WEBVTT - Buy/Sell Blake Snell, June Struggles | Fantasy BFFs, Ep. 450

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. D Yeah,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, welcome your bath your host five Bay Bronn

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>five died, Frob Say Francis practice stand ball. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>your ps and with that we will give you inside

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs Mike's working for

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>now alongside Frankie Stamfill. I am Greg Sousman. It's been

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a wild morning for both Frank and myself. It's gonna

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>be a wild night as well, if we can survive it. Frank,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>at least you have off tomorrow. What's up man? Not much? Gregg?

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You Happy Thursday to you? Is this thing on Mike

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is working? So far? Greg? We're we're doing it right here.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought the intro was about as elevant as ever

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>little New York Knicks nineties intro. There, of course, and uh,

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a big day. It's a big draft night. But

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of course we got some fantasy baseball action as well. Grady, Happy,

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallon day. How are you doing? But how did

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>you sleep last night? I slept fantastically and then I

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>woke up, and then you woke up. So then I

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>woke up to a coup of emails and you know,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you just get the bad email, just put you in

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad mood to start. Oh yeah, right, So I

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>got that, and I wasn't happy leaving, and Junie's like,

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Listen's gonna go up from here, like good vibes, Frank,

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>they went significantly downhill. I immediately went to Dwayne Read

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to pick up a prescription which I renewed on Monday.

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have it because my doctor says, you gotta

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:42.839
<v Speaker 1>come by and go. Well, you told me I don't

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have to visit you anymore. You just gonna keep renewing

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>my prescription, So well you gotta come once. A year

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>ago you told me told me don't do that, And

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>he's like, well, it's only if your physician will just

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>okay your prescription. They go, It's it's just gallant medication.

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>This is what we're talking about. So that that happened,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>then we got some more emails, uh, some more calls

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and texts. It's one of those days, man, Is it

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>also one of those days because you were a blake

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>snow owner? I mean, on top of everything else, I

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just had to remind you, Greg, So the good news

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. It actually it really brought me back two

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand man. I wrote this down but not out

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in front of me. I believe it was two thousand

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and twelve and two thousand and eleven or two thousand

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and twelve. I distinctly remember it. I was at an

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Appleby's with my friends and are all in my league, right,

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and I was always the bummy owner and Madison Bubba

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Gardner that night in on almost a year of the

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>day that happened in June nineteenth. Blakes now one tenth

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of an inning, six runs, no strikeouts, a brutal, brutal night,

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>almost eight years to the day, June one. I believe

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it was two thousand eleven, Madison Bubba Garner went one

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>tenth of an inning for the San Francisco Giants and

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed nine runs on my fantasy team, and it reminded

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>me of that exact moment how I felt like, I

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>felt like the world is over that time. Now like

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I understand, I'm a better fantasy player. I understand it

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit more, and like, all right, you know what,

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>next week, it doesn't matter because the weekly league and

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the stats go away. It's not like a rotal league.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It would have been a disaster, but given that it's

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>just a weekly daily transaction league. Have the day for

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven or twelve. It is June two thousand and eleven,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>one third of an ending nine hits, eight earned runs,

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 1>one strike out. Pretty good, so I remembered it so vividly.

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday Blake Snow does this thing and I'm like,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, So I lost the r A this week,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I lost whip this week, but like, there's a whole

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of other categories I can win. So thanks to

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>my hitters Domingo Santana and Wilson Contreras each hitting two

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>home runs. It's a we have fourteen categories in our

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>league of down seven six, No big deal. I'll try

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to go over the county categories. Now gets strike cows,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe yets, winds, and quality starts. You're trying to quantity

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>greater sign quality in this case. So I got over

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that one really quickly. Greg. I don't know if this

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>will actually make you feel better, but probably not. In

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that start, Madison Bone Gardens was to sixteen. His X

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fit was four point five six. So you played the

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>next FI League. There you go. I wanted to ask

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you it's I think it's a huge topic of conversation

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>today when it comes to Blakes Now. I put out

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.559
<v Speaker 1>the poll before the show as a Blake Snell owner,

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about him right now? I said

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday before the show. I'd rather Jacob Deground than

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell. Yeah, does not look good for me right now.

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I will own up to that. And this is what

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, like calling ourselves and holding ourselves accountable.

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Not the best take yesterday you over Jacob not the

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not the best take. So I don't want to say

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm I'm nervous about a bow Blakes now because

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not nervous. He's not the guy that we saw

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>last year. I think that's very evident. Um, all my

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pictures got bombed yesterday be honestly, like Lucas g Leo

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>had as. We're starting two months right. I'll talk about

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>him later on too, definitely, but Blake Snail's ear a

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>jumps into the four's now. It was a really bad start.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say that I am extremely concerned,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not. But I don't feel like he's my

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>bona fide e's Like, he's not top five picture as

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>he said he was yesterday in baseball at this point

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy baseball. At this point, I don't think he

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is easy a top ten starting pitcher in fantasy baseball.

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>More so, let me to say top twelve because it's

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve league. He's still top ten, Okay, he's maybe. I

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>was thinking off the top of my head top five

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>pictures right now. Obviously suzer Verlander. I put Garrit Cole

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Ye, and then probably Jacob deGrom. Definitely Jacob

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>deg that's five without question, five or they're five more

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I can pull. I could pull up some of the

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>other ones. I'm sure we can think of some names here.

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know I told you this before the show.

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought it is a really really interesting stat right

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>per stats, LLC Snell is the first reigning Cy Young

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Award winner in MLB history to about to start, during

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>which he allowed six or more earned runs and recorded

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>no more than one out. Greg And look, there was

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>no way he's going to live up to a one

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>point eight nine e r A again last season. And

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we kind of spoke about that similarly with Jacob Degram.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Degraam had you know he was the National League

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>version of Blake Snell. He had a historic season. Now,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so I had a couple more pitchers I wanted to

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>throw out a let me. I'd rather have Blakes Now,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Morton, SNeW Zack Grinky, Snell, Louise Castia, Snell, Walker Bueller,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>who's been amazing recently. Yeah, that's a little bit closer.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>We used to hate. That was fun. That's really close.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But I would I would give Snell the edge, Snell

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>than Snells number six for you, Okay, yeah, I mean

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Steven Strossberg. I mean he's struggled recently as well. I

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>still do like Steven Strossberg. He's probably inside that top twelve,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 1>but he's not higher than Blakes Now. David Price, No, no, no, okay,

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corbyn, No, he's a struggled recently. No, no, okay,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean a bounced back performance, and we'll get to

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that as well. But here are the reasons why, right

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just gonna keep telling you why, I'm not

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>just gonna tell you Blake Snell is really good and

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>why you should trust him and potentially by him right

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>now if you can without giving you reasons why. If

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the skills, the underlying skills for Blake's

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>now the three things that I look at and I

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you guys about a lot here on the show.

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Swinging strike rate, ability to generate strikeouts, ability to get

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>opposing batters to chase pitches outside the strike zone that's

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>oh swing percentage, and then first pitch strike percentage, getting

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead in the count when it comes to Blake's now

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>he is up in all three of those categories this season,

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>up from last year, which was his historic cy young season.

