1 00:00:06,480 --> 00:00:10,160 Speaker 1: What's the point of building bigger and bigger colliders other 2 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:13,119 Speaker 1: than the obvious fun and awesomeness of it all. It's 3 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:16,400 Speaker 1: a machine that opens up the sub atomic world. It's 4 00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:19,160 Speaker 1: not just because we like to see things go boom, 5 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:21,799 Speaker 1: though of course we do, but because we want to 6 00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:25,720 Speaker 1: know what happens when you pull things apart. What's inside me, 7 00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:30,120 Speaker 1: what's inside you, what's inside everything. At the root of 8 00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:32,519 Speaker 1: it all is a desire to dig as deep as 9 00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:35,200 Speaker 1: we can into the very nature of matter, to hope 10 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 1: to reveal its inner workings and understand how it all 11 00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 1: comes together to make our amazing, crazy and delicious world. 12 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:45,800 Speaker 1: Is the universe made of quarks and leptons and dark matter? 13 00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:49,400 Speaker 1: Or is it made of strings or shmings or bada bings? 14 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:53,120 Speaker 1: Right now we don't know. We might never know, or 15 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 1: one day and we might build a collider powerful enough 16 00:00:55,920 --> 00:00:59,760 Speaker 1: to show us the universe's fundamental lego bricks. Then we 17 00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:02,120 Speaker 1: can turned to the philosophers and ask them, hey, so 18 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,160 Speaker 1: what does this mean? Dude? But what if we don't 19 00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:07,560 Speaker 1: get the billions to build a bigger collider? Is that 20 00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 1: the only way forward? Can we find some other clever 21 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:14,120 Speaker 1: way to get this information through the universe's back door. 22 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:16,959 Speaker 1: That's what we're going to talk about on today's episode. 23 00:01:17,319 --> 00:01:20,680 Speaker 1: Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe, brought to you 24 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,320 Speaker 1: by all the tiny particles that make it possible. 25 00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:41,279 Speaker 2: Hello. I'm Kelly leader Smith. I'm a parasitologist who also 26 00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:43,800 Speaker 2: studies space, and I'm wondering if today we're going to 27 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:46,600 Speaker 2: be talking about something that Daniel studies staring his day job. 28 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:51,040 Speaker 1: Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and my job 29 00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 1: is to play with taxpayer funded billion dollar toys. 30 00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:56,320 Speaker 2: Ooh, my job usually involves playing with fish bomb and 31 00:01:56,360 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 2: I think your job might be better. 32 00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:01,120 Speaker 1: I hope nobody I've ever paid a billion dollars for 33 00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:01,720 Speaker 1: fish vomit. 34 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:04,520 Speaker 2: There are some important questions that can get answered with 35 00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:06,520 Speaker 2: a lot of fish vomit. But yeah, probably not a 36 00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:08,800 Speaker 2: billion dollars worth. I'll give you that. Maybe a million 37 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:12,400 Speaker 2: dollars worth. So you work at the LAC and we're 38 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:15,320 Speaker 2: going to be talking about research happening at the LAC. 39 00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 2: Is the thing that we're talking about today? Is this 40 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:19,800 Speaker 2: a question that you were working on or what does 41 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 2: your lab do exactly? Daniel? 42 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:26,240 Speaker 1: Mostly I take naps, in my office. Isn't that enough? 43 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:30,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm sure everyone feels great about where their taxpayer 44 00:02:30,440 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 2: dollars are going right now. 45 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:35,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a fair question. What is Daniel actually do 46 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 1: all day? We should have a whole episode where I 47 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:40,800 Speaker 1: talk about my research, But very briefly, in the last 48 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:43,520 Speaker 1: ten years or so, I was looking for dark matter 49 00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:47,120 Speaker 1: at the Large Hadron Collider, smashing particles together, hoping to 50 00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 1: make dark matter particles which would leave an invisible signature 51 00:02:50,200 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 1: which is really hard to pick out, and using machine 52 00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 1: learning to try to filter those patterns out from all 53 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 1: of the noise, which is a fun challenge. But then 54 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 1: dark matter sort of became too popular at the Large 55 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:04,079 Speaker 1: Hadron Collider and everybody was doing it, and there wasn't 56 00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:06,760 Speaker 1: a whole lot of opportunity to like do new clever stuff. 57 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:12,440 Speaker 1: So more recently I've pivoted to looking for weird, unexpected stuff. Like, 58 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:14,760 Speaker 1: we know that dark matter is out there, we should 59 00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 1: be able to see at the collider, so let's go 60 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:18,560 Speaker 1: look for it. That makes sense. But what would be 61 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:21,400 Speaker 1: even more exciting to me is to find something that 62 00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:25,799 Speaker 1: nobody expected, a discovery that makes people go, what, that's impossible, 63 00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:28,960 Speaker 1: or that's crazy or huh, how could that even be 64 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:33,160 Speaker 1: something that nobody expected? And that's hard to do because 65 00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:34,720 Speaker 1: you sort of have to have an idea for what 66 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 1: you're looking for in order to go looking for it. 67 00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:40,680 Speaker 1: But we use some cool machine learning tools, anomaly detection 68 00:03:40,840 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 1: and all sorts of other algorithms to try to make 69 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:46,400 Speaker 1: mathematical what we're looking for, what we're not looking for, 70 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 1: and to figure out clever ways to look for it. 71 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:50,520 Speaker 1: So that's one of the things that I'm focusing on 72 00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:52,880 Speaker 1: more recently, is looking for anomalies. 73 00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:55,840 Speaker 2: It's always so interesting to me the way the questions 74 00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:59,400 Speaker 2: that we ask are influenced by things like, well, what 75 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 2: are other people asking? And too many people are asking this, 76 00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:03,240 Speaker 2: and so I'm going to move on to something else. 77 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:06,480 Speaker 2: And there's a lot of like social and funding things 78 00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:08,520 Speaker 2: that go into the decision about what to study. I 79 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:10,320 Speaker 2: guess it makes sense. We're all humans doing work. 80 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's definitely a lot of that. But I think 81 00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 1: people also underestimate how personal science is. Like people ask 82 00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:22,400 Speaker 1: questions because those are their personal questions, and we all 83 00:04:22,440 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 1: benefit from that, like the fact that some people are 84 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:28,119 Speaker 1: weirdly into fish guts, you know, we learn cool stuff 85 00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:30,680 Speaker 1: about the universe. Because of that, and because some people 86 00:04:31,200 --> 00:04:34,360 Speaker 1: want to stay up late looking into telescopes or get 87 00:04:34,360 --> 00:04:38,159 Speaker 1: their socks wet in the rainforest counting spiders. Because different 88 00:04:38,160 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: people enjoy different kinds of activities and have different questions, 89 00:04:41,160 --> 00:04:43,039 Speaker 1: we get to learn about all lots of different kinds 90 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:46,280 Speaker 1: of science. And so you know, there's no like magic 91 00:04:46,320 --> 00:04:48,360 Speaker 1: sorting hat that tells people what science to do. They 92 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:51,280 Speaker 1: just follow their instincts and also, you know, look for 93 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,920 Speaker 1: opportunities for sure. But I think it really reflects the 94 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:58,320 Speaker 1: sort of breadth of human curiosity, all the different kinds 95 00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:00,000 Speaker 1: of science that we have, and I think that's all 96 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:01,000 Speaker 1: wonderful and delicious. 97 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:04,880 Speaker 2: I absolutely agree limitless human curiosity. You can be interested 98 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 2: in fish, vomits, leeches, or dark matter or anything in between, 99 00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:12,279 Speaker 2: and even chemistry. 100 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:16,280 Speaker 1: Don't go that far. You know, I was going to 101 00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 1: say dark matter fish vomit, Like maybe dark fish's vomit 102 00:05:19,240 --> 00:05:21,520 Speaker 1: up dark matter vomit. That would be pretty awesome. That 103 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 1: would be like where our research overlaps. 104 00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:26,360 Speaker 2: Oh my gosh. Yes, I hope somebody will fund the 105 00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:30,000 Speaker 2: intersection of our research interests. Let's write to the NSF 106 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 2: and find out. 107 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,520 Speaker 1: But more broadly, There's something really cool about the Large 108 00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 1: A Drunk Collider, which is that it lets you do 109 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:38,159 Speaker 1: lots of different kinds of things. People have the idea 110 00:05:38,160 --> 00:05:40,360 Speaker 1: that the Large A Drunk Collider is like an experiment 111 00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:42,280 Speaker 1: that I do and then somebody else get the turn 112 00:05:42,360 --> 00:05:45,080 Speaker 1: they do an experiment. In reality, it's the same experiment. 113 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:47,920 Speaker 1: It's just running twenty four to seven collecting very very 114 00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:50,640 Speaker 1: general data, and people can ask different kinds of questions 115 00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 1: about it. People can be like, hey, dude, we find 116 00:05:52,920 --> 00:05:55,160 Speaker 1: a new particle. People can be like, hey, are the 117 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:58,400 Speaker 1: particles we've seen do they behave the way we expected? 118 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:01,360 Speaker 1: Or also like is is there anything weird in the data? 119 00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:03,520 Speaker 1: You can ask all these different kinds of questions with 120 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:06,800 Speaker 1: the same data from the same setup, and so it's 121 00:06:06,880 --> 00:06:09,200 Speaker 1: very general and very powerful in that way, which I 122 00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:12,200 Speaker 1: love because it lets you pivot easily from different kinds 123 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:12,840 Speaker 1: of questions. 124 00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:17,200 Speaker 2: So, what is the experiment that's constantly running in the LHC. 125 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:20,560 Speaker 2: And I'm always going to call it Hadron and embarrass myself. 126 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:22,159 Speaker 2: So I'm just going to call it the LHC to 127 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:22,719 Speaker 2: avoid that. 128 00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:27,120 Speaker 1: What's embarrassing about saying Hadron is it because it's so 129 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:28,839 Speaker 1: close to another word you're afraid of saying. 