WEBVTT - How the Fairness Doctrine Worked

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody comes see us, because we're coming to see you. Specifically,

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>if you live in Chicago. On July, we're gonna be

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Harris Theater, and the following night we're going

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to be at the Dan Fourth Music Hall in Toronto.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's just the beginning, that's right. We're also going

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to our beloved Wilburt Theater, which we own in Boston

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>on October twenty nine, and then our first visit to Portland,

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Maine at the State Theater in August. Yep. That's going

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to be followed in October. We're gonna take a little

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>break because that's a lot of touring in October. On

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the ninth we're going to be at the Plaza Live

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>in Orlando, and then on October ten, we're gonna be

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Civic Theater in New Orleans, that's right. And

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in October we're gonna round it all out at the

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Bellhouse in Brooklyn for three shows October yep. So go

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to s Y s K live dot com for tickets

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and information and we will see you starting this July

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago. Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, welcome to

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's Charles W. Chook Bryant,

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's Jared Dog the road Land of All Time

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>over there, and this is stuff you should know. I

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta pep it up a little bit, you know? Is

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that what that was? You gotta screw it up a

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit, That's what I meant to say, speaking of

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>screwing up Chicago, Illinois, screwing up it is I was.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to think about this, like which approach

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>should we take. Should we should we just outright lie

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and say, like, there's very few tickets left, so you

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 1>better go get them now now? Or should we shame

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>them and say there are plenty of tickets left, a

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>disappointing amount of tickets left. I think we should just

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>be honest and not shame them, but express our disappointment.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Nothing works better then disappointment. You know, Chicago, we really

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>expected a little more from you than this. So if

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you're confused about what we're talking about, probably because you

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard, and that's our fault. About our live shows

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>coming up all around the country. Two cities we've never

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>been to before. Yeah, yeah, we've never been to Orlando before.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>We've never been to Portland, Maine before, that's right. But

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we are going to Chicago again because we thought Chicago

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>loved us in July at the Harris Theater and then

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Toronto the next night on July. They're buying a lot

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of tickets. They love us up there. Yeah, at the

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Day and fourth. Uh. And then Boston August twenty nine,

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Portland May and August, Orlando and New Orleans October nine

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and ten, and then Brooklyn October three night run at

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bellhouse in Brooklyn, which is gonna be great. But again, Toronto,

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you're doing great, guys. Keep it up. Chicago, you could

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and to step it up a little bit. You've got

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time. But why wait you know, yeah,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean the seats are only going to get worse.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>True dat, Chuck, true dat. So just go to s

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>y s K Live for our home or touring home

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>on the web thanks to our buddies at squarespace. Oh yeah,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>and uh now let's talk about the fairness doctrine. Okay,

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we actually need to um. If this were say, pre seven,

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we would need to have Jerry come in and say, so,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>here's all the reasons why you shouldn't buy tickets to

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know live if we were going to

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>follow the fairness doctrine. But it's not. And as a

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, I wonder how podcasting would how this

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>would apply or have applied to podcasting if it had

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>still been around, or if podcasting would have been one

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of those things that kind of grew up around the

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>fairness doctrine. Who knows, but it's a fascinating Um what

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are those called? When uh, when an impossible Sure there's

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>another word for it, when it's something that just can't

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>possibly happen, kind of like speculative fiction or something like that.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember. But you know, since podcast don't fall

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>under the FCC, then doubt if it would have mattered.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I guess that's that's true. Huh, Yeah, we

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>could if we wanted to. Right now, we could say

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>every curse word, every awful thing in the world under

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the sun. We elect not to do that everyone. I

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>heard a radio DJ the other day say, um, I

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>know you want to curse so bad right now, this

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>is why we're getting a podcast, And I was like, yeah,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>I guess we could. I guess we could curse, but

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's I like that we don't chuck. I do too.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to hear me curse just a

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you can come to a live show true because it

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>happens a little bit, or be you can just join

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>me over at movie crush. I cuss had a lot

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>over there. Yeah. I think at first people were like, oh,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>and then now I think people go listen in part

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to hear you curse. They like to hear that blue

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>streak coming out of the real me. Oh, I'd like

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to think that both sides are the real You put

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>together well for roughly two and a half hours a week,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the real me. Do you find it difficult

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not to curse on on the show? Uh? No, I

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm fully used to it by now, but I

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely am not as fully freewheeling as I normally am. Yeah,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess I should say I want to give the

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>impression that I'm like some you know, Flanders type or whatever,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>curse pretty routinely myself in regular life. But I guess

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I find a kind of comforting just knowing that there's

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a there's a safe space where I don't say, the

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>afford a lot. You should start another podcast just called

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>filth Floren Filth with Josh Clark. Okay, that's a pretty

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>good idea. But none of this has to do with

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties except for the fact that people did

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not curse on the radio back then either because there

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>weren't a lot of people on the radio in the

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties. No, actually, pre or early early early nineteen twenties,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that is, right pre November nine, there was not much

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>going on on the radio aside from Morse Code, some

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Ham Radio operators, and remember we did a pretty good

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>episode on Ham Radio, remember correctly. Yeah, Well, one of

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the things I remember about that Ham Radio episode is

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that there was a kind of a whole hacker antarchic

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>ethos um surrounding the early days of radio. You know,

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just a total free for all. You can broadcast

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on whatever station you wanted to and get in arguments with,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the government if you wanted to, who who

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>cared there was. There was not a lot of ways

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to trace anybody. So there was a lot of anything

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>goes mentality among the early Ham radio operators. But but

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that was basically all you would hear is people saying like, um, like, hey,

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>how's it kind of thing. You know, maybe some heavy breathing.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>And then in November, station called k d k A

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>actually organized itself and the first broadcast UM that it

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>put out was reading the election results from the James

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Cock James Cox, Oh my gosh, I almost just violated

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>FCC rules dirty talk James Cox, Uh, Warren Harding presidential election.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It was the first commercial UM licensed radio broadcast in

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the world. I think, yeah, I think that's a great

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>trivia question if someone were to say, what was what

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>city you know hosted or whatever was part of the

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>first radio commercial radio broadcast Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, uh, And the

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.239
<v Speaker 1>follow up would be, and what did they broadcast federal

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a presidential election outcome? Which was a big deal because

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it's weird to think about in ninety that people all

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>over the country we're waiting for that morning paper to

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>come out. Except in Pittsburgh. They knew, right, they did know,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And not everybody in Pittsburgh, just the people who had

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>basically built their own radios because that was the radios

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that were around. They were pretty much pretty much. But

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this happened in words spread pretty quickly. Yeah,

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>some people in Pittsburgh knew the election results because they

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>were listening to the radio, and they ran around yelling

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that out and said we heard it on a radio,

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's like these people, lock them up. Yeah. And

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>also other little known fact, the first song played on

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the radio was Radio Killed the newspaper Star. Did you

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>just make that up? Or did you have that prep?

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I just made it up? Okay, good job, thank you,

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>man Um, I'm glad I got like that. Grudging good

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>job because there was almost contempt in that first initial well,

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>because off the cuff, that's a great joke. But if

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he works up that for a few hours, then I

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>nont no. When's the last time I workeshop the joke?

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Okay, you don't let you keep it

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a close to the guarded secret. So okay. So here's

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the point. This is the reason we're even talking about

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that first broadcast is because that was November ninety. By

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>nine four, I think they're in in in like twenty

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand radios n four. There are one and a half

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>million radios in the United States. By nineteen thirty eight

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of every household in America had a radio, and so

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>there was this massive transition from distributing news and making

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sure everybody was up to date on all the information

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they needed to be like a smart voter or hold

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like political or social or cultural opinions. Um. That transition

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>moved from newspapers from print, which still hung around, but

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>over to radio. Radio became team much um, much more

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>prevalent as far as the spread of information to an

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>increasingly large number of people went in the United States

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in a very short time, in like twenty years. Yeah. So, um,

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen forties, the FCC and you know, there's

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>some background to all this that will get to but

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we haven't even really said what the fairness doctrine is yet. Uh.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Finally in ninete um that the US government said, you

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, we need some help here. We're a little

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bit worried that um geez, somebody could some private citizen

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>who's wealthy could go and buy all the radio stations

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and essentially propagandize the news and there's nothing we can

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>do about it. Yeah. So basically what they said was this,

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>there is one thing we can do about it. We

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>can flex our muscle as the government and specifically say

0:10:55.280 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you broadcasters can't do that, that's right. Via something called

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the Fairness Doctrine, which had the overall goal of basically,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's very kind of cute to look back

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>at this time period, but its initial goal was to

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure that all the information on the on the

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>radio waves was good information and true and fair and enriching.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And there there's only so much space on a radio dial.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So and this is this is very critical that there

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>were a limited number of frequencies available. Yes, frequency scarcity.

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, that's just put a pin in that,

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's a very big deal. Is how this waighed

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in the favor of the fairness doctrine and then also

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of helped kill it in some ways. But basically,

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the very progressive you that public interest outweigh private interest

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>in the public has a right to really good information

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>over the free speech of the broadcaster. Even yes, so

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you just you just hit it right on the head

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like that is the crux of the fairness doc drin

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like okay, depending on your viewpoint, either

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>either like the most um vile idea ever or just

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a completely sensible idea. And the reason that it can

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>present the same these two totally different um opinions is

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>because this idea, the fairness doctrine, is it sits right

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of the difference between the right and

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the left, between conservativism and libertarianism and and liberalism right,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is it comes down to this, like if

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you if you have to promote um public intercourse, like

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>people understanding not doing it in public, but I mean discourse,

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the public intercourse. So yeah, I guess doing it in

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>public if you're going to promote public discourse and protected

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as a government saying like the the like, it's the

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>role of government to say, we need to make sure

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that the quality of the information that's getting out there

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>is protected, and and that we have to do that.

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>We have to limit what broadcasters can say. We have

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to curtail free speech. Two people on the right like,

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>right there, full stop. That's a problem. That's an issue.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it has fatally flawed because you are curtailing the

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>free speech of somebody, whether it's a whether it's NBC

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or Joe Schmo who wants to say something on the radio.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter. You're curtailing free speech, and therefore that

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. People on the left say, well, whoa, whoa,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 1>this is the this is this is a privilege to

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>broadcast on the radio. And in order to protect the

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>larger public and its interests, we have to curtail that

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>free speech of the very narrowed money, moneyed interests that

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>can afford a license to broadcasts. And and there's no

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>way to reconcile the two. You can't. It's you have

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to choose a side. You have to form an opinion

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. And whatever you choose is

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>your larger view of whether you're a liberal or whether

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you're conservative. Yeah, pretty much. Um, I mean it fell

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>along those lines back then and stilled us today. Even

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>though the fairness doctrine isn't around, the ideology is, well,

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it keeps getting brought out and kind of you know, um,

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>forced along a like an angry parade route and in

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>order to kind of say like, look, look, look what

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the government is capable of doing. Look at the overreach

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they really want to do. Don't let them do it

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>again with X. You know. So it is. It's a

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>huge flashpoint. And it's understandable why it seems like so

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>um kind of limp and bureaucratic and boring. But when

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you dig into the history of the whole thing and

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>even the contemporary idea behind it, it's a huge flashpoint

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>politically in the United States. Yeah. So it had a

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of main components, and then within that a cup

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of big, big rules, very important rules. The first the

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>components were UM They were known together as the fairness rule,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>which is, private broadcasters must report on my matters of

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>public interest, like it's a responsibility of you as a broadcaster,

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Uh. And private broadcasters must cover opposing perspectives

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>regarding that public interest. It's a that's a big one.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And then the little rules there, the personal attack rules

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>said that if you're a broadcaster and you are going

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to run a negative story UM on somebody or something

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>prior to that, you have to let these people know

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or this organization know and give them time to respond

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on the air. And then the political editorial rule, which

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is private broadcasters that air editorial programming that endorses a

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>political candidate must inform other candidates and offer them time

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to respond on air. Uh. Not to be confused with

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the equal time rule, that's that's different. Yeah. The equal

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>time rule is is why debates UM have are supposed

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to have all candidates, because you're supposed to if you

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>give one candidate time air time to say, hey, here's

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>my platform. You're supposed to give all other candidates the

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>equal amount of time, and that that political editorial rule

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's close to it, and it follows in

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the same tradition and principle. But really the personal attack

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>role and the political editorial rule that we're part of

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the fairness doctrine, that's just like the foundation of of

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>good journalism. Basically, it was not they're not radical ideas.

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>That's good point. So the idea though that that public

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that are that private broadcasters have to talk about issues

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and then have to air opposing viewpoints, that is that

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is kind of controversial because it's saying like he we

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we the government are saying you have to do this,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this is your responsibility. And the idea that the government

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>even has control over air waves is is in dispute,

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>but it actually dates pretty are back and we'll talk

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>about the background, the backstory behind the fairness doctrine after

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a message. How about that? It sounds good, okay, Chuck.

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So there there's one thing to really understand what we're

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about here. Initially we're talking about radio waves and

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>then eventually TV waves, and then that eventually turned into

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. But all these things, especially something like air

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>air waves for a radio and TV, these exist naturally, right,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>There's not like a government factory that produces radio waves

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and then the government can say, well, we we produce these,

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>so we can divu that's a it's it's an artificial

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>idea that the government can say we regulate these air

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>waves because it's citizens listening to the stuff that's broadcast

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on the airwaves, and it's private companies broadcasting on the

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>airwaves using equipment that's manufactured by other private companies. So

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the government is insinuating itself and saying, well, well, this

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is too important to leave to the market. We have

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to regulate this in some ways, and we're going to

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. And the whole thing actually started, um with

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the Titanic, to tell you the truth, the Titanic ship,

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the Titanic ship, the very one ship that's right. Uh.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Leading up to the Titanic, you know, radio is being used,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>um and quite a bit a maritime communication. Uh. In fact,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we even passed the Ship Act of nineteen ten, which

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>required ships leaving the United States to have radio equipment

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to know how to use it, uh, and sort of

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>laid out some basic broadcasting standards. But what they didn't

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do was say, all right, we're gonna signed radio frequencies um,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna like reserve a channel for emergencies only. Uh.

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>This kind of stung them because a couple of years

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>after that, a little boat called the RMS Titanic ship

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the Titanic, it wasn't a little boat, it was a

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ocean liner. Sure, I used to know the difference between

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>ocean liner and a cruise ship. I think ocean liners

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are trans atlantic. Is that is that the deal? I've

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>never heard the difference. I think that's it the same

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>or something. And I think an ocean liner specifically can

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>cross the two different continents. I got Yeah, I guess

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the cruise ship could just hug the coast or something

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I might be making all that up. So, Uh,

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Titanic sank. There was a lot of radio traffic

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>going on as the disaster breaks out, obviously, so even

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>though this uh in Newfoundland they heard very early on

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and picked up this distress call, they couldn't really get

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.959
<v Speaker 1>it out because everything was all clogged up. Yeah, there

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of ham radio operators screwing things up

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>at the time. That's right, and that's what prompted the

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Radio Act of nineteen twelve UM, which was sort of

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of the foundation of what would eventually become

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the Fairness doctrine, because what it did was it established

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>spectrum allocation and the FCC basically said, hey, listen, uh,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if you want to broadcast, you can't just broadcast. You

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta come to us and get a license. Yeah. Initially

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it was the Commerce Department that was that was um

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>issuing licenses, and then came the Radio Act of that

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>formed the Radio Commission, and they started handling licenses. But

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>not only did they start saying, Okay, you're a broadcaster,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>here's your license, this is the frequency that you can

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>um broadcast on. Prior to that that was around in

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Radio Act, that was the Commerce Department that did that,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but there was no way to police it. And so

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if you were say NBC Radio and the there were

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people broadcasting on your frequency at seven pm,

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you just switched to Yeah, well no, you just switched

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to a different frequency and start broadcasting, and so there's

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>no way to police it. Well, with the Radio Act

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of and the creation is Radio Commission, there was a

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>way to police it, because you could have your license

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>revoked and if you kept broadcasting, guys would come to

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>your house and kidnap your family. Yeah. But the really

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>important thing, and this is how it uh not your family.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>The really important thing was that established what we talked

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>about before, which is spectrum scarcity. There's only so much

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>space now if everyone has to apply for a license,

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>who wants to broadcast? UM, It's just it's it was

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>very key in in the setup and then, like I said,

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>eventual downfall of the fairness doctrine. Yeah, because it says

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this like, Okay, here's the full here's the full spectrum

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the radio spectrum that we can broadcast on UM, and

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to carve it up and each person gets

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a specific frequency to broadcast on. That's that means that

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a finite number of frequencies. So there's a finite

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>number of licenses, which means that not everybody can have

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a a license to broadcast. Which means that that the

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>people who do have that license to broadcast have a

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>very important privilege afforded to them. And because it's a

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>privilege because the government has insinuated itself and said we're

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>doling out these privileges. We've decided we the government have

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>decided that that you have a responsibility to present fair

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and balanced reporting to the government to the public, including

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>basically all sides of an issue, like you have a

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>responsibility that supersedes your right to free speech as a broadcaster.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>That was That's what Spectrum scarcity created, right. Uh, this

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>radio act Um. While it did establish that, it kind

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of made some errors basically and how they set it up.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of misspellings. Yeah, there are a

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of misspellings. But they would say basically to the broadcasters,

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to air content in support of quote, public convenience,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>interest or necessity end quote. But they didn't really define

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what that was, which, by by the way I looked

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at up, I was like, what does public convenience mean?

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the UK it means a public toilet and that's

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the only definition I could ever find for it. So

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody just made that up. The air content about public

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>toilets actually like that apart from naked gun it's just

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>nothing but the sounds of people peeing. Um. But this

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is a big problem because if something isn't clearly defined,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>then it can't be Uh, it can't be enforced, right,

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you know. So in they knew that this was a problem.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>This was how many years later, like seven years later,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and they said, you know what, we need to issue

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>another act because we're the federal government. And so the

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Federal Communications Act replaced the Radio Act, the FEC was born,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>replaced the Radio Commission, and the f SEC said, all right,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the first thing we gotta do is define what this

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>public interest thing is all about, right, because not only

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>does it make it difficult to enforce, it makes it

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>difficult to follow. So like, even if you're a broadcasting

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I totally agree with this. I do have

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a right and responsibility. Uh, what's this public public convenience thing? Again?

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Like how do I do this? What am I supposed

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to be doing? And if it's not defined, yeah, you

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>can't enforce it. You also can't follow it if you

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>want to follow it. So there was just too much

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>gray area. And so the FCC um when this was created,

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea of um, okay, we're gonna set about create

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>like defining this stuff and really generating this idea of

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>what it means to be a responsible broadcaster. It happened

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>at a really liberal time in America's history, right after

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the New Deal had really kind of come along and

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>changed the complexion of America pretty dramatically, and liberalism and

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:05.959
<v Speaker 1>progressivism had really set in and was entrenched in the

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>fabric of American politics. And so there was this idea

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that the best way to prevent broadcasters from from asserting

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and overbearing influence on public discourse because they had the

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>loudest voice, because they had the radio licenses right, was

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:30.199
<v Speaker 1>to just say, you guys can't editorialize at all. And

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this became known as the Mayflower Decision or the Mayflower doctrine.

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a nineteen forty one FCC ruling that basically said,

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what, um, you guys, you guys have to

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>basically be neutral in that you can't you can't say anything,

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't present any particular side. If we find out

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that you guys are promoting, say the policy agenda or

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the favorite politics of like your station owner or your

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>parent company or something like that, you're trouble. And that

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like the the the line that they

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>drew no editorializing whatsoever, that's right, and that um, that

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>really sort of laid the groundwork in a big, big

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>way for the fairness doctrine, even though the fairness doctrine

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of undid that and said, well, you know, editor

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you can editorialize, but you just have to do it

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on both sides, right, you have to present present, prevent

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>present both sides. And like, on the one hand, that

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was a gift to the to the broadcasters right there

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>saying okay, you can you can use your own voice,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>you can state your own opinion, you can support your

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>own political candidate, but you have to give air time

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to the other political candidate. You have to give air

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>time to people with an opposing view of what you

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>just said. So it was it was kind of like

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a compromise, but it was also a weakening of the

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>progressivist agenda, I guess yeah. And the broadcasters did not

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like it for sure, because again they were still sort

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of confused about what what is public and poor didn't

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>mean we're not even sure you know, everything is decided

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and applied on a case by case basis in other words, yeah,

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if somebody, uh just files a complaint,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>basically they will take up that complaint and hear that complaint.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't like some like big sweeping thing. No,

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>but it was also Chuck, that's so that that means

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's um, it's a capricious an arbitrary basically applying

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the rule on a case by case basis rather than

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a sweeping regulation. But it's also a weakness because it

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>means that the SEC is saying, we'll leave it to you,

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the broadcasters, to police yourselves. We're only gonna act when

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody complains. Yeah, So what happened in a lot of

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>cases was some radio stations were like, you know what,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even gonna go there, and I'm gonna avoid

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>controversy um at all, you know altogether, because I don't

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 1>think we pointed out, uh, it wasn't just about politics.

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It was basically covered controversial issues in general, like and

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that this will play a big part, like everything from

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>climate denial to the anti vax movement in the nineteen eighties,

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Like they all had to have equal time under the

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>fairness doctrine. And a lot of people point to the

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>fairness doctrine as like how these movements got jumped started

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to begin with because they didn't put those opinions in context.

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>They were just like, you know, they didn't say this

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 1>is very scientifically valid and now here's the opposing viewpoint

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>which has no science to back it up, right exactly,

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>And and that was the fact that they didn't do that.

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>They were airing on the side of caution UM over editorializing,

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but also probably they were trying to make sure that

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody was was not offended. They didn't offend either side

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't want to be boycotted with advertising to

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or find sure. Yeah, so that was a big problem

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>with the fairness doctrine is that it was ill defined.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It was opened the door for opposing viewpoints that that

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that put them on equal footing or equal ground with

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>with UM with other viewpoints that were saying scientifically backed,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>which created what's called the false balance problem. UM. And

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>then uh, there was opposition to it to basically the

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to the fairness doctrine from from the outset, not just

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the broadcasters who thought they didn't want any kind of

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>restriction on their speech, but also interestingly UM it represented

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>an loophole to combat advertising too, which I think the

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>FEC hadn't thought of, but they said, yeah, this actually

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>applies when it when it came up, there was UM

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a ruling in nineteen sixty seven that found that cigarette

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>advertising um qualified as a um uh a presentation of

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>one viewpoint of a controversial subject. Basically, cigarette smoking is great,

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Go go smoke some cigarettes. And so some consumer groups

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>uh petition the FCC and say, hey, we should be

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>able to give the opposing viewpoint, don't smoke cigarettes, it's

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>bad for you, and that SEC said you're absolutely right,

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and advertiser was like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, this

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is a big deal. And now they jumped in to

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>back up the National Association of Broadcasters, which was opposed

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to the fairness doctrine in general. Yeah, and it also

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that kind of thing, if advertising counts, set

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>opens the doors, and it did for you know, like uh,

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll get to this more specifically later. But

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like if a power company wanted to do an ad

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about their great new nuclear power plant that they were

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>going to build, like a liberal group can come forward

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and say no, no, no, like that's not an ad. Um.

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, they're paying for airspace, but that means we

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>need to talk about the ills of nuclear power, right right.

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And I mean even if it wasn't at the opposing

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>group could say we get free air time to say

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that this is the opposite of that. And so if

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a broadcaster, especially if you're in a like a

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>successful market that you know fifteen thirty sixties second spot

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is important, you don't want to give that away. But

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it may also you may have like an interest in

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever the other group is protesting. So just on that

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in that respect as well, you don't really want to

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>air the opposing view. The problem with the fairness Doctor,

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and if you're libertarian or conservative is that it said

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to do that. You have to air this

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>opposing view. The SEC says, so that's right. So you

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta think this is gonna end up in court at

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>some point, and it did quite quite a few times

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>over the years, not surprisingly uh and for about a

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty year period US courts basically supported the

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>fcc UH in fulfilling this mandate. Um there were some

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>some real highlights in nineteen sixty nine. There are a

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of big court rulings that affirmed this enforcement. One

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was Red Lion Broadcasting Company Incorporated the f c C.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a little mouthie So this one was sort of

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>two cases in one UM. The Supreme Court was able

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to guild two birds. One case was an FCC appeal

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of a lower court ruling UH that said this, you know,

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the personal attack and political editorial rules as two big

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>rules were unconstitutional. Uh. And the second was a broadcaster

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>appealing of a lower court ruling that said the fccs

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>application of those rules was constitutional. So I said, all right,

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys, let's just combine this into one thing and

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear the case. Uh. And in the latter one,

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there was an investigative journalist named Fred J. Cook, and

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he filed a complaint. And like we said, it was

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>case by case stuff. So these this complaint made it

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the Supreme Court. Fred Cook filed

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a complaint against Redline Broadcasting, who owned uh W c

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>g B, because they had a broadcast with Reverend Billy

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>James Hargus that claimed that Cook, who was an author

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and wrote a very uh kind of salacious expose about

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. I uh. And this this reverend said, you

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>know what, this author is worked for the communist and

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he attacked JEdgar Hoover. And we it turns out they

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't contact Cook to give him that equal chance to respond,

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and they denied him his demand for that, and it

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>made it all the way to the Supreme Court, and

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court said, you know what, Red Lion, you're wrong.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>You gotta do this right. So and I since the

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court ruled that that Cook could have equal airtime,

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this is like I think twelve years or nine years later,

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and I could not find anywhere if he actually took

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>him up on it or not. But the whole thing

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was just like a It was an ad hominum attack,

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>an attack on him on Cook because Cook had written

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a book against Barry Goldwater, who was a presidential candidate

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and the people who ran Red Lion

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it. Um, so they attacked Cook. But he

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so they in this ruling though, and this is the

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>whole point, not not that Cook got his time, it

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was airtime, but that the Supreme Court ruled that the

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>sec applying this fairness doctrine was um good and fine

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and constitutional, which is a big deal. They ruled that

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the SEC could constitutionally um exercise this fairness doctrine, which

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>is that was just enormous. Yeah, it was a very

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>very big deal. Uh. The other big kind of landmark

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 1>case was that same year, UM the Office of Communication

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of the United Church of Christ at all the FEC

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>another scintillating title. Uh. There was a US appeals court

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>who overturned the FEC's decision not to consider a petition

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to revoke the license of Lamar Broadcasting w LBT. So

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>these citizens got together civil rights groups and they were like,

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, this station is awful. They are first

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of all, they're not covering, um, the civil rights movement,

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're flat out racist and segregationist, and so we're

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna petition this. And the FEC denied the petition UH

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty four and said citizens don't have the

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>standing to file a petition like this, which is pretty

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>surprising because you know, the citizens are the ones that

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>FEC have always been like fighting for right. It was

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a little um hanky hanky, it's the word that we

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>used to use. So the petitioners appealed in nineteen sixty six, Uh, yeah,

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty six, the Court of Appeals for d C said,

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you do have standing to petition the FCC to revoke

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a license, because that's all about protecting the public interests,

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>which is what the FEC was supposed to be doing

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, so get back to work. And finally,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty seven, the FEC revisited that petition rejected

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it again because they said, hey, this station is actually

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of taken some steps since then, and we think

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they're doing the right thing. Petitioners still weren't happy. They

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>appealed that in in nineteen sixty nine. Uh, the f

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>SEC actually revoked our broadcastings license. They did. As far

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>as as far as I could tell, Lamar Broadcasting was

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the one and only company to lose their license under

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the fairness doctrine. Right, um, they never got it back

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and chuck a little cherry on top. Because Lamar Broadcasting

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>lost the license of w LBT in Jackson, Mississippi. It

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was up for grabs and it was taken by a

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>majority black owned group that that took over the station.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>At that point that nice. So um, things seem to

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>be going smoothly for the fairness doctrine. What could go wrong? Well,

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you what could go wrong after a break?

0:36:39.560 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>How about that? Okay, chuck. So one thing that I've

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>learned is it's not necessarily like the Supreme Court is um,

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>their decisions are are final forever. They kind of shift

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and move over time over long enough periods of time.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And the fairness doctrine is a really good example of that,

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>because in the sixties the Supreme Court ruled pretty clearly

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the FEC was constitutional. But UM by the end of

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the seventies the Supreme Court started to side with broadcasters instead.

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>The winds of change kind of blew through there. And

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>there was one case in particular that the Supreme Court

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>heard in ninety nine that UM signaled a a real

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>change for UM the fairness doctrine in the sec applying it.

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And it was a case that involved w j I

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>MTV and Lansing, Michigan, which is owned by a guy

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 1>named Harold Gross. Yeah. So uh. The complaint here was

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that he or the station rather via Harold Harold Gross,

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 1>had abused their broadcasting power to the detriment of the public.

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So what he did was he denied airtime to political

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>rivals UM in some cases. In other cases, he censored

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>coverage of local businesses if they didn't advertise with them. Yeah,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he was. He was accused of clipping, which is taking

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>like when a when a network delivers a show, it

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 1>has commercial breaks in it. He would have his editors

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>go through and add even more commercial breaks, which you're

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to do. Um, that was a big one.

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Didn't cover the Jimmy Hoffa disappearance because he didn't like

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Hoffa's politics, even though it was a national and

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a local story. Yeah. So in ninety five hearing by

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the FCC said, you know you've you violated the fairness rule.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>We're taking your license, buddy. But he appealed it and

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.919
<v Speaker 1>this time he won the appeal, And like you said,

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>this was a big shift in the way things were

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 1>being thought about as far as the fairness doctrine went. Um. Hey,

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one one more thing about Harold Gross before we move

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>on this guy. Um. He was such a businessman that

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>when he started his TV station in n w j

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I M, he was actually one of the first hundred

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and eight license holders to broadcast on TV. But he

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sure that TV was going to stick around, that

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it was going to take off as a technology, so

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>he built the w j I M facilities so that

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it could be converted into a motel if TV didn't

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. So the original date w j I m

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>UM TV station had a pool out back what is

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it now? Do you know what is what? The pool?

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I looked up to see if there

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>was anything um recent about it, and I didn't find

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>any any new stuff. But I cleared I saw a

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>picture of the station, and there's definitely a pool out

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>back from back in the fifties. I guess. So I

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you let anybody swimming it or not. Maybe

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>if you advertised, he would have let you. So this

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>was mid to late seventies, and then things really really

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>started changing in the nineteen eighties because, uh, that whole

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>thing about remember when he said putting a pin in

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>uh spectrum scarcity, that was no longer a problem. By

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineteen eighties, there were more than ten thousand

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>radio stations, undred TV stations, about seventeen hundred newspapers, And

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole sort of drumbeat was like, wait a minute,

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>there's not a problem here anymore with scarcity, we should

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to do what we want. Because you told

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>newspapers from the very beginning that their free speech was

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>uh protected and they could do whatever they want. Why

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:39.439
<v Speaker 1>are we any different? Yeah, that's that's a really big

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>point um that a lot of people pointed to over

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the years, is why does this just apply to electronic media?

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the print media literally has an editorial page where

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they come out with positions on candidates and all this stuff.

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Why doesn't it apply to them? And for years and

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:58.319
<v Speaker 1>years and years, it was any smoke can basically go

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>get a newspaper. Printed radio is different because of that

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>spectrum scarcity. But yeah, as the satellite people came along,

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and as cable came along, that just kind of went

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>out the door. So spectrum scarcity going away, and the

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that the newspaper industry the print media was not

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>regulated anywhere near the same way really kind of removed

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>any remaining foundation for for the fairness doctrine to stand on. Yeah,

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so in the fecuh kind of got their gears turning

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and said, you know what, Um, we think this is Uh,

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>we want Congress to review this basically, UM, we're gonna

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>institute a public comment period even and uh, we think

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we should abandon the personal attack rule and in this

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>case by case thing, right, and yeah, And they did

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this for like two years, and while the FEC is

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>holding like these public hearings on it, Congress at the

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>same time was saying, well, we don't really want the

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.760
<v Speaker 1>arness doctrine to go away, and not just the left.

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>There was a bipartisan supported bill that got passed in

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress to codify the fairness doctrine, but it was um

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>vetoed by Reagan and so after that that was basically

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.959
<v Speaker 1>it for the fairness doctrine. Yeah, the FCC voted, uh

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>unanimously to just get rid of it. They did, and

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't actually get rid of it, they just

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>stopped enforcing it, or some parts of it. They kept

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcing I think the personal attack and political editorial provisions

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>up until like two thousand, for like another thirteen years.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that you had to promote um opposing

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>viewpoints on your your television station or your radio station

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that went away starting in and a lot of people

0:42:52.880 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>say that really changed the American media landscape big time. Yeah.

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's depending on who you are.

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm trying to dance around this. Um. Depending

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:12.839
<v Speaker 1>on who you are, you probably have a very strong

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>opinion about the Fairness Doctrine one way or the other,

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or you may think it was a mixed thing. Um,

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it was definitely a flawed policy. I think everyone agrees

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't perfect. Um, but the legacy is really complex. Um.

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, getting rid of it basically opened the door

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:34.399
<v Speaker 1>for what we have today, which is a degraded news standard, um,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>minority viewpoints that aren't necessarily covered. Uh. And how polarized

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we are because you know, people dug in and they said,

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm gonna start my super conservative radio stations,

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and then people said, I'm going to start my super

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>conservative liberal uh website and and radio shows, and liberals

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna listen to theirs, and conservatives are gonna listen

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to theirs and never between she'll meet right right. And

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>so especially if you have like each side promoting a

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>viewpoint or an agenda um to the detriment of the

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>other side, there's there's like the middle ground is lost,

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>which I mean some people, I know, some people aren't

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>very hip on centrism these days anyway, But I mean

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you can keep a pretty decent sized society together when

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you when you kind of follow a centrist access upward

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and onward, you know. And I think that to me,

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the fairness doctrine showed that. I mean, like, I don't

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's a big surprise where I fall on whether

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the fairness doctrine was a good idea or not. But

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think it's um Like, I can see

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>saying all these people out here need good information and

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not going to just get out there on

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>its own if if we the government don't step in

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and say here's how we need to get good information out.

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think the current DA landscape is just complete

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>proof positive of that that if you just don't, if

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you just let it all go free for all, then

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>then you end up with what we have, that this

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is what the market offers us, echo chambers, echo chambers,

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>polarization and a huge division in the country, um with

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:22.919
<v Speaker 1>without anybody saying, well wait, wait, wait, yes, over here,

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>you guys are right. Over here, you guys are right

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and and things are really messed up. But also what

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about this other stuff? We kind of all agree on

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this part and what about this part. Yeah, we have

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of common ground here. No one's talking about that,

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and that used to be the role that the media

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>played before. Yeah. I mean, one thing we can say

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is without the fairness doctrine, um, we may not have

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten any of these majority viewpoints in the nineteen forties

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and fifties and sixties, people might not have been as

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>well informed except maybe be a newspaper about the civil

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>rights movement, women's rights movement, Um, how bad smoking is,

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>about nuclear power plants, like, all of these things that

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>were sort of in the shadows were now now had

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a guaranteed platform. Um. But like we mentioned earlier, because

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't really uh, they had to give these opposing viewpoints.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>He also could have possibly borne the anti vax movement

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and the and the climate denial movement and stuff like that.

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So it was flawed, to be sure. Sure, Yeah, there's

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:29.399
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, like any Democrat to the right

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of Ralph Nader, which is almost everybody, says, yes, fairness doctrine,

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>what a terrible idea, terrible idea. It was officially repealed

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eleven, and if you'll think back,

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that was under the Obama administration. So the Obama administration's

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>FCC was the one that officially took the fairness doctrine

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>off of the books, removed it. Yeah, but I mean

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a purge that was just like there's a

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch of rotten food in the fridge, and why has

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>no one thrown it out yet Yeah, but it was

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>also pretty symbolic, you know, it was it was a

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 1>symbolic act, whether they handed it or not. But but

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the the idea that um that it was it was

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:10.879
<v Speaker 1>removed by a democratic, um, lefty president's administration is it's

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's saying something I think. Yeah, here's

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 1>where we are today. Though there was a pole, a

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>gallop pole. And just last year, in two thousand eighteen,

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that's found Americans don't trust the news. Uh, they guessed, Uh,

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>let me see, si of what they here is biased,

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>forty percent is inaccurate, and thirty is misinformation. That's uh,

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>those numbers seem low to me. That's not a great

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>place to be in as a country though, No, it's

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a terrible place. It's a scary place. Like how is

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>this country still together? You know? Um? But and and

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is we're gonna get so much gough

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 1>because we didn't come out and just stay completely down

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the middle. But I mean, I want to say, like

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I understand where where people on the right are coming

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:04.399
<v Speaker 1>from with this, Like ideologically this is censorship and um,

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the the prohibition of the exercise of free speech, and

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that is one of that is a a core

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>um founding value of conservativism and libertarianism. So like, I

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>can understand how you look at the fairness doctrine and

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be like, this is government overreach and its worst and

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>its worst examples. You know. Yeah, but it's like it

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't It wasn't like state run radio, you know. No,

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like the government, the federal government propagandizing their agenda. Uh.

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it was saying like, hey, you can say

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this viewpoint, you also have to show the other viewpoint

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's almost impossible to argue with. Yeah, and

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think don't newspapers of of high standing still on

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>their editorial page kind of print the two opposing opinions

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.399
<v Speaker 1>side by side. Yeah, that's what op ed stands for,

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:59.359
<v Speaker 1>is opposite the editorial page. So the editorial page will

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 1>be the used papers opinion their editorial board, and then

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>on the literal opposite page is the basically the opposing

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>opinion of that. Yeah, it's just a high journalistic standard.

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But this is the government saying this. Newspapers do this

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.720
<v Speaker 1>on their own, I guess, just out of tradition. Um.

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Whereas electronic media is a little more wild Westy than that.

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So um here we are today. Uh, pretty

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting times we live in and it's all because the

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>fairness doctrine went away. Anyway, thanks for listening to this

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>episode of stuff you should know. If you want to

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>know more about the fairness doctrine, just go outside see

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>how you like things. Uh. And since I said that,

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listener mail, I'm gonna call this the

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>sound of our voices. I'm sorry, let me say this

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the color of our voices. Oh yeah, I know what

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:56.359
<v Speaker 1>my voice is. Color. This is good. In fact, yours

0:49:56.400 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't even color. This is more of a field thing.

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So hey, guys, listened to the episode on perfect pitch.

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that sinistats are often good candidates for having

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:08.839
<v Speaker 1>perfect pitch. I fall into the category of being someone

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>who possesses both. I've been serious about my musicianships since

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>my earliest recollections in life, and that's when I began

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>involuntarily hearing all the individual musical notes and their own unique,

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>unchanging colors. For example, the sound of the note F

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I should have brought in dude, I bought one of

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>those little uh what do you call it? Pitch pipe

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I got I bought a pitch pipe. Why didn't you

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>bring it in? No? I should have brought it in

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the one. No harmonica, I should have brought too. I'm

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy you one. I would love it. Can you

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:42.840
<v Speaker 1>have an engraved to just sure? Okay? Um? So the

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sound of f for Alison has never not caused a

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>rush of the color orange to sweep over her from

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:52.360
<v Speaker 1>head to foot. I also hear people's individual voices and colors.

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.799
<v Speaker 1>What's unique about voices to me? They're incredibly textured in

0:50:56.840 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and of themselves. You guys have voice colors and textures.

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I love mine, read mine. Josh's voice anytime I hear

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like Swede. If Swede Swede could make a

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>sound painted medium to dark brown with a tiny hint

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of easter egg purple. That is a lovely combo, if

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you ask me. Chuck's voice, on the other hand, has

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>zero fuzz to it at all. Chuck's voice is very,

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 1>very metallic, almost shimmery, like you're gazing upon a deep

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>blue green body of water and you can see straight

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom. Nice. That's a nice voice right there.

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>These are both great voices. I'm very happy that, I

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 1>mean who knows what what could have come out of

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this email? You know, your smells like a puke and

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>yours sounds like nails on a chalkboard. The end. Um,

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I've come to find out that no two voice colors

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are exactly the same, kind of like thumb prints and snowflakes.

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:53.440
<v Speaker 1>A person's voice color does not morph and to something

0:51:53.480 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>else either if they suddenly start speaking in another language.

0:51:56.719 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And it also has nothing to do with his or

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>her particular uh personality type. So they're not saying you're

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 1>smooth like swede on like as a person. Oh yes, clearly,

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think as a person. The point of the matter,

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I delight in hearing both of your voices nearly every

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>days a tune into the show. It's become a staple

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in my daily existence. Keep on being wonderful. That is

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:20.399
<v Speaker 1>from Allison, who is at our Salt Lake City show.

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>She interacted with us from the crowd. That's great. Thank

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you for interacting with us, Alison. We appreciate that it's

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>illegal at our shows. But I think I asked a question.

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>She answered it it's against the rules. That's what they say. Um, well,

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks Alison. That was one of the more interesting emails

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we've ever received. Frankly, uh, if you want to be

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like Allison and go to one of our live shows,

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you will never regret it for a single moment in

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your entire life. Go to s Y s K Live

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com and get tickets, especially Chicago. And if you

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:54.799
<v Speaker 1>want to get in touch with us like Allison did too,

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you can go onto our website Stuff you Should Know

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com, follow our social links there, or you can

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:04.120
<v Speaker 1>send us an email send it off to stuff podcast

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at i heart radio dot com. Stuff you Should Know

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is a production of i Heeart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. H