WEBVTT - Dems Go Loco Over Wall

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Why pay your hard eard money to join an organization

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that fought for a government run a healthcare system and

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>stood against tax cuts for middle class Americans and small

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>business owners. That's AARP. Join AMAC, the conservative alternative, same

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>money saving benefits of AARP without the liberal agenda. Stand

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>with AMAC as they fight the good fight and become

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a member today. Join now at AMAC dot us slash buck.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>That's AMAC dot us slash buck. You are entering the

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>freedom hunt. Democrats are now the House majority. We've already

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>gotten a sense of where this is all going. Folks.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>They are nuts. All the Democrats have to do is

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>not be crazy, and they can't do it. We'll talk

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about their socialist tendencies, the tax rates they're putting forward,

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the ideas that they are espousing, and the incendiary rhetoric

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they're using against the president. That and also the border

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>shut down and the fight of the Wall. Coming up

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Show where the mission or mission is to decode what

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, You're

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a great American Again. The Buck Sexton Show begins the

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sect of it. When your son looks at you and says, Mama,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>look you won. Bullies don't win. And I said, baby,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they talked, because we're gonna go in there. We're gonna

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>impeach the Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. There you

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have it a pretty good summation of what you're going

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to be seeing from the incoming Democrat majority in the Congress.

0:01:54.920 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going to impeach the mf in president. That's from

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a newly installed US Member of Congress, Rashida to Leib,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>who says that not only are they going to impeach Trump,

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to use in public with people there

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or you know, people obviously videoing this, use profanity about

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the president. Now, I understand that the immediate inclination of

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the left is going to be to say, oh, but Trump,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump uses such coarse language and Trump says such bad things,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can't complain about this. Now, I'm not really

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>complaining about the fact that a member of Congress wants

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to debase herself and the office that she represents and

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the constituents that she has by using that kind of language.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a difference between calling somebody a dog

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>or calling somebody a jerk and using that kind language,

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>which I obviously can't use on the air. I think

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you all know what I'm talking about. Though. That's about

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as extreme as it's as it's going to get in

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of curses that you're going to hear somebody throw around,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of phrases that someone could use to try

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and debase the president, that's that's really a new level.

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's crossing a line. I have never

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>seen or heard Trump say anything in the same stratosphere

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of profanity as that. Now, this is from a new

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress. It's not the President, it's not Nancy Pelosi.

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I know what the counter arguments are going to be here,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to drill down into this for a moment,

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just because this is not a one off, folks. This

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is not something that comes out of a vacuum. You

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>know that woman who is now a sitting member of Congress,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>who also some of you are probably saying buck talk

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about how she's a you know, anti Israeli some would

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>say anti Semitic, pro Palestinian activists. And I know there's

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole other background we could get into here, but

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm more concerned with the overall context in which somebody

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>can come in, and she's one of the first Muslim

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:21.679
<v Speaker 1>women ever elected to Congress. I'm concerned with how this

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is not that surprising given the kind of things that

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have been said about this president freely for a long

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.559
<v Speaker 1>time by the press and by the Democratic Party. Let's

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not forget that as we start twenty nineteen and now

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have Democrats in control of at least the House of Representatives,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that we are coming off a year where the hatred

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the left, the willingness of left wing activists and

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media and the Democratic Party to act in

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the most heinous and just destructive ways toward their fellow

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Americans was on display time and time again. As these

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are now entering office, and there's this new hope

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>on the left that they're going to hold Trump accountable

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and there's finally going to be a check on his power,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>as if there haven't been checks on his power all along.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a delusional stance. All it takes is one

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>federal judge to stop Trump or who doesn't want Trump

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to do something, and all of a sudden Trump can't

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>do it, and he doesn't say, you know, no, I'm

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go ahead anyway. But there's a context for

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the hatred against this president, and it's that this has

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>been building and building and getting more toxic and more destructive.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>There's been a corrosion of the soul of the progressive left.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That has been an ongoing program. I mean, this has

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>been an intentional policy, mean to make people not just

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>disagree with Trump and his supporters, and don't forget that

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>part of it, it's the supporters too. It's you and me,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not just to disagree with Trump or to even hate Trump,

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>but to hate all of us and think that we

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>are bad. It's not that we're wrong, it's that we're

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>bad people, and we're wrong, but more importantly, we're bad people.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what they really think. That is what the Democrat

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>base believes. They think we're all racist, they think we're

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>all hateful. They think these things, and that is not

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>about to change. That was not just a coping mechanism

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for the last two years, really, but that has been

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>building and now we will see it channeled and weaponized.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll see the full scope of their crazy. Representative

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Hank Johnson, here's an example. I mean, this is now

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>not just this is now the the standard that you

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>will hear from people talking about Trump. This is this

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is an outliers. I'm not you know, I know. We

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>started the show this woman in Congress who's yelling, you know,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>profanity about calling the president of profane word and and

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and also saying she's gonna impeach him, which let's not forget.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>We've had a credulous, laughably credulous media running around for

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the last six months saying, oh, no, we're gonna wait

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Muller probe defend, and they're gonna wait for them,

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna wait. Well, they want to impeach the president too,

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but they've been claiming we're gonna wait for the Muller

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>probe to finish before we make any decision about about impeachment. No,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not. It's a lie. They're gonna they're going, mark

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>my words, they are going to impeach this president. They're

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to remove him. And I even I would

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>even willing to concede. I think Nancy Pelosi knows it's

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>probably not a good idea to impeach the president. But

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>she's gonna be in the kind of puncher's pilot position here.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>She's gonna say, look, if this is what all know,

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if this is what all you crazy's want, I mean,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and all right, I guess I'll give it to you.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>She is going to get so much pressure from the

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>left wing, lunatic Democrat Party base that I just think

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that impeachment is a foregone conclusion. And that's why when

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you hear people already coming out and saying and they

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>already had a member of Congress file articles on peachbi,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I know this is this is going to be an

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>ongoing thing. I mentioned Hank Johnson. Yeah, here's here is

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the standard line from the left on who Trump is

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and who Trump supporters therefore are. Play clip twenty two

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Americans elected an authoritarian, anti immigrant, racist strong man to

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the nation's highest office, Donald Trump and his make America

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>great Again. Follow us who want to return America back

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to a time when white men and white privilege were

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>unchallenged and where minorities and women were in their place.

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Much like Hitler took over the Nazi Party, Trump has

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>taken over the Republican Party. Nazi Party Trump, Trump has

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>taken it over. This is not a fringe This is

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>not a a fringe position. This is not something that

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you will not hear from more and more Democrats, and

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you have been hearing from Democrats obviously for quite for

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>quite some time now. I do want to focus in

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on some of the policy that they've been discussing as well,

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're starting to be reminded and this is the

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>greatest advertisement for the Republican party in power, really is

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats talking about what they want to do. That's

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>when you really get a sense of, oh my gosh,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you cannot give these people power. You cannot allow them

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to be in a position where they get to make decisions,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because their ideas aren't just bad, I mean they are

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>catastrophically bad. You know, today you had your introduction to

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the House of Pelosi articles of impeachment and an effort

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to maybe abolish the electoral college, right voting, this brinksmanship

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on shutdown, profanity from a new member of Congress. You've

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>got this insane tax scheme that okaus Y Cortez is

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I just played audio of that guy talking

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about how Trump is a Nazi and this is day

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is day one, This is day one.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Where does it go from here? And that's why I

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>have to laugh. I have to laugh when people say, oh, yeah,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be an infrastructure bill, and there's how can

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the favorite? The favorite? And I'm man, I

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>get forced to ask it too, So don't don't you

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>know dredge up audio of me saying the same thing.

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>There We all end up having this conversation, even though

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a pretty useless one, of well, what are

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the ways that the new the new you know, Democrat

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>majority can work with the Republicans in a bipartisan fashion

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to make America. It's not gonna happen. It's not gonna happen.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It is not going to happen. Okay, that's we can

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>sit around and talk about it, But that's not what

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this is about. You and I my friends are in

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the early phase of a struggle for power that will

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>not stop. That will be a continuous, ongoing, bare knuckle

0:11:56.000 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>brawl until twenty twenty, and then it just goes into

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a new phase with whoever wins and you know, and

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>then the cycle resets. But but we are, we are

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on a on a pathway now to twenty twenty. Nothing

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of any real political significance from a legislative perspective, is

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>going to happen between now and then it's just you know,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>and people talk about gridlock. I'll say this, you know,

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>let me give you a little moment, a happy because

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're here on a Friday because Bucks happy. Do you

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>know there's I like that song. Um, let me give

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you a little moment happy. Though, I think the founders

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted gridlock to be common, I think that it should

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be hard for the Congress to make massive, massive transformations

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>to this country. I do not want it to be

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a simple thing for them to take it upon themselves,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>one way or another, to transform this country. I think

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's probably for the best. A lot of very

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>smart historians, analysts, pundits, people that look at these issues

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>all the time will tell you and have told me

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that in a lot of ways, the less the Congress does,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the better for the rest of us. Now, there are

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>things that they can fix, but oftentimes they try to fit.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Look at Obamacare, they say they're fix it. If they're

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>making it worse, they're making it worse. You know, if

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>if we can just get a few a few wins,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a few more wins racked up from the president's side

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of things like oh, I don't know, another Supreme Court

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>justice would be really nice, then I think you're you're

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty much just in a election twenty twenty showdown, which

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is where we're heading. And in the meantime, it is stuff.

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna Democrats are gonna be all those And

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this is what I meant before about the context, right

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>when when you have this member of Congress screaming the

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>president is an mf or all of these marches in

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the streets, the Women's March and Antifa and showing up

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>outside of conservatives homes and chasing them down in restaurants,

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and the psychopath who tried to kill Steve Scalise and

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other members of Conservative members of Congress.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Any all of that background, all of that history is

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>now going to be funneled into channeled into the histrionics,

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the grandstanding, the narcissism, and the nastiness of Nancy Pelosi's Democrats. So,

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, this has been a very It's been a

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>good twenty four hour introduction to what we're going to

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>be up against here, which is a lot of a

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of kind of worthless talk about

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>policies that the Democrats know they have no chance of

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>getting through in the next two years. But they're going

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to be engaged in a propaganda battle to see also

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where where they're going to run for twenty twenty and

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>then just just tear down this president. I mean, the

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>effort is going to go into hyper drive here, overdrive, hyperdrive,

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>whichever one is more of a drive. That's what they're

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. Team. We're in the midst of our Friday

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>salon here on the Buck Sexton Show, so I'm very

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>much enjoying it. If you want to send me your thoughts,

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>note Facebook dot com slashbuck Sexton is a great way

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to do it. We've got more on Pelosi's paranoid and

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>crazy Congress and also the Wall shut Down Showdown coming up.

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that's so beautiful to watch is

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>three point two percent wage growth that hasn't happened in

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so long per our country. That's an incredible thing. That

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>means people are actually getting more money, taking home more money.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of good things are happening. Labor participation ation

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>rate increased to sixty three point one. That's an incredible

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>number also, so I just wanted to bring that out.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The economy is very good, and remember from the time

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of my election, the stock market's gone up very close

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to thirty percent. And that's with all of the things

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that are happening. Three hundred and ten I'm sorry, three

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twelve thousand jobs and latest jobs report unemployment

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>still below four percent. In sameer times, this would be

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the primary news story, the single most important thing that

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been told today by the news media. Meanwhile, give

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you a sense of where things are. You know, on

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the other side of things, you have CNN and MSNBC

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and all these different Here you go CNN, hundreds of

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>TSA screeners calling out six okay, and also on seeing

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>an amen allegedly chased a woman into a karate studio,

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it went, just how you okay? Well, that's that's the

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>top story. I guess there must be a viral video

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with that. Speaking of viral videos, you know, there was

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this uh Okazi Quartes dancing video. It's not worth playing

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on Eric because you can't see your dancing. It was

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>put out by some anonymous Twitter account and it went

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it went viral. People were all talking about this last night,

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was a big conversation among the the Twitterati,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the various media folks out there that are

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 1>all Unfortunately, we're all we're all glued to Twitter these

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>days because of the president and and the importance of

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the proclamations that come via tweet. But this

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a Kazy Cortes's video. She's danced around, she's having fun,

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and look it's cute. I mean, she's she's an appealing person.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, she will talk about her terrible ideas and

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>bad economics in a second, but she's an appealing person.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>And I saw all this, all this reporting, or at

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>least all this commentary on how oh look at people jump,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, jumping conclusions and trying to bash Okazia Quartez

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for dancing and having some fun when she was in

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>college or on this video. And then I looked around,

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've still I put out this challenge. I said,

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>can someone show me one instance of a conservative of

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>any note, of an actual conservative of any with any

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of platform or following her voice, who was calling

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Okazia Cortes out for this video? And I still have

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>yet to see one. Tons of people claiming that Republicans

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>pounce and Republicans have overreached on Okazia Quartz And then

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I look at I say, well, hold on a second

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>where it says who who says who Poles or Poles?

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Michael Cohen. Yeah, that was that was a

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>different era, wasn't it. So I just wish people would

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be honest about whether there really is this overreach on

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>this issue with Okazi Quartez, but also in general, you know,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>conservatives basher for policies, not for her persona. That's an

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>important thing. They're just making her more famous all the time.

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And Libs don't care if Okazio Cortez, you know, isn't

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>good at math. So I mentioned Okazio Cortes and and

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>her her tax rate, you know, and a math. And

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>this is where you're gonna have real This is where

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna have real problems for the for

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats going forward. They're not the moment that people

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>get into a place where they hear what the reality

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of these policies are. Things like a green New Deal, right,

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that's you're gonna hear a lot about that coming up.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not going to happen, but they're gonna

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be proposing this idea of a green new deal, um.

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And and then also just on the redistribution of wealth

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and what what paying your your fair share, right, bringing

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>back the old Obama phrase paying your fair share. Maybe.

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I think today she said, was it seventy percent Ocasio

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Cortez on taxes, Yes, seventy percent tax on the on

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the super wealthy too fund the Green New Deal. And

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you always hear people trot out this, oh well, under

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Eisenhower administration, So yeah, let's go back to let's

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>go back now sixty some oddiars. Under the Eisenhower administration,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the top tax rate was, you know, ninety one percent

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and two things one. Nobody paid. Whether that might have

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>been the rate, nobody paid that rate. You know, this

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is like saying, well, in Greece in the mid two thousands,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the tax rate was whatever it was. Yeah, but it

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter what the tax rate was. Nobody was paying taxes,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>which is why Grease had the problems that it did.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the tax compliance rate. It's not nobody. I'm exaggerating, body,

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>The tax compliance rate was very, very low, and no

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>one was really paying ninety one percent. This is also

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>where I get it, I get a little revolutionary in

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>my tone here. You know, if we're gonna have these

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>high taxes, we need to we need to have a

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>wealth tax. It can't be a tax on income. A

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>tax on income prevents people from ascending the ladder. It

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>punishes people for productive activity. Tax on wealth. You know,

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to start, you know, just having the

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>government confiscate from people, well, it shouldn't confiscate from somebody

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>who makes two hundred and fifty thousand dollars one year,

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the same as it confiscates from somebody who's worth ten

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. And it is making two hundred and fifty

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars on unearned investment income every year. Right, that's

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not we're going to talk about fair. That's not fair.

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And we already have an incredibly and like I don't

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think of wealth tax a good idea. I'm just saying,

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to go down this road, let's not

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>pretend that one the people at the at the top

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the of the spectrum are going to be

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>able to fund all of this. There's there's not enough money.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>There's not enough money to do this. And you know,

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I understand that right now because of the Republicans are

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot in you know, Trump we got almost

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars deficit this past year. It's not not

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>good in that sense because Republicans are spending a lot

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the discussion about the debt and what it's going to

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>mean when interest service payments on the debt start to

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>crowd out more of overall spending. You know, we're not

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>in as strong opposition as we should be to make

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that case the American people, because the Republican Party and yes,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration have been somewhat complicit in blowing up

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the debt. I mean, we're not We're not as bad

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>as Obama was, right Obama. Obama took it and basically

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>doubled it, which is pretty remarkable. I mean, if you're

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, one thing that Obama definitely accomplished was putting

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States in a long term dire fiscal situation.

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So he did manage to do that, which which was

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>remarkable in its own way. But this notion of a

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent tax rate only is that going to fundamentally

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>change not just this country's economy, but the global economy.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>We are responded, this country responsible for so much innovation

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and wealth creation. You go back and I know that

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>some people, you know, this doesn't really get headlines, doesn't

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>really get a lot of attention. You go back, you

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>look at how much of the world lived in true poverty,

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>even as far back as nineteen fifty, right, so not

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>that long ago. A lot of you were alive in

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.239
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty, you know, you go back and look at

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what was what the global poverty index was then and

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>what it is now. And there are billions of people

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>who aren't in poverty anymore relative to what was going

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>on then. And this is because of the American approach,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>which other countries have to adopted obviously, you know, Japan

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and Western Europe to very degrees, and but rewarding productive

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>behavior and ingenuity and risk taking and wealth creation in

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and understanding how much human self interest is a motivating

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and mobilizing force in society and the good that that creates.

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>This has you know, we are so blessed. We're almost

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, people all that our life today, we're almost

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like the spoiled brats of the human race because we

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to go through what some of the others,

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what some of the others have in the past. You know,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have to deal with the constraints, the artificial

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>constraints on our productivity and on our ability to choose

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>our own destinies put on us by this state. Remember

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the left, the Democrat Party is now the American Socialist Party.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They they are playing a little bit of foot see

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with the terminology, but that's where they are. And that's

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>why the radicalism in the language that you've heard in

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two years is when you're now, it's being

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>translated into policies abolishing the electoral college, a seventy percent

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>tax rate, impeaching the president, a Green new Deal, you know,

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a radical transformation that just means a radical transformation of

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the energy sector that will make this country a lot

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>poorer very quickly. This is what these people really want

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to do. The biggest advertisement for keeping Trump and Republicans

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in power, fortunately for us, is the Democratic Party. As

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>long as the American people are paying attention. Let's talk

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about that wall fight coming up. You ran your campaign

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>promising supporters that Mexico is going to pay for the

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>wall and that the wall was going to be made

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of concrete. You just said earlier that the wall could

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>be made of steel, and right now our government is

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>shut down over a demand from your administration that the

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>American taxpayer pay for the wall. So how can you

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>say you're not failing on that promise to your supporters.

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>A very nice question, so beautifully asked. Even though I

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just answered, it didn't let me take excuse me? Are

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you ready? Are you ready? I just tell you that

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we just made a trade deal and we will take

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>in billions and billions of does far more than the

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>cost of the wall. The wall is peanuts compared to

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what the value of this trade deal is to the

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>United States. As far as concrete, I said I was

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>going to build a wall. I never said I'm going

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to build a concrete I said I'm gonna build a wall,

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>just so you know, because I know you're not into

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the construction business. If I build this wall or fence

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>or anything that Democrats need to call it, because I'm

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not into names. I'm into production. I'm into something that works.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>If I build a steel wall rather than a concrete wall,

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it will actually be stronger than a conquered Steel is

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>stronger than concrete. Okay, okay, yep, you could check it out.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>This is so dumb, but it tells you a lot

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of it where the Democrats and their their lackeys in

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the media are this It's a wall it's a fence.

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a barrier. No, it's a fence. Everyone knows. We're

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>just talking about barriers at the border to stop people

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from coming into the country illegally. We don't care what

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>color defense is. We don't care what hype the barrier is,

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as it is a physical obstruction to prevent

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>illegal access. How are we even having this discussion? Maybe though,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's because there's a little bit of concern among the

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>left wing propagandists in the media and their allies in

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party over what's going to happen here. Maybe

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they've started to realize that the more the American people

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to this really can't spare five billion dollars

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to build a wall, and Trump is having the shutdown.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>They could end the shutdown anytime they want. Just give

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the man the money he needs to start building this wall.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Five billion dollars is nothing the government. The federal government

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>loses an estimated eighty billion dollars a year in Medicare

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and Medicaid fraud. In fraud, the federal government's spending how

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>many billions of dollars on fourign eight, how many tens

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars on FOIGN eight every year. We

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>don't have five billion dollars with the border, but they

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>focus in on, Oh, the fence is not a fence,

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a barrier. Oh, it's not a barrier, it's a wall.

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That's just this is just a semantics game. This is nonsense.

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't do anything. Why why would anyone spend their

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>time on this? And then also you said Mexico's gonna

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>pay for it, Well, Mexico's not paying for it. Okay,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe Trump was wrong and in that Mexico won't

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to pay for it right away or it Still,

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that it's not a good idea to

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>build a wall. That that's not some argument ender, you know.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>That's uh. CNN's Caitlin Collins. I know Caitlin, and I

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>like Caitlin. I don't know. She used to work a

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>daily caller. We've we used to hang out sometimes. I look,

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>she's seen Jim Acostas turn himself into a household name

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>by going after the president. I understand, if you're at CNN,

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no better career move than going after the president.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think she was I don't think she

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was doing herself long term any favors there. But you know,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm wrong. She's become like I said, I like her,

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and I it's hard. It's hard for me to see

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going on over at CNN these days because I

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>know some good people over there who are on air

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and and they're just doing what little Jeff Zucker tells

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>him to do. You know, that's that's really You got

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to dance to Jeff's tune over there or else you're

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>out of luck. You know, he decides whatever gets paid.

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>He decides, you know, whether you whether you live or dies,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, at CNN is completely in Zucker's hands.

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.959
<v Speaker 1>And obviously he's a he's an anti Trump fanatic at

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this point. So uh, and it's it's just a shame, um.

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But this idea that it somehow is a useful addition

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to the national conversation here to pretend that the specifics

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of the wall, oh well, you know the wall that

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about now, the slats that wasn't one of

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the one of the initial prototypes. Who cares? What is this?

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's desperation. I think it's the left and

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats just trying to find a way to just

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to kick up dust, to throw smooth blow smooth, throw smoke,

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>blow smoke. You can do lots of things with smoke.

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You can just smoke it. Um. Democrats used to talk

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about building a wall. By the way, this this also

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>gets lost. You know, if we had an honest press Corps,

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they would be holding Democrats feet to the fire. On

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the Secure Fence Act of two thousand and six, huge

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan majority said yeah, let's build it. Let's build a

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>border fence. And this this was because everyone knew this

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was a very effective thing to do. But now they're

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>pretending to like, oh, it's not But Democrats, even in

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>recent years have talked about their desire to build a wall.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have been saying openly it's a we have the internet,

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we have the interwebs, we can pull this stuff up,

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we can find it. Here's a here's a whole montage

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of them play clip nineteen. I voted numerous times when

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I was a Senator to spend money to build a

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And I do think you have to control your borders.

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>People who enter the United States without our permission are

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>illegal aliens and illegal aliens should not be treated the

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>same as people who entered the US legally. The American

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>people will never accept immigration reform unless they truly believe

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that their government is committed to ending future illegal immigration.

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But those who enter our country illegally and those who

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>employ them disrespect the rule of law. And because we

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>live in an age where terrorists are challenging our borders,

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we cannot allow people to pour into the US undetected, undocumented,

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and unchecked. Who knew that Hillary, Schumer and Obama were

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>slid a bunch of racists, right, Wow? They must really

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not like Mexicans because they're talking about illegal immigration being bad.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't do this, It's not a good thing for

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the country, Hilary said. Quote I voted to spend money

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to build a barrier. Oh my gosh, she said barrier.

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Well she didn't say wall. The dumbest stuff that you're

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>hearing these days coming from these democrats I do. And

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>also the hypocrisy and dishonesty of it. It really bothers me. Maybe, though,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>just maybe the President's going to find a way a

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>way through this. It is it is possible, it is

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>conceivable that the president finds a way through no matter

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens with a shutdown. Now he's saying he's not

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>going to cave. And I think one thing you say

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>about Trump is trying to force that man to do

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>something he doesn't want to do. Good luck, Democrats, good

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>luck getting Trump to cave when he's really set on something.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying he's not a guy who changes

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>his mind, but if he's dug in, looking how douging

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>he is on trade, He's gone against the He's gone

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>against the most unanimous expert consensus on trade, almost unanimous.

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not n US, but he's going against it, and

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:08.719
<v Speaker 1>he's he's not backing down one bit. You don't think

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna ride this shut down out as long as

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>he has to. But then there's a possibility maybe he

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>just gets a little bit of funding and they say, oh, well,

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't use it for this reason or that reason,

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and then he just drums there is maybe he declares

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the national emergency play eighteen. Have you considered using emergency

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>powers to grant yourself authorities to build this wall without

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>congressional approval? And seconds ago you have, Yes, I have,

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and I can do it if I want. So you

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>don't need congressional approval to build the national emergency because

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of the security of our country. Absolutely no, we can

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. I haven't done it. I may do it,

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I may do it. But we can call a national

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>emergency and build it very quickly. And it's another way

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of doing it. But if we can do it through

0:33:55.080 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a negotiated process, we're giving about a shot. I think

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the right attitude. Now, if Trump did declare a

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 1>national emergency, there's no question that the federal anti Trump,

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>never Trump judiciary would shut it down with another nationwide

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But this will we got to change this, by the way, folks,

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't have one federal judge just declaring for the

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>whole country all the time. Sorry, you know that the

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>executive branch can't do this thing. But you get you

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>get an it'll get a nationwide injunction that'll stop the

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>building of the wall, and then you'll probably get a

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>request for a stay, and then I'll go to appeals

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and then it'll make its way that you know that

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court in the election year might be looking

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>at whether or not the president can use emergency power

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to build the wall. And you can imagine how contentious

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that will be. But if Trump takes it there, if

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he just if he does truly everything that he can

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to get this wall built as he should, then I

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>think he's in excellent shape for twenty twenty and then

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he may have an their four years to get this

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>wall going. So that's why this fight is so important,

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>which is why Pelosi and Schumer obviously don't want to

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>budge at all on it. They understand the political The

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>one thing Nancy Pelosi does know is what's good for

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>her and what's not. I don't think she knows what's

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>good for the country and what's not, or maybe it's

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>more apt to say she doesn't care, but she definitely

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>knows what's good for Nancy Pelosi, which is why she

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is in the position she is in now. So we'll look,

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>We're going to continue to talk more about it. This

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>is the most important issue in the country right now,

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>no question immigration. Who's gonna win. I mean, this is

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this is like the Obama care fight of twenty ten,

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know we lost that one, folks. I don't

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think we want to see what the future is like

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for this country if we lose this one. I don't

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think that we're going to be able to rebound from

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what would really just be the end of any effort

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a secure border. You know, you'd one hundred

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and fifty five thousand people apprehended in the last year

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>at the border, five hundred thousand visa overstays every year.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>You have hundreds of thousands of illegals coming into the

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>country every year, and they're not planning on leaving anytime soon.

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>That's why the numbers. I've told you as a joke,

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's now or never. Trump understands that, and that's why

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm so pleased to see these willing to fight on

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this one. But I worry about these Republicans, weak knees

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>among a lot of GOP establishment types. We got more

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on this. Stay with me. We need protection in our country.

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna make it good. The people of our country

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>want it. Without a wall, you cannot have border security,

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>it won't work. Hopefully, we're gonna work together and we're

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get lots of things done. I think the Presence

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>made it very clear. Yes, there's no wall, no deal,

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but look, we really are prepared to negotiate. We're prepared

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>to talk. I like that they're saying that no wall,

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>no deal. But you know the issue with opening this

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>up here there you had obviously Trump and Pence with

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a one two punch on on where we stand in

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this shutdown. The issue is that the Democrats aren't opposed

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to the wall really for any reason. When I say

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat Democrat Party broadly speaking is opposed to the

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>wall because it will work and because they like illegal immigration.

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats that you're going to have to negotiate with

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:28.479
<v Speaker 1>to get funding for a wall, Pelosi, Schumer, etc. Their

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 1>main opposition to this, at least in the immediate sense,

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is they are against it because Trump is for it.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't want there to be a wall because that

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>would be a win for Trump and they know that

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and politically they will not allow that. You know, I

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>spoke to the incoming budget Chairman, John Yarmouth today on

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>rising and I just said, you know, it's five five

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. There's not a lot of money. And the

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>head of Order Patrol, the head of Immigration, of Customs Enforcement,

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, every border patrol age and I've talked to

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>all say that a wall is useful and a wall works,

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and we need a wall and places where we have

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a wall on the southern border or a barrier of

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind. It's already proven that it works. So what

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is this nonsense? I mean, what is this fabrication that

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we're always told experts say a wall won't work. I

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>never see anybody that'll go, oh, there's an expert. You know,

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 1>this is why, you know, you can't take their word

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on any of this stuff. You can't take their word

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>with the Oh, all the experts agree, agree on climate change,

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>all scientists agree. Well that's not true, but they'll say it.

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>They'll say it because of the momentary propaganda value of

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the lie and the hope that people aren't paying close

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>enough attention that they'll be held to account for the falsehood.

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'll they'll just go go forward with with

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the same nonsense they've always done. You know this, this

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is a very straightforward issue, and it's being made complicated

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>by the Democrats, not not by the Republican. Republicans are

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>not the ones that are complicated. It's very easy to

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>give them what they want. Democrats the ones you say,

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we want border security, but you know not, that's not

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>border security that will actually secure the border. That's that's

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a complicated position. That's a difficult thing to to make

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>work and to make sense. You know, here, here's Pelosi

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know she's back. Everybody, Hey, that's a Pelosi.

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 1>She's back, and you're gonna be hearing a lot from

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>her in the next two years. So get ready for

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:35.439
<v Speaker 1>We're we're gonna be gonna be spending plenty of time

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>holding Pelosi to account here on the show. So that

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>will be I'm hoping, very entertaining for us as well

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>as worthwhile. But here are some of the things that

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>she says about the wall and about the negotiations. Your

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>play clip too. What we're asking the president the Republicans

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate to do is to take yes for

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>an answer. A wall is an immorality. It's not who

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we are as a nation. And this is not a

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:06.240
<v Speaker 1>wall between Mexico and the United States that the president

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is creating here. It's a wall between reality and his constituents.

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder who writes these seemingly gotcha lines for Nancy

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi dispute on TV that when you think about it

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for more than a second, you realize it is idiocy.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>This is not an intelligent thing. A wall is an immorality. Well,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a wall is an inanimate object. So I can't understand

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>how a wall is an immorality. And if let's play

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>this out for a moment, let's take Nancy at her

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>word here froment. If a wall is immoral, isn't our

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>border patrol? Immoral? Isn't our border? Immoral? Isn't the whole

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that we will take people? You know, current US

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>law that exists because of the Congress, that she is

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>now the single most important official working in which is,

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as I say it, astonishing, But that's where we are

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as a country. Oh well, but the law is that

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if you try to come to the country legally, you'll

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>be stopped. Is that immoral? Is our border? Immoral? Democrats

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are never forced to have a real debate on these issues.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>They are never forced to get deep into the discussion

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>about any of this, and they just stick to the

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>talking points. It's very superficial, very surface level, and all

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>about trying to rile people up emotionally without having to

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>engage on the substance. That has been their tactic to

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>deal with immigration for a long time, and as you know,

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the single on this show. I think we

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>talk with immigration more than any other policy issue. And

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we have for quite a long time. I mean, I

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think immigration is from the perspective of what the government

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>can do, should do, needs to do, what the Trump

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:03.280
<v Speaker 1>administration needs. So it's probably the single most important area

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 1>where there needs to be success because it's an existential

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>issue for the Republican Party for conservatism, for limited government,

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and over the long term, it's an existential issue for

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States as we know it. It will not

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:21.399
<v Speaker 1>be the same country in fifty years, some would say

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen years unless we get I handle all this

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and understand what the real implications are of nearly unrestricted

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>mass immigration that's been going on for decades that has

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmed the systems of assimilation that we have had in

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>place in this country for a long time. But the

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>idea that the wall is an immorality, why when Nancy

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi says that a real press corps would push her

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and say is a border immoral? Is it immoral that

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't let anyone just come into this country and

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>then have a claim on our stuff. And I mean

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that quite literally. If you're allowed to just come to

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>America because you want to be in America and get

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the full benefits of being here, then you're essentially able

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to apprise yourself of or able to acquire for yourself

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of the state that are paid for by

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the taxpayer. So is that that's all good, that's fine,

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that's acceptable. I mean, at what point is it theft?

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>What point is this breaking of laws eroding the very

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>foundation of national sovereignty and of the state itself. But

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 1>there's more Pelosi in the wall plicklip three. Resident cannot

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 1>hold public employees hostage because he wants to have a

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>wall that is not affected, not effective in terms of

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>its purpose, not cost effective in terms of what the

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity costs it is of a federal dollars to spend.

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>And the President said, Mexico is going to pay for this. Oh,

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>let's let's anchor ourselves into reality. Mexico is not going

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay for this wall. So no, he could make

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Mexico pay for the wall after the fact. I don't

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>remember the President saying that the Mexico is going to

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>pay upfront. He could start taxing remittances, which I think

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>would be an excellent idea. There should be taxes on remittances.

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You've got about twenty billion dollars a year flowing south

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of our border, most of it, you know, just just

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in pure cash, untaxed, unaccounted for, and subsidizing the Mexican economy.

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I always fine, it's such an interesting argument. You'll hear

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>this from lefties too, from from progressive types. Oh well,

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing, because the stronger the Mexican economy is,

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the less likely people are to come here. Okay, but

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we're still subsidized. You know, you could say that about

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different countries. So so how much more

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>do we need to subsidize the Honduran economy and the

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>El Salvadoran economy and the Nicara You know, you just

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>go all the way down the line. We again subsidize

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>them enough that people don't want to come here. Being

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>an American is a very special thing. We are lucky

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you and I understand that. I know that people listen

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to the show actually all over the world, and some

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of you aren't Americans, but vast majority of us listening

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to the show are American. There are some Canadians, what's up,

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Team Bot Canada. There are some Canadians listen to the

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>show too, But we understand that it's it's a privilege

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're incredibly lucky and are grateful for that, but

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that we want to give it away

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to everybody and allow it to be destroyed either, right,

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And is it fair? You know, there's the accident of

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>birth is a real thing. There's a lot of things

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that aren't fair. One of the most important things in

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>life is to understand that life is not fair. And

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you and I were born in the greatest, wealthiest,

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>freest country in the history of the planet and not

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>born in the midst of a civil war in Somalia

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>or a North Korean gulag is to our everlasting benefit

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and just a stroke of incredible good luck for all

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of us. Right, we are very, very lucky comparatively and

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>not I don't even have to go with present day

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenarios places like North Korea. You know, we're

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>lucky compared to what we would have been dealing with

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>in you know, in basically all of the world you

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred years ago. We're lucky, not just in

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the time we were born, but in the place we

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>were born. So there's a lot that we have to

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>be a lot that we have to be thankful for.

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But the you know, the Democrats don't see it this way.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:33.720
<v Speaker 1>They see it as we owe the world, we owe

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the third world, in particular the redistribution of wealth that

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>will occur from citizens to non citizens through a mass amnesty,

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 1>through open borders, through continued infiltration of illegal aliens in

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this country. Rona McDaniel said this about about the Democratic

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Party and Pelosi, and you know, she definitely hit hit

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the highlights here play for the Democrat Party

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is now the party of sanctuary cities, abolish ice, open borders.

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>She called a wall immorl. What we know about the

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>walls and the borders that we have is that it

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>has decreased illegal crossings by ninety percent where we have them.

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>She called that immorl. I think it's immorl to give

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:15.720
<v Speaker 1>more money to foreign governments than you do to protect

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>our border. The president's asking for five billion, she gave

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty four billion to foreign governments. Her priorities are out

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of whack. The American people now see Republicans are fighting

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for our country. Democrats are doubling down at obstruction and

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>everything against this president that they can do, instead of

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>solving the problems at home. Rememb're this fight's all over

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>spending five billion dollars on border screup. Think of think

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of all the money. I mean, you know this, this

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 1>point about priorities that Ron McDaniels making here you use

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the R and C chairwoman, This point about priorities is

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a very poignant one. I think. I just consider all

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the money that's been spent in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>foreign aid to countries le Honduras like Mexico. Think of

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 1>all the money that the federal government is spending that

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're taking from tag The federal government has no money,

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it has your money. So think of all the checks

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that sent into governments all of the world. And think

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of here we are talking about, as I've said, I

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe second only to the you know, the economy

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and the and the debt, but the long term, biggest

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 1>challenge we have, most important challenge we have is is

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>secure orders and immigration. You know, after the debt deficit

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, and they won't spend five billion dollars

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>to maybe get this thing right. And if they're so

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that it wouldn't work, wouldn't it be worth spending

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the money. Wouldn't it be worth allowing Republicans to go

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>off on this fool's errand and Trump to do his

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>wall that all Mexican's gonna pay for it. They all

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>think they're so clever with this, put it up, and

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then and then let's see what the numbers are. If

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they're right, there'll be no change in illegal crossing, there'll

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be no more secure border sectors than they currently are.

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And then they can laugh at us and say we're

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.319
<v Speaker 1>also dumb. And you know what, if that happens, I'll say, Wow, guys,

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess every single real border expert I spoke to,

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and every person that's worked on law enforce in the border,

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we were somehow all wrong. But I will say that.

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>And they're not taking the position that they're not sure

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this will work. They're saying it won't work, it won't work,

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:29.919
<v Speaker 1>it's foolish, it's dumb. Well, if they're so sure, let's

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>try it out. Let's try it out. And if this

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>were a good faith negotiation of the Democrats, they would say,

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not gonna even five billion dollars. We're

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you two billion dollars, and we're gonna pick

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 1>one sector of the you know, the US Texas. I

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>start the Mexico Texas border. You take one piece of

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the border where we're having a lot of legal crossings,

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to use that as a test case.

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And if it really, if it really does shut down

0:49:57.080 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>legal crossings there, even if across the entire border it

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:02.920
<v Speaker 1>remains unchanged, well then at least we know that sector

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>by sector it could work. So there are ways to

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 1>test out this theory and see who's right. They don't

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 1>want to do it. They don't want to do it,

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and as we've been discussing the things they do want

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to do or are just nuts. You know, all the

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have to do is not be crazy, and they

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 1>are incapable of doing it. So we do have that

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 1>going for us, which is which is very nice. In

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the midst of all the whining that comes from the left,

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you have to wonder why in the world would anyone

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>act this way. My guess is they're just not getting

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>their daily dose of black rifle coffee. You know, that's

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>why they're running around all upset, trigger warnings, crying about this,

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that and the other thing, acting like the world's going

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to end because the climate change. I got an idea,

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 1>drink some black rifle coffee libs. It'll make your day better,

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 1>all right. I love Black Rifle. I drink it every day.

0:50:58.080 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I want everyone to drink it. I want you to

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>drink it. It is rose to order delicious, fresh coffee

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that gets delivered right to your door. And Black Rifle

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Coffee gives a portion of sales to veteran first responder causes.

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Join the coffee club. They'll just send it to you

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 1>every month. That's what I do, and that's what I drink.

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Nothing cures a bad attitude quite like starting your day

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 1>with the most American coffee ever, Black Rifle Coffee. Visit

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck and receive fifteen

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:27.800
<v Speaker 1>percent off your order. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>buck for fifteen percent off Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash Buck.

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Speaker Pelosi is basically align herself with her left wing,

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that for her to back off will

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:44.319
<v Speaker 1>be very expensive. The President has said publicly so many

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>times now that he won't sign anything that doesn't pay

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for border security. That for him to back down would

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be very expensive, and I think this is one of

0:51:53.480 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 1>those cases where exhaustion is the only thing that's going

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to work. I mean, people can get anxiety written, we

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>can have mass TV coverage of every meeting, but the

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:05.399
<v Speaker 1>fact is neither side is tired enough to start moving

0:52:05.440 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>towards an agreement. As you know, I'd advocated several weeks

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>ago to provide a legal path for the Dreamers as

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.200
<v Speaker 1>part of a package that would include border security. You

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>would think the Democrats would be very interested in trying

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to help seven hundred thousand people who came here as children,

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But the fact is they dislike Trump a lot more

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 1>than they care about young Latinos. Now. I agree with

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Mit in general on I'm sorry, Mit, I meant Newt mits.

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I got Mit on the brain this week. Sorry about that.

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Newt in general on a lot of

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 1>these immigration issues, at least right now. Mit is if

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you go back, gosh, I gotta step sing Mit. Newt

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>if you go back, is somebody that I think has,

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 1>let's just say, evolved in the issue of immigration. He's

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>much more open to the Dreamer situation dealing with that now,

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and quite honestly, even I think it is sensible, because

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have a secure border before you get

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Dreamers, the cascading effect of the amnesty for dreamers

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>will overwhelm your ability to have any leverage negotiations to

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>really get border security. I mean, you have to get

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 1>border security now. It has to be real, it has

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and you have to change the whole conversation

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:28.280
<v Speaker 1>around preventing illegal entry into the country and also enforcing

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>immigration law in this country and giving up this point

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of leverage on DACA. Remember DACA turned into DAPPA, which

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is deferred action for the parents of arrivals. So now

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:44.319
<v Speaker 1>it was kids who are here and their families and oh,

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, people who came here and it's not

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>just kids. People came here as kids who claim to

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have come here as kids, and you know, if they've

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 1>had kids, then you know even the extended family is

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to get because there are going to be citizens.

0:53:57.520 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And then so no one's going to be sent home.

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And you just start looking at this and you know,

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that we come out of this with

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a more secure border down the line if we give

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>up on some of these issues that are so important

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to the left right now. And they know that because

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is if they get dreamer amnesty, and

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the term dreamer, but that's you know,

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of you know, if they get amnesty

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for illegals governed under DACA, then the next thing is

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just going to be another amnesty. They're just gonna keep

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:34.279
<v Speaker 1>holding out. They don't budge on these things. There might

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be there might be a compromise here. This is what

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Rampaul said, Play eight. Well, you know, I think there

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is a compromise when you think about it. The Democrats

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 1>last year, almost every one of them in the Senate

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>voted for twenty five billion dollars for a wall. Now

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the president's only asking for five billion. Now, the democrats

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:52.279
<v Speaker 1>new position is zero. So I figure you take their

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 1>position zero the president's position five. I haven't split the difference,

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, two to two and a half billion dollars,

0:54:57.800 --> 0:54:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think that would probably be adequate to have

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a deal where both sides can say, you know, they

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't give the president what he wanted, but the President

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't cave in and get nothing. In their counter, they're

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>increasing foreign aid to other countries to over fifty billion dollars.

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a twelve billion dollar increase in foreign aid. Many

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of these countries hate us and burn our flag. And

0:55:16.600 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the President campaigned on America first, so he wants to

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 1>spend that five billion dollars here at home. And I

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 1>think the Democrats are gonna have a lot of explaining

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:25.399
<v Speaker 1>as to why they won't spend any money at home

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on security, but they're willing to send it to foreign countries,

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 1>many of whom burn our flag and chant death to America.

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Well said by Senator Paul. We'll be right back. A

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of news stories now about how difficult it is

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:43.879
<v Speaker 1>for people that are affected by the shutdown, and well,

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:46.839
<v Speaker 1>we can be sympathetic to those who are working without

0:55:46.880 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a paycheck. It's also perhaps a good time to ask

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:54.360
<v Speaker 1>some questions about is this really the federal workforce that

0:55:54.480 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we need? Is it the size we need? Is this

0:55:57.000 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>really essential to borrow a term that is often used

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:03.719
<v Speaker 1>in these situations, Well, I've got somebody who has no

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>qualms looking at this and asking those tough questions and

0:56:07.600 --> 0:56:10.759
<v Speaker 1>coming up with some answers that may not necessarily be

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>what the public sector union folks want to hear. We

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have Inez Felcher in the House. He's a senior policy

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 1>analyst and the Independent Woman's Forum, and she's ready to

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 1>drop some knowledge here with us on Friday Ines. Thanks

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for calling in, Thanks so much for having me back.

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's just start with the reforming civil service,

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>chopping it down, make it a different. What should we

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:38.439
<v Speaker 1>do with our federal government employee workforce? According to your

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>most recent white paper? Well, I think Donald Trump has

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>some great ideas. When he mentioned that the last State

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Union address, he said, give managers the power

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to hire and fire to make sure that the federal

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 1>workforce actually works for the American people. And that sounds

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:58.799
<v Speaker 1>like a really basic thing, But the way that our

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 1>civil services had today, it's basically an impossible goal. It's

0:57:03.160 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 1>tie in the sky just to have a civil service,

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a competent civil service that actually works for the American people.

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's the case because for the last about one

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, since the progressive era, we've been piling all

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of these job protections on top of federal employees to

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>protect them essentially even when they're doing a really bad

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>job or when they're outright defying the people that we

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>elect to direct them in their jobs. Now, you mentioned

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to me off Fair that there was a Project Veritas video.

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>James O'Keefe outfit that came out pretty recently where you

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 1>had federal government employees who were saying what they were

0:57:41.320 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>pleased with their ability to frustrate Trump's agenda by essentially

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not doing what they're supposed to do as employees of

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the of the executive branch. That's exactly right. So James

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 1>O'Keeffe's outfit uncovered basically when undercover with some of these folks.

0:57:57.040 --> 0:58:00.120
<v Speaker 1>These are some of the folks who actually were if

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you recall that there was a moment, especially during the

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Kabinaugh hearings, but even before that, Republican senators, Republican officials

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:11.960
<v Speaker 1>who worked in the administration were being chased out of buildings. Actually,

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the main organizer of the group that does that, that

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>goes to restaurants and yells at Republicans is a socialist

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and she works in the States Department, And so she

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:22.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't one of the many people they caught on tape

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, yeah, we're gonna go ahead and obstruct Donald

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump's agenda because we don't agree with Donald Trump's agenda,

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and we worked for the federal government and it's impossible

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to fire us. This is a deep constitutional problem. It

0:58:35.200 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if you like Donald Trump. Where you don't

0:58:37.200 --> 0:58:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like Donald Trump. This is a deep constitutional problem. It's

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a democratic problem, right, small d democratic problem. When the

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:47.480
<v Speaker 1>person that the people elect has very little power over

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the people who are supposed to carry out his agenda,

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and when they have absolutely who do not stand for

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.400
<v Speaker 1>election right before the American people, when they have this

0:58:56.520 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>much power to sign me that agenda, there's a democratic

0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:03.000
<v Speaker 1>problem here. How hard is it to fire most people

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 1>under civil service regulations? What kind of hurdles are there

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in place? Well, it currently takes between a year and

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:15.400
<v Speaker 1>three years. There are four separate different systems that one

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 1>might go through to appeal a dismissal. There are two

0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that are used the most often. The other two are

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 1>used in particular instances. But either way that you go,

0:59:25.080 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a twelve step or more slow chart for a

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>manager to go through to fire someone, and even for

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the most egregious misconduct, it can take years. So just

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>as an example, the head of the Caribbean VA who

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was actually completely corrupt and was convicted of corruption by

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a criminal court. So he was convicted of a crime

0:59:46.440 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>during the course of his job. This wasn't a crime

0:59:49.000 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that he committed on his own time. He was committing

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>celonies while he was on the jobs. And it's still

0:59:55.520 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he was in jail, and it still took two years

0:59:58.920 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for the v to actually fire him. Okay, so the

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>American taxpayer paid his salary while he was sitting in

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>jail after being convicted of corruption while on the job.

1:00:09.240 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It still took two years to get rid of that

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>guy and to make sure that the American taxpayer was

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>not paying his salary. That is how long. And most

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>managers they just don't deal with it. It's not worth it.

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>For just a poorly employed, performing or even defiant employee.

1:00:23.640 --> 1:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>They just find ways to move them around at best

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and to get them out of everyone's way to the

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>extent that they can. And oftentimes even there's I'm sure,

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as a former federal employee yourself, bof you've heard of

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the notorious notion of getting rid of an incompetent employee

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>by actually promoting him so that you no longer have

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with him. Oh. Absolutely, I mean I was

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>always amazed at how much shuffling of people would occur

1:00:50.480 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>based upon you know, you'd send some people, you'd send

1:00:55.760 --> 1:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>some people forward and put them up for positions that

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>would have even the high you know, a higher paygrade

1:01:02.240 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>than what they're supposed to have, just because you didn't

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>want them in the office. So there's there's plenty of

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that stuff that would go on. There are a whole

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>there were a whole agencies, whole places in the federal

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>government where they'll just kind of park you instead instead

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of firing you. You know, I I think you would

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have been proud in as Earlier the week, I got

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to speak to a representative from one of the I

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>think it is the biggest federal public sector union, and

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I just said, you know, why do we have to

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have public sector unions? And she looked at me like

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>she had never even this had never even occurred to her.

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And I said, you know, I'm pretty sure FDR, way

1:01:36.480 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, it was like, well, unions are good,

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but obviously public sector unions would be crazy. We can't

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>have government employees with their own unions against the American people.

1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>That would be nuts. No, that's what we have now.

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely what we have now. And as you said,

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>even FDR thought it was nuts. So the unionist is

1:01:54.680 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>actually layered on top of all these caections that they

1:01:57.520 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have by law, And the purpose of a lot of

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>these things, right, purpose, original purpose and a lot of

1:02:02.200 --> 1:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>these protections and union protections among others, was to make

1:02:05.920 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that we don't have a totally corruptible service, to

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>totally politicize to civil service. Right. But the cure has

1:02:12.280 --> 1:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be way worse than the disease, because

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>now we have, as you mentioned, an entire class that's

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>insulated from the American people, from the voter, who imposes

1:02:22.280 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>their political views upon the American body politic with absolutely

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>no legitimacy to do so. And the idea that the

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>civil service is somehow a political because of all of

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this is ridiculous. So in the last election federal employees,

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent of the donation from federal employees went

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to Hillary Clinton ninety five percent. The only places that

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>are more politically spewed than the civil service in America

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>are maybe faculty lounges and maybe Hollywood awards ceremonies. The

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>civil service is incredibly less leaning, but we pretend that

1:02:56.400 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a political and everyone sort of goes about their

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>jobs and hands that these people do not have an agenda.

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>They do just like any other American. The difference is

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they they're working for a government they ought to be

1:03:08.360 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>responsive to the American people, and right now they're not.

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is kind of a random aside and

1:03:13.680 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as but I had to interview today. Did you ever

1:03:16.560 --> 1:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>watch the show The West Wing. I've watched a few

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>episodes here and there of it, but I'm not a

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a voracious watcher. Let's say that. Yeah, yeah, the true

1:03:25.680 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>meet me too. I probably have seen maybe a half

1:03:27.680 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a dozen episodes total of my life, but I've seen

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a few of them. But the deputy, the deputy White

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>House chief of staff character is an actor that I

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>got to interview today and I thought it was you know,

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:40.959
<v Speaker 1>so we were having kind of a Hollywood media talk

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and I said, so, you know, what do you think

1:03:43.320 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>about Hollywood speaking about how politicized and how these places

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>are really a uniparty under themselves. So what do you

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>think about how politicized Hollywood is? Hollywood's really says, we're

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>not really that liberal. So, oh my gosh, of course,

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>now it all makes sense. Hollywood's not really that liberal.

1:04:00.920 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>The federal government's not really that liberal. You know, this

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is this is why we never get anywheres because we

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can't even start with the basic reality of what's happening. Well, absolutely,

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and people, I mean I grew up in the Bay Area, right,

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and none of them actually label themselves as liberal. If

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk to them, they're like, oh, I'm an objective moderate, right,

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but the premises that you come in with are incredibly

1:04:20.880 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>less wing. And I don't know it actually is a

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>larger left wing problem. I think they refuse to see

1:04:26.880 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>their own ideology. They pretend that everything, all the conclusions

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they come to are simply a dispassionate analysis of the fact,

1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>which is not true. But it leads them to feel like, oh, okay,

1:04:38.240 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're well, if you're not left wing, you must

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not care about facts. You must be live in an

1:04:41.880 --> 1:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>alternative fact universe. Right. So I mean, that's the larger

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this is By the way, that's the go ahead. I

1:04:49.320 --> 1:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say that that's the liberal that CNN caters

1:04:51.840 --> 1:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to you. By the way, that's the whole purpose of CNN.

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>It launders liberalism. It's it's an echo chamber. It's just

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the people with the same basics mistis underlying, disagreeing about

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe a policy here or there, but having the same

1:05:04.240 --> 1:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental principles talking to each other and then pretending that

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a real discussion that actually spans the political spectrum

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in America. It Jeff doesn't. And the same thing in

1:05:13.960 --> 1:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the civil service. They may not think of themselves as

1:05:16.240 --> 1:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>explicitly political, but in the way that they see the world,

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they are, and it comes out when you actually look

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>at something like their donations and see that they're ninety

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>five percent go to the Democratic Party. And by the way,

1:05:27.240 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the States Department, your favorite, I'm sure it's ninety

1:05:29.680 --> 1:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>nine percent that went to Hillary. Yeah, think about that, everyone,

1:05:33.240 --> 1:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine percent of donations the last presidential cycle, the

1:05:36.560 --> 1:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>State Department went to Hillary Clinton. What a surprise. Inanez Felcher, everybody.

1:05:41.440 --> 1:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Independent Women's Forum also readers stuff on the Federalist Inez.

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Have a fantastic weekend. Give Jared a high five for me.

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you soon, talk to you to see you.

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Moore coming up, stay with us. It's a way to

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>make noise, but it actually isolate Smith and puts him

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in a much narrower, smaller group. Very smart, he's been

1:06:01.000 --> 1:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a governor, he's been a very successful businessman. He could

1:06:04.760 --> 1:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>come in there and have six or eight or nine

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>really positive ideas he could make a real contribution, but

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to posture as the anti Trump, I think it's a

1:06:14.920 --> 1:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>really narrow career path. And I just think my guess

1:06:17.720 --> 1:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is he has some advisors who thought it was clever.

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Newt didn't like it, did not like that. Mitt op

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>ed on Trump, and my next guest also not a

1:06:27.000 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>fan of it, and I'm not a fan of it either.

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So we'll all just dive into this together. He's got

1:06:31.160 --> 1:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a piece up in the Detroit News. Romney stands for

1:06:34.040 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>failed Politics of the past. Guest host of this program,

1:06:38.080 --> 1:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Clairemont Institute fellow author of the book No Go Zones,

1:06:41.680 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>which you can get on Amazon, and I highly recommend

1:06:43.680 --> 1:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to you. The man himself, mister Raheem Kasam, is joining

1:06:47.120 --> 1:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>us before his weekend festivities kickoff or He'm great to

1:06:50.200 --> 1:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>have you back. I didn't know about weekend festivities. The

1:06:52.880 --> 1:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>buckets drive January for me. Oh my, I don't even know.

1:06:56.480 --> 1:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how that's going to go. But

1:06:57.880 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a good thing. You know, we should all

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>get a good start, a good, strong start to the

1:07:02.360 --> 1:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>new year. Romney did this and we've been talking about

1:07:06.040 --> 1:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it all week and I don't want to overplay this.

1:07:08.280 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I have a curiosity about what do you

1:07:11.680 --> 1:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>think Romney thinks he was doing here? Well, look, I mean,

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go back to when Trump was first running

1:07:20.600 --> 1:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for president and Romney came out against him. Then Mit Romney,

1:07:25.120 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, audition for Secretary of State and President elect

1:07:30.120 --> 1:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump entertained the idea. Then Romney slammed him again. Then

1:07:35.800 --> 1:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Romney sought the Senate seat in Utah, and Trump and

1:07:41.120 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the administration gave them, gave him their blessing for whatever

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it was worse. And now he's in the Senate and

1:07:48.080 --> 1:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>he's slamming Trump again. So when you want to talk

1:07:50.480 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about bad character or poor character, as Mitt Romney suggests

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in this in this OpEd in the Washington Post, there's

1:07:59.600 --> 1:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>there's any one person in that relationship between those two

1:08:03.040 --> 1:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>men who have shown themselves to be poor of character

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and repeatedly hypocritical and backstabbing in that Romney And it

1:08:11.600 --> 1:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>comes down to this for me analyzing this over the

1:08:14.560 --> 1:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>last twenty four to forty eight hours, because I think

1:08:17.680 --> 1:08:20.759
<v Speaker 1>it is something that requires us to be a fleet

1:08:20.800 --> 1:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of foot when it comes to watching the opposition that

1:08:24.720 --> 1:08:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the make America great again crowd experiences from within its

1:08:28.720 --> 1:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>own quote unquote conservative slash gop rax. I think that's

1:08:33.400 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a very important thing. And it comes down to this.

1:08:36.800 --> 1:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Mitt Romney is not somebody who understands, as they say

1:08:42.000 --> 1:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in my article in the Detroit News, the sort of

1:08:44.800 --> 1:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a wildcatterie, the risk taking abilities of somebody like President Trump. Now,

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>those risks sometimes come with rewards and sometimes they come

1:08:55.920 --> 1:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with failures. But remember Romney comes from the school of

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that you always do things by the book, play

1:09:02.920 --> 1:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it very safe, and you'll incrementally, very slowly rise. And

1:09:09.160 --> 1:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that's been the sort of conservative gop mantra for the

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>last ten fifteen years. But it hasn't got them very far,

1:09:16.439 --> 1:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>because fighting against radicals, fighting against the Democrat machine actually

1:09:21.640 --> 1:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>requires radicalism. In return, fighting fire with fire as President

1:09:25.120 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump's whole stick, and it appears to at least, if

1:09:29.240 --> 1:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not completely be working at this point, at least is

1:09:32.240 --> 1:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>keeping the harvest line elements of the political establishment at

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>bay and even seeding radical elements within the Democrat Party

1:09:43.720 --> 1:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Alexander Occasio corteses who are now taking the

1:09:47.400 --> 1:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>fight to the Democrats from within. If anything, Trump's emboldened

1:09:50.960 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 1>the radicals inside the Democrat Party to take on their

1:09:53.560 --> 1:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>own establishment. And I think this is what Mitt Romney

1:09:56.640 --> 1:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>really despises, because in a world of eccentrics and in

1:09:59.840 --> 1:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the world of characters, somebody in the likement Romney disappears.

1:10:03.600 --> 1:10:06.639
<v Speaker 1>He has no place, so he thinks he can grab

1:10:06.760 --> 1:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>some headlines in the Washington Post, he can get some

1:10:09.040 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>airtime on CNN and really kick off this sort of

1:10:12.400 --> 1:10:18.719
<v Speaker 1>new McCain flakelike resistance within I think actually it's probably

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>going to new to him in the long term. What

1:10:21.160 --> 1:10:24.599
<v Speaker 1>does it say to you that the GOP's last two

1:10:24.920 --> 1:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>presidential offerings before Trump were McCain and Romney, who are

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>two of the most vocal anti Trump Republicans anyone can

1:10:34.400 --> 1:10:37.639
<v Speaker 1>think of. Well, that's certainly. I mean, they had their chance.

1:10:38.360 --> 1:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>They had multiple chances to go out there and prove

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the case, and they failed to do it over and

1:10:44.640 --> 1:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>over again because they didn't. What they didn't do is

1:10:47.000 --> 1:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>aim listened to ordinary people in the United States. They

1:10:50.360 --> 1:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't listen to their concerns. You know. They ran on

1:10:52.800 --> 1:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>things like tax cuts, which the GOP made the mistake

1:10:57.360 --> 1:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of trying to do it this last midterm election to

1:10:59.560 --> 1:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>look out worked out we didn't run on the radical

1:11:03.360 --> 1:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>id views in Washington, DC, which aren't actually radical ideas,

1:11:06.240 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the country like, oh, I don't

1:11:08.479 --> 1:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>know a semblance of border security or I don't know

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>helping ordinary people find jobs. And look at the jobs

1:11:15.000 --> 1:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers to day that came out under this radical president.

1:11:18.760 --> 1:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are the things that the mccains of the Romney's

1:11:21.000 --> 1:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are shoot for so long and just turn their backs

1:11:23.920 --> 1:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on when it came to actually campaigning. So for Romney

1:11:27.360 --> 1:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know the failed Weekly Standard and the departing

1:11:30.760 --> 1:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Blakes of the world. This is this is their

1:11:33.320 --> 1:11:36.759
<v Speaker 1>ideology dying. And of course when an animal has wounded,

1:11:36.800 --> 1:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it will lash out. And that's what Mitt Romney's doing

1:11:39.160 --> 1:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is he is the personification of a dying breed of

1:11:44.200 --> 1:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>pseudo conservatism. And I think if if the magatypes, if

1:11:49.280 --> 1:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the trump Trumpists, Trumpites, whatever you want to call them,

1:11:52.760 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>if they're good enough and they're smart enough to see

1:11:55.400 --> 1:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that they can actually bury that pseudo conservatism for a

1:11:58.680 --> 1:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>good generation him. Kassam, everybody, Raheim, can we actually can

1:12:02.200 --> 1:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you back right after this Breakouf, because I

1:12:04.600 --> 1:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you about what's being called by some

1:12:07.840 --> 1:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the victimhood populism of Tucker Carlson. Others are saying Tucker

1:12:12.240 --> 1:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Carlson nailed it in this monologue early this week where

1:12:15.240 --> 1:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>he diagnosed some of the problems. Can you talk about that?

1:12:17.120 --> 1:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a minute? Absolutely? Yeah, all right, We're

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick with Rahem Kasam will be back in just

1:12:21.160 --> 1:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a moment. You know what's really smart figuring out who

1:12:25.400 --> 1:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to hire for each position you have so

1:12:28.080 --> 1:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>that you can take your business to the next level

1:12:30.720 --> 1:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. You know what else is really smart?

1:12:33.320 --> 1:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Starting the new year off strong by going to zip

1:12:36.000 --> 1:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>recruiter dot com slash buck to hire the right people.

1:12:40.120 --> 1:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Unlike other job sites, zipp recruiter finds qualified candidates for you.

1:12:44.000 --> 1:12:47.479
<v Speaker 1>It's powerful matching technology scans thousands of resumes to identify

1:12:47.560 --> 1:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>people with the right skills, education, and experience, and actively

1:12:51.040 --> 1:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>invites them to apply to your job so you get

1:12:53.680 --> 1:12:57.519
<v Speaker 1>qualified candidates fast. That's why zippercruiters rated number one by

1:12:57.560 --> 1:13:00.519
<v Speaker 1>employers in the US. This rating comes from ing sites

1:13:00.560 --> 1:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>on trust Pilot with over a thousand reviews. Right now,

1:13:03.840 --> 1:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>my listeners can try zip recruiter for free at this

1:13:06.520 --> 1:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>exclusive web address. Zipp recruiter dot com, slash buck. If

1:13:10.320 --> 1:13:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you love this show, show your support for the Freedom

1:13:12.880 --> 1:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Hut and zip recruiter by going to zip recruiter dot com,

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>slash buck again, zip recruiter dot com slash buck. Zip

1:13:20.360 --> 1:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>recruiter is the smartest way to hire Now. You had

1:13:24.600 --> 1:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>said before the shutdown that he was being quite cavalier

1:13:27.200 --> 1:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and that maybe the shutdown will give him more time

1:13:29.040 --> 1:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to golf. But in the end, it was you that

1:13:31.240 --> 1:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>took a holiday, and is it retake the holiday? I

1:13:33.680 --> 1:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>observed the Christmas holiday for a few days, and why

1:13:37.200 --> 1:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>cut in fact and cut in half the time I

1:13:39.720 --> 1:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>would have had with my fan? Was that a cheap shot?

1:13:41.880 --> 1:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>But the faid, Oh, it's not it's not important. It's

1:13:45.800 --> 1:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>totally unimportant. The President may not know this, but Hawaii

1:13:49.479 --> 1:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is part of the United States of America. Maybe he

1:13:52.280 --> 1:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't realize that. I love how We're back with Raheem

1:13:56.080 --> 1:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Kasam here, author of No Go Zones, Clairemont Institute, fellow host,

1:14:00.080 --> 1:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>guest host of the show You're listening right now, Raheem,

1:14:03.439 --> 1:14:06.599
<v Speaker 1>I like how Pelosi there is asked by Savannah Guthrie

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>if she made a cheap shot in another context and

1:14:09.040 --> 1:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>then she follows it up with she pivots doing a

1:14:12.040 --> 1:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>different cheap shot, which is maybe the President doesn't know

1:14:14.640 --> 1:14:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Hawaii as part of the US, which was neither clever

1:14:17.760 --> 1:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>nor nor insightful. But but I do have this question

1:14:21.320 --> 1:14:23.679
<v Speaker 1>about how it is that there are so many people

1:14:23.720 --> 1:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>who believe that Nancy Pelosi has the interests of the

1:14:27.479 --> 1:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>American people at heart. I really, you know, I want

1:14:31.280 --> 1:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about trump populism and how some conservatives have

1:14:34.479 --> 1:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>issues with that, But to me, Pelosi is the quintessential

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>limousine liberal. Couldn't be more you know, distant from normal

1:14:45.280 --> 1:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Americans and their concerns. And yet we're always told that

1:14:48.320 --> 1:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>she's practically like a social justice warrior who just you know,

1:14:51.880 --> 1:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>has hashtag resistance tattooed on her arms. It's crazy to me, Well,

1:14:57.400 --> 1:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be in a lot of trouble over

1:14:59.479 --> 1:15:02.759
<v Speaker 1>this this Congress, I think, and mostly from her own side.

1:15:03.479 --> 1:15:07.519
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't represent what the Democrat Party a base, that

1:15:07.920 --> 1:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the active base at least is wishing for in this Congress,

1:15:13.240 --> 1:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and she barely manages to cobble together enough you know,

1:15:17.960 --> 1:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>support in not in the sense of the number of

1:15:20.840 --> 1:15:23.719
<v Speaker 1>votes she gets to become speaker, but in the sense

1:15:23.840 --> 1:15:27.439
<v Speaker 1>of the rhetorical and passion support that you need amongst

1:15:27.479 --> 1:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>your own, you know, your parliamentary party effectively to guide them.

1:15:32.840 --> 1:15:35.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've already got stories in the last twenty

1:15:35.600 --> 1:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>four hours about you know, this move on to or

1:15:39.040 --> 1:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>party from last night, where you've got one of the

1:15:41.000 --> 1:15:44.519
<v Speaker 1>congresswomen swearing and saying we're going to impeach Trump, which

1:15:44.600 --> 1:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is something that Pelosi had tried to get them away from.

1:15:47.320 --> 1:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>The talking points of the media over here is fascinated

1:15:50.600 --> 1:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>by people like Alexander Arcasio Cortez, and I think Pelosi

1:15:54.520 --> 1:15:56.559
<v Speaker 1>number one will get very envious of that. But number

1:15:56.600 --> 1:15:58.519
<v Speaker 1>two will lose a lot of power within her own

1:15:59.320 --> 1:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>party the results, So she's going to be constantly buying

1:16:02.320 --> 1:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for power inside on your right. She has to prove

1:16:06.479 --> 1:16:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that she can represent Trump represents to the conservative base,

1:16:12.680 --> 1:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm afraid she doesn't. She's sort of like the

1:16:15.320 --> 1:16:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Paul Ryan figure in her own party. And Paul Ryan

1:16:19.920 --> 1:16:23.599
<v Speaker 1>lost so much credibility and support over the last couple

1:16:23.640 --> 1:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of years that he almost became irrelevant to most conversations

1:16:27.120 --> 1:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about the future of conservatism. Now. On the issue of

1:16:31.080 --> 1:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>conservatism as it should be today, or where the right

1:16:35.080 --> 1:16:39.679
<v Speaker 1>should be focusing its energy. There was a Tucker cross

1:16:39.760 --> 1:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in monologue that was also then turned into an essay,

1:16:43.120 --> 1:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it was an essay turned into monologue, whatever

1:16:44.960 --> 1:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was on populism this week and really

1:16:49.960 --> 1:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>diagnosing some of the problems of American society and some

1:16:53.800 --> 1:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of the inadequacies of the political elites in addressing that. I,

1:16:59.320 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, any of that, Tucker says, you're going to

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:02.639
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of pushback from the left. They're gonna

1:17:02.640 --> 1:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>say it's terrible, it's it's racist, or whatever. They'll always

1:17:05.439 --> 1:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>have the same knee jerk reactions to it. But there

1:17:08.800 --> 1:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>were many on the right of the kind of Weekly Standard,

1:17:13.360 --> 1:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>National Review, never Trump variety, who are saying that this

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is perpetuating victimhood, that this idea of a populist conservative

1:17:23.600 --> 1:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>movement that needs to take care of workers, that needs

1:17:25.960 --> 1:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to reassess global trade and the free market at all

1:17:32.800 --> 1:17:35.599
<v Speaker 1>costs mantra that we've had is somehow a sell out

1:17:35.640 --> 1:17:38.519
<v Speaker 1>of principles. You know, you were there in the early

1:17:38.640 --> 1:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>days with Bannon talking about things like populism for conservatives.

1:17:43.560 --> 1:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this? Well, look, I'm glad

1:17:46.760 --> 1:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's finally getting the airtime it deserves as a

1:17:51.200 --> 1:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>new guiding philosophy for the political right. And Fox News

1:17:56.320 --> 1:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>not exactly the most populist or nationalist are out there

1:18:01.160 --> 1:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>giving Coger Carlson the air time to do this. I

1:18:04.120 --> 1:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>think is it can only be a very good thing.

1:18:06.520 --> 1:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we should be welcoming conversations like this, but instead,

1:18:10.439 --> 1:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>David French in National Review, they poo poo it. They say,

1:18:13.280 --> 1:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that this is this is a debasement of

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>conservative values. Now, you know, British and American conservative values

1:18:20.160 --> 1:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>differ quite a bit, and I understand that. But I've

1:18:22.120 --> 1:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>also come to understand that when you talk about conservatism

1:18:25.439 --> 1:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in America nowadays, people automatically think free market capitalism, low taxes,

1:18:31.680 --> 1:18:35.519
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps even though not in practice, the theory of

1:18:35.600 --> 1:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>limited government. They don't really talk enough about, especially not

1:18:39.960 --> 1:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in DC, family values, sovereignty, border control, jobs, wages, you know,

1:18:47.400 --> 1:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>as Tunis Carlson said in his monologue, dignity, human dignity,

1:18:52.240 --> 1:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is this has been the clarion call of

1:18:54.880 --> 1:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the so called populists in Europe over the last five

1:18:57.920 --> 1:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>or six years. When you look to Hungary and it's

1:19:00.040 --> 1:19:03.559
<v Speaker 1>lea the Czech Republic, in Austria and the United Kingdom's

1:19:03.640 --> 1:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Brixit vote. The human dignity element came in a very

1:19:08.080 --> 1:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>strong way. You know, people in the United States, the

1:19:11.120 --> 1:19:13.599
<v Speaker 1>average family would struggle to put four hundred and fifty

1:19:13.600 --> 1:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars together in case their boiler breaks down in their home.

1:19:17.560 --> 1:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>That's an undignified position for the world's wealthiest nation to

1:19:22.080 --> 1:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>impart upon its citizens. So something has been broken, but

1:19:26.280 --> 1:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the establishment right didn't want to admit it because it

1:19:29.400 --> 1:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>would mean having to admit that there was something fundamentally

1:19:33.080 --> 1:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>incorrect in their ideology. Now, conservativism, it's conservative, isn't supposed

1:19:38.160 --> 1:19:41.839
<v Speaker 1>to be an ideology like a lot of the lefting dogmas.

1:19:41.880 --> 1:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's actually supposed to be a guiding philosophy. And the

1:19:44.720 --> 1:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>guiding philosophy behind that is effectively the nuclear family in

1:19:47.960 --> 1:19:50.479
<v Speaker 1>your community. So it was incredible that Tucker managed to

1:19:50.560 --> 1:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>do thatteen minutes. And I understand it's gone superviral on

1:19:55.320 --> 1:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the Internet in the last twenty four hours, and I

1:19:57.240 --> 1:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's because for all of the magazines and quarter

1:20:02.160 --> 1:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>leads in journals out there, nobody's managed to boil it

1:20:05.439 --> 1:20:08.839
<v Speaker 1>down just so succinctly and to such a massive audience,

1:20:09.000 --> 1:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course that will cause what I call conservative ink.

1:20:12.439 --> 1:20:15.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, the consulting class, the think tank class that

1:20:15.640 --> 1:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know in Washington, DC. You know the guys that

1:20:17.840 --> 1:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>were feeling us all those free drinks over the Christmas period,

1:20:20.760 --> 1:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but their defensive Christmas part is it causes them great irritation.

1:20:24.560 --> 1:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>The drinks were good, they now have to go back

1:20:26.200 --> 1:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to their donors. The drinks were fine, you know, you know,

1:20:29.320 --> 1:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it was it was, it was all right, but the

1:20:31.000 --> 1:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>conversations were not like this. And it's it's so refreshing

1:20:34.479 --> 1:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to me that that Tucker is moving these conversations on.

1:20:36.960 --> 1:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's an addendum to that, he's written an amazing

1:20:39.760 --> 1:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>article as well this quarter in the American Conservative magazine

1:20:44.240 --> 1:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>about about the foolish and endless wars that Western nations

1:20:48.360 --> 1:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>have found themselves dragged into. So he's really becoming a

1:20:51.040 --> 1:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>torchbearer for the populist writing. I say more power to

1:20:54.200 --> 1:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>him who's written that article. Right, Oh, Tucker wrote an

1:20:58.520 --> 1:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>arcle American servant. I didn't know that he wrote about that.

1:21:00.439 --> 1:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That's I'll have to find that one. I've obviously seen them.

1:21:04.320 --> 1:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the monologue from this week. I just look,

1:21:08.120 --> 1:21:10.519
<v Speaker 1>I like the robust debate, and I give the guys

1:21:10.600 --> 1:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of this one who at least

1:21:12.280 --> 1:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>put their names to things and want to engage with

1:21:14.240 --> 1:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>these ideas seriously credit for being a part of an

1:21:18.160 --> 1:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>important discussion on the right and not just being you know,

1:21:21.840 --> 1:21:23.799
<v Speaker 1>because because there really are and I think it's important

1:21:23.880 --> 1:21:25.479
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, they're people that just disagree with some

1:21:25.640 --> 1:21:30.559
<v Speaker 1>aspects of Trump's you know, nationalism, Trump's view of trade.

1:21:30.600 --> 1:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, there there are places to have disagreement on policy,

1:21:33.280 --> 1:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>never mind on the personal matters. And then they're the

1:21:35.600 --> 1:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>people like Anna Navarro who or Jennifer Rubin who are

1:21:38.680 --> 1:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just in no meaningful way on the right except to

1:21:41.280 --> 1:21:43.519
<v Speaker 1>pretend they are so they can trash people on the right.

1:21:43.880 --> 1:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So those are the people that I have no time

1:21:45.479 --> 1:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for and and don't need to hear from it all.

1:21:47.840 --> 1:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>And I'm fine with just if I could just I

1:21:54.479 --> 1:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>would be okay with that as well. And in fact,

1:21:56.040 --> 1:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see some of these some of

1:21:58.200 --> 1:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>these ideas played out in massive debate settings. But David French,

1:22:01.920 --> 1:22:04.839
<v Speaker 1>at the end of his National Review card criticizing Tucker Carlson,

1:22:05.200 --> 1:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>says the populist elevation of the political over the personal.

1:22:08.760 --> 1:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>It's perhaps the worst possible response. He's not actually tackling

1:22:11.920 --> 1:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the ideas. He's just saying that bad mean good, and

1:22:16.320 --> 1:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that's all I'm afraid the establishment has at the moment,

1:22:18.880 --> 1:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not willing to say, well, actually, the ideas that

1:22:22.120 --> 1:22:24.519
<v Speaker 1>we've been espousing in the cane that Romney, the Ryant

1:22:24.600 --> 1:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>ideas for the last twelve years plus has failed a

1:22:27.880 --> 1:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in the country. So I've yet to

1:22:30.760 --> 1:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>see anybody on the political establishment right take Tucker or

1:22:35.200 --> 1:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Anon or anything like that. Hyper Seriously, I'd like to

1:22:38.960 --> 1:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>see someone step up to the play, but I don't

1:22:41.040 --> 1:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think we are going to see anyone. Well, I mean

1:22:43.120 --> 1:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to the earlier points that we were making here, there

1:22:46.640 --> 1:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of personal investment that some of the

1:22:49.840 --> 1:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>voices in this have just in being right above making

1:22:54.040 --> 1:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that the movement is pushing in the right direction

1:22:58.160 --> 1:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and acting in ways that are are for the betterment

1:23:01.040 --> 1:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the entire country. Right. So I think that there's

1:23:04.200 --> 1:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially we're in the midst of a giant clash of

1:23:06.560 --> 1:23:08.519
<v Speaker 1>egos on the right, and for a lot of people,

1:23:09.000 --> 1:23:11.519
<v Speaker 1>they can't get beyond the fact that you know, Trump

1:23:11.600 --> 1:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been their guy, and they don't want to hear it.

1:23:14.160 --> 1:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, today I was dealing with some people who

1:23:16.000 --> 1:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>are even kind of who are who are on the right,

1:23:18.080 --> 1:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and they were they were just saying, well, you know

1:23:20.200 --> 1:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the jobs numbers. I guess that. I guess they're good. No, no,

1:23:23.320 --> 1:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they're good. It's just it's a good jobs number. Well,

1:23:26.720 --> 1:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'll tell you what any were up against the

1:23:29.439 --> 1:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>debate you want to moderate because you're a very fair guy.

1:23:32.080 --> 1:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>If you want to moderate the debate, I'll take part

1:23:34.680 --> 1:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on the populist national side. You find me an establishment

1:23:37.280 --> 1:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>conservative who can hold their own against me in debate,

1:23:39.880 --> 1:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll be there ten out of ten times. Well, I'm

1:23:44.479 --> 1:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I love this idea actually, and I'm not. This is

1:23:46.680 --> 1:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>not just a throwaway from me. Before we let you

1:23:48.439 --> 1:23:51.599
<v Speaker 1>go to enjoy your weekend, raheem, Who if I could,

1:23:51.720 --> 1:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>if I could help arrange a conservative populism versus you know,

1:23:57.640 --> 1:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>traditionalist GOP debate for you know, with with you, who

1:24:01.360 --> 1:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>would you want to who would you want to uh

1:24:03.600 --> 1:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>have on the other side of that? I mean or

1:24:05.120 --> 1:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>or you know, you give me a couple of names.

1:24:06.479 --> 1:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Who comes to mind. Yeah, it's a it's a good question.

1:24:09.040 --> 1:24:10.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it would have to be someone

1:24:10.720 --> 1:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from from you know, the National Review Stable, to be

1:24:14.479 --> 1:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody from from I think there were some people like

1:24:17.040 --> 1:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that that way in trying to the Federalist um. You know,

1:24:20.360 --> 1:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I can get you a short

1:24:22.080 --> 1:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>list of five to ten people. We should do this. Yeah, no,

1:24:24.560 --> 1:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we should. And I have the we have the ability

1:24:27.080 --> 1:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the resources and the platforms to

1:24:29.000 --> 1:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>do It's him. Let's give us one some thought because

1:24:31.120 --> 1:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think because I you know, I do want this

1:24:33.920 --> 1:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>discussion to be aired out more. I do think people

1:24:35.880 --> 1:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>need to hear it and not just oh, you know

1:24:38.120 --> 1:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump mean Trump say bad things on Twitter, Trump nasty

1:24:41.360 --> 1:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to women. You know. Therefore, on my side wins. Well,

1:24:44.040 --> 1:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about trade, I don't really care what

1:24:46.360 --> 1:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump is writing on Twitter. But you know, we're talking

1:24:49.320 --> 1:24:52.519
<v Speaker 1>about the purpose that people should feel day to day

1:24:52.560 --> 1:24:55.519
<v Speaker 1>in their lives as Americans. I think that's that's worth more,

1:24:55.640 --> 1:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's a more important issue than just the

1:24:58.840 --> 1:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>back and forth that we've been seeing a lot of time. Anyway,

1:25:00.720 --> 1:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I've obviously had fun talking to Raheim because we've gone

1:25:02.680 --> 1:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>way over time. Here check out No Go zones. Follow

1:25:05.360 --> 1:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Raheim on Twitter if you're not already, and and well

1:25:09.400 --> 1:25:11.759
<v Speaker 1>we'll have Raheim back again sooner him. Have a great weekend,

1:25:11.800 --> 1:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>my friend. Thank you everybody. Remember the Mullet pro That's

1:25:17.160 --> 1:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a thing that's still going on. Haven't yet had any

1:25:20.240 --> 1:25:23.559
<v Speaker 1>resolution to it. Have not been told when this thing

1:25:23.720 --> 1:25:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to end, where it's heading, or what the

1:25:27.040 --> 1:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>end result is going to be. But we are getting

1:25:30.200 --> 1:25:33.479
<v Speaker 1>more information and no surprise to any of you, as

1:25:33.600 --> 1:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we find out more about the origins of what you

1:25:37.920 --> 1:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>could call, more broadly, the Russia collusion investigation. Doesn't look good.

1:25:43.360 --> 1:25:47.599
<v Speaker 1>It is not confidence inspiring. That's a pretty easy way

1:25:47.600 --> 1:25:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to put it. And we've got somebody on now who

1:25:49.760 --> 1:25:53.759
<v Speaker 1>has a very interesting addition into the canon of knowledge

1:25:53.880 --> 1:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>about just how shady the whole dossier Russia collusion fantasy

1:25:58.720 --> 1:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>really was. Lee Smith is an investigative journalist. He's with

1:26:02.160 --> 1:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>US now. He's written a piece up on the Federalist.

1:26:04.360 --> 1:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>New documents suggest the Steel dossier was a deliberate setup

1:26:09.280 --> 1:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. Lee, great to have you back on the program. Buck,

1:26:12.880 --> 1:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. It's a pleasure. Happy New Year,

1:26:15.160 --> 1:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and how do all your listeners do? Happy New Year?

1:26:17.360 --> 1:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>To you. So, so tell me, my friend, what do

1:26:20.880 --> 1:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>you What do you have here to suggest that the

1:26:24.080 --> 1:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Steel dossier was in fact a setup meant to just

1:26:28.120 --> 1:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>take down Trump? Right? I mean, there are some interesting

1:26:32.439 --> 1:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and useful details here, as well as some very helpful

1:26:36.160 --> 1:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>interviews from some former US officials and some current US

1:26:41.000 --> 1:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>officials which you know, which which points to specific housing

1:26:46.520 --> 1:26:51.559
<v Speaker 1>wise of why Carter Page was targeted with the size

1:26:51.600 --> 1:26:53.559
<v Speaker 1>of warrant, and how that would get them in there,

1:26:53.920 --> 1:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and how that would allow them to monitor the communications

1:26:57.760 --> 1:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>of the entire Trump team. So I put a lot

1:27:00.560 --> 1:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of different moving pieces in here together. How they weaponized

1:27:04.360 --> 1:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this dossier as you nicely pronounced it, and managed a

1:27:09.520 --> 1:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>media campaign. I think it's really important to see these

1:27:12.000 --> 1:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>two things moving in tanda, the media campaign as well as,

1:27:16.000 --> 1:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, for want of a better word, we might

1:27:18.120 --> 1:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>call it the spy campaign, since a lot of it

1:27:20.840 --> 1:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was run by FBI counter intelligence people. How these things merge.

1:27:25.960 --> 1:27:28.479
<v Speaker 1>So I had some more details which I think are

1:27:28.560 --> 1:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>very helpful and very interesting. One of the other important

1:27:31.479 --> 1:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>things about the piece, I think is to remind people

1:27:34.720 --> 1:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that this has been going on for nearly two years.

1:27:37.760 --> 1:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>James Comey ushered in the era of the dossier January sixth,

1:27:42.680 --> 1:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, when he briefed President elect Trump on the

1:27:46.479 --> 1:27:50.519
<v Speaker 1>existence of this thing. That's the fact of that briefing

1:27:50.640 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was leaked to CNN and then BuzzFeed later published the

1:27:54.600 --> 1:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>entire document. And since that the last two years, we've

1:27:57.960 --> 1:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>been living with this not only the nonsense Russia investigation,

1:28:03.320 --> 1:28:06.719
<v Speaker 1>not only Russia Gate, which is filled the pages, filled

1:28:06.800 --> 1:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>print and broadcast media, but as I point out in

1:28:10.080 --> 1:28:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the Federalist piece, uh, there have been other operations modeled

1:28:15.040 --> 1:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on the dossier operation, targeting not just Trump team policies,

1:28:19.560 --> 1:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but also targeting the American public. So that's that's how

1:28:24.439 --> 1:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what what what I think the piece adds to the

1:28:26.680 --> 1:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>to the discussion targeting the American public house quote if

1:28:33.600 --> 1:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you um, I mean I think the American public was

1:28:36.479 --> 1:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>targeted with the Russia Gate. Uh when with the dossier operation.

1:28:40.439 --> 1:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was about a bunch of people. You're

1:28:43.000 --> 1:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>saying it was an information operation, It was a it

1:28:45.200 --> 1:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was a propaganda operation, right, Yeah, that's what I mean. Um,

1:28:49.120 --> 1:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know they were contesting uh kendidate and then an

1:28:53.680 --> 1:28:57.479
<v Speaker 1>election that that they didn't like. Um, so yeah, so

1:28:57.720 --> 1:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so so so that's what I mean. They were, you know,

1:29:00.040 --> 1:29:05.639
<v Speaker 1>going after the going after the election, going after the election,

1:29:05.760 --> 1:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>right information operation, And I mean, did you do you

1:29:09.520 --> 1:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>find that the To me, it seems like the dossier

1:29:13.520 --> 1:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>has just gotten lost in the memory hole for so

1:29:15.400 --> 1:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>many people because it served its purpose, which was to

1:29:18.760 --> 1:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>give the at the time, to give some kind of

1:29:22.560 --> 1:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a fig leaf for all these different pieces to be

1:29:26.360 --> 1:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>put in play to go after Trump, to go after

1:29:29.320 --> 1:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>people around Trump. And now that a lot of time

1:29:31.960 --> 1:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>has passed and there's no collusion proof whatsoever that's been shown,

1:29:35.520 --> 1:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>yet everyone's kind of like, yeah, what was that dossier again?

1:29:38.320 --> 1:29:40.759
<v Speaker 1>What was that all about? Where, in my mind, shouldn't

1:29:40.800 --> 1:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we be verifying if the dossier was ever really a

1:29:43.720 --> 1:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that anybody should have paid attention to. It seems

1:29:45.840 --> 1:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>like there's not as much interest in this from journalists

1:29:48.360 --> 1:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>or the government as there should be. I think that,

1:29:51.640 --> 1:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, unfortunately, most of the press was part of this, uh,

1:29:55.800 --> 1:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>part of this information operation, so there's not a lot

1:29:58.800 --> 1:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of interest on that part of of trying to see

1:30:03.200 --> 1:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>what was going on here. And certainly we see right now.

1:30:06.880 --> 1:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are large parts of the Department of Justice,

1:30:08.920 --> 1:30:12.559
<v Speaker 1>including the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who was still

1:30:12.640 --> 1:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>pushing back. I mean, when Republicans were in control of

1:30:16.080 --> 1:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the House and in control of oversight committees, they were

1:30:18.680 --> 1:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>pushing back on House intelligence, on judiciary, on oversight. And

1:30:24.080 --> 1:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>now that now that the House has changed hands and

1:30:27.080 --> 1:30:31.559
<v Speaker 1>it's in Democratic hands, we're likely to get the answers

1:30:31.600 --> 1:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to get are not going to come

1:30:34.280 --> 1:30:36.519
<v Speaker 1>through the House. But I think that one of the

1:30:36.600 --> 1:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>things we're going to see happen is I mean, who

1:30:39.200 --> 1:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>has already Brad Sherman, who is filing, you know, filing

1:30:44.160 --> 1:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of impeachment papers. I think that this is

1:30:48.160 --> 1:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going to come up again. They're going to use the

1:30:50.520 --> 1:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Russia Gate stuff. They're going to use They're going to

1:30:52.960 --> 1:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>use the dossier, They're going to use all of these

1:30:55.479 --> 1:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>things again to target President Trump. To that that is,

1:31:01.120 --> 1:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that is for sure, We're gonna have to Yeah, we're

1:31:04.360 --> 1:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna to see if if they're able to actually get

1:31:06.200 --> 1:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the bottom this. Lee Smith, everybody check out his piece

1:31:08.439 --> 1:31:10.439
<v Speaker 1>on the Federalist. Lee, thanks so much for calling in,

1:31:11.320 --> 1:31:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for bringing me on. Oh, it's almost the weekend, team,

1:31:15.600 --> 1:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>which means that I have a very exciting and very

1:31:19.280 --> 1:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>very social weekend plan of watching movies with Miss Molly.

1:31:22.439 --> 1:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be who it's gonna be, gonna be crazy.

1:31:24.360 --> 1:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how we're gonna how we're gonna keep

1:31:26.400 --> 1:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>up with all of it. Lots of time on the couch,

1:31:28.240 --> 1:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of napping. But there will be some film watching,

1:31:31.240 --> 1:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, or at least some Netflix watching. And I

1:31:34.439 --> 1:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>saw this. I saw this piece by Kyle Smith over

1:31:36.840 --> 1:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a National Review. I think Kyle's an astute guy. Have

1:31:39.240 --> 1:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>had him on the show many times in the past,

1:31:41.800 --> 1:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>many different shows in fact. And he says he's got

1:31:44.680 --> 1:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this piece out ten conservative movies that hit home in

1:31:48.760 --> 1:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, and and I was really curious. It's like, wow,

1:31:52.360 --> 1:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>what ten conservative movies? What could be? You know, what

1:31:55.800 --> 1:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>could be on this list? And sure enough he does

1:31:58.840 --> 1:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have some some good ones. I'll start in order of

1:32:01.960 --> 1:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the top of the list down to h you know,

1:32:05.360 --> 1:32:08.479
<v Speaker 1>so we'll start with with the the biggest and the best,

1:32:08.560 --> 1:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and move our way downloads a little bit.

1:32:10.120 --> 1:32:14.439
<v Speaker 1>But he points out the chap Aquittic on Netflix is

1:32:14.479 --> 1:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a movie that you can watch now. I saw it

1:32:16.640 --> 1:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>when it was streaming online a while ago. I think

1:32:19.160 --> 1:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we actually I think I might have even had the

1:32:21.439 --> 1:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>producers of the movie on on this show. I can't

1:32:23.840 --> 1:32:26.559
<v Speaker 1>remember now, I think we did. And Chapa Quittics pretty

1:32:26.560 --> 1:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>good producer, Mike, you see this one, Yeah I did. Yeah,

1:32:28.880 --> 1:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they were on the show. Actually they we had they

1:32:31.080 --> 1:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>were a sponsor for they were right, Yeah, and they were.

1:32:34.479 --> 1:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right, they were a sponsor on the show. We

1:32:36.479 --> 1:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>love our sponsors. Uh. You know, I like this movie

1:32:38.840 --> 1:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just because, for the first time that I can think of,

1:32:42.479 --> 1:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it was fun to see the Kennedy's finally get a

1:32:46.360 --> 1:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit a little bit of the truth treatment, you know,

1:32:48.400 --> 1:32:52.639
<v Speaker 1>where we're so uh inundated in the in our culture

1:32:52.920 --> 1:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>with people trying to pretend that the Kennedy's were fantastic,

1:32:55.840 --> 1:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Kennedy's were, you know, Camelot and all this stuff,

1:32:59.120 --> 1:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and at Teddy Anny Wash you know, kind of a

1:33:01.800 --> 1:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>dirt bag. You know, it's not not a good guy.

1:33:04.680 --> 1:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeh man. He got away with murder. You start with that,

1:33:07.080 --> 1:33:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and then everything else is kind of you know, you

1:33:09.520 --> 1:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>could throw and yeah, you know he's a womanizer and

1:33:11.760 --> 1:33:13.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, a booze hound and all that stuff. But

1:33:13.800 --> 1:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of the day, he let

1:33:15.880 --> 1:33:17.599
<v Speaker 1>he let a woman drown the back of his car,

1:33:17.840 --> 1:33:22.519
<v Speaker 1>and and the whole effort to salvage his political career affords. Anyway,

1:33:22.560 --> 1:33:24.519
<v Speaker 1>chap a quick. It's look, it's not gonna be a

1:33:25.640 --> 1:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>popcorn eating blockbuster kind of experience for your for you,

1:33:29.200 --> 1:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but if you haven't seen it, you know it was.

1:33:31.280 --> 1:33:33.599
<v Speaker 1>It's a good movie. So I I point that one

1:33:33.640 --> 1:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>out and then, or rather Kyle Smith points it out,

1:33:36.720 --> 1:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but I agree with him. He's got number two on

1:33:38.880 --> 1:33:43.479
<v Speaker 1>his top ten list. Here is Halloween, which I am,

1:33:43.760 --> 1:33:46.679
<v Speaker 1>which is now available on demand. I have never seen, Mike,

1:33:46.720 --> 1:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I just realized this. Any of the Halloween movies have you? Yeah?

1:33:51.720 --> 1:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot. Actually, I'm a big Christmas movie guy. So Halloween,

1:33:57.000 --> 1:34:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the the original Halloween. Yeah, Halloween, the horror movie. Halloween.

1:34:02.920 --> 1:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it about Halloween not Christmas? Yeah? My mind is

1:34:06.160 --> 1:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>still on vacation down in Florida where I just got

1:34:08.400 --> 1:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>back from. But so I'm still thinking Christmas. But I

1:34:12.760 --> 1:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>actually do like, I actually do like Halloween movies. Um,

1:34:15.240 --> 1:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't like You're about to start a whole

1:34:17.200 --> 1:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>existential discussion. There is Halloween a Christmas movie. I know

1:34:21.040 --> 1:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you could, you could. It is a Halloween. It is

1:34:22.800 --> 1:34:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a holiday movie. You could say, well, how is it conservative?

1:34:26.200 --> 1:34:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I have no idea unless they're trying to say,

1:34:28.840 --> 1:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like conservatives, Kyle Smith writes. He writes about it, the

1:34:31.720 --> 1:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>importance of armed individual self defense, the fallen nature of man,

1:34:36.400 --> 1:34:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the incompetence of state authorities, the necessity of capital punishment

1:34:40.720 --> 1:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for evildoers, and even the vapidity of liberal true crime podcasters.

1:34:46.080 --> 1:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>All gets traumatized. Well, he's made me in his description,

1:34:49.600 --> 1:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>He's made me kind of want to want to watch Halloween.

1:34:51.800 --> 1:34:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll see if this Molly wants to download it. Yeah,

1:34:54.479 --> 1:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that started out as a stretch, but then I could

1:34:56.120 --> 1:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>see where he was going. Yeah, what's kind of like

1:34:59.000 --> 1:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>how when you when you think of about it? You know,

1:35:00.640 --> 1:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Grand Turino very conservative movie. Yeah, Ghostbusters, very conservative movie.

1:35:05.720 --> 1:35:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Ghostbusters about a couple of plucky entrepreneurs who start a

1:35:10.760 --> 1:35:14.519
<v Speaker 1>small business and get screwed over by the EPA. What

1:35:14.640 --> 1:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>could be more of a conservative fairy tale than that?

1:35:17.160 --> 1:35:20.439
<v Speaker 1>It's very true, so you know some Yeah, sometimes these

1:35:20.479 --> 1:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>movies you don't think of as conservative, turns out they are.

1:35:22.400 --> 1:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But I also would throw in there, Mike, I saw

1:35:25.520 --> 1:35:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought that if I was going to make

1:35:27.520 --> 1:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a movie. There are a few genres that I feel

1:35:29.280 --> 1:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like you can't miss if you do it right. And

1:35:31.640 --> 1:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a I'm not a big Sasquatch person, you know,

1:35:34.439 --> 1:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I don't get that excited about Sasquatch. That said,

1:35:37.200 --> 1:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I've always been surprised that there aren't more excellent offerings

1:35:42.520 --> 1:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Sasquatch film and it's kind of horror and

1:35:46.520 --> 1:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>uh and thriller movie genre, you know, movie genre. I

1:35:50.520 --> 1:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>found one over the break. It's called Primal Rage, which

1:35:53.800 --> 1:35:56.479
<v Speaker 1>is not a pretty good title for a Sasquatch movie,

1:35:56.880 --> 1:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but it is like it is the the big Foot

1:36:00.840 --> 1:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of your nightmares. I mean, it's like hunting people down

1:36:03.160 --> 1:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's incredibly violent and a very brutal, brutal movie. Um,

1:36:08.320 --> 1:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta say it was pretty entertaining. Actually I'll

1:36:10.840 --> 1:36:18.240
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Yeah, yeah, I mean I'm I'm somebody

1:36:18.280 --> 1:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that just feels like they're there are movies that you

1:36:21.400 --> 1:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>know you can watch, you think yourself, I could do

1:36:23.680 --> 1:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a better version of this, uh and and that's definitely

1:36:26.760 --> 1:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>one of them. I feel like I one day will

1:36:29.200 --> 1:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>write the great Sasquatch horror movie. And this is just

1:36:32.760 --> 1:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a weird, A weird thing I thought of before. Oh,

1:36:34.960 --> 1:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>back to uh, back to the list. Here, um Gosnel,

1:36:38.720 --> 1:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the trial of America's biggest serial killer. I know we've

1:36:40.920 --> 1:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>had I've had him people from that Nick Searcy, for example,

1:36:45.200 --> 1:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I had him on Rising. I think we had him

1:36:46.920 --> 1:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>here here on Radio two. I have not seen Gosnell,

1:36:49.920 --> 1:36:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So I've got to add that, add that to my list.

1:36:52.760 --> 1:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>First Reformed. I don't know what that. Have you heard

1:36:55.120 --> 1:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of that? I don't even know what that is? No, yeah,

1:36:56.920 --> 1:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't the only one, actually I did. I did

1:36:59.240 --> 1:37:01.599
<v Speaker 1>not hear of it. I know of Gosnel, I know Halloween,

1:37:01.680 --> 1:37:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and I know Chap a Quick. The other ones I

1:37:04.479 --> 1:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know about. And then this is the one that

1:37:08.680 --> 1:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>really surprised me here, Black Panther, he says. The new

1:37:14.000 --> 1:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Black Panther is a rebuke to the old Black Panthers,

1:37:17.200 --> 1:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>as played by Chadwick Boseman in this terrifically entertaining and

1:37:20.760 --> 1:37:26.440
<v Speaker 1>smart blockbuster. I am a I'm a Black Panther contrarian.

1:37:26.720 --> 1:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I do not like Black Panther as a movie at all.

1:37:31.400 --> 1:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was loud, dumb, and too long, and

1:37:35.320 --> 1:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I would I would say for example, if we're talking

1:37:37.800 --> 1:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about a superhero movie with an African American in the

1:37:42.880 --> 1:37:46.519
<v Speaker 1>lead role, I think Blade with Wesley Snipe's a better movie.

1:37:46.880 --> 1:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a better movie the Black Panther. Maybe

1:37:48.880 --> 1:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm crazy. I haven't heard great things about Black Panther.

1:37:52.439 --> 1:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But Blade was an excellent movie, right, Blade's an excellent movie.

1:37:57.600 --> 1:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean in Black Panther, at the end, you've got

1:38:00.800 --> 1:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>cgi uh, you know, Rhinoceros is running people over. I mean,

1:38:05.680 --> 1:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just nonsense. It's just I don't know. And I

1:38:07.840 --> 1:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>get I said this at the Hill today because we're

1:38:10.080 --> 1:38:12.280
<v Speaker 1>talking to Black Panther came up earlier today. I just

1:38:12.800 --> 1:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. Everyone has drunk the Black Panther kool aid.

1:38:17.360 --> 1:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>They're all being told that it's the greatest movie and

1:38:20.280 --> 1:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to love it, you know, you have to

1:38:22.160 --> 1:38:24.599
<v Speaker 1>be into Black Panther. And I'm just like, I don't

1:38:24.680 --> 1:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. I don't see it. Yeah, yeah, anyway,

1:38:29.120 --> 1:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Well that's that's what. And then there's the Death of Stalin.

1:38:31.479 --> 1:38:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I will say that's on showtime. I've I've been told

1:38:33.800 --> 1:38:37.559
<v Speaker 1>that's excellent. So that actually this weekend, I think Death

1:38:37.600 --> 1:38:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of Stalin top of my list producer, Mike, if you

1:38:39.320 --> 1:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>pick one of these up, you gotta come on and

1:38:41.160 --> 1:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>give us your review, right, Yeah, I will watch one

1:38:42.960 --> 1:38:44.599
<v Speaker 1>of these. I'm looking at a couple of them look

1:38:44.680 --> 1:38:47.519
<v Speaker 1>really good. Um that the Stalin sounds the most appealing

1:38:47.560 --> 1:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to me right now, so I might go with that,

1:38:49.040 --> 1:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we can we're first reformed. I'll go with

1:38:51.760 --> 1:38:53.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those. Ding I think the Gods, no one.

1:38:53.439 --> 1:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I could get through that. That's for me.

1:38:57.880 --> 1:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That's I'll get and yeah, disgusted all at the same time,

1:39:04.680 --> 1:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean I was for Schindler's List for

1:39:07.640 --> 1:39:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while. After I saw it, I was

1:39:09.960 --> 1:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of, yeah, you know, kind of traumatized. I think

1:39:12.080 --> 1:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it's important that people see that movie, but I don't.

1:39:14.880 --> 1:39:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd have a traumatic experience if I sat

1:39:17.240 --> 1:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>through Goss. Although I'm told there's not it's not gory

1:39:19.240 --> 1:39:22.240
<v Speaker 1>or anything, which is obviously good, but it deals, you know,

1:39:22.280 --> 1:39:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the subject matter. It's tough to tough to watch and

1:39:25.720 --> 1:39:27.800
<v Speaker 1>listen and hear about that and not I think come

1:39:27.840 --> 1:39:30.559
<v Speaker 1>away angry and that was all happening in Philly, your hometown.

1:39:30.600 --> 1:39:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I know. I was just about to say that and

1:39:32.479 --> 1:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's a little disappointing. You know. They gotta wait.

1:39:36.360 --> 1:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to watch it at some point so

1:39:37.920 --> 1:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll everybody know what I think. But I am a

1:39:39.880 --> 1:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>next seriously, but all right, that's yeah. You know, he

1:39:44.320 --> 1:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was in the Shape but he was the only good

1:39:46.160 --> 1:39:48.479
<v Speaker 1>thing in the Shape of Water, which is a movie

1:39:48.520 --> 1:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>about a woman who has sex with her aquarium pet.

1:39:51.160 --> 1:39:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And every time I say that to people, they think

1:39:52.760 --> 1:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that I'm weird, and then they think about They're like,

1:39:54.360 --> 1:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, you're right, Buck, that's right. It's a

1:39:58.080 --> 1:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>bizarre movie. Ye, I believe it one best picture. But

1:40:01.280 --> 1:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the oscars now are about as meaningful as a Nobel

1:40:04.479 --> 1:40:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Peace Prize, which is, as we all know, not very meaningful. Meaningful.

1:40:07.680 --> 1:40:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's come back and do some role call

1:40:09.360 --> 1:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>team to close out the show for the and kick

1:40:11.880 --> 1:40:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it off for the weekend. Stay with me like soft

1:40:15.320 --> 1:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>butter on warm toast. Time to spread some freedom coast

1:40:18.960 --> 1:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to coast. It's time for roll call. Indeed, it is

1:40:31.600 --> 1:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>time for the roll call. I'm trying to uh, trying

1:40:36.200 --> 1:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to think about ways I can I can follow through

1:40:39.360 --> 1:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on some of the things we've discussed, some of the

1:40:41.160 --> 1:40:43.240
<v Speaker 1>changes we've discussed for the show in the new year,

1:40:43.360 --> 1:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>so I have not forgotten. I know we've said we're

1:40:45.880 --> 1:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna get away to get more calls going here. That's

1:40:48.160 --> 1:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. We've we've got We've got plans, folks, we

1:40:50.320 --> 1:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>got plans. So roll call, though, is always fun. So

1:40:53.160 --> 1:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep going with that. Rocky kicks us off.

1:40:57.520 --> 1:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It is imperative we let the people who vote Democrat, no,

1:41:00.840 --> 1:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they are supporting the things that Democrats are pushing. After

1:41:04.160 --> 1:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talking to a number of them, it seemed there were

1:41:05.840 --> 1:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>more single issue voters when I mentioned the other issues

1:41:09.240 --> 1:41:11.559
<v Speaker 1>they're pushing. They seem to think they can separate themselves.

1:41:11.640 --> 1:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We have to let them know we are holding every

1:41:13.840 --> 1:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them responsible for the craziest, stupidest ideas. Don't

1:41:17.040 --> 1:41:22.280
<v Speaker 1>let them escape responsibility. All right, Rocky's Rocky's got a

1:41:22.280 --> 1:41:25.800
<v Speaker 1>plan and he's gonna fallow through on it. Andrea, all right,

1:41:26.200 --> 1:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for acknowledging publicly that the opioid

1:41:29.960 --> 1:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis is not patient doctor base, but illegal consumption based.

1:41:34.600 --> 1:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a very painful and debilitating condition for which

1:41:37.120 --> 1:41:39.559
<v Speaker 1>my doctor will no longer prescribe meds. I had safely

1:41:39.600 --> 1:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>been on for six years. To make it worse, the

1:41:42.360 --> 1:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>symptoms are extremely bad in the cold, and we're about

1:41:45.120 --> 1:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to be stationed in Mongolia, oh gosh, where it's usually

1:41:48.080 --> 1:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>negative twenty to negative forty in the winter. I'll have

1:41:50.920 --> 1:41:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to entertain dignitaries while in pain, which makes it difficult

1:41:53.840 --> 1:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to move, think or interact. Thanks mainstream media and military

1:41:57.520 --> 1:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>healthcare for letting me down horribly. Keep up the good work.

1:42:00.240 --> 1:42:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Maybe your voice and other rational voices will help reverse

1:42:03.760 --> 1:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>some of this. Yeah, Andrew, it's it's troublesome because there

1:42:07.880 --> 1:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is a clear preference in the media for talking about

1:42:12.439 --> 1:42:17.519
<v Speaker 1>the downsides of opioids when it comes to prescription drugs

1:42:17.640 --> 1:42:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and doctors who are prescribing, they always want to focus

1:42:20.479 --> 1:42:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on that part of the problem. And in the last

1:42:23.400 --> 1:42:26.320
<v Speaker 1>five years that's become a smaller and smaller slice of

1:42:26.400 --> 1:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years, it's become much much smaller than

1:42:29.640 --> 1:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it was, and yet the problem is worse than it

1:42:32.400 --> 1:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>ever was. And that's because the cartels have seen an

1:42:35.120 --> 1:42:38.280
<v Speaker 1>opening and there's a lot of money to be made

1:42:38.320 --> 1:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for them, and they're now just providing at the street level.

1:42:44.600 --> 1:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>They're providing these drugs for people that they can now

1:42:47.240 --> 1:42:50.240
<v Speaker 1>get illegally, but they're illegal drugs, right if you if

1:42:50.320 --> 1:42:54.679
<v Speaker 1>you buy fake oxyconton, which might actually even be fentonel,

1:42:54.680 --> 1:42:56.519
<v Speaker 1>so it's incredibly dangerous. But if you buy that from

1:42:56.520 --> 1:42:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the cartels, that is a felony. That's illegal. It's illegal

1:42:59.479 --> 1:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>from a seller, it's legal for anyone to buy it.

1:43:02.160 --> 1:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's part of the illegal drug trade. And it

1:43:05.320 --> 1:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is disconcerting because one of the reasons that there was

1:43:09.920 --> 1:43:17.400
<v Speaker 1>such an opening for this explosion of prescribing certain drugs OxyContin.

1:43:17.840 --> 1:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>OxyContin is the most well known one, but one of

1:43:19.600 --> 1:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the reasons for it is that there's a lot of

1:43:22.080 --> 1:43:25.639
<v Speaker 1>chronic pain. People are living longer, but also as life

1:43:25.680 --> 1:43:28.760
<v Speaker 1>expectancy has gone up and people are trying to be

1:43:28.880 --> 1:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>more active, they're dealing with more chronic and debilitating pain

1:43:33.840 --> 1:43:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and there's not The truth is that are modern medicine

1:43:38.640 --> 1:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is pretty disappointing when it comes to really effective pain management,

1:43:43.439 --> 1:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>or at least you have to really become your own

1:43:45.960 --> 1:43:49.479
<v Speaker 1>advocate within the health system to find ways to get

1:43:49.560 --> 1:43:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the assistance you need. And there's no there's you know,

1:43:52.640 --> 1:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no easy fix, and there's a lot of bad information.

1:43:55.200 --> 1:43:57.760
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of people who will tell you, oh,

1:43:57.880 --> 1:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's in your head, or maybe it's maybe it's fibro myalger,

1:44:01.720 --> 1:44:03.519
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's this, or it's that. They just they

1:44:03.560 --> 1:44:07.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't and the answers they don't know. Um, pain management,

1:44:07.840 --> 1:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>once you get into the real you know, the real

1:44:12.360 --> 1:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>deep weeds, if you will, of things like the gastro

1:44:17.840 --> 1:44:23.800
<v Speaker 1>intestinal tract, of of pain management, of you know, neuro

1:44:24.360 --> 1:44:28.840
<v Speaker 1>neurobiological function. We know stuff, but we also don't know

1:44:29.240 --> 1:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff, meaning that modern medicine's got a

1:44:31.760 --> 1:44:34.439
<v Speaker 1>long way to go on that. So anyway, Andrea, stay strong,

1:44:34.840 --> 1:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>keep your shield high and uh and and hopefully you'll

1:44:37.960 --> 1:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to find a regiment that works well for you.

1:44:40.200 --> 1:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you will. Just keep just keep looking and

1:44:42.120 --> 1:44:45.679
<v Speaker 1>remember what I said, You've got to be your own advocate. Joseph,

1:44:46.000 --> 1:44:48.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, it's happy Friday, Buck. I really enjoyed listening

1:44:48.320 --> 1:44:52.599
<v Speaker 1>to you shredding budget chairman this morning. Could could up

1:44:52.680 --> 1:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the fight shields high? Um. Yeah, I I did get

1:44:57.920 --> 1:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Joseph saw me on Unhealthy and I

1:45:01.280 --> 1:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>asked the budget chairman, is there any I love to

1:45:04.320 --> 1:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>do this? I like to do the understated question that

1:45:09.640 --> 1:45:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just wrecks that just ri e kt, as they say

1:45:13.360 --> 1:45:17.479
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, leave somebody wrecked by just asking a question

1:45:17.560 --> 1:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that exposes what the real agenda is or what they're doing.

1:45:20.840 --> 1:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I had somebody on not long ago, and

1:45:24.080 --> 1:45:28.519
<v Speaker 1>her whole thing was how Trump's Trump's deregulation and all

1:45:28.600 --> 1:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>she does is study regulations and advocate against the deregulatory

1:45:33.479 --> 1:45:35.639
<v Speaker 1>efforts of the Trump administration. And I said, well, Trump

1:45:35.680 --> 1:45:38.720
<v Speaker 1>has gotten rid of how many thousands of regulations? Is

1:45:38.760 --> 1:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there a single regulation he's gotten rid of that you

1:45:40.880 --> 1:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>can name person who only works on regulations that was

1:45:45.280 --> 1:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a good was a good decision? Crickets chirping, Nothing, couldn't

1:45:50.800 --> 1:45:54.479
<v Speaker 1>name one. So every federal government regulation Trump's gotten rid of,

1:45:54.479 --> 1:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to believe they're all good ideas, meaning the

1:45:58.240 --> 1:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>regulations were all good ideas. That's laughable. It just goes

1:46:02.200 --> 1:46:05.679
<v Speaker 1>to show how people are are often because they're especially

1:46:05.720 --> 1:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in DC, when you're talking about lobbying or policy advocates,

1:46:09.000 --> 1:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're mercenaries. They're they're paid for an outcome. They're

1:46:11.840 --> 1:46:13.679
<v Speaker 1>not paid for the best interests of the American people.

1:46:14.280 --> 1:46:16.599
<v Speaker 1>And in the budget Chairman Yarmouth, what I will say

1:46:16.720 --> 1:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is a very nice guy from from Kentucky. He's very

1:46:19.400 --> 1:46:22.280
<v Speaker 1>charming guys, he's very friendly. Um. But you know, I

1:46:22.360 --> 1:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>ask he's he's the incoming Democrat budget chairman in the House,

1:46:26.200 --> 1:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and I say, is there an area of the government

1:46:29.080 --> 1:46:32.760
<v Speaker 1>where we're spending too much money? And what do you think?

1:46:32.800 --> 1:46:37.519
<v Speaker 1>He says the only thing that he singles out defense,

1:46:38.400 --> 1:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we hear a yeah, we need to balance

1:46:40.200 --> 1:46:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the budget more generally, you know, kind of some a

1:46:42.560 --> 1:46:44.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of this, a little bit of that, not

1:46:44.400 --> 1:46:46.720
<v Speaker 1>too hot, not too cold, just rite talk. And then

1:46:46.760 --> 1:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he starts talking about raising taxes. So this, this is

1:46:49.720 --> 1:46:53.479
<v Speaker 1>just the This is the Democrat, the Democrat two steps.

1:46:53.479 --> 1:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>This is what you're always going to hear from them.

1:46:55.479 --> 1:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>The only thing we spend too much money on, they'll

1:46:57.160 --> 1:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>admit his defense and the only thing we really need

1:46:59.680 --> 1:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to do is raise taxes. As if that's going to

1:47:05.200 --> 1:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>get us out of the twenty two trillion dollar hole

1:47:07.160 --> 1:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're in, or even over the long term, stabilizes

1:47:11.040 --> 1:47:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it is not. Mike writes Buck. I listen every night

1:47:15.760 --> 1:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in LA on eleven fifty am, and of course that's

1:47:17.920 --> 1:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a six pm start time for your show out here.

1:47:20.000 --> 1:47:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're aware of the situation that they have

1:47:22.640 --> 1:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>replaced your show sometimes with UCLA sports programming and not

1:47:27.760 --> 1:47:29.760
<v Speaker 1>just games, but locker room talk. Is there anyway we

1:47:29.800 --> 1:47:32.559
<v Speaker 1>can get them off of eleven fifty, am, Man, I'm

1:47:32.600 --> 1:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>telling you that most of your shows were placed in

1:47:34.800 --> 1:47:39.559
<v Speaker 1>November and December. Well that's a and then Mike writes,

1:47:39.600 --> 1:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I love your show. This is not good. This is

1:47:42.080 --> 1:47:43.599
<v Speaker 1>not good at all that they're cutting you off. Well,

1:47:43.600 --> 1:47:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I'm on one hundred and thirty

1:47:45.720 --> 1:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>stations or so one hundred and twenty seven I think,

1:47:48.160 --> 1:47:50.519
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So I'm not sure what's going

1:47:50.560 --> 1:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on with this one, but I will look into it

1:47:55.000 --> 1:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and team. That's gonna be it for this weekend or

1:47:57.800 --> 1:48:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for this week rather have a fantastic weekend. I will

1:48:00.360 --> 1:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to you Monday, shield Hie. It's a new year.

1:48:05.160 --> 1:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That means new hiring, bringing new people into your company,

1:48:09.120 --> 1:48:12.519
<v Speaker 1>into the fold, and that means background checks. Now, you

1:48:12.640 --> 1:48:14.519
<v Speaker 1>may be listening to this and you're somebody who's got

1:48:14.600 --> 1:48:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a company with ten employees. You might have ten thousand employees,

1:48:17.920 --> 1:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe working on HR department. Maybe you're a small business owner.

1:48:21.520 --> 1:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You gotta have background checks done. The person that you

1:48:24.000 --> 1:48:26.599
<v Speaker 1>should have. The organization you should have doing your background

1:48:26.640 --> 1:48:31.719
<v Speaker 1>checks is Global Verification Network. GVN is the only dual

1:48:31.800 --> 1:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>certified veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. Okay, they

1:48:35.800 --> 1:48:39.679
<v Speaker 1>are experts in risk mitigation as well, and they never

1:48:39.920 --> 1:48:44.479
<v Speaker 1>offshore any client information. They never subcontract this stuff out.

1:48:44.560 --> 1:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>You deal with them. You call Global Verification Network, you'll

1:48:47.000 --> 1:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>get Global Verification Network on the phone, speaking of which,

1:48:50.439 --> 1:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>give them a call for your background investigation and vetting needs.

1:48:53.320 --> 1:48:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine.

1:48:56.560 --> 1:48:59.479
<v Speaker 1>That's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven

1:48:59.520 --> 1:49:01.800
<v Speaker 1>nine or GOMGVN dot com