WEBVTT - Trump Treasury Pick, Spirit Bankruptcy

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on fo car Playing and Broud Auto with the

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 2>In all this reporting about the new administration in the

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Treasury pic, I've heard the number bending about that the

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 2>US treasury market is twenty eight trillion dollars in size.

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It's large, So say that.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Means I have to be a little bit nicer to

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>our next guest than I typically.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Am Ira Jersey joins us.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know he was so influential. Twenty eight trillion dollars. Ira,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>do you care or to what extent does your market

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>care about who President lect Trump selects as Secretary of

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the Treasury.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, so people have been talking about who it's going

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 5>to be, and you know there's a mantra at the

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 5>Treasury Department that typical is they want to be regular

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 5>and predictable in terms of how they issue debt. So

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 5>if you wind up with any of the three main

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 5>picks that we've been hearing about, I don't suspect that

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 5>you'll see a major seed change from that. But they

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 5>do influence how many of which securities are issued. In fact,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 5>when the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, that's a committee of

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 5>investors and dealers and the like, when they get together,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 5>they actually send a recommendation to the Treasury Secretary of how.

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 6>Things should be issued.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 5>Now, in reality, you know, the Treasury Secretary kind of

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 5>signs off on it, but mostly the decisions are made

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 5>by the people under the Treasury Secretary. But I think that,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, all three of these picks are reasonably middle

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 5>of the road in terms of, you know, how they're

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 5>going to operate the Treasury Department in my opinion. And look,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I haven't had any discussions with any of these folks,

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 5>but I don't think that they're really outside of the

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 5>realm of what we might expect as normal, especially since

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 5>two of them are very much market people.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 6>And they don't want to rock the boat.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 5>They'll get feedback from markets and market participants and investors

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 5>before they make any sweeping changes to how treasuries are issued,

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 5>which treasuries.

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Are issued, and the like.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 4>T back.

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>So the cool kids call it IRA, it's good to

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 3>chat with you. So I was out of commission for

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 3>about a month and a half. And when that happened,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're looking at treasury yields, hey, around like

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 3>three point six percent. It was like, all right, guys,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 3>we're going to move money out of treasuries and we're

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>going to put it into stocks. That's where the return

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 3>is going to be. And then I come into the

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 3>office and we're touching and we're close to four point five.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a big shift. How high do we stay for

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>how long? And is that thesis? Then look, guys, you

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>still got to put money in the long end.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a so I do think that there's a

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 5>cap on how high treasury yields are going to be

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 5>able to go. There's going to be a kind of

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 5>this supply demand balance that probably is somewhere between four

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 5>and a half and five percent, particularly in long term treasuries,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 5>just because the higher yields go from here, the more

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 5>we get into the place where lie ability managers tend

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 5>to really like like bond yields, and especially unless you

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 5>get you know, really big shift up in inflation, there's

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 5>no reason to think that we won't stabilize somewhere in

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 5>this area. So our view is will wind up staying

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 5>in a pretty wide range over the next year.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 6>Smaller range and we had the past year.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 5>Remember over the past year, we've been between five percent

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 5>and three and a half percent, right, so one hundred

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 5>and fifty basis point range. I think it's probably a

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 5>bit narrower than that over the next year, but we

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 5>still wind up being volatile in that range. More important

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 5>is going to be the or as important as going

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 5>to be the curve, I think, and where do two

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 5>year yields go, which is far less certain because we

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 5>don't know how far the Fed's going to cut. Right,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 5>the Fed's probably going to cut at least a little

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 5>bit more. But are they only going to cut another

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 5>seventy five basis points as the market expects, or are

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 5>they going to cut another one hundred and fifty to

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 5>two hundred basis points like we thought.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 6>Just when you know, before you went out on.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Break, Because that's really been the big move and the

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 5>reason why we've seen this massive selloff in treasuries is

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 5>just a shifting expectation for what the Fed's going to do.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 2>So what will we get at the December eighteenth meeting

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>is I guess I've heard the word skip used. It's

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the first time I've heard that. But is skipping the

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>December meeting in terms of rate cuts? Is that reasonable

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 2>or is what? Do you think they're going to move forward?

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Paul, I do think that they There is the

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 5>big distinct possibility that they skip in December.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 6>You heard some language.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Out of out of Chair Powell over the last week

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 5>that basically hinted that they might do that. So you know,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 5>you wind up getting an okay payroll report and okay

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 5>CPI report, and you wind up with maybe a skip.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 5>The market right now, keep in mind, is basically pricing

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 5>a skip in either December or January. So basically one

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.679
<v Speaker 5>cut between the two meetings. Kind of unsure which one

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 5>is of those two meetings is going to be the skip.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, though, is that it feels like we priced

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 3>out a lot of the drama and the rate cuts

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>that we had already priced in and say over the summer.

