WEBVTT - Beach Steppin' | SVG, Hypothetical Warriors Trades, Bowling

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Ah yeah, Stepping on the beach the only place to

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>read your emails and your tweets. It's Friday, October twenty third.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for checking out the No Dunks podcast here on

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the Athletic Network. I'm J. E. Skeets and alongside me,

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>as always, we got task Mellis.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey, everybody, great to hear from you again.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, we got the international man of mystery taking it

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>to the max. Lee Ellis friendly and last but not

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>least making this magic habin as JD. Hello, there he

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is and here we are the bearded want Trey Kirby

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>still off camping with the family. I actually texted him

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>last night to ask how many fish he had caught,

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and sadly I have to report at least last night

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing only bike came off. Lely that was the only

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>one he had. But he says, and I'm quoting him here,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>there's bass in that way. He believes, he believes, gotta

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have some face. So good luck to tray Herbie. He

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>will be back for sure next week for a couple

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts. Thanks again everybody for sending in their

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>questions over the last couple of days over the last week.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Keep them coming, email them in No Dunks at the

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Athletic dot Com or you can tweet them in at

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>No Dunks Inc. We have another great batch of questions tasks,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but before we do, had some coaching news that we

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>can just quickly slip in here. I'll just lump them

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>together and you can go wherever you want with it.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The Pelicans hired Stan Van Gundy and his Twitter account

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>as their next head coach, and the Pacers hired Raptors

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>assistant Nate Jorkrin as next head coach. So from Nate

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to Nate there in Indiana. But the Pelicans hiring the

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>notorious SVG I think is maybe the bigger news to

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of at least casual fans, probably knowing that name.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Well, he is a great coach

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and we are going to miss him. On the tweets,

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>he was a fantastic Twitter follower. He says he's going

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>to continue with the tweets. At the same time he

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>is going to tone it down, and he said he

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>is representing an organization now, so things are going to

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>be a little different on the Twitter. But yeah, it's

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>going to make a difference in our lives. No tweets,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>no stand on the broadcast No Stand on NBA TV.

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Listen when you watch him or listen to him on

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 2>any basketball program. You know, the guy is extremely thorough

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and everything he does and extremely knowledgeable. He's not going

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to be outworked, and that's what all of his players

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 2>have said throughout the year's great reviews. He's also known

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 2>for establishing a great defense, and that's exactly what he

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 2>needs to do in New Orleans. That's his primary job.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>We saw what happened in the bubble. They just kind

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>of fell apart. He told Zach in July, I think

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 2>their personnel is good enough defensively, as a transcribed there

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 2>by Dan Devine, And maybe that got him the job.

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe David Griffin was listening to the Zach Low podcast

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 2>and said, this is perfect after what happened to Alvin

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Gentry in the bubble there. His team just it didn't

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>show up. It really didn't with with you know, Zion

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 2>in and out of the bubble may have been an

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 2>issue and having to deal with his minutes, but the

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>fact is they weren't working hard. You got guys like

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Drew Holliday, Lonzo Ball to be able to be able

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>or should be able to really contribute on that end,

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Ingram, can stan Van get something out of him?

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>And is Derek Favor is going to come back. I'm

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>interested in that because I want to see Zion Williamson

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 2>at the five just purely from a fan standpoint, and

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I think stan Van is inventive enough or was just

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>curious to see that enough, so he'll try that out.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>But I think that what it comes down to is

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>those names, Zion Williamson on the defensive end, sam Van

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Gundy with Wake Griffin most recently in Detroit, Dwight Howard

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>back in Orlando. He will get on guys, and I

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 2>think that's what it's about. It's about accountability, It's about

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 2>superstars being held to their highest level, and stan Van

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 2>is going to do that. So there is definitely hope

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 2>after an up and down five years for Alvin Gentry.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I think I think stan Vand is a good choice

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>for sure to try and get them to play hard

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>on that end. I mean, that's what it really comes

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 2>down to is have a program superstars got to work,

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think I think Sveg can do that.

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think the Pelicans were twenty first

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA last regular season when it came to

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>defensive efficiency so below Averagely you know you're gonna hope

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to get that least above average or average. Do you

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think this higher though SVG in New Orleans? Do you

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>think it makes it less likely more likely that a

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>guy like Holiday stays there, maybe even Reddick. Both of

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>those guys unrestricted free agencies. After the season, you will

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>those guys still be on the trade market. It favors

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, tast mentioned as well, Like I wonder with

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>him coming in there, especially Hollanda as the best of

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the bunch there, what do you think about that?

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, it's just about their timeline. Really, He's

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>got some history with JJ Redick stand van in Orlando,

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 3>so he might want to have his veteran presence on

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 3>the roster there. But if you're JJ Redick, you probably

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 3>look at this roster and think we're not competing for

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>a championship in the next season or two. When he's

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's probably only got a couple of years

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>left in the league, so he may want to go on.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 3>But I wouldn't be surprised if Stan's like, listen, I

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 3>just want you around to help out, help sort of

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 3>coach these younger guys. As for Drew Holliday, I mean,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>we know he's a great player, we know he's a

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 3>great defensive player, but again he is he sort of

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 3>looking right now and thinking, if I'm going to win

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 3>a championship, it's not going to be here in New

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Orleans because it's not going to happen for the next

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 3>two or three seasons at least, no matter how well

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Zion Williams developed. So I think Drew Holiday probably probably

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 3>wants to move on and probably wants to go to

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 3>a team that's a little bit closer to contending. But

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of course it comes back down to them what they

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 3>can can they get in return for him? What sort

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 3>of package do the Pelicans want? Do they want younger guys,

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>do they want hicks, do they want assets? You know,

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 3>to build for the future here with Zion, Because clearly

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Zion is the key and they have to get the

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 3>right players around him, but they also have to get

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 3>pieces that fit around him. And the big question of

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 3>course is Brandon England is that a long term fit

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 3>there together? But in you know, aside from that, they

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 3>have to get pieces that are going to sort of

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 3>be able to grow with Zion. And sort of reach

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>their peak at the same time. So that's going to

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 3>be the question. I think you get something good in

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>return for Drew Holiday, So I think he's got some value.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 3>It's just whether or not the Pelicans want to have

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 3>some veterans around or do they want to just sort

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 3>of basically blow it up and start now building around Zion.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is what's interesting about the sveg Higher. It

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>says to me, hey, we want to win now. I mean,

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this is not like ant Borkrin or like some you know,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>unnamed assistant that we don't know of, and it's like, okay,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll come in and you know, we'll look four or

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>five years in the future, and obviously he's as Zion

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>as our centerpiece and we will be a contending team

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>down the road. This team you get Sam van Gundy.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>You're saying to me, at least, no, we want to

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>win now. No, I'm not saying title, but we want

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to get into the playoffs. We want to be, you know,

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a contender of some sort. So that's what that's fascinating.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, how much does that play with keeping

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Drew Holiday or not? How many picks can you get

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for Drew holiday. You know, are you looking at like

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what Conley got in his return? You know that type

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of thing. So, yeah, a lot of questions here. I'm

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>excited that I'm with your task. It sucks that he

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>won't be on the call because he's one of the best.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I do like that we have an NBA TV front

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>office though now in David Griffin and stan Via Guddy

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>together feels like we're part of the team in a

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>weird way. But yeah, it's it's a it's an interesting

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>decision to like for me. Again, I don't know if

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that's ownership from the Pelicans, if that's Griff himself, Like, no, no,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to win now, and we think we've got

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously some young talent here and we'll see who stays

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and what we can get in return for some of

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>these older guys maybe, But yeah, we're gonna go get

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>some w's right now because stan Van that's what he's

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do, and he's hopefully gonna make that defense better.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, Dan Devine did have a great article I

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>thought I shared it on Twitter talking about Van Gundy teams.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>They control the defensive glass, they keep opponents off the line,

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>keep them out of transition, which the Pelicans were brutal at.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>They take care of the ball for the most part,

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and they force the other team to shoot the shots

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that they don't want to take. It's pretty simple stuff, really,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's what stan Fanny tries to implement, those like

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the classic don't kill yourself, like like, just don't make

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it easier for your opponents. So they should be better.

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>They're instantly going to be better, I think with stan

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Maan Gunny as their coach, But how much better in

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a loaded West? I mean, like, are the Pelicans to you?

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I know this is tough right now here in October

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and we don't even know when the season is starting,

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But are they a playoff team? Are they a lock

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs?

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 2>That should be that should be their expectation. I think

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>so you think they're luck?

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But the goal. But this is what hiring Stanman Gundy

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is saying.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 2>You think, yeah, I think. I think there's two extremes

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 2>we saw in one season last year, the expectations fell out,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 2>fell off the table because Zion Williamson wasn't there. And

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>then when we saw him come back, the expectations went

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 2>through the roof. And if he's healthy, I think we're

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>all sort of we're all in the boat where we're

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 2>still kind of sour with what happened in the bubble,

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 2>just as far as you know fan base goes. But

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>big picture, if David Griffin sits back and looks at

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 2>what Zion did and what his team look like on

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the offensive end for a good chunk of his minutes,

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>he's got to be pumped. And so yeah, you bring

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 2>in Standan because you want to win right now. I

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 2>think Drew Holiday is there next year because stan Van

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>is a guy who wants Drew Holiday on the floor

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 2>big time. So I expect them to have the same

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 2>type of team. And it would be a huge disappointment

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 2>if Zion is healthy next year and they don't make

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs for them, because it's there's a lot to

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 2>tanker with. And I think that's when stan Van, when

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 2>he's on zach Low in July, he wasn't, you know,

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>pining for the job back then. That was Alvin Gentry's

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>job back then. But if you listen to that podcast,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you can hear the gleam in stan Ban Gundy's eye

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>is pumped to just talk about that roster to talk

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>about Drew Holiday and Zion Williamson and what everybody was

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 2>excited for last year. You know, when we're looking forward

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to Game one, Zion is going to take the floor,

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 2>and then he got injured and it didn't happen until

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, he hit four threes against the Spurs. I

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 2>guess it was January when he came back. But I

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>think they have enough talent. And we talked about defense.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Zion Williamson. There's the highlight that is played constantly from

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>his college days where he's in the lane and he

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 2>goes out and blocks a shot in the corner with

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>like a step and a half, like a Yiannis like step.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>He can be, if he's held accountable, a great defensive

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>player as well, and they've got the offensive tools. You know,

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Brandon England is a star. So I think their goals

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>should definitely be the playoffs, and if they're healthy, they

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 2>should definitely be disappointed if they don't make it. It's exciting.

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it's almost like, you know, whatever it

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 2>was twelve months ago when everyone was pumped to see

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Zion on the floor.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think with Drew Holiday too, the idea of

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>trading him or not. I think it's totally up to him.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think if Drew Holiday, I think he's so respected

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.119
<v Speaker 1>in this league and I'm sure has a great relationship

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>with the Pelicans that if he said, like you were saying, ly,

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>if he was like, I want to go win a ring,

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think it's going to happen here

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of years. You guys are set

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>up maybe for the long term, but I want to

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>go get that. I'm getting to that point in my career.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they would because he's obviously would be coming

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>up to free agency unrestricted free agency a year from now.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they would honor that, and I think they

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>would look to see what they could get for him.

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not so sure he would. Actually, I don't know.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, Drew Holly doesn't seem like that type of

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>guy to me either, Like I have no idea, Like

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe he was just like, no this, you know, we

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>got a new coach in here, let's see what we

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can do. And maybe, like task, I sort of split.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>The difference here is you don't trade him this off season,

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever the hell the off season means anymore, but you

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>wait until whenever the trade deadline is right, and then

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get the odd desperate team and maybe

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the trade package coming back is a little juicier. Maybe

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there's an extra pick, maybe there's another younger, small, younger

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>asset that's included. So yeah, I sort of now think

0:11:57.960 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a betting guy, I wouldn't. I don't think

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Holly will be on a different team at the start

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of next season, though I still sort of have an

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that he will be traded around the trade deadline

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>because at that point, you know, who knows what your

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>team has done up to that point, how many wins

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you have. Are the Pelicans in a race, a playoff race?

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Have they shocked people in like a fifth seed? Who knows?

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But I sort of think he will be there now

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the year. And I think Reddick

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>as well. Favors is an interesting one, but we will

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>see anything to add before we get to the questions

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Pacers hiring Raptors assistant Nate Yorkrin, I believe

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that right. You know, it's one of those

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>ones that I think is not that difficult to say,

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but it looks crazy, right, But yeah, I mean, this

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>was a little out of left field Lee. You know,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>there was all There's been a lot of big names

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>being thrown around, you know, coaches that have coached before,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and this guy gets his first shot here in Indiana.

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 3>What do you think they're hoping to get Nick Nurse? Light? Really,

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 3>because it's been with Nick Nurse a long time. I

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 3>think you're dieting back twelve or thirteen years when they

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 3>first started coaching together. And he's going to try to

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 3>adapt a lot of the principles that Nick Nurse is

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 3>implemented there Toronto three pointers, move that ball, and you

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 3>know what, if things aren't working, I'm going to try things.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to try things differently. I'm going to try

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>to improve the defense. He likes that opportunity, likes that team.

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think it's a bit of a flyer

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 3>here for sure for the Paces because he's a relative

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 3>unknown to most basketball fans. But I think they look

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 3>at the success that Nick Nurse had and how he

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 3>was able to communicate with players, and that's one of

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 3>the things that Bjork spoke about. He said, we've got

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 3>to communicate, We've got to get everyone on the same page.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 3>And that's one thing that Nick Nurse has been very,

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 3>very successful with So if the Pacers can get a

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 3>guy who's able to communicate with his players and get

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the same sort of respect from them, then things should

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 3>improve the Pacers. I think this is a playoff team.

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just they've been this same sort of on the

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 3>treadmill here for a couple of years now, where they

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>make the playoffs. They're good enough to make the playoffs,

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, bit seed, six seed even higher, but that's

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 3>they can't really get any further than that. So the

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Pacers are hoping to turn a corner. They've got a

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 3>few question marks, of course, with their roster as whether

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>or not on the deepot stays maybe Miles Turner, so

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>that it will be some interesting things they have for Indiana.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's it's I think it's worth shot.

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Why not.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 3>I think he's done his time and they've seen success

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>with Nick Nurse, and I think maybe Night you can

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 3>have the same sort of impact on oucing anything to

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>add tests.

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 2>No, it's just kind of hard to evaluate because you

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know what his roster is going to be. We

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 2>don't know if Victor Oladipo is going to be there.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I assume he's got the the htzpah of a nick nurse,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>like he's going to take some chances and try and

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>get creative on the offensive end. But who the heck

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>knows the Pacers roster next year. I mean, we really

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>have no idea, and that leads us into our first question.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Unless you want to talk, No, let's do it some Nate. Yeah,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>let's do it, because we've got a hypothetical here. We

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 2>got a who says no. I know you're excitedly. Hello,

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>No Dunks. I love your podcast. I listen to you

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>guys so much that I think of you all as friends.

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>My question today is a who says no, The Warriors

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 2>trade Andrew Wiggins and they're twenty twenty second overall pick

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>for the Pacers, TJ Warren and Miles Turner. I think

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the Warriors do it because they move on from Andrew Wiggins.

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 2>They just got the guy, and in return get back

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>a solid third scoring option to TJ. Warren and get

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>a great defensive center and Miles Turner who can try

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and slow down Anthony Davis. I think the Pacers do

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 2>it because they start a proper rebuild and get a

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>solid young player in the second overall pick who they

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>can build around turn up love you guys. Awesome. That's

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>from Morgan, our friend in Australia, skeets, what do you

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>think of this? Warriors Pacers? Who says no deal?

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you who says no? The Pacers say no,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>The Warriors say absolutely yes, instantaneously, yes, come on, come on, okay.

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>First all, I couldn't believe that this actually checks out,

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like you can actually do this trade. You read it

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, how is that gonna work? You know,

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>financially it does because Wiggins makes USh ton of money,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty nine point five million, still three years

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to go. The number two pick, you know obviously rookie

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>scale con track type thing, that's going to be close

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to nine million. But then Warren eleven point seven million

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for two years, Turner seventeen point five million for three years.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So basically adding those two gets you to Wiggins. So

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it does work. Here is why though, I just think

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers say no, and this is like a I'm

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>glad we got to this because you've seen a lot

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of these, Like the Warriors are going to trade the

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>number two pick, what could they get back? Who could

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.359
<v Speaker 1>they get back? There is an overall lack of consensus

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>surrounding the top available prospects in this draft. Now, I

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>am not a draft expert, but that is that is clear.

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>If this were to happen, there's no way it goes

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>through without I think Golden State having to throw in

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>another pick in the They have to probably throw in

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty one Minnesota pick from the D'Angelo Russell trade,

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>which is protected top three and twenty twenty one and

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>then is unprotected. Now things that gets a little more

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me because you have the Pacers taking on

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the bigger, longer term deal in Wiggins, who, by the way,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of those three guys that we mentioned, is he the

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>worst player easily? Yes, exactly, so you'd have to be.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we're super pumped about TJ. Warren's right.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not super pumped at all about TJ.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Warren.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, but he's Wiggins is not as good as a TJ.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Warren.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather hit on my team at the contract he

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is task basically.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 2>A third Okay, well, you're throwing two things in there.

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Is he the best better? I mean, is he going

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 2>to be your small forward on a championship team like

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>are the Warriors going to say, hey, this guy's are

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 2>starting small forward on our championship team. TJ.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Warren, Well, yeah, you you are holding I mean, Wiggins

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Island is completely yours now, but ulmost respect it. But

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think the Pacers do this without another

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pick being thrown in. There is my point, because again,

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this draft is not like you're not getting John Moran

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at number two here, you know, you like you're you

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>don't even know who you're gonna get because you don't

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>know first off of Minnesota is keeping the number one

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>pick and who they're taking or if it's traded, who

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the hell the other team is taken? So who's let

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you know? I mean, are you getting Ball? Are you

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>getting Wiseman? Are you getting Edwards? Like you don't really know?

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And all three of those guys, by the way, again

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an expert when it comes to draft, but

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>no one's like, well, they're a ten time All Star,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're future All NBA player. Like people are

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>not saying that by any means with a lot of

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>these guys. So it's a huge unknown. So I just

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>think in this scenario, and this is to our friend Morgan,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an easy who says no that the Pacers

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>would say no, they would need more. But all that

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to say, I mean there is there are packages for

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Wiggins and the number two pick and maybe another pick

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. I just don't think it's going to be

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>as juicy as what I think is a pretty good

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>return in TJ. Warren and Miles Turner. Those are two

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really complimentary players in my opinion, to Steph Curry, Clay

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and Draymond Lee.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 3>You agree or disagree, No, I agree, I would if

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm the Pices, I would not want Andrew Wiggins coming

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 3>back for giving up those two players. I mean, TJ.

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Warren I think would actually be a nice fit on

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 3>that team. If you've got Steph and Clay and Draymond

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 3>out there, and I'm forgetting someone. No, but then and

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 3>then t J. I warren't just shoot three pointers in

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the corner. I think that's that's okay, That's what the

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 3>paces of the war we look for. They don't need

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>someone else who's going to command a whole lot of

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the ball.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>And the Warriors would do this in a hopeing at

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this point.

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as Myles Turner, I mean, I'm not a huge

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 3>fan of his right now, but I think again, in

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the right team, on the right system, he could improve.

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, what you were saying there as well is

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 3>about the draft. No one knows anything really about how

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 3>deep this draft is. A because we didn't see a

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 3>lot of these guys play, and B it's just not

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 3>being hyped up. A lot of people have got like

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 3>multiple different guys going in that one or two spot.

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, if I'm the Paces, you need way more

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 3>than that in return if you're going to give up

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 3>those two players. And if you're the Warriors, though, again

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 3>you're in a win now mode. So a rookie coming

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 3>onto that team, I'm not sure how much that fits anyway.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think the Warriors are definitely looking to move

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 3>and get some more veterans, So yeah, I think they

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 3>would do that as well. But see, I.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Agree with that. But my point is usually the number

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>two pick, wow, I'm intrigued because usually that means I'm

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>getting a real damn good player. I think it's different

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think it's a bunch of unknowns and

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like it doesn't have as much value as it

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>normally would at the number two spot. I think that's

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>my point So if I was again Indiana in this scenario,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna need more. I'm just gonna need it.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need another pick. I'm gonna need that Minnesota pick.

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Throw it in, all right, top three protected twenty twenty

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one and then unprotected. That's a little juice here, because

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>now you're looking at drafts down the line, and you're

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Indiana and you're rebuilding and all that, and you're moving

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>guys anyway, So you would just ask for more. That's

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what I think tasks, but you don't mind it well.

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 2>I think the Pacers would be inclined to say yes

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 2>just because they get that number two pick. Just a

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 2>number two pick just doesn't come around very often. I know,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody doesn't know who is going one, two, three, and

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 2>there are teams that are thinking, well, maybe we can

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>trade down from two to eight and still get our guy,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 2>because there's just there's so many varying opinions. But if

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 2>you want to start a rebuild, like the Pacers sure

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>seem like they do, if Victor Oladipo is going to

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 2>go somewhere else, if he is not the star that

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 2>they thought they had in twenty eighteen when he was

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 2>dueling Lebron in a seven game series. Well, then maybe

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 2>you got to move on and to get a number

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 2>two pick. Look up and down their roster that they

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 2>don't have a high pick sitting on their bench. They

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 2>just don't. So yes, I understand that you may not

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 2>get a star at the number two pick, but I

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>think that starts the conversation for this trade because you

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>may want to move on from TJ. Warren when his

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 2>value is ridiculously high here if you're going to start

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the rebuilding and Miles Turner, as solid as he's been,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't really impressed to the level that everyone expected to.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. If I'm the Warriors, I try

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and get somebody else for the number two pick. Yeah,

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Miles Turner, A you're gonna have out there guarding Anthony Davis,

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess, but I don't know's there's big question marks

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 2>on both sides when you look at this deal. And

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 2>I know Andrew Wiggins is a question mark in and

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of himself for sure, but they're going to give him

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>a chance to guard some people on the wing. And

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Lea saying, you know TJ. Warren in the corner hanging out, well,

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Wiggins hanging out and being a third option as well.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 2>And you know he can he can play defense? Will

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>he Who the heck knows this? I mean, who says no?

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Who says yes? It's a very difficult question.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>How about this trade idea? Then I saw SI dot

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>com threw this one out Wiggins the number two pick

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and that Minnesota twenty twenty one pick, because again, I

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna have to be included in a lot

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of these to Atlanta Lee for Clint Capella and the

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>number six pick. Warriors stay in the draft, obviously slide

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit, so they're gonna be able to

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>pick someone that you're gonna have to be nice to

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>have a cheap guy on our roster with obviously a

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money. And you get Clint Capella as you're

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>big to pair with all your shooters, a guy that

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna then you know, is you're gonna be I

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>guess asked to try and guard the Anthony Davison and

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. What do you think of that one? Wiggins

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.479
<v Speaker 1>number two pick, twenty twenty one Minnesota pick for Capella

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and the number six pick.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you're getting too like high picks basically in

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>exchange there for Capella and Wiggins. I think the Hawks

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.719
<v Speaker 3>would do that, I mean, because they're at a different

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 3>place right now. The only question is Trey Young. We

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 3>know was frustrated with front office last year where he

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 3>was like, I need some players around me. I want

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 3>to start winning. So with that upset him a little bit.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 3>If you're like, Okay, we're sort of stocking up again

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 3>for next year's draft, and we're getting another high draft pick,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 3>another guy to develop, so we're going to sort of

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the timeline gets pushed back a little bit further. So

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 3>they may be cautious of that, but in theory otherwise,

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I think, yes, you do that. If the Atlanta Horse

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 3>could just accumulate those assets, keep going until you're ready,

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 3>because you've got some good players, there're some good potential,

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 3>but someone like John Collins, I mean, how much better

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>is he going to get? And is he guy for

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 3>the future, So maybe you can look to sort of

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe move him in a package. And if you've got

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 3>another draft pick there, that's when you can sort of

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 3>start to sweepen deals if you want to try to

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 3>get another player. So that's how I think it works.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I think if you the Hawks, yes, you do that,

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 3>and then we.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Would have Wiggins right here in our backyard. Oh man,

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>click copella. Would he wouldn't even have played a game

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's something like those went down for the high

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>play for them, right, Yeah.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't, I don't remember, no, no, no.

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I saw some footage of him and Tree looking at

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 2>a whiteboard looking over a play, and I thought, where

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the heck is that from? But I guess they hung

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>out and right, they've just never played. Yeah, yeah, I

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 2>did a little work together. But yeah, they would move

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 2>on before he played a game, just like Morgan. Email

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 2>are saying that Andrew Wiggins, well, they'd move on from

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Wiggins. They just got the guy. But I understand,

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I understand Wiggins is a very polarized.

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 3>He's going to be a hoppy title I think for sure. Yeah,

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 3>people are like, yeah, I mean, he's got that huge contract,

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 3>but he's the number one pick, he's got talent, he's athletic.

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we can get something out of him, but he'll

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>end up on IT teams and geez.

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at this point, it's almost I'd be shocked

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>if the Warriors don't do something. Yeah, you know, draft

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>night here because they have so much to play with.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>They have all these picks. You know, you got a

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>big deal in Wiggins, you got the player exception still

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>from Igadala seventeen point two, a huge one. Yeah, they've

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>got smaller ones as well. I don't think you can

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>package those together, by the way, in the same trade.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'll be shocked if they don't do something

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point. There's just so much smoke, and you know,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>he feels like they have gotta be a little bit

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of fire with that. But we will see. Maybe they

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just end up taking Wiseman number two. They're like, all right,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's our big. Let's go with a young big with

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>these with all these shooters, we will see. All right, great, first,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>want to get a started. Next one here Ao no

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Dunk's Crew. On a recent pod, Skeets mentioned how he

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>always forgets that the Nets made back to back finals

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>appearances in two and three. Yes I did. I couldn't

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>believe it. I had to catch myself. This got me

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking about other successful teams over the past ten to

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years that basketball fans or the NBA community has

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>forgotten about. Once you got Turnip love you guys. No

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>awesome from Tim here just stopped right after love you guys.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>It is from Tim again. So yeah, teams, successful teams

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>at that past ten to fifteen years that we've just

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>forgotten about for whatever reason. Tasks when you get started.

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, this one's definitely forgotten. It's not so much for

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 2>what they accomplish that I want to talk about them,

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>but who it was up against. The Washington Wizards were

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Lebron's first rival. It's forgotten the first three years when

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Bron went to the playoffs when he was a member

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 2>of the Cavs. He went up against the Wizards and

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the infamous teams of Gilbert Arenas, Carom Butler, and Twine

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Jamison three straight years, and we were getting peak gil

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that first year. He averaged thirty four points per game

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 2>in that playoff series against the Calves. It was only

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a six game series, but this was this was awesome Gil.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 2>He was forty three percent from three point land. It

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 2>got injured for the second one and he kind of

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the same player after that. It was a real

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>short peak for Gilbert Arenas. But those two teams did

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>not like each other. And you know, this is two

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 2>thousand and six, so This was kind of going back

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to an era where the big man was, you know,

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 2>more traditional, was trying to put the best player on

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the other team on his ass. And the Wizards had

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Brendan Haywood the big, big center. And there was a

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>time where Lebron said it was mid mid series where

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 2>he said, you know, I'm getting hit and not getting

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the call, and Brendan Haywood was asked about that. We've

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 2>got the clip here.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh he's trying to hit me. I mean, come on, man,

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 4>this is the playoffs, man eight whears twenty three. He

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 4>wants me. Michael George, I can respect that. He's a

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 4>great player. He saw Mike went through. Mike got found

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 4>way worse than this. You know what I'm saying is

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 4>no one's trying to hurt him. Everybody's trying to play basketball,

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 4>trying to play tough, play basketball, leave alone trying to

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 4>hurt me.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Can you forget that? That's great stuff? I mean if

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that was today, I was just all pre twitter. If

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that was today, that would be circulating for a good

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>forty eight hours. People would love it, people would keep

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 2>going back to it. But yeah, he was trying to

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 2>rock Lebron's world. And it didn't really work out for

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the Wizards three straight years. They It was six games

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the first time, then it was a sweep for the

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Cavs the second time with no Gilbert Arenas, no Crun

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Butler even and then the third time was another six gamer,

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>but it was It was a decent battle. Its decent.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>We had the Deshaun Stevenson right versus Lebron, one of

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>those serious that was exciting. That's a good pick. Yeah,

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Wizards was a good team. I mean, you're obviously running

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>into a young Lebron. They were going to be easy

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to get by him. That's a good one. You got

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a team there at Adlie Well.

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how well known are the grit and grind

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 3>Grizzlies in that era that they went through between casuals

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 3>casual basketball fans, So I think we obviously remember it there.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 3>But for what seven seven straight seasons, Yeah, seven straight

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 3>seasons they made the playoffs and made the conference finals,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 3>got swept by the Spurs, but they had that incredible

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 3>upset of the Spurs as well, where they tanked to

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 3>get the eighth spot to draw the Spurs and then

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 3>knocked them out in six games, which was really an

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 3>incredible effort by a Memphis team, but you just kind

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 3>of knew what you were getting with the Grizzlies every

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 3>single season. A tough team at the Grindhouse, there was

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 3>a real, real tough place to win, and it's just

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 3>a pity they never made it through to the NBA Finals.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I would like to have seen that team, you know,

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 3>because they were very well liked as well, Marcusol, Mike Conley,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Tony Allen, then Vince when he came along as well.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>So they were one of those teams that I think

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone kind of had as a second team, you know,

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 3>people sort of like to see them perform, but they

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 3>just never quite got over the line there. But they

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 3>were fun, they were fun to watch it, and they

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>were always always tough in those playoff games. That had

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 3>a couple of good series against a Thunder as well,

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 3>which are pretty good. So you know, I think it's

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 3>an era that again, casual basketball fans, I don't think

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 3>we'll remember, but us hardcores who covered it, we'll say

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 3>they were fun team. They were fun teams to g four. Anyway,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>To add a team to the list for the future,

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the current Bucks team. The current Bucks team when we

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.959
<v Speaker 1>do this question ten years from now, they'll be on

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>my list. Like we're talking, you know, the last couple

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of Bucks teams here, I forgot, like the nineteen twenty Bucks,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, pre pandemic. They were the earliest team to

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>clinch a playoff berth since nineteen eighty four. They had

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that wrapped up quickly. They were in finish fifty six

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen again in a very weird year. They had

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that eighteen game winning streak. Of course, just flamed out

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. But this has been the very successful

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is like Budenholzer's Hawks teams. Of course,

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>very successful regular season team and came up short in

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Now, will they make a huge move this offseason,

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>try and get a Chris Paul somebody else to go

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>even further, try and make a finals, maybe even win

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a title. Then that changes this, But I guess I'm

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>banking on that not being the case. And then unfortunately,

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like you know, going out in the second round again,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it's like, wow, this team won like basically

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty games three years in a row. They had MVP

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>back to back three times, for all we know, had

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>all these great players and they just couldn't get even

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to the conference finals. That's rough. So we'll go box

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>looking in the future, looking at them a crystal ball.

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But I liked your answers. Those are great. I love

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Wizards one and the Great and Grind Grizzlies for

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the casual fan, no doubt. I'm sure the people in

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the stream teamers are maybe throwing out some other ones too.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't have my eye on it.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, sort of in your wheelhouse of the Milwaukee Bucks,

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 2>the twenty fifteen Hawks, the sixty games.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, what's the common denomen today?

0:30:54.640 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here, make your best Budenholzer face. Lee. That's great audio.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, early two thousand Celtics made a conference final. According

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to Adjacent Fire thirty four the old Pierce and Antoine Walker.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>That was somewhat random. Yeah, the random conference finalists here there.

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about the Mellow Nuggets in that light.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 2>They know snuck one in there. But yeah, it's hard

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 2>to repeat those. As far as just success getting to

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 2>finals that are forgotten, it's hard to repeat what the

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>nets did. And you know three when you're looking for

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>somebody that's forgotten.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just that I'm still like, I'm still

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not Yeah, like I keep going what they made it

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to back to back finals of two oh three. I mean,

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is weird too. They played two different teams. Yeah,

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just and just and didn't really have much of it.

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know they I guess it. Well, the

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.959
<v Speaker 1>one did go along right, the one series it. Yeah,

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it's so so strange. Yeah too, that serious, that's so weird.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I always remember because to Kembi Mtamba was the center

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>for the Sixers that went to the finals in one,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and then he got traded to the Nets and was

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the center for the Nets two thousand and two, and

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 2>then you get a Todd McCullough center for two thousand

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and three Pinball Wizard.

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And maybe a part of this too is

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're not even the New Jersey Nets anymore,

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Like they're not Like it's just like it feels like

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a completely different team, even though it's of course the

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>same franchise in Brooklyn. Yeah, it's still weird to me

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that they went back to back, But that's it. If

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you can beat that one, let us know in the

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>stream team or tweet at us at no Dunks.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Inc Hello shop blockers. Reading about recent Rockets history, when

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Darryl Morey stepped down, I was reminded multiple times of

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Houston missing twenty seven straight threes in Game seven against

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 2>the Warriors back in twenty eighteen. It struck me that

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 2>those few words twenty seven straight threes would be enough

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>to ruin any Rockets fans day. It's got me thinking

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of other short phrases that haunt certain NBA fan bases.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Three one lead for Warriors fans, four bounces for Sixers, faithful,

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and lebronto for Raptors fans are just a few recent examples.

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Can you guys think of any other NBA moments that

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 2>torment a specific teams fan base in just a few words?

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 2>This question ended up being a lot more evil than

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I intended. Turnips animal crossing. That's from Mitch in Coburg Lee,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>what do you think?

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've got one for both you guys, and I'm

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty sure it's gonna work. I'm going to test out

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 3>my theory here. What's the score? Chris Child? Oh?

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>How dare you? I can picture that play so vividly?

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>What was he?

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 3>What was he doing?

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Man?

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 3>What was he doing?

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know?

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Because it was off a free throw too. The Stackhouse

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 3>hit a free throw, so you know it wasn't like

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't in open play per.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Se, crazy turnover exactly.

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, yeah, so they had time.

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a point guard too.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he was good when he Yeah, I think

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 3>he only played like a year and a half in trot.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 3>I thought he was very good when in Toronto. But

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 3>he just yeah, he just blew it. And uh man,

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 3>that was a tough way to lose that series.

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what year is that again?

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 3>It's a two thousand and two two?

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, I couldn't remember.

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 4>So three.

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I got one. I've got one more. This one's

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 3>a more generic, it's more for the entire league rather

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 3>than just the team. But with the second pick in

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 3>the nine point ninety four NBA draft, that's good, Triblazers,

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 3>that's good.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That's good. I got a couple here. I think you

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>would anger a lot of sun Sands if you brought

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>up I don't even know if you need to throw

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the player's name. You just say hipcheck, the Robert Horriy hipcheck,

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which obviously got some key players suspended in that series.

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that was going to be the one where Phoenix

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>went to the finals. Maybe one MAVs fans, I mean,

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>things turned out well for them down the line, But

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>if you just said the we believe Warriors to MAVs fans,

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a rough one to try and swallow.

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>And then for Kings fans, I mean, you either just

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>say two thousand and two Western Conference Finals, you say

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>forty free throw attempts. Maybe you just say twenty seven

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter free throw attempts. Maybe just say Dick Movetta.

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of things that are going to

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>trigger that Game six of that game where they got

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers got a very kind whistle. Though if you remember,

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and I've heard other Kings players, even I think Doug

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Christie has said this, like they had a Game seven

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>at home and they missed fourteen free throws in that one.

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>They missed them, so it was not a referee anyone

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>doing that to them, and that ultimately helped them blow

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that game and blow their chances of maybe winning a title.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So those are the three that came to mind for

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>poor Sons, MAVs and Kings fans. You got anything else to.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Add to just just quickly imagine we had a King's Nets.

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 3>Finally in two thousand and two, you might not have

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 3>even remembered that one at all.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I'd be super upset. Mike Bibby would have a ring

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>with the Kings, right, you got anything to us?

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>That's a little like Detroit San Antonio in two thousand

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and five. It's a bit of the forgotten series. Well,

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the Mailman doesn't deliver on Sundays, kills Jazz fans. I

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 2>mean two free throws, just needed one. Now, they probably

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 2>would have lost if they hit one, if Carl didn't

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>hit both, because samj went down the other end banged

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 2>that home and that was the end of that series. Well,

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean the malice at the Palace for Pacers fans specifically,

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 2>because the Pistons had just come off winning the title

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and then this, So I don't think it hurts them

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 2>as much. It hurts that ron Our Test was gone

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of that season. That team was good.

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, you talk about the Suns potentially making the

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.959
<v Speaker 2>finals if there wasn't the suspensions and the hipchack there.

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Pacers were awesome with ron Our Test

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and Jermaine O'Neil, and things just fell apart from there.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 2>I think for Hornets fans, just Kobe one word. They

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>drafted Kobe and traded them for bloody Devots. It could

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 2>have been a lot different if they had Kobe Bryant

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 2>on their team. And a weird one but sort of

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 2>like the We Believe Warriors for cast fans, Lebron in

0:36:56.560 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten, but also Lebron coming back and helping them win.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 2>But that was, you know, it was a storybook in

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 2>a weird way. But we all remember the Jerseys burning

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 2>in twenty ten.

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you was in that one. You would say

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the decision for sure that that would trigger some maybe

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Cat's hands, but you're right, ended up working out for everybody.

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's great. That's a fun question. That's a great question, Mitch.

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And again, if you got answers, let us know on

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the stream team or tweet them in at No Dunk.

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Think we got lots of questions still to get to here,

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but first a quick word from our sponsors. All right,

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>next question here, Dear nude onlookers. A friend who doesn't

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>watch a ton of basketball remarked during the finals that

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Heat logo looks like garlic. I looked at

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it closely and lo and behold, it does look like

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a well defined hunk of garlic with a wispy little haircut.

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, Which other NBA logos could moonlight as foods? Ps?

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Grammarly help me make this email clear and more concise.

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Turnips love the trade stock them from Angelo in Brooklyn. Yes, okay,

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I mean I can see the garlic there

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and in the Heat logo, but any other MBIA logos

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that can moonlightest foods?

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Task? Well, it's really good. The Heat one is really good.

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a quick look at that garlic.

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I see it.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Totally totally true. I found this a little difficult. But

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 2>when I looked at the Blazer's logo, okay, kind of

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:28.720
<v Speaker 2>looks like a bowl of spaghetti. Okay, at all those noodles,

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 2>or specifically, if if you put that fork in there

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and you give it a twirl, there, it is right right,

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 2>right right, you got a fork full of spaghetti right there.

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 2>So Blazer's logo, classic logo right there.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I looked at all these logos, I was struggling to

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>come up an answer. I did. I did stop on

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the Blazers one, and I was like, this looks like

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>something but I couldn't get to swatty task way to

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>do it, h Lee, any luck with any of the

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>other ones, same as you.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh my god, what am I saying it?

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 3>The only thing I can sort of see is the

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Indiana pieces Like I was kind of someone holding like

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 3>chicken drumstick or a ticky tru.

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, not bad like the fair right example, times I

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>got the turkey leg exactly that that's the best one

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.959
<v Speaker 1>I could come up with some Yeah, but they've changed

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 1>so much over the eas as well.

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's like everybody, I mean, they should have been.

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>You think you've seen NBA logo, you figured out the food,

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like they go and change the logo.

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Crazy crazy, Yes, there's an old there's old rockets are

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 2>that it's kind of looks like it's dripping at the bottom,

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 2>like it's kind of like barbecue sauce, and like it

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 2>looks like it's definitely dipped into something. But the R

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look like food, right right.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And and I'll just say this now, okay, just save yourself,

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>save the email of sending us in pointing out if

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you turn the bulls logo upside down, it's like a

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>robot reading a Bible. Okay, that's been around since the

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Wizards were battling Lebron James in the playoffs. So just

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to let us know. We're well aware

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy. You're right, it looks like a robot and

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's so funny that comes around. But once a year

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that just like gets like finds life again on Twitter

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or on the blogs or look at this. Yep, we've

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>been looking at that for fifteen plus years. I'm sure

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I blogged about that in one of my first years,

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and it will be around. It's amazing though, all.

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 5>Right, what about the uh, I don't know if you

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 5>remember back in twenty sixteen when Jaegermeister went after the

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 5>Bucks for their Yogo like that.

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 1>It's paid gretty close. It's pretty Yeah, it is. It is. Indeed,

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are you a Yagermester family.

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I've had it, but uh not for I don't know.

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't tell you the last time I've had it,

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 3>but you know I've tried it. Yeah, very fine.

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever done what's it called a doctor pepper?

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think call it a doctor pepper where you

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>drop a shot at Yager yagermester in a in a

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>pint of beer and you taste like doctor Pepper.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think I've ever done that. No, I

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 3>think I've just had shots of it, and it's like

0:40:58.200 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn'd see what the big deal is? That's special?

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Great that week? Clear it up?

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 3>All that a big shot. I'm just not a big

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 3>shots guy, to be honest with, I'm not a big

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 3>shots guy.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, trying to think because you're not twenty.

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I know. One night, I remember having a

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 3>few too many tequila slammers and oh that made a

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 3>bit of a mess of me that day. Yeah, I

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 3>remember I came home because I'd been out and I

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 3>and I slept all day and Mum was just like,

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 3>what did you drink last night? Because you're usually not

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>that bad like you're usually if you hung over, usually

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 3>up at about But I was just did bed all day.

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 3>A cool story, bro. Think I was drinking tequila a

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 3>little bit too much tequila?

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, Lee, we've never done a shot while we

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 1>watched the EFL Grand Finals.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Ah, Hey, it's on tomorrow morning, four thirty in the morning.

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You're going to do it tequila shot at in the morning.

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Let's do Sambuka instead. I think that's uh, that's ok.

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 5>You gotta do Bundy. You're of Bunder, Yeah, that's yeah.

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 5>The Australian basically is the Australian screech for the Canadians

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 5>out there.

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>There you go. So, yeah, this is going to be

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time in a long time. We're not getting

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>together to watch it obviously, unfortunately.

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, but like I think I got it wrong.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 3>It's actually four thirty our time as first bounce they started,

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:22.240
<v Speaker 3>they started daylight saving out on the East Coast before

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 3>we've ended it here.

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So and that's weird because we usually watch it at

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>night here in America because they play the game during

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the day. But yes, you're saying, for the first time whatever,

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're playing this at night over.

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 3>There, first time ever, First time ever a night ground final.

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>First time does the ball bounce differently under the moon lane?

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean most of the big games are played at

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:43.240
<v Speaker 3>night anyway now because of the TV audience, But first

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 3>time ever, it's not been in the MCG part from

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety one they had it at a different ground

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 3>because they were renovating the MCG. So a lot of

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 3>traditionalists like it's not the same. It's not in Melbourne.

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:55.439
<v Speaker 3>But it's a game.

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Who's in the who's in the final.

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Two Victorian teams Ironic Richmond again, Richmond going for their

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 3>thirty four years against Geelong. So go Kats, I'm going

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 3>with the Tigers. I'm going for the Tigers.

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Go on Cats.

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, I think I would say Richmond are probably

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 3>about a ten to fifteen point favorite. I would say

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I would say, okay, see, yeah.

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good luck to both teams. I hope it's a

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>high scoring affair. Yeah, is that what you say?

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean you cleaned up last year. Remember you

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 3>won the you want the money line?

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I did. I'm really good at picking up.

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I want a footy in the raffle. You've got a

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 3>six pack. It was a great It was our best

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 3>night last year for sure.

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to miss this. I can't believe our tradition

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.839
<v Speaker 1>is coming to and end. I'm coming over in your

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>house forour thirty in the morning. All right, bring it

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to killer. We got along long one here. Let's get

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to it.

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Does a Geelong play before their games that they played

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Jelong Jeong Jelung Gelong Jeeng Jelong lung Lee, long, long, long,

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Sorry about that. Listen JD. Get the cool story bro

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 2>audio drop here. I can't talk the cool story drop

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 2>for this guy here Hey absence of jams. On the

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 2>latest Beach episode, Lee sounded truly terrifying when talking about

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the delivery room slash stinky beef situation. I don't think

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 2>he would ever actually kill a man, but I probably

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't make any assumptions about a man who sits backwards

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:23.240
<v Speaker 2>on a toilet to bee. I had my own smelly

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 2>delivery room situation when my son was born in April,

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 2>but I was the villain. My wife was going on

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 2>hour eighteen in the hospital and I was getting hungry,

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 2>so I ordered some Chipotle delivery for dinner. Unfortunately, immediately

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 2>after I ordered, the doctor came in and decided it

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 2>was time for the epidural. As the nurses prepared to

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 2>inject a giant needle into my wife's spine, I got

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 2>an alert that my delivery driver had arrived, so I

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 2>slowly slunk out of my room to grab my food.

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Since this was peak quarantine, no eating was allowed in

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 2>any public areas, so I returned to the delivery room

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 2>and ate my delicious burrito bowl in the corner, all

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 2>while my wife glared at me. She hadn't been allowed

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 2>to eat a proper meal since over eighteen hours ago,

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 2>and here I was crushing a massive Chipotle bowl. I

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 2>had to order double meat to hit a delivery minimum,

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 2>which only made things worse. Yeah, I'm sure your wife

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 2>was looking over evening this guy order double meat. Needless

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to say, what I thought would be a nice, hearty

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 2>dinner instead turned into an absolute disaster. Bringing it back

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to basketball, hopefully the baby went. Okay. What are your

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 2>favorite examples of NBA teams thinking they're set up for

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 2>success only to totally implode in hilarious fashion. Turn up,

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 2>love you guys. Awesome. That's from Steve Ward in Chicago

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 2>eating at Chipotle bowl horror. Thanks Steve for sending that in.

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they named their baby Chipotle? Chipotle Ward?

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Wack?

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>What's your baby's name? Extraquak?

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:54.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so back to basketball. That was a very cool story, bro,

0:45:57.480 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. I did like it. I enjoyed it. I

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>glove I included it, And you're right, Leewood, I think

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Lee would kill a man. I think, yes, yes, that

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was You're saying like that, you have I haven't.

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in that hospital room, that was his clasest of

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 3>common and I would have leaded guilty, but of also

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 3>said I'm not going to jil for that because he

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.360
<v Speaker 3>deserved it, so right right, changing the rules.

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So yeah, favorite examples of NBA teams that were

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of set up and they imploded. I got a couple.

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>One of them I already mentioned in this podcast, The Mavericks.

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a rough one. I mean they were the Mavericks

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 1>were sixty seven and fifteen and O six oh seven.

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a hell of a record, you know, after having

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>just made the finals year before, Dirk won MVP and

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they got sort of embarrassed by the We Believe Warriors.

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you had Steven Jackson shutting down the MVP

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in Dirk and Matt Barnes all up in his shorts

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. So hey, I don't know if

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it's hilarious, but that was, like, damn, that's a real

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>good team. Losing to an eight seed there twenty ten

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to eleven heat is an obvious one, just because they

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are the not one, not two, not three, blah blah blah.

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>The decision of the super team the Villains, and they

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lose the first year. Of course they had some success

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>after that, but to see them lose, I think people

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>were loving that. They were relishing the fact that especially

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Lebron came up short after going down to South Beach

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>taking his talents. And then I'll add one more. I'll

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>say recent one. I think a lot of people enjoyed

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the twenty nineteen twenty Clippers imploding and blowing a three

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to one lead themselves to the Denver Nuggets. A lot

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of people dislike Paul George, A lot of people dislike

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Beverley in Kawhi even polarizing, I think to some

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people with the load management, and then of course Toronto

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and Canada and him leaving. You know, some people upset,

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 1>some people, not like myself. But I think people took

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>some little joy in them falling to the Nuggets after

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>being up three one. So those are three that come

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to mind. You got anything to add there, Ley.

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just on the Kawhi stuff. I think it

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 3>is very interesting because the rept has won the championship,

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and when Kawhi took off twenty two games, but the

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 3>championship sort of pipe it over any cracks because if

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 3>he left off for a year, let's say that four bounds,

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 3>it didn't go in filling, they lose. I think there

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 3>would have been like, man, the Raptors players didn't like

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Kawhi took off games whenever he felt

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 3>like it, but they won and won the championship, whereas

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the Clippers now it's like, see, you didn't you did

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 3>all that load management and we came up short. So

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 3>then they start turning on each other a bit, they

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 3>start pointing the fingers a.

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Bit, you know.

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's an interesting scenario that's playing out there. So

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 3>for me, I've got a couple two. The twenty twelve

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirteen LA Lakers were second favorite heading into that season,

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.479
<v Speaker 3>second championship favorite behind the Miami Heat. That's, of course,

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 3>with Dwight and Steve Nash, and they got swept by

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the Spurs in the first round. They had a few injuries.

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 3>But there's a fantastic if out there of Dwight Howard

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 3>sort of slunking to the bench and Tim Duncan just

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.879
<v Speaker 3>smiling the whole way, just like in a classic Tim

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Duncan fashion, like just laughing at Dwight because they went in.

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 3>They had that Sports Illustrated cover with they had the

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Union shorts and singlets they were wearing, and it just

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:02.320
<v Speaker 3>fell as it's gonna be fun exactly. It fell apart

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 3>very very quickly. And then the other one is the

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:09.919
<v Speaker 3>twenty twelve thirteen Brooklyn Nets roster. Of course they made

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 3>the huge trade there in the office. It was at

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 3>thirteen fourteen. Actually maybe it might be off the season there,

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 3>but it was when the Nets gave up three unprotected

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 3>first round picks for Pearson Garnette and I think Jason

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Terry as well, And we knew that was short sighted

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 3>at the time. And if you look at some of

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the players the Celtics have got out of that draft now,

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 3>like Brown and Tatum done just keeps on coming back

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 3>to haunt the Brooklyn Nets. So that was pretty fun.

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, of course, they did upset the Raptors in

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 3>the first round, which is not fun. Another sort of

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 3>bad day for the Raptors here, but then they got

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.919
<v Speaker 3>killed by the heat again. Lebron and Dwayne Wade killed

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 3>them in the second round. So I think people enjoyed

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 3>seeing just how desperate the Nets were to win and

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 3>the expectations at the owner Prokerov gave them and they

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 3>gave up their Miliga to the future, and they didn't

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 3>even get close to a championship. So a couple of

0:49:58.239 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 3>fun ones.

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 2>There barely is not my GM just feeling this thing

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, Billy making a bad move there. To me,

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I go back for a team that really disappointed after

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the expectations were really high. I go back to two thousand,

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Tracy McGrady and grand Hill teaming up with the Orlando Magic.

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 2>I just thought, two Hall of famers in their prime,

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna win a playoff series. One they didn't win

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 2>a playoff series. Now, a lot of that has to

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 2>do with grand Hill, no doubt, because he was injured.

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, he had some serious injuries where he had

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:35.840
<v Speaker 2>a staff infection and he had rushed him back to

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the hospital and that was really worrisome. I think he

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 2>had one hundred and four fever. So amazing that he

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 2>came back to play the way he did for such

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a long career. But I just thought Tracy McGrady, he

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.479
<v Speaker 2>left the Raptors for a reason to be the number

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:51.719
<v Speaker 2>one guy, and it's crazy when you look back. He

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.799
<v Speaker 2>led the league in scoring twice as a member of

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 2>the Magic. He was a baller. He was an All

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 2>NBA player all four seasons that he was there, which

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 2>I totally forgot. Twice on first team, twice on the

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 2>second team. But the embarrassing part enters in in two

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 2>thousand and three. If you guys remember, they were playing

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the Pistons and they're up three to one, and Tracy

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 2>McGrady was at the podium and he said, it feels

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 2>good to get into the second round. Now. Maybe he

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 2>forgot that the five game series had been gone that season.

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Maybe thought it was a five game series and they won,

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 2>but the Orlando Magic blew that three to one lead

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and the Pistons came back because they used that as

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:38.959
<v Speaker 2>bolton board material, I'm pretty sure. And Tracey McGrady didn't

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 2>get out of the first round there, so that was

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 2>that was ugly stuff. Grant Hill and Tracy McGrady. You

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 2>just thought those two amazing players, but didn't come together whatsoever.

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 2>And then McGrady left and went to Houston and balled

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 2>out there. He was amazing there, but the playoffs sort

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 2>of haunted him as well.

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>For sure. All right, our next one here, Hi, guys,

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I discovered you on my road trip across the country

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>while I was moving from State College Pennsylvania back to

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles this past summer. It was right before the

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Bubble relaunched, and you guys had been doing a bunch

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of stories on what was happening leading up to it.

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It was on my stretch of drive driving from Dallas

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to New Mexico on I ten that I decided to

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>really get back in the know of what was going

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:25.319
<v Speaker 1>on in the bubble. And a few podcasts later, I

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:27.799
<v Speaker 1>was hooked on No Dunks. I got a dog back

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in August, and No Dunks has been my official dog

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>walking podcast. Oh thank you. Has there ever been a

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>time you were on a long drive or doing something

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 1>so boring you decided to listen to something new and

0:52:40.000 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>then you got hooked. Keep up the good work. That's

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>from Virginia. Now back in Los Angeles, task what you got?

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I got a weird one. For some reason, I can't

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 2>remember why. I was looking at the top charts of

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Apple podcasts because I needed just something to listen to.

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 2>So I had listened to Joe Rogan a little bit

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a long time. This was I don't know seven, eight,

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 2>nine years ago. I don't know how long it was,

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 2>but Joe Rogan's been around for a long time, so

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I thought, oh, I'll just click on to Joe Rogan here.

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 2>But I wasn't clicking on a Joe Rogan. I clicked

0:53:13.440 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 2>on the Joe Rogan Experience. Experience, a show that recapped

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 2>the Joe Rogan Show.

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I started listening to these three guys are

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:25.160
<v Speaker 2>just talking about Joe Rogan and the stories he was

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:27.839
<v Speaker 2>telling on the latest episode, and they were saying, you know,

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a great episode. I've heard those Joe Rogan

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 2>stories before. I'm like, this was on the top charts.

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 2>It was I don't know, ten, eleven, twelve. It was

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 2>way up there, while Joe Rogan was, you know, obviously

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 2>hovering at the top. But because of Joe Rogan's name,

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 2>this got up there. And it wasn't a very good

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 2>experience listening to this experience. So I gotta be honest,

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if they're still on top of the charts,

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:55.319
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think they are, so that experience not

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 2>so good.

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:00.799
<v Speaker 1>We should start a podcast commenting on them. On Joe

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Road Layers We together. Wow, that's crazy.

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 2>What happened to the two of the Week Army podcast, which.

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Is I was going there for a while.

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I'll go next year because I've done a

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>long road trip. I've driven back to Canada once or

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>twice here a couple of years ago. Now of course,

0:54:17.480 --> 0:54:21.480
<v Speaker 1>from Atlanta. It's a long drive fourteen fifteen, sixteen hours

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and one of those trips we this was all Nora's doing.

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:32.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, she's plugged into the the crime podcasts. She

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>found one called crime Town, that's what it's called. And man,

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I was hooked. We were both hooked. It made the

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>drive go so quick because it's like a serial documentary

0:54:42.120 --> 0:54:44.919
<v Speaker 1>podcast produced by Gimblet Media. This is years ago now,

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I think twenty sixteen is when it started. It's about

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 1>how organized crime has shaped like particular American cities. And

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the first whole season was about Providence, Rhode Island. You know,

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:56.959
<v Speaker 1>so a city I know nothing about, had no idea.

0:54:57.000 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>There's all these mob ties and all these weird characters

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in this organized crime so well done. The characters in

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 1>this are amazing. It's real. And I think it was

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.919
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen official episodes and then there was a bunch

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of bonus episodes and I just remember that drive like

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it was like we're not stopping, Like I mean, like

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm so into this, I'm so in the zone drive

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're making great time here and like this is

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just the hours are flying by because we're just enthralled

0:55:24.440 --> 0:55:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with this podcast. So Crime Town shout out to Crimetown

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>again twenty sixteen. I think they maybe started to do

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a second season about Detroit. I think I didn't. I

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a trip to go on, so I wasn't

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to it, So you can correct me if I'm

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong some some of the listeners out there. I don't

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 1>even know if they continued with it, but look it

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>up if you ever got a long drive Crime Town

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:47.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen about Providence, Rhode Island. It's fascinating stuff just

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>because the characters the guys are talking to are amazing.

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Su I don't care, we're going We're finishing this episode

0:55:57.360 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at least, even if it ends us on the side

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting. Yeah, it's so good. You got an answer.

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I haven't been on a long road

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:07.839
<v Speaker 3>trip for a while, but we've been on a couple

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:10.359
<v Speaker 3>of two or three hour trips with the boys, and

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 3>I just have to say the listening and driving experience

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:15.919
<v Speaker 3>is different when you've got kids because they don't care

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:17.799
<v Speaker 3>what you want to listen to. They want to listen

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:20.320
<v Speaker 3>to their own music over and over and over again,

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 3>and if you want to stay sane, you just have

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:25.800
<v Speaker 3>to sort of bow and give in. And they like music.

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 3>But sometimes I just like the Despicable Me soundtrack as well,

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:34.239
<v Speaker 3>Minions and stuff like that. And sometimes you're driving along

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 3>and I'm a little bit different to you. I'm driving

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 3>as fast as I can to get to the destination

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 3>so I can turn it off because you're driving long here.

0:56:41.680 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I can't do it. But you hear the Despicable Meets

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 3>voices and it's just like over and over one more time, dad,

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Especially the eight year old is not too bad, but

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the four year olds at that stage like again again again,

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and you're just like, oh my god, no more, please please.

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:01.520
<v Speaker 5>This is why you're a great I'm a good dad.

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:04.799
<v Speaker 5>You're a great dad, because I would never do that

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 5>ever in a million years. You're listening to what I

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:11.280
<v Speaker 5>want to listen to. There's no way that I'm listening

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 5>to the to whatever they want to listen to.

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Not a chance.

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, I guess I start the trip by not

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 3>saying anything about the music. I just sort of hope

0:57:21.560 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 3>that no one's listening. But you know, after half an hour,

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:25.360
<v Speaker 3>they're like, can we listen to this? Can we listen

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 3>to that? And I'm just like, all right, I've tried.

0:57:27.760 --> 0:57:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I've tried resisting in the past, but it just creates

0:57:30.520 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 3>a worse environment, I guess, I have to say. I

0:57:33.200 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 3>probably when it's just me and Rocksander in the car,

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably like, driver decides no, there's no negotiation there.

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:42.080
<v Speaker 3>But the kids will wear you down. Man, They're wear.

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You I can't believe I've yelled to the backseat. We're

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to English Nick and the.

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 3>River, Ah Man exactly ninety seven Won the River.

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 1>That's great. I was just listening to it this morning.

0:57:55.680 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I'll tell you what. The boys they love.

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I love a couple. I love Queen, I love Will Smith,

0:58:03.680 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 3>and I love Britney Spears as well. So you know,

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 3>we get a little bit of sort of nineties music

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 3>and sort of seventies and nineties music in there as well.

0:58:12.640 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 3>So I don't mind it.

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:58:13.760 --> 0:58:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I like Big Will, I like Queen, Britney's kai JD.

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Do you have an answer for this, well, it's it's

0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of almost. The birth of this podcast was I

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 5>discovered podcasting, not while I was driving, but when I

0:58:28.840 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 5>was doing a little show called Kaiu back in the day.

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 5>It was two thousand and four, two thousand and five,

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 5>and I was tasked with doing the feat only I

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 5>only did the feat that first season of Cayu.

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So I would sit there.

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 5>And I couldn't stand Kyu's voice, so I muted the

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:50.919
<v Speaker 5>dialogue track and all I would do is just add feet.

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Every time there was a footstep on the screen, I

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 5>would have to add a sound effect. So uh, And

0:58:57.200 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 5>it was right when Lost had just come out. The

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Lost came out in two thousand and four, so as

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:04.920
<v Speaker 5>I was listening to audiobooks, but it was starting to

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 5>get a little expensive. So then I discovered iTunes podcasts

0:59:09.400 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 5>and I listened to three different Lost podcasts. Those were

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 5>my first, my first foray into podcasts, and they were terrible,

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 5>but I listened to them and I was like, I

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 5>could do this, we could do this. Let's let's do

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 5>a podcast. And the basketball Jones was born.

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow, so we can actually thank Cayu, I guess, and

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Lost started starting the basket down the hatch we go.

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:39.000
<v Speaker 2>There was another podcast you were listening to at the time.

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a couple right out.

0:59:40.800 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Keith and the Girl. I think they might still be going.

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 5>I think they're still going. So they're they're like O

0:59:46.680 --> 0:59:47.000
<v Speaker 5>G S.

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I even I remember that one, Keith and the Girl.

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Good call. Great questions, guys. Let's take one more quick

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 1>break before we get to a few more all right,

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>few more questions. We got wrapped over? Run long here today.

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:03.560
<v Speaker 2>What's up, yeah, floaters. When I had my birthday a

1:00:03.640 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks ago, my brother showed me a video.

1:00:06.840 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>It was the one and only Skeets wishing me a

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>happy birthday. I was so surprised and so happy that

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>I had to hold back a few tears of joy.

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Normally I kind of expect the gifts I get, but

1:00:18.800 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>that video surprised me so much it kind of overshadowed

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>all the other gifts of the day. So my question

1:00:24.880 --> 1:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to you guys is when was the time you received

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>a gift that you would have never expected? Greetings from Germany.

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>That's from Paul Grimmig. Thank you for the email. Paul Skeats,

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:34.520
<v Speaker 2>This one's all you.

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's fantastic. I'm happy to hear someone in Paul's

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>life came through with the cameo from old Skeatzy. Go

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to cameo dot com find Jay Skeets if you want

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a message from me. All that money goes to charity anyway,

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>so might as well do it if you want a

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>video from me, I enjoyed doing them. They are a

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun, so I'm glad you liked it, Paul.

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>My answer for this, I already talked once about Nora

1:00:53.960 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>surprising me with a trip to Dublin way back in

1:00:56.080 --> 1:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the day. That was cool because that's when we didn't

1:00:57.600 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>have any money either. We were basically poor, you know,

1:01:01.160 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get by in Toronto, which is a expensive

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>damn city. But then she somehow sprung this little trip

1:01:06.400 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to Dublin for like four days. That was awesome. But

1:01:08.360 --> 1:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>most recently, Nora made me a photo book of one

1:01:13.520 --> 1:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of our favorite trips to Western Canada when I went

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to went to Vernon, British Columbia to see friends, and

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>then we went Nora and I we went sort of

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a road trip to Bamfed National Park and Jasper National

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Park and it was such an awesome trip. We were

1:01:25.240 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>gone for like three or four weeks. So she did

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the old classic, you know, sort of scrap book, I guess,

1:01:30.480 --> 1:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you can like upload the photos to

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>these services now and like make these really slick productions.

1:01:34.760 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So this was one of my birthday gifts. It was awesome,

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and we got a second one for free because they

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>accidentally put a weird caption on one of the photos,

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like in BAMF National Park. It said like accidentally I

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know how it said, like Mongolia or something like that.

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like cam Body or something some weird country that

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they just for some reason slapped on there. So they

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>sent us another one. But yeah, that was a nice gift.

1:01:58.040 --> 1:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a thoughtful gift. Come man, there's like a legit book.

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>We obviously had a ton of photos from seeing friends

1:02:03.760 --> 1:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and doing a bunch of stuff and going to all

1:02:05.160 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>these parks. I mean, it took her a lot of

1:02:07.680 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>time and effort to put into this, so something like

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's always next level. So that was very very

1:02:12.120 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of her.

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>That's my buddy Grish's move. That's Buddy Grish. Didn't make

1:02:16.440 --> 1:02:18.920
<v Speaker 2>it the scrap the scrap book for everything. Took a

1:02:18.960 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>trip down to the store and made a scrap book.

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But here's me buying some eggs at Public's. Yeah, he

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>does like that. That's a that's a Gris move. But

1:02:29.480 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this Nora did it a lot better than any of

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one I've seen from Grish. I'll tell you that.

1:02:33.200 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 2>It's easy to make a mistake on those captions. That

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>wasn't very stake, but.

1:02:37.560 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was just a yeah, it was just a

1:02:39.640 --> 1:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>random thing.

1:02:40.400 --> 1:02:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I think.

1:02:40.720 --> 1:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the heck popped in there on

1:02:42.400 --> 1:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the photos. But you're right, a ton of work.

1:02:44.040 --> 1:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Because you're right, it's not just the photos. There are

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like this is when we were doing this, or this

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is where we were and stuff like that. So it's

1:02:50.120 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely well done.

1:02:51.600 --> 1:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>You've done that before, haven't you shut her fly before?

1:02:54.040 --> 1:02:56.920
<v Speaker 3>I shot a fly tons of stuff basically every Mother's

1:02:56.960 --> 1:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Day and anniversary, roxanner, I do something off. So we've

1:03:00.600 --> 1:03:04.480
<v Speaker 3>got plates and bowls and mugs and drinking bottles and

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:07.000
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of stuff covered in photos. Yeah, we've got

1:03:07.040 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>scrapbooks all over the place. But because it's it's it's

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>good because otherwise your photos just stay on your phone. Yeah,

1:03:13.600 --> 1:03:16.040
<v Speaker 3>so many times you get I've got all these great photo,

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 3>especially from a trip. Then you get home and you

1:03:17.880 --> 1:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>just kind of forget about them. So you know, it's

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:23.240
<v Speaker 3>good thing. Roxana's birthday, our anniversary, and Mother's Day very

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:25.520
<v Speaker 3>very close by. So I just up like crazy on

1:03:25.560 --> 1:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>shutterfly for about six weeks and order all sorts of stuff,

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know, it's a bit repetitive, but it's fine.

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just you standing like this in every photo

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in a puffy jacket in front of the kids. It's great.

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>My mother in law for our kids, does it monthly?

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>We get a monthly Yeah.

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Kirbies do that too, don't they. I'm

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure they do.

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 3>We get something on Instagram where it's not monthly. It's

1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>like when you hit a certain amount of photos, they

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>just automatically triggers it.

1:03:54.600 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, yeah, Now it's it's a little much.

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Monthly is a little Yeah, that's you said, repetitive. It

1:04:02.600 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 2>gets it definitely gets a little repetitive. It's like when

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>you were young and you had a girlfriend for a

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>long period of time, did you celebrate monthly? Did you

1:04:11.560 --> 1:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>have a monthly anniversary? I did, mistake, just just do

1:04:15.440 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it every so often every few months. Now it is

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>really nice to have and get him off the phone.

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Lead he got an answer for this baby.

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Well kind of a little bit like what Skeetz was

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 3>saying there. A friend of mine once flew over from

1:04:26.960 --> 1:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I was in London. He flew from Australia on Emirates

1:04:29.320 --> 1:04:34.000
<v Speaker 3>to England and something happened on his flight and they

1:04:34.040 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 3>gave him a free return flight to Dubai from London,

1:04:37.720 --> 1:04:39.400
<v Speaker 3>but he didn't really need it because he had his

1:04:39.440 --> 1:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>return ticket and they weren't going to give him anything else.

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:44.680
<v Speaker 3>They said, this is what we give you, you can transfer

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>it to somebody else. And he gave me a ticket

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 3>to Dubai, one ticket, and I was like, oh, perfect,

1:04:49.840 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait. I'm going to use it for sure.

1:04:51.880 --> 1:04:55.200
<v Speaker 3>And I never used it because I was like, I

1:04:55.280 --> 1:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>kept trying to organize someone to go with because I

1:04:57.120 --> 1:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to go by myself, like all the way

1:04:59.600 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 3>out there, and it was one of those things I

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of got pushed back a few people like yeah,

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm in, and I'm out. I mean I'm out, and

1:05:05.160 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 3>then I ended up just not using it. It expired after

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>like eighteen months or something, I can't remember what it was,

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 3>and I was like, I can't believe I just had

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:12.600
<v Speaker 3>a free ticket to Dubai and I never used it,

1:05:12.640 --> 1:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>never been there, never been there. Wow, And I missed out.

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So many photos of you standing in front of We

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>missed out on you and you in the desert alone.

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we have photos of you in the desert.

1:05:23.520 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>And I wanted to do that thing you can do

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>in Dubai where apparently you can go surfing, you know,

1:05:28.200 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 3>on the same day you can go surfing outside and

1:05:30.040 --> 1:05:33.520
<v Speaker 3>then go inside to that massive skiing room. Have you

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:34.480
<v Speaker 3>been there? Did you do that?

1:05:34.520 --> 1:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been to Dubai. I didn't go that though.

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's what I would have done. But this was

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>before Twitter on Instagram, so would have it even been

1:05:39.960 --> 1:05:40.360
<v Speaker 3>worth it?

1:05:40.400 --> 1:05:40.640
<v Speaker 4>You know?

1:05:42.440 --> 1:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't make a scrap book.

1:05:45.640 --> 1:05:49.439
<v Speaker 2>A weird gift that I didn't expect. It was basketball. Really.

1:05:49.480 --> 1:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>At twenty seventeen All Star Game in New Orleans, check

1:05:53.200 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 2>into my hotel room. There's a bottle of champagne sitting

1:05:56.480 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>there with a card carde signed by Isaiah to Sherlin

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Champagne that he has brought into the NBA world and

1:06:05.960 --> 1:06:07.960
<v Speaker 2>was given to some of the media members there, And

1:06:08.000 --> 1:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>it was the first official champagne of a celebration of

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>a championship celebration. I guess that was associated with the

1:06:15.040 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Lakers this year. It wasn't really made a huge deal,

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, I was surprised to see that. And I

1:06:20.560 --> 1:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>just bring it up because I know it angers JD

1:06:22.880 --> 1:06:26.840
<v Speaker 2>because he didn't get a bottle of champagne and you too, LEA, right, Yeah.

1:06:26.520 --> 1:06:30.200
<v Speaker 3>And JD and I wrote the post all Style Games

1:06:30.240 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 3>party and someone took out details specifically and said it's coming,

1:06:35.120 --> 1:06:36.560
<v Speaker 3>It's on its way, and we're like, right.

1:06:37.000 --> 1:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Never hopes he exceeds this man.

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Where is it?

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Blake? Name Blake?

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember, but I remember getting excited at me

1:06:44.560 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 3>and JDB sort of like, great, we're getting a champagne

1:06:46.840 --> 1:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>as we deserve. As we deserve never showed up.

1:06:50.200 --> 1:06:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, there was no way we were getting that champagne.

1:06:52.520 --> 1:06:55.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean that was the night we were leaving, wasn't it, Like.

1:06:55.560 --> 1:06:57.600
<v Speaker 3>No, but they took our address to like send it

1:06:57.640 --> 1:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>to Atlanta there. Yeah.

1:06:59.000 --> 1:07:05.120
<v Speaker 5>Also, we worked the guy for three more years or whatever, and.

1:07:03.760 --> 1:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Every time he like mind drinking a.

1:07:07.440 --> 1:07:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Exactly you think he fills up the sirloin bottles with

1:07:10.840 --> 1:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>water after they're they're done just because because he uses

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>them on props as as props on this NBA TV set.

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Pretty they're drinking. I think they've got to connect. They're

1:07:21.920 --> 1:07:22.840
<v Speaker 2>not going through Blake.

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys get your bottle.

1:07:27.360 --> 1:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Of the champagne.

1:07:28.360 --> 1:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever get those jeans you were supposed to

1:07:30.120 --> 1:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>get in the mill from?

1:07:31.440 --> 1:07:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

1:07:32.320 --> 1:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>What was that guy's name? He was angry. He was

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>angry at my jeans, and he said he's gonna send

1:07:36.880 --> 1:07:39.680
<v Speaker 3>me a few pays. All right, great, never turned off,

1:07:39.880 --> 1:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>never got him old muzzlewamp.

1:07:41.720 --> 1:07:42.040
<v Speaker 4>That was.

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Mulewamp, didn't come.

1:07:48.600 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Didn't get your jeans swamp?

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, Alright, one more before we wrap this badly up.

1:07:56.600 --> 1:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey toe hunks, a long time, first time on one

1:07:59.360 --> 1:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of your recent beach step in episode, Skeets finally noticed

1:08:01.920 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that Lee and JD had sneakily replaced the stumpy feet

1:08:05.000 --> 1:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>guy in the opener with old eight toes. Yeah, there

1:08:08.680 --> 1:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they are. Now. I'm very much team podcast since I

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>listened to your show every day on the way to

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and from work. But when I heard this exchange, I

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>had to go back and watch the YouTube video. I

1:08:18.920 --> 1:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>was stunned to see that the first three toes on

1:08:22.360 --> 1:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>old eight toes right foot are fused, and that's why

1:08:25.920 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he's called old a toes. For some reason, I had

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>always assumed that old a toes was called old a

1:08:32.040 --> 1:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>toes because he was straight up missing one toe from

1:08:35.320 --> 1:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>each foot. I went all these years listening to your

1:08:38.720 --> 1:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>show thinking I knew all about your friend's bodies. But

1:08:41.200 --> 1:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>boy was I wrong. Anyways, my question to you is this,

1:08:43.800 --> 1:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>what's one time you thought you were in on a

1:08:45.520 --> 1:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>joke only to realize you had been solely mistaken the

1:08:48.240 --> 1:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>whole time? Eight toes Rhino sets grishow. That's from Bayon

1:08:53.840 --> 1:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>from London, Ontario, Canada. Shout out to London. I don't

1:08:59.600 --> 1:09:01.759
<v Speaker 1>really want answer to the question, but I'm one hundred

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>percent on board with what he thought. For the longest

1:09:05.439 --> 1:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>time we heard all day toes. I think I've said

1:09:07.240 --> 1:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this before. I thought that just meant that he had

1:09:11.520 --> 1:09:14.479
<v Speaker 1>four toes on each flat. I would have never, ever,

1:09:14.560 --> 1:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in a million years, I thought that it was because

1:09:17.400 --> 1:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>three of them were lumped into one fused together the appearance.

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Of ten, but three operators a single unit, so they

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:30.840
<v Speaker 3>only count as eight. Yeah, you know, now I've got

1:09:30.880 --> 1:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>another mate called KitKat who's missing. He was born without

1:09:33.800 --> 1:09:37.040
<v Speaker 3>a thumb, uh, and so he's only got four fingers.

1:09:38.000 --> 1:09:40.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's that's legit.

1:09:40.520 --> 1:09:49.479
<v Speaker 1>That's legit. What's going on in the water in Australia,

1:09:49.520 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you got oxygen water. He's weird body, you know, a

1:09:55.200 --> 1:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>nuclear place.

1:09:57.479 --> 1:09:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Kit Cats from South Africa.

1:09:58.960 --> 1:09:59.479
<v Speaker 4>So well.

1:10:02.200 --> 1:10:05.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's funny because you know, when you go to

1:10:05.040 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 3>meet somebody, it's on his right hand. So when you

1:10:07.000 --> 1:10:11.120
<v Speaker 3>shake hands, you know the thumb. You realize, yeah that

1:10:11.600 --> 1:10:13.439
<v Speaker 3>you expect the thumb to be there, and you slide

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:15.080
<v Speaker 3>right past and you sort of grab his forearm.

1:10:15.320 --> 1:10:16.519
<v Speaker 1>You're already bad at.

1:10:18.720 --> 1:10:20.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that one's one of those ones who're like, what

1:10:20.560 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the hell did I missed there? You know, but he

1:10:23.120 --> 1:10:24.800
<v Speaker 3>was born he was born without a thumb.

1:10:24.880 --> 1:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:10:25.120 --> 1:10:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a great guy kid cat. Yeah, sure, really

1:10:27.840 --> 1:10:29.800
<v Speaker 3>good guy. But you know he's sort of like you

1:10:29.800 --> 1:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>know people, every time you meet someone new that he's like,

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:34.280
<v Speaker 3>yeahs born without a thumb, No big deal.

1:10:35.520 --> 1:10:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Get pissed with you every time you do your old

1:10:37.640 --> 1:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>two thumbs up. I'll tell you that. You just fly

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in his face.

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:48.160
<v Speaker 3>He's a good sport kit cat. He's fine.

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Here's another guy who has a tattoo of leave. But

1:10:50.760 --> 1:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>it's just one from one thumber kit cat. That's legit.

1:10:55.400 --> 1:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>It's legit.

1:10:56.160 --> 1:11:01.519
<v Speaker 1>That's a great Honestly, it's just a fun thing to say.

1:11:01.600 --> 1:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>It's some perfectual. I'm on bre with that. I like that.

1:11:05.680 --> 1:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an answer for this, lee?

1:11:08.080 --> 1:11:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to think of one. Yeah, it is

1:11:10.360 --> 1:11:13.479
<v Speaker 3>because in school, you know, sometimes when like you would

1:11:13.680 --> 1:11:15.720
<v Speaker 3>you put the sticker on the back of someone that

1:11:15.760 --> 1:11:17.320
<v Speaker 3>says kick me and all that, you'll be in on that,

1:11:17.479 --> 1:11:19.920
<v Speaker 3>but sometimes you were the one who's been kicked as well.

1:11:21.400 --> 1:11:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I had another story, but that's that one's not appropriate

1:11:26.200 --> 1:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>to broadcast because of it involves a couple of people.

1:11:28.840 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 3>But that was a pretty funny story one time in Spain,

1:11:31.040 --> 1:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>actually in Barcelona.

1:11:33.360 --> 1:11:34.519
<v Speaker 1>That was a pretty funny story.

1:11:35.360 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 4>No.

1:11:36.160 --> 1:11:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to think, could I somehow shoehorn this

1:11:38.439 --> 1:11:41.240
<v Speaker 3>in without giving away the details? But no, I can't. Unfortunately,

1:11:41.280 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 3>sorry about that. But yeah, it's tough. It's tough, really,

1:11:46.400 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I think. I guess.

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess.

1:11:47.840 --> 1:11:50.840
<v Speaker 3>The only time we've all been in on a joke

1:11:50.960 --> 1:11:52.760
<v Speaker 3>is when we used to hide the orange gum from

1:11:52.800 --> 1:11:58.920
<v Speaker 3>our producer Matt, you know, because he would eat the

1:11:58.920 --> 1:12:01.680
<v Speaker 3>whole packet in like ten minutes and and act like

1:12:01.720 --> 1:12:04.400
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't. And so we would have a whole fresh,

1:12:04.479 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 3>like twenty packet, grew thing of it, and someone whould

1:12:07.280 --> 1:12:07.600
<v Speaker 3>hide it.

1:12:07.680 --> 1:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>We would have to hide it.

1:12:08.840 --> 1:12:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And then all of a sudden Matt would leave

1:12:10.479 --> 1:12:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the office and come back and there'd just be a

1:12:12.280 --> 1:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>packet on the desk and no one would say anything.

1:12:14.160 --> 1:12:15.880
<v Speaker 3>And a couple of times he was looking around like

1:12:15.920 --> 1:12:16.840
<v Speaker 3>where did that come from?

1:12:17.280 --> 1:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there was Matt's birthday yesterday. We should have sent

1:12:19.880 --> 1:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>him a package that would here to be a whole

1:12:23.360 --> 1:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>array of gum. But then you'd open it and there

1:12:26.240 --> 1:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>there would be a note, we're hatting it from you,

1:12:29.040 --> 1:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>no come find it.

1:12:30.360 --> 1:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It would be it would be all the gum that

1:12:32.640 --> 1:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>we've already chewed and wrapped of the packet and just

1:12:36.479 --> 1:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>put back in.

1:12:37.479 --> 1:12:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because he coun't throw those in the trash, he

1:12:39.280 --> 1:12:41.240
<v Speaker 3>would pile them up next to his like you would

1:12:41.240 --> 1:12:43.680
<v Speaker 3>have like ten pieces of chewed gum there, And he

1:12:43.680 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't think that was weird either of all the things

1:12:46.040 --> 1:12:48.439
<v Speaker 3>that he thinks I did that was gross. He didn't

1:12:48.439 --> 1:12:49.600
<v Speaker 3>think that was gross.

1:12:50.080 --> 1:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fair, Yeah, it's good.

1:12:52.720 --> 1:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>He's again, he's so against biting into a fresh piece.

1:12:57.479 --> 1:13:05.479
<v Speaker 2>They'll have used gum on a table for hours. Okay,

1:13:05.479 --> 1:13:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll give a quick answer to this one. And it

1:13:09.479 --> 1:13:13.320
<v Speaker 2>does involve a thumb. Actually, yeah, the it's not a

1:13:13.400 --> 1:13:15.639
<v Speaker 2>kit kat story, but the email Aer signed off there

1:13:15.680 --> 1:13:19.200
<v Speaker 2>with eight toes rhino sets. Grisham a few of our friends,

1:13:19.200 --> 1:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and mine does involve rhino sets. Who was once Canadian

1:13:23.200 --> 1:13:25.679
<v Speaker 2>Junior Bowler of the Year. The man knows is bowling.

1:13:25.880 --> 1:13:29.519
<v Speaker 2>He won the TSN Classic Bowl Championship. The announcer said,

1:13:29.840 --> 1:13:33.240
<v Speaker 2>this kid's got maple moxie. Yeah, that Canadian definitely had

1:13:33.240 --> 1:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of maple moxie rhino sets. Actually, he told

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>me that in the PBA, the Professional Bowlers Association, they

1:13:40.120 --> 1:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>had started bowling with two hands, and I didn't believe them.

1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>He said, there's no chance, like they would put two

1:13:45.280 --> 1:13:48.080
<v Speaker 2>hands on the ball and throw it right. You know,

1:13:48.120 --> 1:13:50.559
<v Speaker 2>they stick their thumb in there, stick their other two

1:13:50.560 --> 1:13:53.559
<v Speaker 2>fingers in there, corral it and do a you know,

1:13:53.600 --> 1:13:57.680
<v Speaker 2>their big spin. It's not it's not legal. It's not

1:13:57.720 --> 1:14:02.000
<v Speaker 2>possible that, but they he had He had me. I

1:14:02.080 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 2>just didn't. I mean, I guess I just had myself

1:14:05.000 --> 1:14:06.479
<v Speaker 2>because I didn't believe it for a while and then

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:08.759
<v Speaker 2>then I saw it. The best bowlers in the world

1:14:08.800 --> 1:14:11.280
<v Speaker 2>now bowl with two hands. Jason Bell Monte, he's a

1:14:11.280 --> 1:14:13.639
<v Speaker 2>two hand bowler, flinging it out there.

1:14:14.040 --> 1:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. Can you do that? But you mean when

1:14:16.160 --> 1:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you when you say two hands, he's not literally sticking

1:14:19.720 --> 1:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>fingers from both hands into the Okay, yeah, he's like

1:14:22.040 --> 1:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what he'd do.

1:14:23.000 --> 1:14:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, he's he's got he's got both hands. He

1:14:26.200 --> 1:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>guides it with the other hand like it it's it's

1:14:28.200 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 2>on the whole time until he he lets it go.

1:14:31.200 --> 1:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>He it's not a traditional rear back with your one arm.

1:14:35.560 --> 1:14:38.200
<v Speaker 2>He kind of you know, it's less of a wind

1:14:38.280 --> 1:14:42.120
<v Speaker 2>up and uh yeah, that's two hands.

1:14:42.400 --> 1:14:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm gonna say, it almost makes more sense,

1:14:44.479 --> 1:14:46.559
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it. We shoot a basketball with two hands. He's

1:14:46.640 --> 1:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>your other one as like a guiding hand.

1:14:48.680 --> 1:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it just feels like cheating after after seeing generations

1:14:52.800 --> 1:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>of generations bowl with one hand. But it's it's the

1:14:56.360 --> 1:14:59.599
<v Speaker 2>way the game's evolving. It's the way the sports evolving.

1:14:59.640 --> 1:15:01.360
<v Speaker 2>But it it doesn't feel like cheating.

1:15:02.600 --> 1:15:03.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just like it.

1:15:03.800 --> 1:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>The old schoolers definitely don't like it. They think it's

1:15:06.360 --> 1:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>they think it's cheap.

1:15:08.840 --> 1:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean cheating. I don't think it's the right word

1:15:11.040 --> 1:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for it. It's yeah, it's unorthodox. It's be like someone

1:15:13.960 --> 1:15:16.799
<v Speaker 1>shooting underhand free throws, I would guess. I mean it's

1:15:16.960 --> 1:15:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it's still the same thing. You're still doing the same

1:15:20.360 --> 1:15:22.599
<v Speaker 1>The goal is not changed. It's just how you're going

1:15:22.600 --> 1:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about it looks silly, But.

1:15:23.880 --> 1:15:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I think with balling, with professional balls, the spin they

1:15:26.680 --> 1:15:28.240
<v Speaker 3>put on the ball, I think it would be harder

1:15:28.280 --> 1:15:31.400
<v Speaker 3>to do that with two hands because you got to

1:15:31.439 --> 1:15:34.400
<v Speaker 3>curve it around and it's got a grip, and then.

1:15:34.320 --> 1:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the second hand while he's throwing it is like

1:15:36.960 --> 1:15:39.559
<v Speaker 1>spinning it even more coming down on it.

1:15:39.640 --> 1:15:42.160
<v Speaker 2>The spin's still there. It's just it makes it a

1:15:42.200 --> 1:15:46.599
<v Speaker 2>tiny bit easier, I guess, to be able to guide

1:15:46.600 --> 1:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>it where you want.

1:15:47.800 --> 1:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we've got Dave setting here in the comments. Is

1:15:51.080 --> 1:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>his brother someone's talking about.

1:15:53.640 --> 1:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you.

1:15:55.240 --> 1:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Talk to Dave, that's a real Dave set and is

1:15:59.280 --> 1:16:02.040
<v Speaker 2>a perfect game, says Dave Setton. Twelve strikes in a

1:16:02.120 --> 1:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>row eight hundred series is three consecutive games, adding to

1:16:05.400 --> 1:16:07.799
<v Speaker 2>at least eight hundred. Eight hundred is much harder Oh.

1:16:07.680 --> 1:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've talked about this.

1:16:08.760 --> 1:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, Yeah, he's he's just having a chat with

1:16:11.680 --> 1:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>somebody in the in the chat here because Erwin Rossio asked,

1:16:16.520 --> 1:16:20.559
<v Speaker 2>is is a eight hundred still better than a perfect games?

1:16:20.720 --> 1:16:23.120
<v Speaker 2>That's the debate. Three games to get you to eight

1:16:23.200 --> 1:16:25.719
<v Speaker 2>hundred or a perfect game game?

1:16:25.920 --> 1:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:16:26.400 --> 1:16:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Is that more more difficult? Because Dave Setton he's never

1:16:30.960 --> 1:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>bowled a perfect game from what I remember, but he's

1:16:33.200 --> 1:16:35.759
<v Speaker 2>done the eight hundred and three games. So that's the debate.

1:16:35.840 --> 1:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>But listen, Rhino Sentence, he's got the resume to prove it.

1:16:39.080 --> 1:16:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Canadian Junior Bowl of the Year. You can watch him

1:16:41.439 --> 1:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube. TSM Classic Bowl Championship. He's got the maple moxie.

1:16:45.400 --> 1:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>He's you mentioned Vick Rouder a couple of weeks ago,

1:16:48.280 --> 1:16:54.160
<v Speaker 2>League the TSN broadcaster. He's calling Rhino sentence Classic Bowl

1:16:54.280 --> 1:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Championship as he as he check.

1:16:57.479 --> 1:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>That's incredible. I mean when you said he does all

1:16:59.360 --> 1:17:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the sports, think bawling was up there as well. I

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:05.320
<v Speaker 3>mean Olympics and hockey. It might be possible tennis, but

1:17:05.479 --> 1:17:09.160
<v Speaker 3>bawling as well. Man, what a stop? Vicky?

1:17:09.280 --> 1:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, go check that clip out. Let's call it there.

1:17:12.000 --> 1:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Because that's a lot of bowling talk to end a

1:17:13.960 --> 1:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>basketball podcast with. But we appreciate all your emails. Keep

1:17:17.040 --> 1:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>them coming No Dunks at the Athletic dot com or

1:17:19.880 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 1>tweet them in at No Dunksinc. Thanks to everybody who

1:17:22.640 --> 1:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>joined us live here as part of the stream team

1:17:25.040 --> 1:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. If you haven't catched or listened, excuse me

1:17:29.120 --> 1:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to some of our podcasts earlier this week. I highly

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>recommend you do. We talked to John Schuman about the

1:17:33.439 --> 1:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>most Intriguing free Agents, which we ended up realizing wasn't

1:17:37.720 --> 1:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the most intriguing list in the world, but we had

1:17:40.360 --> 1:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun with Shoe and then we talked

1:17:42.360 --> 1:17:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to Ben Standing talking about that Athletic NBA Agent survey,

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>which came out in two parts this week on the Athletic.

1:17:51.439 --> 1:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Some juicy stuff in there, some comments on Lebron and

1:17:55.400 --> 1:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>some other things, so go check out. That was a

1:17:56.800 --> 1:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun as well. So those were two guests

1:17:58.240 --> 1:17:59.479
<v Speaker 1>we had on this week. If you haven't listened to

1:17:59.479 --> 1:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>those podcasts, go and download them. I think you'll really

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>enjoy them. And thanks again for joining us. Keep questions coming.

1:18:04.160 --> 1:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>We'll call it there. Everybody, have a safe and fun weekend.

1:18:07.320 --> 1:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Clipper bros. You heard it here first, have a great time,

1:18:10.520 --> 1:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>turn up, love you guys.

1:18:12.000 --> 1:18:12.400
<v Speaker 5>Awesome.

1:18:13.720 --> 1:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to do this but a little bit

1:18:15.120 --> 1:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>more bowling talk. And since we had John Schuman on

1:18:18.320 --> 1:18:20.960
<v Speaker 2>this week, who likes to correct people with a well, actually,

1:18:20.960 --> 1:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I just got well actually by my friend Dave said,

1:18:23.080 --> 1:18:25.479
<v Speaker 2>and he said, I have four three hundreds, four perfect

1:18:25.520 --> 1:18:27.679
<v Speaker 2>games and was the youngest in Ontario at the time

1:18:28.240 --> 1:18:31.120
<v Speaker 2>to shoot an eight hundred. Way to go, I just

1:18:31.120 --> 1:18:34.360
<v Speaker 2>got well actually by my buddy on this show.

1:18:35.360 --> 1:18:37.599
<v Speaker 3>Correct And he's not even the best bowler in his family,

1:18:38.479 --> 1:18:39.639
<v Speaker 3>but he's probably third.

1:18:41.040 --> 1:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the crazy part. We're going to see a thirty

1:18:42.840 --> 1:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for thirty talk about the sets bowling one of these days.

1:18:45.080 --> 1:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, embrace the weekend. People.

1:18:48.439 --> 1:18:52.000
<v Speaker 5>You could stay every day.

1:18:53.960 --> 1:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, happy every man so long that you're the

1:19:01.479 --> 1:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>one I've waiting for.

1:19:04.760 --> 1:19:05.920
<v Speaker 2>It's happened already.

1:19:07.360 --> 1:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be grippy.