WEBVTT - Rates, Markets, and the Economy (Podcast)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. It's going to Ira Jersey,

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Chief US Interest rate Strategist, because you know, we talk

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about earnings, but the reality is we still have to

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to Ira Jersey. As much as we want to

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid talking about the Fed, the Fed is

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>moving continues to move this market. So, Ira, what's some

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>of the latest work you and your team have been

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>doing about kind of what's going on in the treasury market. Again,

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we got a two year four point seven percent to

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>ten year three point nine I'm sorry three point nine

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>three percent? Wow, what are you guys looking at? Yeah,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.639
<v Speaker 1>so that three point nine percent on the ten year

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty important technical level, and you know, even

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>though a longer term I'm a bit constructive on the

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>long end of the market, there's clearly clearly the market

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is very offered right now and we're likely to see

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>UM a break now above four percent and a ten

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>year in the near term, so that the next important

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>technical level is actually around four and a quarter percent

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ten year. And I think there's two things

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>driving this number. One is just the idea that inflation

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to be a problem. You have

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>UM some of the services numbers, like some of the

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing data PMI data that just came out looking pretty strong.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Philadelphia Services Index come out this morning

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>and positive territory after being in negative territory, and that

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that tends to follow um excuse me, the services inflation

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>tends to follow what some of these services indexes are doing. UM. So,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>so the fact that you have positive Philly fed UM

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Services index going up is you know, suggesting that you're

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to get a decline in inflation. And I

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the reasons why you're seeing inflation

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>expectation today up by five basis points. By the way,

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>do we have uh, hey, ken fella, you do we

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>have Philadelphia terrestrial radio station? No? No, all right, who

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>cares about Philadelphia? Ira Love? Why why does it matter? Philly?

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I've I've actually listened to eleven three

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>zero in Philadelphia. Okay, we love Philadelphia. We love you Philadelphians.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>How important is this? I mean Philadelphia Fed survey versus

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta versus New York. Are these very regional surveys or

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>do they all do national work? Now, those are all

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>regional surveys, um. And then they they then they do

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have a national survey for UH for the PMI, and

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously the different Fed districts kind of get together and

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>create something called the Beige Book. And these are these

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>monthly survey data are part of that larger narrative as

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to what's going on in the different Federal Reserve Bank regions. UM.

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But but Philadelphia is is big enough and has enough

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, both services and manufacturing that that you know,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it has over the course of many decades, been at

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>least a little bit of a leading indicator, you know,

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes better than others. So you have to take the

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>full mosaic and look at all of these data. And

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly there's going to be some regions that are doing

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>better than others and some that are obviously going to

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>be doing worse. UM. You know, we had a significant

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>period of time in the intermeding period over the last

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>decade in between the two crises, where you know, the

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 1>South and southeast were doing very well, so you had

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>like the president of the you know, Dallas FED would

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>be very hawkish, whereas everyone else was like, things aren't

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>so rosy because California was still doing bad. New York

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and Northeast were doing bad. So you know, Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Um,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, feder reserve presidents were saying, well, we're not

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>as optimistic as you are, maybe down in Texas. So

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>so again, like the federal Federal Reserve obviously is looking

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at the whole country, but there are certainly regional differences

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's and quite frankly, that is one of the

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>benefits of having the Federal Reserve system be similar to

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>how it is with all of these regions doing their

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>own work and trying to determine what's going on within

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>their their you know, one of their twelve districts, all right, Ira,

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So what's the market telling us now in terms of

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>what this FED is going to do over the remainder

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of this year? Is it? Because I think at one

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>point we're seeing twenty five bases points maybe a second

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five bases point than a pause and maybe even

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>cutting rates later in the year. Is where are we now? Yeah,

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so now we're still three twenty five bases point hikes

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>now is more or less what's priced, Um, some small

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>chance of a fifty basis point in there for the

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for the March meeting. I think that they're going to

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be in in doing twenty fives. Now the question is

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>how many more twenty five bases point hikes and do

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>they get you know, towards six percent. I don't think

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that they'll get there, but then again, you know, some

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of this data is just is as surprisingly strong, so

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't completely discount the possibility. So the market is

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking now five and a half percent on the upper

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>bound for the Fed funds rate and then still some

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty high chance of a cut before the end of

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the year. And I still think that that's what the

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>market's mispricing. It's not necessarily mispricing five and a quarter

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or five and a half. It's more that you know,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we're we're pricing for for cuts before year end, which

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>which I think is very unlikely. I just heard um

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody may not be buying Liverpool and we're still we

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>still care about Manu. In fact, Paul, did you know

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>MANU Manchester United the soccer team. It's US listed and traded. Yes,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like for a reindeer, like an Inuit name.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, man you why uh? Oh, Well they have

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>an American owner, um so, and they went and they

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>went public. They're actually for sale according to a lot

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of reporting being done actually on by Bloomberg in the sports,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like a six billion dollars sale. Yeah. So it's it's

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a reasonably big company, right, it's a global brand, um

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're playing in a cup final this coming week.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So before Paul asked me what I'm watching this weekend,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it is Manchester United versus Newcastle a currently middle e

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>cloud versus a likely to be cloud going to be

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>playing in a cup final and in English and English. Yeah,

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>exact stuff all right, Ira, great stuff as always, Ira Jersey.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He's our chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Also a avid soccer fan. Deepot reported some numbers forecast

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a little disappointing stocks off about let's call it five

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>percent here, three hundred dollars a share. This is a

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>company with a three hundred billion dollars market cap. Let's

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>break it down with Drew Reading. He covers the stock

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's research annalists over there. Hey, Drew,

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about HD. I mean what I was

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in an HD store a couple of weeks ago. Packed. Um,

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Seems like people are still buying wood

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and nails and hammers and stuff, doing that do it

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>yourself thing. What's going on? Yeah, I mean home Depot

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>has been really resilient. If you look over the last

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, they've grown sales over forty percent. They've

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>added about fifty billion dollars in sales over the last

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>three years. But we're in a little bit of a

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>different environment now where we're starting to see some more

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>stress on the consumer. And I think that's what their

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>guidance really hint at. It's that there's going to be

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>some spending pullback among consumers who've got a weaker housing market,

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got some anxiety over where home prices are heading.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And then at the same time, if you put on

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>top of that, they're going to have some margin contraction

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because of investments they're making to their hourly employees. So

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what's weighing on the stock today. And they've underperformed

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this year as well. You know, while the rest of

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>us have been rallying, home Depot is little changed with

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>today's dropped their down five percent year to date. Do

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>investors not like the home depost story as is it

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not kind of techy enough? Did it not do as

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>badly last year as the other winners this year? Yes,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>so they're actually up about twenty five percent since September,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so they've had a nice rally. But I think what

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing now, and you know, this is kind of

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>how I'm thinking about the guide is they haven't really

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>de risked twenty twenty three fully, and I think that's

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>something investors are concerned about. When we were thinking about

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the market next year home improvement broadly, we were looking

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>at the market being down about mid single digits, home

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Depot outperforming, maybe down two to three percent. Their guidance

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>suggest that the broader market for home improvement will be

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>down about only one to two percent call it, and

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll be about flat. So I think there's still some

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>concern out there in the market that there is room

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>for four things to deteriorate a little bit more than

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>what they're indicating. They also called out some compensation issues.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>They're going to pay people more, you know, the smart

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>people that help you out in the aisles and tell

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you where to find stuff, because they're going to pay

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>them more. Right, Yeah, that's what the investment is in.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really in that customer service aspect, something Home Depot

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>has been well known for. So they're going to invest

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in additional one billion dollars in their hourly employees over

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the next year. That's going to contribute to about a

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty base this point contraction in operating margin. And you know,

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a little surprising just because they've made so

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>many investments over the last years with their employees through COVID.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think it really just highlights, you know, the

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>tight labor market that's out there and how difficult it

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is to attract employees and also to retain the ones

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that they already have. So I put up the comp screen.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I always like to look at just a five year

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>shot of any company. Home Depot is over the last

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>five years up total return eighty five percent, so not bad.

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>That's better than the S ANDP total return sixty three percent,

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's they're both better than Lows, which is only

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>up twenty five percent over the past five years. Why

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is Lows such a big underperformer as Home Depot just

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>kicking it or is Lows dropping the ball? So when

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think when you're talking about the comparison

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>between two, it probably makes sense to look a little

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bit more near term because Lows has been and some

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of a turnaround story over the last several years. They

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>brought in new management, they're re emphasizing the professional customer

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that they've been underpenetrated, and that's really been one

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of the sources of out performance from a home depot

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>versus the Lows. As home depots forty five percent exposure

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to professional customers versus Lows at about twenty five percent.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, Lows is starting to reinvest in

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their online business, which is something they've neglected over the

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>last several years. So Los is more of a turnaround story.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>They've made some good strides, they're improving their profitability, and

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>they've also narrowed that comp gap with Home Depot that

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>has been you know, pretty wide over the last several

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>years and drew. In addition to home depot, I know

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you cover the housing industry overall. Here we got existing

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>home sales came in with a seven percent decline month

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>over a month. Consensus was for a two percent increase,

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So rule under performance. There are people not buying homes?

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Are they not listing homes? What's going on in the

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>housing market. So the fact that people aren't listing homes

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is is definitely one of the issues. You know, ninety

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>two percent of outstanding mortgages have a rate below five

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent, so there's a lot of distancented

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>for people to move, so they're not putting their homes

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on the market. At the same time, unlike what we

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>saw in the last downturn, you don't have those forced sellers,

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and that's because people are locked into fixed rate mortgages

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and they don't have the adjustable mortgages. So a big

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>part of it is certainly inventory, but let's not ignore

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the fact that affordability is, you know, near the worst

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's ever been. We heard some commentary from some

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the builders recently that as we got into January

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and rates pulled back to just under six percent from

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>as highest seven percent in November, that buyers started to

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>come back out into the market. So demand was pretty

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>strong in January and early February. But at the same time,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks, rates are back up

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty basis points, so you know, we're approaching seven percent again.

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So we think just as quickly as demands kind of

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>bounced back, you know, we could see things kind of

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>fall off in the other direction. Are there any that

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you like better than the rest when you look at

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>k Lnar Poult at all the home builders? So I

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think there, you know, there's a couple of different criteria

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that we look at when we think about how we

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the builders on a relative thence, in a

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>slowing economic environment, we like those with scale because they can,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, leverage the trades more, they could spread their

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>costs out, they could push back against their suppliers, So

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>those names would be a Dr. Hort and Lenar. And

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>then from a product perspective, we like builders who are

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>focused more on affordability. We don't care so much what

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they call their segments, whether it's entry level, move up,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but we want builders who are competing by price with

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the resale market. So some of the names that come

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to mind there again Dr Horton, a KB home LGI.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Over the longer terms, so Drew just real quickly here.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when we think about the new home market

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in that affordability segment, that's been a role on the

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>industry that they just haven't built enough affordable and lower

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>end or you know, kind of first time buyer units.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that changing in the industry. So it has started

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to change over the last several years. When we were,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the early days of the cycle, all

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis was placed on the move up market because

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where the demand was, that's where the margins were.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But over the last couple of years, we have seen

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>a shift towards the lower end of the market because

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>from a demographic perspective, that's where the demand is going

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to come from. You know, we think that will continue

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to be the case once we kind of get through

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the down part of this cycle. We do think that

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the lower end of the market will show relative strength.

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Drew great stuff appreciated as always Drew Reading.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>He's a research channels to Bloomberg Intelligence. He follows the

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>housing market and all the industries around that, including the

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>do it yourself retailers like home Depot and Lows and

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Home Depot Forecasting lower earnings in part due to some

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>concerns about the top line intercessionary environment, but also because

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>their wage costs are increasing. It again, home depot was

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>half a million people, so yeah, you got to pay

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>those folks that are in the aisles. Also joining us

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg interactive brooks sho shine, shold shine.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Let me just let me just give you a definition.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Shol Schein debt. This is, according to Bloomberg News, is

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a German promissory note syndicated like both loans and bonds

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that can have both fixed and floating rates. It's turning

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>into a niche German instrument to increasingly popular funding option

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for big European companies. I learned something new, and I

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>say she will know because Amanda Robello just walked in

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the studio. She has head of passive sales US on

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>shore but for DWS GROW. So Amanda, talk to us

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about how you're viewing the markets here. We've had a

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a it feels like a little bit of

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a sea change over the past few weeks, maybe in

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>response to some economic data that came in maybe a

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit hotter than expected and CPI PPI retail sales.

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>However you want to look, we at some PMI data today,

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the Fed maybe has a little bit

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>more support for hire for longers that how you guys

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>are reading it. Yeah, we think that it's not all

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>doom and gloom, but we think it's still worthwhile thinking

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about potential volatility in the market's going forward. I think,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know Biden and the trip that everyone's been speaking about,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>He's really thrown the cash among the pigeons. So volatility

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be here for the rest of the year.

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>There are some biopportunities though, and we think it makes

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sense to think about burdenhand theory, locking in dividends, having

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>less focus on price appreciation of stocks. Really so we've

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>actually heard from somebody night you but this was a

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>several weeks ago, and it's just stuck with me because

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I simple catchphrases stick with me, Like the decade of

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the dividend. I mean, I don't know, do I go

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>out just buy some of these big three, four or

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>five percent yielding stocks and then maybe put the rest

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of it a two year treasury, build a four point

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>seven percent or you can buy a dividen focus ets Okay,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to tell me about that? Definitely, So We've got two

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on our side which had been quite interesting in the

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks and months. So the first one SMPD.

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We've spoken in the past with you guys about our

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ESG SMP five hundred fun this is now an ESG

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>SMP Dividend Aristocrats fund. The one on there, it's an

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>ETF with dividend paying stacks that are also good at

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>ESG companies exactly as you get everything in there. And

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason why the ESG part here is interesting is

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>because ESG is also a very good way to think

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about intangible off balance sheets risks, so that's kind of

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.239
<v Speaker 1>helping with the volatility component. Also, the dividend Aristocrats methodology,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of investors are familiar with. This

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is about quality, sustainable dividends, so not just names which

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to pay out four five percent, but then

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not investing CAPEX, for example, So that's an interesting side

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective. And the fund is yielding about five

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points sorry, more than just SMP alone, but

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>international equities as well also quite interesting as well, So

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>these typically yield more than US equities, so thinking about

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>more diversification in the portfolio and now you can be

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>yielding as much as five point two five percent. Are

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we in an age where I mean you say ESG

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and it makes me think of you know, climate change,

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>global warming. We're against that sort of thing, right, But

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this dividend holds x on Mobile. Yeah, this dividend holds

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola. Yeah. Um, can you just put anything you

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>want in an EESG ETF as long as you call

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 1>it ESG, it's a better seller because those things are

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>not good for like humanity or the environment. You're equating

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola with big energy. Well, no Coca I mean,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say even executives there would have to acknowledge

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of giving people diabetes globally, right, and

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>x on Mobile I don't even have to explain that one.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>We all know that doesn't sound like an ESG name.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So um, sad but true that you know, maybe Coca

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Cola is added to the obest crisis an xomobile. Maybe

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing. But going on this rabbit hole,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>it's the The thing is, though, it's about which of

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the companies which also have most scope for CAPEX in diversifying.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So Coca Cola, for example, is included because there isn't

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of capex, which is in like diversifying

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>their revenue streams to things like water and health drinks

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, health products as well. Then on the

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>health drinks are for the most part packed with sugar

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and a spossible consumption is just fine. Yeah, And do

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you think a large part of Americans are responsibly? So

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, So, Amanda, give us another sense of where

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing flows right now. I mean, I kind of

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like ESG has peaked in terms of interest level.

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's right or wrong. Maybe that's

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>just here in the US. I know it's still probably

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more popular in Europe. Give us a

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of where you're seeing flows right now. So we've

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>been seeing a lot of flows going into China, especially

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead or when we saw the reopening of society, seeing

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>higher consumer spending again just because people are out and

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>about at the end of the day. Offend Asher has

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>been quite popular because it's tracking the local index, so

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of the SMP five hundred for China, which

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is the CSI three hundred. And we've also seen as

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>well a lot of interest in this international dividend plan

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that I spoke about before HDF that's been driven very

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>much by just thinking about the hurdle rate that investors

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>need to overcome versus the risk free rate at the moment,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and international dividend focus strategies are definitely providing an opportunity there.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>What are just ETF funds in general? What have the

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>flow has been like? Last year was such a bad

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>year for investors equity Fixingcome, there's no place to hide

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>in your sixty forty portfolio. Kind of great year for

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ETF launches though, great year for ETF launcher. So tell

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>us about how the ETF market kind of behaved or

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>evolved in last year going into this year. Yeah, so

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>last year and we already start to see the trend

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>as well this year. I think on the ETF side

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that continues to be a lot of innovation, much easier

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring funds to market then on the mutual funds side,

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and just because you don't have investors looking for the

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>three year track record, they can kind of buy them

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>typically straight away. Then we've seen flows going into some

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of those new products. So we do still see a

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of ESG products. But I think you're absolutely right

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>that maybe there's been more focus on risk management and

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>things that we're more familiar with. So what's been interesting

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is you've actually seen some value come back as well,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen a lot of the value ETF to

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>start to attract assets. Also short duration as well, so

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just in light of the uncertainty, cash plus kind of

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>products as well, they're doing very well too, short duration

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>treasury focus funds. And then on the flip side of that,

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen high yield, but high yield that's very considered.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>So just thinking about the boost that you get in

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the yield, investors advisors being paid for adding risk the portfolios.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>High yield is actually not as terrible as historically. The

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>corporate default rate is actually pretty low at the moment

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>versus historically, so high yield is providing opportunities to But

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in general, do you see inflows continuing, do you see

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>more or you know, mutual fund conversions, more launches, just

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the ETF industry growing further in twenty twenty three, definitely,

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that uncertainty in the market the ETF

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is definitely adding a lot of value. On the active side,

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the transparency that suffered is really invaluable to investors at

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the moment. They just need to know what's going on.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone understands that transparency and low costs, right,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's huge. Exactly ten basis points makes a huge

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>difference over a decade when you're suffering a loss. Right, Yes,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what is the fidelity do of the world? The big

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund companies are they are they getting into the

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ETF game. So I don't tend to comment to competitors,

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they have launched a number of funds, and

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we've also seen a number of other typically active houses

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>starting to enter in the ETF space. Let's say. Yeah,

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in general, other companies are getting big into it. Like

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>your head hunter is calling you more and more often,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like Amanda, I've got a lot of job offers for you,

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, no, I love DWS because it's such

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a great company, right, because I get too about exactly

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, So, I mean I just can't what is

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this ETF business goal? Do you think? I mean, maybe

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>just give us a sense of the I don't know

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the third party managed money out there, how much is

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ets versus mutual funds and kind of how's that changing? Yeah,

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we're actually expecting the next year the amount of assets

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and ets versus mutual funds is going to take over.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So at the moment, mutual funds are still slightly ahead,

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but ETFs will take over next year. One of the

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>key I think it's really about this cost component and

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>also about the transparency as well, but also operationally as well.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>If you think about it, with a mutual fund, you

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>don't need to sign up to a transfer agent. If

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got access to the exchange, you can just buy

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it that way. It's very easy dealing costs also very

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>very cheap as well. When you think about the pricing

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>mechanics too, you don't have the swing pricing component where

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>existing investors are penalized by new flows or outflows from

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>existing investors. So there's also kind of a more fairness,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. But I think what clients are looking

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for at the moment in these tough markets is just

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>more niche exposures. All right, man, what a story this

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>has been over the last Just for me, I've been

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>aware of the last ten or fifteen years, but boy,

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the ETF growth has just been extraordinary. If I'm Abigail

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Johnson up at Fidelity, I'm like, oh my good, where's

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>my growth coming from? Amanda Rebello, head of Passive Sales

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>US on Shore at DWS Group, joining us to give

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>us the latest on the ETF space continues to attract assets.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>This is the conversation of the morning. Let's get right

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to it. Chevin Yelticin, dean at the University of Rochester

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Business School, joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>What a resume. Undergraduate from Wellesley, PhD from Stanford, former

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>assistant professor at economics at Cullout School, those good folks

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>out in Chicago, president, former professor of economics at Carnegie

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Mellon and now at University of Rochester. So great, great stuff.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And she is also Turkish, and she has been kind

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to share maybe a quick view of kind of

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in Turkey right now. It's so many difficult,

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>difficult times over there with all of the earthquakes. Another

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>earthquake just a couple of days ago. Chevin, thanks so

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here in studio. I know you're

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be going back to Turkey you mentioned next week.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Kind of give us an overview of what you're hearing

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>from friends and family about. Yes, it's a it's thank

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. And it's a complete devastation. Really,

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>two major earthquakes hit about two weeks ago. As everybody knows.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>What I'm hearing is that the situation on the ground

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is actually much worse than even what the news can depict.

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>There's just not very much organized help going to various regions.

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's spent ten cities. So that's another reason why getting

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of that scale of help. You know, we're now

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>almost nearing fifty thousand lives lost and a lot more

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to come because not everybody has been identified or rescued,

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and another kid just yesterday in the same region. So

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of anxiety, a lot of sadness. Just

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of anxiety over whether there's going to

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be more earthquakes on the northern fourth line, and it's

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>really the Cold country is in a state of mourning.

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And before we get to you know, any anything else,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is the economic situation there making it so much more difficult.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, Turkey has had huge inflation problems, they've got

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>incredibly high interest rates, and hopefully the international community steps

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>in as much as possible, but it's got to be

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>more difficult. Yes, absolutely, the economic situation had not been great.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Turkish era had deteriorated against the dollar

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and major currency. We talked about the Turkish a lot exactly.

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>So the other thing is that the Turkish growth in

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the last sort of fifteen to twenty years has been

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>growth by construction, and that's what we're seeing the repercussions

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of because some of these buildings that are relatively brand

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>new should not have collapsed, being that we live in

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>an earthquake region. And that's because this sort of the

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>economic stimulus through construction has led to this overblown investment

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not always up to code, that's not always well done,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>lots of amnesties right before elections to be able to

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>get the votes. And so it's it's now pressure on

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the government building, do you think, or it's the government

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.719
<v Speaker 1>is just sort of giving a lot of you know,

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>basically signing off on a lot of development in areas

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that would be really not a good idea if you

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>ask the engineers and everybody else. So let's talk about

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of this the fiscal stimulus issue from our point

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>of view here in the US and how it's affecting

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the US count I mean, we're obviously We're going to

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to cover that disaster, the tragedy there, and hope

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that everyone can help out as much as possible. Here

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the US, we also had a ton of economic stimulus,

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean trillions of dollars obviously from the government, and

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>then the FED blew up its balance sheet to like

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>nine trillion, and now we're, I guess, dealing with the

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>repercussions of that. It looked like a guaranteed recession as

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the FED started to fight inflation and more people now

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are talking optimistically about a soft landing or no landing.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your view. I have been, actually, I've been only

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>optimistic part for a long time now because the labor

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>market has been very, very strong as we see it,

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and also just businesses finances and liquidity and household finances

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have not been in bad It's that's why I think

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much been resilience in certain pockets of

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the economy that I was never one of those that

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>said that the recession is very likely. The problem though, is,

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously the labor market is strong and the

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>economy was growing, but if the FED comes in and

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>raises raises rates by four hundred and fifty basis points

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>in the year and says they're on a path to

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>keep going. That's the concern, right, The concern is that,

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we see mortgages, for example, going up

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to seven percent in the market where houses are already

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not affordable, that just makes it more difficult for the

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>economy to keep humming along. Yes, I mean, we're definitely

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing that correction in the in the housing market. And

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a distribution issue as well. You know,

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>who's it really affecting it. It's not affecting necessarily kind

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the better of companies that have some

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>liquidity base. It's not really affecting sort of higher income folks.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But credit has tightened for a lot of small and

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>medium businesses and they've already hurting because of the wage

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>bill has been going up with that kind of unemployment figure,

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and costs have been going up. Inflation is there. So

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for them, it's less about the recession. It's about the

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>cost of doing business, whether it's being able to borrow

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and or being able to kind of pay the wage bill.

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I worry about. It's really that and

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that feels inflation too, because as small and medium sized

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses struggle, they don't present as much competition to bigger businesses,

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and we end up seeing a lot more market power concentrated,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>which means ability to just do a larger markups and

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>fuel inflation. Are you concerned that this federal Reserve may

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>overdo it maybe too hawks year, because I think even

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as recently as maybe a couple of weeks ago, this

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>market was thinking about, Hey, they're going to pause and

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>then they're gonna start cutting rates in the back half

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I'm not sure we think that today.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But are you concerned that maybe they'll overdo it overtighten.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not terribly concerned. I think they're going to sort

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of maybe slow down a little bit in the way

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that they raise rates. I mean, the GDP figure came

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on strong. Inflation is down, but it's still relatively high,

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think they're going to want to take

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>their foot off the break. Whether or not they're going

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to really push it too far, I'm not quite sure.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're really hoping that this time around they

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>can souf land the economy. I mean, this seems like

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>such an exciting time to study business, you know, or

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to be in your job as the dean of a

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:18.959
<v Speaker 1>business school. What incredible experiments you have to evaluate, from

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, initially quantitative easing to a zero interest rate

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>policy to you know, fiscal stimulus that amounts to you know,

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>double digit percentages of a GDP in one of the

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>largest nations in the world. How exciting is this for

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you and for your students right now? It's extremely exciting.

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no shortage. If this is the one time that

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, I'm not teaching this this year because

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of my dean duties, I wish I was, because I

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>really get excited being able to bring all of the

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>news into There's no shortage of topics, everything including with

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the COVID and the labor market and supply chain and

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>now you know the dead Sea lying obviously the geopolitics.

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It is both a uncertain but from sort of a

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>research and business study and economic study time of a

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>very exciting phase. What are the students, what are their

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>interests right now? Like when I was in business school

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty some odd years ago, it was consulting and investment banking.

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Now there's so many other companies recruiting on campus. There's

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>so many technology is such a big draft what are

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the interests of these kids today? Do you have altruistic students?

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Because when Paul was in business school, it was about money,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>money and money, that's right, So we do we do.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 1>There has been a shift and that's been going on,

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say for about a decade if not a

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer, about students wanting to go to kind

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of sustainable, more sort of socially responsible companies. You know,

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to take classes in ESG. They want to

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>understand sort of what the social and environmental impact and

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>as and also sort of you know, what are the

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>diversity measures that the companies are employing. So it's not

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all about money. Consulting is still big investment, banking less.

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So I would say the tech industry, especially for schools

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>where I've been I've worked at, Yes, we're very tech

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>heavy where a STEM, NBA and and you know, and

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>so our students are going to the tech industry quite

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit with different kinds of roles. You know, they're

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>everywhere from marketing analysts to sort of product managers. But

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be the biggest during the pandemic when

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we had those supply chain issues for you know, a

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. I said, boy, I shouldn't have skipped

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>all those supply chain manager classes. The Duke and or

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>played golf and decided not to go, because those folks

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that were really, you know, the lynchpin

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in this economy. Yes, absolutely, And now I mean whether

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if we're out of hopefully the acute

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>phase of COVID, we're still still seeing the geopolitics play

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in incredible roles. Is there demand or what is the

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>demand from international students to come study at the schools

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you've been at, so um the biggest group that comes

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>so the United States as a single country tends to

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>be China. We've been seeing, at least in graduate education

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a decline and applications across the board. In business schools

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at least, there's also some provisions about what kind of

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>research they can be involved in because of sort of

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>IP concerns, and so we've seen a decline. We're seeing

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 1>some replacement by India, a little bit from Africa, a

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit from places like Indonesia and Vietnam. But you

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>know the scale of China is so big, it's all yes, impossible. Well,

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and what amazes me is I think it's great that

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you have that kind of diversity. It's helpful to the

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>other students, it's helpful for academia, and you know, the

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>quest for more knowledge. What to me is insane is

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that we give these international students the best education on

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>earth and then send them back to their countries and

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>don't give them visas to work here. It's like if

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>we had, you know, Chinese carpenters coming over and we say, here,

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you the very best tools we can possive,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>money can possibly buy, and but you can't use them

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Yes, I I you're you're you're speaking

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to the choiet here. If I could, you know, with

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>one hand, sort of change one policy, it would be

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>about getting visas for educated folks in the United States

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>because it is it is very fraught, um, it is

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult causes a lot of anxiety, It causes

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty, and there's just not you know,

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's all tied to the job. If they change jobs,

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>then they have to go through the process again. It's

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I do not understand, given that we don't have a

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we have an aging population, why we're not giving more

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>visas to qualified folks that we have a lot that

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we educate, right, that we educate, but we have invest

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of resources. Exactly exactly it should come with.

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the acceptance letter from the University of

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Rochester Business School should also come with like a five

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>year working right, because you're prepared. It's only beneficial to

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the US economy if you let them work here. Yes,

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we have stem Stamp programs which gives them

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>three years of visa, but I'd like to be able

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to stay pule a green card to their diplomaslutely all right, Chevin,

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Chevin Yelkin, Dean at

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the University of Rochester Business School, returning to your homeland

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of Turkey next week for a business so hopefully that

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>will be positive experience as those folks continue to deal

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with very, very tough conditions. Thanks for listening to the

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 1>of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three,

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and I Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always Catch us worldwide at

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.