WEBVTT - US Ambassador to EU Andrew Puzder Talks Trade Tensions

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Trade tensions between the

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>United States and the European Union of resurfaced since President

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Trump said he would raise the tariffs on e U

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>cars and trucks to twenty five percent. The European Commission

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>President Ursla Vonderlon says the e is ready for all

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>scenarios if Washington breaks its trade agreements. Truck last summer,

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>they saw ahead of a meeting of G seven trade

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ministers happening in Paris this morning, joining us in our

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Brussels studio to discuss as the US ambassadors the opinion

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Poster, good morning, ambassador. Great to have you back

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with us. Good morning on Bloomberg Radio. Can you explain

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the route of this problem? President Trump says he wants

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to increase these levees because the EU isn't complying with

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the deal.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>What's the issue, so Beck.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 3>In March of twenty twenty five, the President took auto

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 3>turifs up to twenty five percent. After a bunch of

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 3>back and forth communications between President Vonderline and President Trump,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 3>we reached an agreement in Turnbury last year, we would

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 3>reduce our tariffs to fifteen percent and the EU would reduce.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>Their tariffs to zero.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 3>We reduced our tariffs on August first of last year,

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 3>that's nine months ago on autos, and to date we

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen the EU reduced a single tariff. Not only

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>haven't they reduced tariffs, but when the Parliament came forward

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 3>after many delays and voted to approve the deal, they

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>tried to change the deal. They want to add four

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 3>or five amendments to the deal which completely change it.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 3>They want to renegotiate. So the President said, look, after

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>nine months of you enjoying the benefits of this deal

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 3>and dragging your feet on getting us the benefits, times up,

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to put up with this. You need

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to get this thing done. You need to get it

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 3>done the way we agreed to it, the way President

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Vanderline and I agreed to it. And if you can't

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>get it done, then we're going to take tariffs back

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 3>up and we're going to take back take the tariff

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>up on notice. Now it hasn't happened yet, but he's

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 3>notified Europe that it will happen.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 4>The European Union would argue that this is the system

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 4>by which the legislation has to be passed that it

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 4>has to go through the legislative process. Was it necessary

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 4>to threaten tariffs in order to try to push this through?

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 3>So two things. One is the Parliament could have approved

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>this a long time ago. This is something that was delayed.

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 3>They delayed the vote, they delayed the committee votes. It

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>was stalled for a long time, and when they finally

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>pass it, they want to amend the deal. So when

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 3>you're saying it's our legislative process, well, the legislative process

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 3>was to drag your feed, continue hearings, continue votes, not

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>have them, and then change the deal once you do

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 3>have a vote. Then I would say that that's not

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>really a very fair legislative process.

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>They did also delay it because if i'm there were

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>also fresh threats of tariffs coming from the United States

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, which was one of the key delays. But

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the last time that we spoke, you were on your

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>way to the planary session in Strasbourg to talk to

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>MEPs about their concerns. Did that not come to the

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>right resolution? Is that why we're in the situation wherein.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Berd Longey did a great job getting this

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>bill through the Parliament. I think there were a lot

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 3>of people opposed to the deal and he had to

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>make some concessions to get it approved in parliament.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:11.399
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Chairman Webber has done a great job with the EPP.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I think there are people who are sincerely interested in

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 3>getting this deal approved, but it did get delayed continuously.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 3>The United States has not increased tariffs. That's just not true.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>We have not increased to threaten too well, it's a

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 3>big difference between threatening to do something and doing it

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>since the day that we since August first of last year,

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>tariffs on automobiles have been fifteen percent. Nobody's changed that.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>And when it did get when they do finally get

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>it through the parliament, I think everybody realizes that they

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>want to renegotiate the deal. I quite honestly, in the

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>United States side, there's no interest in renegotiating the deal.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>We have a deal, and as many in the EU.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>This isn't just the United States saying this, but many

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>people in the European Union have been saying a deal

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 3>is a deal, we need to approve this. Well, we

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>agree a deal is a deal. We need to approve this,

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>so let's get it approved.

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 4>What conversations have you been having this week then, and

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 4>what conversations are you having now with the EU? Do

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 4>you think that this you know, as you say times up,

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 4>do you think that that message is getting across Do

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 4>you think that that is going to speed things up?

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think rather than talking about conversations I have

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 3>with various EU officials, some of who are favorably disposed

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 3>towards our position, some of them are aggressively not favorably

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 3>disposed our position. I think if you look at the

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 3>public statements, you can see that there are divisions within

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 3>the EU as to whether their support for doing this

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 3>deal or opposition to it. But I believe that there

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 3>is more support than there is oppositions, So I believe

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 3>we're going to get this deal done.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Look, this deal is part of really getting.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 3>The the new EU US relationship where it needs to be.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>We need to get certainty in our trade relationship. Businesses

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>need that, countries need that. That will lead to greater

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 3>prosperity for both the EU and the US. And it

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>actually says that in the Framework Trade Agreement we've got

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the critical Minerals deal, which we now have a memorandum

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 3>of understanding on that. Commissioner Chefkevich and Secretary Rubio signed.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 3>It was last week or the week before. We're trying

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 3>to get Europe on board, and I think we will

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>come to a Pax Silica agreement with the EU, which

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 3>will help bring the EU more aggressively into the AI economy,

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 3>along with as a partner with the United States. So

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 3>these are all efforts to try and bring the two

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>economies together, and I think we'll both be more prosperous

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>if we can approve these agreements, and I think we

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 3>will approve them. It's just going through this process is

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 3>not easy, and I think both sides doing the best

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 3>it can. But nine months of you got to deal,

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>we got nothing isn't going to work.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see the I suppose the zone for negotiations. Now,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>then what are the things because I mean the clauses

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that the European Parliament added, including you know that it

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>would only the deal would only come into force when

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the US held a bit side of the bargain. So

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you agree with that if you're talking about

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a deal being a deal.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>We've been holding up our side of the bargram since

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 2>last fall, so.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not an issue. The other the other key condition

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was we should be.

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>We should be making that condition with I mean but

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 3>that that I guess, I guess really we are. You

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>don't have a deal until both people comply. A deal

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 3>isn't you do what you promise and and we'll do

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 3>ours later. A deal is you do what you promise

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 3>we'll do would we promise? Well, okay, we're waiting.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but I'm trying to identify upos. What is it

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly that that was in the European Parliament changes that

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that is now an issue given that you've been talking

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to the European Parliament about this.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, the things that are an issue are the things

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 3>that weren't in the deal that was agreed to a

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Turnbury and that you know, really great people on the

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 3>on the EU side, big advocates for the European Union,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Bjorn Seabird morro Chef negotiated this against people from the

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>US who are the same Jamison Greer, our ambassador, and

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Howard Lutnik, our Secretary of Commerce. These for individuals, with

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>help from others, put what Trump and Wonderline agreed to

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 3>in writing, and we did what we said we would do.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>It's time for Europe to do what it said it

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>would do and stop with the amendments.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Already, Okay, I suppose. In the meantime, though, what has

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 4>happened is the US led war in Iran, and many

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 4>European countries have been critical of that war. Also, what

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 4>sort of conversations have been having with counterparts and what

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 4>are those conversations been like since the start of the war,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 4>given the economic, the inflationary, the growth impact that is

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 4>having now on European countries.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 3>So my conversations with the people in the the ones

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>who need a conversation, I think some people understood this

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>without me having to say it. But President Trump, Secretary

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Rubio has been very clear and President Trump as as well,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 3>that the United States believes that Iran was building up

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>a significant resource or reserves of missiles, including long range

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 3>missiles and drones, so that if anybody tried to stop

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 3>their nuclear weapons program with which they were proceeding, if

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 3>anybody tried to stop it, they would disrupt the world

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 3>economy by tacking their neighbors in the Middle East, by

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 3>shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, and doing whatever they

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 3>could to prevent the world from restricting their ability to

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>get a nuclear weapon. Now, President Trump once he had

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 3>that knowledge, could could have done what other presidents and

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>other leaders in other countries have done, which has kicked

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the ball down the road, or kick the can down

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the road and say, you know, let the next guy

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 3>deal with this. Because there was no political benefit to

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>President Trump doing what he did. The Democrats aren't going

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to support him no matter what he does, so that

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 3>wasn't going to help. But his own party wasn't completely

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 3>supportive of the President taking this move, so and with

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 3>elections coming up in November, there was no political benefits.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 3>So you know, if he did this, he had a

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 3>very sincere belief that this was absolutely the right thing

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to do, not only for the United States, but for

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 3>world peace. You cannot let this crazy theocratic regime get

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 3>a nuclear weapon.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>It would be a complete disasswer.

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So consequences of this as well, with energy prices that

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>much higher, and so you know, this is something that

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously European countries are feeling very keenly. I'm wondering, do

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a sense that relations with some of those

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>countries in the EU are irreparably damaged? Can there be

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>an improvements?

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think. I don't think relations are irreparably damaged.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 3>To get back to what I'm talking to people in

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the EU about, once you understand why President Trump did

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 3>this and the importance of his doing it, and the

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 3>really the decision being that this was absolutely what was

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 3>the right thing to do. When you find countries where

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 3>we've spent really billions, if not trillions of dollars defending

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 3>we've had military bases in place, even since the fall

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>of the Soviet Union, where we really didn't need to

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 3>have those bases, We've continued to spend American taxpayer dollars

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 3>on defense of Europe. You know, we went in the

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>past one hundred and twenty years, We've been to Europe

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 3>twice to free it from from aggressive, aggressive, militaristic people,

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, and then we can't use our bases, we

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 3>can't fly over countries to do what President Trump believed

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 3>was the right thing to do in with respect to Iran,

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and I think was unquestionably the right thing to do.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 3>It is it will, it is having an effect on prices,

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>but look, this is nothing compared to what would have

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>happened if a long range ballistic missile carrying a nuclear

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 3>weapon had headed off towards Rome or Cyprus, or Berlin

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 3>or Tel Aviv.

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is we know there was no indications

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that that was imminent either.

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, we know they had the ballistic missiles, we know

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 3>they've been threatening to do it. We know they sent

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>a missile, we know they attacked Cyprus. So I mean,

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 3>so there are a lot of things we do know.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 2>You can't. You know, we don't. But in nineteen thirty five.

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 3>If they if we had stopped Adolf Hitler, everybody would

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>have claimed we don't know what would have happened if

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 3>we if we hadn't stopped him.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the same thing here. We don't know what would

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 2>have happened.

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 3>You'll never know what would have happened, but we do

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 3>have evidence as to what could have happened.

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, good to have you with you. I'm Bossdor,

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for being my pleasure in studio.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Poster there, US Ambassador to the European Union, joining

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>us in the Brussels Radio studio.