WEBVTT - Taper and Timetable Are Key Issues for FOMC

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Clovel News. We continue to break um

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>or deal with, you know, outbreaks and some progress and

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>then some setbacks, Doctor Randa Meadows. Though Tim is present

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>population health over at Providence Health System, one of the

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.319
<v Speaker 1>largest nonprofit health systems in the US, and you might

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>remember they were home to the first confirmed COVID case

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>back in early so we really appreciate their perspective, she

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone and Rent in Washington. Doctor Meadows,

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>good to have you back with Tim and myself. How

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>are you and what are you guys seeing there out west?

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to COVID. It's great to be back

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with you. And what we are seeing is we still

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have some areas of spikes. Surge is still occurring, like

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in eastern Washington, Montana, and Alaska. But thankfully we're seeing

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of plateauing in California as well as

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in parts of our Again, Washington seems to be fairly

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>stable as well. We're not over the hump, but it's

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>over seeing a little bit Doctor Meadows Daylight coming true.

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Just to confirm are these outbreaks? Are these happening in

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>unvaccinated populations? Predominantly unvaccinated or small percent are vaccinated? Is

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that most of the let's can say the few that

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think our breakthrough vaccinated or usually people don't remune

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>compromise or other chronic illnesses behind them, um, but mostly unvaccinated.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And are you right now? Where are you right now?

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Falling when it comes to to boosters and what you're

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing as far as people coming in who want boosters

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or guide it's coming from a doctor's about who should

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>get a booster. So we're saying a lot of questions

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and inquiries coming in and we are actually sharing with

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>them what we know, UM, including the most recent announcement

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>coming about the FDA Panel of Advisors recommending boosters for

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are be ncompromised. We're waiting for their final

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>word on people who are over the age of sixty

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>five getting it, who are otherwise healthy. UM patients are

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>asking about it. You know, It's it's kind of a

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>mixed bag depending on which community you're in. Some anxious

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to get it and some still are waiting to get

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the first shot. I'm like, poke me as much as

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you want. I got my shot this morning. I'm like,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>um no, but it is. It is important, and I

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>do wonder we keep reminding doctor Meadows, you understand this

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>so well about the importance of community and so the

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>importance of individuals who don't even have a first shot

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of getting a first shot of making sure the developing

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>world is getting vaccinated, because we can't move forward as

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a global society and community unless most people get some

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>form of vaccination right or some kind of immunity. You

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely correct. If we leave anybody uncoverage, it becomes

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a hot spot that they convince spread. It's also a

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>hot spot for mutations to occur. So everybody needs to

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>get it. So I am curious, are we? There was

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>something I was reading or listening to this morning that

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think was looking at China specifically, how maybe they

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are they shut down kind of their cities. I mean,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>are we? I mean, this is it, this is how

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be moving forward. I mean, you can't

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>convince maybe everybody to get a vaccine. We kind of

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>know that already. Um So, are we going to be

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>constantly in a state of we'll see some COVID outbreaks,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>people would be getting boosters. I don't know. Like that's

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to understand. You know, I think, first

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, I think it's too early to tell, but

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that I'm going to agree with

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you that I hope certainly not. I think what's going

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen as well, we'll slowly but surely convinced more

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>people to get the vaccine. Um, the people who actually

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 1>have gotten sick from COVID may now become our best

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>folkespeople from encouraging their family and communities to do it. Um.

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think this is going to continue just

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>forever if that's not the way that vaccines and pandemics work.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I think what we're going to find is

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see the count's starting to go

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>down again closer coming into December, unless another new variant

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>comes up, UM, and I think eventually over the next

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of years it will start to blend in a

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. So. You just mentioned you got your

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>flu vaccine. There may be a time when we're getting

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>a flu vaccine and a COVID mixed together combination vaccine yesterday.

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I will do that yesterday. Dr Meadows. As a parent,

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>what should we know about or how concerned should we

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be about about kids? What are you seeing in the

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Providence health system when it comes to kids who are

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>severely all those who don't even have the chance right

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>now to get vaccinated because they're not old enough. We're

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>seeing an increase in the number of children who not

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>only are testing positive of but even because it's the

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of the number of people are exposed, including children,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing more kids coming into our hospitals and becoming

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more s really ill. Thankfully, Um, the mortality or death

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>rates from them is still relatively low. But I gotta

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you, if it's just one kid and it's my kid,

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that's way too many. Agreed. To put that out there. Agreed, agreed, Um,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to Meadows. Sit tight. We just have to do

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of news. But we will come back

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and I would love to continue with you. Dr Ronda

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Meadows is our guest president of Population Health at Providence

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Health System, joining us on the phone from Wenton, Washington.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you just kind of waiting? I mean you have

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a little one. Yeah, we do. So. Part of the

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>reason I was off over the last week is because

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>he started preschool, so we did. It's like a phase

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and thing all parents are familiar with this when kids

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>start preschool. You know they're they're going into an hour

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half and eventually you know a few hours

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and then all day. Um. But you know, he's not

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>keeping his mask on. He's two and a half. He's

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not he's supposed to wear a mask at school. Not

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>keeping his mask on, But who can blame him, he's

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. He's two and a half. It's

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>not required at the school. They's suggested, but you can't

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>really require it to an aff yeal to wear masks,

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>right exactly right there, little critters, And like, so what

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>do you do? So are you kind of bracing? Yeah?

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Well so they do weekly tests, which is great. The kids. Yeah,

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the kids. Yeah, it's very hard to teach it to

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>year old how to spit. But then I learned how

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to do it and it just doesn't stop. Yeah. Great,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Probably stay tuned. All right, folks, we're gonna come back

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>with Dr Meadows in just a moment talking about the

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>day's latest COVID headlines. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser, my co host Tim Stanovic. This is

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get back to Dr Ronda Meadows. She's

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>President of Population Health at Providence Health System. Still with

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone and written Washington. So one of

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've certainly seen as society stressed, we've

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>seen healthcare workers stressed. Uh, Dr Meadows, what are you

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>seeing on that front? So absolutely not just stressed, but

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>exhausted and um and dismayed by by some of the

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>contempt that they feel for the very people they're trying

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to help. UM. So, our cases are increasing, our hospitalizations,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean What do you mean by that?

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean on account you know? Oh, actually

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>what I need is UM. Not only are people that

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are on vaccity becoming end to seeking care, but those

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some of those same people are standing outside of our

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>hospitals who are protesting against vaccinations. UM. They get letters

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>left on the on their car shield when they come

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>out from a long shift working the emergency room or

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in the hospital. UM, they see the social media UM

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>disparaging comments against them what they're trying to do. So

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about the vaccine. It's basically about their

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>efforts to try to help people and say people and

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>promote the science getting a vaccine, reducing the transmission and

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>reducing the number of people who need hospital care. On

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the first place, Well, we live in a world of

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>scarce resources, and one narrative that has emerged over the

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks has been the way that I see

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>use in certain parts of the country have filled up,

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and you see percentages in the high nineties in some

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>places in the past few weeks, and I wonder about

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the decisions that doctors have to make about, Okay, who

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is able to use this scarce resource that we have,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it's UH, you know a certain number of of

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>nurses per patient, um or a certain number of patients

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>per nurse, And I'm wondering what goes through a doctor's

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>head when they have to make those decisions. Well, first,

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that the doctors aren't making the

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>decisions alone. We are actually actually a well prepared to

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>try to make the decision. They're still hard, um. I

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>think what you're referring to is will we go to

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a crisis standard of care when we're trying to make

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a decision about what little resources, how will we use

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>them as we will we use them for and what so?

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>How do we decide that kind of stuff? You know,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be in a position where you're

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>having to ration care, but that's where we are in

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>some places. And Tim, I want to tell you it's

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>not just about rationing care, but people who are being

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>treated for COVID's rationing resources for anybody who needs that ventilator,

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>oxygen therapy. The doctors are nurses. That's what I mean.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Frustrating to patients and to caregivers if people who are

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>using resources that essentially don't need to be there, People

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who could have been vaccinated and wouldn't even be in

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the hospital and perhaps are making it more difficult on

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>patients you have a heart attack or some other emergency condition.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, and we see that and we feel it.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And for the most part, I think our doctors, nurses,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>caregivers that are in the they're trying their best to

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>do what they can, but they're only human. Well, we

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>wish you luck exactly, um, and that's something we need

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to remember in terms of what's going on today, what's

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>going on tomorrow, and we really appreciate getting another glimpse

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of what you are seeing. Dr Rhonda Meadows stay Safety Well,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>President of Population Health at Providence Health System, as you

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>might recall, home to the first COVID nineteen case confirmed

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>back in January. She joined us on the phone from

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>written Washington. That's tough. It's something we're approaching the two

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>year mark as to where you know, when COVID was

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>circulating around the world in the United States, and it's

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>just it's mind boggling to two years. Two years and

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, like my daughter's gone back to school, she's

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in college now, and they have a vaccination policy, but

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>they gave some leeway of kids to get vaccines after

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they came back to school, and there are cases coming

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>out and they're keeping kids in classes, but they're trying to,

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to make it work, but it's tough

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>in masks and class masks and class many closed place yep, yep.

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And there is a vaccine mandate, but again they were

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>allowing kids to kind of get vaccines. So far, so good,

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So far, so good, but there are there are cases

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>that that are definitely breaking out. This is Bloomberg Big

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>to This Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick takes

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the upcoming sooner than

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you think issue Bloomberg Business This Week out later this week.

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Already though on the Bloomberg and at business week dot Com.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a story that takes us Tim inside Amazon's flagship

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>fulfillment center outside Seattle, and it's all about algorithms and robots.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>They rule sooner than you think. They're here already. Joe

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Weber is editor at Bloomberg Business Week. He's with us

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Matt Dave is technology reporter.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>He wrote the story. He's with Bloomberg News and he

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Seattle. Uh, Joel, what

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is so special about this one fulfillment center that Matt profiles.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's outside Seattle, and it has the reputation of

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>being a flagship sort of almost like a like a

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>test lab. I guess you could think of it as

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of that is just, you know,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>proximity to h Q. You can get those executives, executives

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>coming by and saying, hey, in a second, how do

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys do things here? But what they've really done,

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the significance of this is that this was

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the first fulfillment sale center that was able to process

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>more than a million packages a day, and so obviously

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, once they optimized that, it was like

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>what else can we take it? Um And And the

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>secret to that, though, as Matt has revealed, is that

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of algorithms. There's a few robots, and

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the humans work for all of them, right, Matt, Yeah,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Honestly, the starting point for this story, I

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>met a guy who used to work at Amazon, went

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and jump somewhere else and he said, Man, I'm doing

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so many things that I never had to do back

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>when I was at an Amazon warehouse. They just automated

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>all of that for me. Well, tell us more as

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you walk um BF I four, which is this massive

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fulfillment center outside uh Seattle, tell us about it. Did

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you go visit? I did, Yeah, And it's the place

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been a couple of times over over the years

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>writing about Amazon. You know, as Joel said, they'd love

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to have folks in for tours. They're really proud of

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the facility. It's just a big excurban rectangle beside the

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen football yield. Go in and there's this kind of

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>low hum. But the weird thing for me is it's

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of quiet. Everybody's sort of in their own station.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, most people, probably by number, are are putting

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>something in a shelf um that's brought to them by

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a robot, or recreating something from a shelf and sending

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>on down the line. Um. You know, a couple of

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand people a day just you know, doing roughly most

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of them the same task over and over again, whether

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's picking something off the shelf, putting in a package,

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and taking orders from from a smartphone app all time.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>What does your instinct tell you about a facility? Like

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this when you walk inside it and you see it,

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>does it seem like, given the number of packages it's

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>able to process a day, does it seem like more

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people should be there? You know, it really does. Um

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that the places there's a there's a low hum, but

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of you really quiet, like you would

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you would assume hearing figures like a million packages the day,

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that there'll be more more frenzy. But Amazon's just got

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it down to such a science that everyone's just sort of,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, quietly going about their business that at their station, um,

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>quietly working for algorithms and robots. So what is the

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>hue to that they even told that? Well, it's it's

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, working an Amazon warehouses often an unpleasant place

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>and has been been widely reported. Um. Amazon's productivity tracking

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>systems are are real precise, right. They can tell when

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you're working, They can tell when you put down the scanner,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, So if you're in one of these frontline jobs,

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there's always this voice you know sometimes that it's just

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>literally account countdown clock on your workstation telling you, um,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, exactly what they expect you to be able

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to do. And Amazon, the very aggressive company sets that

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>target real high. Um. So that's that's the life for

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the front line. But one of the things that interested me,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>especially given that that story is so well known, as so,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>what the heck the managers do in this construct? Right,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>if if these people are working kind of self directed,

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>what what are the people you know, at the top

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of the pyramid in a building like this, what do

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they all do all day? Well, they get to manage

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more people, right, they do um and and

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what they do is HR essentially. You know,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're trying to take it the best set of people.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to troubleshoot when something goes wrong, you know,

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>just because again all of the soft where whizzes that

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon have taken taken things out of their hands, right,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't do um staffing planning at a at a

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>granular way. A lot of you know, warehouses in any

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>company will do right. Most places you go to work

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the boss or the schedule tells you

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>where to go here, the schedule gripped up by by algorithm. Right,

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much that's been taken off their shoulders

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of with the aim of getting getting this this

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>thin line of managers to effectively manage thousands and thousands

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of people. Um. So when you when you think about this,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>actually just real basic question. What's b F I F

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>stand for? What? What is that? So it is a

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>reference to uh an airport in Seattle called Boeing Field.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Every every Amazon building across the country takes its name

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>from from whatever the regional airport is. Okay, So that

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was a big question I forgot to ask during the

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>edity confessional. But is you get to know how the

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>sausages made? The other thing is you know, obviously this

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat of a secret weapon for Amazon and is

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed them to really become such a dominant company. But

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>how does this automation compare with you know, the Walmarts

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and the targets of the world that that compete with them.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Folks are definitely closing the gap. Um. Amazon has you know,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>built a lot of its technology, It's bought a lot

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of its technology. We read about their their similar acquisition

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of a little robot maker called Kiva back in twelve

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that gave him a real big head start. Um. But

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>companies you know are imitating what Amazon does and they

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are closing that gap, right Amazon's biggest advantage a few

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago was getting things out of these buildings as

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>fast as they can. You know today they're looking for

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for secrets also, well, just because you know, the targets

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world, the Walmarts of the world are are

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of taking their cues from Amazon's robotifizes fulfillment and

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and put it in their own operations. Not from a

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>financial perspective, the ultimate goal for for any company that

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>has this many employees is to reduce the number of

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>employees because they're so expensive. Help us see into the

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>future and Amazon's ability to actually automate nearly everything. Amazon

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>has a set aside full automation as a long term goal. UM,

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it's something there their technology teams and their roboticists are

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>working towards. I think realistically they don't see that as

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>practical for a long long time. UM, but that doesn't

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>mean they can't get savings along the way, right We

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>We talked to some folks who had insight into their

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>key acquisition and said they saved something like on labor

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>costs in the first implementations of their Their robots come

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to people, um operating methods. So there's there's definitely a

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of costs that that Amazon can look to reduce,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, without going kind of that that dream of

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of a fully automated to samably that doesn't require any

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>any humans at all. So how much better has this

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff gotten with with practice in time? Is there any

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of that? We do know that how to call it?

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>In a in a five or six year period, they

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>were maybe three times as fast, right, it's date of

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the art. Warehouse um, you know, roughly a decade ago

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was doing something like three hundred thousand items a day,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, kicking us off, this facility can do

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>a million plus that that stat though I put an

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>afteriston that's getting a couple of years old now out,

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So it would not surprise me at all of Amazon

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is setting a new threshold and just just isn't quite

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>ready to brack about it yet. All right, So to

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be feared or imitated or both, oh, certainly both depending

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>on depending on your line of work. But yeah, they've

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely reshaped warehousing in their image with this kind of technology.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It's an incredible read. Um that day. Thank you tech

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News joining us from Seattle, Joe Weber

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>in our interactive Broker Studio. But I think it's interesting

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>because I think we expect robots and automation to take

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>some of the lower level jobs, but it sounds like

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you'll need fewer, maybe higher paying managers also in the

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>process if other companies start to follow what Amazon's doing,

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's like inevitable that other companies will write,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like if you're three hundred thousand packages a day to

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a million, it's like, how do I get that? How

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>do I get that? And how do I reduce costs

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in the process? All right, sound of the future. Alright,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run. Joe Webber, thank you so much. Check

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this out sooner than you think. That's the upcoming issue

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. You are listening to Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovik on Bloomberg Radio. So the

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>f O m C FED will reserve Open Market Committee,

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>kicking off its two day meeting today, decision we know

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>expected tomorrow. Fed officials Tim expected to hold interest rates

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>near zero while telegraphing tapering of the FEDS and twenty

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in monthly bond purchases in that policy statement

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that we get at two pm Wall Street time tomorrow.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But of interest, of course, as always j Pal's press conference,

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what he has to say about some of the concerns

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on investors minds Evergrand COVID, debt ceilings, inflation, jobs que

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on that subject bridge words, Ray Dalio caught up with

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>our Tom Keene earlier today and Dahlia saying another round

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of quantitative easy yep, another round none out of the question.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to get another round every another

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>round of q QUEI. You're predicting another round of QUEI,

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>not immediately. I think that what happens is you get

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a taper. I think like every tightening of interest rates

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>has been less than the one before it, since and

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>now when we had zero, then we did kwei, and

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>every QUEI has been larger than the one before before

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it because we've accumulated so much that and that we're

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>now printing. I think that you'll have probably one pull

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>back and then you set the markets down because the

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>duration of the bond market and the duration of assets

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is longer. That means interest rate sensitivity is greater. You

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have that particular correction, and then you'll have another round

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of that fascinating Bridgewater's ratelio earlier with our Tom Keene.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get another perspective. So glad to have back with us.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Steven Skanky, chief economic advisor at Kiel Point, former U S.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and White House National Security Council staff member based

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. And that's where we find him. Steve.

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you here with Tim and myself, So

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get that perspective. What do you think about another

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>round of QUEI at some point? Well, Carol, thanks, thanks

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for I mean to be back. It's always a pleasure

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to be with you. It certainly is possible that we'll

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>need to have another run of QI, but but that

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to be. What's out of the gate next.

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The Fed is is looking to start a tapering program.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>The market is expecting that. You know, August showed weak

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>employment growth and moderating inflation, so it's not like they

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have to do anything. I think it's fair to say

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that overall the economy hasn't made substantial further progress, which

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is their touchstone. But they they will talk about it.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>They will try to work out a plan I believe

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that they will hint at when it begins. But to

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the point that the radialio made, they could get into

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it and and find out that they have to reverse course.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Why why do you think that? What tells you what's

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the data that you point to when you say that

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy has not made further substantial progress? Well, just

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the August employment numbers. Uh, we're we're far weaker than

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>consensus and certainly what the FET is looking for. Um

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and even the expectation of retail sales, which turned out

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to be fine, we're below what. Uh, folks need to

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to see to see that the economy is really getting traction.

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like it's collapsing, but it's it's not

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>creating jobs at a at a pace that the bet

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>is is needing it to do still millions more to

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>get still, millions more steve to get back to work.

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, could we possibly be facing a scenario We're

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>not all of those jobs come back and it's a

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>different economy post pandemic. I think we're seeing that already, Carrol,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be a different economy. Um. The

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that the fact that the unemployment rate is falling,

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>but we still have large numbers of people looking for work. Uh.

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, the simates as to how many people are

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>looking for full time work in jobs that they would

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like to have is way beyond the number of people

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>who are listed as unemployed. The fact that we don't

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have any positive movement in the labor force participation rate

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>means that the growth opportunity is necessarily constrained. Um. The

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the impact of COVID, particularly in the United States, continues

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a big issue, and the government you could

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just see, is is struggling to see how how that's

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get worked out. You know, the moves of

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the president made a couple of weeks ago, we're surprising,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>but I think they point to the level of tanks

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and concern about what has to happen to getting people

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>back into the labor force and back to work and

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>back contributing to productive economic growth. Does that mismatch between

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>demand for jobs and supply of jobs is Does that

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you that we're going to see serious wage increases

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>from employers and that is a sign that inflation will

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be here to stay. We certainly can expect to see

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>um significantly meaningful increases in wages to to get the

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>people back to work. It seems to be that there's

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things going on. What is what is

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>technical and technology based. There have been some interesting articles

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on it on how the automatic of the automation of

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>resume scanning has put a big obstacle in getting resumes

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of people who would like the jobs actually hired into

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the job. You know that the second thing the concerned about,

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>COVID has has kept a lot of people whose ballot

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sheets are just fine from going back into the workplace.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we see that, we see that a lot heyt

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just got about seconds here, Um, Steve, I wanted to

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you, ever grand or China remaking its economy, are

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>we likely to hear anything uh from the FET on that?

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And should we or do you want to hear from

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the FET on that? Well? I certainly don't want to

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>hear from the FETE at that about that. If we

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>hear from the FET it means it's way worse than

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.479
<v Speaker 1>any of us think it is or ought to be. Uh.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of the day, that's that's

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>probably not a big issue for the US economy. Uh.

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly sparked some here in markets. But I think

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the good news about ever brand is that, uh, that

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>negative impact gets worked out pretty quickly. Hey, thirty more seconds,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>really quickly though. But if China's remaking its economy or

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brown and Bloomberg saying, you know, we may have

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 1>to get accustomed to much lower growth rates in China,

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is that something that would ultimately impact the global economy

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in a big way and possibly the US just quickly. Yes,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it will have a negative impact on global economic growth,

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think not so much on the United States.

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You are a gem, come back soon. Steve Skanky. He

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>is chief Economic Advisor at kill Point, former U S.

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and White House National Security Council staff member based

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. That's where he found him taking

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>lots of notes from that room a journal. Yeah, but

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no home, honey, please,

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the right drivel. I want to drive all

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>drive the questions dry. This is the drive to the

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>globe community. Thanks, we'll drying us Dawn on bloom Bird Radio.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, just about ten minutes left in today's trading session.

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>We have been bouncing around or offer highs and loads

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of this session. Green on the screen though, with those

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>major equity averages, but little changes in particular for the

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>TAO and the SMP now stack up four tons of

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a percent, as we heard from Charlie, biggest gain there

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>among those major equity averages. Let's get to it. Drive

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>to the close with Eric Schoenstein. He is managing director

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager Jensen Investment Management. They've got more than thirteen

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>point four billion in assets under management. Among the funds

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that he helps manage, the Jensen Quality Growth Fund, which

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>TIM is beating most of its peers in the past

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>three years, up nearly fourteen percent on average annually according

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Data. Eric, good to have you here. What's

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>front and center for you? Uh? Well, first and foremost,

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me um front and center for

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>us as an investment team. You know, probably trying to

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>parts through, as I'm sure many of your investing folks are,

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is trying to part through all the various risks and

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know how they're going to impact companies, impact economy

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and what that means for our investment. Investment strategy. The

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>good news is for us is our investment strategy has

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>always been focused on you know, what we consider to

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 1>be high quality companies that are are frankly resilient in

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.959
<v Speaker 1>the face of risk, and so we think our companies

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>are built to handle them. But nonetheless, risk assessment, I

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>think is what is front and center right now. Well, yeah,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think China also front and center. I wonder

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>these high quality companies, many of them do business I

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>assume in China. I mean think about Apple for example,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and in the kind of business that Apple does in China.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how how you eric way China risk right now? Well,

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly one of the elements that needs to be weighed.

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we have a um you know, you can

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly say we have geopolitical risk as a as a

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>as something that needs to be considered now, perhaps in

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>ways that it didn't need to be considered a few years.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Why why do you say that? Because we've gone through

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, not eleven, We've gone through some really serious

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>UM stuff over the last two decades or so. So

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what's different now? Is it just a China story that's

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the geopolitical I think? But well, yeah, what I was

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>referring to really is more of the China story. I

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>mean geopolitical in terms of you know, terrorist activity and

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the other things that have happened. Yes, and

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>those are things that should be considered. But I think

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.479
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of how, you know, trading partners in

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>China's growth as an economy, growth is as a you know,

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a nation that is more formidable. They're certainly trying to

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>play a larger part on the world stage, and that

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that has real impact on on every company that does

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>business in China, and certainly the ones we invest in

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are not immune to that. I think that a bit

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the difference for us from our perspective would be that,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are multinational companies and so I don't

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>know that we're necessarily in a position where China would be,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the largest part of any one of these

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>businesses or their revenue streams and they so there's some

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>level of insulation. But nonetheless it's a it's just one

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of the many things that we have to be thinking about,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>both domestically as well as globally in terms of the

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 1>impact on our business. Well, I take it you're not

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>invested in casinos that have a large portion of operations

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in Macau because some of those typically the casino side

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of things doesn't meet our screen. Our you know our

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>screen because of the consistency and quality means you know

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that they have two companies for us have to generate

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a fiftcent return on equity every year for ten consecutive

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>years at a minimum, which means their business return is

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>consistently above their cost to capital. And casinos are a

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun, but they don't necessarily meet that criteria

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for us. So, Eric, how do you read into what

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>happened yesterday in the markets and whether or not we

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>see this as a signal or you see this as

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a signal that there could be a further pullback ahead.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think what happened yesterday is is emblematic in the

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.719
<v Speaker 1>fact that the markets searching for something to help direct it.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've got a lot of moving parts,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>everything from what is the Fed going to do, to

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of tax legislation is going to be out there,

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to what kind of spending, how are we going to

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>treat the fact that we're going to have a fairly

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>large gap in terms of you know, economic stimulus from

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what was provided this year to what's provided next year,

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and all of that creates a bit more of a

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>troublesome direction in terms of trying to think about where

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>things are headed. And so any event like what happened

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday which China, can become a catalyst for volatility. And

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what we're probably facing in the times

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in there, in the weeks and months ahead, is the

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>potential for higher volatility. The anecdote to us for higher

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>volatility is to look for companies that are less variable

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in their business performance, and that that speaks to our

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>high quality investing style. All right, so you have to

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>pick names, and you do pick names for the funds

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that you manage and help manage. I mentioned the Gentsen

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Quality Growth Fund, which is got a bunch of investments

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in names like Apple, Microsoft, PepsiCo. There's a gent and

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>quality value fund I think I mentioned in terms of

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem the performance um that's invested in the like

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Crown and Hasbro, Equifax. Tell me, how are

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you picking names right now? Are you finding lots of opportunities?

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>We actually are still finding good opportunities. I think the

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>reality is is that you know, everything that happened last

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>year from a momentum perspective was really focused on, you know,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>concentrated on very large companies and just a few stocks,

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the average company was mostly left behind. And from evaluation perspective,

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>even in the last month or so, you know, we've

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>seen the average stock probably dropped in double digits or so,

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and so that's an opportunity from a yeah, from evaluation perspective,

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that presents opportunity. I think the key though for us

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is it's not strictly about valuation discipline. It also has

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a very strong fundamental opportunity and that's where

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you can see, you know, in our portfolio. You mentioned

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the Quality Growth fund. For instance, you can see a

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft alongside of PEPSI. Now, clearly there are different growth rates,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>there are also different valuation opportunities. But our focus is

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to find to thirty really great combinations of

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamental strength and valuation opportunity to comprise the portfolio. And

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the same thing would be true in the value strategy,

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>although it's a little bit larger companies and a little

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>bit smaller in cap you know, but in every case,

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the pillar of fundamental fundamental strength based on high business

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>returns against across the capital and then the valuation opportunity

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is really what drives us. All right, listen, thanks great

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to check in with you. Eric stones Stone, Managing Director,

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager, Jensen Investment Management. I did mention fun performance before.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the Gents and Quality Growth Value Fund which is

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>beating most of its peers in the past three years,

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>up nearly four on average annually, so I just wanted

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that I was clear about that. Thanks

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News