WEBVTT - Google Shares Soar After Dodging Chrome Sale 

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is alive from coast to coast with Caroline

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Hide in New York and Eva, though in San Francisco.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet hits a record high as Google dodges the sale

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 3>of Chrome in a key antitrust ruling.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Plus Apple benefits from Google's legal win but loses out

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>on the AI talent wars Again. We discussed the latest

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>key researcher jumping to rival Meta.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And the rolls.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Royce CFO joins US stateside as the British engineering giant

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 3>goes off to AI fuel's data center demand for power tech.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But first we check in on these markets.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 4>The power higher on the day.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Ed reprieve from yesterday's sell off as we see boniols

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 1>come back a little bit, and we focus on well,

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty woeful data when it comes to the jobs data.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean the Fed Canandian cut. We're up

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>more than a percentage point, But dig into the individual

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>movers because they're big.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, our top story is Google.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 3>The key headline that you need to know is that

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>they will not have to divest or sell Chrome. They

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 3>will be allowed to continue paying in particular Apple twenty

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars per year for placement of search, but there

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 3>is a lot that they're still required to do in

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the remedy section of that key and trust ruling. The

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 3>stock for Alphabet pairent of Google on track for its

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 3>biggest jump since April record high Alphabet Apple.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 2>Is also pushing a lot high. Later in the program, going.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Too detail, let's start with a Google piece and bring

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 3>in our guest character.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's bring in Sarah Forden because we want to

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>blow by blow account about what the legal win is here.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>You're in DC, our legal team leader, Sarah, just walk

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>us through why there seems to be such a win

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>for Alphabet.

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Ah.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely. I mean this was a huge win because primarily,

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.639
<v Speaker 5>I mean the judge in the end didn't give Google

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 5>much more than a slap on the wrist, and there

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 5>was a lot of fear and concern that this was

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 5>going to completely reshape the tech market, the search market,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 5>and instead it's almost status quo. I mean, they don't

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 5>have to break off Chrome. They can keep paying the

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 5>money to Apple to be a deferred default search engine.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 5>But the only caveat there was that it can't be exclusive,

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 5>so that opens up things for Apple a little bit

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 5>more and they have to do some data sharing, but

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 5>it's very limited. It's a one time shot at sharing

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 5>the data, and it's just search data, not advertising data.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 5>So they're still looking at how that's going to work technically,

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 5>and they'll have to report back to the judge. But

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day, it's not a huge

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 5>change or a huge blow for Google.

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Sarah.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Google's response and it's statement with celebratory basically, and that

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 3>largely focuses on Chrome.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 2>They do not in the data sharing part.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Their concern is privacy because they don't want to share

0:02:54.680 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 3>data with rivals like Perplexiopenai, dot Go, etc. There's still

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 3>some mechanics here. September tenth is a key date the

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>parties need to write down on paper something that appeases

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 3>this judge. But in the ruling, the judge also talks

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 3>about generative AI being key to the outcome of this case.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Explain that.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So that was very interesting because the way the

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 5>judge handled the initial trial and even the remedy portion

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 5>of the trial made a lot of people think that

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 5>he was going to be much tougher, But at the

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 5>end of the day, his ruling was very conservative and

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 5>he said the main reason was that that he said

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 5>the generative AI was really changing the shape of the market,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 5>and he didn't want to get out ahead of that,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 5>and he didn't want to issue ruling that was going

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 5>to really disrupt the market, change the money flows, inhibit

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 5>innovation in any way.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg, Sarah Forden, who leads the ns trust team out

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>of DC and all things legal, thank you very much.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk through the market reaction. Jeffrey's analyst Brent Hill

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 3>joins US. Now the stock's up eight point six percent

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 3>record high, but that's only the biggest jump since the first.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Week of April.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Your colleagues on the street, many of them have raised

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>price targets or calls on the stock.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 2>You have not in response to this ruling.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Why and what is your main takeaway from it?

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 6>So for the last ten years in tech, we maintained

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 6>that any regulatory in insertion into these stocks are really

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 6>not founded. So watching what happened to Meta was Zuckerberg

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 6>watching what happened with Microsoft. There's been no breakup ever,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 6>and so we've always said that an illegal case like this,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 6>that there's always a remedy, and that the companies are

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 6>too big and that the regulators want one thing and

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 6>the tech companies want one thing, and they'll find a

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 6>way to meet in the middle. They have found a

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 6>way to meet in the middle. And so our view

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 6>is that again, in any situation, you buy these stocks

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 6>on the sphere, and that worked for Microsoft and at

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 6>work now for Google, we are a one hundred percent hit rate.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 6>This isn't the game I'm creating. This is the game

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 6>we're playing in and that's been the rule book. So

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 6>our view is like it's there's been no change. This

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 6>company's growing their EBITDA at a mid to high team

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 6>multiple and the stock train at fourteen times and it

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 6>traded it twelve times just a few months ago. So

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 6>there's really no knee jerk reaction from us because the

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 6>reaction for the last ten years has been the same

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 6>reaction and any legal case that we've had when we

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 6>talk to our clients, which is they'll figure out a

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 6>way and the inherent value is higher for what they're

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 6>doing than what the street is embedding.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, brands now will change.

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, Google needs to find a way to continue to

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>compete even with a little bit of data sharing. What

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that part of the agreement and

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>what it means versus rivals, particularly in general to AI.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 6>Look, I mean we are starting our searches in perplexity

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 6>and open AI, and then we're going to Google. We're

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 6>not going away from Google. Google is still part of that.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 6>But the way we as consumers are looking for information

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 6>I think is changing. And so I think this pressure

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 6>on Google is good. It's going to bring their game out.

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 6>You know, It's not like Scottie Shuffler likes to go

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 6>out and play golf against himself. He wants justin Thomas.

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 6>He wants the other players, whether it's Tommy Fleetwood competing

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 6>against him, that makes him better. So I think many

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 6>of these AI companies are making Google better. And we've

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 6>said this for a long time. There's more horsepower underneath

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 6>the hood. Google has done a terrible job of popping

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 6>the hood and showing us what's behind the hood, and

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 6>we think you're going to see that. So you know,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 6>Gemini is doing a good job. We think ultimately that

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 6>many's AI.

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Competitors are a good thing.

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 6>And I think this came into obviously the judge's ruling,

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 6>which is there's a lot more competition now than there

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 6>was a few years ago.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 3>We're going to go very deep on the Apple portion

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 3>of this later in the hour, but the basics of

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 3>it are is that Google's still allowed to play pay

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Apple twenty billion dollars a year and others to be

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the default search basement.

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>How big is that for Google? That result?

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 6>I think it's I mean it's huge, it's it's it's

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 6>a big thing. And I think Apple has said that

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 6>they are also looking at evaluating Gemini, they are evaluing

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 6>other AI tools. But I think ultimately what happens is, look,

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 6>even if they had to divest the browser, they didn't

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 6>get this, Everyone's still going to go back to Google. Right,

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 6>We're going to go to opening perplexity to do different searches,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 6>but we ultimately end back up in Google. You can't

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 6>complete the loop without Google, whether it's map information or

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 6>hours about a business you're trying to visit, or you're

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 6>trying to figure out, you know what time does the

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 6>vet close? You know, like, there's just things that you

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 6>need Google for and it's the best way. And so

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 6>it really didn't matter in our opinion if they had

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 6>to divest the browser or what's gonna happen. It's the

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 6>consumers are going to defect their behavior, and the behavior

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 6>is you go to where you get the best information,

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 6>and that's the best information today for a lot of

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 6>the consumers is in Google. So again, I think the

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 6>world is shifting. There's no question. I think this pressure

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 6>is going to be good. But I think again, if

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 6>you take a picture of a car in California, which

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 6>I did for my son, and you want to figure

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 6>out where a Toyota four Runner with different colors is at,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 6>and Gemini will tell you the dealerships where that car

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 6>is available in perplexity or or check gvtal to tell

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 6>you the dealerships, it won't tell you where the exact

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 6>car can be found. So I think there's examples of

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 6>where Gemini is actually better than the other systems. And again,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 6>we're gonna have multiple agents. We're gonna have multiple AI

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 6>systems that we all embrace that work in concert with

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 6>each other. And again I think that's what we're seeing

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 6>in our survey work. When you talk to your own usage,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 6>when you look at you talk to your friends, we're

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 6>using multiple tools. This isn't going to reduce the need

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 6>for Google.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>We're at your price target for alvabet I believe. So

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>do we see ongoing growth for alvabet.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 4>You seem to be talking a.

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Very bullish case for why it's going to win out

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in this competition.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean Stock's up twenty two percent now and it's

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 6>outperforming Amazon and many of the other names. The sen

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 6>and AI was too negative, and on this court ruling

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 6>it was too It was too negative. So we've had

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 6>a nice snap back. And again, as we've seen in

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 6>many cases like Oracles up fifteen, Stock gave back fifteen

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 6>points recently. I mean I would say that I think

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 6>clearly Stock's reflecting a lot of the good news now

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 6>and that's honestly kind of again where our price target

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 6>was set. So we didn't predict this, but I certainly

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 6>think there Again, just go back to the playbook for

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 6>the last two decades in tech, the rule is every time,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 6>going forward, in every conversation we have going forward with

0:09:55.040 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 6>you guys, the big tech investigations lead to basically nothing,

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 6>and they are great buying opportunities. It's been that case

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 6>for two decades.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 7>So that's the That's what I think we've got to

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 7>continue to take away right big texts trying to help consumers, governments,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 7>trying and protect and they ultimately find a way to

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 7>have peace and in this new AI world.

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's exactly what we got.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Brenville Anst Jefferies. Great to have you on.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Coming up software companies, well, they're offering the government steep

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>discounts to line up contracts.

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss next. That's pretty bad tech.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Service Now is aiming to boost its contracts with the

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 3>US government by offering federal agencies discounts, but as much

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 3>as seventy percent on its software. Bloombo's Brody Ford breaks

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 3>the story and joins US now. Service now wants adoption

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>of its AI tools, right, but just explain the mechanism.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 3>What does a federal government agency need to do to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>get that seventy percent discount?

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so service now makes effectively it helped desk software.

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 8>You say, oh, dang, I lost my laptop. I need

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 8>a new one. Instead of going and finding somebody, you know,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 8>you just put in a ticket with service now over simplification.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 8>But it makes these kinds of things simple in the workplace. Essentially,

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 8>the federal government has been saying, for these software tools

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 8>we use, why don't we centralize our negotiations and try

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 8>to get the best discount we can from these software vendors.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 8>And so Service Now is just the latest of these

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 8>steep discounts. They say, if you upgrade, if you expand

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 8>your business, we'll give you a discount. Government gets a

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 8>discount and Service now gets effectively new business because in

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 8>a couple of years that pricing might go back to normal.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And is that the positive here because Service now is

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in what seventy five percent of government agencies, So they

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>take this hit to margin in the short term for

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>long term reward.

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I'm sure that is the bet there. May right,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 8>they're saying that we can land some new business, get

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 8>them to upgrade to our better systems, We'll take the

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 8>margin hit for a little while. Then in two or

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 8>three years, you know what are we going to charge them.

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 8>Then it's unclear how these discounts will stick.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Will they stick, But.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 8>For now, the government and these vendors are saying it's

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 8>a bit of a win win situation. I mean, government

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 8>buying of software is a famously fragmented and chaotic process,

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 8>and they're trying to improve that a bit.

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Brodie Ford, it's a great read. Thanks so much

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>for explaining it. Look for more on software expertise here,

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Hillary fresh Year is the senior research

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts for software and IT services at clear Bridge Investments,

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and Hillary, Look, it's not just Service Now. Microsoft has

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>also been discounting. We've seen slacks have two pass a

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>salesforce and indeed some of the providers of cloud. Is

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this something you build into the models at the moment

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that for the time being they're going to have to

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>offer more for less.

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 9>Sure, well, I think yes, it's part and parcel of

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 9>actually doing business in the current era with the government.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 9>But the government has such antiquated systems, they have so

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 9>much to do with respect to digitizing their environments that,

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 9>as Brodie said, I think it's a big opportunity for

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 9>the vendors. And recall that the margin on incremental software

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 9>is incredibly high, so they can afford to give more

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 9>for the same amount initially to get more in the end. So,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 9>in fact, I think it's been a source of upside

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 9>for some of these models. We actually saw that in

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 9>Service Now few quarters ago.

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Hillary, you said in this current environment in Carolina,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>and I was discussing this morning at.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 2>The desk about how that last.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Earnings period, there were a number of names where government

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>contracts were track so closely. How crucial is it that

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>a software name is on good terms with this administration

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and able to get through that procurement process.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 9>I think it's very important and beneficial. Most of the

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 9>vendors we track are doing a pretty good job of it,

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 9>and I actually I think most investors haven't imputed much

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 9>benefit from government near term in their models to so

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 9>to the extent that comes through, I think that could

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 9>be a source of upside for some of them.

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 3>So then how should investors adjust maybe how they model

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 3>some of these names. Is there a lot more upside

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 3>in some of these shares that come directly from top

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 3>line growth from government sales that you're not yet seeing

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 3>baked in overtime?

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 9>Yes, over time, potentially next quarter. I don't think that's

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 9>an immediate term phenomenon for many, But we saw Salesforce

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 9>had booked one hundred million dollar government contract recently to

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 9>the end of the quarter. That's actually a very small

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 9>relative to the total, but it's indicative of a thign.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 9>It's an indicative of the government starting to purchase following

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 9>DOGE cuts, where the vendors saw some immediate term pain

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 9>in the prayer a few quarters, and.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That's important considering we've got Salesforce numbers coming out after

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the battle on September the third, and I'm interested well,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>so today I'm interested in the growth or the winners

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and losers here because in many ways, Salesforce has been

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>beaten up this year, unlike many other tech names, because

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we're that it's losing out to Genai competitors.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Is not something you're seeing.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 9>Yes, the entire SaaS complex has been really beaten up

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 9>on investor concerns of our disintermediation.

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 4>And it's funny.

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 9>We've seen rolling recognition of GENI beneficiaries, starting with semis

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 9>and hardware, data center, power, hyperscalers, etc. Most recently the

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 9>data platform names, but SAS has been left behind, and

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 9>I believe in that ving investors are assuming that SaaS

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 9>is very much a zero sum game, meaning for any

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 9>GENI winner, there are going to be multiple incumbent losers.

