WEBVTT - 30 Years Gone

0:00:08.245 --> 0:00:14.365
<v Speaker 1>School of Humans. As I go through the case file

0:00:14.525 --> 0:00:19.005
<v Speaker 1>one last time, three moments stand out to me. It's

0:00:19.045 --> 0:00:23.565
<v Speaker 1>September eleventh, nineteen eighty nine, two days after Janie Ward died.

0:00:24.605 --> 0:00:28.925
<v Speaker 1>It's around noon at the Junction Liquor store in Big Flat, Arkansas.

0:00:29.445 --> 0:00:32.965
<v Speaker 1>A pickup truck pulls into the parking lot. Gary Don

0:00:33.045 --> 0:00:35.325
<v Speaker 1>is the driver, and he's hauling two kegs off the

0:00:35.365 --> 0:00:38.405
<v Speaker 1>back of the truck. He comes inside says that one

0:00:38.445 --> 0:00:41.125
<v Speaker 1>of the kegs is untapped and he wants a refund.

0:00:42.165 --> 0:00:45.845
<v Speaker 1>His request is denied. The keg is several days old

0:00:45.925 --> 0:00:49.125
<v Speaker 1>and it hadn't been on ice. Gary Don asks again,

0:00:49.405 --> 0:00:53.925
<v Speaker 1>more aggressively. This time he is refused again. He hadn't

0:00:53.965 --> 0:00:57.325
<v Speaker 1>even brought one of the keg taps back. Gary Don

0:00:57.365 --> 0:01:00.605
<v Speaker 1>gives up. He slams the door of his truck, annoyed

0:01:00.645 --> 0:01:08.285
<v Speaker 1>that he couldn't get the money back. It's April two

0:01:08.325 --> 0:01:11.885
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven and investigators are asking Sherry, who was

0:01:11.925 --> 0:01:15.085
<v Speaker 1>one of the passengers in Ron Roses truck, about the

0:01:15.205 --> 0:01:18.125
<v Speaker 1>night Janie died and what she thinks happened. There's no

0:01:18.125 --> 0:01:22.685
<v Speaker 1>one down there fighting, There is no one doing anything here.

0:01:23.005 --> 0:01:24.725
<v Speaker 1>She had no one who did find her there was

0:01:24.805 --> 0:01:27.485
<v Speaker 1>no boy that she was dating someone else's life, and

0:01:28.005 --> 0:01:30.005
<v Speaker 1>you know all those unders that have always gone around.

0:01:30.165 --> 0:01:32.885
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I just don't believe that anything happened

0:01:32.885 --> 0:01:35.725
<v Speaker 1>there in all these hears in school, even saying they're

0:01:35.765 --> 0:01:39.605
<v Speaker 1>rum and rumors among the kids. No, the only ones

0:01:39.685 --> 0:01:43.885
<v Speaker 1>who've ever made allegations and who brought up rumor had

0:01:43.885 --> 0:01:48.125
<v Speaker 1>been her parents and adults, not the kids. There's no

0:01:48.205 --> 0:01:50.525
<v Speaker 1>way that if something bad had happened, it would have

0:01:50.565 --> 0:01:54.045
<v Speaker 1>not somehow gotten through the kids in school. Even teachers

0:01:54.085 --> 0:01:56.645
<v Speaker 1>here things. The teacher's never heard anything because we see

0:01:56.685 --> 0:01:59.925
<v Speaker 1>these outside. So I mean, I don't know. I'm times

0:01:59.965 --> 0:02:05.485
<v Speaker 1>that anything happened to her. That same day, Investigators interview Kim.

0:02:05.685 --> 0:02:09.725
<v Speaker 1>She says that September ninth, nineteen eighty nine, was the

0:02:09.765 --> 0:02:13.005
<v Speaker 1>worst day of her life. Fourth day in my life.

0:02:13.245 --> 0:02:17.725
<v Speaker 1>I I can understand. It's been thirty years and we

0:02:17.885 --> 0:02:22.325
<v Speaker 1>still don't know how Janie Ward died. I'm Catherine Townsend

0:02:23.005 --> 0:03:01.045
<v Speaker 1>and this is Helen Gone. Janie's third autopsy was filled

0:03:01.085 --> 0:03:04.085
<v Speaker 1>with observers. There was a representative for the Ward family,

0:03:04.365 --> 0:03:09.125
<v Speaker 1>a forensic anthropology, and ABC had their FBI consultant, Brad

0:03:09.125 --> 0:03:13.285
<v Speaker 1>Garrett in the room. Brad worked at the FBI for years.

0:03:13.805 --> 0:03:17.445
<v Speaker 1>He worked on tons of high profile cases. Because of this,

0:03:18.125 --> 0:03:21.805
<v Speaker 1>he got the nickname doctor Death. When he first started

0:03:21.805 --> 0:03:25.605
<v Speaker 1>looking into Janey's case, even before the third autopsy, he

0:03:25.645 --> 0:03:29.125
<v Speaker 1>didn't think anything pointed to a homicide. Well, it was

0:03:29.325 --> 0:03:33.805
<v Speaker 1>really unclear to me based on the initial evidence that

0:03:33.965 --> 0:03:38.085
<v Speaker 1>looked at you. And I will say that it struck

0:03:38.125 --> 0:03:40.685
<v Speaker 1>me that the Arkansas State Police really did a great

0:03:40.805 --> 0:03:44.125
<v Speaker 1>job of trying to figure out what really happened at

0:03:44.125 --> 0:03:48.125
<v Speaker 1>this cabin. And I started get in the flavor of

0:03:48.325 --> 0:03:51.485
<v Speaker 1>and I totally ABC this early on was I'm not

0:03:51.525 --> 0:03:55.245
<v Speaker 1>sure this is a homicide. It could be, but it's

0:03:55.285 --> 0:03:58.045
<v Speaker 1>not in my mind, not at least at that point

0:03:58.085 --> 0:04:04.405
<v Speaker 1>going together as sort of a clearcutter of an homicide

0:04:04.405 --> 0:04:07.565
<v Speaker 1>that it really could be something else. Is there anything

0:04:07.605 --> 0:04:10.165
<v Speaker 1>specific that you remember about this case in terms of that.

0:04:10.925 --> 0:04:13.125
<v Speaker 1>Is it more challenging than cases like it? Is it

0:04:13.165 --> 0:04:16.325
<v Speaker 1>similar to what makes it different? The important thing for

0:04:16.405 --> 0:04:21.445
<v Speaker 1>the public to understand is that people form opinions about

0:04:21.525 --> 0:04:26.965
<v Speaker 1>what happens in cases. Obviously, families God bless them, form

0:04:27.005 --> 0:04:30.925
<v Speaker 1>their own opinions because it's very difficult. And let me

0:04:30.925 --> 0:04:33.805
<v Speaker 1>tell you I've worked a number of child deaths. It's

0:04:33.925 --> 0:04:37.085
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for parents to accept that, you know, their

0:04:37.165 --> 0:04:40.005
<v Speaker 1>child in effect either died by accident or by their

0:04:40.045 --> 0:04:42.605
<v Speaker 1>own hand. In this case, I'm not suggesting at all

0:04:42.605 --> 0:04:45.405
<v Speaker 1>this was by our own hand, but the point being,

0:04:45.485 --> 0:04:48.005
<v Speaker 1>there's like this opinion form. Then then the parents in

0:04:48.045 --> 0:04:52.525
<v Speaker 1>a very rural county now are promoting that this was

0:04:52.565 --> 0:04:55.605
<v Speaker 1>a homicide. They're not really going to be interested in

0:04:55.685 --> 0:05:00.885
<v Speaker 1>anything but an outcome that says that. And you made it.

0:05:00.925 --> 0:05:04.565
<v Speaker 1>You said something in the program about talking to the kids,

0:05:04.565 --> 0:05:06.645
<v Speaker 1>and you said it'd be hard to have a conspiracy

0:05:06.685 --> 0:05:10.365
<v Speaker 1>if there were something like twenty people with a similar story. Yeah,

0:05:10.405 --> 0:05:14.205
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I find most conspiracies laughable because you know,

0:05:14.245 --> 0:05:16.925
<v Speaker 1>I used to hear these constantly that you know, the

0:05:17.085 --> 0:05:20.365
<v Speaker 1>FBI colluded to cover up. You can't get two agents

0:05:20.405 --> 0:05:23.765
<v Speaker 1>to collude on something, so let alone to get an

0:05:23.885 --> 0:05:27.205
<v Speaker 1>entire system too, and what would be the motive of

0:05:27.285 --> 0:05:30.205
<v Speaker 1>doing that? But I realized that there was, you know,

0:05:31.125 --> 0:05:33.845
<v Speaker 1>controversy if that's the right word, with a local judge

0:05:33.845 --> 0:05:37.885
<v Speaker 1>and a local judge's daughter, and you know, allegations made

0:05:38.525 --> 0:05:42.005
<v Speaker 1>with really nothing factually just supported. Of course, many of

0:05:42.005 --> 0:05:44.085
<v Speaker 1>the suspicions that get brought up in the news articles

0:05:44.085 --> 0:05:47.325
<v Speaker 1>about Jane and on the Justice for Jennie forums have answers,

0:05:47.765 --> 0:05:50.565
<v Speaker 1>but these are still questions that get brought up constantly,

0:05:51.325 --> 0:05:56.245
<v Speaker 1>and rumors continue in Marshall across Arkansas and as Janie's

0:05:56.285 --> 0:05:59.485
<v Speaker 1>case continued to get traction across the nation. You know,

0:05:59.565 --> 0:06:05.805
<v Speaker 1>anytime you have I suppose public exposure of a case

0:06:05.885 --> 0:06:11.245
<v Speaker 1>that draws particular conclusions, or you know, for example, when

0:06:11.285 --> 0:06:15.445
<v Speaker 1>you look at the second autopsy, which you know, sort

0:06:15.485 --> 0:06:19.485
<v Speaker 1>of reinforce the Wards belief that Godter was murdered, you know,

0:06:19.885 --> 0:06:23.005
<v Speaker 1>you then you know, sort of get an emotional reaction

0:06:23.205 --> 0:06:27.805
<v Speaker 1>from the community as to you know, well maybe that's

0:06:27.805 --> 0:06:31.085
<v Speaker 1>what happened, you know, whether it's really true or not.

0:06:31.205 --> 0:06:36.045
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we're all i think suspect or vulnerable

0:06:36.085 --> 0:06:40.165
<v Speaker 1>to the stories of others in driving our own narrative.

0:06:40.165 --> 0:06:42.285
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the problem today and trying to figure

0:06:42.325 --> 0:06:46.005
<v Speaker 1>out what's actually true, and certain people speaks to just

0:06:46.125 --> 0:06:48.885
<v Speaker 1>accept it or question it as to well, that doesn't

0:06:48.885 --> 0:06:52.525
<v Speaker 1>make any sense, it's probably not true. And so you know, people,

0:06:52.605 --> 0:06:57.845
<v Speaker 1>particularly folks like average everyday citizens, they don't really know,

0:06:58.245 --> 0:07:00.285
<v Speaker 1>I mean from the standpoint of what is it? What

0:07:00.325 --> 0:07:03.045
<v Speaker 1>does it take to actually prove these cases? Is there

0:07:03.205 --> 0:07:07.485
<v Speaker 1>really any evidence to support one's or the other other

0:07:07.565 --> 0:07:10.725
<v Speaker 1>than this sort of idle chat about it or what

0:07:10.925 --> 0:07:14.925
<v Speaker 1>some media outlet might say about it. I will tell

0:07:14.965 --> 0:07:19.285
<v Speaker 1>you because I've worked so many high profile cases that

0:07:20.645 --> 0:07:24.045
<v Speaker 1>I just sort of ignore all that because you know,

0:07:24.085 --> 0:07:27.405
<v Speaker 1>the facts are the facts, and wherever they drive you to.

0:07:27.645 --> 0:07:33.645
<v Speaker 1>Now you know, sadly the facts don't always because maybe

0:07:33.645 --> 0:07:36.805
<v Speaker 1>even the lack of facts or evidence, you know, they

0:07:36.925 --> 0:07:43.045
<v Speaker 1>draw you to not a really solid conclusion. When I

0:07:43.085 --> 0:07:46.725
<v Speaker 1>talked to the ward's lawyer, Jerry Sallings, he didn't think

0:07:46.765 --> 0:07:50.805
<v Speaker 1>the first investigation was done very well. But Brad Garrett

0:07:50.845 --> 0:07:53.325
<v Speaker 1>said he thought the Arkansas State Police did a pretty

0:07:53.325 --> 0:07:56.965
<v Speaker 1>thorough job investigating what happened, particularly because it was all

0:07:57.005 --> 0:07:58.965
<v Speaker 1>happening in such a small town. I know, I was

0:07:59.005 --> 0:08:02.085
<v Speaker 1>a little surprised the witness statement seemed really short, and

0:08:02.165 --> 0:08:06.445
<v Speaker 1>also they didn't I was surprised that weren't They weren't

0:08:06.485 --> 0:08:10.605
<v Speaker 1>separated in question that night and in a more fair away, right,

0:08:10.645 --> 0:08:14.525
<v Speaker 1>because I thought that made it difficult later. Right, So,

0:08:14.765 --> 0:08:18.085
<v Speaker 1>investigative protocol is supposed to sort of be the template

0:08:18.125 --> 0:08:22.525
<v Speaker 1>of how you investigate a case, separate the witnesses, sort

