WEBVTT - How to Train Your Dragon and Live Action Remakes

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Cue the bagpipes. Today's episode contains spoilers for How to

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Train Your Dragon, the live action remake, but of course,

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>also the first installment of the original animated movie. Jason

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Soon and I'm Mersey Night and welcome back to X

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ray Vision. The podcast Will We divedo Your favorite shows, movies,

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>comments of pop culture companies form by our podcast.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Where We're for you, three episodes a week every Tuesday Wednesday.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 3>There's in today's episode, we are giving you our review

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 3>of the live action movie How to Train Your Dragon?

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Ever heard of it? It's a part of it. It's

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 3>a live action remake of an animated classic, which is

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 3>going to inspire a round table conversation asking is it

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 3>a live action remake or an adaptation? Oh baby, I'm

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 3>sure that's gonna get spicy, and we will also be

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 3>talking about the future of live action remakes. But bust,

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about it. Jason, me and you. What do

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>we think about this movie?

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it?

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we have recently seen.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 2>The live action remake of How to Train Your Dragon.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>A wonderful truly. You called it a classic. I believe

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it is. And it's also it contains or has what

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I think is a very underrated soundtrack. Now, yes, yes,

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>some people are gonna say, well, the soundtrack was nominated

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for an Oscar.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 2>It was, but it didn't win.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Still, I feel like it's not one that people talk

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>about in the same way they talk about, you know, like.

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 2>The Star Wars or Inception, et cetera.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a wonderful soundtrack by John Powell, and

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what did you think of how to

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>How to Train Your Dragons?

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I thought it was really, really enjoyable. I actually

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 3>decided to wait till after I watched it to rewatch

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 3>the animated one so I could kind of go in and.

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Enjoy it.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Obviously. We sat together with my friend Isaiah and my

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>eleven year old review guy that I bring with me,

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 3>who saw Minecraft. Yeah, I thought it was really great.

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 3>I was actually kind of blown away by how good

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the casting was, how wonderful, unbelievable casting. Everybody is just

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent committed. I was very moved by the score,

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 3>especially the kind of like flight test flying with a

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 3>toothless score that they use as a theme throughout every

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 3>single time. That would just be like crying every single

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>It's it's so passed thrilling. Yeah, and we, I mean

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 3>we both talked about this after straight after when we

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>were at the cinema, But I was blown away by,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 3>for the most part, how unbelievable this movie look, not

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 3>only the aerial stuff, the landscape, how they make the

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>dragons feel so real in a live action space, how

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 3>they light the characters to kind of make them look

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 3>more cartoony but still very much in this kind of

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>I really felt like they did a great job with that,

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>especially with Hiccup. They constantly light his face to look

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 3>anime character.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 4>I love.

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I love the casting of his I love the casting

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of Astrid Nico Parker. Big fan of her here. I

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 3>think this is the first role she's really gotten to

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 3>like showcase her kind of not only obviously there's a

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of like kind of stunt prowess in this, but

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 3>just generally like her charm, her kind of. This is

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the first great movie that I've seen her in. She

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 3>was most recently seen in another like to me, in

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 3>another movie that I'm sure we'll talk about, Dumbo, far

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>less successful live action adaptation. In my opinion, Yeah, I

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>just thought it was really really good. There were actually

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 3>multiple moments here to do with how good the movie looked,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 3>the feeling of it that were giving like the original

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of loath to throw back to them nowadays, but

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 3>they made me feel like when I was a kid

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>first watching the Harry Potter movies. There was moments here

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>where I felt like this could be an epic franchise

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 3>for kids. Cinematography beautiful, Jared Butler amazing.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm a G buts lover.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.119
<v Speaker 3>I love the g he love We love the G butts.

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>He rarely gets to be in any big movies like this.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 3>He is definitely more of a B movie guy, an

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>action guy, a straight terme video guy. But I thought

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 3>he was so fun here. I thought the costume design

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 3>was fantastic, and really I was just I just thought

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 3>it was. It was really really great. How about you.

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I I loved it.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I found it comforting and thrilling all at the same time.

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Great way I thought the I thought it was a

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 2>wonderful you know.

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>They They were so loyal really to the original story,

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>same director obviously, Oh yeah, and.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>When I would be.

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And but everything that they added in the everything that

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>live action added was an upgrade, which I thought was

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that's how you do it. When you talked about the

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>aerial stuff, I mean it can't be talked about enough

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>about how I mean it's powerful. I could watch a

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>two hour super cut of just the flying scenes. It

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>looks amazing. It captures the thrill and the energy and

0:05:55.680 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the dynamism, the excitement of what it must be like

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, riding Toothless around this incredible.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>You really do feel like you are having that experience.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 3>We got to see it in IMAX, and it really

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>does feel like the rush. This is a movie where

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe I would go and see it in forty X.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 3>I want to think about in my hair. I want

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>to feel like I'm riding the spray, Yeah the cinema,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 3>what the ocean spray?

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And I you know they didn't they understood, don't change

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>what is broken, like this character design for not just

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the human characters in the live action adaptation, like the hair,

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>you know Hiccup's hair is they styled it somehow the

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>same from how to the animated.

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>That is really true. I was quite blown away by

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>that when I watched, I was white impressed.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 2>And then also, you know, Toothless.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what of the character assets they took

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>from the animated version, or how they scaled that up

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and improved it and you know, improved the textures, but

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it it doesn't look as if they ripped Toothless from How.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 2>To Train Your Dragon.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It looks like they took everything that was there and

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>just added more detail, but didn't lose that feel, that

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>animated feel, so that there were times where I had

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to remind myself that I wasn't watching Toothless from yeah

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>animated version like it was.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>It was a seamless sless and that is a critique

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 3>some people have sometimes, right, but like I and at

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the film, which opens the exact same

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>way as the original film, they show Buck and they

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>do change the the voice O very little bit, but

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>they show but and he's showing his home, and in

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>my head I had like the cynical voice was like, oh, yeah,

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 3>you're completely cgi home, Like it's clear. But then once

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 3>you start getting into the village and you can see

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the practical nature of it, I was. I just thought

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>it looked so good and also as well, I was.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of blown away. And I do think

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>that it is focused on something I really liked about

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 3>the live action movie versus the animated movie is they

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>gave some of the scenes like time to breathe in

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the live action one that they don't get in the original.

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>When I rewatched the original, I basically felt like I

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 3>was speed running the movie because things happened really really.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Fast, and I guess the emotional turns even are really

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>really fa exactly.

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 3>And something that kind of came across in my opinion,

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 3>like really strongly in this version is how it's like

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of a movie about like adaptive technology and like

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 3>disability and like accept invisibility, and that begins with Toothless

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>and kind of the film ends with you know, Hiccup,

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 3>and and honestly, like you know, my biggest critique would

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 3>be like, couldn't you have found someone with an amp

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 3>who was an like Cata limb difference, or wasn't amputee

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 3>to play like Goober's like the Nick the Nick Frost character,

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 3>or couldn't you have found someone to play Hiccup? But

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 3>you know what, Hollywood, they never doing that stuff. So

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 3>but I did think that the themes were like very

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 3>very well and you'll get to that.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I will get to that in a moment, because I

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned I do have a I love the film. I

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to love the film, I love the animated series,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>but I do have a dark take.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you go to do it.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>That said, I mentioned that I found this movie comforting,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's I love a good kids movie because the

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>emotions are front and center, but there's also that feeling

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>of like, hey, you know, when toothless biler, when toothless

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is is chained up and harnessed and being forced to

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>lead them to.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 2>The dragon mast.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>As a kid, that's gonna be intense. You're gonna really

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a young audience member is going to really feel that.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, because it's a kid's movie, there's

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>also that like gentle kind of undertone of hey, it's

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna work out. It's gonna be yeah, yeah, yeah, don't

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it. And I found that really in

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>these times, it's a nice, really comforting. It's a nice

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling of just being like, you know what, don't worry

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>about it, it's gonna be.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 3>And also the eleven year old reviewer who also loved

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the Minecraft and did did say after see a Minecraft

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 3>that was gonna make a lot more money than the

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 3>box I said, and he was correct. He was also

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 3>a big a big fan in this movie. I think

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 3>it was very moving, it was very exciting. There were

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>even moments when he was kind of scared and it

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 3>was spooky, which I thought they did really well. I

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 3>also thought they redesigned the kind of I think in

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 3>the original Uh, How to Train Your Dragon the Red Death,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 3>they redesigned him to make them like basically a terrifying Kaiju,

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 3>which I loved obviously. And I do feel like we're

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 3>going to be in an interesting situation this year of

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 3>being able to talk about having like a monster movie summer.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>If this does well. I do think it's gonna do well.

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 3>I that saying that the film is gonna perform overperform

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 3>with sixty five million to seventy five million this for

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 3>its opening weekend. I think it's gonna make one hundred million.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it might be the high end of that.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I think. I think this is the kind of I

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>think kids.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Are gonna want to see over.

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I love Minecraft, Yes, a love Minecraft. Kids are gonna

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>want to see it. The older kids who grew up

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>with the originals are gonna want to see it in

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>live action, and for an adult, it's a pleasant time

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>at the movie theater. So I think it's got all

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got all of those things. Here's my

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>dark tick on this movie and the message of this movie,

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and that includes the original animated version.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this is not a new edition. This is definitely

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>something that is a story. But it really struck me

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 3>this time watching it in live action.

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I love this movie, passionately love this movie. Said, this

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is a movie. This is a movie about regime change.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a movie about a nation who went to

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>war mistakenly with a culture and a race of beings

0:12:50.120 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that then tricks or cajoles a small minority of that race,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>including several members who had been long imprisoned and enslaved

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and potentially brainwashed, into assassinating their nation's leader so that

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>afterwards they can be put to work by the conquering people.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>That is basically what this story is.

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I love this.

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Movie, but there is a kind of a dark undertone

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of like colonialism and.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Occupation and war and conquering.

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of like, hey, listen, all we know about

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this queen is she's bad. How do we know that

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't like because she ate a couple of her

0:13:55.440 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>subjects and therefore it's totally okay that we take these

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>prisoners who we have been torturing for a long time

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>by doing various mock executions in a tournament format for

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment of our town, if we then turn them

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 1>loose in order to kill her so that we can

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>take over this nation and use them as you know,

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>are construction workers.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean that is that basically the same thing? Yeah,

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean also as well, like let's be real that

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 3>we don't actually see the giant Kaiju dragon like do

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>anything wrong, Like she's.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Just she eats, like she eats one or two of

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>her subjects, which I am not condoning. I'm just saying

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as an outside force, we don't understand the societal dynamic funny.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 3>As well, because like in the live action when they

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 3>were like, you know, she's probably like controlling the don't

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 3>listen to them or something, and I'm like, I don't

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 3>know if she is, man, I think this is just

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 3>like an ecosystem. You can't understand, like she lives in

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 3>a giant volcano.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 4>Giant it's a kids movie.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Therefore, I accept that she was evil. I am just saying,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of thought.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Goes into that.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Really, I think you're read is like correct and the

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>truth is right now, it's hard not to look at

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 3>things through that lens. And a lot of stories from

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, fairy tales and obviously I'll Train Your Dragons

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>adapts from a book, but it's not that old. But

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these kind of kids films they do

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 3>intentionally or unintentionally continue ideas of like assimilation or and

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>so so. So I think you're right to call this out.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>And let's be real. The movie does I mean sorry,

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>sorry sorry I said, I said just noticing. I mean

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I just say you should you you're correct to note it,

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>to note that it exists. But you know, like they

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>see this movie, go see it because it is really great.

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 3>And then you you can go in the discord and

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>then we'll go back to lay tank.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's go to another break, and then let's bring in.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>The super producer crew and let's talk about live Actually.

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, welcome to the floor, super producers.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Joelle's superproducer Aaron. How are you folks.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Tickled by e? How do you want to hear it?

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Any the movie there in the groove, you said, Jay said,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>it is actually about two communities coming together. Joel, talk

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 3>more about it.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I believe that that is also a reading,

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's also a not unfair reading.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, please, Joel No, I think the very.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Basic like jeneric reading is like this kid thinks differently,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 4>and that's really beautiful and it really opens can.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 2>We don't have to kill them, we can use slaves.

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Jason's like maybe death is bad and being I'm not

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 1>saying that, and they do have and and he and

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to listen and again tooth listen, Hiccup have a they

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>do have a very loving relation and loving relationship where

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>they love the relationship they.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Have the Hiccup wounded him.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And then I'm just saying the rest of the dragons,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for the crew, it's a little we get into like

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a murky ethical.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Area considering that they were.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Released very quickly through that actually directly from dungeons and

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like put to put to war fighting.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, but continue, Joelle No.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 4>You know I actually have the the esteemed privilege of

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 4>having spoken to Aaron separately and then you guys separately

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 4>and knowing your takes and they are oceans apart.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Real and tell us what this movie.

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I cannot wait for this.

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 6>Shots that I am so different from you on this, Jason.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 6>I think before you threw the break, you were like,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 6>go see this movie. I would are you don't just

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 6>watch the original. You're not missing any track.

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Please continue.

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so one of your I took some notes as

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 6>you were talking about. One of the things you said

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 6>was everything the live action movie added was an upgrade.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 6>You mean, like the two extra minutes of training sequence

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 6>just sling. Yeah, but doesn't look amazing. Yeah, so I

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 6>do think that yossified How to Train Your Dragon looks better.

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 6>The dragons, the dragons, The dragons amazing. The dragons look amazing. Hiccup, Hiccup,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 6>what's it? Hiccup looks like Andrew Garfield.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Too hot? Too hot? You've got your crush on this

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 3>young man, he lied. I was actually I had had

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 3>rumor that you had this feeling. I was actually feeling

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 3>for this kid, because Hiccup in the original is like

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 3>very generic, like he's got a completely even face. He's

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 3>just like a right like this guy, this Hiccup. They

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>spend like fifteen minutes early on in the movie lighting

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 3>him to be like make sure you know he's got

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 3>a big nose, like look at that nose, Like they

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 3>were like trying to make him look uglier. He was

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 3>no like yasified. I think you just have a crush

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 3>on him.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Also, I would just to lightly push back and then

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you continue. His dad stood like the vast

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>stoke Jerry Butts. This guy's chest is twenty feet wide.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>He looks like he's eight and a half feet tall

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in his armor. He's a massive guy, and you're meant

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to buy contrast, say, God, I wonder if Hiccup can

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>live up to the intense masculinity that Jerry Butch is

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>putting down on a daily base. Look at that beard,

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Look at those muscles, Look at that helmet.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 6>You know anyway, Yes, for as for as hot as

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 6>Hiccup was, Gerard Butler looks like ship. His wig was

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 6>so bad. When when he comes out of the water

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 6>and his wig is all wet, he's so bad.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 3>My main care.

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 6>And hey, and I love I love Dead of Thieves

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 6>as much as the next guy.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>So like I'm a Butler fan. I will say.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 6>The one thing that this one I do think added

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 6>from the original was the Gerard Butler monologue to rally

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 6>the troops and get everyone, this is why we have

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 6>to go look for the nest and and they do

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 6>this great thing where he goes to the first Viking

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 6>and you know, you got all this glory because you

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 6>killed the dragon. You may have lost your limb, but

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 6>like you did all this great work, and now you

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 6>the Asian Viking. Okay, you can't go far away. You

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 6>don't get to have a line. You just came from

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 6>far away, all right, and moving like what a dumb scene.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I hated that.

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 6>I thought that like completely ground everything to a halt.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 6>I will say, Toothless look great. I think in the

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 6>animated I felt like Toothless was very cat coated, but

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 6>in this one, Toothless felt more like a dog.

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Well though I thought it was.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was like sixty five percent dog thirty

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>five percent excuse me, sixty five percent cat thirty five

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>percent dog. Like the scratching was dog, but like obviously

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>everything else, the face, the growling was cat.

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 6>Yes, but yeah, I I walked out of this and

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 6>I was pretty disappointed. I feel like the original was

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 6>better and this didn't add a new take on stuff,

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 6>like you were saying, you know, there's beat for beat.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, Toothless chained up on the boat guiding them

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 6>to the dragons, like they didn't need to change how

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 6>that happened, but there were things that could have been

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 6>a different read on it or something. I thought the

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 6>dad going in and saving toothless was less effective in

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 6>this than it was in the animated Again, maybe at

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 6>this point it's deep enough into the movie that I

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 6>have just like kind of I'm on I'm on the

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 6>back foot, and I'm not as happy with it already.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 6>But this just feels like a band like went recorded

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 6>their favorite album and like words slightly Taylor.

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Taylor made like several billion dollars exactly that.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, I do think, I mean, it's an interesting Joe,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell us that thread. I do think it's a

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 4>really interesting approach to filmmaking. Like I think some people

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 4>sort of view animation as like a big part of it,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 4>just storyboarding. It's like really going through and getting these

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 4>story beats and so to have like made this entire

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 4>animated film and then you're not you're definitely not adapting it.

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 4>You are remaking it just in live action. I found

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 4>it kind of incredible, especially because it's the same director

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 4>coming back to his work like so many years later.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 4>I thought, I will say, if I have like one

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 4>tick e tacky thing about it. Sometimes I thought the

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 4>frames were too much like an animated frame as opposed

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 4>to what you would shoot for a live action, Just

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 4>the way some of the times the characters entered there's

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 4>a hiccups walking. He's in sillow wet at one point,

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 4>and it's very flat when like if you pushed your

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 4>horizon not in the center, as we learned from Spielberg,

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 4>you would have had a much more interesting shot. So

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 4>there was.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Just learned from.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 4>He learned from forward. Yeah, yes, the religious John to

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Spielberg would also say, like.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 3>I will add my two cents of what I didn't like,

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 3>just because we're here. There were only actually like two

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 3>sequences that I felt like they must have done reshoots on,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 3>and it was when they were in because the whole movie,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of blown away by how unvolume me

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 3>it looked. And I think that is why it appealed

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 3>to me so much. It looked so much better than

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>like no ninety percent of like big budget like NU

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>style movies. I felt like there was so much life

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 3>and texture and real beautiful locations and this I felt

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>like that generally the CGI and and like obvious screen

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 3>screen was pretty, you know, unnoticeable, pretty seamless. There was

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the scene when Hiccup and Astrid are in the northern lights.

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I felt like that suddenly just took us to being

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 3>in like a weird TV show that had like no budget.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what happened with the lighting. I don't

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>know if it was the flatness.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 2>It was completely.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Random and it they just didn't light it was very supernatural,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 3>invite them properly to give them like the full kind

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of beautiful wholeness. And then there was like one other

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 3>scene when it was only like both of these scenes

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 3>are like five ten seconds of the movie, but like

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the other there was another one with Astrid where they'd

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 3>clearly done a similar reshoot where it was just suddenly

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 3>it was like but it was really wild because up

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 3>until then I was like, this is gonna be one

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 3>of the best looking, like big budget movies. And I'm

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna say something as well, this is a I guess

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna get into this next. But kind of like

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 3>the conversation of like is it a remake? Is it

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 3>an adaptation? Like I've seen a lot of people be like,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 3>this is a great movie, but it didn't need to

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 3>be made, and I'm like, guys, I got a terrible

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 3>things to tell you. Welcome to the history of Hollywood.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you know how many versions of a fucking Star

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Is born? There? There are like fucking four versions of

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 3>a Star Is Born?

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Like you don't dream Works is trying to become the

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 4>new Disney.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Not just that, this is throughout history, throughout Hollywood history.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 3>This is what happens is they go back and they

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 3>remake movies and they redo the same story and they

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's fifty versions of snow White because that

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 3>is an out of license story. There are, you know,

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>so many different fairy tale stories. There are so many

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Westerns that are basically beat for beat the same thing.

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think that when a movie is made, which

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 3>in Aaron's opinion like this movie is not good, then

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 3>you do ask those questions. For me, I thought this

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 3>movie was beautiful enough. It's been like eleven years, and

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 3>you know what I feel like this is gonna introduce.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 3>For example, Isaiah had not seen the original, but he

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 3>loved this. He'd watch the TV shows and he felt

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>like this just like supplanted that and he was so

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 3>excited to go back and check.

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 6>Out the original he's only seen the TV shows and

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 6>not the original movie.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna go see it. But what I'm saying is

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 3>that what I'm saying is that is gonna be There's

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a whole generation of kids like that who

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 3>were gonna get to experience this for the first time,

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 3>like so many of us did with remakes of other stuff.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think plus, a whole new theme park just

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 4>opened up.

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 3>And that's the real The thing that I find interesting

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 3>is I want to talk to whoever it was who

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 3>understood the kind of insane fandom that this had that

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 3>they could build an entire park off it and do

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 3>another remake, because look, on, I know that this is

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 3>a popular movie, but I didn't know this was like

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 3>a you can build a multi billion dollar theme park

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and do a new movie. But now that I've seen

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the new movie and I've seen images of the theme park,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 3>which apparently is the best, if not one of the

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 3>best lad Good, I get it, Like I want to

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>spend more time in this world. So I just I

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I do think that the notion of like remakes are

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 3>unneeded becomes a question of quality, because that is just

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the history of like Hollywood and entertainment in general. It

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 3>say it's always going to be a sequel, there's always

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 3>going to be a remake. But I think that compared

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 3>to like ninety percent, if not more, of the Disney ones,

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>this to me felt like, oh yeah, I mean when

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 3>I rewatched How to Train Your Dragon, it's amazing and

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 3>it is obviously like the original. The animated vision is gorgeous,

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 3>but I was like, but I also do I would

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 3>like to be in the cinema watching this and feeling

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 3>like I'm flying through the ad with toothless, which you can't.

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 3>You don't feel like that in the anime ad version.

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I will say, I think that the I think the

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for me, what this remake, adaption whatever do well is

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't try as I think some of the Disney ones,

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>many of the Disney ones try to do, which is

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>create this entirely new, hyper real aesthetic.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this is very cost to any movie.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that turns into this kind of surreal, uncanny valley

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling thing that has an entire visual language that I one,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I find it really hard to emotionally connect to, and

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>two it feels as real as it is, it almost

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>feels like more fakes sometimes and I think that they,

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in my in my view, smartly took what worked and.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Kind of transitioned it.

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>To the live action space in terms of character design,

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of detailing, in terms of you know, how

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the characters look, in terms of shots, in terms of lighting.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 2>I liked it.

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think, Rosie, you're exactly right that the

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be made argument is basically just say you

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like it and let's move on, like, because none

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of this shit needs.

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 4>To be made.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 3>It's the nature of like all of Hollywood is like,

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 3>guess what, guys, I'm gonna tell you something. Roger and Eba,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>you know what, they were saying they didn't need to

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 3>make seven Friday the Thirteenth movies. They didn't even need

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 3>to make one, but guess yeah. So I think it's

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 3>a constant conversation. But I think that because Aaron is

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>here and I believe he is the only one out

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 3>of the three of us who's seen it. Aaron, let's

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 3>get your take on another controversial live action remake recently,

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 3>because we did recently have the Lelo and Stitch live

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 3>action remake, which did it inspired a lot of different conversations.

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 3>There was a lot of discourse about it. There was

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of feelings in the Native Hawaiian community about it,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and there was also millions and millions of dollars made

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 3>at the box office because for certain families it was

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>the perfect movie. So, Aaron, what were your feelings on

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Leelo and Stitches live action film?

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 6>So I will again acknowledge up top you already mentioned it,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 6>but there were a lot of things that people were

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 6>upset about with this live action remake. Adaptation whatever you

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 6>want to do, and there were some particular changes both

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 6>the story as well as character characters that were just

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 6>completely cut out for your film, yep, and so some

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 6>people were unhappy with that. I thought that this felt

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 6>like as opposed to How to Treat Your Dragon, which,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 6>to be fair, I did enjoy. I just enjoyed the

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 6>animated more and I felt like Leelo and Stitch the

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 6>live action added something and gave us a nice little

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 6>deeper view into certain parts of the movie that we

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 6>didn't get in the animated And again animated is older.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 6>There are a lot different things that are happening in

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.959
<v Speaker 6>Disney at that time and what they can do. But

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 6>for instance, I liked the character changes they did, so

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 6>they split mister Bubbles from being this like secret agent

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 6>also social worker into a social worker and a secret agent,

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 6>so there are two separate characters, and that just made

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 6>more sense to me. And I liked that the social

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 6>worker was Hawaiian. It was in fact Tia who was

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 6>Nanny in the original, and she comes back in the

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 6>live action to play the social worker, which I loved.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 6>And in the live action I didn't miss gone to

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 6>that much, like it was cool the kids missed God.

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I had a kid tell me yesterday at a graduation party.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 3>She was like, yeah, I really liked it, but where

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I was gone to? And then also, I will say,

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the kids are upset about the lack of cross dressing.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I've had multiple people say that they actually little kids

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 3>be like why wasn't that character allowed to dress like

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 3>a go now?

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 6>And I didn't they fight over who gets to wear

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 6>the wig when they're falling asleep, and like, yeah, there's yeah,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 6>I get that. I just liked I didn't need Jumba

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 6>to have a to get fixed and like change their tune,

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 6>because we already have that with Leelo and Stitch. We

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 6>don't need everyone in the movie to be redeemed like

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm totally fine with just the main characters getting redeemed.

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:26.479
<v Speaker 6>And I loved the you know, the the writer is

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 6>Hawaiian as well, and the screenwriter and he meant he

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.959
<v Speaker 6>made a point to say, like I wanted to make

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 6>a change that if this happened in real life, it

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 6>the Hawaii I come from, would not have these two

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 6>girls left on their own. The community would come together.

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 6>And so I loved that their auntie comes in, their neighbor,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 6>becomes part of their family in the same way that like,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, family is not just blood relatives. We all

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 6>have close friends who are found family. We all have

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 6>family friends who were not directly related to who become

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 6>essential parts of your family. That's who their auntie, Amy Hill.

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 6>She becomes their family and she takes Leelo. So it's

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 6>not just it's not you know, you know, Nannie gives

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 6>Leelo up to the state and never sees her again.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 6>She lives like in the same house with her auntie

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 6>who lives next door. That's the most like, I don't know,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 6>heartwarming way that that could have gone. Sure get rid of,

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 6>like why does she have to go to college in

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 6>the States as opposed to on Hawaii that's.

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 3>A famously great marine biology is in Hawaii.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 6>I just have to say, but I'm not gonna let

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 6>one sentence ruin the movie for me, Like there was

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 6>a lot in that I really enjoyed, and I thought

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 6>Nanni was fleshed out a lot more and I got

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 6>a much bigger sense of like her hopes and dreams

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 6>were important, and when they lost their parents, she was

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 6>impacted in a way that wasn't just now I have

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 6>to take care of my sister. It was I had

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 6>always wanted to do this and I don't get to

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 6>now because my parents passed away, and so and there's

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 6>this great scene I thought it was great where they're

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 6>talking about her.

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to go scene for scene and tell

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 2>us about this love this movie so much.

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I also just want to say, guys, I.

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Know the credits when I loved about the font with

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the credits as the.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Rule, I do want to say. I do want to say, guys,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 3>as there was Yes, that is where a lot of

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the conversation was about, and I do understand as well.

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I want to say that I do think it is

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 3>absolutely fair for people to watch a movie made by

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 3>a multi billion dollar American company like Disney and to

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 3>read the change in the ending as essentially like at

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 3>best not thoughtful and at worst as propaganda, which is

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 3>when there is such a conversation about like a Native

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 3>children being taken away from their parents. And also, but

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I do think that something and this is another interesting

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 3>conversation I think to have about live action adaptations, especially

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 3>when it's something like Lelo and Stitch, which the original

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 3>movie was not a huge smash hit and became one

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 3>over VHS. Lelo and Stitch the original movie hat because

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 3>of the lack of kind of oversight it, it did

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 3>get to make statements that to a lot of people

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 3>I think ended up feeling radical, even if that wasn't

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the intention. Even though a lot of the movie was

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 3>made by white.

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 6>People, and I have seen and starred white people. Let's

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 6>let's be open about that.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And also I will say there was also issues

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 3>in this movie that Nanni is not played by a

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Native Hawaiian actress. And so I think like it's a

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 3>very interesting conversation in this case because I think Lelo

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 3>and Stitch acted as one of those movies where it

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 3>was an unexpected finding representation where you can and people

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 3>hold it very dear and there are generations of people

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 3>who grew up with it on VHS, and I also

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 3>think that is going to be a very hard thing

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>to translate, whereas something like How to Train Your Dragon

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 3>is pretty much a beat for beat remake, and you're

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 3>just like, hey, this is a really gorgeous upgraded version

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 3>that isn't some shitty upscaled Ai four K remaster. This

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 3>is like a re envisioning. Yeah, it's like and I

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 3>think that's the difference. And I think that's why the

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 3>conversations kind of talk.

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>About that, because what is it what works and what

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work for us in a live action remake?

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Aaron like, what is.

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>What are the things that for you make a live

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>action remake essential or additive?

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 2>And what are the things that don't work for you?

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 2>And when is it?

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 6>So I think I think about it like when you

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 6>see a band perform live, you've listened to the album

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.919
<v Speaker 6>and you hear the song that they've done recorded. When

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 6>you when they do it live, you want a different

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 6>sort of energy, whether that be they are changing up

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 6>bits of the song they're they're doing, you know, different

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 6>interpretations of sections of the songs. I like things that

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 6>are you already know the original. Let me give you

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 6>another take on this. Yeah, And so that's why I

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 6>think in a live action remake, adaptation, and I want

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 6>something that gives me. I don't want to have it

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 6>be seen for see from what I've already watched. And

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 6>so I think that's for me. I want, like, I

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 6>want some changes, and I think that that is how

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 6>I view seeing a continuation of the story Joelle.

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's like anything that's happening in a franchise. Now,

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 4>you don't need to justify why the film needs be made,

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 4>but you do need to make a good film. So

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm open to films that have changes in are reinterpreting characters,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 4>especially if it's been a long time. But you know,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 4>we can look to snow White and see what happens

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 4>when you do that poorly, when you're not updating for

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 4>the time period, when you're not interacting.

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Oh, you.

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Understand it completely. You just read the assignment and a

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 4>train X. And so I just think for me, like

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I'll say, up until I have dun your Dragon, and

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen le Loan Stitch yet, I have not

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 4>liked the remakes. The only one I thought was worth

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 4>the Damaged Jungle Book, which again is more yeah wonder

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:10.280
<v Speaker 4>One remake. But if they're going to continue to exist,

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 4>which it seems like, I mean, Leon's just making this

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 4>most money and what we imagine is going to happen

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 4>with How to Train Your Dragon, then at least like

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 4>to me, like the casting of How To Train Your

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Dragon is so freaking phenomenal, Like everybody really understood the

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 4>assignment of their character and you feel very connected to them.

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 4>And that's really what I'm looking for, especially on the

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 4>Disney Train, like we come for the characters. I want

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 4>to see them in the parks. I want their outfits,

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I want them on T shirts. Give me an interesting

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 4>perspective on these characters.

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I was very happy to see Julian Dennison. I don't

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 3>think he gets enough work legendary making the movie. I

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 3>thought he was really fun. That character is barely good

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 3>anything in the originally the I will also say I

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 3>thought that they did a good job of like making

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 3>those characters still still feel as like weird and kind

0:38:57.560 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 3>of cartoony as they are. Okay, I want to talk

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 3>about this too, because when we were prepping this episode

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.959
<v Speaker 3>in this stock, let's talk about that because because Aaron

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 3>wants changes, Joelle's open to either what do you guys

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 3>think about, Like, how do you define something like Maleficent,

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 3>which follows the same plot points as Sleeping Beauty but

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 3>from a completely different perspective, essentially creating a different movie

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 3>and recasting a character in a different phrase, to something

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 3>like How to Train Your Dragon, which is a direct

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of remake, like almost like a shot for shot

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 3>like Psycho Gus Van Samins Psycho remake, but like some

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 3>doesn't like.

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Something like Maleficent is not a live action remake. It

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is a completely different story a la Wicked.

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, okay, I like the Wicked comparison.

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.959
<v Speaker 1>That even though there is kind of a let's say,

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like loose similarity between the story arcs, the fact that

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 1>you're in another character's shoes is so upending to the

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>original story, Like it is a completely different perspective, a

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>different story, a different protagonist, and therefore I think it

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>is I think something like that is not a.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm classify that as a franchise expander, giving more death

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 4>on your specific in the way that I don't want

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 4>to reference.

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 3>Those movies franchise expansion.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 4>I like that which I can appreciate. You know, I

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 4>love a world in diving in and exploring, but I

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 4>do kind of hope we continue to find ways to

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 4>like engage and like for me, like Scar, the Moufasa

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 4>like movie should have been the Scar movie. I'm like,

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 4>what are we doing?

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Like we have?

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Mufasa has a perfect arc in the original Lion King.

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 4>If you're going to and and stop doing it with

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 4>animals until we can figure out what to do with

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the mouths, it just stop.

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Also, okay, I want to talk about let's talk about

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Lion k slash Mafasa because can those even count as

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 3>live action if they're completely CG. I think that is

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 3>still an animated movie. I have.

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 4>I I agree with you. I do.

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 6>It's tough because both of the two movies we talked

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 6>about earlier, Lelo and Stitch and How to Train Your

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 6>Dragon feature very prominent fully.

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 3>CG.

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 4>This is.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Exactly I'm gonna so. I'm gonna tell you this is

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 3>my spiciest take that I think that and it's very

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 3>like it's a it's not particularly spicy, but I do

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 3>think it's I think all of these movies should be

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 3>considered essentially like Roger Rabbit esque, like animated live action

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of combo movies, and I actually think that that

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.439
<v Speaker 3>would maybe interest people more if we spoke about them

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 3>like that. But I also think that it's tough because

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 3>people then would start to wonder about like every live

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 3>action movie you see now that has like heavily CG characters,

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 3>So that would basically like quantum Is that essentially the

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 3>same thing? Yeah, basically. But I mean I think that

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 3>there's something interesting about the way that live action and

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 3>CG are used together in these movies, and I think

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 3>that's something that should actually be like interestingly, you know,

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 3>having a conversation about Ian, don't bring up Robert zemeachis

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 3>in this conversation that that insane dead eyed man like

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the Polar Express. That's one of the scariest movies I've

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 3>ever seen, man, But you know, I watch it every

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 3>year at Christmas. I still love it. Bear Wolf, he

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 3>was doing this before anyone else, honestly, so we can't

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 3>we can't take that away from him. Okay, So I'm

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna tell you guys, this is my the first live

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 3>action Disney animated movie that they made, the animated remake

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 3>that they made, like this live action remake of an

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 3>animated film, I should say was Pete's Dragon. Right now,

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm like a number one Pete Dragon Superstan. I love

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 3>the original movie, which was an animated live action kind

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of hybrid. But the movie, I think this is actually

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 3>where they went wrong because the Pete Dragon movie is

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 3>essentially a completely different story. The original Pete's Dragon is

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 3>very whimsical. It's very much in that kind of Mary

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Poppins space. It's also super like Stoner coded Puff the

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 3>Magic Dragon, like weird.

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 4>We say seventies.

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's like it's like, you know, very seventies, like

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 3>whoa spiraling out? But it has kind of similar vibes,

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:33.720
<v Speaker 3>which is like kid Left by Himself Dragon. That movie

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 3>is directed by David Lowry. It has Bryce, Alice Howard,

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 3>It has Wes Bentley, It has Carl Urban as Una

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Lawrence has Robert Redford. The movie is so gorgeous and

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 3>basically is about found family and about the freedom of

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 3>found family and about the dangers of the state getting

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 3>involved with found family. And I thought it was fantastic,

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 3>and it was made for sixty five million dollars and

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 3>it made one hundred and forty three million dollars. But

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.439
<v Speaker 3>I think post that they were like, well, we want

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 3>these movies to make a billion dollars. We want I

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 3>think that David Lowry was allowed to make this movie

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 3>because it was the first in a trial period. But

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, this is where we should be going. We

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 3>should be doing weirder old Disney movies that people have

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 3>not really seen. I'll tell you what I would make

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.760
<v Speaker 3>a remake of doesn't need any animation. There's a really

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 3>weird Jody Foster movie where she is clearly she's like twelve,

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 3>and she's clearly a lesbian feet who goes into an

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 3>old man's house to steal all his goods. It's called Candlewick.

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Ten out of ten remake that shit. Like Disney has

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 3>such a weird history of like animation and just strange

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 3>movies in general, and I think leaning into the strains.

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 4>We Cauldron, live Action Wears Please.

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 3>That's what I am talking about, like movies that maybe

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 3>didn't hit at the time but then were able to

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 3>find their kind of wow Iam Page masterymake. I would

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 3>watch it.

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 4>I try. I'm not prepared.

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I love that movie. But yeah, like I think the

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 3>conversation of what is animation, what is live action? It's

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 3>so blurred nowadays that it becomes like a hard conversation

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.760
<v Speaker 3>to have because MCU movies are you know, fifty percent

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 3>if not more in something like ant Man in Quantitmania volume,

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 3>what does that really add to it? So it's an

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 3>interesting space and an interesting conversation. But I also think

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 3>that the almost like the semantics of it end up

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 3>just kind of like you missed the fact of as

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:45.399
<v Speaker 3>the movie.

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 4>If I can bring a ridiculous hard rule to it,

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 4>I think if we have, I think.

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.320
<v Speaker 3>I love a ridiculous hard rule avatar.

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 4>I do, I really do, because it's in the details.

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 3>It's important.

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 4>I classify as a live action because they shoot all

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 4>of it, like the act being there that.

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>The reforms to move through it and they're like everybody

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in it's a lot of mo cap okay, okay.

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Jungle Book is a live action movie. The live action

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 4>remake of Jungle Book has a kidney. All of that

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 4>is staged and moved around it behind the scenes. A

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Lion King is an animated movie.

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because the lion is not a single real thing

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 3>in it.

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 4>That's that's my dividing line. If there's at least one

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 4>real person and they had stage and set it up

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.959
<v Speaker 4>and shoot with real like, you know, actually shooting something

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 4>and not creating with in the computer. Then live action.

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, okay, let's go to a break, and then we

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 3>can come back and talk about our best and worst

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 3>live action animated remakes or franchise expanders or whatever else

0:46:50.600 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 3>do you want to pull, and we're back.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's talk about our best live action remakes, our

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite live action remakes or expanders or whatever you want

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to call it. Let's start, Joelle, let's start with you.

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm gonna go and start real controversial one hundred

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 4>and one Dalmatians with Glenn Close.

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's great.

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I love that is such.

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:35.959
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it kind of funny that when we were kids

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 3>we didn't even think about that wasn't a terminology for it.

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 3>We were just like, yeah, of course you would remake.

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 4>This, Yes, Glenn Close and fabulous outfits, being as wild

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:46.720
<v Speaker 4>and crazy as she wants to be. There's some crazy

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:51.240
<v Speaker 4>production design in there, and incind about the soundtracks that slaps.

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:53.839
<v Speaker 4>One hundred and one Dalmatians got me into jazz as

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 4>a child, really lovely. And then I would say, do

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 4>you want just do best and worst.

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just do Best and West want to be I'm

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna be real. There's not a lot of good ones.

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like a hundred movies, and maybe they're not great.

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I am gonna say Mulan because it misses everything.

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 4>It didn't get the historical like recreation right, it didn't

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 4>get the things we loved about the original animation right.

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 4>It's a hot mess. No one seemed to appreciate it.

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Nobody who's like no bisexuality.

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Like excited about it. I think Mulan is an interesting

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 4>historical figure that should have many great movies.

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 3>And I've had many great Chinese movies.

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and I think Disney just really really dropped the

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:38.800
<v Speaker 4>ball on Mulan.

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Aaron, Best and West, I don't know.

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 3>This is cheating.

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Can I say the Flintstones for best? Or is that

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 2>not you can?

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry Flintstones.

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I think for the best, it's great. For the worst.

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 6>I feel bad because I haven't actually seen the entire thing.

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 6>But Aladdin, I just I'm.

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Badly unnecessary pop song that made me would have rip

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:07.359
<v Speaker 4>my eyes out. I said, what have you done to Ali? Insanity?

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Not not not, not great.

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.439
<v Speaker 4>I could go on. I could I forgot about whatever?

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm I love the kind of I love

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.919
<v Speaker 3>that these are spreading beyond because I do think Aaron,

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I think you make a great point with flint Stones.

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I think that's definitely one of the really really legendary

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 3>ones and also comes from that era before there were

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:31.799
<v Speaker 3>enough movies that we were having to have conversations about

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 3>whether these are live action adaptations or remaates or whatever.

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:40.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go, uh, I'm gonna I'm gonna pick Peach

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Dragon as my best because I do watch that movie

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot. I own it on Blu Ray. I think

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 3>it's beautiful. It breaks my heart every time I watch

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 3>it. It's got a great soundtrack. I will say, I'm gonna say,

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 3>but my, you know what I'm gonna I'm gonna skip

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Peach Dragon. I already shouted out, I'm gonna say, you

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 3>know what I'm gonna say right now. Recently Bias How

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 3>to Train Your Dragon. It was really brilliant. I loved it.

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 3>It made me. When I got home, I immediately rewatched

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 3>the original because I wanted to recapture the feeling I

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 3>had in the movie theater and it's a Nico Parker

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 3>as Astrod. It's a Nico Parker vehicle, the one she deserves,

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 3>and it will make me less bad about picking my

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 3>worst live action adaptation. Kind of not really, I guess

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 3>we would say this is a franchise expander. Dumbo director

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:28.960
<v Speaker 3>by Timber.

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It's so bad, Timothy.

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Take them away. He made that. He made frickin' both

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 3>the Alison Wondler again, Yes, you don't want to hear

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 3>it there. Dumbo should have been Dumbo should have been

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:53.399
<v Speaker 3>like really fantastic and weird, but it was not. It

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 3>was just a bad movie. And you know what. That

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 3>was another thing I was struck by with How to

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Train Your Dragon and Pete Dragon also has this issue,

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 3>which is why I guess I kind of knocked it

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 3>off in the end. These Disney adaptations, live action remakes whatever,

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 3>they really meander like often you're watching them and you're like,

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 3>where is that straight through like story that grabbed me

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:18.840
<v Speaker 3>in the original animation? We have to now make it

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 3>two hours and fourty minutes long. Dumbo drugs are that

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 3>How To Train Your Dragon does not. That is a breezy, frickin' movie,

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Like you just feel like you're on the adventure. So

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:30.359
<v Speaker 3>I think those will be my current twenty twenty five.

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's notable picks. It's notable to me that

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 1>like in terms of live action remakes, Disney has been

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 1>at this a while. You mentioned one Dalmatians from ninety

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:43.359
<v Speaker 1>six with Gone Close and Jeff Daniels, and then it's

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>really not until like twenty sixteen, twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>when you get this glut and nothing from the glut

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is good. Almost nothing from the glut is it's just

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>too much. There is stuff throwing it thickle.

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 3>Reconsideration of Cinderella, I will say I seen Young gen Z.

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 3>It's made by Kenneth Browner. If you like a traditional

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of fairytale story doesn't have music, is great, interesting,

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 3>actually very interesting. And Angelina Joe.

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But again those were the only two, like it was,

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>those were the only two of that, you know, twenty

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:26.160
<v Speaker 1>fourteen you get Molesticent and Cinderella the previous with Sorcerer's

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Apprentice from twenty ten and then so so it's this

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>big space and then you enter into like post Beauty

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Beast. It's like twenty seventeen Beauty and the Beast.

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Robinson twenty eighteen, Dumbo twenty nineteen, Aladdin twenty I

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you this, Rosie, where do we is?

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Is Pete's Dragon truly a live action remake? When I

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 1>would argue the amount of the balance of animation exactly

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>live action? Correct, this is basically the same from that.

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying.

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that you make a good point. I was

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:08.759
<v Speaker 3>actually kind of just thinking and saying about this, like,

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I think if it was up to me, I would

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of be promoting all of these as those old

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 3>movies were promoted as Roger Rabbit was promoted as these

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of combo like, look what we can do. But

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 3>obviously the idea of CG is it's supposed to be

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 3>so seamless. So no, I think that's very fair. I don't.

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the reason that Pete Dragon is so wonderful

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 3>is because it doesn't necessarily fit into a lot of

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:32.239
<v Speaker 3>the trappings and tropes, and David Lowry was given a

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of freedom. That and Green Knight are like a

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 3>really great weird forest they double bill. Yeah, but it's true.

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested. I will say I do as somebody who

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of friends who love romance and who

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 3>love like historical romantic fiction. The Little Mermaid has a

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 3>huge fan base in that space. There's a huge fan

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:55.320
<v Speaker 3>art fan base for it. There is also a huge

0:53:56.160 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 3>there's yeah, and there's a huge fan base for the

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 3>fact that it is a very traditional happily ever after

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 3>and it has this kind of very almost like Renaissance

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 3>esthetic where you get to see these two people fall

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 3>in love. I've seen I've seen the movie. I thought that, uh,

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 3>is it was it Hailey who is in that movie? Yes,

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Hailey Berry. Yeah, she's fantastic. And I thought that the

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 3>movie was was like, you know, interesting. That again meandered.

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 3>But I will say that's another one where from just

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 3>being online, I've realized that there is a huge kind

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 3>of emotional and fan response to it, which I'm interested

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 3>to see if that continues. But these I think for

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 3>the amount that there has been, if you really look

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 3>at the Bangers, quality is not the point here, Like

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:48.480
<v Speaker 3>the point is making money off nostalgia.

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think in particular, Disney made a big, big bet

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:57.919
<v Speaker 1>coming off of, you know, being high on their own

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:03.640
<v Speaker 1>MCU supply like oh we've gary, we've figured it out,

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we know what to do, and now we're just gonna

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>bet big on this thing, and.

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Frankly it just didn't work. It just didn't, you know what.

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 3>But it's made them a lot of money, so I

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:18.359
<v Speaker 3>think that is from that sense, yes, it's been very successful.

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, my uh best and worst, I'm gonna go with Paddington.

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 1>The Paddington series adapted from the original BBC like the

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:37.359
<v Speaker 1>less choice paper animation and stop motion animation which was

0:55:37.400 --> 0:55:39.839
<v Speaker 1>so charming and delightful, but like when you watch it

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:44.760
<v Speaker 1>now feels they're eleven year olds that are probably making

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>better like stop motion than this right now with their

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like computers. And I think that the Paddington. I just

0:55:52.600 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>love the Paddington movies, like even the even when it's

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not that great, they're great and the pat and Paddington

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>looks wonderful. He's so like a motive and charming. I

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:05.560
<v Speaker 1>could stare into his eyes and he's fantastic. I love

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that they did the exact same thing from the origin,

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Paddington books and from the Paddington original animator,

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>where it's like this bear is here, we don't question it.

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:17.280
<v Speaker 2>It makes perfect sense. He's hand now walking around.

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>He's here now, and he's walking around, He's interacting with everybody,

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's fine.

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I love that.

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Worst fuck There's so much to choose from, but I'm

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Pinocchio twenty two.

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, how did we not talk about this?

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like, is this.

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>An snl skit? Like, what's happening this movie?

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 3>I could not believe it. There is a scene in

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.560
<v Speaker 3>this movie and it's you know, I do rag on myself.

0:56:46.600 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think a fair amount for how much

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:53.759
<v Speaker 3>my Easter egg hunting, uh, you know, kind of had

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 3>a ripple effect on the impact of things. And I

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:00.520
<v Speaker 3>hate to imagine that I even played point five percent

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:04.080
<v Speaker 3>of the fact that in this movie there is an

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:09.280
<v Speaker 3>entire wall of clocks that Geppetto made and every single

0:57:09.320 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 3>one is a fucking Easter egg to a different Disney movie.

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, no, do not do this. Nobody

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.440
<v Speaker 3>wants this, Nobody wants to write an article about every

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 3>fifty No, no, no. And it wasn't Tom Tom Hanks

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:25.920
<v Speaker 3>his weirdest action.

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Like sure his accent sucks thet.

0:57:33.120 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Exactly the same.

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 4>And so much worse by the fact that Del Toro

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:42.720
<v Speaker 4>releases a stunning animated like Pinocchio.

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 3>What months later if I recall literally in the same Yeah, yeah,

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:47.000
<v Speaker 3>it was.

0:57:47.040 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I was flabbergas. I was like, Doesny you have to

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 4>be so embarrassed.

0:57:50.040 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 3>By this.

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And the and the way that the live action elements

0:57:56.240 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in the CGI elements meet is social and cold feeling,

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like yes, yes, I mean none of the magic of

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the original is transmitted to this one.

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 2>It is bad.

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:58:12.080 --> 0:58:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I also I hate it.

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I also do wanna I want to like

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:24.400
<v Speaker 3>add another worst I'm on the Disney Live Action Reimaginings

0:58:24.440 --> 0:58:27.560
<v Speaker 3>franchise page on IMDb, which I guess is kind of

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 3>how they looking at all the worldwide openings. But you

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 3>know which one. I don't necessarily think this counts because

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not adapting something that was originally animated, but they

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:39.040
<v Speaker 3>do include it in here. Oz the Great and Powerful

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:42.320
<v Speaker 3>hated that ship just make Wicked Wicked was already out

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 3>like the book. You could have just adapted Wicked hated It.

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Made the douchey wizard it sympathetic.

0:58:48.720 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 3>And then the Wicked the Witch is evil because like

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:53.439
<v Speaker 3>he didn't want to date her, Like, come the fuck on,

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 3>this is a lesbian story again, Okay, Aaron dishonorable mention, Yes,

0:58:57.560 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 3>please an official hater.

0:58:59.160 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Ghost in the Shell. I don't I don't know if that's.

0:59:03.000 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the ass Yes, exactly out.

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Of here Scarlett and Emma Untilda and that our favorite

0:59:10.720 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 6>Asian movie stars.

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, wait, Aaron, you were going to call in a

0:59:14.880 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 3>boot bringing.

0:59:15.400 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 6>It a boo just he mentioned in the chat that

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:22.800
<v Speaker 6>he that Aladdin was bad, but he enjoyed how fun

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 6>it was, so like.

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, please please stand there. I love a stand for absolutely.

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 4>There's a whole parade scene that is literally a whole

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:36.920
<v Speaker 4>way in like behind the Disney line. It looks so

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 4>it's five walk away. They're like, that's the parade.

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay. I think Ian has actually come in in

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 3>my opinion with the winner, and you should probably leave

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 3>it on this because he put the new Chip and

0:59:50.760 --> 0:59:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Dale was really good. Movie is fucking amazing. It's so funny,

0:59:57.280 --> 1:00:01.480
<v Speaker 3>it has ugly sonic in it. It's honestly like one

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 3>of the best. Also, I love like bootleg Disney movies.

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 3>There's a director called Orlando Karate who made a lot

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 3>of bootleg kind of anime esque like Japanese American co production,

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Japanese Talian co productions in like the eighties and nineties.

1:00:16.720 --> 1:00:19.640
<v Speaker 3>They'll be like Cinderella's Trip to the Ball and they

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 3>are like so bad and I'm obsessed with them, And

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 3>that is essentially the plot of Chippindale.

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Also a big LA movie, like just if you love

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 4>It on the City of La. It's really fun.

1:00:30.720 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, Yeah, great Coolly and I am like, you gotta

1:00:33.440 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 3>come on here next time because you won all of

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:36.280
<v Speaker 3>our picks.

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we where we've landed is live action movies.

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Just make a good one.

1:00:44.720 --> 1:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Just make a good one. It's a little care where

1:00:48.480 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes from or when it's a down to.

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Just do it about it. Just do it movie.

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to our panel of super producers for joining

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>us today to us this heated topic. On the next

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>episode of Extra Vision, We've got news and our thoughts

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on Hulu's Predator.

1:01:08.640 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Killer of Killers and animated.

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Great for sure. That's it for this episode. Next for listening, Bye.

1:01:24.760 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>X ray Vision is hosted by Jason steps Young and

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Rosie Knight and is a production of iHeart Podcast.

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Our executive producers are Joel Monique and Aaron Kaufman.

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Our supervising producer is Abusafar.

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Our producers are Common Laurent Dean Jonathan and Fay Wax.

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Our theme song is by Brian Vasquez, with alternate theme

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>songs by Aaron Kaufman.

1:01:44.480 --> 1:01:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Special thanks to Soul Rubin, Chris Lord, Kenny Goodman and

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Heidi Our Discord moderate them