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>His swinging strike rate this year is still number one

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>among starting pitchers. It's eighteen percent. That's up to repersent

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this year. His first pitch strike percentage last year fifty

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>seven percent that was below league average. This year it's

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>up to sixty six point eight percent, almost ten percentage

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>points and his chase rate thirty six point eight percent,

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's getting opposing batters to swing and miss at

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pitches outside the strike zone. Even more, he's been a

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit unlucky in terms of the strand rate. He's

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>at a sixty strand rate. Normally I would say nice,

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but that's not nice because it's below league average. Last

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>year that was at eight percent, and he kept it

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>up for an entire season. That's why it's historic. He

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna be able to do that again last season,

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>a to forty one babit. A lot of people pointed

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to that heading into this season. There's no way he's

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to maintain a two forty one

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>babbit again. That's why it was a historic season. But

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>last year his hard hit rate was thirty five point

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. This year it's thirty one point seven percent.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>All things point to Blake Snell the underlying numbers actually

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>being better this season than they were last season. Last season,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the average eleven case per nine this year it's twelve

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>case per nine. The walks are still there. He's giving

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>up more home runs, he's giving up more hits. The

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>strand rate is down. I can't defend what he's done.

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like three of his last four stars, he's been

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>really bad. His earra is at four point four zero

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>whip at one point to four intense starts. Since returning

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>from his injury, he's got a five point five one earray.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So he hasn't been good over his last ten stars.

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yesterday factors into that a lot, but during

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that span, a three point for eight exfit. I mean,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>there's just there's a lot of numbers that support that

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he's actually a better pitcher this season than he was

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. Everything just broke right for Blake Snell last season.

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And if anybody's freaking out because I think a lot

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of people are freaking out about Blake Snell right now, Greg,

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I would be trying to buy him, I think. But

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as an owner, you're holding correct, I'm not gonna sell

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>him low. Like what's the offer, right like? If you

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>want he? Like, how about all those names that you

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>just throwing that I was gonna bring at you if

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you offered me right now, like Patrick Corban for Blake Snell. Yeah,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>that's something I have I have to consider and I

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>have to look into it deeply. Yeah, I wouldn't. I know,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't like Corbyn. I know that if you offered

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>me Stephen Strasburg for Snell, I would say no, given

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>all the injury history with Strasburg, at least Corbyn's past

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that I believe in his career. You offered me Knjen

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Ryu and Charlie Morton not doing that either, So I

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>guess my general answer is no. Save with David Price,

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't do that either. Any of the guys are

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in that top. If someone offers you Walker Bueler, that's

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the little bit closer. That's the closest. That's the closest.

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>That's the closest for sure. Remember the slow start that

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Walker Bueller got off to, and we spoke about this

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>almost every day in conjunction with Chris Sale. It was

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>so similar. These guys didn't have spring trainings. And now

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>look at where they're at. Walker Bueller on the season, remember,

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was got awful earlier on in the year.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Now on June twenty three, point zero six year a

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>zero point nine to whip Walker Bueler has been amazing.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>He's got eighty four strikeouts in eighty two and a

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>third and he's pitched so I like, I don't know

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that his upside is as high as a Blake Snell.

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in the whip department, like the whip could one

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be better than Blake Snell. But I think when everything

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is going right for Blake Snell, there's gonna be more

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts there. The ear a probably comparable, so it probably

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're splitting hairs, it comes down to

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what you want more. But I think Blake Snell does

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have more strikeout upside than one Walker built. We mentioned

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corman and you talked about his bounce back store.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>He was someone that I think is kind of in

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this mix. I think he's a top ten pitcher at

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this point in Fantasy Baseball. He had a nice top

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>ten grade. I think he is. Yeah, Well, why do

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you feel that way? Think he's really good? I think

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you just irrationally don't like him. But I mean he

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't he's gone through like a five six star

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>stretch now where he's been it was really it was

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>really a three start stretch, And I'm sure isn't his

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't him who? His splits are like really bad. He's

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>really good at home, bad on the road. So they're

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like devalues your trust him hone ear a

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>two point one seven A five point nine one. Yeah,

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>he's probably he's more of like a top twenty picture

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, which is where he was being drafted. You

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>don't like him, it's fine, but I think it's warranted

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>based on what he's done recently. Fine last night against

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia seven eight things, one run, ball, four hits, he

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>struck out eight in the outing. He wound up walking three.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Zach Eflin yesterday afternoon it was Evelyn versus Corbyn. Evelyn

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>worked his way in and out of trouble. Ninety pitches.

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh did walk three out of five hits to earn

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>runs three total, struck out seven though, solid outing from Efflyn,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Who's we're all waiting to come back down to earth.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We talking about Zach Efflyn a lot on Tuesday during

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>our trade show, Frank, the ear A for Evelyn still

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sits at two point eight three. Yeah. First, I'll start

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>off with Patrick Corbyn. Yesterday was a really nice bounce

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>back for him. I think that's something that you needed

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to see that gets the r A down to three

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>point nine zero. That's why just saying that, getting his

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>ear A down to three point nine zero. That's why

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't put him in like that top ten, top

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve conversation. But seven ending's pitched one or run eight

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts against a really good Phillies lineup. He had eighteen

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes yesterday. Yesterday was also the best at his

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>slider has looked for a long time. And we spoke

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>about that recently as well, Greg. Where if Patrick Corban

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the slider working, I mean, that's his bread

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and butter. He's got everything plays off of his slider.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got to have the slider working. He had eleven

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes on his slider and basically throughout this last

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>five start stretch, this was the best at his slider

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>has looked. And that's something that he he needs, he

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>needs in order to uh to pay off his value.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>But when I look at his numbers, you look at

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>his past four seasons, right three point nine zero e

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>r A three point nine five x FIT three point

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>one five era A last year two point six one

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>x FIT four point zero three r A back in

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>three point eight nine x fit and in sixteen A

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>five point one five e r A four point two

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>three x fit. One of these things is not like

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the other that's is it possible that is just an

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>outlier season for Patrick Corbin because the underlying numbers for

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>him don't suggest that he's going to get that much

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>better than the three point nine zero era that he

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>has right now. I think that last year was the

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>career year at the right time for Patrick Corban. It's

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>funny how these contract years always are the creer years.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So so so I think it is I think that

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>three point one five he's probably not match double again.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>But going back, I think it is like also an outlier,

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>like the five point one five ear a seems like

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>way higher. That's probably true, but look at his career

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>ear are career at three point nine one, exactly where

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he is, Like that might be the picture who he is.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gotten a little bit better. Like I

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think if you ask me right now, will he

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>finished the season Bubba below the three point nine one

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's currently at or three point nine whenever I

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>would take the under? I probably agree with you, but

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like slightly, like if we set the line at three

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>point seven five, Greg, would you take the under for

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season or over? So I think

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a good number. I think that's a better number

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>than three point nine. I don't think I would take

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the slightly under. I'll take the over. Okay, are you

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>being on that there right? All right? Reggy's under three

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>point seven five from here on out or by end

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of season and the season? Okay? Well great ra at

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>three point nine? Yeah, I mean yeah, so under the

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>after the season, where will we be with Patrick Corbyn

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank on the other side, Zach Eflyn, would you think

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of his performance? Yeah? I mean, look, Eflyn another one

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>putting it right in my eye because I spoke about

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it the other day as a Cell High candidate. Reminds

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit of Jake Junas from last year.

