WEBVTT - Catherine O'Hara: Our Top 5 Characters | #1054

0:00:21.244 --> 0:00:24.604
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you

0:00:24.605 --> 0:00:27.605
<v Speaker 1>can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in

0:00:27.685 --> 0:00:31.365
<v Speaker 1>just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime

0:00:31.725 --> 0:00:34.805
<v Speaker 1>with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Sign up now on the

0:00:34.885 --> 0:00:37.284
<v Speaker 1>Regal app or at the link in our description and

0:00:37.405 --> 0:00:41.685
<v Speaker 1>use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen percent off.

0:00:45.885 --> 0:00:48.325
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:48.445 --> 0:00:49.565
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in art?

0:00:49.724 --> 0:00:49.884
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:00:50.284 --> 0:00:51.804
<v Speaker 1>Look, we're going to do this thing. We're going to

0:00:51.845 --> 0:00:53.044
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation.

0:00:55.045 --> 0:00:56.925
<v Speaker 3>From Chicago. This is film Spotting.

0:00:56.965 --> 0:00:59.245
<v Speaker 1>I'm Madam Kempinar and I'm Josh Larson.

0:00:59.525 --> 0:01:03.645
<v Speaker 4>I just thought she was the prettiest thing that I'd

0:01:03.645 --> 0:01:07.125
<v Speaker 4>ever seen, and she was there with somebody else. She

0:01:07.325 --> 0:01:14.525
<v Speaker 4>was very popular back then. She had dozens of boyfriends, hundreds, hundreds. Yeah,

0:01:14.565 --> 0:01:15.485
<v Speaker 4>I did not know that.

0:01:15.765 --> 0:01:20.164
<v Speaker 3>Cookie Fleck, Deliadets, Kate McCallister and Moira Rose. We lost

0:01:20.205 --> 0:01:22.604
<v Speaker 3>the one and only Catherine O'Hara last month.

0:01:22.925 --> 0:01:26.045
<v Speaker 1>This week we paid tribute with our top five Catherine

0:01:26.084 --> 0:01:29.845
<v Speaker 1>O'Hara characters that more ahead on film Spotty.

0:01:32.045 --> 0:01:32.845
<v Speaker 4>Sally is.

0:01:37.765 --> 0:01:40.964
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Film Spotting. Josh favorite Paul McCartney and Wings

0:01:40.964 --> 0:01:41.444
<v Speaker 3>song go.

0:01:43.084 --> 0:01:49.165
<v Speaker 1>Uh Lifeline, Can I call my dad? You can? I

0:01:49.165 --> 0:01:51.085
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I should be insulted by that or not.

0:01:51.165 --> 0:01:53.605
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess I wasn't alive really when Wings

0:01:53.765 --> 0:01:57.125
<v Speaker 3>was in its full glory, but not even a maybe

0:01:57.125 --> 0:01:57.844
<v Speaker 3>I'm amazed.

0:01:58.405 --> 0:02:01.445
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure, okay, I can hear that one in my head.

0:02:02.045 --> 0:02:06.165
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great favorite, we were okay, Yeah, it's a great tune.

0:02:06.165 --> 0:02:09.485
<v Speaker 3>We were planning to include my conversation with director Morgan

0:02:09.485 --> 0:02:12.845
<v Speaker 3>Neville about his new film Paul McCartney Man on the

0:02:12.885 --> 0:02:15.725
<v Speaker 3>Run in this show. Neville an Oscar winner, of course,

0:02:15.725 --> 0:02:18.525
<v Speaker 3>for the twenty thirteen documentary Twenty Feet from Stardom. He

0:02:18.565 --> 0:02:20.965
<v Speaker 3>also made the mister Rogers doc Won't You Be My Name?

0:02:21.645 --> 0:02:24.285
<v Speaker 3>And twenty twenty four is piece by piece the lego

0:02:24.365 --> 0:02:27.965
<v Speaker 3>fied bio doc about Froh Williams. But we decided to

0:02:28.125 --> 0:02:30.924
<v Speaker 3>drop it into the film spotting Feed earlier this week

0:02:31.044 --> 0:02:33.725
<v Speaker 3>as a standalone episode, so by the time people are

0:02:33.725 --> 0:02:36.725
<v Speaker 3>hearing this, Josh, hopefully they have already heard that what

0:02:36.805 --> 0:02:39.365
<v Speaker 3>I thought was a fun conversation with Morgan Neville, even

0:02:39.405 --> 0:02:41.365
<v Speaker 3>if it really was just the two of us, it

0:02:41.405 --> 0:02:44.765
<v Speaker 3>turns out two bass players geeking out about how good

0:02:44.805 --> 0:02:45.685
<v Speaker 3>Paul McCartney is.

0:02:46.085 --> 0:02:48.524
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the real reason is there's a rumor

0:02:48.605 --> 0:02:51.685
<v Speaker 1>that we have a singing Masacre theater coming up later

0:02:51.685 --> 0:02:55.445
<v Speaker 1>in this show, and we just didn't want, we didn't want,

0:02:55.605 --> 0:03:00.045
<v Speaker 1>like a discussion about good legendary music to share any

0:03:00.125 --> 0:03:02.845
<v Speaker 1>space with what is about to go down later.

0:03:02.965 --> 0:03:07.605
<v Speaker 3>Okay, did producer Sam sneak this by? Because I wasn't

0:03:07.644 --> 0:03:10.725
<v Speaker 3>aware I missed this. I should read the dot It's.

0:03:10.565 --> 0:03:15.485
<v Speaker 1>Going to be rough. It's gonna be rough. Yeah, just

0:03:15.644 --> 0:03:16.245
<v Speaker 1>buckle up.

0:03:18.204 --> 0:03:23.325
<v Speaker 3>That conversation with morganev was recorded as a video conversation

0:03:23.885 --> 0:03:28.285
<v Speaker 3>like this very episode we are taping right now. Film

0:03:28.325 --> 0:03:31.125
<v Speaker 3>Spotting is available as a video podcast. You can watch

0:03:31.325 --> 0:03:34.565
<v Speaker 3>that interview. You can watch this show on YouTube. For

0:03:34.605 --> 0:03:37.365
<v Speaker 3>a link to video episodes, go to YouTube YouTube dot

0:03:37.365 --> 0:03:40.205
<v Speaker 3>com slash film spotting or go to film spotting dot

0:03:40.285 --> 0:03:45.885
<v Speaker 3>net slash episodes. Time now to talk Catherine O'Hara, and

0:03:45.965 --> 0:03:50.045
<v Speaker 3>I know that we are despite the sad occasion, we

0:03:50.085 --> 0:03:55.844
<v Speaker 3>are excited to talk about Catherine O'Hara, to share these characters,

0:03:55.885 --> 0:03:58.565
<v Speaker 3>to share these scenes, and I don't think it's going

0:03:58.645 --> 0:04:02.445
<v Speaker 3>to be a surprise, despite the great many of characters

0:04:02.485 --> 0:04:06.765
<v Speaker 3>she's played in a great many wonderful films. We are

0:04:06.805 --> 0:04:09.765
<v Speaker 3>going to have a fair amount of overlap here, and

0:04:09.805 --> 0:04:11.684
<v Speaker 3>I think we probably have a fair amount of overlap

0:04:11.765 --> 0:04:14.485
<v Speaker 3>with most people listening to this show, Josh.

0:04:15.165 --> 0:04:18.925
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean there are a couple of iconic characters

0:04:18.925 --> 0:04:21.125
<v Speaker 1>who come to mind when you hear Katherine O'Hara, and

0:04:21.165 --> 0:04:25.005
<v Speaker 1>we're going to give those roles plenty of time. I

0:04:25.045 --> 0:04:27.685
<v Speaker 1>am surprised the way things ultimately shook out, though Adam

0:04:28.005 --> 0:04:32.805
<v Speaker 1>is a little more outlier. Talk to use the language

0:04:32.805 --> 0:04:36.325
<v Speaker 1>we apply to our top ten show and those titles

0:04:36.445 --> 0:04:38.085
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year, the best of the

0:04:38.165 --> 0:04:41.085
<v Speaker 1>year that maybe only one panelist picks. I think we

0:04:41.165 --> 0:04:44.885
<v Speaker 1>each maybe ended up with two outliers. But yeah, to

0:04:44.925 --> 0:04:49.044
<v Speaker 1>your point, that means there are three consensus, and more tellingly,

0:04:49.245 --> 0:04:51.805
<v Speaker 1>I think the three consensus we all have ranked within

0:04:51.885 --> 0:04:55.565
<v Speaker 1>the top three. So it seemed like something that might

0:04:55.605 --> 0:05:00.325
<v Speaker 1>be more more fitting for a general conversation and then

0:05:00.365 --> 0:05:04.525
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about where we actually placed these characters.

0:05:04.685 --> 0:05:08.805
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Catherine O'Hara, definitely you have one or two

0:05:08.844 --> 0:05:11.805
<v Speaker 1>faces that come to mind right away, for sure. How

0:05:11.885 --> 0:05:12.845
<v Speaker 1>do you want to get started?

0:05:13.485 --> 0:05:13.605
<v Speaker 5>Go?

0:05:13.685 --> 0:05:15.765
<v Speaker 1>I want to share something on just to cover us

0:05:15.885 --> 0:05:19.085
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because and ask a more general question

0:05:19.165 --> 0:05:22.885
<v Speaker 1>about her. Basically, when this news came down, it was

0:05:22.925 --> 0:05:24.965
<v Speaker 1>a shock, as we said when we first talked about

0:05:25.005 --> 0:05:28.085
<v Speaker 1>it afterwards on the show, given how young she was,

0:05:28.685 --> 0:05:33.445
<v Speaker 1>and felt like a loss. I don't know, I don't

0:05:33.485 --> 0:05:35.484
<v Speaker 1>want to say out of proportion. Definitely not out of

0:05:35.485 --> 0:05:38.445
<v Speaker 1>proportion with the talent, but maybe out of proportion with

0:05:38.605 --> 0:05:42.725
<v Speaker 1>the stature in the sense that she wasn't really a

0:05:42.765 --> 0:05:47.125
<v Speaker 1>star in the traditional meaning right where she had all

0:05:47.205 --> 0:05:50.445
<v Speaker 1>of these films built around her. She never anchored a

0:05:50.485 --> 0:05:54.284
<v Speaker 1>movie exactly on her own. So some of the legends

0:05:54.284 --> 0:05:56.205
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about in the last year who have

0:05:56.445 --> 0:06:01.845
<v Speaker 1>passed away, she was in a different stratosphere. Yet for

0:06:02.085 --> 0:06:04.005
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us, I think it felt like as

0:06:04.125 --> 0:06:08.725
<v Speaker 1>monumental as a loss, just sort of emotionally and instinctively,

0:06:08.885 --> 0:06:11.685
<v Speaker 1>it was like, ooh, one of those And so I

0:06:11.725 --> 0:06:15.485
<v Speaker 1>was curious, you know, what was that? And I sent

0:06:15.645 --> 0:06:18.165
<v Speaker 1>out an email asking this when I was asking for

0:06:18.645 --> 0:06:21.805
<v Speaker 1>people for their favorite characters, and I got this back

0:06:21.805 --> 0:06:24.285
<v Speaker 1>from Jacob Allen, which I wanted to share because I

0:06:24.365 --> 0:06:28.445
<v Speaker 1>think he's onto something that also speaks for the nineties kids.

0:06:28.605 --> 0:06:31.205
<v Speaker 1>Because this is an Ohara character I don't think either

0:06:31.284 --> 0:06:33.925
<v Speaker 1>of us are going to include. But Jacob shared this

0:06:34.125 --> 0:06:39.404
<v Speaker 1>about why losing her felt so monumental. I wonder if

0:06:39.445 --> 0:06:43.125
<v Speaker 1>because so many of our earliest associations with her is

0:06:43.205 --> 0:06:46.724
<v Speaker 1>as the devoted mother in Home Alone, she feels like

0:06:46.805 --> 0:06:50.645
<v Speaker 1>the motherly matron saint to the film community. It sounds

0:06:50.685 --> 0:06:53.125
<v Speaker 1>odd to say, but I feel so comforted by her

0:06:53.165 --> 0:06:55.645
<v Speaker 1>screen presence, just as the presence of my own bomb

0:06:55.645 --> 0:06:58.965
<v Speaker 1>puts me at ease. That's my favorite performance of hers

0:06:59.005 --> 0:07:02.165
<v Speaker 1>has to be that of Gail in After Hours. So yeah,

0:07:02.205 --> 0:07:04.605
<v Speaker 1>I think we might hear more about Gail in just

0:07:04.685 --> 0:07:07.445
<v Speaker 1>a bit. But thanks for that, Jacob. That gets us

0:07:07.445 --> 0:07:09.525
<v Speaker 1>to nod to Home Alone as well. But I do

0:07:09.565 --> 0:07:12.445
<v Speaker 1>think raw emotionally speaking for a certain generation, maybe maybe

0:07:12.485 --> 0:07:14.085
<v Speaker 1>he's onto something here. Yeah.

0:07:14.165 --> 0:07:17.765
<v Speaker 3>I know there are Home Alone fans out there. I

0:07:17.805 --> 0:07:20.365
<v Speaker 3>know you're not one of those, Josh, and I really

0:07:20.445 --> 0:07:22.925
<v Speaker 3>have no. I don't have strong feelings about the film

0:07:22.965 --> 0:07:26.605
<v Speaker 3>one way or the other. It's definitely not going to

0:07:26.605 --> 0:07:30.005
<v Speaker 3>come up on this list, and it's interesting to think

0:07:30.445 --> 0:07:33.725
<v Speaker 3>that maybe in the recesses of my brain, it's entirely

0:07:33.765 --> 0:07:37.485
<v Speaker 3>possible that the first time I really thought about Catherine

0:07:37.485 --> 0:07:41.725
<v Speaker 3>O'Hara on screen, like processed who she was, really saw

0:07:41.725 --> 0:07:43.605
<v Speaker 3>that face, it might have been home alone. Now I

0:07:43.605 --> 0:07:48.245
<v Speaker 3>had seen Beetlejuice before that, so ald in that way instead.

0:07:48.285 --> 0:07:51.405
<v Speaker 3>But yes, it's possible that, certainly for a lot of

0:07:51.405 --> 0:07:54.085
<v Speaker 3>people listening it was home alone. And so there is

0:07:54.125 --> 0:07:58.005
<v Speaker 3>something comforting about thinking about her as Kate McAllister, and

0:07:58.525 --> 0:08:01.525
<v Speaker 3>and in your subconscious you will always think of her

0:08:01.965 --> 0:08:05.125
<v Speaker 3>in that way. I do like that sentiment as well,

0:08:05.285 --> 0:08:07.885
<v Speaker 3>you know, for me, as I was especially going back

0:08:08.325 --> 0:08:13.565
<v Speaker 3>through these characters and considering different people and watching different scenes,

0:08:14.245 --> 0:08:18.245
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about a line from a character played

0:08:18.285 --> 0:08:22.645
<v Speaker 3>by another person who we very tragically lost this year,

0:08:22.685 --> 0:08:25.684
<v Speaker 3>who we haven't paid tribute to yet, but I believe

0:08:25.765 --> 0:08:30.765
<v Speaker 3>we have plans to later this year, and that's Rob Reiner.

0:08:31.445 --> 0:08:34.565
<v Speaker 3>He plays a character in the film Bullets Over Broadway

0:08:34.805 --> 0:08:39.845
<v Speaker 3>who famously, or maybe even infamously says, an artist creates

0:08:39.845 --> 0:08:44.245
<v Speaker 3>his own moral universe. Again, watching all of these scenes,

0:08:44.285 --> 0:08:49.805
<v Speaker 3>I feel like with every character Catherine O'Hara plays, she

0:08:49.965 --> 0:08:53.485
<v Speaker 3>is consistently creating her own moral universe, and not just

0:08:53.564 --> 0:08:58.685
<v Speaker 3>moral universe, just her own universe, she is operating. Her

0:08:58.804 --> 0:09:05.965
<v Speaker 3>characters are always operating by their own set of principles, moral, ethical,

0:09:06.804 --> 0:09:11.125
<v Speaker 3>you know, you name it, any framework for the world.

0:09:11.605 --> 0:09:17.005
<v Speaker 3>They will never be denied. They are completely individual and idiosyncratic,

0:09:17.085 --> 0:09:19.205
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's what makes them, part of what

0:09:19.325 --> 0:09:20.405
<v Speaker 3>makes them so memorable.

0:09:21.045 --> 0:09:26.125
<v Speaker 1>Ye, their own reality is living comfortably within their own

0:09:26.165 --> 0:09:28.645
<v Speaker 1>reality and wondering what the rest of us are doing.

0:09:29.405 --> 0:09:32.245
<v Speaker 3>Exactly right, So get us started. You can name your

0:09:32.325 --> 0:09:35.325
<v Speaker 3>number five. We'll see where, we'll see where we land.

0:09:35.765 --> 0:09:38.165
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got an outlier here at number five, which

0:09:38.325 --> 0:09:43.005
<v Speaker 1>is a vocal performance. It's Judith from Where the Wild

0:09:43.125 --> 0:09:46.364
<v Speaker 1>Things Are. And I did want to nod to O'Hara's

0:09:46.405 --> 0:09:50.205
<v Speaker 1>voice work. She's done more recently the Wild Robot or

0:09:50.205 --> 0:09:54.005
<v Speaker 1>something like Elemental years earlier, franken WEENI. She's done a

0:09:54.085 --> 0:09:57.005
<v Speaker 1>lot of voice work, and to me, maybe the most

0:09:57.005 --> 0:10:00.645
<v Speaker 1>interesting vocal performance she gave us in Spike Jones's Where

0:10:00.684 --> 0:10:02.565
<v Speaker 1>the Wild Things Are. This is two thousand and nine,

0:10:03.205 --> 0:10:08.525
<v Speaker 1>and Judith is a particularly prickly wild thing. For those

0:10:08.564 --> 0:10:11.725
<v Speaker 1>who haven't seen this, it's a live action adaptation of

0:10:11.765 --> 0:10:14.805
<v Speaker 1>the Maurice Sundeck children's book about a kid who runs

0:10:14.804 --> 0:10:18.885
<v Speaker 1>away to a land of furry monsters. And it's just

0:10:19.045 --> 0:10:23.485
<v Speaker 1>one of our most unique integration of imagination, live action

0:10:23.605 --> 0:10:27.205
<v Speaker 1>and special effects. So you have Max Records, young actor

0:10:27.285 --> 0:10:31.085
<v Speaker 1>playing Max, this main character, and then the wild things

0:10:31.085 --> 0:10:35.365
<v Speaker 1>are played by performers in these giant monster suits. Some

0:10:35.405 --> 0:10:39.205
<v Speaker 1>sort of digital manipulation is used for their facial expressions.

0:10:39.325 --> 0:10:42.125
<v Speaker 1>It's all completely seamless. If you haven't seen it, it works.

0:10:42.165 --> 0:10:46.325
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it really does work. The suit performer.

0:10:46.365 --> 0:10:49.444
<v Speaker 1>On that note, I should credit for Judith. The O'Hara

0:10:49.525 --> 0:10:52.725
<v Speaker 1>character is Nick Farnell, and then of course she is

0:10:52.804 --> 0:10:57.885
<v Speaker 1>the voice and it's an interesting performance from her because

0:10:57.925 --> 0:11:01.204
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't just go for laughs, though there are those.

0:11:01.885 --> 0:11:05.365
<v Speaker 1>There's a real threat to Judith. It looks like this

0:11:05.525 --> 0:11:09.725
<v Speaker 1>three horned monster, and she's always dancing on the line

0:11:09.725 --> 0:11:14.365
<v Speaker 1>between teasing Max and then being serious about eating him,

0:11:15.085 --> 0:11:19.125
<v Speaker 1>which is a continual danger in the film. Just beyond

0:11:19.405 --> 0:11:22.845
<v Speaker 1>O'Hara though, where the Wild a stellar example a voice

0:11:23.085 --> 0:11:28.084
<v Speaker 1>casting for talent not name recognition. This is where producers

0:11:28.165 --> 0:11:31.684
<v Speaker 1>always go wrong when they go for the star. Sometimes

0:11:31.725 --> 0:11:35.885
<v Speaker 1>that works Tom Hanks brilliant voice actor. More often than

0:11:35.925 --> 0:11:39.285
<v Speaker 1>not it doesn't. So here you have you're going for

0:11:39.325 --> 0:11:42.645
<v Speaker 1>the voice talent. You're going for James Gandolfini, Chris Cooper,

0:11:43.125 --> 0:11:47.485
<v Speaker 1>Forrest Whittaker, Paul Dano, they all voice other wild Things.

0:11:47.845 --> 0:11:51.245
<v Speaker 1>O'Hara is, you know, one of the standouts among them.

0:11:51.325 --> 0:11:54.965
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, throwing that into the mix. Officially my number five.

0:11:55.125 --> 0:11:57.725
<v Speaker 1>But starting things off with Judith from Where the Wild

0:11:57.725 --> 0:11:58.405
<v Speaker 1>Things Are.

0:11:58.765 --> 0:12:01.725
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen that since it was reviewed very positively

0:12:01.804 --> 0:12:04.485
<v Speaker 3>here on Film Spotting when it came out. But I

0:12:04.525 --> 0:12:08.405
<v Speaker 3>love what you said there about how it's funny and

0:12:08.684 --> 0:12:12.485
<v Speaker 3>she gets the laughs, but there's also that sense of danger.

0:12:12.684 --> 0:12:16.485
<v Speaker 3>There's a threat there because those same and I'm not

0:12:16.525 --> 0:12:20.324
<v Speaker 3>gonna say layers. I think it's more aligne. She's consistently

0:12:20.365 --> 0:12:22.605
<v Speaker 3>able to walk with her characters. And the reason why

0:12:22.605 --> 0:12:26.285
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say that line versus layers may go

0:12:26.405 --> 0:12:28.965
<v Speaker 3>back to something I think you alluded to earlier, Josh,

0:12:29.005 --> 0:12:32.565
<v Speaker 3>which is not that in any of these roles that

0:12:32.564 --> 0:12:34.485
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk about her. In any of these movies,

0:12:34.605 --> 0:12:38.765
<v Speaker 3>she's not playing a significant role, obviously, but she usually

0:12:38.845 --> 0:12:41.365
<v Speaker 3>is part of an ensemble or she is a supporting

0:12:41.485 --> 0:12:44.445
<v Speaker 3>character as opposed to the lead in the film, so

0:12:44.445 --> 0:12:47.885
<v Speaker 3>she doesn't necessarily get a chance to show all of

0:12:47.925 --> 0:12:52.565
<v Speaker 3>these layers over the course of a huge narrative character arc. Right,

0:12:52.725 --> 0:12:57.165
<v Speaker 3>she has to come in and deliver in a brief

0:12:57.205 --> 0:13:00.325
<v Speaker 3>scene sometimes or an extended scene, but she has to

0:13:00.684 --> 0:13:05.445
<v Speaker 3>walk various lines. She has to give us different different shades,

0:13:05.965 --> 0:13:09.885
<v Speaker 3>and her ability to do that is something It's going

0:13:09.925 --> 0:13:11.885
<v Speaker 3>to come up again and again in my picks, and

0:13:12.325 --> 0:13:14.485
<v Speaker 3>we're going to start with number five. I already mentioned

0:13:14.804 --> 0:13:17.845
<v Speaker 3>this movie, and I was sure when we did this.

0:13:17.965 --> 0:13:20.165
<v Speaker 3>I love I mean, your picks are great, so I

0:13:20.165 --> 0:13:23.125
<v Speaker 3>don't begrudge you, and I'm glad I get to include

0:13:23.125 --> 0:13:26.605
<v Speaker 3>it now as my outlier. But I know that even

0:13:26.645 --> 0:13:29.565
<v Speaker 3>though I really like this film, you like it even more.

0:13:30.245 --> 0:13:32.324
<v Speaker 3>I know that, even though I really like this director,

0:13:32.925 --> 0:13:35.645
<v Speaker 3>you like this director even more. I am going with

0:13:35.765 --> 0:13:41.325
<v Speaker 3>Delia Deets from Beetlejuice. And it's been ages, Josh since

0:13:41.645 --> 0:13:45.204
<v Speaker 3>since I've seen this movie, certainly in full. I have

0:13:45.285 --> 0:13:47.365
<v Speaker 3>seen a few scenes from it here and there when

0:13:47.365 --> 0:13:50.965
<v Speaker 3>it's popped on TV, and it usually is fun to watch.

0:13:51.485 --> 0:13:55.405
<v Speaker 3>And I enjoyed her to some extent in Beetlejuice. Beetlejuice

0:13:55.605 --> 0:13:58.804
<v Speaker 3>as well. I'm gonna give credit to O'Hara for that,

0:13:58.845 --> 0:14:02.165
<v Speaker 3>even if I really didn't like that movie. But what

0:14:02.405 --> 0:14:06.485
<v Speaker 3>struck me rewatching scenes for this top five, and it

0:14:06.564 --> 0:14:12.325
<v Speaker 3>really shouldn't have surprised me, is not how good O'Hara

0:14:12.564 --> 0:14:16.645
<v Speaker 3>is at making Delia the vampy, kind of evil step

0:14:16.684 --> 0:14:21.765
<v Speaker 3>mom character, this unhinged, self absorbed artist that we get

0:14:21.765 --> 0:14:26.725
<v Speaker 3>to laugh at. Of course those elements are there. Maybe

0:14:26.765 --> 0:14:29.445
<v Speaker 3>I did assume, Josh because it's been so long that

0:14:29.525 --> 0:14:32.005
<v Speaker 3>it was a little bit more while hilarious, a little

0:14:32.045 --> 0:14:36.365
<v Speaker 3>bit more one note like that, and it's so not right.

0:14:36.645 --> 0:14:41.325
<v Speaker 3>You get that in moments that really deliver, for instance,

0:14:41.405 --> 0:14:46.045
<v Speaker 3>the incredible side eye then turn of the head that

0:14:46.085 --> 0:14:49.645
<v Speaker 3>she gives Charles, her husband, when they first show up

0:14:49.965 --> 0:14:53.045
<v Speaker 3>at the house and you know she's already looking to

0:14:53.165 --> 0:14:56.325
<v Speaker 3>redo all of the decorating, and he says to her

0:14:56.765 --> 0:14:58.885
<v Speaker 3>that she'll finally be able to cook a decent meal

0:14:59.365 --> 0:15:04.565
<v Speaker 3>in the kitchen. That look, no words, The look says

0:15:04.565 --> 0:15:08.885
<v Speaker 3>everything that she gives him is so perfect and watching

0:15:08.925 --> 0:15:11.365
<v Speaker 3>it is it that he insults.

0:15:11.005 --> 0:15:12.845
<v Speaker 1>Her cooking that makes her so mad?

0:15:13.245 --> 0:15:15.765
<v Speaker 3>Or is it that he insults her identity as a

0:15:15.805 --> 0:15:19.685
<v Speaker 3>brilliant artist by reducing her to a mere housewife or

0:15:19.765 --> 0:15:23.405
<v Speaker 3>is it both right? It doesn't really matter. But you

0:15:23.445 --> 0:15:26.645
<v Speaker 3>know she's just staring daggers at him. But what O'Hara

0:15:26.805 --> 0:15:31.605
<v Speaker 3>gives Delia in this scene, but also in every scene,

0:15:32.045 --> 0:15:36.405
<v Speaker 3>without a hint of sentimentality, is real human emotion. She

0:15:36.645 --> 0:15:41.124
<v Speaker 3>is as insecure and needy as she is abrasive.

0:15:41.485 --> 0:15:42.125
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:15:42.205 --> 0:15:45.005
<v Speaker 3>In this same scene, when they move in, when she

0:15:45.885 --> 0:15:50.325
<v Speaker 3>has she has to, she is so compelled to tell

0:15:50.365 --> 0:15:54.285
<v Speaker 3>the mover who she feels like. She has to remind

0:15:54.325 --> 0:15:58.725
<v Speaker 3>him to be careful with this sculpture that it's her sculpture,

0:15:59.565 --> 0:16:03.405
<v Speaker 3>not hers, like she bought it. She owns it, Josh hers,

0:16:04.005 --> 0:16:06.125
<v Speaker 3>she made it, careful.

0:16:05.765 --> 0:16:07.965
<v Speaker 1>That's my sculpture, and I don't mean my's and I

0:16:07.965 --> 0:16:08.245
<v Speaker 1>bought it.

0:16:08.285 --> 0:16:08.965
<v Speaker 2>I mean I made it.

0:16:08.965 --> 0:16:09.885
<v Speaker 3>It's my sculpture.

0:16:12.125 --> 0:16:12.965
<v Speaker 2>Put it on the table.

0:16:13.325 --> 0:16:15.725
<v Speaker 3>When she sees that he's just giving her a blank

0:16:15.765 --> 0:16:21.005
<v Speaker 3>stare back that's completely utterly meaningless to him, she then

0:16:21.725 --> 0:16:25.645
<v Speaker 3>she then becomes in front of him a completely normal person.

0:16:26.125 --> 0:16:31.845
<v Speaker 3>The pretense completely fades because she realizes that she's powerless

0:16:31.845 --> 0:16:34.645
<v Speaker 3>in front of a guy like this who does not care.

0:16:34.805 --> 0:16:37.605
<v Speaker 3>That does not impress him one bit. And you see

0:16:37.645 --> 0:16:41.925
<v Speaker 3>the facade completely crumble in that moment, and so watching

0:16:41.925 --> 0:16:44.405
<v Speaker 3>some scenes form Beald Juice again, you realize that it's

0:16:44.405 --> 0:16:49.005
<v Speaker 3>not O'Hara playing Deliadiads. It's O'Hara playing Deliadiads, who is

0:16:49.045 --> 0:16:53.285
<v Speaker 3>playing the best slash version of herself.

0:16:53.045 --> 0:16:53.965
<v Speaker 1>The entire time.

0:16:54.285 --> 0:16:56.925
<v Speaker 3>There's that sort of meta layer to that character. And

0:16:57.445 --> 0:17:01.085
<v Speaker 3>she doesn't, of course, like any good comedic performer, which

0:17:01.085 --> 0:17:04.325
<v Speaker 3>she doesn't play the comedy. She finds the humor in

0:17:04.405 --> 0:17:05.765
<v Speaker 3>the heart of the character.

0:17:06.565 --> 0:17:10.445
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this really should have been my outlier pick to

0:17:10.965 --> 0:17:13.205
<v Speaker 1>a degree, and it was on my rough draft. It

0:17:13.245 --> 0:17:17.325
<v Speaker 1>was heard the news and started thinking about this. I

0:17:17.365 --> 0:17:22.725
<v Speaker 1>think it is definitely more layered as you gust. It's

0:17:22.765 --> 0:17:24.965
<v Speaker 1>for me, would have been a surefire thing if we

0:17:24.965 --> 0:17:28.685
<v Speaker 1>had done O'Hara scenes, because she kicks off the Deo

0:17:28.805 --> 0:17:31.725
<v Speaker 1>banana boat musical sequence. Yes, and that is just a

0:17:31.765 --> 0:17:35.125
<v Speaker 1>tour de force of comedy just going for you know,

0:17:35.565 --> 0:17:41.725
<v Speaker 1>this experience of being musically possessed but also snapping in

0:17:41.765 --> 0:17:44.045
<v Speaker 1>and out of it. It's you know, it's like Delia

0:17:44.165 --> 0:17:47.525
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just suddenly get possessed and starts singing. It's like

0:17:47.725 --> 0:17:50.885
<v Speaker 1>it happens and then she comes out and recognizes asks

0:17:51.005 --> 0:17:53.445
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to me? And then goes back in and

0:17:53.805 --> 0:17:57.885
<v Speaker 1>the deafness O'Hara has in that sequence, yeah, I think

0:17:58.005 --> 0:18:01.325
<v Speaker 1>is among her best scenes for sure. It's interesting what

0:18:01.365 --> 0:18:04.605
<v Speaker 1>you say. I think we're going to come across this

0:18:04.925 --> 0:18:09.685
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly in that they're our roles she's been given, which

0:18:10.445 --> 0:18:15.005
<v Speaker 1>basically have one clear comic signifier to them. And I

0:18:15.005 --> 0:18:17.285
<v Speaker 1>think you could say this to Delia too. And then

0:18:17.325 --> 0:18:23.125
<v Speaker 1>the magic is what O'Hara weaves and rings into making

0:18:23.165 --> 0:18:27.245
<v Speaker 1>this character even more than that, as you say, without

0:18:27.845 --> 0:18:31.365
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the most screen time among the ensembles, she still

0:18:31.405 --> 0:18:34.805
<v Speaker 1>manages to pull it off. Yeah, my other outlier I

0:18:34.805 --> 0:18:38.205
<v Speaker 1>actually have ranked quite Let's let's be anire. I could

0:18:38.205 --> 0:18:39.765
<v Speaker 1>do that, or I could just go to number four.

0:18:39.885 --> 0:18:41.805
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, I like that. No, let's let's go with

0:18:41.885 --> 0:18:42.605
<v Speaker 3>your other outlier.

0:18:42.645 --> 0:18:46.645
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Okay, let's hit our outliers first, and I

0:18:46.765 --> 0:18:50.645
<v Speaker 1>put Moira Rose from Shit's Creek at number two. I know,

0:18:51.365 --> 0:18:54.885
<v Speaker 1>I know, breaking some rules here. This is a television

0:18:55.365 --> 0:19:01.085
<v Speaker 1>it's television performance. We're gonna listeners will expose themselves. Who

0:19:01.085 --> 0:19:05.365
<v Speaker 1>are the comrade Josh's or Adams right in in a fury.

0:19:06.045 --> 0:19:08.765
<v Speaker 1>H huh I could. I had to do it. I

0:19:08.885 --> 0:19:13.485
<v Speaker 1>just had to do it because this is especially the

0:19:13.525 --> 0:19:17.885
<v Speaker 1>sentimentality of doing this list now after her passing, and

0:19:18.845 --> 0:19:21.605
<v Speaker 1>the joy to know that near the end of her

0:19:21.645 --> 0:19:25.325
<v Speaker 1>career she was given an opportunity like this, a multi

0:19:25.645 --> 0:19:31.765
<v Speaker 1>season opportunity to delve into all her improvisational comic gifts,

0:19:31.885 --> 0:19:35.325
<v Speaker 1>create a character over a long series of time. This

0:19:35.365 --> 0:19:37.605
<v Speaker 1>is an ensemble show, too, Adam, but in a way,

0:19:37.685 --> 0:19:39.885
<v Speaker 1>this is her lead role. This is the one that

0:19:39.925 --> 0:19:46.125
<v Speaker 1>maybe she didn't get in film throughout her career, And yeah,

0:19:46.165 --> 0:19:49.125
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it had to be recognized here. I

0:19:49.485 --> 0:19:52.805
<v Speaker 1>think my list would have been paltry without it. This

0:19:52.845 --> 0:19:55.845
<v Speaker 1>is on Netflix if people haven't caught up with Shit's Creek,

0:19:56.165 --> 0:19:58.885
<v Speaker 1>So right now, we're about halfway through our rewatch. We

0:19:58.925 --> 0:20:01.605
<v Speaker 1>watched it when it first aired and loved it. Moira

0:20:01.725 --> 0:20:05.805
<v Speaker 1>Rose is basically the disgraced former actress who's trying to

0:20:05.805 --> 0:20:10.245
<v Speaker 1>rebuild her life with her spoiled family after they are

0:20:10.325 --> 0:20:14.365
<v Speaker 1>forced to move to a small town having I'm not

0:20:14.405 --> 0:20:16.165
<v Speaker 1>going to get to into the plot. Basically, they've lost

0:20:16.165 --> 0:20:18.685
<v Speaker 1>all their wealth. Her husband here a name that's going

0:20:18.765 --> 0:20:21.485
<v Speaker 1>to come up a lot Eugene Levy get to have

0:20:21.565 --> 0:20:25.525
<v Speaker 1>them working off of each other and man, Adam your

0:20:25.525 --> 0:20:29.205
<v Speaker 1>description at the top of her creating this own moral

0:20:29.285 --> 0:20:30.045
<v Speaker 1>universe or.

0:20:30.085 --> 0:20:33.925
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking of her, I definitely, yeah, it's.

0:20:33.765 --> 0:20:36.685
<v Speaker 1>A multiverse depending on what wig Moira Wit decides to

0:20:36.685 --> 0:20:42.205
<v Speaker 1>wear that day the point. And I think half of

0:20:42.245 --> 0:20:46.885
<v Speaker 1>Eugene Levy's wide eyed reaction shots, which is probably like

0:20:46.925 --> 0:20:49.765
<v Speaker 1>eighty five percent of his performance on the show come

0:20:49.805 --> 0:20:55.965
<v Speaker 1>from one of Moira's absurd proclamations. And this is in

0:20:56.045 --> 0:20:59.845
<v Speaker 1>terms of both content what she says and how she

0:20:59.885 --> 0:21:03.725
<v Speaker 1>says it. I think O'Hara has invented her own accent

0:21:04.085 --> 0:21:07.725
<v Speaker 1>for this part. It is it is a posh draw

0:21:08.325 --> 0:21:13.045
<v Speaker 1>if that's a thing. It's it's like Catherine Hepburn, but

0:21:13.885 --> 0:21:17.725
<v Speaker 1>tipsy and slurring her speech. Maybe I mean to give

0:21:17.725 --> 0:21:19.405
<v Speaker 1>you a sense of this. There is a super cut

0:21:19.645 --> 0:21:24.805
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube her just pronouncing baby as Bebe. It's throughout

0:21:24.805 --> 0:21:28.805
<v Speaker 1>the series, Yes, I seen. I think the accent work

0:21:28.845 --> 0:21:31.245
<v Speaker 1>here is you know, is just a tour de fouresid

0:21:31.325 --> 0:21:33.085
<v Speaker 1>its own. It's no idea of.

0:21:33.165 --> 0:21:35.965
<v Speaker 2>The toller Bebe can take on its mother or it's

0:21:36.005 --> 0:21:36.645
<v Speaker 2>mother's mother.

0:21:37.165 --> 0:21:38.605
<v Speaker 3>Where is Bebe's chamber.

0:21:39.765 --> 0:21:40.885
<v Speaker 4>You're right we should go.

0:21:41.085 --> 0:21:42.965
<v Speaker 3>Justcen has that beepe thing time?

0:21:43.045 --> 0:21:45.845
<v Speaker 1>Did you said you couldn't make it because of the

0:21:45.845 --> 0:21:50.405
<v Speaker 1>bebe I'm curious about this too. Rewatching it on the

0:21:50.485 --> 0:21:53.125
<v Speaker 1>first watch, I thought, and this speaks to your point too, Adam,

0:21:53.565 --> 0:21:57.125
<v Speaker 1>Moira might be the one in this family. So there's

0:21:57.165 --> 0:22:00.085
<v Speaker 1>the two adult children and then her husband, who grows

0:22:00.125 --> 0:22:02.645
<v Speaker 1>the least, like over four or five seasons, there might

0:22:02.685 --> 0:22:07.485
<v Speaker 1>be they all kind of some grown, become humbled, or

0:22:08.125 --> 0:22:12.125
<v Speaker 1>recognize value in others. In my first watch, I felt

0:22:12.165 --> 0:22:15.245
<v Speaker 1>like Moira was, let's say, the most steadfast. But I

0:22:15.245 --> 0:22:18.765
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe you know, especially now as we're as

0:22:18.845 --> 0:22:21.885
<v Speaker 1>we're picking up on these nuances she brings to characters.

0:22:22.085 --> 0:22:25.325
<v Speaker 1>I'll be eager to watch these last two seasons or

0:22:25.325 --> 0:22:27.845
<v Speaker 1>so and see if I missed something and she might

0:22:27.925 --> 0:22:31.165
<v Speaker 1>have might have snuck something in there on us to

0:22:31.165 --> 0:22:33.285
<v Speaker 1>Moira as well. I wouldn't be surprised, But at the

0:22:33.325 --> 0:22:36.005
<v Speaker 1>same time wouldn't be surprised if she had that that

0:22:36.085 --> 0:22:39.565
<v Speaker 1>conviction to Moira's own reality.

0:22:40.125 --> 0:22:42.885
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, steadfast is such a charitable way of putting it.

0:22:43.005 --> 0:22:43.525
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:22:44.125 --> 0:22:47.365
<v Speaker 3>I didn't include it in part because I absolutely knew

0:22:47.405 --> 0:22:50.165
<v Speaker 3>you would. I figured I could leave it off because

0:22:50.165 --> 0:22:53.245
<v Speaker 3>of the TV technicality, and also, not only have I

0:22:53.285 --> 0:22:56.045
<v Speaker 3>not watched It's Creek twice or am not on my

0:22:56.085 --> 0:23:00.245
<v Speaker 3>second viewing, I haven't finished it once. I've seen certainly

0:23:00.885 --> 0:23:04.365
<v Speaker 3>the bulk of the episodes. I know my wife has

0:23:04.405 --> 0:23:08.125
<v Speaker 3>seen the entire series, but I still have some homework

0:23:08.165 --> 0:23:09.925
<v Speaker 3>to do, Josh. So I don't feel like I have

0:23:10.005 --> 0:23:13.005
<v Speaker 3>any claim to Moira Rose like you do.

0:23:13.645 --> 0:23:15.765
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of good stuff waiting for you.

0:23:16.085 --> 0:23:19.165
<v Speaker 1>Had you gotten to the point where she was filming

0:23:19.205 --> 0:23:22.565
<v Speaker 1>her schlocky horror movie The Crows have ice three the

0:23:22.605 --> 0:23:24.845
<v Speaker 1>Crow name. Did you get to that yet? I did

0:23:24.885 --> 0:23:27.085
<v Speaker 1>not get to that. Okay, you got good stuff ahead.

0:23:27.085 --> 0:23:27.765
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say that.

0:23:28.285 --> 0:23:33.845
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually a perfect transition because every actor, or almost

0:23:33.925 --> 0:23:37.205
<v Speaker 3>every actor, you may know them for a breakout role,

0:23:37.685 --> 0:23:40.485
<v Speaker 3>but you go look at their IMDb and they probably

0:23:40.525 --> 0:23:45.405
<v Speaker 3>have some kind of schlocky horror, schlocky thriller right first

0:23:45.445 --> 0:23:48.565
<v Speaker 3>as their first feature, maybe after their TV work, or

0:23:48.605 --> 0:23:51.445
<v Speaker 3>thrown into their TV work there near the end, before

0:23:51.445 --> 0:23:54.005
<v Speaker 3>they really transition to the big time.

0:23:54.085 --> 0:23:54.245
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:23:54.885 --> 0:23:59.005
<v Speaker 3>Catherine O'Hara is no different. Double negative is what the

0:23:59.045 --> 0:24:04.165
<v Speaker 3>movie's called a nineteen eighty thriller that she is in.

0:24:04.925 --> 0:24:08.485
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going with my outlier and I'm just gonna

0:24:08.565 --> 0:24:09.325
<v Speaker 3>keep going in order.

0:24:09.325 --> 0:24:09.445
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:24:09.485 --> 0:24:13.125
<v Speaker 3>I've got it at number four. Already mentioned by the

0:24:13.405 --> 0:24:17.885
<v Speaker 3>listener that you quoted Josh Gail from After Hours, and

0:24:18.405 --> 0:24:21.725
<v Speaker 3>not only is it a great performance, I truly believe,

0:24:21.845 --> 0:24:25.045
<v Speaker 3>but deserves recognition I think on this list because after

0:24:25.125 --> 0:24:28.525
<v Speaker 3>double negative, well, let me just set that aside. It

0:24:28.605 --> 0:24:33.405
<v Speaker 3>really was her first notable screen appearance, certainly a major

0:24:33.445 --> 0:24:38.085
<v Speaker 3>studio film, working with a major director, obviously in Martin Scorsese.

0:24:38.485 --> 0:24:42.325
<v Speaker 3>It's the first time she was really widely recognized as

0:24:42.365 --> 0:24:44.805
<v Speaker 3>a comedic performer on screen.

0:24:44.925 --> 0:24:45.445
<v Speaker 1>First time.

0:24:45.605 --> 0:24:49.205
<v Speaker 3>You know, critics were taking note of her as well,

0:24:49.285 --> 0:24:53.045
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you talked about the magic of O'Hara.

0:24:53.165 --> 0:24:58.205
<v Speaker 3>The magic of this performance as Gail lies for me

0:24:58.885 --> 0:25:01.445
<v Speaker 3>in what I was saying before about her performance as

0:25:01.525 --> 0:25:05.565
<v Speaker 3>Delia as well. It lies in how she grounds this character,

0:25:05.725 --> 0:25:10.725
<v Speaker 3>because this in this movie that's completely ungrounded, right, This

0:25:10.925 --> 0:25:14.205
<v Speaker 3>mister softy ice cream truck driver. That's what she does

0:25:14.245 --> 0:25:16.485
<v Speaker 3>for a living, and she wants to tell you that

0:25:17.405 --> 0:25:19.925
<v Speaker 3>she is a mister softy ice cream truck driver. She

0:25:20.325 --> 0:25:25.805
<v Speaker 3>is the embo of chaos. She absolutely takes to another level,

0:25:26.085 --> 0:25:31.565
<v Speaker 3>helps escalate the already highly escalated absurdity of this night

0:25:31.765 --> 0:25:36.565
<v Speaker 3>for Griffin Dunn's Paul character. And how does O'Hara play her.

0:25:37.285 --> 0:25:39.645
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't able to rewatch the entire movie, Josh, But

0:25:39.765 --> 0:25:43.285
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if Gail's heart rate gets above like

0:25:43.645 --> 0:25:48.285
<v Speaker 3>one oh five. It's just it's just pretty steady and

0:25:48.365 --> 0:25:51.645
<v Speaker 3>calm the entire time. She does not play the comedy.

0:25:51.965 --> 0:25:57.765
<v Speaker 3>She doesn't play the chaos at all. She just plays Gail.

0:25:57.885 --> 0:26:00.445
<v Speaker 3>And in just one scene which I think is probably

0:26:00.525 --> 0:26:02.925
<v Speaker 3>universally the most famous scene of hers in the movie,

0:26:03.245 --> 0:26:06.805
<v Speaker 3>it's the scene where she and Paul meet out out

0:26:06.845 --> 0:26:08.085
<v Speaker 3>on the street in an alley.

0:26:08.325 --> 0:26:09.045
<v Speaker 1>He gets hurt.

0:26:09.445 --> 0:26:13.605
<v Speaker 3>She brings him up to her apartment ostensibly to help

0:26:13.885 --> 0:26:16.325
<v Speaker 3>bandage up is his wounded arm, like she's going to

0:26:16.405 --> 0:26:20.445
<v Speaker 3>take care of him. It's just under five minutes, and Josh,

0:26:20.805 --> 0:26:24.645
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably even missing a few different layers here, but

0:26:25.045 --> 0:26:30.565
<v Speaker 3>she gives us Gail as genuinely sympathetic, look at your arm,

0:26:30.645 --> 0:26:34.525
<v Speaker 3>it's bleeding. I'll get you a bandage right into sweetly

0:26:34.565 --> 0:26:37.885
<v Speaker 3>self absorbed I have my own mister, softy truck, even

0:26:37.925 --> 0:26:40.405
<v Speaker 3>though he didn't ask. He has no interest in what

0:26:40.485 --> 0:26:44.685
<v Speaker 3>she does for a living, right into accommodating do you

0:26:44.725 --> 0:26:46.805
<v Speaker 3>need a pencil as he tries to write down a

0:26:46.805 --> 0:26:52.085
<v Speaker 3>phone number, then right into playing the jesture, saying random

0:26:52.205 --> 0:26:57.165
<v Speaker 3>numbers out loud to discombobulate him so he can't remember

0:26:57.605 --> 0:26:59.205
<v Speaker 3>the numbers that he's supposed to dial.

0:26:59.565 --> 0:27:04.405
<v Speaker 1>Five eight one, nine six.

0:27:06.165 --> 0:27:13.325
<v Speaker 4>Two.

0:27:14.725 --> 0:27:16.565
<v Speaker 1>That was funny, That was funny.

0:27:16.805 --> 0:27:19.205
<v Speaker 3>This poor guy just needs a break, and all she

0:27:19.325 --> 0:27:22.845
<v Speaker 3>wants to do is torment him and confuse him so

0:27:22.925 --> 0:27:25.325
<v Speaker 3>he can't make this phone call. The best part of

0:27:25.365 --> 0:27:29.045
<v Speaker 3>the scene, though, Josh, is that devilish grin. She has

0:27:29.125 --> 0:27:33.725
<v Speaker 3>that joyful, devilish face she makes when he calls the

0:27:33.765 --> 0:27:38.405
<v Speaker 3>operator again. Take two, and she makes a face like

0:27:38.965 --> 0:27:41.725
<v Speaker 3>almost like your mom makes when you're a little kid

0:27:41.805 --> 0:27:43.405
<v Speaker 3>and she's about to tickle you again.

0:27:44.045 --> 0:27:48.325
<v Speaker 1>Oh, here it comes. You're gonna do it again? Five

0:27:48.525 --> 0:27:57.885
<v Speaker 1>eight six two, don't nine three eight zero? Sure enough?

0:27:58.485 --> 0:28:03.405
<v Speaker 3>More numbers out loud and he loses them again. Then

0:28:03.485 --> 0:28:06.125
<v Speaker 3>she lets out this laugh, almost like she's the joker,

0:28:06.525 --> 0:28:08.605
<v Speaker 3>but you know, a more benevolent joker.

0:28:09.245 --> 0:28:10.605
<v Speaker 1>And then Josh, she goes back to.

0:28:10.565 --> 0:28:13.885
<v Speaker 3>Being caring again, except and this, this is what you

0:28:13.925 --> 0:28:16.885
<v Speaker 3>were saying about where the wild things are? This is

0:28:17.085 --> 0:28:20.885
<v Speaker 3>we can trace it back to this moment. Here she's caring,

0:28:21.365 --> 0:28:24.605
<v Speaker 3>except there is just a little bit of menace in

0:28:24.645 --> 0:28:28.685
<v Speaker 3>her voice. The danger is there, Like if he wasn't

0:28:28.885 --> 0:28:34.765
<v Speaker 3>so desperate, Sureley Paul would recognize that something is off

0:28:35.365 --> 0:28:38.245
<v Speaker 3>with this woman. And I just think if you saw

0:28:38.405 --> 0:28:41.685
<v Speaker 3>SCTV and then you went to the movies, the new

0:28:41.685 --> 0:28:45.245
<v Speaker 3>Martin Scorsese movie, and you saw Catherine O'Hara on screen,

0:28:45.525 --> 0:28:47.605
<v Speaker 3>none of this maybe would have surprised you about her,

0:28:47.725 --> 0:28:49.965
<v Speaker 3>right you would have said, oh, of course, I expect

0:28:49.965 --> 0:28:54.805
<v Speaker 3>this transition to movies. But if you never saw SCTV

0:28:54.965 --> 0:28:57.005
<v Speaker 3>and you just went out to the movies and saw

0:28:57.405 --> 0:29:02.565
<v Speaker 3>this woman playing Gail, I think my first reaction would

0:29:02.565 --> 0:29:05.165
<v Speaker 3>have been something like, how have I missed her? Because

0:29:05.685 --> 0:29:09.325
<v Speaker 3>surely this comedic actress has been in like twenty films already.

0:29:09.405 --> 0:29:11.325
<v Speaker 3>She's just too polished and too funny.

0:29:11.845 --> 0:29:14.285
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you don't know what's coming next with Gail. I

0:29:14.325 --> 0:29:19.285
<v Speaker 1>think this character is also an example of what I think.

0:29:19.365 --> 0:29:22.485
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this when we shared the news on that episode,

0:29:22.765 --> 0:29:26.645
<v Speaker 1>after just hearing about her passing, how O'Hara comes into

0:29:26.685 --> 0:29:30.045
<v Speaker 1>a movie and can often no matter what movie you've

0:29:30.045 --> 0:29:33.045
<v Speaker 1>been watching and whoever she's playing, you suddenly kind of

0:29:33.125 --> 0:29:37.125
<v Speaker 1>wish the movie became that character's movie and you could

0:29:37.165 --> 0:29:39.565
<v Speaker 1>follow them. Now, that might be a dangerous proposition with

0:29:39.645 --> 0:29:43.285
<v Speaker 1>Gail because it could go potentially to some very dark places,

0:29:43.285 --> 0:29:45.685
<v Speaker 1>but it could go to some fun places too. It

0:29:45.045 --> 0:29:47.925
<v Speaker 1>could be some ice cream involved. I mean, really, who knows?

0:29:48.325 --> 0:29:50.365
<v Speaker 1>It would have been a wild, a wild ride when

0:29:50.405 --> 0:29:53.885
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Gail. All right, So I think here's

0:29:53.925 --> 0:29:57.165
<v Speaker 1>where we'll have some splitting of hairs, of ranking but

0:29:57.365 --> 0:30:04.725
<v Speaker 1>shared shared characters. Because Sheila Albertson in waiting for Guffman,

0:30:06.485 --> 0:30:10.245
<v Speaker 1>wants her time in the spotlight and deserves her time

0:30:10.965 --> 0:30:14.765
<v Speaker 1>in the spotlight. She's not paired O'Hara's not paired here

0:30:14.765 --> 0:30:19.125
<v Speaker 1>with Eugene Levy. Even though this is a Christopher Guest mockumentary,

0:30:19.205 --> 0:30:22.645
<v Speaker 1>this time it is Fred Willard Ron and Sheila Albertson,

0:30:22.725 --> 0:30:27.325
<v Speaker 1>the overly confident travel agent couple who you know have

0:30:27.485 --> 0:30:30.285
<v Speaker 1>some performance experience and they are very eager to be

0:30:30.325 --> 0:30:32.805
<v Speaker 1>part of the community theater production. At the heart of

0:30:32.845 --> 0:30:34.925
<v Speaker 1>this film, their audition.

0:30:34.925 --> 0:30:40.085
<v Speaker 2>Scene, you surprised how did you find me?

0:30:40.445 --> 0:30:43.045
<v Speaker 1>I have my ways? Would you like to come in

0:30:43.085 --> 0:30:46.605
<v Speaker 1>for coffee? You don't need to ask.

0:30:47.165 --> 0:30:50.725
<v Speaker 2>They just don't need to speak.

0:30:51.205 --> 0:30:56.125
<v Speaker 1>It's so loud, they're saying, it's just so loud. And

0:30:57.205 --> 0:31:01.325
<v Speaker 1>she has no concern for really hitting a note. And

0:31:01.405 --> 0:31:04.245
<v Speaker 1>I think, if I'm noticing that, Adam, it must be

0:31:04.325 --> 0:31:05.645
<v Speaker 1>really bad. Right.

0:31:05.685 --> 0:31:08.045
<v Speaker 3>We're all Bob Balaban in that scene.

0:31:07.965 --> 0:31:10.765
<v Speaker 1>Right, just like reaching for the glass of water, not

0:31:10.845 --> 0:31:14.645
<v Speaker 1>sure what to do, whereas guests Corky Saint Clair's smitten,

0:31:14.925 --> 0:31:18.085
<v Speaker 1>just Smith's in right with the passion, with the passion

0:31:18.085 --> 0:31:21.405
<v Speaker 1>they're showing. How about the double date at the Chinese

0:31:21.485 --> 0:31:27.725
<v Speaker 1>restaurant where she drunkenly brings up her husband's penis reduction surgery, right,

0:31:27.965 --> 0:31:33.605
<v Speaker 1>and you think you know, okay, low hanging fruit, right,

0:31:34.605 --> 0:31:38.525
<v Speaker 1>fun intended? You just you just give you give that

0:31:38.645 --> 0:31:41.165
<v Speaker 1>as the script, if that was even in the script.

0:31:41.565 --> 0:31:46.405
<v Speaker 1>But oh my gosh, the comic chaos. She again, like

0:31:46.525 --> 0:31:48.005
<v Speaker 1>Gail induces with it.

0:31:49.525 --> 0:31:54.525
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk what's it like to be with the circumsessment I.

0:31:56.205 --> 0:31:59.525
<v Speaker 1>Ask you more about that? But Hern said the whole

0:31:59.685 --> 0:32:06.245
<v Speaker 1>jew things and then acting like she isn't doing anything

0:32:06.285 --> 0:32:11.365
<v Speaker 1>unusual that everyone else at the table. Adam is being

0:32:11.445 --> 0:32:16.285
<v Speaker 1>weird by how they're responding to her bringing it up.

0:32:16.405 --> 0:32:19.045
<v Speaker 1>There you go in her own reality, right, her own reality.

0:32:19.165 --> 0:32:21.605
<v Speaker 1>And you know what this made me realize. I wonder

0:32:22.405 --> 0:32:25.645
<v Speaker 1>if she is an influence, if O'Hara is an influence

0:32:26.285 --> 0:32:30.085
<v Speaker 1>at all on Tim Robinson, who you know with I

0:32:30.085 --> 0:32:31.485
<v Speaker 1>think you should leave. I think that was the name

0:32:31.525 --> 0:32:36.765
<v Speaker 1>of his the cringe comedy. You know that he specializes

0:32:37.565 --> 0:32:40.685
<v Speaker 1>in friendship. That was the Paul Rudd. I think a

0:32:40.885 --> 0:32:44.485
<v Speaker 1>movie from last year, just a guy who walks into

0:32:44.485 --> 0:32:48.365
<v Speaker 1>a scene is as weird as possible and doesn't understand

0:32:48.405 --> 0:32:50.485
<v Speaker 1>why people are reacting that way. There's a there's a

0:32:50.565 --> 0:32:53.525
<v Speaker 1>variation of that happening here in this sequence, and I

0:32:53.525 --> 0:32:57.365
<v Speaker 1>think in a lot of the scenes with O'Hara characters. Yeah,

0:32:57.365 --> 0:32:59.005
<v Speaker 1>it was a delight to just watch some of these

0:32:59.045 --> 0:33:01.445
<v Speaker 1>waiting for Guffman sequences. Again, I haven't watched it in

0:33:01.525 --> 0:33:03.445
<v Speaker 1>years and years. I think the key to this movie

0:33:03.525 --> 0:33:06.725
<v Speaker 1>is really that this production they're trying to put on

0:33:07.125 --> 0:33:09.685
<v Speaker 1>isn't that terrible. I mean it's bad, don't get me wrong,

0:33:09.765 --> 0:33:12.925
<v Speaker 1>it's bad, but it's it never pushes. The movie never

0:33:12.965 --> 0:33:17.125
<v Speaker 1>pushes beyond the comic familiar ribbing, you know, into something

0:33:17.205 --> 0:33:21.005
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just kind of ripping them apart for their idiocy.

0:33:21.085 --> 0:33:23.925
<v Speaker 1>It never goes that far. And I think that O'Hara,

0:33:25.125 --> 0:33:28.725
<v Speaker 1>even in a scene like that restaurant, manages a shred

0:33:28.725 --> 0:33:34.245
<v Speaker 1>of idiosyncratic dignity to Sheila. That is crucial. It's the

0:33:34.245 --> 0:33:37.085
<v Speaker 1>only way, that's the only way she can act like

0:33:37.125 --> 0:33:44.205
<v Speaker 1>she's being the completely normal one. Adam, you hear Scream

0:33:44.325 --> 0:33:47.365
<v Speaker 1>seven and you might think, come on, how many of

0:33:47.365 --> 0:33:51.565
<v Speaker 1>these do we really need? Well, if I look at

0:33:51.605 --> 0:33:56.405
<v Speaker 1>my Scream ranked list, I actually have the two most

0:33:56.565 --> 0:33:59.925
<v Speaker 1>recent Scream films twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three,

0:34:00.805 --> 0:34:03.205
<v Speaker 1>kind of high up there. I have them as number

0:34:03.245 --> 0:34:05.925
<v Speaker 1>three and number four of the Scream film So all

0:34:05.925 --> 0:34:10.885
<v Speaker 1>that to say, might be worth checking out Scream seven

0:34:11.165 --> 0:34:14.445
<v Speaker 1>if you are interested in the franchise, if you're interested

0:34:14.525 --> 0:34:19.325
<v Speaker 1>in horror in general, and you know we all know horror,

0:34:19.405 --> 0:34:22.085
<v Speaker 1>you've got to see in a you've got to see

0:34:22.085 --> 0:34:25.725
<v Speaker 1>this with a crowd. You want to scream alongside others.

0:34:25.805 --> 0:34:28.165
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to do that, have that experience

0:34:28.205 --> 0:34:31.045
<v Speaker 1>with Scream seven. You could have it for free with

0:34:31.565 --> 0:34:34.565
<v Speaker 1>Regal Unlimited Regal Unlimited is the all you can watch

0:34:34.605 --> 0:34:38.365
<v Speaker 1>movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits.

0:34:38.445 --> 0:34:42.285
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Regal is offering film spotting, listeners, endless movies

0:34:42.685 --> 0:34:45.525
<v Speaker 1>for less. If you sign up for Regal Unlimited using

0:34:45.845 --> 0:34:49.445
<v Speaker 1>code film Spot twenty six, you're gonna get fifteen percent

0:34:49.605 --> 0:34:53.165
<v Speaker 1>off now. Regal Unlimited is the only truly limitless movie

0:34:53.165 --> 0:34:56.645
<v Speaker 1>subscription pass. You can see any standard two D movie anytime.

0:34:56.725 --> 0:35:00.725
<v Speaker 1>There are no blackout dates or restrictions. And with Regal Unlimited,

0:35:00.965 --> 0:35:03.125
<v Speaker 1>you won't just save money on tickets, you'll also save

0:35:03.245 --> 0:35:08.085
<v Speaker 1>on snacks. Members get ten percent off all non alcoholic concessions.

0:35:08.565 --> 0:35:11.005
<v Speaker 1>Sign up now in the Regal app or at the

0:35:11.045 --> 0:35:14.365
<v Speaker 1>link in our description and use code film Spot twenty

0:35:14.365 --> 0:35:16.485
<v Speaker 1>six to receive your discount.

0:35:22.285 --> 0:35:25.165
<v Speaker 3>I have Sheila at number three on my list, and

0:35:25.565 --> 0:35:28.005
<v Speaker 3>you know I talked about the range that you see

0:35:28.045 --> 0:35:31.805
<v Speaker 3>just within that one after hour scene. What's fun about

0:35:32.005 --> 0:35:34.565
<v Speaker 3>the guest performances that we're going to talk about. We're

0:35:34.605 --> 0:35:36.805
<v Speaker 3>talking about just three, but you think about the other

0:35:37.005 --> 0:35:41.805
<v Speaker 3>films as well. Is how vastly different these characters are.

0:35:42.165 --> 0:35:45.605
<v Speaker 3>And maybe that sounds obvious, but there's no sort of

0:35:45.725 --> 0:35:49.485
<v Speaker 3>type casting with her. Fred Willard, as brilliant as he is,

0:35:49.485 --> 0:35:51.525
<v Speaker 3>is always kind of Fred Willard, right. But if you

0:35:51.565 --> 0:35:53.725
<v Speaker 3>think about the three characters we're going to mention with

0:35:53.845 --> 0:35:57.645
<v Speaker 3>Catherine O'Hara, she's she's not remotely the same person. She's

0:35:57.685 --> 0:36:01.085
<v Speaker 3>not remotely playing the same character. That's probably true across

0:36:01.125 --> 0:36:03.685
<v Speaker 3>the seven or eight or however many it is different

0:36:03.765 --> 0:36:05.844
<v Speaker 3>characters that we're going to mention over the course of

0:36:05.885 --> 0:36:08.525
<v Speaker 3>this list, and I think that just speaks to how

0:36:08.565 --> 0:36:12.765
<v Speaker 3>talented she is now in every case here that I'm

0:36:12.845 --> 0:36:14.805
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to mention, and I think maybe maybe so

0:36:14.925 --> 0:36:17.125
<v Speaker 3>far other than you know, where the wild Things are,

0:36:18.085 --> 0:36:22.525
<v Speaker 3>she is coupled with a man, and there is never

0:36:22.605 --> 0:36:26.965
<v Speaker 3>an impulse, it seems for us as viewers watching her,

0:36:27.125 --> 0:36:29.165
<v Speaker 3>there never seems to be an impulse to be anything

0:36:29.205 --> 0:36:34.565
<v Speaker 3>but supportive, and I mean supportive in the way ensemble

0:36:34.885 --> 0:36:39.525
<v Speaker 3>and improvisational comedy has to be that anyone of any

0:36:39.605 --> 0:36:43.645
<v Speaker 3>gender has to be within that type of environment. There's

0:36:43.645 --> 0:36:47.885
<v Speaker 3>just a complete absence of ego. There's an understanding, and

0:36:47.925 --> 0:36:50.885
<v Speaker 3>in this case, you know, it's that Fred Willard is

0:36:50.965 --> 0:36:55.125
<v Speaker 3>Fred Willard, and both his persona and this character are

0:36:55.165 --> 0:36:59.325
<v Speaker 3>predicated on being blowhards who are going to ramble on

0:36:59.405 --> 0:37:01.964
<v Speaker 3>a bit. They're going to make every conversation and every

0:37:02.005 --> 0:37:06.245
<v Speaker 3>moment about themselves, and he'll be hilarious and she's going

0:37:06.325 --> 0:37:10.685
<v Speaker 3>to set him up. Or like in the scene that

0:37:10.925 --> 0:37:12.565
<v Speaker 3>I want to single out, which is the.

0:37:12.445 --> 0:37:17.405
<v Speaker 5>One where they're talking about their dreams of going to Hollywood,

0:37:18.085 --> 0:37:22.845
<v Speaker 5>not Broadway, going to Hollywood, and he does his awful

0:37:23.605 --> 0:37:24.725
<v Speaker 5>actor impressions.

0:37:25.285 --> 0:37:30.404
<v Speaker 3>She just like us, has no idea who he's actually impersonating, right,

0:37:30.485 --> 0:37:31.205
<v Speaker 3>But what does she do?

0:37:31.365 --> 0:37:34.245
<v Speaker 1>Like what does her character do? And he even mentions it?

0:37:34.525 --> 0:37:37.845
<v Speaker 3>She laughs, She laughs right along, you know, she supports

0:37:37.885 --> 0:37:41.325
<v Speaker 3>him right and giggles with him, like, oh, you're doing

0:37:41.405 --> 0:37:43.725
<v Speaker 3>such a good job, even though again she has absolutely

0:37:43.805 --> 0:37:44.805
<v Speaker 3>no clue what he's doing.

0:37:45.445 --> 0:37:46.605
<v Speaker 1>But what ends up happening?

