WEBVTT - #546 Jason Flom with David Smith

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>On October sixteenth, twenty fifteen, twenty four year old Courtney

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Tolliver was struck by a blunt object in her Portage County,

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Ohio trailer home. After running to the neighbors for help,

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>she was rushed to the hospital and put into a

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>medically induced coma. When she regained consciousness, her memory was unclear.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Soon detectives suggested David Smith, a man who had texted

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>her that day, but she said it wasn't David until

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>she was facing her own charges. Then her memory made room.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>For that possibility.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Wrongful Conviction. Welcome back to Wrongful Conviction, where

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we returned to Portage County, Ohio. Now, the last time

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we covered a case out of there was Tyrone Noling

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and that one lives rent free in my head, and

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to link to his story in the episode description. Tragically,

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he's still on death row to this very day in Ohio,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're only aware of the wrongful conviction epidemic in

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that state because of the incredible attorneys who also call

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Ohio home, not least of which is Kim Kral Kim.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back, Yeah, thanks for having me back.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And she's here to help tell the story of the

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>man himself, David Smith. Thank you for joining.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Us, right, thank you. I appreciate you.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And typically we like to hear about our guest lives.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, before all this insanity came to pass. And

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with David, that's forty seven years. I mean, he wasn't

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't a youngster when he went to prison. But

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>those forty seven years they weren't easy ones, were they.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I was taken from my real parents at the age

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of six, giving up for adoption. I had eight brothers

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and sisters, and I went from foster home to group home,

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>foster home to group home, and finally a man picked

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>me up as someone that he wanted as his son.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 2>In order for him to adopt me, he had to

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>have a wife, so he married my mother under false

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>tensus for real. Because fast forward, it was a whole

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of abuse in the home, I mean extreme abuse,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 2>physical abuse. So where I got upset with my mother

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>was there couldn't have been nothing in that home that

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>could have been worse where you would have to give

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>me away. If it wasn't good enough for you, then

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>why should it be good enough for me? Why didn't

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>you take me with you? And a judge also made

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 2>that statement to her, and she said she couldn't because

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that would have been kidnapping. In my head, I'm saying,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>how could that be? You can prove the abuse by

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the markings on my body, by me warning myself back

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>to the state. But I wasn't good enough to take

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 2>with you.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>So after his mother left him in this man's custody,

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>he found a way to get himself out of that

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>awful situation.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 2>At the age of ten, I warded myself back to

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the state. We went in to see the judge on

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>some kind of official business dealing with the adoption park, and

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 2>I told the judge I'm not going back there, and

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>he looked at me and he couldn't figure out why.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And I said, I'm just not going back with that man,

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>while he was sitting right next to me. And that

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 2>day forward, my life began by myself, without me having

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>any kind of guidance or direction. The only thing I

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>knew to do was to survive. It didn't tailed me

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>committing crimes. I didn't know any better, and all it

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>did was grew until it grew out of control. I

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>was constantly detention centers, juvenile facilities. I was numb. I

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 2>was just a mechanical animal out here, just trying to

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>survive my life. At that time, I was just a

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>car thief boy, and then that grew to the life

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of crime as the adult. I had a robbery case,

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a boloneyssault case, and then twenty fourteen, I had got

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>into the trade selling drugs. That's all I've known up

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 2>until ten years ago, when I actually started getting my

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>life together. I had opened up two small businesses. I

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>moved out of Portage County and moved to Trumble County,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Newton Folls.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's where he lived with his girlfriend, Margaret Austin,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>while both getting his cleaning business off the ground and

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>remaining in touch with friends in Portage County, including the

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>victim in this case, a twenty four year old woman

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>named Portney Tolliver who was also involved in the drug trade.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And on the night before the incident, she had texted

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>David for a ride to Cleveland, and so they were

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in contact earlier that day, that fateful day of October sixteen,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen, and then she suddenly stopped texting David right

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>around the time that she had been struck with the

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>blunt object inside of her trailer home.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Nine one one gets a call from a neighbor that

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Courtney Tolliver is wandering around sort of between trailers and

0:04:55.680 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 3>collapses on the ramp of her trailer and and they

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>believe she's muttered something about being hit with a hammer.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 3>The police arrive, she is taken by EMS and then

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 3>life light. She is put into a medically induced coma

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and during this time the Portage County Sheriff's Office begins

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>an investigation. I'm using the term investigation very lightly because

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>they gathered I mean, I think five items of physical evidence,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 3>all of which have since been lost. So they take

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a few photographs. They gather five items of physical evidence,

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>and they swab a number of things for DNA. There

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>is a hammer on site that is not collected as evidence.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 3>The photograph of it, it appears to have no blood

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 3>on it. What is most interesting is there is a

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 3>stool absolutely covered in blood. When you zoom in you

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 3>can see a hair fiber on it. There is a

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 3>massive puddle of blood around this stool. Now, this stool

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>is not swabbed, it's not collected, it's hardly photographed. There

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>is a set of keys that are moved onto a

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 3>puddle of blood, so someone touched those keys after the incident.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Those were not gathered or swabbed or finger printed.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 2>And it was a size six footprint that was inside

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the blood, a woman's size six shot. The detective said

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't step into blood, They didn't do none

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of that. So whose size six shoot was this?

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 3>There was a lock box which someone opened, whoever did this,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 3>that was not swabbed or fingerprinted. It was gathered but

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>never used as evidence and has since been lost. There

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 3>was a laptop that the contents of which were never investigated,

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 3>that was lost. And she had two cell phones.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Courtney described one cell phone as her family phone and

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the other as her drug phone, but at the time

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of trial, the state claimed to only have the records

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>for the family phone, which she had used to text

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>David about a ride to Cleveland.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 3>And so throughout that evening they go back and forth

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>with text about a ride to Cleveland, and throughout the

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 3>next morning, Dave says, I have a job interview. We

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 3>know from the location of his cell phone. He goes

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to a job interview, and then there's text back and forth,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and then she drops off the texting and he says,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 3>what do you want to do? I'm pulling up and

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>then no response.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>But she was text messaging people steal on that other

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>phone when this crime was supposed to have occurred with me. Anyway,

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>they say it has happened between ten thirty and ten

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 2>forty five with me. But at ten forty something she

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 2>was still on the phone, text messaging and making calls

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 2>with whoever she was talking to.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But the drug phone record and this exculpatory context were

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not discovered for many years. Nevertheless, the police visited David,

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>who confirmed his number, and they probably visited the people

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other phone log too, And soon Courtney came

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the coma.

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>She cannot speak because she's intubated, and she writes down

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>who did this to me? She had been engaged in

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>a number of drug transactions the night before and the

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 3>next day early in the morning before this attack. They

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>don't investigate any of those people in any manner whatsoever.

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 3>They don't investigate any other person she contacts or calls.

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Or they did, but they just didn't keep any record

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. Now, when Courtney's intubation tube came out, they

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>interviewed her again and again she said that she had

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>no recollection of what had happened, and in between that

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>visit and the following one, they ran some of the

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>crime scene evidence through CODIS, the national database, and they

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>came up with a possible match, not a true match,

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>but a possible match for David Smith. So while waiting

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for confirmation of that, they visited Courtney once again, this

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>time recording the interaction and telling her whose DNA they

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>believed that they had found at the scene.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>When they go interview her on December ninth, they hold

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 3>up a single photo of David Smith and tell her

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 3>this man is a dangerous man. We already spoke to him.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 3>He did this to you. He wanted you dead. He

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 3>doesn't care about you. And she does not identify him

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 3>as her attacker. She says, why would he do this

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>to me?

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And she seems to have some foggy recollection of her attacker.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 2>She states that the guy had blue tip Dreds. I

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 2>don't have blue tip Dreds. I think I've been bald

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>for twenty five years at least. And the blue tip

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Dreds is the person that their mother called and asks

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 2>did you try to kill me? And his name is Hood.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 3>In a recording, her mother says, we called and asked

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 3>him why he did this?

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>And this is a person that she been known forever,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>good friends, they do business together, they kick it together.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>They was like peanut, butter and jelly. Why would you

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>call him and ask him did he try to kill you?

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So Corney and her mother had their own suspects. They

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned others in that recording, some of whom were

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>on that other call log. But at this point the

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>police appeared to be hoping for their possible codus match

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>with David was going to be confirmed, but it wasn't,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so now they began to scream.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 3>What we found later with these alternative suspects is detector

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Johnson's calling the BCI, people who handle the DNA testing

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 3>and telling them we have these alternative suspects. They could

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 3>have been involved. Here's why they actually let Courtney Tolliver's

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 3>children's father out of jail to help investigate for them.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Our baby daddy was talking to his mother and his

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>aunt on the phone in the county jail and said

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 2>that she said who did it to her?

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 3>And then they don't disclose the information they get from him.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 3>And then as BCI is calling back saying these other

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 3>people's DNA. Most of his DNA isn't matching to anyone,

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 3>almost all of it. Then Johnson starts to just narrow

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 3>in on David. Smith refuses to give anyone else's DNA

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and refuses to turn over any discovery about these other

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>alternative suspects.

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>At this point, they returned to the DNA that had

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>been a possible match to David. And if you've ever

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>seen a DNA analysis graph also known as an electro pharah,

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a series of little peaks marking genetic

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>alleles that are present in a given sample, which are

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>measured in relative fluorescence units or RFUs, And it seems

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like there were enough peaks in common with David and

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:18.239
<v Speaker 1>this DNA sample to trigger a possible match in codis,

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but not an actual match. And there are ways to

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>enhance the quantity of a sample as well as the

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>height of the peaks or what lies between the peaks,

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what is called static to see if potentially there is

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>other genetic information.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It's an amplification process, which was a process they used

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 3>for the first time in Portage County in his case,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>and they're only supposed to amplify a certain number of

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 3>times and that amplification creates static, and those static points

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 3>either can cause you to misteray actual alleles as static,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>or you can have static so high, which is nothing.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not real information. It's created from the amplification process

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 3>that can be read as an allele, a marker in

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>a certain space. They enlarged that possible match to Dave Smith,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>and it was still not a match to Dave Smith.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>So they enlarged it a second time, and it was

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 3>still not a match to Dave Smith. And they enlarged

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 3>it a third time and it was a match in

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 3>equal parts to Dave Smith and the victim.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>This triple amplification process produced an electro pharagram that differed

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>from previous iterations in order to produce this result, and

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>it's unknown whether these differences may have been actual genetic

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>information or nothing at all. So there's a potential here

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for subjectivity, false positives and negatives, and definitely a lot

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of room for doubt.

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>But an unreliable process in this case produced a result

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 3>that there's a one in one fifty chance it's anyone

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 3>but David Smith or Courtney Tolliver, which is not a

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 3>match at all. So one in one fifty chance means

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 3>it could have been twenty seven thousand other people in

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Portage County.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So at this point they returned to court me for

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>an identification, and they doubled.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Down on David.

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, without that identification, they had some trash DNA and

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 3>that's about it. She continues to not identify David Smith

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 3>as her attacker for several more months until February of

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen. She had I believe eight or nine felony

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>drug counts pending. In February, those counts are resolved with

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the same judge who tried David's case. Those are resolved

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to a term of probation, and she walks directly out

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 3>of the courtroom into a little room immediately to the

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 3>left and explains to Detective Johnson that she now remembers

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 3>that she had a dream while in her coma she's

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 3>as a baal black man mased her, and she now

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 3>interprets that to me that David Smith hit her with

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 3>a hammer in October of twenty fifteen.

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So no more assailant with blue dreads and no more

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>felony drug charges. Maybe she had no idea who had

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>hit her, but now at least she found a way

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that she could get something out of it.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 2>No, I think she has an idea, and I think

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 2>that what really transpired is something that her and the

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>person that did it is going to take to the grade.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if somebody beat me like that, I'm gonna

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>know who it was beat me.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Nevertheless, it was enough for an arrest warrant on April first,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>That morning, I have my cell phone in one hand

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and my car keys and the other. I chirked my

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 2>truck and I stepped one foot in and when I

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>look in the rearview mirror, it's a black, undercovered car

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>bumper to bumper with me. He pulled out his gun.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>He's like, free, stick your hands out, and I stick

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 2>my hands out and I said, what's this about? Officer?

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 2>He put the handcuffs on me, and then he said,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you have a warren for a tempted murder. And I

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>damn that passed out. Like what.

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to, wrongful Conviction. You can listen to this

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and all the Lava for Good podcasts one week early

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and ad free by subscribing to Lava for Good Plus

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>It was the biggest case of Portish County. Everybody at

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 2>that time at Portish County Jail tried to get on

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>that witness list to testify against me so they could

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>get out of jail. The detectives was pulling up on people,

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about you ain't gonna get in trouble. All you

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>got to do is just tell us you was down

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>there witting. I mean, all this is video and recording.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Eventually, the investigators came upon some willing participants who they

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>could actually use, starting with a couple who knew David

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>from the drug trade, Randy Milem and Florence Fontanella. And

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Randy was the one who made the first statement.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you looked at the video of this interview,

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>be like, this is a dope fiend trying to get

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 2>out because she's telling the the detectives all these ale

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Lander's statements. But he's also saying, are you going to

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>go to the judge and tell her to let me out?

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 2>He came up with a story that I told him

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I did it. I told him I left the hammer

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 2>at the house, that me and this girl did it together.

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Then Florence Fontanella, who was facing her own charges, was

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>approached about being in Randy's car during the alleged confession.

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 2>The DEA went to her house and asked her up

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and she said, I don't know nothing about that. She said,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I was in the vehicle, Winnie, and I never heard

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>that man say he did anything. And the very next

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>day they had a warned for her arrest. When back

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>picked her up brought it to Forty County jail, she

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 2>wrote a statement, I was in the car and I

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't hear none of that. She made recorded calls on

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the phone and said Randy must be in trouble and

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I didn't hear none of that. But two weeks later

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 2>she spent around and said I as a forthcoming. She said,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't hear nothing but him say got the bitch

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>with a hammer.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And then once Florence hopped on board, Randy recanted. So

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>now they couldn't afford to lose Florence as well.

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Florence found it Tello. She was scheduled to go for

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>sentencing a week before my trial. They postponed her sentencing

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that she testified for the deal that

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 2>they gave her. She went to treatment facility by Addings.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Instead of prison. Yet she switched her story quite literally

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 3>when she.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Got the deal, and they pulled a similar stunt with

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>another acquaintance of David's who was named Lisa Frame. Ironic

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>name much, Lisa Frame, Come on now.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Lisa Frame was in Jefferson County jail and Lisa Frame

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 3>drove a black car. A black car can be seen

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 3>driving in and out of the trailer park around the

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 3>time they believe the crime happened. And to me, it's

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 3>pretty clear if they knew someone. It was a known

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 3>associate of David Smith with a black car. She was

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 3>in jail. They went to the jail threatened to charge

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 3>her with conspiracy to commit attempted murder unless she told

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>them that she drove Dave Smith there.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 2>And so she said, would tell me what you want

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>me to say then, and I'll say it.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>And this insanity is on tape.

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 3>She says there was a day she gave Dave Smith

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 3>a ride, but she wasn't sure what day it was.

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>She took him to the trailer park. He was in

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 3>there a couple minutes and he came back. He had

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 3>no blood on him or anything. He wasn't in any

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 3>state of outrage or upset or panic or anything. She

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't say anything about having a hammer on him, but

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 3>she says he has something and wrapped up in his shirt,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 3>which she thinks is a gun, and she reiterates she

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 3>has no idea what Dave this happened.

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Frame said, I called him several times that would

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>have blocked me and Lisa Frame into that day that time.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>But they said that they took her phone and plugged

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 2>it into the computer and they couldn't get nothing out

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 2>of it.

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm sure.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>And not only did they plug it in and decide

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 3>that it wasn't computering, but they then thought, should we

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 3>keep it?

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Should we keep it?

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Should we store it somewhere important? Nobody knows it has

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>disappeared into thin air. And in all of the phone

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>records that were available in this case, they got one

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 3>set of phone records which helped the tail they were spinning,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and then everything else was unavailable.

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So to shore up Lisa Frames date and time, they

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pulled surveillance footage from a Walmart parking lot showing two

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>black cars traveling in the direction of the trailer homes

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>around the time of the last text message from David,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and then only one leaving shortly after. And we could

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>get into how possible or impossible it was that these

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>were even her car, and how long it would take

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for the round trip plus the bludgeoning. But why unpack

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of meaningless bullshit that's masquerading as evidence when

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the logical framework is built on the word of someone

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who said a recording, tell me what you want me

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, and I'll say it. So they went ahead

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to trial with Lisa Frame, Florence Fontanello, Courtney Tolliver and

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the bogus DNA evidence, which magically seemed to have gotten

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a boost of credibility in the lead up to the trial.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Before twenty sixteen, when they come up with the electro faarrograms,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the peak had to be taller than seventy five RFUs

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>otherwise it could have been static and it's too risky

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 3>to consider it. But in between October twenty fifteen to

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 3>Fall twenty sixteen, BCI published a paper saying, now, just

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 3>in the nick of time, they're allowed to lower the

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 3>threshold to fifty RFUs and count peaks that really fall

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 3>in that high risk static range.

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So this lowering of standards allowed for the triple amplified

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>DNA sample to be presented as a partial match to

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>both David and Courtney, which is a confusing result, and

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>implied that it could have been David, but it eventually

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>turned out it could have also been so many others.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the neighbor across the street, in fact, when we

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>compared it, had more alleles in common with this sample

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 3>than Dave Smith did, and had blood on his pants

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and was present when the police arrived. And I'm not

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 3>saying he did it, but I'm evidencing how we manipulate

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 3>DNA to say what we wanted to say, and that's

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 3>what they did in this case.

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And the steak got one last helping hand. David's attorney

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>filed to suppress the victim's identification because if you remember,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the December ninth, twenty fifteen, interaction was recorded when Lieutenant

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnson was suggestive with the witness.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he literally is saying, this man is dangerous, he

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 3>wanted you dead. We know that he did this, and

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 3>she's still not identifying him. And what is crazy is

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Tolliver's mother is in that same interview, and in the

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 3>course of the conversation, Tlliver's mother is talking about other

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>people that they believe did this.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>By name specifically Hood with the blue tipped dreads. But

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the motion to suppress the id was denied, and by.

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 3>The time we get to the first trial, they don't

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 3>allow that to be played in court. Instead, the court says, well,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 3>they have the transcript of it. The jury's going to

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 3>get the transcript.

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 2>But it took me ten years to find out that

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>those transcripts wasn't even accurate. In the first place.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 3>The transcript had the names of the other potential suspects redacted,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and it had it redacted in such a manner that

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 3>it then sounded like his mother was still talking about

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 3>David Smith. We called him and asked him why he

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 3>did this, implicating that they believed it was Dave Smith,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 3>when really what they said about Dave Smith was why

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>would he do that to me? She said, he gave

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 3>me a ride once? Why would he do this?

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So even if the jury planned on reading them, they'd

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>be misled by the redacted text anyway. And that's how

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>both Lieutenant Johnson and Courtney Tolliver testified about the identification

0:22:55.320 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>without being irreparably impeached. Instead, the cross examination was new.

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>While Courtney took the.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Stand, she testifies with one hundred percent certainty that David

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Smith came to her door and attacked her with a hammer.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And despite cross examination, this was still a bludgeoning victim

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>naming her attacker.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 2>But this is the key to a one hundred percent

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>sure This dream summary never came up to that detective

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>shoulder that picture. And then now she's saying, in my dream,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I dreamt it was him. But there was never a

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>dream summary in the hospital on November seventh. But whatever

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 2>it was that the detectives came to the hospital and

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>asked you, and you say it, I have no memory of.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That, perhaps having not heard the contextual audio recording or

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>having not heard a word about the deal she got

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>for her nine felony drug charges. Sadly unsurprising that the

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>jury accepted the bogus idea as truth and then came

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote supporting evidence. Like Florence Fontanello, who had

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:58.719
<v Speaker 1>her own issues.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Initially, she says that David Smith had nothing to do

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 3>with this, and she says it in these Facebook communications

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 3>with Margaret Austin. Randy Mulam comes forward and tells them

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 3>what they want to hear. Then she all of a

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 3>sudden switches to Team State and She says David Smith

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 3>made an admission to her.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>When my attorney actor, well, what did you hear in

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the conversation, she said, I didn't hear nothing but him say,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 2>got the bitch with a hammer.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 3>And she's confronted with these Facebook texts, but maintains that

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 3>David Smith made an admission to her.

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 2>She told the jury the reason why she didn't come

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 2>forward because she was scared.

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>The jury was also unaware of the deal that she

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>had received, as well as the threat that Lisa Frame

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>had sidestepped with her testimony, which was supported by surveillance

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>footage of random black cars traveling toward the trailer park.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>There's not a single photo of what her actual black

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Cadillac looks like. Even though they had a search, weren't

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 3>for it, and they searched it all. They took not

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 3>a photo of anything. But they did take a floor

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>mat and they tested the floor mat for either Dave's

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 3>DNA or blood or any blood splatter at all. Because

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 3>this was one of the bloodiest crime scenes I've seen.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>There's not a drop respect of blood on the matt

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>note of Dave's DNA. But then since we have no

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 3>photo of the car to say whether that was the

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 3>car pulling into the trailer park or not. They just

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 3>infer to the jury that it is, and that Lisa

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Frame doesn't remember the day, but that was the day,

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>and that also she must just be confused about how

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Dave Smith didn't by any stretch looked like he had

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 3>just hammered someone nearly to death.

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So after hearing only some of the impeaching issues about

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>every single one of the state's witnesses, and having heard

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the identification of the attacker without the context of how

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that identification came to be, the jury went to deliverate.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a lot of evidence that the jury

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't able to deliver right on, and they came back

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 2>two days later with a guilty burden twenty three years flat.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 2>They told me I wasn't coming home till I was

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>seventy one years old, and I just started it at

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 2>forty seven. I was angry about it, but I wasn't

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 2>bitter because before I left out of that court room,

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I told the detective Lieutenant Johnson, I'll see you again

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>in trial, and he said to me, I'll be there.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 2>And for ten years I made sure that I was

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 2>going to be there to see him again. While the

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>appeal was going on, I was in a law library

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>every single day.

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Like so many of our guests, David learned the law,

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and after his direct appeal failed, he began fining motions

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>pro se, meaning on his own, without the up of

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>an attorney.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I did a post conviction on ineffect assistance of council

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>for the not playing those audios in court. They shut

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 2>that down. She said that there was nothing outside the

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>records because these transcripts and audios went back to the jury.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Subsequently we found out they never went to the jury.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Did never happened, And subsequently he filed his federal habias

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>based on the impermissibly suggestive identification, citing the transcript of

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the December ninth, twenty fifteen recording, a transcript that they

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>had thought was both complete and seen by the jury,

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and the filing made its way to the Sixth Circuit

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>by twenty twenty two, by which point Kim had already

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>joined the fight.

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 2>By this time, Kim had set me the audio and

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the original transcripts of Courtney Tolliver's interview with Lieutenant Johnson,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and when she said it to me and I was

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>reading it, I said, Kim, these transcripts, it's not accurate.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 2>She like, what you mean? I said, they took evidence

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 2>out of these transcripts. Send me to audio. I marked

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 2>off where all the meat was, taking out the transcripts,

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>the identification to somebody else and everything else, and I

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>sent it back to her. She tended to an independent

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>transcriber and they put all of it back inside the transcripts.

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>They're authenticating through another transcriber, but they're not authenticating through

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 2>the courts. Also, I didn't use these transcripts in my

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>federal aid. So now we're in the six certain Court

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 2>of Appeals and I bugging Kim and saying, how are

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 2>we going to get these transcripts in the evidence. What's difficult?

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Though, We were procedurally in a place where you can't

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>expand the record, and so knowing that they weren't going

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>to allow me to expand the record at that time,

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I was just like making up other things to file

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 3>that i'd have a reason to attach the transcripts.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>So when they read the motion, they're going to read

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the transcripts. And that's what we.

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Did, without regard to the fact that they removed a

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 3>part of the transcript which contained exculpatory information and identified

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 3>an alternative suspect. The court was just like, this wild

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 3>identification procedure overly influenced her, and it's so bad. It's

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to such an extent that there's no way it can

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 3>overcome even the stringent protections of EDPATH.

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>EDPA is the Anti Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act,

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>which was signed into law in the wake of the

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six Oklahoma City bombing. And in order to

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>reverse a state court decision quote, every fair minded jurist

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would have to agree end quote. So what they're saying

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is that not a single quote unquote fair minded judge

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in existence could have seen this another way. And the

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Sixth Circuit ruled that this seemingly impossibly high standard had

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>actually been met, and.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 3>That's when they awarded him a habeous corpus on the

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 3>condition that they have to release him if they don't

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 3>retry him without that identification within six months.

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And it was just hard that it took me all

0:29:55.800 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 2>this time. Quote just see where really happened to that case. Yeah,

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 2>evidence didn't change, nothing changed, but it was jud just

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 2>that seeing, hey, but this may did to this do

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 2>this a right? You should have never went.

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>To trial, so the state tried to stay the decision,

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>which brought them about six weeks against the six months

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they were given, meaning they had to retry him by

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>March thirteenth, twenty twenty five, and with the clock ticking,

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the state appealed to the denial of the stay as

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>well as filed for sir tierrari with the US Supreme Court,

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>both of which were almost unanimously denied in January of

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Since the ruling in July of twenty twenty four, I'd

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 3>been actively filing defense motions, all of which went ignored

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 3>until January for a trial that had to start by

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 3>mid February, and so by the time they were responded to,

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 3>like our emotions for expert, all of those deadlines that

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 3>expired for us. And then two days before trial, they

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 3>find a box labeled Detective Johnson. It was in the

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 3>back of some garage and it contained exculpatory information. It

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 3>referenced confidential informants.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And this confirmed suspicions that Kim had raised before the

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>July twenty twenty four ruling.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 3>While I'm working on David's case, I am randomly working

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 3>another federal drug case and I'm in the trial and

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 3>a confidential informants name is disclosed, which is wildly protected,

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>but it is a name I recognize. So I go

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 3>back to Portage County and I say, I have documentations

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 3>signed by Portage County Sheriff's office indicating that this person

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 3>was paid as a confidential informant right around the same

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 3>time of this case, that they were on the payroll

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 3>by the Portage County Sheriffs. And the sheriffs continually and

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 3>repeatedly stated, we have no record of that, while I'm

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 3>holding documentation signed by their office on their letterhead.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 2>The people that they had on the list suspects are

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 2>confidential informants, and that.

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Would explain why they never even called them into interview them,

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 3>not one of them. Did they identify their whereabouts at

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 3>the time of the crime, did they get their cell

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 3>phone records to see their location or their communication with

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Courtney Tolliger.

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Which definitely adds context as to why this second phone

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>long was allegedly never gathered into evidence. And additionally, there

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>was new context for how David's and only David's cell

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>phone location had been obtained.

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 2>When he got the warrant from my cell phone tower evidence.

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>He told the judge that his DNA is on this

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>scene and that's what he used to get a search WARM.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 2>When the people from BCIs and you have to do

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 2>further investigation. This is not evidence, but he took it

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>to the judge and the judge gave me a search

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>WARM from my cell phone tower evidence.

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 3>The big part of the first trial I was like,

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>her last text message was to David Smith, she never

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 3>texted anybody again. F that well, her other phone makes

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 3>clear she's continuing texting and engaging with people for fifteen

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 3>or twenty minutes after they believe the crime occurred, and

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 3>that she has constant contact with one person more than

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 3>one hundred times that day. That was another aspect of

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 3>the case that was not a part of the first trial,

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 3>and then they tried so hard not to make it

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 3>a part of the second trial by arguing that we

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 3>could not authenticate it because the records were ten years old.

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And that was an issue for everything that was found

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in Lieutenant Johnson's garage as they moved into the retrial

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in February twenty twenty five.

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Another one of the big issues at the retrial is

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 3>that the state investigator who photographed the crime scene has

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 3>retired and literally told them, sorry, I'm not coming in,

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 3>So we were denied the opportunity to cross examine him

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 3>about the photos on scene. You literally can't question anyone

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 3>about anything you see in the scene. How can you

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 3>develop arguments when you can't even point things out.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Like whether or not the hammer was even the murder

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>weapon at all. When the stool in the photo, well,

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it was an interesting alternative.

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting about it is someone touched it after it

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 3>was used, because there's both blood under it that it

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 3>is resting on top of and blood on top of it,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 3>so that is going to have meaningful evidence on it.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Did they collect it? No, you didn't pick up the

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 3>only hammer on scene, and you didn't pick up the

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 3>thing that looks like a bludgeoning object covered in blood.

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 3>You didn't pick up the plastic bag which was sitting

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 3>on top of pile blood and also blood spleater on it.

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 3>So it was moved after. You know, it was touched

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 3>in some way in the course of this attack.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But without that witness or a more well documented crime scene,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>the defense was hamstrung in this regard. But that was

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not the case when they confronted the DNA evidence at

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a pre trial hearing. As we discussed earlier, the triple

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>amplification process on the DNA sample drew into question what

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>were peaks and what was just static, which brings in

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>room for subjectivity to something that should just be an

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>objective science. And then Kim proceeded to present what this

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>process meant for a neighbor's DNA When.

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 3>I compared it to the neighbor, he had moraleles in

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 3>common with that sample than David Smith did. When you

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 3>bastardize the process, you get shit in, shit out. And

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to watch these experts sit up there and try and

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 3>make sense of a senseless DNA procedure was just It

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 3>was painful.

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 2>The way she went in there and took the evidence

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and threw it in the trash. The prosecutor came walked

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 2>over and said, listen, I'm gonna ask my boss if

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 2>we could just walk him out of here with time

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 2>serve and let him go. So the day before the

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 2>trial started on February to twenty four, and they put

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 2>it on the record time served. I said, no, I

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't fight like this just to go in there and

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>plead guilty to somebody didn't do. I want my name

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 2>clear for this. And the prosecutor looked at me and said,

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you got balls, and I looked at him and said, no,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 2>you have bulls because the sixth Circred Quarter of Appeals

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 2>told you that you can't use this identification, and you

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 2>have televised that's what you're going to do. Anyway.

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 3>It is a habeas corpus in which he has to

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 3>be released unless they try him within six months without

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 3>using Tolliver's identification of Smith, which is suppressed and excluded.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I have read it and retyped it so many.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Times, and they were trying to interpret those words to

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>make it permissible to have the victims identified David but

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not expressly as her attacker, right.

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Like, no, it doesn't say that. Like these are the

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 3>highest judges in the country. They weren't confused. They meant

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 3>to press and excluded. And when she woke up, she

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.479
<v Speaker 3>didn't remember anything about the day. So any identification which

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 3>includes an identification of David Smith from that day would

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 3>be the result of their overly influential, impermissible identification tactics.

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>The day before trial we found emotion. And as for clarification,

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the Norther distrect Court of Appeals than not it summarily,

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>because what is do to clarify?

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 3>They said, we can't interpret what the six circuit means.

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 3>What the six circuit means is you cannot use Tolliver's

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 3>identification of Smith, which is suppressed and excluded. When that

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 3>order comes out, I think, oh, thank god, this explains

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 3>it to them. But they take it the other way.

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 3>They're like, see, they said, we can't interpret what the

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 3>six circuit does. So obviously the six circuit means she

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 3>just can't identify him as her attacker. So she's allowed

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 3>to say, that's David Smith, the ball black man and

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the yellow sweater. He came to my door and then

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 3>I was struck with a hammer, and that's not an identification.

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And it would be hilarious if it wasn't so freaking sinister.

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And then they found a second way to bring it in.

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 2>In the opening statements, he says, Courtney, Tolliver is going

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to come in here and tell you that David Smith

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 2>hit her in the head with a hammer.

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And then Courtney took a stand.

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 2>They say, well, can you identify the person that you

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 2>said came to your house? She said, yes, that ball

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 2>guy over there with a yellow shirt to brown souno

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 2>and they said, well, let the record reflect she identified

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 2>David Smith and it just said no. And she said,

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 2>he was just standing on my porch. Okay, now what happened.

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I hit the legs and he opened the door and

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>came in, and this thing I felt with a stroke

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and I woke up in the hospital.

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>But somehow, in their minds this skirted the Sixth Circuits

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>order that her identification was to be suppressed and excluded

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>due to Lieutenant Johnson's impermissible procedure.

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 3>And then after they get her to do this whull identification,

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 3>I got to cross examine on the fact that it

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 3>was a wildly prejudicial identification procedure. And they're like, oh, no,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 3>you can't cross him on that. You'd be opening the.

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Door, meaning the door to allowing her identification. It's unfucking real.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, is it genuinely your takeaway from the

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Sixth Circuits order that her identification is allowed? But I

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 3>can't cross exams on the unreliability of the identification. You

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 3>think their point was to make it worse than it

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 3>was before.

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yep, they did.

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>They thought that, and then they found a way to

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>make it even worse with Florence Fontanello, who by this

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>time had recanted, but they weren't interested in hearing that,

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so they claimed they just couldn't find her.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 3>They got the court to admit her testimony from the

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 3>first trial again, even though she had issued an affidavit

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 3>saying that she had lied.

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 2>They took the twenty sixteen transcripts and read them into

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a twenty twenty trial.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 3>So we can't cross examine her. They just read her

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 3>testimony and everyone reads their own part, same prosecutor, same judge,

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, I'm refusing to participate in this display

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 3>of injustice. Like I'm not going to sit here like

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the defense attorney from ten years ago and read his part.

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I would make it very clear to the court that

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a part of this. We're just re enacting

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the same trial that was considered to be on constitution.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, what if we did was set there without being

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 2>able to say anything.

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I was so pissed off as I sat there in court,

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 3>I ordered little Oscar statues and gave them to the

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 3>judge and the prosecutors the next day, like here, since

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 3>this is just a play, congrats on your acting.

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody liked them, So the jury heard Florence Fontanellez recanted

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen testimony as well as the state's non identification

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>identification right, and despite being threatened with opening the door

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to the full force of the unconstitutional evidence, they were

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>able to provide some evidence about Courtney's two phones, and

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the records for the drug phone revealed that she had

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>been active after the state had contended that this crime occurred,

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and that she had been contacted by an alternate suspect

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred times that morning. But with the passage

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of time, getting those records authenticated was the real problem.

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So Kim asked the investigators about these records and why

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 1>they had gotten lost or what had happened to Lisa

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Frame's cell phone or for that matter, any of the

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>physical evidence in this case.

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 2>The detectives was saying they don't remember anything, and then

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 2>with Kim refreshed their memory with their reports, they steer

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 2>with Sam, I don't recall.

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 3>That we had all this testimony about how they lost

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>all the evidence, and then after they realized it was lost,

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 3>sought a destruction order from the judge to destroy it

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 3>so that we couldn't use it I could get one

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 3>person to testify about some of the timing of the

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 3>text and the second set of cell phone records. And

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 3>because I wasn't allowed to admit those records, I was

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 3>allowed to publish them in front of the jury. So

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm on a giant post it like writing down the

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 3>evidence I hope they can consider, so that when they

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 3>go back with half of the phone records, only the

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 3>half that benefit the state, they'll remember having seen me

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 3>write down the content of what mattered from the second set.

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 3>And so I thought that if we attacked the quality

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 3>of the investigation enough, it would be enough.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Kim fought everything tooth and nail, and they went in

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 2>there and came back at twelve o'clock with a guilty verdict, but.

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>A plan to return the Sixth Circuit was already in motion.

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>After all, these fucking people acted like they couldn't properly

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 1>comprehend the Sixth Circuit's order. But if the conviction was vacated,

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>then technically the Sixth Circuit no longer had jurisdiction, so

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>David would have to start his appeal all over again.

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So David made sure that a copy of the Ohio

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Department of corrections docket was taken for evidence.

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:38.919
<v Speaker 2>When we filed the motion back to the court, they saying, hey,

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 2>this case was vacated. The federal court don't have jurisdiction

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 2>no more. My evidence was the docket, which there's no

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>general wintry in there, that the case was vacated. Two

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the transport order. Three the ODRC website still said that

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I was convicted, that I was still under conviction, that

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 2>it was never vacated. We fouled that most marks the twelve.

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>After they found me guilty, the Jews answered they gave

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 2>us a court day for April the first. They transported

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 2>me back to Cleveland to the federal courthouse and Attorney General.

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of ugly because I've never seen the

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Jews treat nobody in the courtroom like that, especially attorney General.

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>They were I mean, he was.

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Not shy and saying how could you guys have done this,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 3>like you touched the third rail, and not being from

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.399
<v Speaker 3>New York, he then had to explain what the third

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 3>railmant to get into opposing council, like it's the thing

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 3>you don't touch. That's how you get electrocuted. You don't

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 3>touch the third rail, and you guys danced on the

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 3>third rail. What did you put me in a position?

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 2>What am I going to do?

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And even though the Northern District Court initially had a

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>differing opinion than the higher six Circuit, they had no

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 1>choice but to honor the higher court's ruling because the

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 1>state's jurisdiction argument held no water. The conviction had not

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>been vacated, but rather only a new trial had been ordered.

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 2>On May to twelve, he called his back to the

0:43:58.360 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Northern District Court of.

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Appeals and I thank god the District Court did not

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 3>agree with them, and they ordered that David Smith be

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 3>granted an unconditional habeas corpus and that he'd be released.

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 3>But then he stayed his order for seventy five days

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 3>through the use of an administrative stay, which we appealed,

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 3>and the Sixth Circuit basically said, there's no such procedure

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 3>as an administrative stay in this context and he has

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 3>to be let out. And that was on July third.

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Now it's a lot of third I was free on

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 2>July four if I was on a boat with my

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:29.919
<v Speaker 2>attorneys and.

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 3>We took a picture from the boat of the Federal Courthouse.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Like everything that's happened. Now you get to view it

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 3>from this side. Yeah, and I sent it to the prosecutor.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 2>When I first got out, I didn't want to live

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 2>with nobody, to deal with nobody. So we have a

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 2>guy who was also exonerated, who has an exign of

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 2>ree house in Cleveland.

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 3>We have so much injustice, so we have a lot

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 3>of exgneries and they take care of each other. So

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 3>one of them bought a house for all ex honeries

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 3>to live in when they're in this position when they

0:44:57.400 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 3>first get out, Charles, Checks and Raymond.

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We had the good fortune of covering Charles's story with

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Maggie Feeling, and we'll make sure to link it in

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the episode descriptions, so check it out.

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I've been doing Charles for a long time, so I

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 2>mean he was familiar with me, But for like the

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 2>first three weeks, the only thing I did was went

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 2>from my bedroom to the bathroom, to the kitchen back

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to my bedroom, like I was steal in a sale.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Since I've been home, Kim gave me a job with

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the law firm.

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:30.879
<v Speaker 3>So right now on the docket, it's his appeal. I'm

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 3>confident we're going to win. We've already had rulings from

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the Sixth Circuit when they released him, saying that they

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 3>don't believe that the warden has a winnable position, so

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 3>that's really favorable. Nonetheless, we're going full steam ahead and

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 3>that's submitted to the court and it's going to be

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 3>decided without oral argument. And so as soon as we

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 3>get a decision, that ankle monitor is going to come

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 3>off and he will be free. Hopefully he'll decide to

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.760
<v Speaker 3>pursue his civil remedies because a lot has been taken

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 3>from him. In the meantime, he's doing everything can. He's

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:04.720
<v Speaker 3>been working. He's gotten himself an ID. He has MS

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 3>and diabetes, so he's gotten his medical setup and taken

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 3>care of which is a lot of steps. But he

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 3>could use all the support in the world. So if

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 3>anybody has anything to offer, he's been saving to get

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 3>a vehicle, he certainly needs business clothes for job interviews

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 3>or stuff like that, and he desperately wants to go

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 3>back to school, and so people have resources that they

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 3>could lend to him to give him support. We would

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.280
<v Speaker 3>be happy to help facilitate those resources directly to him.

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And we'll link ways to contact Kim and get David

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to support he needs, and with that we're going to

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>go to closing arguments. Closing arguments, everyone knows is my

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite part of the show, where I'm going to kick

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>back in my chair, turn my microphone off and leave

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>my headphones on and just listen to anything else you

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>want to share with our amazing audience. And so Kim,

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you go first, and then just hand the microphone off

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to David. Then he could take us off into the sunset.

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 3>This is a case with one of the most egregious

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 3>identification procedures I've ever seen. Which is so appalling about

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 3>it is how many courts justified and upheld the conduct,

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 3>who gave it a pass in the state court at

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the appellate level, at the Ohio Supreme Court level, at

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 3>the district court level, and federal court. It took eight

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 3>years to get any justice, and then when we finally

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 3>got that justice by way of an order, the state

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 3>court threw it out in totally ignored it conduct that, frankly,

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 3>if any of us engaged in would be criminalized. Were

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 3>all required to follow the law, and the trial court

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 3>thought they were above that. They stopped all over his

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 3>rights through a second trial, and then used an unconstitutional

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 3>second conviction to justify their misconduct. We're so thankful that

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 3>the district court sought through it. But if you imagine

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 3>being responsible for someone's life and freedom as their attorney,

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:56.760
<v Speaker 3>he turned down a flea he could have been free,

0:47:57.120 --> 0:47:59.359
<v Speaker 3>and then for four months he lived with a twenty

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 3>year cent hanging over his head and just the hope

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 3>that the federal court would step in and enforce its

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 3>prior ruling. We're so thankful it did, but here we

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 3>are still up against it in the Federal Court of Appeals.

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 3>And this case is a story of even when you

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 3>get justice through your immediate appellate procedure, it can take

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 3>a full decade, And even when you find a judge

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 3>who's willing to say and do the right thing, there's

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 3>a slew of judges below them who aren't.

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 2>In Ohio, we have a feal that's on the ballot

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:34.760
<v Speaker 2>called the absolute Immunity View. If it's passed in Ohio

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 2>would be the very first time that anything like this

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 2>has been passed. And that deal makes judges, prosecutors, detectives, police,

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 2>anything of authority can be prosecuted for what they do

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 2>for violding the person's constitutional rights because right now, like

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 2>it is so thick where they don't have to answer

0:48:57.360 --> 0:48:59.319
<v Speaker 2>to nobody, they could do what they want and put

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 2>it up under job duties. You cannot turn over evidence

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 2>and say it was part of my investigation. The judge

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 2>can violate your constitutional rights and know that there's no

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 2>consequences for these people. Them. People need to be held

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 2>accountable because if I watched so and so take a

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 2>piece of paper from so and so, and the detective

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 2>come and ask me and say did you see that happen?

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And I say no, I got a case because I lied.

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 2>But a prosecutor and a jug can lie all day long,

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 2>can withhold evidence, can cover up whatever they want to

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 2>because there's no consequences for them. That's why this bill

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 2>in Ohio is so important. And when I spoke at

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 2>the Wrongful Conviction Days, that was one of the things

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I spoke about. All this is beautiful, but if people

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 2>don't get out and vote on that bill, we're going

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to continue to have wrongful Conviction Days.

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. You can listen

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to this and all the Lava for Good podcast one

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>week early and ad free by subscribing to Lava for

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Good plus on Apple Podcasts. I want to thank our

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>production team Connor Hall and Kathleen Fink, as well as

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>my fellow executive producers Jeff Kempler, Kevin Wartis, and Jeff Cliber.

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:15.239
<v Speaker 1>The music in this production was supplied by three time

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>across all social media platforms at Lava for Good and

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at Wrongful Conviction. You can also follow me on Instagram

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 1>at It's Jason Flamm. Wrongful Conviction is a production of

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Lava for Good Podcasts and association with Signal Company Number One.

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>We have worked hard to ensure that all facts reported

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in this show are accurate.

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 2>The views and opinions expressed by the individuals featured in

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 2>this show are their own and do not necessarily reflect

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 2>those of Lava for Good.