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 3>So are we sort of at neutral in essence in

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>terms of what the market actually expects versus what the

0:04:58.640 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Fed's actually going to deliver.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think, well, the market seems to think that

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 5>maybe if the Fed's going to get back to neutral,

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 5>that maybe the neutral rate is three and three quarters

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 5>to four percent, because that's what the market's priced for

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 5>where the Fed's going to get to. So again, a

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 5>little bit more in terms of cuts, but not the

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 5>not down to you know, two point seventy five percent,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 5>where we were priced very briefly for a.

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 6>Cup of coffee back in September.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 5>So I do think that the market believes that neutral

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 5>is higher.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 6>I think the FED is skeptical of that.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Right, which is the reason why the FED, I think

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 5>thinks that they might need to remain restrictive a little

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 5>bit longer. And they do think that they're restrictive, right,

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 5>Almost every single member of the FED has said that

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 5>they that they're restrictive. But the question is how restrictive

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 5>and will the Fed, you know, get when they get

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 5>to restrictive, how long then will they stay there? And

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 5>that's when the reason why you have two year yields

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 5>that kind of can't make up their mind whether or

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 5>not they want to be at four percent or four

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 5>and a quarter percent. And I suspect that we'll want

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 5>a two year yields to wind up back back at

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 5>four even under four percent by the end of next year.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 5>But there's still you know, that's that's incremental tightening or

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 5>easing by the Federal Reserve over the course of that

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 5>period of time. And you know, unless we get a recession,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 5>it's hard to see how the yield curve significantly steepens

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 5>from here unless you wind up with some kind of

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, deficit shock where where the Treasury Department has

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 5>to go out initial a whole lot of long term debt.

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 5>It's possible, but that I think is kind of an

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 5>educase scenario.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, Ara, thank you so much as I always appreciate it.

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>Our Jersey chief viewers, interest rates strategists for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 2>joining us from the b I headquarters down there in Princeton,

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Androud

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>We alex you here alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence Radio. We bring you all the top news and business,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 3>economics and finance through our lens of our Bloomberg intelligence folks.

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>They cover two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>industries all around the world. We also like to tap

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 3>them outside of Bloomberg as well to get a good

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 3>read on what's actually happening in the market. If you're

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>putting money to work, what's the smartest way to do that?

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Fill Orlando, a chief equity market strategistic head of client

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 3>portfolio Management at Federated Hermes, joins me. Now, Phil, what's

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the case for not being in equities?

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, the stock market has had a phenomenal run here.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 7>Animal spirits have returned and from the bottom of the

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 7>market in early to mid August, a lot of the

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 7>indices are up fifteen to twenty percent, So that the

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 7>case for not being in equities or being underweight equities

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 7>at the moment is perhaps you think stocks are overvalued

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 7>near term and you'd like to have you'd like to

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 7>be patient and get a better re entry point in

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 7>order to get back to an overweight. But if we're taking,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, a longer cycle position and looking at the

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 7>prospect of less regulation, lower tax rates both individual and corporate,

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 7>stronger economic growth, all of those things are good for

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 7>corporate earnings. Ultimately, share prices reflect stronger earnings, and we

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 7>could see the S and P five hundred, you know,

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 7>from six thousand. Now let's call it up into the

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 7>seventy five hundred neighborhood as we look out over the

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 7>next couple of years.

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>So, Phil, to what extent did your I guess market

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>call change the day after the election when it became

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>a parent that not only president like Donald Trump coming

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 2>back to the White House, but it looks like he's

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>going to have a pretty solid Republican support in Congress.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 4>How has that impacted your call?

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 7>The good news, Paul, is it did absolutely nothing to

0:08:54.880 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 7>our call because we were we were expecting a a

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 7>red wave, if you will, and had positioned for that

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 7>accordingly in terms of overweights in domestic large cap value

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 7>and the small cap categories. We had been essentially fading

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 7>the dramatic outperformance of the mag seven names over the

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 7>eighteen month period into the middle of this year. And

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, as you look back on the third quarter

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 7>and results over the last you know, six weeks or so,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 7>the values and the small caps have had a pretty

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 7>good run of it. So we didn't need to make

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 7>any changes after the election results became known.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>What other thing I was just talking about that struck

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 3>me was the rise in ten year yield almost a

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 3>four and a half percent and the continued money into

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>money market funds. Is that ever going to leave?

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 7>Well, there's a concern that's growing based upon developments over

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 7>just the course of the last week. L And I

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 7>think you know, we've seen this with the backup in

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 7>treasury yields. We were at three point fifty three sixty

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 7>or so a couple of months ago. You know, we're

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 7>now up in that four forty four to fifty neighborhood.

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 7>And the question is whether or not we're going to

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 7>go back and retest you know, the four seventy five

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 7>or five percent level we saw you know, October of

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 7>last year. The reasons for that backup, in our view

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 7>is that inflation is is is not going down anymore.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 7>It's sort of stalled. And you know, based upon the

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 7>wholesale inflation metrics we saw last week are actually starting

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 7>to re accelerate. Is we look ahead to the core

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 7>personal consumption expenditure index that we're going to get I

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 7>think the day after Thanksgiving, the expectation is that that

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 7>number is going to continue to go up as well

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 7>to two point eight percent. Remember the Fed's target there

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 7>is two percent. You had some pretty strong economic growth

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 7>from the second and third quarters compared to the first quarter.

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 7>Last week's retail sales numbers upward, revisions in September, some

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 7>strong nominal or headline numbers out of October. So the

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 7>thinking is that the economy strong, inflation is sticky and persistent.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 7>You've got a red waves here that in all likelihood

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 7>is going to result in stronger economic growth. Maybe the

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 7>Feds not on a glide path to you know, take

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 7>the funds right down at three percent, which was sort

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 7>of the gist of what most investors got out of

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 7>their SEP back on September eighteenth.

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>So given that backdrop, Phil kind of where's your best

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>opportunity after that? As you look at the equity markets here,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>where are you guys focusing these days?

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, again, we're taking a longer term view and that

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 7>if we're right that the issues that we just talked

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 7>about do result in you know, let's our forecast is

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 7>three hundred and fifty dollars in corporate earnings for the

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 7>S ANDP looking out to calendar twenty seven embedded in

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 7>that assumption is comparable or perhaps lower corporate tax rates

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 7>and extension of the individual tax rates at the end

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 7>of next year, the end of calendar twenty five when

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 7>they come up for renewal. So, as a result, as

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 7>we look out to twenty six and twenty seven, the

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 7>economy ought to do pretty well. So if we discount

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 7>back three hundred and fifty dollars in earnings into the

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 7>end of twenty six, that would suggest the seventy five

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 7>hundred SMP we're trading at six thousand now. So if

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 7>the market does pull back here, you know, let's say

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 7>we pulled back to the two hundred day moving average,

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, roughly about fifty four hundred. That gives you

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 7>a couple of thousand points in the S and P

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 7>potentially the upside over the next couple of years. That

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 7>looks pretty attractive to us.

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>And sounds pretty attractive to me certainly. Phill Er, Orlando,

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Chief Epity market strategist and head of Client Portfolio Management

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and federator and Armies.

0:12:58.520 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for your time.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.599
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Playing and

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>broud Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.359
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 3>Happy Monday, everybody. Alex Deal here alongside paulse We need.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Intelligence. We are broadcasting to live on

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>this lovely Monday morning for our interactive broker studio right

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 3>here in Midtown Manhattan. Maybe lovely morning for us, but

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe not so much for Spirit Airlines. The company declares

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Chapter eleven bankruptcy. It's seeking Chapter eleven protection in New

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 3>York to restructure about one point six billion dollars of debt.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>It did tell customers on Monday that they should continue

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 3>feeling comfortable booking fights now and in the future. I

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 3>don't really I guess that stock is obviously halted for

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 3>bankruptcy protection filing. We wanted to get the latest now

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>with Francois do Flow. He is US airline analyst with

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News. He joins us, excuse me, Bloomberg Intelligence. I think, yes, okay,

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Elligence. That's important. We want to sparse that out.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>What happens to Spirit, like, what does this process wind

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>up looking like?

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 8>So good morning. Spirit have been struggling struggling since twenty

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 8>twenty with losses and cashburns things. So God only was

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 8>since twenty twenty three after the merger with Jeed Blue

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 8>was blocked and Praught and Whitney and on the need

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 8>for some engines to be inspected and that granted some

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 8>twenty four aircraft for this year. So with everything, unicodes

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 8>have increased faster than revenue, both because of inflationary effects

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 8>and also from competition. And there was this need of

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 8>refinance one point one billion of debt raised during the

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 8>pandemic that was packed by loyalty program and that was

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 8>due on September twenty twenty five, and there is another

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 8>five hundred million compatible debt due in twenty twenty six.

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 8>And because of this cash burn and losses, this debt

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 8>was needed to be written, recognociated, or restructure one way

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 8>or another. And that's what's managed to do with this

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 8>announcement today. So eighty million or so of the date

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 8>will be equitized, an exit of about eighty million eight

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 8>hundred million will be issued and you on twenty thirty

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>and in the meantime, Spirit will get three hundred million

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 8>of debt in the orin position facility to go through

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 8>the winter and continue to operate and make sure that

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 8>the flyer passenger can still fly during this important radio season.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Is there an expectation about when Spirit will come out of.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 8>Bankruptcy, so they expect they expect to end to exit

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 8>the bankruptcy early March twenty twenty five, so there is

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 8>an extension period of forty days that is possible. That

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 8>will still be early twenty five to twenty five, which

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 8>is a very fast process. But it's also because they

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 8>managed to arrange to play arrange most of the big

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 8>although before filing.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 3>So what could a new administration under President Trump free

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 3>up some more merger possibilities that were kind of squashed

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 3>and does that sort of become Spirit's future in like

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>April of twenty twenty.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 6>Five, good course, that could be.

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 8>Definitely Spirit will emerge from this bankruptcy a liner and

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 8>hopefully more profitable in the long term airlines, not necessarily

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 8>in twenty twenty five. They only help to get back

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 8>to profits in twenty twenty six, which can be event

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 8>though very very hard to achieve, but definitely liner and

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 8>better position and a more attractive airline for somebody else

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 8>to grab, and definitely a change of an administration would

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 8>luckily make that easier for a new buyer.

