WEBVTT - What It'll Take For...

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Solid verbal call that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man, I'm for I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for dake Ado State?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Is that whoo whoom?

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And Dan and Ty.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the Solid Rubber boys and Girls. My

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 2>name's Ty Hildebrant. I am joined as always, but I'm

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a good friend, colleague and co host over there in

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>beautiful New York City. My man Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 2>are you?

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm good?

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 3>I both had a good and bad sign as I

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>was walking back to the CLO office from the office,

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know what it portends for this show,

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>but I'm willing to hear you out if I tell you.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, please, what's the show about? Honesty? As you know,

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about the show.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about my answers to this sort of

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>very specific and non college football Q and A. And

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>as I'm walking by a subway station, out of the

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>station emerges I'm a perfectly lovely looking woman wearing an.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Oregon Dux hat.

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, And I said, I said, hot, damn, this is

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a good show. What a great sign. I'm

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 3>walking home to do this podcast with tie in my clofice,

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 3>my closet office. That's a great sign that we're gonna

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 3>do a good show. And then on my way home

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 3>and I walk by a popular butcher here in Brooklyn, Okay,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 3>and I was I was like, oh, I'm grilling tomorrow

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 3>for the fourth of July. We're recording this on Wednesday,

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the third, and I'm thinking about going full time butcher

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>instead of getting my my ground meat, my sausages, steaks,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 3>whatever I'm going to grow from, you know whatever, Trader

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 3>Joe's or a local grocery store here, and they're fine,

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 3>but you might as well support a more local business

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>and higher quality. They're they're grinding the meat right there

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 3>on the area.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 2>It's very pro butcher continue And so I'm like, all right,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna I'm gonna pop in and get some some

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>meat for some burgers tomorrow. And it's it's basically, if

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you've ever seen a subway in a very very crowded

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>rush hour international city, people are like pressed up against

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 2>the tour yearning to breathe free the day before the

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 2>fourth of July to grab their their are sorted grilling meats.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna have to go out later, and the

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 2>butcher's gonna be closed to some grocery store and slummet

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>with grocery meat instead of fresh, locally butchered ground meats.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 2>We've got We've got a I don't know about, I

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know fifteen twenty minutes from here called Dietrichs Meats.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And I took solid wife Cayden there. Oh gosh, must

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 2>have been two years ago, and she was mortified because

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>on the walls it's like Deliverance. You've got a lot

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>of things hanging that, a lot of local taxidermy on display.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>They do do they do sort of obscure meats.

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they'll do anything, anything you can imagine. There's a

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>counter all the way in the one corner where you

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 2>can find pretty much whatever you're looking for.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 3>This place is offering camel patties. Yeah, okay, maybe not

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 3>camel patties.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>You can get rattlesnake at this place. Okay, Now, maybe

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's a Brooklyn thing.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 3>Yet it might be, well, it doesn't sound like a

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Brooklyn thing. Perhaps Here's here's what I'm going to say.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say it's a good sign people are

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>enjoying the outdoors tomorrow. People are gonna enjoy grilling meat

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 3>and that all wraps together with a nice little bow

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>into college football. And we have a very specific Q

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and A that we're I don't know what the title is,

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>but basically we asked people to fit their circular questions

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>into this this little peg or the peg into the

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 3>hole whatever. We said, what'll it take for blank to happen?

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>And you got to fill in the blank. Yeah, and

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>we have all sorts of great fill ins here from everywhere,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 3>fans of every Witch team. You know, we have NJK

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>saying what's going to take for Cincinnati to get national respect?

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I know you've been deep diving the Bearcats for a

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 3>few weeks now, so.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>The floor months on these Yeah, you're no, it's I mean,

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Cincinnati if you'd like to.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>But what'll it take for We've We've got an astounding

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>number of questions here that we're going to delve into moments.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you have time to really get to you know,

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>we also have a bunch of non college football.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna wing this one tonight, Dan, now.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I know, but do you have you do you have

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 3>a heart out at any time?

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a heart out. No great, okay, you

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>think a three hour show? What are we doing here?

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing?

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm good if you are, I'm gonna have to take

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 3>an intermission and get some water at a certain point.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise all right.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, before we get into yeah, this wonderful assortment of

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 2>questions that have been sent to a a few very

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 2>important housekeeping things that we need to discuss first and foremost.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 2>If you didn't get the newsletter, if you didn't see

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the newsletter, if you haven't been listening to our show

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>or following us on social media, surprise, surprise, We are

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>doing our next live show, or I should say a

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>live show a of August, August the eighth. It's a

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Sunday night. The show starts at seven point thirty. The

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>doors open at six at a place called Union Stage

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and Awesome Venue on the Waterfront in Washington, DC. So

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 2>we would urge everyone to get out there solidverbotickets dot

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>com is where you can go if you want to

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 2>get in on tickets. We've got it posted a number

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>of different places out on social media. Very excited. Tickets

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 2>the first day went like hotcakes. There are still some left.

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 2>We would urge you that if you're going to be

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 2>in the DC area, if you're close to the DC area,

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 2>if you can get to the DC area, it's going

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>to be a fun show Sunday, August the eighteenth.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>We're really excited about it. We're going to do fantasy things.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean we're it's still unconfirmed Big twelve location,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>still working on it.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but yes, at least for now, we've got one

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>live show that is locked up in DC. So if

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>you got any questions, hit us up. But in the meantime,

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>DC show is happening August the eighteenth. Please get your tickets.

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to meet you and say hello.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>As an addendum, tie a phrase selling like hotcakes originated

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 3>in the eighteen hundreds when simple cornmeal versions were sold

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 3>at church bake sales and snapped up by the congregation.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Before they went cold. Thank you, Daniel, no problem. Random factoid.

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Secondly, we've got t shirts out there, which you can

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>find at solidverbal dot com slash store, four of them

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>to be exact. We're still working on getting some of

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 2>our older favorites activated, but that's going to happen in

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>very short order. As we said on our last show,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>We have changed up the ordering process a little bit,

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and instead of having to wait weeks on end for

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 2>the pre order to finish up and then for the

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>shirts to be printed, we now do it differently and

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 2>if you order, you're going to get them in like

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>one to two weeks or somewhere in that vicinity.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, on demand printing, on demand printing.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>If you order it now, you'll have it in time

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>for the season, which all too often has been a

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>sticky point, no longer a problem. Get on out there,

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 2>go to solid verbal dot com slash store for more

0:06:58.880 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>information on what we've got to.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Be a no. I think that's it.

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 3>We hope to see you, know if you ended up

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 3>in DC after college or for work, or because a

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 3>loved one brought you there, we hope to see you

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 3>and bring your loved ones and pals who enjoy college

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>football and weird college football shows to the what is

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 3>the Union Stage, Tye Union Stage on August the eighteenth.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 3>We are quite excited to do a show in a

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>new locale and so this is our our annual show

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 3>that we have a ton of fun doing. It's multimedia

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>and tie is so much taller in person than you

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>think I am so don't pass up that opportunity.

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, Dan, where do we want to start here

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 2>with these questions that were sent in?

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's start that. Let's start with.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Bup up, up, up up.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with Kevin. Okay, what'll it take for the

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 3>full back position to make a comeback? Let's start here

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 3>with the forgotten fullbacks of.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Your the forgotten fullbacks of your Yeah, college football, well

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>sports in general, but especially college football, it seems very cyclical.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Disagree, I mean a little bit.

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Even though offenses have changed a great deal and gone

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>in entirely different direction than they were when fullbacks were

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 2>still a very prominent position within college football. I would expect,

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and I've said this forever, at some point in time,

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>with everyone going smaller and faster and more versatile and

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>taking better advantage of space, eventually, at some point it's

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>going to swing in the other direction and there's going

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>to be this renaissance back to the future. At that point,

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 2>potentially the fullback could make a comeback.

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything?

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 3>And I understand that teams have used concepts that you

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 3>harken back to the single wing or the veer and

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that that are inspired by, but at the

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>same time it's almost injecting those concepts into more modern frameworks.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to imagine seeing programs dead kate a position

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to blocking to help open up lanes and occasionally sort

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>of squirt out for third and three passes kind of thing.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to imagine that we are going to revert

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 3>to that kind of athletes. That said, the H back

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 3>is taking a lot of you know, in spread systems,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 3>the H back, which is more of a fullback tight

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 3>end hybrid, you know, on those sort of wham running plays,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>going out for passes, leading the way in sort of

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>power sets, even if they're even if a team is

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 3>playing the spread. I don't I can't imagine full time

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 3>fullbacks are going to come back everywhere.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 2>So you think that the modern fullback is a guy

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>like Jalen Samuels.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think you're going to see guys you need

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to be able to offer me two or three quality

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>things with speed in twenty nineteen, twenty twenty, twenty twenty one,

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 3>because that's just that's where high schools have gone, that's

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>where colleges have gone, and that's where more and more

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 3>pro I mean, we see a lot of fullbacks. I

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>know the forty nine ers I think just paid a

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>ton of money for a fullback weirdly, but mostly where

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 3>you see where the sport is going. It's hard to

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 3>imagine saying I need that five two and twenty pound

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 3>guy who's not super fast, who doesn't offer me much

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 3>as the game goes out open wide. But here's the caveat.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I think you're right that defenses will continue to evolve

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 3>to play against these spread and guys that are offenses

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 3>that are using the full width of the field. I

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 3>imagine that we're going to see more two way players

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 3>that aren't necessarily fullbacks in the way that was it

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 3>Owen Mari Sick for Stanford played linebacker and full back

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 3>in a couple of games. I don't think we're going

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>to see that kind of full time two way play.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 3>But more to what Ian Boyd talked about way back

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 3>when on this show, where we see four minute offenses

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 3>to just ram the ball and use up clock, give

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the give some of the defense some rest, but bringing

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 3>an outside linebacker, bringing a defensive end. All this you're

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 3>playing with heavy sets, you're draining clock, and you're just

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 3>trying to get five yards at a time, and I

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 3>think guys like that will start assuming some of the

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 3>responsibilities of fullback without dedicating a scholarship to generally a

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 3>guy named Joe.

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>So you're thinking more Miles jacks out there, more Miles Jackson,

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily carrying the ball, but yes, all of a sudden,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, three guys in the backfield, two of

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>whom are sort of an h back positions and one

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 2>of them is Christian Wilkins.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 3>That kind of thing. And it's not just in the

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 3>red zone. It's not just on the goal line, but it's, oh,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 3>we're up five with three point fifty two left and

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 3>we want to kill clock, but we still want to

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 3>be aggressive about it and creative about it instead of

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 3>just going straight at defenses. And maybe there's misdirection, and

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's misdirection with power. I think I hope, My

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 3>hope is that we see more of that to get

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 3>more of the best athletes on a team, not just

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 3>on offense, on the field.

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 2>So in conclusion, yeah, Moose Johnston ain't walking through that

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>door anytime soon.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to see that. It's tough to see it.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>It's either going to require a dramatic slow evolution of

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>college football back to its power roots, let's say of

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the old Nebraska days three yards and a cloud of dust,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>or it's going to require some hybrid version like the

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 2>h back, two way players something like that to take

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>hold in college.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is there is there another sport in which

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 3>all of the sudden, somebody who is not offering an

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 3>advanced athletic option making like are we going to see

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 3>baseball players that look like kent Herbeck ever?

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Again? Probably not? Probably, I mean the NBA is a

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>good example.

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>The NBA's are great, Like, are we going to see

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 3>power forwards just like settling for ten footers and playing

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 3>with their back to the back.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Everyone can shoot now, everyone can dribble. It's it's a

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>different game. Things have changed.

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 3>It's and I understand, you know, size in every sport,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>and I understand, you know, the sort of quote unicorn

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 3>nature of different players in different sports. But it's hard

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 3>to imagine we're going to go back to seeing many

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 3>teams say we're going old school and succeeding doing it.

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Kent her back, Okay, is that guys? That is a

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>twins he was.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean to slander in's first basement Yeah, he

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>was the first like nineteen ninety three player I could

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>think of who's probably not built like a god. He

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 2>pulled a guy off the bag in the World Series,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>if I remember correctly. Okay, we got to move on here. Yeah,

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 2>we've got a question from someone named Jet. I'm just

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>going to assume that Jet is Jet Toner former kicker Stanford.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I believe.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, he says, and that's thematic here because he said,

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 2>what will it take for DoD the PAC twelve to

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>be relevant again?

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Dan?

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, I did have a chance to deep drill

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>this one. My guess is that my opinion is in

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>as turbo charged as yours. I vary with mine, but

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>continue in the short term. The thing that has really

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>haunted the Pac twelve is they just they need a

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 2>team with a lot of credibility coming out of the

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>regular season and to perform better in the playoff. You

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 2>need to get a team in the playoff, and Washington

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>has been that team in recent years that hasn't performed

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 2>as well as maybe we hoped coming out of the

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>regular season. But they need they just need a team

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to go undefeed it and that's a very easy starting point.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's correct. I don't know. I don't know.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>If people look at the PAC twelve and say, oh,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Oregon went undefeated, Washington went undefeated, that conference is in

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>good shape. I think it's a good thing for the conference,

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's a good thing financially for a

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 3>team to make the playoff and to have you know,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 3>as many teams as possible playing playoff games or New

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Year's was New Year six games. That's great. That's wonderful

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 3>financially for the financial health of the conference and payouts

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>to other teams, you know, rising tide, et cetera. I

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 3>think in terms of when I see the word relevant,

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I think I think about reputation. I think about what

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 3>somebody in Ohio thinks, somebody in Florida thing, somebody in

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Texas thinks, somebody in New Mexico things. Shout out to

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 3>all our New Mexicans. You got to win big and

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the winnable September non conference games. Last year, we saw

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Washington come close but not beat Auburn. That game came

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 3>down and probably a questionable no call on the Jake

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Browning hit. Oregon has Auburn to start the year off

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 3>at Jerry World. They need to win that game. For

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the PAC twelve in terms of talking about relevance and reputation,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 3>they need to win those games, and they need to

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 3>win the winnable games. You feel like, can't lose to Cincinnati.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I know it's Cincinnati's good. I know it was Chip

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Kelly's first game that was a winnable game that they lost.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 3>They need to win all of those games. They can't

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 3>lose dumb games, and they need to win the big games.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I know that might be asking a lot, but this

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 3>is a conference with resources, good quarterbacks, with good coaches,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and so they need to establish that early on. So

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>in week five you're thinking to yourself, you know what, Yeah,

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I will watch Oregon Arizona.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Because Oregon beat Auburn and I want to see what

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they look like.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Now here's something else that I think could be important. Yeah,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about PAC twelve real events. Let's look at USC. Sure,

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people who aren't in PAC twelve country.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you're just moonlighting as PAC twelve fans watching a

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>game late night on a Saturday, they look at the

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>PAC twelve, they think of USC.

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>USC has been very so so over the last couple

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 2>of years. Now, if USC can rise under Clay Helton

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 2>or anybody else, really we rise and more become a

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>threat in the PAC twelve and on the national stage.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that helps. That helps the reputation of the conference.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Again, totally true. I think the two teams who have

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 3>really branded themselves well in terms of success in the

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>PAC twelve or USC in Oregon, even though Washington has

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>been really good recently. I don't know how much national

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 3>interest there is, and maybe I'm wrong here is if

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>USC is the bell Weather, which I think is a

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 3>pretty good case, they open the season Fresno State at

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 3>home ten thirty pm. Kick Week two, Stanford at USC,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 3>which it's a pretty light week in terms of games

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 3>that potentially could have natural national interest. I'm not saying

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Stanford USC is at the top of that list the

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 3>same week as Texas, LSU, and I think A and

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>M Clemson, but Stanford USC the premier game in the

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>conference that week.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Ten thirty pm Eastern.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 3>So if the case is to be made that USC

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 3>is the bell weather of how the conference is doing

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 3>health wise, that's how they're opening the season. You taught

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 3>USC week four, nine pm Eastern. I think it's a

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 3>Friday night game and then other random games early on

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>that just to me sound interesting, like I would want

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 3>to watch that if I.

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Liked college football.

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Texas Tech Arizona Week three, ten thirty pm kick Khalil

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Tait new coach for Texas Tech, but you know, returning

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 3>quarterback British comedy legend Alan Bowman, and then Wazoo Houston

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Mike Leach Dana Holgerson Week three, nine to fifteen pm

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Eastern time kick. I think it's in Houston, but not

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 3>at Houston. So that's Those are all interesting sounding games

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 3>to me, potentially, and if you are living any in

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Central time East Coast time, probably not seeing the end

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 3>of potentially a really good game.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, Joel writes in what will it take for

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Adrian Martinez to win the Heisman Day? And Adrian Martinez, Yeah,

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 2>exciting quarterback. Young quarterback for Nebraska was really the first

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>big recruit that Scott Frost was able to capture after

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 2>he took the job in Lincoln.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 3>By the way, did you see Bruce Feldman's piece today

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 3>about Nebraska's quarterback coach? Really good? Go go to the

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Athletic and read it. He's just like a sort of mercurial.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Interesting dude, not in fully Mike Leachway his name I forgot,

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't have his name at the top of my head.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 3>But really good piece about the development of Adrian Martinez

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and in line if you're interested in Joel's what'll it

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 3>take worth reading?

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>We know the Heisman Trophy generally goes to a quarterback.

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm, all right, so he's got that going for him,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 2>which is nice. We also know he's a dual threat guy,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 2>so presumably if he gets things going in the right direction,

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 2>he's going to rack up both passing and rushing yardage.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>He needs Nebraska to genuinely challenge for that big ten West.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>That might not even be enough.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's right. It's hard for me to

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 3>look at I think JD. Spielman's back, Stanley Morgan's gone

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>at receiver. He might be asked to do a lot.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the defense will take a step forward, but

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 3>there's I still have a bunch of questions with that defense.

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Nebraska has to win games, and they have to beat Colorado.

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 3>They have to make up for last year. I'm trying

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 3>to get their schedule in front of me. It's going

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 3>to take a super star year from him, because I

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 3>just I don't see Nebraska at the very very high

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 3>end winning eight games, and he will have to be okay,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 3>I have their schedule in front of me.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>They go to Colorado.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he doesn't say this year in his question.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 2>He just says people would take for him to win

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 2>the Heisman and that probably doesn't happen this year. But

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 2>moving forward, what is it take to win? What does

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 2>it take to get in the conversation. I don't know

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 2>if it's all that complicated Joel it it just needs

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to happen.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Right he gets Ohio State early on in the season

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 3>this year if we are talking about this year, which

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 3>who knows. So he has to have another killer game

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 3>against the Buckeyes and to close like he has a

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>tougher November Purdue, Wisconsin, Maryland, Iowa and has to finish strong.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>If if they are flirting with nine wins, I don't

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.239
<v Speaker 3>think the context will be good enough. But that's going

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 3>to be crazy impressed from Nebraska and Adril Martinez. And

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 3>if it's a down year and he's putting on you know,

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 3>if he has thirty eight touchdowns to three interceptions at

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>a certain point. My favorite phrase it's going to be

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 3>impossible to ignore a player like that.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>All Right, what will it take four.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Florida State to return to the top of the ACC consistently?

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? How do you feel about this?

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Kendall Briles is going to have to be everything advertised

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 3>and that he's been these you know at Houston and

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>what he did at Baylor.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>On the field.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I think they're going to I mean, the incoming class

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 3>is quite good. They're going to have to put together

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 3>top five classes for two. They're gonna have to put

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>together two and a half like top five classes, especially

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 3>along the lines, because they look very good at skill

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 3>positions right now. On offense, their incoming class has a

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 3>ton of promising defenders. But if we're talking about returning

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 3>to the top of the ACC, so we're matching and

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>getting past Clemson, we're talking about somehow surpassing the gold

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 3>standard right now nationally. So it's going to take huge classes,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's going to take retaining coaches. Taggart hitting on

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>this latest defensive coordinator higher. I it's going to take

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 3>more than I can see happening. But I can see

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 3>them returning to competing for the top of the ACC.

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Right It's it's gonna take all of those things that

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 2>you said, quarterback, recruiting, all of those things that you

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 2>just said, plus some sort of coaching turnover at Clemson. Yes,

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and maybe maybe it's reventable as leading.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Clemson right now has so much momentum in the right direction.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It will I think require something to change that. His

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 2>question again says top of the acc consistently, you could

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 2>do that two years from now, even a year from

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>now with great recruiting, with a well coached game against

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Clemson that you just happen to win by like three points.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't seem too far fetched to me. Clemson could

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 2>be gettable, sure, but consistently, consistently you need some sort

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of ce change right now. That's that's the only thing

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 2>that comes to mind, because they've got that program loaded

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>for bear for years to come. They've just done so

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 2>well on the recruiting front. They're not going to be

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 2>recruiting all duds at Clemson. They're too good for that

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.239
<v Speaker 2>at this point. So I think you got to look

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>at coaching turnover. That could be Dabo Obama. Dabo Obama, Yeah,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Dabo Obama help, Daboa Obama helps or Dabbo to the

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 2>NFL or whatever helps uh and then yes, hiring somebody

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 2>at a coordinator spot that always gets the grown for

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 2>good reason, whether it's Andy Ludwig or Scott Leffler or

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Ted Rue for any of those types where they're just

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>like keep getting jobs and keep putting out below average

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 2>units that you know Dabbo has some sort of personal

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 2>connection to. I just can't see that specific scenario happening.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 2>He's just too good at hiring and too good at

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 2>iding coaching talent. But yeah, something.

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Like that where I don't know, he just really really

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 3>whiffs on three crucial hires and something changes within that program.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 3>But right now it's you're not surpassing Clemson the acc

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>outside of something dramatic.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 2>In that same vein, Mark says, what will it take

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 2>for someone other than Clemson or Alabama to be ranked

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>number one at any point in this season? This is

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>another question that to me doesn't seem all that complicated.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Right. The rankings are stupid.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 2>We've come to that, Kik, I've done a full line.

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>They're fine, but we were in some agreement here that

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>rankings to a large extent are kind of dumb. So really,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 2>if Clemson loses a game, if Alabama also loses a game,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>they would both have to lose. It stands to reason

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 2>that they would drop them because when a team loses,

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>they almost always drop. Someone else would bubble up and

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't be long before Clemson or Alabama found their

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>way back to the top. But it would really require

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 2>both of them losing in somewhat close proximity throughout the

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 2>course of the year and for there to be a

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 2>team with a better record below them.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, we see fluctuations in September, right, We sees that

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 3>sometimes people overreact to result the time, all the time,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and so I could see I don't believe Ohio State

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 3>has anybody huge early on. I mean, I'll due respect

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to Cincinnati and your bear Cat's deep dive since it's

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Florida Atlantic, Cincinnati, Indiana, Miami of Ohio early on in

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 3>their non conference schedule. So Ohio State is probably not

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 3>going to beat anybody. But what if LSU goes into

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 3>Austin and beats Texas forty seven to fourteen, and they're

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 3>ranked number four or five in Week two, they just

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 3>completely obliterate Texas in Austin, Maybe.

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That they just leap frog.

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 3>They leap frog a Clemson team who say struggled with

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Texas A and M. So, yes, Clemson has a very

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 3>losable game in Week two. Alabama, I think they're fine

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 3>early on in terms of opponents that seem like a threat.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 3>But what if Georgia is number three in the country

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and undefeated Clemson and undefeated Alabama ahead of them, and

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's late September, you would probably know better

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 3>than I. Georgia just demolishes Notre Dame. They demolish a

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>big time consensus top seven to twelve team, and Georgia

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 3>beats them fifty five to ten. They're gonna get votes.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna get votes. They're not gonna jump both though, No,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>they could jump one of them. They could jump one

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 2>of them, but they're not jumping both. I still think

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 2>it takes well. Maybe in a scenario like that, let

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 2>me let me rephrase. I think if it's that flattening,

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 2>if it's if it's a situation where one of these

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>two teams has a loss and Georgia has a great

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 2>flattening like that, potentially there could be a jump up.

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I still think we're just talking early September. But the

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>most likely way to.

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Do it is both teams have a loss and someone

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 2>like Georgia just lurks.

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, I think the only way to jump one

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 3>of those teams without them losing is by a statement

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 3>win early on. If we're talking specific to early, let's

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 3>go you want to do South Carolina? Yeahs are South

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Carolina next? Okay, so we have how does South Carolina

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>get to? This is from Andy? How what'll it take

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 3>for South Carolina to ascend to Florida levels? Which is

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>sort of a very vague and up for interpretation quality.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 3>What does Florida levels mean? What does government mean to you?

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 3>What does Florida mean to you?

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>So? What does that? What does that mean?

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 3>That means like a threat, a significant threat to the

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 3>to the SEC East, but not a favorite.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I would assume. So the last time that.

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 2>I would say South Carolina was truly a threat in

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the SEC, truly deeply a threat to like win.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>The SEC, truly madly, deeply. You got to go back

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Steve Spurrier days.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>He told us not to set to bring up Steve Spurrier,

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I apologize, It's okay. Steve Spurrier had three

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 2>straight seasons where he won eleven games, right, was that

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 2>was pretty good. They haven't quite gotten back to that.

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 2>They had that one nine win season with the Bowl

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 2>win and the outback ball under mush Champ.

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess two years ago, but.

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think you can see you need to

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 2>start by consistently getting to nine wins. Yeah, that will help,

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and that regular season build regular season wins, yes, thank you.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 2>That will build momentum moving forward. The problem right now

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>for South Carolina is they've got to contend with both

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Georgia and Florida in the SEC East and that makes

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 2>life really difficult.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 3>So if we're talking specific to Florida, what we currently

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 3>believe about Florida as a significant threat to the SEC East,

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina needs to probably and they've recruited well under

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 3>will Musham, but it's consistent. I want to say top

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty classes if you're good, they've been twenty four to seven.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that's like ninth or eighth in the

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>SEC that there's just so many recruiting heavyweights ahead of them,

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 3>both in their division and their conference. So they need

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to probably start recruiting on a Tennessee Auburn type level,

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>which are a couple of the teams just ahead of them.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's adding two, three, four or five more blue

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 3>chips to each class, which is tough because recruiting locally.

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina has a good amount of talent. But that's

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 3>not a regional brand. I hate that word, but I'm

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 3>using it anyway. Like the other team, you know, competing

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 3>against Florida and Georgia, and you know, Tennessee is a

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 3>bigger name, Auburn's a bigger name, and Florida State and

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 3>obviously Clemson in their region. So they're going to need

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to really get aggressive and however, you gotta do it.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 3>You got to do it. And then they need to

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 3>lift their floor on the field. And last year they

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>take a really impressive step forward on offense. You know,

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 3>they give away the Florida game, Texas A and M

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>was within their grasp, but defensively they just took such

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 3>a huge step back that they can't be any worse

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 3>than average on either side of the ball, and on

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 3>special teams, they can't give things away because of being

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 3>just well, we can't stop the run for these three weeks.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>They just can't happen.

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>If they're going to threaten the division, especially with now Florida,

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 3>presumably improving from where they were under Jim mcawain. So

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 3>they have to raise that floor, and they have to

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 3>they have to take another step forward and put together,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, because of a rough November means depth top

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 3>thirteen twelve classes, I've maybe even top fifteen classes, and

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 3>I could see them as being that threat because we

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 3>saw them against Georgia last year. Threat would not be

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 3>one of the words to describe South Carolina's twenty eighteen

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 3>game against the Dowgs.

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>What about Kirby smart deep fakes.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Kirby smart deep fakes. Yes, if we're going negative, if

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 3>we're going opoh, always really.

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Strong misinformation campaign could help the game Cocks. Just throwing

0:30:59.240 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>that out there.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I could see Will Muschamp wanting to do the voice

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 3>himself though.

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Ye, this is.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Definitely Kirby and not Will must Champ. Yeah, it's not

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 3>going to work. Let's do Yeah, I think it's possible.

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's gonna be a lot.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's do a few more of these here, we got

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 2>so many good ones. How about Andrew Joe moorehead, your guy,

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Joe Moorehead. Okay, he says, what will it take for

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Joe Moorehead to have a big second season at Mississippi State.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>How did you feel about year one under Joe Moorehead.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 3>High ceiling, low floor. There were really impressive moments That

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 3>defense had such a high ceiling that that I've always

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 3>liked Bob Shoop. I know we had a rough time

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 3>at Tennessee, but going back to where what he did

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 3>at Penn State and what they look like up front

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 3>with Jeffrey Simmons and Montes sweating with Jonathan Abraham who

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 3>was great, uh, sort of playing center field for Mississippi State,

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 3>what they look like on defense had me convinced that

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be a really tough out and they

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 3>should be. They should have a ceiling of nine probably

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 3>nine wins under Morehead. And so this season specifically, a

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 3>lot of variables replacing a lot on defense, especially up front.

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I like their receivers a whole bunch. I think Kylon

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Hill is one of the more underrated names at running

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 3>back nationally with how he played last year and some

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 3>of those bigger games for Mississippi State, Basically they need

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 3>to start four and oh this year. That includes Kentucky.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I believe in Starkville they need to split LSU at

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 3>home and they go there against A and M on

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 3>the road. They had a real rough time with LSU

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 3>last year, but under Dan Mullen, always competitive, won some loss,

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 3>some generally close split the road games Auburn, Tennessee both

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 3>on the road.

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. I think that's totally respectable.

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 3>The need to beat Arkansas, Ole Miss and Abilene Christian,

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 3>all of this sounds realistic and all of that. If

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 3>that happens, if those splits and those wins at the

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 3>end happen, they go nine to three. Okay, I think

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 3>it's probably Tommy Stevens. Yes, that was gonna be my

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 3>point here. So before Tommy Stevens came onto the scene

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 3>and grad transferred away from State College and pick Starkville,

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 3>it seemed like it was going to be between Keyton Thompson,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 3>who we saw a little bit last year when Nick

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Fitzgerald was out, and Garrett Trader, who's a freshman.

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That would seem to be. Yeah, that seemed to be

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback battle.

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 2>But now through Tommy Stevens in the mix, I don't

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>know if Tommy Stevens is going to be the guy

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 2>or not. Joe Morehead will make that decision. But I

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 2>do think it helps.

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That would be a weird transfer.

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 2>If it was a transfer, wouldn't be the first time

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 2>that something like that's happened. I like the fact that

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Tommy Stevens is familiar with the Joe Moorehead system because

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>last year points in the year for Mississippi State just

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 2>seemed like the offense was out of sync. So to

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.479
<v Speaker 2>bring in a guy like Stevens who knows what Morehead

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 2>wants to do, He's got a lot of familiarity with it,

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that certainly benefits them in the short term. I think

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 2>it's going to take someone Stevens to be the starter

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 2>to really have a good grasp with what more Head's

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to do to give them a chance to have

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>that big season.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 3>But do you think if he were good and he

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 3>had a grasp of that system, just at least big

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 3>picture wise, he would have kind of easily won the

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Penn State job. I don't know what this is that

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 3>much experience and familiarity. Obviously it's shifted.

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the system looks like now.

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't seem like it'd be night and day.

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem that way.

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 2>But keep in mind there's been a lot of turnover

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 2>with a personnel at Penn State. Yeah, on the offensive side,

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 2>so sure, you know they like Sean Clifford and state.

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 2>He's younger, Yeah, yeah, he's younger. He maybe he gives

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 2>them more upside with what they're trying to do. Stevens

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 2>saw an opportunity to go to a place where he's

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 2>familiar and took the opportunity. So I think it's win

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 2>win for Joe moorehead time will tell what it means

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 2>for Tommy Stevens. I think though his grasp of that

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 2>system could help Mississippi State if they want to try

0:34:55.840 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and become, you know, a better entity in twenty nine ten,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 2>if they want to have that quote unquote big year.

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 3>And here's the other thing that should be remembered about

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Tommy Stevens and the Mississippi State offense, Nick Fitzgerald completing

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 3>pastes downfield against pretty good teams was ugly twenty eighteen,

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 3>and so the bar is very low right now that

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 3>even if Tommy Stevens is fine, even if he's Joe Burrow,

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 3>which is not supposed to be an insult, and I

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.919
<v Speaker 3>know it's what it sounds like. That's great because there's

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot at Mississippi State right now to be excited

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 3>about both from the coaching I know there's a little

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 3>bit of turnover on offense and the coaching staff. But

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 3>if he's fine, they're probably better than they were last

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 3>year with a good amount of defensive experience in the

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 3>back half of that defense. So yes, even if Sean

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Clifford was clearly the guy at Penn State, Tommy Stevens

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 3>can very well be a fine guy.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what's your definition of a big year?

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 2>They made it up to like fourteenth or fifteenth in

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the AP pole if memory serves. Yeah, it was one

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 2>of the best, probably eight defenses in the country, finished

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 2>eight four with the regular season, really good defense. So

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 2>he was starting from a point where he had a

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>lot to work with. The offense was obviously a bit

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 2>of a work in progress. But now as we move

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 2>forward into twenty nineteen, a big quote unquote year is relative.

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 3>It's one hundred percent true. And if you need a reminder,

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the worst passing team in the SEC was probably Mississippi

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 3>State last year. I mean it was Arkansas, but after that,

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 3>of teams that were competitive, it was Mississippi State, and

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 3>they were competitive in spite of where they were at

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 3>quarterback throwing the ball. So it's a good position to

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 3>be in.

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 2>MJ writes in with a very interesting question, what will

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>it take for Oklahoma to not make the Big Twelve Championship?

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Let me this as well. Will it be enough if

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the Jalen Hurts experiment explodes to keep Oklahoma out of

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the Big Twelve Championship? So you're saying that he's just okay,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 2>what if he shows up and he's just a total flop,

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 2>He's a disaster.

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's all.

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 3>He's a disaster. Oh no, I don't think that'll I

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 3>think that's highly unlikely.

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 2>But what happens if he shows up he's not good

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 2>in the offense, the whole experiment goes bust. Is that,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 2>in and of itself enough to keep Oklahoma out of

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.479
<v Speaker 2>that game, knowing that they've got a ton of talent

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 2>behind him?

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Because the Heisman winner was at times pretty bad against

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Texas last year, threw a couple of bad picks early

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 3>on and they lose that game. The Heisman winner, Jalen

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Hurts is not the throwing quarterback that Kyler Murray was,

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and I don't anticipate he'll be particularly close. But yeah,

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 3>it's turnovers, and not that Jalen Hurts is a turnover

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 3>prone quarterback. But yes, I think I'm basically I think

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 3>we can break it down even easier than that. They

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 3>lose Bedlam in the shootout because the defense by then

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 3>is stressed and even though they're improved, that's the I

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's the final game of the year this year.

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 3>So they lose Bedlam and then they lose red River.

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 3>That's a second loss, and things get weird against Iowa

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 3>State again or I mean the road stuff is actually

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 3>really nice. Bedlam's on the road, but otherwise it's Baylor

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 3>with an improving Baylor, a brand new Kansas State and

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Kansas so road wise in the Big Twelve, it's a

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty ideal year for Oklahoma. But they lose red River,

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:40.280
<v Speaker 3>they lose Bedlam, and they lose some sort of toss

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 3>up to Iowa State or TCU.

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. All right, two more of these dan

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>only only two more? Run along?

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Man, we got a well, you agreed to do a

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 3>mega show tie.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 2>What will cake for a team like Alabama, Penn State

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 2>or Clemson to where it alternate uniform for a game.

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, what qualifies as an alternate uniform, Dan.

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I have breaking news here for Okay, our question asker, Okay,

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Penn State is actually going to wear something they call

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the Generations of Greatness Special Throwback uniform.

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh, on October the fifth.

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking it up now, which includes numbers on the helmets. Okay,

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>they did back in like the late fifties and so bold.

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, I know. There are a few other

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:32.919
<v Speaker 1>tweaks here and there.

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I could see one of those schools if they were

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 3>honoring some kind of legend who passed away, and they

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 3>were saying, Okay, this person had such a great game

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 3>against Auburn that for the Iron Bowl, we're wearing this look.

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Or this guy had such a good game against Michigan

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.959
<v Speaker 3>he just passed away, this legend, we're wearing this look

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 3>for this game to honor him instead of just a decal,

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 3>instead of just you know, putting his initials above the

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Nike swoosh. I could see that it would have to

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 3>come together pretty quickly, or that person would have to

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:04.760
<v Speaker 3>be honored months and months in advance, if it happened

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 3>over spring or something like that, for the following season.

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I could see that, like what Michigan did, and horrifically

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 3>so with those the windowed uniforms, the windowed numbers, or

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 3>the giant M when they played it was the giant

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.720
<v Speaker 3>M was under the lights. I believe I could see

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 3>a more subtle version of that for one of those schools.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not counting on it, but it could happen.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Dan, What would it take for the Big Ten to

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 2>kick out and or replace Rutgers.

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 3>It would have to be some sort of off field

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 3>scandal that they would use as an excuse.

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Rutgers is of course, it's an official school of New

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>York City.

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a Rutgers town for sure, and this place would

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 3>be shut down with anger. But it would be something

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.399
<v Speaker 3>off field. I can't imagine that the Big Ten would

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 3>want to do that.

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>It would you know, what it would have to take.

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 3>It would have to take some sort of complete reorganization

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of the posts eason so that you know, I don't

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 3>know when this has happened. It would have to be

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, another round of realignment when TV deals are

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:10.479
<v Speaker 3>up or whatever, where there would have to be some

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 3>sort of complete rejiggering of the sport where we're saying, okay,

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 3>we're we're doing five super conferences or three super conferences

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 3>or four super conferences, And like, who's gonna be left

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 3>standing when the music stops? Well, friends, it's gonna be Rutgers. Well,

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be Rutgers and probably a couple other schools.

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So it happens.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 2>If Rutgers gets really good in basketball and is extended

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 2>an invite from the ACC, they become like the twenty

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 2>eighth team in the ACC?

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Could they be coach?

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Are they approachable candidate if they get excellent at basketball?

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, because just not generating enough revenue. I'll go

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Big East.

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 3>The Big East just added Yukon, Right, Yukon is no

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>longer an AAC school, I think football wise, I think

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that's so it'll just be like that. What will Okay,

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:05.919
<v Speaker 3>So what'll it take for Purdue to win the Big

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Ten West?

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I have.

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it takes as much as people might think. Okay,

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 2>what do you have?

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 3>So Iowa has a double body blow ahead of Purdue.

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 3>It's it's in Iowa City the Purdue game. I think

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I have Michigan and Penn State leading up to it.

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Northwestern definitely has a tough stretch and a new starting

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 3>quarterback in Hunter Johnson or Johnson. So Hunter Johnson leading

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 3>an offense that at times was disastrously bad, but they

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 3>did find Isaiah Bowser and then improve things. And then

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Wisconsin also has a tough stretch leading up to the

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Purdue game. It's like in Madison, but you know, is

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Jack Cone good? Is it Graham Ertz whatever? Graham Mertz.

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 3>I believe it's a tough, tough name to blend into

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 3>each other. So yes, Wisconsin has the best running back.

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 3>It looks like in college football if everybody's putting nine

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 3>in the box and Wisconsin struggles again and they have

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 3>to deal with injury issues and offense of creativity issues,

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.919
<v Speaker 3>producing a pretty good place the defense will it has

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 3>to be better than what it looked like the last

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 3>time we saw them against Auburn. I want to say,

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Jared Stidham threw for like four hundred yards, possibly all

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 3>to Darius Slayton.

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I was very very against the grain going with Purdue

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 2>in that game, and they got It's okay.

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and that's I mean, you're at Jared Stdam's now

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 3>an NFL quarterback, Darius Slayton's in the league. There's a

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 3>tough team when they're on. So I don't think anybody's

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 3>going to have an offense like that.

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>In the West.

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, they have potentially the best weapon in Rondelle

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Moore outside of Jonathan Taylor touchdown. So yeah, they could

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 3>get lucky with some body blows and get better on

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 3>defense and have things work out.

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's I think it's Cindelar is probably the guy

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and have him improved. That's the time in.

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 2>The system, board, the Cindularity, the singularity, So yeah, I

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's crazy. No, We've got another question here, Dylan,

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>what will it take for mel Tucker's first year in

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 2>Colorado considered a promising success? So if you take to

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the side the great run that Colorado had maybe two

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:16.359
<v Speaker 2>years ago, three years ago, I found Oh it's more

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:20.320
<v Speaker 2>than that. Yeah, it's the year under my back and tire. Yeah,

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 2>it really has been since two thousand and three.

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a bunch of great dbs.

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, since two thousand and three, we've only seen that

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:33.959
<v Speaker 2>one winning season for Colorado Buffalo. So to start, he's

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 2>got to get a young core of players assembled. You've

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 2>got to feel somewhat hopeful about the future of the program.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 2>That might not happen until after his first season. In

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the interim, you need to feel like the team plays hard.

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 2>You need to feel like they improve from start to finish.

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's more complicated than that. In the

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 2>short term, there's a lot of room to grow in

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the PAC twelve, a ton of room. So you got

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to start so where. You got to establish your roots

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 2>by recruiting well, but you also need to establish a

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>culture by fielding a team that looks like it is

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 2>playing hard and hungry every single down.

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 1>What a way to live, live hard and hungry.

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 3>God, But that's it feels like you're doing sidework for

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Mountain Dew, the new energy bar. I don't know what

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say. Okay, their schedule's fine. The road

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 3>stuff is not the best.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they're at Oregon at Wazoo, but they have

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Stanford and Washington at home and they miss who do

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 2>they miss from the north? I think they missed Cal

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 2>which is fine, and unfortunately they miss Oregon State, so

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:42.839
<v Speaker 2>that would have been nice. But if they start three

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and oh that include a win over Nebraska at home,

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 2>which they did it last year, they have If if

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Leviska Chhanault is not the best receiver in the country.

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 2>It's Jerry Judy and it might still be Leaviska Chenault. Otherwise,

0:45:56.520 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you start three and oh you go two and two

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 2>at home. So that's splitting USC, Stanford.

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington, Arizona.

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 3>So say they beat I don't know, Stanford and Arizona

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 3>and then they just they basically have to win when

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Steven monte excuse me, Stevie Montese is good. Last year,

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 3>they start out undefeated, Colorado fans get upset at us

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 3>for not respecting them, and then what do they lose

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 3>their final seven and he was really good against teams

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 3>that weren't all that good, and they still managed to

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 3>lose that Oregon State game in the Arizona game. So

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 3>they win those two games, they're making a bowl that's something,

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 3>and so make a bowl that's that would be considered successful.

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:43.879
<v Speaker 3>They weren't bad at anything last year. They were bad

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 3>at not being better against bad teams. They were fine

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 3>on defense. They got healthier than where they were the

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 3>year before. They you know, Leviscus Channault's injury definitely hurt

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 3>them in terms of offensive momentum. But I think the

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 3>staff is fine. If defense is about effort, I think

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 3>melt Tucker's probably going to get a little more effort

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:03.760
<v Speaker 3>out of this this team, and so maybe they finished

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:06.879
<v Speaker 3>in the fifties or forties instead of the seventies and

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 3>they make a Bowl. I think six and six is

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 3>a wildly successful year for this Colorado team given the

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of upheaval these past couple of years.

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>All Right, you get to pick out our final question

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>before we move on.

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we already talked about the Big Ten West a

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit. We talked about Jeff Brohm. What'll it take

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 3>for you to believe that Matt Campbell is staying in

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 3>ames long term?

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Long term?

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So that means in football ease, in college footballs

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 3>long term. As we do this in early July twenty

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 3>nineteen or five years, I was gonna say, if he's

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 3>if he is the coach of Iowa State in twenty

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, right now, that feels long term. At the

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 3>end of the twenty twenty two season. So that's for

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 3>full season. I don't believe it.

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So what course of actions will make you a believer?

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 2>I will be made a believer if they make him

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 2>a top five highest paid coach in college football.

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, do you think it's about the money for him?

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't cost a lot from what I understand to live

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.919
<v Speaker 3>healthy and hungry or what did you say, hard and hungry?

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Hungry and hard in ames Iowa.

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's about the money, but the

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>money is there.

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:25.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's a pride thing. Money is a point

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of pride.

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 2>It's right, it's the only one of the only ways

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 2>to show respect, unfortunately in the sport. So I think

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:36.280
<v Speaker 2>that's got to be a component. But within five years

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 2>there are certainly a lot of jobs that could come open.

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 2>We've had this discussion about Matt Campbell before in the past.

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a chance he could leave for the NFL.

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a possibility when you're a coach of his magnitude,

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of his caliber. At this point, he's going to be

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 2>building up his brand enough where the NFL might be

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 2>an attractive place for him. So it's not just college

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 2>football that I always say it has to contend with.

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it happening, But if it's gonna happen,

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna need to pay him handsily.

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Sure, So.

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 3>If in the next three years, both Michigan schools, Notre Dame,

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and Penn State all open, and they come and go.

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 3>In terms of Matt campbell interest or his interest whatever,

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll be a pretty firm believer. Here's here's my sort

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 3>of my sub question that goes against a lot of

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 3>the logic and common sense of coaching hires and coaching

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 3>lives that we've seen, you know, since the dawn of

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 3>college football.

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Basically, if he.

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Ends up making I don't know whatever, four or five,

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 3>six million dollars, he keeps going to bowl games, he

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:41.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, keeps recruiting well, developing quarterbacks, putting together exciting offenses,

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 3>developing guys and putting them in the NFL. Do you

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:48.280
<v Speaker 3>think we will ever get to a point where guys

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 3>like Matt Campbell and Jeff Brahm, We've seen it with

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 3>some coordinators like Brent Venables at Clemson are just to themselves.

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I like it here, family likes it here. I believe

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 3>Matt Campbell is mayor with a bunch of kids, three

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 3>or four kids, that you know what, I've got it good.

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't have the pressure i'd have elsewhere. I know

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 3>that these guys are crazy competitive and they want to win.

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 3>At the biggest places over the biggest places. And I

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 3>know that's what the fallacy is in all of what

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying. But do you think that there are people

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 3>other than Brent Venables out there who basically will say

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 3>to themselves, life's pretty good. Can win the Big twelve here.

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:27.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm making a lot of money. Family likes it here.

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a fun it's fun to be at Iowa State

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 3>and beat Oklahoma.

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Are there people out there like that? Sure?

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Sure, I don't know if Matt Campbell's that guy. Yeah,

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I think he is. I don't think Jeff brom is

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 2>that guy. Jeff Brohm had an opportunity to go to

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Louisville and decided not to for one reason or another.

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 2>But Louisville's a probable upgrade over Purdue, but not a

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Louisville is definitely light years ahead.

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And I understand the personal we have.

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we've gotten to a point yet with

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 2>either of those guys where there have been really high

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 2>level programs that have come after them, And we probably

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 2>can't make that assessment right now. But until someone like

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Matt Campbell turns down Notre Dame program like that, it's

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 2>tough to say.

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 3>There are some and this is a this is kind

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 3>of a flawed example. Who's who's the star of ncis

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Mark Harmon?

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that sound right? Yeah?

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Who are the people on like CSI We're talking Mark

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Helgenberger that are on these long, long running shows. David Caruso,

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:38.839
<v Speaker 3>Well see David Cruso's goes against it. David Caruso left

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 3>NYPD Blue after the first season because he thought he

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 3>could be a movie star. He was the one who

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 3>had the ambition. So what I'm saying is, are we

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 3>going to have more Franz Dennis Franz than Caruso at

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:55.480
<v Speaker 3>any point? As it's a very volatile profession, I just

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 3>don't think.

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:58.320
<v Speaker 2>So, it's not it's not where the coaching world is

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:01.240
<v Speaker 2>at right now. Well, I mean it's it's the coaching

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 2>world is at. You go to one of these top places,

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 2>if you don't win within three years, we fire you.

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a golden parachute at the end of that. Usually,

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 2>so financially they're going to be in a good place.

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I just don't But what if they're happy and making money,

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 2>what if they want to Fronzi? If they want to

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Fronzi by all means Franzi. Yeah, I just don't see

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 2>it happening as a commonality.

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a flawed example because NYPD Blue was like a

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 3>top five or ten TV show ratings wise on ABC,

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 3>a huge one of the three huge networks at the time. So,

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 3>but also Dennis Franz perhaps knew that he would not succeed.

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>As a movie star.

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Is I just wonder I wonder if Jeff Brown is

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 3>secret Dennis Franz without the butt stuff, because Dennis Franz

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 3>did show his.

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 1>He did and he did do that.

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, before we move on, Yeah, I want to

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:53.959
<v Speaker 2>do about fifteen minutes of okay, college football, Okay.

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Before we move on.

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Another quick reminder, because we always read for other people

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:00.720
<v Speaker 2>in this spot. We've got a live show in DC.

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 2>We said it at the top, I'll say it again

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 2>August the eighteenth. It's a Sunday night at Union Stage, Washington,

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 2>d C. Come out meet other verballers. We've been getting

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 2>tweets from people. If you've purchased tickets, please.

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Let us know.

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 2>We want to know who's comment Yeah, right to us

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 2>at Soliverble on Twitter, on Facebook, on Instagram, all the

0:53:22.480 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 2>usual hotspots go on the subreddit at reddit dot com,

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 2>slash our slash soliverbal talk to others who are going

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 2>to the show. We're excited about it. You can buy

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.839
<v Speaker 2>tickets now. Just go to soliverbletickets dot com. We'll hook

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 2>you up with the official website where you can buy

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 2>the tickets. Awesome, Daniel hit me Happy July fourth. Yep

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to you as well. Are you tired of your credit

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:46.320
<v Speaker 2>card bills? The ones with the holly in the streets.

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Always I get my text that like your credit card

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 3>bill is due and I not super pleased.

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Get a credit card consolidation loan from our friends at

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:58.439
<v Speaker 2>light Stream with rates as low as five point nine

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 2>five percent APR, are with autopay and lower than the

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:06.920
<v Speaker 2>average credit card interest rate of over nineteen percent APR.

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 2>You can get a loan from five thousand to one

0:54:09.160 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand with no application fees, no origination fees, no

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 2>transaction fees, and no prepayment penalties. The rate is fixed

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 2>it's never going to go up over the life of

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the loan. Plus, you can even get your money in

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 2>your bank account as soon as the day you apply

0:54:25.719 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 2>for our listeners. Apply now get a special interest rate discount,

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the only way to get the discount is to go

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 2>to lightstream dot com slash solid. That's l I g

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 2>H T S t R e A M dot com

0:54:38.480 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 2>slash solid. Subject to credit approval rate includes a point

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:48.560
<v Speaker 2>five percent autopay discount. Terms and conditions apply and offers

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a subject to change without notice. Visit lightstream dot com

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:53.320
<v Speaker 2>slash solid for more information.

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Do it all right? Dan? Give me non college football?

0:54:58.040 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So do you want to?

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:00.880
<v Speaker 3>We got to We have a string of food questions

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:03.000
<v Speaker 3>because it is the fourth and people have food on

0:55:03.040 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 3>their mind. Do you want to start with a string

0:55:05.120 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 3>of food questions or do you want to conclude with them?

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 1>People are going to their July fourth.

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Picnics, barbecues. I know people get upset about the Thursday

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 2>or Friday, or Saturday or Sunday, I don't know, probably

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 2>all weekend, long weekend. Let's start, but we got to

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>go rapid fire. We got a lot of these questions.

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, that's fine, a bunch of them. Let's wrap

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 2>it fire, let's do it.

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 3>What'll it take for tater tot nachos to supplant the

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:30.800
<v Speaker 3>traditional tortilla chip nachos.

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm protat tots, protat tots absolutely, but I'm more

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:37.480
<v Speaker 2>of a traditionalist when it comes to nachos. What will

0:55:37.520 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 2>it take Probably a clever marketing campaign from some chain restaurant.

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 3>I like tater tots, I like dipping tater tots. You

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.800
<v Speaker 3>get tater tot nachos, it turns into one giant mess

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of fried potato and gloppy toppings. I would say we

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 3>need to turn the traditional shape of a like a

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's style hash brown, which you can you can pictures

0:55:57.920 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 3>like the size of like a big belt buckle tie yep.

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Turn that into like a smaller surfboard shape. We dress

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 3>each one of them individually with whatever charizo, cheese, onion,

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 3>salce or whatever, and you get a much better vehicle

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 3>for whatever toppings you're interested in. I'm totally pro the

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 3>fried potato and especially a hash brown type mini surfboard

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:21.880
<v Speaker 3>as a nacho replacement vehicle. It needs to be crispy.

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that's one crispy, a deep golden brown. What

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 3>food do you not like what wish.

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:28.799
<v Speaker 1>You did for me?

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:32.719
<v Speaker 2>It's sushi? Okay, I'm not pro sushi. It seems like

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:33.799
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the world is.

0:56:33.920 --> 0:56:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it.

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Have you had sushi outside of the Greater Allentown, Bethlehem

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Northampton area.

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm not gonna it may be too strong for

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 2>me to say that I don't like it, Okay, but

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:46.759
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's not something that I ever look at

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and say, oh, I have to have that. Like, I'll

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 2>eat it if I have to, but generally it's not

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 2>something I'm going to order.

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Are you open to the possibility that if you and

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 3>solid wife Kate ended up in Osaka that you would

0:56:56.600 --> 0:56:58.839
<v Speaker 3>be fully mind changed.

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:01.000
<v Speaker 1>When in Rome in Osaka?

0:57:01.440 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you try it, but are you open to like,

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 3>oh wow, this is Yes, this is spectacularly good.

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I'm I'm open to that. Yes, I

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:11.480
<v Speaker 1>wish I liked raw tomatoes. I just don't.

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I really wish that that umami natural MSG. You got

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the brusquetta, you have, salsa's you have. You know they

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 3>add to burgers definitely, But I just, for whatever reason,

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 3>rubs me the wrong way.

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:23.920
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Next question, when hankering for a fish taco, what's your

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 3>fish of choice? I don't like life is allergic to

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 3>fish tacos. I like a white fish. I don't it

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:38.560
<v Speaker 3>can be blackened, grilled, fried, whatever. I want a non

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 3>gloppy batter for my for my fried fish taco, and

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 3>probably either a thick corn tortilla or flour, not a

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:49.280
<v Speaker 3>thin corn. It's got to stand up to a heavier,

0:57:49.360 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 3>heavier protein like a fried fish would be. Okay, Yeah,

0:57:52.600 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a fan best dessert item to bring to

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 3>a pot luck style barbecue or cookout party.

0:57:57.920 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So when they say pot luck style, dam what is

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that means?

0:58:01.040 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Everybody brings a separate dish. Somebody's in charge of cooking

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 3>the meat, and they're probably the host. But then, okay,

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 3>why don't you bring chips, Why don't you bring fruit salad?

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you bring dessert? Why do you bring drinks?

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Kind of thing where the host is not responsible for everything?

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I like a good strawberry shortcakes.

0:58:19.880 --> 0:58:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's be specific to summer, because I mean

0:58:22.440 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 3>you are right now strawberry shortcake.

0:58:24.600 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I like strawberry shortcake. It's usually it's usually light enough

0:58:28.440 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 2>that will.

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You make the shortcake though? Oh well, I mean in

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the past, I haven't.

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 2>There's no saying that I couldn't, right, But if you've

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:41.800
<v Speaker 2>got to take something and you're maybe not in the

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.360
<v Speaker 2>mood to bake it, I think that's a good option.

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:46.960
<v Speaker 3>So what would you make if you were tasked with

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:49.160
<v Speaker 3>actually preparing something homemade?

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 2>If it's for the July fourth holiday? I think it's

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 2>got to be something cool. Yeah, and I mean that

0:58:55.600 --> 0:59:00.680
<v Speaker 2>literally got to be something cool. So by is there

0:59:00.760 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 2>some sort of like.

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Ice cream dessert that we can You would make ice cream,

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not.

0:59:07.120 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Making it, but you can buy ice cream to assemble

0:59:10.000 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 2>as part of a larger dessert item.

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I'd go with a berry crumble. They're really easy. You

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:18.919
<v Speaker 3>don't have to like make like a pie crust type thing.

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 3>You just mash up a bunch of berries, or you

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 3>can do peaches something like that, a fruit crumble, peaches

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 3>or berries, and then the crumble is just generally like butter, flour,

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 3>some some oats, sugar. That's what I tend to do.

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Can we just put it on top?

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Can we get rid of this question the same way

0:59:34.440 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 2>we got rid of coach questions? Why every time this

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 2>question comes in? I never have an answer for it. Well,

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 2>you gotta start cooking, man, I do cook. You gotta

0:59:44.360 --> 0:59:44.920
<v Speaker 2>start baking.

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't go to enough picnics where I've got to

0:59:47.000 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do this thing. I never have an answer for it.

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to you have to have go to recipes

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for dessert, cookies, whatever. I don't know.

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's get you going, get that. It's science. Tw you

0:59:56.640 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 3>love science. I'm done with this question, okay, Menophic. Next topic,

1:00:02.360 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 3>best road trip car snacks.

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say combos here, Dan combos, Okay. Why you

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like the variety? I like the variety.

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the ones that have the crazy spices

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:18.800
<v Speaker 2>on them, because if we're talking long car trip, the

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:21.439
<v Speaker 2>crazy spices could have other plants for your stomach.

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Sensitive sensitive tom tum.

1:00:22.960 --> 1:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Just the plain old fashioned combos gives you the nice

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>variety of the pretzel. Get your carbs, get some of

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>that cheese flavor in there.

1:00:30.200 --> 1:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>M m yeah, That's where I'm going with it.

1:00:33.560 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Give me some somehow altered pretzels, you know, seasonally, whether

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>it's like a honey pretzel, whether it's some some sort

1:00:40.800 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>of seasoned pretzel for savory and then sweet. I'll just

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>if I can get a big old chilled bag like

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I would chill it the night before, put in the

1:00:50.040 --> 1:00:54.479
<v Speaker 2>freezer or the fridge of Reese's pieces, I'm pretty happy. Also,

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>just a giant water yeah, some sort of giant water.

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going with the I'm not going with some

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of juice because that'll make it pee quicker, more sugar,

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, giant water. I have some sort of altered

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>pretzel in Reese's Pieces, and I think you can probably

1:01:09.720 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>get both in the same package. Now, next question, I

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:17.400
<v Speaker 2>think we're out of food questions. Which big relief. Wife

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and I just bought a house and we'll move in

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:23.000
<v Speaker 2>in September. It's a three bedroom with an open concept kitchen, dining,

1:01:23.040 --> 1:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>living room. Ooh, fancy my wife. My wife doesn't care

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>about football. Should I A turn the office into my

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:35.520
<v Speaker 2>football viewing room complete with couch, whiskey cabinet, mini fridge,

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>giant coffee table, or b dump that extra money into

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the actual living room to take advantage of the large

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>entertaining space and watch games in there. He feels like

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a no brainer to me.

1:01:46.080 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Be feels like it's probably the no brainer.

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, because football season is pretty finite.

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, That's my point. If you dump the extra money

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:58.280
<v Speaker 2>into the living room and really make it into a

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>cool place to view anything, it seems like you're killing

1:02:02.360 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>two birds with one stone.

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Mm hm oh yeah. Somebody asked about a good surround sound.

1:02:09.080 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>I think what's the new Dolby? Is it at most Atmosphy?

1:02:12.360 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Do you have a surround sound movie recommendation?

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1:02:17.360 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>No, because you got you got all fancy set up there.

1:02:20.200 --> 1:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I've got the Saunos soundbar and two Saunos play

1:02:24.080 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 2>ones that I have synced up.

1:02:26.000 --> 1:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Are they behind the couch?

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>They are not behind the couch. No, they're on either side.

1:02:30.400 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>They're in either corner of my living room as you

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>look towards the television. Okay, that's been my way of

1:02:36.320 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>achieving some kind of surround sound. I know it's not

1:02:40.280 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 2>as deluxe as you're doing one eighty. Yeah, but that's

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 2>where I'm at right now. I don't have any recommendations

1:02:46.600 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>for it, is the same movies anything?

1:02:49.360 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know.

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I will say that would be good to watch on it.

1:02:52.080 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>The Our Planet series on Netflix is pretty damn cool.

1:02:55.160 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Question surround sound? Yeah.

1:02:57.320 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 3>The best thing I think I've watched in surround sound

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>might be Band of Brothers the HBO. I could see

1:03:04.280 --> 1:03:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that it was terrific and surround really. I mean, it's

1:03:08.680 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 3>already an incredible mini series, but with that sort of experience,

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 3>it was it was something else. When on a business

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>trip and sharing a room with a colleague, do colleague,

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>do you a try to go to sleep as early

1:03:22.320 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>as possible, even to the point of faking sleep. B

1:03:26.960 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 3>stay up and have the good night conversation with someone

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 3>you don't really know. I've had that conversation. I know

1:03:33.320 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>exactly what he's talking about. Or see, stay at the

1:03:36.360 --> 1:03:38.920
<v Speaker 3>bar drinking much later than you normally would to make

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 3>sure your roommate will be asleep by the time you return.

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>What kind of business trip is it where they're making

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you room with a colleague?

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Ty, you've never worked for a startup? Have you

1:03:49.520 --> 1:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>rooming with a colleague?

1:03:51.400 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Absolutely?

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, Ti, technically our live shows are business trips and

1:03:56.160 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>we've roomed together. This is also true. Okay, like we

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>know each other quite well. He's sort of saying he

1:04:03.760 --> 1:04:05.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't know this person.

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:08.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, so you've clearly been in this situation. Dan,

1:04:09.040 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a recommendation here?

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Go to sleep? Yeah, go to sleep.

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, now, I don't sleep nearly as much as i'd

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:18.560
<v Speaker 3>like to because of the solid baby, so I would

1:04:18.600 --> 1:04:21.480
<v Speaker 3>take every opportunity and use it as an excuse. Hey,

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to turn in early. I don't get a

1:04:22.920 --> 1:04:26.160
<v Speaker 3>full night's sleep basically, ever, so I'm doing that, so

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>use that as an excuse. I would also say, as

1:04:29.440 --> 1:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>a backup, maybe try and get to know the person

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>at the bar instead of when the lights go out,

1:04:35.640 --> 1:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>so at least you are having a conversation. Maybe they

1:04:38.760 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>become a new friend.

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:04:40.680 --> 1:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm with you. Cashing your chips as early

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>as you can. Yeah, at all costs, avoid the awkward conversation.

1:04:47.400 --> 1:04:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Have the good night conversation at seven pm the hotel bar,

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>over dinner, whatever. Next question will be, Okay, this will

1:04:56.240 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>be our final one? Is this is really steering into you?

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I would love to hear tis thoughts on the US

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>men's national team. Oh boy, super appropriate now that the

1:05:06.120 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 3>women are the story and have like the best selling

1:05:08.240 --> 1:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>jersey ever very Nike.

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>When is the Championship Championships on Sunday?

1:05:14.920 --> 1:05:17.720
<v Speaker 2>For both the Sunday who play in the Gold Cup

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>presumably provided a win tonight, they'll be in the Gold

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Cup final against Mexico.

1:05:22.720 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and the women who play I believe earlier in

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the day over in France. How is the game?

1:05:27.120 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Last week in Philadelphia? You watched the US team take

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>on Kurisou.

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right?

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Is it ridiculous? How expensive tickets are? Are the current

1:05:35.880 --> 1:05:40.200
<v Speaker 3>players good enough? Songs? Pulisic and maybe a handful of others.

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Is the system bear Halter, Burholter, Yeah, Burhlter is a system.

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Bur Halter is trying to install working, going to work.

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Wow, this is a loaded question.

1:05:52.840 --> 1:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Is the us WNT the best American thing we currently have?

1:05:56.680 --> 1:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>This is a loaded follow a loaded, loaded question from

1:06:00.040 --> 1:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>top to bottom. Okay, what's your current state of the USMNT.

1:06:04.160 --> 1:06:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, so here's my thing with soccer. Okay, and I've

1:06:06.320 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>said this before. I did not play soccer at any

1:06:08.960 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 2>point in my life.

1:06:09.680 --> 1:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm terrible.

1:06:11.040 --> 1:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I learned pretty much everything I know from playing the

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 2>FIFA video game and getting interested in international and professional

1:06:18.240 --> 1:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>soccer with that as a starting point, and then reading

1:06:22.080 --> 1:06:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and researching and learning about it from that point forward.

1:06:25.480 --> 1:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I believe Will Leech once referred to this as hipster patriotism,

1:06:29.320 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's about right, at least for me.

1:06:32.120 --> 1:06:34.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm very into it. I follow it as closely as anybody.

1:06:35.400 --> 1:06:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I can't speak much to the tactical elements of the

1:06:39.280 --> 1:06:42.840
<v Speaker 2>international soccer scene. I'm just not knowledgeable with that, but

1:06:43.280 --> 1:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>it does seem like what I saw on Sunday evening

1:06:46.560 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>in Philadelphia was a very lousy, uninspired effort. Whoa by

1:06:51.760 --> 1:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the US team, especially in the second half, did not

1:06:55.520 --> 1:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>look good.

1:06:56.640 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>They were lucky to.

1:06:57.640 --> 1:07:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Escape that game against Cursow as of one nil, one nil, Yeah,

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>first goal early in the game. Header from Weston McKinney.

1:07:05.440 --> 1:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited about a lot of the young players that

1:07:08.720 --> 1:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the United States has not the least that is Christian Polissic,

1:07:11.640 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>who is a native Pennsylvanian here. But there are plenty

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>of young guns that I think could be really good

1:07:17.960 --> 1:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>by the time the next World Cup rolls around. But

1:07:20.960 --> 1:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>at least in the short term, they need to turn

1:07:23.360 --> 1:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in more inspired efforts for me to feel good about

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>what Craig Berhalter, the new coach, is trying to install

1:07:29.440 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>on the team, because thus far it hasn't been all

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>that promising.

1:07:33.440 --> 1:07:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you ever find yourself involuntarily moving your thumbs like

1:07:36.600 --> 1:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>you're holding a PS four controller while.

1:07:38.440 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 2>You watch the US? Okay, no, I've currently quit FIFA again.

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I know, oh you quit again. I was back into

1:07:44.360 --> 1:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it for a while, but I've since quit again. I

1:07:46.480 --> 1:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>bumped the difficulty up. I'm just not good at it.

1:07:49.120 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Can we bring the show full circle at our conclusive

1:07:52.440 --> 1:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>at our conclusion time. Yes, I'm pretty bullish on Cincinnati

1:07:56.640 --> 1:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>this year. Ah, I'm pretty bullish. I know they go

1:08:02.440 --> 1:08:06.720
<v Speaker 3>to Houston its first year, Hulego trying to retool a

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 3>pretty bad defense of the Cougars. They get UCF with

1:08:10.960 --> 1:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>your guy, your notre Dame QB. They get Yeah with Wimbush,

1:08:17.280 --> 1:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>they finished out. You know, Temple could be tricky. I

1:08:19.200 --> 1:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>know they have a new coach. I'm just I like

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Mikey Warren, I like Desmond Ritter. I like the back

1:08:25.240 --> 1:08:28.880
<v Speaker 3>half of their defense. I like how much better they

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:32.720
<v Speaker 3>got going from twenty seventeen to twenty eighteen. That I

1:08:32.760 --> 1:08:36.680
<v Speaker 3>can't help but feel very good about Cincinnati going against

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>an American schedule with a lot of questions Yukon is

1:08:40.280 --> 1:08:42.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be terrible, I'm not. I don't feel particularly

1:08:42.800 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 3>great about South Florida again, Temple first year coach, Memphis,

1:08:46.439 --> 1:08:50.320
<v Speaker 3>they get Brady White's ninth year whatever however long he's

1:08:50.360 --> 1:08:54.360
<v Speaker 3>been eligible. I'm it's a good year for Cincinnati to

1:08:54.400 --> 1:08:57.519
<v Speaker 3>have a lot in place, even traveling to Columbus to

1:08:57.520 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>play Ohio state early on, and I think you is

1:09:00.439 --> 1:09:03.240
<v Speaker 3>going to look a lot better than they did last year,

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:06.080
<v Speaker 3>in which you which sincey snuck out a win to

1:09:06.200 --> 1:09:08.799
<v Speaker 3>open the season, I think they're still going to threaten

1:09:08.880 --> 1:09:11.559
<v Speaker 3>double digit wins and if things break right, be a

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:12.599
<v Speaker 3>top twenty five team.

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

1:09:13.360 --> 1:09:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, how about that good way to bring things full circle.

1:09:16.800 --> 1:09:19.519
<v Speaker 2>So again, thank you to everyone out there who wrote in.

1:09:19.560 --> 1:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Soliverble at gmail, dot com, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, all the

1:09:23.720 --> 1:09:27.559
<v Speaker 2>usual hotspots. If you haven't already, please do go to

1:09:27.600 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>soliverbletickets dot com dan do we have that redirect in place.

1:09:32.040 --> 1:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>By the time people are listening, it will be in place.

1:09:34.479 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Solid verbaltickets dot com. If you're gonna be in the

1:09:37.439 --> 1:09:39.479
<v Speaker 2>DC area. If you can get to the DC area,

1:09:40.120 --> 1:09:41.920
<v Speaker 2>please do check us out. We'd love to meet you.

1:09:41.920 --> 1:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to say hello. If you buy tickets, write

1:09:44.400 --> 1:09:46.600
<v Speaker 2>in let us know we want to say hello. We

1:09:46.640 --> 1:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know who's coming for sure. Also, don't forget to

1:09:50.840 --> 1:09:53.719
<v Speaker 2>go to soliverble dot com slash store check out the

1:09:53.760 --> 1:09:55.960
<v Speaker 2>new assortment of t shirts that we have available.

1:09:56.040 --> 1:09:57.799
<v Speaker 1>That's all I have enjoy.

1:09:58.439 --> 1:09:59.880
<v Speaker 3>By the time you're listening, it might even be a

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 3>but hope your long weekend is going well. Hope you

1:10:03.120 --> 1:10:07.120
<v Speaker 3>get some sun, Hope you get some sleep, Hope you hydrate,

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 3>and generally just hope life is all.

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Right with all of you.

1:10:10.080 --> 1:10:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, have a safe, have a fun, have a happy

1:10:12.960 --> 1:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>July fourth, wherever you may be. Dan and I will

1:10:18.040 --> 1:10:21.320
<v Speaker 2>be back in a week. In the meantime, thanks as

1:10:21.360 --> 1:10:24.200
<v Speaker 2>always for downloading. Enjoy the rest of your week, all

1:10:24.200 --> 1:10:24.599
<v Speaker 2>your weekend.

1:10:24.640 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, say summer peace.