WEBVTT -  Why This Recession Is Deeper and Deadlier Than 2008! | Ed Dowd

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Coincidentally, COVID hit and gave central banks and governments unprecedented

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>excuses to create more debt and print more money, and

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that reinflated the system.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump's new policies could potentially stay that off, or does

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>that only exaggerate things?

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>His plan is this right. He wants to deregulate, reinstitute

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the tax cuts. He wants to bring investment to the US.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Just the second derivative change on that is going to

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>create a debt. The real economy, the middle class economy, was,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, was in a recession in twenty three

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.959
<v Speaker 1>and twenty four. So if you have a global debt problem,

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there's two ways to handle its way out of it.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Or you ed you said that, You've been saying that

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>there's a clock that started on a global debt crisis,

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 2>Like what are you looking at that broke and why

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>should anyone listening to right now be preparing for that?

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, the global debt crisis kind of manifested itself

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. There was a lot of synchronized global

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>growth slowing and the repo market started blowing up in

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>September of twenty nineteen. The plumbing was becoming unwound. Coincidentally,

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID hit and gave central banks and governments unprecedented excuses

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to create more debt and print more money, and that

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>reinflated the system. So if you have a global debt problem,

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>there's two ways to handle it. You inflate your way

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>out of it, or you default. And COVID, again, I

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in the room. We can debate whether it was

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a plan or an accident. Who cares. It saved the

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>system temporarily kicked the can down the road, and the

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>FED printed and the US government spent. Printing without spending

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean anything. So we saw unprecedented growth in the

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>money supply. And my partner Carlos Aellegaria, you know in

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>his book that he had a revised edition in twenty

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, predicted that massive inflation was coming, and it came.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's a little bit of a debate

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as to who caused the inflation. I would say what

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>they did under the Trump administration with the COVID spending

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and the printing didn't really have an impact until you know,

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve to eighteen months later, and that was in the

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. So you know, inflation which quote unquote was transitory.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's what we were hearing from, you know,

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>yelling and Powell was nonsense, because monetary, when you increase

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the money supply without you know, without a commensurate like growth,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it just gonna inflay prices. And it did. And so

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the FED then responded by going on an unprecedented interest

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>rate rapid interest rate increased from basically zero to five

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent, and m two year over year

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>growth unged in the aftermath, and we saw for the

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>first time since not you know, the thirties, and two

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>year year growth went negative in November twenty two, and

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>then unsurprisingly, we had a bunch of bank failures in

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the spring of twenty twenty three. People forget that, and

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED plugged the hole. They gave bank term funding program.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>They lent moneies to banks that were underwater to prevent

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a deposit run and that worked because most of the

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>most most of the credit that was underwater were you know,

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>risk free assets like treasuries because of you know, the

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>duration risks that happened when they raised interest rates. So

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed's not going to do and they've already

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>ended the bank term funding program what the Fed's not

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do is lend money to bad credit, and

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that's we're getting into the credit cycle of this commercial

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>real estate, as we know, is already a problem. That's

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>about three to five trillion on banks balance sheets in

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the US. The bigger problem we see is the economy

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>having been floated in twenty three and twenty four by

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>illegal immigration. A large part of our growth came from

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that whole movement into basically an organized illegal operation that

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think of a large majority of the

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>deficit spending we saw funded that through NGOs and other

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>agencies and then direct payments to illegals. So that really

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>floated the economy. And that's all coming away. So we

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>see a housing crisis coming next. And when we say crisis,

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't want people to freak out. I

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's needed. I mean, home prices need to

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>come down. People can't afford homes and new home supplies.

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, at all time record of the world near

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>all time record levels, there's no there's no transaction active.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>And the housing market was really buoyed by the marginal renter,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>which was the illegal alien. That that momentum is all

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>going the wrong way and p M I, you know,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a problem for two years. It's been showing

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>recessionary signals globally and the only economy that was really

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>outstanding was the US economy. And that's all that's all

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>going the wrong way. The second derivative government spending, even

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>though the Trump administration is really not cutting spending, the

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>second derivative is changing. The growth is flattening, and that's

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>all you need to cause a softening in the economy.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what We've put out a report that we're

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>selling on January ninth detailing what we were seeing, and

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you can buy it if you want at our website

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Finance Technologies dot com with the pH. So that's kind

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of the brad swathe we're already starting to see indicates

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that the economy is slowly starting to roll over, and

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if our calls right. We think we're going

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to be right in a very big way.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks for setting the stage on that. Let's let's

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 2>dig into a couple of things on that you said.

