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of mail in ballots. And if you look

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at these cases that are that are pending there, they're

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about a thousand ballots here, a thousand ballots there.

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Even in Arizona it's ten thousand ballots, so not a lot,

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of margin. June Grosso, host of Bloomberg Law,

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>are resident legal expert. Thanks for being with us this morning.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned for another hour of complete coverage on the

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>election in the future of White House policy. I'm Nathan

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Hagar alongside Amy Morris. This is Bloomberry. We have no

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>doubt that when the count is finished, Senator Harris and

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I will be declared the winners. We think there's going

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of litigation because we have so

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>much evidence, so much proof. I ask everyone to stay calm.

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The process is working. It's going to end up perhaps

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at the highest court in the land. This is special

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the twenty twenty election from Bloomberg Radio. And

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a Bloomberg Daybreak special report. I'm Nathan Hagar,

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Hi'm Amy Morris. The votes are still being counted, legal

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>challenges remain, but the path to the White House is

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there for Joe Biden. Now coming up over the next hour,

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll examine the vote and the legal battle, plus the

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>path ahead for White House policy, plus how the next

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>steps could play out in the days and weeks leading

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>up to December's Electoral College vote. That's all straight ahead.

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We bring in Wendy Schiller, chair of the Political science

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>department at Brown University. Good to have you with us

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this morning on this special program, Professor, and I want

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at how this election process, this

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>protracted count is really affecting the political tenor in this country.

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>How much soul searching needs to be done by either

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of the parties. Uh, now that this is all going on, well, um,

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>good morning, amazing, Good morning, Amy. I think that what's

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting about the slow processes it's very frustrating, I think

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>now to people who voted for Joe Biden, who support

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, who want this to be declared and to

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>move on. But in some ways it's actually you know,

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's giving people time to sort of get used to

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea, and particularly people who who supported Trump. Now

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen examples of people who support Trump are going

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>down to the polling places, and you know, very few

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>cases seem to be sort of more agitated than not

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>mostly peaceful. But you know this, the longer this takes,

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the more methodical it is, the more explanation of what's

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>going on, you know, the harder it is to challenge

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate result as being fraudulent, and you're seeing that

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>now from Republican leaders who are kind of walking this

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>tight line. You're also seeing it from some conservative media

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sources that are you know, strident, and there are sort

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of in prime time but starting to say kind of

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like Joe Biden's we president. We've got to get

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>used to the idea. So in some ways, the slowness

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of the process, Nathan, maybe one of the blessings actually

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of such a huge turnout and and absentee ballot and

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>mail in ballot, because it's giving people sort of time

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to explain and time to get used to the idea.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Professor Schiller, we know the country is politically divided. You

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>can see that in these razor thin margins in this vote.

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But i'd like to get your take on where we

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are politically in this country where counting votes in a

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>presidential election seems to have become a source of political debate. Well, Amy,

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it would be great to think, oh, this is the

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>first time people have far by counting votes, you know,

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'm definitely all enough to have set through Bush v. Gore,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>And of course we've had these controversies for you know,

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:12.439
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty years minimally, you know, we turned

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to a different balloting system in the late eighteen hundreds,

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen eighty eight going forward, which is sort of

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>office block, meaning you voted not for your party per se,

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but you voted for individual offices and candidates. And ever

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 1>since then we've had a much more complicated voting apparatus,

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So we've been challenging votes forever, you know, And I

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>think that's I think that's the interesting part. People are

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so glued into its starting, glued and tuned in that

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there now I know what a provisional ballot is, Like

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I knew what it was before, but I didn't know

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>quite right. Right, You're gonna have people talking Thanksgiving about

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>provisional ballots in America. You know that's not bad thing.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Does this point to the deed for reform in how

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the electoral process is done in this country? Yes? I think, Makedon,

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think. Listen, you know you speaking with

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you're gonna have two million ballots coming

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>in on election day and you don't let people count

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>them when they come in. That's what the Pennsylvania State

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Legislature did, because you can't start counting until election night. Clearly,

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>now we're looking at Pennsylvania, that is not good public

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>policy for anybody, for Trump supporters or for Biden supporters.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So there are some decisions that were made, I think

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to process the enormous mail and ballast. But I think

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the good news is that people will have more ways

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of voting going forward. I do think they're going to

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>insist on having a lot of these options, and hopefully

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that means more turnout, greater numbers of turnout in the future.

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean looking ahead at for the electoral college?

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>How will the electoral College handle uh all of this

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and what does it mean for the future of the

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>electoral college. There are those who have been calling for

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it to be banned. So the electoral causes is to

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>two things I'll try to get in. One is state

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>legislatures can turn it from lunatic all to proportional representation.

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>That's all you need. You don't need to change the constitution.

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You just change the way you allocate your electoral College delegates,

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the way that the main in a breast that have done.

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Every state can do that and it would be more fair.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Would it changed the outcome? In the end? We don't know,

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>but it would be more fair. And that is something

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.959
<v Speaker 1>people can agitate at the local level for for the

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>their state legislature. So that's something you can do on

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the ground going forward. The second thing is I am

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous about the electoral college. It just turns

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>out to be super narrow, you know, faithless selectors of

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Screme Court case this summer said basically, you can't really

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>do that. States can sort of punish you, pull you back, whatever.

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's still nerve wracking if it's super close that

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>some people who go to electoral college um can defect

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and from the popular vote in their state. Screme Court

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 1>decision is pretty clear that they believe the intent is

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that you should follow a popular vote in your state,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's legally bound or not. But still it's nerve wracking.

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are a little nervous

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>that we've got to get to that point to know

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 1>that this election result, whichever way it goes, will be

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, solidified and cemented now. And it's really interesting,

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>even as we continue to watch the votes being counted,

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is once again tweeting this more and he

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>sent out three tweets, uh, talking about tens of thousands

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>of illegally received votes after eight pm Tuesday, election day,

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>he says, totally and easily changing the results in Pennsylvania

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and certain other razor thin states. It goes on from there,

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>But the rhetorical strategy that we're seeing from the President

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as this count goes on, of uh, separating legal from

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>illegal votes as he sees them, is going to be

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>something to continue to watch very closely. Wendy Schuler, chair

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Political Science Department at Brown University, thank you

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for your insights this morning as we continue to watch

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the count. Roll in of Nathan Hagar along with Amy Morrison,

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. This is special coverage of the

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty election from Bloomberg Radio. And this is a Bloomberg

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak special report. I'm Nathan Hager, I'm Amy Morris. The

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>path to the White House is there for Joe Biden,

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but how much power will he have with a divided Congress.

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Now we want to bring in Kevin Seilli, chief Washington

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>correspondent for Bloomberg Radio and Television. Kevin, A, good morning

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to you. We have been high. We've been listening to

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>two very different messages from the candidates, Joe Biden talking

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.919
<v Speaker 1>about unity, asking for people to be patient and stick

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>by him. President Trump meanwhile demanding the count be stopped.

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 1>How are those messages resonating. Well, Look, I think in

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 1>terms of what we saw last night from former Vice

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 1>President Joe Biden when he spoke in Wilmington, Delaware, quite frankly,

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>he wanted it to be a declaratory victorious speech, but

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't able to get that because the state has

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.720
<v Speaker 1>not been called that would get him to that magic

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy threshold. The count as it stands

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>now in the electoral College amie to sixty four to

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>two fourteen, with Biden leading. Meanwhile, Uh, they're still optimistic,

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they're still earning urging patients. And he said something yesterday

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>though that I think many of the sources that I

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was talking to throughout the day yesterday wanted to hear,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>which was that they are making the legal threat still

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 1>seriously enough to make sure that they're prepared for it.

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And he had a line in a speech where he

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>said that he would make sure that every vote was counted. Meanwhile,

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>President Trump also continuing to work with his inner circle

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared Kushner Rudy Giuliani in order to pursue legal actions,

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and they have been deployed, uh, some of them throughout

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the country to some of these battleground states. So the

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden team is exuding patients. The Trump team is indicating

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that it is willing to take this fight through every

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>legal channel. If there is that sort of trepidation from

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans, does that put pressure on the Trump side,

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>uh to perhaps not go as far as they have

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>expressed rhetorically that they're willing to go legally. Kevin, I

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really smart point, Nathan, what you just

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>said about rhetorical arguments and media arguments versus the actual

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>nuts and bolts on the rounds in some of these

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>battleground states. Um, it's been difficult, I think for everyone

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the media to cover the legal elements of this

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't really seen a cohesive legal message nor

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy that could change. This is a very quickly evolving strategy.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But that that frustration, based upon my reporting, even when

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I talked to members of Congress and who are Republicans,

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling that as well. Um, And so the law

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:32.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a long way of saying that I'm not sure

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the president's legal team, with the addition of David Bossi,

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>who they've brought on, Jared Kushner has brought on, I'm

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure they yet. As of now, UH have clearly

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>articulated nor rallied the Republican leadership and thought leaders at

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this point behind them to get them all on the

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>same page. They know they're not speaking from the same

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>playbook today. And now, Kevin, there are some Biden supporters

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.879
<v Speaker 1>who want to see Biden go ahead and act like

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a president elect. You know, President Trump came out early

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday morning and said he won. So they're looking at

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Biden as someone who can stand up and say he won.

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Why they're asking why Biden doesn't just go ahead and

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>claim that well, and Speaker Pelosi also mentioned him as

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>president elect Biden as well. So this is a I mean, Amy,

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just remarkable to see the both sides in

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of declaring victory. And I can tell you, based

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>upon my own reporting, that there was some internal deliberations

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Trump side about how far he should have gone.

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Some wanted him to go further on that speech on

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>election night in the early morning hours after um and

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and the short answer is, well, some would some of

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>my sources tell me that what Biden already is doing

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that uh he And it was reported yesterday that uh

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Gary Gensler will be his Wall Street oversight advisor. Um,

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>based upon my reporting sources, you know, continue to tell

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>me that that Biden is being briefed on COVID nineteen,

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that he is being briefed on the economy on yesterday's

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>unemployment numbers at six and you use you heard him

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>make mention to that, and so in practice, yes, in

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in rhetoric, not yet the declaratory statements. It's not an

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>assessment of his tone right now. Always, Uh, Lame duck

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>sessions are tough stuff to get anything done in the

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>laptock session. What you have this kind of protracted count

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>going on, legal maneuvering and the need for a stimulus

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>or some sort of response to this resurging coronavirus pandemic.

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a lot of factors uh coming

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in here, Uh that could make it very difficult to

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>get something done in a lame duck cabin you know.

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:50.879
<v Speaker 1>But here's here's the variable that I don't think we've

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we've we've talked enough about and that's the uptaking COVID

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen cases, right, because you're seeing the uptick really have

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to implement the policy in Europe, whether it's the k France, Germany,

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and those governments, mind you, ideologically diverse in terms of politics.

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So here the United States, we have been so focused

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on the election that I don't think, uh, and maybe

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:11.439
<v Speaker 1>we're a couple of weeks out from this, I don't

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think that we've fully had a reconciliation of the upticking cases.

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Hundred thousand plus cases in the United States. Another day

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred thousand plus cases in the United States,

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and mind you are Jennifer jacob scooping yesterday that Mark Meadows,

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the President's chief of staff, also contracting COVID nineteen as well.

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know that I say all of that because

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:35.479
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen really could place pressure on local governments around

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the country to to add more restrictions, and as a

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>result of that, that could force Congress to act in

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of fiscal negotiations. Secretary Revenution and Speaker Pelosi, mind you,

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>both saying publicly uh this week that they're still going

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to continue their deliberations. Kevin, let's build on a little

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of what Nathan just asked you about. What Because

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're basically boiling this down to is the business

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of government and how it can continue while all of

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this limbo is ongoing. What would the path ahead be

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for White House policy even while we are in this

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>period of uncertainty? Does that have to freeze as well? No?

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the US just took the weaker groups off

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the terror lists yesterday and so and I mentioned that

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>because the government is still very much going on, and

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're rightfully. The American people are are

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>focused on what's going on in terms of their elections. Uh.

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And Amy, you and I have have talked about this

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>before almost you know, with millions and millions of Americans

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>voting um and you know, for the first time ever

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>such a dramatic increase in mail in ballots. Uh. It's

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>taking a couple of days at least for this process

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to play out. But the process is playing out, whether

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's down in Georgia where there's going to be a recount,

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.399
<v Speaker 1>or in Nevada, where we're anticipating over the next couple

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of hours additional reports on ballots from Clark County, where

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Nevada of course is low caated or in the judicial

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>system where the Trump campaign is continuing to exports legal options.

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 1>There's multiple process, process proceeds, Amy play, but they're playing out. Yeah,

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and when you have a pandemic going on, we knew

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 1>this was going to take some time, and with a

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of cases, it just reinforces the fact that this

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>count needs to be done not only carefully but safely.

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna take a while. Kevin cereali chief Washington

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>correspondent for Bloomberg Radio and Television. Thank you for getting

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>us up to speed. Here. I'm Nathan Hagar alongside Amy Morris,

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. This is special coverage of the

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty election from Bloomberg Radio. This is a Bloomberg

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak special report. I'm Nathan Hagar, I have Amy Morris.

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The votes are still being counted, but the path to

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the White Houses are for Joe Biden. Let's bring in

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Emily Wilkins, now Bloomberg Government reporters. She is with the

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Biden campaign in Wilmington, Delaware. Good morning to you, Emily.

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about the Biden camp, which

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously has been holding its breath ready to release the

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>balloons and shoot the confetti cannon. They thought they might

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:18.839
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that last night. Didn't work out

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that way. So where are we now? So, as we

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just heard, Biden is up in four major states. UH.

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.919
<v Speaker 1>If he wins Pennsylvania day, if that is called for him,

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that's it. UH. Nevada and Arizona is another pathway to

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>its victory. We're also looking at Georgia. We saw Biden

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>address the nation last night, and his remarks were far

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>more substantive than anything else we've heard since election night.

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>They were also forward looking. Biden began to talk about

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>uniting the country, putting anger aside, bringing people together, and

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>also began to talk about the response that his administration

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>would have the coronavirus. He's still not declaring victory, but

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the speech we heard tonight from Biden was the speech

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that we would expect from the next president of the

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>United States. What we expect Biden to make that speech

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>definitively once a projection at or past to seventy is reached,

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 1>or is he still going to put in that note

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of caution given the uh seeming unwillingness of the current

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>president to um end this fight That's a great question.

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>At this point, the Biding campaign has been taking the calls, um,

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the network calls and the AP calls for the states

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as they come. The AP and Fox News declared Arizona

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for him, and the Biding campaign has been counting that

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in their total, despite the fact that some of the

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>other networks haven't called that state yet. But Biden does

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have to be cautious here, you know. His message to

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.799
<v Speaker 1>voters over the last several weeks has been that he

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cannot declare victory, that Trump cannot declare victory, that it's

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 1>rather the networks, the polsters, the people counting. Who are

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the ones who will say is definitively who is the

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>next president? Emily? What measures is Biden taking now in

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 1>order to hit the ground running when that presidential transition

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>gets underway, assuming he maintains his lead, wins the court battles,

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and as officially declared the president elect. So Budden has

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>already started reaching out to individuals to help with his

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>transition team. UM A couple that we've heard of the

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:31.280
<v Speaker 1>other day, a former Commodity Futures Treating Commissioner chairman Gary

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Gensler and Keeping and executive down Grave are being tapped

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to oversee financial regulations under a Biden administration. So we've

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of names there. We also know that

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden's reaching out to a number of other individuals trying

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 1>to put together that transition team. You got to think

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of jocking going around behind the scenes

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>as well for high senior administration official positions, even in

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>cabinet level positions. What are hearing in terms of who's

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get Biden's here right now? Well, I think

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>an important thing to keep in mind here is what

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Senate is going to look like at this point.

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:14.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if we're headed for Republican controlled Senate

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the most likely scenario. There is a potential that

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>you have at Senate which gives Democrats the slightest of

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>slight advantages. And look in a Senate like that, uh,

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>it might be a little bit hard to see uh,

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Elizabeth barn or Labor Secretary Bernie Standards because

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be some concern that that those individuals

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 1>need to remain in the Senate and needs to remain

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>solid Democratic vote. Biden is also probably going to have

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to put forward a number of cabinet nominees who are

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a little more moderate rather than some progressive names that

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>could face a lot of turbulence their nomination process in

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. Emily, which states are the Biden campaign taking

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>note of at this hour? Pennsylvania, maybe an obvious one.

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>In Georgia, maybe the Surprise, But I'm wondering about Arizona

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and Nevada. Well, the Biden campaign is pretty confident in

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the AP and Foxes call of Arizona, but I think

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone is still watching that one very closely at that point.

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Um Nevada is obviously the other one. That Pennsylvania has

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 1>always been within the sites of the of teen Biden,

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't spend so much time there. He started

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>election day there, he was there the day before election

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:31.400
<v Speaker 1>day and the day before that. Pennsylvania has always been

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a really key state for Biden in sort of building

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>back that blue wall of Wisconsin in Michigan and Pennsylvania

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Midwest. And that's definitely one that his campaign

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think the rest of us too, are watching

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>very very closely today and just thirty seconds here, Emily,

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of psychologically, Pennsylvania is important as well as his childhood

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>home absolutely. When Biden visited Scratton, he visited his childhood home.

