WEBVTT - Tech News: The Political War Against Social Media

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? It is Friday, January twenty sixth, twenty

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, and I thought maybe we would talk about

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>some tech news. And we've got a lot of news

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that we could touch on due to the fact that

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I was out of commission for most of the month.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>But I figure we're just going to focus on what's recent.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So first up, this week, Tesla held an earnings call,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and the results didn't fill investors with optimism. The company

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>did not meet market expectations last quarter, and Elon Musk

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>indicated that twenty twenty four is likely to be a

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>slower year than what the company had hoped for. So

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in response, investors lost a little bit of confidence in

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the EV company and stock prices dropped around twelve percent.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is currently working on a new vehicle, which is

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>code named Redwood. This EV is said to be targeted

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for like a lower price point. It's meant to be

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>a mass market vehicle and it's rumored to be in

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the compact crossover category. Musk said it'll actually be sometime

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of twenty twenty five when It's

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Texas manufacturing facility will actually begin production. He also indicated

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla employees should anticipate some very long work days

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>leading up to that production. He flat out said they

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>should expect to work long shifts and sleep at the

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing plant. Once again, Musk shows he has a firm

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>grasp on how to motivate a workforce. In the meantime,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>investors continue to worry about their nest eggs and they

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>shoot ugly glances at Musk whenever he gets bogged down

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in X slash Twitter drama, which, as you imagine, happens

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Next up, I've got a whole bunch of

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>social network related news, but mercifully I've left out the

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff about X, because honestly, the recent X news is

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just so ugly I can't even so. First up, Meta

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>announced that its platforms Facebook and Instagram will automatically block

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>any direct messages sent to teenage users unless those messages

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>come from someone who is already a friend of that

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>user on those platforms, and this applies even if both

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of the users are teenagers. So if TEMA sends Team

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>B a DM but they aren't already friends on these platforms,

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>team B will not get that message. However, if they

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>are friends on the platform, the message will go through.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Also for Facebook Messenger, it's a little different. If Team

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>B is in Teena's phone contacts from why, I understand,

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the message would then go through, but they have to

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>already be confirmed friends or contacts with each other. The

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>age barrier is dependent upon the country you're in, so

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in some countries this will only impact users who are

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>under the age of sixteen. In a few other countries,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that age is actually up to eighteen. This is not

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a perfect system because I don't know if you've heard

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about this, but there's this thing called lying, in which

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 1>someone could tell a social platform that they're older when

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in fact they are not. I know, it's insidious, right.

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Meta does have some systems in place that are designed

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to predict a person's age to try and head that

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>thing off, to determine, Hey, is this person actually the

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>age that they claim to be? But I have no

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>clue how good it is, how reliable is this tech?

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, And considering how some of my grown

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>ass friends act like they're five year olds. I'm really

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>curious how any Aisis can figure out anything at all.

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Meta has been under a ton of scrutiny and litigation

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>regarding how it can impact users, particularly young users, and

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly this is a move to try and mollify some

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of the company's harshest critics. If you'd like to learn more,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I recommend Mary Ella Moon's article Facebook and Instagram will

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>block dms to teens unless they're from a friend and

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that is on the site. In Gadget Gizmotos, Thomas Jermaine

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 1>has what is, in my opinion, a justifiably snarky article

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>titled NYC mayor calls social media and environmental toxin announces

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it on social media. Oh the irony so. Jermaine explains

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that Mayor Eric Adams of the Big Apple took to

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the podium as well as the Internet's to declare social

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>media a public menace, something akin to guns and tobacco,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>which just makes me think that like our four fathers

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US would have traded these things back in

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the day. You know, you ship guns and tobacco and

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>social media across the frontier anyway. Mayor Adams was arguing

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that social platforms have made choices that have caused direct

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>or indirect harm to young people. And honestly, I do

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>think there is some truth in that. We've talked on

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the show about how algorithms can reinforce messaging that at

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the very least is unhealthy or promotes misinformation. And these

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>social platforms use algorithms in order to drive engagement and

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to keep people tied to their services for as long

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as is possible, all to serve as many ads to

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>them as is possible. And to the platforms, it doesn't

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really matter if the messages they serve are good or

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bad or whatever. They're kind of amorl when it comes

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to that. They just want the messages to be effective

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep them there and to keep them engaged. It

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what other impacted the messages might have. If

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the bad messages are more effective at keeping people there

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>than good messages are, well, them's the breaks. So yeah,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I do think these networks have engaged in activities that