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 9>But there are a few things I think about when

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 9>thinking through that which I'd be happy to discuss. One

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 9>of them is that over the next five years we're

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 9>going to see so much more opportunity in software and

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 9>even in SaaS than we've been seen, there's going to

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 9>be far more workloads to address farmer software written, and

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 9>the incumbents who are moving quickly and executing will be

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 9>a big part of that. Second, these vendors are probably

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 9>going to generate more revenue from GENNI before we see

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 9>any actual real distancetermuniation from their businesses and their variances

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 9>depending on the sub segment. But that's something to think about.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 9>And then finally, the valuations have been crushed, as you

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 9>pointed out, so it's an interesting stetup. There's still a

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 9>fair amount of mutum uncertainty, but as we moved through

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 9>the year, that narrative could shift similar to but not

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 9>exactly to the extent that we saw in a in

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 9>a Snowflake a year ago or a Mango DV more recently,

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 9>but to a less.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Find that so fascinating.

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I was in Europe for the UK for much of

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the last thirty days and a lot of the software

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 3>names had a rough period. There's a lot of empsystem

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 3>like how the no Code Low Code player survives right,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 3>And I'm interested in salesforce earnings right because there's the hype.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Of the AI headline.

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you see that materially like growing these businesses?

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 10>Now?

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Are they good at AI or are they just good

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>at marketing?

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 9>They'll some of them will be good at both. I

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 9>think salesforce will be good at both. Cogin is a

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 9>very different discipline. Co gen doesn't have to be right

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 9>out of the You have a world of developers who

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 9>can spend all the time they save actually generating code

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 9>or remediating the code after it's been written. When something

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 9>is customer facing or even broadly employee facing, it has

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 9>to be accurate, secure, compliant, trust it. It can't run

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 9>off the rails. It can't expose proprietary data or expose

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 9>the organization to liability or security vulnerabilities. So that just

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 9>translates to slower adoption in the enterprise in particular and

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 9>commercial organizations. But the incumbents have incomacy advantages, They delivering

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 9>distribution advantages. They have a lot of hooks into every system.

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 9>They can make things work together. They own the workflows,

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 9>the data fabric, the business logic. There's a lot there

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 9>that they can work with and IMPUTYI on top of it.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 9>So it just means they have a fighting chance and

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 9>they're moving a whole lot faster this time around than

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 9>they did in cloud. But it's going to take time.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 9>We're not going to see it immediately. It'll take time.

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 4>Henry Fresh Deep Insight.

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>We thank as senior research analysts for software and IT

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>services at Clearbridge Investment.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Cato Networks is announcing its first ever acquisition, buying Israeli

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 3>startup aim Security, which specialized is in enterprise AI security tools,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 3>going to bring in Cato CEO Sho Kramer.

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 2>And you know this is interesting.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 3>You've been on the show regularly throughout the year, We've

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>talked about M and A and now you've done some

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 3>what's the rationale here?

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, the nationalist that AI transformation is going to dominate

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 10>enterprise investment in the next decade. It's going to be

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 10>bigger and faster and more impactful from a business perspective

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 10>than even digital transformation.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 11>And it creates a huge security challenge because it's a

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 11>completely new security sect that needs to listen to all

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:01.239
<v Speaker 11>these tens of thousands of conversations in plain language and

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 11>decide what is.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 10>Appopulate for the enterprise according to some policy. So this

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 10>is a whole new category in security is going to

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 10>be huge, and SASE is the best place to put it.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 10>SASE is the network. Security is a cloud service that

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 10>sits and listen to all these conversations. So we've obviously

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 10>jumped in early into this and bought a security that

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 10>specializes for the last three years in building these security sets.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it about the talent that you need to bring

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in when you've already got an annual recurring revenue run

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>rate of three hundred million dollars. You're building fast too.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you do it organically?

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 10>Because the market is happening at late that is unprecedented.

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 10>There's a huge pressure both from the board that's is

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 10>AI as most important business initiative as well as from

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 10>employees that the AI is the most important productivity initiative

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 10>And the SISO that, as we talked last time, is

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 10>in its predicament as it is from a budget and

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 10>from a polational from a gunity perspective, now has to

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 10>face AI and needs to deliver a secure journey and

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 10>it needs to and they need to do it now.

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 10>So developing three years now, what AIM has developed in

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 10>the last three years is not going to cut it.

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 10>Enterprises need it now and need a broad solution and

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 10>a deep solution and that's what we bring them.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Schlima.

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>We only have a minute left, but a crew has

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>come in and giving you an additional fifty million on

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 3>top of the three point fifty you did in June.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Did you need the money for this piece of M

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and A or why are you taking that extra capital.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 10>Because we can. Because I think that with this acquisition,

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 10>Kato is becoming even more exciting to investors. And you know,

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 10>we always have a second closing plan and and we

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 10>have we have we have enough cash in the bank

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 10>to get to profitability without compromising our aggressive golf targets,

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 10>with or without this fifteen million, but showing a stronger balance.

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 10>It is always a good thing.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Saline's Shomo Kramer. So it's great to catch up with you.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Co found the CEO Cato Networks as it makes its

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>first ever M and a.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>The data center power demand is growing exponentially thanks to

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>AI and the UK's biggest engineering company, Rolls Royce is

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>seizing that opportunity. Best known for its jet engine business,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll Royce is also one of the pioneers of small

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear reactor technology. Was recently chosen to build three units

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom. HIT to talk through the power

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>systems growth along with civil, aerospace and defense is a

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>company's CFO, Helen McKay.

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>It is wonderful to have you here, Helen, while you're

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 4>in the US talking to investors.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm interested in what you tell them at the moment,

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly about SMR technology. What is the opportunity here for

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you as a business.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 12>Huge opportunities you see in SMR, the size of that market.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 12>We think the addressable market is about four hundred equivalents

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 12>of their SMRs. Huge opportunity coming forward. As you think

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 12>about how we're going to support energy resilience going forward,

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 12>it has to figure we have a leading position in

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 12>that market. As you said, we won the contract with

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 12>the UK government for the first three small modular reactors.

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 12>We've actually won a contract with the Czech Republic for

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 12>up to six. We're in final stages with Sweden for

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 12>their small module reactors, and we're actually looking at entry

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 12>positions in the US. I mean the US market. You

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 12>have a nuclear ambition to go from I think it's

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 12>one hundred gigawatts to four hundred gigawatts by twenty fifty

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 12>massive opportunity. And we've been building nuclear reactors for submarines,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 12>for nuclear submarines for more than sixty years, and our

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 12>small modular reactors are the largest on the market as well.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You've really been selling into government and it's interesting at

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment that for us, it's all about the hyperscalar

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>demand as well. And we have seen this nuclear renaissance

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>bear fruit. When you've got Amazon with x Energy, when

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got Alphabet going with Chairostpower, do you talk to

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the hyperscalers or is it more about the US government

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>giving your defense leaning No soo.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely we're talking to the hyperscalers right now. Where the

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 12>initial focus is on governments and utility companies, but the

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 12>hyperscalers are absolutely talking to us and interested in this.

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 12>If you think about, as you said earlier, the growth

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 12>and AI the that's going to be required to provide

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 12>that continuity and resilience, SMR will absolutely figure in that.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 12>So those conversations are underway across the globe, not just

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 12>in the US.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Helen we spent a lot of time in the last

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 3>year speaking to Oklow and x Energy, the kind of

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the more small nimble startups in SMR on this program.

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>What's the Rolls Royce advantage?

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 3>What makes your technology better than the newcomers to the field.

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 12>Fantastic, So thanks for the question. So we've been in

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 12>this area for more than sixty years.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we have built.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 12>Nuclear submarines with nuclear reactors, which is consistent technology with

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 12>SMRs for the U for the UK Navy, So we've

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 12>got leading technology, proven technology. It's based on proven fuel

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 12>supplies as well. In addition to that, SMR is the

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 12>largest on the market at four hundred and seventeen megawatts.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 12>That means from a cost and efficiency perspective, it's one

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 12>of the more efficient, actually more comparable with energy and wind,

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 12>but importantly more consistent, so it doesn't have latency issues.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 12>And very importantly ere SMR construct eighty percent of it

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 12>can be modular built, so you can construct it in

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 12>the factory and if you think about almost like a

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 12>Lego block and then you take it to build it

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 12>on site. So it means the construction is much shorter

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 12>and it means the risk factor faster, yeah, is much

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 12>lower as well. So we do have that leading position

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 12>with that distinctive technology.

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Helen.

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>In the defense tech context, the political and strategic environments

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 3>like really changed, not just the United States, but like

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Western allies overall. Could you just kind of give me

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 3>your outlook for your next gen military turbo fans combined

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 3>psyco engines and what's changing for you.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 12>So, as you say, lots of activity in relation to

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 12>investment and defense at the minute, both in the US

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 12>and in Europe. And we've got a very strong position

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 12>in the defense business, not just in what we provide

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 12>for military operations, but actually how that shows up in

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 12>our energy business within power systems. We have a very

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 12>strong governmental position there. We have got leading positions in

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 12>Germany and Europe. We have got leading positions in land

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 12>and naval, and with the spending particularly that's happening in

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 12>Europe when people are talking about increasing natal commitments, where

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 12>we expect to see that show up in the short

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 12>term is actually in land and then naval. You know,

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 12>in our power systems business that governmental business is twenty

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 12>five percent of our revenues. So we're very well positioned

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 12>YEP to support that growth and to capture those opportunities

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 12>going forward. So short term that's where we see it

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 12>will show up. In longer term, we expect to see

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 12>it show up in our defense business, but very exciting.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, talk to us about the positioning for the

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>long term opportunity here. Because you're the CFO, you're thinking

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.239
<v Speaker 1>about how to finance all of this that has been

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some reporting around the.

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 4>SMR part of the business.

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you think for outside funding even talk of an

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>IPO of that unit.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 4>What are you thinking about longer term to finance all

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 4>of this?

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 12>So SMR, we're not ipo ing that, just to be clear.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 12>So we're investing right now to support growth across all

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 12>of our businesses. But if I maybe focus on the

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 12>governmental business, just within the last six weeks, we've actually

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 12>invested more than one hundred million pounds in the US

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 12>alone to support the growth of expanded production, be that

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 12>in defense or data centers.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to because of the administration investment on

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the No, Yeah, the US is an important market for

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It is very important that we continue to grow our

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>position here.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 12>It's one of our home markets. So it's the right

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 12>thing for us to do. But across our business, since

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 12>we put our transformation together, we've actually increased investment each year. Yeah,

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 12>while we've delivered this results and we're investing now for

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 12>the longer term, some of the investments that we're doing

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 12>in our investment defense business, the platforms and the programs

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 12>won't come into operation until the twenty thirties. So the

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 12>long term growth is happening right now.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Helen ros Royce is so aligned with Airbus.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 3>But the strategy of this president administration is to use

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 3>Boeings like a negotiating tool, you know in international markets.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 2>How do you see that playing out?

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you participate in a US administration that's focused on

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Boeing if you're so close to Airbus? By the way,

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 3>massive aviation like a care about the propulsion as well

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 3>as the fuselage which aircraft cone on.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 12>So what I'd say is we have got a very

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 12>good and strong relationship with the US administration and we've

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 12>got a very good relationship with Boeing and Airbus. So

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 12>that's how we lead into that. We've had a presence

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 12>in America for more than one hundred years. We have

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 12>got five thos people across twenty six states that work

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 12>for rules Royce. It is one of your whole markets.

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>So that is how we.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 12>Approach those relationships with the administration in the US, and

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 12>it has worked incredibly well. And it will remain a

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 12>very important market for us going forward.

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Helen McKay, CFO Rolls Royce, thank you so much for

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>joining us on Bloomberg Tech. Let's get back to our

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 3>top story, and that is Google it does not have

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 3>to divest Chrome. The shares are up almost nine percent,

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 3>biggest jumpson's April record high. There's the second part to

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the story, which is that Google's able to continue paying

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>partners for placement of search. Apple is the main part

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 3>of that story. Its shares are also higher and in

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the balance and remainder.

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Of the show.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>We're going to go out to bloombergs Mark German and

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>understand the Apple piece of this story.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 2>What else is coming up?

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Karen plenty more, particularly when it comes to funding and

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world of general to AI. The CEO of

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you dot Com joining us to discuss the company's latest

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollar funding round.

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 3>AI search company u dot Com has closed a one

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollar Series C funding round that values it

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 3>at one point five billion dollars, fueled by the AI boom,

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and it shift in focus to enterprise customers. Use dot

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Com co founder and CEO Richard Socials with us in

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. The environment has changed, The landscape has changed.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Every time you come on, it's changed. But did that

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of make this round necessary? What do you need

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the funds for?

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 13>We're scaling, Our customers are scaling. The LM infrastructure that

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 13>we need to keep these AI and agents up to

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 13>date is increasing. The needs for it are increasing, so

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 13>that's why we raise it to support our customers like Harvey,

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 13>the Nih abduct, Dot Go, windsurf Telegraph, the German Press

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 13>Agency DPA. There's so many customers now that want this

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 13>technology and need to get the LMS to.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 11>Be up to date.

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Many founder CEOs from the show saying we're scaling, I

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 3>think that there's like a lot of value in explaining

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 3>what that reads in material real terms, like you're hiring

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>better talent, you need more compute.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 2>What is it? Yeah?

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 13>For us, it's definitely more compute, but also the talent.

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 13>Those are basically the two biggest factors. The more mbdigpus

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 13>but also more scraping infrastructure to really build out the

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 13>best search index for lms. You know, Google build an

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 13>amazing search index for people to decide, oh, which link

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 13>should I click on.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>But LMS search differently.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 13>They can search through hundreds of different websites, right, they

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 13>can read the whole text or certain lurbs of each

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 13>website to then give you a summary of those answers.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 13>So all of that is different and needs investment.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Richard, I mean you are one of the heroes in

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>natural language processing. You're like the fourth most cited researcher

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in it. You've been studying it for years. I must

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>envisage that you've had some calls for your talent IU

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and wanting to purchase your company. Have you been fending

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>off Meta and the like so left, right and center.

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 13>There's definitely been interest in you dot com and our

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 13>team for the last like five years. But we're here

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 13>to really build an enduring company where people can get answers,

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 13>build their own agents, transform their companies, and so we're

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 13>not that interested in that.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It is such a fair space though. Everyone's in on

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise. The large language model developers that you use

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>open AI, they're trying to get into enterprise, and just

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>recently the judge Meta ruling on alphabet for example, and

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're going to have to share data.

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 1>How does that benefit you? Because you started your journey

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in AI search.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah. I think in consumer there will be a few

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 13>usually monopoly or throw our polies, right, But an enterprise

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 13>there's so much open space, right. There are so many

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 13>different companies that need up to date information to make

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 13>their lms more productive over both web data but also

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:16.479
<v Speaker 13>internal search, internal data, and you need to have all

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 13>of that be composable as an API infrastructure. And so

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 13>that's kind of what we're focused on and where we

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 13>think that is. Indeed, the killer app for lms is

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 13>their productivity in enterprise.

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Our executive producer Jackie Lopez was talking about how it's

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 3>just beautiful timing having you on the show today. Let's

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 3>be honest about it. You know, with the Google decision

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 3>last night, it's coincidence. I was trying to think what

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 3>is richards socialst thing and you've always been basically talking

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 3>about Google in the context that people are building different

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and better stuff and both consumers and enterprises are more

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 3>open to using a different technology. I think that's a

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 3>fair summary of your position. But how has the ruling

0:33:55.880 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 3>changed things? You know against your the ideology of recent years.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 13>Is so in many ways it's a good ruling now

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 13>of course, as a startup, when this ruling will really

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 13>come into effect is important. They might appeal the ruling.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 13>It'll take years probably for it to really materialize. That's

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 13>infinity in AI and startup time. So we're still just

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 13>focused on building the best APIs and also enter in

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 13>solutions for our customers, and we don't really think this

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 13>will materially affect us over next two or three years.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 13>Of course it will affect other consumer companies, but again,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 13>in many ways, this is an index that was built

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.439
<v Speaker 13>for people to decide which flew a link to click

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 13>on AIS, and people through their AIS and through their

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.479
<v Speaker 13>agents will search very differently into the three years.

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's interesting is one of your clients that we

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>just showed is dut dot Go and it's all about search.

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So how does its end exposure affect you and how

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think about continuing to serve are the AI

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>winners or broadening out to more of the blue chips.

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 13>Well, yeah, I think the values of privacy are actually

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 13>very useful for both consumers and for enterprise, and so

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 13>we're really excited to keep partnering with companies like that

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 13>that both want to get search results but also feed

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 13>those search results into lms, and we're doing that over

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 13>a billion times a month. There's actually no other AI

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 13>startup I know of that is at that scale a

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 13>billion times where our answers either are shown directly to

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 13>a user or are given to an LM to then

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 13>majorly effect what that LM says. In fact, it would

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 13>say that many people underestimate that whole search infrastructure layer.

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 13>Whereas the lms themselves are going to get commoditized more

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 13>and morts open source pressure for them, but the search

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 13>you can't open source search index.

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>We want to thank you, Richard Shosha, wish we had

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>more time, CEO and co founder Review dot Com. Fascinating fundraise,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>fascinating business model.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Come back soon. We hope.

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got to get back to the key story of

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the day, and one of the move is on the

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>back of it, Apple up almost three percent. That's as

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it rises alongside Alphabet the Court of Course ruling that

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Google can continue to pay partners for keeping Google's Search

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>on their operating system. So more on Alphabet's impact on Apple.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Mark German. It is a big lift

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's a relief because it helps Apple's bottom line.

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 14>It's a relief for Apple, it's a relief for Google,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 14>but it's also relief for the whole technology industry. Right

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 14>the US government is scrutinizing all of them, meta.

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Google, Apple.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 14>Of course you have the European Union involved, obviously that's separate.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 14>But this ruling yesterday sets some pretty nice precedent. Don't

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 14>forget Apple. They're going to try on a couple of

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 14>years now for what they've done to consumers according to

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 14>the US government. Right, So if Google's getting off scot

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 14>free for things that probably are much worse than what

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 14>Apple has done according I mean, in my viewpoint, I

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 14>think Apple is going to be okay in a couple

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 14>of years too. So that long term headwind that's been

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.399
<v Speaker 14>but also the short term headwind of losing potentially twenty

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 14>billion a year from this Google deal that's also been mitigated.

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, Mark, just really quick, because I also want to

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 3>get to a story you broke yesterday. It's the services

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 3>part of Apple's business that the streets focused on this

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 3>morning in the context of the Google ruling.

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, like I said, the

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 14>Google deal right now brings in over twenty billion dollars

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 14>a year for Apple, and that's just one of two

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 14>twenty billion dollar per year potential headwinds. The other is

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 14>the app store. Obviously, the EU is trying to rip

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 14>up the business model there. You have a judge in

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 14>California who ruled that developers can spin users towards the

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 14>web to complete transactions, which obviously means Apple loses it's

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 14>fifteen to thirty percent. So the services business, nearly half

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 14>of it was potentially under fire over the over the

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 14>next twelve months. Now the Google one's resolved, we'll see

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 14>what happens with the app store.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is Judge Meta basically said genera to AI

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>has changed the game here.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Jeneraiti AI is changing the game when.

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It comes to talent, and just talk to us about

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>how we really are seeing Apple lose out in that respect.

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 14>It feels like, well, there's a talent war right now

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 14>and Meta is leading the pack. You have Open AI

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 14>and Anthropic in there. They're all trying to hire each

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 14>other's top academics and researchers in the AI space. A

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 14>little edge can do a lot. The big question for

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 14>me is how quickly does this stuff all become commoditized

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 14>and Apple's bed is well pretty soon because they are

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 14>working on some extensive AI partnerships right now, and they've

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 14>been looking at a number of companies to acquire, so

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 14>they believe they're going to play in here too. But

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 14>for now, they're bleeding talent on an almost weekly basis.

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 14>Every two weeks, I have a story coming out between

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.240
<v Speaker 14>two and five different major AI players at Apple leaving

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 14>for Meta. Yesterday, I had a story about four departures

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 14>over the last week or so, including the head of

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 14>AI Robotics research going to Meta to their new robotics department.

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 14>You also have two people going to Open Ai and

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 14>another person going to Anthropic, and a lot of the

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 14>people on Apple's LM team they're interviewing out. So you're

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 14>going to see more departures in the near future, but

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 14>for now, Apples looking at ways to replenish that talent

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 14>pool by buying or partnering mes Monk.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 3>What is a notable move for Apple of almost three

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 3>percent of Google ruling, But also check out his reporting

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 3>on the talent departures. Another AI story, Open Ai is

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 3>agreed to buy product testing startup Statsig for one point

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 3>one billion dollars in an all stock deal want to

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 3>bring in Bloomberg's AI reporter Rachel Metz. It's not the

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 3>biggest deal that open AI's done.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 2>It's not small either.

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Why does open ai need statsig?

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 15>Open ai is working to build out its products. It's

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 15>consumer products also, it's B to B products, and this is,

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:36.959
<v Speaker 15>in the company's view, a really good way to do that.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 15>They bought this company that helps companies test products that

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 15>could do things like ab testing, so you can have

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 15>people trying out different things with features that you might

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 15>want to launch, and this is something that they see

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 15>as really valuable to the future of products like chat GPT.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The CEO moves over become CTO of Applications reports into Fijisimo. Rachel,

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>What did the deal look like from a talent perspective,

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>because they've been getting more and more extraordinary as times

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>gone on between AI companies.

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.919
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so as far as talent, as you mentioned, the

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 15>CEO of statsig is going to take on this new

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 15>role underneath Fijisimo. Figisimo is in charge of opening Eyes

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 15>Applications at this point, and they also it also led

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 15>to a whole bunch of other changes that you see

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 15>that were announced at the same time. Open the eyes

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.320
<v Speaker 15>sort of shuffling around a number of people in management.

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 15>So now the company's going to have two chief technology officers.

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 15>Previously it had one, mirror Marati. She's been gone for

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 15>a while and started her own company. Now they will

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 15>have two, one on the consumer side and one on

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 15>the B to B side. So it's going to be

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 15>interesting to see how those two people are in charge

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 15>of different things, how they all work together, and what

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 15>it means as far as growth in their business.

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Rachel and lots happened in the last month, Like GPT five,

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 3>we have more m and a news.

0:40:58.600 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of talent news.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Could you just update the audience where open ai currently

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of stands in all the chaos of reorgs and newsflow.

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 15>I mean a lot has been a lot has been

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.439
<v Speaker 15>going on, and I suspect we will we will see more.

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 15>I mean we have to remember that this is a

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 15>company that's undergoing a lot of change. It's not a

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 15>young company at this point. I mean it's been around

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 15>for about ten years. However, things have been chanting very

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 15>rapidly over the past few years, and chagbt is continuing

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 15>to grow and grow and grow. It's got over seven

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 15>hundred million users weekly users at this point, so I

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 15>would expect to keep seeing things move around as a

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 15>company continues to try to figure out what's going on,

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:43.240
<v Speaker 15>and as the industry continues to shift with other companies

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 15>such as Meta, I'm trying to poach people on paying

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 15>extremely large amounts of money for employees. It's going to

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 15>be an interesting ride.

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And we're here for it as a you Rachel Metz,

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>so good to have you on on the latest bit

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of M and A and Open AI. I meanwhile, that

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>does it for this edition Opening by Tech, But we've

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>got to look in at what the market's been up to.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 4>It has been a bounce back since yesterday.

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now's that one hundred bounce back. Whether it's short

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 3>lived or not. Apple and Alphabet the main stories. Apple,

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:13.479
<v Speaker 3>I think is kind of big, like it's a strong

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 3>reaction on a stop where a standard deviation Okay, forgive

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 3>me that one one sigma move is two percent. We'll

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 3>keep tracking the top story recap on the podcast. We've

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 3>had some absolutely terrific conversations today on what has been

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 3>a massive story from San Francisco and New York.

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech