WEBVTT - Colin Cowherd Podcast - Raiders/Rams TNF, Baker’s Best, Week 14 ‘Sharp’ or ‘Square’

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>The volume. It's the Colin Coward Podcast presented by FanDuel

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Football Seasons in full gear. No better place to get

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in on the action than Fan Duel. FanDuel app is safe.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You get paid fast, A lot of ways to play

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the spread, the money line, team totals, players, props, a

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff over unders, jump into the action. Same

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>game parlays are my favorite. Just use the promo code

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Colin and download the Fan Duel app today. Welcome to

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>another instant reaction on what was three hours of absolute drek.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, television star, big time personality, saved the broadcasts,

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>saved a night of dreary football. My takeaway was, I

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely rooting for Baker Mayfield to drive at ninety

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>eight yards for a winning touchdown. I'm in the story business.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a great story, and you know everybody knows my

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>history with Baker Mayfield. I think that's honestly the most

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>impressive win of his career. And I'm dead serious. He

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>won a playoff game. Go back, and look at that

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland roster. The old line was like number two in

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>the league. Nick Chubb, David and Joku Good receivers, Miles Garrett.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a really really good roster and they beat

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of a old big Ben you know, kind of

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a wobbly Steeler team. This was impressive. Ben Scronic was

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>his go to receiver tonight, a second year pro who

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>was fourth or fifth on the depth chart, missing multiple

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman. That's impressive. To walk into a city, new playbook,

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>new coach, new system, new teammates. I mean, nobody really knows.

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Baker Fist bumped a few guys. I mean, Kirk Curvestreet said,

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been in town. He goes like, I here Tuesday

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>for a speaking engagement. I've been in town longer than

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield to walk in and kind of you could

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>tell throughout the course of the game Baker Mayfield was

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>just getting the information from Sean McVeigh and instantly relaying

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it to his team. And I imagine as Baker moved

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to the line of scrimmage, McVeigh was telling him kind

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of what the play was going to precisely look like

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Raiders had because of Max Crosmy a decent pass rush.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not a great defense, but that loss, even by

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Raiders standards, worst of the year for them. They're now

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>probably on the outside looking in for the playoffs as

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>they end the year with the Niners and the Chiefs,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so they really really needed this win. But that was

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>really impressive by Baker Mayfield. The other thing is you

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>don't really I mean, what makes sports is the stories.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody loves their home team and everybody dislikes

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the rival to the home team. But the reason we

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>watch games beyond our favorite team or the team we

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>grew up with is the drama, the chance for upsets.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Raiders were hot, the Raiders were healthier.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>The fact the Raiders could not pick up a first

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>down on third and one. You don't deserve to be

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a playoff team. You don't deserve to win that game.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But what made tonight special for Baker is a great story.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of his faults and problems are his, and

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, he couldn't step to the podium for

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>his weekly press conference in Cleveland without hissing somebody off right,

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Like he just wasn't quite ready to be the face

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of a franchise. He had more commercials than touchdown passes.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Seemingly he didn't have great judgment. It was my knock

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>coming out of college and in the end, he just

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>ticked off too many people. Andrew Berry, the coach, teammates

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>handed unraveled. And then he goes to Carolina and you

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know they want to see Sam Donold play, but your

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>hand to root for Baker Mayfield tonight. Come on. I mean,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason we watched this stuff is upsets and drama

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and stories outside of our favorite teams we grew up with.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>That was a great story. And not only was it

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a great story because of the multiple holding calls on

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the Rams tonight, Baker was twenty two of thirty five

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and thirty yards a touchdown, no interception. I'm

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not exactly sure he had at least two, but I

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>think three other really nice completions that were negated due

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to holding calls. Baker's oll was throwing a pretty good ball.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>When he can set his feet clean pocket, that's never

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>been his problem. You know, he gets a little squirrely

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when he's moving. You know, he rushes things his judgment.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But if he can set and throw, I mean, you know,

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he was a number one pick for a reason. Set

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and throw, let it rip. He can be accurate. But

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>you know there's sometimes is this ever true for you?

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the more I get into golf, start taking lessons

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or I start playing more, my golf gets worse. I'm

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>overthinking and then I'll take like six months off. I'll

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>go golf for the first time in the summer. It

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>happened this year in Rhode Island. I played the best

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>round of golf I've played like four years. I just

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>went out and played. I didn't overthink it. Baker was

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>playing tonight on adrenaline, little anxiety, a lot of nerves.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Didn't overthink it. McVay said, here's the play. Re let it,

0:05:54.160 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>step back and let it rip. And as impressive. I'm serious,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that's about as impressive a moment that Baker Mayfield's had.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, we all know the playoff win in

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland for people in Ohio is going to go down

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>as a very memorable day. That's a really good team,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>has a really good old line, that was a really

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>good roster. This Ram offense is I mean, Baker Mayfield

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>made the Rams watchable. You know, we saw this a

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of nights ago. I was thinking about this. With

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Brady struggled and then his last two drives, you know,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the defense goes into a little pre event the defense

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is on the field, you start giving up, you know,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten twelve yards defense on the field. End

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of a game. Defense gets tired. Suddenly, the defense, you know,

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the Saints against Brady, the Raiders against Baker, gets a

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>little more vulnerable, a little more gassed. You're asking you know,

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>you're asking these big guys to be on the field

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>those last two drives after three and a half hours.

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Brady and Baker Mayfield. When's the last time they were

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the same sentence? But you had a root

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>for Baker tonight. I mean that was fun. It really

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>was a lot like that Buccaneer Saints game with Brady

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just dreck until the final two drives. It really was.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I think from this point forward, anytime you mentioned Baker,

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you should also simultaneously mentioned Tom Brady. That's the new

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>rule in broadcasting. Tom Brady, Baker Mayfield, Baker Mayfield, Tom Brady.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Where'd you go? Baker? You know we live in the

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>same hometown. Now, could you invite him on the volume?

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>If an excellent guest, I'm not sure he'd except that

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be busy actually learning the playbook. Isn't

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that amazing? I mean think about speaking of Brady. When

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Brady moved to Tampa, he literally held secret practices that

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>were taped by a helicopter like ten in ink Lee

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to learn the playbook with a loaded roster and

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve games. In all those practices, Brady was seven and five.

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>The protection was bad. He was screaming at teammates. Baker

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield is in town with a bad roster. He doesn't know,

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he can't spell Ben Scronic his best receiver. He doesn't

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>know where he to college. He's never seen him play.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They've probably never run, you know, they've never run in

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>game routes, obviously, And Baker Mayfield was pretty accurate tonight

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>when he had reasonable time to throw. It's pretty accurate.

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And Raider fans I've supported all year, you earned that l.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You absolutely earned every inch of that L. That was bad.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And I've been on the Raiders bandwagon all year. That

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was awful. That was just awful. Tip of the cap

0:08:55.679 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to Baker Mayfield all right. Time for Sharper Square, Chad Millman,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>CCO Action Network All odds provided by FanDuel. By the way,

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>before we get into our picks, I think a really

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>fascinating situation I'm gonna throw this at you. So I

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>do mock drafts all day. I got no life, right,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and so in this league, often you will get really

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>good players having a down year. They get hurt bad system.

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Rarely do you get average players having a great year.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Geno Smith, I am betting against him next year. Duplicating

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this right, So you're Seattle, you're the GM. They have

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>two first two seconds, a third, two fourths, So those

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>are seven high quality picks. Do you would you give

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>up a third for Jordan Love who will be twenty

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>five bigger then Bryce Young, more talented than CJ. Stroud,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>and more season than all of them. I would give

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>up a third for him. Still have two first, two

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>seconds to fourth. I wouldn't draft a quarterback because I

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>think here's what I think, Chad. If you look at

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that roster, they have two needs nose tackle. Their first

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>pick Georgia looks like the next Fletcher Cox, and then

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you can argue center or another receiver. It's a good

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>center and wide receiver draft. Until about late second. I

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't draft a quarterback. I would go get Jordan Love

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with a third. Been in the league. Good coaching behind

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a star? Is he any less talented than CJ. Stroud.

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>He's five inches four inches bigger and heavier by twenty

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>five pounds than Bryce Jump. What would you do as GM?

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback is such an important position in the NFL you

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>have that much draft capital. I would be as aggressive

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Package Geno Smith, maybe in number one, maybe

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in number two. Try to get as close to the

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>top of the draft as possible and get a player

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback who you believe is going to be your

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>generational talent. I would not do it with Jordan Love.

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's enough tape on Jordan Love from practices

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and preseason games for GMS to understand who he is

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and also know that Aaron Rodgers when

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they're resigning Aaron Rodgers, they couldn't have believed in Jordan's

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Love because if they did the same way, the Packers

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>were like, we gotta get Aaron Rodgers start playing, we

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>gotta get rid of Brett Farve. If Jordan Love was

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that good, Aaron Rodgers wouldn't be there anymore because he's

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a pain in the ass. So I disagree with you.

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Remember Seattle does have Denver's first pick, so they're gonna

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>have a top five pick without giving up anything. Then

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>then then, by the way I'd stand pat, there are

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple quarterbacks who could go top five right now that

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you believe could be of that kind of talent to

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be perennial Pro Bowlers. You don't need to go trade

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for a guy who's three years in that A lot

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of people don't think is the next guy. I wouldn't

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>do it, all right, as they say, uh, you know,

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm poor. I'm pouring I'm pouring cold water on your

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>hot take. All right, Well, wouldn't be the first guy.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So I like, I've been very much an underdog guy

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>all year. I'm going to start with a favorite. I like, okay,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody now pouring cold water on the Dolphins. No, no, no, no, no.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Missing both tackles against the best defense and about six

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>years in the league. The Chargers are poorly coached, inconsistent

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>o line and receiver. Miami's a real team. We overreacted

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to that loss. The fact they were competitive late is impressive.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>They were missing both tackles against the best defensive front

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in the sport. I think Miami is better coached. Stayed

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out West bounces back as a favorite. Minus three really

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>like the Dolphins, Sharper Square. Not only do the wise

0:13:53.720 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>guys disagree with you on this on the Favorite Pod today,

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this was what we call our big balls better week.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You got to have balls if you want to bet

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Chargers and a team that's been banged

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>up with a really big coaching deficit. Because I agree

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins are just much better coach than the Los

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Chargers. But the Chargers as dogs are different than

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers's favorites. The Chargers's dogs. There's so much variance

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in how they play, what their play calling is. They're

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>complete wild cards in a game that probably can be

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a shootout because I do think that the Dolphins are

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>struggling with injuries and the numbers three and a half,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're getting the hook right now. This is a

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>total pros Joe's game with the squares on the Dolphins

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and the wise guys on the Chargers. All right, let's

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>go back to dogs, which I usually like. Deshaun Watson

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be better in Week two than Week

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one divisional game. Plus six, they've had their number Bengals

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>off a wildly crucial watched discuss game over the Chiefs

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>pull back a little Browns plus six or five and

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a half sharper square, great number, totally sharp. Play divisional game,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>playing against with the Browns, a team that did horribly

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>against a team that is even worse in the Texans.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>This game probably should be lined around four. But there's

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation on the Bengals because they are now the public

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>darling and what they did to the Chiefs, which we

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about. Love the Bengals is two and a half

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>point home underdogs. It's exactly what we thought they would do.

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But now the market is so overinflated on the Bengals.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to take the Browns in. This another one

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>where there's a huge discrepancy. You've got a lot of tickets.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Tickets are usually indication of the squares at the public

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>coming in. They're all coming in in the Bengals, but

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the money coming in and the Browns football seasons underway.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Now is the perfect time to download fan Duel, America's

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>number one sports book. Right now, new customers get a

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>no sweat first bet up to a thousand dollars. That's

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>free bets back if your first bet doesn't win. The

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>promo code is always Colin FanDuel has tons of betting options.

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I like the same game, parlay, bet a little, win

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot. FanDuel's app is safe, secure, easy to use,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and you get paid your winnings really fast. The no

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sweat first bet up to a thousand bucks promo code

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Colin make every moment more this season with fan Duel,

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>official sports book partner of the National Football League. Twenty

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>one plus some present in Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, and Louisiana.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Permitted pair is only Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee,

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Virginia or West Virginia. First online real money wager only.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Refund issued as non withdrawal psyche credit that expires in

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen days. Restrictions suply s terms at sportsbook dot fandel

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Gambling problem one eight hundred, next step or

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>text next step to five three three four two Arizona

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>one A eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>seven or visit CCPG dot org, slash chat Connecticut one

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred gambler or visit FanDuel dot com, slash RG and Colorado, Indiana,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and Virginia one eight seven seven seven seven zero

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>stop in Louisiana one hundred and two seven oh seven

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>one one seven for confidential health in Michigan one eight

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>seven seven h Ope n Y. Or text Hope n Y.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Four six seven three six nine in New York, Tennessee

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>redline one hundred eight eight nine nine seven eight nine

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee visit one eight hundred gamble dot in West Virginia.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I think my favorite bet of the week as a

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>dog is the Panthers plus four at the Seahawks. I

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>think this team plays hard. I think they like Sam Darnold.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle struggled to put away what is currently

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>an awful RAMS team. I think Seattle is a better

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>story than a team. People buy into sometimes stories and narratives.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>This game, to me is last second, not shocked if

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Carolina wins for the record. Brian Burns Rookie offensive tackle

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>watch out. I like Carolina plus the point Sharper square,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>totally sharp, complete agreement on this. Seattle's really been struggling

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the past few games. Kenneth Walker, he looked like the

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>odds on favorite. He was the odds on favorite to

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>win Offensive Rookie of the Year. Last three games. That

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>running game has been struggling. He's injured, did not practice

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, his backup is injured, did not practice as well.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot more third and long situations. Was

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>does not play to geno strength. And you're right about

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. When Baker Mayfield isn't the quarterback for this team,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>they're mediocre to decent team. Defensively, they're really good on

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>explosive plays, defending explosive plays. And jac Horne he's had

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty one coverage snaps this year. He's

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed one hundred and thirty eight yards. She's great, he's great.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at like the other side of it,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>we just said the Seahawks need to run the ball,

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're gonna have a hard time doing it. So

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>then you've got a lockdown corner who can take away

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf or Tyler Lockett. So now you've basically eliminated

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>all the things that the Seahawks can do. I think

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the wise guys agree that this is a good number

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and they expect it to be a close game. Vikings

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>getting a point and a half all odds provided by

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a fan duel, still a better team, more balanced than Detroit.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Detroit off a big win, feeling themselves it is still

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely awful back end of the defense, even if

0:19:55.560 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they outplay Minnesota. Minnesota's got that veteran quarterback, lots of weapons.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a classic. I just don't trust Detroit as

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a favorite. I'll take more stability, at least a defense

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that can occasionally situationally make some stops sharper square. I'll

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>take the Vikings and the points you are playing pretty

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>square on that one. I don't agree that you can

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.479
<v Speaker 1>say the Vikings are a better team than the Lions.

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you look at the numbers, look at

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the advanced metrics, which is what wise guys like to do.

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't do total yards on offense, total yards on defense.

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>They like to look at the next level. They look

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to look at the metrics that tell you the story

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the game, regardless of what the final score is.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So one of those metrics is called DVOA right. Lions

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth overall in DVOA Vikings twentieth, Lions ninth in offense

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on DVOA Vikings eighteenth defense, Lions nineteenth vis eighteenth. And

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way, since the Lions came out of the

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bye and since they fired their defensive backs coach, this

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is a team that statistically offensively and defensively is pretty

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>much the Cincinnati Bengals, and everyone thinks the Cincinnati Bengals

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are now going to the super Bowl. So the reason

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>why you have a team that has a much worse

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>record that is favored at home against the team that

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is leaving their division by many many games is because

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the professionals feel like the Lions are probably a better

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>team than the Vikings. And the fact you're getting it

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>at one and a half is a really good number.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I recommend you take it. Sometimes I don't understand numbers

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and I stay away, but I actually think when Mike

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>White's at quarterback, it's a reasonably capable offense. They're now

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>getting ten. Revenge is overrated in divisional games. I think

0:21:55.160 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's a good team. Ten against the Jets defense seems

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>awfully optimistic. I would take the points with the Jets.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they're a real football team. Sharper square. Believe

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it or not, it's square. So right now, the number

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of tickets, the Jets are the public underdog in this game.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned the numbers at ten, it was at nine.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>The tickets are coming in on the Jets, but the

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>money the professionals are on the Bills, and so we've

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>had what's called the reverse line move. That's when the

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>preponderance of tickets are on one side, but the money

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>is on the other side, and it moves in the

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>direction of the money, not in the direction of the tickets.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think one people believe Mike White is a

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>better quarterback than Zach Wilson. But now you're getting tape

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>on Mike White. You've got six games of tape in

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years, it's easier to figure out

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>who this guy is. I think the wise guys feel

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Bills will be able to scheme against him differently.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And I also think they believe the Bills are getting healthy.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>And look what they did against the Patriots ten days

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>ago was really impressive. To beat a team that people

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>thought was on the ascent in the Patriots and do

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it convincingly on the road in a short week. That's

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>not easy to do. You don't do that often in

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. So there's a lot of enthusiasm for what

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bills can be right now all right time for

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what to do with this game. I

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you Jags plus three and a half

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>at the Titans coming off a humiliating loss. Vabel off

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a humiliating loss. My guess is at home they player

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 1>their arts off. But I didn't bet it. Tell me

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the side sharper square. The sharp side is the Jaguars.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>If there is a huge Trevor Lawns question right now,

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>he injured his toe, is he going to be playing?

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the expectation is that he will be playing.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>What you do by beating the Titans is by beating

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jags is by throwing the ball. The Titans don't

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have a downfield threat. Traylan Brooks is not expected to

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>play because of the concussion protocols, and the Jags have

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a really good rush defense. Meanwhile, and the other side

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ball, let's say Trevor Lawrence does play. The

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Titans defense is crushed by injuries, especially in the secondary.

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They're just like they're playing guys literally off the street

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. So you're buying a little bit low in

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the Jacks because what happened with the lines. They got

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>completely blown out. And the Titans need to win by

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a margin. It's not like one or two points. If

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they need to win by more than a field goal.

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>That's actually when you fade Rabel. So the wise guys,

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>if they get Trevor Lawrence are going to be in

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jacks. Okay, now, try to talk me into a game.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>For the record. Last week, the minute the game started,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I knew you were right. It was Denver And I

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>looked at them again this week at nine and a

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>half and I'm like, God, I hate it, but is

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that the game? Last week? I begged you, I beg

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you to bet the Bronchos, and I begged you to

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bet the Rams. I'm going to do it again. Not

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Rams. I'm going to beg you, beg you,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>beg you to bet the Broncos. I will have more

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>money on the Bronchos this week than any other game.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Forget about the teams. Let's just say you put your

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>hand over the franchises. If you blindly bet home underdogs

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>are seven or more. The last twenty years, they cover

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty six percent of the time. And by the way,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>when I give that number, it's not like, oh, they

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>win six times out of ten. That's a four hundred

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>plus game sample size. It is a lot of games. Right,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Take it one step further. You've got a team with

0:25:55.800 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a sixty five plus percent winning percentage, that's Kansas City

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs against a team that is losing it, that is

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>winning at twenty five percent or less. They're winning percentage

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of twenty five percent or less. Since twenty sixteen, those

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>winning teams, the teams that win are covering at a

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty six percent rate. Okay, that's terrible. Let's take it

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>one step further, and there's a reason for all this.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes in November and December in his career is

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty two and five against the spread seventeen eighteen and two.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>The reason why all this happens is because when you

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>get later in the year, you have bigger favorites. The

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>bigger favorites are always the teams that have won for

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>two straight months. They're the Kansas City Chiefs, right, and

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so they're inflated. The public is going to come in

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>on them. Bookmakers know that, so you are always getting

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>extra value when you fade that when you bet against

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>those teams, because those teams are so beloved by the public.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night Football Patriots Cardinals. Am I betting, buddy Colin?

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I know it's hard. I told you, I hate betting

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>bad offenses. Oh, it's terrible. Betting is terrible. Patriots, Cardinals.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Who would you take? I'd probably take the Cardinals. Um,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. We've talked about this. Like when we do

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcasts, we do one on Tuesday, we do one

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday. In those forty eight hours, we get a

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of calls from professional betters who like to talk

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about the games that we were talking about and sort

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of give us their take, and we call it sharp calls.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of sharp calls this week,

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like in Arizona. It's a little bit because the Pats

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to be in some offensive disarray. I think that

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking and we talked about this a couple weeks

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>ago with the Cardinals prior to the bye. I liked

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>him as dogs against the Chargers and that covered it's

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because they were finally healthy, Like they got Hollywood Brown,

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they got DeAndre Hopkins. Hopkins has been all worlds since

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he came back. You're just getting a better look at

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that offense and the Pats if they struggled with anything defensively,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been with Russian quarterbacks. So I favor the Cardinals.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Chad Millman CCO Action Network good see anybody. Good to

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>see you too, my man. We'll touch you later the volume.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Make sure to check out The Draymond Green Show. I

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>brought Draymond Green into the volume because one of the

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>more entertaining voices in sports. Unique perspective understands behind the rope.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Also chops up with guests like Gary Peyton, Zach Levine,

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Tracy McGrady. Make sure download The Draymond Green Show wherever

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, only on the Volume podcast Network.