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.000
<v Speaker 1>This is on election day. He met with the people

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>there and I think wrote on the wall some variation

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of from this house to the White House, with the

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>grace of God. All right, We're going to continue to

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:09.360
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. It's Pennsylvania and a handful of

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>other states still in flux. On this Saturday morning, Bloomberg

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Government reporter Emily Wilkins with us from Delaware, where biden

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>campaign headquarters is located in the capitol of Wilmington's Thank you,

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Emily for joining us this morning. And straight ahead on

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this Bloomberg Daybreak special report, We're gonna look ahead at

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the path ahead for policy with the potential for gridlock

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in Washington if it turns out that the blue wave

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:36.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fully materialize. On Nathan Hagar along with Amy Morris

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Barr nine on Wall Street, and this is Bloomberg.

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>This is special coverage of the twenty election from Bloomberg Radio.

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is a Bloomberg Daybreak special report. I'm Nathan Hager,

0:51:57.000 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amy Morris. The path to the White House is

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 1>there for Joe Biden, but how much power will we

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>have with a divided Congress. We bring you Greg Garow

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are Bloomberg Government reporter covering Congress, which, like the presidential race,

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>remains somewhat influx, particularly uh in the In the Senate,

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there's still a pretty good chance. Greg, I think it's

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>safe to say that Republicans retain control of the Senate,

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>but two key races in Georgia we're going to run off.

0:52:28.320 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Um, So basically the Senate is forty to

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>forty eight. The Republicans are leading in races in North

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Carolina and Alaska, which means those two runoffs in Georgia

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>could determine whether Republicans keep their majority or if the

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats can pull to a fifty fifty tie, which would

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>allow them to organize the Senate as a with a

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.400
<v Speaker 1>tie breaking vote of a Vice President Kamala Harris. Provided

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the Biden Harris ticket wins and Democrats are able to

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:57.239
<v Speaker 1>unseek two Republican senators, that's the only way they can

0:52:57.239 --> 0:52:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's gonna be a tall order. So Republicans

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are mortally than not to have a very narrow majority

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>when the new Congress convenes. You know, Greg, back in

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand. It was Florida, Florida, Florida that was the

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>pivotal state. UM break this down for us this time,

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:13.919
<v Speaker 1>which state is more pivotal because it seems like Joe

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Biden has several paths. He does have several paths. And

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe the watchwhere this time is Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania,

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 1>or that's not easy to say three times. We could

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>We could be here all day if we said all

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the states that were so close three times, but Pennsylvania

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is one of them. Twenty electoral votes that alone would

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>get Joe Biden the presidency. So right now Biden's up

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>at about twenty nine thousand votes in that state. They're

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:40.280
<v Speaker 1>about eighty nine thousand mail in ballots left to count

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:43.799
<v Speaker 1>as of this morning, plus so called provisional ballots. Most

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of these mail in ballots are in Philadelphia or in

0:53:46.480 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the county that has Pittsburgh. These are very democratic counties,

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and Biden has been winning these votes with more than

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the vote because Biden had his wanted

0:53:57.200 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>his supporters to vote early, and Trump had his supporters

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>want to vote on election day. So these votes have

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 1>been trunning, very democratic. I would expect Biden's lead in

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania increase. There was so much betting ahead of the

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.680
<v Speaker 1>election greg of a blue wave in the markets, uh,

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that we would see a Democratic takeover decisively, and obviously

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we didn't get that this time around. Uh. That looks

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like the House will hold onto its majority, though not

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:27.319
<v Speaker 1>as uh as deep as it was in the current Congress.

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 1>What could that mean potentially for how leadership is made

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>up in the House. Well, I think it's hard to say, um,

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>how it's gonna affect the leadership structure. It could be

0:54:38.000 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the same Democratic leadership. I mean, you do have some

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 1>leaders who one of the leaders Ben ray Luhan, a

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:46.240
<v Speaker 1>top ranking House Democrat, did get elected to the Senate,

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So there'll be a shuffle in the leadership down there.

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But at the top of the leadership structure is Speaker

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, and she said she'd want to be Speaker

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for one more term. I presume she would have the

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>votes to do it. Although there is some uh, you know,

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>frustration within Democrat ranks because they underperformed in this election.

0:55:02.440 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 1>They're going to lose seats when they fully expected and

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 1>predicted publicly multiple times that they would gain seats. But

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have a reduced Democratic majority. How reduced

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that is remains to be seen because we still have

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncalled races. But it just makes uh

0:55:17.280 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>pelos Seas that weakens the pelos sees negotiating power a

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit because she doesn't have as many votes at

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:26.319
<v Speaker 1>her disposal she did before. But Democrats will still have

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a majority, but a narrow one. Does that then translate

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>greg into a mandate for those who are still holding

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on to their seats in the House, And does that

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>then lead to not just gridlock, but maybe an opportunity

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I try to be so sunshiny here, maybe an opportunity

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>for cooperation. Yes, well, one would hope there'd be opportunities

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for cooperation, but it's really hard to see how that happens.

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have a you know, if Biden is

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:56.319
<v Speaker 1>elected president, that would be by uh, I mean he'll

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>win by four or five million votes, but you know,

0:55:59.200 --> 0:56:01.919
<v Speaker 1>uh by two, you know, three or four percentage points.

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 1>But in the Senate of the House, the Senate is

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be fifty fifty or Republican or Republican. And

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, to get a lot of things done,

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you often need sixty votes to advance major legislation in

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the House. As we mentioned, it's gonna be a very

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 1>narrow majority for Nancy Pelosi and her Democrats. So you

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder what kind of big things can pass

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic controlled House, a Senate that's probably going to

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 1>be controlled by Republicans by very narrow margin and be

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:33.279
<v Speaker 1>signed into law by a President Biden if he does

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 1>win the win this election. Pandemic relief, I think is

0:56:36.600 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 1>one thing you're gonna watch out for. But can they

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:42.240
<v Speaker 1>agree on big ticket things like infrastructure? The two parties

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 1>are still very very uh divided on some major policies

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on taxes and spending. And when you have a Senate

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that is held by such tight margins, no matter which

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:59.800
<v Speaker 1>party ultimately gains the majority, greg it gives leverage to

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just about every Senator depending on whether they want to

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:07.240
<v Speaker 1>try to pass something or hold up legislation, which often

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>happens in the Senate. How could this potentially come up

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the works on the Senate side of the Capitol. Yeah, Senate,

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be close to fifty. It does kind

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of magnify the importance of maybe, you know, the few

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 1>senators remaining who are sort of in the middle of

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 1>their respective political caucuses. Ideologically, you want to look at

0:57:28.160 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody like a Joe Mansion of West Virginia. We're probably

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the most conservative Democrat and the Senate. Um he'll, I

0:57:34.560 --> 0:57:36.800
<v Speaker 1>mean he and he and Biden are friendly and they

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 1>agree on a lot of things. But he's not from

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the progressive wing of the party. So um so, I

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>mean he could be an important dealmaker in the Senate.

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 1>On the Republican side, Senator Susan Collins from Maine was reelected.

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh perhaps you know, perhaps in a surprise. He was

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>trailing in most of the polls. She's one of the

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>rare moderates in the Senate. She's also someone to watch,

0:57:57.400 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>someone who's gonna try and forge compromises with people like

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mansion on the other side of the aisle on

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>things like pandemic relief. So those are senators to watch

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Senate because if just a couple of senators from one

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>party joined the other party, they can you can get

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a majority that way and advance legislations. Will have to see,

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to see what the final result of the

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Senate is. Uh, have an idea of what kind of

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan opportunities there are in a in a Senate that's

0:58:24.920 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be closely divided. We've been talking this morning about

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 1>what job one might be for whomever does win the

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:34.919
<v Speaker 1>presidential race. But I want to ask you what job

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>one might be for the House and Senate once the

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 1>dust settles, and will it be the same job one. Well,

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the first things are going to do is they're going

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to organize their leadership. And in the Senate there's still

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 1>some you know, suspense at least about who's going to

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 1>be majority Leader's most likely going to be Mitch McConnell.

0:58:51.920 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>But if if the Biden Harris ticket wins and the

0:58:54.920 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats win those Georgia seats, you will have a fifty

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Senate with a Vice President Harris as a tie eyebreakers.

0:59:00.440 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So that could allowed Chuck Schumer to become the majority leader.

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But I do I do think the Republicans are more

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>favored than not to hold their Senate majority. But Job one,

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is the pandemic relief um. You know, the

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 1>latest tranche of aid ran out months ago and the

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>two sides, the two parties could not agree on a

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on a relief package next to relief package before the election,

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we've all been so heavily focused on

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this election, we maybe we lose sights sometimes the fact that,

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had a record number of cases in

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days, more than twenty five thousand.

0:59:33.080 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think once the dust settles for the elections,

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna come to the We're gonna come

0:59:37.880 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>close to the hard realities of governing and realize that

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to really tackle this pandemic. I think that's

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on the minds of lawmakers and when it comes to

0:59:45.560 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>longer term domestic policy issues. Greg Zorov Bloomberg Government, Uh,

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you got to think that it's going to be difficult

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for h a President Biden should have come to that

0:59:56.080 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to to pass something that could be a really uh

1:00:00.200 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>big bore. Uh, it's gonna be a lot more difficult

1:00:03.440 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for him to pass something like a like a big

1:00:05.800 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>tax package that could fund things like infrastructure or a

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>some kind of overhauls of the health care system. Uh.

1:00:13.800 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>What kind of domestic policy uh proposals could actually get

1:00:19.520 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>through in the months to come under a divided government

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>working with potentially a Senate majority. Leader Mitch McConnell, Yeah,

1:00:27.280 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good question. I think pandemic relief, I

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>think they have to come in agreement on that. Just

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what the specifics are Um, I think, yeah, we have

1:00:35.160 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch out for that, but I think it would

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>include some aid to businesses and hospitals. They have disagreed

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on aid to state governments. But I think you will

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>see the two parties finally come together after the election

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>on a next tranche of aid for pandemic relief. And

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about infrastructure for many months. Maybe the two

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>sides finally agree on that, but we always people always

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>joke about is it's going to be finally be infrastructure week?

1:00:56.840 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So you think they could probably agree on that, although

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we have that remains to be seen. But you're right though, Um,

1:01:02.920 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the Biden if if Joe Biden is elected president, he

1:01:05.400 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>had a campaign platform that you know is very aspirational. Um,

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's going to come to the hard realities of governing,

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you're not gonna be able to get

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a public option added to Medicare or or to the

1:01:17.120 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Care Act, or you're not gonna be able to

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>increase taxes on people making four thousand dollars a year

1:01:22.640 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>or more as Biden wants. You're not gonna get that

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>through the Congress as we expect it will be currently composed.

1:01:29.400 --> 1:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg what's on your agenda for today? What are you

1:01:31.440 --> 1:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>watching for in the next few hours on this Saturday, Well,

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the counts continue in the four states where voting Uh,

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I should say the talion continues that haven't

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>been called. That's Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona. We should

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>get updates, uh later this morning from Arizona and Nevada.

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>In Arizona, that's the state where the president has been

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gaining on Biden in the tally, but not at the

1:01:57.560 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>rate that he needs to overtake Biden in Arizona. In Nevada,

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Biden is up by almost two percentage points, and with UM,

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>if he quinches Nevada and Arizona, the race is over

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>because you'll have two hundred and seventy electoral votes. But

1:02:10.800 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, Amy, Biden has several pasts of

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the presidency. He is also leading in Georgia, in Pennsylvania,

1:02:17.640 --> 1:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and if he wins all four states, Biden will have

1:02:20.120 --> 1:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and six electoral votes, well above the two

1:02:22.600 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy needed to win Greg Gerald, Bloomberg Government. Thank you

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on this very busy Saturday morning. Stay

1:02:28.960 --> 1:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>tuned for another hour of complete coverage of election and

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the future of White House policy. I'm Nathan Hagar with

1:02:34.760 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Amy Morris. This is Bloomberg. We have no doubt that

1:02:43.200 --> 1:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>when the countess finished, Senator Harris and I will be

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>declared the winners. Do we think there's going to be

1:02:47.560 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of litigation because we have so much evidence,

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so much proof. I ask everyone to stay calm. The

1:02:53.160 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>process is working. It's going to end up perhaps at

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the highest court in the last This is special coverage

1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the from Bloomberg Radio, and this is a Bloomberg

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak special report. I'm Nathan Hagar, Hi'm Amy Morris. The

1:03:07.720 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>vote still being counted, legal challenges remain, but the path

1:03:11.000 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to the White House is there for Joe Biden and

1:03:13.680 --> 1:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up over the next hour, we'll examine the vote

1:03:16.280 --> 1:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and the legal battle, as well as the path ahead

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for White House policy. Not only that, but how the

1:03:21.320 --> 1:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>next steps could play out in the days and weeks

1:03:23.880 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>leading up to December's electoral College vote. All straight ahead.

1:03:28.040 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>For now, we bring in Terry Haynes, founder of pangea policy.

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>We should note Terry pushed back against the blue wave

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>expectations that much of the market was looking for prior

1:03:38.640 --> 1:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to election day. Terry, it does look as though we

1:03:41.720 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to have a divided government once all the

1:03:45.280 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>dust settles. What is that going to mean for the

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>mandate that Joe Biden is trying to put out there

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for things like UH, climate policy, UH, dealing with the

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>economic setback, UH, dealing with the coronavirus. Well, I think

1:04:04.320 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that Vice President Biden is following in a long political

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>tradition of trying to put the best face and in

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the most emphasis on exactly what he's what he's got

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>out of this election. But the fact is there's no

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>mandate for either side UH. And this is about as

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>closely divided an election as possible. UH. And he's going

1:04:27.280 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to have to work with a Congress that is still

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>very likely marginally Republican, but marginally Republican in the Senate

1:04:36.880 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and even more marginally Democratic in the House. What that

1:04:40.480 --> 1:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>means in practice is that you don't really have coherent

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>or cohesive party structures. UH. You're gonna have a bunch

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of shifting coalitions that probably deal well with the fiscal

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>things that need to happen. Probably you'll end up with

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a another stimulus in the one point five trillion to

1:04:57.960 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>two trillion range, and you will continue you to have

1:05:00.840 --> 1:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the parties agreeing on funding government pretty much in the

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>realm that they've been doing for the last decade. But

1:05:08.360 --> 1:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, I wouldn't look for a lot of policy changes.

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the smaller margin of the Democratic majority in

1:05:15.040 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the House, and now how Speaker Nancy Pelosi's leadership there

1:05:18.680 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is being questioned, how's that factor into your outlook? UH? Well,

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I I I thought all along that the uh, the

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>House was going to be less less democratic than it was.

1:05:30.080 --> 1:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It was already a tiny majority of around seventeen seats,

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and it stood to reason that the there would be

1:05:36.120 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure on the Centrists that had won

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen in Trump districts. Um. I think what's

1:05:41.200 --> 1:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up happening is that I think there's an

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>important part here with Pelosi that most people miss, which

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is that the deal that she made when she became

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Speaker against UH last year was that she would only

1:05:52.920 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>serve two more terms. So going into this she'll be

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in her last term. Assuming she survives, at which I

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>think she probably does probably continue to speaker but it

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but but no longer will the loyalty be there among Democrats. Uh,

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And no longer will the ability of Speaker Pelosi be

1:06:09.360 --> 1:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>there to uh to to bring these people into line

1:06:14.200 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and have them vote on a on a unified basis

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>as they did on contentious things like safer impeachment for example. Uh,

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that won't be there. Uh. So you're gonna see less

1:06:24.080 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>discipline in the Democrats, and you're gonna see more jockeying. Paradoxically,

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that might uh that might lead to more coalition building

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and more solutions. Uh, people start reaching across the aisle

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, which would be a good thing

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for the country. Well, the President Biden be able to

1:06:39.560 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>work that way, obviously, He's got decades of legislative experience

1:06:43.840 --> 1:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. Particularly how much pressure can he put

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on the House uh to uh to enact the kinds

1:06:51.280 --> 1:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of policy agenda items that he campaigned on. I think

1:06:56.120 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>almost none. In in reality, what you have is, uh,

1:07:01.080 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Biden Biden has two problems and you

1:07:04.240 --> 1:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I will get to your question because yours is the

1:07:06.280 --> 1:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>second one, and it's important the first problem problem is

1:07:09.760 --> 1:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that uh, he's gonna have to negotiate with a Republican

1:07:13.000 --> 1:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>majority Senate just to even put cabinet officials and senior

1:07:16.640 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>regulators in place. Uh. There's about I think four thousand

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>positions that are political positions in the United States government,

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the top that are required to be confirmed by the Senator,

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>about thousands to fift hundreds somewhere in there. Uh. You know,

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>unless the Republican Senate agrees with Biden on who should

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>be in there, he doesn't get nominees. So he's already

1:07:38.040 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to trim his sales and pushed back against

1:07:41.560 --> 1:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the progressives in his own party, which uh, which have

1:07:46.760 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>had two conflicting things going on. The first thing is, uh,

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been enthusiastic about the Biden Harris ticket. And

1:07:53.360 --> 1:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the second thing is, now that it looks like Biden's

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna win, Uh, they're starting to demand things uh and

1:07:59.000 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>demand things which of course they can't get in this

1:08:01.040 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>divided government. Now to the House, and much more shortly, Uh,

1:08:05.240 --> 1:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you have still even although you still have some of

1:08:07.720 --> 1:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>those centrists in place, the vast majority of the House

1:08:11.440 --> 1:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is the progressives and on the Democratic side, and those

1:08:15.720 --> 1:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>progressives are people who don't want any part of a

1:08:20.720 --> 1:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>moderate agenda, and we'll push back strongly against it. So

1:08:23.720 --> 1:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Biden has almost no ability to extract discipline

1:08:27.240 --> 1:08:31.719
<v Speaker 1>from his own party. Terry Haynes, founder of Pangia Policy.

1:08:31.880 --> 1:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Always giving us a clarity when it comes to the

1:08:35.120 --> 1:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>policy path forward, uh, something that's sorely needed as we

1:08:39.840 --> 1:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to navigate a vote count that is still not

1:08:45.040 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>entirely clear, although the focus is coming in a little

1:08:49.400 --> 1:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>bit more as we head through this weekend. Terry Haynes

1:08:51.720 --> 1:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of Pangia Policy, Again, thank you for being with us

1:08:53.800 --> 1:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I'm Nathan Hagar along with Amy Morris. This

1:08:57.920 --> 1:09:07.479
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is special coverage of the twenty twenty

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:11.879
<v Speaker 1>election from Bloomberg Radio, and this is a Bloomberg Daybreak

1:09:11.960 --> 1:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>special report. I'm Nathan Hagar. Hi'm Amy Morris. The votes

1:09:15.360 --> 1:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>still being counted, legal challenges remain, but the path to

1:09:18.400 --> 1:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the White House is there for Joe Biden. Want to

1:09:21.080 --> 1:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>bring in Kevin's really now Chief Washington correspondent for Bloomberg

1:09:24.439 --> 1:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Television and Jennie Zo, Bloomberg News contributor and

1:09:28.120 --> 1:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>political science professor at Iona College, and Kevin let's just

1:09:32.439 --> 1:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>start with you, President Trump on Twitter claiming voter fraud.

1:09:35.840 --> 1:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitters are already flagged at least one of the President's

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:42.479
<v Speaker 1>tweets about legal observers being refused admitutes admittance to those

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>rooms where the votes are being counted. What does all

1:09:45.720 --> 1:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of this do beyond just creating some confusion and delay, Well,

1:09:48.880 --> 1:09:52.479
<v Speaker 1>two things. I think that analytically speaking, First and foremost,

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it it once again raises the issue about big tech

1:09:56.360 --> 1:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>organizations and the the puns and the clout that they

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have in the national and global conversation. And it's a

1:10:06.680 --> 1:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>conversation that quite frankly, policymakers here in Washington, d C.

1:10:10.800 --> 1:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Even having for quite some time, you know, and we

1:10:13.240 --> 1:10:15.479
<v Speaker 1>just saw the other week where big tech ceo is

1:10:15.520 --> 1:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like Jack Dorsey were testified virtually on Capitol Hill, and

1:10:19.120 --> 1:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and quite frankly, I think that conversation is going to continue. Secondly,

1:10:22.520 --> 1:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in the more immediate news developments. Based upon my reporting,

1:10:26.400 --> 1:10:28.479
<v Speaker 1>what I can tell you is that the President will

1:10:28.520 --> 1:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be meeting throughout the weekend with his legal team, some

1:10:32.360 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of which he has deployed in battleground states like Georgia, Nevada,

1:10:36.560 --> 1:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as Pennsylvania. The question becomes for President Trump,

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is a question not being asked by the

1:10:42.120 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>media but by members of Congress within the president's own party,

1:10:46.439 --> 1:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is what is the strategy in the short term and

1:10:49.040 --> 1:10:52.479
<v Speaker 1>in the long term. And that is a question, quite frankly,

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that they are still trying to sort through. We can

1:10:54.800 --> 1:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about all of the different ins and outs of

1:10:56.640 --> 1:10:58.519
<v Speaker 1>the legalities, and I know Jeanie's I know who has

1:10:58.560 --> 1:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>been all over this and the new wants of this,

1:11:00.920 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, it has to

1:11:02.880 --> 1:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>come down to a simple message, and Republicans are still

1:11:07.240 --> 1:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>asking for that message to be more clearly articulated. You've

1:11:11.200 --> 1:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>seen some tweaks of it amy in which they're saying

1:11:14.200 --> 1:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to have all of the legal votes counted,

1:11:16.160 --> 1:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they're continuing to to intensify with. But

1:11:20.240 --> 1:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't have one singular court case, for example, that

1:11:23.120 --> 1:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>has made this easily digestible. Well, let's bring in Geniezo

1:11:26.680 --> 1:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of I own a college. Because the President, as he

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:33.519
<v Speaker 1>has once again done this morning, Professor, can say that

1:11:33.560 --> 1:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>there are legal votes versus illegal votes, But it does

1:11:36.920 --> 1:11:41.879
<v Speaker 1>come down to what the election officials themselves are finding

1:11:42.040 --> 1:11:46.599
<v Speaker 1>and counting as this tally continues, do we see any

1:11:46.720 --> 1:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>evidence at this point that there are actually illegal votes

1:11:50.680 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>being counted right now? At this point, we do not.

1:11:55.400 --> 1:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the reality is we simply do not have

1:11:58.520 --> 1:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>evidence of voter road or this kind of mouth seasons

1:12:04.120 --> 1:12:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that the President has been talking about at the polls

1:12:06.640 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>or with the count That's not to say we won't

1:12:09.240 --> 1:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>find evidence of it or that they won't produce that

1:12:12.240 --> 1:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in the future in court, but again, at this point,

1:12:15.280 --> 1:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just we don't have it. And you know, look

1:12:18.439 --> 1:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at what the Wall Street Journal editorial board is saying.

1:12:21.120 --> 1:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Look at what Kevin was just mentioning members of the

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>president's own party in the Senator, saying, you have to

1:12:27.080 --> 1:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have an argument to make in court. It's one thing

1:12:30.240 --> 1:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and and and Facebook and elsewhere to proclaim

1:12:33.960 --> 1:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that there are these problems at the polls, to proclaim

1:12:36.360 --> 1:12:39.639
<v Speaker 1>there's widespread fraud, It's another thing to prove it in court.

1:12:39.960 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And as of this moment, as we've all seen, the

1:12:43.080 --> 1:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>courts have been unwilling and you know, just not accepting

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:49.519
<v Speaker 1>any of the arguments at least at this point. And

1:12:49.520 --> 1:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still early that have been made, and so the

1:12:52.840 --> 1:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>President remains sort of screaming in the wind at this

1:12:56.080 --> 1:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>point without evidence to back up, and I you know,

1:12:58.920 --> 1:13:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm so here is to hear. As Kevin says, they're

1:13:01.520 --> 1:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be meeting with their legal team over the

1:13:03.439 --> 1:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>weekend what they come up with in terms of a

1:13:05.960 --> 1:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>legal strategy, because that is where their focus needs to be.

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, George W. Bush in two thousand had a

1:13:13.320 --> 1:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>legal team behind him. They were making a solid case,

1:13:17.439 --> 1:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you agree with it or not, that the courts

1:13:19.439 --> 1:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>were willing to listen to. We haven't heard yet what

1:13:21.840 --> 1:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that might potentially be from the President and his team.

1:13:25.360 --> 1:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I would like to follow up on that if I could,

1:13:27.280 --> 1:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeannie with just going back to because none of this

1:13:32.040 --> 1:13:35.479
<v Speaker 1>is really that big of a surprise. Remember in President

1:13:35.520 --> 1:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump then when he was still candidate, Trump said he

1:13:38.760 --> 1:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>would accept the results of the election if he wins.

1:13:41.560 --> 1:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>He was very clear on that point, same thing this time,

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's already said he'd be taking this fight as

1:13:46.280 --> 1:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>far as he can legally. But what we're seeing now

1:13:49.560 --> 1:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is a split in the Republican Party over whether to

1:13:52.880 --> 1:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>fight this and how far to take this fight. What

1:13:55.800 --> 1:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>could this possibly mean for the GOP down the line,

1:13:59.680 --> 1:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question, because you know, we just think

1:14:02.400 --> 1:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>about it at the at the state level. In Pennsylvania,

1:14:05.520 --> 1:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the President has indicated that there are problems at the polls,

1:14:08.960 --> 1:14:11.759
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't trust the count coming out of certain aspects

1:14:11.800 --> 1:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>certain counties, particularly Democratic counties in Pennsylvania. Yet on the

1:14:15.960 --> 1:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>down ballot you have important racist sided for Republicans in

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that state. Well, how do you square those two things.

