WEBVTT - The Optics of This Administration Are Hideous, Stavridis Says

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought you by Bank of America, Mary Lynch. Investing in

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>local communities, economies and a sustainable future. That's the power

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of global connections, Mary Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Member s I p C. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best of economics, finance, investment and international relations.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg Let me go down

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to Charles Powell. He's remember the House of Lords. Joins

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>us from our studios in London, where Tom Keen is

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>all week and Lord Power. Let me just get you

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to react to to what we've seen today. Of course

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got data on manufacturing, industrial production as well the

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>trade gap in the UK. Give me your reaction to

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what we've heard from the BOE today. Well, mine is

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>not a particular skill. Three, I'm not. I'm unsurprised. As

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the short answer, I didn't expect to see interest rates

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>go up. I think a month before an election would

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>be any way quite sporting to try and do something

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like that, even though across the bank of being it

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>is independent. So no, it sounds to be thoroughly sensible

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>as any man. Let me let me get your your

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your sense of word things stand with Brexit. At this

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>point we have a negotiations continuously press ahead of the

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>snap election on the eighth of June. Give us at

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>your perspective on what campaigning is like at this point.

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The import of this election that we face here in

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>less than a month's time. Now, well, it's quite clear

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason that Mrs May called an election was to

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>strengthen her hand in the negotiations over Brexit. She had

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a narrow majority in the House of Commons and

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>merely sixteen votes, and not everyone in the party would

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with everything she wants to do, so she needed

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a bigger majority, and so she's staking all on getting

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that bigger majority. We shall see four weeks today whether

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>she succeeds. But the opinion polls seem to be fairly

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>strongly in her favor. The b we here reducing its

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>growth forecast at to one point nine from two percent

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for so long after the weight In the wake of

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that Brexit vote, the first Brexit vote, uh, so, many

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>economists were telling us that the effects on the economy

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>were more muted than many expected. What's your sense of

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>growth right now in the UK? Are we seeing a

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Brexit effect in a way that we didn't in the

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>immediate aftermath of that vote. I'm not sure how much

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of it is really affected by Brexit. I think the

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>growth rate was bound to sort of wobbles a little bit,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but it hasn't wobbled greatly. I'd still be pretty optimistic

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>about Britain and the run up to Brexit, and I

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think that also the European economies are doing better. Um

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm unexcited. Let's put it like that. I'm untroubled.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm unperturbed. I'm not flapping about Brexit. How about the

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>corporate migration we've heard so much about over these last

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. We've had various banks outline plans to

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>send a few dozen, a few hundred employees elsewhere. How

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>worried are you about the prospects of that A flight

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from the city of London. Well, I'm frankly not terribly worried.

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never thought London was a great financial center because

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we were in the European Union. I mean, we were

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a great financial center like New York's a great financial

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>center because of what we are, because of the policy,

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the policies, the economic life of this country, the traditions,

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>great experience of the city Europe have very little to

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>do with it. I think banks are taking some sensible

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>precautionary measures, check a few guys over there in Europe

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to get the necessary licenses and so on. But don't

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>don't talk now about really locating on a massive scale.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It would be pointless. I mean, Frankfurt and Paris are

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to be world financial centers. They really are not.

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, more people work in the square miles of

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the city of London live in the whole of Frankfort.

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's all very relative. Lord power with us

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Charles Powell, member of the House of Lords, from a

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>private secretary and advisor on Foreign Affairs and defense to

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Lady Thatcher here on Bloomberg Surveillance, Tom Keen with us

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>now at from London, you're more approximate to threaten Neeedle Street,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of course than then. I watch your reaction to the

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>news that we got this boarding time taking British accent lesson.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna try to come back to New York

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>with an appropriate and proper British accent. We are honored

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us, out Lord Power, with your

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>public service to the nation of long ago and far away.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Does the United Kingdom speak to the leadership of Europe

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>now as they spoke to the leadership twenty and thirty

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Is the same dialogue and discourse or will

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it be different? Well, many of the themes are the same,

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course in some areas not covered by the

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>European Union, by which I mean particularly defense and security,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue will go on unchanged. Obviously, ever matters about

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>our membership of the EU, it's a different sort of

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>dialogue and it's in a difficult phase. You would have

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>read the reports of the famous dinner between Prime Minister

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Theresa May and the President of the European Commissioner, Mr

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yunka talking about us from pretty much of a punch

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>up which went on that. I think that's because we're

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>in the phase before the real negotiation staff when both

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>sides are sort of squaring up. They're strutting around the ring,

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>beating their chests, flexing their muscles. The serious stuff hasn't

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>started yet. Did John money do that. I mean, I

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>just find the cadence today totally different than what I

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>studied of your well, John money is even before my time.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But of course I think the point I would make

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>on that, because there's an ideological belief in European Union

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>amongst the original countries of the European Community, they really

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to a belief and a principle. Much of that

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is evaporated over the years. You can't get twenty eight

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>countries thinking and feeding exactly the same as the original six.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>The general aim of closer European Union is officially there,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it's written on all the documents, but I don't believe

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>anyone really believes in Sydney wore as a practical outcome. Cooperation, yes,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe tighter cooperation between smaller groups of countries within the

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven or eight, but not the full the full work.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's just not going to happen. It's under estimation then,

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>has as the experiment itself failed. No, I certainly don't

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's sailed. Obviously, one of the main principles, one

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of the main hopes for it was it would prevent

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>any future war in the middle of Europe, and that

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think but further away from hoever, thank god, I

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>need to rip up the script. Am I allowed to

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>do that? I mean, you know, I'm watching Bank of

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>England here and I'm I'm trying to get it up

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>here on my Bloomberg terminal. There we go. It took

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>me a while to type in the keyboard. Is different.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Sterling is lower with a real drop and this of

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>course has to do with GDP forecast and higher inflation

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. What's your first regulation of sterling two dollar?

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Was it four to one? Yes? It was full to one.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I was in at the time because the US can

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to hear about that. You were there for water

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>again And yes, at the time when when the US

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>came out of gold currency started seventy three, Yeah, I

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>was sitting there in Washington. This is your first radio announcement.

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I know the BBC. You can be four ft back

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>from the mic there, You've got to be a little closer.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But but how do you how do you adjust to

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the generational sterling devaluation We've seen I think people who

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have become cylical about it over the years. We've had

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so many fluctuations in the UK. When you think back

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to the sort of inflation we experienced in the nineteen

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>seventies and early people see this by comparison as a

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>calm time, steady time. I think the initial drop of

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>sterling after after the vote on brixit was a bit

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of a shock, but not an unexpected shock. Really people

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>would have thought that would happen, and it has advantages

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to It's helped our export figures really quite considerably. So

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no sense of PANDAE cattle the person is losing control.

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Things are going pretty well. This has been wonderful. My

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>next trip back to London, I'll drag David Gurrow with

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you and we would love to speak to you and

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jurgen together. I think that would be just a

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>really special Danielson would be great to be We can't

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>stand you or Lord Paul. Thank you so much, Charles

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Paul with his public service during the major Thatcher administrations

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and in Dr Jurgen, if you're listening, we would love

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to make that happen right now. We can do that

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. Joining us now, James Davids a Fletcher School,

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Tough University. We speak to the Admiral about leadership differently

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>than we would have spoken to him two or three

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>or four days ago, Admirals Davids. I'm reading Eric Larabee's

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>incredible one volume on FDR and his Oval Office. Somehow

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't fathom FDR keeping the American press out of

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a photo op in the Oval Office. I mean, these

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>are unique times. Your interpretation of what you've observed from

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the White House in the last two days, well, I'm worried.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone is. Um I'll sort of pin my

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>hopes on hr McMaster, who kind of General McMaster, who

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote an extraordinary book, Dereliction of Duty, the subject of

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>which is the need to speak truth to power. It's

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Joint chiefs during the Vietnam War and how

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they failed in their duty dereliction of duty to the

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States. Uh. It is important in

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>these times that people are unafraid to walk into the

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Oval Office and tell the President when he is embarking

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on a dangerous course. And I think we are in

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>those times. So I'm hopeful that Hr McMaster's voice will

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>be heard. Do those of a military tinge need to

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>speak up? I mean, I understand the discourse of voices

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>need to be heard. I mean the movies would tell

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>me that the Secretary Defense wanders into the office and says,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, sir. Does that happen? Absolutely? And that's okay.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>We have to respect the institutions, but that respect has

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to flow both ways. Tom. In other words, those who

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>hold positions of power must respect them, and those who

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>are subordinate must respect those in power. But there has

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to be confrontation behind closed doors so that our leaders

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>do not take missteps. You mentioned hr McMaster, the head

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the NSC. There was more reporting this week from Eli,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>like our colleague here at Bloomberg among others, talking about

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a potential divide among the NSC again, maybe some tension

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>between the president and an hr McMaster. What's your reaction

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to that? Do do you get the sense that that continues?

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And how worrisome is that to you? Uh, It's worrisome,

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>but it is not in my view definitives. From what

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I can source, hr McMaster continues to have the confidence

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>of the President. He has regular interaction with him. I

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think his voice will be heard. Now, let's say said

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>hr McMaster is the National Security Advisor. He's opening most

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>emphatically on Russia, China, North Korea, these domestic issues. I

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think we have to turn to the Chief of Staff

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Rance previous and hope that he is speaking proof to power.

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the message from what we've seen unfold here over

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>these last couple of days to other members of this

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>administration positions of power? Does that seem like those positions

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>are more tenuous somehow? Yes, you serve at the pleasure

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of the president, But it seems like under this administration

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that can change rather quickly. It's pretty remarkable to see

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>both the National Security Advisor fired as well as the

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>FBI director in the first hundred and twelve days of

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>an administration. So sure, any job that you're holding in

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this admit stration must feel more tenuous today than it

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>did four days ago. On the other hand, that is

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the system and the nature of the

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>executive branch. The president has power, and people serve at

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of the president. When you hit a policy

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you cannot abide, you have the option to resign. Let's

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>hope we don't get to that point where people are

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>walking out the doors. Um At mustavidez. Can you bring

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Doris Karren's Goodwin's team of rivals over to something as

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>fractious as the Senate? I mean they're above it all.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>They don't need to read Doris Karen's Goodwin or the

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Senator McConnell and the rest do They a team of rivals?

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think that we have not seen that

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in quite a while. Frankly, you'd have to go back

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in modern times perhaps to the Reagan tip O'Neill famous linkages.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But on the Senate side, Um, typically we've seen collegiality,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but over the decades. But now, Tom, you're absolutely right,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we see the horses pulling in distinctly different directions. That's

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to me extremely worrisome because the founding fathers built the

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Senate to provide stability, to pride, compromise, to rise above

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the petty issues. It's not happening. What did you make

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of that moment yesterday when the Oval Office tour swung open,

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>and sitting there in was Henry Kissinger, A middle of

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the conversation we've had about the parallels right or wrong

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to what happened in nineteen three, talking of the optics

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that you're you're witnessing here from this administration, Well, uh,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>really extraordinarily bad optics. I mean, you know, sort of

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happening can run on a scale from UH Director Comb.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>He did a bad job. The President was within his

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>rights to fire him over to hey, it's a conspiracy

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>because Comy was investigating the Russians. What we what we

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>know for sure is the optics of this are hideous.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just Kissinger in the link to water Gate.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Who was the previous visitor in the White House, Lavara,

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the secret Foreign Minister of Russia. So just badly mishandled.

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Just coincidentally, early or in the day, I had a

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>chance to be with former Secretary Kissinger, and I'll tell

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you he is on his game, and he told me

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he would be talking to the President about China, North

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Korea and the European Union in Russia. The President could

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>not get better advice based on everything I know in

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>my interactions even earlier in the day with Dr Kissinger.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>The President of Turkey is going to be watched in

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>next week. That's President air Duan. What do you make

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the the list of leaders with whom the President

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>has been engaged? Of course, he's invited President to Tarte

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Philippines to come to the White House as well.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>When you when you look at all the leaders around

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the world, and then all the leaders that he's invited

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to the White House. What do you make of that list? It's, uh,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a mixed picture. I'm extremely concerned about

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we would invite the Turte of the

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Philippines to the White House. He is he's not the

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of character that we want sitting with the President

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. UM. I was also st that's

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the awkwardness of the interaction. For example, is Angela Merkel

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chancellor of Germany. UM So he's arranged the spectrum

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of who he's inviting who's actually bringing in.

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>The key is what are the personal relationships he's building,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the most important of which will be with President g

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>One more quick question you want to get you on

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>your day at Fletcher What are the what are the

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>personal relationships as president needs to uh develop with General Madison,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:31.119
<v Speaker 1>with Mr Tillerson. He's got to be in an absolute

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>mind milk with two of them. And here's some good news.

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>The two of them, Tillerson and Madis are working very

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>very closely together, meeting frequently and also with Secretary of

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security John Kelly. That's a powerful trio. If he

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>means on them for advice, and he continues to reach

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>outside to people like Dr Kissinger. I think he'll be

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on a good course at least on the international side

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of his portfolio. Alright, great to speak with you as

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>always there. Emirald James Tefrita is heading up to the

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Dirks and Senate Office Building to testify before the Senate

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Armed Services commit He joined us on our phone lines.

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom always great to hear his perspective. The Dean of

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fletchery School Slam Diplomacy at Tofts University. Brought you

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>by Bank of America. Mary Lynch. Dedicated to bringing our

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>clients insights and solutions to meet the challenges of a

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>transforming world. That's the power of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Feeder and Smith Incorporated Member s I p C. There's

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>something new from Bloomberg. It's called Lens. Starting right now,

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you can use the Bloomberg Io s app off your

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>iPhone or iPad, or our new Google Chrome extension to

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>read any news story on any website, scan it, and

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>then instantly see the news stories relevant market data from Bloomberg.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>In addition, see all the bios of the key people

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>into the story. It's called lens, and it is just that,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a lens into the people and the data of any

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>story you may be reading. Again, Lens brings you the

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>power of Bloomberg's news and data. Download or io s

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>app or search for the Bloomberg extension at the Chrome

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Store to try lens out. Learn more at Bloomberg dot

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>com slash lens. David Garray in New York, Tom Keene

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in London. As I fumble here on the Bloomberg, typing

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>k W one commodity, trying hard to get my hard

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 1>red winter wheat up on the Bloomberg, a man who

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>can help me do that is one Dennis Gartman, of course,

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Gartman lettered. Let's let's let's get this out

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of the way first. How is hard red winter wheat doing, Dennis,

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It's boring, Lee boring, It's doing very little. Actually the

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>crop is doing fine. There There were problems last week

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with excess rain. But in people one might scoff about

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>software or hard read winter week. But it is the

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff of which bread is made, and bread is still

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the staff of life and dreams. Bread and dreams, yes,

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and and the and of dreams. Absolutely so if the

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>crop is doing fine. Thanks very much, Dan, it's great

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk with you. As always, will move move on

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>down out the matter. As we've been talking throughout the

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>morning all day yesterday about what we've seen in Washington,

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the firing of James Comey, the now former director of

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, and the fallout from that, and we've seen

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>precious little response here in the market. You note in

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>your in your letter yesterday that that might be news

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself. Why is that the case? Do

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you think? Well, it is astonishing how everybody's talking about it.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>There are two things everybody's talking about. One, the Cobe incident,

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and to the lack of volatility. Utterly everywhere in all

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets, there is a total lack of volatility. And

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps until and you can write this down, volatility will

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>return when it returns, and it won't return until a

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>moment before then. It will return when nobody cares any

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>longer about it, when it has been when it has

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>ceased to be a topic of conversation. And probably the

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the COMI incident, now that people understand that it was

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>probably an ungentlemanly manner in which it was done. One

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fire people via node. One fires people across the desk,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But other than that it probably was understandable. So in

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the long term of things, not not much effect, to

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>be honest. A book that you and I love Dennis Gartman,

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Reminiscence of a stock Operator. You were around when Edward

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>le Favre wrote it, um Edwin LaFave wrote it. Here's

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a quote. The desire for constant action, irrespective of underlying

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>conditions is responsible for many losses in Wall Street, even

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>among the professionals. That's a quote from another time. What

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do you do to enjoy not losing money when it's

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this boring? Trying to stay upon the sidelines to the

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>best of one's ability, trying trying to buy break ups

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to the upside, trying to sell break up of the downside,

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to find the charred patterns that one finds interesting

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that where the fundamentals are are also moving in the

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>same direction, but on balance keeping one's powder dry. It is,

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it really is astonishing, how boring is the movement from

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the up from the lower left of the upper right.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And it shall continue tom It is always enjoying, enjoyable.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Gartment. To do a panel or speech with one

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>g Kamensky. Gary Kaminsky with all of his work over

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the years on making a nut losing money, and he

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>brought up a Dennis Gartment concept. Explain to our audience

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>anti Martin gel theory, where you buy more of something

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when it begins to go up, you don't buy more

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>something and double down, etcetera, etcetera. Explain that to our audience.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a very simple concept in life. If you

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do more of the things that are working and less

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things that are not. As I say in

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>speech after speech, gentleman, if you take flowers to your

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend or your wife more often and you get lucky

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>more often, take her flowers on a more consistent basis,

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and be nicer. Do the things that are working. Yes,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it's true. Do the things that are working, and try

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>your best to do less of the things that are not.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>If you buy a stock at fifteen and it goes

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to twenty, the market's telling you that you're right, do

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>more of it. If you buy a stock at fifteen

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and it goes to ten, the market, the collective wisdom

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and the stupidity of everyone trading, it's telling you that

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong. Why would you do more of something that

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>has been going wrong. So it's a very simple notion.

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>The difference I think between pros and amateurs is that

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>pros will buy new highs. Amateurs are always trying to

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>buy new lows. This is not a business. I've said

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>this time and time again, and when I deviate from

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>an eye er. This is not a business of buying

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>low and selling higher. This is a business of buying

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>high and selling higher. This is a business of being

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of shorting something that's already made a new low, because

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>in all likelihood it shall go even lower. Ask Mr

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Ackman about the the What what happened as he continued

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to buy Valiant all the way down from what three

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars to share and he finally sold out at ten.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Do more of that which is working, less of that

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>which is not, and it will serve you very well.

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Dennis will come back with you. But I'm running down here.

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to buy buy flowers. What else should I

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be buying at this point? What's another? One's another opportunity

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>to work work argue at this point by by aluminum

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>by ball bearings. Everybody laughs at me for the for

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the concept of buying America's largest ball bearing manufacturer. But

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>what's more incumbent in economic growth than than the things

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that are absolutely important to machinery. Machines can't run without

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ball bearings, and nobody's paying attention to it except American's

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>large at a ball bearing manufacturer keeps going to new highs.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some economic analysis in real time here, Dennis PPI,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>there up point three more than than was surveyed. What's

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>your read on the numbers we just got today? Those

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>are rather impressive numbers. Clearly the set wants to see

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation and it's finally getting it. I think what's

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>even more important than the p p I number, which

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was was well above expectations, and the two point five

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>x food and energy for the year over year is

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>very is well above expectations. But what's interesting is the

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>jobless claims number keeps plunging. To use a uh Tom's term,

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>making newer and lower low is a two thirty six thousand.

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>The jobs market is getting very tight out there. We

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>simply don't have we we we are running out of

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>laborers on a very quick basis, and you're going to

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>start to see labor rates begin to tip up, I

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think rather quickly. So in the inflation numbers is really

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>quite surprising. Uh. The the the claims number is even

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>more surprising. And I think inflation is now on the

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Let's pivot back to London here. We

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>also got inflation data quarterly inflation data from the BOE

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Is Tom mentioned we've seen diminution in in

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sterling this morning. Uh, Tom, Joey the long and getting

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>killed on it. What's your outlook for sterling? Dennis? You know,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at it's very hard for me to be barish of

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>sterling relative to the US dollar. If if, if the

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the the euro continues to weekend, and I think that

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Euro probably shall it may drag Sterling down. But quite honestly,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that we've seen the worst as far as

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the cable is concerned. So if you made me do something,

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>if I have had a gun held in my head

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and I had to buy or sell cable right here,

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the sterling right here, I'd rather be a buyer than

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a seller. But you'd have to hold a gun to

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>my head to make me do it. We've gotten quiet,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Gartman on dollar. We had a big leap couple

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, and yeah, it's been just sort of

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>training range, but maybe not as range about as oil.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>But there it is, is is that the big surprise

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to come where the optimism gartment has on the US economy.

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>By definition, you get a stronger dollar. I think that

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the propensity shall be for the dollar to get, if

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not dramatically stronger, at least the reasonably stronger over the

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>course of the next several years. There we we will

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>tighten monetary policy long before anybody else shall. Our economy

0:24:59.920 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is doing reasonably well, thank you, compared to most any

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>other economy anywhere around the world. So on balance, all

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>things being otherwise equal, calm, the dollar has to go higher,

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not lower. Bringing your most recent note here, Dennis, say

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you highlight euro Swissy in light of the election in France.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking for there in that cross? You

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>know what has been happening that it's very fascinating that

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Swiss National Bank is really almost the world's largest

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>macro hedge fund. The Swiss National Bank has been trying

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>its best and had not been succeeding until the election

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>results of last week in trying to keep the Swiss

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Franc weak. Suddenly since the election, which puts to bed

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the risks of the Euro collapsing and falling apart. Uh.

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly the Swiss franc has has weakened rather dramatically relative

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to to the Euro. The Swiss have been selling Swiss francs,

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>creating Swiss francs, buying euros, buying dollars, buying in and

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>taking those currencies and buying stocks. They are now one

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of the world's largest shareholders, rivaling rivalry, rivaling the the

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Norwegian UH government fund. And it's astonishing. Nobody's paying much

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>attention to you back. Do you assume, Mr Gartman? Do

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you assume that ends ugly? All these these things, things

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.239
<v Speaker 1>such as that almost always end ugly. But for right

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>now they've got the wind at their back, at least

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for the last week. Let's give them credit for that.

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But Tom, you and I have been around a long time.

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Things like that usually end in a in a very

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>ugly fashion. When shall that happen? Your guess is as

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>good as mine, but it probably shall. Let's been here

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to the equities markets in the time we have left

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>with you, just about a minute left with you, Dennis Gartman,

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you feeling about US equities right now? Still

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a bullmarket, isn't it? As I've said for months and months,

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in a bullmarket, and only prepositions you can have really

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>aggressively long, pleasantly long, or neutral. At this point, you're

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be pleasantly long. It is a bull market,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and every time I hear on call on the side

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of selling it, I regret it. Let's get out in

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>front of the Garment Letter tomorrow. We're going to have

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>our David Abits join us here. Howard. It is an

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary morning for all of retail as they witness the

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>further collapse of Macy's. It is a down six ball

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>market from the seventies, it's down some twelve percent today.

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the chart right in front of me

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, Dennis, retail, do you just get out of

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the way? Is that the Gartment advice? You have no choice,

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>do you? It's retail has been has been distraught and destroyed.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has changed the environment completely. It is even putting

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure upon of all places, Walmart. So mom and Pop

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>may survive, but the middle side stores it is. It

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>is a terrible and dangerous place. So if you have

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>no choice, get out, Dennis. Thank you so much, Dennis Gartment.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>The Gartment Letter, we do not have the gartment letter

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to ship to you by carrier pigeon. We protect the

0:27:50.040 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>copyright of all of our guests today. David Kerry, New York,

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking Keenan, London, England and now joining us is

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who understands retail and understands real estate. Whether it's

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>River Ridge in Lynchburg, Virginia, landmarkt and Alexandria, Virginia, Good

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Morning FM in Washington, maybe it's out at Northgate Durham,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, or maybe it's you know, thank you, Silver

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>City Galeria taught in Massachusetts, Howard. Davidovitz has been to

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>them all. Howard, a workout like Macy's is about real estate,

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Well, it's certainly a big part of it

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>because the stores are too big. You also have to

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>use the real estate to generate new capital to reinvigorate

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the business. They're doing that. Uh, there're in the process

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of monetizing a lot of it. Stores have to be downside,

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>stores have to be closed. The core problem is that

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a number of years ago Macy's doubled their size and

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>what the main company they both did about sixteen billion

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time. It was a disastrous decision because they

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>got second rate stores in second rate malls. Macy's at

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the time was number one and number two in every city,

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and they raced out and what the main company to

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>double their size. When you look back on it, and

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of course I said it at the time everywhere. Uh,

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a disastrous decision and they did it, and

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>now they're paying a price, you know, I I we

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the Harold Squares store just a few

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>moments ago. How much longer this company can hold on

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to that? What would it mean to Macy's for Macy's

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to have to get rid of that piece of real state. Well,

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they're never going to get rid of that. That's what

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you just said is impossible. It won't happen. Here's what

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>will happen in Harold Square is the same thing they're

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>doing in Chicago. It's the same thing they're doing in Minneapolis.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>The store is way too big. What they can do

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is monetize it by finding a way to have multi

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>use development, office, hotel, and that's exactly what they will

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>do and it's exactly what it so they'll end up.