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are harmful to users, not just young ones, old ones

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like me too. I mean, it's the reason why you

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>don't find me on nearly any social media these days now.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Germaine in his article makes a solid point. There does

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>appear to be a correlation between social media use and

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a decline in mental health. But we all know correlation

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is not the same thing as causation. It's a leap

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to say that one is causing the other, and that

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is valid. It's possible that social media dependency does lead

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to poor mental health. That is possible. It's also possible

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that people who already have poor mental health find themselves

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>drawn to using social media more so it doesn't become

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>causal in one direction, maybe it's in the other. Maybe

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the situation is far more complicated than any of that.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So Jermaine goes on to point out how social platforms

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>can and do exacerbate real problems in our real world,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like the spread of hate speech or misinformation. So there

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>are valid reasons to be concerned about social media, though honestly,

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember these platforms they're facilitators. It's not

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like they're magically generating this material, right, The materials not

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>originating out of the platforms. Regular old humans are doing this,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes with the help of AI. So sometimes it's AI

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>boosted human efforts to spread misery. But the platforms just

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>make it really easy to deliver and spread the messaging,

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jermaine rightly points out that even Mayor Adams points out,

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't know to what extent or what in what

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>way social media actually interacts with mental health. It just

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>appears to have a negative relationship, but we don't really

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>know very much about that. But Mayor Adams is convinced

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's bad and it should be addressed, So I

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>recommend reading the article. I don't one hundred percent agree

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with Jermaine's point of view, but I feel like we're

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>more in agreement than otherwise. I just think we differ

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a tiny bit toward the tail end of the matter.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm also quick to say Jermaine may be more

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>right than I am. But go check out that article

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to learn more. Katie Kinderln of Good Morning America on

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ABC News wrote an article titled Florida House of Representatives

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>approves bill to ban social media for kids under sixteen.

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So here we see another example of lawmakers taking a

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>stand against these companies and their networks. The bill will

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>actually need to go to the state's Senate for approval,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and then, if approved, it would then go to the

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>governor's desk to be signed into law or vetoed, whichever

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the governor decides, although I think DeSantis would probably uphold

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this one. Kendalyn points out that the bill passed with

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>an overwhelming majority in the House one hundred and six

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and six to thirteen, and that the bill

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>received a good deal of bipartisan support, and that's understandable. Again,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there's this perception that social networks are hurting users, particularly

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>young ones. So the bill would make it illegal for

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>these platforms to grant accounts to any Floridian user under

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the age of sixteen, something that I suspect will be

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult to enforce. I mean, a kid in Florida could

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>either lie about their age or maybe where they live

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to get around this block. Sure, a network

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook could take note of a person's physical location

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>while they attempt to make an account, But who's to

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>say you couldn't make an account while you happen to

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>be on vacation. Like if I happened to be a

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen year old kid from Georgia and I'm decided that

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to make a Facebook account while I'm vacationing

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, maybe because I'm surrounded by old people and

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it's rubbing off on me. I should be able to

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>do that, right because I'm not a citizen of Florida.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that Florida law would argue that it covers

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone under the age of sixteen who's in the state,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>whether they happen to be a citizen of the state

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or not. Anyway, I don't think it's really enforceable. I

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>also don't think it addresses the root problem. Like I said,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>these networks, they exacerbate things that are already out there,

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and cutting off the networks doesn't stop the harm at best,

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it just slows it down. Anyway, we'll follow up on

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this story once we know where it goes, when it

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>passes through the state Senate, or if it doesn't pass

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll check back then. One story that passed me by

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>while I was recovering from my little adventure through the

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>American healthcare system was that a media company called Doodzy

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>released a v on YouTube that ruffled a lot of

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>feathers because of how it used AI to quote unquote

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>resurrect a beloved comedian who passed away years ago. That

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>comedian was George Carlin, a man known for making shrewd

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>satirical and often hilarious observations about culture, politics, media, and

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>everything else. He had a reputation for pointing out hypocrisy

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and holding it up for public scrutiny. While the media

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>company created an hour long comedy special featuring what they

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>claimed to be was an AI generated impression of Carlin. So,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>according to the video, the voice, the content, the cadence,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the delivery, all of it came courtesy of AI attempting

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to copy Carlin's style while generating new material. Now, Carlin's

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>estate has filed a lawsuit against this media company, arguing

0:11:54.480 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that Dudezi has infringed upon copyright and has effectively stolen personality.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The estate seeks damages and also the immediate removal of

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this video. So Carlin's estate also argues that the special

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>harms the comedian's reputation and that it does represent theft.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the most high profile examples of creatives

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>criticizing AI content generation and arguing that the whole enterprise

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>depends upon plagiarism and that stands as a threat to

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's actually in a creative field. This is one

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of the big concerns that both the Writer's Guild of

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>America and sag Aftra had in their recent strikes against

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>producers in Hollywood that studios could use AI to bypass

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>real human creatives entirely while making something that lacks the

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>sole sincerity and creativity of human endeavor. If you'd like

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to learn more, I recommend checking out J. Kim Murphy's

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>article George Carlin Estate files lawsuit against group behind AI

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>generated stand up Special, a casual theft of a great

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>American artist's work that's in variety. Wired's Paresh Dave has

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>an article titled open Ai Quietly Scrapped a promise to

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>disclose key documents to the public, and I think it's

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>well worth reading. It's another illustration of how the Open

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Ai of today appears to be quite different from the

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>original concept of the organization. So back in the idealistic days,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the company's founders, which at the time included Elon Musk,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>intended open ai to be a research center committed to

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 1>advancing AI technologies in a responsible, safe and helpful way,

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and to share its findings with the world to best

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>ensure that we all enter a future in which AI

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>provides the most benefit and the fewest terminators, and that

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>requires a certain level of transparency. However, it seems that

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>open ai has now drifted a bit from those ideals,

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>which reminds me a lot of Google. Once upon a time,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Google famously had a motto that read don't be Evil

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as part of its corporate conduct. In fact, it was

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>in the preface for its corporate conduct and was up

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on the walls of certain Google buildings. But Google took

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that motto off the preface and the walls and then

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just sort of buried it at the end of the

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>corporate conduct statement. So it's still there, but it's just

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>now it's at the end of it, not prominently at

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, and it kind of was an indicator

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that Google had changed its approach. Well. Anyway, Wired sent

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a request for documents from open ai back in December

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of last year, and they received a response saying that

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>open AI's policy of sharing governing documents has changed. That

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>changed back in twenty twenty two, and now the company

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>only sends financial statements. As Wired points out, this could

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be one of several changes that prompted the former board

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of directors of open ai to suddenly co founder and

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>CEO Sam Altman last year. Of course, that decision didn't

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>last very long, and soon afterward the entire board of

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>directors almost had changed and Sam Altman was back in

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the saddle. But my point is, it looks like open

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Ai has changed, perhaps gradually, to a point that it's

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>at odds with the original founding mission of the company,

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and that the board was uncomfortable with how things were going.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems a bit like a boiling frog situation. You

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>know that idea that you got a frog in water

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and you just gradually increase the temperature of the water

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>until the frog is done dead from being boiled, and

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it never hopped out because you know you were increasing

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that temperature so gradually you SICKO. Anyway, I recommend the

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>article to learn more about how things have changed, as

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>well as what this could possibly mean for open AI

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and the way that companies tackle AI development in general. Okay,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take a quick break. When we come back,

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>we got a lot more tech news to go through.

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>We're back and still have a couple of AI things

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to chat about. So Scott Foster of Asia Times has

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a short article titled Samsung to build all AI no

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>human chip factories, So yes, the future of an all robot.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>All automated manufacturing facility is around the corner. They would seem.

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>It's still gonna take some time right now. The projected

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>launch date would be sometime around twenty thirty. If it works,

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>then the manufacturing plant won't rely on human labor at all.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>AI will design and build and package products all by itself.

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh brave new world to have no people in it.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Post reported this week that the Securities in

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Exchange Commission the SEC and the Department of Justice DOJ

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, the US are investigating GM's

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Cruise division. That is, the division that's in charge of developing, deploying,

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and operating driverless vehicles, which have been used as a

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ride hailing service. Last year, one of the Cruise vehicles

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was involved in an accident, and it included an incident

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in which the cruise vehicle struck a pedestrian and dragged

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>her for twenty feet at approximately seven miles per hour.