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I think what you said is after you

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 2>talked about the FED bailing out the banks in twenty

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty three through the BTFP, that the FED is not

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 2>going to give money to bad businesses or bad investments anymore.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, they're not. They're not. They're not going

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to loan money to Uh. It was easy to provide

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>liquidity versus treasury assets. They're underwater. They're not going to

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>provide liquidity to bad loan decisions, bad credit decisions. And

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with the commercial real estate problem?

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, this all eventually affects lending bank.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>The bank's main function is to choose the economy by lending.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>When you start to accumulate bad debts on your books,

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you you you, you know, you stop lending as much.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And what's going on with the commercial real estate is

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they've been extending and pretending.

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>And the FED put out a report in November of

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four detailing that.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think they're going to start cracking down on banks,

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, coincidentally during the Trump administration. That may be

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a political move, who knows, but I mean, this has

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>been a problem for well over a year and a half.

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>There there's also starting to be uh, you know, indications

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and problems in auto loans, and there's delinquencies and homes arising.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So we have a credit we have a classic credit

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>cycle coming and it's just inevitable and it will cause

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the word deflation to be mentioned temporarily because we know

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that deflation is not allowed under the rules of the bankers.

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're predicting inflation CPI headlined to some sometime in

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the next six to twelve months print sub two percent number.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The biggest component of inflation is shelter. It's about forty

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the CPI number. That's sticky, it takes

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>time to adjust. And so we're expecting a recession. We're

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>expecting the Fed to do what it does, lower interest rates,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe if if the crisis is you know,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>if it goes if it looks like it's going to

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>go systemic, they're going to print a ton of money

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and the government will have to do deficit spending and

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>then you know, we're back in you know, the reinflation

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bubble if they can do it again.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, so you said that if deflation is not

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>allowed in bankers terms, it's really not allowed in a

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>debt based monetary system.

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Just overall, it's if allowed to go on checked it

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the daisy chain effects are collapse.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Would you say you mentioned, you know how this actually

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>started in twenty nineteen and then the COVID sort of

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 2>excuse came along. Would you say that it actually started

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>back in two thousand and eight when we really sort

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>of had the first QE. Maybe the FED tried to

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 2>allow the bubble to deflate like they had done in

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>previous cycles two thousand, et cetera. But then it became

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 2>too systemic, right, they had to bel out the banks,

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>they had to do the quantitative easing. It levered up

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the system to a point now in twenty nineteen, twenty

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty showed that they're and even twenty twenty three showed

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>there's zero appetite to allow it to sort of deflate

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 2>on its own and they have to keep reinflating.

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would. It's interesting you talked about the Great

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Financial Crisis. That's when a lot of things change. That's

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>when we saw unprecedented monetary policy, which now everybody expects

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's not as unprecedented. It's a tool in the toolbox.

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And what that did is the real economy, if you

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>go back, really kind of died globally and what floated

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy for the next fourteen years was precedented monetary

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>policy coupled with government spending, and the government as a

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of GDP, not only in the US, but in Europe, China,

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you name, it grew its share the pie in GDP,

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's changed a lot of you know, what's been

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>going on economically. So the closer you are to government

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and government favors and the printing press, the better. After

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you've done so, the economy showed growth, but the problem was,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>over time there was a wealth disparity effect. And that's why,

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want to ask yourself why populism

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>is on the rise, it's basically because the rich got

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>richer and everybody else got poor. And it's been an

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>economy of the rich, not of the middle class. And

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump was elected primarily because there was minus two percent

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>real wage growth going into the election. The last time

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>that happened in nineteen eighty, Ronald Reagan swept in and

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Bill Clinton ninety two. So you know, well, Trump

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>was was going to win no matter what because of

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy didn't matter. Got it.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 2>So if the system structurally fundamentally changed in two thousand

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 2>and eight, got so levered up, you could see twenty nineteen,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, the response was way faster. Right, two thousand

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 2>and eight, they allowed bear Stearns to go down and

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>took seven months to get a bail out. In twenty

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, it took six days to bail out the banks.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>But you think that now maybe FED, the FED would

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 2>sort of change their tune and say, well, let's just

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 2>let these bad loans go bad and let's see what

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>happens with the defaise.

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it depends they can't be seen as bailing out politically,

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot harder to try to

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>bail out the banks. And during twenty.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Short of like just take the loans on their books

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>like they did with the NBS and eight, like, you

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's politically sustainable.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>They could do it, but they will only do it

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's enough pain, So that's why they'll do it.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 1>But they'll do it after a big correction and people

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are freaking out and begged them to do it. They

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do it ahead of time. Twenty twenty

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>gave them great cover. I mean, they bailed out Citadel Capital.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, they gave them emergency repos during twenty twenty

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and and and there was also and they also basically

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>privatized the corporate credit market. They started buying I don't

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>know if people remember this, but they started buying under

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheet apple bonds, So they they basically privatized

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the corporate credit market. The problem with that is it's

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>kept corporate spread credit spreads tight, and that's driven a

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>massive amount of misallocation of capital, as you would imagine.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So and the other problem is this, so you know,

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in the dot com boom, we had a corporate fraud cycle,

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, we had a the FED do

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>their easy money after that bus that led to a

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>banking fraud cycle. And now we have, fourteen years later,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a i would say, a central bank government fraud cycle.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>And we're discovering all sorts of frauds, you know, through

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what doge is exposed and whatnot. And it's not so

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>much that the FED will become trapped when another central

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>bank has a problem. And the Bank of Japan is

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of the in the problem right now. They can

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>either you know, continue to print money to float the

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>yen carry trade or there people will continue to get

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>poor and there's a currency crisis. So the release valve

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on the sovereign debt crisis is always was always going

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the currency markets, because eventually the currency markets

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>will revolt if one country, you know, it's someone to

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>if the market's determined no moss, then it's over and

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>then the whole thing has a problem. So the FED,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, is the FED going to bail out Japan?

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean that right? So this is where we are.

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very precarious. We don't have a crystal ball.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But what we do know is there's an economic sloan

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>on coming. There's going to be, you know, problem in

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the stock markets, and we're expecting yields to go much lower.

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, if you believe our call, you want to

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be up to your eyeballs in risk creer assets like

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the US T bills, notes and buys. And I don't

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>have anything with the risk any risk asset.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's come back to that. How you see this playing out?

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>And uh and I know we'll talk about the report

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that you said you have and how people can get

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>a hold of that. Would you say that Trump's new

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 2>policies potentially this mar a Lago accord restructuring the global

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 2>monetary system uh, making America investible again, could potentially stay

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that off or does that only exaggerate things?

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>No, Look, his plan is this right. He wants to deregulate,

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>reinstitute the tax cuts. He wants to bring investment to

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the US. The bringing investments to the US is going

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to take time. You know, as well as I do.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Breaking ground, getting getting things going doesn't happen overnight. So

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that that that is out in the future. It's

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>much like what happened around Ronald Rugg and Renald Reagan

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>had a recession and you know eighty I think eighty

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and eight eighty one, he had a double dip recession.

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump is facing the same problem. His policies are going

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to take time to to an app The FED is

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>too tight at the moment, and his policies are actually

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>reversing out the juice to the economy the last two years,

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>which was unprecedented deficit spending, a legal immigration, and government

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>job hiring. So just the second derivative change on that

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to create a dip because the economy, the

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>real economy, the middle class economy was you could argue,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>was in a recession in twenty three twenty four.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 2>So we have eight trillion dollars of commitments to be

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 2>invested in the United States. But to your point, that's

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 2>going to take a while to see that come to fruition.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, commitment, commitment, commitments don't translate into money changing hands.

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Yet it does.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now, he has done quite a few executive orders

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>laying the groundwork for like fast tracking these two things,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 2>coordinating through all the states to get these things through.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it was any investments over a billion dollars

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 2>get sort of rubber stamped through. But even then you're

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>still talking years probably before that stuff happening happened, at

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 2>least at least.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, twelve to twenty four months depends, you know,

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why you know this. We wrote the report.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>His reversal his policies actually will cause a temporary recession

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and then his other policies will bring us out of it.

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But again, there's a timing issue. So there's there's a

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>valley before the glory right now, right, it all depends

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>on the execution, the timing. If he if the economy

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't turning around by twenty twenty six mid terms, we've

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>got a problem. So the idea here is you have

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>a recession that we think manifests itself pretty soon and

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the stock market's bottom sometime in the first quarter of

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, and then you have, you know, a recovery.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the ideal situation. And that's why in our report

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not we're not. In our report, we don't we're

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>not claiming anything it's going to go systemic. We're not

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>doom and gloom. It's just, you know, we think it's

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>an old fashioned deep recession and hopefully it's quick and

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>typically speaking in recessions, like in the dot com recession

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Great Financial Crisis, stocks went down fifty percent

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>before they recovered. So we're nowhere near down fifty percent yet,

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and we think that's kind of and you know, look,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not the end of the world, right, I mean,

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>home price is going down, are you know, well, not

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>good for overlevered rich people that are over their skis.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>It's great for like someone who had a first time

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a home buyer. So you know, it's just not people

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just don't like recessions and they think it's the end

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of the world. But it's healthy and it resets things.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, you know, the bankers don't like it,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and they keep reinflating and creating malinvestments. So we're going

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens in the in the teeth of

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this one. The Fed is behind the eight ball. They

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't lower that. You know, I predicted they weren't going

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to lower this Wednesday. They didn't. And we might even

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>get some headline inflation reports that look like inflation's accelerating.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you get to remember the Great Financial Crisis,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation was accelerating June, July, and August before everything imploded.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>It seems like, you know, when you have basically a

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>heads or tails sort of thing where we either continue

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to inflate this bubble and have more inflation, or we

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>let a def in To your point, you know, maybe

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>that's a good thing to let asset prices, house prices

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 2>come back down, sort of give that that next generation

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a chance. It just seems like if people were given

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 2>a choice like which one's more bearable, most people would

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>probably rather see their retirement accounts than their their house

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 2>et cetera go up in value, even if the price

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 2>of gas and food went up a little bit, versus

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, all their prices come crashing down, their stock

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 2>retirement accounts, housecounts all come crashing down, their businesses suffer.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 2>So it seems like maybe if people had to choose,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and you know, the government having to deal with sort

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 2>of the public's view on this, seems like they would

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>probably choose inflation.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But well, I think it's a generational issue, right, So

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we have the baby boomer generation. It has a lot

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the wealth in the country who wants to see

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>policies that protect themselves. And then it's this is classic

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>generational warfare. My partner Carlos Selegri who writes about it

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in his book Economic Cycles, Debt and Demographics. This has

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>gone on, you know, many times before in history. So

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>we have we have a we have a we have

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what money would call a fourth attorney. I mean, this

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is this is a generational war. You have the young

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are locked out of a lifestyle that their

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>parents and grandparents experienced and are still holding on to

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and and they and you know, uh, that's why populism

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is rising at the moment. And you can see you know,

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're online a lot. You know, I'm not

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a boomer, I'm a gen exer, but I get called

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the boomer Okay, boomer, you.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Know, yeah, yeah, yeah, how much of that would you

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 2>say is attributed more to where we're at in technology?

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 2>So for example, right like, the baby boomers had a

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 2>massive middle class because we had the industrial age and

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>we had assembly lines, and so smart people and dumb

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 2>people were marginalized and they all did just put their

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 2>their peace on the widget as it went down the

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>assembly line. So we got this massive middle class. But

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>as we moved to the information age especially and as

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 2>we've accelerated into that now with AI, it's almost more

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 2>of a meritocracy where if I'm smarter, I can just

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>use my laptop, I can just get ahead, and that

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>middle class sort of goes away and maybe there's no

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 2>returning to that.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what Trump is trying to address by bringing manufacturing

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs back. It's a bold move. We'll see if it works.

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>The other thing to remember, though, is when you have

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>let's say you bring a manufacturing plant to a town,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking micro economics, and you hire that just say

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a thousand people, That creates jobs for those people. Those

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>people then spend on ancillary services like housing, restaurants, services,

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so there's other jobs that are created by that steady

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>base of manufacturing. And you know, that's what we saw

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>hopp into a lot of Midwest towns during the outsourcing

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of manufacturing in the US and the nineties and two

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thousands under Clinton, Bush, Obama and and and and and

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and what have you, we saw towns. I mean I drove,

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I drove across the country Midwest towns just like the

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>plant left, and they're just shadows of their former selves.

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So Trump, I think I did, idealistically, wants to bring

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>back that kind of Whether it works or not, let's

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. And you're right there, there's been a change

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in the nature of the workforce and unfortunately, I Q

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with it.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 2>And our education system isn't helping at all.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, our education system is a disaster. It's making

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I went to public school and I

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot. It was great. And I think that's

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of people's experience that are my age.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I hear what's going on in the public school system now,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a disaster.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>My My daughter is a sophomore in high school and

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>she she's homeschooling, and she just does she just wants

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to just take her to get out, and I'm like,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 2>just drop out, like I don't care. There's nothing that

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 2>they're going to teach you at this point that you

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 2>need to know. Like you're already working for me, You're

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>already learning more cutting edge marketing stuff than they'll ever

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>teach you in that industrial era school. So it's almost

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 2>like people are being still trained in an industrial era

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 2>school system with industrial age tools, and they're being left

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>behind because that world no longer exists for them. And

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 2>unless we change that, we're still going to have this

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 2>populist uprising which is going to continue to push things,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and if inflation continues to rage on, they continue to

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 2>fall further and further behind. So yeah, it's not a

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>good fix. I want to ask you, you know, when

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 2>we talk about these debt crisises, I don't believe that

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll pay the debt down. I mean, it's more about management.

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like the medical systems today, right, let's manage

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.479
<v Speaker 2>the symptoms, does not try to cure it. And so

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 2>we have this debt bubble. It's obviously it's a problem

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that TOGP levels are are extreme high. Obviously the interest

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>on the debt is is has become a big problem,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>which is why races need to come down. Would you

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 2>also believe that one it can't ever be really repaid.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's not really the goal that we're aiming for.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's more about like a management of it, and

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 2>like as we've seen other nations just like sort of

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 2>muddle along with it for a long periods of time.

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And does that mean it's not as acute as many

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 2>people think it is. It's something that maybe just continues

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to sort of drag the economy down over a long

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 2>period of time.

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So so there's there's two charts. As I said,

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>inflated away or default. Default is probably not an option.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So they will inflate and uh this is and and

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and and the will be in stag we're predicting stagflation,

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>so paths of inflation with deflation that result stagflation kind

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of this you know read you know this just this

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like roller coaster ride. As the monetary policy

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he has less and less impact. And so the goal

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is to try to muddle along. The problem,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of course is societally what that happens, what happens to

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the popular populations of the globe. And one result is populism.

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>If you're in China, China is a you know, a

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>communist country that rules from the top down. They fear

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>their people the most. When I was a black Rock

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and three, our energy guys came back

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>from China and every everything they said was all the

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>high officials there want to keep max employment so the

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>people have food in their belly because they fear their

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>people the most China, and China has a demographic problem,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>so china solution to this will be a distraction likely.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're mongoring and that's why you know, geopolitically,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these these debt problems and gender wars, it's kind of classic, right,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't a country is the leadership of a country

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to take responsibility, so they'll blame someone else.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's we think China's at risk of going kinetic

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sometime in the next you know, five to ten years.

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe has a demographic problem, and we we we have

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>as as bad as our demographics. We're like the best

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the clean of shirt and a dury laundery. And you know,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>the illegal immigration did help the economy short term. The

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>problem is societally, it wrecks the social fabric. So there's

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a trade off, and it's going to be very interesting

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens over the next five years. I

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have a crystal ball, but what I can say

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>is volatility and risk are going to continue to be unprecedented.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the days the fourteen years of low volatility

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are over.

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I would agree.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw this quote.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 2>You know more, Buffett just decided to step down after

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 2>a legendary status over at his company, Berkshire Hathaway. But

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I saw this chart. Over the past forty five years,

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Berkshire has returned three hundred and thirty one thousand percent

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 2>compared to the S and P five hundred and fourteen

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 2>thousand percent. However, during the same time frame, gold basically

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>kept even with Berkshire. He didn't really beat that, and

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 2>it really kind of goes into this monetary debasement. And

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>he said, the tendency of government to want to debase

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>its currency over time, there's no system that beats that.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>You can pick dictators, you can pick representatives, you can

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 2>do anything, but there will always be a push towards

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.239
<v Speaker 2>weaker currencies. The natural course of government is to make

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the currency worth less over time. He seemed to sort

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 2>of make the case for bitcoin even though he hates

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin and he hates gold. I'm curious your take, as

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you said, sort of this volatile nature that we're going

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 2>into markets potentially looking very risky risk assets. You called

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that as this world sort of goes through this sort

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of breakup, if you will, do you see like a

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>rush to gold and bitcoin assets really kind of taken over.

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about gold first. What's interesting about gold

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is they're making it money again. If you've been following

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Basil three and July first of this year, it's going

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to be instituted in the US. Gold will be considered

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>tier one capital and not paper gold, so not the

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>ETFGLD or futures, physical gold. And so banks are going

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to start and already have been acquiring gold because you

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can lend against it, you can create money from it.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>In seventy one, when we DEALNK from gold, they turn

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it into a commodity. They're making it money. Yeah, and

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>so gold, interestingly enough is being re liquefied as money.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why gold is doing what it's doing. Slowly,

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think physical gold I want to I don't want

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to encourage people to buy paper gold, physical gold. Bitcoin.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is a legitimate asset, the only and I missed it,

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I'll just say that I did. I

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>did not get involved. Bitcoin at the moment is very volatile,

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and if you're looking at it as a hedge against

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a coming recession, just be careful because I'm a math guy,

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's very highly correlated to the nasdack and the

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>NAS deck is a risk asset, so you know, think

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of it as a part of your portfolio. And you

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>never should have all your eggs in one basket. You know,

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be one hundred percent gold one hundred percent.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>But bitcoin so and cash is also an asset temporarily

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>because if things are going to deflate. Even though cash

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>traditionally held over long periods of time, it's not a

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>good idea. Look at what Warren Buppet's doing right now.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>He's hold he's holding he owns four point six percent

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the t boll market. Uh, that's cash. Effectively, he's

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>earning four percent on it, four point three percent, and

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he's making the bet that cash is a good trade

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at the moment because he's going to pick up bargains

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in in a in a dislocation. So so cash is

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>also an assets. But but you know, if if someone

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>had to put a gun in my head, and I've

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>been telling people, look, uh, just have some dry powder

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of the volatility that's coming. Don't be

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>don't be over levered, and don't be one hundred percent

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>any risk asset. Yeah.

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I was just thinking again sort of looking at Buffett's

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.239
<v Speaker 2>record and again gold sort of keeping up with what

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Berkshire did and to the point that you're making, uh

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe with the recession in front of us, but then

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 2>probably a big uh stimulus print on the back end

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and not just the US, China, et cetera. And then

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>you think about as the world continues to break apart

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and do they want to trust US treasuries and so

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>then maybe those are the tailwind sort of catalysts for

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 2>for bitcoin and gold. But that's that's more longer term.

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 2>You guys are focused a little bit more shorter term.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, Look, if if bitcoin could prove to me

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>mathematically it was delinking from risk assets, that would be interesting.

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we need time to you know, see

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that right now, it's not historically, it's it's it acts

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.959
<v Speaker 1>like a risk asset, and that's that's fine. You know,

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it keeps printing new highs over time. But you know,

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna, if you think of receptions coming and

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you put all your money in bitcoin hoping to avoid uh,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, preserving your capital, I'd be lary of that.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's all I'm saying. And maybe bitcoin de couples

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>during this recession and holds its value that yet, you know,

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, that could prove me wrong. But historically the

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>correlation is it's a risk asset. So until that changes,

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is.

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, what about I mean in it seems like

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 2>in times of high inflation, those assets tend to get correlated,

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>which is why like the sixty to forty bond, you know,

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 2>stock portfolio is dead. They're sort of moving into unison

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 2>right now. And you know, in twenty eight and twenty twenty,

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>when the markets plunged, gold also crashed along with those.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 2>So is everything somewhat kind of correlated and tied together

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 2>at this point?

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>No gold gold gold also, I mean, let's not forget

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>during the Great Financial Crisis, gold went down fifty percent

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>when when the when Lehman crisis hit, primarily because you know,

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in a in a margin call that's global, you sell

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:00.959
<v Speaker 1>what you can, not what you want too, so everything

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>gets hit, especially if it's on leverage. So but interestingly enough,

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>gold recovered quite quickly once you're a new high. The

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>US stock markets took longer, uh to do that. So

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's why Warren Buffett is probably in T

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>bills because you know, in a dislocation like that where

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>everything goes down, T bills don't go down, and then

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you you know, you know you have dry powder and

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then you start scooping up everything.

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think I saw you probably know better.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it was just off of the treasury allocation.

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 2>He's making twelve or fourteen billion a year, I think

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 2>some crazy number like that.

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, basically he's getting paid to sit to wait

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what he's he's determined that risk assets are too expensive.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>He's not trying to time the market, but he's decided

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>he'll wait for a correction and then he'll go back.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That's basically what he's telling you.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 2>All Right, So in your report, you're projecting, and we'll

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 2>link to that down below. I people want to check

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 2>that out. But you're projecting that there's some big recession

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.879
<v Speaker 2>coming up, you know this year, probably in twenty twenty five,

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of lay that out what people should be watching,

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 2>paying attention to, and sort of what you think from

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a big picture, their sort of life raft is through

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 2>that moment.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, again it's structural, it's endogenous to the

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>US economy being it's a cycle. It's going to happen,

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and housing is going to be the one that leads it.

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly enough, housing has eighteen year cycles. The last one

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand and seven. Carlos in his book in

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one wrote about a housing crisis appearing sometime

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in twenty five twenty six, And as we wrote the report,

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing it, you know, we're seeing it in real time.

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>It's early indicators that lead new permit. New permits started

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>collapsing in twenty two. That's a leading indicator. So what

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing our completions. Once the completions dry up, that's

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>an indication there's no demand. And we're starting to see

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that new tenant rents have been coming down. That's probably

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 1>due to the illegals either self deporting or the stop

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of the flow. And new tenant rens lead all tenant

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>rents which lead home prices, and so it's just a cycle.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Government spending is on the margin being cut and that's

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>going to affect the economy and consumption, and we're expecting

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>this to become apparent sometime in the fall. The stock market. Unfortunately,

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>we have a housing problem and a AI bubble, so

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a deflation of both. We think

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the AI bubble has already popped and is in process

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of popping. We think we saw peak spend in Q

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one and it's downhill from there. And it's it's just

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>classic second derivative stuff and there'll be you know, credit contraction.

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>The money supply I will come down, velocity of money

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>will come down, and it will cause a deflationary scare.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>And if that'll come in and do what it does,

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and stock prices will revolt and people will blame Trump people,

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>people will blame tariffs. But it's just a classic cycle.

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>And we go into our reports eighty five pages. We

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>have also a video of us going over an executive presentation,

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>which we also provide, so it comes with three components report,

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>executive presentation, and an hour long video of Carlos and

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I going over it and It's on our website at

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 1>finance technologies dot com. It's stilled with a pH and

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 1>if you buy the report, you'll get free updates as

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we track this and when we think the bottom is in,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll get If you buy this report, you'll get that

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>report for free.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, that's a compelling case. I appreciate you

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:51.280
<v Speaker 2>sharing that with us.

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll wait and see.

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm hopeful, but we'll wait and see see how this

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 2>all plays out.

0:36:58.640 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot, Mark,