WEBVTT - Week 4 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 58)

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Welcome back to another episode of the Betting

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Pros NFL podcast. I'm your host, Dan Harris. You can

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. With me,

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, is Matt host of the Daily Juice podcast.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>You can find him on Twitter at Sports Talk Matt. Matt.

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>What's up Week four?

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's get going here. We're kind of tread and water.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>We're like a duck right now. We're just gonna tread

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>and water. We've gotta get going.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, it's unfortunate that we're not able to

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>bet on the most exciting game of the week, which

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is the Jets. I mean, we could.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>How do feel, honest to gosh, as a Jet fan?

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>How do you feel about your football team right now?

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>I think my football team is one of the biggest

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>embarrassments in the country, which says a lot. I think

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're horrific and they have the worst coach in

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the league. I tell you what I really think about

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the season. Though. What really bugs me.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>By the way, at the top of taping, you have

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the worst coach in the league.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>That's true, although there's a report today that they weren't going

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to fire him. I was like, great. It doesn't really matter.

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna I mean, whether he survives this season

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>or not. I don't know. The big thing for me

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is I don't Maybe you feel differently. I don't really

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like I have enough of the sense of whether

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I can evaluate Darnald Yet he makes some horrific throws

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and some terrible decisions, but he also unquirks a lot

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of pretty amazing things that I've seen him do, and

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>I never I don't think he's been given a fair shake,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>given his coach and given the team they put around him.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So I guess out of curiosity before we get into it,

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you feel about Darnald in

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the future, Because I could see us getting the number

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>one pick, drafting Lawrence, getting rid of Darnald, and then

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>him winning like six championships for the Pats or something

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. Right Like, That's how I can see it.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe, I mean you kind of have to

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>ask me tomorrow morning, because I bet the Jets do

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>win today. So at naldas if he plays his butt

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>off and he's you know, lighten up that defense for

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos, and I'm gonna be like, go Sam Darnold.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>If he loses tonight, I'm gonna say tank for Trevor.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I'm sure it won't be impressive no matter what.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But either way, we are, unfortunately both on the Jets side,

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>not in our contest, and we are not advising anybody.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't know, yell at us at the Jets lowers. It's

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just a game that you bet because otherwise, even as

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>a Jets fan, there's absolutely no reason to watch. Okay,

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna get into every game for this weekend,

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>as we do every single time we record. But as always,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>let us recap where we are in the Draft Kings Championship.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>We were five and five coming in, so just kind

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>of treading water, and as Matt said, we're still kind

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of treading water. We went three and two last week,

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 1>so at least a winning week. We're two hundred and

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifth out of six hundred and eighty nine, so

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not great, but not the worst in the world. We

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>missed on the Chargers laying six and a half to

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. Remind us never to back a rookie quarterback.

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>As you said, no good. We did hit on the

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Steelers laying three and a half to the Texans, the

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Pats laying five and a half to the Raiders, which

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>we both loved, and the chiefs S getting three and

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a half from the Ravens. We really enjoyed. The last

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>time we will see Patrick mahone getting points from anyone.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And on the podcast, we had picked the Titans laying

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to the Vikings. Matt messaged me

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, because we talk, you know, we generally messaged

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Arount the week, said some sharps had really really pushed

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>him off of that number, so we decided to move off.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We didn't really have another pick that we love, so

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Matt allowed me to go with the Giants getting three

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half from the four Nines, which just missed.

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But also the other games that we were thinking about

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>also did not go well anyway. We were talking about

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Falcons or the Cowboys, so we would have

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>lost that pick anyway. So three and two, eight and

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>seven on the year. We need a good week, So

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go back and forth a bit. Matt is

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>going to list his top choice. I will list my

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>top choice. I talked to my briefly before we got on.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He sounds like he is not feeling all that good

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I have, Matt. I think I have nine games that

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if you came up, I don't feel great. But let

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>me qualify that I don't feel great. But if you

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>came to me right now, if you list one of

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>those games, I will probably just be like, yeah, okay,

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that. I'll go with that. Okay, So

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that again. I will remind everybody props

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>props are not out yet. That's just the way it

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is with the sports books. They don't come out until

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>late So again I will remind you. Matt does a

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>live stream on our YouTube channel YouTube dot com slash

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros on Sunday morning at eleven am Eastern, so

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that's eight am Matt's time. He goes through the entire

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>slate for the week, if you've changed anything. He also

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>does props. I give him a couple of props. I

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was six for six on my props. I only give

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt two because they were the only two I felt

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>really good about. But I was six for six over

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>all my props. Again, I do fantasy projections. So hopefully

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>things are starting to normalize a little bit, because the

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>first couple of weeks were a little more difficult for

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>me to get a sense of. But anyway, we will

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. As always, if we change any of the

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>picks we discussed today, we will note them on Twitter

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at Tan Harris Ati at Sports Talk. Matt, let's get

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>into it, Matt, start us off. Who is your Do

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you have any games that you are like excited about?

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Again, yes, go ahead.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>You gonna start with the one I like the most.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You can, Matt, the world is your oyster man. Start

0:04:58.240 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with the Let's Biggs Raiders at home catching

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 2>two and a half? Oh wow, already and out of

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 2>you first?

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how long how long are you just going to

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>avoid the Bills? How long are you just going to

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>fade the Bills until they eventually win the Super Bowl?

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And you're gonna be like, I don't know next year

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>though that, Josh.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 2>So you tell me, should they have one last week? No?

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>So we're going on a team that got a massive break.

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 2>It's coming across the country to take on a team

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>in the Raiders who are playing at home, who rested

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of guys, and we don't know exactly who's

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna play for the Raiders, but they're getting some guys

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>back for this game.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>We know a couple of guys who are not coming back,

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>though we know Brian Edwards is out correct. You know,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Henry Ruggs is almost definitely out correct.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>So you're gonna have Josh Jacobs is playing. That's all

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 2>I need to know about, all right. He's going to

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>destroy the Bills. Gave up so many rushing yards in

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the second half of that game against the Rams. They

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 2>can't tackle. That defense got lit up by the Dolphins

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 2>and it got lit up by the Rams. The Raiders

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 2>are going to run the ball and Diacops is the

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 2>best back of the three teams that they got. Going

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Jacob's prop over everything. Josh Jacobs leads to this team

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to a victory. They're gonna win this game outright at

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 2>home and beat the Buffalo Bills take the two and

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I heard you talk about it

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>with Dave Sharpan on The Daily Juice where you made

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>your pick, and again, I don't just say it because

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's part of our network of podcasts. The Daily Jews

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great podcast every morning fifteen minutes. I really

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. So, Matt, you already made that pick, so

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I knew this was coming, that I was ready for it,

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I looked into it and I was like,

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, is this something I feel comfortable with? First

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of all, you have it at three though, right.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>That's it, That's what I bet it at. Yes, but

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I think they win the game outright, So any points

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 2>in general, I like, why?

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>What? What is? So?

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how are are bad teams? And they should

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>have lost to the Ramska?

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how are the Raiders gonna be able to stop

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bills offense?

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a high scoring game, but yeah, I

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>think of an enough yes that they will stop the money.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>A high scoring game. How I don't understand is Josh

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Jacob's gonna run for four hundred yards because they're gonna

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>probably put for Davius White on Darren Waller, and right,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>there are no other wide receivers out there. You're legitimately

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just gonna have to live, are you? Are you going

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to mention Za Jones or Nelson.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Looks good in a Raider uniform? Looked good. Derek Carr

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>has been accurate and I'm telling you this. Mcdermot's not Belichick,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>all right, And Waller will be force fed. I thought

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders really were afraid to give the ball to

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Waller for whatever reason they I think they got out

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 2>belichicked in their brain. They should have force fed Waller.

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.119
<v Speaker 2>I think they'll force feed him coming up and at home.

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I I like this team in the comfort of their home,

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>their own home, and it's kind of in a local story.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>They went cut a national but they had a really

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>bad week. Okay, this team needs to win a football

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>game to get everybody's What happened the the Waller fundraiser

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 2>on Monday was bad, really bad. Ten players, no matter,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 2>no social distancing. It was awful. It was really awful.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>This team needs a victory to get everybody off of

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that because if they lose, the questions are going to

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 2>be loud to the grood inside of well. John, you

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>got fined one hundred k for not wearing a mask.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Ten two days later, ten of your players were sitting

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>there at an event without wearing masks. Distraction, not focused,

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>not taking it seriously. I expect an A plus effort

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>out of the Raiders coming up this weekend.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>How many people from either your radio show or from

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>your podcast, get like, get on you on Twitter for

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>how much you fade the Bills.

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be like I want to say, it's

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine percent of Bills fans out here from that

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>are negative and one percent say you're right. I mean literally,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I've had people say you need to apologize. I've had

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>them say you need to go on an apology tour,

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>that you need to bet the Bills every time. Now

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I want you wearing a Bill's jersey by the end

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>of the season, all all sorts of I'm gonna maintain

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>this and look, I talked to someone from Pro Football

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Focused on my show today who said that Josh Allen's

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 2>numbers when he's pressured are better than Josh Allen's numbers

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>in a clean pocket. That tells you that that's a

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>regression coming in a big, big way. When you're more accurate,

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>when you're getting guys in your face, that's luck. Okay,

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>you're getting lucky that you're completing these passes and having

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>big numbers. A regression for the Bills offense is coming

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>this weekend.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of friends still in Buffalo, I

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have some family in Buffalo. I went to school there,

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So I apologize on behalf of Matt par just at

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>him Sports Talk Matt, not me.

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>But did you see that stupid thing going around Twitter

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 2>about like why people is an apology letter to Josh,

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 2>you clowns. Just cut it out, Just get out of here.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>The guy can't hit a broad set of a barn still, Okay,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 2>he's an athlete, good athlete, that's what he.

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Is to everyone in Buffalo. I love duff Swings, man,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I would I would go get some Duffs right now.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Give me some duff right over there.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, which funny I have? I have a chicken wing

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 2>a day, like I love buffaloings. Yes, they're my favorite food,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So I should like the bills, but I just don't.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Oh my god, this is actually terrible. I

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have to just make sure that I'm not going to

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>say it wrong because I think it was yeah, okay,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>good dust Wings. I was like, wait, there's Duffs. It's plural, right,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not staying there. I haven't been there in like

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, unfortunately, but Dusts wings. By the way, if

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>you go there, anchor bar. I know they say they

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>invented wings. Duff's is the best. But oh okay, I

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>love it. When the Jets beat writers go up there

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're all like, no, nah, we're going to DAF

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm like, that's right, that's what you do. But

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>we are not taking the raiders. I'm not. Look I don't,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't see it. I don't see it

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>with no receivers. That's my big worry I get. I

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>do think Jacob's gonna run all over them. I think

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they'll go to Waller, but I think that they are

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. The Patriots gonna stick my best corner on

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller, and I think, you know, White is good.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>He's not Gilmore good, but he's really really good. And

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's gonna be able to kind of

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>shum down. And I think the Patriots showed a little bit.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>What you do.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>You just kind of get all of car checkdown options.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>You're like, nah, man, we are not giving you this outlet.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Feel free to go deep to Nelson Agalore, orse A

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Jones or something like that. But we're just blanketing your

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>checkdown options. So for me, under a field goal can't

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do it because that means I have to feel like

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna win outright, and I just don't. So we're

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna put that one off. I'm exercising my right to

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>put that one off as you will with multiple picks.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure. Okay, So a game I like, I'll start

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>with this one. Saints slaying three and a half to

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. So there are a couple of minarrasis here.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Number one, Detroit's getting healthier. Kenny Galladay played last week,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The defense is getting a little healthier. Saints are dealing

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with a ton of injuries. Jared Cook, My guess is

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he's probably not gonna play. I'm a little worried about

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Latimore. Apparently he's got a little bit of a hamstring.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't play, that might change the way I

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>feel about it, because I really do view this as

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Latimore is just gonna take away Galladay, just the whole game.

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think Michael Thomas is gonna play here. He's

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>practiced the last two days. Sounds like he's trending up.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>They need to bounce back here. You don't go wrong

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>really fading Matt. I feel like, and the Saints didn't

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>look good against the Packers, but I don't think the

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Lions are really going to be able to run on

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>them with ap. I think Latimore is going to be

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>able to take away Golladi. So you're looking at them

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>moving the ball with Hockinson and Marvin Jones, and I'm

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just not that worried about it. And again, you look

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>at this game against the Packers, where you know eventually

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the Saints got beat Taysom Hill doesn't fumble that ball

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and they can easily win that game. They're still putting

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>up twenty nine points per game as bad as Drew

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Brees looks. Twenty nine points per game, they're fourth in

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive DVOA and that's without Michael Thomas. Pretty much. There's

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>no pass rush for the Lions. I think this is

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a bounce back game for the Saints. There's no fans,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>so I don't care really about the home build advantage.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I like the Saints lank three and

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Lions.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>See this is the week of home dogs. That really

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 2>concerns me. And I'm concerned about laying points on the road.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>And you've been fitting the Lions. You faded my Lions

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>pick last week, and you exit and they want and

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 2>won the game outright. On the part on the Cardinals,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say no, to this, and I don't like

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the Saints this year at all, and there might They

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>were my pick preseason to win the Super Bowl Drew Brees.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Unless they're gonna come up with the package that is

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>half Hill and half Breeze, it's really difficult to like

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 2>the Saints offense. And that's with Alvin Kamara, who's just

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 2>an absolute destroyer of defenses. I'm concerned about the Saints

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>in a big way. And look, they've invested in that defense.

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Stafford played really well. Galladay was a beast.

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I get it. You take him away and then what

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 2>else have you got there? But that's a scary number

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>for me. I really I gotta I'm very concerned about

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>laying points on the road right now, especially for a

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>team like the Saints. So I gotta say no to

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the Saints.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That's totally fine. And again, this is part of what

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we do. We go back and forth. Each one of

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>us has the full power to be like, absolutely, I

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>cannot do that, and that's totally fine for me. I

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna I think they're gonna run. I think

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna destroy the lines in this game. But

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's completely fine and again, I'm not really fading

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the road team because of the act of home build

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage in this point. If Thomas comes back, I feel fine,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>get to your next pick, then let's see if we

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>can agree.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so my next pick that I like a lot,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and this a lot of these plays are based upon numbers.

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Here right yep, Eagles plus seven and a half really

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 2>over over a touchdown. You look at this line. This

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>line should be three. This line shouldn't be seven and

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>a half. This is way too many points here. The

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Eagles are everyone's fading them. They're O two and one.

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>You know they're playing so poorly. There are so many

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>injuries on the forty nine ers. We don't know who's

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 2>playing for them. And look, I know the Giants just

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>got destroyed by them running the football. But think about this.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>If you're Doug Peterson, you lose this game, you're O

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>three and one right now, you might be on the

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>hot seat. He might be on the hot seat. Now.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Carson Wentz is this bad. I think

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>this is a team that's got Look, they're gonna lose

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 2>this game, I think, but not by more than seven points.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I love the seven and a half the hook here

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>matters to me. Taking the Eagles plus seven and a half.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree that the hook. It's on my list,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm I'm I'm gonna put this one as probable

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of putting it on this I liked it as well.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little nervous Carson Wentz is playing, I mean,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as poorly as I can remember a quarterback playing. He's

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>not this bad. But again, a little bit that worries

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>me is they're really down wide receivers right now. I mean,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Deshaun Jackson's gonna play. We know

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Rakers out, we know Nels Goddard is out. It

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>makes me a little worried. But you talk about the

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Giants game. Man, we were texting during the first half

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of that game. Daniel Jones doesn't turn the ball over

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like right by the half. That's not It wasn't like

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they blew them out of the water right out of

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the gate like the forty nine ers right now are

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not that good. Garoppolo is not going to play Kittle,

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess is gonna play. It sounds like that, which

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>does make me a little worried. And I think it

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds like McKinnon is also healthy, so the at least

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have the two backs. Most of it's not gonna play.

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with you here. I mean, they're just

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>given all the injuries on defense, given everything that's starting,

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the desperation that's going to set in for the Eagles,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which you wouldn't know necessarily because of the fact that

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they play for the tie against Cincinnati, which was just

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ludicrous. I'm okay with it. So let's put that

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>one in a pencil. But I think that's one that

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go with and shocked, shocked that that's what

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you went with. Okay, how about and this one again?

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>This is sort of I guess similar to the Saints.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think about the Cardinals laying three

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half at the Panthers. To me, I think

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this last game was a bit of a wake up

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>call for the Cardinals. You've heard Larry Fitzgerald talk about

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it was like, what you know, You've got sort of

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>these suddenly Super Bowl aspirations and then this game comes

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>along and just knocks you on your butt. The caveat

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is for me. DeAndre Hopkins has missed the last two

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>days of practice with an ankle injury. It may be nothing.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It may just be routine maintenance. If he's out, forget it.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anything about this, but they should be

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>able to run all day. I think there's a big

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Kenyon Drake game for them and Kyler Murray running the ball.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the Panthers. They're coming off that win,

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like good for them, but I think it's a letdown

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>spot for them. I think the Cardinals are angry. I

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think they're way better than we saw against the Lions.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So well, now this kind of goes with the Saints

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>laying three and a half on the road, but Cardinals

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at the Panthers three and a half?

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you think put it in pen Ooh.

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, okay Cardinals.

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Look here's the thing with the Panthers and I got

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>into a little bit of an argument. I mentioned I

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 2>was talking to someone from Pro Football Focus. They were

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to make the case that the Panthers are a

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>better offense without McCaffrey, and I just was like, what

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 2>do you mean in The person was like it was

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Eric Eager, and he was like, look, he's like, you

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 2>can make a case for this offense being more prolific

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>because they share the football when they don't have McCaffrey

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 2>on the field, and so they go to the wide receivers,

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 2>they'll go to different running backs. It's not just all McCaffrey. McCaffrey.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's kind of nuts personally. I think

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the top five best players in the game,

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and you feed that guy as much as possible because

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>him versus a linebacker, and he's like, well, they throw

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the ball over ten yards when they've got McCaffrey on

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 2>the sidelines with him, he starts five yards behind the

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage, which I guess in theory makes sense.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But it's still Christian McCaffrey. So this Panthers team, I know,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I got called, but I think we had the charges

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 2>last week, right, we did. Yes, I had it.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love it. I didn't love it. That was

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that we we sort of let and you

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>felt pretty good about.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I had it on both I had it

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 2>on the DraftKings in, I had it on on the

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Circle Million Picks. So I got I went oh and

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 2>two on that. I'm gonna I'm okay going back and

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 2>fading the Panthers again. I don't I think they're garbage.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 2>And I think there was just some points left on

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 2>the field there by a rookie. I think there were

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>some mistakes there that shouldn't have happened. I mean, the

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 2>defense basically bent and didn't break. They stopped him inside

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>the red zone a bunch of times held in the

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>field goals. So maybe it was a little bit of

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 2>a better performance than I thought offensively. But the Cardinals,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, coming off of a loss. It's only

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 2>three and a half. And Hopkins, I think he's gonna play.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's a guy who's notorious for, you know,

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>not practicing during the.

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Ab doesn't play, I will revisit it and we you

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>know again, I always said on Saturday night, I always

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out what our final picks are because that's when

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I put them in. I don't put them in. We

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>can put them in on Sunday morning. I put them

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in on Saturday night. So follow us on Twitter, Dan

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Harris at Sports Talk mat just in case we change it.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>But assuming he plays, which right now I'm assuming he does,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally on board with it. So this is good.

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It's an in penn subject to Hopkins, go to your

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>next one.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Good second one. Why are the Cowboys favored by four

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and a half points? Mmm?

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>This is a good question.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 2>This is kind of nuts to me. I mean, the

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys are not good right now. They've got big problems.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 2>They have internal issues with whether or not the owner

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 2>is saying things about Dak Prescott publicly saying he's not

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes, and well who is? But so so Jerry

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Jones's comments were interesting. I think there's big issues, and

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the Browns are coming along here and they're

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 2>starting to grow on me. And I think Stefanski's offense

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 2>is starting to take hold a little bit. That defense

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 2>playing a little bit better than maybe we thought they

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 2>were going to be. And it's four and a half,

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 2>so again, this is the numbers play for me. But

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 2>I think the Cowboys win the game, but they might win.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they went by a field goal. I'll take

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 2>the four and a half points here with the Browns.

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. I want to know though, whether

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or not if Kareem Hunt misses this game because he's

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>mispracticed several days in a row now with a groin injury,

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and today Odell Beckham Junior popped up on the injury

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>report with a back injury that he's apparently playing through.

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that, because this is a big

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>game for Beckham coming. I think he's fully healthy, right,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the corners can't stop him. I I I

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it was on my list, So I'm good with it

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. That that does make me a little worried

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. I'm not sure, you know, I don't think

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Den's Award is going to come back and play yet,

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>which I don't really think matters. I think it's gonna

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>be shooting. But I what I really get at is

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>after that first game against the Ravens, we were like, oh, no,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>same old Browns. But they I mean, yes, they let

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati backdoor cover, but they they completely dominated that game, yep,

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and against the Washington football team, so they're they're a

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>better team than they're being given credit for. And if

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're saying, why don't we fade the Cowboys,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally about that. Like every single week, I'm fining

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to do that because I was. I've been about them

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and I've been like, oh, I think they're gonna do it,

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>but no, Yeah, I'm good with that. Let's put that

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>one in in like a raceable pay and just in

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>case we've got something there. But I'm pretty good with that.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty good with that. I have a couple of

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>other games and I like, let me go, and I

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling you're not gonna like this one, although

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you probably just hate both these teams. You're like, this

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is just to stay away to me. But there's another

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>road favorite, so I know you're not loving it. The

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Colts laying two and a half to Chicago. The Bears

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>are the most fraudulent three to zero team in like

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the history of the National Football League. They've barely squeaked

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Lions, the Giants, and the Falcons. I think

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the Colts defense is legitimate. I mean, forget about what

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>they did to the Jets. You and I could do

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that to the Jets. They destroyed Minnesota, which I think

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know you saw last week Minnesota against Tennessee. They

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>can score, they can put up points. I think what

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they did there is a lot on their defense as

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>opposed to you know, the Vikings offense. They didn't play

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>well against Jacksonville. They let them get back into the game.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, you can do that. They've got a lot

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of injuries on offense. They're without Paris Campbell, they're without

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pittman Jr. But the offensive line is elite. I

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think they've kind of got this figured out right now

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to go to a lot of two

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>tight ends scents so they can get in Moley Cox

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and Jack Doyle. And I think they've got enough on

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>offense if you're laying less than the field. Though, Like,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the Colts are gonna win this game. I

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>think Chicago stinks for I mean that that's oversetting it.

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I like the Colts even in Chicago

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>laying two and a half.

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Are you afraid about teams preparing for for Foals and

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the and the You know the reason why that fellow

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that thing fell apart is because they prepped for Trubetsky.

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, we're talking about Atlanta blowing a massive fourth quarter league.

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah? I know, But I just wonder. I mean,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 2>because I thought about this game. I mean I looked

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>at it and I went, Okay, what do I think

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>is the most likely thing to happen? Yeah, the Colts

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>probably winning, and if they win, they probably win by

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and cover this. But man, I'm concerned about.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, it's not like the prepared. They're

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not preparing. They haven't been preparing for this game for weeks.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>This is in the first game of the season where

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they've been like, oh, we're getting ready for Drubisky. They've

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>been preparing for it. They've known Foles was gonna be

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I do not like betting against Nick Foles. I really don't,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>because he is able to do that. He didn't really

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>play all that well against the Falcons. He really didn't.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>He made a lot of, you know, questionable throws. Both

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the guys in our Fantasy Football podcast, Mike tag Leaire

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and Kylli Yeates are Bears fans. Like they were lamenting

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact almost that they won, and everybody was lauding

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles because as much as he brought them back,

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he did even play well. But I'm okay, we've got

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>question marks about that one. You don't feel that good

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>about it, That's okay.

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know who the Colts are yet. That's

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 2>my thing. Like what Jonathan Taylor should have had a

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>monster game last weekend.

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you. Tag said the exact same thing on

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy podcast. They had that game one from a

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>minute in and they knew it. They didn't need to

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>do anything. So Johnathan Taylor, I know we're all disappointed

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>at his production, even though he found the end zone.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Tags mentioned it on our Fansy Pros Football podcast that

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>he was like, he didn't just I don't know. He

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't look like he had good vision. He wasn't making anyone.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 2>He was running into the line into lineman. Yes, he

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 2>was running street in the he was. He wasn't bouncing.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 2>He was like, the hole wasn't there, and he's like,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't care, I'm going through the eight.

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 2>It was it.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Was disinterest, that's what it was. It was this game

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is over. Let's just run the clock out. It doesn't

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>really matter. That's what I think about it. Anyway. I'm

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not willing to be worried whatsoever about Taylor

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people were asking about that from

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective. I'm not worried about it all now.

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think it was give me whatever, this game's over.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is interesting, But that's fine. It's okay because

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we do have three games already that we are both

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to go with So you have questions about that,

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Do you have another one? Then, who's your

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>next one?

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Well? I only have one left because we agree on

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 2>the we agree on the Browns, and we agree on

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals. Correct, I only have one left. And you might,

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 2>you might actually kind of go, what the at this?

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Pick a ready Houston Texans at home lay in three

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's all right, So it's not on my list,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>but talk me through it. It's not it's not on

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the it's not on the other side, So talk me

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>through it.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So the Vikings I think are not a good

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 2>football team right now. And I think when you have

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 2>an zero to three football team who have played the

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, arguably the hardest beginning of any season that

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I can remember. I'm forty three. I can't remember a

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 2>harder start to a year than to go up against

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens Chiefs and on the road at Pittsburgh. Yeah.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>That that is just absolutely ridiculous. So I think Watson

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and company have a big day. I think this defensive

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 2>secondary for the Vikings is young, inexperience and clueless. There's

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 2>going to be about thirteen thousand fans in the building,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>so it's going to have a little bit of a

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>home field advantage. I think their back to are against

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the wall, and they know that you're paying Watson all

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 2>this money you gave up on Hopkins, you traded him away.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of pressure on O'Brien in company to

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 2>deliver here and turn the ship around. I think it

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>starts here with this Vikings team that's really bad and

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 2>I think they've got their COVID questions going around. They

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>missed practice, miss two days of practice in preparation for Watson.

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I think this is where the finally a win for

0:25:58.600 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 2>the Texans by seven.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate it. I don't hate it. I lean

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.719
<v Speaker 1>towards the Texans so we can put it in pencil.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little worried about a few things. Number One,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of injuries popping up on the

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>practice board this week. Will Fuller, who is always actually

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>injured on the on the injury board, I think with

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring, so we'll have to monitor a status because

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>he does really change that oftense a bit. Number Two,

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little worried that the Vikings found something here

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>with Justin Jefferson and realizing what they needed to do

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to score points offensively, so I'm a little worried that

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they might be able to keep it close. They're also desperate,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, in a different way, but they

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are desperate. So I'll put that one in pencil, and

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about a couple other games here

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that we can think about. So we've got these, We've

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>got these these too. I'm going to put the Colts

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on on. It wasn't an outright absolutely not. We're not

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>going to do it right. Neither are the Texans. So

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got the Saints definitely not, and the Raiders definitely not.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's go let me ask you this because I know

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that the number here annoys you. Where it is on DraftKings,

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember if it's dipping on circuits on circa.

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But what about the Pats. They're getting six and a

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>half in casey, what are they in the circa for

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the same Okay.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So here's the thing on this game. I'm gonna

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 2>bet this game, all right. I'm also gonna tease this game,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>taking the Patriots at eight when it gets there. Now,

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna get there. It's not there yet, but the

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Patriots plus eight because I think the books are gonna

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 2>go there for teasers, they're gonna go to eight. So

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 2>I think we're gonna get eight at some point in

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the next twenty four to forty eight hours.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I heard you talking about that too.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll I'll take the Pats at eight and I am

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 2>going to at seven. In a contest, I would take

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots at six and a half. I would take

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs.

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. That's fair. And the consensus line right now again,

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm on betting pros. I coming to get consensus lines.

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a couple of the breakdowns by the

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>way of how the consensus experts are doing the picks.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Fifty five percent still on the Pats even at six

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. If I have to choose one, I'll

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>still go to the Pats. I think this sets up

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>really well for them that the you know, brilliant game

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>by everybody on the Chiefs, they don't stop the run

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think you're gonna get a lot in

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Newton as they try to control the clock. They do

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>what the Ravens basically look like they were going to

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>try to do from the get go, and then they

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>just turned into a passing machine, which when they fell behind.

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 2>You can't go down. I mean, the Pats and the

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 2>Ravens are gonna run the same offense, and if they

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>go down by fourteen, it's all she wrote, it's game over.

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think that's fair. So I do lean that

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>way at six and a half. But it is something

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>where you know, I know that the hook really is

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what it is, and I think if you're getting there

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and you can get that in Vegas, well you should.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm go ahead.

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean I'm mad. I mean, I'm about this line.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a mistake by both contests.

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And I understand six and a half by the way

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, yeah, it's.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>In both its six and a half, and I think

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 2>it's wrong because this number is going to be off

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>by a point and a half. Yeah, And so that

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 2>ticks me off because normally they predict where the number

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 2>is gonna go. You're telling me that people are going

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to the window to bet the Patriots. Yeah, I mean,

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>come on, after what they just did in primetime on

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Monday night football, that's not I mean, normally the Patriots

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs game would be on you know, prime time, blow

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>it up, Mark Key game, Brady versus you know, versus

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the young stud and Patrick Mahomes defending champs against the

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 2>team that they beat against. You know, I believe Mahomes's

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 2>own three still against the Patriots or one and four

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>against Brady, so you would have had that whole storyline

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 2>going on, it's can Mahomes finally beat Brady? Well, that

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 2>was last week for them against the Ravens, so a

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 2>letdown game for the Patriots fits in perfectly for Belichick.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>So I still think I think very much like the

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Chargers game where the Church got out to a really

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 2>good start, I don't hate a bet on Patriots in

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 2>the first half here to have a lead at the half,

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and then the second half the Chiefs get to life

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and then they win the game, but maybe not covering

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 2>that six and a half point line. So like, I

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>don't hate a playing the Patriots, but from from a

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 2>betting perspective, I think you have to you have to

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 2>get seven or higher to bet it for the Patriots.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And it is seven out there. Again I mentioned it

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on Betting Bros. We have the consensus lines from the

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>various sports books. We do have two seven's showing right now,

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one at bet MGM and one at Fandle they're both

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at plus seven, so that's a different But everybody else

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that I can see is at six and a half.

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's a tough one under a touchdown. It's

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a li little bit tough for me to do. Let

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>me go down. By the way, a couple of just

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the how the you know on betting bros dot com,

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a bunch of experts. Matt and I make

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>our picks as well making picks, you get this consensus

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of where people are with the lines. Now Philadelphia at

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco it's minus seven in the consensus line, so

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we're actually getting the better of the line, and still

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.719
<v Speaker 1>sixty six percent of experts are going with Philly in

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that sense. Yeah, I will say that even at Buffalo

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>laying three and a half to Las Vegas, seventy seven

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of people are on Buffalo. So I just want

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to put that out there for you. Uh, Indianapolis laying

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to Chicago, which is the consensus line,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>just like ours, that is, sixty percent of experts are

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>going with Indianapolis.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 2>By the way, did you guys ever run the number

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>based upon what the what our experts go? Yes, totality

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 2>because I does it matter ifcause on a public side

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>of things, if seventy five percent are on one side,

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I like being in the twenty five percent, right, So like,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>so I'm curious about, like, well, how are our experts

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 2>doing if the seventy five percent matter? Like, does it

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 2>matter they run seventy five percent on one?

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>No? No, it's a good point. It's a good point

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what I can also do and what I should I'll

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do next time because I don't want to. I don't

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>want to lay ust too much as I have all

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the moving parts. But you can look at the people

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>who are the most accurate, who are doing better in units,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and you can see just how they are picking any.

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Snow, that's yeah, let's talk about those guys.

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going to do those guys next week. Don't worry

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about hopefully it will be me, me and you.

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>No. No, okay, I play straight because I'm doing strategy

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 2>in that. So I'm doing the like I never played

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 2>three unit games, but I'll do three unit games on that.

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Fair, No, I do. I do much more of my

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>level of confidence that I definitely do change it and

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I go higher on that. Okay, So just a couple

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>other ones because I want to just for the games

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're going, Uh, the vikings at Houston, Houston lane

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, sixty five percent with Houston, so

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's something good. New Orleans giving four. We are

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at three and a half, giving four to Detroit sixty

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>eight percent on New Orleans, Dallas sixty six percent laying

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. That's not going to be me

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and you though, seeat We'll get to that game in

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Hold on, I want to talk about that one.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Are on Arizona?

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh good, are on Arizona?

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So that sense and we've got that, and just so

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifty seven percent around the Jets, so we'll

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>hope that goes well. But anyway, let's move on here then,

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and fifty five percent around New England. I may mention

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that at six and a half, talk to me about

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Seattle lank six and a half to Miami. Okay, it's

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not a game.

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I really want a hard game because it is right.

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The sharp side. Do you agree that the sharp side

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for me like the side that makes the most sense,

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>putting aside the Oh my god, it's Russell Wilson and

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>why are you ever going to bet against Russell Wilson.

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>To me, is Miami at home getting six and a half,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's the better side.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, like I said, this is the week of home dogs,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and historically speaking, in the NFL, home team's catching points,

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you want to be on that side, in particular over

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 2>a field goal. Teams at home getting more than a

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>field goal, you want to be on that side. So,

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, granted, it's gonna be greasy and grimey in

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a back door might be needed to cut it, but yeah,

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think this is either a dog or

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 2>a no play for me because you can easily see

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a letdown after the Cowboys and all this praise, all

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>this love. They're going literally to the too farthest. Seattle

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to Miami is the farthest distance between cities you can

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>play in the NFL, so it's a huge road trip.

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>You're going into the heart of COVID nineteen country in

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Miami and Miami Dade County. So you got that whole

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>concern going off for Seattle. I mean, yeah, I mean,

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 2>if I don't like this, but if I was gonna

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 2>take it, if I had to, I would take the Dolphins.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if you if you came in on this. You

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>were like, Dan, you know what I like? I like them.

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I would take it. I know it's gross,

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it's too big of a risk. I don't want to

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>be there on Sunday going against Russels.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I choose not right now that noneuthless DK Metco gets hurt,

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>right If DK Metco gets hurt, then it changes everything.

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 2>But he is a matchup nightmare for every defense. And

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Wilson's got this crazy ability of throwing the football up

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and it stays up there for like an eternity, and

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Metcalf just runs underneath it and he plays basketball. He

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 2>boxes out the DBS. Awesome, it's incredible.

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's just as long as he can hold

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>onto the ball before he crosses the goal line, that's

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he's unstoppable.

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>And he's unguardable. Even with double teams, he's unguardable. So

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 2>it's so difficult to look at Seattle and like their

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 2>defense gets to play better because they're always playing with

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the lead, so they get in their ears back and

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 2>just go after the quarterback. And like, I mean, they're beatable.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 2>But right now, I mean this whole like charge to

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 2>get Wilson MVP. I think the team really wants to

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 2>do it. I think this is like the calling card

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty for the for the Seattle Seahawks is

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 2>to get Russell Wilson the MVP because he's not.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Like he's playing out of control, and he does the

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>thing where he drops it in the bucket better than

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone I can remember ever doing. Where he's able to

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>throw that ball. It's really amazing and it's great. It's

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>good to and again you talk about what they're going

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to do in this game, they really have no running game.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Chris Carson plays, I doubt it. Even Carlos Hyde

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>is on the injury reports really going to be throwing.

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think Miami is the right side. I

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>will probably have it, for example on our site. That's

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the side that I would go with. But yeah, it

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>makes me a little worried about it getting into the contest.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So again, we may have our five and the three

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we kind of like and we don't absolutely hate. But

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go through a couple more here. I know this

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>goes against the paralism, so it's off the table. But

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>if you came in and you wanted hold on second, sorry,

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>this is just where my garage door opens.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I was like, that's what sounds like.

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Can you hear it?

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Clinton sometimes leaves us in the video. If you're

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>watching us on Bettingpros dot com Sash YouTube, Hello, my

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>office is on top of my garage and my wife,

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, and I do seven podcasts a week

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>no matter what time it is. She I guarantee you

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>she is leaving to come in and out of this

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>garage and you can feel free to here.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>So you probably you'll hear my kid running around right

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 2>by me.

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 1>That's all right, that's all right. My kids are usually

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>best saying okay. So if you came and you said, Dan,

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I just got this feeling. Man. I think they're going

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to be so mad at what happened on Monday, and

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to take the Ravens laying twelve and a

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>half to Washington. I would do it. I think they

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to be so angry right now, Dwayne.

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Had I mean, this is a back door waiting to happen.

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Of course it is, of course, which is why you know,

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what it really probably is. It's a Dwayne

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Haskins gets benched or you know, hurt, God forbid or

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, and Kyle Allen comes in and scores

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>like two meaningless touchdowns for them to lose by ten

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So I get it. I assume it.

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I assumed it was off the table, which is why

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it was way.

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Best to many. I mean, it's a prime teaser game.

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, go after's true.

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Go after the teaser here and tease this thing down,

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and I I think that's the way you'll be. But

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 2>twelve and a half is just get it below a touchdown,

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 2>and I agree, But you gotta protect against the back door,

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and that back door is going to be open.

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, in the consensus lines, it is now

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>up to thirteen and a half or fourteen at certain places,

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's coming in, well.

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 2>You get me fourteen and a half. I think you bet.

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 2>You may wind up betting.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like last year, right with the Patriots, when you

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 1>were doing that at the beginning of the season, where

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we were like, oh, the Lion's just seventeen and I

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even hate it. So that's where it is. Okay,

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>But that's fine. We can say all that one. And

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless you like the underdog, which I assume

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't given how much you hate the Giants. The

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants getting twelve and a half from.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 2>The Rams, Oh my gosh, no, I mean.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't want that game at all.

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>But here's here's the thing, though, Should the Rams be

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 2>favored that much? But against anybody like the like I

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 2>don't like the number, but that again is a dog

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 2>or no play because yeah, I mean, I don't know

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 2>the Rams are good, but I mean I guess because

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 2>they're at home. It's it's you know, after the two

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 2>back to back trips of the East Coast, now they're

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 2>at home taking on a horrible team that they have

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 2>chance to put some numbers up on the board. But

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. That's that's a lot of.

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Points the who's the worst team? Giants or Jets? By

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, because I've been getting this question one yeah

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>by far right, thank you, So all my friends who

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 1>are listening, you have it now from a and.

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm biased. There's not even a debate in my mind.

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's what Oh exactly, that's what I'm saying. I'm like,

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't understand why there's a discussion, like

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 1>the Jets are on their own tier of terribleness, but yeah,

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I look for me the Rams. Yeah, I get that

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems crazy that it's that big a favorite, but

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a game I don't want to touch. I mean,

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>it's just not something.

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>You can't lay in these contests. You can't lay double digits.

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>It's just even even out of the contest, though, I

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 1>don't want to touch it at all. Like, I get

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that the spread sort of is like, wow, that's crazy.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the Rams offense, you saw what

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 1>they could do very easily. I mean, I know you

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>hate Buffalo's defense, but they can put up points in

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>an instant and especially if you've got something at home

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>or now on the road without noise for McVeigh to

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>be in golfzy or as you talk about all the time. Yep,

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go to and by the way, sixty three percent

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of experts at twelve and a half are leaning towards

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. Let's go how about the Jaguars getting three

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half from the Bengals. Do you have any

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lean on that.

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 2>These are games I wouldn't bet with your money. Yeah,

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean you can, because here's the thing with the Jags. Okay,

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna be They're so tough to predict like I

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 2>thought against Miami, I was. I was on the Jags. Yeah,

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 2>they have talent. I mean they're not horrible, they're not great,

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 2>but they have talent. And so I look at I

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know yet about Joe Burrow. I'm coming around. I'm

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 2>talking about betting on him. I'm coming around on the

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 2>idea that Burrow might be a guy that the books

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 2>are undervaluing his ability, his moxy, his toughness, his ability

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 2>to back door cover, which is you know, Joey backdoor

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 2>may be a nickname that we're given it because of

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>we're laughing about it, but that might stick. He might

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 2>be a dude that just even when they're losing, he

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 2>could come out. And then the tie last week against

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles, I think that benefited the Bengals. It gives

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 2>them some confidence going into this game. So I don't

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 2>like it. But if I had to pick a side

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to be on the Bengals.

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think with the hook I'd go Jaguars. I

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>think that the I'm assuming Djhark plays because I really

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>think that the loss of DJ Tark last week was

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>completely messing them up. Chris Conley dropped to ball. I

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>just you know, it was. That doesn't explain why Ryan

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick almost set a record for you know, completions in

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a row. But I think i'd probably lean at three

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half towards the Jaguars. But again, it's a

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>complete stay away game. I think there's only two that

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't touched on. One of them is the Chargers

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>getting seven and a half from the Bucks.

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 2>See, let me throw it back at you for a second. Yes,

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 2>how good is this Bucks offense? When healthy? Uh?

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>When healthy? I think they're pretty good there. I don't

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>think they're an elite offense at this point because I

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>think that Brady has really taken a step back and

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's feeling.

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 2>The because it's strength on strength here. Okay, this is

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>defense for the Chargers offense for the pet for the Bucks,

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they I think the Chargers keep this game

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 2>within a touchdown. I think the Bucks win. But if

0:40:58.360 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 2>I had to pick a side, I don't like it,

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 2>but I think the number matters to hear, I would

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 2>take the Chargers.

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The consensus has gone down to seven for what it's worth,

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so you're getting the hook. In the context. I think

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of things. I think Chris Godwin's

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>out right. I think that really hurts because I think

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Godwin's huge. I think Scotty Miller maybe out. He's struggling

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think with a Coroin injury which I

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't even realize necessarily so, and I think Leonard Fournette

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be out. They're really hurting on offense.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But as you aptly predicted before we got into the season,

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers are completely decimated with injuries. They just put

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Harris Junior on ir They lost Melvin Ingram, we

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>know they lost Irwin James, and I don't want to

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>bet on a rookie QB and this I just I

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>don't love him. I'd rather if you were willing, if

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you felt the same way about it, and we had

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to pick one, I would certainly go with the Colts

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 1>getting given the two and a half to the Bears.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>There's one other game I think that we haven't tached on.

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Monday Night, which is the Falcons getting seven and

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a half from the Packers.

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Tease it, tease it, tease it. This is my week,

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 2>this is my teaser. I'm teasing Green Bay down to one. Okay,

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 2>but I don't like this game, but I think I

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 2>think Green Bay wins, but I don't. I don't know.

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Alans are also is almost certainly. I think Fanta Adams

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is coming back.

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I think Adams back is a bit is

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit it makes it.

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, of course it's a huge deal.

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 2>But I think they win. I think Green Bay wins,

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 2>but I don't like that number. I think that that's

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 2>heavy here, and because I think the Falcons, I mean again,

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 2>this is another team playing for their lives, and the

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 2>hook matters seven and a half. That hook matters to me.

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I uh, I don't like it either way.

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to go near it. I don't

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>know what the Packers are. The Packers is good, I

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.720
<v Speaker 1>can't I can't really tell. I mean, Rodgers is playing

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>at old Rogers level, but I'm still not convinced one hundred.

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, it kind of throws it back in the face

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of us who expected the regression because

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 2>of the one the one score wins last year. Yeah,

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and everyone said, oh, that team that went to the

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 2>NFC Championship game, they're not really that good because look

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>how many games they won by one score. And in

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 2>a way, it kind of showed us the other way

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 2>of like, well, they were good enough to win and

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 2>be on the right side of all those one scores. So,

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think this Falcons team is really bad.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 2>And Laculio might come back. If he does, I think

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 2>it's significance. But if he doesn't, you know, that's a

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty big loss as well. And this Falcons

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 2>team just keeps on finding new and impressive ways to

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 2>blow games. So it's bad.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>It's really bad. Fifty nine Yeah, in primetime, fifty nine

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>percent in Lambeau, fifty nine percent of people are of

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>experts are on Green Bay at minus seven right here, Okay,

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I've got, man, and you tell me

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong. The Eagles are getting seven and a

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>half from the four nine ers. We like that one.

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals are laying three and a half to the Panthers,

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we like that one.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>The Browns are getting four and a half from the Cowboys.

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>We like that one.

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:57.360
<v Speaker 1>The Texans are laying three and a half to the Vikings.

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 1>You like that one. I'm okay with it and it's

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 1>passable for me, okay. And the Colts are laying two

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and a half to the Bears. You don't like it,

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but you you don't hate it as much as you

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hate every other game.

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't. I don't. Again, I don't hate it.

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean I need rivers to not throw receptions and

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I need rivers to get rid of the football and

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 2>nugets sacked and have pick sixes and whatnot.

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But as long as I can't guarantee any of that, yes,

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>as long.

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>As it doesn't happen, well, I think the Colts win.

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, I think I think, Look, I will.

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I am a little worried about. I would feel better

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>about it with Trubisky for sure.

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm I have a master's degree in favor lady

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 2>fitting that guy. I love fitting that dude. Nick Fole

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.399
<v Speaker 2>scares me, just because I wonder if they're I mean again,

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 2>you're playing with a new quarterback, new options, and I think,

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's funny Nick Knick's comments after the game

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of like I feel for Mitch and I was there,

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I've been there for Mitch. It's like, yeah, Bud, you

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 2>don't care you're starting. Man, You've got a job again,

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and you know it's your job because Matt that Nanny

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 2>was waiting. He was waiting to make that change. He

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do that when they signed him, but he

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 2>couldn't do it until. I mean, he in a game

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 2>in which Trebitsky didn't play that badly. He threw one pick,

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 2>and the second time as soon as you threw a pick,

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 2>he was benched. Boomly.

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think what it was is they clearly wanted Foles

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the starter, but you couldn't go to Foles

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and ever go back to Mitch. It was it was done,

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>so you had to start Mitch see what you had.

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And then he played terribly in that first game, and

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>then miraculously had this awesome fourth quarter and they won

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the game, and you're like, all right, well now we

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of here. Which once he went to Foles, I

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 1>was talking with the guys too. They were like, I

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe they go back to my No, no,

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>this is done, and then started, okay, so those are

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>our five picks unless we change. If you talk to

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you know you get some good inside information like you

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>often do, let me know and we can change it

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and we will tweet it out again. Tune into Matt's

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>livestream eleven am eastern eight a m. Pacific on Sunday mornings.

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>He's going to go through the whole Sley. I'll let

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you know if we change. I'll have some props for you.

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>As I did last week. I will send him a

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of props on Saturday night that he can relate

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. And that is it. Follow us along

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>again on Twitter at Dan Harris ad and that Sports

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Talk Matt. Matt will talk to you in the Morning podcast.

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I will talk to you next week or on the

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Bros. Football Podcast. See them