0:37:46.605 --> 0:37:48.885
<v Speaker 3>What does O'Hara end up happening, especially since we know

0:37:48.925 --> 0:37:51.844
<v Speaker 3>the dynamic and we know how these these scenes are

0:37:51.845 --> 0:37:54.085
<v Speaker 3>shot for the most part, in these Christopher Guest movies,

0:37:54.285 --> 0:37:58.685
<v Speaker 3>what ends up happening? She just waits for exactly her

0:37:58.725 --> 0:38:01.805
<v Speaker 3>moment and she delivers. And I think not just here

0:38:01.885 --> 0:38:05.005
<v Speaker 3>Josh in this scene, but probably in every scene in

0:38:05.005 --> 0:38:08.205
<v Speaker 3>this movie and most scenes in all of the guest

0:38:08.245 --> 0:38:10.725
<v Speaker 3>movies that she's in. She waits for her moment and

0:38:10.765 --> 0:38:14.325
<v Speaker 3>she delivers what is usually the most memorable part of

0:38:14.365 --> 0:38:14.925
<v Speaker 3>the scene.

0:38:15.365 --> 0:38:17.125
<v Speaker 2>You know, I want to try that less as more

0:38:17.245 --> 0:38:20.285
<v Speaker 2>kind of acting where you just when you're talking to someone,

0:38:20.485 --> 0:38:22.525
<v Speaker 2>you close your eyes and then you look at them.

0:38:22.805 --> 0:38:24.485
<v Speaker 1>When you're not talking to the person.

0:38:24.245 --> 0:38:26.205
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you open your eyes when you're looking away,

0:38:26.245 --> 0:38:27.645
<v Speaker 2>but then when you talk to the person, you like that,

0:38:28.005 --> 0:38:29.405
<v Speaker 2>and you open your eyes and then you look.

0:38:29.325 --> 0:38:29.925
<v Speaker 1>Back at the person.

0:38:29.965 --> 0:38:32.645
<v Speaker 3>That's the funniest part of that scene, without a doubt,

0:38:32.685 --> 0:38:34.485
<v Speaker 3>you know. And she just she just waits, she just

0:38:34.525 --> 0:38:38.165
<v Speaker 3>waits her turn patiently for that moment to happen. And

0:38:38.205 --> 0:38:42.605
<v Speaker 3>you know, Fred's character here is an idiot, and you

0:38:42.725 --> 0:38:46.925
<v Speaker 3>laugh at him, and that's great. He understands that. Guest

0:38:47.005 --> 0:38:50.405
<v Speaker 3>understands that. I think I think O'Hara understands that about Fred.

0:38:50.605 --> 0:38:53.404
<v Speaker 3>But you just really can't laugh. You can't laugh at

0:38:53.445 --> 0:38:56.125
<v Speaker 3>Sheila or I think most of, if not all, of

0:38:56.445 --> 0:39:00.525
<v Speaker 3>O'Hara's characters, because not only do they have the human

0:39:00.805 --> 0:39:03.485
<v Speaker 3>part that we've talked about, they're just and this is

0:39:03.485 --> 0:39:06.365
<v Speaker 3>true certainly of Sheila. I think they're just so damn earnest.

0:39:06.725 --> 0:39:10.685
<v Speaker 3>They're so earnest. You you just you you you like

0:39:10.805 --> 0:39:13.925
<v Speaker 3>them and you can't laugh at them. And that's that's

0:39:14.485 --> 0:39:17.565
<v Speaker 3>what I felt anyway, watching Sheila in this scene, which

0:39:17.565 --> 0:39:20.045
<v Speaker 3>still just cracks me up every time I watch it

0:39:20.085 --> 0:39:23.085
<v Speaker 3>and think about her. Less is more approach to acting.

0:39:23.685 --> 0:39:26.364
<v Speaker 1>There's a through line now that we're talking about it,

0:39:27.005 --> 0:39:30.325
<v Speaker 1>of that supportive element to Yeah, so much of what

0:39:30.405 --> 0:39:37.045
<v Speaker 1>she does, and in terms of being there and allowing

0:39:37.085 --> 0:39:40.245
<v Speaker 1>her co star to do what they need to do

0:39:40.605 --> 0:39:43.125
<v Speaker 1>and giving them something tied to that, I think that's

0:39:43.165 --> 0:39:45.285
<v Speaker 1>going to be a crucial part to what is likely

0:39:45.325 --> 0:39:48.005
<v Speaker 1>our shared number one. So I'll save that and maybe

0:39:48.045 --> 0:39:53.005
<v Speaker 1>I'll move to my number three because this element of

0:39:53.445 --> 0:39:56.924
<v Speaker 1>a co star and supporting them and still making room

0:39:57.005 --> 0:40:00.925
<v Speaker 1>for her own comedy is not only crucial to her character.

0:40:01.085 --> 0:40:03.165
<v Speaker 1>I think it's crucial. This is the one I rewatched

0:40:03.205 --> 0:40:07.605
<v Speaker 1>for this list. I think it's crucial to best in Show. Overall.

0:40:08.085 --> 0:40:10.885
<v Speaker 1>I liked this. I've always liked this movie, but I

0:40:11.005 --> 0:40:13.285
<v Speaker 1>liked it so much more this time. I think because

0:40:13.365 --> 0:40:17.484
<v Speaker 1>I realized that there were certain couples who we meet

0:40:17.685 --> 0:40:20.245
<v Speaker 1>who are going to this dog show. Some are just

0:40:20.365 --> 0:40:22.645
<v Speaker 1>terrible for you each other and terrible to each other, right,

0:40:23.245 --> 0:40:26.885
<v Speaker 1>and those are funny, But the ones that stick with us,

0:40:27.285 --> 0:40:30.565
<v Speaker 1>uh huh are those who we get to know that

0:40:31.085 --> 0:40:34.005
<v Speaker 1>it's more about how they're there for each other. And

0:40:34.125 --> 0:40:40.565
<v Speaker 1>I think Cookie, Cookie, Cookie, Google's Cooky, She's Cookie. Yeah.

0:40:40.645 --> 0:40:44.125
<v Speaker 1>Cookie and her husband played by Eugene Levy in this case,

0:40:44.405 --> 0:40:50.205
<v Speaker 1>of course, are so wonderfully supportive of each other in

0:40:50.325 --> 0:40:55.205
<v Speaker 1>some very awkward situations, most of them due to the

0:40:55.205 --> 0:40:58.285
<v Speaker 1>fact that we learn along the way, as her husband

0:40:58.365 --> 0:41:01.085
<v Speaker 1>does on this trip to the dog show, that Cookie

0:41:01.125 --> 0:41:05.364
<v Speaker 1>had a lively romantic life before they married. And this

0:41:05.645 --> 0:41:07.565
<v Speaker 1>is this is an example, Adam, I think of like

0:41:07.605 --> 0:41:09.445
<v Speaker 1>the one note I was talking about, like.

0:41:09.605 --> 0:41:11.605
<v Speaker 3>I was going to go there if you didn't. Yes, right,

0:41:11.645 --> 0:41:14.125
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of like one joke with Cookie, one joke.

0:41:14.245 --> 0:41:17.885
<v Speaker 1>Cookie has this promiscuous past, okay, and it could have

0:41:17.885 --> 0:41:20.924
<v Speaker 1>been a gag that got tired. But I have to think,

0:41:21.365 --> 0:41:23.085
<v Speaker 1>you know, Levy, I think is a co writer here

0:41:23.085 --> 0:41:25.404
<v Speaker 1>with guests. I have to think they like trusted her

0:41:26.125 --> 0:41:28.725
<v Speaker 1>to just say this is all you need and we

0:41:28.845 --> 0:41:34.325
<v Speaker 1>know what you'll do with it, because the improvisational possibilities

0:41:34.685 --> 0:41:38.685
<v Speaker 1>that knowing you're getting served a fastball in every one

0:41:38.725 --> 0:41:41.645
<v Speaker 1>of your scenes, and you can choose to hit it

0:41:41.685 --> 0:41:44.605
<v Speaker 1>to right field to let me dumbside, like you just

0:41:44.725 --> 0:41:49.245
<v Speaker 1>know what's coming. And here's what she does. Every guy

0:41:49.285 --> 0:41:53.205
<v Speaker 1>who comes up and recognizes her and shares their memory

0:41:53.765 --> 0:41:58.005
<v Speaker 1>with her, each guy is different because of how she responds,

0:41:58.445 --> 0:42:01.925
<v Speaker 1>and each situation is different because of how she plays it,

0:42:01.965 --> 0:42:07.565
<v Speaker 1>and you get a sense of their particular relationship, which

0:42:07.605 --> 0:42:12.725
<v Speaker 1>is unique every time. Doesn't she look fantastic? Well, thank you?

0:42:12.965 --> 0:42:14.605
<v Speaker 1>Well you've got that right, good one.

0:42:14.685 --> 0:42:19.405
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Eighteen nineteen years Louisville, the mint Julip.

0:42:19.165 --> 0:42:24.485
<v Speaker 1>You were working as a waitress thing. Wow, welcome Malcolm,

0:42:24.485 --> 0:42:27.844
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Malcolm, Oh yeah, you know I've banged a lot

0:42:27.885 --> 0:42:31.205
<v Speaker 1>of waitresses to my dave you you you were the best.

0:42:31.325 --> 0:42:33.285
<v Speaker 1>You do forget.

0:42:34.045 --> 0:42:36.005
<v Speaker 2>Oh Jerry, Jerry.

0:42:36.125 --> 0:42:38.405
<v Speaker 1>I think part of you know, Jerry is her husband.

0:42:38.445 --> 0:42:41.364
<v Speaker 1>And then this goes back to the supporting thing. Part

0:42:41.405 --> 0:42:44.525
<v Speaker 1>of the cookie persona is the way during each one

0:42:44.565 --> 0:42:51.085
<v Speaker 1>of these encounters she makes room for Jerry's feelings of discomfort. Now, yeah,

0:42:51.245 --> 0:42:55.525
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't apologize. Let's be clear, there's nothing for her

0:42:55.565 --> 0:42:58.805
<v Speaker 1>to apologize for this. You know, this was before she

0:42:58.845 --> 0:43:03.165
<v Speaker 1>met Jerry, but you know, she's she doesn't just turn

0:43:03.245 --> 0:43:06.245
<v Speaker 1>all her attention to these men. There's and this too

0:43:06.325 --> 0:43:11.005
<v Speaker 1>she gives variations to depending on Jerry's reaction, how how

0:43:11.245 --> 0:43:14.965
<v Speaker 1>like mortified he is, she'll alter her response. It's just

0:43:15.085 --> 0:43:20.125
<v Speaker 1>that she acknowledges his discomfort. So this is some of

0:43:20.165 --> 0:43:22.965
<v Speaker 1>the nuanced some of the layers she brings to it.

0:43:23.685 --> 0:43:27.645
<v Speaker 1>Can we just also say, I don't know what O'Hara

0:43:27.725 --> 0:43:32.645
<v Speaker 1>did with her leg, but after Cookie sprains her knee

0:43:32.765 --> 0:43:36.605
<v Speaker 1>just before the climactic final show competition, uh huh, and

0:43:36.685 --> 0:43:41.085
<v Speaker 1>she's wobbling in a circle around that backstage. I don't

0:43:41.085 --> 0:43:43.565
<v Speaker 1>know how she did that physically, but it is disturbing

0:43:43.965 --> 0:43:46.045
<v Speaker 1>and it is hilarious. And I don't know how much

0:43:46.045 --> 0:43:49.885
<v Speaker 1>physical comedy we get from from O'Hara, but but she

0:43:50.005 --> 0:43:53.845
<v Speaker 1>definitely throws them out there in this movie and it

0:43:53.885 --> 0:43:54.725
<v Speaker 1>works quite well.

0:43:55.405 --> 0:43:58.685
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've got Cookie Fleck from Best in Show as

0:43:58.925 --> 0:44:02.725
<v Speaker 3>my number two and she might be the best character

0:44:03.325 --> 0:44:06.125
<v Speaker 3>in the movie, even though I am going to say,

0:44:06.165 --> 0:44:07.964
<v Speaker 3>and she's part of this obviously part of the scene

0:44:07.965 --> 0:44:11.445
<v Speaker 3>and part of what makes this joke work, the single

0:44:11.525 --> 0:44:14.565
<v Speaker 3>best joke in the movie, and it might be the

0:44:14.605 --> 0:44:17.445
<v Speaker 3>single I'm gonna say, I'm gonna go bold here, Josh.

0:44:17.525 --> 0:44:21.125
<v Speaker 3>The single best joke maybe in all of the the

0:44:21.205 --> 0:44:25.605
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Guest universe, is one that belongs to Eugene Levy

0:44:25.645 --> 0:44:29.205
<v Speaker 3>in the scene Well Levy and Christopher Guest, and it's

0:44:29.285 --> 0:44:32.205
<v Speaker 3>when they're talking about how they met on the dance

0:44:32.285 --> 0:44:35.765
<v Speaker 3>floor and how he's protesting, no, I can't dance.

0:44:35.805 --> 0:44:36.484
<v Speaker 1>I can't dance.

0:44:36.525 --> 0:44:38.765
<v Speaker 3>I've got two left feet, and she says, I thought

0:44:38.805 --> 0:44:42.045
<v Speaker 3>he was kidding, and there's a pause. So I rewatched

0:44:42.045 --> 0:44:44.925
<v Speaker 3>this too, Josh, and I hadn't seen Best in Show

0:44:45.045 --> 0:44:48.125
<v Speaker 3>in I don't know how long, at least ten years, right,

0:44:48.365 --> 0:44:52.484
<v Speaker 3>so I didn't remember exactly what was going to happen here.

0:44:52.645 --> 0:44:56.565
<v Speaker 3>And I am telling you truthfully, in this moment, it's

0:44:56.645 --> 0:45:01.205
<v Speaker 3>like Christopher Guest knew. I think he did know, right.

0:45:01.445 --> 0:45:03.925
<v Speaker 3>He was smart enough to know that every audience member

0:45:05.045 --> 0:45:07.525
<v Speaker 3>understood that we were watching a Christopher Guest movie and

0:45:07.565 --> 0:45:11.805
<v Speaker 3>that anything could happen here. And when he says, you know,

0:45:12.685 --> 0:45:15.365
<v Speaker 3>I have two left feet, and when the camera pauses

0:45:16.725 --> 0:45:19.445
<v Speaker 3>that the reality could be that he actually has two

0:45:19.525 --> 0:45:22.844
<v Speaker 3>left feet, and the pause allows for that. And I

0:45:22.925 --> 0:45:25.364
<v Speaker 3>actually set out loud on my couch, even though I've

0:45:25.405 --> 0:45:28.605
<v Speaker 3>seen this movie before, I set out loud, don't do it,

0:45:29.605 --> 0:45:32.805
<v Speaker 3>like like, no, you're not, actually you're not gonna do it.

0:45:32.845 --> 0:45:34.845
<v Speaker 3>And then he's in right is right after I finished

0:45:34.845 --> 0:45:39.525
<v Speaker 3>the word it. But I wasn't in the slope pan

0:45:39.765 --> 0:45:45.085
<v Speaker 3>down and Josh, that alone, that alone, that sort of

0:45:45.125 --> 0:45:48.965
<v Speaker 3>interaction with the audience, and the notion that he actually

0:45:49.045 --> 0:45:52.165
<v Speaker 3>has two left feet, the slope pan that that could

0:45:52.245 --> 0:45:55.325
<v Speaker 3>be enough. That's enough to make it brilliant. But of

0:45:55.365 --> 0:45:58.125
<v Speaker 3>course they take it to another level. They had a

0:45:58.245 --> 0:46:03.845
<v Speaker 3>nickname for me. They called me Loopy because I walked

0:46:03.885 --> 0:46:06.805
<v Speaker 3>in circles. I mean, I I just I don't know,

0:46:06.845 --> 0:46:07.965
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it could be topped.

0:46:08.405 --> 0:46:12.005
<v Speaker 1>Can I point out the callback to this that I

0:46:12.325 --> 0:46:14.485
<v Speaker 1>didn't catch. Debbie caught this when we were watching it.

0:46:15.365 --> 0:46:18.725
<v Speaker 1>This is why he wins. Yeah, because when he's walking

0:46:18.765 --> 0:46:24.285
<v Speaker 1>the dog, he has to go in circles. Of course, yes, yes,

0:46:24.405 --> 0:46:27.965
<v Speaker 1>Jerry was born for this. I know, I know, I know.

0:46:28.085 --> 0:46:31.165
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's he's very limited, but it actually it actually.

0:46:30.965 --> 0:46:33.844
<v Speaker 1>Pays this case. Circles is a skill.

0:46:35.125 --> 0:46:38.885
<v Speaker 3>So Cookie, you know, she just she takes no offense.

0:46:38.965 --> 0:46:42.605
<v Speaker 3>Of course, at the vulgarity of all these men who

0:46:42.685 --> 0:46:45.525
<v Speaker 3>approached them right in front of her husband Noah's We

0:46:45.605 --> 0:46:49.685
<v Speaker 3>think we think she might be like, oh, you know,

0:46:49.765 --> 0:46:52.884
<v Speaker 3>that's that's in the past, you know, don't say that.

0:46:53.205 --> 0:46:56.325
<v Speaker 3>We think she might have more respect for her husband's feelings.

0:46:56.365 --> 0:47:00.965
<v Speaker 3>But no, yeah, exactly, she tries to thread the needle

0:47:01.845 --> 0:47:02.965
<v Speaker 3>and and.

0:47:03.285 --> 0:47:06.725
<v Speaker 1>In uh in that seed, you know, in this in

0:47:06.765 --> 0:47:10.485
<v Speaker 1>this one of the very memorable scenes, right, the character says,

0:47:11.045 --> 0:47:14.245
<v Speaker 1>I've banged a lot of cocktail waitresses in my day,

0:47:14.365 --> 0:47:15.685
<v Speaker 1>but you never forget the best.

0:47:15.725 --> 0:47:18.605
<v Speaker 3>And again she doesn't. There's no offense in that because

0:47:18.725 --> 0:47:21.565
<v Speaker 3>in fact, she takes pride. She says, you know, forget

0:47:21.565 --> 0:47:25.485
<v Speaker 3>the best, right like she knows she's the best in

0:47:25.565 --> 0:47:26.125
<v Speaker 3>that moment.

0:47:26.245 --> 0:47:27.444
<v Speaker 1>So that is the joke.

0:47:27.565 --> 0:47:30.245
<v Speaker 3>The joke for her is that recurring gag of men,

0:47:30.525 --> 0:47:34.005
<v Speaker 3>every man showing up and then her sort of unrepentant

0:47:34.085 --> 0:47:38.325
<v Speaker 3>you know, shameless horniness or the feminism of cookie Fleck

0:47:38.445 --> 0:47:41.365
<v Speaker 3>because you know, she's she's not going to let society

0:47:41.765 --> 0:47:44.805
<v Speaker 3>or her marriage vows. I'm gonna say, you know, restrict

0:47:44.805 --> 0:47:48.285
<v Speaker 3>her choices, Josh, because or her fond recollections, but her

0:47:48.365 --> 0:47:51.045
<v Speaker 3>choices because these aren't just choices in the past the

0:47:51.085 --> 0:47:53.565
<v Speaker 3>movie suggests, right, like, let's not forget that when they

0:47:53.605 --> 0:47:56.605
<v Speaker 3>go to Larry Miller's house. They stop off at Larry

0:47:56.645 --> 0:48:00.725
<v Speaker 3>Miller's house, there is that scene where they just disappear.

0:48:01.845 --> 0:48:03.805
<v Speaker 3>They just disappear in the house. And I don't think

0:48:03.845 --> 0:48:07.765
<v Speaker 3>he was like showing her as bowling trophies, you know, like,

0:48:08.885 --> 0:48:10.725
<v Speaker 3>I think we know what they were getting up to

0:48:10.965 --> 0:48:14.005
<v Speaker 3>in that scene. But but you mentioned this, and I

0:48:14.005 --> 0:48:17.525
<v Speaker 3>do think this is what makes the character work so well.

0:48:17.525 --> 0:48:20.445
<v Speaker 3>And it is about it's about cutting that sort of

0:48:20.605 --> 0:48:23.285
<v Speaker 3>edge of the one note. It's about adding in the

0:48:23.325 --> 0:48:26.405
<v Speaker 3>real human element that we've talked about so much. Do

0:48:26.445 --> 0:48:29.085
<v Speaker 3>you ever feel like, you know, you talked about the

0:48:29.365 --> 0:48:32.005
<v Speaker 3>characters who support each other. Do you ever feel like

0:48:32.365 --> 0:48:36.525
<v Speaker 3>despite this, despite in any real marriage, any any man

0:48:36.565 --> 0:48:40.525
<v Speaker 3>really you know, obviously being even more disturbed by this

0:48:40.685 --> 0:48:43.325
<v Speaker 3>and you know, not allowing it. Do you ever feel

0:48:43.325 --> 0:48:46.965
<v Speaker 3>like Cookie is using Jerry for something? Do you ever

0:48:47.005 --> 0:48:50.005
<v Speaker 3>feel like she's she's using him for his money or

0:48:50.085 --> 0:48:54.405
<v Speaker 3>just some kind of stability. No, it seems like she

0:48:54.645 --> 0:48:59.765
<v Speaker 3>genuinely loves her husband and she's she's taking no pleasure

0:49:00.005 --> 0:49:04.445
<v Speaker 3>in cooking him in this way. She just has a

0:49:04.565 --> 0:49:09.444
<v Speaker 3>voracious sexual appetite and and I think, I think it's

0:49:09.445 --> 0:49:12.845
<v Speaker 3>the end scene for me, Josh, because here again you

0:49:12.845 --> 0:49:15.725
<v Speaker 3>think how many different variations on this joke, but also

0:49:15.805 --> 0:49:19.085
<v Speaker 3>her response to it. Can she give us and have

0:49:19.205 --> 0:49:23.085
<v Speaker 3>them still be as frish and and as brilliant as

0:49:23.285 --> 0:49:25.645
<v Speaker 3>as the last one? And they're in this they're in

0:49:25.685 --> 0:49:30.085
<v Speaker 3>the recording studio. They're singing the Terrier song. And by

0:49:30.165 --> 0:49:34.205
<v Speaker 3>now you think, maybe you know, he's been triumphant, he won, right,

0:49:34.325 --> 0:49:38.445
<v Speaker 3>he won for them. Maybe maybe this is behind them now,

0:49:38.845 --> 0:49:41.805
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe maybe he'll have some more respect and

0:49:42.245 --> 0:49:44.845
<v Speaker 3>maybe some some of these men won't. You know, this

0:49:44.965 --> 0:49:46.525
<v Speaker 3>is a part of the film, but you're just thinking,

0:49:46.565 --> 0:49:49.605
<v Speaker 3>maybe you know, he's got some status and he can

0:49:49.645 --> 0:49:52.325
<v Speaker 3>move on with his life and this won't haunt him anymore.

0:49:52.445 --> 0:49:53.205
<v Speaker 1>And what happens.

0:49:53.925 --> 0:49:56.485
<v Speaker 3>They're in the recording studio, and of course the engineer

0:49:57.285 --> 0:49:58.165
<v Speaker 3>recognizes her.

0:49:58.285 --> 0:50:03.285
<v Speaker 4>Cookie Yeah, Cookie Google man, Yeah.

0:50:02.765 --> 0:50:07.765
<v Speaker 1>Does this ring a bell? I'm not wearing underwear?

0:50:08.525 --> 0:50:08.765
<v Speaker 3>Fault?

0:50:09.285 --> 0:50:14.245
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's me. Yeah, it's me.

0:50:15.165 --> 0:50:21.405
<v Speaker 3>And this moment, Josh O'Hara's moment, that focused look that

0:50:21.525 --> 0:50:24.685
<v Speaker 3>she gives the guy, and that little cough and the

0:50:24.805 --> 0:50:27.245
<v Speaker 3>lowering of the voice, which she says he's He says,

0:50:27.285 --> 0:50:30.005
<v Speaker 3>you look good girl, whatever, and she goes you too.

0:50:30.405 --> 0:50:34.365
<v Speaker 1>You look fantastic too. You've grown.

0:50:35.285 --> 0:50:37.805
<v Speaker 4>I'm growing right now, girl, I'm just looking at you.

0:50:38.805 --> 0:50:42.245
<v Speaker 3>Poor Jerry, right, I mean Levy Levi starts banging his

0:50:42.325 --> 0:50:43.725
<v Speaker 3>head against the microphone.

0:50:43.765 --> 0:50:44.805
<v Speaker 1>That's my favorite.

0:50:44.885 --> 0:50:48.165
<v Speaker 3>I think that is my favorite Cookie fleck line delivery

0:50:48.245 --> 0:50:51.485
<v Speaker 3>in the entire film. You two, you've grown, like you

0:50:51.645 --> 0:50:55.445
<v Speaker 3>just know like it's over. It's over for Jerry, Like,

0:50:55.805 --> 0:50:58.725
<v Speaker 3>do not let do not let Bulge come out from

0:50:58.765 --> 0:51:01.965
<v Speaker 3>behind that side of the glass, Do not let Cookie

0:51:02.325 --> 0:51:05.444
<v Speaker 3>go into that side of the studio. Just just leave

0:51:05.845 --> 0:51:07.045
<v Speaker 3>as fast as you can.

0:51:08.165 --> 0:51:11.325
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to watch that and see you know

0:51:12.165 --> 0:51:14.565
<v Speaker 1>what she does to acknowledge Jerry, Like, is that the

0:51:14.685 --> 0:51:18.045
<v Speaker 1>rare moment where she's like, he's not here as far

0:51:18.085 --> 0:51:19.445
<v Speaker 1>as I'm concerned, he doesn't.

0:51:19.605 --> 0:51:21.765
<v Speaker 3>She doesn't look at all at him. She is straight

0:51:21.845 --> 0:51:22.805
<v Speaker 3>on with Bulge.

0:51:22.965 --> 0:51:27.205
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, because there's because there's Yeah, most scenes she'll

0:51:27.525 --> 0:51:30.325
<v Speaker 1>she'll try to make space for for Harry as well,

0:51:30.365 --> 0:51:35.165
<v Speaker 1>which is Yeah, it's a it's a really much more,

0:51:35.805 --> 0:51:38.285
<v Speaker 1>much funnier and more. I always used to credit a

0:51:38.365 --> 0:51:39.925
<v Speaker 1>Mighty Wind, which I think we're about to get to

0:51:40.365 --> 0:51:45.885
<v Speaker 1>with being the more thoughtful and resonant Christopher Guest's documentary.

0:51:45.925 --> 0:51:47.805
<v Speaker 1>But there was a lot of that invest in show

0:51:48.085 --> 0:51:50.605
<v Speaker 1>and the and you know, especially the other couple besides

0:51:50.685 --> 0:51:54.125
<v Speaker 1>Cookie and Jerry. I think of where Michael McKeon and

0:51:54.205 --> 0:51:58.725
<v Speaker 1>John Michael Higgins as Stefan and Scott like you just

0:51:58.765 --> 0:51:59.485
<v Speaker 1>realized for it.

0:51:59.685 --> 0:52:02.205
<v Speaker 2>Listen to Laugh with Me a podcast with Jeremy Odom

0:52:02.405 --> 0:52:06.844
<v Speaker 2>right here on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcast or wherever

0:52:07.165 --> 0:52:11.285
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcast. I'm j oh I'm your host, baby,

0:52:11.485 --> 0:52:14.685
<v Speaker 2>and here's a little taste of what you are gonna

0:52:14.685 --> 0:52:17.085
<v Speaker 2>find on Laugh with Me. And they're like, what happened.

0:52:17.125 --> 0:52:18.965
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I got Peppi's braid, and everybody's like, oh

0:52:19.005 --> 0:52:21.005
<v Speaker 2>my god, what happened? I got Beavorence braid.

0:52:21.045 --> 0:52:21.765
<v Speaker 1>I just told you.

0:52:22.285 --> 0:52:26.125
<v Speaker 2>And listen to Laugh with Me on the iHeartRadio app,

0:52:26.205 --> 0:52:29.685
<v Speaker 2>Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:52:29.765 --> 0:52:33.925
<v Speaker 1>You know, outrageous and you know, stereotypical. We would say

0:52:34.445 --> 0:52:38.165
<v Speaker 1>this couple presents like there is They are there for

0:52:38.205 --> 0:52:41.805
<v Speaker 1>each other in every moment and in every way, and

0:52:41.845 --> 0:52:45.685
<v Speaker 1>there was something like just so sweet about that amidst

0:52:45.765 --> 0:52:49.005
<v Speaker 1>all the laughs, and I think even with Jerry and Cookie,

0:52:49.045 --> 0:52:52.885
<v Speaker 1>there is something sweet amidst all the perversity, perhaps so

0:52:53.645 --> 0:52:57.045
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt. So we're at our shared number one

0:52:57.365 --> 0:53:01.365
<v Speaker 1>if I've been following correctly, And this is in terms

0:53:01.485 --> 0:53:06.444
<v Speaker 1>of the carving her own space alongside a co star,

0:53:06.845 --> 0:53:09.965
<v Speaker 1>but delivering that support. I think her performance is Mickey

0:53:10.525 --> 0:53:15.045
<v Speaker 1>in a Mighty Wind is to me the definitive Ohara character,

0:53:15.805 --> 0:53:19.805
<v Speaker 1>and you know, really a distinctive performance in the way

0:53:20.005 --> 0:53:24.085
<v Speaker 1>it it pumps the breaks on the comedy a little bit,

0:53:24.805 --> 0:53:27.725
<v Speaker 1>not saying that she isn't quite funny in a Mighty Win.

0:53:27.885 --> 0:53:30.365
<v Speaker 1>She's one half of Mitch and Mickey. So Eugene Levy

0:53:30.405 --> 0:53:33.285
<v Speaker 1>is the other half. Christopher guest again and they're a

0:53:33.365 --> 0:53:38.245
<v Speaker 1>folk duo who they separated years before professionally and romantically

0:53:38.325 --> 0:53:41.725
<v Speaker 1>and have now been reunited for this memorial concert. And

0:53:41.885 --> 0:53:44.484
<v Speaker 1>I think both of them, I think Levy two, they're

0:53:44.485 --> 0:53:50.005
<v Speaker 1>really layering their improvisational genius with a feel for fully

0:53:50.085 --> 0:53:53.765
<v Speaker 1>formed characters. It feels like this is something they've been

0:53:53.845 --> 0:53:59.165
<v Speaker 1>working towards as collaborators on screen, collaborators through some of

0:53:59.205 --> 0:54:02.085
<v Speaker 1>the movies. We've been talking about and Mitch and Mickey

0:54:02.125 --> 0:54:04.005
<v Speaker 1>are just something special. I actually had them as my

0:54:04.085 --> 0:54:07.085
<v Speaker 1>number two movie band when we did that Top five

0:54:07.165 --> 0:54:10.245
<v Speaker 1>that was episode five oh three. And yeah, I think

0:54:10.285 --> 0:54:15.404
<v Speaker 1>with O'Hara here you can see how she's maybe it's calibration, right,

0:54:15.485 --> 0:54:18.165
<v Speaker 1>it's not choosing one thing over the other, it's where

0:54:18.205 --> 0:54:22.404
<v Speaker 1>am I going to modulate? And I feel like here

0:54:22.485 --> 0:54:29.925
<v Speaker 1>she's going slightly more. She's slightly privileging sincerity overhumor while

0:54:30.005 --> 0:54:34.245
<v Speaker 1>allowing both to be part of every moment that she's in.

0:54:34.965 --> 0:54:39.125
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a dexterity there that's quite special.

0:54:40.045 --> 0:54:43.085
<v Speaker 1>And then to put over the top you have you know,

0:54:43.165 --> 0:54:47.205
<v Speaker 1>their climactic performance at this reunion concert of kiss at

0:54:47.205 --> 0:54:50.845
<v Speaker 1>the end of the Rainbow. I think here is where

0:54:50.965 --> 0:54:55.725
<v Speaker 1>O'Hara is going for sincerity and it's funny. At my

0:54:56.165 --> 0:54:58.925
<v Speaker 1>notes after watching this again are so in line with

0:54:59.125 --> 0:55:04.045
<v Speaker 1>what we've been talking about because that sequence, we're all

0:55:04.085 --> 0:55:05.845
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see if they're going to kiss at the

0:55:05.925 --> 0:55:07.685
<v Speaker 1>end of the song, right, this is what they used

0:55:07.725 --> 0:55:10.045
<v Speaker 1>to do traditionally the audience is waiting for We now

0:55:10.165 --> 0:55:13.285
<v Speaker 1>vicariously as movie viewers, are waiting to see if they're

0:55:13.325 --> 0:55:16.565
<v Speaker 1>going to do this and watching it this time, I

0:55:16.605 --> 0:55:21.005
<v Speaker 1>think I realized that Mickey was giving that kiss as

0:55:21.085 --> 0:55:26.685
<v Speaker 1>a gift to Mitch. So it wasn't this romantic thing

0:55:26.805 --> 0:55:29.445
<v Speaker 1>between the two of them. It was more of a

0:55:29.445 --> 0:55:31.125
<v Speaker 1>one side It struck me this time as more of

0:55:31.125 --> 0:55:33.925
<v Speaker 1>a one sided gift, knowing he needed it even if

0:55:33.965 --> 0:55:38.525
<v Speaker 1>she didn't. And so it's not even a romantic need

0:55:39.165 --> 0:55:43.325
<v Speaker 1>Micky's fulfilling here. But this is a gesture of affirmation,

0:55:44.685 --> 0:55:48.605
<v Speaker 1>which I think is something quite sophisticated to try to

0:55:48.845 --> 0:55:53.405
<v Speaker 1>perform and a choice rather than just going for that romance.

0:55:53.445 --> 0:55:56.565
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's true to to who this character is,

0:55:56.605 --> 0:56:01.045
<v Speaker 1>who Mickey is through throughout the movie. And I want

0:56:01.085 --> 0:56:02.845
<v Speaker 1>to real quick before I thought to you, share something

0:56:02.845 --> 0:56:05.405
<v Speaker 1>from a listener Luke Standaway, because I saw his letterbox

0:56:05.445 --> 0:56:09.005
<v Speaker 1>review of A Mighty Wind. Must have watched it after

0:56:09.525 --> 0:56:12.844
<v Speaker 1>O'Hara passed, and he said this, Catherine O'Hara can make

0:56:12.885 --> 0:56:16.365
<v Speaker 1>you laugh your pants off and then with the faintest expression,

0:56:16.765 --> 0:56:20.725
<v Speaker 1>break your heart. And if yeah, there's no reason or

0:56:20.725 --> 0:56:23.444
<v Speaker 1>there's a clear reason he wrote that for a Mighty Wind.

0:56:23.485 --> 0:56:25.605
<v Speaker 1>After watching A Mighty Wind, right, I think that's absolutely

0:56:25.605 --> 0:56:26.765
<v Speaker 1>what she does here.

0:56:27.685 --> 0:56:30.885
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I did have Cookie as my number one for

0:56:30.925 --> 0:56:34.285
<v Speaker 3>the longest time, and then, as sometimes happens, you end

0:56:34.365 --> 0:56:37.645
<v Speaker 3>up rearranging your list. The more you think about the films,

0:56:38.005 --> 0:56:41.525
<v Speaker 3>the more you the more you start justifying your picks,

0:56:42.205 --> 0:56:45.445
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden, I found myself going, no,

0:56:45.925 --> 0:56:48.045
<v Speaker 3>it's got to be Mickey. It's got to be a

0:56:48.125 --> 0:56:50.525
<v Speaker 3>mighty wind at number one. And a big part of

0:56:50.565 --> 0:56:54.525
<v Speaker 3>it is that you you said it, Josh, is that

0:56:55.285 --> 0:56:57.964
<v Speaker 3>this character, even though she is part of this duo,

0:56:59.525 --> 0:57:04.085
<v Speaker 3>it's wrestling with this very notion of supportive or being

0:57:04.325 --> 0:57:09.045
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent of a whole versus being one hundred percent

0:57:09.085 --> 0:57:12.364
<v Speaker 3>of yourself, and that that's what the character's wrestling with.

0:57:12.405 --> 0:57:15.645
<v Speaker 3>And we see, you know O'Hara then getting to kind

0:57:15.685 --> 0:57:21.525
<v Speaker 3>of bring that out in her performance. This character is singular,

0:57:21.685 --> 0:57:25.565
<v Speaker 3>and I think that that separates her. She she's not

0:57:25.725 --> 0:57:29.805
<v Speaker 3>there just to support Levy, certainly for most of this film.

0:57:30.245 --> 0:57:34.085
<v Speaker 3>She's she's separated and thus separate and and she's not

0:57:34.565 --> 0:57:37.965
<v Speaker 3>defined in any way as wife of right or partner

0:57:38.005 --> 0:57:40.605
<v Speaker 3>of and I think that that that is a distinction,

0:57:40.725 --> 0:57:43.485
<v Speaker 3>that that matters, and even at the end when we

0:57:43.605 --> 0:57:46.365
<v Speaker 3>see post kiss, and that's what really matters to me.

0:57:46.645 --> 0:57:49.165
<v Speaker 3>As good as the kiss is and as amazing as

0:57:49.205 --> 0:57:51.885
<v Speaker 3>it makes me feel watching it, even watching it again

0:57:52.445 --> 0:57:56.405
<v Speaker 3>just on YouTube, the aftermath is what really gets me, Josh,

0:57:56.445 --> 0:57:58.165
<v Speaker 3>and what I want to talk about. And and you

0:57:58.205 --> 0:58:00.445
<v Speaker 3>know she's playing Is she playing the harp? One of

0:58:00.485 --> 0:58:03.005
<v Speaker 3>those it's not a harpsichord.

0:58:02.445 --> 0:58:04.285
<v Speaker 1>Is it? She's something like that.

0:58:04.645 --> 0:58:06.885
<v Speaker 3>It's like something like I can't believe I'm blanking on that,

0:58:06.925 --> 0:58:09.005
<v Speaker 3>but she's she's at some kind of trade show or

0:58:09.045 --> 0:58:10.885
<v Speaker 3>something where no one's paying attention to her. But she

0:58:10.925 --> 0:58:14.285
<v Speaker 3>even says, I'm a musician again. You know, I'm a

0:58:14.365 --> 0:58:17.765
<v Speaker 3>musician again, Like I can do this on my own.

0:58:17.885 --> 0:58:20.045
<v Speaker 3>She she is on her own. And I think that

0:58:20.165 --> 0:58:24.085
<v Speaker 3>declaration matters for that character. But you're not wrong that

0:58:24.125 --> 0:58:26.765
<v Speaker 3>they deserve. Mickey and Mitch Vicky deserve to be a

0:58:26.765 --> 0:58:30.885
<v Speaker 3>top five movie band with that song. That's the song incredible,

0:58:31.005 --> 0:58:33.365
<v Speaker 3>so good. It has to be right, It has to

0:58:33.405 --> 0:58:35.845
<v Speaker 3>deliver for us to believe that this movie is going

0:58:35.885 --> 0:58:39.205
<v Speaker 3>to build to it, and that all the characters think

0:58:39.245 --> 0:58:42.005
<v Speaker 3>about think about what Guest has to pull off there,

0:58:42.045 --> 0:58:46.165
<v Speaker 3>not only musically but emotionally. If if the entire film

0:58:46.245 --> 0:58:49.485
<v Speaker 3>hinges on, we have to believe that all those people

0:58:49.525 --> 0:58:52.005
<v Speaker 3>backstage are going to come to the side of the

0:58:52.005 --> 0:58:54.885
<v Speaker 3>stage and look, and we as viewers to everyone in

0:58:54.925 --> 0:58:59.325
<v Speaker 3>the audience, everyone watching the screen and everyone watching from

0:58:59.365 --> 0:59:01.005
<v Speaker 3>the side of the stage, we're all looking for the

0:59:01.085 --> 0:59:03.245
<v Speaker 3>same thing. And we're all listening to that music and

0:59:03.285 --> 0:59:04.245
<v Speaker 3>being moved by it.

0:59:04.685 --> 0:59:07.045
<v Speaker 1>And it works.

0:59:07.125 --> 0:59:10.645
<v Speaker 3>And as I said, there's poignancy absolutely in the kiss itself,

0:59:11.485 --> 0:59:14.165
<v Speaker 3>that kind of will they or won't they? Suspense that

0:59:14.165 --> 0:59:18.325
<v Speaker 3>that really matters, and that anticipation building because of all

0:59:18.365 --> 0:59:21.725
<v Speaker 3>the onlookers. And there's a joke in there too, right,

0:59:21.925 --> 0:59:24.805
<v Speaker 3>you know when when in the aftermath, there's a joke

0:59:24.885 --> 0:59:29.485
<v Speaker 3>in there, like there's always going to be when Nicky says,

0:59:30.005 --> 0:59:32.805
<v Speaker 3>my sister said, well, you shouldn't have let him on.

0:59:33.125 --> 0:59:34.805
<v Speaker 3>You shouldn't have kissed him if you weren't going to

0:59:34.845 --> 0:59:37.125
<v Speaker 3>go all the way. It's what she says, you know,

0:59:37.205 --> 0:59:41.005
<v Speaker 3>like this this nineteen fifties view of teenagers dating or

0:59:41.045 --> 0:59:44.005
<v Speaker 3>something like, it's so stupid, right, but it's also in

0:59:44.045 --> 0:59:48.805
<v Speaker 3>a way accurate, you know, it's accurate as in, if

0:59:48.845 --> 0:59:53.285
<v Speaker 3>all the way actually meant falling back in love, you know, reuniting,

0:59:53.365 --> 0:59:55.685
<v Speaker 3>you shouldn't have kissed him if you weren't willing to

0:59:55.805 --> 0:59:59.565
<v Speaker 3>commit to being all in with him, if you take

0:59:59.605 --> 1:00:01.805
<v Speaker 3>it to mean that it has a serious component to

1:00:01.885 --> 1:00:05.165
<v Speaker 3>it as well as in everything that kiss could could pressage.

1:00:05.205 --> 1:00:08.045
<v Speaker 3>So here again with O'Hara and with Guest, we get

1:00:08.285 --> 1:00:11.045
<v Speaker 3>after a punchline comes from real pathos, right.

1:00:11.725 --> 1:00:13.765
<v Speaker 1>But what I love, Josh.

1:00:13.805 --> 1:00:16.805
<v Speaker 3>And I'm I'm maybe going to push back a little

1:00:16.845 --> 1:00:20.405
<v Speaker 3>bit because on your on your reading, because this is

1:00:20.445 --> 1:00:23.965
<v Speaker 3>a revelation I think I had for the first time,

1:00:24.685 --> 1:00:26.445
<v Speaker 3>and I say, I think I'll explain why I say

1:00:26.485 --> 1:00:29.245
<v Speaker 3>I think I had for the first time watching it

1:00:30.045 --> 1:00:33.805
<v Speaker 3>a few times prepping for this top five. What I

1:00:33.885 --> 1:00:39.565
<v Speaker 3>love about the end of this film post kiss, and

1:00:40.005 --> 1:00:44.045
<v Speaker 3>their individual explanations of what it means and where they

1:00:44.045 --> 1:00:49.445
<v Speaker 3>are now as individuals, is that the film structure by

1:00:49.485 --> 1:00:57.765
<v Speaker 3>putting Nicky first, that that order creates the impression that

1:00:58.565 --> 1:01:02.565
<v Speaker 3>she's the reasonable one. She's the one who sort of

1:01:02.605 --> 1:01:05.405
<v Speaker 3>set a boundary. She's the one who doesn't feel the

1:01:05.485 --> 1:01:08.765
<v Speaker 3>same way about Mitch that he feels about her. She

1:01:09.085 --> 1:01:12.085
<v Speaker 3>is the She's not the one who took the kiss seriously,

1:01:12.325 --> 1:01:17.325
<v Speaker 3>while Mitch might have. And so maybe when we watch

1:01:17.405 --> 1:01:22.085
<v Speaker 3>him explaining to us that he that he wasn't moved

1:01:22.125 --> 1:01:24.125
<v Speaker 3>by it either and it didn't mean anything, and he

1:01:24.165 --> 1:01:26.125
<v Speaker 3>feels sorry for her because she.

1:01:26.205 --> 1:01:27.485
<v Speaker 1>Might have taken it too seriously.

1:01:27.885 --> 1:01:31.405
<v Speaker 3>It feels to us as viewers like he's quite possibly

1:01:31.445 --> 1:01:36.285
<v Speaker 3>deceiving himself, But that's because that's because Micky got to

1:01:36.365 --> 1:01:41.325
<v Speaker 3>talk first. So does guests choice to give Micky primacy

1:01:41.405 --> 1:01:44.165
<v Speaker 3>mean that he wants to leave us with that question?

1:01:44.965 --> 1:01:48.405
<v Speaker 3>As in Micky is speaking from a place of conviction

1:01:48.565 --> 1:01:51.765
<v Speaker 3>and honesty. She feels the way she feels as she

1:01:51.885 --> 1:01:55.765
<v Speaker 3>explained it, and she's worried that you know, Mitch did

1:01:55.805 --> 1:01:58.525
<v Speaker 3>take it too seriously and she just wanted the drama.

1:01:58.605 --> 1:02:02.125
<v Speaker 3>It was just performance and that was it. Or is

1:02:02.165 --> 1:02:06.405
<v Speaker 3>the ambiguity there to make us consider And I'm going

1:02:06.485 --> 1:02:09.325
<v Speaker 3>to argue that I think we have to that it's

1:02:09.405 --> 1:02:13.845
<v Speaker 3>quite likely that Micky took the kiss no less seriously

1:02:13.925 --> 1:02:18.365
<v Speaker 3>than niche, and she's also rationalizing just like he is.

1:02:18.685 --> 1:02:21.365
<v Speaker 3>I think the ambiguity leaves the door open that you know,

1:02:21.565 --> 1:02:25.645
<v Speaker 3>both are really tender people, both are too scared of

1:02:25.685 --> 1:02:29.365
<v Speaker 3>what the kiss could mean. Both are maybe protecting themselves,

1:02:30.045 --> 1:02:32.845
<v Speaker 3>both are protecting each other, or maybe it's only one

1:02:32.885 --> 1:02:36.245
<v Speaker 3>of them, Josh. But maybe it's Micky not Mitch that

1:02:36.365 --> 1:02:38.645
<v Speaker 3>feels the way we all think, Mitch, does you know

1:02:38.645 --> 1:02:40.565
<v Speaker 3>what I mean? Like, I think the ambiguity is there,

1:02:40.765 --> 1:02:44.165
<v Speaker 3>that we read it a certain way because Nicky talks first,

1:02:44.325 --> 1:02:46.685
<v Speaker 3>but maybe that's not the way we should feel about it.

1:02:47.765 --> 1:02:49.685
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess I'm you know, I didn't watch the

1:02:49.805 --> 1:02:52.085
<v Speaker 1>ending scene, so I don't think I was so influenced

1:02:52.325 --> 1:02:56.725
<v Speaker 1>by the positioning of their testimonies as we might describe

1:02:56.765 --> 1:03:01.245
<v Speaker 1>it as just the scene itself and my understanding of

1:03:02.125 --> 1:03:06.165
<v Speaker 1>who Mickey's been up until that point where it did.

1:03:06.245 --> 1:03:08.725
<v Speaker 1>It did seem to me like she was in a

1:03:08.805 --> 1:03:12.245
<v Speaker 1>more secure place, and you know, Mitch, Mitch is the

1:03:12.245 --> 1:03:17.565
<v Speaker 1>one who had the like serious breakdown over this, right.

1:03:17.645 --> 1:03:23.005
<v Speaker 1>It's it's almost like that goes back to my notion

1:03:23.085 --> 1:03:26.045
<v Speaker 1>of the kiss being a gift. Is her understanding that

1:03:26.405 --> 1:03:29.005
<v Speaker 1>maybe this isn't a chance for us to rekindle our romance,

1:03:29.445 --> 1:03:32.325
<v Speaker 1>but this is a chance for me. This would be

1:03:32.365 --> 1:03:36.845
<v Speaker 1>Mickey thinking to end things well where I didn't before.

1:03:37.605 --> 1:03:41.845
<v Speaker 1>And I'm basing that mostly again in O'Hara's performance in

1:03:41.925 --> 1:03:46.205
<v Speaker 1>the actual kiss scene, in the actual moment where where

1:03:46.325 --> 1:03:50.045
<v Speaker 1>she's she's walking a fine line there too, both as

1:03:50.925 --> 1:03:56.245
<v Speaker 1>O'Hara performer and as Mickey performer. Right. But of course,

1:03:56.245 --> 1:03:59.045
<v Speaker 1>to your point, like you have to allow those ambiguities,

1:03:59.085 --> 1:04:01.525
<v Speaker 1>for this to even be envisioned as an either or

1:04:02.365 --> 1:04:05.205
<v Speaker 1>in terms of its scripting or it's performing, would have

1:04:05.285 --> 1:04:07.685
<v Speaker 1>ruined it, right if you want, you want all those

1:04:07.765 --> 1:04:10.805
<v Speaker 1>human complications to be at play, And I think you

1:04:10.845 --> 1:04:13.645
<v Speaker 1>see that on the part of both performers to allow

1:04:13.725 --> 1:04:15.885
<v Speaker 1>us to ask these questions. Yeah, for sure.

1:04:15.965 --> 1:04:20.005
<v Speaker 3>And what makes it even more dramatically interesting is everything

1:04:20.085 --> 1:04:24.405
<v Speaker 3>you've said it makes it makes for dramatic irony that

1:04:24.525 --> 1:04:27.685
<v Speaker 3>maybe this entire time she's viewed it this way and

1:04:27.725 --> 1:04:30.845
<v Speaker 3>she's been that character, and she's the one who separated

1:04:30.845 --> 1:04:33.165
<v Speaker 3>herself from him, and then at the end she actually

1:04:33.165 --> 1:04:35.925
<v Speaker 3>found herself in the moment feeling more moved by it

1:04:36.365 --> 1:04:37.325
<v Speaker 3>than she expected.

1:04:37.405 --> 1:04:39.525
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I slash absolutely that, right.

1:04:39.605 --> 1:04:44.045
<v Speaker 3>Yeah Slash, he did even you know that could be possible, right?

1:04:44.085 --> 1:04:46.445
<v Speaker 3>And so when I said when I said I think so,

1:04:47.045 --> 1:04:50.125
<v Speaker 3>I think this was a revelation of ambiguity I had.

1:04:50.245 --> 1:04:52.485
<v Speaker 3>It's only because I went back and looked at my

1:04:52.565 --> 1:04:55.565
<v Speaker 3>letterboxed review and I just really had a paragraph on it.

1:04:55.605 --> 1:04:59.405
<v Speaker 3>Though it's one of the ones that I've gotten more comments.

1:04:59.445 --> 1:05:01.565
<v Speaker 3>I don't know it's in my top fifteen or something.

1:05:01.885 --> 1:05:04.285
<v Speaker 3>And I said, I said, despite the brilliance of the

1:05:04.285 --> 1:05:07.485
<v Speaker 3>lines above, and I quote I quote John Michael Hughes

1:05:07.525 --> 1:05:10.925
<v Speaker 3>his character when he said, Wow, what a what a

1:05:10.925 --> 1:05:13.965
<v Speaker 3>line deliverer, A comedic line deliver when he says, there

1:05:14.005 --> 1:05:16.045
<v Speaker 3>had been abuse in my family, but it was mostly

1:05:16.205 --> 1:05:18.845
<v Speaker 3>musical in nature. My father used to lock me out

1:05:18.885 --> 1:05:20.685
<v Speaker 3>a way. My father used to lock me away in

1:05:20.725 --> 1:05:23.205
<v Speaker 3>a room with nothing but the Percy Faith recording of

1:05:23.285 --> 1:05:26.085
<v Speaker 3>Bim Bam Boom and then send me to bed with

1:05:26.125 --> 1:05:30.845
<v Speaker 3>nothing but dessert. Okay, So I said, despite the brilliance

1:05:30.845 --> 1:05:32.925
<v Speaker 3>of the lines above, I can't say Wind is quite

1:05:32.925 --> 1:05:35.685
<v Speaker 3>as funny as Best in Show or Guffman. And actually

1:05:35.725 --> 1:05:37.965
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure I still feel that way. I need

1:05:38.005 --> 1:05:41.245
<v Speaker 3>to revisit all these films. But it is certainly more poignant.

1:05:41.725 --> 1:05:45.365
<v Speaker 3>Everything hinges on the Mitch and Mickey performance to your point,

1:05:45.445 --> 1:05:49.005
<v Speaker 3>Josh and that kiss, past and present collapsing and colliding,

1:05:49.285 --> 1:05:52.685
<v Speaker 3>which Levy and O'Hara nail naturally. Most affecting, though, is

1:05:52.725 --> 1:05:56.085
<v Speaker 3>the aftermath where guest lets the former lovers each frame

1:05:56.125 --> 1:05:58.645
<v Speaker 3>the moment and its meaning. If there's a more sensitive,

1:05:59.285 --> 1:06:02.765
<v Speaker 3>sad example of the human capacity for rationalization and all

1:06:02.765 --> 1:06:05.365
<v Speaker 3>of Guest's work, I'd love to see it. So rereading

1:06:05.405 --> 1:06:10.125
<v Speaker 3>that when I say rationalization, clearly I was seeing it

1:06:10.205 --> 1:06:14.245
<v Speaker 3>in at least one of the characters, the idea being

1:06:14.325 --> 1:06:17.725
<v Speaker 3>as as it's played straight. If you take Mickey at

1:06:17.725 --> 1:06:22.325
<v Speaker 3>face value, it's Mitch who's rationalizing, protecting him and going, oh,

1:06:22.485 --> 1:06:26.205
<v Speaker 3>I hope Mickey didn't take that too seriously, and I

1:06:26.285 --> 1:06:29.765
<v Speaker 3>hope she's okay, right, and he's the one who's rationalizing.

1:06:30.645 --> 1:06:32.765
<v Speaker 3>I think that's how I meant it right, not that

1:06:32.845 --> 1:06:35.325
<v Speaker 3>both of them were potentially rationalizing, but I love to

1:06:35.325 --> 1:06:37.765
<v Speaker 3>think about it now is maybe, wow, what if they

1:06:37.765 --> 1:06:41.045
<v Speaker 3>both for what if Mickey actually is still kind of

1:06:41.965 --> 1:06:43.965
<v Speaker 3>reeling from this kiss?

1:06:44.365 --> 1:06:46.965
<v Speaker 1>It's fun thinking. I think O'Hara's performance is, you know,

1:06:47.205 --> 1:06:50.645
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated enough in a broad comedy like this to allow

1:06:50.685 --> 1:06:51.605
<v Speaker 1>for that possibility.

1:06:52.085 --> 1:06:56.845
<v Speaker 3>Well, those are our top five Catherine O'Hara characters. Any

1:06:57.405 --> 1:07:00.285
<v Speaker 3>additional characters you want to throw in honorable mentions?

1:07:00.605 --> 1:07:03.965
<v Speaker 1>I mean you had my honorable mention, you know, Delia

1:07:04.205 --> 1:07:06.205
<v Speaker 1>in in beat old Juice. I do think that's a

1:07:06.245 --> 1:07:08.885
<v Speaker 1>great performance. Actually, I'll throw in one more as we're

1:07:08.885 --> 1:07:13.005
<v Speaker 1>talking about Christopher Guest too. For your consideration, is the

1:07:13.125 --> 1:07:16.645
<v Speaker 1>rare mockumentary Misfire. I think it's pretty general. We agreed,

1:07:17.165 --> 1:07:22.165
<v Speaker 1>but O'Hara's actually one of the elements that works. She

1:07:22.565 --> 1:07:26.325
<v Speaker 1>plays a career actress who becomes undone a little bit

1:07:26.405 --> 1:07:31.125
<v Speaker 1>by this acclaim she receives during the Hollywood Award season.

1:07:31.485 --> 1:07:33.845
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I haven't watched this. I don't think

1:07:33.845 --> 1:07:36.285
<v Speaker 1>I've watched this twice, but I do wonder if there

1:07:36.285 --> 1:07:39.325
<v Speaker 1>are maybe seeds of Moira Rose in some way in

1:07:39.365 --> 1:07:43.645
<v Speaker 1>that character. So wouldn't recommend for your consideration necessarily to

1:07:43.725 --> 1:07:46.045
<v Speaker 1>go catch up with. But I do think if you've

1:07:46.085 --> 1:07:49.485
<v Speaker 1>seen everything else O'Hara has done and have not seen

1:07:49.525 --> 1:07:52.045
<v Speaker 1>that because it didn't get great reviews, maybe check it out,

1:07:52.085 --> 1:07:54.405
<v Speaker 1>because my memory is she is at least quite good

1:07:54.405 --> 1:07:57.285
<v Speaker 1>in it. And then I will mention I listened to

1:07:57.525 --> 1:08:01.125
<v Speaker 1>on occasion the Julia Louis Dreyfus podcast Wiser than Me,

1:08:01.765 --> 1:08:04.365
<v Speaker 1>and she had maybe a year and a half ago,

1:08:04.525 --> 1:08:07.565
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was a little longer. She had Catherine O'Hara

1:08:07.645 --> 1:08:11.645
<v Speaker 1>on as a guest and just to listen to these

1:08:11.805 --> 1:08:18.684
<v Speaker 1>two improvisational, you know, sketch comedians to talk about all

1:08:18.724 --> 1:08:21.845
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff beyond the business. But you know that

1:08:22.365 --> 1:08:26.485
<v Speaker 1>business stuff is just gold. So I would recommend tracking

1:08:26.525 --> 1:08:29.845
<v Speaker 1>that conversation down. That podcast is called Wiser than Me.

1:08:30.485 --> 1:08:32.804
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good pull. I definitely I wasn't aware

1:08:32.845 --> 1:08:35.005
<v Speaker 3>of that, and I would like to hear it for me.

1:08:35.805 --> 1:08:38.325
<v Speaker 3>Moyer Rose is definitely one, obviously, as I said, I

1:08:38.405 --> 1:08:42.725
<v Speaker 3>considered she I think is maybe in the movie for

1:08:42.845 --> 1:08:45.405
<v Speaker 3>only one scene, but it is as you would expect.

1:08:45.445 --> 1:08:48.965
<v Speaker 3>A memorable scene The Paper, the Michael Keaton and Robert

1:08:49.005 --> 1:08:51.885
<v Speaker 3>Duvall film from nineteen ninety four. She is in a

1:08:51.885 --> 1:08:56.884
<v Speaker 3>scene where she's meeting Marissa Tomey, who is Michael Keaton's wife,

1:08:57.605 --> 1:09:02.965
<v Speaker 3>for lunch in the daytime, and she's a former journalist herself,

1:09:03.045 --> 1:09:05.685
<v Speaker 3>like Marissa Tomay's character who gave it up, you know,

1:09:05.845 --> 1:09:08.645
<v Speaker 3>to kind of be there as the supportive wife to

1:09:08.725 --> 1:09:11.165
<v Speaker 3>her husband, gave up her career to raise the kids,

1:09:11.485 --> 1:09:14.365
<v Speaker 3>and as the camera in Marisa Tomey's point of view

1:09:14.405 --> 1:09:18.285
<v Speaker 3>as her eyes keep noticing it's O'Hara's character who keeps

1:09:18.285 --> 1:09:20.965
<v Speaker 3>filling the wineglass, you know, basically up to the top

1:09:21.365 --> 1:09:23.885
<v Speaker 3>in the middle of the day, you know, and she's

1:09:24.005 --> 1:09:26.365
<v Speaker 3>she's a little bit of cerbic there in that scene.

1:09:26.445 --> 1:09:28.764
<v Speaker 3>Let's just say she's not too happy about the choices

1:09:29.165 --> 1:09:32.764
<v Speaker 3>that she has made. And in addition to Shit's Creek.

1:09:32.805 --> 1:09:35.725
<v Speaker 3>From a TV standpoint, you know, she did win for

1:09:36.125 --> 1:09:39.885
<v Speaker 3>the Studio as Patty Lee. And I haven't seen all

1:09:39.925 --> 1:09:42.085
<v Speaker 3>of The Studio. I haven't finished that season, but I

1:09:42.125 --> 1:09:46.644
<v Speaker 3>have seen enough episodes to really enjoy her performance as

1:09:46.685 --> 1:09:49.685
<v Speaker 3>Patty and that I did want to even though I

1:09:49.725 --> 1:09:51.845
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen it at all. But in a lot of

1:09:51.885 --> 1:09:59.365
<v Speaker 3>remembrances of O'Hara her performance as another another Gale, I

1:09:59.445 --> 1:10:03.604
<v Speaker 3>believe in the Last of Us, Josh is someone who

1:10:04.205 --> 1:10:06.405
<v Speaker 3>gets called out in a fair number of you know,

1:10:06.525 --> 1:10:12.285
<v Speaker 3>top ten O'Hara characters and in or on one website

1:10:12.605 --> 1:10:17.165
<v Speaker 3>a list that paid tribute to her Consequence of Sound,

1:10:17.645 --> 1:10:20.405
<v Speaker 3>they said this O'Hara got an Emmy nomination for her

1:10:20.445 --> 1:10:23.485
<v Speaker 3>portrayal the therapist who has no interest in healing herself

1:10:23.525 --> 1:10:25.844
<v Speaker 3>after the death of her husband, a death she blames

1:10:26.245 --> 1:10:29.125
<v Speaker 3>Joel Pedro Pascal for as lovely and Sonny as her

1:10:29.125 --> 1:10:31.205
<v Speaker 3>onscreen persona could be the role of Gail was a

1:10:31.205 --> 1:10:34.125
<v Speaker 3>powerful reminder of how much deep emotion she brought to

1:10:34.165 --> 1:10:36.485
<v Speaker 3>her work. Not to mention her talent, for here's the

1:10:36.485 --> 1:10:39.445
<v Speaker 3>word of Cerbic for her. For a cerbic turns of phrase.

1:10:39.725 --> 1:10:42.485
<v Speaker 3>Your heart broke for Gail and you also related to her,

1:10:42.725 --> 1:10:45.285
<v Speaker 3>no fucks to give any more attitude. The Last of

1:10:45.365 --> 1:10:48.685
<v Speaker 3>Us both some memorable performances, and O'Hara's tender Emmy nominated

1:10:48.685 --> 1:10:50.925
<v Speaker 3>turn as Gail is no exception. So if you're looking

1:10:50.965 --> 1:10:56.005
<v Speaker 3>for a it sounds like almost deadly serious performance from O'Hara.

1:10:56.085 --> 1:10:59.405
<v Speaker 3>The Last of Us maybe one to check out. And

1:10:59.445 --> 1:11:03.365
<v Speaker 3>once again, those are our top five Catherine O'Hara performances.

1:11:03.405 --> 1:11:05.445
<v Speaker 3>You can check out our lists and the scenes we

1:11:05.565 --> 1:11:09.205
<v Speaker 3>mention links to those on YouTube by going to film

1:11:09.245 --> 1:11:12.365
<v Speaker 3>spotting dot net slash list.

1:11:12.965 --> 1:11:16.165
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a moment to thank our film Spotting family

1:11:16.205 --> 1:11:19.125
<v Speaker 1>members for their support of the show. We want to

1:11:19.205 --> 1:11:25.285
<v Speaker 1>especially thank Maggie Gilmore for Wichita and Brad in Vancouver Island, Canada.

1:11:25.685 --> 1:11:29.165
<v Speaker 1>Brad included an exclamation point there at the end of Canada.

1:11:29.245 --> 1:11:32.525
<v Speaker 1>Sure we'll give Canada an exclamation point, Maggie wrote in

1:11:32.565 --> 1:11:34.445
<v Speaker 1>this I know I've been a listener for at least

1:11:34.485 --> 1:11:36.205
<v Speaker 1>eight years, but I can't, for the life of me,

1:11:36.325 --> 1:11:39.405
<v Speaker 1>remember how I found Film Spotting. I'm also a longtime

1:11:39.405 --> 1:11:42.764
<v Speaker 1>listener of Sillier movie podcasts, The Flophouse and Doug Love's Movies,

1:11:42.885 --> 1:11:46.205
<v Speaker 1>so I probably stumbled across Film Spotting on a recommendation

1:11:46.285 --> 1:11:49.245
<v Speaker 1>list and haven't looked back since. One early episode I

1:11:49.285 --> 1:11:53.085
<v Speaker 1>remember really enjoying was The Florida Project, because that film

1:11:53.205 --> 1:11:55.885
<v Speaker 1>shot up to one of my all time favorites after

1:11:55.925 --> 1:11:59.365
<v Speaker 1>watching it based on your review. Love hearing that. Maggie

1:11:59.405 --> 1:12:03.885
<v Speaker 1>Brad also shared a bit here circus twenty seventeen, What

1:12:04.005 --> 1:12:06.525
<v Speaker 1>an awesome year for film I stumbled upon the pod

1:12:06.645 --> 1:12:11.365
<v Speaker 1>after seeking out recommendations on Reddit. The Phantom Thread review

1:12:11.485 --> 1:12:14.485
<v Speaker 1>stands out in retrospect. I was working at an independent

1:12:14.565 --> 1:12:17.165
<v Speaker 1>two screen cinema at the time it was showing, and

1:12:17.205 --> 1:12:20.165
<v Speaker 1>your insights and perspectives helped it climb the ranks of

1:12:20.205 --> 1:12:23.445
<v Speaker 1>my personal all time favorites. Wonderful.

1:12:23.845 --> 1:12:27.205
<v Speaker 3>Maggie says her favorite show segment is Film Spotting Madness.

1:12:27.245 --> 1:12:29.085
<v Speaker 3>It's a favorite every year because there's nothing I love

1:12:29.125 --> 1:12:31.525
<v Speaker 3>more than an excuse to make a list and check

1:12:31.645 --> 1:12:34.724
<v Speaker 3>things off of it. Oh, Maggie, we should get together

1:12:34.765 --> 1:12:38.165
<v Speaker 3>and go bowling sometime. Brad says, I treasure the year

1:12:38.245 --> 1:12:40.644
<v Speaker 3>end top ten lists such a wide variety of films,

1:12:40.925 --> 1:12:43.485
<v Speaker 3>and it's always a joy to discover new favorites.

1:12:44.765 --> 1:12:46.965
<v Speaker 1>We asked them both if they had a random favorite

1:12:46.965 --> 1:12:52.245
<v Speaker 1>film or filmmaker. Maggie suggested strictly. Ballroom said, I think

1:12:52.325 --> 1:12:56.525
<v Speaker 1>it's an underrated boz lerman Jem. For Brad, he's going

1:12:56.805 --> 1:13:01.525
<v Speaker 1>with a Charlie Kaufman. He's going with Charlie Kaufman, saying

1:13:01.645 --> 1:13:05.845
<v Speaker 1>I love my existential dread and yeah, maybe there's a

1:13:05.845 --> 1:13:11.485
<v Speaker 1>good time to note Adam that, speaking of actors passing,

1:13:11.605 --> 1:13:15.245
<v Speaker 1>veteran character actor Tom Noonan news that he died and

1:13:15.445 --> 1:13:18.805
<v Speaker 1>Tom Noonan appeared in two Kaufman films, Senecticky New York

1:13:18.965 --> 1:13:22.925
<v Speaker 1>and A Noma Lisa, the voice of I think all

1:13:22.965 --> 1:13:26.285
<v Speaker 1>the characters in a Nomaly. That sounds right. It's been

1:13:26.325 --> 1:13:33.165
<v Speaker 1>a long time, pretty remarkable concept that Noonan made work brilliantly.

1:13:33.885 --> 1:13:38.645
<v Speaker 3>He is Francis Dollide aka the Tooth Fairy and Manhunter,

1:13:38.725 --> 1:13:41.564
<v Speaker 3>and he's Kelso, the wheelchair bound Hacker and heat he

1:13:41.685 --> 1:13:44.485
<v Speaker 3>was in ty West House of the Devil and Last

1:13:44.525 --> 1:13:48.045
<v Speaker 3>Action Hero RoboCop two. He's in Jarmish's Mystery Train Man

1:13:48.085 --> 1:13:52.045
<v Speaker 3>Heaven's Gate in that infamous movie. And Todd Haynes Wonderstruck

1:13:52.085 --> 1:13:56.405
<v Speaker 3>as well, a very very memorable character actor and sad

1:13:56.485 --> 1:13:59.645
<v Speaker 3>too to hear that news. Sam shared this with me,

1:13:59.725 --> 1:14:02.165
<v Speaker 3>and for some reason I came across it recently. I

1:14:02.165 --> 1:14:04.525
<v Speaker 3>think I think I actually played it, maybe Josh in

1:14:04.565 --> 1:14:07.764
<v Speaker 3>a class for for some reason where I was talking

1:14:07.805 --> 1:14:10.725
<v Speaker 3>about Senectic Key, New York. I played the scene if

1:14:10.765 --> 1:14:13.005
<v Speaker 3>you can find it on YouTube, the scene that's the

1:14:13.045 --> 1:14:18.005
<v Speaker 3>audition scene where he is playing he's auditioning to play

1:14:18.005 --> 1:14:21.925
<v Speaker 3>the role of the Philip Seymour Hoffman character and how

1:14:21.925 --> 1:14:23.165
<v Speaker 3>he's going to embody him.

1:14:23.205 --> 1:14:25.845
<v Speaker 1>And it is it is something. It's it's really good.

1:14:26.125 --> 1:14:28.564
<v Speaker 3>A movie you credit with becoming a cinophile. Maggie says,

1:14:28.645 --> 1:14:31.884
<v Speaker 3>I distinctly remember coming back from winter Break in January

1:14:31.965 --> 1:14:35.045
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and two, after having my mind blown by

1:14:35.085 --> 1:14:38.245
<v Speaker 3>the Fellowship of the Rings and being deeply disappointed that

1:14:38.245 --> 1:14:41.085
<v Speaker 3>none of my fellow sixth graders had any idea what

1:14:41.165 --> 1:14:45.845
<v Speaker 3>I was talking about. Yeah, kids, Brad says, Okay, I

1:14:45.885 --> 1:14:51.405
<v Speaker 3>love this fifty to fifty. I'm so serious. Everybody listening

1:14:51.525 --> 1:14:54.805
<v Speaker 3>right now is typing into their computer or phone. What's

1:14:54.925 --> 1:14:58.804
<v Speaker 3>fifty to fifty? Yes, the Joseph Gordon Levitt Seth Rogan movie.

1:14:59.205 --> 1:15:03.485
<v Speaker 3>And Sam Sam notes here that last week a family

1:15:03.485 --> 1:15:05.725
<v Speaker 3>member had the Gordon Levit starting. Yes, that's true, five

1:15:05.765 --> 1:15:08.085
<v Speaker 3>hundred days a summer in this slot. I do remember that, Sam,

1:15:08.445 --> 1:15:09.724
<v Speaker 3>And here we have fifty to fifty.

1:15:09.925 --> 1:15:10.205
<v Speaker 1>Now.

1:15:10.285 --> 1:15:13.365
<v Speaker 3>I do remember talking about fifty to fifty. I think

1:15:13.405 --> 1:15:16.885
<v Speaker 3>I may have even given it a recommendation, maybe a

1:15:16.925 --> 1:15:18.605
<v Speaker 3>mild one, but a recommendation.

1:15:18.885 --> 1:15:19.604
<v Speaker 1>Fifty to fifty.

1:15:19.605 --> 1:15:22.285
<v Speaker 3>Those one of those films Josh to compile a list

1:15:22.285 --> 1:15:26.885
<v Speaker 3>someday of the like the movies that time forgot on

1:15:26.965 --> 1:15:29.445
<v Speaker 3>film spotting, You know, movies that you just sort of go,

1:15:30.285 --> 1:15:32.605
<v Speaker 3>really that was that was a film. You know, you

1:15:32.845 --> 1:15:35.685
<v Speaker 3>almost don't remember that it ever came out, that you

1:15:35.805 --> 1:15:38.925
<v Speaker 3>talked about it, that you reviewed it. But when someone

1:15:39.205 --> 1:15:42.085
<v Speaker 3>says it, you go, oh, yeah, I think that was

1:15:42.125 --> 1:15:44.724
<v Speaker 3>a thing. Well apparently it was a thing. Brad remembers

1:15:44.765 --> 1:15:45.765
<v Speaker 3>it is.

1:15:46.005 --> 1:15:48.965
<v Speaker 1>This is why I have my Larson Film website. It

1:15:49.005 --> 1:15:51.325
<v Speaker 1>may be public facing, Adam, but it's really for me

1:15:51.565 --> 1:15:55.525
<v Speaker 1>so I can answer such questions. And this I did.

1:15:55.565 --> 1:15:57.685
<v Speaker 1>Remember this was a cancer drama. I knew that when

1:15:57.685 --> 1:16:01.765
<v Speaker 1>I heard the title. Okay, and apparently big fan three

1:16:01.805 --> 1:16:03.405
<v Speaker 1>and a half out of four stars, three and a half,

1:16:03.445 --> 1:16:07.525
<v Speaker 1>I said it was deeply affecting and admirably even keeled.

1:16:07.685 --> 1:16:10.764
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Fifty to fifty Okay.

1:16:11.005 --> 1:16:13.485
<v Speaker 3>Thank you Maggie and Brad for being family members and

1:16:13.525 --> 1:16:15.605
<v Speaker 3>for all of those years of listening. If you'd like

1:16:15.645 --> 1:16:18.285
<v Speaker 3>to follow them on letterbox, you can follow Maggie. She

1:16:18.445 --> 1:16:22.885
<v Speaker 3>is Maggie Gilmore and Brad is be Rad. I think

1:16:22.925 --> 1:16:25.005
<v Speaker 3>you get the gist with both of their names there.

1:16:25.245 --> 1:16:27.604
<v Speaker 3>In addition to keeping us doing what we're doing, membership

1:16:27.645 --> 1:16:29.525
<v Speaker 3>does come with perks. You get to listen early in

1:16:29.565 --> 1:16:31.925
<v Speaker 3>ad free, you get our weekly newsletter, you get to

1:16:31.965 --> 1:16:34.325
<v Speaker 3>be part of the film Spotting Family discord, and you

1:16:34.365 --> 1:16:38.445
<v Speaker 3>get monthly bonus shows. Just earlier this week, you got

1:16:38.485 --> 1:16:43.405
<v Speaker 3>our conversation with producer Sam about a Kira Kurasawa's Drunken Angel,

1:16:43.765 --> 1:16:46.005
<v Speaker 3>a blind spot for all three of us, we're all

1:16:46.005 --> 1:16:50.085
<v Speaker 3>pretty happy that we did finally see that movie. Not

1:16:50.205 --> 1:16:57.045
<v Speaker 3>surprisingly pretty good film with Toshiro Maffune. Yeah, we went

1:16:57.045 --> 1:17:00.005
<v Speaker 3>for it spoilers. More information about joining the Film Spotting

1:17:00.045 --> 1:17:04.005
<v Speaker 3>Family is available at film Spottingfamily dot com, and you

1:17:04.005 --> 1:17:07.165
<v Speaker 3>can also help out the show by rating or reviewing

1:17:07.245 --> 1:17:10.765
<v Speaker 3>us at Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Go ahead, just take

1:17:10.805 --> 1:17:12.445
<v Speaker 3>a second, just click five stars.

1:17:12.485 --> 1:17:17.525
<v Speaker 1>Why not? We thought you up.

1:17:21.125 --> 1:17:31.325
<v Speaker 3>All the pigo. Next week here on the show Josh,

1:17:31.325 --> 1:17:35.765
<v Speaker 3>we will continue our Film Spotting Pantheon project homework with

1:17:35.845 --> 1:17:41.005
<v Speaker 3>the Kira Kurosawa's Raschoman. The director is nineteen fifty masterpiece.

1:17:41.045 --> 1:17:43.525
<v Speaker 3>This is one we have both seen, though it has

1:17:43.605 --> 1:17:47.045
<v Speaker 3>probably been a while. It is the second of three

1:17:47.085 --> 1:17:50.285
<v Speaker 3>films that we are taking another look at before they

1:17:50.365 --> 1:17:55.405
<v Speaker 3>become officially eligible for the Pantheon. I believe it was

1:17:56.125 --> 1:18:01.165
<v Speaker 3>producer Sam who nominated this as as a marathon movie,

1:18:01.525 --> 1:18:06.445
<v Speaker 3>a former marathon titled It Bounds. He wants to be eligible,

1:18:06.485 --> 1:18:10.165
<v Speaker 3>He wants it to be considered for the Pantheon. Nine

1:18:10.245 --> 1:18:13.005
<v Speaker 3>total nominees is how we do it now. Six have

1:18:13.085 --> 1:18:15.645
<v Speaker 3>been reviewed on the show, discussed in depth by the

1:18:15.685 --> 1:18:18.045
<v Speaker 3>two of us, But then we have three that haven't.

1:18:18.285 --> 1:18:20.365
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they've been talked about on the show before and

1:18:20.405 --> 1:18:23.525
<v Speaker 3>it's twenty years history but not really been dug into

1:18:23.565 --> 1:18:26.205
<v Speaker 3>by the two of us and Rashomon's one of those

1:18:26.205 --> 1:18:29.285
<v Speaker 3>two films, and one of those other films was John

1:18:29.325 --> 1:18:31.925
<v Speaker 3>Ford's How Green Was My Valley, But we took care

1:18:31.965 --> 1:18:36.205
<v Speaker 3>of that on our last show, Josh, and I'm looking

1:18:36.205 --> 1:18:38.805
<v Speaker 3>at that film spotting family Discord. I don't know, it's

1:18:38.845 --> 1:18:40.685
<v Speaker 3>only a couple posts, but we seem to be kind

1:18:40.685 --> 1:18:43.245
<v Speaker 3>of in the minority in terms of how much we

1:18:43.685 --> 1:18:44.804
<v Speaker 3>enjoyed that film.

1:18:45.125 --> 1:18:46.965
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we just need a few more

1:18:46.965 --> 1:18:50.485
<v Speaker 1>people to watch How Green Was My Valley. I know

1:18:50.645 --> 1:18:53.604
<v Speaker 1>those who didn't quite go for it have seen it,

1:18:54.045 --> 1:18:57.925
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I was so heartened by your really enthusiastic

1:18:58.045 --> 1:18:59.805
<v Speaker 1>response to it that I think there have to be

1:18:59.845 --> 1:19:02.405
<v Speaker 1>others who would enjoy it quite as much. And it matters,

1:19:02.485 --> 1:19:07.365
<v Speaker 1>right we put these Pantheon eligible films to a vote

1:19:07.405 --> 1:19:10.645
<v Speaker 1>to decide which two. At the end of this process,

1:19:10.845 --> 1:19:13.525
<v Speaker 1>in I don't know, maybe a month or so, we'll

1:19:13.525 --> 1:19:15.685
<v Speaker 1>put it to a vote and see which two of

1:19:15.845 --> 1:19:19.885
<v Speaker 1>these nine nominees actually get in. So, yeah, watch the

1:19:19.925 --> 1:19:23.165
<v Speaker 1>movies that were actual discussing on the show. Heck, watch

1:19:23.165 --> 1:19:25.405
<v Speaker 1>all nine if you want, if you have time and

1:19:25.485 --> 1:19:28.005
<v Speaker 1>be an informed voter, and yeah, let us know what

1:19:28.045 --> 1:19:29.765
<v Speaker 1>you think about how green was my value? If you've

1:19:29.765 --> 1:19:31.245
<v Speaker 1>never seen it before, let us know what you think

1:19:31.245 --> 1:19:34.325
<v Speaker 1>about Raschaman if you watch it a second or third

1:19:34.365 --> 1:19:37.765
<v Speaker 1>time in preparation for our discussion next week, you can

1:19:37.805 --> 1:19:38.085
<v Speaker 1>do that.

1:19:38.725 --> 1:19:42.685
<v Speaker 3>Watch Raschoman on the Criterion Channel, also HBO Max and

1:19:42.965 --> 1:19:48.804
<v Speaker 3>available on other platforms. Vod Our plan next week tying

1:19:48.845 --> 1:19:53.285
<v Speaker 3>in with Raschoman is to share our top five unreliable narrators.

1:19:53.325 --> 1:19:55.764
<v Speaker 3>Turns out, in the twenty plus year history of the show,

1:19:56.365 --> 1:20:00.045
<v Speaker 3>we have done our top five movies with narrators. That

1:20:00.205 --> 1:20:02.885
<v Speaker 3>was done in like the first year or two of

1:20:02.925 --> 1:20:06.445
<v Speaker 3>film spotting, but we have never devoted a top five

1:20:06.525 --> 1:20:08.565
<v Speaker 3>to unreliable narrators.

1:20:08.605 --> 1:20:10.604
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be good. Who would have thought there

1:20:10.645 --> 1:20:13.604
<v Speaker 1>was still an obvious top five that we could tackle

1:20:14.125 --> 1:20:17.645
<v Speaker 1>for a show. And can we have a quick on

1:20:17.725 --> 1:20:23.365
<v Speaker 1>air production meeting? Yes? Clarification, okay, top five unreliable narrators?

1:20:23.445 --> 1:20:28.245
<v Speaker 1>Are we choosing the actual narrators or are we choosing

1:20:28.245 --> 1:20:32.845
<v Speaker 1>the films? So, because that really good question makes a

1:20:32.885 --> 1:20:35.565
<v Speaker 1>distinction for which way I go, I don't have a

1:20:35.605 --> 1:20:39.685
<v Speaker 1>preference necessarily. I have not started.

1:20:39.285 --> 1:20:44.085
<v Speaker 3>Forming my list, so I have not faced this conundrum myself.

1:20:44.605 --> 1:20:47.885
<v Speaker 3>But my initial response Josh is this is one of

1:20:47.925 --> 1:20:52.764
<v Speaker 3>those cases where unreliable narrators is more fun and easy

1:20:52.765 --> 1:20:56.805
<v Speaker 3>to say than unreliable narrator movies. But yeah, I think

1:20:56.845 --> 1:21:00.885
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about the movies, not the narrators. Okay, that's

1:21:00.925 --> 1:21:03.165
<v Speaker 3>that's how I think. But I also know that, like

1:21:03.565 --> 1:21:06.684
<v Speaker 3>Sam's probably now listening to this, going, no, you're wrong, Adam,

1:21:07.405 --> 1:21:10.205
<v Speaker 3>of course, it's the characters that are more interesting, and

1:21:10.485 --> 1:21:12.925
<v Speaker 3>we'll change our mind by the time we actually record

1:21:12.925 --> 1:21:14.205
<v Speaker 3>the next shows.

1:21:14.565 --> 1:21:19.365
<v Speaker 1>What do you think it's very possible? I think my

1:21:19.485 --> 1:21:21.684
<v Speaker 1>instinct was to think of it the same way you did,

1:21:21.805 --> 1:21:24.005
<v Speaker 1>because yes, we have many top fives where you just

1:21:24.045 --> 1:21:28.045
<v Speaker 1>don't tag movies on the end. I also think I

1:21:28.165 --> 1:21:31.205
<v Speaker 1>like the freedom of that, because there's no reason you

1:21:31.285 --> 1:21:36.604
<v Speaker 1>can't choose a top five unreliable narrator movie and focus

1:21:36.645 --> 1:21:41.285
<v Speaker 1>on the actual narrator. Whereas, if we say it has

1:21:41.365 --> 1:21:44.165
<v Speaker 1>to be your the narrator we're choosing, that's kind of

1:21:44.205 --> 1:21:46.604
<v Speaker 1>like what you have to you know what I mean.

1:21:46.605 --> 1:21:49.604
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like a character versus movie. And I think

1:21:49.645 --> 1:21:51.805
<v Speaker 1>what might be more interesting for a list like this

1:21:51.925 --> 1:21:55.325
<v Speaker 1>is to talk about how the movies as a whole

1:21:55.405 --> 1:21:59.485
<v Speaker 1>are unreliable. Agree, and the narrator is obviously the most

1:21:59.485 --> 1:22:02.764
<v Speaker 1>crucial part of that. But you know, maybe the narrator

1:22:02.805 --> 1:22:06.245
<v Speaker 1>is unreliable in a different way that the movie is unreliable,

1:22:06.365 --> 1:22:08.685
<v Speaker 1>and so there's just more places to go.

1:22:08.845 --> 1:22:11.885
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I initially agree, and I think that's how we

1:22:11.925 --> 1:22:12.605
<v Speaker 3>should approach it.

1:22:12.725 --> 1:22:14.445
<v Speaker 1>Let's we will, we will.

1:22:14.565 --> 1:22:18.525
<v Speaker 3>Let's get our supposal to say, yeah, okay, we'll plan

1:22:18.605 --> 1:22:21.684
<v Speaker 3>on that. You can send your initial picks to feedback

1:22:21.685 --> 1:22:23.925
<v Speaker 3>at film spotting dot net, and you know, do it,

1:22:24.005 --> 1:22:26.685
<v Speaker 3>do it soon, because we will take any help that

1:22:26.725 --> 1:22:30.125
<v Speaker 3>we can get. In two weeks the weekend right before

1:22:30.205 --> 1:22:35.205
<v Speaker 3>the Oscars, we will drop our Oscar special with Michael Phillips.

1:22:35.205 --> 1:22:37.445
<v Speaker 3>Who will win, who should win, and who should have

1:22:37.445 --> 1:22:40.085
<v Speaker 3>been nominated? You get a say in all of this too.

1:22:40.165 --> 1:22:42.285
<v Speaker 3>You can go to film spotting dot net right now

1:22:42.365 --> 1:22:47.845
<v Speaker 3>and submit your official Film Spotting Ranked Choice Best Picture ballot.

1:22:48.205 --> 1:22:50.965
<v Speaker 3>It is right there, a link on the main page.

1:22:51.005 --> 1:22:55.085
<v Speaker 3>We will announce the winner with all due solemnity on

1:22:55.445 --> 1:22:58.005
<v Speaker 3>that Oscars special. Have you submitted yours?

1:22:58.125 --> 1:23:01.485
<v Speaker 1>Josh? I have not. No, Okay, I wait till the

1:23:01.525 --> 1:23:02.325
<v Speaker 1>last one I have neither.

1:23:02.725 --> 1:23:04.805
<v Speaker 3>You wait, you wait until the end Procrastinator.

1:23:04.845 --> 1:23:05.125
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1:23:05.645 --> 1:23:07.885
<v Speaker 3>To get a glimpse of what we have planned for

1:23:07.925 --> 1:23:10.325
<v Speaker 3>future episodes, you can go to film Spotting dot Net

1:23:10.365 --> 1:23:13.605
<v Speaker 3>and click on episodes right there at the top of

1:23:13.645 --> 1:23:14.005
<v Speaker 3>the page.

1:23:14.445 --> 1:23:17.564
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of nineties nostalgia going on at

1:23:17.885 --> 1:23:20.805
<v Speaker 1>at our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show, Looking at

1:23:20.805 --> 1:23:25.405
<v Speaker 1>Some was present via its past. It's their pop classics pairing,

1:23:25.805 --> 1:23:30.605
<v Speaker 1>so they first delved into Boz Luhrmann's Romeo plus Juliet

1:23:30.765 --> 1:23:35.445
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six. Man, I think I kind of want

1:23:35.445 --> 1:23:39.805
<v Speaker 1>to watch that again now after hearing their discussion. Of course,

1:23:39.805 --> 1:23:44.485
<v Speaker 1>they're pairing this with Wathering Heights, which we reviewed recently

1:23:44.565 --> 1:23:47.525
<v Speaker 1>on the show. It's kind of an inspired pairing, especially

1:23:47.645 --> 1:23:50.965
<v Speaker 1>if you've seen Weathering Heights. So yeah, I've enjoyed that

1:23:51.005 --> 1:23:54.405
<v Speaker 1>first episode. The Wathering Heights one is out now, so

1:23:54.445 --> 1:23:56.165
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to these back to back if you

1:23:56.285 --> 1:23:58.644
<v Speaker 1>so choose. New episodes of The Next Picture Show drop

1:23:58.725 --> 1:24:01.604
<v Speaker 1>every Tuesday and you can find them wherever you get

1:24:01.645 --> 1:24:05.325
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Okay, time now for Massacre Theater, where Adam

1:24:05.365 --> 1:24:07.564
<v Speaker 1>and I perform a scene and you get a chance

1:24:07.605 --> 1:24:11.325
<v Speaker 1>to win a Film Spotting prize. Last time we mascreed

1:24:11.445 --> 1:24:12.005
<v Speaker 1>this scene.

1:24:12.325 --> 1:24:13.205
<v Speaker 2>I can't do this.

1:24:13.685 --> 1:24:18.645
<v Speaker 1>Sure you come there. That's my queen right here we go.

1:24:20.245 --> 1:24:22.325
<v Speaker 2>I'm not wanting to get I want to stay single

1:24:22.365 --> 1:24:23.845
<v Speaker 2>and let my hair from the wind.

1:24:23.845 --> 1:24:27.485
<v Speaker 1>Does I ride through the glen firing odors into the sunset.

1:24:28.005 --> 1:24:31.325
<v Speaker 1>That was Billy Connelly and Ama Thompson in twenty twelve's Brave,

1:24:31.405 --> 1:24:36.085
<v Speaker 1>written by Mark andrews Irene Metchi, Steve Purcell and Brenda Chapman,

1:24:36.245 --> 1:24:39.724
<v Speaker 1>directed by Chapman and andrews Our Massacre of that scene

1:24:39.805 --> 1:24:43.685
<v Speaker 1>was part of our train spotting at thirty show. We

1:24:43.765 --> 1:24:47.525
<v Speaker 1>also shared our Pantheon nominees on that episode, and there's

1:24:47.525 --> 1:24:49.965
<v Speaker 1>always a tie in. So why that scene from Brave.

1:24:50.405 --> 1:24:55.365
<v Speaker 3>Here's Daniel Fuguccio in Blue Mountains that's west of Sydney, Australia.

1:24:55.445 --> 1:24:58.885
<v Speaker 3>Sounds lovely, he says, been a listener and supporter at

1:24:58.885 --> 1:25:01.885
<v Speaker 3>one stage. I was labeled beyond platinum. Thank you Daniel

1:25:02.125 --> 1:25:03.925
<v Speaker 3>for twenty odd years, and I think this may be

1:25:04.045 --> 1:25:06.485
<v Speaker 3>the first time I've entered Massacre theater. I think it

1:25:06.565 --> 1:25:09.525
<v Speaker 3>is Eleanor, Emma Thompson and Ferguson. Billy Connolly, You're right

1:25:09.645 --> 1:25:13.045
<v Speaker 3>in Disney. Pixar's Brave. They are discussing their daughter Meredith

1:25:13.205 --> 1:25:17.205
<v Speaker 3>Kelly McDonald and there's your Train Spotting link, fierce independent streak.

1:25:17.445 --> 1:25:19.405
<v Speaker 3>The funny thing is I watched this just two days

1:25:19.445 --> 1:25:21.325
<v Speaker 3>ago as I decided I wanted to go back to

1:25:21.365 --> 1:25:24.725
<v Speaker 3>my favorite Pixar films, and this is one of my favorite.

1:25:24.925 --> 1:25:28.525
<v Speaker 1>All Right, nice taste, Daniel. Here's Josh Glover from West Fargo,

1:25:28.645 --> 1:25:32.604
<v Speaker 1>North Dakota. Tie ins include Kevin McKidd, who is in

1:25:32.685 --> 1:25:36.165
<v Speaker 1>both films as Tommy and Train Spotting and the voice

1:25:36.165 --> 1:25:38.645
<v Speaker 1>of Lord mcguffin and Brave. I didn't Yeah, we knew that.

1:25:38.685 --> 1:25:43.045
<v Speaker 1>Gosh huh voiced? Did you know this one, Adam? I'm

1:25:43.045 --> 1:25:46.165
<v Speaker 1>sure you did. McKidd also voiced the character of Fenn

1:25:46.285 --> 1:25:50.525
<v Speaker 1>Rau in the Star Wars Rebels series, which features the

1:25:50.565 --> 1:25:55.445
<v Speaker 1>final final battle between Darth Maul and one Obi Wan Kenobi, who,

1:25:55.965 --> 1:25:58.125
<v Speaker 1>while not voiced by him there, was played in the

1:25:58.165 --> 1:26:01.405
<v Speaker 1>live action pre boots of the Star Wars the Clone

1:26:01.405 --> 1:26:04.405
<v Speaker 1>Wars series by Ewan McGregor, who is also in Train Spotty.

1:26:04.605 --> 1:26:07.564
<v Speaker 1>Also maybe because I'm a big train I'm a big

1:26:07.605 --> 1:26:08.205
<v Speaker 1>Rebels guy.

1:26:08.325 --> 1:26:10.045
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's my favorite of all the series.

1:26:10.165 --> 1:26:13.885
<v Speaker 1>I was good go by, but sorry to not allow

1:26:13.925 --> 1:26:18.245
<v Speaker 1>you space to say that. Also, Josh continues, maybe because

1:26:18.285 --> 1:26:21.365
<v Speaker 1>both Train Spotting and Brave are set in Scottland, and

1:26:21.445 --> 1:26:24.804
<v Speaker 1>Kelly McDonald is in both as Diane and the voice

1:26:24.845 --> 1:26:28.165
<v Speaker 1>of Mereda, the name of which was changed to Carla

1:26:28.245 --> 1:26:31.445
<v Speaker 1>Jean in the homage to her for No Country for

1:26:31.605 --> 1:26:34.405
<v Speaker 1>Old Men character, That is correct.

1:26:34.405 --> 1:26:38.205
<v Speaker 3>Here's Dan Wright in Saint Louis. He says, Josh, great

1:26:38.245 --> 1:26:41.325
<v Speaker 3>accent work this week. It ends with the question mark

1:26:41.445 --> 1:26:42.125
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why.

1:26:42.445 --> 1:26:44.604
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think that's supposed to be an

1:26:44.605 --> 1:26:47.405
<v Speaker 1>exclamation point like in Canada. Yeah, it's a typo.

1:26:47.965 --> 1:26:50.564
<v Speaker 3>This week's Masacar Theater is Pixar's Brave, a movie I

1:26:50.565 --> 1:26:51.965
<v Speaker 3>loved when I saw in the theater and have not

1:26:52.045 --> 1:26:54.405
<v Speaker 3>put much thought into it. Sense it might be time

1:26:54.445 --> 1:26:56.765
<v Speaker 3>for a revisit. Well, there you go, Like Daniel, why

1:26:56.765 --> 1:26:57.644
<v Speaker 3>not one.

1:26:57.445 --> 1:27:01.005
<v Speaker 1>More common here from Dylan dom and Blair Nebraska. It's

1:27:01.125 --> 1:27:06.005
<v Speaker 1>Josh's beloved and boring. Sorry, Josh, brave ouch. I'd love

1:27:06.005 --> 1:27:09.604
<v Speaker 1>to hear Joshua Adam take on Kelly McDonald's No Country

1:27:09.645 --> 1:27:11.804
<v Speaker 1>for Old Men accent next.

1:27:12.125 --> 1:27:17.405
<v Speaker 3>That might be more painful than Scottish West Texas.

1:27:16.605 --> 1:27:19.925
<v Speaker 1>Someday, Dylan, you might, you might get your dream.

1:27:20.085 --> 1:27:23.765
<v Speaker 3>All right, the hat pretty brimming, Josh, This one, I

1:27:23.765 --> 1:27:27.205
<v Speaker 3>guess was fairly easy. Go ahead, reach into it and

1:27:27.285 --> 1:27:28.724
<v Speaker 3>pick out this week's winner.

1:27:29.045 --> 1:27:31.845
<v Speaker 1>Our winner is Abby from Denton, Texas.

1:27:32.605 --> 1:27:35.325
<v Speaker 3>I love that Abby won, Josh, because, if I'm remembering

1:27:35.405 --> 1:27:39.285
<v Speaker 3>her email correctly, she's actually this this may anger some people.

1:27:39.445 --> 1:27:42.165
<v Speaker 3>She's actually not really a Film Spotting listener. It's her

1:27:42.245 --> 1:27:45.005
<v Speaker 3>husband who listens to the show. She just likes to

1:27:45.045 --> 1:27:46.245
<v Speaker 3>listen to Massacre Theater.

1:27:46.725 --> 1:27:47.845
<v Speaker 1>She's a listener to the show.

1:27:47.925 --> 1:27:51.125
<v Speaker 3>Then I guess that counts right, and she she won

1:27:51.205 --> 1:27:53.884
<v Speaker 3>her husband a prize in this case, come on.

1:27:54.205 --> 1:27:56.804
<v Speaker 1>It works. You're legit. You're legit.

1:27:57.445 --> 1:28:01.085
<v Speaker 3>Congrats Abby and Abby's husband. You can email Feedback at

1:28:01.125 --> 1:28:04.205
<v Speaker 3>film spotting dot net to claim your prize, film Spotting

1:28:04.245 --> 1:28:07.925
<v Speaker 3>tote bag, film Spotting t shirt, or a trial membership

1:28:08.125 --> 1:28:09.645
<v Speaker 3>to the Film Spotting Family.

1:28:11.005 --> 1:28:12.565
<v Speaker 1>With the symbol.

1:28:14.685 --> 1:28:20.605
<v Speaker 2>Would the wou would The was Why do you say that?

1:28:20.645 --> 1:28:20.925
<v Speaker 1>Why do you?

1:28:22.045 --> 1:28:22.245
<v Speaker 3>Well?

1:28:22.365 --> 1:28:23.644
<v Speaker 1>You said say it like I said.

1:28:25.245 --> 1:28:28.724
<v Speaker 3>We move on to this week's edition of Massacre Theater,

1:28:28.965 --> 1:28:31.885
<v Speaker 3>and I guess I have to well, I have to

1:28:31.925 --> 1:28:34.765
<v Speaker 3>hate Sam because he's gonna make me sing, which is

1:28:34.805 --> 1:28:39.085
<v Speaker 3>something I can't do at all. Everyone's going to hear

1:28:39.125 --> 1:28:42.604
<v Speaker 3>that in a moment, Josh. But this is the first

1:28:42.645 --> 1:28:46.045
<v Speaker 3>opportunity I get to to break out my brand new guitar.

1:28:46.125 --> 1:28:51.645
<v Speaker 1>I just bought this. Whoa wow. Yeah, you know what,

1:28:51.725 --> 1:28:54.684
<v Speaker 1>first performance you get to write it off as an expense.

1:28:55.125 --> 1:28:59.325
<v Speaker 3>There you go, exactly, that's right. It is an electric guitar.

1:28:59.405 --> 1:29:01.005
<v Speaker 3>I don't have it plugged in. I'm not going to

1:29:01.045 --> 1:29:03.445
<v Speaker 3>play the acoustic because I want to play this. So

1:29:03.685 --> 1:29:08.285
<v Speaker 3>it is a musical number here anything else.

1:29:09.565 --> 1:29:13.125
<v Speaker 1>Not. Only am I distressed because I was literally kicked

1:29:13.165 --> 1:29:18.884
<v Speaker 1>out of middle school choir for I'm gonna say sixty

1:29:18.925 --> 1:29:23.125
<v Speaker 1>performance reasons and forty percent behavioral reasons. So really it's

1:29:23.125 --> 1:29:26.165
<v Speaker 1>because I couldn't sing. So I have that hanging over

1:29:26.205 --> 1:29:30.764
<v Speaker 1>my head. Also, the rehearsal process for MASCAR theater is

1:29:31.045 --> 1:29:34.005
<v Speaker 1>usually Sam will suggests a scene, I'll watch it, Sure,

1:29:34.045 --> 1:29:36.564
<v Speaker 1>we'll do that, and then just before we record it,

1:29:36.605 --> 1:29:39.245
<v Speaker 1>we'll watch it again. Right, So I did watch this

1:29:39.365 --> 1:29:42.085
<v Speaker 1>scene maybe eight ten hours ago. I don't know what's

1:29:42.125 --> 1:29:44.805
<v Speaker 1>going on with my VPN. I can't access it here

1:29:44.805 --> 1:29:48.205
<v Speaker 1>in Scotland. The YouTube clip that Sam shared so I'm

1:29:48.205 --> 1:29:51.845
<v Speaker 1>pretty much going in half blind, half blind with no

1:29:51.965 --> 1:29:55.285
<v Speaker 1>sense of tune listeners enjoy.

1:29:56.325 --> 1:30:00.165
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy is not the right word for this. I actually

1:30:00.205 --> 1:30:02.005
<v Speaker 3>started off with the guitar. So you're going to give

1:30:02.045 --> 1:30:05.245
<v Speaker 3>me the action. I am as ready as I am

1:30:05.325 --> 1:30:08.045
<v Speaker 3>going to be Josh and.

1:30:09.445 --> 1:30:16.125
<v Speaker 1>Action. Whoa whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa whoa? What do you singing? There?

1:30:16.565 --> 1:30:22.325
<v Speaker 1>You got the root? And sing? You singing the root? No? Uh? Singing?

1:30:23.325 --> 1:30:25.405
<v Speaker 3>Everybody's gonna sing.

1:30:26.085 --> 1:30:28.725
<v Speaker 1>Didn't I give you a sixth? I don't think so?

1:30:29.205 --> 1:30:31.205
<v Speaker 1>Can you give me a sixth? There? Can you sing

1:30:31.245 --> 1:30:33.684
<v Speaker 1>a sixth? Everybody's gonna sing?

1:30:34.485 --> 1:30:38.804
<v Speaker 3>No, everybody's gonna sing sing.

1:30:38.885 --> 1:30:43.525
<v Speaker 1>Sure, let's try it again? One, two, three? Huh? Can

1:30:43.565 --> 1:30:47.365
<v Speaker 1>I say what? I'm sorry? Go ahead? No, you got

1:30:47.405 --> 1:30:48.365
<v Speaker 1>a problem on the bridge?

1:30:48.925 --> 1:30:52.245
<v Speaker 3>No, I was gonna Can I switch? Can I change

1:30:52.245 --> 1:30:53.045
<v Speaker 3>out of my costume?

1:30:53.405 --> 1:30:55.965
<v Speaker 1>Costume? Are you hot? Yeah?

1:30:56.005 --> 1:30:58.285
<v Speaker 3>But also, I mean I've been wearing it for a month.

1:30:58.725 --> 1:31:01.684
<v Speaker 1>You know the policy we all gotta wear. We all

1:31:01.725 --> 1:31:04.325
<v Speaker 1>gotta wear the uniform until we're ready to take it off.

1:31:04.805 --> 1:31:07.485
<v Speaker 1>I think you're real close. I just don't think you're

1:31:07.525 --> 1:31:10.765
<v Speaker 1>quite there yet. You did not sing that sixth? And

1:31:10.805 --> 1:31:13.605
<v Speaker 1>I want to see you sing that sixth and.

1:31:14.325 --> 1:31:19.564
<v Speaker 3>Scene as anyone out there, like listeners like Taylor Cole

1:31:20.285 --> 1:31:23.125
<v Speaker 3>in the Chicago area, anyone out there is a music teacher.

1:31:23.445 --> 1:31:26.365
<v Speaker 3>They all know that neither one of us came anywhere

1:31:26.405 --> 1:31:27.925
<v Speaker 3>close to singing a sixth.

1:31:28.285 --> 1:31:31.445
<v Speaker 1>I played the sixth. I don't even know what that means, So.

1:31:32.085 --> 1:31:33.925
<v Speaker 3>I know what it means, and I played it, but

1:31:34.045 --> 1:31:35.165
<v Speaker 3>neither of us sang it.

1:31:35.525 --> 1:31:38.205
<v Speaker 1>So that that.

1:31:38.445 --> 1:31:40.885
<v Speaker 3>Is it for this week's edition on Massacre Theater.

1:31:41.005 --> 1:31:43.645
<v Speaker 1>If you know what film we mercifully survived.

1:31:44.525 --> 1:31:47.005
<v Speaker 3>If you know what film we just massacred, email the

1:31:47.045 --> 1:31:50.165
<v Speaker 3>movie's title, your name, and location to feedback at filmspotting

1:31:50.245 --> 1:31:54.045
<v Speaker 3>dot net. The deadline is Monday, March ninth. We will

1:31:54.085 --> 1:31:56.965
<v Speaker 3>select the winner randomly from all the correct entries and

1:31:57.005 --> 1:31:59.085
<v Speaker 3>announce it in a couple of weeks. But honestly, Josh,

1:31:59.085 --> 1:32:01.165
<v Speaker 3>everyone got to hear that they're all the winners.

1:32:02.045 --> 1:32:05.405
<v Speaker 1>Sure, and that's the show. Yeah, we killed the show.

1:32:06.365 --> 1:32:09.125
<v Speaker 3>I love it when we end with these kind of numbers,

1:32:09.165 --> 1:32:11.405
<v Speaker 3>You know, the mascer Theater are just like, there's nowhere

1:32:11.445 --> 1:32:11.725
<v Speaker 3>to go.

1:32:11.965 --> 1:32:15.325
<v Speaker 1>Just mean it for some reason. If after that you

1:32:15.365 --> 1:32:17.885
<v Speaker 1>want to connect with the show on social media. I

1:32:17.925 --> 1:32:23.684
<v Speaker 1>guess you could find Adam and the show on Instagram, Facebook, letterbox, YouTube.

1:32:23.965 --> 1:32:27.485
<v Speaker 1>He's at film Spotting. I promise I won't sing at

1:32:27.525 --> 1:32:30.965
<v Speaker 1>you on my social channels. I'm at Larson on film.

1:32:31.565 --> 1:32:35.685
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is independently produced and listener supported. You can

1:32:35.725 --> 1:32:38.365
<v Speaker 1>support the show by joining the film Spotting Family at

1:32:38.365 --> 1:32:41.644
<v Speaker 1>filmspottingfamily dot com. That way you'll be able to listen

1:32:41.725 --> 1:32:44.924
<v Speaker 1>early and ad free. You'll also get a weekly newsletter,

1:32:45.085 --> 1:32:48.965
<v Speaker 1>monthly bonus episodes, and access to the entire show archive.

1:32:49.485 --> 1:32:51.925
<v Speaker 1>For show t shirts another merch go to film spotting

1:32:51.965 --> 1:32:53.644
<v Speaker 1>dot net slash shop.

1:32:54.005 --> 1:32:57.085
<v Speaker 3>In the archive that Film Spotting archive, we have some

1:32:57.285 --> 1:32:59.805
<v Speaker 3>Catherine O'Hara conversations, though you have to go way back.

1:33:00.325 --> 1:33:02.765
<v Speaker 3>Sam has noted where the wild Things are episode two

1:33:02.845 --> 1:33:05.405
<v Speaker 3>seventy eight, Away we go. Yes, she was in that

1:33:05.485 --> 1:33:09.365
<v Speaker 3>episode two sixty one, and Sam swears we reviewed for

1:33:09.485 --> 1:33:12.325
<v Speaker 3>your consideration in two thousand and six. He might be right,

1:33:13.045 --> 1:33:14.644
<v Speaker 3>but he says he can't find it in the Film

1:33:14.645 --> 1:33:18.445
<v Speaker 3>Spotting Guide to the archives and now listener Bill McLaughlin

1:33:18.525 --> 1:33:20.285
<v Speaker 3>is just going to be off in a wild goose chase.

1:33:20.325 --> 1:33:22.845
<v Speaker 3>He's going to think it's something wrong. I'm not sure

1:33:22.885 --> 1:33:25.965
<v Speaker 3>we reviewed it, so I don't know. We'll get some

1:33:26.005 --> 1:33:30.564
<v Speaker 3>detectives on the case. In limited release, Pillion is expanding.

1:33:30.645 --> 1:33:32.804
<v Speaker 3>I'm definitely hoping to catch up with that one. Jessica

1:33:32.925 --> 1:33:36.485
<v Speaker 3>Chastain is a socialite engaged in a dangerous affair with

1:33:36.565 --> 1:33:40.564
<v Speaker 3>the Mexican ballet dancer Okay in Michelle Franco's class critique Dreams.

1:33:40.885 --> 1:33:44.925
<v Speaker 3>Werner Hertzog has a new documentary, How Josh Ghost Elephants?

1:33:45.085 --> 1:33:45.685
<v Speaker 1>How about that?

1:33:46.165 --> 1:33:51.365
<v Speaker 3>I'm intrigued in wide release Scream seven. If I had said,

1:33:51.605 --> 1:33:53.725
<v Speaker 3>if you weren't looking at the page in front of you,

1:33:53.805 --> 1:33:56.405
<v Speaker 3>and I had said, Josh, there's a new Scream movie

1:33:56.445 --> 1:34:00.725
<v Speaker 3>coming out. What number do you think goes on appends

1:34:00.765 --> 1:34:03.005
<v Speaker 3>to the end of it, what would you have said?

1:34:03.045 --> 1:34:06.085
<v Speaker 1>Would you have known it was seven? I would have

1:34:06.125 --> 1:34:08.485
<v Speaker 1>guessed six or seven. I am, up to this point

1:34:08.525 --> 1:34:12.005
<v Speaker 1>Adam a Scream completist. So I'm gonna need I'm gonna

1:34:12.005 --> 1:34:15.125
<v Speaker 1>need to see this and probably will because the last

1:34:15.165 --> 1:34:18.005
<v Speaker 1>two I think there's two are the most you know,

1:34:18.085 --> 1:34:22.285
<v Speaker 1>not like the reimagined ones. They've been interesting. I wouldn't

1:34:22.285 --> 1:34:24.205
<v Speaker 1>say they've been anything like the first film, but they've

1:34:24.245 --> 1:34:27.765
<v Speaker 1>been interesting. So so yeah, I might have to catch

1:34:27.845 --> 1:34:30.085
<v Speaker 1>up with this and report back. Okay.

1:34:30.325 --> 1:34:34.685
<v Speaker 3>Also available vod you can see or streaming you can

1:34:34.725 --> 1:34:37.005
<v Speaker 3>see on Prime. Paul McCartney Man on the Run the

1:34:37.085 --> 1:34:39.285
<v Speaker 3>latest documentary from Morgan Neville, and if you haven't heard

1:34:39.285 --> 1:34:43.925
<v Speaker 3>it already, check out the Film Spotting feed and hear

1:34:44.005 --> 1:34:47.205
<v Speaker 3>my conversation with the director Morgan Neville. Next week on

1:34:47.245 --> 1:34:50.045
<v Speaker 3>the show, we will have a discussion for our Pantheon

1:34:50.165 --> 1:34:55.085
<v Speaker 3>project of Akira Kurasawa's renown Rascho Man, and we will

1:34:55.085 --> 1:34:58.125
<v Speaker 3>share our top five unreliable narrators.

1:34:58.445 --> 1:35:01.285
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Deso and Sam

1:35:01.405 --> 1:35:04.725
<v Speaker 1>Van Hagren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go.

1:35:05.005 --> 1:35:08.564
<v Speaker 1>Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar. Special thanks to everyone

1:35:08.645 --> 1:35:13.005
<v Speaker 1>at wb easy Chicago. More information is available at wbeazy

1:35:13.285 --> 1:35:16.485
<v Speaker 1>dot org for Film Spotting. I'm Josh Larson and.

1:35:16.445 --> 1:35:18.445
<v Speaker 3>I'm Medam Kempinar. Thanks for listening.

1:35:18.805 --> 1:35:29.205
<v Speaker 4>This conversation can serve no purpose us anymore. Good Bye.