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You can't. I mean, a million square foot store is

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>nush and that's what they got, so they'll end up

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>with a half a million square footstore or four dred

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand square footstore, which is plenty big. It's enormous, and

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's what they'll do it Harold Square. I'll

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>raise a mountain of money and they'll downsize the store.

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>They will never get at Herald Square. Are we still

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>building malls anywhere in this country? Are there any malls

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>under construction? What is the mall of two thousand seventeen?

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The mall of two thousand seventeen doesn't exist because we're

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>not building any enclosed mall zero. We're at level zero.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>We have to close malls. We have to change malls

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that there aren't any malls were dramatically overstored with dramatically overmalled.

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing doesn't make sense. There has to be

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge adjustment take place. How do we get here?

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>How how did it make sense or how did it

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>make sense on paper? For a time? Well, it made

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>sense because number one, cheap money, that's what drives real estate.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Number two, the crazy lunatic analysts who come on radio

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and televisions, who come on and immediately and ask, well,

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you gotta grow at this rate? You gotta do this,

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and that we can't give you this multiple So of

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>course every retailer went completely bananas, dancing to the tune

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of growth, tremendous growth, because that's what you have to have.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Blah blah, blah blah. That's how we ended up the

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>most overstought country in the world by a factor of fool,

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely astounding, dancing to wolf streets, looney tunes

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and private equities, crazy attitudes, and that's how we got here.

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Within this our is merchandizing. I'm looking at the Macy's website.

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>It says trend shop are curated boutique of the latest arrivals,

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>fresh off the runway. Are they cool? The big note

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not cool, and no department store is cool. They're

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>too big to be cool. If you want to be cool,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got to have a focused presentation in a specialty store.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what's cool. So you can't have this gigantic edifice

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and be cool because young people are not going to

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>go there. So cool is out. But here's what's in

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest merchandizing change. Macy's is facing and and and

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they they've been in a statement in a massive sleep

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>for a ten years behind is off price. For ten years,

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>off price has been the most powerful for US and

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>apparel in America. Norts From has double double the number

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of off price nords from rackings that I have nords

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>from sacks of fit. Macy's has been asleep and they've

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>done nothing. Nothing woke up, Get Howard. I'm looking at

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Zaro website granteds in the United Kingdom, folks from

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>London and York. Today Azara doesn't sell price, They're selling

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the image, the trendy, the cool. Does price work anymore?

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Are we exhausted by ten percent off? I don't think

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we're exhausted, because if we were, t J Max wouldn't

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be the leading apparel chain in the world. So I

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're exhausted by a good deal. I do

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>think we're exhausted by over promotion that are not real promotions,

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>which traditional department stores like Macy's specialize in, because after

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they give you the deal, t J Max is still

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>less and all the shoppers know it. So I think

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people like promotions that are real, not fake promotions. And

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Macy's and older department says, I'm not naming me mean

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>all of them specialize in fake promotions and those don't work. Uh.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And Amazon is certainly gonna shake and is shaking it

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>all up. They'll do more apparel business than May sees

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. So there's more apparel business than Macy's. Amazon,

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and they just started David asked a question, so hard

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I will say, it's in the crapper. Yeah, And Howard

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>we started off asking about all the walking that you

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>have to do, all the geography that you have to cover.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>How about virtual geography. When you look at the online

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>stories aside from Amazon, who's doing online retailing? Well, well

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to know who's doing it, Well, the brick

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and water stores. If you look at Macy's penetration, they're

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>doing business online. That's pretty damn good. Let's take the

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>best brick and water store in the world and online,

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the best staples of business online eleven point two billion online.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>How would they do it? They're in the crapper. In

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>other words, it didn't help them because they still have

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>are this real estate to deal with. So no matter

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>how johnline business you have, if you've still got all

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>these courts and all this real estate, you're in that

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>bank to brick and water Source eight out of the dead.

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Largest online companies in America are brick and Yeah, and

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll still in the tank. And they will remain in

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the tank. Our dividivets thank you so much and Carol

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>master sends your kindness regards to you as uh well.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene David

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Gura Is that David Gura? Before the podcast? You can

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio, brought you by

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Mary Lynch. Dedicated to bringing our clients

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>insights and solutions to meet the challenges of a transforming world.

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the power of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce, Fenner

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and Smith Incorporated Member s I p C.