1:14:24.439 --> 1:14:27.519
<v Speaker 1>The Republican Party is bigger than Donald Trump. Of course

1:14:27.560 --> 1:14:29.479
<v Speaker 1>he's the leader of the party as President of the

1:14:29.560 --> 1:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>United States. But to your point, his arguments have an

1:14:33.280 --> 1:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>impact on down ballot, and Republicans didn't do so badly.

1:14:37.240 --> 1:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Down ballot looks like and again you were just talking

1:14:40.120 --> 1:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to specials in Georgia, looks like they will probably hold

1:14:43.439 --> 1:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. They picked up seats in the House, you know,

1:14:47.360 --> 1:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>really unexpected. We thought Democrats would gain. They got at

1:14:50.880 --> 1:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>least six seats, if not more, in the House, and

1:14:53.240 --> 1:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they did well at the state and local level in

1:14:55.320 --> 1:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>certain states. So the President claiming flaunt fraud has implications

1:14:59.360 --> 1:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on all of those races, and Republicans are going to

1:15:02.000 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>have to think really hard about how they go forward

1:15:05.080 --> 1:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and make these arguments. Not to mention Unlike in two thousand,

1:15:08.240 --> 1:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking multiple states where he may be contesting and

1:15:11.439 --> 1:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>asking for recounts in some states, wanting votes counted, in

1:15:15.240 --> 1:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>some states wanting the vote counts stopped. That makes it

1:15:18.520 --> 1:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that much more difficult for attorneys to go into court

1:15:21.200 --> 1:15:23.599
<v Speaker 1>and make a solid case on behalf of the president.

1:15:23.960 --> 1:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching the headlines continue to cross this Saturday morning

1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal. The Biden campaign is speaking to

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:32.959
<v Speaker 1>MSNBC this morning saying they feel frustrated with the networks.

1:15:32.960 --> 1:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>They expect a race call today. Kevin CILLI, what are

1:15:36.280 --> 1:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you hearing in terms of where the margins are right now?

1:15:40.840 --> 1:15:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Are we at a point where we can see more

1:15:43.600 --> 1:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>states called by the major networks today? Well, I mean,

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is a really fascinating conversation that is that

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:55.559
<v Speaker 1>is now emerging publicly, which is how networks and news

1:15:55.680 --> 1:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>organizations call a state for a candidate. And you know,

1:16:00.760 --> 1:16:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I go back historically, speaking to two thousand, when quite frankly,

1:16:05.320 --> 1:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Americans learned, maybe in real time, about the importance of

1:16:10.880 --> 1:16:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that you could win a popular vote but losing an election.

1:16:13.920 --> 1:16:16.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think this go around in two thousand and twenty,

1:16:17.120 --> 1:16:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Americans are learning about just how complex mail in voting

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and ballots and ABSENCEEE ballots, and and the impact accounting

1:16:23.560 --> 1:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in the data and the trends, and the impact of

1:16:25.800 --> 1:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>all of this in real time how long it can take. Uh.

1:16:29.000 --> 1:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>That said, based upon the conversations that I've had with

1:16:32.479 --> 1:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>uh Biden's campaign as well as his political strategic orbit, UH,

1:16:36.840 --> 1:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they're incredibly frustrated. And we still have to remind people

1:16:39.960 --> 1:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't come down to the network calls. It

1:16:42.320 --> 1:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>comes down to raw votes in each state. Kevin's really

1:16:45.320 --> 1:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Chief Washington corresponded from Bloomberg Radio and Television, along with

1:16:48.040 --> 1:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeanie's a know Bloomberg News contributor, political science professor, and

1:16:51.240 --> 1:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Iland College. Thanks to both of you for joining us

1:16:53.720 --> 1:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I'm Nathan Hagar along with Amy Morris. This

1:16:57.760 --> 1:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is special coverage on the twenty twenty

1:17:08.160 --> 1:17:11.799
<v Speaker 1>election from Bloomberg Radio, and this is a Bloomberg Daybreak

1:17:11.840 --> 1:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>special report. I'm Nathan Hagar, I'm Amy Morris. The votes

1:17:15.360 --> 1:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>are still being counted, but the path to the White

1:17:17.400 --> 1:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>House is there for Joe Biden. Let's bring in Josh

1:17:20.280 --> 1:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>wind Grove now. Bloomberg News White House car responded and Josh,

1:17:24.080 --> 1:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's right there in your title, White House Correspondent. You're

1:17:26.800 --> 1:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>at the White House on a regular basis. I'm curious

1:17:29.200 --> 1:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>about a sense of optimism or hopeful determination. What the

1:17:32.760 --> 1:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>mood might be at the White House at this hour. Well,

1:17:35.960 --> 1:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I think they're in pretty dour moods, or

1:17:39.000 --> 1:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>at least more dour than they were a couple of

1:17:41.160 --> 1:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>days ago. You know, rewind to Thursday, the Trump campaign was,

1:17:44.960 --> 1:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing call after call with the press, press

1:17:47.360 --> 1:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>conference after press conference, saying that they think the account

1:17:50.120 --> 1:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>would go their way, particularly in Arizona. Uh in Pennsylvania.

1:17:54.920 --> 1:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That all sort of dried up yesterday and has continued

1:17:58.200 --> 1:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to drive up today. It looks like, uh, it's unclear

1:18:02.000 --> 1:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>what Trump's doing today. It could be golfing, we don't

1:18:03.880 --> 1:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>know yet. So, you know, the numbers are really ticking

1:18:07.920 --> 1:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in one direction. There is no call at this point,

1:18:11.000 --> 1:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the AP or none of the major networks have called it,

1:18:14.560 --> 1:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but it feels like it's only a matter of time

1:18:17.160 --> 1:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>because every batch about coming in in Pennsylvania just drives

1:18:20.520 --> 1:18:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Biden's bleep up higher. You know, Georgia is similar. They're

1:18:24.560 --> 1:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty much almost done counting and Georgia overseas ballots, which

1:18:28.680 --> 1:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is members of the military and other folks overseas, which

1:18:32.080 --> 1:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually skew necessarily as trumpy as you would think

1:18:34.720 --> 1:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it would. Um, But you know, we're headed for a

1:18:37.120 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 1>recount there basically in the four crucial states. Biden leads

1:18:40.680 --> 1:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in all of them, and there aren't a lot of

1:18:43.640 --> 1:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>signs that there's a bunch of Trump boats waiting to

1:18:45.680 --> 1:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>be counted. One thing we do know, Josh, is that

1:18:48.439 --> 1:18:51.519
<v Speaker 1>the President has been tweeting this morning claiming a lack

1:18:51.560 --> 1:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of transparency, talking again about illegally cast votes. Beyond rhetoric,

1:18:58.320 --> 1:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is there any more in terms of strategy for how

1:19:02.160 --> 1:19:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the president plans to pursue this fight over the ongoing

1:19:06.800 --> 1:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>vote count. No, not really. Um. You know, they've been

1:19:11.200 --> 1:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>filing suits in particular in those four states Pennsylvania, George, Arizona, Nevada. Um.

1:19:16.560 --> 1:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>The pushback yesterday, it was weird watching Fox News yesterday.

1:19:20.120 --> 1:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I watched Fox for a living essentially, you know, and uh,

1:19:23.720 --> 1:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the tone changed a little bit. There was pushback from

1:19:26.000 --> 1:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican allies of the president saying, you know, essentially put

1:19:31.080 --> 1:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>up or shut up. But where is the proof? You know,

1:19:33.520 --> 1:19:38.759
<v Speaker 1>the campaign has not provided proof widespread fraud. In fact,

1:19:39.240 --> 1:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the only one case that they brought forward is a

1:19:41.760 --> 1:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>case of a woman in Nevada who says that she

1:19:44.320 --> 1:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>went to vote in person and was told that her

1:19:46.360 --> 1:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>mail ballot had already been cast uh and the Clark

1:19:50.800 --> 1:19:53.519
<v Speaker 1>County registrars said that they looked at the mail ballot

1:19:53.600 --> 1:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and their view that it's her signature. In other words,

1:19:56.560 --> 1:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>they're accusing her of trying to vote twice. So the

1:19:59.800 --> 1:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>only the only evidence that they's been brought forward so

1:20:02.040 --> 1:20:05.519
<v Speaker 1>far by the Trump campaign is a woman who the

1:20:05.640 --> 1:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>part who the county registrar basically says attempted to vote twice.

1:20:09.400 --> 1:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's that's all they've gone so far soever

1:20:12.560 --> 1:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this one. There, you know, we're waiting for evidence. There

1:20:15.960 --> 1:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't any yet. Well well, Josh, I think the judges

1:20:18.360 --> 1:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>have also said publicly that there they too are waiting

1:20:21.640 --> 1:20:24.599
<v Speaker 1>for evidence. They want to see more evidence before they

1:20:24.600 --> 1:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to proceed with these court cases. I want to

1:20:28.200 --> 1:20:30.519
<v Speaker 1>ask you, though, to pull the curtain back a little bit.

1:20:30.640 --> 1:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Who is in the President's ear to advise him, to

1:20:33.439 --> 1:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tell him how to either concede gracefully or take the

1:20:37.080 --> 1:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>fight to the courts. Who will the president listen to

1:20:39.680 --> 1:20:43.479
<v Speaker 1>At this point, his circle is essentially what it always

1:20:43.479 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>has been. First of all, is this family, um, and

1:20:46.479 --> 1:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what the signs are seeing from the family, our mixed

1:20:49.320 --> 1:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump Jr. Has been you know, publicly urging Trump

1:20:53.040 --> 1:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>allies to go on offense, you know, hold press conferences,

1:20:56.560 --> 1:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>raised pressure to what end I'm not sure, but essentially

1:20:59.120 --> 1:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>get out there in fight. Um A. Banka. Trump on

1:21:02.040 --> 1:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, has been pretty quiet. Uh. And so

1:21:05.840 --> 1:21:07.519
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not really clear what his kids would be

1:21:07.520 --> 1:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>telling him. And then outside of that you get into

1:21:09.320 --> 1:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like the Mike tents world. Mike ten has been pretty

1:21:11.360 --> 1:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>low profile since it all happened. Um Uh, loyal foot

1:21:16.360 --> 1:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>soldier for the president. Um So, I think I think

1:21:18.800 --> 1:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of that in a circle. But then of

1:21:20.960 --> 1:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>course you mentioned um Mark Meadows as a COVID case.

1:21:25.120 --> 1:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Um A little. We missed a couple of zeros on

1:21:27.840 --> 1:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that total. It's not twelve hundred, it's a hundred and

1:21:29.760 --> 1:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand cases that we've had in the US yesterday

1:21:32.760 --> 1:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>hand the day before. Um So, you know, we've got

1:21:35.640 --> 1:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a resurgent pandemic right now that seems to have hit

1:21:38.439 --> 1:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump world pretty again. And I've got sort of the

1:21:42.400 --> 1:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>chief of staff, the Trump campaigns battleground director and not

1:21:45.439 --> 1:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>one of its most loyal congress and Matt Gave reportedly

1:21:49.600 --> 1:21:53.519
<v Speaker 1>also having COVID. Kudos to the Bloomberg White House team

1:21:53.560 --> 1:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for uncovering that scoop that White House chief of staff

1:21:56.360 --> 1:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Mark Meadows and sever several other people in the Trump

1:21:58.760 --> 1:22:01.519
<v Speaker 1>orbit have come down with COVID nineteen In our last

1:22:01.520 --> 1:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds here, Josh, what does that do in terms

1:22:03.840 --> 1:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of the disarray that we're seeing from the Trump side

1:22:07.360 --> 1:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>as this account goes on. I mean, Trump released the

1:22:10.960 --> 1:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>statement yesterday that was combative, but you could read it

1:22:14.120 --> 1:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as the start of a climb down. If the numbers

1:22:17.320 --> 1:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>keep going the way they have been going, then it

1:22:20.760 --> 1:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>will you know, we we can't. We're going to get

1:22:23.840 --> 1:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a call sooner or later. I thought it would be yesterday.

1:22:25.960 --> 1:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong, you know. But if if Pennsylvania Friends

1:22:29.120 --> 1:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is called today, I'm sure we'll see last gasps of

1:22:32.800 --> 1:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>legal fights. But this feels like it's marching in one direction.

1:22:36.640 --> 1:22:39.559
<v Speaker 1>We're certainly seeing a lot of care being taken by

1:22:39.600 --> 1:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the networks with these margins. As the count goes on,

1:22:44.080 --> 1:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh wind Grove Bloomberg News White House correspondents. So great

1:22:47.240 --> 1:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>having you on with us this morning on this special

1:22:50.439 --> 1:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>report from Bloomberg Daybreak on the ongoing election fight coming up,

1:22:55.240 --> 1:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the legal battle for the White House, how these lawsuits

1:22:58.760 --> 1:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>could play out as President Trump has said he's willing

1:23:01.640 --> 1:23:04.479
<v Speaker 1>to take them to the Supreme Court. I'm Nathan Hagar

1:23:04.600 --> 1:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>along with Amy Morris. This is Bloomberg. This is special

1:23:14.200 --> 1:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the election from Bloomberg Radio. This is a

1:23:18.760 --> 1:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak special report. It is on Wall Street. I'm

1:23:23.520 --> 1:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Hagar Morris. The path to the White Houses there

1:23:27.000 --> 1:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Biden, but a protracted legal battle could be

1:23:29.720 --> 1:23:32.519
<v Speaker 1>in the offing. We bring in June Grosso, host of

1:23:32.520 --> 1:23:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law, are resident legal expert, as we watch breaking

1:23:36.600 --> 1:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>developments across the Bloomberg terminal this morning June, as Michael

1:23:40.880 --> 1:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, President Trump announced his legal team will be

1:23:43.600 --> 1:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>holding a news conference in Philadelphia. He now says it

1:23:47.160 --> 1:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>will be at the Four Seasons at eleven thirty this

1:23:50.680 --> 1:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>morning on the East Coast to deal with what he

1:23:54.760 --> 1:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>calls the Four Seasons uh landscaping. Not quite sure what

1:24:00.080 --> 1:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that means, whether that's some kind of UH term that

1:24:03.720 --> 1:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to put out in terms of what's happening

1:24:07.400 --> 1:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>with the vote. What will you be watching for, uh,

1:24:10.560 --> 1:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Pennsylvania legal fight, Well, I'll be watching for

1:24:17.160 --> 1:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some actual allegations of voter fraud. So President Trump has

1:24:23.120 --> 1:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>been saying that there's voter fraud, and that's what a

1:24:26.720 --> 1:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the the Trump surrogates have been saying as

1:24:30.120 --> 1:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>well in lawsuits. But the lawsuits have been getting dismissed

1:24:34.200 --> 1:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>time after time. Every time I look and check, there's

1:24:37.080 --> 1:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>another judge who has dismissed another lawsuit because they make

1:24:41.040 --> 1:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the allegations, but they don't have the evidence to back

1:24:43.840 --> 1:24:47.599
<v Speaker 1>it up. So, for example, just yesterday in Nevada, there

1:24:47.680 --> 1:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was an allegation that they shouldn't be using the signature

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>matching machines. They should be checking them by hand because

1:24:53.960 --> 1:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the signature matching machines don't do a good enough job. Well,

1:24:58.280 --> 1:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the judge said there was absolutely no evidence, that there

1:25:01.360 --> 1:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>was no proof whatsoever, even though there were some there

1:25:04.760 --> 1:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>were some some papers that were filed and some a

1:25:09.200 --> 1:25:12.759
<v Speaker 1>lawyer attributed to it, but you know, no real evidence.

1:25:12.760 --> 1:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And that keeps happening time and time again, that the

1:25:15.760 --> 1:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>judges are just dismissing these lawsuits without any evidence. So

1:25:18.720 --> 1:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine what the legal team is going to

1:25:21.920 --> 1:25:27.559
<v Speaker 1>be alleging in Pennsylvania today. Well, June, you and I

1:25:27.600 --> 1:25:30.559
<v Speaker 1>have talked about this before, and you know, confusion and

1:25:30.600 --> 1:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>distraction can be a strategy, if not a just a

1:25:34.800 --> 1:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>delaying tactic. If you were the president's attorney, how would

1:25:40.120 --> 1:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you advise him at this point? Does he have a

1:25:43.479 --> 1:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>path to the presidency through the courts, assuming there may

1:25:47.200 --> 1:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>be some evidence somewhere. Even if there's evidence, it has

1:25:52.720 --> 1:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to be in a state that's pivotal. It has to

1:25:56.920 --> 1:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be enough concerning enough votes that will make a difference

1:26:01.360 --> 1:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in that pivotal state. And even you know, in Pennsylvania,

1:26:05.280 --> 1:26:08.599
<v Speaker 1>everyone is really focused on Pennsylvania because the president has

1:26:08.640 --> 1:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to win Pennsylvania, and there have been a lot of

1:26:11.479 --> 1:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>cases filed in that in that state. However, none of

1:26:17.040 --> 1:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the cases have really come through for the president except

1:26:21.120 --> 1:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>for one that allowed his election observers to be a

1:26:24.479 --> 1:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit closer to watching the process. So I mean,

1:26:28.439 --> 1:26:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the critical thing. And even in Pennsylvania, where they're

1:26:31.760 --> 1:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to focus on the number of ballots that were

1:26:35.439 --> 1:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>counted after election day received after election day. That's what's

1:26:39.960 --> 1:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>up at the Supreme Court. From what I have been told,

1:26:43.960 --> 1:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>those are just ballots in the thousands, not even in

1:26:48.000 --> 1:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the tens of thousands, So where would they get the

1:26:51.120 --> 1:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>numbers to turn any of these states? So far, none

1:26:54.720 --> 1:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>of these lawsuits that I've seen concerns itself with anything

1:26:58.680 --> 1:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>more than perhaps ten thousand votes. So it doesn't seem

1:27:02.920 --> 1:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to me like there either is a path through the

1:27:05.760 --> 1:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits unless they come up with some new theory that

1:27:09.320 --> 1:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>will attack the substantial number in the margin of victory

1:27:14.280 --> 1:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in one of these states to make a difference. So

1:27:17.080 --> 1:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>wanna pass on a little more information about this news

1:27:20.160 --> 1:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>conference that the president says his legal team will be

1:27:23.439 --> 1:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>holding later this morning in Philadelphia, And thanks to Bob Bragger,

1:27:27.080 --> 1:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>producer for passing this along. That it's going to be

1:27:29.280 --> 1:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>held at four Seasons Total Landscaping. That's a that's a

1:27:32.479 --> 1:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>business in Philadelphia where the news conference is going to

1:27:36.720 --> 1:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be held. As we wait for much more information on

1:27:40.280 --> 1:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what the president's legal team could be pursuing. But June Grosso,

1:27:45.360 --> 1:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>host of Bloomberg Law, given how the cases have gone

1:27:49.760 --> 1:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for the president's team, uh since election Day, where do

1:27:54.200 --> 1:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you see this going? What do you make of the

1:27:56.160 --> 1:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>strategy that has been put out thus far and does

1:27:59.439 --> 1:28:03.839
<v Speaker 1>it point to where the Trump team could take itself

1:28:04.520 --> 1:28:08.799
<v Speaker 1>as as it tries to pursue further remedies for whatever

1:28:08.840 --> 1:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>it sees as going wrong with this vote. You know,

1:28:12.520 --> 1:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a member of the US Federal Election Commission said today

1:28:17.400 --> 1:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on CNN that there's no evidence of voter fraud, there's

1:28:20.439 --> 1:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of illegal votes being cast, and yet the

1:28:24.800 --> 1:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign they are going, as you said, have that

1:28:28.960 --> 1:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>very It will be very interesting for all of us

1:28:31.680 --> 1:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to hear what they're going to talk about and what

1:28:34.320 --> 1:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of allegations they're going to come up with. They've

1:28:36.720 --> 1:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>also sent legal teams to Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

1:28:40.960 --> 1:28:44.519
<v Speaker 1>So they're looking for their looking for fraud. They're looking

1:28:44.560 --> 1:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for something to be able to sue on. But that's

1:28:48.200 --> 1:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not an easy task. I mean, as I just said,

1:28:50.160 --> 1:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to have evidence. And an interesting thing is, uh,

1:28:54.240 --> 1:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at the lawyers so far, we're not seeing any

1:28:57.040 --> 1:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the heavy hitting lawyers that you're used to seeing

1:29:00.960 --> 1:29:05.559
<v Speaker 1>in these kinds of election battles. So and um, I

1:29:05.680 --> 1:29:09.839
<v Speaker 1>understand there was a reporting on CNN again that President

1:29:09.840 --> 1:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump was upset with the legal team that was put

1:29:12.360 --> 1:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>together by his son in law, Jared Kushner, because you

1:29:16.680 --> 1:29:19.639
<v Speaker 1>don't hear those big names you'd see, for example, Rudy

1:29:19.680 --> 1:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Giuliani was the last time they had a conference in

1:29:23.600 --> 1:29:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Philly was the was a lawyer out front, and he's

1:29:26.800 --> 1:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not an attorney that deals with election law. Election law

1:29:30.200 --> 1:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so specific to each state. It's different from other law,

1:29:33.680 --> 1:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>very specific to each state. And you have special litigators

1:29:38.120 --> 1:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in those states that are usually used to deal with

1:29:42.320 --> 1:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>these issues because they're just so complex. Because the procedures,

1:29:46.920 --> 1:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>especially in until in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania, the procedures aren't

1:29:51.360 --> 1:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>really minute, and they sometimes conflict with each other, and

1:29:54.880 --> 1:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>there's been no legal there's no not been clear legal

1:29:58.760 --> 1:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>guidance in Pennsylvania about a lot of the vote counting procedures.

1:30:05.640 --> 1:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>June I asked how you would um how you would

1:30:08.240 --> 1:30:10.439
<v Speaker 1>advise the president. Now I want to ask how if

1:30:10.520 --> 1:30:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you were one of Joe Biden's attorneys, because both sides

1:30:13.760 --> 1:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have lawyered up. If you were advising the Biden campaign,

1:30:18.240 --> 1:30:20.519
<v Speaker 1>would you just tell them to sit tight, keep your

1:30:20.520 --> 1:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>head down, and keep the faith. How would you advise them?

1:30:24.120 --> 1:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>What is their role? Right? Now as the president continues

1:30:27.120 --> 1:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to take all these different courses through the courts, their

1:30:30.960 --> 1:30:34.559
<v Speaker 1>role is defense. That's simple. It's been that way since

1:30:34.640 --> 1:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>these lawsuits over the accounts started. They come in and

1:30:38.760 --> 1:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>they debunk whatever the allegations are. You have a top

1:30:43.000 --> 1:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>lawyer in Mark Elias, and he was the one who

1:30:46.439 --> 1:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>who debunked the Nevada case, one of the Nevada cases

1:30:50.240 --> 1:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about before the signature matching machine, saying

1:30:53.040 --> 1:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there's just no evidence here. That's what they do. They

1:30:55.479 --> 1:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>come in and they look at the allegations that the

1:30:58.760 --> 1:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign is aching, and then they first say, where's

1:31:01.880 --> 1:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence here, where's your proof, which is what most

1:31:05.040 --> 1:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the judges have been saying in these cases in

1:31:08.080 --> 1:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Michigan that its cases have been dismissed in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada,

1:31:13.439 --> 1:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and the judges all say the same thing, there's no

1:31:16.360 --> 1:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence for this. So it's easy to make these claims.

1:31:19.880 --> 1:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Anyone can make these claims, but you've got to come

1:31:22.120 --> 1:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>up with evidence. And remember something else, It's really important

1:31:25.240 --> 1:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that once the vote is cast, it's really difficult for

1:31:29.439 --> 1:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a court to come in and say, no, we're not

1:31:32.200 --> 1:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>going to count that vote because the voter has reliance

1:31:36.320 --> 1:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on the machinery, on the rules of the election, the

1:31:40.840 --> 1:31:43.679
<v Speaker 1>voter has cast the vote. So even the Supreme Court

1:31:44.000 --> 1:31:47.519
<v Speaker 1>will find it very difficult to say these votes that

1:31:47.560 --> 1:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you've cast, voters that you relied on and you exercised

1:31:52.120 --> 1:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>your franchise, these votes won't count. That's different from what

1:31:55.800 --> 1:32:00.439
<v Speaker 1>happened in Bush by Gore. The Supreme Court there didn't say, oh,

1:32:00.479 --> 1:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>these votes are not going to count. They said you

1:32:02.200 --> 1:32:06.639
<v Speaker 1>can't recount these. So I think it's a really big

1:32:06.720 --> 1:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>step for a court to take to discount any of

1:32:09.320 --> 1:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the votes that have been cast. JOm Grosso, host of

1:32:11.760 --> 1:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law, thank you for joining us on this special

1:32:15.400 --> 1:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Daybreak on the election count. Stay with

1:32:19.240 --> 1:32:21.719
<v Speaker 1>us throughout the weekend and again first thing Monday morning.

1:32:21.800 --> 1:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Is we tracked the latest on the election, the legal battle,

1:32:24.200 --> 1:32:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and the path ahead for White House policy. I'm Nathan

1:32:26.720 --> 1:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Hagar with Amy Morris. This is Bloomberg