WEBVTT - Episode 44: Omicron and The Path Forward with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Pop next The Truth with Lisa bof A The So,

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the omicron variant is sweeping the nation, and with it

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:13.159
<v Speaker 1>has come fear and new draconian government measures. Cities like

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Boston and Chicago are now implementing vaccine mandates. You've got

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to be vaccinated to go out to dinner, to go

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to museums, basically just to live your life. But what's

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the point of it when the vaccines don't stop transmission?

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>When vaccinated people like Senators Elizabeth Warren and Corey Booker,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>who both said they've recently got the boosted, well they

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>both just got COVID. So what do you need to

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>know about all this? What do you need to know

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about a macron? What do you need to know about

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>this incredibly transmissible variant? Is it going to get us

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>closer to her immunity? Does the vaccine provide any protection

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at all? This week, I turned to Dr j Baticharia

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for The Truth. He's a professor of medicine at Stanford University.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>He's also one of the co authors of the Great

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Barrington Declaration. He is also recently opened the Academy for

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Science and Freedom with Hillsdale College along with Dr Scott

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Atlas and Martin Colder. You guys are familiar with them.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.639
<v Speaker 1>They both have been on this show. All of these people,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 1>including j. Batcharia, They've come, They've given you the truth.

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>They're honest people. There are people we should be turning

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to for the truth and all of this. Also want

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk with Dr about a Charia about how Fauci

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and the ni H have intentionally shut down dissenting voices

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and the truth and all of this. We're gonna get

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>into how exactly they have done that, how the ni

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>H has done that, and how they control so many

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of the scientists in the country through grant money and funding.

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So a lot to get into. It's going to be

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>super interesting. We'll get you the truth on all of

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this with Dr J. Baticharia. Stay tuned. I'm so excited

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for this next episode. As we're saying this, this new

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>variant in the country, the panic, the draconian measures, rinse

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and repeat, which is something we're all familiar with. So

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy to have Dr J. Batachara on the show,

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>someone who has been a voice of reason throughout all

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>this chaos. Doctor, thanks so much for joining the show.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh thank you for having me so I'm actually one

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>of the unlucky recipients of this new variant. I have

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>spent the past week now just getting over COVID, So

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>fortunately I'm on the other side of it almost, but

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it definitely kicked my butt. I'm not gonna lie. Yeah,

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it could. You know, there's there's

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>delta still floating around. So I think the evidence on

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>amicron by itself is that it's it's milder. But COVID

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't a joke. I mean, obviously, so many people have

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>died from it, so it's something we should take seriously,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not something we should destroy our society around,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>which is unfortunately, I think we've done large in many

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ways over the last two years. Well, it definitely has.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you're one of the few people out

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>there really arguing again some of those draconian lockdown. You

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>know what's so interesting is there's recently a Foyer request

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>from the American Institute for Economic Research that undercovered emails

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>were Dr Fauci and Dr Francis Collins were scheming against

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you and the other individuals who signed the Great Barrington Declaration.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>What did that feel like to sort of be on

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the receiving end of you know, the government's propaganda and attacks. Really,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was really surprised. I mean, I guess

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and since I'm not surprised that it happened, surprising to

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>see it in black and white. The last year and

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>some have been quite difficult because what's happened over the

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>last year and a half and so is that after

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we wrote the Great Banking Nequation, which which we was

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with me Sinetra Gupta from professor at Oxford University, she's

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>fantastic theoretical epidomologists, uh and and actually practical epidomologists, and

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>then Martin Cooldorf at Harvard University, amazing biostatistician. We wrote

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this in Octo and the idea was very simple that

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>COVID has an enormously bad effect on people who were

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>older as also thousandfold increase in the risk of death,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of your disease if you are older versus if

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you're young. At the same time, the lockdowns are been devastating,

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just devastatingly harmful. Tens of millions of people thrown into

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>starvation worldwide, missed cancer screenings resulting in breast cancers that

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>are that should have been cut earlier tolling cancers. Psychological

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>effects on especially on kids, has been enormous. So we

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>called for an end of the lockdowns and focus protection

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for the elderly, especially for the older and other other vulnerable.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>What we hope for was an open conversation with the

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>public comp community about how best to protect the old

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>older population without a lockdown. Because the idea, but up

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>until this one was the only way to protect anybody

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>was was a lockdown to stop this use and spreading

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that we knew that was not possible because what the

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns this does is protects a certain class of rich

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>people who can who can stay from home at work

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and not lose their jobs, and not not anyone else.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So we we put this out hoping that were to

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>open a conversation. Instead what was we were met with

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It was just this like vilification campaign is campaign to

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>say that we wanted the virus to rip society, to

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.119
<v Speaker 1>kill people, as if we were somehow Google that wanted

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to destroy destroy the lives of people. And I was

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I wondered what was the source of that? And the

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Francis Collins emails that were released through a FOIA reveals

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that the NI h with including the head of the

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>NIH and Tony Faucci, the head of the n A.

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I d uh. They spread those lies, they worked to

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>try to get the media to amplify them, and it

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>led to so many interviews with reporters where they're asking

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>me why I wanted to let it rip, why I

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hurt immunity strategy, which is which is nonsense? Um.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>And it made my life much more difficult with me,

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>even with my colleagues who sort of fell for the propaganda. Well,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and what's so odd is I mean, science is not

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be this consensus, this group think. I mean,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to have diverging opinions. And so when did

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this change? And why do you think it changed? Because

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we we've really seen this take fold in a way

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that is so different you know, times of the past.

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>So we're a science today, and how do you think

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that happened? I mean, I think that it's always been

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>true for science. Science is such a powerful, beautiful thing.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like an engine for producing things that tend

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to be true. Right, So learning learning how the material

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.119
<v Speaker 1>world functions, science is so powerful and so chief, so much,

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think what's what's happened over I don't know

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>exactly the time frame, but certainly, uh, we've seen this

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in during the pandemic. Science has become a thing where

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially you believe in it just because it's science, rather

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>than understanding the mechanisms by which science tends to produce

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>truth and so like. You can see this with the

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>almost crazy worship of Tony Faucci, or even the way

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he talks about science. He says things like, if you

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>disagree with me, you're not simply just disagree with a man,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You're just doing with science itself. He's turned science into

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a god. He's a high priest of science. When he

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>says things like that, that's not the right way to

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>think about science. At least, it's exactly what you said.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Science is a process by which truth reveals itself with

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>open mindedness, tolerance, uh and and openness. The discussion also

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>correction by data. Right, So if you believe A and

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe B, we disagree, Well, we agree on an

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>experiment and it resolves in your it turns out your right,

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, oh donn, I'm you're right. And then

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I say, well then you know, buy you dinner or something,

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and then I say see, and we do the next

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thing right. Then slowly over time, by that just open discussion,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we learn things about the real world. Instead, during the pandemic,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>what's happened, it's essentially replaced with this attitude you see

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in this letter and also the Trances columns head of

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>an NH wrote, and also what Tony Fauci has said

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of science as a dictum as given from on him.

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The science has said X, Y or z. There is

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>no fighting over it. There's there's no there's no disagreeing

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>over it. There's no recourse to any data that would

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>would solve it. Instead, you just propagandize, you demonize people

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to disagree with you, and you push them the outside

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>so that that scientific opinion is outside the bounds of

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the polite discussion. I mean, that's essentially exactly what Francis

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Collins and the United did to the Great Parenting Declaration. Well,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and they did this at the beginning of COVID as well,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the pandemic, of trying to shut

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>down any talk about the virus having escaped from the

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Wuhan lab. There. They did it in the lance that

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.119
<v Speaker 1>you had Peter Dazac and a bunch of scientists wrote

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that letter basically trying to shut down any alternative thought

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>process of oh no, it had to have come from

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the wet market, which even China is saying that didn't

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>happen now, you know, so they try to shut down

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>so they're just seems to be this really odd desire

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>by the people in charge, people like Dr Fauci, of

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just shutting down any alternative viewpoint in a way that

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is really dangerous, and to me, I think the reason

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>why everyone should be concerned about this is what information

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>are we not getting? What critical information do we not

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>know that is not being share, that is not being

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>brought to light that could potentially save lives because of

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this group think, because of the shutting down, because of

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the labeling anything that is outside of what Dr Fauci

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>deems acceptable as conspiracy. You know, what information are we

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>not learning right now that we need to know? I mean,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's always the problem when you treat science as

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if it were established out of facts with a high priesthood, right,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but what if the high priesthood is wrong? How would

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know? There's no there's no fighting with them reasonably

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>with with data and with with reason. Instead, what you

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>have is dictims, some of which may be right, someone

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>which are may be wrong. It's impossible to tell because

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been subjected to the test that you normally

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>would subject to scientific ideas to Every scientific idea is

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>subject to challenge in that same same exact way. It

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>has to be what do we not know? I and

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you? Like a great example is this

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this idea that he couldn't have possibly been a lab leak? Right? Well,

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in fact it was conspiracy here to even

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>suggested for a long time. Uh. The revision on this

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is I think going to be healthy, but a lot

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of the sort of circling of wagons on the lablacate. Frankly,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it smacks of like a cover up to me. Um,

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>whether there wasn't lablique or not, I don't. I don't

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>know for certain. It's hard, it's going to be challenging

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>to find out, but certainly we should be allowed to

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>ask questions around along those lines. The same thing was like,

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>actually I worked on a study in the early days

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the epidemic called the Santa Clara Seria Prevalence Study and

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the l A county, Seria prevalence say where What we

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>tried to do is figure out how widespread the disease

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was in the in the population um. What we found

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 1>was that in April twenty in Santa Clara and l

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>A County there were forty or fifty times more infections

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>than cases, which meant a few things. One, the mortality

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Riffin disease was much lower than people have been saying

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because the denominator the number of people infect it was

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>much higher, but the deaths were the same, So you

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just didn't it didn't. But the second, and equally certain

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>probably more important, is that by that meant that it

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was so widespread by April there was already too late

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a zero COVID kind of policy. We've been following.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>The idea for the policy all along has been a, well,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we just need to suppress the spread of the virus

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>down to low enough levels so we can open society again. Well,

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the data from April,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>there was no chance that was going to be true.

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>That successful in most in most places in the world.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's exactly what's happened. Like we've done so

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>much to try to lock down and get this virus

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>down to zero. That we've been unable to stop the

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>spread of the disease. We don't have a technology to

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>do that. Tony fact, you wrote a letter an email

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about that Santa Clara study that was in an earlier

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>email dump from through pain through Foia where he had

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a five pages of redacted the text that was redacted

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>about the study. Uh. And he at the end of

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the five pages he said he had a line saying, well,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we should contact one of the authors of the study,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>and it was one of my colleagues who was the

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>senior author on the study. He never was contacted. I

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>would dearly love to know with those five pages of

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>redacted text said, because what should have happened in response

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to that study and and a whole bunch of other

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>share problem studies, is a revision of thinking about what

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the right policy should be. And yet, just like with

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the lab leak, just like with the Great Parents and declaration,

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the NIH closed ranks of CDC closed ranks and decided

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to go full on down the lockdown strategy that's led

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to such a disaster the last two years. Well, and

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>so I remember, you know, I was one of the

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people screaming from the rooftops because I was reading stuff

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that Dr e and Edys was writing. I was saying

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the study that you just talked about that you worked

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>out at a Santa Clara, And then we had also,

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think closely after that, there was this study at

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York. There was also Miami Dade County, and

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>all of it was sort of saying the same thing

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that we were missing cases by, like you know, I

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>think it was something like ten to sixty five fold

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or something, which means that it's a lot less deadly

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>than we originally thought. And then you had also I

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think it was New York's own data was saying that

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the new hospitalizations were people who are

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>staying at home. So to your point, we had all

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this information in front of us that the decisions we

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>were making were the wrong ones. Yet will uh, you know,

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>continue down that road. But you know, here we are

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>again sort of in the same position where we have

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this new variant out that is seemingly as contagious as

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the measles. Yet they're still trying to revise the old

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>bag of tricks to stop something that we can't stop. Yeah,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I mean, the problem is that

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's exposed to actual discussion and data. The people who

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have supported the lockdowns really have no argument, right. They'll

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>point to places like Australian New Zealand say well, look

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they got to zero, but in fact they didn't get

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to zero. You can see the cases exploding Australia now,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>um that the the you can see the cases coming back.

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They've had more lockdown days than any place on Earth. Um.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And yet the disease is still floating around the way

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that that that the lockdowners have behaved, It's as if

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, there was no other possible alternative response

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to this this virus other than to to do the

0:13:55.160 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of school closures and church closures and and closing

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>businesses and uh and and sort of ending normal civic life. Well,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work. Was a complete disaster for the poor

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the vulnerable, both in the both in devest in the

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>developed world and the developing world. To pretend as if

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we had no choice, that that that wasn't actually policy

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>choice is completely disingenuous. And in order to maintain the

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>illusion that we had no choice, they had to shut

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>down the scientific debate about it, and so that the campaign,

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the propaganda campaign about the Great brand and Declaration, essentially

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the similar kind of uh shutting down a debate around

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>how widespread the virus actually was with the serial prevalence.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, there's now a hundreds of more of

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>these studies that found basically the same thing, like a

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>huge of a very large fraction of of cases that

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>affection is not identified and disease more widespread than realized.

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>UM and that's been tree is said from the beginning

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the epidemic. UH so that they had to shut

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that debate down in order to get the policy through

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>because if that policy was subject to old reason, no

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>one would have gone for it. Instead, they relied on

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>panicking the population to generate support for a policy that

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is utterly destructed. Quit commercial break more with Dr J

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Baicharia on the other side, where do you think we

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>would be today if we had followed the Great Barrington

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Declaration and protected the elderly and essentially allowed you know,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of society to go back to life. I

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>think we've had many, many, many fewer deaths from the

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>virus itself because we would have we would have protected

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>better protected the elderly. It's not I don't think there

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>would have been zero desk because this is a terrible

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>virus and it's really hard to stop. But we managed

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to protect the laptop class. That was the policy we followed.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We shielded the laptop class. We could instead have thought

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to ours I've thought about how best to protect the

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>actually vulnerable, so we would have many fewer deaths from

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the virus. We actually might even had less of this

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>viral evolution. And then the other thing that we would

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have had is we would have had an enormously uh

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>less damage from the lockdown arms. Right, kids would have

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>spent the last year and a half year year and

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>some in school rather than uh quote learning from home,

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as if it's really possible to do that. So kids

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>would be leading better lives as a result of it.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, that will have long term impacts

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have. We have kids that can't read, we

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>have kids is going to collapse in in learning. UM

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that has long term impacts on the lives. Just tragic

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>increase in depression and anxiety and kids and young adults. UM,

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we would have avoided all of that. We would have

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>avoided the there's now I mean, there's data that show

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that tens of millions of people around the world are

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>starving as a consequence of these lockdowns, tens of millions. Um,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you do. You have a country, a

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>poor country, many people on the verge of poverty. They

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>restructure their economies to fit into the global economy over

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years, lifting a billion people out of

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>poverty over twenty years. Overnight, we we reneged on those

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>promises and as it result, tens of millions of people,

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>their income drops below one to two dollars a day

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and they start and that's exactly what's happened. Um, those

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>those lives would have been saved. Hundreds of thousands of

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>children in South Asia, corning to report in the by

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the u N and March this year, have already starved

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to death. Right, So you have like all that collateral

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>harm that's going to have consequences for decades avoided if

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we follow the Great branch and Declaration. You talked about

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the virus or the vaccines to blame

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for that. I've seen the argument made that we have

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>leaky vaccines that don't provide immunity, don't stop transmission, and

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>therefore or you know, have led to this new variant

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of macron. What are your thoughts on that. I mean,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the virus is hard to predict, but

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>it responds to the environment that it sees, right, So

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the virus UM when you have a vaccinated population UM,

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there it creates an ecological niche where a variant to

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the virus that can infect the vaccinated UH is more

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>likely to succeed in stead of replicating itself. UM. So

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be surprising that to me to find a

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>widespread vaccination with a vaccine that doesn't stop dis ease

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>spread could have contributed to this evolutionary process and and

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>moved the viral evolution along a certain line. If we

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>followed the Great par interacoration, the pandemic wad it over

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier because what would have happened is is that through

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>normal activity, younger populations would have had more exposure to

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the virus. Is just I mean, that's just a normal way.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>But because the harm to younger people from being exposed

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to virus is so much lower than the old they

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>would have died at much lower rates and they wouldn't

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have been exposed to the lockdown harms, and so thus

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>would have been benefited from from the policy. It's hard

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to say exactly with any kind of precision, because you

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>have to play this game of like what if, and

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>play the game of what evolution would have looked like

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>had we gone down a different path. But it is

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>clear that the policy itself, both of the vaccination and

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>also the lockdowns, changed the path of our evolution. Well,

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and what's interesting is there used to be this game

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of oh, it's the unvaccinated's fault, you know, these dirty

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>unvaccinated people. And now that you have vaccinated and even

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>people who are just recently boosted to get it, you know,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>now it's, oh, it's no one's fault, it's you know,

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics and the conversation have completely changed surrounding COVID

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>now that we're saying that the vaccines aren't protecting people

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>from getting COVID at this current moment. Yeah, I mean,

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unfortunate. We should never have come to a

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>point where public counsel was promoting the idea that it's

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody's fault to get sick. We don't make you feel

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>guilty for being sick. That is that is bad medicine,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's about bad public heuple we do is we

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>treat people who get sick with compassion. That's the right

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>way to message around it. And if we have a

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>messaging strategy, it leads people to believe that anyone who

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gets sick is somehow lesser or somehow it hasn't been

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>careful or is I mean essentially other. That is bad

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>public health and that's clearly what's happened in the last

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>two years. And so now to see a reversion to

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that and say, well, it's not your faults, you've got

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sick as soon as the laptop class starts getting sick, um,

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I just it's frustrating. I mean, of course it is true.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That is the laptop class is not stop the fault

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>for getting sick. This is a this is a vexious

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>virus that spreads very easily and so it's very hard

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to hard to protect yourself from it. So it's not

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>their fault. But it does strike me as as curious

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that now we're finally getting that message from public health,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and we should have been getting that message all along. Really,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>there's been this illusion of control over the spread of

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the virus that's said this, we somehow spread the idea

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>around it if we were just we were just good enough,

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>obeyed the rules hard enough, we can protect ourselves and

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>others from the virus. But that that was a lie.

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>There was no technology we possessed or possessed currently to

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>stop the spread of this virus, and it's not anybody's

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>fault for getting it. I guess what I'm trying to

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>figure out is we we keep hearing this argument of Okay,

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so we know that the vaccines aren't stopping transmission. That's

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>evident when you have people like Elizabeth Warren Corey Booker

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>who said they were just recently boosted, you know, having

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>recently gotten COVID. But so we keep hearing this argument

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's still you still need to get it because

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it's still protecting people, it's keeping people out of hospitals.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But what evidence do we have that it's doing that

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>when we're also just seeing the natural evolution of a virus,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>which my understanding is it tends to lead to where

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it becomes more transmissible but less lethal as it continues

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to evolve. So how do we know it's the vaccines

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>keeping people out of the hospital versus just the virus

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>inevitably taking the course of being more transmissible and less lethal,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so it could be both, right, So I think I think,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>for instance, at least with the delta version of the virus,

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>there were some very good studies out of places like Qatar,

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>out of Sweden, out of out of the UK, even

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Kaiser in northern California that showed based on matched cohorts

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of vaccinated and unvaccinated people where where they carefully followed

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>them over time UM that showed that vaccine efficacy against

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>severe disease actually stayed quite high up to six seven

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>eight months after vaccination. UM. There was a Swedish studies

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>suggested that that at the end of eight months it

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>starts to decline for pretty sharply, but for quite a

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>long time it protects against severe disease, even as the

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>protection against against being infected declines pretty sharply after two

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or three months. UM. So I think really on the

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>basis of those studies that the people believe, at least

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe that there's it protects against severe disease, at

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>least against delta. UH. The evidence about a macron, this

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>new variant seems to suggest that it is much milder.

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>The disease itself is much milder and both vaccinated and unvaccinated,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that is much less likely to produce hospitalizations, much less

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>likely to kill you. I mean, I know, I've heard

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>this general dictum that viruses tend to evolve toward milder.

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>That's I don't know that it's always true, but with

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the case of Aramicron it it certainly has turned out

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to be true, which is I mean, a great blessing. Well,

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>because I guess I'm just observing in a you know,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>more immediate circle. But I know a lot of people

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>who have recently gotten COVID, you know, many vaccinated, small

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>handful not, and it seems like everyone's symptoms have ultimately

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>been the same, regardless of having been vaccinated or not.

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So I just I don't know, I just wonder it's,

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, again back to our original conversation of when

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of this group think narrative being told, it's

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really hard to know what is true and what is not,

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 1>which is why I've been bringing people like you, or

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>doctor Atlas or Dr Martin colder If on the show

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>who have been honest and have been unbiased in your

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>explanation of all this stuff, because it we're really living

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at this time where it's it's very difficult to discern

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>between truth and lies. Yeah, I mean, I think the

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>problem is uh actually comes back to this propaganda campaign

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>where we're talking about earlier. If you have at the

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of commanding heights of science, people who do not

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>respect open scientific discussion, the first instinct when they're challenge

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is to shut that down. You're gonna create this distrust

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is something that we absolutely have to work

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to to to address. As as I said, I think

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>science is a beautiful thing. It's wonderful, it's wonderful, has

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>produced so much knowledge, has been useful for humans, for people,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But that can only work when you have the scientific

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>process the working way it should. It's not a high priesthood,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a it's a discussion and open structured discussion.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>The lack of trust that that many, many, many people

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have in public health and in science is fully earned

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>by the public health establishment, by the scientific establishment. It's

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>brought brought that distrust on itself by not actually following

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the principles of public health and in in in lockdowns,

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>by not following the principles of what, how how science

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>actually should operate in in terms of how the ni

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>H and and other other entities that have been funding

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>sciences operated. It's it's led to this sort of, uh,

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the situation where um, we see that science can produced

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so many wonderful things and certainly improve our knowledge about

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>how the way the world works, but at the same

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>time it's created a class of class of people that

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>just there's no reason to trust them, but based on

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the way they behaved. I sympathize with a lot of

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>folks about the inability to how what's what's true and

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>false because you know, in the middle of a propaganda war,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what happends up happening. Uh, we shouldn't have

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a propaganda war here, we should have as an open

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>scientific discussion. So when and how did this claim that

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines would stop transmission begin? Because you can go

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>back to the visor's chairman's comments last December on Dateline

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>he said he wasn't sure the vaccine would stop transmission.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also look at maderna chief medical officer told

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Axios last November that we need to be careful to

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not over interpret the vaccines because we didn't have sufficient

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>concrete data showing that the vaccines would reduce transmission. But

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>then lo and behold, we had people like Dr Fauci,

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We had the CDC director, you had Joe Biden saying, hey, look,

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>if you go out, you get vaccinated, you're not going

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to get COVID. How did that narrative take fold when

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you even have the heads of these companies a year

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>ago warning for that to not happen, I mean, I

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>just was like a matter of full confession, I should say,

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I thought in January this year that the that the

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>vaccines would greatly reduce transmission. UM. On the basis of

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the trials, the randomized trials of the vaccines UM.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The endpoints of those trials were actually symptomatic COVID. And

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.239
<v Speaker 1>my reasoning was that if in fact the vaccines do

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>reduce the risk of symptomatic COVID, which is the trials

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>did show at least for a few months after the vaccine, well,

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>then symptomatic people are much more likely to pass the

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>disease on than someone who's not as asymptomatic disease. So

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>if you prevent symptomatic disease, it's a factor you're going

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to prevent trans or reduce transmission. That's what I thought

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in January this year, and the data started coming out

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that that protection against symptomatic disease didn't last very long,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe two or three months. You know. I started to

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>see like there were countries that were had big outbreaks

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>despite having very highly vaccinated populations, you know, and let's

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>say like March, April, May, um, and it became clear

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that the protection against infection was short lived. And I

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>changed my opinion on this based on those data that

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>came out. Um. I don't know why Joe Biden or

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Dauchi and and and others didn't change their opinion also

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>based on those data. They started that. I think partly

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking that in order to induce people to

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated, you can't tell them that you could get

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the disease anyways, because that would decrease the demand for

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. But I think I have the opposite idea

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to tell people the truth based on what the data

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is showing you. It's if you tell people. Look, I

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>changed my mind when the day appears the data on

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>which I changed my mind. And here's why I thought

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what I did before, and here was I think. But

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>now I think people are gonna trust you more. And

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>what actually increased demand for the vaccines, because what it

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>would happen is people say, well, yeah, okay, this person,

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>this person is telling me what the data show that

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>changed their minds based on the data, and that they're

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>also telling me that protects against severe disease, which I

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>still think it does for at least eight months. Like

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's how you build trust is by being

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>honest when you get something wrong, uh, follow the data

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and then tell and then reason with the public like

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 1>their adults, rather than trying to manipulate the public, which

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is essentially how I think Joe Biden and advised mainly

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I think by Tony Facci has done. They like the

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccine passports and vaccine mandates are are are fruit of that, right.

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>They they want these policies in order to cource people

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the vaccine at risk of losing your job,

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>at risk of being able to go to restaurants, to

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>uh to public libraries, uh, you know too, museums, you

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>name it. You you can't have, you can't participate in

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>civic life. Only you get the vaccine in order to

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>course people to get it. Rather than reasoning with people

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about the vaccines, say well, here's here's here's who especially

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>important for Here's what the side effects are for this group,

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's much less for that group, and just and

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>just showing on openly and honestly what the data are.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that reeds trust and that trust helps people

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>feel more comfortable doing the right thing for them. Well,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're right in the sense of, like,

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just earned my trust more by saying, hey,

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in January, this is what I thought,

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>here's why. And I think if they were just honest

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>with people and saying, hey, look that's what we thought

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and then Delta came along, and then

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, we're looking at us studies out

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Provincetown, Massachusetts, where you know, an outbreak

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>took place in the cases were fully vaccinated. Now those

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of you know, if if they were just honest.

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is and then they just keep pushing

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>forward with these failed strategies. I mean, like, so, for instance,

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we're we're all saying with their own eyes that the

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is not stopping transmission. Right, We're seeing people left

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and right get O Macron vaccinated. Not it doesn't seem

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to matter at all. But yet then you've got new

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cities like Boston saying you have to be vaccinated to

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>live among society here or Chicago, and it's like why,

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like what what is it actually doing to protect society

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>when it's not stopping transmission whatsoever? Like what's the point

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of vaccine mandates right now when it doesn't stop transmission?

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't understand it. It makes no sense

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. You're right to know, I don't understand it.

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>There is no point to it other than to create

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>social division and ostracism. Um. I mean I think I

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>think if you'd ask some a proponent, they probably say, well,

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we want to coerce people into getting the vaccine, like

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they're being honest when that policy induces such enormous social division,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like people have lost their jobs because they don't want

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to get vaccinated for whatever reason. Um. You know, it's

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>at this point the vaccine is very clear is a

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>private decision, like it has private consequence of that person

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>has vaccinated in the sense of protecting against severe disease.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>That's according to mind you of the data, um, but

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>very little in the way of public public Like, so

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>my vaccine actually doesn't protect you very much. If I don't,

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't stop me from getting affected, Vaccinated people

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>can and do spread the disease. And in fact, if

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you're in a group of unvaccinated people and all of

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>them are COVID recovered, well that natural immunity is quite

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>good against reinfection. They're great data from places again like

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Israel and Qatar, Sweden, Denmark that at one year there's

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>only a point three percent reinfection rate, or as a

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>sub reation, point three and one percent, a very very

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>low rate of reinfection one year. If you're naturally means

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it might actually be the case if you're among a

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>group of unvaccinated COVID recovered people, that you have less

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>risk of getting disease if you're in a group of

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated people who have the vaccine. You know, several months ago,

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>quick commercial break more Dr j Badtaria. On the other side,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so South Africa just recently, you know, they all this

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>macron wave hit first. Now it's subsiding. They've actually stopped

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing, quarantining. They've sort of changed their policy now

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that of the country has some level of immunity from

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>either prior illness or vaccines. What do you think a

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>macron will do to the United States in terms of

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>reaching endemic status herd immunity in the sense of, you know,

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems like this thing is just so contagious, the

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>incubation period is so short that so many people in

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the country are ultimately going to get this thing. Yeah,

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think, um, the illusion that you can

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>protect yourself from getting the virus if you just are

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:42.479
<v Speaker 1>careful enough, is authority on its way of being shattered. Right,

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this enormous seasonal wave and almocron I think

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is just fueled that throughout the Northeast and through much

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. Actually, that is I think inevitable

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because again we don't have a technology from stopping it.

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>In South Africa, what it's done is it's actually, I

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>mean interestingly, uh reduced the fear about the virus because

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of getting an omicrons all seems to be

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>much lower. Right, There's much lower risk of death, much

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>lower risk of hospitalization, and the end point than is

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of h I say, decoupling of cases from hospitalizations and

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>death like in the in many previous way, especially whenever

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>cases when possibilizations and death follows, sort of like night

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>follows day in the vaccine era in mid um. Actually,

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in many countries there was already this decoupling, like when

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>when the vaccine was used to protect the old, so

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that even if the old got it, they would they

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>would not go be hospitalized or die. That you'd see

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a very increase, sharp increase in cases with no con commitment,

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>increase in death or hospitalizations. You saw that in the UK,

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for instance, You saw that in Sweden for instance, saw

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that in Iceland. Actually, uh, in the in the now

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with a Macron, you're seeing that basically South Africa a

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>huge increase in cases with no no really increase in death,

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's in a population that's not particularly particularly well vaccinated. UM.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the same is likely to be true. As

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Omicron's president us, there will be the decoupling of cases

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and death, and that decoupling really is the end state.

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>The cases. We can't stop. The cases will continue forever

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 1>in waves, seasonal or regional waves, but it will no

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 1>longer produce the death that it once did. Are we

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in endemic status now as a country or where do

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you think we are in terms of is this still

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic or is an endemic. Now it's hard to

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>say biologically exactly mean so endemic, what it means is

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in her immunity. What it means is every additional person

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>infected insects one or fewer people. In that sense, we're

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>not as herd immunity because the number of cases is rising,

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>so each additional person infected. But in a different sense,

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic could be over as soon as we decide

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it's over. The pandemic really is in some sense, is

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.959
<v Speaker 1>the set of responses we've taken to the biological fact

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of the spread of this virus. The herd immunity means

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that there's sufficiently large faction of the population that uh,

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that isn't uh it isn't at risk of spreading the

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>disease very very sharply if they were to be exposed,

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>because if they're supposed to it, they don't get it.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>With a virus like this one, you can move in

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and out of herd immunity, right, you can get You

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>can be protected against infection for a while, and then

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>your community declines over time against against infection and so

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you get it again. The common cold is like this, right,

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there's herd immunity for common cold, your protection against it

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>declines over time, and then you might be exposed as

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to like another corner that's the same cornervirus that before,

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you you get it against several times in

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>your life. But the second, third, fourth time that doesn't

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 1>produce severe disease because you have immune mechanisms cellular immunity

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and other mechanisms of immunity that use the harm from

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>being infected reduced it so you don't you don't end

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>up in the hospital, you don't die if you get

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just a cold. That is I think the endpoint

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>is epidemic herd immunity, endemic equilibrium. What it means. All

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>that means is UM is that the virus isn't spreading

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>sharply because a sufficially number of men people have that

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for times. But the key thing is not that. The

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>key thing is the protection against severe disease, which I

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>think we are in the midst of getting UM naturally.

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people seem to have a lot of protection

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>against severe reinfections, and I think, uh, you know, I

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>think that that's the direction we're ahead of this, this

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>decoupling of cases and to end ut and severe outcomes.

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we should be more careful in our

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccination status in the sense I mean we are seeing

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>myocarditis and heard issues uh, you know, correlated to the vaccines,

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly among younger people who aren't as susceptible to ending

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>up in the hospital or dying. I mean, should there

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more transparency and honesty around some

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of those conversations and the potential adverse effects of the

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccines on certain groups of people? Absolutely? Right, I think

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the vaccination should be a personal medical decision based on

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the risk of vaccine to the person in that group, UM,

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>and and the benefits of vaccines for that group. Right. So,

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>a young male who is COVID recovered UM, is there

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>any reason to vaccinate them? They faced the risk of

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>markett it is from the from the vaccine, which just

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not it's enormous, but it's like it's

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, one in five thousand one and something on

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that order, UM versus where. But the benefit they get

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is so little because they're already COVID recovered UM. Whereas

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>an older person who's not been exposed to virus previously

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>uh faces a high risk of death or or you

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 1>know high meaning like four, three, four or five percent

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of death if they were to get infected. UM, the

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccine might be quite a good idea. UM. So it

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>really depends on who you are, your your medical circumstances.

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>It should be a personal medical decision you make in

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 1>consultation with your physician, not something that's forced on you

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.399
<v Speaker 1>by public health and in the way it has been.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But do you think physicians are up to that task

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of I have found in my conversations

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of different people that some doctors actually

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to have as full of knowledge of like

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>data and the bigger picture of things. Like someone one

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>time was like, well, Trump got the vaccine to me

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>because I made the decision to not get the vaccine.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason I was vocal with it as

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I felt like someone like me can take bullets more

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>easily than someone getting fired for making the same decision

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have the platform that I have. So I

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>decided to go out publicly and try, you know, I

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>wrote that op ed in Newsweek, really trying to articulate

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that people are making decision aren't rubes, like

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they've actually really thought through this, and it doesn't make

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>sense for them personally, whether they're young and healthy such

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>as myself, or they have prior you know, immunity, right,

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why I went out and and and

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>and did that. But you know, I had a doctor

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>one time and be like, well, you know, Trump got vaccinated,

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, well, he's like seventy five, and you know,

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>his health condition is entirely different than mine. You know,

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he probably is a little overweight, he's much older than me,

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>so his risk is severely higher than mine. So like

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't even make sense. So I I don't know.

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, our doctors really up to that task in

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the sense a lot of them really haven't gone through

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the data in the same way that you have. I mean,

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think traditionally the way that doctors get educated about

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of data is not by reading the papers

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>themselves amazingly, um, but by participating in professional activities where

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.479
<v Speaker 1>they get essentially like the summaries of this information put

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to them. Right, these things called continuing medical education credits

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that every doctor is supposed to get so that they

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they're always learning. The way that the discussion about the

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccines and about sort of how to think about natural

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>immunity has been spread through the medical community has been

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>been really lacking in my view. A lot of the

0:39:54.960 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>educational activities have emphasized the importance of vaccination without talking

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>through the nuances about who it's really useful for, what

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the side effect profiles are, and it's been in service

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of a public health goal to get everyone vaccinated rather

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>than a personal health goal to make sure that the

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 1>doctor is giving you the best possible advice for your

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 1>own personal health circumstance. I think if we shift back

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to a normal footing where doctors are looking out for

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the their patients as opposed to playing the part of

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>public health and forces for the population at large, we

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>will have doctors giving good, reasonable advice again, but that

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>has to be a decision made by public health authorities.

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Places like the NIH play an enormously important role in that.

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So when it's led by someone like uh like Francis

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Collins or Tony Fauci, who have essentially an ideological almost

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>seems commitment to making forcing everyone, no matter what the

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.439
<v Speaker 1>harm to society, to get the vaccine, regardless of whether

0:40:56.440 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they consent to it or not, you're gonna get is distrust.

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Not just the public competent doctors as well. And what

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you said is right. I mean, like, I think a

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have lost trust with their doctors as

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a result. Again that I don't think that's a good

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>thing at least, I think that doctors, it's really necessary

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that we be able to trust our doctors because doctors

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are so important for the health of personal health and

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for the health of population at large. Um And I

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>think medicine is going to need to do some self

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>reflection trying to get that trust back, because I have

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>been fortunate to you know, I've reached out to a

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 1>ton of different people involve different walks of life in

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the medical and science fields to try to get information

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for them and to try to learn that way, because

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's how we all learn the most, is

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>by asking a bunch of questions and then trying to

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>take that information from people and trying to come to

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what I think is the correct information or

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>the right decision with all of that, which is how

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I know concluded to not get the vaccine of also

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just having questions about you know, most vaccines we've got

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like five to ten years of data. We don't have

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that for these and so if I'm not higher risk.

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather just wait it out and see what we

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, learned from it moving forward, you know, versus

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously higher risk people might not be able to make

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that same decision because they're more at risk. But we're

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>just at this such an odd place in society where

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:14.479
<v Speaker 1>it's just, you know, the truth really isn't out there

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 1>as much. You know. Dr Scott Atlas had said something

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>when I interviewed him recently that really stood out to me,

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and he had just talked about sort of the profound

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>impact that even the ni AH has on science and

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the fact that so much of science is funded by

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the ni AGE and the United States and some of

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these other agencies, and so therefore it really

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>dictates sort of the broader landscape of science and the

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>conversations that we're having. Can you just talk about the

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>funding aspect of it and how that is controlled by

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these government agencies and the problem of that. Sure,

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So I spent my career at a at a medical school,

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>at mc Medical School UM. In order to advance your

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>career in a place like Stanford University in the medical school,

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to have NIH funding. It's it's almost a requirement, right,

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just marker of success as a scientists that

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you are able to garner funding from competitive funding from

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the NIH. Like every time I put a granted grant application,

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's like, you know, one in one

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in ten or one in one in fifteen grants actually

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>get funded. So it's a a great success if you

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>managed to do that. Um. Now, the problem is that

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>with that is that it's creates the incentives that you

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>have to align your research agenda with the NIH. And

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that's reasonable. The NIH UH may direct scientists towards

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>studying something like Alzheimer's because such a serious problem for

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:41.959
<v Speaker 1>so many and and putting a lot of scientists minds

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on that one problem could be a very productive thing,

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>but can also, as we found through the epidemic, be

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a danger. So you get one person, Tony Facci, who

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>has been sitting on top of a huge pile of

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>money funding the careers and making and breaking the careers

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of account of scientists over forty years based on his

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>priorities for what infects of these reasoners focused on what happening?

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Theologists focused on Well, um, you know a lot of

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 1>scientists stayed silent even though they were uncomfortable with the

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>policies in the lockdown because they didn't want to risk

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>not getting funded by Tony Facci's and I A D.

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>When Francis Collins, the head of the n i H,

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially says these Great Branch and decoration people are are terrible.

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We should wage a propaganda war against them. Well, no one,

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>no scientists who's thinking about their career, unless they're very

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>brave or very foolish, is going to speak up and

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>say look, this is this is um these lockdowns are

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>really bad idea. I agree with a great branch of

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that question. Very very few scientists will will want to

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>do that ever to their career. I mean, I can

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>understand why, right, it's they they're working on things that

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>are remote from from COVID or the Great Branch Decoration.

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>They just there's no reason for them to speak up,

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to stick their neck out, and so they won't even

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if they probably should. UM. So what you have is

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a situation where a legitimate role and I just to

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>help direct the attention of scientists on important problems. But

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the leadership of the NIH, including Collins and Sauci,

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>them use that legitimate power illegitimately to essentially silence scientific discussion.

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and it's undermined trust in science, it's undermine trust

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in public health, and as as we just talked about,

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>undermine trust in medicine. Had enormous negative consequences for institutions

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 1>that I think most Americans before the pandemic had a

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of respect for. Is that self preservation because obviously

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there's been concerns that the NIH funding went to, you know,

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the funding of back coronaviruses and that research at the

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Wuhan Laboratory. I mean, is it self preservation from Dr

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Fauci or why has he adopted this approach? Like what's

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>behind it? In your estimation? I don't know whether it

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:02.239
<v Speaker 1>was um and lobly, but what I do know is

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 1>that that ni H, with the the explicit sign off

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of Fauci and Collins, funded gain a function research that

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was incredibly controversial. So in two thousand and fourteen there

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 1>was actually a pause put on gain a function research

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>because there was a paper where that someone has published

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 1>in Science funded by the ANI agent part that it

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:29.839
<v Speaker 1>had managed to take an avian flu virus and make

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it able to infect human self people were very very

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>upset by this. UM. The argument for why they did

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>this was, what, we need to find out how many

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.879
<v Speaker 1>mutations it would take in order for the this av

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and flu virus to mutate so that you can affect humans.

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out it wasn't that many, and so

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh, well, we have to be prepared for this.

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time people were worried what if

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be allably lots of lots of examples of

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lab belief that have happened dangerous ones. Uh and so

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.919
<v Speaker 1>there was a pause put on this where in order

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to do research that involved all of this gain of

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>function work gain of functioning you take a virus and

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>give it new capabilities that didn't previously have, you needed

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 1>to get explicit sign off from Tony Fauci and from

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Frances Collins, and they signed off a whole bunch of

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>grants from fourteen on despite the pause. UM and UM.

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So they bear responsibility for the funding, and including by

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, Peter Dazac and the and the Equal Health

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Alliance which cooperated with the with the Wuhan Lab very closely,

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so they funded a lot of this work. And I

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know for a fact that that's what's motivating them,

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's frankly in the retrospective embarrassing thing that

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they did. It was a lapse in judgment, wasn't a

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>wise use of of n I H resources of American

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>tax about paid tax carder dollars? Um and uh. I mean,

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't surprise me to know that that this is

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>partly with motivating them. I don't think it's all. It

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>can't be all of it, because why focus on these

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>destructive lockdowns. I think that partly is just a failure

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of understand that there were alternate policies that were available

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that would have reduced the harm for the virus and

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>also from the lockdowns. Um. But but you know, I

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>do think that that this sort of desire to like

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>make up for this poor judgment that they had must

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have played some role. Well. I also just think there's

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a level of arrogance because someone had mentioned to me

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in the pandemic to sort of like explained

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Dr Fauci to me, is this is a guy who

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>flew that a bowl of patient from Texas I think,

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to the n I age in Maryland so that he

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>could treat her himself, put on a hazmat suit for

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the cameras, did a bunch of interviews when she would

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>have just been fine, like staying in Texas. So it

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>was like basically he like did this whole thing for himself, like,

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that he could like basically be in

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the glory. I agree. I mean there's some element of

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>self promotion in his in his in the way he

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>behaves that it's um so unseemly like frankly, should should

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we really know the name of the head of the

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 1>ANI D? Yeah, I think the head of an I

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>is important position, but shouldn't be someone who's so in

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the public eye, you know. Do you think that part

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the problem is so we see this with like

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>politicians very often. Right, You've got like all these people,

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>like most of our leaders, you know, I mean, you

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get any bit like Pelosi, even like

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>all these guys have been in the public office for

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>like decades. So it's like, how do you solve some

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that you've literally been a part of

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>making right? And so do you think some of that

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is true for these public health bureaucrats in the sense of,

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've been in government for so long that

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of out of the game or they can't

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:33.880
<v Speaker 1>really solve these problems or bring a fresh approach when

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 1>they've kind of been a part of the problem where

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they've been a part of the system for too long.

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to kind of take a fresh look

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>at bringing in, you know, different voices and different people

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:43.919
<v Speaker 1>who have you been out in the field a little

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bit fresher and you know, not been bureaucrats for so long?

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I do? I think I think that that someone like

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that Dr Fauci, who has been in his position at

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the head of the nmity for forty years on that way,

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or something on that order or years I've done an

0:49:57.520 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>exact number, but something a very very, very long time.

0:50:00.520 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Just by dint of being in such power for so long,

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you essentially create this insular sense where where like, you know,

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>no one's going to talk back to you, no one's

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna like tell to contradict you, and you you there's

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this feedback loop where you start to think you're always

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>right because no one's contradicting always everyone is always praising you. Um,

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>it's really dangerous for any leader to be in that position.

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Right the Greeks, the Romans, when a when a successful

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Roman general that have this major parade through Rome, that

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have someone that that someone whispering in their ear and

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at the head of the parade, and it was everyone's

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>praising him. Look, you're only mortal, You're not a god,

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You're only mortal. Right. So, UM, I think someone in

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a position like um Tony Faccy for for such a

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>long time, where he's controlled the budgets of careers of

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>countless incredibly bright scientists, all of them are telling essentially

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a very strong incentives to like to tell him you

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>know that he's doing a good job. Um. It's it's

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous kind of mixture of of power and science,

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 1>um and and it and it creates a kind of

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>corruption that's really hard to undo unless you have essentially

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:13.720
<v Speaker 1>term limits or something. I think no, no one human

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:16.279
<v Speaker 1>should ever be in that position for so long. See

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you've congratulations on the Academy for Science and Freedom with

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Hillsdale College. You Dr Scott Atlas and Dr Martin colderfans

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>started uh this academy. You know, what do you guys

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>hope to accomplish with it? And what are sort of

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the goals and the objectives with it. To me, that's

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's twofold. So I think I think we've talked a

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>lot about about what's motivated is through the sole conversation these.

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the the trust in science because of the

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>lock the failures in the lock around the lockdown, is

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at a low point, and in particular, the ability for

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.759
<v Speaker 1>scientists to talk to one another freely without fear of

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>canceling is really hard the discussions lockdown. That needs reform.

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So one is to restore the ability for scientists to

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be free within science itself, and that may be involve

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 1>reforms beyond just the lockdowns themselves, that scientists should be

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:07.440
<v Speaker 1>free to talk to one another without this sort of

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>propaganda of more against it. The other thing is, um,

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what role does science play in a free society? Science

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is important, but we've had during this pandemic this idea

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that science ought to completely structure all of our civic life.

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But in fact that's not right. Science helps you understand

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that about the way the physical world works. If I

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do a B might happen, but that doesn't say that

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I want BE to happen. Um, maybe I want CE

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen, right, So I'll do D instead, which D

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>produces C. Whether you want B or C. Well, that's

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>not a scientific question. That that's a question of ethics,

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of morality, of politics, of of a whole bunch of

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>other social values that scientists have no ex special expertise.

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Science and free society is not are not the rulers

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the scientists we study, Your advisors and the people who

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 1>make decisions should take that into account. But it doesn't

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>determine what's the right thing to do. Is it right

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to adopt a set of policies that mainly protect the

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:16.239
<v Speaker 1>laptop class at the expense of the working class and

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the poor and the vulnerable. I mean, that's essentially what

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>science said to do. We have to stop the virus

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and spreading, so we adopt these policies to protect only

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a certain class of people. Well, is that right? Well,

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>scientists have no monopoly and you should have no monopoly

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>in that discussion or free society, and so part of

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Academy is is to restore the proper place of

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>science and a free society and to restore the ability

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for scientists to freely discuss with one another. Well, I

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys doing that, and you know you guys

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>have been so brave and have had so much courage

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and really bring truth in a time where it's dire

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's dying and it's needed. You know what,

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>before we go, what should the path forward be for

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the country and how we deal with COVID obviously knowing

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>what we know now and knowing what we don't know

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in the future, but right now where we are in

0:54:02.400 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this what should the path forward look like? I think

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a few things. So one, we should vow never to

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt the lies of children ever again. Should restore

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.800
<v Speaker 1>normal life to children literally everywhere in the country. There's

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>no good reason to think about children as particularly particularly

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.360
<v Speaker 1>super spread as not since the beginning of the the epidemic,

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and the harm to them is just immorl uh. So

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we should end. We should restore normal life and children immediately. Next,

0:54:28.640 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we should stop a mass asymptomatic testing. Right. We shouldn't

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>be forcing people and I'm I'm in favor of rapid

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:38.840
<v Speaker 1>energy and tests and other tests that allow people to

0:54:39.280 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>take charge of the risk in their lives. Right, So,

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>before you go visit Grandma, you want to check with

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 1>your positive if that makes some sense to me. So

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we should allow that to happen, we should have if

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we should encourage that. But another hand, forced to testing

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and forced vaccination and coercion, that should end immediately, um

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's not it's produced social division without actually

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>doing much far as a public health benefit. Those two

0:55:03.040 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 1>steps would go a long way. For instance, and and

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and part of that the ending vaccine mandates and ending

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:12.400
<v Speaker 1>vaccine passports. I think we'd go a long way towards

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:15.280
<v Speaker 1>starting to restore the trust. Will need to actually address

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the remaining risk around this virus. Well, hopefully people adopt that.

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, there seems to be some hope when you've

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 1>got people like Governor Jared Poulis of a Democrat from

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Colorado basically saying that you know, hey, the medical emergency

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:31.799
<v Speaker 1>phase of all this is over. You know, let's kind

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of move forward with her alive. So praying more governors

0:55:35.440 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>take your advice and we can go back to normal.

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And I just feel like there's been so much harm

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to society even in just this blame game and you know,

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:47.319
<v Speaker 1>turning on our neighbors and it just you know, there's

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:50.360
<v Speaker 1>just been so much ugliness to the past couple of years.

0:55:50.360 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 1>So praying people heed your your words of advice there.

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr J. Batachara, thank you so much for everything you've done.

0:55:57.480 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So much respect for you and and just appreciate your work,

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>can your voice and all of this, and and thank

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you so much for your time, sir. It's an honor.

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you great to talk with you. I want to

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>thank Dr J. Batcharia again for such a great interview

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and just the honesty. It's so nice to have people

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like him to turn to during all this chaos, all

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the noise, all the craziness. I want to thank you

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:29.919
<v Speaker 1>guys at home for listening. If you enjoy today's show,

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>please leave us a review. You can rate us five

0:56:32.120 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 1>stars and Apple Podcast It means a lot. You can

0:56:35.080 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>find me on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook at Lisa Marie Booth.

0:56:38.840 --> 0:56:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank or team producer John Castio and

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Drew Steele who stepped up this week to bring you

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Executive producers Debbie Myers and Speak Renew the

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>English as well, all part of the Gingridge three sixty

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>network and team