WEBVTT - Ep66 "Why do brains love conspiracy theories?"

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Why are conspiracy theories a natural output of the brain?

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And what does this have to do with Roswell New

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Mexico or John F. Kennedy or the Great Fire of Rome.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>What do conspiracy theories have to do with brains and

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>puzzle solving and cognitive dissonance and in groups and outgroups

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and storytelling? If you hear an unlikely explanation for something,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>what are good and bad ways to assess it? Welcome

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and an author at Stanford and in these episodes we

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sail deeply into our three pound universe to understand why

0:00:48.960 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and how our lives look the way they do. Today's

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>episode is about conspiracy theories. Now, the point of today's

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>podcast is not to assess the truth value of any

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>particular theory, but instead, my interest is in why they

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>happen in the brain and why they are so sticky

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in society. Okay, So, for definition, the idea of a

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory is this, although all the available facts seem

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to indicate X, there is an alternative story that reveals

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a different truth. There are a million examples of this,

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but let's just take a couple of examples to get

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball rolling. So in nineteen forty seven, in Roswell,

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico, an object falls from the sky. The examiners

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>conclude that it is a weather balloon, but that confirmation

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>did nothing to stem the tide of a conspiracy theory

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that space aliens had crashed in Roswell. The alternative explanation

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>suggested it was a spaceship and no one wanted to

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>admit it. Now, this is an example of a conspiracy

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>theory because it requires that some people know the truth,

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>in this case, that there's evidence of an extraterrestrial civilization

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and in fact one that has vehicle troubles like we do.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But the conspiracy is to conceal that from the rest

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the population. Or take the nineteen sixty nine Moon landing,

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a moment of great pride for the scientists and engineers

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>who made it happen, but many thousands of people at

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that time and I think even some now, asserted that

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the landing was a fake filmed professionally in a movie studio.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Or take the assassination of the President of the United States,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>John F. Kennedy in nineteen sixty three. Although one man

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Oswald was captured for the crime. The conspiracy theory is

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that many powerful shadowy figures and perhaps even another shooter

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>was involved with all of these examples. Decades after the event,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>there are still assertions that there are alternative and better

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>explanations to the mainstream stories that the general public has

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>taken on. Now, most people that I talk with imagine

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that conspiracy theories are something new. They are not. As

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>best I can tell, there is no country in the

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>world and no time in history that was not rife

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>with conspiracy theories. And this, as we shall see, is

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because conspiracy theories don't require any particular technology or country

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>or politics. All they require are human brains. For example,

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in sixty four CE, there was a huge fire that

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>destroyed much of the city of Rome. Now, historical accounts

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>suggest that the Emperor Nero had no responsibility for the fire,

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and in fact he helped people in the fires aftermath.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But he had previously announced plans to build his new

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>palace the Domis area, and for that land needed to

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be cleared. So conspiracy theories bloss and Roman said, maybe

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Nero lit the fire or allowed it to happen, because

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he clearly has something to gain here. Conspiracy theories pervade history.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>There's so many examples, like who was really behind the

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>assassination of Julius Caesar twenty years earlier than that, or

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>who was actually responsible for the death of Alexander the Great,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which was three hundred and seventy years before that, or

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who actually wanted to make sure that Socrates was tried

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and executed before that. So conspiracy theories go back for

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>as long as we have written history, and that's the

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>signature that tells us we're not just looking at a

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>cultural phenomenon but a neural one. Now, it's often easy

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>to take the position of laughing at all conspiracy theories,

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in large part because they end up being different than

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>whatever we have in our internal models. But I'm going

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to assert that there are good and bad approaches to

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>analyzing any new explanatory idea, because, first of all, there

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>probably are some conspiracy theories that have some truth value.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>A tame example would be price fixing, where you have

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>a small handful of companies who control a market, so

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they all get together and decide that all of them

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>should keep their prices high. Or another example is that

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of planned obsolescence, where a company will make a product

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good, but it's not going to last you

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>eight years. Instead, it's going to break down in a

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>much shorter time so that you'll have to buy the

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>next model of it, and they'll get to enjoy you

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as a repeat customer. So our conspiracy theory is true,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not true sometimes all the time. I only mention this

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to remind us that the world is driven by incentives

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of individuals, and sometimes weird stuff can happen. And then,

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of course remember that sometimes there are unsolved mysteries, like

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy one, when a mild mannered man hijacked

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the Northwest Airlines between Portland and Seattle and exchanged the

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>passengers for two hundred thousand dollars and then kept the

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>crew and ordered them to fly to Mexico City. And

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>then on the flight he did something totally unexpected. He

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>leapt out of the back of the plane with a

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>parachute and the money. This remains one of the great

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>unsolved mysteries in FBI history. Are there conspiracy theories around

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the shore, but of course it's hard to separate whether

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>something was a conspiracy or whether the investigators were just

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>not talented enough or whether the perpetrator was just too talented. Anyway,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a big, complicated world, and we can't always rule

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>out conspiracy theories right away because something could be possible.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But what we are going to see today is how

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to think about this through a scientific lens to distinguish

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>which ones have some modicum of possibility and which ones

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>most likely do not. So to begin, I'm going to

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>argue that conspiracy theories are inevitable. There's no way to

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>say if we just get better education and better media,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>then we'll get rid of conspiracy theories, because in fact,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>they emerge as I'll argue from a brain locked in

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>silence and darkness trying to understand the outside world. The

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>way brains figure out the world is by making hypotheses.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>They make their best guesses about how everything in the

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>world fits together. Now, almost everything in the world is

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>beyond the reach of your short little limbs and even

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>your line of sight. So to understand what's happening with

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>groups of people, or politics or societies, we work to

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>put these little puzzle pieces together. Now, we essentially never

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have all the puzzle pieces, so we always just work

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>with what we can. This is how we function in

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, and brains work to balance their conclusions against

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>an assessment of how likely that hypothesis is. So let

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>me give you an example. Brains cough up hypotheses on everything,

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>usually entirely unconsciously, and then they evaluate those hypotheses, and

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>almost all of them are wrong. So an example is

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you say, I thought that I had put my keys

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on the counter right here, But where are they? So

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>your brain runs through simulations. Maybe they're in your pocket

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>from last night's pants. Maybe you accidentally carried them into

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the other room and left them over there. Maybe you

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>left them in the door. But if none of those

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses pan out, eventually your brain starts turning up the

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>temperature to cook up more and more exotic possibilities. Maybe

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>my wife took them accidentally thinking they were her keys.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the electrician who fixed our panel accidentally pocketed them.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>And eventually, because you've ruled out many of the other explanations,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you might come up with something in a more far

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>away range, like the electrician who was here was casing

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the joint and has plans to come back and rob me,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So he took the keys in order to make a copy.

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Now what interests me is not just that brains come

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>up with increasingly more esoteric hypotheses, that's what brains do,

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>but our evaluation of those hypotheses, because we're always trying

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to land on a story that makes sense. We're always

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for a through line that takes the complexity of

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the external world and turns it into something we can understand.

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So when do we say, yeah, I think that is

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the optimal explanation. Now, fundamentally, finding the best explanation is

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a matter of connecting different dots together in ways that

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>best match the world. Here's a visual description of this picture.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of dots, and the dots are data points. Okay,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Now imagine some lines in between connecting the dots, something

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like a subway map. And now this represents knowledge. And

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>when you can trace a path all the way from

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>one dot to another, we call that inside. And the

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>question is when does something go from insight to being

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of dots all connected to each other

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in a pattern that no one else sees. And that's

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what puts us into the realm of conspiracy theories, which

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>is what we'll talk about today. So why do people

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>find themselves there from a neural point of view. I

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>think there are several reasons. First, the brain is all

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about pattern recognition. Our brains are wired to detect patterns

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and make connections even when none exists. And this tendency

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to see patterns even in random data is what's known

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>as apophenia. And by the way, if you listen to

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>episode sixty three about the way that we sometimes see

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>faces and patterns even where there is not a face,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that's called paridolia. And note that this is a visual

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>type of apofenia. But apofenia relates not just to what

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we see, but to any sense like hearing, as well

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as to con We make patterns out of random data,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is really at the heart of conspiracy theories.

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Now there's another thing as well, which is that puzzle

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>solving activates our reward systems. That's why we do Sudoku

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>or wordle or brain teasers or whatever, because we love

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>finding solutions. Presumably this involves the reward systems in the brain,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like the neurotransmitter dopamine associated with the reward system. When

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you engage with a bunch of facts and suddenly see

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a pattern, we all know the sense of excitement that

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>triggers and the positive reinforcement there. Now, it's for these

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.719
<v Speaker 1>reasons that we solve puzzles, and of course when we're

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>kids in school, we get rewarded all the time for

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>solving problems by connecting the dots. And by the way,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I suspect this is why we love mystery novels. Something

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>seems so impossible and complex and confusing, and the satisfaction

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is delivered in the final pages when Sherlock Holmes or

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Hercule Poirot gives the explanation and now that you see it,

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you thrill in the transition from something seeming impenetrable moments

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ago now being rotated to a different angle so that

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you can connect all these dots with ease. It's the

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>same series of events, but now there's a clear path

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>connecting them. So when someone generates a good conspiracy theory

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to suddenly explain a mysterious event, there is this satisfying

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>feeling of having cracked the puzzle. Plus, I imagine that

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the appeals of conspiracy theories is the overwhelming

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sense of awe that you are the first person in

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the world who sees the truth, whereas everyone else is fooled.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You're the Sherlock. Now, I want to make clear that

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>even though people often say that conspiracy theories are not rational,

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's perfectly in line with what brains do to try

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to solve problems. It's not necessarily the case that anyone

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is trying to be disingenuous. It's that the world is

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>large and complex, and the best anyone can do is

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to fit together the lego pieces that we

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have to try to make a model of what is

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>going on out there. So the desire to crack mysteries

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to resolve questions, this is presumably one of the things

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of our success as a species. It's

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>what drives us to constantly cook up the next solution

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and find the shorter paths and solve things that would

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have otherwise been opaque. So why do we like having

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>answers so much? While psychologists point to a number of

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>drives that push us towards finding answers, the first is

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the desire to reduce cognitive dissonance. When we're faced with

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>facts that don't fit our model or information that conflicts,

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we experience a state of mental discomfort. I know that

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel this way when something doesn't make sense. It

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>almost hurts physically until I can solve it. So we're

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>always trying to resolve this discomfort, and sometimes conspiracy theories

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>can offer explanations that seem to provide a fit to

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one's own existing beliefs or biases. A closely related issue

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is that we always seek things that reduce cognitive load,

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is why we so often look for simple

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>explanations for very complex events. When we're faced with overwhelming

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>our ambiguous information, our brains often prefer a more straightforward narrative,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>even if it's incorrect, to reduce cognitive load. And I'll

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>come back to this in a little bit, but I

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>also want to mention one more thing. We typically have

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>what's called a confirmation bias, which means we seek out

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>information and we favor information that confirms our pre existing

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>beliefs and we disregard contradictory evidence. This shows up really

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>importantly in conspiracy theories when people selectively gather and interpret

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>information that supports their views. So these are reasons why

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we seek answers in gener But there are even more

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>specific drives that shape a good conspiracy theory, and that

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>has to do with in group and outgroup dynamics. So

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we grew up in small tribes for millions of years,

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and you knew the people in your tribe, but you

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't know those other people on the other side of

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the hill. So as a matter of our deep history,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we have developed suspicions about our outgroups. In other episodes,

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you've heard me talk a lot about the dynamics of

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in groups and outgroups. But the key here today is

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that many details of conspiracy theories are influenced by social identity. Specifically,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you are more likely to believe in theories that align

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with your group's view and portray your outgroups those outside

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>your social or political group negatively to your mind. Your

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>outgroups are predisposed to act poorly and without the kind

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of excellent conscience possessed by your in group, and that

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>fact gives a great deal of latitude for your theories.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>After all, if you were trying to explain some terrible

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>event that happens and you only had your in group,

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you would be limited in your explanation. But without groups,

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all the normal constraints of human behavior are unlocked, which

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>opens a broader set of possible narratives to use. Suddenly,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not talking about your friends and neighbors. Now you're

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about them, that other group that lacks morality and

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>ethics and always wants to trip up the good intentions

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of your group, And so the impossible now seems possible.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>This was all a ruse. It was a setup to

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>fool everyone, and only they would be sneaky enough and

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>cynical enough and devious enough to do something like this. Now,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the social benefits that people derive from outgroup

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>accusations is that it can strengthen in group cohesion and identity.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So your group, with all of its flaws, can nonetheless

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about itself. So conspiracy theories typically reflect

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>who our friends are and who our enemies are. In

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>other words, the particular conspiracy that a theorist chooses is

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>consistent with what they already have in their internal model.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So if they hate Russians for whatever reason, then that

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is the target of their conspiracy. If they hate Ukrainians,

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>then that is the target of the conspiracy. And there's

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>one more thing I just want to mention here about

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>in groups and outgroups. Your outgroup doesn't have to be

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>someone with whom you have enmity, just someone you don't trust.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you think they're secretive, and this is why shadowy

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>government organizations so often feature. They are a default outgroup

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that you don't trust because they reveal their cards so little.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to that, okay, So returning to the

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture of why people generate conspiracy theories, there's another

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>drive that deserves mention, and that is the jern audience.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't be overlooked that there is a social component

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>to conspiracy theories. So for the puzzle solver, there's often

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense that they will get famous for nailing this

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that everyone else overlooked. The theorist's mind races to

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>visions of the future in which they are on the

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>front page of Time magazine for having figured out what

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>no one else did. All of these are feelings that

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are natural and important drives of our brains. Not only

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the desire to simplify a complex model to something that

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>suddenly clarifies our understanding, but also the desire to demonstrate

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>your value to your community. And this social component, I

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>suspect is an important piece of what powers the creation

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of conspiracy theories. But there's even a slightly more tame

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>way that the social drive expresses itself and that's even

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just repeating the story. You get something out of telling it.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>After all. The piracy theory is interesting, so you get

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the attention at the party or on the couch or

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on social media. The reason it's interesting is because it

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>challenges someone else's internal model. They think they understand something,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you tell them, voila, you have a totally

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>different framework for explaining the same thing. That's why it

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>holds their attention. Maybe you weren't the original sherlock who

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>came up with the theory, but you can glow in

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>much of the credit because you're the one spreading the word.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>So conspiracy theory is propagate because you get to be

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the one who tells the story. It's like having this

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>precious little gem that you get to show over and over.

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>It's like a gift certificate that you can use, but

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't get used up. And that's why if you

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>have a good conspiracy theory, you'll tell everybody you know,

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's not only about truth, it's about social dynamics. Now,

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this is not to say that you as the teller,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>might not believe it totally, just that you don't have

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to believe it totally to get all this delicious social feedback. Okay,

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so these are some of the drivers of why people

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>create and repeat conspiracy theories. We are all driven to

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>solve puzzles and that helps us to simplify narratives and

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>reduce cognitive dissonance. And there are many social components here.

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Our in groups and out groups typically play big roles

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in shaping the story. And finally, conspiracy theories tend to

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be sticky because people could have the impression that they

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are doing something valuable for their community or at minimum

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>getting social attention for being the one to offer the

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>surprise twist. And in thinking about conspiracy theories from the

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience point of view, I realized there we're two more

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>things that are important here. The first has to do

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>with threat detection. One of the most important jobs of

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the brain is to see trouble coming. What we find

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in neuroimaging is that the amigdala is like an emergency

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>control center that kicks into gear when anything menacing is brewing,

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a real threat or even just a perceived threat.

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>And once you're amigdala is revd up, you operate with

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>heightened suspicion and vigilance. Now like almost everything in neuroscience,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we find a spectrum of threat detection across the population.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Some people never see threats, possibly at their detriment, while

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>other people have more fear and anxiety and see threats everywhere.

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I just want to note that Mother Nature always seems

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to do this. She generates a spectrum, and in some

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>situations or in some eras, one end of the spectrum

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>might do better than another. But it's not to say

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that there is a single best answer for all situations.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with threat detection, there's one more thing that brains

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>try to do all the time, which is agency detection.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Did this event happen because of the actions of agents

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 1>behind it, like other people or groups of people, Like

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>are my keys missing because I with them somewhere stupid

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or because someone else came in and took them? Not surprisingly,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>we find the same kind of spectrum here, such that

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>at one end people think that everything just ends up

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the way it is by natural forces, not by any

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>planning by humans. At the other end, people have hyperactive

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>agency detection, and they are more likely to believe that

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>powerful forces are behind complex events. Now I've been talking

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about this so far, as though anywhere on that spectrum

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>is equally useful, but in fact, at the extremes we

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>find things like paranoid schizophrenia. People who suffer from this

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>are much more likely to be predisposed to conspiracy thinking.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>In paranoid schizophrenia, we generally find patterns of suspicious thinking

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and a heightened tendency to see threats and hidden motives.

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>These detectors are all cranked way up, and the reason

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>that we categorize this as a mental illness is because

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it tends to in ped the social progress of a

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>person because they're out on a part of the spectrum

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>which is unlikely to be correct very often. Again, I'm

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>not saying that there's no possibility of conspiracies in the world.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just that if you connect the dots everywhere all

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the time, it's very unlikely within your lifetime that you

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to be right often if ever. Now, what

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>has always fascinated me about people who suffer from paranoid

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>schizophrenia as I've traveled around the world is an obsession

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that they have with shadowy organizations, but specifically whatever your

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>local shadowy organization is. So, if you have schizophrenia in

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States, you obsess about the FBI or the NSA.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you're in Russia, you obsess about the Federal

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Security Service, the FSB or its predecessor of the KGB.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>In the United Kingdom, it's the MI six that you

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>worry about. In China, it's the Ministry of State Security,

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>known for its secretive operations. In North Korea, you're sure

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the Reconnaissance General Bureau that's behind whatever conspiracy theory

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you're working on. So the stories themselves are plug and play.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 1>You find the same stories translated everywhere. The thing that

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>changes is the local group that you are paranoid about. Okay, Now,

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with that foundation about why brains cook up more and

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>more esoteric explanations for things, I now want to pose

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the question, what are the chances of any particular theory

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>being true? I mean, we all have limited information, and

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a possibility that some things are done in a

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>shady way. But I assert that with any proposed theory,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the important thing is to look at it through the

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>lens of probability. And there are a couple of ways

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that I want us to think about this. First, let's

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>consider the optimal number of people involved to keep a

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy going. My guess is that this number would have

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to be very small, like two or three, because that

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>would give just enough power to do something maybe interesting,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't involve so many people that you're guaranteed

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that somebody is going to defect. Now, the fact is,

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>any of these conspiracy theories that float around, like the

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>moon landing was faked, or JFK was murdered by a

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>larger organization, or nine to eleven was an inside job

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>by the American government, all of these would require an

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>enormous number of people to keep a secret. And the

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>question is, how do you keep a really big secret

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in the face of someone involved getting drunk in a bar,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>or talking in his sleep or having a deathbed confession.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you can model this mathematically by his assuming that

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>each day there's some very tiny probability of defection or

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of accidentally spilling the secret, and then you look at

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>time ticking along, and if each day you have a

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>tiny probability of the secret coming out, the chance that

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>that secret survives drops with time. This is done mathematically

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with what's called a survival analysis. So, for example, say

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on a given night, you have a super small chance

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of getting drunk and spilling the secret. Let's say it's

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a point zho one chance. Then after a year of

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>having to keep this secret every day, there's a larger

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>chance that you have spilled the secret, And after two

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>years the chance is even bigger, and so on. But

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>now here's where I think it's really interesting. There's a

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>branch of math called game theory, which studies the interaction

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>between people and the strategies they use and the outcomes

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that happen, especially when the outcome for each person depends

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>on the choices of everyone who's involved. In other words,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens when people are making independent decisions, but those

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>decisions are actually all related to one another, but the

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>outcome depends on all of the decisions. One of the

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>most famous versions of this is a puzzle called the

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>prisoner's dilemma. Now there can be many versions of this,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but here's the basic idea. Two criminals get arrested, but

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of getting thrown in the same cell, they're separated

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>into different cells and interrogated independently. The police investigator says

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to each one, look, we don't have the evidence yet

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that you guys robbed the bank, but we can charge

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you right now on a lesser offense, and you're both

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get one year in jail. But if you confess. Now,

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if you rat out your partner, he'll get ten years

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and you get to go home. And by the way,

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>if they both rat each other out, they'll both do

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>seven years. So each prisoner can either stay silent and

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>not admit that they were up to anything, and they'll

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>both just spend a year in prison, or each prisoner

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>can make the decision to defect to rat out his partner,

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>because that way, as a defector, you can go free,

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>while the prisoner who stayed silent would receive a long sentence. Now,

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the key is that if both prisoners remain silent, if

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't admit anything, then they can only be charged

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on the lesser offense. They will both have a much

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>shorter sentence, so that it turns out as the optimal

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>solution for both of them mutual cooperation and a short sentence.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But it never happens because individually it's actually better to

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>defect to betray your partner, which leads to a worse

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>outcome for both of them. The expected outcome essentially every

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>time is that both don't want to take the chance

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that the other is going to rat them out, so

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they take the option to betray. Now there's a parallel

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>here with anything that requires a lot of people to

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>cover it up. So let's say there were some conspiracy.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>For the guy who decides to break from the group,

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he frees himself from getting in trouble, and he's incentivized

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to do so before someone else in the group does

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it to him. He doesn't want to be the one

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>who's been ratted out. He wants to do the ratting.

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And presumably if you're the first guy who comes clean,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd be world famous. If you're the guy who says, look,

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I was there, here's how we set up a studio

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and filmed a fake moon landing, and here's all my

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>proof and documentation, or here's how he orchestrated this incredibly

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>sly assassination of a president and kept it secret for decades.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>But now I am coming clean, or my conscience has

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten to me, and two and a half decades after

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>nine to eleven, I'm going to explain how this was

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>done as an inside job, and I'm going to write

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>an internationally best selling book on this and beyond every

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>news and morning show and presumably make a ton of

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>money because I'm the one who chose to blow the

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>whistle for reasons of guilt or over some internal argument,

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>or because I can win the prisoner's dilemma this way,

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>because I suspect that some other guy on the team

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is on the verge of spilling the means, whatever the reasons,

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>game theory would suggest that the rational thing to do

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>would be too defect before someone else does. And this

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is why I look skeptically at UFO conspiracies. It's not

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think the cosmos is enormous and there

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>could be other life forms out there. In fact, I

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's inevitable. But all the conspiracy theories about UFOs

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I find difficult to believe because it's very hard to

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>get a large group of people to keep a secret.

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>The incentives are just too high to defect. The defector

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>could say, you know what I want protection, I want

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a seven figure deal with Penguin Random House to publish

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the best selling book of the decade. I want to

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be played by Tom Cruise in the movie of My

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Life and so on. Okay, so maybe you'll say, well,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a bunch of military discipline involved, a bunch

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of hard men who would never crack. But what about

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>their law young haired rebellious kid or their gen z grandkid.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>They'd be thrilled to be on CNN revealing what they

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>discovered in the attic, like a little piece of spaceship

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or a secret correspondence, and then everyone on their social

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>media would give them thumbs up. And at the heart

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of this discussion about getting a big group of individuals

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep a secret is a critical question what would

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be the point of keeping a secret? For example, what's

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the point of keeping a secret about aliens having landed

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen forty seven. The conspiracy theorist always insists that

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the government keeps it a secret because if it's revealed,

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the public will freak out and some sort of unspecified

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>chaos will rain. But that argument seems specious to me,

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>given that every person is talking about aliens in Roswell. Anyway.

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It just so happens that my brother went to military

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>school in Roswell, New Mexico, so I've been there plenty

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of times, and they sell t shirts there with UFOs

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on them, and hats and toys with UFOs and so on,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and outside Roswell and even outside New Mexico. Almost everyone

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in the nation who I run into recognizes the name

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Roswell precisely because they've heard about this supposed alien crash landing.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But the conspiracy theory requires, for its upkeep that every

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>single person who knows anything has to stay quiet because

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the nation would freak out if they knew. And yet

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that is all that almost anyone associates with the town

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of Roswell. It seems like a leak at this point

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>would be anti climactics. Someone would come out with the

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>big reveal and everyone would say, yeah, tell me something

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. So I'm not making the claim that

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we are the only life form in the cosmos. Statistics

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>would suggest there should be lots and lots of life

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>pervading the galaxies. But I am suggesting that it's probably

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be easy to know when we actually get visited,

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>because it won't depend on dozens or hundreds of people

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping a secret with no particular clarity on why the

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>secret is being kept. Or take the Moon landing, some

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>small fraction of the population still says this was actually

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a hoax. Now, this one is easy to address because

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>with some equipment you can actually prove to yourself that

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not a hoax. I was lucky enough to meet

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Neil Armstrong, and he would always say that he was

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just a lowly worker whose job was to put a

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>mirror on the Moon. Now he was obviously much more

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>than that, but it's true about him placing the mirror.

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>The mirror is there to bounce a laser light off of,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can measure the distance to the Moon with

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>millimeter precision by using the speed of light. This is

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>called lunar laser ranging. And by the way, there are

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>now six mirrors on the Moon, three placed by the USA,

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>two by the Soviets, and one by India. So you

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>can prove this to yourself by bouncing a laser off

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the Moon. But let's say you didn't know about the

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>retroflectors and you thought there was a possibility that the

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 1>moon landing had been faked. Again, there are presumably an

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>enormous number of people who would have to have been

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>involved here, certainly more than two or three I would guess.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>To pull off a moon landing hoax where the entire

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>world is watching and you want to fool the whole population,

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you would need the participation from the entirety of NASA,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>from the production crew, from the newscasters, you certainly need

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole astronaut core to be on board, and probably

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the president and presumably hundreds of engineers who went home

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to their families each night. And every one of these

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>people was at risk of getting drunk or talking in

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>their sleep, or having spasms of guilt or religious conversions

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>or deathbed regrets or whatever. So the key whenever you

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>are confronted with a conspiracy theory is to ask what

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>are the probabilities. You shouldn't dismiss a new hypothesis on

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the grounds that anything outside your internal model simply can't

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>be true. Instead, you should consider the numbers, how many

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>people would have to be involved, what incentive structure would

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>keep them not talking, how much time has passed where

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>they could have had a chance to slip up or

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>make a purposeful confession. Okay, now, I just want to

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>take a minute to address something that I often hear

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>people lament about conspiracy theories, and that is the idea

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Internet is a key problem here. This is

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what allows for the easy flooding of conspiracy theories. I

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>think the Internet is not particularly powerful here. Why because

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Whenever someone asserts this to me, I say, okay, let's

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>say you wanted to make a new conspiracy theory, say

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden actually has an alien baby. So what

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>do you mean that the Internet gives you the technology

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>to flood the world with your crazy idea? Really? Picture this.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You post this statement on your x account, and you

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>do a selfie video, and you post it to Insta

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok. Now, the question is is the Internet meaningfully

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>allowing you to flood society with your conspiracy theory or

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>does nobody care that you've posted this? Do you get

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of reposts or do you get none? When people

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about how easy it is to flood a conspiracy theory,

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>what they overlook is a subtle but critical point, what

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>makes a really good conspiracy theory? Because it has to

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>live in a very narrow range to get love online,

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't flood the Internet with anything. Just like Darwinian evolution,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>only a very tiny number of ideas make it and

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.439
<v Speaker 1>have successful reproduction. So this leads us to the really

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>important question what kind of conspiracy theories stick? And the

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>answer is it has to make a really good story.

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>As I said earlier, the story has to connect the

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 1>dots in a way that it's interesting and surprising and

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>has explanatory power and reduces cognitive load. A good conspiracy

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>theory is one that has an appealing narrative structure. Many times,

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when something happens, like the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown, it's because

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of a mistake or incompetence or an oversight, and those

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>don't make an interesting story. And this is what opens

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity for conspiracy theories to blossom, if they can

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>put together a bigger and more exciting story. My guess

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>would be in fact, that if some random chance event occurred,

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you're always going to get a conspiracy theory blossoming. And

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>if you re ran the exact history a thousand times,

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>every time, the randomness of the event would not be believed,

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and instead alternative explanations would shoot up around it. Why,

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Because we want story, We want a clear explanation. Story

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>gives meaning to events. And by the way, I think

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we can flip this description and look at it from

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the brain's point of view. Sequences of events that have meaning,

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in other words, things that resonate in the internal model,

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>as in this cause this, which caused this, this is

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>what we call a story, as in, I have a

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>narrative that explains this, and the narrative is easy to

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>remember because each thought follows from the last, and there's

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a minimum that I have to memorize because the pieces

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>fall into place. So what makes a good conspiracy theory, Well,

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it can't be too complex. It has to be a

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>digestible story, and it has to be plausible, even if unlikely. Plausible.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>It often involves a shadowy group or simply any out group,

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and it has to be surprising and compelling. So, coming

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the Great Fire of Rome in the year

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty four, who the heck knows how the fire started.

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>It might have been someone cooking a chicken and a

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>spark flu or some candle in a house somewhere melted

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 1>most of the way and then fell over, or there

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.439
<v Speaker 1>was an accidental spark from a blacksmith, or maybe someone

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 1>doing a religious ritual, or a seven year old kicking

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>embers around or whatever. They didn't have forensic tools for

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the investigation at that time, and even if they did,

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear that they would have found the answer.

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But the story that Emperor Nero would directly benefit from

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>having this land cleared. That's straightforward, and it's spicy and

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>compelling and repeat worthy because of the simplicity and deviousness

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the whole thing. Or a weather balloon randomly landing

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in Roswell is obviously not the kind of thing that

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.720
<v Speaker 1>people are going to get all excited about write books

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and start clubs over. But alien life covered up by

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the government that is a very compelling plot. Or Oswald

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>acting alone in JFK's assassination is one kind of narrative,

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's not nearly as compelling as a larger story

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>where lots of secretive people decided that they wanted the

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>president dead. So to work, a conspiracy theory needs to

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>have a good narrative. Now, I've watched news events happen

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for years and conspiracy theories come out about them, and

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the thing that has struck me as so interesting is

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 1>how the whole thing unfolds. Like physics, as in, if

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>X happens, then you're guaranteed some group will come out

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and say, wait, what if why happened? So, for example,

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Nero's rome gets incinerated, but someone realized says, hey, he

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>could benefit from this because the land is now clear.

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Therefore he might have been the one to have caused this.

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>With thousands or millions of brains thinking about the situation,

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it is absolutely inevitable that that version of things will

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>come down the pike next or after JFK's assassination. The

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>FBI ran twenty five thousand interviews and that's how they

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. But that's just

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fuel for the fire. We're guaranteed that another version of

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the story is inevitable. I really can't think of a

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>single big event in history where one story came out

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and everyone said, Wow, what a world we're in, and

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone shook hands on the narrative. So nowadays I'm putting

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>together a model of this because my assertion is that

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>what unfolds every time is inevitable. When X happens, there

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are many people in the world who could have had

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a vested interest in it. As one random example, when

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Hamas invaded Israel, someone I knew suggested, Hey, this seems

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like the kind of thing that Russia could have been behind,

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>because Russia wants to get the attention off of themselves

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for their attack on the Ukraine. And of course that's

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>true that Russia would theoretically like to have a distraction,

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean that Russia was behind it? Well,

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't know. But just because an entity has an interest,

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>does that tell you something meaningful? Maybe? Maybe not. So

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the model goes like this, an event happens. Then let's

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>say there are ten entities in the world, like governments

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or people or organizations who could, in theory, have something

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to gain from that. What will inevitably happen then is

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that all ten will become the targets of different conspiracy

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>theories because they could in some way benefit, perhaps directly,

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps very circuitously, but they could benefit from the event

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that just happened. So all ten of them will be

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the target of a round of YouTube videos and AM

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.240
<v Speaker 1>radio programs and so on saying hey, look, I think

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they were behind this event. And then there's the second level.

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>There's the people who could benefit from having someone else

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 1>accused of benefiting. So in a cartoon example, we might say, well,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine would benefit if people thought that Russia was behind

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the attack. So then it becomes a second level conspiracy

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>because the idea is that they would benefit from igniting

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a conspiracy theory about Russia, and I suspect that good

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theorists can do third level and fourth level theories,

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>where they can point to anywhere on the map and

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>connect enough dots to make a story. The story might

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>not be compelling to everyone, but if it involves the

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>right out groups, it can get traction, at least among

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a particular in group. In other words, the cascade of

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories following any event seems to me totally predictable,

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 1>because in any random situation, there will always be other

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 1>parties that could be seen to benefit from it, other

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>countries or governments, or individuals or shadowy organizations. And because

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of the inherent complexity of the world, there will always

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be a large canvas upon which to draw connections between dots.

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to address one final point. Someone

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>asked me recently if I thought that conspiracy theories were

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>more common right now than they are at other times

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in history. I don't know, and I think it's hard

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to study that with high resolution, But two things seem

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>clear to me. The first is that we always retrospectively romanticize.

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>We imagine that previous eras were more rational, whereas any

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>close reading of history tells us that's absolutely not the case.

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>The second is, like I mentioned before, there have been

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of conspiracy theories all throughout history. I

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the plot against Socrates, or the death of Alexander

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 1>the Great, or the assassination of Julius Caesar. But I

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have to allow that only tells us that conspiracies exist

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>across the centuries of millennia, but it can't tell us

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 1>much about whether there's some slight up and down that

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>happens on the scale of decades. So this is very

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>speculative and maybe erroneous, But I've been wondering if conspiracy

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>theories grew more popular around twenty twenty than they were

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in the years just preceding that. Now, again this is

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 1>just a speculation, but if it's true, I feel like

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I have an explanation for that, and that is covid.

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm making this conjecture because of something you've heard me

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>say a million times that brains build internal models of

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the outside world to try to predict things as best

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they can. Fundamentally, the brain is a prediction machine, and

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>that is why we have brains, and that is why

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we have been so successful as a species. But what

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>happens when our internal models suddenly are not predicting. Well.

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Example I've ever seen at a societal level was when

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>COVID hit. It all seems clear enough in retrospect, as in,

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.239
<v Speaker 1>that's what happened, and the world did this and that,

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you can really put yourself back and let's

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>say March of twenty twenty, what you might remember is

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that the whole thing seemed not possible. We all heard

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there was some virus in China that people were worried about,

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and it started hitting our ears, some discussion about it,

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and then at some point you heard the term SARS

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID two virus for the first time, and eventually you

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>hear COVID nineteen and you realize you've heard that word

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times now, and then it starts being

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>part of more conversations, and pretty soon it's all anybody

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is talking about. But the feeling that essentially everyone had

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>was that this is somehow going to get taken care of,

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's why we have governments, and they have all

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of special departments and units and people in white coats,

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and surely this is the kind of thing that somebody

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>will take care of and it'll just blow over, just

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like everything else is blown over. After all, we haven't

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>had a meaningful pandemic since the nineteen eighteen influenza epidemic,

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and now, for goodness sakes, it's twenty twenty. We're living

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in the future. There's not going to be anything to

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>worry about here. And at some point in the middle

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of March twenty twenty, it became clear that we all

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>needed to shut down our businesses and offices temporarily and

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>work from home, something most of us had never done.

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if you remember the details, but

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like we were going to have to shut

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>things down for a few days, and pretty soon we

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 1>were all dismayed to realize this was going to last

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>at least a couple of weeks, and suddenly the world

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>became highly unpredictable. By your brain. It used to be

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that the biggest surprise you'd had was maybe your local

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>store rearranged things so the toilet paper moved from Aisle

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>six to Aisle eight. But you never in your life

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>saw a situation where they simply said, we don't have

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>any toilet paper. The supply chain broke, and you probably

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>never even thought about the supply chain before, and now

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know if the Starbucks down the road was

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be open, would your haircut place be open,

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 1>would the bank be open? Suddenly all of your prediction

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>abilities were afraid. Our internal models in March twenty twenty

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 1>suddenly revealed themselves to be woefully inadequate. So what happens

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>when our internal models suddenly are not doing a good job.

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I hypothesize that they grasp for foundation, They grab for

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>things that would seem to return them to a firm footing.

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So I watched this and myself and in all my colleagues.

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You would read an article that said this is all

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be over by next week, and you think, okay, cool,

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I got it. I believe the argument. I can repeat

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this to my friends. And then ten minutes later you

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 1>read an article that says two hundred thousand Americans are

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going to die and you think, wow, well that was

0:48:57.640 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>well argued. I get it. I can repeat this to

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>my friends. Now. It's not easy to remember now, but

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we were all going back and forth on completely different

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>predictions about the world and everything happening around us. We

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>had a breakdown of the internal model. And this, I suggest,

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is when conspiracy theories really thrive. Why Because we're seeking

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>harder than ever to find foundation, to place our understanding

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of the world on firm ground, and whackier and wackier

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>theories can scratch the itch of reducing cognitive dissonance and

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>giving good explanations for things. And the fact is, the

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>main thing we learned from the pandemic is that the

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:46.840
<v Speaker 1>world is very complicated and fragile, and when it's suddenly

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>tossed into a blender by a global pandemic, the results

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>can be unpredictable. But our brains aren't in that business.

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>They're in the business of finding hypotheses that allow the

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>mind to impose a narrative that makes sense. Okay, so

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>let's wrap up. What we saw in this episode is

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that conspiracy theories have been with us for as long

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:12.839
<v Speaker 1>as we have recorded history, so it's not something brand new.

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I did make the argument that

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there may be small periods of time, like during COVID,

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:21.359
<v Speaker 1>when the brain's internal model is having a harder time

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>landing predictions and therefore is more susceptible to compelling stories.

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>We also saw that brains love to solve puzzles, and

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something like a compulsion for brains which always

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>want to lighten cognitive load and reduce cognitive dissonance. But

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact is that events in the world tend to

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be quite complex, so there are many ways to solve

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle, some more straightforward and some more arcane. And

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the reason the arcane explanations are sometimes appealing to some

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>people is because they give an opportunity to confirm biases

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:59.320
<v Speaker 1>about our outgroups. And I also emphasized the social aspect

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of that is gained from having the conspiracy theory. Finally,

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I suggested that we can't always know what is true

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and not true because the world is complex, But the

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>most sensible thing to do is to approach any particular

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>suggestion with a scientific lens and ask yourself questions about it,

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>like how many people would have to be involved, do

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they have realistic incentives that would allow them to spend

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of their life in prison if they get caught,

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And with the increasing passage of time, how likely is

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>it that none of the people involved would defect in

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:40.760
<v Speaker 1>order to save themselves from punishment and make themselves famous

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as the whistleblower. Most conspiracy theories that float around are

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not particularly robust When viewed against the background of these questions,

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and very often it's because the conspiracy theories are not

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>built on a good model of human behavior. In a

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>future episode, I'm going to dive into this issue of

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>why conspiracy theories are generally unlikely because of the difficulty

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of keeping anything confidential. That upcoming episode is called why

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is it so hard for the brain to keep a secret?

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to imply that these considerations would rule

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 1>out any conspiracy theory, but certainly many or most conspiracy

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>theories are ruled out by a good understanding of our

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>neural drives and the resultant insight into human social dynamics.

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Go to Eagleman dot com slash podcast for more information

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and to find further reading. Send me an email at

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>podcasts at eagleman dot com with questions or discussion, and

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 1>check out and subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>videos of each episode and to leave comments Until next time.

0:52:51.760 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos.