WEBVTT - Tech News: Stealing from the Rich

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and a love of all things tech. And this is

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the tech Stuff News episode for February second, two thousand,

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, eight cues day as I am led to understand.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Our top story for today's episode goes back to the

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>ongoing drama with Wall Street hedge funds and a group

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of independent investors using platforms like Discord and Reddit to

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>organize and drive up share prices for companies like game Stop.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>So as a quick reminder, the subreddit Wall Street bets

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>took up the cause of buying shares of game Stop

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to counteract how some hedge fund companies

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>were attempting to short sell that stock. Short Selling is

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when you borrow shares from somebody else, a different investor,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and you sell those shares that are not yours at

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>market value. Then you hope the price goes down so

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can swoop in and you know, buy back

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>those borrowed shares for less than what you sold them for,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you return the borrowed shares to the person

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you borrowed them from, and you get to pocket the difference.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>The Internet crusaders are buying up stocks, which makes the

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>stock price go higher, and that starts to pressure those

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>investors and companies that were attempting to short the stock,

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>because the higher the stock price goes, the more money

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>those investors will lose when it comes time to buy

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>back shares and return them to the parties that they

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>borrow them from. The Motivations for this action among these

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>independent investors varies and ranges from those who are hoping

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they can get rich quick by jumping on a trend

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>those be kind of like speculators to those who harbor

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a grudge against the hedge funds in general, which typically

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>represent the interests of people who are, let me see,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>let me check my notes here, um right, filthy rich,

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like really filthy rich. So a short squeeze is a

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>way to really stick it to these funds, which could

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>stand to lose billions of dollars as a consequence. In fact,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that has already happened with a couple of these hedge

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>funds that have tried to cut their losses and get

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>out before they saw even more money lost because with

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a short sell. The higher that market price goes, the

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>more money the short sellers are going to lose when

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>it comes time to return that stock. There's no limit

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to how much money they can lose, because the stock

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>price can just keep going up, up, up and up.

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no there's no bottom there. However, this all hinges

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>on the investors being able to buy up those shares

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of games Op as those shares are hitting the market

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep this trend going, and that's getting

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>harder to do. Last Thursday, the day of our last

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>news episode, in fact, the mobile stocks trading app robin

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Hood angered users when it put a temporary block on them,

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>preventing them from buying shares in various companies that the

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Internet investors had targeted, including game Stop, but also including

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>some other companies like AMC Theaters. Uh. They could still

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sell stocks, but they couldn't buy them now. At one point,

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood had a buying ban on fifty different companies,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>though as of Monday, February one, that list has been

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>whittled down to eight, and yet game Stop is still

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on that list. The move prompted users to point out

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the inherent irony that a company naming itself after the

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>legendary character Robin Hood, who literally robbed from the rich

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to give to the poor, was preventing average investors from

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing the equivalent action in the modern day

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>through the stock market. Investors have filed numerous lawsuits, like

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty of them at the federal level against

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the company. At the heart of the issue is what

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>led robin Hood to level that ban on users. It

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help robin Hood's case that among its sources of

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>revenue is a hedge fund called Citadel, leading some to

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>speculate that robin Hood was facing pressure from revenue sources

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that stood to lose a lot of money if they

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>were caught up in a short squeeze. Citadel, for its part,

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>denies that it played any role in robin Hood's decision making.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>This is building into a pretty compelling narrative that may

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>or may not be realistic, and the narrative goes like this,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds that are attempting to short sell companies aren't

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 1>just betting that those companies shares are going to drop

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in price. These hedge funds, according to the narrative, actively

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>campai Hayne for that to happen. So, in other words,

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the independence the investors on the sub credit in Wall

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Street bets are saying that these big hedge funds are

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>using leverage and market forces to help companies fail and

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>then they reap in rewards through this short selling practice.

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>These companies may or may not have failed on their own,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but the story that the investors are telling is that

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the hedge funds are actively working to cause companies to

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>fail with only an eye on profit and no care

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>about the consequences of failed company brings along with it,

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>including the consequences to that company's employees and its customers.

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And so turning a short cell around on these hedge

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>funds is being portrayed within these communities as an act

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>of heroism. That buying up the stock isn't meant to

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 1>be a way to turn these investors into wealthy people.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You're not supposed to be buying it to make money,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but rather as a way to act as a check

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on these hedge funds so they can't set out to

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>them these companies just for profit. Now, I would suggest

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that this narrative, while a good one, isn't necessarily the

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>whole truth of the matter. I think there's a lot

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of it in there. I think a lot of truth

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is in that narrative, but I also think there are

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other complicating factors at play. One of

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>those is that sometimes a short cell is really just

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a short sell. It's not an attempt to make a

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>company fail. Sometimes companies are just in a bad place,

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes the short cell recommendations are kind of an indicator,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a warning flag, and it tells other investors who might

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>have shares in those companies that maybe they want to

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>protect their money and they should probably sell off those

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>shares if in fact that company really is in danger.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>It's not manufactured danger, it's something is wrong with that company.

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there are the ripple effects of these kind

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of events, which can cause further market disruption. I think that,

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as in most things in life, the situation is actually

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>really complicated. There are no cut and dried heroes or villains.

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But speaking from my own personal standpoint, it is way

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>easier for me to side with the people who are

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>not billionaires. I'm just saying. Also a full disclosure, I

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>don't own any stock in any of these companies. In

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>related news, that narrative I was just talking about really

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>must be compelling, because Deadline, that is, the news journal

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that covers all things Hollywood, reports that MGM has acquired

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>rights to a book proposal. Not a book, but our

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>proposal for a book called The Antisocial Network by Ben Meseric.

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The book, as I'm sure you have all guessed, will

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>be about this game stop share price, saga and Wall

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Street bets and hedge funds, and about the story of

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>independent investors on the and it who are taking aim

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>at the big entrenched, fat cat hedge fund managers. Meseric

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>proposed the book and his agent was able to shop

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>around the proposal, not even a manuscript, and nothing's been

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fully written out yet, and boom, MGM options it for

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a movie. Now, folks, both of my parents are published authors,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and I just have to say, this is not the

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>way things typically work. Now that being said, Meseric already

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>has a track record. He wrote the book that would

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>become the inspiration for the film The Social Network, you know,

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Academy Award winning movie. So do keep that in

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>mind that while this means that MGM has the rights

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a movie about this idea for a book,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily guarantee that a movie will ever actually

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>come out. Now. If it does, it's gonna take some

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>time for that to happen. I mean, it hasn't even

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>been written yet, let alone had a director attached or

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>cast it or gone into pre production or anything. And

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>between now and whenever all that stuff can happen, a

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more might evolve, and we might see a lot

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more happened during the fallout of this initial story. So

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>I can't promise you that in a year or two

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you'll be watching something like I don't know, Tom Holland

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>leading a group of upstart investors online against someone like

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, let's say, Richard Dreyfuss representing the head

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of a hedge fund. Clearly I should be the casting

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>director for this movie, is what I'm saying. Now that

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I say it all out loud, I kind of want

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to see it. Well, let's stick with the Hollywood approach

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to the tech world, or at least, in this case,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the tech adjacent world. The Hollywood Reporter says that Apple

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>TV is producing a series called We Crashed all one word,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>big W, big C. We Crashed, based off a podcast

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>from Wondering about the Real Estate Slash kind of sort

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of but not really tech company we Work, or to

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be more specific, the A WE Company, which is the

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>parent company to we Work, along with a couple of

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>related ventures. You know, that's the company that would get

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>hold of office space in various markets and then rent

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>that office space out to various freelancers and companies that

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't already have a physical space of their own. The

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Reporter says that Jared Leto has been cast as

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Adam Neuman and and Hathaway will be Rebecca Noyman and

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Noyman's are leaders in the Wee Company, or at

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>least they used to be, with Adam as the former

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO of the Wee Company, and Rebecca was a and

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>still is a founding partner fund bit of trivia here.

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca is also cousin to Gwyneth Paltrow. And it seems

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like some of the more new Agish wacky beliefs run

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in that family. Okay, I admit it, that is unfair.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't run in the family. They positively gallop to

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>steal a joke from arsenic and old lace. Adam Neuman

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>previously made millions of dollars by buying up real estate

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and then least those buildings too We Work, you know,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the company he was CEO of when the Weed Company

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>filed for an i p O in two thousand nineteen.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>The filing contained a lot of unusual stuff in it,

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like an inscrutable hierarchy diagram that had companies nested inside

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>other companies and no real useful information inside of it.

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>There was also a succession plan that seemed more geared

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>toward making the We Company a Neuman dynasty rather than

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, an independent company. I would do a full

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>episode about the We Company and its trials and tribulations,

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>including how that i p O never actually happened, how

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Adam Nouman was pressured by the board of directors to

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>step down, complete with a nearly two billion dollar exit package,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and how the company's valuation has plummeted by nearly since

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that planned i p O. But for one thing, We Work,

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>despite the way it branded and marketed itself, is not

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>really a tech company. And for another, if you want

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to read an incredible account about that i p O,

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you need to go to the Verge and read Elizabeth

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Lapado's article We Work isn't a tech company, It's a

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>soap opera. Because that article is equally informative and wildly entertaining.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend it. And I'll conclude this segment of

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>our news episode with an update on the ongoing story

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>about employees at Google attempting to unionize. I mentioned last

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>week that the Alphabet Workers Union or a w U,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>which is really hard to say because of that WU combination.

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Can I just say triple you just make it easier? Anyway,

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the a WU announced it was joining an international alliance

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of unions connected to Google called Alpha Global, this being

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>unions all around the world that are related to Google

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or Alphabet. The problem is that the United States members

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of this organization said they didn't know about any alliance

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.719
<v Speaker 1>until after the announcement of it had been published by

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>The Verge, and that meant they didn't have a chance

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to vote on the matter, or even consider it, or

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>even be told about it. What's more, the press release

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>cited by The Verge had comments attributed to a WU leader,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Poole Cool, who says she never actually made the comments

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that appear in the press release. What followed was confusion,

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and along with confusion came some mistrust, which is, you know,

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty common and if you can't trust democratically elected leaders

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to actually represent those who elected those leaders. Everything falls apart,

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>which really we're seeing play out in arenas much larger

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>than the a WU, But we'll leave it at that.

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Part of the problem appears to be that the Communications

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Workers of America or c w A, pushed out that

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>press release prematurely and with a false attribution to cool

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>regarding those comments. Now there are discussions within the a

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>WU about whether the union should disassociate from the c

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>w A entirely, and the person responsible for the press

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>release is no longer working with the a WU teams.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>If I were making a bird's eye view observation, I

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>would say it looks like those organizing the union are

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>relying heavily on other organizations that have proven to be

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a bad match, and that this in turn has actually

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>threatened the formation of the union itself. I'm sure I'll

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be returning to the story again in the future. My

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>hope is that they are able to continue their efforts

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to unionize. But when we see stuff like this happen,

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.239
<v Speaker 1>it really can cause a great deal of damage, particularly

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in trust. I mean, you're asking impl yease to trust

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that the union will take care of them When something

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>like this happens that trust gets eroded. We've got a

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>lot more stories to talk about in today's episode, but

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break. We're back. Did you

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>guys know there was a pandemic going on? Well, it

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>continues to be a dominating force for news in general,

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and one of the stories here in the United States

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>has been about how badly the country has handled the

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>process of distributing and administering vaccines. It's a pretty big mess,

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>with each state in the country largely left to determine

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>its own processes and there being a general lack of

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>clarity across the nation. For example, here in Georgia, we

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>are in what is called Phase one A plus, meaning

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the state is currently administering the vaccine to healthcare workers,

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>long term care facilities, citizens who are sixty five or older,

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and their caregivers and first responders. After that will come

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Phase one B, which includes essential workers, then one C,

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>which will include people who have, you know, medical conditions

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that increase the risk of them contracting a severe case

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of COVID nineteen, and then presumably will come the rest

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of us. But there's no actual timeline associated with that plan.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>There's just a description of phases, but it doesn't even

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have a prediction of when will move from Phase one

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>A plus to Phase one B. You can search to

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>see where you could go to get vaccinated, but that

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that you would be eligible for a vaccination.

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You just know where the locations are that are administering vaccines.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's about it. Now, that's just Georgia and every

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>state in the US is different. But Georgia is also

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>home for the Centers for Disease Control or c d C,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and the c d C has played a big part

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in why the vaccine rollout has not gone so smoothly

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for thousands and thousands of people. And this is what

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>relates it to technology. It's because of a website called

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the Vaccine Administration Management System or VAMS v A m S.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>So this was developed for the princely sum of forty

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars. According to the m I T Technology Review,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>numerous states that had planned to lean on VAMS as

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the official way to manage vaccine rollout didn't go so well.

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Things have gone pear shaped. A lot of people have

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>reported various bugs or glitches in the system that have

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>failed to actually make appointments with facilities. So a patient

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>goes on VAMS, goes through the process of making an appointment,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>appears to be confirmed for that appointment, they go and

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>show up to the physical location, and that's when are told, hey,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we have no record of you. There's no actual appointment

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on our books, so we can't see you. In other cases,

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the system appears to cancel appointments without rhyme or reason,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>although the c d C says this is due not

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>to a flaw in VAMS but rather user error. Uh.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>There are also reports that it locks people out as

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they try to use the system, or it only locks

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>them in as a patient, not an administrator, and that's

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a big problem for those who are trying to actually

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>administer the system. You know, it's also not just about

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>creating appointments, but but managing that information and tracking that

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>information so you know who has received the vaccine, who

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to come in for a follow up, all that

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. So it's really a failure of the

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>whole system. And the whole point of VAMS was to

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>take the burden off of individual states so that they

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to build out their own management systems. But

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>these various issues have led a lot of states to

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of do that anyway, rather than rely on something

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:06.239
<v Speaker 1>that other states have said has been a pretty big mess.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Some local governments, like counting governments in Florida, have even

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>repurposed online services like event bright. You know the website

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you would use in order to send out invitations to

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>your kid's birthday party. They're using that in order to

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>make appointments, which, y'all, that is messed up. Moreover, the

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>m I T piece, which is titled What Went Wrong

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>with America's forty four million dollar Vaccine Data System, lays

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>out more problems. For example, the layout of the vam's site,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>even when it's working correctly, doesn't sound like it was

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>made to be friendly for senior patients, and since seniors

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>are the early focus of a lot of the vaccine programs,

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge problem. And it also points out the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>overall issue of creating systems that are accessible to a

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>wide audience. This stuff is important. There are companies that

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have entire departments dedicated to this kind of stuff, and

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>as the peace in the m I T Technology Review

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>points out, there's a real problem with the procurement process

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>when government offices are selecting companies to carry out these

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>big projects, and that the process itself can eliminate a

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of different valid choices from consideration. Even if those

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>choices are more suitable. They may be more suitable, but

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because they don't fit these other criteria that are required

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in the procurement process, they aren't even eligible for consideration. Clearly,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>managing such a massive effort is a huge challenge, and

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they are bound to be big problems along the way,

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like these challenges are made all the

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>more difficult because of the nature of how the US

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>government partners with the private sector in general, and the

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tech sector in particular. By the way this sort of

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>thing is nonpartisan. We see messages like this no matter

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>who happens to be in charge, because the policies themselves

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>are so restrictive that it almost doesn't make a difference

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you have a conservative administration in power

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or a liberal one. The policies themselves persist, and that

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>ends up being an issue. And speaking of the US government,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the effects of an administration changing hands is

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes long term projects get disrupted, and one of

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>those projects appears to be NASA's planned returned to the

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Moon under former President Trump. NASA was to aim to

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>get astronauts back on the Moon by four, including the

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>first woman astronaut to go to the Moon. Now, that

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>timeline was pretty ambitious and aggressive. I wouldn't go so

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>far as to say it was impossible, but it was

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be really hard to do and really expensive,

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and there is uncertainty about where the plan now stands.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>In the wake of Joe Biden winning the US presidency.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 1>With a new ends stration in charge, there are questions

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about whether NASA will get the funding needed to stay

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on target, particularly for that goal. We're already seeing some

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>results of this, with NASA pushing back when it will

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>announce lunar lander contracts. Originally, NASA was to announce which

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>two of the three companies that had been under consideration

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>would be awarded a pair of contracts for lunar landers,

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so one contract per company. We don't know which of

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>which two of the three we're going to get these.

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>We were supposed to find out later this month in February.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Now NASA has told the contractors that the announcement has

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>been pushed back to April. This was probably a necessary step.

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>The agency had requested a budget of three point two

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in order to stay the course. But in

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>December twenty twenty, Congress approved a much more modest budget

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of eight hundred fifty million dollars. And yeah, it feels

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>weird to call eight hundred fifty million dollars honest, but

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>then we are also talking about trying to keep people

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>alive and safe as we shoot them off to the Moon,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and that ain't cheap. We're still waiting to hear who

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration will choose to head up the agency

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and what priorities the administration will stress. It's all but

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>certain that the Artemis project of returning to the Moon

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to get pushed back beyond if it sticks

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>around as an official project in the first place. And

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the initial timeline was probably unrealistic and

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you really have to define what are your goals besides

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just going there. Going there's great, it's really a fantastic achievement.

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to downplay that, but is that the

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>best use of resources? Uh? But on the other hand,

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I also think that a Moon mission does have a

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of potential. You can find ways to perhaps harvest

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>resources from the moon, though that's a very delicate matter.

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You have to figure out a way of doing that.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>It isn't too damaging or dangerous or we'll have long

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>lasting consequences. But then you can also pursue a challenge

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that would undoubtedly inspire countless others to really dream big

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and become the next generation of pilots and engineers and scientists.

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a big thing in itself. So, like

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, I do feel uh complicated about this. Moving on, Microsoft,

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>which has managed to dodge a bullet in the United

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>States as the US government has discussed the fate of

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>big companies like Facebook, Amazon, Google, and Apple, is going

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>under the magnifying glass. Over in the EU, antitrust regulators

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have until March five to decide if Microsoft's proposed acquisition

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of ZeniMax Media is acceptable or if the EU regulators

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>will prevent it or require concessions before the acquisition can

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>move forward. As it stands, the deal is valued at

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half billion dollars. Holy cow, makes that

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>forty four million dollar website really look like small potatoes, right,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So what is it that zenni Max does? I mean,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be important for that kind of money, right, Well,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Zenny Max is the parent company of Bethesda, the video

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>game studio responsible for things like the older Scrolls games,

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fallout titles, and the Doom titles. Though the story

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is behind Fallout and Doom stretch back to other studios

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>before Bethesda. But that's that's a matter for a different episode.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, video games are a huge business, and I

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to downplay that. It's just one of those

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>weird facts of life that I really find bizarre that

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about money for a video game company acquisition

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that is orders of magnitude larger than the money that's

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>put forward as part of an effort to administer vaccines

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>against a deadly pandemic. But that's enough of me on

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>my soapbox. I get it, you all don't need to

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>hear it. If Microsoft's acquisition can move forward, it will

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>put the company on more equal footing with Sony and

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the PlayStation platform. For a long time, one of the

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>big strengths PlayStation has had against the Xbox platform is

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a list of really good exclusive titles. Now there's a

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>chance Microsoft would be able to create new titles with

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Bethesda's work that tie in with those those big popular

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>franchises and have them be exclusive to Xbox in the

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Windows platform, as long as they don't end up like

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Fallout seventy six, which the Gaming World at Largest categorized

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as a let's see here says here a total disaster. Now,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's more likely that the games will still be available

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for Sony's console, but that Microsoft will then include them

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>with their Xbox Game Pass service. That's one of the

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>big selling points for the Xbox series of consoles. Essentially,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to that and you get access to dozens

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of different video games idols that are included in the

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>subscription price, so you don't have to pay extra to

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>get access to them. So that's probably where this is going.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And and and honestly, that's kind of the best of

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>all worlds because Microsoft can still make money selling games

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that are going for a competitor's console while they also

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>build up the library of games in their own exclusive

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>subscription service. It's kind of a no brainer, really. And

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we have a couple of short Facebook stories to mention.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Three of them actually. First up is the newly appointed

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Oversight Board at Facebook. This is an independent group that

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>is reviewing Facebook's moderation policies. Ours Technica reports that this

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>group recently ruled against four of the five substantive rulings

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook provided them, and reading over these rulings, I'm

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of floored. It's five different cases in which Facebook

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>chose to remove a post for the interpretation of the

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>post violating Facebook's rules, and the board agreed with four

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of those five decisions. But I'm not sure that I

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>fully agree with the board in every case. Though to

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be fair, I'm working from summaries of what these cases were.

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the full context, but it really illustrates

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>how complicated moderation actually is and why it requires a

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of work and it's not something you can just

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hand over to an algorithm. And by creating this independent

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>oversight board, Facebook also kind of has an excuse when

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>someone gets mad at a post that Facebook didn't take down,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>because the oversight board is sort of setting the precedent

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook and say, hey, we got an independent board

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of experts who make these decisions, so go blame those people. Now.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Related to that story is another one that Facebook is

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of navigating some super tricky territory when it comes

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to anti Semitism and use of the term Zionist. This

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>issue shows how difficult things can be due to context

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and language. For example, some Jewish people who criticize the

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Israeli government's polo sees use the term Zionist when talking

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>about specific policies that they don't agree with. But there

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are others who use the term interchangeably with other terms,

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and they all end up being part of expressions of

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>hate speech. And so this is a really challenging situation

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in which some uses of a word might fall into

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the category of hate speech, something that clearly violates Facebook's

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>policies and should be removed. But in other cases it's

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>being used in a way where it's a part of

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate criticism of Israeli government actions. When I say

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>legitimate criticism, I mean sincere as opposed to whether or

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not you agree with the point of that criticism. The

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Jewish Voices for Peace organization circulated a petition calling for

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to avoid classifying zionist as hate speech outright. Facebook

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>reps have said that the company allows the term when

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes to political discussions, but then removes it in

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cases where it's quote used as a proxy for Jews

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>or Israeli's in a dehumanizing or violent way. End quote.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, this is a really complicated matter,

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and I feel we're seeing the beginning of a lot

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of very difficult conversations within Facebook and between Facebook and

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>its critics, as more people demand that social networks take

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a firmer stance when it comes to moderating user content.

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And finally, the Wall Street Journal reports that internal memos

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>within Facebook revealed that researchers had pointed out to executives

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that there was a rise of hate groups and misinformation

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>campaigns in the summer of twenty twenty, including calls to violence.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So that doesn't look great considering how extremists use platforms

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook to organize ahead of the assault on the

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>US capital. And it also doesn't look great for organizations

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like the FBI that at least initially stated that there

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't any real heads up of any issues, when

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it appears that there were a lot of

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>warning signs months in advance. We have some more tech

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>stories to cover in just a moment, but before we

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>get to those, let's take another quick break. We're back.

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Ford has announced that starting in twenty three, the company's

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>vehicles will incorporate Android Auto, and this is a six

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>year partnership Ford has made with Google. Android Auto is

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a platform for well, I mean, it's kind of obvious

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>car systems, and it means that Ford vehicles will have

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>certain Google apps like Maps and even Assistant incorporated into

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>their entertainment systems. And I have to admit that could

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>be kind of neat being able to talk to your

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 1>car to have it do things like give you directions,

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or play your favorite station, or give you an update

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on whether or make schedule changes to your calendar. All

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of that seems like a decent way to keep your

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>eyes on the road instead of on your phone or

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on the dashboard of the car. The two companies also

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>announced that they were forming a new R and D

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>group called Team Up Shift, which would explore all sorts

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of of uses of technology in the car world, like

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>improving the experience of buying a car. Hey, you know,

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if I think if this means that a salesperson doesn't

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>get up and leave you waiting for half an hour

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to try and you know, kind of put the screws

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to you, that's a good start. Anyone out there who

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>has had the experience of buying a new car from

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a dealership likely has their share of really bad stories.

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But the partnership is also going to look at stuff

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that happens behind the scenes with the aim to improve

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>processes and manage supply chains and all sorts of stuff

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that customers rarely think about, but they really have a

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>real impact on the bottom line of a business. And

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>according to reps, with the companies, there will be no

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>harvesting of personal information, so you don't have to worry

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about forward and Google logging every time you go to

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that greasy spoon or you like, or if you haven't

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>hit the comic book store every week, or you know,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is other people do. Don't judge me. I

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like greasy food and I like comic books. Anyway, this

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>could be an interesting partnership, But I do think it's

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>good for people to ask tough questions about data management

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and privacy because we have seen how that information can

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>be misused or even just collected and bartered without our

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledge or consent. And hey, that leads me well into

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the next story, which is that sixty Minutes reported that

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>China may have stolen the personal data of around eighty

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of all adults in America. That is staggering. Imagine

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you're with a group of four friends and for this

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical situation, we're saying that everyone's been vaccinated. It's all safe, yea,

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>except you look around at your friends and you think, hey,

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>only one of us has not had their personal data

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>stolen by China. That I mean, yikes, guys. And the

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 1>information stolen is personal information that apparently includes bio data

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>like DNA and stuff, which is truly wild. According to

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the International Business Times, the purpose of doing that kind

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing might be to feed that information into China's

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>medical industry in an effort for that industry to dominate

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the global medical treatments and technologies markets, essentially giving China

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>a scientific edge on all things medical. But you know,

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>without going through that whole nasty business of asking people

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for permission to harvest and use their personal and biological information. See,

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of thing we have to be on

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the lookout for. And guys, if you were looking forward

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to going to Coachella, have some bad news. For the

0:34:54.680 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>third time since the pandemic started, Coachella is canceled. Coachella

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to happen in April of but by that

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>point the pandemic was in full bloom in the United States,

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and so the organizers postponed it to October twenty. That

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:14.720
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be a bit too ambitious as well,

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>as we were sliding toward another terrible surge in COVID cases,

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and so twenty twenty was called a loss, and the

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>plan was to hold Coachella one in April, but seeing

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>as the vaccine rollout it's likely to still be in

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the early stages for most of the population even by

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that point in time, April isn't a guarantee either, and

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>now the show has been canceled. There are rumors that

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>it might get pushed to October again, but as I

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>record this, there's been no official word on that. Obviously,

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the live events industry has been absolutely hammered by COVID,

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and it appears that the vaccination rollout this year will

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>really determine when we can expect some of those big

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>events to return. So in the meantime, stay home if

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you can, key social distancing, wash your hands, and be safe.

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Our last couple of stories are about Vigia Games. First

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>up is the game everyone loves to dunk on for

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>some pretty legitimate reasons cyberpunk. The latest is that PC

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 1>gamers should take some precautions before installing any mods. Now,

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for those not up on gaming lingo, mods are modifications,

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and in this case, it refers to stuff that's been

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>programmed by other people who don't work for the video

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>game company, with the purpose of creating different effects or

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>opening up new features once you download it and install

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it into the code of your game. Some games natively

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>support mods, and even have marketplaces where users can shop

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>around for different types of mods. And a mod might

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>make a game look better, or it might create weird

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and silly effects, or it might allow you to do

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff like make edits to the game while you're playing

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it so that you know you don't have to do

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that irritating thing where you play a game to progress.

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, right, who has time for that anyway?

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Forbes reported a subreddit post that indicated that there were

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>some vulnerabilities in the PC version of the game that

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 1>could allow for malicious mods to integrate with the game

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and then compromise the PC running the game. So you

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>might think you're getting, you know, a cool mod that's

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna make Keanu Reeves your best Friend Forever BFFs, but

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact it ends up creating a back door for

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a hacker to take over your computer. Apparently there are

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>some workarounds to protect your PC to patch those vulnerabilities

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>on your own, but as of this recording, there's no

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>official patch from the video game company CD project to

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 1>fix things. And finally, we have some good news, at

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>least for Nintendo. The company had projected it would sell

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty four million Nintendo Switch consoles in the current fiscal year,

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which lasts through March, so Nintendo's fiscal year doesn't follow

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the calendar year. However, the company has already sold twenty

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>four point one million units, and looking at the calendar,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we still have a little bit to go before March

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is over, so that's prompted Nintendo to adjust its projection

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>upward to twenty six and a half million units. Now,

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly the pandemic has had a big effect with this,

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with lots of people buying a Switch console during lockdown.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I'm one of those people because I bought

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>one for my wife, and honestly, I should probably get

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>one of my own because it looks like a lot

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of fun and she won't let me play it. Also

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the company has exceeded its projected sales

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>also helps explain why sometimes it can still be a

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>challenge to find a switch console in stock depending on

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>where you live. Um, it's hard to find those in

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>inventories at times. But good news for Nintendo and there's

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>some big titles that are coming up in the in

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the months ahead. That's what's really got them excited about

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the potential of hitting that tway six and a half

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 1>billion unit benchmark. So that's good for them. Bee beep,

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>beep beep, breaking news. I had already finished recording this

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>episode and just as I was about to jump into

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>sending it off to super producer Torii, I saw the

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>news today. Oh boy, and it's more of a a video

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>games So we're just tagging this onto the very end.

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Apparently Google is now shuttering. It's in house Stadia Games

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Development studio. That headline comes straight from c NET and

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Shelby Brown. So Shelby, big thanks to you for getting

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that out there. Just before I was going to send

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this off. It's awesome that I get to talk about

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this only in the sense that it is breaking news.

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It is said I'm also a Google Stadia user, I

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>got a chance to get hold of a Stadio system,

0:39:57.640 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of interesting. I haven't really played with

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that much, to be honest, but I thought it was

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>an interesting idea. However, Google has now decided that they're

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to really get into the business of developing

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>video games. They will instead continue to act as a

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>platform supporting video games, So you can still have video

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>games on the Stadio platform, just that Google won't be

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>making any of those itself. So I thought I would

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>update that before this episode goes out because I had

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the chance to do so. Back to Jonathan. Thanks Jonathan.

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>All Right, guys, that wraps up this episode of tech

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Stuff News. We will be back on Thursday with more

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>news episodes. Tomorrow you will get a brand new episode

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff Proper. That one's going to be all

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about Discord, So if you're curious about the platform I

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>talk all about history and tomorrow's episode, be sure to

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tune into that. If you have any suggestions for topics

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, let

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>me know. Discord was a user suggestion. Maybe you can

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>make one of your own. The best way to get

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in touch with me is over On Twitter, the handle

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is text stuff H s W and I'll talk to

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I Heart

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.