WEBVTT - Bonus: Loutish Lingo and a Group Goodbye

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I know some very vulgar phrases, but I'm not going

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to share them on the podcast. But sometimes if you

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>hear someone giggling quietly in the back corner of sets,

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it might be because I shared one of my secret

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>phrases from the eighteenth or early nineteenth century got someone

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to guess what it meant. Welcome to Bridgerton the

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Official Podcast. I'm Gabby Collins, I'm Hannah Craith, I'm Annabelhood,

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just Brownell. And we're here too. As Agua would say,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>salute you as we better do so. On this episode,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we're just wrapping up the season, and one of my

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite things to do with you three was talk about

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>all the research that you did, and I felt like

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I got to learn a whole lot more about the

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>spirit behind Bridgerton and of course your daily process. So

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would be fun to just kind of

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the lingo and all of the

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful language that you used in Bridgerton with just some

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fun Regency slang that was used throughout the show. What

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>was the best Regency insult? I don't know who wrote it,

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but the writer in season one it might have been

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Chris who wrote Rince Featherington saying to Philippa Dunderhead, I

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a pretty good one. Yeah, I think

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the Featherington's have some of the best lines, don't they sometimes. Yeah, Yeah,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Philippa Imprudence whenever they're on screen or even like behind

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the scenes are just a double act. They are hilarious.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of my favorite kind of Regency slang phrases.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It might even be in the scripts, maybe get it

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>into feature scripts, and it's just blast your eyes and

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it just means, you know, a way of saying I

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>hate you, go wait or something ruder. I like a

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>good old old draft. We were all kind of struggling

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to BVS. Like, I know, if I could see this,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've dropped an F word at all.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I would love to do once in a while. I

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>don't actually think it's right for the show, but you're writing,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just so a nice F word really communicates what

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to say. But also even religious oaths back then,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like you couldn't say God, damn or damn you or

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. That was as bad as saying the

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>F word today. So yeah, even even they were very

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>guarded in their swear words. I think, yeah, well that

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you do find the F word you used quite a

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>lot in lots of historical contexts. Kind of depends on

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which which sources you go to. You not in Jane

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Austen so much, admittedly, but in some other places. There's

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely a Bordier Richer terminology that we could draw and

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if we wanted to. But I think, you know, we're

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>not We're not impolite in British to no, we we're

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not really sweary or rude. So the closest moment though

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that that happens is when Daphne punches Nigel. When I

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>read that script, that was almost like a f you

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like expression. It was like I'm here and

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm meant to behave in a particular way and then

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna deck him. And I always remember reading

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that bit like when I first got the script through

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>before we started season one, and also talking about it

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in the rehearsal room with Phoebe, and just how much

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I liked it, Like, although it feels like a kind

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of break from convention, it also just captured something this

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of frustration and just this need to whack him.

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>So that, you know, that was the kind of the

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>closest to a slang moment in some ways, wasn't it,

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>nabel didn't you mention? There was some sort of document

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like a list of customers or something like that. So

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the writers had this document that was done up that

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>had a few of the rules for language in terms

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the dialogue and stuff or shall verse will and

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that, not using contractions, can't they don't say,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>can't they they cannot or even I beg your pardon,

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>swap for forgive me and it's not, don't it do

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not and things like that. And then in the depth

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of this very long document there's also rules for swing

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and rules for using the F word and things like that,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was really funny. And we've we've not

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>gone there. I just googled it myself trying to remember

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the swear words. Strumpet. That's a fun one.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And it has me thinking about how funny your job is, Annabelle,

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>as a researcher, just googling ways for us to be,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, obscene. I remember when I was researcher on scandal,

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I often would like have to google how to build

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a bomb at an airport or something, and I thought like, oh,

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm surely on you know, some kind of do not

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>fly list now, So I hope there's some equivalent of

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that for you. How does anyone even know how these

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>phrases evolve? How does one even begin to research these

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>colloquialisms and slang? Hannah, can you tell us about some

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of the origins. If you're a historian and you want

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to go about it, you're in luck because in the

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>early nineteenth century there are a lot of dictionaries. You

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have to emergence of dictionaries of slang, so compellations of

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>colloquialisms of everyday language, as people became really interested in

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to collate and collect how people spoke

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in an ordinary way, so you've got your kind of

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>reference library that you can use. But then also novels

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>from the time. I mean, Georget Hare was a sort

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of famous user and creator of regency slang, so she

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>both researched the language very carefully, but also introduced some

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of her own phrases. But the Regency romance novels use

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of regency language to give it a kind

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of feel of the period, and Georget just keeps on

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up. And would you say she's also known for

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>creating a lot of the slang that we might recognize. Yeah, definitely,

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>because that was one of her kind of traits in

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>her writing, and it carries through to regency romance novels today.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>As part of the genre is that language, but a

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of it comes, some of it from the regency,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but also some of it from georget Hare herself, because

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>she created phrases and planted them in her books because

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>she got fed up with people copying her work, so

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>she sort of constructed some of her own terms and

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>phrases that had the regency sound to them, and then

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>if they popped up in other people's work, she realized

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that she was being plagiarized. So there was a bit

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of wordplay going on. So if you've got some time

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on your hands, watched the Waiting for season two, you

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can read georget Hair and find out which are the

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>real regency phrases and which are the ones of her

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>own eventution, it will take a while. So there's this

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>wonderful presenter here in English or Susie Dent who does

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>dictionary corner and countdown, and I you know, I'm a

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>great fan of Susie, and now I feel a little

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>bit like Susi Dent. I'm having like a Susi Dent

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a moment when we talk about the origins of terms.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So Susie, if you're listening, drop me a little message.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I love you. Hannah's work corners it like that. Yeah,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Hannah's hisstory corner. But we can have the extra edition,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>which is for the you know, the later night audience.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So I know some very vulgar phrases, but I'm not

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>going to share them on the podcast. I could put

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>them into the chat and see if you can guess

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what they are. But sometimes if you hear someone giggling

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>quietly in the back corner of sets, it might be

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>because I shared one of my secret very course phrases

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>from the eighteenth or early nineteenth century, got someone trying

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to guess what it meant. But they are really they

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>are really quite quite bad. So I didn't. I just

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to share them. Sorry, you have to

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>ask me in person. Oh, I'm going to come find

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you next time you're on set. Yeah, yeah, that's that'd

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>be good. We'll be right back after a work from

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>our sponsor. Welcome back, to the season finale of bridgeton

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the official podcast, I'm Garby Collins and I'm sitting here

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with Annabelle Hood, Jess Brownell, and doctor Hannah Gregg. We've

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>been talking about some of the Regency slang and lingo,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and we pulled some other favorites. So I'm going to

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>quiz you and see how well you remember some of

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>these pieces of Regency language that showed up either in

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>our conversations or in the actual show. Do we get

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a prize at the end of this, so it's really

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>no ifacking gabulous makes me do like pop quiz, don't

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I know? I have a thing for bob quizzes. I

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have a problem. What is a rake of a manhole?

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd say regency f boy, I would say a philanderer,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a Philander kind of going polight there, Flander. Those are

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, all of the above, all of the above,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Ding ding ding ding. What about by blow? I believe

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a bye blow is a child created from out of marriage.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it can be in an illegitimate child. So

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>I did have a quick check on that in the

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Oxford English Dictionary, which is one of my main resources

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for the origins of language, because it always shows first

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>use of words, and by blow is actually something like

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>we often talk about blow by blow now as a

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of blow by blow account, you know, step by

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>step account, and it seems to have come from a

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>sword of fighting reference. It's like blow by blow. And

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>then a bye blow is a side swipe to attack

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>someone from the side. And so this then links to

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of illegitimacy and that they are born through

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a kind of side action, like a kind of slightly

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>off off the path, so they're not a legitimate offspring.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, that's so juicy. We got a little bit

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of etemology, linguistics history. Moving on to dickt in the NAB.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that one is. I don't know.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like mental, like that crazy in the head. Yeah,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>nab meant head at the time, to be dicked in.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that means crazy, but that is

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>what it meant. I know for sure. What to become

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a tenant for a life means jackled for life like shackled.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's one that georget Haya created in

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>her novels or whether it has a regency like a

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>real agency root I'm going to go and find out

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>later the cut direct, the cut direct. We have Violet

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bridgertin giving Lady Featherington the cut direct in season one

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>after the whole callin Marina business goes down. I remember

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about it quite a lot in the

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>room and how vicious that is, you know, to just

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be fought out ignored like that. And then that night

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I was on the lot where we were, you know,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the studio lot where we were writing, and I was

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting for my car from Ballet and this man walked

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in for a screening and I asked him, Oh, what's screening?

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And he looked at me and he ignored me, and

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he kept walking, and I thought, oh, I just got

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the cut direct. And I was kind of thrilled. It

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>really hurt, though I understood that's a really good one. Jesse.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>You also mentioned before that you have a technique for

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>blazing through writing while also maintaining whatever energy you've got

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>while not knowing the right words. Can you tell us

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about that, Yes, yes, yes. Occasionally when we're writing the script,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about a scene in the room and

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we understand the emotional and the character context for the scene,

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but not the exact regency specifics. We might just put

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like Regency Regency or Annabelle TBD because we expect that

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Annabelle or doctor Hannah will help us figure

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it out. I write the scene like it's a modern

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>day scene, and I write, you know, the colloquialisms that

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are anachronistic, and then I just go back and I

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>do a research pass on it or a Regency Regency

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>pass on it. Basically it's too hard to get a

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>perfect you know, in terms of the period the first

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>time through. One of the things that makes the Bridgeton

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>scripts so distinctive, I think it is probably not what

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the view is will hear because it's in this stage

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>direction too, that kind of, you know, the way the

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>world is brought to life by the Bridgeton script's very

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>distinctive style of fighting stage directions. And I remember reading,

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the season one scripts and sometimes just laughing

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>out loud and just feeling like such warmth towards the

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>writers because if all of the energy that was coming

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>through those directions. And so there was one stage direction

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>from season one where we must be going to the

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Hastings House and you write, mister Darcy can f right

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>off because the house was so much so much grands

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are so much bigger, and I was like, yeah, that's

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely right, that's like perfect. It's so beyond the

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>world of the Darcy pride and prejudice sort of world.

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Mister Darcy can't f right off because this is another

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>layer of kind of that should a glamor and wealth

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and excitement. I loved all of those bits, and that's

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>from you know, Chris Vanders and start of that in

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the pilot, those action lines that have a lot of

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>modern day sayings in them. But when I think about it,

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it really is a Shonda Rhimes thing too, you know,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to Scandal, like those action lines,

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's Shonda's voice. It's rich with references and pop

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>culture moments and you know, comparisons. So so yeah, we

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>love to throw in you know, modern day slang. And

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>actually there should be like an audiobook of it with

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>either Chris or Betsy Bears reading out the stage directions

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.599
<v Speaker 1>as well, because there's just a wonderful character to it,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>its own character. Hasn't it really in there? And of

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>course it is on screen when you see it, because

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>it dictates how everyone approaches the script, which is the

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>blueprint for the whole production. Yeah, Betsy Beers classically reads

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the stage directions that most of our readthroughs for many

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of our shows, and she just goes for it. It's

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>so fun to listen to her read the stage directions

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>because you know she'll be like and then Daphne comes

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in and she's feeling hot. Ab I don't know it's

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the words or the page for me as well. I

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>just see you. I could just spend the lecture, theater

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and the library, and I always feels like a treat

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to see an actors speak words that I would recognize

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>from a historical document. There's something kind of magical about it,

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise it just lives in my head. I'm probably

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a broken record at this point. But I grew up

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on Austin and I streamed those mini series and films

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>into my eyeballs, and so season one when I showed up,

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and then to just walk into a ballroom and see

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>everyone dressed in regency costumes and to see everything that

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Will the production design and did was just like this

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>dream come true, even though I was not a part

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. I was not on camera or anything. I

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in costume. Just to see it all around me

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>was amazing and even like today, it hasn't worn off

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>just stepping on to set every day, so it's like

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a dream. And yes, seeing how just the amount of

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>effort that goes into just a production design and like

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>all the hard work that goes into into filming even

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just a minute of screen time, it's just so so

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>many hours of work. That's what That's what blows me

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>away every single day. I just want to say thank

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you to the three of you, and especially to you Gabby.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's such a law between season one in

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>season two, there's this big gap and to come back

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for this podcast and you know, try to put myself

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the writer's room in season one and think

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>about all the decisions we made and you know, remember

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>those like initial feelings of working on this show when

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it was just a spark and Chris Vanduzen and Shanda

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and Betsy's eye to talk about the beginning of it.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>When here we are, you know, a couple of years later,

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's doing as well as it's doing and being

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>so well received, and you know, continuing now into seasons

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>three and four, it's incredibly exciting and was just so

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>wonderful to revisit the inception of it all. So thank

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you for the opportunity, Hannah, Annabelle Jess. Thank you. It's

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>been such a great opportunity to get to meet you,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to get to know you better, to go behind the

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>scenes of Bridgerton, and it's just been really great listeners

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to just take you inside of Shanda Land. That has

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>been great fun and we look forward to doing more

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. So just keep your ears to the feeds

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and we will get together again soon. So take care,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be well and go back and watch Bridgeton again on Netflix.

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You know you want to. Thanks again for going behind

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the scenes with us. Until next time. Bridgeton the Official

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Podcast was executive produced by Lauren Homan, Sandy Bailey, Holly

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Fry and me Gabby Collins. Our producer is Chris Vanduson

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and our producer editor is Vincent to Johnny, thanks for listening.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Bridgeton the Official Podcast is a production of Shondaland Audio

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in partnership with iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from Shondaland Audio,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or anywhere you subscribe

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows,