WEBVTT - Tech News: An Elon-Gated Episode

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Tech Are Yet it is time for the tech News

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for Thursday, December fourteenth, twenty twenty three. And first up,

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>before I actually get into the news, I really have

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to give a huge shout out to Ours Technica. I

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>referenced them all the time, but for today's episode, I mean,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>article after article was popping up that really was relevant,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and the quality of the work over at Ours Technica

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>is taught notch. Once again, I don't have any connection

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>with Ours Technica. I as far as I know, I

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know anyone who works there. I just really admire

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the work that they create. So a lot of the

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff today will be referencing that, as I will call

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>out out in the story after story. Anyway, our first

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>story actually is one of the ones that comes from

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Ours Technica. It was written by Ashley Bellinger and it's

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>titled Elon Musk's x AD. Revenue reportedly fell one point

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>five billion with a B this year amid boycotts, so

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the story elaborates on this, saying that initially analysts estimated

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that X, which was actually known as Twitter at the

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this year. That transformation actually happened this year.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like an eternity ago at this point, But anyway,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that X would generate around three billion dollars in AD revenue.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>That was the initial estimate for twenty twenty three. Instead,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that number is closer to two point five billion in

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>AD revenue. Now, keep in mind ads are just one

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>source of revenue for Twitter, but it's the main source. Anyway.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Last year it was closer to four billion dollars in

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.279
<v Speaker 1>AD revenue. So yeah, the site has seen a massive drop,

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>right four billion year to two point five billion this year.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It's actually five billion the year before that. Now, this

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come as a huge surprise because there have been

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>numerous brands, ranging from globally recognized names to smaller niche companies,

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that have ceased to advertise on the platform in the

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>wake of various scandals. Those range from Elon Musk personally

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>elevating anti Semitic conspiracy theories to Elon Musk deciding he

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>would reinstate the account of Alex Jones while using the

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>cover story of it was the will of the people

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in a poll that some might question the validity anyway.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Musk has pretty much taken the you're killing my company

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>stance against these advertisers, accusing them of running a semi

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>organized campaign of destruction against X. He seems unwilling or

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe incapable of acknowledging that these are consequences that stem

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>from his own actions, and instead thinks of it as

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>some sort of conspiracy to destroy Twitter, just to argue

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that I don't see the logic in companies banding together

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to destroy Twitter. That makes no sense because prior to

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Musk's takeover of the company, Twitter was looked at as

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a viable advertising platform. I mean, it was far from perfect,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong. Twitter was a mess before Musk

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>took it over. But I don't know many brands that

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>are actually eager to decrease the number of options they

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have when it comes to advertising. They would rather be

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>able to advertise everywhere, like including inside your brain, if

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they could. Anyway, please check out the article in Ours

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Technica if you want more in depth analysis on the issue.

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot more Musk related stories to get

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>through for this episode. My apologies for that, but that's

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>just how this week played out. So our next story

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>comes from CBC's Jonathan Montpetite, who reports that several Canadian

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>companies have also chosen to halt advertising on X. So

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Montpetit says that CBC investigated several accounts on X that

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>were linked to extremists, including accounts that belonged to white nationalists,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and when they were looking at the posts on these accounts,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>they also saw ads for prominent companies appearing in that feed,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>side by side with the hateful content. This actually mirrors

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what several other organizations have claimed to have found in

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the past, including the Center for Countering Digital Hate. That

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>was one of the organizations that X threatened to sue

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>after that nonprofit pointed out there was a rise of

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hateful content in general on X. That's something that advertisers

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>would likely object to. So X has been fighting against

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>these these these accusations or allegations, however you want to

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>frame it. It's been fighting against these claims for the

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>better part of the year. But organizations have found similar things,

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>like they've discovered commonalities. So either all of these organizations

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>are lying or at the very least manipulating data to

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>support the narrative they want to tell, or things that

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>X are pretty bad anyway, This story shows that X's

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>issues with advertising extends beyond US borders. Now, on top

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of those issues, X continues to have sporadic technical problems.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>In an article titled an X outage Broke All Outgoing

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Links Again by Richard Lawler of The Verge yesterday afternoon,

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>users on X found that clicking on any outgoing link

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in a post would only bring up an error message.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Lawler reports that X appeared to resolve the issue after

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>about an hour after it had happened, though according to Lawler,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>there was never any official acknowledgment from the company that

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the problem had even happened at all. Now, obviously, technical

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>issues like that are also a concern for advertisers, right,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't do you any good to post an ad

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on X if when someone who's actually interested in the

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ad clicks on a link and then they get an

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>error page instead. That's no good either. As for why

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>this problem happened in the first place, I would wager

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that the massive layoffs that musk oversaw at Twitter slash

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>X means that it's much more difficult for staff to anticipate,

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>prevent or even fix issues. But that's just my opinion.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not something that I can point to as hard evidence.

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>It just seems to be logical to me that when

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you lay off a massive amount of your engineering staff

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>when problems crop up, it is a lot harder to

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>address those in a timely manner. Still, it did resolve

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the issue in a little around an hour, which isn't terrible,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess, especially when you consider the constraints that the

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>team is working under. Those folks should receive huge accolades

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for getting the problem fixed at least within an hour.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But you could also argue, well, this shouldn't have happened

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>at all, and maybe it wouldn't have if Musk Hatton

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>had that massive culling of staff earlier in the year.

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>The woes don't stop for Musk yet. I don't think

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be counting twenty twenty three as one

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of the best years of his life as it's going

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, at least not the end of it. It's

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>been a pretty rocky ride anyway. Druv Merotra and Dell

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Cameron of Wired and my apologies for butchering the name there.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They have a piece that's titled Elon Musk's New Monkey

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Death Claims spur Fresh Demands for an SEC investigation. That's

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a wild headline, Elon Musk's New Monkey Death Claims. Elon

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Musk's New Monkey Death Claims to me, sounds like the

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>name of a heavy metal band. But anyway, this is

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>actually very serious and very sad. Business has to do

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with another of Musk's companies, the startup Neurolink. That's the

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>company Musk founded that is dedicated to developing brain computer interfaces.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>That is a way for you to be able to

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>interact and control computer systems using thought, and that's all

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to use. So the piece covers how an

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>organization called the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine disputes Elon

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Musk's claims that the primates that have died as a

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>result of Neurolink experimentation were already terminal cases. Musk said,

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had to euthanize primates that we've experimented on,

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but these primates were already facing death. They were already

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in some form of terminal health. Perhaps they had cancer

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>or some other condition that meant that they were dying,

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and that they specifically picked these animals because knowing that

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>they were going to have to be euthanized afterward because

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they were already facing death. The advocacy group denies that

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they said that, you know, veterinary data points to the

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>animals not having any sort of terminal cases before being

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>put through the experimental procedures that then ultimately led to

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the animals being euthanized, and that instead what Musk was

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>doing was just spouting off misinformation and lies in an

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>effort to encourage investors to pour more money into the business.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>That he was misleading investors, and as such, they are

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>calling upon the US Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to open an investigation into Neuralink. If you want to

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>know more about this, you should definitely read the article

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>over and wired, but I will warn you it is

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>incredibly upsetting. If you are tenderhearted like I am, it

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>may disturb you. I make no apologies for being a sap,

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, That's just who I am, and I

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>love animals. So it was a very hard read, but

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think a very important one. We're not done with

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's companies just yet. We actually have a couple

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>more stories, but before we get to that, for goodness sakes,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>let's just take a quick break to thank our sponsors.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>All right. I mentioned that we still had a couple

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of stories about Elon Musk companies. In this case, the

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>company we're talking about is Tesla. So it's been an

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>eventful week for Elon Musk. Tesla had to issue or

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to issue a recall for practically all Tesla's

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on US roads today. It's a software update kind of recall.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>This mas Tesla owners won't have to take their car

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>into a dealership to have modifications performed on the vehicle

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>or even swap out their vehicle or anything like that.

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>They won't have to do that. But it has to

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do with Tesla's advanced driver assist features, namely autopilot. So essentially,

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA, has ordered

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Tesla to increase the number of warnings sent to drivers

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they keep their attention on the

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>road even when they engage autopilot. The NHTSA determined that

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>several Tesla owners were using autopilot features outside of their

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>approved operating parameters, and this represents a danger to both

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the driver and to others on the road. Now, Tesla

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>has always included language and its official documents that these

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>features are meant for specific use cases like highway driving. Right,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not meant for everything. And the drivers also are

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so posed to always remain focused on their surroundings. They're

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to just let the car take over. But

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>then you also have folks like Elon Musk who complicate

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>matters by hyping up the autonomous features of the technology,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>seemingly suggesting that they are more capable than what they

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>really are. It's the same matter that's at the heart

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of an ongoing lawsuit between the State of California and Tesla. Anyway,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>once updated, Tesla's that are in autopilot mode will perform

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>more frequent checks to ensure that the driver is still

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>fully focused on what's going on and that their hands

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>remain on the steering wheel. Otherwise, the vehicle may disengage

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>autopilot and force the driver to take over. And according

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to Reuter's, Tesla faces more opposition in Sweden. This stems

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>from the company's refusal to negotiate with collective bargaining groups

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that represent various workers like mechanics, for example. I mentioned

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this in an earlier Technic New episode. But in Sweden

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it is customary for these worker groups essentially unions, to

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>negotiate their own salaries and benefits with each employer. There's

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>no national minimum wage or anything like that, so all

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>agreements are made between the worker organizations and the employers.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But Tesla hasn't played ball, and so multiple worker groups

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>have now refused to cooperate with Tesla to apply pressure

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to the company. The latest of these is the Transport

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Workers Union, which now says it will stop collecting waste

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>from Tesla's workshops starting December twenty fourth unless Tesla meets

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with these groups. Honestly, the whole situation between Tesla and

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the various Swedish worker groups is starting to sound like

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an Always Sunny and Philadelphia episode to me. And I

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>know that Elon Musk traditionally has been very anti workers' unions,

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't surprise me that it has reached this

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>particular level now. In non Elon News, You're Welcome, a

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit claims that insurance company Humana has been relying upon

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>an AI model to make decisions about agreeing to or

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>denying care to patients mostly the latter, and that this

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>AI model has a failure rate of around ninety percent. Yikes,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So the whole story is in ours tetnaca. Once again,

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>big shout out to them. This one is by Beth

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Mole and it's titled Humana also using AI tool with

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent error rate to deny care, lawsuit claims. So

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the also in that headline refers to a similar accusation

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>against insurance company United Health, which also makes use of

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this same AI model. That AI model is a product

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>titled NH Predict. It is named after the company that

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>makes it, nave Health. The ninety percent error rate references

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that allegedly, when people have appealed a denial of care

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>decision that was guided by this AI model, ninety percent

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of the time those decisions are reversed. So essentially, the

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>AI model takes into account various factors to determine when

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>benefits should end for specific medical issues. The lawsuit argues

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that the model is far too restrictive and it's limited

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and it cannot take into consideration particulars that are unique

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to each individual patient, so as a result, patients find

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>their benefits cut off prematurely or denied outright, and that

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies are making use of this AI tool not

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>because it is accurate, but actually for the opposite reason

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that it is incredibly inaccurate, but it's inaccurate and airing

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on the side where insurance companies aren't having to pay

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>out as much so they can hoard all that money

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. There's a lot I could say about the

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance industry, but I won't because that this isn't the

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Pott cast for it. But the lawsuit accuses Humana of

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>breach of contract along with several other offenses, and we'll

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have to see where this goes from here. I just

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>will remind you there are lots of legitimate beneficial uses

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for artificial intelligence. There really are. They're ones that could

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have incredible positive impact on our lives. But there are

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>other applications of AI that are unbalanced in how they

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>will benefit one party versus everybody else, in this case,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the insurance industry versus anyone who's not an insurance company

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>or an investor in an insurance company. So we do

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>need to wrestle with that. Next up, well, guess what,

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got another piece from ours Tetnica once again by

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Bellinger. Seriously, Ashley, where do you find the time

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to do all this stuff? Your articles are great? I

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just can't imagine. Gosh, you got to work super hard anyway.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>The article is titled trains were designed to break down

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>after a third party repairs hackers find and yeah, this

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is another piece that demonstrates how companies can jealously guard

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>their ecosystems. Right. We have the whole right to repair

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>movement here in the United States that aims to break

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>down those walls that companies will put up, like the

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>John Deere tractor company. There's all these cases where farmers

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>were arguing they should have the right to be able

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to maintain and repair their own equipment and not have

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to a specific authorized John Deere repair shop

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to get this stuff done. This falls into

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>that same sort of category, but in this case it's

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>about trains in Poland. So a hacker group called Dragon

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Sector investigated trains made by a Polish company called Nuog.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>So Dragon Sector was actually hired to do this to

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>look into it because there was a railway company that

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was using these trains for NWOG and they were seeing

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of breakdowns and were wondering what was actually

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of it, because it didn't appear to

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be hardware related. It seemed to be software related, and

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they wondered if something hinky was going on, so they

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hired these hackers to look into it. The hackers say

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>they found the reason that apparently the software running on

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>these trains would detect if the trains were brought anywhere

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>other than an official Nuog facility for repairs. So if

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>a railway company dared to use some third party repair

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>shop in order to perform maintenance or repair on ANWOG train,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the software would detect that and then trigger failures, so

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>essentially bricking the train, which is kind of like how

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>some smartphones would brick themselves if the phones detected that

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>users were trying to, you know, jail break them. Newog

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>has denied the hackers claims and threatened a lawsuit against them,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but the hackers maintained that their investigation has plenty of

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>proof that Nwogg's was fixing the game in their favor.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Newogg has also suggested that perhaps a competitor actually hacked

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>into Nuogg's trains and altered the software to make it

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>look like nwog was walling off its ecosystem, But in fact,

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>this is all an elaborate attempt to discredit Nuog and

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to really heap dirt upon their name. That sounds like

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a hail Mary kind of play if you ask me.

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that it would be impossible, but it

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like the most likely reason why this software

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>would include these kinds of features, assuming that the hackers

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are telling the truth. They also said they uncovered essentially

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>a code that you could enter into the system that

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>would clear all the issues. So if that's true, then

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's what they're saying is, yeah, nuogg sabotages their trains

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so that you're forced to use Nuog to fix them.

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Then they just put in this code and everything's fixed

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>because they were the ones who put the problem there

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. That's the allegation. Very interesting case here,

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, I've got a couple more stories to go

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>through before we can get to that. Let's take another

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>quick break. We're back. CNBC's Chelsea Cox has a piece

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>titled FCC votes to ban termination fees for cable and

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>satellite services, and that's something that I think should make

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of American customers happy because previously, if you

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>were a customer of a cable or a satellite provider

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and you wanted out of your agreement and it was

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you had entered into a two year

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>agreement and a year and a half in you wanted out,

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>typically to get out you had to pay a fee,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it was a prohibitively hefty fee for the

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>privilege of ending this agreement. Personally, in my opinion, I

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>have always thought of these fees as a way of

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>discouraging even the meager amount of competition we see in

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>this space here in the United States. I've said it

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>many times. Most Americans actually have very few options when

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to stuff like cable providers. In my neighborhood,

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I have two options. That's only if I don't want

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>internet service as part of that package, right, If I

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>want internet service as part of my cable package, really

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I only have one choice. The other one is so

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>far behind that it's not really a viable choice in

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the first place. But one way to discourage competition is

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to lock customers into a multi year agreement, and then

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in order to make sure they stay there, you tack

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>on this hefty fee to prevent anyone from severing that

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>agreement early. Unsurprisingly, the FCC passed this measure right down

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>party lines. Two members of the FCC voted against it,

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty typical. Like, I don't think I can't

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>remember the last time I saw a matter where the

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>FCC unanimously voted on a measure. It almost always comes

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>down to party lines. Now, before I get to some

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>article recommendations, I do have one final story. This one

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>comes from NASA. Miles Hatfield posted a blog entry and

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it's titled Engineers are working to resolve issues with Voyager

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>one computer. So the Voyager one spacecraft has traveled further

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>into space than any other spacecraft we've ever sent up there.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It's in fact, it's no longer in our Solar System.

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It is traveling through interstellar space, and a computer glitch

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in Voyager one's Flight data System or FDS appears to

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>be the cause of this problem. It can actually receive

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and execute commands that we send here from Earth, so

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>that part is still good, but it's unable to send

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>information back to us, so we can't get any scientific

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>or engineering data back from Voyager one. We can just

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>send stuff to it, which which greatly limits its utility

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as a scientific instrument. Obviously, now engineers are hoping that

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>they can resolve this problem, but it's likely going to

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>take weeks in order to come up with a solution

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 1>to do it, so it may be a while before

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>we can find out if we can get Voyager to

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>send information back to us again. And in fact, just

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>sending a message between Earth and the spacecraft takes nearly

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a full day. In fact, it takes twenty two and

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a half hours to go from Earth to the Voyager one,

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's because of how far away the spacecraft is

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>from US. Here's hoping NASA can implement a fix, as

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the story of the Voyager spacecraft has been a truly

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>remarkable one. I've got a couple of suggested reading recommendations

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>for y'all. One of those, No Surprise, comes from Ours Technica.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>This one was written by John Brodkin and it is

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>titled Ted Cruz wants to stop the FCC from updating

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>data breach notification rules. So yeah, it's another tech meets

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.719
<v Speaker 1>political news item, and it highlights what seems like an

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>odd position from my perspective, because I would think that

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>requiring companies to be prompt about reporting data breaches was

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>an important component of keeping businesses, customers, investors, pretty much

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody safer. But it gets more complicated than that. The

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>other recommendation is actually a series of articles in The

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Verge and they're all posted under an umbrella topic titled

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the Year Twitter Died. So The Verge has done an

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing job of analyzing how Twitter slash x has navigated

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the year twenty twenty three and makes the case that

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is actually dead, if only because the service now

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>has the name X if nothing else. I won't lie.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It is a lot to read. There are a lot

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of articles in this, but it's all very well done

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and it gives a pretty thorough treatment of the various

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>issues the company has faced this year. All right, that's

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it for the news today. I hope you are all well,

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.