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He is though, because I'm sorry him. I did we

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we own him together? True? Yeah, we do own him

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on a team together. So the thing was, Zach Eflin,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he had just five hits yesterday. You're like, all right,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but all five hits went for extra bass, Like, all

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>five hits were hit pretty hard. It wasn't like dnking

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and dunking against zach Eflyn. He walked three. As I mentioned,

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he worked in and out of trouble yesterday all throughout

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the day against Washington and there does needs to be

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>given credit when you are able to work out of jams.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>No doubt the strike it was working for Zach Evelyn.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he's fine. I think is he a guy

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>with a two point three r A that you can

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>trust to be close to there the rest of the way.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, So you expect that, don't. But I think

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Zach Evelyn's, you know, a number four or five starters.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Strikeouts have just been a lot better in the Let's

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>really give him credit for that. The walks have also

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>been up to so it's max him and take Walter break.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna come back, Lucas Giolito versus John Lester. We

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>hit that next. Daily Roado dot Com learned from the

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Roado dot Com optimized her in minutes,

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line up for cash games and tourneys.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Learned from the game's best df best players joined Daily

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Rohado dot com the morning after. My thought was, potentially

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they could go Barret design and pair them together. Yet

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>if I'm the Pelicans, I actually wouldn't. Yes they get

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>along and yes they played together, but I think they're

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>both too big for the same court. Here in the NBA,

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you're almost better off getting a player that

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>will really compliment Scion, better than having two sort of

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>future stars on the court getting in each other's way.

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Week days, not amister, on F and T, s Y

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio and on your popular podcast Providers, rain is make

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it Rain. There's something to it that it's sort of

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like sports show. These guys dedicate their life to it,

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and full Houser just didn't show up on the set here.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Guys like he's been studying his ass off for like

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>eight ten years to do this. He didn't drop out

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>of the sky and was like, oh look at that.

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Look at how lucky he is. You know, he's a

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>professional trivia this is what he does. And it showed

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>as where the two people he lost to it. By

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, also professional trivia people week days six to

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>nine a m. Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers, can't get enough Fantasy Football. Rhoto

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Experts has launched their NFL three Fantasy Football package, which

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings available

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>anywhere on the Internet. Davis Madigan The Roto Experts are

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>content every day of the year to give you an

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Say Tember cent at roto Experts dot com with the

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>promo code V and t s Y it's the NFL

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>three five Fantasy Football package only at rhoto Experts dot com.

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Back with you here, BFFs Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Tonight

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we will have live NBA Draft coverage gap on myself

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>BFS holding it down to BFF NBAJF Lottery Special. Oh great,

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a lot of fun too, because I

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are a few days out of the

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>year as a s It's fan that I really really

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>look forward to. The NFL Draft is obviously one of them.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The the NBA Draft is also one of those days.

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Just really excited to welcome into a new era of

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of of young players in the league. Superstars will talk about,

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, their fit on on specific teams, what it

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>means for their fantasy value, um just their prospects overall,

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Like coming out of college. What we expect. It's gonna

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of fun. I'm looking forward to it.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>So we'll be live on the radio and YouTube. Correct

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>will be live on the radio, YouTube. Wherever you're watching

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>us now, you'll be able to catch us then seven

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to eleven tonight, also on Twitch from five to six

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>LU pre game show, Frankie and I will have to

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be covered their NBA Twitch the NBA Fantasy Hour. We'll

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>be live on Twitch at NBA on Twitch. I am

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>very excited, Greggy, be fun night. Let's go next. We're

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna mess this one up. Greg. You know this is

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>our first draft. We are we're watching together. Ever, that

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is true, most most of the drafts actually fall on

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>my fiance's birthday because her birthday is June twenty two.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm not here tomorrow. Actually, hopefully I can

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>get Florio here with you, so you're not alone, Luria.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Floria did tell me he to be here, all right,

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So there you got Floria. Tomorrow. I will not be here.

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It's because I'm taking her out and we're gonna go

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to the Yankee game. God willing, assuming the weathers are right.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like rained every day this week. It's disgusting. It's

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so humid in New York. I hate it. Not that

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Judy knows this yet because I haven't asked her. Okay,

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance I go to the Yankee an tomorrow, alright,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>hit me up, I will. I think it's Peacock against

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to Nacka. I thought it was Paxison's Paxiston, all right,

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean either way, I haven't seen Paxson yet in

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the Yankee uniforms. Could be wrong, I'd be I'd be

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>cool with that. It packs we could potentially see Judge

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Stanton and you're don Avaree all in the same field together.

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Awesome si. Um So, there's a chance I haven't asked

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>her about if she wants to go do it. We

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>have a wedding next day, um so maybe we'll also

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>July twelve, I'll throw this out there. It is Captain

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>America Marianna rivera bobble head day to Mariano dressed up

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>as Captain America. Tickets are already like the cheapest tickets,

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like forty bucks. People get so crazy about these babble

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>My mom is gonna be inn so I will not

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to make that. Sorry, I really want to go,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>but prices kind of driving me off here, Greg tay

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>us first Tomorrow aren't bad, They're just like fine nice.

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually bought him a couple of weeks ago because

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I felt like the impending return of Judge. Yeah, Skyro

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is the only last night, and it's Yankees astros too,

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so I thought they would have been higher. I think

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I paid like twenty eight pecty um, Okay, let me

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>get to Lucas Giolito now, Frank, because we're always not

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the clock to straight midnight here because all

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the signs are very very real. But I thenk we

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>were kind of waiting for a little blow of outing

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Lucas g Leater. That's what happened last night. He went

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>have four in the third, alout seven, hit six runs,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>walk three, did strike out nine, But it was the

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>home run that was the buggaboo for him last night,

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>specifically from Wilson and Charis. Charis hit the a grand

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>slam in the first inning, followed out with the solo

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 1>shot in the third, and then David Body knocked him

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>out with one and the fourth. That make you feel

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>better than it was all home runs against Ladas Gilna

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily. I'm not really holding this against was flying

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>out of really last night because there are a ton

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of runs by both teams. Like his last eleven starts,

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he was nine and oh with at one point six

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>seven e r A. I mean this was the first

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lost for Lucas Elito since April six on the season,

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think he was kind of due for a clunker.

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I know we've been spoiled by him to this point,

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>and again we're all I don't want to speak for

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody out there, but I'm excited for Lucas Clito, a

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>guy who has been talked up as this top pitching

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>prospect for so many years, and it seems like he

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was kind of being written off. And in this year,

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, changes up to mechanics a little bit. That fastball,

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>changeup combination looks awesome for him. And I think it

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>was just, you know, he was due for a clunker

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>here and the Cubs are a really good lineup. With

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that being said, I mean, as bad as he pitched,

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>he still had nine strikeouts and eighteen swinging strikes against

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a really, really good clubs lineup. Greg, did you watch

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>the home runs that Wilson has hit off of him

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>because he was really pimping his home runs. I thought

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for sure he was getting later on in the game,

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Like he's rolling around the basis, he's like pointing to everyone,

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>He's like taking his time, he's strutting around there. I

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>thought for sure he was gonna get plunk. But when

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Gelito, I think, especially given the way

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that the pitching landscape has gone this year and the

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>way that the ball is flying out, and we know

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Wrigley the nights where the wind

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>is blowing out, you can be prone to giving up

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>home runs. I kind of give him a pass for

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 1>this one. Greg, Like I said, the home runs were

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>flying out of Wrigley Field last night, with the team's

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>combining four five home runs on the evening. They had

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>counted actually for almost all of the runs scored in

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. The only run it didn't count come on

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>our home runs of Kyle Shoreberg double in the bottom

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of the eighth inning. So I'll give it past as well.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>What about Horbor by the way, Man, he's been really

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>really good recently. Oh Man, we went past the Nationals.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention Wan Soto has been incredible recently.

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And years with dam of Victor Robeless. I wanted to

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>give a chance to kind of opine on that, and

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>we went past the Nationals. But I mean, we can

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>work our way backwards. You want to start with Schreber

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:49.959
<v Speaker 1>and kind of let me, let me get to Shoreber.

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>We had Lester also because Lester last night, We've been waiting.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>He's been really really struggling as of late. And last

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>night five and two thirds, seven innings, three runs, a

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of two home runs, struck at six for those

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in qualities starts leagues. It was very annoying. Believe me,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing with Lester? You own him. I

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>don't want him anywhere obviously, I know what I'm supposed

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to do, and he's got a four point one three

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>e r ray, what am I supposed to do? I mean,

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you can have for the right picture that

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>comes around. Yeah, I would do that. I would make

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>that move. I don't know. I think pigeon is so

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>hard to come by though, Like Zach Gallant's an answer, right,

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but all the other guys that we mentioned, Yes, like

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Zack Gallant and we love the talent.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>But again, like I want to preface this and remind everyone.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone knows the answer to this. I

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he's going to be up like long term, Greg,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that for sure to be true when

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to gown Like, I'm very excited for him.

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy owners are excited for him, and they should be.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>The guy has we We read you all the numbers

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday while the mics were still on. I just don't

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>know that he's going to stick around for the rest

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the season. So I I do want to like

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>throw that out as a possibility without question. And I

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>think the thing is like, Yeah, you have these younger guys,

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>but enough of them. The lester, the backer by any

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>means anyway drafted him. Would you drop him for Yamamoto? No,

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that right now. I'm not doing it.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of other guys. Moto has been pretty good, Greg,

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>He's been dude. I was one yesterday was saying how

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>much loved him and Jim Yakobon's got a start yesterday,

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Yaka bonus to shout out anys. Greg, Yeah, I don't

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>want to. I don't want to do it. To be

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, personally, anyway, So that's my John lesterday.

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you want to say about

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>cosh over Kyle Swarber is just I spoke about him.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was. There was I think a Thursday

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Friday that you were gone. I think when

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you went to the bachelor party. I had a segment

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>here alone when before Matt Moodika came on, and I

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>was talking about Kyle Swarburn, how I picked him up

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in one of my home leagues, which is a points league,

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's been really good, you know, over the past

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>two months. I mean since the start of May. I

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>mean the batting average in May was very bad. It

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>was one, but he had six home runs in May,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and now he has six home runs in June and

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the batting averages up in June. Now I would never

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>really expect to eight batting average from Swarber, which he

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>has this month, but he has at least six home

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>runs in each of the past two months. He's got

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a nine six ops in June. He's leading off for

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good lineup. He's playing against lefties, he's holding

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>his own against left He's actually better against lefties this year,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>something that we've never seen from Swarber, So he actually

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is getting better as a player this year. To sixty

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>one batting average against lefties, he's two thirty one against

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>right eas He's got a higher OPS against lefties as well.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Three of his sixteen home runs against left handed pitching.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>So he's actually getting better. And Joe Madden is showing

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>faith and confidence in Kyles Swarber, and he's leading off

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for a really good lineup. So, I mean, if he's

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>out there, I don't think he should be available anywhere,

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>even in points leaves. He walks a lot to scores

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of runs. I like him kind of. Shober

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>has really turned it on, as you said, over the

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>last month. He has become somebody that he has become

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody that is reliable at this point in fantasy baseball leagues,

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>much like one. Soto has really turned it on the

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>month of June as well. I don't have any shares

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of Juan Soto and I wasn't against taking him, It's

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just my draft slots never really allowed me to take him.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>He would have been a target of mine in the

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>third round. I mean, I can um consistently talked about

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the position scarcity before the season, and how I wanted

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to target outfielders early on. And you know, look all

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>season long for Juan Soto to batting average eleven home runs,

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>forty two r bis, I think you want more power

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>out of him. But in PS five stolen basis for

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy who is twenty years old. It's not even

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>legal to drink in Washington yet, and he won't be

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>legal until October. So I think this is just a

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>sign of things to come for Juan Soto and then

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>for Victor Roeblis. Right. Of course, as soon as I

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this out last night, the guy goes out and

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>hits the home run, and a bunch of people are

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>tweeting at me, Well, he just hit a home run,

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like that's how it always works out.

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted this out for Juan Soda yesterday, Greg, and

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen this before because obviously he's the only

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>one who be in the zero if. I don't even

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>know if that's a word zero with percentile in average

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>exit velocity. Right when you hover over his exit average

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>EGX velocity on baseball Savant on a stat cast page,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it says zero if percentile last in baseball Now, I

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>did get a fair response from dvr derk Van Riper

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Athletic and says, you have to account for

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as often as he bunts, So yes, you take that

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>into consideration, but you still have concerns when it comes

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to plate discipline. For Victor Robost, he strikes out a lot.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't walk all that much, even if you consider

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the bunts. Like the hard hit rate is down tremendously

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this year. Before that home run yesterday, he was betting

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>two dred a five thirty five o p s in

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the month of June. I think there are real concerns.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, people are asking me, you know, should I

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>should I drop Victor Roboist? Someone asked me yesterday, can

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I dropped Roboist for Scott Kary? I said, if it's

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a redraft league, yes you can. Is that crazy, Greg,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think so, because as soon as

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you said the names got Kingary, I'm interested. The roles

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>has not been what you and I hope they'd be.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And and look, he's still on pace for over accounting

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>stats are fine, but he's doing it with one thirty

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>batting average six. I mean, we were certainly expecting more

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>than that very much, not that he was gonna be

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like a three sixty. You know, anyone from seventy would

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have been adequate to eight eight in just twenty games

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. I mean, that's not what I was expecting.

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And he's a better prospect than what he's shown in

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of batting average, because batting average in the minors

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was better than this. But yeah, I mean it's I

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's especially recently, I regularly two numbers. It's it's

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been very frustrating. I do want to look up

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what he's on pace four because I believe it's um,

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's over, which is fine. Again, but let's

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>see on page four twenty two runs, twenty stolen basis.

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, right there, sixty five ribbies, eighty seven runs.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.719
<v Speaker 1>He's at a two thirty six batting average right now.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>If he can get that up to to fifty and goes,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fine. Like if he goes to twenty

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this year close to ninety runs scored, perfectly fine with

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that from Victor Robost, totally fine. But he's still a

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>really young player. And we talk about like young players

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go through slumps. We see them with White

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Sox that elo him and as in Uanna Moncada, who

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have been very streaky players this year. So I guess

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>all in all, what I'm saying is I would try

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>my best to hold onto robots, especially in like keeper dynasty,

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, but you know, for a guy like Kingary,

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>who's performing right now, you're playing a ten twelve team league.

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have a problem with that. I think

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be better, though. Frank, yesterday you said I'm

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>starting Daniel post dale On today. Yeah, I picked him

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>up and stream him in the pit league, and it

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>worked out because Daniel posts dally On went six shutout

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>anything's against the Marlins yesterday stream against the Marlins Grade

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>six strikeouts, two hits, one walk on the day face

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Richards you went five and two thirds. He also

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>crushed in the Quality Start League and one and run,

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>four hits, eight strikeouts and three walks. Adam Conley blew

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it in the eleventh for Miami. Yeah, and Paul Goldschman

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>hit the walk off home run. Who another guy we

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>could talk about has been struggling mightily so far this season.

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Ponds da Leone looked into his numbers before the show.

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Greg throws his fastball a lot. Reminds me a decent

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of Freddy Peralta. Doesn't throw his fastball like eighty

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time like Freddy Peralta does, but does

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>throw it over seventy percent of the time. He mixes

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in a curve, he mixes in a cutter, you know it,

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>throws that fastball per hour. I think he could stream

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>him in the right spot. But I don't really have

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of faith in Daniel Ponds da Leone, even

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>though he's had like fairly good minor league numbers. I

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>don't feel good about his long term prospects because he

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>does rely on that fastball a lot. That reminds me

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of something that he might have been able to get

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a get away with at the minor league level, much

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like a Freddy Peralta, just you know, throwing gas past

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of like these double A, triple A hitters.

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>When you get to the major leagues, I mean, you

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>become a little bit more predictable. Um. I don't know

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's gonna work out long term for Daniel Pons

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>d Leon unless he continues to develop these secondary off

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>speed pitches. But It was a great start yesterday, and

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's worth streaming in the right spots, but

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>long term potential, I have questions about when it comes

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to pont st Leon. Greg, Absolutely, pus Leon somebody you

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can stream, I think right now, long term, wait, what

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>are you doing with gold Schmidt? Right now? I knew

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that question was coming. I knew that you get the

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>walk off home run yesterday, didn't get the star he

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was he was came in later in the game. Is

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a pinch hitter. He's at two fifty six seven seventy

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>seven o ps, only eleven home runs, thirty rb I

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>s in a year where everyone is smashing home runs,

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg ESPN is crazy. Then I read fourteen. I saw

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the eleven next to it because the eleventh ending. But

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>he's at fourth, fourteen homers, thirty ribbies. I mean, we

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>saw something similar to this last year with cold Schmidt.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Are we just getting to that point where it's like

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to continue to struggle every year in the

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>first half and then he's just going to pick it up.

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Because again, like I'll bring up the numbers from last year,

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>right and it's from June on last season he was

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a he was his triple slash three two. I mean,

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just absolutely insane. Twenty six home runs, sixty four runs,

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 1>sixty four babies, and a hundred and four games. Wait,

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we know what cape what Paul Goldschman is capable of

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.479
<v Speaker 1>in terms of going on a run and getting hot.

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>It's like the weather is going to get Obviously in St. Louis,

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're already there. But it's really baffling to

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>me that this Cardinal's lineup and this Cardinal's team overall

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Gregg has struggled as much as they have this season.

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I read an interesting I think Mike as a River

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of Blues tweeted it out that it was about the

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Lukeavoid trade with the St. Louis Cardinals, and he said,

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's rare for the Yankees to be on the side

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>where you pick up a young player and then the

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>other team trades away prospects to get a player that's

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>worse than the player they traded away. I know that's

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>very Uh, it's convoluted. Yeah, overall, Luke Void is performing

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>better than It's crazy because Luke Void was like, well,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth round player and fantasy, and Paul it was a

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>second round pick Paul gold Schmidt, who signed his massive

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:19.919
<v Speaker 1>extension with St. Louis, is a ferret question if we're

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in his decline period. I know last year we had

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all these question marks. He was so horrific April and May,

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and they wound up with thirty home runs backing to

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety being Paul Goldschman again, like, is it possible he

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>can turn it on in the second half. Yeah, Greg,

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm actually closer to him turning it on like

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>he did last year than he's in his decline phase,

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at the bat ball numbers for him,

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty two percent hard hit rate for Paul gold Schmidt

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this year, he's only got a three oh six babbit

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>while his career mark is three fifty two. So I

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>think he's been a little bit unlucky. He's got a

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>seven sixty five OPS this year, and his career mark

0:35:55.800 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is so again last year, over those final one hundred

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and four games, he had an ops of one thousand

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two, and that's what Paul Goldschmidt is capable of.

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think I'm still a little bit closer to

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>him being that player rather than he's just declining. This year.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I will mention that his barrel percentage is down this

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>year than where it's been at in in years past.

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>His his longch angles a little bit down, but all

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of his his expected slugging is four eight six. Right

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>now it's at four thirty two, So I think there's

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's room for improvement. I would much like

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Blakes now, I would be trying to buy Paul Goldschmid

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if someone's selling right now. April and May of last year,

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Paul Goldman had at two nine seven and then one

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>forty four in the month of May, turned it on

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 1>in June. He hasn't yet at three sixty four in June,

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>three seventeen, July, three fifty six in August, and then

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a rough September for him. June's were really really turned

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>around hopefully, uh for us that started last night, right.

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I have more concerns over his teammate Matt Carpenter, like

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>legitimate concern You look at his average eggit velocophy is

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>down over two miles per hour on averages here that

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is a massive amount. That is legitimately a massive amount.

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>He's still hitting a lot of flyballs, but is expected

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>batting averages, so what that tells me with the eggs

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of velocity down this year and still hitting as many flyballs,

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lazy flyballs to the outfield for Matt

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Carpets and who's actually older than Paul Goldschmid, So I

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>do have a lot more legitimate concerns when it comes

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to him over Goldie. We'll take a break. When we

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>come back, the show will get your fantasy. That's that's forever,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and go around the Major's next. I had great results.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I lost seventy pounds by way to sixty five and

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>went down to my doctor told me that it works

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 1>for you, then do it. But a lot of people

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>say to me, how would you lose the weight? I said,

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I take Andrew four everything, but I'm gonna take it forever.

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>That was Walt talking about Andrew four hundred. Now listen

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to what Bob has to say. When you listen to

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>your radio commercials, you say that's not possible. But since

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I've experienced it, your commercials aren't strong enough. I m

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've had a belly for way too long. My

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>whole body is shrinking. My energy level has gone up,

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and don't think differences, and it's great stuff. I tried

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>other products and nothing happen. Guys, if you'd like to

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>lose stubborn belly fat, gain energy, and feel years younger,

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>try Androw four hundred, the safe, natural and affordable way

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to boost your testosterone. Go to Androw four hundred dot

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>com or call eight eight eight four hundred zero four

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>three five eight eight four hundred zero four three five

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Androw four hundred dot com. Let Daily rodo dot com

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>guide you to victory as you swing for the fences

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>playing daily Fantasy Baseball. Become the eighth Daily Rodo lineup.

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Optimize it will win one million dollars in a fan

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Duela Draft Kings tournament, or become part of the growing

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>community who have won thousands of dollars. If you're playing

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>MLB dfs and not using Daily rodo dot com, you're

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Enter promo code f n t s

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Y for a ten percent discount the two thousand, nineteen

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>MLB Daily Rodo Premium package at Daily rodo dot com.

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Use a promo code fn t s Y and get

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 1>your ten percent discount today. You can't get enough fantasy football.

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL Fantasy Football package, which

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings available

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>anywhere on the Internet. Davis Madigan the Roto Experts are

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>content every day of the year to give you an

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play.

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Save temper cent at roto Experts dot com with the

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>promo code V and T s Y. It's the NFL

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>three Fantasy Football package only at rhoto Experts dot Com.

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Back with you here, b f FS. Rolling through shows

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>me the best part of my day so far. Frank's, well,

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that I'm happy. I'm happy to cheer you up. Grady.

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I did want to mention that, I mean, back from

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the last break, we had some some Justin Bieber, so

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.800
<v Speaker 1>he's a happy Bieber Day, Greggy, same Biebers on the

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>man up against Texas. I think I don't know if

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that was done purposely, but we'll just act like it

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was done purposely up here. Yeah, just Brian, Yeah, Justin

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Bieb's for for Shane Beabs. Happy be day. It was

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>very confident Beam's day. Happy Gallant Day, Happy NBA Draft Day.

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a great day. Greg makes sense, Hopefully like Judy said,

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it could only go up. Is that true? This might

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:34.919
<v Speaker 1>be the peak right now? Yeah, I'm sorry, it's okay.

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh uch more we have to get you. So let's

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>just get right into it. And that, of course is

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 1>mr quality greater sign quantity. Oh you gotta give Florio

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>crap for this tomorrow leave me, Frank I will. All

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he did was quote tweet a bunch of stuff of

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>rich Hill getting hurt yesterday and and do like the

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>cross fingers emoji's, which you should have to do when

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 1>it comes to rich Hill. Rich Hill left the game

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 1>in the second and he was a foe arm tightenes

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is that what it was? Four arm tighteness. Now, the

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 1>good news was that is asked. All velocity stayed where

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the throughout the first inning. It was pretty

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>consistent where he has been. But he took some extra

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>time almost after every curve ball he threw, and he

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't feeling right. Rich Hill being injured? What why is

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.439
<v Speaker 1>this a surprise? It's it's not. It's not greg death

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>taxes and rich Hill will get hurt throughout the course

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season, but that comes with the territory. You

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 1>know that he's gonna get hurt. At some point he

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was just an Admittedly, he's been awesome. You know, we

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>joked up with Florio and even if he were here,

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and even if I was on the show tomorrow, I

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>would tell him, yes, we're gonna give you crap for

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Richill getting hurt, but he has been really good. So

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I will acknowledge that two point five five r a

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>M the season, one point one one whip ten case

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>per nine. He's he's been awesome. He's been phenomenal for

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasy purposes. But I mean, this was just this was

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a lock. So and I saw people tweeting last night, well,

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's only a matter of time until engine Ru gets

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hurt now. But you know again, also saw a lot

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of people responding that, like Ronus and Modica, even if

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Riu doesn't throw an other pitches here, he's already like

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>vastly outperformed anything you could have ever imagined. So it's

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine. I mean, of course we don't want these

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>guys to get hurt, but yes, rich Hill and Hinge

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and U have been otherworldly this season. The Dodgers, I

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>believe it was today was supposed to go with a

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>bullpen day, uh, starting Hulu Urias going to row stripling

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and combining that they have to use an opener. Last night,

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially rich Hill uh, I think he was. Dylan Flora

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>came in, uh, followed by all these other relievers. We'll

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>see what they do today. Now. The big question we're

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>getting when it comes to rich Hill's injury is what

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>do I do? Do I pick up raw stripling? Do

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I pick up Julio Urias? What's the plan? I don't

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.439
<v Speaker 1>think anyone knows for sure, Greg, unless there's a report

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:40.879
<v Speaker 1>that I've missed, I haven't seen any I think it's

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be up to one of those guys, but I

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>think that they have, neither of whom are touched out

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Yes, it's true. So I mean they

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>could just go with what they're doing today right like

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>as a formula moving forward, and they do like Reu

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for three innings stripling for three innings. I mean, I mean,

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not re you Urias for three innings for their So

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>their starters are my eight re Kershaw Bueller. Those are

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the four healthy guys. He's saying the fifth time, essentially

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>piggyback Strippling and Urias. I guess they could do like

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 1>why not, right, I think it makes a lot of

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sense for them. I think they could do that. I

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know that there's just gonna be one winner here.

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that they really like Urias in the bullpen

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and maybe serving as an opener role, So maybe raw

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Stripling has more value in terms of anything that he's

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw. I still do think Urias has more upside

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>long term, obviously, but I don't think anyone really knows.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it could be what we just talked about,

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>where they kind of like split the start together, like

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>three innings for one guy, three innings for one guy,

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's like two innings for Urias, like three

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.919
<v Speaker 1>or four for Stripling. I don't think anyone really knows,

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think long term, Urias still has more upside.

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.399
<v Speaker 1>But as of right now, I mean here, I guess

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is as good as mine, Grega, So we'll just take

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a weight and see approach. Chris Taylor had two bombs

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>last night. He's six and seventh home runs of the season.

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>This is interesting. I do not know. I don't know

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>who this person is, but he's got the last name

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Garlic and need a home run. Oh Arlic, Yeah, Kyle

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Garlic Carl Jr. Shout out to the dragon ball Z

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fans out there. Imagine your last name is Garlic. I

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I like garlic, but I don't. I don't love

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it like I love garlic. But to be cool with you,

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg Garlic, that's a lot of that's like way too

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>many d's in one name, way too much garlic. Now

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you got me looking up Greg Garlics minor league number?

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>How are that? You can take a garlic pun? Here

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be um, I don't have anything. Perhaps you can think

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of something to ninety batting average, twelve homers ops over

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a thousand in Triple A this year. Good numbers. So yeah,

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, twenty seven years old, he's I don't he

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>said he's been chopping it up. I guess it's about

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>as uh about as good as we could go with,

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but only I guess. Pay attention to Kyle Garlic. I

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to. I don't want to mention too. I

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to mention Chris Taylor since since May, since

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>May one on. He got off to a really really

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>slow art this year. Obviously, he didn't win out the

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>starting second baseman job like he had hoped. He was

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>more so a utility guy. He's getting more playing time

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>now with Corey Seeger going down, but to seventy batting

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 1>average since May one on a five slug six home runs,

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty runs scored, twenty r b i s, three stolen

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 1>bases in forty games. So I mean, if you take

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that as like a quarter of the season pace, be

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on pace for twenty four home runs, twelve stolen bases,

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>eight runs a d r BIS. He's actually performing pretty

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>well forty one percent hard hit rate during that span.

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.479
<v Speaker 1>He's only owned in twenty seven percent of CBS leagues

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and twenty one percent of Yahoo leaves Greg. So, you know,

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with Corey Seeger on the shelf, I think Chris Taylor

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually a pretty good at right now in a

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>really really good Dodgers lineup. Yeah. So Chris Taylor is

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a guy that, as you know, I drafted him. I

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was super high on him. I thought he'd get this

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>second base job back on keeping here Nandez never really happened,

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and we questioned, hey, do you want to pick this

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>guy up? He's gonna play every day with Corey Seeker's injury.

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Really all he's done in the month of June, is

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is it for some power. Now the average still struggle right,

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like still batting to thirty in the month of June

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:09.959
<v Speaker 1>one ninety seven month of April, so the average hasn't

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly been there. But three horsy three homers in June

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>back back uh months of ten r V I's Cally

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers are there. I think he's okay. I don't think

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's excited as I was about him when I drafted him.

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>He's okay, film alright, I mean it sounds like I'm

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more excited about him there. But yeah,

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's just like we spoke about with King

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Ary a couple of weeks ago, and now he's been

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sticking around just cheap expulture into a really good line

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>up with the Dodgers. And you know, Corey Seeger dealt

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>with so many injuries before this season, all the surgeries

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he's had. He's obviously has the hamstring injury. Now, I

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like Chris Taylor. I feel like his ownership percentage should

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>be probably closer to fifty percent, like definitely owned in

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like and only fifteen teamers. But I think if you

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:50.840
<v Speaker 1>need a short stop and might have outfield eligibility to

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in a twelve teamer, I would be interested. Yeah, he

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 1>has second short stop in outfield on Yahoo, so yeah,

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I would want to Adham in twelve. Team leaks. You

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 1>know you you know what. You haven't yell at me

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>out recently? What's up? You know you had a lot

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of Ramon Loriano like you idiot? Well yeah right, so

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>be great during the other time in the draft year,

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 1>pissed Domingo Santanaga. Yeah, he went to the bathroom. And

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>at least we got Austin Meadows. We did that team

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is very bad though. Check today we're in four out

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen. Really it's gone that they go, don't that bad.

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We had Brad Keller in the line up yesterday seven

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>earned runs against the Mariners. We had someone else in

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the lineup that also got blown up, and it was

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>really just like I was hoping, like, please, don't I

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 1>hope we didn't put him in the lineup, And then

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I looked at it. He was in the lineup. Let's

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 1>throw a bunch of name out there who have thrown

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>blown up yesterday? Oh, Zack Davis go, we had Zach Davies.

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>So this week in our lineup, Zach Wheeler blown up.

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Brad Keller blown up, Zach Davies blown up, Trember Bauer

0:47:56.480 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>very good, Jack Flaherty pretty good, Wade Miley last time

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>out blown up. I don't know, Craig, I don't know.

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>We lost Clint Fraser, we lost Hunter Pence in a

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team league. I mean, that's that's really all you

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 1>need to happen. You lose, you lose two of your

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>starting outfielders, you have three four guys get blown up

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>your e r A just I mean, that's that's really

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>all you need. Greg. Anyway, I can't buy anything at

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>least edwardo Escobar is good for this team. For this team, um,

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Domago Santana was with a guy we didn't get ultimately

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Anthony sat and tender in the lineup over eleven on

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the week. Fantastic. Oh my god, Greg, should we like

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>look into a trade? Probably you Stanna to home runs

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>now fourteen fifteen who runs on the season and Domago

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Santana struggled a little bit after the really really hot

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>start that he had. But if you you want it

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for a Royal League, you're you're getting what you want.

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Eight and April with three whole runs in May about

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at two thirty seven, but gave you a four whole

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 1>runs in June back over three d for now with

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>five more home runs powers real, dude, Yeah, he's absolutely legit.

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:08.439
<v Speaker 1>And I looked at this before the season in rotor leagues.

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now he is the outfielder eleventh on the season,

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the eleventh best outfielder. He was drafted in NFBC before

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the season during the month of March as the fifty

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:20.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth outfielder off the board. He's been one of the

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 1>best values in Fantasy baseball so far this season to

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine batting average, fifteen home runs, fifty four RB.

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I's five stolen bases as well. I think he's gonna

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 1>be prone to being streaky because he does strike out

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>around twenty nine percent of the time, so there's gonna

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 1>be peaks and valleys when it comes to Domingo Santana,

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but hits the ball extremely hard hard hit rate this

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>year that's by far a career high for him. He's

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>hitting more flyballs than ever before. He's hitting a lot

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of line drives. He needed a change of scenery. He

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was just it was just so obvious plastic change of

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>scenery scenario here with there was too many bats in Milwaukee.

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and for good reason. They have Christ and Yells,

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you have the m v P. Lorenzo Kane hasn't been

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>very good. We'll have to talk about that soon as well. Greg,

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>But he just didn't fit into what Milwaukee wanted to do.

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Goes over to Seattle. A great job by Jerry to Poto.

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 1>He's only twenty six years old. You have this guy

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in a keeper or dynasty, A bolt low on him

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>or even if you haven't been redraft, he has just

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>been one of the gems in fantasy baseball this year. Greg,

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:31.439
<v Speaker 1>it's Santana. I loved watching in the spring that draft

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>stock just kind of skyrocket like Jake. Jake was on it.

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And then when the more we looked into it, like

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I really like this guy. I really like this guy

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>every day, and then everybody jumped on board. And this

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is one of those where everybody was right. Just isn't

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. Yeah, but it's cool to see Austin

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Meadows being another one that people are all jumping in

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 1>on and got it right. It sounds like we could

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>use him in g d D right now, Greg, we could, Frank, Yes,

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta give you crap. For that again. I

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>went to the bathroom split second. But this what happens.

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't drink in auction. That's that's the moral of

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the story. Drink drink an auction. Well, admittedly I was

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>drinking a little bit faster than you, and you didn't

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>eat and I didn't eat, so it just went right

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 1>through me. I had to go to the back, refused.

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Next thing, I come back, Greg goes bad news. Somebody

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>was auctioned off, Domingo Santana, I said, Greg, Greg, of

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>course we ended up with Wilmer Flora's instead. How's that

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have? And I wanted Romo Loriano over Wilmer

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>flora Is too. He sucks, Oh he sucks. Yeah, he's

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 1>only performing, like, uh, you know, one of the five

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>best outfielders over the past month and a half. Greig. Sorry,

0:51:38.640 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll have time to bash you for the rest of

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the season, Greig. I just didn't wanna keep bidding. I

0:51:44.520 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't wanna, you know, because then you get mad at

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 1>me that I overbid and so horrid to the balance.

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, it's all right, Sorry, Greg. Last game we

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about before we sign off a YouTube. I just

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.240
<v Speaker 1>want to mention it quickly. It's Colorado. They defeated Arizona

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>yesterday six to four. Um Zach Griggy eleven hits, five

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 1>runs allowed into seven innings of work. Johnny Gray Um

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>two runs aloud and six innings of work, just four

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts though um Daie Murphy has a sixth whole run

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of the season, riving man three before. He's been pretty

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>hotessib late, but you are nervous abou the guy that

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>left this game. That's Trevor story. Yeah, he was like

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>flexing his thumb. He left the game. He's gonna do

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>be due four. I believe in Mr. Right today, we're

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna find out more about that injury. It sounds like

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he might land on the injured list here and then Rogers,

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Garen Hampson, one of those guys get Yeah, I think

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:33.919
<v Speaker 1>we could see more Brendan Rodgers here. You know. Shout

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:35.800
<v Speaker 1>out to Daniel Murphy and Ryan McMahon. Those guys have

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>been playing a lot better recently. The power hasn't been

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:40.319
<v Speaker 1>there for Ryan McMahon, but the batting average certainly has.

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And like Kyle Soarber, he's actually performing really well against

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>lefties this year, which we thought he was gonna be

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:47.879
<v Speaker 1>on the strong side of a platoon versuing right eas.

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 1>He's actually been better against left eis this year. But

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I do have some concern over Trevor story. Obviously, whenever

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with the thumb ability to grip the bat

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and hit for power, which is what we want out

0:52:58.640 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of Trevor story. So think we he might land on

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the iisle here. This is my speculation, but I would

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>want them to be cautious with him and take their

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>time and make sure he's completely healthy for the long haul.

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we might lose Servor story for a couple

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Greig, We'll see hopefully that ultimately is not

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens with that. We're gonna sign off at YouTube

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for today. At the window up next, Sean Guastamakia will

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 1>have you covered NBA draft tonight. I know they've been

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at props all day long, so make sure you

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 1>watch at the window next with Sean Guastamachia. I'll join

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:28.799
<v Speaker 1>him as well at Frankie's coming on the show as well.

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>That's very very cool, frank We had a lot after this.

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Five minutes from now, it's all NBA the rest of

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the day. For us, it'll be very exciting. Um, alright, No,

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a huge fantasy sport. But dude, I

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just think the basketball is like my first passion. You know.

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people You'll ask people like,

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what was the first sport that you really really got into?

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Basketball was like when you if you asked ten year

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>old Frank, what do you want to do when you

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:53.239
<v Speaker 1>grow up? It was, you know, be an NBA player. Yeah,

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that was like the dream obviously didn't work out. I

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:59.919
<v Speaker 1>mean physical limitations, you know, five ft nine, I don't

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>how much I wait now under eight pounds. How about you, Greg,

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>what was the first support for you? What was for

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the love of the game? Football? T ball? Not ball, football, football, football, soccer? Football?

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I played soccer, Yeah, but like loving sports is football?

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Really did you ever play it? That's interesting to me

0:54:20.320 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 1>then because I never played I never played football either,

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I don't get me wrong, I love football.

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I love fantasy football, but I would say, you know,

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because I played basketball, it was like the first support

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that it really really played that in baseball play a

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:35.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of baseball growing up. Um, those were like the

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>two first loves. I didn't really watch a lot of

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:40.800
<v Speaker 1>football until I got to high school. Break to be honest,

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 1>once I got to high school and then I mean

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 1>everything with Rex Ryan and the Jets, Man, those were

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the glory days. Enough of that. What do you got, Greg?

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You gotta can we change it up? Man? I know

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this is what it's working. I think me going first,

0:54:52.920 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>why I sucked, But it's been working for me. I'm

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>owing three on the week you were three and one. Yes,

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start keeping tracks. One. Let's do it best

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>best forever, Frank, what you got tonight? I mean, I

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if you can call what I give

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>people here my best bets forever. They are what I

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 1>perceived to be pretty good wagers. They haven't been the

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>best of anything, even the best at losing. So if

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you want that, there are a few that caught my eye.

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's bounce around here. Obviously, Zack plus one, especially the

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:34.800
<v Speaker 1>way that the Cardinals have hit, or rather have not

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>hit in the month of June like Adam Wayne Right

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.919
<v Speaker 1>really minus one. Favorite. I will say Garrett Cooper dealing

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with an injury if he's not in the lineup makes

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it a little a little bit harder for the Mordlins

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to score runs and win games. So I'll throw that

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>out there. But I think Zack Gallant at plus there

0:55:50.520 --> 0:55:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is some value there. Greg, the other one that I

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.879
<v Speaker 1>was looking at, and I'm pretty I'm like all over

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this game. I haven't spoke to you about it yet,

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:00.319
<v Speaker 1>so this might be the game that you really too.

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a fun game to watch Charlie Morton

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 1>against Frankie Monta. It's just gonna be awesome. I want

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to be all over this game, Greg, I just don't

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:12.920
<v Speaker 1>know how like I want action on this game. I think,

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I like, I really like the under at seven and

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a half, but they're kind of suckering you in, like

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's such a low number and you look at how

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>well both of these both of these pictures have pitches here,

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Morton and Frankie Montas Like, I want to take

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the under here. I think if I was leaning on

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a side, I would take Charlie Morton and the Tampa

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Bay Rays just overall there, they've been the better team

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>on the season. Oakland swinging a hot bat recently. I

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:37.400
<v Speaker 1>think I like the under, Greg under seven and a

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>half in the Rais and A's and Zach Gallen at

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>plus Marlon's money line against the Cardinals. Where you at?

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So the two that sparked me was Tampa and Oakland.

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:50.719
<v Speaker 1>The under seven and a half I like that as well.

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>The only other one I like Giants and Dodgers late

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>tonight over seven and a half. I think that number

0:56:57.360 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is too small for another Bull Penn game for the Dodgers.

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 1>A tired bullpen coming out of last night, and Bubby

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been great and it was Dodger Stadiums a good

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:06.000
<v Speaker 1>pitchers park, like over seven and a half in that

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>long that's all right with that. We're gonna say goodbye

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for now. Frankie's off tomorrow, so Mike Florio will join

0:57:12.160 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>me here on the BFF checking our draft coverage the

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of the day. It would be fun for Franks,

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 1>staff and Greg Susman. Thanks to everybody downstairs. We'll do

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it all again tomorrow. We hope couldn't catch the live show.

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Make sure to download our podcast at the v n

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>T S Y Sports Network Audio Boom channel