1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,400 Speaker 1: Well, now it's time for our daily Bloomberg Lab Brief, 2 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:04,800 Speaker 1: exploring legal issues in the news. It's brought to you 3 00:00:04,880 --> 00:00:09,800 Speaker 1: by American Arbitration Association. Business disputes are inevitable, resolve faster 4 00:00:09,920 --> 00:00:13,880 Speaker 1: with the American Arbitration Association, the global leader in alternative 5 00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:17,239 Speaker 1: dispute resolution for over ninety years. More at a d 6 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:21,119 Speaker 1: r dot org. Today, Bloomberg Law host Michael Best discusses 7 00:00:21,200 --> 00:00:24,440 Speaker 1: opening arguments in a Supreme Court case that could enable 8 00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:28,960 Speaker 1: employers to block class action lawsuits and instead channel disputes 9 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:32,279 Speaker 1: into arbitration. He speaks with Mark Rifkin, a partner at 10 00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 1: wolf Haldenstein. Mark, let's start with what the case is about. 11 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:39,880 Speaker 1: There are two statutes here that are kind of in conflict. Well, 12 00:00:39,880 --> 00:00:42,880 Speaker 1: what what do the What does the court have to decide? Michael, 13 00:00:42,960 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 1: The court is being asked to decide number one if 14 00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:47,760 Speaker 1: there really is a conflict between the two statutes. That 15 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:52,599 Speaker 1: is the Federal Arbitration Act, which requires that arbitration agreements 16 00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:55,200 Speaker 1: be protected to the same extent as every every other 17 00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 1: contract on the one hand, and then the National Labor 18 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:04,160 Speaker 1: Relations Act, which protect employees rights to uh to collective 19 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:09,240 Speaker 1: actions and the effect of the arbitration waiver in all 20 00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 1: these employment agreements is to prohibit employees from bringing either 21 00:01:13,880 --> 00:01:16,680 Speaker 1: a class action or a collective action under the Fair 22 00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:20,400 Speaker 1: Labor Standards Act or the National Labor Relations Act, which 23 00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 1: the employees say is a substantive right they have under 24 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:27,760 Speaker 1: the statute. So, as I understand it, marked the employers 25 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:30,200 Speaker 1: are arguing that the arbitration at the Federal Arbitration Act 26 00:01:30,240 --> 00:01:34,960 Speaker 1: says that basically their arbitration provisions are always enforceable, and 27 00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 1: these contracts do have arbitration provisions, So how is it 28 00:01:38,080 --> 00:01:41,920 Speaker 1: that the employee side of this argues around that provision 29 00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:45,040 Speaker 1: of the law. Well, the employees saying that the f 30 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:49,280 Speaker 1: a A, the Federal Arbitration Act, only entitles arbitration agreements 31 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:51,920 Speaker 1: to be enforced to the same extent as all other contracts. 32 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 1: It used to be historically in this country that arbitration 33 00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:58,240 Speaker 1: agreements were frowned upon, and the f a A protects 34 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 1: arbitration agreements, But that doesn't mean that an unlawful agreement 35 00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 1: can be enforced in the federal courts. And so the 36 00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:10,960 Speaker 1: employees say, if this agreement takes away statutory rights that 37 00:02:11,639 --> 00:02:14,280 Speaker 1: the n l r A, the National Labor Relations Act 38 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:17,640 Speaker 1: gives us, then it's an unlawful agreement and it can't 39 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:21,919 Speaker 1: be enforced, just like any other unlawful contract could be enforced. 40 00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 1: And that's Mark Riffkin, a partner at Wolf Helden Stain, 41 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:27,600 Speaker 1: speaking with Bloomberg Law host Michael Best. You can listen 42 00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,160 Speaker 1: to Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm all street time 43 00:02:30,280 --> 00:02:33,720 Speaker 1: here on Bloomberg Radio. And that's this morning's Bloomberg Lawbrary. 44 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:35,760 Speaker 1: If you can find more legal news at Bloomberg Law 45 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:38,640 Speaker 1: dot com and Bloomberg b and a dot com. Attorneys 46 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,840 Speaker 1: will find exceptional legal research and business development tools there 47 00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:44,639 Speaker 1: as well. Visit Bloomberg Law dot com and Bloomberg b 48 00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:46,360 Speaker 1: and a dot com for more information.