130 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:31,640 Speaker 2: Yeah it is. 131 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:32,840 Speaker 1: That's not family friendly. 132 00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:34,159 Speaker 2: You called out Wienersmith. 133 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:41,359 Speaker 1: It's true, the large Wienersmith collider. Yeah, what is the experiment? Essentially, 134 00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:44,839 Speaker 1: it's just a big camera around a collision point. You 135 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:47,720 Speaker 1: smash particles together, and then you try to capture all 136 00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:50,080 Speaker 1: the debris that comes out to get it's much information 137 00:06:50,360 --> 00:06:53,400 Speaker 1: about the collision and the aftermath, so you can piece 138 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:56,480 Speaker 1: together what happened because you can't see the actual collision directly, 139 00:06:56,560 --> 00:06:59,000 Speaker 1: Like when the quarks annihilate, you don't get to see 140 00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:01,520 Speaker 1: that happen. You just get to see what they turn into. 141 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:04,880 Speaker 1: So we have these layers of detectors around the collision 142 00:07:04,880 --> 00:07:07,640 Speaker 1: point to take information about those particles so we can 143 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:10,280 Speaker 1: reconstruct their trajectories and their energies and their angles and 144 00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:12,920 Speaker 1: all sorts of stuff and figure out what happened. And 145 00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:14,880 Speaker 1: we just do that for every collision, no matter what. 146 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:18,920 Speaker 2: And is it like today we're just running electrons through there, 147 00:07:19,080 --> 00:07:20,960 Speaker 2: or it's like whatever particles happen to be in there 148 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:22,840 Speaker 2: we're going to run into, or you know, is there 149 00:07:22,840 --> 00:07:24,800 Speaker 2: like a certain combination. What do you start with? 150 00:07:24,920 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, we just go outside and take a scoop of stuff, 151 00:07:27,440 --> 00:07:29,280 Speaker 1: toss it in the collider and see what happened. 152 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:31,000 Speaker 2: It's like, oh my gosh, you're like biologists. 153 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: We're colliding fish bombit today. No, the collider is very 154 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:36,200 Speaker 1: sensitive and very carefully tuned, so you have to put 155 00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:38,640 Speaker 1: the right stuff in and tune it. Most of the 156 00:07:38,640 --> 00:07:41,400 Speaker 1: time it runs protons, and so you just start from hydrogen. 157 00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:44,440 Speaker 1: You kick off the electrons, you give them energy, and 158 00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:47,560 Speaker 1: you separate them using their charges. You have pure protons 159 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:50,840 Speaker 1: and you collide those. The previous collider I worked at 160 00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 1: in Chicago, the Tepatron, collided protons and anti protons, so 161 00:07:54,680 --> 00:07:57,040 Speaker 1: you have to make a source of anti protons a 162 00:07:57,080 --> 00:08:00,480 Speaker 1: whole other factory. That was too complicated. So for the 163 00:08:00,520 --> 00:08:03,280 Speaker 1: next collider, the Large Hadron Collider is just protons and protons, 164 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:06,480 Speaker 1: but sometimes we do other stuff. Sometimes we put lead 165 00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:10,360 Speaker 1: in there or gold atoms and smash them together because 166 00:08:10,480 --> 00:08:12,600 Speaker 1: you can ask all sorts of interesting questions when you 167 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:16,080 Speaker 1: have like zillions of protons smashing together. It's called heavy 168 00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:19,320 Speaker 1: ion physics. So yeah, the Large Adron collider is pretty flexible. 169 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,720 Speaker 1: You can collide other kinds of stuff, not just protons, 170 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:23,160 Speaker 1: probably not fish guts though. 171 00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:26,520 Speaker 2: That's disappointing, but I guess we'll keep talking about physics anyway. 172 00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:28,400 Speaker 2: And so is it like you know, Fridays or the 173 00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:31,080 Speaker 2: gold days, or just somebody like gets a grant and 174 00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:34,040 Speaker 2: that's the day you do the gold ions or whatever instead. 175 00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:37,400 Speaker 1: No, it's like ninety five percent protons. That's the main physics. 176 00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 1: And then occasionally we'll do a run with gold or 177 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:42,680 Speaker 1: with lead or something else, but it's mostly just proton 178 00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:45,920 Speaker 1: proton physics. That's the bread and butter. The large Adron collider, 179 00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 1: and it's decided some very high level of committees ascerned. 180 00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:51,360 Speaker 1: It is like a collection of dozens of countries, and 181 00:08:51,400 --> 00:08:54,160 Speaker 1: so everything's decided by committees that take forever, and so 182 00:08:54,200 --> 00:08:57,079 Speaker 1: it's very bureaucratic. Even the way we publish a paper 183 00:08:57,080 --> 00:08:59,400 Speaker 1: is very bureaucratic. We have five thousand authors on a 184 00:08:59,400 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 1: paper and everybody gets to read it and comment on it. 185 00:09:02,280 --> 00:09:04,200 Speaker 1: So you know, you put a paper through and somebody's 186 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:06,079 Speaker 1: like add a comma, and somebody else is like remove 187 00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:08,440 Speaker 1: that comments. We also know add that comment, put that comments. 188 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:12,040 Speaker 1: It's very slow and frustrating, but it's also wonderful to 189 00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 1: work with people from all over the world. 190 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 2: You have a very nuanced viewpoint on it. That's great. 191 00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:19,040 Speaker 2: I do get frustrated by those bureaucracy, like who cares 192 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 2: about the comma, Let's just get the paper done. But 193 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:23,240 Speaker 2: on the other hand, I'm sure you get lots of 194 00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:25,200 Speaker 2: great ideas you wouldn't have gotten otherwise and it was 195 00:09:25,280 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 2: just two people working together on the paper. 196 00:09:27,120 --> 00:09:30,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, but the particle collider is very powerful and it 197 00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:32,199 Speaker 1: lets you do things like look for new kind of 198 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:35,439 Speaker 1: particles directly. But also I think this underappreciated, is that 199 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:39,439 Speaker 1: there are indirect ways to discover new particles without actually 200 00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:41,199 Speaker 1: seeing them. And that's the thing I want to talk 201 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:44,000 Speaker 1: about today. How we can use that potentially to see 202 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:47,960 Speaker 1: inside particles, to learn about what's going on inside the 203 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,200 Speaker 1: particles we think might be fundamental. 204 00:09:50,320 --> 00:09:51,800 Speaker 2: All right, well, and today we're going to be talking 205 00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:55,439 Speaker 2: about how can we see what's inside the electron? And 206 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:58,880 Speaker 2: we asked our amazing listeners, who are always insightful, to 207 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:01,000 Speaker 2: tell us what they think the answer is to how 208 00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:03,400 Speaker 2: can we see inside an electron? So let's go ahead 209 00:10:03,400 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 2: and hear. What they had to say is that in order. 210 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:08,560 Speaker 1: To see things at that scale, we would need a 211 00:10:09,679 --> 00:10:16,040 Speaker 1: solar system sized particle collider. If we wanted to try 212 00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:18,360 Speaker 1: to see inside of it, we'd probably have to smash 213 00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 1: other particles into it, and we just have to smash 214 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,559 Speaker 1: them together block we do everything else. To see inside 215 00:10:23,559 --> 00:10:26,679 Speaker 1: an electron, we would need to probe it with something 216 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:29,400 Speaker 1: that has a wavelength that's smaller than the electron. 217 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 3: I thought that we couldn't. I thought electrons a fundamental 218 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:37,720 Speaker 3: and there's nothing in there. 219 00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 1: Because we could crash them together with high energy particle physics, 220 00:10:40,920 --> 00:10:43,680 Speaker 1: can we actually see inside of an electrons? You can't 221 00:10:43,720 --> 00:10:47,959 Speaker 1: smash electrons together, so maybe you do it with neutrinos. 222 00:10:48,360 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 2: We might only be able just to look at the 223 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:52,120 Speaker 2: outside of it, and there might not be anything different 224 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:52,880 Speaker 2: on the inside. 225 00:10:52,920 --> 00:10:56,120 Speaker 1: I think that electrons are fundamental particles. 226 00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:59,600 Speaker 3: By colliding it with other electrons or other particles and 227 00:10:59,679 --> 00:11:00,600 Speaker 3: seeing what comes. 228 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:04,480 Speaker 2: Out, it's various quantum states. When probed multiple times with 229 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:09,720 Speaker 2: perhaps light, will generate some sort of semblance of a structure. 230 00:11:10,280 --> 00:11:14,240 Speaker 1: With a very powerful microscope and a lot of imagination, 231 00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:18,200 Speaker 1: get some pliers and a set of thirty weight ball bearings. 232 00:11:18,840 --> 00:11:20,760 Speaker 1: It's all about ball bearings nowadays. 233 00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 3: Okay, I'm pretty certain Daniel's job is smashing particles together 234 00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:28,440 Speaker 3: and seeing their guts when they pop out. So that's 235 00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:31,840 Speaker 3: my guess. Or maybe the answer is math, but that's 236 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:33,079 Speaker 3: not nearly as exciting. 237 00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:38,760 Speaker 1: I'm imagining something like X ray crystallography, like Rosalind Franklin 238 00:11:39,360 --> 00:11:43,120 Speaker 1: saw the structure of DNA, but much much more sensitive. 239 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:46,640 Speaker 1: I mean electron microscope. It's right there in the name. 240 00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 2: Wait wait wait wait wait, I see where this is going. 241 00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:52,280 Speaker 3: Are you asking for more funds to build an even 242 00:11:52,400 --> 00:11:53,600 Speaker 3: larger particle collider? 243 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:57,080 Speaker 1: As far as I know, there's not an insight of 244 00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 1: the electron to see. 245 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 4: You like collide electrons together and when they hit each other, 246 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:12,480 Speaker 4: they like four minutees a big explosion, like a big 247 00:12:13,400 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 4: like a big electronic explosion, and when and when that happens, 248 00:12:20,240 --> 00:12:25,560 Speaker 4: it will there's like a giant microscope over it, and 249 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:28,480 Speaker 4: there's like somebody looking through the microscope and they like 250 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:31,600 Speaker 4: see what comes out of the explosion. 251 00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:37,120 Speaker 1: M magnets. Thanks to everybody who's sent in these answers. 252 00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:39,840 Speaker 1: If you would like to play for future episodes, don't 253 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:43,439 Speaker 1: be shy. Write to us two questions at Danielandkelly dot org. 254 00:12:43,559 --> 00:12:44,959 Speaker 1: We want to hear from you and we want your 255 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:48,439 Speaker 1: voice on the podcast. I love that so many people 256 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:51,920 Speaker 1: said smash them together. These are particle physicists and folks 257 00:12:51,960 --> 00:12:52,720 Speaker 1: after my heart. 258 00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:55,360 Speaker 2: They've been listening to you. I think they've been listening 259 00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:57,920 Speaker 2: to the show for a while. I like the one 260 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:01,040 Speaker 2: person who said it involves ball. I think a lot 261 00:13:01,040 --> 00:13:04,200 Speaker 2: of really great scientific questions involve ball bearings. That was 262 00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:04,840 Speaker 2: a good guess. 263 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:07,120 Speaker 1: If you don't know, use some ball bearings, right. They 264 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: can't hurt. 265 00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:09,960 Speaker 2: No, no, no, and they're always fun to play with, 266 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:11,959 Speaker 2: although I always lose them. 267 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:14,600 Speaker 1: But these folks are basically right on the direct approach, 268 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:16,679 Speaker 1: smash it together, see what comes out. If you have 269 00:13:16,800 --> 00:13:19,520 Speaker 1: enough energy, you can break the electron open. You know. 270 00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:22,880 Speaker 1: That's basically the short answer, and they're right, But nobody 271 00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:25,560 Speaker 1: got the indirect answer. The more subtle, the clever, the 272 00:13:25,640 --> 00:13:28,480 Speaker 1: back door way to maybe see what's inside the electron 273 00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:30,959 Speaker 1: without actually breaking it open, which I'm very excited to 274 00:13:30,960 --> 00:13:31,360 Speaker 1: talk about. 275 00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:33,559 Speaker 2: And I'm very excited to hear the explanation because I 276 00:13:33,600 --> 00:13:34,880 Speaker 2: looked at the outline and I was like, I have 277 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:37,240 Speaker 2: never heard about this before, so this will be exciting 278 00:13:37,240 --> 00:13:39,840 Speaker 2: and new for me. Let's start from the very beginning. 279 00:13:40,040 --> 00:13:42,800 Speaker 2: You know, we're all made of molecules. Molecules are made 280 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:45,320 Speaker 2: of atoms. Give me some more detail, what background do 281 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:45,600 Speaker 2: we need? 282 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:49,000 Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, And I just love this question because I 283 00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:51,280 Speaker 1: love like looking at the stuff around us and wondering, 284 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:53,920 Speaker 1: like how it comes together? What's the recipe for my coffee? 285 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:56,560 Speaker 1: What's the recipe for those fish guts? How do we 286 00:13:56,679 --> 00:13:58,600 Speaker 1: end up in this universe? You know? And to me, 287 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:02,520 Speaker 1: unraveling with things are made of is really like looking 288 00:14:02,559 --> 00:14:04,960 Speaker 1: at the matrix, you know, finding the source code for 289 00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:07,719 Speaker 1: the universe. It's something really deeply satisfying. So it's no 290 00:14:07,840 --> 00:14:10,360 Speaker 1: surprise that I am a particle physicist instead of like 291 00:14:10,360 --> 00:14:13,319 Speaker 1: a rainforest spider ologist. But I hope other people out 292 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:16,160 Speaker 1: there also find that exciting. And we get to live 293 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:18,600 Speaker 1: in a time when we have unraveled so much of nature. 294 00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:21,240 Speaker 1: You know, thousands of years ago people were like, I 295 00:14:21,240 --> 00:14:23,400 Speaker 1: don't know, maybe there's four kinds of stuff, who knows. 296 00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:26,880 Speaker 1: But you know, we figured out what used to summarize, like, Okay, 297 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:28,920 Speaker 1: we're made of molecules, we're made of atoms. That took 298 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,160 Speaker 1: us thousands of years to figure out. It's just like 299 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:35,560 Speaker 1: obvious high school chemistry by now. But it's also hugely 300 00:14:35,640 --> 00:14:38,200 Speaker 1: revealing about the way our universe works, you know, and 301 00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:41,920 Speaker 1: it tells you something already really powerful, which is that 302 00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:44,480 Speaker 1: you have a huge complexity of stuff, right, Like how 303 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:46,480 Speaker 1: many different kinds of things are out there in the universe? 304 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:50,960 Speaker 1: Ice cream and blueberries and mushrooms and fish guts and planets, 305 00:14:51,040 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: so many things. Maybe infinite numbers of kinds of things. 306 00:14:54,640 --> 00:14:58,120 Speaker 2: Definitely a huge number, even white chocolate unfortunately, but yeah, 307 00:14:58,120 --> 00:14:59,120 Speaker 2: there's a lot of stuff out. 308 00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:02,360 Speaker 1: There, hey said fish cuts, Okay, don't be redundant. The 309 00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:04,600 Speaker 1: amazing thing is that you can build all of that 310 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:08,960 Speaker 1: with like one hundred atoms, right, It's kind of incredible. 311 00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:11,120 Speaker 1: You put those hundred items together in different ways, and 312 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:14,640 Speaker 1: you get lava, or you get kittens, or you get hamsters, 313 00:15:15,120 --> 00:15:18,000 Speaker 1: or you get whatever. It's incredible that this huge complexity 314 00:15:18,040 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 1: is built out of simplicity, and the complexity comes from 315 00:15:21,280 --> 00:15:23,960 Speaker 1: the arrangements of the stuff. I think that says something 316 00:15:24,040 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: really deep and powerful about the nature of our universe. 317 00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:28,280 Speaker 1: And so I want to dig deeper, but I want 318 00:15:28,320 --> 00:15:30,560 Speaker 1: to past for a moment and like appreciate how far 319 00:15:30,720 --> 00:15:33,160 Speaker 1: we've come, even just when we get to the atom, right, 320 00:15:33,760 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 1: because the universe could have been different. It could have 321 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:38,040 Speaker 1: been that like everything's made of its own kind of 322 00:15:38,040 --> 00:15:40,960 Speaker 1: particle and there isn't simplicity, or as you get lower, 323 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:43,400 Speaker 1: there's more and more kinds of stuff. And so I'm 324 00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:45,360 Speaker 1: grateful that we live in the universe where as you 325 00:15:45,400 --> 00:15:49,080 Speaker 1: dig deeper, things seem to get simpler. And it's tantalizing 326 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:51,560 Speaker 1: because it tells you like, ooh, maybe keep going. There's 327 00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:54,520 Speaker 1: a really simple hints they're waiting for you. It's all 328 00:15:54,560 --> 00:15:55,000 Speaker 1: forty two. 329 00:15:55,760 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 2: And as someone who studies behavior, I also think it's 330 00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:00,440 Speaker 2: awesome that we live in a time where you can 331 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:03,120 Speaker 2: get a bunch of nations together to agree that we're 332 00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:05,600 Speaker 2: interested in the fundamental nature of the universe and we're 333 00:16:05,600 --> 00:16:09,040 Speaker 2: going to invest in something like the LHC. It's just 334 00:16:09,240 --> 00:16:10,560 Speaker 2: I don't know. I think it's an amazing time to 335 00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:12,120 Speaker 2: live for a lot of different reasons. 336 00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:15,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, it is, And so for anybody out there who 337 00:16:15,280 --> 00:16:18,240 Speaker 1: happens to be in the US Congress, for example, I 338 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:22,280 Speaker 1: think funding for particle physics is great for lots of reasons. 339 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:24,640 Speaker 1: One is the huge return on investment in terms of 340 00:16:24,680 --> 00:16:27,840 Speaker 1: transforming the nature of society economically and militarily and all 341 00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:30,680 Speaker 1: that stuff. But also just for the sheer knowledge, you know, 342 00:16:30,760 --> 00:16:33,760 Speaker 1: like it's worth it anyway, Let's dig deeper. So we 343 00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:36,840 Speaker 1: have molecules. Molecules are atoms, is like roughly one hundred 344 00:16:36,960 --> 00:16:39,800 Speaker 1: kinds of atoms. Inside the atom, of course, is the 345 00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:43,680 Speaker 1: nucleus and then electrons. Nucleus is made of protons and neutrons, 346 00:16:44,320 --> 00:16:46,880 Speaker 1: and so now we have structure inside the atom, right, 347 00:16:47,240 --> 00:16:50,480 Speaker 1: and don't take that for granted. There's an amazing correlation 348 00:16:50,680 --> 00:16:53,760 Speaker 1: between the structure of the atom and the behavior of 349 00:16:53,800 --> 00:16:56,360 Speaker 1: the atom. All this complexity we're talking about, all the 350 00:16:56,400 --> 00:16:59,880 Speaker 1: fascinating different behavior like why are metals metallic, and why 351 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:03,240 Speaker 1: something's active and something's inactive. That all comes from the 352 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:06,160 Speaker 1: structure of the atom. And you could almost have guessed 353 00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:08,320 Speaker 1: it if you looked at the periodic table you said, oh, 354 00:17:08,320 --> 00:17:09,840 Speaker 1: look at these different kinds of atoms. Why there are 355 00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:12,080 Speaker 1: so many different ones, and why are there patterns here? 356 00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:15,560 Speaker 1: You could have guessed that it comes from internal structure. 357 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 1: That the atoms weren't themselves fundamental, meaning they weren't just 358 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:21,640 Speaker 1: made of their own stuff. They were made of something smaller. 359 00:17:21,960 --> 00:17:24,000 Speaker 1: So we had a very strong clue already when you 360 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:26,400 Speaker 1: look at the periodic table that there was more structure 361 00:17:26,440 --> 00:17:28,199 Speaker 1: deep down, and it's amazing that when we dig in 362 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:30,920 Speaker 1: we find that structure and we're then able to explain 363 00:17:31,520 --> 00:17:33,920 Speaker 1: all of those patterns we saw, right, It's incredible. 364 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:36,440 Speaker 2: I feel like you just said that chemistry is important, 365 00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:39,800 Speaker 2: and I'm feeling a little uncomfortable. But we talked about this. 366 00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:42,359 Speaker 2: There was a listener question about why is carbon so 367 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:44,679 Speaker 2: important for life forms and that did come out of 368 00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:47,200 Speaker 2: a long discussion about, you know, what we can learn 369 00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:50,360 Speaker 2: from the periodic, So it's important even if it's chemistry. 370 00:17:50,440 --> 00:17:52,560 Speaker 1: Now I would say it's redundant. All you need to 371 00:17:52,600 --> 00:17:54,560 Speaker 1: know is the structure of the atom, and chemistry you 372 00:17:54,560 --> 00:17:56,879 Speaker 1: should just follow naturally from that if you knew what 373 00:17:56,920 --> 00:17:57,360 Speaker 1: you were doing. 374 00:17:57,480 --> 00:17:59,200 Speaker 2: It's always about physics. 375 00:18:00,320 --> 00:18:04,239 Speaker 1: Exactly anyway. So now let's dig inside the nucleus. Right, 376 00:18:04,240 --> 00:18:06,840 Speaker 1: we have the protons and the neutrons. Protons and neutrons 377 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:09,920 Speaker 1: we know are made of smaller particles. They're made of quarks, 378 00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:12,080 Speaker 1: and the mass of the proton is fascinating, you know, 379 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:14,880 Speaker 1: like basically the proton is the mass of hydrogen. That's 380 00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:17,520 Speaker 1: what the hydrogen is, basically just a proton. So fix 381 00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:19,679 Speaker 1: that in your mind is like the unit, and in 382 00:18:19,720 --> 00:18:23,680 Speaker 1: particle physics we use units of GeV giga electron volts 383 00:18:23,720 --> 00:18:26,440 Speaker 1: to talk about mass. It really is GeV divided by 384 00:18:26,440 --> 00:18:28,040 Speaker 1: the speed of light squared, but we just set the 385 00:18:28,080 --> 00:18:30,159 Speaker 1: speed of light to equal one because otherwise it's such 386 00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:32,760 Speaker 1: a pain in the butt. Anyways, So the proton has 387 00:18:32,800 --> 00:18:35,040 Speaker 1: a certain mass. And if you dig into the proton 388 00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:37,639 Speaker 1: and you ask, like, well, the proton is made of 389 00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:40,160 Speaker 1: the quarks. Does that mean I can get the proton 390 00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,679 Speaker 1: mass by adding up the mass of the quarks the 391 00:18:42,720 --> 00:18:44,719 Speaker 1: way you feel like if you take your car apart, 392 00:18:45,119 --> 00:18:47,600 Speaker 1: the mass of the car is equal to the mass 393 00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:50,560 Speaker 1: of the parts of the car, right, Well, that's not 394 00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:52,040 Speaker 1: true for the proton, and this is going to be 395 00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:55,080 Speaker 1: very important later. The proton's mass is made of things 396 00:18:55,080 --> 00:18:57,840 Speaker 1: with much much smaller mass. Like you add up the 397 00:18:57,880 --> 00:19:00,479 Speaker 1: mass of the quarks that make up the proton, you 398 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:03,359 Speaker 1: get like a few percent of its mass. So where 399 00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:05,800 Speaker 1: do the rest of its mass come from? Or? Remember 400 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:10,760 Speaker 1: mass is not stuff, right, Mass is internal stored energy, 401 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:13,679 Speaker 1: and there's a lot of energy between those quarks holding 402 00:19:13,720 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: those quarks together, and that energy inside the proton contributes 403 00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 1: to the proton's mass. The same way, like shining a 404 00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:24,240 Speaker 1: photon into a box of mirrors makes that box more massive, 405 00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:27,560 Speaker 1: even though what you've added hasn't added any actual mass 406 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:30,919 Speaker 1: on its own. So the proton is pretty massive, but 407 00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:33,040 Speaker 1: it's made of very low mass stuff, and a lot 408 00:19:33,080 --> 00:19:35,919 Speaker 1: of its mass doesn't come from the mass of the 409 00:19:35,920 --> 00:19:36,879 Speaker 1: things that's made out. 410 00:19:36,720 --> 00:19:39,639 Speaker 2: Of this mass is internal stored energy thing. I remember 411 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:41,680 Speaker 2: you blew my mind when we were talking about that 412 00:19:41,800 --> 00:19:44,439 Speaker 2: in the Where does Energy Come From? Episode? So if 413 00:19:44,480 --> 00:19:47,080 Speaker 2: folks want a bit of a deeper dive into that concept, 414 00:19:47,320 --> 00:19:48,640 Speaker 2: they should check out that episode. 415 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:52,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, So we've zoomed it now inside the protons 416 00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:55,439 Speaker 1: and neutrons, and protons and neutrons both made of quarks, 417 00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:58,280 Speaker 1: just different arrangements. You got upcorks and down quarks and 418 00:19:58,680 --> 00:20:00,480 Speaker 1: two upcorks in it. Down makes one of them to 419 00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:02,720 Speaker 1: down quarks and up and makes the other one. Honestly, 420 00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:04,440 Speaker 1: I don't even remember which is which. I can never 421 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:07,399 Speaker 1: keep that straight, but you can look it up. 422 00:20:08,680 --> 00:20:10,480 Speaker 2: I don't bother memorizing stuff like that either. 423 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:14,399 Speaker 1: I often remember this stuff, but I feel like if 424 00:20:14,400 --> 00:20:16,800 Speaker 1: you confuse it too many times early on when you're 425 00:20:16,880 --> 00:20:19,280 Speaker 1: learning it, then it's forever scrambled in your brain, and 426 00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:21,720 Speaker 1: I will never be able to snangle them and always 427 00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:22,399 Speaker 1: have to look it up. 428 00:20:22,480 --> 00:20:24,040 Speaker 2: And this is why I'm never going to try to 429 00:20:24,080 --> 00:20:28,119 Speaker 2: say hadrawn, because I've gotten it totally confused. If there 430 00:20:28,119 --> 00:20:29,800 Speaker 2: are some people in my life where I said their 431 00:20:29,880 --> 00:20:32,120 Speaker 2: name wrong so many times, I will never be constantly 432 00:20:32,240 --> 00:20:33,960 Speaker 2: I'm going to say it right where I'm just like, hey, 433 00:20:34,640 --> 00:20:36,399 Speaker 2: I've known you for five years. I don't want to 434 00:20:36,440 --> 00:20:37,960 Speaker 2: mess it up now that we're face to face. 435 00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:39,520 Speaker 1: You remember my name though, right? 436 00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:39,800 Speaker 2: Hey? 437 00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:41,760 Speaker 1: You putting you on the spot. 438 00:20:42,840 --> 00:20:43,840 Speaker 2: It's Whitson right. 439 00:20:49,119 --> 00:20:53,040 Speaker 1: In French they call me Wittissan. I was actually one 440 00:20:53,080 --> 00:20:55,200 Speaker 1: time waiting for an aployment at a bank in France 441 00:20:55,240 --> 00:20:58,199 Speaker 1: and they came out and said Monsieur Wisson and I 442 00:20:58,280 --> 00:21:01,120 Speaker 1: was like, that's not me, and calling him and calling him. 443 00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: I was like, who is this moron? We're going for 444 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:04,479 Speaker 1: your appointment already. 445 00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:06,400 Speaker 2: Your whole never would come with me, oh. 446 00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:10,960 Speaker 1: Exact, oh simla. Anyway, I go to. 447 00:21:11,040 --> 00:21:14,480 Speaker 2: Doctor's appointments, including to the like obgyn, where you think 448 00:21:14,480 --> 00:21:16,920 Speaker 2: that people would be comfortable saying the word wiener. It's 449 00:21:16,920 --> 00:21:19,320 Speaker 2: always like when they call people out from the waiting 450 00:21:19,359 --> 00:21:23,120 Speaker 2: room it's like, oh, uh, you know, miss Smith, Miss Jordan, 451 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:29,280 Speaker 2: Miss god Luski, uh Kelly, would they get to me? 452 00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:32,080 Speaker 2: And nobody wants to try to say Wiener Smith, even 453 00:21:32,119 --> 00:21:35,119 Speaker 2: at the Obgyn. But anyway, that's all right, I go 454 00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:36,520 Speaker 2: buy anything. It's all fine. 455 00:21:36,600 --> 00:21:38,600 Speaker 1: Maybe they think you're Bird Simpson, you're playing a brank 456 00:21:38,600 --> 00:21:38,920 Speaker 1: on them. 457 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:42,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe nobody would actually do that. We did one 458 00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:45,800 Speaker 2: We went to go pick up our turkey for Thanksgiving 459 00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:47,600 Speaker 2: it Whole Foods, and they called to the back, the 460 00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:50,320 Speaker 2: wiener Smiths are here for their turkey. And then fifteen 461 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:52,960 Speaker 2: minutes later we hadn't gotten the turkey, and I was like, hey, 462 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:55,000 Speaker 2: could you call them in the back and see what's up. 463 00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:57,000 Speaker 2: They called back and they said, what about the turkey 464 00:21:57,040 --> 00:21:58,720 Speaker 2: for the Wienersmith's. And I heard the person on the 465 00:21:58,760 --> 00:22:04,560 Speaker 2: walkie talkie go, oh oh gosh, you were serious. So 466 00:22:04,600 --> 00:22:07,920 Speaker 2: then we got our turkey. All right, I've gotten us 467 00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:10,200 Speaker 2: off track, daniell get us back on track. 468 00:22:10,040 --> 00:22:13,360 Speaker 1: Please, that's right. So we're zooming inside of matter inside 469 00:22:13,359 --> 00:22:16,200 Speaker 1: your frozen turkey. You have molecules and atoms, and those 470 00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:19,199 Speaker 1: are made of protons and neutrons and electrons, and the 471 00:22:19,240 --> 00:22:21,440 Speaker 1: protons and neutrons are made of quarks. So we've zoomed 472 00:22:21,480 --> 00:22:24,080 Speaker 1: all the way down, and everything that you've ever tasted 473 00:22:24,200 --> 00:22:27,280 Speaker 1: or eaten or thrown at your family members on Thanksgiving 474 00:22:27,720 --> 00:22:31,119 Speaker 1: is made of quarks and electrons, right down to this 475 00:22:31,320 --> 00:22:33,359 Speaker 1: very basic Two kinds of quarks and one kind of 476 00:22:33,440 --> 00:22:37,280 Speaker 1: electron can make basically everything. So the particle physicists cookbook 477 00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:40,160 Speaker 1: has three ingredients. And the most amazing thing, the most 478 00:22:40,160 --> 00:22:42,919 Speaker 1: mind blowing to me, is that everything in the universe 479 00:22:43,000 --> 00:22:45,960 Speaker 1: is made of the same ratio of that stuff. It's 480 00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:48,680 Speaker 1: like one proton to one neutron to one electron, which 481 00:22:48,680 --> 00:22:51,479 Speaker 1: means the same numbers of quarks and electrons in everything. 482 00:22:51,520 --> 00:22:53,960 Speaker 1: It's just the arrangement of stuff. But you know, we're 483 00:22:53,960 --> 00:22:56,680 Speaker 1: never satisfied just knowing that it's not like that's the answer, 484 00:22:57,160 --> 00:22:59,560 Speaker 1: and so we're always interested in the question of like, 485 00:22:59,680 --> 00:23:02,680 Speaker 1: is there something deeper? Is there something inside the electron? 486 00:23:02,800 --> 00:23:05,320 Speaker 1: Is there something inside the quarks? And we haven't talked 487 00:23:05,359 --> 00:23:07,720 Speaker 1: about it today and probably won't, But obviously there's a 488 00:23:07,800 --> 00:23:10,440 Speaker 1: huge chunk of the universe dark matter that's not made 489 00:23:10,440 --> 00:23:12,720 Speaker 1: of quarks and leptons, So we know there's other kinds 490 00:23:12,720 --> 00:23:15,800 Speaker 1: of matter out there. Definitely not the end of the story. 491 00:23:16,040 --> 00:23:19,200 Speaker 2: Well, and you said leptons, which we haven't talked about yet. 492 00:23:19,400 --> 00:23:22,119 Speaker 2: What is elepton? Is a lepton like a quark, but 493 00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:26,360 Speaker 2: it jumps a lot. I'm stretched. 494 00:23:26,480 --> 00:23:30,040 Speaker 1: No, it's a particle that's slept in. No electon, Sorry 495 00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:32,960 Speaker 1: for the terminology. There's a category of particles that the 496 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:36,040 Speaker 1: electron belongs in, and the electron has cousins the muon 497 00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:39,199 Speaker 1: and the towel that make up the other leptons. But 498 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:41,600 Speaker 1: we can also do say quarks and electrons because that's 499 00:23:41,600 --> 00:23:43,560 Speaker 1: what makes up the matter that we are made out of. 500 00:23:43,720 --> 00:23:45,520 Speaker 1: There are other quarks out there, and there are other 501 00:23:45,720 --> 00:23:48,359 Speaker 1: versions of the electron out there, the muon and the towel, 502 00:23:48,520 --> 00:23:50,680 Speaker 1: but our kind of matter is made out of two quarks, 503 00:23:50,680 --> 00:23:52,560 Speaker 1: the up and the down, and the electron. 504 00:23:52,840 --> 00:23:55,600 Speaker 2: Got it, Okay, So after the break, we're going to 505 00:23:55,640 --> 00:23:59,359 Speaker 2: talk about why we think that digging into the electron 506 00:23:59,520 --> 00:24:01,439 Speaker 2: is worth it doing. Do we have any evidence to 507 00:24:01,480 --> 00:24:04,320 Speaker 2: suggest there's something else making that up? And we'll discuss 508 00:24:04,359 --> 00:24:23,640 Speaker 2: that after the break and we're back. Okay. So we've 509 00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:27,159 Speaker 2: dug into protons and neutrons. We know that there's quarks 510 00:24:27,200 --> 00:24:30,080 Speaker 2: that are making them up. Do we have any indication 511 00:24:30,320 --> 00:24:33,160 Speaker 2: that if we dig farther into electrons we will find 512 00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:35,080 Speaker 2: that electrons are made up out of something. 513 00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:38,879 Speaker 1: We have no really direct smoking gun, right. What we 514 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:41,840 Speaker 1: do have is a sort of history and some hints 515 00:24:42,000 --> 00:24:44,760 Speaker 1: that encourage us. Recall when we were talking about the 516 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:47,000 Speaker 1: periodic table. We saw all these patterns in the periodic 517 00:24:47,000 --> 00:24:49,720 Speaker 1: table and we were wondering, could that be explained by 518 00:24:49,800 --> 00:24:52,679 Speaker 1: internal structure? Could these actually all be made out of 519 00:24:52,680 --> 00:24:54,879 Speaker 1: smaller bits? And the patterns come from how those bits 520 00:24:55,119 --> 00:24:58,240 Speaker 1: arrange themselves and come together naturally, from the different ways 521 00:24:58,280 --> 00:25:00,320 Speaker 1: that they can click together, or whatever. And now we 522 00:25:00,359 --> 00:25:03,480 Speaker 1: know the answer is yes. So we can also look 523 00:25:03,600 --> 00:25:06,239 Speaker 1: at the current list of particles that we don't know 524 00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:09,400 Speaker 1: what's inside and ask are there patterns there? Are there 525 00:25:09,520 --> 00:25:13,640 Speaker 1: unexplained phenomena, things that seem suggestive that maybe these are 526 00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:16,159 Speaker 1: built out of the same smaller bits. The answer to 527 00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:20,720 Speaker 1: that is, oh, yeah, absolutely, there are huge, obvious, screaming 528 00:25:20,800 --> 00:25:24,719 Speaker 1: patterns that suggest very strongly this is not the final answer. 529 00:25:25,160 --> 00:25:29,280 Speaker 2: And if you were to find something fundamental making up electrons, 530 00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:30,040 Speaker 2: what would you name it? 531 00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:34,040 Speaker 1: The white son? Of course? 532 00:25:35,480 --> 00:25:37,840 Speaker 2: The what toll exactly? 533 00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:41,800 Speaker 1: So yeah, I hope I'm around to do that, and 534 00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:44,520 Speaker 1: I suspect the particle physics community would overrule me, and 535 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:48,360 Speaker 1: that happens occasionally, you get overruled, like the electron discovered 536 00:25:48,359 --> 00:25:50,600 Speaker 1: by JJ Thompson. He didn't call it the electron. He 537 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:54,800 Speaker 1: wanted to call them corpuscules, like little bits of matter. 538 00:25:55,200 --> 00:25:56,840 Speaker 1: But people are like, yeah, no, we're going to go 539 00:25:56,840 --> 00:25:57,400 Speaker 1: with electron. 540 00:25:57,480 --> 00:25:58,800 Speaker 2: I mean, as long as they don't name it like 541 00:25:58,880 --> 00:26:02,399 Speaker 2: A or B, like what was it Jupiter's rings? It 542 00:26:02,560 --> 00:26:04,959 Speaker 2: needs to be something exciting. But okay, all right, so 543 00:26:05,000 --> 00:26:07,080 Speaker 2: tell me more about these tantalizing patterns. 544 00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:10,000 Speaker 1: Yes, So we mentioned earlier that there's more than just 545 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:14,000 Speaker 1: the electron, right, the electron has cousins. There's the muon 546 00:26:14,119 --> 00:26:16,960 Speaker 1: in the towel, so there's three kinds of electrons. The 547 00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:20,120 Speaker 1: electron also has a partner, the new trino, which isn't 548 00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:22,159 Speaker 1: part of our matter, but it's part of the universe. 549 00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:24,919 Speaker 1: It's something the universe can do. So in total, there 550 00:26:24,920 --> 00:26:28,400 Speaker 1: are six of these lepton particles, the electron, muon, TAW, 551 00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:31,480 Speaker 1: and then the three neutrinos that correspond to them. So 552 00:26:31,520 --> 00:26:33,639 Speaker 1: that's interesting and you might ask like, well, why are 553 00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:36,119 Speaker 1: there three these particles are all so closely related that 554 00:26:36,240 --> 00:26:38,679 Speaker 1: muon is just a little heavier than the electron. The 555 00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:42,040 Speaker 1: toaw is even heavier. It feels like you patterns in 556 00:26:42,080 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 1: the periodic table. There's like three columns of these particles. 557 00:26:46,240 --> 00:26:49,919 Speaker 1: So that's already very interesting and suggestive. It makes you wonder, like, 558 00:26:49,960 --> 00:26:52,800 Speaker 1: are there three ways to click together their internal bits? 559 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:55,359 Speaker 1: And this is how it happens, three ways for some 560 00:26:55,480 --> 00:26:58,040 Speaker 1: string inside of it to vibrate. And that's just one 561 00:26:58,160 --> 00:27:01,080 Speaker 1: of the really interesting patterns. That whole pattern of like 562 00:27:01,200 --> 00:27:04,840 Speaker 1: six particles three pairs of two is also reflected in 563 00:27:04,880 --> 00:27:07,320 Speaker 1: the quarks. We talked about the quarks the up and 564 00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:10,040 Speaker 1: the down. That's one doublet of quarks up and the 565 00:27:10,080 --> 00:27:13,240 Speaker 1: down go together. There's a copy of that doublet the 566 00:27:13,320 --> 00:27:15,760 Speaker 1: charm and the strange, very similar to the up and 567 00:27:15,800 --> 00:27:18,560 Speaker 1: the down, but heavier. And then there's another copy of 568 00:27:18,600 --> 00:27:21,040 Speaker 1: that doublet the top and the bottom. So all in 569 00:27:21,080 --> 00:27:24,040 Speaker 1: all the quarks have six and it breaks into these 570 00:27:24,119 --> 00:27:27,800 Speaker 1: three columns of two particles exactly the same way the 571 00:27:27,880 --> 00:27:31,360 Speaker 1: leptons do. So you have this structure which is interesting 572 00:27:31,400 --> 00:27:34,480 Speaker 1: and suggestive, and then you have it repeated in another 573 00:27:34,520 --> 00:27:37,000 Speaker 1: set of particles. The amazing thing is that the quarks 574 00:27:37,000 --> 00:27:39,880 Speaker 1: and leptons are very different. The quarks feel the strong force, 575 00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:42,520 Speaker 1: the leptons don't. The quarks make up the nucleus, the 576 00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:45,280 Speaker 1: leptons make up the stuff that orbits around it. We 577 00:27:45,320 --> 00:27:48,200 Speaker 1: don't actually know what the relationship is between quarks and leptons, 578 00:27:48,440 --> 00:27:51,879 Speaker 1: yet there's this very strong symmetry between them. It's like 579 00:27:51,880 --> 00:27:53,800 Speaker 1: if you go into a suburban street and you see, 580 00:27:53,840 --> 00:27:55,880 Speaker 1: like all the houses on the left have this one 581 00:27:55,880 --> 00:27:57,439 Speaker 1: floor plan, all the houses on the right have this 582 00:27:57,520 --> 00:28:00,880 Speaker 1: other floor plan, but they're similar. You might be like, oh, okay, 583 00:28:00,840 --> 00:28:02,919 Speaker 1: well this is obviously built by one company and they 584 00:28:02,960 --> 00:28:05,600 Speaker 1: got two floor plans, right, it's the same deal. It's 585 00:28:05,640 --> 00:28:07,320 Speaker 1: like the universe can do this or it could do that, 586 00:28:07,440 --> 00:28:11,000 Speaker 1: and probably they're built out of the same bits, you know, Like, 587 00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:14,640 Speaker 1: for example, the charge of the proton is plus one 588 00:28:14,680 --> 00:28:17,000 Speaker 1: and the charge of the electron is minus one. Those 589 00:28:17,000 --> 00:28:20,400 Speaker 1: two things cancel exactly. For that to happen, there has 590 00:28:20,440 --> 00:28:23,440 Speaker 1: to be some relationship between the quarks and leftons. Can't 591 00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:25,760 Speaker 1: just be chance that the quarks add up to make 592 00:28:25,800 --> 00:28:28,159 Speaker 1: plus one and the electron adds up to make minus one. 593 00:28:28,359 --> 00:28:30,720 Speaker 1: So there's definitely some connection there. But we don't know 594 00:28:30,760 --> 00:28:33,240 Speaker 1: what it is. So all of this to me are 595 00:28:33,359 --> 00:28:36,080 Speaker 1: very obvious clues. And in one hundred years, when we 596 00:28:36,160 --> 00:28:38,640 Speaker 1: know what's inside the electron and the quarks, people will 597 00:28:38,680 --> 00:28:40,760 Speaker 1: be like, God, it was so obvious. How did you 598 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:43,400 Speaker 1: not see it? Right? But right now we don't know. 599 00:28:43,480 --> 00:28:45,600 Speaker 1: We know that we have these patterns, and it could 600 00:28:45,680 --> 00:28:48,520 Speaker 1: be that the universe is just this way, that all 601 00:28:48,520 --> 00:28:50,760 Speaker 1: this stuff is fundamental and the universe has made it 602 00:28:50,800 --> 00:28:53,480 Speaker 1: of these complex bits with these weird patterns, and there 603 00:28:53,560 --> 00:28:57,320 Speaker 1: is no explanation, but I refuse to believe it. I 604 00:28:57,360 --> 00:28:59,600 Speaker 1: think that everything out there should be explained. 605 00:29:00,040 --> 00:29:02,480 Speaker 2: So if we've got you know, three different kinds of neutrinos, 606 00:29:02,520 --> 00:29:05,680 Speaker 2: they've got up and down quarks, charm and strange and 607 00:29:06,320 --> 00:29:09,200 Speaker 2: top and bottom charm and strange was a good naming thing. 608 00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:12,160 Speaker 2: When we break the electron into its component parts, do 609 00:29:12,200 --> 00:29:15,840 Speaker 2: we expect there to be two parts then, to match 610 00:29:15,960 --> 00:29:17,480 Speaker 2: with what we're seeing with the neutrinos. 611 00:29:17,720 --> 00:29:20,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, good question. We don't know. There could be made 612 00:29:20,080 --> 00:29:22,160 Speaker 1: of two things, could we have three things? Could just 613 00:29:22,200 --> 00:29:25,440 Speaker 1: be made of itself. Whatever is down there is going 614 00:29:25,520 --> 00:29:27,840 Speaker 1: to be very different from what we've seen before. And 615 00:29:27,960 --> 00:29:29,480 Speaker 1: you know, when we saw the proton, it was made 616 00:29:29,520 --> 00:29:31,440 Speaker 1: out of three things. And it's interesting it's made of 617 00:29:31,480 --> 00:29:34,240 Speaker 1: three things because of the way the strong force works. 618 00:29:34,320 --> 00:29:37,280 Speaker 1: There's three colors, and one way to get a balance 619 00:29:37,360 --> 00:29:39,600 Speaker 1: is to have all three colors, you know. It's not 620 00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:42,280 Speaker 1: just like a plus charge and a minus charge is red, green, blue, 621 00:29:42,280 --> 00:29:44,440 Speaker 1: and if you have a red, green, and a blue, 622 00:29:44,680 --> 00:29:47,600 Speaker 1: it comes together to make a color neutral object, which 623 00:29:47,640 --> 00:29:50,640 Speaker 1: is stable. So one reason why the proton is made 624 00:29:50,640 --> 00:29:53,040 Speaker 1: out of three is for that reason, because of the 625 00:29:53,080 --> 00:29:55,320 Speaker 1: structure of that force. So we don't know what force 626 00:29:55,400 --> 00:29:59,080 Speaker 1: is holding together the quarks or the electrons, and that's 627 00:29:59,120 --> 00:30:01,240 Speaker 1: what would determine how many pieces there are and how 628 00:30:01,280 --> 00:30:04,080 Speaker 1: they interact, you know. And so it could be that 629 00:30:04,120 --> 00:30:07,400 Speaker 1: the electron is fundamental. It's just made of itself, and 630 00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:11,040 Speaker 1: when the coders of our simulation put together the universe, 631 00:30:11,040 --> 00:30:13,680 Speaker 1: they started with electrons and that's it, and there's just 632 00:30:13,720 --> 00:30:16,520 Speaker 1: nothing else inside. But it could also be that it's 633 00:30:16,520 --> 00:30:19,600 Speaker 1: made of smaller stuff. The frustrating thing is that you 634 00:30:19,640 --> 00:30:23,479 Speaker 1: can never prove that something is fundamental, right. You can 635 00:30:23,520 --> 00:30:26,560 Speaker 1: prove it's not by breaking it open and seeing what's inside. 636 00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:30,120 Speaker 1: But all you can do is not to discover that 637 00:30:30,160 --> 00:30:32,160 Speaker 1: it is made of something. That doesn't prove that it 638 00:30:32,200 --> 00:30:36,000 Speaker 1: is fundamental, right, just shows that, well, maybe it's fundamental, 639 00:30:36,120 --> 00:30:38,560 Speaker 1: or maybe it's stuff that's so small you can't see, 640 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:41,560 Speaker 1: or it's bound together so tightly you can't break it open, 641 00:30:42,160 --> 00:30:44,640 Speaker 1: so you can never actually prove that it's fundamental. 642 00:30:45,040 --> 00:30:47,080 Speaker 2: The universe can be very frustrating that way. 643 00:30:47,320 --> 00:30:49,960 Speaker 1: And it might also be this is really philosophical, that 644 00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:53,600 Speaker 1: there's nothing fundamental, like maybe the electron is made of 645 00:30:53,640 --> 00:30:57,160 Speaker 1: something else, Schma electrons and those are made of something else, 646 00:30:57,400 --> 00:31:00,280 Speaker 1: but electrons and those are made of something else, is 647 00:31:00,280 --> 00:31:02,720 Speaker 1: made of something else. And your instinct is, well, there's 648 00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:04,360 Speaker 1: got to be something at the bottom, right, it's got 649 00:31:04,400 --> 00:31:07,640 Speaker 1: to be a bedrock layer of reality. And maybe but 650 00:31:07,920 --> 00:31:10,400 Speaker 1: that's just a philosophical hunch, you know, we have no 651 00:31:10,520 --> 00:31:13,560 Speaker 1: evidence that there is. There are theories out there in 652 00:31:13,560 --> 00:31:16,440 Speaker 1: philosophy that the universe could just be an infinite ladder 653 00:31:16,520 --> 00:31:20,160 Speaker 1: of particles with no bottom, right, it just goes on forever, 654 00:31:20,520 --> 00:31:23,720 Speaker 1: which would be great for particle physics because like infinite funding, right, 655 00:31:23,800 --> 00:31:24,320 Speaker 1: just keep. 656 00:31:24,120 --> 00:31:28,160 Speaker 2: Digging infinite nobels. Yeah, there go, there you go. 657 00:31:28,920 --> 00:31:32,160 Speaker 1: But that could be our reality, right, it's possible, but 658 00:31:32,160 --> 00:31:34,280 Speaker 1: there also could be a bedrock, and that's what I 659 00:31:34,280 --> 00:31:37,120 Speaker 1: hope for. I hope that we get someday to some 660 00:31:37,280 --> 00:31:40,640 Speaker 1: set of particles that's so simple, so basic, so obvious 661 00:31:40,720 --> 00:31:43,520 Speaker 1: and beautiful that we think, okay, this must be it. 662 00:31:43,520 --> 00:31:45,960 Speaker 1: It would make sense for the universe to have this 663 00:31:46,040 --> 00:31:49,240 Speaker 1: beats fundamental, because it'd be very unsatisfying if the answer 664 00:31:49,280 --> 00:31:51,480 Speaker 1: is what we have today. The answer is, well, there 665 00:31:51,480 --> 00:31:54,640 Speaker 1: are twelve matter particles and there are five forced particles, 666 00:31:54,680 --> 00:31:56,760 Speaker 1: and that's just it. They're seventeen and that's the basic 667 00:31:56,800 --> 00:31:58,560 Speaker 1: elements of the universe, and that's what we start from. 668 00:31:58,560 --> 00:32:01,160 Speaker 1: And like, really, come on, it's got to be simpler 669 00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:03,920 Speaker 1: than that. We have this tendency towards simplicity, and I 670 00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:07,680 Speaker 1: just hope that the march continues, but there's no guarantees, so. 671 00:32:07,680 --> 00:32:10,160 Speaker 2: I gotta be honest. Before you and I started talking regularly, 672 00:32:10,600 --> 00:32:13,720 Speaker 2: I also held out hope that they were like simple, beautiful, 673 00:32:13,720 --> 00:32:16,480 Speaker 2: elegant answers. And then you told me about the weak force. 674 00:32:19,120 --> 00:32:21,440 Speaker 2: That was the moment for me where I'm like, I 675 00:32:21,440 --> 00:32:23,920 Speaker 2: don't think any of this is gonna make sense. We're 676 00:32:23,960 --> 00:32:26,280 Speaker 2: just gonna have to keep buddling our way through. But 677 00:32:26,360 --> 00:32:27,240 Speaker 2: hopefully I'm wrong. 678 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:30,000 Speaker 1: So I ruined your view of particle physics. Used to 679 00:32:30,000 --> 00:32:32,400 Speaker 1: think of it as like a shining cathedral of simplicity 680 00:32:32,440 --> 00:32:34,320 Speaker 1: and beauty, and then you're like, man, this is a 681 00:32:34,360 --> 00:32:35,840 Speaker 1: mess that's. 682 00:32:35,640 --> 00:32:38,280 Speaker 2: All held together with zip ties and duct tape in there. 683 00:32:38,360 --> 00:32:40,239 Speaker 2: I don't know what's going on, but it is. 684 00:32:40,560 --> 00:32:42,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, But you know, at least now we understand why 685 00:32:42,800 --> 00:32:45,120 Speaker 1: the weak force is a mess. They used to just 686 00:32:45,160 --> 00:32:47,360 Speaker 1: be like, gosh, this is kind of ugly, and now 687 00:32:47,400 --> 00:32:50,520 Speaker 1: we see, oh, it was beautiful and it was shattered 688 00:32:50,560 --> 00:32:52,800 Speaker 1: by the Higgs boson in this precise way, and that's 689 00:32:52,840 --> 00:32:55,320 Speaker 1: at least satisfying, and we can explain it, and we 690 00:32:55,400 --> 00:32:57,920 Speaker 1: can hark back to an earlier day in the universe 691 00:32:57,960 --> 00:33:01,200 Speaker 1: before it all got messed up. Something satisfying there, and 692 00:33:01,200 --> 00:33:02,640 Speaker 1: I hope we get that kind of explanation. 693 00:33:02,760 --> 00:33:04,720 Speaker 2: All right, sounds good. I'm sure the more I learn, 694 00:33:04,760 --> 00:33:10,280 Speaker 2: the more satisfied I'll become. That's so nice of you, 695 00:33:09,520 --> 00:33:12,080 Speaker 2: You know, you make a strong effort to be interested 696 00:33:12,080 --> 00:33:15,760 Speaker 2: in biology. We're both supporting each other here. So let's 697 00:33:15,800 --> 00:33:18,400 Speaker 2: talk about the methods that are currently being used to 698 00:33:18,480 --> 00:33:21,520 Speaker 2: try to break electrons into smaller pieces. If that's a 699 00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:22,280 Speaker 2: thing that exists. 700 00:33:22,440 --> 00:33:25,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, So the most obvious thing is what 701 00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:28,040 Speaker 1: the listener suggested, which is like, hey, let's smash it open, right, 702 00:33:28,720 --> 00:33:31,280 Speaker 1: Take two electrons or an electron and a positron, doesn't 703 00:33:31,320 --> 00:33:34,000 Speaker 1: really matter, point them at each other, give them a 704 00:33:34,000 --> 00:33:37,160 Speaker 1: lot of energy, and bounce them off each other. See 705 00:33:37,160 --> 00:33:41,120 Speaker 1: what happens. Like This method works also for things like toasters. Right, 706 00:33:41,480 --> 00:33:43,880 Speaker 1: want to know what's inside your toaster? Take two toasters, 707 00:33:44,160 --> 00:33:46,560 Speaker 1: throw them at each other at really high speeds. You're 708 00:33:46,600 --> 00:33:48,320 Speaker 1: gonna have a shower of stuff that comes out, and 709 00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:49,960 Speaker 1: you can sift through the debris and be like, oh 710 00:33:49,960 --> 00:33:53,160 Speaker 1: look there's two springs and there's two handles, and oh okay, 711 00:33:53,160 --> 00:33:54,880 Speaker 1: this must be what the toaster is made out of. 712 00:33:55,160 --> 00:33:56,720 Speaker 2: An ouch just should have unplugged it first. 713 00:33:58,360 --> 00:34:04,360 Speaker 1: That's a long extension cord. And there's something fundamentally different 714 00:34:04,360 --> 00:34:06,560 Speaker 1: about the way it happens or quantum particles, but the 715 00:34:06,600 --> 00:34:08,759 Speaker 1: spirit is the same. I mean, if you smash two 716 00:34:08,760 --> 00:34:11,840 Speaker 1: toasters together, you're not destroying parts of the toaster and 717 00:34:11,920 --> 00:34:14,839 Speaker 1: converting their math into energy and trains meeting them into 718 00:34:14,840 --> 00:34:17,000 Speaker 1: something else. The bits that come out of the toaster 719 00:34:17,080 --> 00:34:19,520 Speaker 1: collision are the same bits that went into the toaster collision. 720 00:34:20,080 --> 00:34:23,200 Speaker 1: In a quantum collision, you can annihilate the particles like 721 00:34:23,239 --> 00:34:26,040 Speaker 1: eve an electron and a positron. They can annihilate into 722 00:34:26,080 --> 00:34:29,160 Speaker 1: a photon and then turn into something else. Crazy. What 723 00:34:29,320 --> 00:34:31,719 Speaker 1: comes out isn't always what went in, right, So you're 724 00:34:31,719 --> 00:34:34,320 Speaker 1: not always learning about what's inside the electron if you 725 00:34:34,400 --> 00:34:35,120 Speaker 1: annihilate it. 726 00:34:35,400 --> 00:34:38,080 Speaker 2: So, say you smashed two toasters into each other, and 727 00:34:38,200 --> 00:34:41,120 Speaker 2: you expected to see like screws and springs and stuff 728 00:34:41,160 --> 00:34:43,960 Speaker 2: like that. We don't even know what we should expect 729 00:34:43,960 --> 00:34:46,000 Speaker 2: to see when you break the electron. And so if 730 00:34:46,040 --> 00:34:47,759 Speaker 2: you know, things we had never seen before came out 731 00:34:47,760 --> 00:34:50,920 Speaker 2: of the toaster, like fish cuts, fish guts, exactly, how 732 00:34:50,960 --> 00:34:52,920 Speaker 2: would we even know what to do with that? And so, like, 733 00:34:52,920 --> 00:34:54,879 Speaker 2: how do we know what to look for or how 734 00:34:54,920 --> 00:34:57,080 Speaker 2: to measure it if we've never seen it before? 735 00:34:57,280 --> 00:34:59,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, good question. It would be amazing if we discover 736 00:34:59,640 --> 00:35:00,960 Speaker 1: this fish all the way down. 737 00:35:02,239 --> 00:35:03,080 Speaker 2: I'm skeptical. 738 00:35:04,520 --> 00:35:06,520 Speaker 1: The simplest version of what we do is that we 739 00:35:06,560 --> 00:35:09,360 Speaker 1: start at low energy and we know what we expect 740 00:35:09,440 --> 00:35:11,560 Speaker 1: to see. Like, if you shoot two electrons at each 741 00:35:11,560 --> 00:35:14,279 Speaker 1: other at fairly low energy, they're going to bounce off 742 00:35:14,320 --> 00:35:16,800 Speaker 1: each other in a way that's similar to what happens 743 00:35:16,800 --> 00:35:19,080 Speaker 1: if you shoot two baseballs at each other. They're going 744 00:35:19,120 --> 00:35:22,239 Speaker 1: to bounce off, and you can calculate the angles they're 745 00:35:22,239 --> 00:35:24,399 Speaker 1: going to come out at and the energy. And they're 746 00:35:24,480 --> 00:35:27,120 Speaker 1: quantum particles, so you can't predict an individual one, but 747 00:35:27,160 --> 00:35:29,520 Speaker 1: you can predict the distribution. And so if you have 748 00:35:29,600 --> 00:35:32,640 Speaker 1: what we call elastic scattering, which means you're not breaking 749 00:35:32,640 --> 00:35:35,880 Speaker 1: the particles open, you know, changing the configuration they're just 750 00:35:35,920 --> 00:35:39,200 Speaker 1: bouncing off each other is very predictable. So you start 751 00:35:39,239 --> 00:35:41,680 Speaker 1: with that and you see the distributions you expect, the 752 00:35:41,719 --> 00:35:44,319 Speaker 1: angles that you expect, you're like, okay, that's cool. And 753 00:35:44,360 --> 00:35:47,080 Speaker 1: then you increase the energy, and like with baseballs, at 754 00:35:47,080 --> 00:35:49,680 Speaker 1: some point when you increase the energy, you're going to 755 00:35:49,719 --> 00:35:52,200 Speaker 1: get what we call an inelastic collision, which means the 756 00:35:52,200 --> 00:35:56,520 Speaker 1: baseballs shatter or they stick together, or something else happens. Right, 757 00:35:56,960 --> 00:35:59,959 Speaker 1: And it's an energy threshold because the baseball's help together 758 00:36:00,560 --> 00:36:03,480 Speaker 1: with energy, right, it's bound together. And if you have 759 00:36:03,560 --> 00:36:05,640 Speaker 1: a high enough energy, you can break those bonds. If 760 00:36:05,640 --> 00:36:08,640 Speaker 1: you don't, you don't, So below some energy threshold, you're 761 00:36:08,680 --> 00:36:13,040 Speaker 1: not probing inside the baseball. You're probing the baseball behavior itself, 762 00:36:13,280 --> 00:36:17,439 Speaker 1: but above some energy, it's inelastic, and then the distribution changes. Yeah, 763 00:36:17,480 --> 00:36:19,800 Speaker 1: maybe a baseball comes out, but first of all, it's mangled. 764 00:36:19,840 --> 00:36:23,200 Speaker 1: It looks different, and the angles look very different. Like 765 00:36:23,280 --> 00:36:26,200 Speaker 1: if you collide to baseballs and they stick together, they 766 00:36:26,200 --> 00:36:28,040 Speaker 1: don't come back out at you in the same way. 767 00:36:28,440 --> 00:36:30,360 Speaker 1: Or imagine if you're doing it, like you throw a 768 00:36:30,360 --> 00:36:33,080 Speaker 1: baseball at a wall, and if you throw it low energy, 769 00:36:33,120 --> 00:36:35,200 Speaker 1: it bounces off, it doesn't break the wall. Throw it 770 00:36:35,280 --> 00:36:38,560 Speaker 1: high enough energy, baseball just doesn't come back right. It 771 00:36:38,680 --> 00:36:41,680 Speaker 1: just goes through the wall. So that's very different. And 772 00:36:41,719 --> 00:36:43,560 Speaker 1: so that's what you look for to see. If you're 773 00:36:43,600 --> 00:36:46,919 Speaker 1: probing inside a particle, you shoot it at higher, higher 774 00:36:46,920 --> 00:36:50,040 Speaker 1: and energy, and you look for deviations from the distributions 775 00:36:50,040 --> 00:36:52,879 Speaker 1: you would expect from elastic scattering to see that you're 776 00:36:53,000 --> 00:36:56,239 Speaker 1: starting to do inelastic scattering. You're starting to probe maybe 777 00:36:56,239 --> 00:36:59,319 Speaker 1: what's inside the particles instead of probing the particles as 778 00:36:59,320 --> 00:36:59,680 Speaker 1: a whole. 779 00:37:00,120 --> 00:37:02,640 Speaker 2: We found an energy at which we can shoot electrons 780 00:37:02,680 --> 00:37:05,000 Speaker 2: at each other where it looks like we're transitioning from 781 00:37:05,160 --> 00:37:06,960 Speaker 2: elastic to inelastic scattering. 782 00:37:07,239 --> 00:37:10,600 Speaker 1: Unfortunately not yet, but This is exactly how we discovered 783 00:37:10,640 --> 00:37:14,000 Speaker 1: the structure of the proton. We shot electrons and protons 784 00:37:14,000 --> 00:37:16,520 Speaker 1: at each other, and a low energy they bounce off 785 00:37:16,600 --> 00:37:20,480 Speaker 1: elastic scattering. At higher energy, you start to destroy the proton, 786 00:37:20,920 --> 00:37:23,120 Speaker 1: and what's happening is the electron is now interacting with 787 00:37:23,160 --> 00:37:26,400 Speaker 1: the quarks inside of it, and so at some energy 788 00:37:26,640 --> 00:37:28,960 Speaker 1: you start to just get like shrapnel from the proton 789 00:37:29,200 --> 00:37:31,640 Speaker 1: and it's definitely not elastic scattering, so you can tell 790 00:37:31,680 --> 00:37:34,719 Speaker 1: you're doing inelastic scattering. For people who want to learn 791 00:37:34,719 --> 00:37:37,399 Speaker 1: more about these experiments, they're fascinating and amazing. They're called 792 00:37:37,680 --> 00:37:41,040 Speaker 1: deep in elastic scattering, so you can google that. And 793 00:37:41,080 --> 00:37:43,560 Speaker 1: if you get to high enough energy, you actually start 794 00:37:43,560 --> 00:37:47,000 Speaker 1: to see elastic scattering from the things inside the proton. 795 00:37:47,560 --> 00:37:50,200 Speaker 1: And that's, for example, how we know we have three 796 00:37:50,320 --> 00:37:53,680 Speaker 1: quarks inside the proton, because you shoot electrons at the 797 00:37:53,680 --> 00:37:56,719 Speaker 1: proton and you start to get elastic scattering as if 798 00:37:56,719 --> 00:37:59,480 Speaker 1: there are three tight little dots of objects that you're 799 00:37:59,520 --> 00:38:02,560 Speaker 1: interacting with. Because at high enough energy, the bonds of 800 00:38:02,560 --> 00:38:05,640 Speaker 1: the quarks are irrelevant. If your energy of your probe 801 00:38:05,719 --> 00:38:08,080 Speaker 1: is larger than the energy of the bonds between the quarks, 802 00:38:08,360 --> 00:38:11,120 Speaker 1: you're just shooting it at three quarks and sometimes they 803 00:38:11,120 --> 00:38:13,080 Speaker 1: bounce off and exactly the way you would expect from 804 00:38:13,080 --> 00:38:16,640 Speaker 1: elastic scattering between electrons and quarks. So it's this incredibly 805 00:38:16,680 --> 00:38:20,840 Speaker 1: beautiful transition from elastic to inelastic to then three times 806 00:38:20,920 --> 00:38:22,760 Speaker 1: elastic scattering. It's really amazing. 807 00:38:23,040 --> 00:38:25,239 Speaker 2: That must have been so cool to realize that you, 808 00:38:25,400 --> 00:38:27,680 Speaker 2: instead of a proton, now have three other things that 809 00:38:27,680 --> 00:38:29,719 Speaker 2: have popped out and be like the answer is three. 810 00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:31,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know. 811 00:38:31,120 --> 00:38:32,120 Speaker 2: That sounds really cool to me. 812 00:38:32,640 --> 00:38:34,600 Speaker 1: It is really cool, but for a while people didn't 813 00:38:34,600 --> 00:38:37,360 Speaker 1: believe it. They're like, okay, well that's cool and that's clever, 814 00:38:37,800 --> 00:38:40,960 Speaker 1: but that's just mathematics, Like is that real. And for 815 00:38:41,000 --> 00:38:43,839 Speaker 1: a long time people call these partons like parts of 816 00:38:43,880 --> 00:38:47,000 Speaker 1: the proton, and nobody believes that they were like actually 817 00:38:47,040 --> 00:38:51,040 Speaker 1: physically real things inside the proton until somebody predicted, like, okay, 818 00:38:51,080 --> 00:38:53,120 Speaker 1: well if these things are real, these quarks are real, 819 00:38:53,400 --> 00:38:55,360 Speaker 1: they should be able to do other things also, like 820 00:38:55,480 --> 00:38:59,040 Speaker 1: make other states bound together. And somebody predicted one of 821 00:38:59,040 --> 00:39:02,160 Speaker 1: these states. And the day they saw this in the experiment, 822 00:39:02,160 --> 00:39:04,920 Speaker 1: is this new state made of just these quarks together. 823 00:39:05,360 --> 00:39:07,919 Speaker 1: That's when everybody started to believe Okay, quarks are real. 824 00:39:08,239 --> 00:39:11,759 Speaker 1: It's called the October Revolution. It was a very yeah, 825 00:39:11,760 --> 00:39:15,000 Speaker 1: absolutely in physics. And a guy I worked with tells 826 00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:17,680 Speaker 1: a story about his father who's also a particle physicist, 827 00:39:18,080 --> 00:39:20,080 Speaker 1: getting a phone call that day in October and like 828 00:39:20,160 --> 00:39:22,399 Speaker 1: leaping out of the shower naked and dripping wet because 829 00:39:22,400 --> 00:39:24,279 Speaker 1: he knew he was going to be exciting news to 830 00:39:24,320 --> 00:39:26,480 Speaker 1: take that phone call. So sometimes there is drama in 831 00:39:26,520 --> 00:39:28,759 Speaker 1: particle physics. And so that's what we saw for the 832 00:39:28,760 --> 00:39:31,520 Speaker 1: inside the proton. We know the proton has structure, and 833 00:39:31,560 --> 00:39:33,479 Speaker 1: that's how we know, and we can try the same 834 00:39:33,560 --> 00:39:36,160 Speaker 1: thing shooting electrons at each other. But so far we've 835 00:39:36,160 --> 00:39:37,400 Speaker 1: seen no structure. 836 00:39:37,600 --> 00:39:40,080 Speaker 2: And have we gone up to what you would consider 837 00:39:40,120 --> 00:39:43,440 Speaker 2: to be very very very high energies doing these experiments, Well. 838 00:39:43,320 --> 00:39:45,600 Speaker 1: We've done the highest we can, right. The large hadron 839 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:48,759 Speaker 1: collider is the highest energy collisions of protons and protons, 840 00:39:49,040 --> 00:39:51,840 Speaker 1: and before that we had a high energy electron collider. 841 00:39:52,239 --> 00:39:53,920 Speaker 1: You know, we built these things as large as we can. 842 00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:59,040 Speaker 1: The limitation is just money, Like, there's no fundamental limitation 843 00:39:59,040 --> 00:40:01,239 Speaker 1: to building a bigger collidse. We know how to do it. 844 00:40:01,239 --> 00:40:03,520 Speaker 1: It just costs a lot of cash. You got to 845 00:40:03,520 --> 00:40:06,840 Speaker 1: build a tunnel, you got magnets, you got little accelerating modules. 846 00:40:07,360 --> 00:40:10,839 Speaker 1: We could, in principle build one that circumnavigates the moon 847 00:40:11,440 --> 00:40:13,719 Speaker 1: or you know, the galaxy or whatever. You just cost 848 00:40:13,760 --> 00:40:16,759 Speaker 1: a zillion dollars, and even I think that's probably not 849 00:40:16,840 --> 00:40:19,640 Speaker 1: a good way to spend to your cash. But it's 850 00:40:19,800 --> 00:40:22,160 Speaker 1: awesome sort of to think that, like we could just 851 00:40:22,239 --> 00:40:25,040 Speaker 1: buy this knowledge of the universe, Like it's out there, 852 00:40:25,200 --> 00:40:27,040 Speaker 1: we're in the candy store, we have the money in 853 00:40:27,080 --> 00:40:29,360 Speaker 1: our pockets. We're just like, hmmm, I feel like that 854 00:40:29,440 --> 00:40:30,800 Speaker 1: Snickers bar is too much money. 855 00:40:30,880 --> 00:40:32,760 Speaker 2: Maybe we should figure out what causes cancer. 856 00:40:33,000 --> 00:40:37,319 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, save some kids from dying. Exactly. So one 857 00:40:37,360 --> 00:40:40,000 Speaker 1: approach is like, just build bigger colliders. But the problem 858 00:40:40,080 --> 00:40:41,799 Speaker 1: is we don't know how big it has to be, 859 00:40:42,040 --> 00:40:44,560 Speaker 1: Like until you see the inside of the electron, you 860 00:40:44,640 --> 00:40:47,359 Speaker 1: have no idea. Is it right beyond our capability if 861 00:40:47,360 --> 00:40:49,120 Speaker 1: we build it a little bit bigger we see it, 862 00:40:49,400 --> 00:40:51,800 Speaker 1: or is it going to require a solar system sized 863 00:40:51,840 --> 00:40:55,000 Speaker 1: collider or a galaxy sized colider or use black holes 864 00:40:55,239 --> 00:40:57,640 Speaker 1: or just like a revolution in collider technology, so we 865 00:40:57,680 --> 00:40:59,839 Speaker 1: don't need to make them so big and expensive something 866 00:41:00,120 --> 00:41:03,560 Speaker 1: are working on that, So it's an exploration game the 867 00:41:03,600 --> 00:41:05,440 Speaker 1: same way. You don't know when you land on an 868 00:41:05,440 --> 00:41:07,400 Speaker 1: alien planet is going to be all dust and rubble? 869 00:41:07,480 --> 00:41:09,440 Speaker 1: Or are the aliens waiting for us? And you want 870 00:41:09,440 --> 00:41:11,479 Speaker 1: to land on as many planets as possible. We don't 871 00:41:11,480 --> 00:41:13,680 Speaker 1: know when we build a collider, are we about to 872 00:41:13,719 --> 00:41:16,759 Speaker 1: see inside the electron? Or is this thing way too 873 00:41:16,760 --> 00:41:18,640 Speaker 1: small and we're not going to see anything. You just 874 00:41:18,680 --> 00:41:19,640 Speaker 1: don't know, all right. 875 00:41:19,520 --> 00:41:22,200 Speaker 2: Well, so we've talked about direct methods of trying to 876 00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:25,000 Speaker 2: figure out if electrons are made of smaller parts. Next, 877 00:41:25,080 --> 00:41:27,120 Speaker 2: you are going to tell us about the indirect method 878 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:29,160 Speaker 2: that you queued up for us as a super exciting 879 00:41:29,160 --> 00:41:31,200 Speaker 2: thing earlier in the episode, And when we get back 880 00:41:31,200 --> 00:41:38,560 Speaker 2: from the break, we're going to learn all about it. 881 00:41:50,040 --> 00:41:52,799 Speaker 2: We're back and during the break I asked Daniel if 882 00:41:52,840 --> 00:41:55,360 Speaker 2: the indirect method required bigger colliders, and he said the 883 00:41:55,400 --> 00:41:57,320 Speaker 2: answer is no, which means maybe this could be the 884 00:41:57,400 --> 00:42:00,960 Speaker 2: key with existing technologies for figuring it out exactly. I'm 885 00:42:01,000 --> 00:42:03,400 Speaker 2: super excited. How do we do this indirectly? 886 00:42:03,600 --> 00:42:06,920 Speaker 1: Yeah? So, particle physicists loves smashing stuff together and they 887 00:42:06,960 --> 00:42:09,279 Speaker 1: love making bigger and bigger colliders, and that's all fun 888 00:42:09,320 --> 00:42:11,200 Speaker 1: and everybody would prefer to do it's a direct way. 889 00:42:11,239 --> 00:42:13,560 Speaker 1: It's the most fun, it's the most obvious, it's the cleanest, 890 00:42:13,560 --> 00:42:16,719 Speaker 1: the data is beautiful. But hey, it's expensive, and you know, 891 00:42:16,800 --> 00:42:19,399 Speaker 1: it's hard to build new colliders, and so we also 892 00:42:19,440 --> 00:42:21,359 Speaker 1: try to be resourceful and we try to find other 893 00:42:21,440 --> 00:42:24,960 Speaker 1: ways to discover things without having to build the collider 894 00:42:25,000 --> 00:42:27,880 Speaker 1: to make them directly. So we have these indirect methods 895 00:42:27,880 --> 00:42:31,279 Speaker 1: of discovering things. Essentially, if we can see the influence 896 00:42:31,680 --> 00:42:34,239 Speaker 1: of some new particle, for example, on the particles we 897 00:42:34,320 --> 00:42:36,880 Speaker 1: already are able to make in the collider, even if 898 00:42:36,880 --> 00:42:38,760 Speaker 1: we don't have enough energy to make that new particle, 899 00:42:38,760 --> 00:42:42,080 Speaker 1: that can still influence the particles we have. So for example, 900 00:42:42,120 --> 00:42:44,480 Speaker 1: before we discovered the top quark, we were pretty sure 901 00:42:44,520 --> 00:42:46,560 Speaker 1: it was there, and we're pretty sure we knew where 902 00:42:46,600 --> 00:42:48,759 Speaker 1: it was, like how much mass it had because of 903 00:42:48,800 --> 00:42:50,960 Speaker 1: the way it influenced the particles we were able to 904 00:42:51,000 --> 00:42:53,839 Speaker 1: make at the lower energy colliders. So we can play 905 00:42:53,880 --> 00:42:57,080 Speaker 1: this indirect game of seeing the influence of new particles 906 00:42:57,120 --> 00:43:00,839 Speaker 1: out there on the particles we see to discover new 907 00:43:00,880 --> 00:43:03,880 Speaker 1: particles without like having the energy to make them, but 908 00:43:03,960 --> 00:43:06,480 Speaker 1: we can also do something similar to see inside the 909 00:43:06,560 --> 00:43:11,000 Speaker 1: electron using a very clever trick of studying the Higgs boson. 910 00:43:11,360 --> 00:43:13,800 Speaker 1: So you remember, the Higgs boson is the particle it 911 00:43:13,880 --> 00:43:16,799 Speaker 1: messes up the weak force, but also it gives mass 912 00:43:16,880 --> 00:43:19,880 Speaker 1: to all the particles, like it gives mass to the electron, 913 00:43:19,920 --> 00:43:23,200 Speaker 1: for example, by interacting with it. So without the Higgs boson, 914 00:43:23,239 --> 00:43:25,239 Speaker 1: the electron would have no mass. It would be a 915 00:43:25,239 --> 00:43:28,560 Speaker 1: speed of light, massless particle, similar to the photon, but 916 00:43:28,680 --> 00:43:31,240 Speaker 1: with charge. Of course, once you have the Higgs boson 917 00:43:31,239 --> 00:43:33,960 Speaker 1: in the universe, the Higgs and the electron interact, and 918 00:43:34,000 --> 00:43:36,840 Speaker 1: so the electron that we see is not the pure electron. 919 00:43:36,880 --> 00:43:40,080 Speaker 1: It's the electron interacting with the Higgs field, and that 920 00:43:40,200 --> 00:43:43,440 Speaker 1: interaction is sort of like a big pulsing ball. The 921 00:43:43,640 --> 00:43:45,960 Speaker 1: energy is sliding back and forth between the electron field 922 00:43:45,960 --> 00:43:49,160 Speaker 1: and Higgs field, back and forth constantly, and that basically 923 00:43:49,160 --> 00:43:53,160 Speaker 1: counts as internal stored mass of this thing, this thing 924 00:43:53,160 --> 00:43:55,719 Speaker 1: which is a combination of the electron in the Higgs field. 925 00:43:56,040 --> 00:43:59,000 Speaker 1: We talked in the Charge episode about how fields are 926 00:43:59,040 --> 00:44:02,359 Speaker 1: coupled together sloshes back and forth between them. That's what's 927 00:44:02,360 --> 00:44:04,960 Speaker 1: happening with the electron field and the Higgs field. So 928 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:07,400 Speaker 1: the thing that we see is not really a pure electron. 929 00:44:07,719 --> 00:44:10,000 Speaker 1: What we call the electron is actually a combination of 930 00:44:10,040 --> 00:44:12,160 Speaker 1: the electron field and the Higgs field, and that thing 931 00:44:12,200 --> 00:44:15,239 Speaker 1: has energy inside of it because of this interaction, and 932 00:44:15,280 --> 00:44:18,080 Speaker 1: that's where the electrons mass comes from. Still with me, 933 00:44:18,880 --> 00:44:19,200 Speaker 1: So I'm. 934 00:44:19,080 --> 00:44:21,560 Speaker 2: Trying to connect what you just said and thinking about 935 00:44:21,840 --> 00:44:24,440 Speaker 2: what we were talking about before. So is this interaction 936 00:44:24,520 --> 00:44:26,640 Speaker 2: going to give us more energy than you would get 937 00:44:26,680 --> 00:44:30,080 Speaker 2: if you were just smashing electrons together. No, that's not 938 00:44:30,120 --> 00:44:32,759 Speaker 2: what we're going for. We're just expecting the interactions to 939 00:44:32,800 --> 00:44:35,240 Speaker 2: be different in a way that is formative. 940 00:44:35,440 --> 00:44:37,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. You can't use that as a source of 941 00:44:37,640 --> 00:44:40,680 Speaker 1: fuel to like push things further or anything. But what's 942 00:44:40,719 --> 00:44:44,240 Speaker 1: really fascinating is that the electron has a different mass 943 00:44:44,360 --> 00:44:47,160 Speaker 1: than the muon. For example, right, muon is the cousin 944 00:44:47,160 --> 00:44:49,840 Speaker 1: of the electron. Muon has a lot more mass, interacts 945 00:44:49,920 --> 00:44:52,920 Speaker 1: much more strongly with the Higgs boson, and so the 946 00:44:53,000 --> 00:44:55,640 Speaker 1: Higgs boson interacts with the muon more intensely. So the 947 00:44:55,719 --> 00:44:59,160 Speaker 1: muon has more mass. And that's really interesting because it 948 00:44:59,239 --> 00:45:03,200 Speaker 1: means that by studying the interaction between the Higgs boson 949 00:45:03,560 --> 00:45:06,719 Speaker 1: and a particle, you can understand how much mass it 950 00:45:06,760 --> 00:45:09,840 Speaker 1: should have. Like if you knew the strength of the 951 00:45:09,840 --> 00:45:12,520 Speaker 1: interaction between the Higgs boson the electron, you could predict 952 00:45:12,520 --> 00:45:15,440 Speaker 1: the electrons mass. You'd be like, Okay, I know how 953 00:45:15,520 --> 00:45:18,000 Speaker 1: much these two fields couple together, so I can calculate 954 00:45:18,040 --> 00:45:20,160 Speaker 1: how that little pulsling ball of energy should be and 955 00:45:20,200 --> 00:45:23,480 Speaker 1: I can predict the electrons mass. Right, And the same way, 956 00:45:23,520 --> 00:45:26,080 Speaker 1: you know, Okay, the muon interacts more strongly with the Higgs, 957 00:45:26,120 --> 00:45:27,399 Speaker 1: so we should have a higher mass. And the top 958 00:45:27,480 --> 00:45:31,000 Speaker 1: quark crazy interaction with the Higgs. Huge mass for the 959 00:45:31,000 --> 00:45:33,359 Speaker 1: top quark. Top quark is like two hundred times the 960 00:45:33,360 --> 00:45:35,759 Speaker 1: mass of the proton, which is much more massive than 961 00:45:35,760 --> 00:45:39,120 Speaker 1: the electron. So enormous variations in the amount that the 962 00:45:39,160 --> 00:45:43,040 Speaker 1: Higgs boson interacts with this stuff. So say you knew 963 00:45:43,080 --> 00:45:45,439 Speaker 1: how the Higgs boson interacts with these particles, you could 964 00:45:45,480 --> 00:45:47,759 Speaker 1: predict their mass, and then you went out and you 965 00:45:47,840 --> 00:45:50,759 Speaker 1: measured their mass, and what if you saw a discrepancy. 966 00:45:51,120 --> 00:45:53,880 Speaker 1: What if the Higgs boson interacts with the electron and 967 00:45:53,920 --> 00:45:55,839 Speaker 1: it should give it a mass of like zero point one. 968 00:45:56,160 --> 00:45:57,920 Speaker 1: But you go out and you measure the mass and 969 00:45:57,960 --> 00:46:01,000 Speaker 1: it's point five where it's ten point zero, then you'd 970 00:46:01,040 --> 00:46:04,160 Speaker 1: be like, hold on a second, the electron has more 971 00:46:04,239 --> 00:46:08,000 Speaker 1: mass than it's getting from the Higgs boson. We think 972 00:46:08,040 --> 00:46:10,080 Speaker 1: the Higgs boson is giving the electron a certain amount 973 00:46:10,080 --> 00:46:11,160 Speaker 1: of mass, but we can go out and measure it 974 00:46:11,160 --> 00:46:13,359 Speaker 1: in the universe it has more mass than that. What 975 00:46:13,400 --> 00:46:16,440 Speaker 1: could that mean. Well, we've seen that before, haven't we. 976 00:46:17,040 --> 00:46:20,840 Speaker 1: The proton is made of three quarks, and those quarks 977 00:46:20,880 --> 00:46:23,600 Speaker 1: get their mass from the Higgs boson, But the proton 978 00:46:23,680 --> 00:46:25,800 Speaker 1: gets most of its mass not from the Higgs boson, 979 00:46:26,000 --> 00:46:29,080 Speaker 1: but from the interaction of the quarks, and so in 980 00:46:29,120 --> 00:46:31,520 Speaker 1: a similar way, if you measure the mass of the 981 00:46:31,560 --> 00:46:34,400 Speaker 1: electron and it's heavier than you can explain with the 982 00:46:34,480 --> 00:46:38,360 Speaker 1: Higgs boson, that means that it's got some energy inside 983 00:46:38,400 --> 00:46:41,160 Speaker 1: of it, some bonds that are holding its bits together. 984 00:46:41,840 --> 00:46:44,360 Speaker 1: That its mass is not just coming from the Higgs boson. 985 00:46:44,400 --> 00:46:47,200 Speaker 1: Its mass is coming from the interaction of the things 986 00:46:47,239 --> 00:46:51,080 Speaker 1: inside of it, which means there are things inside of it. Haha, 987 00:46:51,120 --> 00:46:52,720 Speaker 1: look at that, ha ha. 988 00:46:53,120 --> 00:46:55,640 Speaker 2: But that doesn't tell us how many things are inside 989 00:46:55,680 --> 00:46:57,400 Speaker 2: of it, or the nature of the things inside of it. 990 00:46:57,480 --> 00:46:59,839 Speaker 1: Don't throw cold water on our discovery. Oh my god, 991 00:46:59,840 --> 00:47:02,000 Speaker 1: we just had an aha moment. We revealed something about 992 00:47:02,000 --> 00:47:03,640 Speaker 1: the universe, and now you're not sad. 993 00:47:04,120 --> 00:47:06,480 Speaker 2: Now I'm excited. I'm excited. I'm just trying to figure 994 00:47:06,480 --> 00:47:07,840 Speaker 2: out how excited. 995 00:47:07,440 --> 00:47:10,160 Speaker 1: I should be. No, you're totally right. The indirect method 996 00:47:10,239 --> 00:47:12,520 Speaker 1: is not as exciting as the direct method. It tells 997 00:47:12,600 --> 00:47:14,560 Speaker 1: us that there is something inside of it, and you 998 00:47:14,640 --> 00:47:16,680 Speaker 1: can tell us something about the nature of those bonds. 999 00:47:16,840 --> 00:47:18,440 Speaker 1: But you're right, it doesn't tell us what it is. 1000 00:47:18,560 --> 00:47:20,160 Speaker 1: It doesn't show it to us, It doesn't give it 1001 00:47:20,200 --> 00:47:20,920 Speaker 1: to us to play with. 1002 00:47:21,520 --> 00:47:22,720 Speaker 2: But has this been done? 1003 00:47:22,880 --> 00:47:24,480 Speaker 1: So this is what we're working on. And this is 1004 00:47:24,480 --> 00:47:27,320 Speaker 1: something we can do with a large hadron collider because 1005 00:47:27,360 --> 00:47:29,840 Speaker 1: we can study the interaction of the Higgs boson in 1006 00:47:29,920 --> 00:47:31,719 Speaker 1: various particles. Who The way we do that is by 1007 00:47:31,760 --> 00:47:34,759 Speaker 1: measuring how often the Higgs boson turns into those particles. 1008 00:47:35,160 --> 00:47:37,200 Speaker 1: Like you create a Higgs boson, does it turn into 1009 00:47:37,239 --> 00:47:39,120 Speaker 1: a pair of bottom quarks or a pair of top quarks, 1010 00:47:39,200 --> 00:47:41,000 Speaker 1: or a pair of electrons or a pair of muons. 1011 00:47:41,640 --> 00:47:44,200 Speaker 1: The rate at which it interacts with these particles determines 1012 00:47:44,280 --> 00:47:47,680 Speaker 1: how often it turns into those particles, so electrons very 1013 00:47:47,760 --> 00:47:51,200 Speaker 1: very low mass, low interaction with the higgs, very rare. 1014 00:47:51,360 --> 00:47:54,680 Speaker 1: To see higgs turn into electrons very difficult, but you 1015 00:47:54,760 --> 00:47:56,799 Speaker 1: run the collider long enough, you'll see it and you'll 1016 00:47:56,840 --> 00:47:58,880 Speaker 1: be able to measure that, and then we can compare 1017 00:47:58,920 --> 00:48:00,879 Speaker 1: that to the mass of the higgs. So we don't 1018 00:48:00,920 --> 00:48:03,440 Speaker 1: have that number yet because the higgs decase to electrons 1019 00:48:03,560 --> 00:48:06,560 Speaker 1: very very very rarely because they're so light. But we're 1020 00:48:06,560 --> 00:48:09,360 Speaker 1: starting to be able to measure that for other particles. 1021 00:48:09,360 --> 00:48:11,440 Speaker 1: So we've measured it for the top cork and for 1022 00:48:11,480 --> 00:48:14,240 Speaker 1: the bottom cork, and those numbers are as we expect. 1023 00:48:14,400 --> 00:48:16,480 Speaker 1: So the higgs boson de case to the top cork 1024 00:48:16,520 --> 00:48:18,720 Speaker 1: in a way that suggests that all of its mass 1025 00:48:18,760 --> 00:48:21,160 Speaker 1: comes from the higgs boson. I mean, you would have 1026 00:48:21,200 --> 00:48:24,440 Speaker 1: heard about it already if we discovered something inside the quarks. 1027 00:48:25,000 --> 00:48:27,200 Speaker 1: So far the number is don't indicate that there's anything 1028 00:48:27,239 --> 00:48:29,359 Speaker 1: inside the top cork or the bottom cork. We haven't 1029 00:48:29,360 --> 00:48:32,000 Speaker 1: been able to probe the other particles because they're lower 1030 00:48:32,040 --> 00:48:34,680 Speaker 1: masks and therefore the higgs the case to them more rarely. 1031 00:48:35,120 --> 00:48:37,279 Speaker 1: But that is something we can do, and we have 1032 00:48:37,760 --> 00:48:39,799 Speaker 1: ten more years to run this collider and get all 1033 00:48:39,800 --> 00:48:42,560 Speaker 1: that data and analyze these things. And I just think 1034 00:48:42,600 --> 00:48:45,000 Speaker 1: it's cool that we have sort of these backdoor methods 1035 00:48:45,040 --> 00:48:46,680 Speaker 1: to be like, well, let's look to see if we 1036 00:48:46,719 --> 00:48:48,920 Speaker 1: can figure out if there is something there before we 1037 00:48:48,960 --> 00:48:51,919 Speaker 1: actually build the collider to break it open and show 1038 00:48:51,920 --> 00:48:52,319 Speaker 1: it to us. 1039 00:48:52,600 --> 00:48:55,319 Speaker 2: Yeah. So say you had an electron a muon what 1040 00:48:55,440 --> 00:48:56,839 Speaker 2: is a tau town? 1041 00:48:56,920 --> 00:48:57,120 Speaker 4: Good? 1042 00:48:57,719 --> 00:49:01,000 Speaker 2: Right? Towh man, it was so cool question stuff. 1043 00:49:01,400 --> 00:49:03,120 Speaker 1: I'm rounding you up to any of plus. 1044 00:49:02,880 --> 00:49:05,200 Speaker 2: All right, thank you? Great? Oh yeah, okay, So you've 1045 00:49:05,239 --> 00:49:07,320 Speaker 2: got these three things and you interact them with the 1046 00:49:07,400 --> 00:49:11,359 Speaker 2: Higgs if the answer for their mass differs in some 1047 00:49:11,440 --> 00:49:14,120 Speaker 2: predictable way, like you know, one is always twenty five 1048 00:49:14,160 --> 00:49:16,040 Speaker 2: percent higher than the other, and then the other one 1049 00:49:16,080 --> 00:49:19,560 Speaker 2: is another twenty five percent beyond that, could you guess 1050 00:49:19,560 --> 00:49:22,239 Speaker 2: how many there were in there, like you know, there's 1051 00:49:22,239 --> 00:49:24,239 Speaker 2: probably three, and then there's an additional one in this 1052 00:49:24,280 --> 00:49:26,719 Speaker 2: one and an additional one in that one, Like could 1053 00:49:26,760 --> 00:49:28,520 Speaker 2: you get a handle on like the relative numbers of 1054 00:49:28,600 --> 00:49:29,239 Speaker 2: things that way? 1055 00:49:29,760 --> 00:49:32,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's exactly the game we'd love to play. You know, 1056 00:49:32,080 --> 00:49:34,200 Speaker 1: look at these things, look for patterns, look for clues. 1057 00:49:34,680 --> 00:49:37,760 Speaker 1: If we saw this, there would be instantly a zillion 1058 00:49:37,840 --> 00:49:41,080 Speaker 1: theories explaining it, you know, to match all those numbers, 1059 00:49:41,320 --> 00:49:43,920 Speaker 1: which would be really fun. And you know, we need 1060 00:49:43,920 --> 00:49:46,360 Speaker 1: that kind of inspiration. We need this kind of data 1061 00:49:46,400 --> 00:49:48,400 Speaker 1: to give us a clue to come up with these ideas. 1062 00:49:48,440 --> 00:49:51,440 Speaker 1: There are lots of theories of electron compositeness, you know, 1063 00:49:51,480 --> 00:49:53,920 Speaker 1: things that could be inside the electron, but nobody's any 1064 00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:56,239 Speaker 1: idea if any of them are true. Maybe the most 1065 00:49:56,239 --> 00:49:59,160 Speaker 1: famous is string theory. String theory says all the particles 1066 00:49:59,200 --> 00:50:02,240 Speaker 1: are just string oscillating in different ways, which is cool 1067 00:50:02,320 --> 00:50:05,160 Speaker 1: and very beautiful, but strings are so tiny that we 1068 00:50:05,160 --> 00:50:08,600 Speaker 1: could never see them with a direct method, like we 1069 00:50:08,600 --> 00:50:12,759 Speaker 1: would need a ridiculous collider to see strings. And you know, 1070 00:50:12,840 --> 00:50:15,640 Speaker 1: not everything that's inside the electron could be seen even 1071 00:50:15,680 --> 00:50:18,279 Speaker 1: with this indirect method, because it has to couple to 1072 00:50:18,320 --> 00:50:20,880 Speaker 1: the Higgs boson. In order for this to work, it 1073 00:50:20,920 --> 00:50:23,560 Speaker 1: has to directly get its mass from the Higgs boson 1074 00:50:23,560 --> 00:50:26,279 Speaker 1: the constituents of the electron. It could be that the 1075 00:50:26,320 --> 00:50:28,760 Speaker 1: constituous electron don't get their mass from the Higgs boson, 1076 00:50:29,239 --> 00:50:32,960 Speaker 1: and the electron itself is some like effective approximate description 1077 00:50:33,040 --> 00:50:34,840 Speaker 1: of it, and it gets its mass directly from the 1078 00:50:34,880 --> 00:50:38,080 Speaker 1: Higgs boson, unlike the proton, for example. So there are 1079 00:50:38,080 --> 00:50:40,520 Speaker 1: ways that this could fail, but it's an exciting way 1080 00:50:40,719 --> 00:50:42,840 Speaker 1: to see inside the electron anyway. 1081 00:50:43,000 --> 00:50:45,120 Speaker 2: So is this the kind of thing where, like tomorrow, 1082 00:50:45,160 --> 00:50:47,239 Speaker 2: the news could be saying, oh my gosh, using the 1083 00:50:47,239 --> 00:50:49,480 Speaker 2: indirect method, we are now sure that the electron is 1084 00:50:49,480 --> 00:50:51,440 Speaker 2: made up of stuff. You said something about a decade's 1085 00:50:51,440 --> 00:50:52,879 Speaker 2: worth of data. Is this the kind of thing where 1086 00:50:52,880 --> 00:50:54,880 Speaker 2: we're gonna need ten years to figure it out? To 1087 00:50:55,040 --> 00:50:56,719 Speaker 2: see a signature, We're gonna. 1088 00:50:56,440 --> 00:50:59,120 Speaker 1: Need a while. This is hard. You're measuring something that's 1089 00:50:59,280 --> 00:51:02,160 Speaker 1: very very rarely happens, and then you want to measure 1090 00:51:02,239 --> 00:51:04,839 Speaker 1: very precisely, which means you need a bunch of examples. 1091 00:51:05,200 --> 00:51:06,640 Speaker 1: But this is what we're good at, you know, we 1092 00:51:06,680 --> 00:51:09,040 Speaker 1: are good at using machine learning to extract this information 1093 00:51:09,440 --> 00:51:12,200 Speaker 1: from the data to get the most juice out of 1094 00:51:12,200 --> 00:51:14,719 Speaker 1: the dollars that we have spent on it. And you know, 1095 00:51:14,800 --> 00:51:17,359 Speaker 1: this is what particle physicists do. We're blocked by this wall, 1096 00:51:17,400 --> 00:51:19,160 Speaker 1: so let's see if we can find a way around it. 1097 00:51:19,200 --> 00:51:21,239 Speaker 1: And I'm impressed with the cleverness. I mean, I didn't 1098 00:51:21,280 --> 00:51:23,719 Speaker 1: come over this. Yeah, somebody else thought of this, and 1099 00:51:24,120 --> 00:51:26,719 Speaker 1: it just goes to show you the ingenuity of humanity. 1100 00:51:26,800 --> 00:51:28,799 Speaker 1: You know, there are questions we have, and we will 1101 00:51:28,840 --> 00:51:31,200 Speaker 1: always push to find the answers, even if it seems 1102 00:51:31,239 --> 00:51:35,239 Speaker 1: impossible or impractical or ridiculously expensive, we will find a 1103 00:51:35,239 --> 00:51:35,959 Speaker 1: way to get there. 1104 00:51:36,160 --> 00:51:39,319 Speaker 2: So you said that the LEDC right now mostly has 1105 00:51:39,360 --> 00:51:42,440 Speaker 2: protons shooting around. So are we even collecting the right 1106 00:51:42,520 --> 00:51:44,640 Speaker 2: kind of data to use the indirect method right now 1107 00:51:44,760 --> 00:51:46,520 Speaker 2: or is that happening at like a different collider. 1108 00:51:46,880 --> 00:51:48,799 Speaker 1: No, proton shooting around is a good way to make 1109 00:51:48,880 --> 00:51:51,680 Speaker 1: Higgs bosons. One thing that LEDC is really good at 1110 00:51:51,800 --> 00:51:55,120 Speaker 1: is making Higgs bosons. It was built to discover the Higgs, 1111 00:51:55,680 --> 00:51:57,760 Speaker 1: but it was also built to discover lots of different 1112 00:51:57,840 --> 00:52:00,000 Speaker 1: versions of the Higgs, because we didn't know in advance 1113 00:52:00,600 --> 00:52:03,000 Speaker 1: how much mass the Higgs would have, and so exactly 1114 00:52:03,040 --> 00:52:05,319 Speaker 1: the best way to make it. So proton collider is 1115 00:52:05,320 --> 00:52:08,000 Speaker 1: really good at discovering things you don't know much about, 1116 00:52:08,040 --> 00:52:10,279 Speaker 1: because it can make lots of different kinds of things. 1117 00:52:10,520 --> 00:52:12,719 Speaker 1: Now that we know more about the Higgs boson, people 1118 00:52:12,760 --> 00:52:15,440 Speaker 1: are talking about making a Higgs factory, which is a 1119 00:52:15,440 --> 00:52:17,920 Speaker 1: machine that makes zillions and zillions of higgs. It's like 1120 00:52:17,960 --> 00:52:20,760 Speaker 1: perfect for making higgs, and it does it by colliding 1121 00:52:20,880 --> 00:52:24,800 Speaker 1: muons actually, so you make beams of muons because muons 1122 00:52:24,840 --> 00:52:27,719 Speaker 1: interact with the higgs more than the electrons do. This 1123 00:52:27,800 --> 00:52:30,000 Speaker 1: is a good way to make lots of higgs. It's 1124 00:52:30,040 --> 00:52:32,520 Speaker 1: really hard to make muon beams because muons don't last 1125 00:52:32,560 --> 00:52:35,080 Speaker 1: very long that the k back into electrons. But people 1126 00:52:35,120 --> 00:52:36,880 Speaker 1: have figured that out. So that's one thing on the 1127 00:52:36,920 --> 00:52:39,960 Speaker 1: docket for the next colliders. Maybe make a big muon 1128 00:52:39,960 --> 00:52:43,560 Speaker 1: collider higgs factory so you can study these things incredible detail. 1129 00:52:43,920 --> 00:52:45,560 Speaker 1: So that'd be exciting, but of course you know that 1130 00:52:45,680 --> 00:52:47,640 Speaker 1: cost a few bill Yeah, yeah. 1131 00:52:47,400 --> 00:52:49,279 Speaker 2: I would like to make a discovery there where people 1132 00:52:49,280 --> 00:52:51,840 Speaker 2: can say, like, well, we need to make more Wienersmiths, 1133 00:52:52,560 --> 00:52:54,719 Speaker 2: make more higgs. Like that's a person and that's just 1134 00:52:54,760 --> 00:52:57,160 Speaker 2: so great that his name has become, you know, used 1135 00:52:57,200 --> 00:52:59,800 Speaker 2: in that way. But anyway, maybe one day they'll be 1136 00:53:00,200 --> 00:53:01,920 Speaker 2: wanting to make more Wienersmiths, but maybe not. 1137 00:53:02,160 --> 00:53:04,480 Speaker 1: Maybe one day, And I hope that in a one 1138 00:53:04,560 --> 00:53:06,959 Speaker 1: hundred years or a thousand years, people know more about 1139 00:53:07,000 --> 00:53:09,360 Speaker 1: the structure of matter and they can talk about the 1140 00:53:09,360 --> 00:53:11,880 Speaker 1: fundamental bits and you can smoke banana peels on the 1141 00:53:11,960 --> 00:53:14,000 Speaker 1: roof and talk about why the universe is made out 1142 00:53:14,040 --> 00:53:16,160 Speaker 1: of squiggly ons and what that even means and why 1143 00:53:16,160 --> 00:53:18,400 Speaker 1: are the two of them? And you know, to me, 1144 00:53:18,480 --> 00:53:20,680 Speaker 1: these are fun philosophical questions and we don't even get 1145 00:53:20,680 --> 00:53:22,799 Speaker 1: to ask them yet because we don't know what those 1146 00:53:22,800 --> 00:53:25,239 Speaker 1: answers are. And I hope to live long enough to 1147 00:53:25,239 --> 00:53:25,799 Speaker 1: see some of that. 1148 00:53:26,040 --> 00:53:27,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, but it's cool that we live in a time 1149 00:53:27,719 --> 00:53:30,480 Speaker 2: where you can devise the experiments to ask these questions 1150 00:53:30,480 --> 00:53:33,760 Speaker 2: that we've gotten this far down the ladder. So I'm excited. 1151 00:53:33,840 --> 00:53:35,480 Speaker 1: The ancient Greece would be very impressed. 1152 00:53:35,480 --> 00:53:37,359 Speaker 2: I hope, I think so. Yeah. I mean, even though 1153 00:53:37,360 --> 00:53:39,520 Speaker 2: this isn't about fish cuts or fish vomit, I still 1154 00:53:39,600 --> 00:53:39,960 Speaker 2: think this. 1155 00:53:39,960 --> 00:53:43,040 Speaker 1: Is very cool in a way. It is about fish 1156 00:53:43,040 --> 00:53:44,359 Speaker 1: cuts because it's about all of us. 1157 00:53:44,719 --> 00:53:50,200 Speaker 2: That's aw man. That was poetic, really poetics modern days. 1158 00:53:50,200 --> 00:53:54,880 Speaker 5: Saga over here, all right, all right, thanks everyone for 1159 00:53:54,960 --> 00:53:57,359 Speaker 5: going on this journey with us into the dark heart 1160 00:53:57,440 --> 00:54:00,400 Speaker 5: of matter and understanding what makes up our uni and 1161 00:54:00,440 --> 00:54:01,319 Speaker 5: what we know about it. 1162 00:54:01,400 --> 00:54:03,239 Speaker 2: And if you have a question about the universe, you 1163 00:54:03,280 --> 00:54:05,520 Speaker 2: can send it to us at Questions at Daniel and 1164 00:54:05,600 --> 00:54:07,880 Speaker 2: Kelly dot org. We look forward to hearing from you. 1165 00:54:15,080 --> 00:54:18,920 Speaker 2: Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by Iheartreading. We 1166 00:54:18,960 --> 00:54:21,360 Speaker 2: would love to hear from you, We really would. 1167 00:54:21,520 --> 00:54:24,279 Speaker 1: We want to know what questions you have about this 1168 00:54:24,480 --> 00:54:26,160 Speaker 1: Extraordinary Universe. 1169 00:54:26,280 --> 00:54:29,240 Speaker 2: We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions 1170 00:54:29,239 --> 00:54:32,239 Speaker 2: for future shows. If you contact us, we will get 1171 00:54:32,280 --> 00:54:32,680 Speaker 2: back to you. 1172 00:54:32,920 --> 00:54:36,400 Speaker 1: We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us 1173 00:54:36,440 --> 00:54:39,600 Speaker 1: at Questions at Danielankelly. 1174 00:54:38,719 --> 00:54:40,800 Speaker 2: Dot org, or you can find us on social media. 1175 00:54:40,880 --> 00:54:44,680 Speaker 2: We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on 1176 00:54:44,760 --> 00:54:46,719 Speaker 2: all of those platforms. You can find us at d 1177 00:54:47,160 --> 00:54:48,640 Speaker 2: and kuniverse. 1178 00:54:48,800 --> 00:54:50,319 Speaker 1: Don't be shy, write to us