WEBVTT - US and Iran Trade Blows in the Middle East

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Well Iron fired missiles at a US air base, and

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 2>Cutter after promising it would respond proportionately and decisively to

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>President Trump's weekend air strikes on three of its nuclear facilities.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Cutter said the barrage at Aluded Base, the biggest such

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 2>US facility in the Middle East, was intercepted, and that

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>there were no casualties.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Carol.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>For a look at US national security in the US's

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>role in global security, We're going to bring in Nick Wadams,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News National Security Team leader. He joins us from

0:00:59.160 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>our Washington DCA.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Nick, good to have you here. I know it's

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 4>been a busy week and a busy day. We're trying

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 4>to understand a little bit what feels like military choreography,

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 4>maybe on the part of the US and on the

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 4>part of Iran. Right, missile strike on Cutter was telegraphed

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 4>and had been expected by the US and its allies,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 4>according to a person familiar. And it's also you know,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 4>you've got President Trump. He was telegraphing it's going to

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.919
<v Speaker 4>be within two weeks. And so did that give Iran

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 4>a warning? You understand this world? Help me understand how

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 4>military works today?

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, so choreography is a really good word here.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 5>There is a sort of delicate dance going on. After

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 5>the President telegraphed his plans well in advance and then

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 5>sort of tried to gauge what the potential reaction would be.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 5>US carried out those strikes, and then afterwards had a

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 5>bunch of US officials go on TV and say, hey, listen,

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 5>this was a limited strike. It was aimed at the

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 5>nuclear program, not against Iran. Writ large, then Iran feels

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 5>it needs to retaliate, and then it wants to sort

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 5>for its domestic audience portray this as a very big,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 5>overwhelming response. But then the indication we're getting from Cutter

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 5>and elsewhere, As you mentioned, this was telegraphed well in advance.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 5>It targeted a base that had been largely evacuated of

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 5>valuable US military assets, So a symbolic show of force,

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 5>but it looks like when you dig a little bit. Actually,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 5>the Iranian desire was not to cause too much damage,

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 5>So the interpretation there is okay, now they want to

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 5>push toward a potential new conversation with the US. They

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 5>want an off ramp. Two complicating factors to that. One noise,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 5>of course, that Iran and Israel are still engaged in

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 5>tit for tat exchanges, so that conflict hasn't ended. The

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 5>other is, which we don't know, is this the end?

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 5>Is Iran planning further attacks? They haven't issued a statement

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 5>to say, hey, we're done here, let's move on.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:53.839
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good point. I mean, they did say

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>proportionately and decisively, this doesn't seem proportional to attacks on

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>three of its nuclear facilities. I think it doesn't take

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 2>a nuclear scientist to make that conclearsion. Nick, You know,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about this over the weekend. Other presidents

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>have had the opportunity to strike Iran's nuclear targets. Did

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 2>they avoid it because of fears of retaliation?

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean I think there were a lot of questions there.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 5>The reasons why they avoided it. I mean, it was

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 5>seen as too risky potentially in terms of retaliation by Iran.

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 5>The other question is a matter of efficacy, and one

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 5>thing we don't know about these strikes how much they

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 5>actually obliterated the Iranian nuclear program, as President Trump claimed.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 5>So there is a potential unintended consequence which as you

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 5>drive Iran's nuclear program deeper underground, both figuratively and literally.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 5>So does this produce the outcomeing you want? The other is, obviously, well,

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 5>what are the third, fourth, fifth order consequence consequences of this,

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 5>the unknown unknowns that we don't know about. You look

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 5>at the Iraq War two thousand and three. Folks thought, okay,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.119
<v Speaker 5>we were going to be greeted as liberators when US

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 5>troops went in there, and then you look at what

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 5>a mess everything became, the rise of the Islamic State,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 5>et cetera.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 3>So the question is is.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 5>This something Trump can just do and then get out

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 5>or does this lead to a whole new conflict the

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 5>likes of which we just can't imagine right now.

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, Nick, on a global security basis, I mean, what

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 4>are the implications and kind of optics of the US

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 4>actually getting involved, right. You know, that's one thing that

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 4>they're behind the scenes and helping out and supporting, But

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 4>they're involved.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Right, and you know they're the first order consequences the

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 5>issue of what the potential Iranian retaliation might be in

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 5>the future, what this actually does to Iron's nuclear program.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 5>But then you have the other element, which is the

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 5>United States just attacked a sovereign country even though the

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 5>US intelligence community assessed that there was no imminent threat

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 5>to the US. So you could call this deterrence or

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 5>a preventive strike. But is it you know, was it

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 5>too precipitous When you have a country like the US

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 5>that essentially says, hey, we're going to uphold this global

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 5>order and then condemn a country like Russia for an

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 5>attack on a sovereign country ie Ukraine, What does that

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 5>do to US legitimacy and questions around US authority when

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 5>it goes after a sovereign country like Iran. You know,

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 5>there's a concern that it's essentially opening up a Pandora's box, right,

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 5>and maybe opening it up to other countries doing the

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 5>same thing.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 4>All right, good to check in with you, Like I said,

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I know you guys all there in DC are super busy.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 4>Nick Wadams, Bloomberg News National Security Team leader, joining us

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 4>from our Washington d C burea.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 6>Nick, Thank you.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So look at how US government is thinking about

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 2>potential retaliation from Iran. For more on how Iran navigates

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 2>after the US bombings over the weekend, we turned to

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Arial Cohen, non resident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council's

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Eurasia Center, also a member of the Council of Foreign Relations.

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>He joins us from Washington d C. Doctor Cohen, good

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>to have you with us this afternoon. I have a

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions about proportional retaliation, but I want to

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>know what, in your view, Iran is actually capable of

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 2>right now? What is the state of Iran's military, it's

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 2>armed forces right now? What are they capable of?

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 6>I believe that in a short range missile such as

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 6>the missiles that they fired against US based and Kutar

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 6>potentially US based in Iraq.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 3>And Syria, we may see more attacks.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 6>The main news here is that Iran went through sort

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 6>of kind of performative retaliation.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>This was not mother of old.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 6>Retaliations because a they signaled and b they use the

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 6>systems that were intercepted, and they knew that US and

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 6>Cutter could intercept their missiles. So what does it tell me?

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 6>Tell me that they did not throw the caution out

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 6>of the window. They probably had intervention from China because

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 6>China is a major customer poor Iranian oil. Up to

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 6>fifteen percent of Chinese oil and even more so of

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 6>Iranian oil goes to China and the Golf States, because

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 6>Qatar is a member of Golf Corporation Council, so is Amad.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>If they try to block the Strait of Horrormus, they.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 6>Would need to do it in the Omani waters, that's

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 6>where the passage is, so they would be in conflict

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.559
<v Speaker 6>with all of the Golf Corporation Council, which is Arab

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 6>of course and Sunni. And then you could couch this

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 6>conflict in the in terms of Arab versus Iranian, Sunni versus.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 3>They did not want to do it.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 6>They're not there yet in terms of are they going

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 6>to do more retaliations. It really depends on the balance

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 6>of power in Tehran. We see reports that Ayatola is

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 6>in hiding and nowhere to be found. That Ayatola has

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 6>to sign everything, so I do believe that once the

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 6>elite in Tehran digests the severity of the blows both

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 6>Israeli and American, there will be massive changes in the regime.

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 3>My sources are saying more than sixty percent.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 6>Chances that the Ayatollah will not stay here by the

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 6>end of this year.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 7>Regime change, wow, okay, better.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 6>Internal internal, not US imposed, not Israeli posed.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 3>But things will shift.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 6>And we know for years that i RGC, the Islamic

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 6>Revolutionary Guard a corn the.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Fifth of the regime, is not happy with the rule

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of the clerics. They want to run the show. They

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 3>want to control all the goodies.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 6>They are aware that the Iranian economy was run into

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 6>the ground by the clerics and the Iran is very isolated.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 6>And as usual, they're different wings. They're more anti Western wing,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 6>more radical wing, and more pragmatic wing.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 7>I have a couple questions. First of all, regime change.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Will be for the better or we don't know, like

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 4>who is in the wings waiting to take over.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's let's go down the list.

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 6>I mentioned IRGC, and I mentioned that there's a split

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 6>within IRGC.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 3>This is the military wing of the Islamic regime.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 6>In addition, there's a regular army, which is less idea,

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 6>less ideological, less politicized. They are a separate body. Some

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 6>of these officers were officers back in the day, even

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 6>under the shop. Now of course that generation is gone.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 6>Then they're liberals or technocratics in the regime. Then they're

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 6>the monarchists. The crown Prince of Iran, Reza lives about.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>What five miles from where I live in Potomac, Maryland.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And then they're the Mujahiden, the Marxist wing that

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 6>was fighting desperately with this regime.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 3>These are atheists and.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 6>Once violent. Some people call them terrorists. That's another far

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 6>left which so you see the spectrum and what the

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 6>islamister are doing. Them are monopolizing power. They're not transitioning

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 6>that pretty sophisticated modern society into some semblance of a

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 6>democratic machine that could balance the interest of different groups.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 4>So, doctor Coni dosick, if we do see a regime change,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 4>or largely a regime change, is it better is such

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 4>a poor word, But is it better on the other side,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 4>for the people of Iran, for Iron's role in the region,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 4>and maybe even you know, globally.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 6>Look, this is a highly opaque situation, very difficult to predict.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 6>I would say that if the system opens up, if

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 6>the system avoids a civil war, which is a possibility

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 6>also not necessarily a high possibility, but a possibility, if

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 6>the system brings more participation from the society.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Imagine they have the urban.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 6>Dweller, the city society that is educated, a lot of

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 6>people whose college education. A lot of people are looking

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 6>towards the West, not towards China, not towards Russia to

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 6>model their society, and they're aware that women fifty percent

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 6>of the population are abused and severely.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Oppressed by that regime.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 6>We saw nine hundred plus nine hundred and eighty two

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 6>people I believe in twenty twenty four killed. We see torture,

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 6>we see execution of gays, we see all kinds of brutal,

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 6>barbaric behavior that a lot of city dwellers, educated Iranians

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 6>are totally rejecting. There's a lot of sympathy towards the West,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 6>towards the United States, and even towards Israel. And the

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 6>fact that the Israeli intelligence and other intelligences so effective

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 6>is because there is a lot of corporation by the

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 6>Iranians with Western intelligence services.

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 2>That is fascinating to hear before even the possibility of

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>talking about a different regime in Tehran. I think there

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 2>are some questions now that Americans in the US military

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and the President wants the answers to, For example, where

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is the enriched uranium now? If it left fourdoh? Do

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 2>we have any idea?

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, we don't know if it left fourdo. But I

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 3>can tell you one thing.

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 6>That uranium is enriched to sixty percent, which is twenty

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 6>times more.

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Enriched than what they need for the.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 6>Civilian nuclear reactor for electric power generation. That was a

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 6>step before enriching to eighty ninety percent for the bomb.

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 6>They have enough uranium, according to open sources, to eight

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 6>or nine bombs. They could have taken that uranium at

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 6>sixty percent as they have it currently, package it into

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 6>regular explosion with regular explosives, containerize it and blow it

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 6>up in Israel, in the United States, in Europe, you

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 6>name it.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's a clear and present danger.

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 6>And I disagree with the intelligent community assessment and with

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 6>the gentleman who spoke before me, your security desk chief,

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 6>because no country builds a ballistic missile arsenal with long

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 6>range missiles that could reach Europe and are reaching Israel,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 6>and all you need to do is add one more

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 6>stage to that missile to make it an ICBM.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>And Iran already is building.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 6>That capacity because they're putting satellites in space. So with

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 6>sixty percent enrichment, that a step just before putting it

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 6>in a warhead. And they can get the warhead technology

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 6>from North Korea, Russia, from China, from Pakistan. So they

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 6>are at a threshold country. And what the United States

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 6>and President Trump did was absolutely correct for the interest

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 6>of the United States.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 3>We do not forget that.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 6>Since ninety seventy nine, for forty six years, every Friday,

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 6>these people are chanting death to America, death to Israel,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 6>and they killed over a thousand Americans, the tortured American officers,

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>military officers, the killed American servicemen in the Cobar towers,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 6>et cetera.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 3>They are a hostile power and they what.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 6>Trump is trying to do is to put them down

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 6>a peg and possibly consumed doctor Villain Freeman.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>In your view, did the US go far enough with

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the bombing campaign on Saturday evening into the early hours

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>of Sunday, or does the US need to do more.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I think we went as far as we could.

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 6>We used cutting edge technology, the heavy bunk bunker buster bombs,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 6>and we need to do a damage assessment. Once we

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 6>have a damage assessment and it will be classified, I

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 6>won't know it then Trump, he said, Chief of Joint Chiefs.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 6>The Head of Joint Chiefs will reassess it with the

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 6>National Security Council, with the intelligence community, reassess it and decide.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think President Trump is trying to de escalate now.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 6>And I think what this attack is telling me that

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 6>the Iranians are playing ball. They want to walk away

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 6>from this situation because they realize they're kind of crazy.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>But they're not, you know, they're not stupid.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 6>They're trying to They're realizing that more bombing campaign, both

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 6>from Israel and from the United States may signal the

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 6>end of that regime.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 4>AH many more questions I'd love to ask you. Can

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 4>I just ask you thirty seconds? Does China, being somewhat

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 4>a lot allied with Ron, complicate things.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 7>Very quickly if you could?

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Like twenty five.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 6>Has a four hundred billion dollar investment agreement.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's twenty five.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 6>Years stretch, and they are buying a lot of Iranian.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Oil, and they're doing a lot of other.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Things the Chinese do infrastructure, roads, airports, etc. The Chinese

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 6>do not want that agreement to be destroyed. And I

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 6>would recommend to anybody who is engaged in Iran tell

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese, don't worry, your investment is safe. Same thing

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 6>as we should have done with the Russians in Iraq.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I advocated that back in.

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 6>Two thousand and three, and the Bush administration did not

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 6>listen and we turned Russia against US.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Now the Russians are being very cautious.

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 6>The Russians had that defense agreement with Iran, but it

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 6>did not include mutual defense, mutual military activity. And the Chinese,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 6>again it's very opaque. We do not know what they're supplying.

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 6>Possibly some miss cell technology too. Iran came from China,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 6>we don't know.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 3>That for sure.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 6>But the Chinese are very very cautious because they don't

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 6>have the power projection capability in the Gulf like the

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 6>United States.

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 4>Very interesting, Thank you so much, so appreciate your time today.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Eryl Cohen, non resident Senior Fellow at the Atlanta Council's

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Eurasia Center and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 4>joining us from Washington, DC.

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 2>Well against the backdrop of the war in the Middle East,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>that the US is now involved in an ongoing tariff

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>trade war, we're just a few weeks from that July deadline,

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 2>rising oil prices, Carol, potential disruptions, and chipping through the

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 2>crucial strait of horror moves. The macro economic background is

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>certainly complex. There's a lot for investors to wade through.

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, although risk go on in today's straight Torston's

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Lack is chief economist partner of at Apollo Global Management,

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 4>joining us from New York. Tourston, you did send, first

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 4>of all, welcome, welcome, good to have you here. You

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 4>sent a note out this morning that included data for

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 4>ship crossings in the Strait of Hormus. It's Bloomberg data.

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 4>It does show decline in traffic both.

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 7>West to east, east to west.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 4>Is this your main macroeconomic concern when it comes to

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 4>what we are watching in the Middle East? And the

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 4>potential for even further escalations escalation, and.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 7>I guess not just escalation, but a longer duration of conflict.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 8>I think the bigger picture really here is that we

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 8>already have an economy that is experiencing techflation. We have

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 8>terms higher means, higher inflation, lower GDP growth. We also

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 8>have restrictions on immigration, many deportations. Meaning if you lower

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 8>the labor falls at the moment, the administration has the

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 8>stated goal of lowering labor falls but about a million people.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 9>And of course if you do that.

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 8>You would also begin to have more upward pressure on inflation,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 8>specifically wa inflation, and of course also downward pressure on

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 8>employment and therefore economic activity.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 9>And if we add to that the risks here to

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 9>oil prices.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I do understand that oil prices are now going

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 8>down and.

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 9>Some special reasons for that.

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 8>But the fear of course here is that if the

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 8>oil price increase that we've seen since the beginning of June,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 8>if that is continuously hanging at the current levels or

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 8>even goes higher, of course that will also be staflation,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 8>meaning putting up our pressure on inflation and downward pressure

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 8>on GDP.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 9>So, in summary, adding everything together, where we stand.

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 8>At the moment, We just have that the economy is

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 8>hit by a number of shocks that have the same characteristics,

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 8>namely high inflation and lower.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>GDP Trsten, You've been beating this drum for a while,

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 2>and I was surprised because I read the notes that

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 2>you send. Perhaps I was surprised to hear j. Powell

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>essentially say last week that everything is okay, there are

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 2>no issues starting to form anywhere. That was the takeaway

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I got. Maybe we'll hear something different tomorrow and Wednesday

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 2>when we hear from the Fed chair on Capitol Hill.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that the Fed chair is incorrect with

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>his assessment of the economy?

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 8>Tim this is really really important because what's also very

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 8>interesting is that last week Chris Waller began to talk

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 8>about rapcut in July, and today we had Mickey Bowman

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 8>first talk about rapcot also now in July, and now

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 8>we also have goals by talking about that, Well, the

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 8>dust may have been cleared in the air and maybe

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 8>there's no room for cutting rates. That's very interesting. When

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 8>Japal last week very clearly said word for word, we

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 8>expect a meaningful increase in inflation over the coming months,

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 8>so it's telling you that this rise in inflation that's

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 8>coming as a result of oil prices already haven't gone up,

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 8>this as a result of tariffs already having of course

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 8>gone up, and also as a result of potential up

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 8>by pressure on wage inflation, that the FED is deciding

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 8>to almost look through the coming rise in inflation and

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 8>focus more on the worries about growth slowing down. So yes,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 8>FED watching here at the moment is very interesting simply

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 8>because the dual mandate is torn in opposite directions.

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 9>On the one hand, when inflation is going up, the

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 9>fetch would be hiking. On the other hand, where he

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 9>grows is slowing down, the fetcher be cutting. So where

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 9>do they put that weight? And the last few fitzpeakers

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 9>have clearly said, including.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 8>Today Will Goalsby and Bowman, that the focus should be

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 8>on growth slowing down. So that's why we are probably

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.239
<v Speaker 8>moving more towards more rate cuts coming faster than what

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 8>the marker was pricing just even a few days ago.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 4>I just want to add in one caveat from Austin

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Gooseby towards him where he said, of course, Federal Reserve

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Bank of Chicago President Austin Goolsby. He says the Central

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 4>Bank could resume interest rates cuts if the inflation hit

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 4>from tariff's remains subdued. Don't we have to kind of

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 4>wait a few months to see because ultimately we're going

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 4>to find out hopefully very soon in terms of what

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs really are and how they play out. But

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 4>at any rate it is going to be higher than

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 4>it was before. There will be some cost pressures potentially.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, And that's why what's really interesting in Harold about

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 8>this issue and this debate is, of course this difference

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 8>between what Jappal said Wednesday and now we've had three

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 8>speakers since then that go out and basically say something

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 8>a little bit different. They are all of course conditioning

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 8>on saying if inflation is not a problem, then we'll

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 8>be cutting.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 9>But here the key question becomes what does a problem mean?

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 8>If I on my Blueberg screen side ECFC go and

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 8>I start looking at the consentuous forecast to inflation, you

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 8>will see that the expectation is inflation will go up

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 8>from two point six in this quarter to three point.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 9>Three by the end of the year.

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 8>That's a fairly significant expected increase in invlation. And is

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 8>the fit just going to ignore that rise and say, hey,

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 8>we're just going to cut interest rates and ignore inflation

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 8>is going up. That's why it still remains to be

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 8>seen with the next FROMC meeting what they actually are

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 8>as a committee thinking, because it's very clear that these

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 8>individual members that are moving in a direction of more cuts.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 8>You're right that there are more nuances as both Gostby

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 8>was also pointing out his speech, but definitely also in

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 8>contrast to what Jpal was saying last week.

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's amazing how fast and furious it's coming. Having

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 4>said that, so then the idea of stag vers, I mean,

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I know we've talked about it, We've talked about it

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot here at Bloomberg.

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 7>Is that still a high possibility?

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 8>I still think that it's a high possible at least

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 8>this is what the consensus is expecting. If I do

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 8>look at that Bloomberg screen that shows you the consensus

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 8>expectation again ECFC go, then it will tell you that

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 8>there is the expectation inflation is going up.

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 9>And this was also m GDP growing down.

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 8>This was also what the Fed did last week and

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 8>the CP in the forecast that the Fed published, they

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 8>raised inflation. This year to three percent by the end

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 8>of the year, and they lower grows.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 9>One point four percent.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 8>That means quite uncomfortable for investors scenario, because should I

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 8>put weight on inflation going up on growth slowing down?

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 8>In terms of what the FED will do, And now

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 8>the Fed seems to be leaning, at least with the

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 8>lateste from symbombers towards saying, hey, we're just going to

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 8>ignore the rise in inflation is probably just temporary, and

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 8>then we're.

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 9>Going to cut rates.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 8>But that is where the debate needs to be again

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 8>more clear in terms of what is it that they're

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 8>saying today reads it to what Jip how actually said

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 8>last Wednesday.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm curious because look, you're an economist, you're

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 2>you're you're not going to tell us what stocks to

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 2>buy or you know what equities or what assets to own.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 2>But you do work for an asset manager, and the

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 2>idea is that you advise people there about what to do.

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 2>What should investors be doing in a situation like this,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 2>because by the sound of it, it seems like maybe

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you think the equity market has it wrong right now.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 9>I do think the public equity market has it wrong.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 8>So here's the answer to your question, what you'ld investors do,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 8>they should do three things. The key outcome of everything

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 8>we're talking about here is that interest rates will be

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 8>higher for longer, meaning we're not going down to zero

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 8>interest rates or to dramatically low interest rates. Yes, the

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 8>market is pricing somewhere between one and two cuts this year,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 8>but that's not much.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 9>That means that the level of interest rates this year

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 9>will still be high and next year.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 8>The Fed also just published their forecast saying that interust

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 8>rates will be high.

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 9>And what should you do when interest rates are higher

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 9>for longer? You should be up in.

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 8>Quality opt ecology and credit and private credit. That means

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 8>first lean seeing as secure a top of the campus

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 8>structure to get the best protection you can get against

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 8>the risk of a sharper slowdown. But it must be

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 8>high quality assets, high quality credit to make sure that

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 8>you're protected against the downside risks that comes with this

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 8>risk of growth slowing down. At the same time, the

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 8>second thing that's interesting, Yeah, two more things, Carol. Thing

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 8>that's interesting for investors is, of course, as the things

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 8>that comes with dislocation funds. That means secondaries in pe,

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 8>that means these location funds also in when it comes.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 9>To the broader entry point for private credit and for markets.

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 8>And the last thing that's interesting is of course thematic

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 8>investing things that as five ways, so you can get

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 8>from the trade wall, so that will be infrastructure, data center, inergy, sensation,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 8>climate thinks, the long duration assets that have nothing to do

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 8>with in near term outlook.

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, fifteen seconds on a tenure? Is five percent

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 4>not even a consideration in your world?

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 7>Or could it happen?

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 8>I absolutely think that long term interstrates are going up.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 8>So solter interstrates are going up because of inflation. Long

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 8>ter interstrates are going up because of partly inflation, but

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 8>also because of the fiscal challenges. So there's upward pressure

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 8>on the whole yield curve for these different reasons.

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 4>Even five percent, yes, sir, no, real quick? Yeah you

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 4>think you said yes? I think I saw them say yes.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 7>It's touristed.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, thank you, Turstan slack Over at Apollo Global Management.

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloomberg Business Weekdaily.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Mac.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll a beout.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 8>You let me drive.

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, no no, this is not a toy.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 6>He's going to honey.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Please how the gravel? Listen? I want to drive.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 8>It's a good question, good time.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the clothes dot Com for me.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 9>Thing well dri Jona don.

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 3>On Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 7>All right, TikTok everybody.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we got about just under seventeen minutes. Are going

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 4>to we wrap up the trade on this Monday. It's

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 4>been an interesting one, maybe not as expected. We've seen

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 4>the markets kind of all over the place, and right

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 4>now we are hovering near our highs of the day.

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 7>So we're up almost eight.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Tens of a percent on the S and P five hundred,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 4>up seven tens of a percent in the Dow Jones

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Industrial Average. More than three hundred point moved to the

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 4>upside for the Dow NASTEQ one hundred up almost two

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 4>hundred points. Tim good for a gain of about nine

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 4>tens of a percent, But keep in mind we were

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 4>lower when the initial strikes by iron on cutter, and

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 4>then I think the perception was that it wasn't as

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 4>maybe big as it could have been, or as devastating, I.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 7>Guess, yeah. And so we saw markets bounce off in

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 7>a big way. Oil has been down.

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think what I found pretty shocking just

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>being and this is the day when you want to

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>be a fly on a wall in a newsroom, because

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>we're following the headlines. The markets are moving with the headlines.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 2>At twelve thirty three pm Wall Street time, we saw

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>stocks fall because the Wall Street jonnel reported that Ron

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 2>moved launchers for a possible attack on US forces. And

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 2>then less than an hour later we get this headline

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Cutter says, it's successfully intercepted Iran missile attack. We see

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>a breath of relief in the markets, and we start

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to see them move higher.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, exactly.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 4>If I'm going back to crude futures, which we're up

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 4>more than six percent at they're high. Today they're down

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 4>almost seven percent as we speak. I go back to

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 4>our conversation with Dick Wanham's about the choreography, like I just.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 7>There's you know, we'll see, we'll see where this all lands.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to see what Megan Horneman has to say

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 2>about this. She's chief investment officer at Burden's Capital Advisor.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>She joins us from Hunt Valley, Maryland. Meghan, I want

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to let everybody know that in the notes that you

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>sent out today, you make the point that you are

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>market specialists, not political experts. So we're not going to

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>ask you about the politics of this. We're going to

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 2>ask you about the market reaction. It's been muted on.

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 3>The equity side.

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 2>We saw oil go up, now oil go down. Why

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 2>a muted reaction to a military operation and esc adding

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 2>conflicts such as this.

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 10>So I think coming in this morning and we can

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 10>talk about equities first. When we came in this morning,

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 10>it was it was it was a muted reaction. Equity

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 10>futures were actually up before the market open, and then

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 10>it was relatively you know, positive, but not by much.

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 10>And I think that markets were just awaiting what was

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 10>going to happen next. And I think the surprise you

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 10>know that that Qatar had was being you know, Iran

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 10>and launched missiles against Qatar. This the markets reacted to

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 10>the fact that this was a better than expected I

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 10>guess reaction from Iran. So what we saw was you know,

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 10>the markets down when the news broke that they were

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 10>going to attack guitar and then them come all the

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.959
<v Speaker 10>way back now sitting here near record highs as the

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 10>markets seeing that, hey, that this was not that big

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 10>of a move. So I think the market's just celebrating

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 10>the fact that there hasn't been anything major yet and

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 10>the retaliation efforts that Iran has taken thus far haven't

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 10>been that detrimental.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 7>Are you surprised? I mean, I think, you know, we

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 7>came in and it felt.

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 4>A little quiet, and then of course the headlines you know,

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 4>started around midday in terms of what's going on and cutter,

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 4>but it just felt like an uneasy quiet. Certainly this

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 4>morning we were surprised by the market reaction or what

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 4>does it tell you, maybe more longer term or maybe nothing.

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 10>I was a bit surprised this morning that it was

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 10>so quiet. Even the VIX index really didn't move much.

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it was more than less than half of

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 10>what we saw in the during the liberation spike, what

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 10>we saw in volatility. So I was a bit surprised

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 10>that the equity markets relatively muted. I'm a bit more

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 10>surprised that oil futures have sold off so much. I

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 10>don't think that's behind US. I do think any disruption

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 10>in the Middle East can have an impact on oil prices,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 10>so I'm a little surprised at how quickly they decline.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we're down on the day, you know that.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 10>That's surprising when we're looking at such a dramatic impact

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 10>that we saw over the weekend in Iran.

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 4>I think we're still up though about I want to say,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 4>about four percent since that initial Israel attack on Iran.

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 4>So I think we're still up. But you're right today,

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 4>you know we're down a lot. We've seen actually a

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 4>pretty big swing. So what do you do for clients

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 4>right now?

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 10>Well, first of all, we have to not be complacent.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 10>We have to realize that, yes, we haven't seen any

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 10>major retaliatory impacts from Iran. It does look like we've

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 10>weakened them in some respect. But don't be complacent either.

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 10>We still do have a conflict in the Middle East

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 10>and that can have impacts on the market. And what

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 10>we've seen with history, if you look at any of

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 10>the different military actions the US has taken, they tend

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 10>to see some weakness, but positive equity markets in the

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 10>long term. So that's what we're telling clients right now.

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 10>We're focusing on the long term. We're not going to

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 10>get emotional and just sell everything because of this conflict. Instead,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 10>we're going to look at long term fundamentals us economy.

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 10>The FED still is on the table to be able

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 10>to cut rates this year. The economy is weakening but

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 10>not completely falling off a cliff, and we're seeing that,

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 10>you know, consumers, The confidence has been very weak, but

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 10>consumers still are out there, So there are some positives

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 10>to note. Don't forget. There's several things though, coming up

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 10>in the next couple of weeks where we also don't

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 10>want to be complacent. We have earning season picking up,

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 10>and then we still have that July ninth deadline. From

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 10>a tariff perspective, don't be complacent on some of these

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 10>other risks that are out there. So don't sell into this.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 10>But I wouldn't necessarily be buying into this either, which what.

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Changes your view though, what makes you either run for

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the hills or says, Okay, we better strap in for

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the long haul here.

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 10>I think if the if we start to see this

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 10>intensify and broaden out beyond just Iran and Israel. If

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 10>other countries get involved, that obviously wouldn't.

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Make anathy like the US did over the weekend.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, the US again has been trying to get Iran

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 10>to the negotiating table for many many months, and this

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 10>has failed and failed and failed. And it's not just

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, this has been many administrations. So again the

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 10>US did get get involved in this. The US has

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 10>also said this isn't a declaration of war. The other countries,

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 10>where we get China, Russia, some of these other big

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 10>powerhouses involved, that's going to be a concern for me.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 10>If it does escalate beyond just these missiles that are

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 10>going into Israel that are being intercepted by their dome,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 10>that's a concern as well because they are one of

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 10>our key allies.

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 7>Meghan, thanks so much. Megan Horneman.

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 4>She's chief Investment Officer of at Vernon's Capital Advisors, joining

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 4>us from Maryland on this Monday.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Tune in and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal