WEBVTT - Gary Cohn talks AI and How It Productive It Is 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news bringing out to that

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>special conversation that we mentioned at Bloomberg in Vest, Gary Coheneweischer,

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>IBM and Bloomberg's Matt Miller.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's watch and listen live. Yeah, we have right now.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>During that period of time, you had to pre program

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge database with all of the answers because we

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the real time connectivity to the data around

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. Today, if you were going to play Jeopardy,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you would completely do it differently. You would just allow

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the AI machine to go get the answer instantaneously. Forty

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>years ago, you had to sort of put the answers

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in the room and hope that Jeopardy asked the questions

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in the categories you wanted. It was easier to program

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>all the chess moves. Today, you know, AI has evolved

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>dramatically and I think we're all living through this. I

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>would say evolution. I'm not sure it's a revolution evolution

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of AI. You know, we've gone from the concept and

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at sort of CEO surveys or corporate surveys,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a year or two ago, I think it

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was ninety about ninety percent of CEOs said, they, you know,

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly we're going to be involved in use AIAI. And

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of those ninety percent, less than ten percent could actually

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>tell you what they were going.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 2>To use it for.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>They just felt like they needed to talk about using it. Today,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>I think the amount of CEOs they are using AI

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>continues to grow, but more importantly, they actually know what

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 1>they're going to use it for, and the definitional outcomes

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>of where AI can enhance your business is becoming clear.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>That's where they are today. I think it's going to

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to evolve to where you can use AI in

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>your business and where the paybacks are and how you create.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Real productivity growth.

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I won't geek out on productivity growth, but at the

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, you know, if you want to

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>grow GDP and you want to grow your economy, it

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is all about getting more productivity, getting more units of

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>work your labor force.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think about this a lot in a competitive sense.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>If you're a big business and you haven't figured out

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>how you're going to.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Use AI yet, are you too late? Have you lost out?

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You're never too late. You're never too late. You know

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>what you may be late is you may be at

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a competitive disadvantage to your nearest competitor because they may

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to do certain things more efficiently than you,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But you can catch up quickly, so you're not that

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>far behind. So you have to sort of figure out

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>where the opportunities are in your business. And it depends

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on size, scope scale of your business, so like a

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>very obvious place where in a bigger company. And this

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is something we did at IBM, and we've talked about it.

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>We like being client zero for all of our products.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we did something relatively simple. It sounds simple,

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>but it was not that simple, an HR chat pot.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 2>You think of what most people use.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>HR for after the day one hiring experience of what

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they want is, you know, they go buy an apartment,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they go rent an apartment, they get some they need

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a reference letter, they need a reference leative. What day

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>did I start working? How long have I worked here?

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>What was my last year's conversation? What was my bonus?

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And you want that scent like that minute. And you

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>know in a year, a year or two ago, used

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to call someone in HR, used to give them the information.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You said, tell them where you want it sent, and

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you hope and pray they send it out quickly. Today

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you're at IBM, you will type it into a HR

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>chatbot and in a minute you said hit send, the

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>letter will go out. So people are actually very happy.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I get what I want. I get

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>all this information. You have information about your benefit and

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>information about your healthcare. We do it all real time.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>We cut six hundred people out of our HR department.

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Now we didn't fire them, we redeployed them to places

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>where they can be more useful.

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>And our satisfaction scores for.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Our employees using HR has gone up dramatically because they

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>get real time answers. So it depends what you're trying

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to achieve in your company. You know, there's a lot

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of people using AI today and.

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Code assist in writing new code.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you're in a big code writing shop or

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>writing new code is important to you, and you're at

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a disadvantage.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Because your competitors are using a.

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Code assist program and you're you're at a competitive disadvantage.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You take a lot of people here on financial services industry,

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>most banks happen to know what banks do. Most banks

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>historically build a technology infrastructure on a sort of as

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>needed basis, and if you go pull back the covers.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>They've got lots of different systems in a variety of

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>different languages, and when you try and integrate them and

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>have them talk to each other, it's very difficult. So

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>every bank during the course of the last decade or

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty years tried to think, how do I get all

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of my software? How do I get all my systems

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on a common language. It was an arduous task that

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was cost prohibitive. Today it's not cost prohibitive. Today you

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>can get a code assist bot to basically port one

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>language over to another pro another language, and it's pretty

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>flawless and how it happens. So there's a lot of

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>places evolving today where AI is very useful, and it.

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Depends on your I think your circumstances.

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask you about the cost because I

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 3>think the reason it was so daunting in my mind,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 3>especially for a information technology company, is I was looking

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 3>at open AI and thinking, you've got to invest one

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollars to create a large language model, and

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 3>only a few of these giant hyperscalers in Silicon Valley

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 3>can do it.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, Deep Seek, although there are questions about how exactly

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 3>they did it how much it costs, shows that you

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 3>can do it for far less.

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you the Chinese Deep Seek for proving out

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of us knew in this country but

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>no one wanted to listen to. So if you look

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>at what we've been doing at IBM, you look at

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what met has been doing, you look at a lot

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of companies here in the United States been doing. We've

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>been building small models.

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 2>What we have found and Deep Seek sort of proved

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>this out. The small models are much.

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>More efficient, they compute faster, they take less power, but

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>they're not a model that can do everything. They're sort

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of targeted models. So the things that I was talking

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to you about, we have small models that are used

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.679
<v Speaker 1>for specific targeted goals. I think that is the future.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>We think that is the future of AI. We think

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>most companies will engage with as many small models as

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they need to get done what they need to get

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>done where they're using AI, and it will be vastly

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>more efficient, vastly more cost effective for them. And I

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>think this is the future where we're going. Look, will

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there be some large language models out there that are effective, Yes,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but they will sort of be the catch all models

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for everything, so.

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>It still costs a lot of money to invest. I

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 3>think Moody's estimated it's going to be two billion dollars

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.559
<v Speaker 3>in investment over the next five years, which doesn't seem

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that far off when I look at the kapex plans

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 3>of these mag seven companies. You and I both lived

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>through the Internet bubble and watched so many companies put

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 3>money into paying down fiber cable and build the infrastructure

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>the data centers of Web one point zero for a

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of CAPEX when they weren't getting a lot of

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>return on investment, at least not for years if they

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 3>ever did.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Do you see real parallels here? Yeah? Yes.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Look, as you're building technological infrastructure and backbone, you're building

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it based on the available what's available today.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>In what you know today, the whole.

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>AI backbone infrastructure, compute technology, it's moving very fast. But

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't wait for version two point zero or version

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>three point zero, version four point oh, you have to

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>build based on what's build what's available today. What's available

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>today will be obsolete a lot of it before it

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>gets built, and it will get replaced.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 2>By newer and newer versions.

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So there is a bunch of money being spent today,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll have very low returns to no returns. But if

0:07:59.920 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't start investing, you'll never start.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>So you sort of have this.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Prisoner's dilemma that I have to start building this data

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>center and I think I'm going to be putting x

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>y z chip in, but by the way it gets

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>built in two years, I may not be putting most

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>likely will not be putting that chip in, And the

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of power I think I need to run that

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>data center may be dramatically less because the next chip

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I bet is going to be a lot more efficient

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>than the chip we have today. So a lot of

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>this build you can't wait for the efficient frontier because someone's.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Always going to be out there.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to keep building, and there will be a

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of waste to get there. I just think it's inevitable.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, these AI models themselves are going

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to build upon themselves, and they're gonna get smarter and smarter,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to optimize and re optimize, and everything's

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get better and faster and quicker, and ultimately

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the AI of this of the data center is going

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>to tell you how to build better data center, how

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>to build better connectivity, how to optimize the optimization.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 3>What do you do though as an investor, I mean,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, as an IBM or as a Microsoft or

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 3>as you point out, they don't have any choice, They've

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 3>got to build now. But what do you do as

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>a as a private investor or what do you do

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>as someone who's looking at markets?

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 2>How do you analyze that? Well, it's interesting if you

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>look at the.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>History and the history of technology is not that old,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at you know, sort of what's

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>going on here. Ultimately, the bigger companies are going to have.

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 2>A real big impact in this now.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It's really and then I'll point out that all the

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger companies that we talk about today, whether it be

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the Metas or the Googles. You know, I remember when

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook started, it was a really small company.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not that old. I'm old enough, but I'm

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 2>not that old.

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So all these big companies, I remind people, start out

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as really small companies. So there are a bunch of

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>small companies so that are going to be really big

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>companies in less in that path, one of these bigger

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>companies can buy them out. You know, We've now got

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that can go spend on hundred million dollars in

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>buy out a company you know, relatively easily today. So

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if you were looking at what you think is the

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>most likely path, I think the most likely path is

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the big I don't know if it's the mag seven,

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but the bigger companies who are spending the most in

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>CAPEX are the most likely winners, and they will you know,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>they many will.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Fund some of these startups.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And almost all of the big companies have huge venture

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>arms because they're trying to spend money in these startups.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to get.

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Opportunities to let creative people create, and then as those

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>products become really valuable, they're just going to buy them

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and merge them into the bigger companies. So, you know,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess my investment advice is, like, you can own

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>some of these small companies and most are private, and

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're probably interesting to own a portfolio of them. But

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me where I think this is going

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a decade from now, I think the bigger

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>companies are going to dominate the space.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Is that part of what you're doing at IBM? I mean,

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 3>do you help Arvin Krishna maybe zone in on some targets.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>We definitely have a ventures portfolio.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>We're always looking for something that's on the cutting edge

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that fits within our parameters.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, where there's.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Hybrid cloud, open AI, quantum, you know.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>But we're very much in the open source.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna buy open source company if it fits

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>within our parameters and we think it's got an interesting opportunity.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It's in our shareholder's best interest for us to get

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>involved in the company early, not late.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>By the way, a little bit detached from the specific

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 3>AI conversation, what do you think about the M and

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I M and A landscape right now?

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>When we came into.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 3>This year, me and Shanali and Katie, we're joking about

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 3>an opinion writer who said, maybe there won't be that

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 3>many deals because everybody said this is going to be

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the year you know that the regulators drop their guard

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and everybody can get together. Now it's starting to look

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 3>like that may not be the case.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was the total market euphoria from November election

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>January twentieth. Was deregulation, ease of doing business, the FDC,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the CFDC, the SEC, everything C is going to get

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>easier and be much more pro business and we're going

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to have this huge influx, this huge, massive explosion of

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>deals of M and A, deals of IPO deals.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Look, we're forty five or forty six days into this.

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to judge this book by its cover,

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but the first forty five days we've not had an

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>explosion of deals. In fact, probably based on what's going

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>on in markets right now, in market.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Multiples, we've probably lost deals.

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So I would say the calendar from January twenty today

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is smaller than it was. That's not a regulatory statement,

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a valuation statement. And you also have to be

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>reminded that some of these commissioners are not in place

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>heads of SEC. Even the FDC doesn't have a full

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Republican slate, it's got two Republicans too Democrats, so it's

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to get things through on to too. These things

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>take more time, So I think some of that euphoria

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is still there, but I think more people are taking

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the approach of Okay, you're going to have to show me.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>It's a different environment than just trust me. I think

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>we've gone from trust me to show me.

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to get back to regulation in a minute,

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 3>as it pretends to AI, But you mentioned productivity. You

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 3>don't want to geek out on it. We haven't seen

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 3>much of an impact yet from.

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>A on productivity.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I actually have a chatbot now open next to my

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg screens every morning, so make you more productive. It's

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually getting a lot more detail into my newscast

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>than I would otherwise.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I use it as more of a glorified search.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 3>But we haven't really seen it boost the numbers economically,

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 3>And I wonder when you think we're going to see

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 3>that and if it's going to actually have an effect

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 3>on jobs. You mentioned that you've moved HR people out

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 3>because you can replace them with in that role with AI.

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Are we going to see you know, an uptick in

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>or a loss in non farm payrolls because of it?

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So we've also created you know, artificial workers, you know,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So we now can create artificial workers in certain in

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>our consulting business. We now have artificial workers who you know,

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>will work twenty four hour days, which is.

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Kind of nice, just like Doge. Yeah, so.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm going to make that you

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>made that comparison, I will not own that comparison. So

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>let let's talk about your question. I think your question is,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if AI is going to be successful, are

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>we going to see a real impact to labor and

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>employment numbers around the world?

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Let leonne in the United States.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So my pretty bold answer is, and I always say

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this to rooms, to people like this who usually first

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>question I get is isn't this devastating the economy? I say, look,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the rest of the time I'm up here,

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>which is very short at this point, so it's not

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time. I'll give you the rest time

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm up to come up with a major technological advancement

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that destroyed jobs, and you can go.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Back and you can take anyone you want.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And so like, let's just take the internal combustion engine

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that was supposed to destroy jobs because all those people

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they cleaned stalls and put.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Shoes on horses, they were going to lose their jobs.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, but all of a sudden, the next day when

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we started putting internal combustion engines on the streets. We

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>needed mechanics, we needed gas stations, we needed we needed

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>different skill sets, different people. But all of a sudden,

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>there were more jobs created because people could go you know,

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty miles a day or a hundred miles a day

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>versus two miles a day, so their landscape, their business

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>model expanded. It's no different than when the internet. Like

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I worked at a bank before we had email. We

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>used to have every floor head had a person that

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>printed the memos and put it in your mailbox and

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>told you what time the meeting was or told you

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what time to go. What happened to that person who

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>delivered the mail on the floor and printed the memos.

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, they sort of disappeared overnight.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Now we didn't have less people.

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, every bank, I guarantee you since the invention

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of email.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Is double its size.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Why because we got more productive. We got email coverage,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so we could cover more clients. We could cover more

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>people around the world. We could communicate quicker, we could

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>communicate faster. I think AI is the next leg in

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>this evolution of making us more productive. So look, will

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there be a change in skill sets?

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Will people do jobs that they hate?

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>The machine can input data. The machine can take codes

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>out of an operating room in a hospital and input

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>them into the insurance reimbursement system. By the way, that

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>job in a couple of hospitals has like forty fifty

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>percent turnover rates because people hate doing that, they shouldn't

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. Those people in that hospital can now do

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a job where they try and work on recoveries and

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the hospital gets paid back. So I think you will

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>see like this natural evolution of people out of jobs

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>that they don't like, jobs with load dissatisfaction ratings, jobs

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that have higher satisfaction rates, that are more productive and

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>grows the economy.

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 2>That's the history of every.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Other technological advancement we see. It's not overnight. That's why

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I call this an evolution, not a revolution. All right,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and all this, by the way, we probably won't have time,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but AI I believe is just a stepping stone to

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the real outcome, which is.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Quantum, which is I'm guessing you also think ten to

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years off, No sooner, sooner, and how soon.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Five years.

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>The strides that is being made in quantum right now

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are large.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's a lot more.

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Look again, there's a lot of private capital going in

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to quantum.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 2>It's big companies and small companies. It's all about error correction.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>How quickly you can correct their how quickly you can

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>compute the data is pretty interesting right now. So you know,

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as we have evolve, you know, everything in this technology

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>space is speeding up.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'll you know, five years all right, fascinating.

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to ask about regulation because you mentioned AI

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 3>is going to help us create better AI, and I

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 3>wonder what else AI is.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Going to decide to do for us. Do we need

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>to regulate it?

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Do we need to have a heavy hand here, or

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>is it okay to have a few South African billionaires

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 3>just say like, go, I don't.

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Know, I don't know what you're talking about.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to chat EPT and ask that what that is.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 2>So look, the answer is yes.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And I sit on a couple of these big regulatory

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>boards around the world, so I'll do this relatively quickly.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>If it's a regulated activity today, if you use a

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>it should be a regulated activity using AI. So an

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>example of that is if I'm going to call my

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>doctor and tell my doctor that I got a scratchy throat,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>a headache, a swelling of this d D and he

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>or she puts it in a machine and they're going

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to diagnose my disease and prescribe me medicine. That's a

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>highly regulated business today. The AI machine that does that

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and the program that does should be highly regulated. On

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the flip side, if when I'm working out tomorrow morning,

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Spotify chooses a bad song for me and I have

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to hit skip, which they do a lot, you.

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Know, I'm not sure that needs to be a regulated activity.

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I can get through my workout in the morning listening

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to one bad song and skipping a bad song. So

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>my view is, Look, we've decided what businesses are regulated.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>We know what business should not be regulated. We should

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>not use AI as a wedge to regulate more businesses.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, we shouldn't use AI to take

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>businesses today that deserve regulation and take them out of regulation.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, we have one audience question here on tariffs.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing how you got an other question on your card.

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Does this strategy make sense to you as a way

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 3>to deter illegal immigration and fent and all smuggling from Canada? No, Seriously,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>we've seen for a couple of days in a row,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 3>markets really come down. We've seen rates come down from

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 3>four eighty to four twenty. President Trump has put twenty

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>five percent tariffs on our two closest trading partners after

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>he negotiated possibly the greatest trade deal in history with them, right, yeah, yes,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 3>does it make sense to you?

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean you were there.

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So look, I think what we have to understand and

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I understand this, but I think what

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to try and figure out is what.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Is the objective of the tariffs?

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And that, to me, I think that's where we're a

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of us are struggling. Is the tariffs meant to

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>make foreign products more expensive so the domestic product is cheaper.

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's a good use of a tariff.

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is a lot of the things that we

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>import we actually don't make here in the United States.

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can make the foreign product more expensive, it

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make the domestic product cheaper because we don't have it.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's a question I have is the But if

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>we put that tariff on, does that incentivize CAPEX to

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>build the capability to make that product? You could argue, Okay,

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not a bad long term outcome, because look, if

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>we took nothing else away from COVID, we should have

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>taken away from COVID. There are some strategic needs of

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>this country that we are just too dependent on the

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world for and we better figure out

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 1>how to be more self sufficient on necessity goods and items.

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So you know, when.

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>It's coming to buying personal protective equipment, we have to

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>import it from China. We need sterile gloves and masks

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>from China. Probably something we should manufacture in the United States.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>If we're worried about you know, toys and games, we

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>can live it at them. I don't think it's a

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>necessity items. So I think we have to figure out

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what the objective is. If the objective is to raise

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>money for the government, like make that the objective, I'm

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure how you do that, and how do you

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>do that with weighing the effects of inflation on the

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>other side, And I think you have to think about that.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So if we're just using it as a revenue raiser,

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it creates a higher cost of goods. It's a really

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>regressive way to raise revenue.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Because I hate to say it, like it's the.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Reality of it is, poor people or less highly paid

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>people consume one hundred percent of their paychecks. Wealthier people

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>consume a very small percentage of their paychecks, and they

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 1>have to consume their paychecks. So the things that are

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>being tariffed, they are things that every day people buy

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes a really regressive tax system. I don't

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think we want a regressive tax system. I'm the first

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>guy here that's going to argue for a progressive tax

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>system that be rich people need to pay more in

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this country. They should pay more, and they do pay

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>more today. I don't think we want to with that

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>around you, terraff. So to me, the question is what

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is the objective here? Like there may be a real robust,

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bona fide reason to have terriffs.

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know what we're trying to achieve, and

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you would know.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel like anyway there's a thoughtful answer, and I

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 3>appreciate your time.

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, thank you, thanks so much. Possible