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>While the vehicle should have immediately come to a stop

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>after striking the pedestrian, in fact, it shouldn't have struck

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the pedestrian at all, but once doing so, it should

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have stopped. Instead, it mistakenly interpreted the accident as one

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that impacted the car's side and so it was attempting

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to pull over and get out of traffic. The pedestrians

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>suffered additional injuries due to this error, as you can imagine.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're being dragged behind a car at

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>seven miles per hour, that's like twice the speed of walking.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>That's going to hurt. So the next day, government officials

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>met with the company to investigate the incident, which makes sense,

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and at that meeting, Cruise employees failed to, you know,

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>mention that their car had dragged a person twenty feet

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>down the road at seven miles per hour. So instead

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>their narrative largely focused on another vehicle, a Nissan that

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was under human control, that was also involved in this accident,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and the implication appeared to be that Cruz was saying

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>it was really the driver of the Nissan, it was

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>their fault for the pedestrians injuries, and that the Cruise

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>vehicle really wasn't to blame. Now, according to Cruise, their

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>intention was to show a video of the incident to officials,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and this video presumably would have included the fact that

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the pedestrian had been dragged behind the Cruise vehicle, but

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a problem with their internet meant they couldn't get the

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>video to play. And then CRU's employees just sort of,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, didn't mention it. They didn't say, hey, you know,

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the video would have shown this, and we probably should

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you that our card dragged her for twenty feet.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>They didn't. They didn't cover the gap that was left

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>by this lack of video, which seems pretty darn horrifying

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>not to mention stupid. I mean, you'd have to assume

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that the truth would come out, and it did so

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>not being forthcoming and bringing it up yourself makes you

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>look even worse, which it has, at least in my

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>opinion it has. Anyway, since that incident, the division of

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Cruz has changed quite a bit. Co founder Daniel Khan

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>resigned from Cruz, Kyle Vote, the CEO, left the company,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and GM also downsized nearly a quarter of the staff

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>working at cru So just another example of what can

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>happen when AI goes wrong, not to mention when people

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>fail to acknowledge when AI has gone wrong. Next up,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple is loosening its grip on iOS a little bit,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but only if you happen to live in the European Union.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>This is, of course, so that Apple will be in

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>compliance with regulations that passed in the EU just last year,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and Apple is not happy about it. So it's not

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>like the company had some sort of massive change of

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>heart or anything. In fact, Apple representatives have indicated in

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>plain English that the company feels this is a terrible,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible mistake. But the changes mean that for the first time,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>EU iPhone users will be able to install fully featured

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>browsers other than Safari on their iPhones. So you have

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand that these browsers run on of browser engines,

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how game engines provide a foundation for

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>certain types of video games, and that's why certain video

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>games feel very different from others, is that they might

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>be built on top of a different game engine. Well,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>browsers are built on top of browser engines, and on iPhones,

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>at least up until now, all browsers needed to run

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>on top of the WebKit browser engine. However, several competing

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>browsers typically would use a totally different browser engine to

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>underlie their functionality. So in order to comply with Apple's

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>requirements and to be able to run on Apple devices,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>these other browsers had to make a version of their

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>browser that could run on top of WebKit, and sometimes

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that meant they had to shed features that would work

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on their browser in order to be compatible with WebKit.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>But now EU iPhone users can have other browser engines

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on them, which means these alternatives like Google Chrome will

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to exist fully featured on iOS devices for

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the first time. Now that's just one change that's happening

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>with iPhones and other iOS devices in the EU. Another

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is that Apple is going to allow users to sideload

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>apps onto their devices for the first time. Sideloading is

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>when you go to some third party source for apps,

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so you're not going to the official iOS app store.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>In the past, Apple only let you download apps from

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the official store unless you went to some sort of

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>extreme like if you did a jail break on your iPhone,

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>which was not easy to do and sometimes could break

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>your phone, then you had to get all of your

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>apps from the iOS store. However, now EU users will

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to access third party apps or third party

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>stores in order to get apps, and Apple says this

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous for the Apple's longest running statement on this

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is that the reason why they have this draconian control

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>over where you can get your apps on your phone

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is in order to protect you. It's because you, as

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a user are far too vulnerable and you're just a

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>naive little fond dancing through the woods, and meanwhile there

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are predators all around you. So Apple says that allowing

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>people to sideload apps is a compromise to privacy and security,

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.479
<v Speaker 1>but they have to do it. They have to comply

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with these EU rules. So regulators have said the reason

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>why they've got to comply is because the policy Apple

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>had in place gave it a monopolistic hold on its

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>app system, and that this would open up the app environment.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And it'll be interesting to see what it all looks

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like a year from now. So will the EU show

0:23:55.400 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>how an open environment benefits customers or will the entire

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Higher Continent be reduced to sinders because regulators allowed chaos

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to rain unchecked. We'll just have to wait and see. Recently,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Netflix revealed that one place you will not be able

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to access its content is on the upcoming mixed reality

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>headset from Apple called the Vision Pro. You won't even

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to launch the iPad version of the Netflix

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>app on the Vision Pro when it launches next week.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>At least not as it stands right now. You will

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to access Netflix if you use the vision

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Pro and you go through Safari. So if you actually

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>do the web browser version, but you won't have a

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>native app for the headset, nor will you be able

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>to use the iPad version. So according to nine to

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>five Mac, Netflix's CEO actually just one of Netflix's CEO,

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there are co CEOs, Greg Peters. He said that the

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>vision pro is quote unquote subscale. By that, he means

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>there wouldn't be enough un in circulation and enough interest

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>among the owners of those units to justify building out

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>an experiencement just for that platform. It would cost more

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>than what they would make back from the people who

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>actually owned these devices. Sick Burn. I mean, it's interesting

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to me because for a very long time I would

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>joke that Netflix's strategy was to get on every single

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>screen it could, whether that screen was on a smartphone

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or a tablet, or it was part of a video

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>game console, or maybe a smart refrigerator or perhaps your

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>washing machine. So for Netflix to say, yeah, we figure

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is not a good return on investment. When

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the Vision Pro, it seems at least

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>initially to be a pretty big slap to Apple's face,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>but then we figure that Apple isn't producing a huge

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>number of these things. It's probably in the tens of thousands,

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they'd cost more than three grand

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a pop means it is going to be a niche

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>product for the most part. There are always Apple fanatics,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there are developers who are interested in the platform, there

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>are companies that are interested in a platform. But still

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of phenomenal in a world where we worry

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about inflation and there's been so much talk about inflation

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that you're spending money wisely, that people

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are still willing to spend thousands of dollars on an

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>unproven mixed reality headset that appears to be a huge

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>compromise from Apple's original quote unquote vision. It just it

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>blows my mind. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. There

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>are people who have way more money than they have since,

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and I guess that's always going to be the case anyway.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>If you bought a Vision pro, by the way, no

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>shade on you, like you probably have legit reasons why

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you did. I'm just still flabbergasted that they sold all

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of the pre production units, or at least all the

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>ones that they plan on manufacturing in the near future. Anyway,

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>it's still pretty fair to say that it would be

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a difficult sell to make something specific for the Vision

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Pro just because the user base is going to be small.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's probably going to be a big challenge

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for Apple moving forward, convincing developers to spend the time

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and money it takes to create new apps for the

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Vision Pro knowing that there's a limited reach, like there's

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just a limited user base, and are these developers willing

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to perhaps take a loss on that initial launch group

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in the hopes that it will establish a foundation for

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a larger customer base moving forward. I don't know the

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>answer to that. I know that if I were developing apps,

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I would be thinking twice before creating something for the

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Vision Pro, just because I could spend that same amount

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of time. I'm an effort developing for established platforms and

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>actually know that I have a good chance of making

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a return on my investment rather than doing something that

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>might work out. But then it's Apple. Apple's got such

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a long track record of making technology work when nobody

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>else could make it work. Before them. It's hard for

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>me to say anyway, it's it's going to be interesting

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to see how things unfold once the product launches next week,

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very curious to hear people's honest reviews of it.

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a suspicion that the actual experience of using

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the device is pretty darn impressive, but I'm not sure

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it will be enough to convince someone like me to

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>start setting money aside to buy it. I just don't

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's enough for me yet. Anyway, that's enough about that.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take another quick break and when we

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>come back, I've got a little bit more news to

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>finish off with, so we'll be back right after these messages. Okay,

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we're back, and we've got a little bit of a

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>inspiring but sort of sad story, and that is the

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Ingenuity helicopter has flown its final mission on Mars. This

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>was the little drone copter that could, and it last

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>flew on January eighteenth. It briefly lost contact with the

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Perseverance land Rover that's the vehicle that it launched with

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>way back in the day, but the two regained connectivity

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later, and at that point NASA engineers

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>discovered that at least one of Ingenuity's rotors had broken

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>during its final flight, so it will go flying no more.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But this little sucker had already achieved far more than

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what NASA initially hoped. Now, let's set aside the fact

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that NASA occasionally sets modest goals with the hopes of

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>exceeding them, kind of following in the footsteps of engineer

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Scotty on Star Trek, who would always say he would

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>underpromise and over deliver. That way, it always seemed like

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.719
<v Speaker 1>he was a genius. Right If he says, oh, I

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have it to you in three hours, and then like

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in an hour later he gets it done, it looks

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like he just really busted his button got it done.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>NASA kind of follows the same thing, like they're careful

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>with setting mission parameters because space is hard y'all. Like,

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take anything away from NASA. Being

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>able to do anything successfully in a space oriented mission

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is a huge achievement, So being careful with your goals

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing. So NASA's mission parameters for Ingenuity

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>were for it to do five test flights over the

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>course of thirty days. That was it. They thought, if

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we can do five, like, we don't even know if

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we can take off once because Mars's atmosphere is really thin,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so you have to you know, being able to provide

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>enough lift to get even a light drone off the

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>ground is challenging. You just you don't have the thickness

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of atmosphere that you would have in a place like Earth.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>But by the end of Ingenuity's time on Mars, it

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>had flown seventy two times phenomenal. It had even survived

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Martian Winter like there was concern that the cold of

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Mars's winter would really shut down all of Ingenuity systems,

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and it did, but NASA was able to reheat those

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>systems and to reboot Ingenuities computer systems and have it

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>still be operational. They even sent updates to Ingenuities capabilities,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like they gave it firmware updates, and it suddenly was

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>able to do more autonomous activities like identifying safe landing zones.

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It even did a couple of emergency landings and did

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>so successfully. It's just fantastic, and it means that there

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was this huge amount of information and practical experience that

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>NASA was able to gather that they can then use

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to build into future missions. And when you start to

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>think about how far drone technology has come over the

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>last decade because Ingenuities planning started like back in twenty twelve,

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>when you think about how far we've come with those advancements,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it really makes you get excited about the future of

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>space exploration and space travel because we can apply what

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we know as well as the advances in that technology

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to create even better, more capable drones in the future

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and use them to conduct science that in the past

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>would have been impossible for us. So honestly, my head

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is off for Ingenuity and the team behind it. Y'all

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>did good. This was an incredible achievement, one that I

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think I would have imagined I would have seen

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in my lifetime, so I'm so pleased that I'm wrong

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>about that. Now, that wraps up the main news items,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but before I go, I do have a couple of

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>article recommendations for you on top of the ones I've

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned already in this episode. Both of these recommendations involve

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>upsetting stories, so these are not happy stories. And first

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>up is a piece by Janie Rose of Motherboard, and

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's an article that's titled Taylor Swift is Living every

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Woman's AI Nightmare. And as the title suggests, this is

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>about deep fake technology and how it enables people to

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dehumanize victims. And let's face it, most of these victims

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>are women or they are female presenting, and they use

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>these to create all sorts of AI generated pornographic images

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and then they spread them online and lots of platforms

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have served as kind of distribution centers. X is a

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>big one. Reddit used to be. They've gotten better at

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>cutting back on that, but yeah, there are places online

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>where this just sort of runs rampant. You're not surprised

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that it does so on X because Elon Musk famously

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>cut way back on content moderation when he acquired that

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>company and has shown very little interest in addressing these things,

0:34:55.840 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>so it becomes an ongoing issue over there. I think

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the article is a really important read, and it does

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tie in with some of the threads that I mentioned

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the George Carlin story in this episode, right, this

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of using AI to victimize people in various ways.

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>The deep fake stuff is really disturbing. It's been really

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>troubling to me for a couple of years. Now and

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>it's only getting worse. And obviously the sexualization is one

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>element of deep fake technology, but there are other facets too, right,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Like there's the potential of using deep fakes to spread misinformation.

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a really troubling topic, but I think it's an

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>important article to read. Again. That's called Taylor Swift is

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Living every Woman's AI porn Nightmare. It's on Motherboard or

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Vice if you prefer. It's by Jenis Rose. The other

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>article I want to recommend is from our old buddy

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jermaine, and by old buddy. Don't know Thomas Jermaine

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. We just mentioned one of his articles earlier

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in this episode. This is on Gizmoto. The article is

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>titled iPhone apps secretly harvest data when they send you notifications.

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Researchers find so yeah, not happy, right, like to find

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out that just by receiving a notification, an app may

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be gathering information about you. In fact, is gathering information

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>about you and the implications that has on your own

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>privacy and security. It's it's not fun to read about,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>but I think it is important to know about, particularly

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>if you have any concern at all about privacy and security. Now,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>as always, I have no connection to these reporters, to

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the writers, journalists, to the outlets. I just find their

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 1>work to be interesting and worth reading. So go check

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that out. And that wraps up this tech news episode

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for this week on January twenty sixth, twenty twenty four.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope all of you are well. I'm getting better

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>every day, which is nice. It's a nice change of pace,

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.