WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Wrapping Up Week 3

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman and bar Garcia and

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Wednesday, September twenty six, twenty seventeen,

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>season thirteen, episode number forty five. Welcome to another edition

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of The Break. I'm Derrek Eagleton, joined by the normal crew. Here.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>We were live at s WBC Mortgage Studios at the Star.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the twenty seventh of September. So I'm so thrown off.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yesterday a fan tweeted me like, did you

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just say it was Monday? And I did I say

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it was Monday? I'm so thrown off. It is Wednesday,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>September twenty seventh to the seventeen. We welcome to a show,

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the show. We appreciate you guys taking

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>some time with us today. Talk a little Cowboys football.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>How's everybody feeling this morning? Doing really well? Erica? But

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>are the episodes right? I mean, yes, the episode I

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>know is right because I updated that on the plane.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure. I'm pretty sure. I think I updated that

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on the plane. Good show. Let's have a good show.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's see did you guys see Donald Trump's tweet this morning? Wow?

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Starting right off of that, No, I did not see Donald.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I just saw Jones. Yeah. I spoke to Jerry Jones

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys yesterday. Jerry is a winner who

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>knows how to get things done. Players will stand for country.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got the live audio on that. We're gonna play

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it later. No, we do, We absolutely do not. Um. Okay,

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>so that story is gonna keep keep rolling it. Um,

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get into some football. Um. This is a yeah,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a tricky obviously it's a tricky thing. But just

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, like all these other talk about Jerry

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Goodell and now you've got Goodell and Trump, it's

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like which side are we taking here? And like which

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>stands he is he trying to really go after? I

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know where this whole thing is

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up, But I don't know. We'll stay tuned,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>but for right now, we're going to spend the next

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.119
<v Speaker 1>hour talking about football and uh and this just kind

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of dag dig into these cowboys. Let's start first with

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Lawrence. Yesterday we find out I guess it was

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this morning, maybe we find out that Lawrence is it

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was named that the NFL's defensive Player of the Week,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and we talked yesterday about about how well he's playing.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think for an honor like this, it kind

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of when you look across the league right now, statistically

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's best defensive end in all football. Bro's. I mean

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the stats show that. I mean, I don't think I

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would call him the best defensive end in football, but

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>artistically yeah yeah, and statistically yeah. And Golf is one

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the best quarterbacks in the league statistically. But but

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>he's he's been better than the stats. And that's what

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is the most impressive part he His stats

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>are the best in the league, but he's been better

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>than that because he's had a half sack taken away,

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he's had another sack taken away, he's been around another

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>play that looked, you know, that was close to a sack.

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>He's almost had interceptions, He's had a lot of tackles

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>behind the line of scrimmage. He's getting a lot of

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hits on the pressures on the quarterback. I mean, he

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>has been the most disruptive player we've seen, you know,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and Irving did it for a half against Tampa. You know,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Irving showed some flashes. He has been the most dominant

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>player we've seen since about since Drew Brees was running

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for his life when DeMarcus Ware was going to get

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>him back at oh nine or two. And you know

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that that area for DeMarcus Ware, it's been this has

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>been impressive. But you got to keep it up though.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that's why he's not you know, the

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>JJ Watt and those guys. I mean, they do it

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>every single week. You know, he's got to keep doing that.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But man, it's a great time for Irving to come

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>back too fresh. And not this week obviously, but the

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>next week, come back fresh. I'm wondering, and I'm very

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>interested to see over the next several weeks how much

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>one team start doing more things to disrupt him. So, now,

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>how does he play when he has to live in

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a world of double teams and chips and all that.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about DeMarcus Lawrence, Because teams are gonna start

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>paying more attention to him. And the flip side of that,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>who else on this defensive line is gonna have opportunities?

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Isn't going to take advantage of those opportunities to step

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>up and beat one guy to get to the quarterback?

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna be Crawford? Obviously we saw Mollie Collins

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have those two sacks last week, and he's been consistent,

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I think since last year. But on the other side,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>are you, Vincent Mayo, are you're gonna see tackle Charlton?

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the question becomes is tackle even the best guy,

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>does Tapper get a shot? And it's Tapper have the

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>ability to beat that one guy. They're gonna be opportunities

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for other guys across this line because the way that

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Lawrence is right now he's going to do, it's

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>going to force other teams to pay more attention to him,

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>which is going to create opportunities for other guys. Can

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they step up? Well, you know he's he's so good

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at the at the left defensive end spot going up

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>against you know, those right tackles, and so I don't

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>think anyone was gonna would ever change what they do

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:22.799
<v Speaker 1>to try to block him, you know, the switch switch

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to your left tackle over to your right tackle. But

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of it is an interesting dynamic that you

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>know when you when you have a strong rusher like

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that off the left end, and most teams have their

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>best left tackle over there, so you're not really going

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to have that that which is I think an advantage

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys. Yeah, you know, and now that means

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they got it. They got to dedicate a tight end,

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>they have to get a running back to Chip, they

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>got other things that they'll have to do in their

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>offense in order to account for him on that side.

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's where additional opportunities are created for other guys. Yep,

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I know he's ready for the Rams part eating the way. Yes, Okay,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he's getting ready. So one more thing before we get

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to that, and we are going to talk about the

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Rams and the day. We're going to focus in on

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rams offense versus the Cowboys defense, and Dave's gonna

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 1>give us a scouting report that he's feverishly putting together

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. But before we get to that, I did

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>want to get an update on Sean Lee and Jordan Lewis.

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Coach Garrett yesterday said both had hamstring injuries from the game.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>What do we know is there a do we have

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a statush report on where they are at this point

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what's going to be happening throughout this

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>week to get them ready to play. Thought me, if

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you've heard this before, day to day, they're gonna take

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>him day by day. It's day by day that sounds

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>reading between the lines, that sounds like Jordan Lewis's deal

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is not as serious as Sean Lee's. Okay, Jordan, that's

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. Jordan was feeling tightness in his hamstring

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and they decided to pull him out for the last

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>couple possessions of the game. Shawn Lee I think might

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have actually tweaked it. However, Shawn Lee's what eighth year

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>All Pro, seventh year All Pro linebackers, So typically, you know,

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>going back to the Odell Beckham conversation from week one,

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I tend to give the nod toward that guy to

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>find a way to get himself ready, more so than

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the rookie who's playing his third game. I was convinced

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>he went down just to stop the clock. It looked well,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it really couldn't tell, right because he kind of tried

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to get off. He was sitting and he looked like

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he was hurt, and then he looked like he tried

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to jog off the field and then he realized that

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't worth it, so it did. It looked like he

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>was hurt to me, but that's because I had my

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>eye on him before he got up, So it looks

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, hamstrings are tricky. Like it doesn't look

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>bad because he ultimately wound up kind of jogging off

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the field, but you know how those things go. So

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I bet, well, nobody's going to practice today. Today is

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially a walkthrough. I bet she's not going to practice tomorrow,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so it'll be one of those scenarios where you're looking

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at him on Friday to see what he's doing. And

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the same thing probably goes for Jordan, because, like I said,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he's a rookie. He's had hamstring problems for most of

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the time he's been here. He said it is the

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>same hamstring as the one that was bothering him in

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>training camp. So probably need to keep an eye on

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>both of them as the week goes along. Because the

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>same thing happened to the Cheeto and then he got

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>hurt again in the Denver game, and then he obviously

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't play last week. And it doesn't sound like he's

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna him or no, only Carroll are gonna be

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>ready to play this week. I mean us don't rule

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>him out. But Garrett pretty much said yesterday he said,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look overly positive for them, were too optimistic or

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>something like. It doesn't look like if I were a

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>betting man, I wouldn't bet on Cheeto or Carol or Carol.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you this question. And I know

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>these injuries are different. Obviously, can't say just because it's

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring injury it's the same thing. And talking about

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Cheeto right now, but I know, Nick, you made the

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>point a couple of weeks ago. Is it a smart

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>move to just go ahead and sit Cheeto for a

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>while because of this hamstring injury is recurring? Well, if

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, should that be the consideration at least

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to some degree With Jordan Lewis because he says it's

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the same hamstring and maybe maybe it wasn't an injury

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>like Dave said, maybe it was more just tightness and

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in which case there wasn't a tweak and so maybe

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel like you need to sit him. But

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>if this is going to be an ongoing thing and

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the only thing you can do to help it is rest,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make more sense just to give him just straight rest. Well,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>when I said that about Cheetoh, I was talking about

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe doing a roster spot, I mean with a with

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>an I R type of move, because they cleared they

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>knocked him out so quickly into the game like you're out,

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as like this is probably a severe enough thing where

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take some time. What I would do

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>now is whatever they're gonna do for David Irving, I

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>would do it this week, whatever move is they're gonna make,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I would. I would release that player or

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>move him off the roster this week and bring up

0:09:55.160 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Marquez White to the roster, then probably move Mark White

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>off the roster and hoping one of these corners backs

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is ready for the next week and then you've already

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>got that spot for David Derby. That's that's such a

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that actually doesn't mean that is such a good next

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>level idea that I wonder if maybe you had a

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>conversation I swear I didn't. You do have to wonder

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that with Nick. I mean, it's a great but there's

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a shower. I thought about that in the shower. I don't.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if I thought it was a conversation

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the shower. That doesn't I don't. Who would think

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that sounds weird? If you don't know that you have

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 1>your best ideas in the shower, then no, No, I

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>thought that you said. I thought he was saying he

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>had a conversation in the shower. And that's why I

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was like with Jamal Showers's back on the practice squad.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So we all three took something to me different. Jamil

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, yeah, they're probably gonna move. They're probably gonna

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>move to Mark Quay. I'm here. Nick's like, what are

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you doing in my shower? Yeah? All right, let's um,

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>let's get into this this talk on the Rams versus

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. Let's talk first about the Rams offense versus

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys defense. The one thing that that's ends out

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think most about this Rams offense is offensively, they're

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>scoring a ton of points right now, they're good. Now, Well,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that's the and that's really the question,

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>because they've scored a ton of points. But most of

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>those points were done in two games against teams that

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't really think are among the best in the NFL,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and so and so, I guess my question for you, Davis,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>give us a scouting report, and then I want all

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of us to chime in on how much do you

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>respect what they've done in these games, knowing that the

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>opponents they mainly did it against were not among the

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>NFL's best teams, first of all in my opinion. And

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I get that they're two wins or against San Francisco

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and Indy, both of whom I think will be top

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>ten draft pick candidates. It's still the NFL. This isn't

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>college football. I don't care about that. You beat, you

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>score forty points on somebody, it's pretty good. You beat

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody as badly as they beat the Colts, that's pretty good.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They're one losses to the Redskins, which you know that's

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>probably a playoff caliber at least gonna be in the

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Hunt type of team. They or twenty points, so that

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of gives you a little bit of an indicator

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of what we're dealing with here. Having said that, it's

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really impressive what they're doing, considering how hapless they looked

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>last year to start off this LA era because Jared

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Goff through three games has a quarterback rating of one eighteen.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>He's completing seventy percent of his passes. He's averaging ten

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>yards per tempt, so it's it's not like he's dinking

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and dunking. Oh, which leads the league? Which does lead? Yeah,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody's nobody's up that high. He's got three receivers who

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are averaging a lot of yards per catch, one of

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>whom I really want to talk about because he's a

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>draft show guy. But Sammy Watkins, who you might remember

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>from Buffalo, He's averaging like fifteen yards per catch, had

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns on this last game. I believe he kind

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>of started slow, but I mean thirteen catches for two

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and two touchdowns through three games is pretty

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>solid start. Robert Woods, who they also got from Buffalo

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and enough, he's averaging seventeen yards per reception, so downfield

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>type of and he's a big downfield type of receiver. Actually,

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>two draft show guys, because remember we talked a lot

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about Evan Ingram in the season opener. Gerald Everett is

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the same type of dude, same type of like why

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>tight end who gets off the line, who's an athletic

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>guy South Alabama, kind of an under the radar guy.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging thirty three yards per catch. Doesn't many catches yet,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>four but all of I mean four catches. Four catches

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred and thirty four yards. He's not your

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten you know, on the line tight end, but

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he's an athletic mismatch guy. It's goot Byron Jones written

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>all over it. It's something they're gonna have to look

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>out for. And then my guy, Cooper cup who was

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe my favorite receiver in this past draft. Who you know,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>he can play outside, he can play inside. People think

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>he's like a Wes Welker type because he's white, but

0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>he's really not. He's just a very versatile, very dynamic receiver.

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>He scored in the preseason game against the Cowboys. If

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you remember on that play that Anthony Hitchins forced the

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fumble on the goal line, he recovered the ball. Yes,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he's got nine catches for one hundred and twenty six

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>yards through and a touchdown. Just like a solid, versatile,

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>possession guy who can play anywhere they want him to.

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Basically they are seventh in offense, sixth in passing offense.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't even mentioned Todd Gurley, which is crazy because

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you would think that he's and obviously, you know they

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>want to give him a lot of touches. I mean,

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he was Zeke the year before Zeke went. He's the

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>top ten pick. He's getting twenty one touches a game.

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But just like Zeke, it doesn't look like it's going

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so easily for him. They're passing the ball well, but

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging three point eight yards per carry. He's got

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty one yards through three games, but

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>he's also got sixty four carries, so I kind of

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they're going to try to get that crank

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit more. The big thing that' stands

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>out to me. He's got thirteen catches for one hundred

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and forty yards and two touchdowns through three games, so

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>catching the ball. They're using him in the passing game

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the way that I want the Cowboys to use Zeke.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I know Zeke probably has close to that many receptions

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>if I had to guess, he's probably got nine, ten, eleven,

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But has he had more than twenty receiving yards in

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a game so far, I don't think so. So he's

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>leading their team in receptions right now, he's leading the

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>rams up Gurley exactly and rushing definitely in rushing. But

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, like you were talking about those receivers,

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he's caught more balls than any of the receivers has.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Like they use him a lot in their passing game.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>He is the most integral part of their I think

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of their offense right and so well. I think it

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>would probably this is my cliche that I use for

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys all the time, which is that Zeke is

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of the engine that makes it all go. I

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think they probably want to base everything they do around

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, but the difference between this team being any

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>good and not is clearly Jared Goff, which you know,

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say I'm surprised by him playing

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>well because he was the number one overall pick in

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the draft, but he looked so bad last year that

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I have no choice but to give a ton of

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>credit to Sean McVeigh because that was kind of his

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of his reputation when they hired him,

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is that he's the guy that helped Kirk Cousins become

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a franchise tag caliber guy and all I mean, Goff

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>looks great. That's that's the big takeaway that I have.

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And again, I mean, can you can talk to me

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>about the quality of the opponents all you want, but

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they're two in one and he's playing lights out right now.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So what this will probably be? Cowboys saw the Rams.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>DeMarco ran all over him in twenty eleven, they beat

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>him up in twenty thirteen, they played him in twenty fourteen.

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>This will be the best Rams team that the Cowboys

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the last five or six years. I

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>would guess, all right, let's take a break. When we

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>come back, I'm gonna tell you two things that scare

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>me about this Rams offense as a Cowboys observer, and

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your opinions on whether you think

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's legitimate or not. We'll come right back. This is

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. We the entertainment loving people

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>demand the best unlimited wireless plan ever from AT ANDT.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>What else do you want? Are you in a car?

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe only AT and T offers you unlimited data with

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>HBO included and never payoverages. Get ATNT Unlimited plus our

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>best wireless dealer. Unlimited Data Plus save twenty five dollars

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>per month on Direct TV. It's entertainment. You're way after

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty two kidd lights of data usage and TAMY Slow

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Speeds plan includes stream saving videos, will stream and standard

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>definition unless you're turn it off. Twenty five dollars direct

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>savings across AT and T Unlimited Plus credits start within

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>three bills. Service prices subject to change, other usage speed fees,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>charges and restrictions. Supplies the att dot com slash Unlimited

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for details. Hey Cowboys fans, did you know that over

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the next few years, more than a million service members

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>will transition from military to civilian life. Veterans face unique

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>challenges when they get out of the military, and Bank

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of America and the Dallas Cowboys are teaming up to

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>help with financial education, career opportunities, and support of military

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>nonprofits and organizations locally in North Texas and across the country.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>We're proud as apport our troops and are deeply grateful

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for the dedication and sacrifice of our service members and veterans.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Official Bank of the Dallas Cowboys, invites

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you to join us in our efforts to get involved

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>by tagging game day photos on social media using hashtag

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>troop thanks. That's hashtag troop thanks, and by learning more

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>about our commitment to veterans at Bank of America dot

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>com slash Military Support. Together, we can thank our troops

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in ways that make a real difference. Copyright twenty sixteen,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation. It's bowling night with brands and

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you're hanging out together. Pit up us there, but you're

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>craving something better, but they're f defensag. You don't know

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what to do, Sactor Pepper. When you do Peppler, When

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you crave a doctor Pepper, nothing else will do. Pick

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>up a nice cold twenty ounce bottle today, doctor Pepper,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>und you grave. I hear all this talk about what

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it takes to be a cowboy. Everyone's got their ideas,

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but I just say to myself, it's what's up top

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that matters. Sure, you need men with the muscle and

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>heart to get her done. But if your scouts and

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>coaches are listening out there a word of advice. Pick

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the man with the most well worn stetson. That's the

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>one most cut out to be a cowboy. Stetson hats

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are handmade right here in Texas and have been on

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys heads for over one hundred and fifty years. The

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of you can visit stetson dot com slash cowboy

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to find a retailer nearest you. Back to the break

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It's the second segment of the Breaklock from

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star, and we're talking

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about the Cowboys defense versus the Rams offense. They'll take

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys take on the Rams this Sunday. It'll be

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a noon game. It's the only noon game other than

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the final game of the season, which I think they

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>probably schedule all teams at next until they decide how

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna play that out. Cowboys and Eagles have a

0:19:58.000 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>good season, there's a good bet that this will be

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the only noon game of the year. And the way

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>things look right now, that could be a game of consequence.

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It certainly looks that way to get to the playoffs early,

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to play like a ten thirty

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>game or something like that for TV ten thirty, something

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like that eleven am. Unless you're not it won't be

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys playing on that time were not played

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>at eleven am in the playoffs in Minnesota. We definitely

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>did I know that like our first year yep, oh,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I thought you met O nine. Oh, this would have

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>been when you were five Dallas. That might have been

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty early too. The Cowboys are a lock for the

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>three thirty playoff game, I don't. I mean, there's just

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday afternoon. Why are we talking about the playoffs

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>right now? As I said it? Or all right? So

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>here's what I want to do. I have a couple

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of things that that I think if you're a Cowboys

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>fan probably should worry you a little bit about facing

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>this Rams team. And I'm gonna throw them out there,

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and then I want you guys to tell me if

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm way off base or if you think this is

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate I think the first thing is when you

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>look at this offense, to me, it kind of seems

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>like it's a culmination of the two offenses that had

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>given Cowboys problems this year. They only had three games,

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but in two those games there were two specific things.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.959
<v Speaker 1>One against Denver, they ran the ball well and they

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>completed a high percentage of their passes and their receivers

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>were able to just make plays after they got the

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>ball in their hands. And then against Arizona, the big play,

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's been something that has been that Arizona does well.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>We saw in the first drive they had three I

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>think they had three explosive plays in the first drive

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>alone of twenty yards plus. That all being said, that's

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the first thing. The second thing is the one team

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that shut them down. I'm starting to get more respect

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for that defense. Washington is a team that if you

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>watched them last Sunday night play against the Oakland Raiders,

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>which I think most people considered to be one of

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the better offenses in the league, they absolutely shut the

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Raiders down and there was no question about it. Was

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the game between the Cowboys and the Broncos.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>They clearly beat them up and didn't allow them to

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>do the things that they've been doing against teams going

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>back to last season. Those two things make me think

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that Arizona's I'm sorry that that the Rams are much

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>better than just saying, hey, well, the only team they know,

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the only team that they lost to was the Redskins.

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>The Redskins are a really good team. I think I

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>think so too. And so when you look at those

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>two things, I think those are two things that should

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>concern fans a little bit more. This is not a

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>typical game Cowboys versus Rams, where you say it's the Rams, dude,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like this is a much better team. I guess that's

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the point I was trying to make a minute ago,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is that it's lazy and misinformed to think that it's

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, dude, and chill out that. I don't think

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna fly. I think when you're at the top

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of the draft for as long as the Rams have been,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you have you can acquire some talent. We haven't, and

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get into their defense tomorrow because that's

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that's loaded yet. So this is a talented team, and

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not saying that they're going to make

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, but I certainly don't think they're going to

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be out of contention by October, which is well it

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is October, they're not, so clearly they're not going They're

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>not going to fade away. This is a team with

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talent and a promising young quarterback and

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, twenty eight year old head coach or

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty and he's like thirty one years old. He seems

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to know what he's doing. So if you're writing this

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>off as the Rams, I think you're making a mistake.

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm making a mistake. Then they're gonna kick Yeah, I'm sorry,

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I know we wait till Friday. I think the Cowboys

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to absolutely kick their ass this week. I

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>really do, thirty eight to seventeen, based on what, based

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on what, Based on the fact that I don't think

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the Rams can stop the Cowboys. I don't. I don't

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think they I don't think they can stop them. I don't.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know their defense is good because they

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>have Aaron Donald, but I mean it was Montana de

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>rice slighting them up last week. I mean, I don't

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>understand why the Rams can score forty six points, a

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of it on defense against the Colts. The Colts

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>are are atrocious right now. And then they played the

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers. The forty nine ers, when what? When

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>did they get back? When did? When? Are they good?

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the Rams be them and all of a sudden,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley's saying they're gonna whip up in the Cowboys.

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that, I think that's ridiculous. I don't think so.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll come and play this game. I've seen

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this game a lot of times, this this noon kickoff game,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think the Rams will have a chance.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I really don't. I think it'll be a blowout. I

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's outdated thinking. And that's the point I'm trying

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to make, is that, you know, yeah, in twenty thirteen,

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this was a craptastic Rams team and the Cowboys beat

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>him thirty test. They were awful. It was my third

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>game covering this team. It was a noon game. DeMarco

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Murray did whatever he wanted too. It was pretty you're

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that that the Rams are different from that year. Absolutely, Okay,

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Well the Cowboys were eight and eight, Yeah they were,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think the Cowboys will be eight and

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>eighth that year. I mean this year. I just tell you,

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that. I don't think they can. They'll

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to hold up with the Cowboys. With the

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>running game, I think they'll be back on track. Sean

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Lee's injury will be will be big for this one.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if he doesn't practice all week, that

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>could be a little bit of a factor. But I

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>really I don't think it's what the Rams doing on

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>offense I think what the Cowboys will do will absolutely

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>control the game. I think golf will come down to

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>earth and so so you're buying into the idea that

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this Cowboys defense, yep, is really good. Like you don't

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's an aberration what we saw necessarily in the

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>first week and for most of the game last week.

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I think there was some moments early in the game

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>where the defense will suspect, but yeah, really what you

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>saw most of that game. In my opinion, I said

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday on the show. I think in two of

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the three games this season, the Cowboys defense has been

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the better unit. They've been unit that has been the

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>reason why they've won those games. You're buying into that

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>as going forward, I think the defense is going to

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>be strong and be able to shut teams down or

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>at least be able to limit teams to the point

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>where Cowboys score seventeen, they win. But I don't think that.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this game that's gonna be predicated on what

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys do offensively. I think the Cowboys offense is

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be the better unit this game. I think

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that they will be back in gear, they'll be running

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I think they'll be spreading around passing. I

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think you'll see Whitten and Beasley combined for four catches.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll see a dominating performance by the Cowboys offense,

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and then that trickles down to Okay, go get Jared

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Goff and this guy didn't go stop him. If you

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>can get up on him, you can take Gurly somewhat

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the game, even though he catches the ball.

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see it not this week. I don't

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>want to spoil tomorrow's show, but this rams front seven

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>looks equally equipped to slow down the Cowboys and what

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as good as Denver, No, I don't. I maintain what

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we said is that Denver is unique among the NFL defenses,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>and if the Cowboys can have success, it'll probably be

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>spreading the ball around. What I'm trying to say is

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Zeke is gonna get back to

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>be in Zeke this week. Because there's talent on that

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>front set, then when is that going to happen? I

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I mean honestly, and this is not this

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is not a knock on Z because I thought Zeke

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the numbers don't say that he had a great week

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>last week. But that was one of those games to

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>me that makes the difference between a really good running

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>back and a running back that's just okay, get eighty

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>something yards against the way that in a situation of

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that that game was being presented, in the

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>way the defense was playing. To me, those are a

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of hard nosed yards, and that's a good running

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>back that he put up eighty three yards against that.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it for the millionth time. It's a testament

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to how good he's been during his career that I

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>look at that game as like, because that's really good

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>effort for most NFL running backs. But when you average

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>five point one yards a carry as a rookie, three

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>point eight don't look that great. Yeah, But it's how

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you get the yards too, Like, I know, there were

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so many times when he got the ball and he

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>hit the line of scrimmage and there were guys right

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>there the line of scrimmage and he still made it

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a two or three yard guy. That's value. I completely

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. But he was dominant as a rookie

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and he just looks good right now. Yeah, I mean

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just the truth. So what game last year did

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys think was the first game where Zeke was like,

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, oh yeah, that's that's that's the big Chicago

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Week three. I mean, and I know the sucked last year,

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but he ran all over him and he hurtled a

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>guy for the first time and just looked like a stud.

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And then he followed that up by going sixty untouched

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals. And then he followed that up by

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>running for one sixty or whatever against the Packers, who

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>were statistically the best run defense in football. When with

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, was that actually I skipped one? Yeah, he

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>had I like that that week, but then then might

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>take that was week what that was Week four? I

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>want to say so Varl Bowman getting injured kind of

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>was a big part of that game because then but

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in this second half, you know, he started kind of yeah,

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>making some plays there. It was it was that late

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>September early October. He has looked absolutely good through through

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know he was awful against Denver, everybody was,

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but he ground out a hundred yards against a really

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>good New York defense. He was resilient and tough and

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>fought for everything. Against Arizona, he's been good. He has not.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>The running game hasn't looked as incredible as it did

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>last year. It just hasn't. For whether that's because the

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is still jelly, or he's still getting his

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, feet underneath him, or these these defenses have

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>just been that good. And I think, you know, maybe

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll be wrong for the record, I will. I do

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>expect the Cowboys to win this game, but I don't

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be easy. Do you think that part

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of the issues with the running game is they're not

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>getting enough push along the offensive line? Yeah, I think

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's part of it. I mean, this

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't the first time we've seen eight man front. I

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>mean they've been doing it all last year as well. Um,

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that that is an issue. But

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>something I wanted to say that it'll be interesting to

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>see how Dak's game Monday night will in moving forward,

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>will kind of change what some defenses do. I mean,

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen him throw on the run, but not as

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>not as much as I thought he did in that game.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're able to just roll out and kind

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of slinging a little bit. You know, teams are basically saying, Dak,

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to beat us with your arm, and he did.

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>He did in that game, and and his receivers made

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>plays for him. I mean, he gave Ryce a chance,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>he made the play game, Terrence a chance, and he

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just dumped it off the Des and then Des went

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>him and Frederick just you know, plow through the defense.

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that they are saying the passing

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>game has to beat us, and Dak showed in that

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>game against the Cardinals that he can do that. But

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting to note it's not just going

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to be his arm that's gonna beat teams. He's on

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a combination arms and got to get out there. What

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>makes him a really dynamic quarterback is his ability to

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>move around, and I think on the run, some of

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the throws we've seen him made between last year and

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this year that he's made on the run are as good,

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>if not better than some of the then his best

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>throws in the pocket, Like the guy can throw the

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>ball when he's running, and that's what makes him special.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>As Nick brought this up right at the end of

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the show, as memorable as the Bryce Butler players were,

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that's just chucking it up to a guy on one

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on one cover. His throw to Noah Brown was incredible, Yes,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's moving, he's basically sprinting and just fires it

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in there to a guy with a defender draped on

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>his back. It was his and it was on I

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>mean like it was a laser like he shot it

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>through to him. Who caught the ball? Um? I guess

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it was in the third quarter. He was rolling to

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>his left right in front of the Cowboys bench, had

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the binoculars on him, and he I mean just rolling

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to the left and just didn't stop, set his feet

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and just throws it back on his body. I think

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it was Terrence Williams maybe at the sideline, remember thinking.

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember thinking it was like, that is a heck

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of a throw. Of course, Amber was like, no, it wasn't.

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a little wobbly, but it's early, right, but

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>better the second half. I think it was the second half,

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but but it's just better throw in the fourth quarter,

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>rolland left though, rolland left and and you know, throwing it.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's Randall Cunningham style right there. I mean,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>being able to have the arm strength to do that. Uh,

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He's he's getting there. He's getting there with his arm

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean where he could go and make

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>plays with his arm like that and his legs. I

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think that running game found a little something in the

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. It was one of those things you just

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta keep pushing. Your defense has to allow you to

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>stay in the game so you can keep doing that,

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's Denver. You couldn't just keep doing that because

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you're down twenty one. I did have a couple more

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:11.479
<v Speaker 1>questions about the Cowboys defense, particularly though matching up against

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. Yeah, if Jordan Lewis joins Cheetah Bay and

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Nolan Carroll kind of trouble ack, isn't this what they do?

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I know Nick said the possibility of trying to move up,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>move up a guy. But right now, do you think

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, because they have gone into a game this

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>year where they had four healthy cornerbacks, do you think

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they could go to this game and say, hey, we're

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>okay with the idea of not bringing someone up and

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>just rolling with the four we got. Well, if Jordan

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>joins those guys on the inactive list, they wouldn't have

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about a scenario where you're just looking at

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods as a corner I have already kind of

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>put him in and I know he plays safety but

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of But the thing is he's in the

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>slot so much. Is that it's It's just like I

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>assume going into a game, if they don't have any

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>other cornerbacks, they will just say he's in the slot

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>all day. Xavier Woods is a pet cat of mine.

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>We I'm not going to get into the whole draft

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>show thing, but we were very much a big fan

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of him joining this team. I got I love watching

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>him play great. Still don't want to go into a

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>game with him as my fourth cornerback. That sounds is

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he not already playing at that right? But you know,

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just a it's a numbers standpoint, you know. I mean,

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>if you lose a guy in this game, then are

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna move Xavier Woods outside? Outside? Too? I just

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I just like to cover my bases. It was so

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>bad in the Denver game that I was like asking

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys in the press box, like who could cover

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like Switzer Dz. I mean, who who can actually go

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>out and be in cover someone? I don't know. I

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think that Brown did it? Who Troy Brown? Trey Brown.

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why the only time I've ever so I said,

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe an offensive guy just flipped over to the defense

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and just played corner. It was that was thank you.

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be. I think it would be

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>smarter to call up Marquez White or um. Is there

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>another corner on the practice squad right now? Any seamster's

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>not still here? Is he? I don't know. I would

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>call somebody up because if Jordan Lewis can't go this week,

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>then you're looking at Orlando, Anthony Brown, Ben Bene, bin Wickery,

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods. That's it, you know. Byron Jones also can

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>slide down. We gotta we gotta throw him in there.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>You can't. Maybe they should, but yeah, I think the

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are going to struggle this week. I think if

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they do win, it's gonna be because of their offense,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not because of the defense. And looking at last week,

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe the Cowboys defensive line is their strongest point

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>right now on defense. Yes, rushing the quarterback now, I

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 1>think let's just let that sink in for thinking about

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what we thought of this team going into training camp. Yeah,

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and now look at him success. Pick pick your unit,

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>but see us. I think the best special teams is

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe the only one that can compete. Let me let

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>me throw it farther like across the entire team, if

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying, So including offense, every is that

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the most productive on this team right now? It's not

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a debatable. That's a good point. But see, I think

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Golf can still play well even though when his pressure,

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he keeps his focus. Maybe in some place

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll mess him up a little bit, but I don't

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>think you'll make that much of an impact right here

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>unless they keep sacking him and stuff like that, but

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's not gonna happen all the time. Therefore, I

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think they'll have the ability to move that ball. And

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the secondary is not very not looking good right now

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys, so I don't think he'll be such

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>a good win from the defense. How do we how

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>do we sorry, how do we get mark Quez White

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on the on the team? How would you get him

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on the team? I mean, because you can't do anything

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>with the running back situation because the Zeke thing, they're

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're gonna have another hearing after the Rams game, right, yes,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or one more? This is what I find. This is

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the last game that we know for certain he's playing

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's scheduled for Monday or Tuesday next week, and then

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 1>after that if he's still playing. I think you could

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>probably do something at running back if you needed to.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>But so how do you get that? Well, but here's

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing. They have that hearing next week. That doesn't

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean that that the court will come back with

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a decision, So so you might not. You still may

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 1>not find out for weeks from now. That's there's no Yeah,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no real time frame on when the court actually

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>comes back. I forget the running back position. Then how

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do you get a spot somewhere else? It would have

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to be Well, honestly, even not knowing, even not knowing

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen with Zeek, you could figure up a

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>space at running back if you really, you could. There's

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>six of them right now, right if you count Keith

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as a running back. Yeah, I think you think Rod

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and Keith. You think you could get by without Rod

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and Keith. I think you could get by without one

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of them. I don't want them to cut either one

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of them because I like those guys. But I mean

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you could if you had to. But I could make Fadden.

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>What's gonna happen? Who picks him up. I don't know,

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>some I bet somebody would. I do too. I kind

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of think somebody would pick him up. Do you think

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>someone would pick up Alford Morris? Probably? Probably there's somebody

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>out there who's hurting it running back. I don't know

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>who it is, but they're out there. Um. Otherwise, I

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>mean if and I don't know, but if Cheeto's hamstring

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>is that much of a problem, you could maybe do

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>something with him other than that Carol's or Carol there's

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not there's not a ton to go when when Irving

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>comes back. I mean, like, don't you think that one

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of those defensive linemen maybe, I mean, who who Brian Price?

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the only because they they I think we're playing

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>him out the right. But that's not the worst idea

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>when you see where you're going. Irving can play tackle,

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think Crawford could could just be a tackle.

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the only guy. Point, that's the only guy on

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that line that I would feel comfortable cutting for various

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>reasons like so I don't know, um which, well, this

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.479
<v Speaker 1>is sort of related, But what I was going to say,

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>going into Amber's point, if Sean Lee can't go in

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this game, that's super troubling to me for a variety

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. One the obvious, Sean Lee's the best thing

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>about your run defense. He's amazing. He diagnoses like every

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>play before the running back even gets the ball more

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>often than not. And then number two, who the hell's

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>playing linebacker if he can't play? Probably I was gonna

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>say Durant is Durant and I slide in there. I

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>know that's not his typical position, but if it were me,

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I would probably play Jalen at Mike and Damien at Will,

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>just because I think Damien's more athletic, and I went

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>him on the field. Yeah, and he flies around. I

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>love Justin Durant, but I kind of like him as

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a situational guy. I don't know if I want him

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>out there, you'd have to play Wilbur a lot. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you're thin as hell if some but he

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt too. I mean that's a good as he can't.

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 1>He's a San Francisco forty nine ers. He would say

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you miss that. Yes, that happened on Monday, Ranking News

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that was big San Francisco signed King. News didn't know

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco signed him to their active that they didn't

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>see it on our site? Is San Francisco forty nine?

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Was it on our site? Probably not. He's making that

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>team look better maybe. Oh, you mean you know where

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going with Amber? Come on, you know where he's

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>going there that day. We're gonna take our final break

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Let's get some questions you guys,

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>give us a call and call us. You can also

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>hit us on Twitter at Cowboys Break. This is the break.

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>To work this big land, you need equipment with values

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are like

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>John Deer compact tractors with a six year power training

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>warrant to him. Big features that help you work less

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>so you have more time to do what you love.

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>John Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field as the official agg

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and turf equip of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>deals at my John Dear Dealer dot com. Slash football terms, Conditions,

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>exclusions and warranty limitations applies. You can be love for details.

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>We the entertainment loving people, demand the best unlimited wireless

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>plan ever from ATNT. What else do you want? Are

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you Unicorn Maybe only AT and T offers you unlimited

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.720
<v Speaker 1>data with HBO included and never payoverages. Get ATNT Unlimited

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>plus our best wireless deal and unlimited data plus save

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars per month on Direct TV. It's Entertainments.

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You're right after twenty two three devices of data us

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>A tam A slow speeds plan includes stream saving videos

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>will streaming standard definition unless you turn it off twenty

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>five dollars Direct D savings Acrise AT and T Unlimited

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>plus credits start within three bills. Service prices subject to change,

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>other usage speed fees, charges and interstrictions. Supplies the att

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash unlimited for details. Star Sports Tours is

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the only official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline access and

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 1>photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk xs and those with Senior Director

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>truly me, Brian Broadest. You can try the official fan

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 1>travel like a pro. Is it Cowboys Travel dot com

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to book your travel package today. Back to the break

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Buckle back. It is the final segment of the Break

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Laughing SWBC Mortgage Studios at the Star, Dave take it away.

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh goodness, all right, Derek, Um, adjust your cleats, adjust

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>your pads, adjust your helmet, but seriously, don't adjust your

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>underwear because once it's been seen, it cannot be unseen.

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John has a contour pouch that helps you be comfortable.

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Why who put that phrase into these reads? Moisture wicking

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fabric to keep you cool and dry on the field

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.439
<v Speaker 1>or in the stands, Tommy John, No adjustment needed. Shop

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>exclude Cowboys underwear at Tommy john dot com Forward Slash

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys for twenty percent off your first order Tommy john

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>dot COM's Forward Slash Cowboys. I will not say that phrase, gross.

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I was laughing at Amber Ambers giving videos over there.

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.959
<v Speaker 1>So wouldn't you love to be the people at Tommy

0:41:58.000 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 1>John that get to come up with that stuff? Though?

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That'd be some meetings, I'm sure. I'm sure. Yeah, I

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>did see. I got one tweet last night from a

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>guy who said we talked him into trying it and

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 1>he loves it. I did see that too, So hopefully

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he's enjoying it to the more people that are enjoying

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John. Because what does this say, Nestle the boys,

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>pouch to Nestle the boys, and moister we can fabric

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep you cool and dry, Nick or not? Nick

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can't get it? Sounded better when she said that as

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>a drop. Just take that audio and send it to

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John. They'll use it in the jolly happy that

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the boy. And then we can just we can just

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>come back and just play it, yes, exactly, and then

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we just sit there and have a little bit extended break.

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Just just play it. We're gonna have Amber just do

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the read on tape and we'll nestle the voice. That

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>will take a whole day for me to get that

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 1>right with my accent. That was pretty good. I don't

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>think you need a whole day. That was That was

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. All right, Let's let's jump back in. Let's

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>get some phone calls you guys call us two one

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>four eighty seven two twenty one h two. You can

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>also hit us on Twitter at Howboys break will start

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>first with a call I mean, I'm sorry with a

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>question from Twitter. Do you guys think that Jason's knowledge

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of Phillip's system will help him in this match. I

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>think you could say Wade's knowledge of Jason's system could

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 1>help him as well. So I think that I think

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that whole that is a weekly overrated storyline. Somebody was

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tweeting me or emailed me back in Denver. That was

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like nobody's talking about how Ron Leary helping Broncos figure

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>out that. I don't like you understand that NFL teams

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.959
<v Speaker 1>have whole staffs of people that break this stuff down

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks in advance. The Cowboys started looking at the Rams.

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Not Jason Garrett and his coaches, but Cowboys staffers started

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Rams. On Friday, they started watching tape

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of these games they've been you know, it's a first

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>four week opponent, so this is definitely one of the

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>teams that they were looking back in April, May, June,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and July. The amount of man hours that NFL coaching

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>staff spend on scouting the opposition is insane. So the

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>fact that Jason Garrett worked with Wade for as many

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>years as he did years ago, I mean, when did

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Wade left here in twenty ten? Yep, so that was

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago. I mean, so much stuff has happened.

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>There's so many other things you can look at. The

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:20.280
<v Speaker 1>personnel is completely different. I mean, he's playing Aaron Donald

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>in the three four as opposed to a four to three.

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It's that I don't buy that as a meaningful thing.

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Heath cover skills and opposing

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:34.919
<v Speaker 1>teams passing down? I'd rather replace him with Woods at

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 1>some point, and I'm starting I'm starting to think Xavier

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Woods will be a starting safety by the end of

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the year. Maybe I could see that happening over Heath.

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>It's possible. I mean, he's already out there. They're already

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>playing him in safety in certain looks. Who do you

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>think has played better in the first three games, Heath

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>or Jones? Just Jeff Heath, He's played better, I think

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so I did two. And I don't think it's because

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, we're expecting a lot of at a Jones

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and Heath is the first year. I mean, Heath has

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>actually been here longer than Jones. Can I say neither? Yeah,

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean because I don't think. I mean it's if

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to say one's been better than the other, Okay, whatever,

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's been a sizeable difference number one

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in number two. I don't think I've seen play from

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 1>either one that suggested me I'm happy with the safety

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>position right now, right, But but I think that we

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be careful too, because Xavier Woods comes in.

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>He's made some plays on special teams, he's made some

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>plays around the line of scrimmage, and we're saying, hey,

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy's playing well, and he and he is, but

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you can need to be careful to say, all right,

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>since he's playing so well, he'll be fine back there

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as the last line of defense as a rookie I

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>mean Madden syndrome, right, And maybe I've just fell for

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it myself a little bit. But the fact that he's

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>handled everything they've asked them to do so far, and

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they trust him enough, they've they're already putting him back there.

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>They're doing it mainly in like dime and when they

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>play deacon and stuff like that, basically in situations where

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it'd be for him to screw it up. That's basically

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>what it's looked like. But the fact that he's already

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>done that much in three weeks after being limited for

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the second half of training camp, that's really encouraging, honestly.

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jeff Heath hasn't been great, but I don't

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think he's been terrible either. I mean, he made a

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>nice play on a ball in Denver where he broke

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up what might have been a touchdown right And I again,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I know the play didn't count, but I was very

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>impressed by the read he made on that throw that

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he almost intercepted. Um. No, he's not a pro bowler,

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think he's been absolutely awful either. And

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>again I'm not saying I'm not saying that they've been great.

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that they've been awful. What I do

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>know is that I want a little more consistency out

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of the safety position. I think they've both been in

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>situations where I've seen him miss tackles and make bad

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean we used to jump on JJ Wilcox a

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch for bad angles and missing tackles. And when you

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:54.919
<v Speaker 1>got a safety, that's one of their primary responsibilities because

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they are the last line of defense in many cases.

0:46:57.000 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 1>So and you know some of those deep balls, like

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you see the safety kind of trailing back there, like

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 1>where were you? That was a play that you probably

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>needed to be a part of. And so all I'm

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>saying is right now, at the safety position, I haven't

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>been thrilled with what I've seen. I think there are

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>some positive things, but I think there's just as many

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 1>negative things. I want to set. First touchdown, That first

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdown of the game, I mean not good. Heath was

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was over there. But looking at the play Heath was

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>was trying to he was going with like the All

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Pro Larry Fitzgerald. I mean he ran to the to

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the outside, so he had to follow him. I mean

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Byron Jones that wasn't over there.

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're seeing signs that this is what

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Your six primary dbs have not played a

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of games together, right Yes, and it looks they're

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:46.959
<v Speaker 1>not well coordinated right now. It looks like that. Yeah,

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>So who would you guys like to Sorry, but who

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>would you guys like to see going up against Gurley?

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Line up against him? Are you are they asking more

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>from this somebody when he gets going? Who would be

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the best guy that you would like to see him

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 1>cover once he gets going down the field? I mean,

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I want Sean Lee to play this game. If you're

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna help limit Todd Gurley just again in the sense

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of he's as good as the defensive line has been.

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:17.720
<v Speaker 1>He's the best thing about the run defense in my opinion.

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can't count how many times live. But then

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>also when you go back on tape where he's just

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>knifes through the line and makes that tackle for it

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.720
<v Speaker 1>has a chance. If it's not him, the next best

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>option would have to be Damien Wilson. Yep, Jalen Smith

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:39.919
<v Speaker 1>is He's gonna get there, but he's to me where

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you see the one deficiency for him is speed. His speed,

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is there just yet. I mean,

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he's got a brace on his ankle like like that

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:53.919
<v Speaker 1>he's running with. He's got a great reaction. He gets there,

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>he hits people. It reminds me of the when Rolando

0:48:56.840 --> 0:49:00.080
<v Speaker 1>McClain got here and he's just finishing the play. But

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 1>when he has to, when he has to really run

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 1>in the open field, you can kind of see it

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in his run. It's not the same. So that one

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>would kind of scare me a little bit. But I

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>think Damian Wilson, I think he could, he could play well.

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He could be a factor in this game. And he

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 1>might need to be. Even if Sean lee Is is healthy,

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 1>he's really good and to that point, he's good in space.

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like when he's not good, it's when he can't

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>get away from his the blocks, if he can't get

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>away from the offensive line. But when he's out in space,

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a really athletic dude, and he more often than

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>not makes the tackle. So he could be big this week.

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The last time they played the Rams was at fourteen

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in Saint Louis. Is that the last time that in

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the regular sea the regular season? Um? I think I

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>think that was the game. Hitchins had eighteen tackles. He

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>was a beast. He had to start that game. Yeah

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>he had. I believe he had a fourth down stop. Yeah. Yeah.

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>He had a bunch of bo plays as a as

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a rookie. So because I don't think was it Austin

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Davis the quarterbacks, sounds like Jared Goff is gonna be

0:49:57.480 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a little better than that. Bruce Carter had to pick

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>six below A Bourne sealed the go on the game.

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Proud Brian, Proud Brian. Let's grab me a phone call

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>from Tim and New York doesn't want to talk about Sam.

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>What up, Hey, how you guys doing great? First to

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>get to football in just second. But I quickly have

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, really appreciated that twenty minutes yesterday at the

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>start of the show that you guys were talking about

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>race relations and different things. I think that's a good conversation.

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's something that we need. And I must say, Derek

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Um totally agree with you about the comment that you

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>made of how that Washington the country in general needs

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to come together as compromise on some things. I think

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've just been too divided too long. Like to

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 1>see our leaders take the league in doing that. But

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>anyways to football. So earlier you guys were talking, Nick

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>brought up bringing up Mark Quz White for the cornerback situation,

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and so I was thinking, why not look at releasing

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>this week to do that, um Price and then bring

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>up Marquez, see how he does see the health of

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the cornerbacks next week, and then perhaps UM at that

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>point release Ben Wickery if that's a possibility, and keeping

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>White then as on the UM fifty three so UM

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and then get Irving. So what you think about that?

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:31.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's good, that's a good call. I kind

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of I kind of get that and then bring the

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>ding into Yeah, I think that probably depends on their

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>comfort level. If you release Price and he plays, it's

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not like he's not a part of this. And Nick

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.359
<v Speaker 1>always says he's their only big body. I mean that's

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a big guy, that just body that just sits down

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. Highrely depends on your comfort level playing

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this game with basically three defensive tackles, one of whom

0:51:56.239 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>right three this game Paya, Collins and Crawford, and well,

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess you would have Crawford. Yet it doesn't leave

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you with a lot of depth at defensive tackle if

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you do that. But like I said, he's the one

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>defensive lineman. I could see them being willing to release

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yeah, that makes sense. But remember this about

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the Marquez White been Wickery and we're only four weeks removed,

0:52:20.840 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess from cut down day, and they could have

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>done the same thing then. I mean they could have

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:28.880
<v Speaker 1>had been Wickery. I mean they didn't have to go

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>get him. They could have put Marquez White on the team.

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:34.799
<v Speaker 1>They chose to do that, so at that point they

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:36.919
<v Speaker 1>looked at it and said, Hey, this guy is way

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 1>better than him. Let's go make this move. And cut

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Marquez and hope we can get it back. So we'll

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>see if if things have changed that much since then.

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I mean, but I like that thinking.

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know about cutting price for this game

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this week. I think you cut price if you could

0:52:56.560 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get Irving back into the mix. I'm almost to the

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.839
<v Speaker 1>point like I don't want to make any changes right

0:53:01.840 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 1>now to that defensive line. I'm like, okay, let's just

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>leave it like that for right now. Not did he

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>much he make a play? Though? Did he? I don't

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>even remember him in the game. I remember him being

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>in the game. I couldn't point to a specific play

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that he made. But but but a guy in that position,

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna notice, right, You're you're right, and they

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 1>you know Paia and and maliek Collins, and Malie's not

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 1>undersized at all. Pia though, is for that for that position,

0:53:31.520 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and so you know Crawford's guys playing in so I

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 1>mean he's somewhat undersized too. I mean, at some point

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you do want that, you know, big body guy in

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>there to kind of clog the middle. And let's remember

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the you kind of said it the same way. But Ben,

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been wickery was more about getting some veteran presence

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>in this secondary where you got a bunch of young

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:53.880
<v Speaker 1>guys and then they and so are they willing to

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:55.879
<v Speaker 1>now forego that? You know, you still got a bunch

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of young guys, and by the way, a couple of

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>them are injured, So you kind of wanted that veteran presence.

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to add a little more of a veteran

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 1>presence to that group, and that's why you brought him in.

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's changed in three weeks, right, Yeah,

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess whoever that was, I was one. I couldn't

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>tell if he was still on the line or not.

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, he's not anymore, all right, Thanks for the call.

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:17.439
<v Speaker 1>It was a good call. I's second to the question

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 1>from twitter. You guys think that DeMarcus Lawrence will be

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>able to take advantage of how far golf drops back

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>when he's trying to throw it pass, haven't. I'm great,

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. I'm honestly, I haven't had a

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:36.920
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of time to study the Rams offense. I

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>fell asleep at eight thirty last night when I got home.

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:43.439
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think the drop really matters so much

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as I mean, Andrew Whitworth is a Pro Bowl tackle.

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 1>He's good player, shout out at LSU. He's on the

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>left side. That's not demark I mean, and I know

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus played both sides in this game, but I still think,

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at least for right now, I would imagine he's primarily

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>your left end. So he's going against Rob Havenstein. He's

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty wentworth, No exactly, It's really I don't care about

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>how back, how far back he's dropping. I care about

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the tackle he's I think so um.

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I remember putting him like in a mock

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>draft or something like that, fourth or fifth round. Here's

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the big thing for me is and again you know,

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I will. I'm gonna go and watch the

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Rams offense and defense tonight when I get home from work.

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like Sean mcvay's whole thing is getting

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball out quick. It's kind of I don't know

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's like purely West Coast, but it's a very

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, I don't think he's I don't

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 1>think the goal is for him to be holding the

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 1>ball for you know, four or five six seconds. I

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>think they want to get it out quick. So that's

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm looking for, is just that kind of like

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning, he's throwing the ball before you really have

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance to get your pass rush back there. So

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm looking for. I know they did have

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a Thursday game last week, but Taylor Austin and Sammy

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Watkins were in the concussion protocol to finish the game.

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't know kind of where they stand now. Like it's

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>funny like with another with another guy has a concussion

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:12.399
<v Speaker 1>on the other team, you're like, oh man, they'll be back.

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course on this team though, you're thinking it's not

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a given for I'll see him in November. Yeah, I

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 1>mean we could gathers Is on IR and Nolan Carroll

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>has missed one game and probably will miss another. So

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's the thing that with concussions day that's probably

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 1>with every injury, but certainly with concussions, it's so different.

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:31.799
<v Speaker 1>You never know with every guy. Like you guys said,

0:56:32.160 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Ron Leary was in the concussion protocol. Bill surprised me.

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys played them, and I think he was in the

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:39.279
<v Speaker 1>protocol for six days and then was ready to play

0:56:39.280 --> 0:56:41.879
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. So well, it just depends on kind of

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the I guess the level of severity of the of

0:56:45.320 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the injury. All right, guys, appreciate you joining us. We're

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:50.280
<v Speaker 1>back tomorrow. Nine thirties are normal time. Actually, stay tuned

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:53.319
<v Speaker 1>ten thirty am today, got talking Cowboys coming right up.

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I see Taylor walkins through with a big smile on

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 1>her face, so she must have something really interesting to

0:56:57.239 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you. Guys, make sure you join us. Small until

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they predict even Dave Hellman Ambergarcia. I'm Derek Eagleton. This

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.200
<v Speaker 1>has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio.

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Or this has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club