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 4>So what what kind of looking at Spirit are they do?

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Are they a bad operator or do they just have

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>a bad capital structure.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 8>No, they faced a lot of end winds from everywhere,

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 8>ending from exiting from the pandemic. They faced higher courts

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 8>because of pilots, because of everything getting more expensive, and

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 8>at the same time they faced strong competition from American Delta,

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 8>United Airlines who were looking for passengers to fill seats

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 8>at business travelers were we're not feeling and this was

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 8>pressuring yields at low cost airlines, including Spirit. So and

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 8>then on top of that you add their engine problems.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 8>That makes only everything worse with one out of ten

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 8>airplane grounded, even though they got some conversation from Product win.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 8>So it's a nation of plenty of things. Plus the

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 8>fact that it seems that travelers are moving away from

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 8>low cost ticket to more premium fly and that's why

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 8>they are also changing their business model a little bit,

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 8>offering more premium seats and services to their customers, and

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 8>they are trying to change their experience.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 9>And this is not something that.

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 8>Is specific to Spirit. But we also say that at

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 8>a legend and frontier because of this change in customer behavior.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and also you know then you add things they

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 3>make their money by. Hey, I'm going to check a

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 3>bag out, you pay for something. I want a pretty ticket,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>you got to pay for I'm a coffee, you got

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to pay for it at some point. It's like guys

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 3>enoup with that. All right, I think so much. FIRSTOI,

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 3>we appreciate Francois de Flow he joins us s Boomberg Intelligence,

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 3>US Airlines analysts joining us from Princeton, New Jersey. Again,

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that tickers s a ve. Also the big guys get

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Alta United, for example, they can really compete on lower

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>affairs if they want to want at the end of

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the day too, So how do you compete with that?

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>And I didn't understand it, but now since Francois explained it.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>During the pandemic, when they lost some of their business

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>passengers or a lot of their business passengers, they had

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to fill those seats, and so let's discount some prices

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and get those people in boom So I think your

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 2>question was the best, which is, now that we have

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a new administration, can we get a deal done with

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 2>JetBlue or our Frontier one of those two, because it

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like they can operate on their own and

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a smaller market stick they get hurt.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 3>Exactly because then you got to close maybe less flights,

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 3>and it actually went to hurting the people who need

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 3>the flight.

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>There, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Else you'll Paul Sweeney, You're live here in our Bloomberg

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Interactive Broker Studio. When you're streaming live on YouTube as well,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 2>also head over to YouTube dot com search Bloomberg Podcast

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's where you'll find it. So it's just listening

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 2>to Charlie's report here the NASDAK up almost nine tens

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>a one percent. Said what's pushing the NASDAC car and

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 2>I look, go over to the mov function Tesla. It

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 2>counts for forty five points of the move there in

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.479
<v Speaker 2>the Nasdaq. So Tesla stock up set seven point two

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 2>percent today, leading the Nasdaq higher the question is the

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump trade?

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it a thing? How do you play it? Has

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 4>it played out?

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk to somebody who does this stuff for a living.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Carol Schlife, chief investment officer for BEMO Family Office. Carol,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the world's a different place since the election on November sixth.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Here, how did your investment out look change? If at all?

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 10>It didn't really change. We're always very intent about building

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 10>durable and sturdy portfolios. And actually we had thought going

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 10>into the election that you know, of a variety of

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 10>potential outcome comes of red suite, Actually it was one

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 10>of the most likely outcomes, and we didn't have high

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 10>probabilities on any of them, if you will. It's not

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 10>like it was run away, but you know, it is

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 10>interesting because you are trying to make sure that you're

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 10>watching what the ten years doing and what treasuries are doing. So,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 10>if anything, we've probably backed off a little bit on duration,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 10>and we had been underweight on the duration side anyway,

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 10>and we'd leaned into growth and into the United States

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 10>and North American securities anyway. So we feel pretty good

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 10>about the positioning and trying to be very adaptive and

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 10>watching as things go forward.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, it appeared that the gridlock scenario was a

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 2>scenario that would work well for markets. But I'm not

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 2>sure we're going to have a gridlock Congress and an

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>executive branch. Looks like it's going to be a clear

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 2>swaite for the Republicans and maybe they can get a

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of stuff done here.

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 4>How do you position for that?

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 10>Well, the interesting thing is is I think if you

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 10>go back and you listen to the way when Chairman

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 10>Powell was asked at the last FMC conference call how

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 10>they were going to adapt to the changes, and they said, look,

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 10>until policy is there, we can't really start trying to

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 10>model for it. And I think that's one of the

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 10>approaches to take because the market's trying to in advanced

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 10>discount which way things are going to swing that come

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 10>late January, depending on if we get across the board

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 10>tariffs in the first week or two of a Trump administration,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:38.959
<v Speaker 10>that's one potential policy response with portfolios as opposed to

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 10>a more gradual response or using tariffs as a negotiating

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 10>tactic and an opening bit. So to preposition portfolios is

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 10>probably a little premature, if you will, but keeping adept

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 10>at watching the way those things play out will be

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 10>import important, but it is ironic because historically markets have

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 10>preferred gridlock. I think under the assumptions that if the

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 10>legislators are all off bickering with each other, markets can

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 10>get on with being markets. But clearly this time I

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 10>think it was both not having to wait for the

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 10>election outcome and having a decisive sort of tilt to it.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 10>The presumption is then okay, fine, we'll get policy quickly

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 10>and then we'll be able to adapt and adjust, and

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 10>so that unknown period shrunk from being what could have

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 10>been months and months to being basically just a matter

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 10>of weeks.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Something that's really stood out to me in the last

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 3>few weeks is the out performance of financials. Do you

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 3>think that that continues?

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 4>We do.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 10>And one of the things that's interesting is when you

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 10>start digging into the stats and looking at how low

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 10>the level of initial public offerings and m and A is.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 10>I saw once to to Stick recently that said something

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 10>like twenty seven thousand companies are sitting in venture capital portfolios.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 10>Over half of them have been there for over four years.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 10>So you've got a lot of really high quality potential

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 10>companies that just haven't come public. You have a lot

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 10>of M and A that hasn't happened, and that's teed up.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 10>I think that's one of the primary reasons why you're

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 10>seeing Wall Street get pretty excited both and we hear

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 10>anecdotally there's a lot of bankers out there teeing up

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 10>deals and so that could be positive for the industry.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, Carol, we appreciate it. Thank you very much.

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Carol's life joining us there over at FEMO Family office.

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 4>She cio over at that shop.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so very much.

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Just say to play Bloomberg eleven.

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>The Nasdak up almost nine tens a one percent of

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 2>So what's pushing the nasdak? Karr and we'll go over

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 2>to the mov function.

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Tesla.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>It counts for forty five points of the move there

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in the Nasdaq. So Tesla stock up set seven point

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 2>two percent today, leading the Nasdaq higher.

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 4>The question is the Trump trade? Is it a thing?

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you play it? Has it played out. Let's

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>talk to somebody who does this stuff for a living.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Carol Schleife, chief investment officer for BEMO Family Office. Carol,

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the world's a different place since the election on November sixth.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 4>Here, how did your investment out look change?

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 10>If at all, it didn't really change. We're always very

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 10>intent about building durable and sturdy portfolios, and actually we

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 10>had thought going into the election that you know, of

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 10>a variety of potential outcomes, a red suite actually was

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 10>was one of the most likely outcomes, and we didn't

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 10>have high probabilities on any of them, if you will.

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 10>It's not like it was run away, but you know,

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 10>it is interesting because you are trying to make sure

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 10>that you're watching what the ten years doing and what

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 10>treasuries are doing. So, if anything, we've probably backed off

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 10>a little bit on duration, and we had been underweight

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 10>on the duration side anyway, and we'd leaned into growth

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 10>and into the United States and North American securities anyway.

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 10>So we feel pretty good about positioning and trying to

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 10>be very adaptive and watching as things go forward.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, it appeared that the gridlock scenario was a

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 2>scenario that would work well for markets but I'm not

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 2>sure we're going to have a gridlock Congress and an

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 2>executive branch looks like it's going to be a clear

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 2>suite for the Republicans and maybe they can get a

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of stuff done here. How do you position for that?

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, the interesting thing is is, I think if you

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 10>go back and you listen to the way when Chairman

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 10>Powell was asked at the last FMC conference call how

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 10>they were going to adapt to the changes, and they said, look,

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 10>until policy is there, we can't really start trying to

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 10>model for it. And I think that's one of the

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 10>approaches to take because the market's trying to in advanced

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 10>discount which way things are going to swing that come

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 10>late January, depending on if we get across the board

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 10>tariffs in the first week or two of a Trump administration,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 10>that's one potential policy response with portfolios as opposed to

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 10>a more gradual response or using tariffs as a negotiating

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 10>tactic and an opening bit. So to preposition portfolios is

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 10>probably a little premature, if you will, but keeping adept

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 10>at watching the way those things play out will be important.

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 10>But it is ironic because historic markets have preferred gridlock.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 10>I think under the assumptions that if the legislators are

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 10>all off bickering with each other, markets can get on

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 10>with being markets. But clearly this time I think it

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 10>was both not having to wait for the election outcome

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 10>and having a decisive sort of tilt to it. The

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 10>presumption is then okay, fine, we'll get policy quickly and

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 10>then we'll be able to adapt and adjust, and so

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 10>that unknown period shrunk from being what could have been

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 10>months and months to being basically just a matter of weeks.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Something that's really stood out to me in the last

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 3>few weeks is the outperformance of financials. Do you think

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 3>that that continues.

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>We do.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 10>And one of the things that's interesting is when you

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 10>start digging into the stats and looking at how low

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 10>the level of initial public offerings and m and A is.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 10>I saw one statistic recently that said something like twenty

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 10>seven companies are sitting in venture capital portfolios. Over half

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 10>of them have been there for over four years. So

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 10>you've got a lot of really high quality potential companies

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 10>that just haven't come public. You have a lot of

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 10>m and A that hasn't happened, and that's teed up.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 10>I think that's one of the primary reasons why you're

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 10>seeing Wall Street get pretty excited both and we hear

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 10>anecdotally there's a lot of bankers out there teeing up deals,

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 10>so that could be positive for the industry.

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, Carol, we appreciate it. Thank you very much.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Carol's life joining us there over at FIMO family office.

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 4>She cio over at that shop.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so very much. All right, let's go to

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Steve Mann, now Bloomberg Intelligence, Global Autos and Industrial Research Manager.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 3>We were talking about Tesla earlier and how potentially the

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump new Trump administration might loosen some regulation on self

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>driving cars. And this comes though as maybe ev subsidies

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 3>will be rolled back, which is a bit of a

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 3>head scratcher for me. Steve Mann joins us. Now, hey, Steve,

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 3>what do you make of the fact that maybe those

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 3>fully self driving vehicles is a is a now hallmark

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>or priority for the incoming Transportation Department?

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 11>I think it's important for self driving vehicles. It's it's

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 11>the next kind of technology evolution for cars. And one

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 11>of the biggest hurdles really in the US is regulations.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 11>There's only two states that allow uh, you know, self

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 11>driving cars meeting without steering wheel and pedals on the

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 11>road today is uh, California and Texas, But nationally, the

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 11>other states or the National Highways Safety Board actually do

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 11>not allow these steering wheel lists and pedal list vehicles

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 11>on the road. So it's it's a huge it's a

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 11>huge evolution if they allow that.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 2>So Elon Musk certainly having an influence there on this,

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 2>presumably on this policy direction. Here in Tesla, stock is

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>up seven point two percent today, Steve, how likely is

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the federal government to kind of maybe follow California and

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Texas and allow these on the road.

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, the you know, first of all, Tesla is not

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 11>going to be the only one benefiting from it. GM

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 11>could benefit from it, way more cob benefit from it.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 11>Actually, GM's Cruise division has actually lobbied the National Highway

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 11>Safety Board to really push rules and regulations, relax those

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 11>regulations to allowed you know, unsupervised vehicles, more unsupervised vehicles

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 11>on the road. But that's been held up for the

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 11>last two three years. And I mean, personally, I think

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 11>I think it's really important for the for the government

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 11>to actually relax that regulation. It's not just the US

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 11>trying to develop this technology, there's a lot of companies

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 11>in China, there's a lot of companies in Europe that

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 11>are trying to develop this uh kind of a driverless technology.

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 11>And I think, you know, US needs to do this

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 11>to to compete.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 3>When you say that they need to do it to compete,

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't it be the same with EV's And I'm wondering

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 3>from maybe Elon Musk's point of view, if Tesla is

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 3>able to make a lot of inroads with the robotaxis

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 3>and self driving cars that like that in essence will

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 3>also help prop up evs because oh, by the way,

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 3>those cars will be electric.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 11>Oh that's that's very true. You know, those self driving

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 11>software is propulsion or powertrain agnostic, agnostic. But you know,

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 11>having an ev really helps help push that through, push

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 11>that into the evolution into the future, because they do

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 11>work better on evs than gasoline cars.

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 2>So, Steve, just give us a sense of these self

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 2>driving vehicles. Where is the technology to day and when

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 2>do you think it'll get to the point where Paul's.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Going to use one, which, by the way, let me

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 3>tell you it's going to be a while.

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 11>Where are we I mean, I you know, we still

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 11>think it's going to take a while.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 6>Like when we.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 11>Look at uh, you know folk, you know, autonomous vehicles

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 11>as a main driver to Tesla's revenue, we don't really

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 11>model that out until like twenty thirty five, So it's

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 11>going to be a while because it's really relying on

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 11>the AI technology, and specifically for Tesla, it's really using

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the data that is collecting from its

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 11>cameras and all the vehicles are out there and teaching

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 11>the machine how to react and respond response appropriately in

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 11>various situations. As you know, as both of your drive

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 11>on the road, there's you know, there's an mptiene number

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 11>of scenarios that could happen, So it will take a

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 11>while for the machine to really learn and be proficient

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 11>at driving as as well as a human being.

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Uh what else do you make of that?

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 8>Now?

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 3>If we just switch focus to just the EV part

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla or other companies, if that subsidy winds up

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 3>going away for EV's, what do you think happens the

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 3>likes of like Rivian and Tesla and even the EV

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 3>parts of major automakers.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think, you know, the initial thought for us

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 11>is really it could be beneficial to companies like Tesla

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 11>and Rivian. You know, if if the credit goes away,

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 11>I think EV's will still be around. There's still gonna

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 11>be some buyers who are really interested in in in

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 11>driving evs. Will it you know, will it get past

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 11>the eight percent penetration rate or will it drop down

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 11>a little bit below eight It could, It could, But

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 11>what that means is gonna weed out a lot of competition.

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 11>The unprofitable EV makers will have to probably leave exit

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 11>the market. That will leave companies like Tesla, who's profitable.

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 11>And the reason I bring a Arrivian is because they

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 11>have a huge backing from Volkswagen right now to really

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, to really uh fund their next affordable vehicle.

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 2>So when I look at the forwards, the gms of

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the world, what's their level of commitment to the electric

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 2>vehicle business, Steve, has it changed in the last several

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 2>years or is it still there?

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 6>Uh?

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 11>It hasn't for GM. And that's that's a good point, Paul,

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 11>because I think the Trump administration will have to actually

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 11>take that into consideration. You know, with the Inflation Reduction

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 11>Act one hundreds you know, over one hundred billion has

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 11>been spent on kind of on shoring the EV supply chain,

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 11>and for these companies to actually give that up and

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 11>it's a you know, can convert that to a someunk costs,

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 11>it's not gonna go very well with the with the carmakers.

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 11>So you know, for GM, they've invested a lot. You know,

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 11>they're rolling out cheaper and cheaper evs. Next year you're

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 11>gonna launch the Bolt which is EV E Chevrolet Bulb

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 11>which is under thirty thousand. But Ford, on the other hand,

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 11>is quite different. They actually have retrenched, they delay the battery,

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 11>the new battery plant, and then they're also you know,

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 11>cutting back on a three three year row su E

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 11>V SUV. But so you know, depending on the different allmakers,

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 11>the different approaches.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, Steve As I always thank you very much.

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Steve Man, Global Autos and Industrials Analysts for Bloomberg Intelligencies

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 2>down there in our Princeton office. Again, it seems like

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the presence of Elon Musk is certainly influencing some of

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 2>the transportation policy that may be coming down the pike.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Would you be more apt to buy an EV or

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 3>a self driving car EV?

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yes, but you know I think about it every

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 2>morning I get in a car with some dude I've

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 2>never met before.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 6>What's kind of the.

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 3>Difference between self driving in that? No, it's a good point.

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, at least when it comes to say transportation

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 3>like caps and taxis. Yes, would you get into a

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 3>self driving taxi?

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 3>He's not there yet.

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't know if I would. I don't know.

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.959
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steel here alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 3>We bring you all the top news and business. Were

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 3>my business, economics and finance. Thank you very much. You know,

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 3>it's like riding a bike until you kind a speedbump

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 3>all across the world. We also love to tap into

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 3>our Bloomberg n EF folks. So Bloomberg n EF Research

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 3>basically powers data sets and models for everything from commodities

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 3>to power, transport, industry, buildings, AG sectors. It's all about

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 3>businesses helping to finance the energy transition dot dot dot.

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 3>What does a Trump two point zero mean for something

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 3>called the energy transition? Joining US now? Is Derek FLAKEL Bloomberg,

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 3>EF lead US policy analyst. What do we think a

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump two point zero and energy means?

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 9>So, first of all, there's a lot of worries about

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 9>the future of the Insfalation Reduction Acts, the US Signature

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 9>Climate subsidy program. We expect that will mostly remain intact.

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 9>A lot of Republican district states are benefiting fourteen health

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 9>Republicans have signed a letter saying they don't want to

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 9>see those tax credits repealed hastily, and the Speaker of

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 9>the House has said that he wants to use a scalpel,

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 9>not a sledgehammer. So we think a lot of that

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 9>will survive. Where you're likely to see more change is

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 9>regulations and some voluntary initiatives like the procurement for clean

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 9>products from the federal government.

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just looking. You have a great, great chart

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>graphic here. Fossil fuels are likely to farewell on our

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Electric vehicles are not.

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't mister Musk have something to say about the fate

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 2>of electric vehicles.

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 9>He certainly would, But the question is what if Tesla's

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 9>strategy going to be visa the via of electric vehicle producers.

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 9>Most of the valuation comes from the dream of a robotaxi.

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 9>And we've certainly seen some Bloomberg reporting recently saying that

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 9>Musk is likely to put for a favorable framework on

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 9>av's when it comes to evs or electric vehicles. You know,

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 9>he has said and the business and now may or

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:15.760
<v Speaker 9>may not bear this out, that Tesla would do better

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 9>sort of survive the loss of the EV tax credits

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 9>in a way that some of his EV competitors might not.

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 9>It ultimately depends on what you and what he thinks.

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 9>Tesl's interest is whether it's dominating a smaller EV market

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 9>or having a smaller share of a larger EV market.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's move to some of the stuff that feels a

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit disier, and those are the tax credits that

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 3>are part of the IRA. So one is a tax

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 3>credit for carbon that's captured, how you stored, how you

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 3>capture it is debatable in terms of how much tax

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 3>credit you receive, and the other has to do with hydrogen.

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 3>How do we feel about those two policies either staying

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 3>in place or getting reduced.

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 9>So these tax credits are favored by you know, industrial interests,

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 9>oil and gas interests. From what I've heard, there's not

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 9>a lot of republic appetite to appeal either of those.

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 9>But you're likely to see is looser regulations on both,

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 9>which actually strengthens the business case for both. We might

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 9>see a better outlook for both carbon castor and for

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 9>hydrants than under Trump administrations. Now, as for emmistance benefits,

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 9>the market acceptance of that, that might be a little

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 9>bit diceier, But nevertheless we see the economic case beouse

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 9>being a little bit easier as compliance costs go down.

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just looking in again winners and losers here.

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 2>How much of this is a day one type of

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 2>policy thing versus boy, this is just take a while.

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 2>To the extent that Trump administration may want to shift

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 2>gears on this energy transition, it seems like a lot

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of stuff has already been spent. There's a lot of

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>investment already pink around. What's the timing do you think?

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, it depends on what you're talking about. If you're

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 9>talking about taxes, there's going to be a big tax

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 9>negotiation taking up probably most of twenty twenty five to

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 9>do with extending the Trump tax cuts. Seeing what happens

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 9>with the IRA et cetera. You're likely to see closure

0:40:58.520 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 9>on that by the end of the year. But after

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 9>that regulatory changes and so forth. In general, regulatory changes,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 9>including those for existing tax credits, take usually about two

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 9>or three years, give or take, and so a lot

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 9>of the stuff can't really happen on day one. You

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 9>can't really shift the stiff on a dime. However, in

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.479
<v Speaker 9>terms of carrick, those are things that can be done

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 9>more or less immediately, though politically that might not fly

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 9>too well. And programs that are sort of voluntary, like

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 9>again federal procurement of clean products, those could be killed

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 9>more or less day one by an executive order.

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 3>What about wind and solar, so to some extent, a

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 3>lot has already been thrown into that, and it's hard

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 3>to see onshore wind and solar, it's harder to reconcile

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 3>that being really stripped away. But the offshore wind space

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 3>that has question.

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 9>Marks for me, Yeah, it does have quite a few.

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 9>If you look at BNF's modeling for what might happen

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 9>if the IRA were repealed at the earliest opportunity, which

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 9>again we don't think will happen, but even if it did,

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 9>you would see about a seventeen percent drop overall in

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 9>the combination of wind, solar, and storage installations. Wind itself, though,

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 9>would see a much bigger drop because it's very expensive

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 9>and tax pres dependent. You might see about like thirty

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 9>percent drop in on store wind and an over forty

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 9>percent drop in offshore wind, and that's only based on

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:16.800
<v Speaker 9>the financial subsidies.

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 9>Trump has a lot more control over offshore leasing as

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 9>well as federal permits. There's a pipeline of projects that

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 9>already have both offer leases and permits, but a lot

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 9>of proposed ones don't have that yet. And there's also

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 9>questions about how the even would approach litigate and against

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 9>existing off for wind permits. You might see some of

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 9>that fall by the wayside depending on how lawsuits go.

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Derek just broadly defined how committed is Congress as a

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 2>legislative body to this whole energy transition. Do they feel

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 2>like it's real or how did they feel about it?

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Are facilities being built in their states?

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>That could they.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 9>Answer to that exactly from what we attracted in clean

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 9>tech factory deployments. I think about ninety sent is going

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 9>to red or purple, that is swing states. So there's

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 9>a lot of electoral consequences, especially if you zoom down

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 9>at the district level, where overwhelming with Republican districts with

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 9>the planned better labor costs Richthoor, these are the place

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:16.399
<v Speaker 9>that they're seeing the most investment, and so I think

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 9>the commitment primarily is to economic development, local opportunity, as

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 9>well as to some degree on storing and supply chained

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 9>diversificate and de risking, and that I think is fairly

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 9>durable in a bipartisan manner.

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, most important question of the day, Derek, for

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 2>you are the unc Tar Hills. Are they even going

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 2>to be able to field a basketball team this year?

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 6>Go but go up against my dookies.

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 9>Well, my wife's duke. So I'm I'm gonna not take

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 9>a position on that.

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:47.879
<v Speaker 4>Man A very good all right, Derek, thanks so much

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 4>for you. Appreciate it.

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Derek Flackle, lead US policy analysts for b n e F.

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Again, one of my thoughts here, as.

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 2>We think about it from the energy perspective, it just

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 2>seems like there's so much or there is a certain

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 2>degree of just movement towards cleaner energy that I'm not

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>sure how you stop that much lessen slow it down,

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 2>but I guess there are certain things that you can do.

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Executive Order day one.

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just think it's also going to be sort

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 3>of a pick and choose, right, Like I mentioned sort

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 3>of the carbon credit tax credit. You could see that staying,

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 3>but hydrogen feels like a real question mark, maybe more

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 3>of a push into nuclear, So like there's some nuances there,

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 3>And also what happens with coal if you were going

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 3>to shut out a coal plant or you have a

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 3>clean coal plant, Like, does that change your calculus?

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal