WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off September 22nd, 2022 (Ep. 601)

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, hello friends, and welcome in to leading off. I'm

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>your host Chris Welsh. Joining me today is Andrew Sifter

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter Andrew Underscore Sifter and today we're going to

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be breaking down all the stuff that went down yesterday

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and how to prepare you for today. It's j Andrew Seifter.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? My friend? Final Push? Any articles coming

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up that everybody needs to know about.

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.599
<v Speaker 2>It's the Waiver wire Man every Saturday that's coming out

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:37.639
<v Speaker 2>at Fantasy Pro. So we got one more to go

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>for that final week of the regular season. And I

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>have to say, it's always a treat to get to

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 2>join you on a Thursday because we do the Mondays

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 2>a lot, but the Thursdays are always a special occasion.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I figured also would be good because I

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>knew you had the article coming up. I could remember

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it was Friday or Saturday. But you know, this is

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a good time to do it since we're a couple

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of days out. It's the final stretch. If there were

0:00:57.680 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>any guys, and one of those guys that is probably

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>going to show up in that article is a late

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>call up. Every time I open my mouth, I continue

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>to open my mouth the last month I'm like, all right,

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.839
<v Speaker 1>so this is the last big prospect guy that's gonna

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>come up. They're not gonna be anymore. Doesn't make sense.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna do it. Then another one comes up.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>I say the same thing, then another one. So really,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm doing it at a lock. I'm doing it

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for everybody else to keep saying this. So I said it,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>and we got another one. And one of the top

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>guys you might want to take a look at is

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Tovar from the Colorado Rockies. He's getting a call

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up to make his major league debut. Now, he may

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>not be in the lineup today, as I believe he's

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like traveling to get there, so the debut may be

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>happening on Friday. And Tovar is really fascinating because Tivar

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is twenty one years old. Twenty one to twenty two,

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>let's see. Actually I think he might have just turned

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, No, twenty one, it doesn't matter. But Tovar

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating because of the rise that he has had

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>so far in his minor league career. He was in

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the ears of a fall league last year from low

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>A all the way up to making them he's missed

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>significant time this year, which is why this move is

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>really surprising. It's actually pretty shocking that I thought he

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to be an Arizona Fall League lock this year.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He's under three hundred minor league at bats this season,

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but fourteen homers, seventeen stolen bases, a three nineteen batting average,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a source of stolen bases a little bit smaller, but

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he's really connected in with high power. Colorado is a

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>great place to hit. He should theoretically get work this

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>last week, which makes him a really fascinating waiver wire

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>pick up for the final week. So any thoughts on

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Tovar, Who's gonna be making the debut and, like

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I said, should get I would imagine all the starts

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>until this season ends.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he'll not only be in that column I write,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing he'll probably be one of the headline names

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>in that column because we're talking, like you said, a

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>guy who's just been a real fast riser. I mean,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>he's now considered a top forty prospect in baseball, the

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 2>number one prospect in the Rocky system, and we know

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>how it plays in that thin air. You want that,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 2>especially when you're gonna get the stolen base potential as well.

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 3>He's hit at every level.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, it's limited played appearances, but I mean

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>he put up a three hundred batting average in Single

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>A last year, in Double A this year, and then

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 2>he came up for a brief cup of coffee in

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Triple A and was actually doing even better. I mean

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>he only struck out an eight point seven percent of

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 2>his Triple A played appearances. So he just looked ready,

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 2>and you know, a team like the Rockies like, why

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>not get a little sneak peek at this guy and

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 2>see if he's a guy that you maybe can feel

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>comfortable going into next season with because we saw you know,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>with players like Michael Harris, they've come right in and

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>been comfortable at the major league level. And if you

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>see something like that, that's really actionable intelligence that you

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 2>can get in this last week or two of a

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>season where you're rebuilding. So I think it makes sense

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>for the Rockies, and I think that it makes sense

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 2>for fantasy managers to take a shot on the upside.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel very confident that he'll play maybe his one

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>game miss, but he should play the whole way through

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>because of the amount of time he missed, there's no

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>reason for them to not let him get a full run.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>He needs a bat. So I'm assuming he's not going

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to the ball league because he's probably gonna play in

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Dominican Winter League. And I also think that you're probably

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be seeing a situation where they're bringing him up.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>They're getting them all these at bats, and he might

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that breaks roster next season so they

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>can vuy for that extra pickspot. Because this is a

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that hits for high contact. He's got sneaky power.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Though I just I personally will be surprised if it's

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>anything more. I was surprised if it's twenty, to be

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, but I'll be surprised if it's over twenty.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>But he's gonna put in stolen bases, he's gonna hit

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for high contact, and he's a guy I think that

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this team was kind of lacked. All these prospects they've

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>had in the middle infield, do nenever really worked. And

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that they could break camp with

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>next year and they could potentially get an extra pick

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.239
<v Speaker 1>out of it. So I think all of those things

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>combined makes sense. Why Tovar is going to be a

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>really good pick up for this final week or four days.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Like Bizzarrizza said, whatever it is you've got left for

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy baseball, and I will point out he is a

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>yard goat. Tovar is maybe one one of my probably

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>top five favorite logos as far as like minor league.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I want that hat something I don't do. My wife

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 1>would kill me, especially if I bought them. Wink wink.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that I want to get a collection of really

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>good minor league hats, and probably the yard goats would

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>be in the top five list of ones i'd like

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to where it's a good purple the goat, it's biting

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a bat. Who doesn't want a goat on their hat?

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, I'm pulling that up right now. Just take a

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>little look at it. You're right, that is some nice

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 2>stuff there. It's also just hilarious that the Rockies have

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>a farm team in Hartford, Connecticut.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, that's exactly. I would also say the

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Hillsboro Hops for obvious reasons for the Diamondbacks would be

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>another very good logo of hats. But go and pick

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>up Ezekiel Tovar if he's sitting out there because he'll

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>get playing time. Blake Snell struck out a season. I

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>had thirteen batters going seven innings, and you get some

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>shut out ball on Wednesday as they beat the Cardinals

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>one to nothing, stifling the pool Holes hopes at least

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>for one more day. As we get closer, we're now

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>into god, what are we like eight days? Nine days

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>left for pool Holes to get two more homers. We're

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>getting down to the stretch. I said, there's really bad feeling.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna sit at six ninety nine, but we still

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>got just enough days.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, I think it's going to be a two homer

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 2>day that puts him over the top. That's my prediction. Yeah,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>well I might mention him a little bit later today.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>James Kaprillion on point on Wednesday to to one win

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.239
<v Speaker 1>over the Mariners when seven innings, two hits, shut out ball.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Kaprillion is so fast enough that any of you guys care.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But like Kaprillion is the first guy I saw when

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I really made a concerted effort to going to the

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Fall League in twenty sixteen. Was when I made

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>sure every year I'm there, And he was with the

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>New York Yankees, and I remember he gave up he

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>had one solid inning and he was coming back off

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of injury, and then he gave up a leadoff homer

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the second inning to Mauricio Dubon who was at

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox at that time. And now I believe

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Giant still and I always think about that,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but Kaprillion has been one of those guys I thought

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to move into the bullpen just based off

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of injury issues away now, but he's been a very

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>serviceable starter and one of those streaming guys probably going

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to have looks like, maybe one more start your trust

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on Kaprillion rest of the way, this last start, I guess.

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know you've got your personal connection to him,

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not going there with him.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 2>His strikeout to walk rate is really poor and the

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>bar is high to be fantasy viable as a starter

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>for Oakland anyway, if you're in a league that you

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 2>need wins, so I think I'll take the pass. I

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>could probably find better streamers I like.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Tristan McKenzie held the White Sox to two runs

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>over eight innings, struck out thirteen to Guardians one eight

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to two on Wednesday. Tristan McKenzie continues the consistency of

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>why we are going to probably be buying in heavier

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>than I think we think next season on him.

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I feel like he's kind of like one of

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 2>those underrated under the radar breakouts. I don't know if

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.559
<v Speaker 2>it's because he's doing it in Cleveland. That whole team

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>is sort of surprising that they're in such strong playoff

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 2>positioning right now. I don't think many people saw that

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>coming this year. But the thing that with mackenzie, I mean,

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>he's such a tall, lanky guy, and for a while

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>it looked like he had to sort out his mechanics

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. But the thing you really saw this

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>year is the walk rate just cut in half. I

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>mean last year four point three five walks per nine,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>this year two point one five. So even though his

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>strikeout rights down a little bit, you'll gladly take that

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>trade off for fantasy because it's you know, it's it's

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>it goes without saying like first rule, don't harm yourself,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and if you don't put those free passes on, it

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>allows you a lot more room for error. With babeb

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>and things like that. So I believe in what he's doing.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, his peripherals are still a little worse than

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>his surface numbers, but he's he's a legitimate fantasy pitcher

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>in the for.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at why did this go to last year?

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>That's super odd, that's not good. This is so weird.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Fangrafts like he pitched one hundred and fifty innings in

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the first half. There we go. Now it cleaned itself up.

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>In the first half. Mackenzie over one hundred innings at

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a three to two ERA, which is very nice. And

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this is one hundred and one innings, striking out ninety six,

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>holding batters to an under one ninety nine average. In

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the second half, he's sporting a two eight five ERA,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty four strikeouts over seventy nine innings. The walks have

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>cut down as well, only sixteen. And the last three

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>months have been phenomenal for him. In let me pull

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this up. He's had a one I think it was

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a one to three four as this is reloading here

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Yeah, in the month of July he had

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a one to three four ERA over five starts. Last

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>month in August at three point zero three ERA over

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>five o ver six starts and this month so far

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>got a two two nine ERA with eighteen. That's not

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>correct on how much it's counted here, but he has

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>had I'm trying to do the math real quick, twenty one.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>That would be thirty one strikeouts over the last four

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>starts that he's had. He's just he's going to be

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys that I think he's probably going

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to be right outside the top one hundred as far

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>as overall goes, and he's going to be a major target.

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean, you raised an interesting point because

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>his striker right for the season is essentially a batter

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 2>per inning, which is fine, but he's had these games.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he struck out thirteen in his last start.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>He had a start in mid August where he struck

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>out fourteen. Now both of those starts are against the

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 2>White Sox, so maybe he just has the White Sox number.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but I mean there's no doubt he's

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 2>pitching terrifically. He really hasn't had a subpar start since

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the very beginning of August. So we're now talking to

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 2>two months worth of just great starts in a row.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 3>So keep broad in that.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Bizrus has said, guy, I'm facing in the finals had McKenzie.

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful Snell matched him, so you have to match him.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I dropped Snell in a league last week because I

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>was in such strong positioning and I was running out

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>of innings and he had I saw as the final

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>two matchups were tough, so I just said, you know,

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll let someone else have him for the last two weeks.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And then I missed out on that Cardinals start.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>M Madison Mungarner allowed one run over six innings on

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday in a six to one win over the Dodgers Diamondbacks,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>stealing a couple wins there. Jordan Lyles allowed one run

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday in a complete game victory over the Tigers

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and over on the fun fact side, this is from

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's My Boy Yancy. Shout out to Yancy Yancy. Eaton

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Lyles. This is his tweet. Has more wins than

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Corman Burns, Nestor Cortez, Christian Javier Joe Musgrove, Max Ers

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Or Clayton Kershaw and Aaron Nola. That's kind of a

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>fun fact. Jordan Lyles one of those sneaky sneaky streamers

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that has been out there the whole time, and a

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>complete game, complete gamer is gonna do some wonders for

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>your little last bit of whether it's playoffs or Roto Andrew.

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that's that's a fun stat. I think that

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>stat right there kind of says a few things. One

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>it says it reminds us how fickle wins are. Two

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>finds us of how surprisingly solid the Orioles have been

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>this season. Uh, And Three it's a reminder that a

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of those guys have missed a little bit of

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 2>time this year with injuries, so that's a factor as well.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 3>But that was a fun stat to see, no doubt.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't you don't you dare start the wins? The fickle wins.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Conversation of quality starts, and we're going to go into

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>kat The chat's going to go into chaos and eat

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>each other alive.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>If I don't propose it, I don't propose a solution.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I just think we all have to learn to live

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 2>with it and accept it.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I am so the same on that. I'm actually so

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>utterly tired of the like down talking of wins throughout

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole preseason, of like draft preparation we're like, oh,

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they need to end and it's win, and it's just like,

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is. That is fantasy. Like maybe

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>someday the norm will change, you know, the norms change

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football, the norms change from standard non catching formats

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to PPR and being the standard. Super flex is an

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>option that's coming up. Baseball has accepted a whole lot

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>more of quality starts and OBP, but for it to

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be the standard, it just is what it is. I

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>actually don't mind wins, like the thing I think you

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>get and get. I pick on roto people a little bit,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>even though I play probably more rod than head to head.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's like the perfection. Everybody needs it perfected. It.

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I played to the very end, and my entire season

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>as a whole is calculated. I don't mind variants in

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>my fantasy sports. That's why I like playoffs. That's why

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with wins where guy has a great start

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't get a win, because I don't need everything.

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't need this to equal this at all times.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>The fun for me is the chaos that real baseball has.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, no, I totally agree.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, fantasy sports is a mix of skill and luck,

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>like no matter how you do it, it is and

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>some pieces of it are more skilled, some pieces of

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 2>it are more luck. Fantasy baseball as a whole is

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>more skill. It's more skill than fantasy football. It requires

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>f for two all season long. So if you are,

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 2>if you're the best in your league, like you might

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>have bad win luck and you can still win your league,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 2>you know so. And I also feel like there's this

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>aspect that people sometimes don't think about, which is the

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>fun of fantasy sports, of watching the games, you know,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>because the thing about a win is that's always on

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a you know, that can go either way, right up

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 2>till the ninth inning. So that's something where you can

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 2>watch the game even after your pitcher's out of the game.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 2>If you really need that win, you're sweating it out

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to see if they can get it.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 3>It's you know, it's.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Sort of like you know, like people have about field

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>goals in football, same kind of thing. It's like fun

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to watch, it's fun to root for when you're watching

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the game. So that's something too.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And Wonky, I love the first line here. I love

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the randomness of wins me too. I actually don't Saves

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is another thing. I'm not someone that's proponent of being

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like we should have saves plus holds. I'm okay with

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>absolute chaos and randomness in fantasy sports. And if somebody

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>also wanted to be like, hey, I'm want to have

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a league that has quality starts because wins are fickle. Cool,

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's great, but you know, winds are still wins. Wins

0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>are still out there, and it's something that we consider.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Last couple of pizza pieces of news here Jared Kelnick

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>on his way back as he was recalled from Triple

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>A to Coma. My god, if you follow the news.

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>About a month ago, Jared Keelnick went on his social

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>media and deleted everything he had in reference to the Mariners,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't seem too great. He does get the callback

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in Triple A so far this year eighteen homers, nine

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, not too too shabby. Did hit two ninety

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>five cut a strikeout rate from his major league rate

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of around twenty eight percent last season. This year was

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight percent. Cut it down to twenty That's still

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>higher though than almost every other I don't want to

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>say every single but with the Mariners, there's only one

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>time he had a higher strikeout rate in the minor leagues,

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and that was at high ag. In twenty nineteen, when

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>he moved three levels, he had a twenty five point

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>eight percent strikeout rate. Twenty point eight is the second

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>highest Mariner's k percentage he's had in the miners, which

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is still concerning. So I don't want to like you

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>look and see the majors he had a thirty eight

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>percent strikeout rate and he cuts it down to twenty

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in the miners. It doesn't make me still feel great

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's still one of the highest ones. But he

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>did connect with a lot of long balls, he stole

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>some bases, kept his average up around two ninety. We'll

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>see if it translate. It feels very much Joe Adellish

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>where it's like you hit between two seventy and two

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety and the miners you come back, you still can't

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>hit a high fastball. You still are trying to sit

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>on off speed stuff, which kills the fastball, and then

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you try to cheat on the high end and you

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>get beat low. Let's see if Jared Kalnick does it.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I have zero hopes for it, but if you can

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>get a couple of days of some positive returns. Maybe

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we can take it into the offseason, but it'll be

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>all but nothing. I'm going to guess for everybody moving

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>into next year, including you, Andrew.

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean right now, I hate to say it,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 2>but he has all the markings of a quad A

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>player at the moment. I mean, a guy that can

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 2>succeed in Triple A but cannot succeed in the majors.

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Whether it's a confidence issue or what. We just we've

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>seen enough struggles, you know. I feel like when air

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Across was willing to like give up the ghost on

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>kal Nick, it was like giving all the rest of

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>us permission to do that too, because it's just been

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>so disappointing.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And Eric went at it like that that was a

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>tough thing that we all have those guys.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>We all have those oh totally, and he gets so

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>much right. I don't mean it as criticism.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm great friends of Eric and we always

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about but I give him crap about it because

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was this huge debate of going on

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for years. I was Julio over Kelnick when it wasn't

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>popular to do. I'm making this about me, but also

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>there with the Kelnick versus Wander, which is really not

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a great winner right now, but it's still clearly Wander.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's a tough one. But I know what you're saying.

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>It's like you could have people myself others that have

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>been anti Kelnic. But as soon as like Eric let

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that go. That was like the last passenger, that was

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the ship captain. The captain couldn't go down with the ship.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>At the very end, everybody was off the boat and

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>he finally got off, and then it was permission to

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh yeah, Quada.

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's like, honestly, that's one of the most important

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>things in fantasy sports is to not get locked in

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>your takes. And when things change on the field. You see,

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 2>you learn new and every day in this game, and

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 2>you have to factor that in and eventually that tipping

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 2>point is reached. And you know, I wouldn't be surprised

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 2>if at some point in the future we see Jared

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Kelnick have a great season out of nowhere when he's

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven, twenty eight years old and he's on his

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>third franchise or.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Something for the Mariners.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Though you know, like that that seems like that that's

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 2>going to happen at some point, but in the short term,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 2>it's just really hard to be optimistic that he's that

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 2>this is the time where he's suddenly going to figure

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 2>it out.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Busy, you are right. It is always about

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the well shuts, right, I will point out, I very

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>very much believe Jared Kinnick will be traded this offseason.

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll have a new home. I think the

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Mariners are going to move on. Don't want distractions. I

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a place for him, and I think

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>they will find a situation where they can just do

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>an even swap, probably a pitcher, pitcher that needs a

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>new home for a hitter that needs some destination. And

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately Jered Kelnick is trending more in the Clint Fraser

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>territory than anybody else. Also a little piece, Stephen Vote

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is announcing that he's retiring at the conclusion of the year.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Even Votes just fun player, plays the Diamondbacks great year.

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I believe in Steven Vote. I don't know if you

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>ever heard that before. I get that going in the Crown. Yeah,

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and he's just a great dude too.

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Not much on the injury front, though Adam wayn Wright

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>acknowledged on Tuesday that he's battling some arm fatigue. So

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they're going to do anything and

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe push that last start off or if they If they,

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean even if they don't, I'm probably going to

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>shy away. Hearing arm fatigue on the back end of

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the season doesn't really make me feel too good.

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm suffering from arm fatigue too, from all the typing,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 2>all the articles I've been writing.

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 3>It's tough.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I got the finger fatigue. I had the

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>glove on earlier, getting like arthritis from all the clicking

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I've got on. The stat heroes from yesterday, Glabor Torres

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>had a two homer day, five RBI, three for four

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>with four runs. That's going to help you. Oswaldo Cabrera.

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Cabrera had a homer with five RBIs for the Yankees.

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>He's been quite nice in his little run. Stephen Kwan,

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>who is really quietly and secretly re established himself when

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>he had that great first big start to the year

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and then he really tapered down. Where were the counting

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>stats all the of a sudden, They've just come back

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in droves, And I think I was just looking him up.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to confirm it before I say it, because

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>yesterday he went out and he had a combo meal

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>day homer with a stolen base. He was three for five,

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and we questioned, I question where the counting stats were

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>not the seventeen stolen bases, hitting about three hundred, a

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>higher walk percentage in K percentage, five homers is still

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not much. He's got eighty runs and seventeen stolen bases.

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I tell you, The homers and RBI you

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>really want. That's a big category, but it's the most

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>easy replaceable one. He's actually gone from a one category

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>player to a three category player stolen. If you get

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty stolen bases, if you get ninety runs and a

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>three hundred batting average, that's a serviceable player that he

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't and didn't seem like he was before, which I'm

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>very impressed with him going into next year because I

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>was out for I just don't care about a guy

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>who's a high batting average. But now that you put

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>three categories on the table, we can make do with

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the other two. He's not an albatross, and that's what

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I really like about Kwan. He's been a this year.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I totally agree that the stolen bases

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 2>are so so key, and then also just the fact

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 2>that that team has been scoring a lot of runs

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and he's been scoring a lot of runs in that lineup,

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 2>So those two things have really made him more interesting.

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, I still feel like the margin for error

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 2>is small when you don't hit for power. You need

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>those steals, like it's critical that he gets them to

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 2>have the fantasy value. But I would also point out

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>that he gets a little bit of a boost in

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>a points league where you know, he's got double digit

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 2>walk rate year in and year out, so that helps

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>as well with his value.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Very true. Kyle Stowers for the Orioles hit a homer

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>three RBI, Martin Maldonado had a home run. Nick Fortes,

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Joymnesis Matt vere both had homers. Matt Verling was five

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 1>for five, and Willia Damas one of the quest quiteest

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty home run seasons that a guy who's put together

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>had a homer yesterday, going one for two. Joymness also

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>continuing his push for dynasty relevance and back end of

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>league drafting next season. On the picture side, Blake's now

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned Struck out thirteen over seven Jordan Lyles the

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>full game, Kaprillion had those six strikeouts, Mackenzie struck out thirteen,

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and he's just Lozardo six and two thirds with eleven k's.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>That Marlin's line up putting out. You know some decent

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>pitchers that we can value into next year. On the

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>zero's a couple of rookies, JJ Blede and Josh Young

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>both oh for four with four strikeouts, some for three

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with three k's, Chris morel Manny Machado, Tommy fam and

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Paul de Young and oh for four with three k's,

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Andris Michael Massey and Victor Roblis. On the pitching side,

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Dustin May got lit a little bit, four earned five

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>earned runs over four innings, gave up seven hits. Roinsi

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Contreras he struck out ten, but he gave up six

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>earned runs. And Lance Lynn went six but gave up

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>nine hits, only struck out three three earned runs. That's

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>not really a stat zero. That's as quality start. He

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>got a quality start, it just wasn't very lenish. If

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you will, any of those guys jump out to Rowenzi May,

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>any of the strikeout guys, I kind of burned through those.

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I just sort of watch it through

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 2>my own leagues. At this point in the season, I

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>have Lance Lynn, So he got off to a rough

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.479
<v Speaker 2>are in that game. It looked like it was going

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>to be disastrous, but he kind of settled in and

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of hits, but it certainly doesn't kill you

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the numbers he put up. And then you know Rosey

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Contreras and Dustin May I love those guys' longer term,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 2>but they're young pitchers and there's going to be ups

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 2>and downs.

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So the home run call, which, by the way, reminder

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to let everybody know one of these guys or gals

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be winning a signed for Nando Tatis

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Junior Jersey. Whoever gets the home run call correct. Well,

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I picked Mooki Bets yesterday and quite a few other

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>people did, and that changed the scope of the board.

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, not that I really want it, but

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>can I get a heat check? I have no idea

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>where my homers are probably in the thirties, I'm not

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the board. I did get a

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>double home run call yesterday for my Mookie Bets, but

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling I'm at like thirty five or

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty six, which is not great because it's not on

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the board. But I'm just curious, Wonky, or if anybody

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>knows what my home run total is. But Mookie Bets

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>changed the board yesterday because now we are tied at

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the top. El Skill and Kat Fox are both sitting

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at fifty five. Ol Skill had Mookie Bets, which was

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a ding cat. Fox had Kyle Schwarber, which was a

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>right up on their heels Helpless in Miami is at

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty four, So three people within one homer with like

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a little over a week to go. We also had

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Highcve at fifty two and de Blum at fifty, so

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>five people at the fifty homer mark here is quite

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So okay, So Wonky updated, I feel

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>actually not too bad about that. Wonkey and I are

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>both at thirty eight. You know, that's not too far

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>from making the board. If I if we had a

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>nice little run, there we go. Ah, Wonkey has thirty nine, boo,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but I have thirty eight. Wonkey, you and I could

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>make a nice little run and maybe make the board

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year. That's not too too shabby.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>But there you go. That's the home run stuff. We'll

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to update and that should be pretty exciting. Over

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>by our friends over at bet MGM, they want to

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hook you guys up right now with a one thousand

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars risk free bet all your first timers. Just go

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on over, download the app, use a promo code leading off,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and get hooked up. The Crown will be back next week.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking a week off of the Crown. I think

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we use too much Crown Tiara that I think the

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>luster went away, So make you guys work for it here.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Crown will be back, the tierro will be back, and

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you will as well. Leading off promo code over

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at bet MGM, make all your great bets and do

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it today. Andrew, I've got a couple here for you

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>as always. Using betty Pro's MLB prop cheat sheet, We've

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>got some of the top plays and then the number

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>one money plays however you want to do it. On

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the total base side, Rowdy Tales is the number one

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>total base play. It's minus one sixty four at bet MGM.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You only need one today up against Cincinnati and Hunter Green.

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>The number one plus play is in the same game.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, with Jose Barrero. You just need

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>one total base, but it pays plus one twenty five

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>on DK. On the pitching side, maybe a little bit

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>better here, justin Verlander is the number one pitching play

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>over in UNIBT minus one thirty two for six strikeouts.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>He's projected at seven against Baltimore, and Jose Brios is

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the number one plus money play rejected at five. The

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>numbers four and a half, you get one ten plus

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one ten over on DK. And do you like either

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.719
<v Speaker 1>one of those plays? The hitting ones I think are

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit susy. Yeah, Land, the Verlander one jumps

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>out to me.

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I hate to just pick the best player, but I

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>also think it's the best bet. I mean, what minus

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 2>one thirty two is not extreme, and that just seems

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>like an easy number for Verlander to get over there.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 2>So you know, Barrios has not been striking out many

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 2>guys at all lately, so I don't I don't have

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of faith in him to get over that

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 2>four point five number.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I like that Verlander one, but our own doctor Glenn says,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>rowdy going yard tonight and also lock it in, So

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>doctor Glenn, you go lock that bet in over on

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>what was that that was? On bet MGM. You can

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>use the promo code leading off if you already or not.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>All you need is a one total base my friend.

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a little juiced up, but you know, if you

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 1>put enough on it, it'll make sense. Over on the

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on the DFS side, a couple of plays over on

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel Justin Verlaine at eleven one one point one,

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber at ten eight, and George Kirby today I

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think is kind of sneaky at nine to three. Stacking

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>looks really difficult right now as far as the matchups

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>go today, But I kind of honed in on maybe

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Seattle in Toronto. If you can get some of the

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>top end bats there, maybe you can stack that if

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what you want to do. Over on the home

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>run contest today, there's no extra bonus, But Andrew Psyct,

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna let you go first. Who do you have

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>on your home run call for today? I think you've

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>done pretty good. I don't know what your percentage is

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>on the air, but I feel like you've done pretty

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>good at this.

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 2>I've hit a couple out of the park. Yeah, not

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 2>as many of bats as the rest of you.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But no, no, no, but your percentage. I think your

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>home run the fly ball is looking pretty good.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I'm I allowed to have the same player

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 2>as Wonky because that's what I was planning to do.

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 2>And I see Wonky has Jordan Slash Jordan Alvarez as well,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's who I want to go with against Kyle Bradish.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's a good matchup.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, Alvarez has only faced him three times, but

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I just I just think it's always a good bet

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 2>to beat on Alvarez, especially when he's facing questionable pitching.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I feel even though you know, I do want to

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>point out I have thirty eight, I'm I'm not too

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>upset about my number, even though I know I'm not

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the list. But thirty ain't too bad.

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Thirty eight ain't too bad because it's very close to

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the list, so I probably should really hone in if

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into the forties. But just gonna

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>do it. I got a feeling I had a feeling

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on Judge on the sixty and I forgot to mention

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on this show, but I told you guys the next

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>day that they had the bonus over on DraftKings, and

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I took it where you got the plus sixty percent

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>bonus to make the bet he'd hit it. I did.

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, even though the lineup, you know, I

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>probably should look as I'm doing this, because I have

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a backup. I went to look before the show started.

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The lineups were not out. It's still not out, but

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go with Albert Poolholes and number

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>six ninety nine happening today against Joe Musgrove. Who does

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I have a career homer on decent batting average.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with some big conversation piece and give

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>me some Albert Pools. If he is not in the

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup. My pivot it's Julio Rodriguez. I'm going on

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>complete opposite that ends of age. Pools could be his

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>dad at this point. So I'm going with Julio if

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Poolhols is not in the lineup, So mark that down

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. And as you said, Wonky has got Alvarez

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe of course as Aaron judge, and I don't see

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>anything from Mayor yet that he'll put his home run

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in the discord. If you guys are there we have

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a home run room. You literally can go in you

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>hashtag a home run slash and your player and it

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is tracked. It's really cool. It's one of the many,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>many cool things that they've got over on the discord

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you go and check it out and

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>sign up on the premium. Mister Andrew Sifter, you got

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the article coming up on Saturday. Anything else on the

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>baseball front or just waiting waiting for the ship.

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Just waiting for the ship really at this point. And

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm always happy to answer anyone's questions on Twitter,

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 2>so at Andrew Underscore Siftter. If you have any last

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>minute lineup questions or you know, waiver wire concerns, please

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 2>do reach out.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Happy to answer all those questions.

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. Follow me on Twitter at is as well

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>as you guys know the deal prospect one coming up

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this week talking about the Arizona Fall League. I have

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>been trying to get out to instructional games, but it's

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>been raining here. Might get out today to one of them.

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see and I'll be sharing all that stuff over

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on my Twitter or We've got a Patreon for in

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this league where I've got a special group me room

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>where I share some extra stuff that I don't put

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>out there, like even goofy stuff. I actually saw a

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of baseball players at the grocery store the other day,

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of big name prospects, and I shared that

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's goofy. It's wellsh in the bushes searching for the prospects,

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what it. No, they were shopping, they were shot.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a very very big name Texas Ranger prospect that

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I saw shopping. If you can put those together on

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>who might be out here. But that is it, friends,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that is for the show. We will be back tomorrow.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Cleig is in the house, and I believe next week,

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Andrew is our last show. You and I together on

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday tearing up. Yeah, I got to talk to them,

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pretty sure. Next Friday is the final show

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of Leading Off, so everybody prepare for that. We've got

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>one more Thursday one. Actually, there's one more Thursday show

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>left and two Fridays, so we're getting down to the countdown.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So make sure you guys are hanging out with us tomorrow.

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It's Chris leg and me, but four Andrew Cipher. I'm

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Welsh. I begain tomorrow, Friends pants, Gregordax later