0:08:22.565 --> 0:08:25.285
<v Speaker 1>of locked down the scene, and basically you don't let

0:08:25.325 --> 0:08:27.445
<v Speaker 1>anybody leave, or you make sure you've got the names

0:08:27.485 --> 0:08:29.085
<v Speaker 1>of all the people that were there, which in a

0:08:29.125 --> 0:08:32.085
<v Speaker 1>place like Marshall, Arkansas, shouldn't be that difficult. But you

0:08:32.885 --> 0:08:35.285
<v Speaker 1>still have to understand that I doubt if they were

0:08:35.325 --> 0:08:39.885
<v Speaker 1>thinking that way. Let's face it, a deputy sheriff in

0:08:39.925 --> 0:08:44.925
<v Speaker 1>that county, I'm sure doesn't make much money. That obviously

0:08:44.925 --> 0:08:48.725
<v Speaker 1>affects the quality of person you're going to get. And again,

0:08:48.925 --> 0:08:50.925
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing against the people who were there who did this,

0:08:51.045 --> 0:08:53.965
<v Speaker 1>It's just that it's going to be hard to get

0:08:53.965 --> 0:08:56.605
<v Speaker 1>somebody that really has a lot of experience or super

0:08:56.685 --> 0:09:00.365
<v Speaker 1>qualified to work in a super rural county unless they've

0:09:00.365 --> 0:09:04.405
<v Speaker 1>got some passion about living there. On Janie's death certificate,

0:09:04.885 --> 0:09:08.405
<v Speaker 1>both the and the cause of death are still undetermined.

0:09:09.245 --> 0:09:12.285
<v Speaker 1>But because it's not definitive, can we say that the

0:09:12.325 --> 0:09:15.125
<v Speaker 1>Wards are completely wrong in their perception of what happened,

0:09:15.725 --> 0:09:19.405
<v Speaker 1>that their daughter was murdered, and can anything we find

0:09:19.485 --> 0:09:22.285
<v Speaker 1>support what the family believes. You're not going to make

0:09:22.365 --> 0:09:26.725
<v Speaker 1>any family feel better unless it fits the fact patterns

0:09:27.085 --> 0:09:31.005
<v Speaker 1>as to how they want it to be, and so

0:09:32.445 --> 0:09:38.165
<v Speaker 1>could anything else be done in this case to support

0:09:38.205 --> 0:09:41.325
<v Speaker 1>the family's fact pattern And I don't think there is,

0:09:41.365 --> 0:09:44.965
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think there's evidence to support that. You know,

0:09:45.125 --> 0:09:49.925
<v Speaker 1>like that one totally unreliable witness claimed that she was

0:09:50.245 --> 0:09:54.925
<v Speaker 1>struck with a board or a bat or a club

0:09:55.525 --> 0:09:57.205
<v Speaker 1>and that she went down. First of all, there was

0:09:57.245 --> 0:10:00.325
<v Speaker 1>no evidence, there was no forensic evidence on her body

0:10:00.405 --> 0:10:06.605
<v Speaker 1>to support that. But again, there's nothing to suitue that

0:10:06.765 --> 0:10:11.605
<v Speaker 1>any of that occurred. So you know, I've walked away

0:10:11.605 --> 0:10:15.605
<v Speaker 1>from a number of families basically telling them literally everything

0:10:15.685 --> 0:10:19.685
<v Speaker 1>I could tell them about a case that was appropriate

0:10:19.685 --> 0:10:22.925
<v Speaker 1>to tell them, and you know, they're just not happy

0:10:22.965 --> 0:10:26.205
<v Speaker 1>with what I'm saying, and I fully accept that and

0:10:26.205 --> 0:10:29.125
<v Speaker 1>say I totally understand, so that I can only be

0:10:29.245 --> 0:10:32.805
<v Speaker 1>driven by the facts, my own experience, what the forensics

0:10:32.805 --> 0:10:36.525
<v Speaker 1>tell me, and I have to go with that. So

0:10:37.165 --> 0:10:39.925
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm open to if you or somebody else

0:10:39.925 --> 0:10:44.485
<v Speaker 1>could tell me that contradicts what this sort of general

0:10:44.525 --> 0:10:48.925
<v Speaker 1>conclusion is about this particular case. Great, but nobody has

0:10:48.965 --> 0:10:51.285
<v Speaker 1>ever come up with that because I just don't think

0:10:51.285 --> 0:10:55.005
<v Speaker 1>it exists. Now, I will say one thing about that

0:10:55.765 --> 0:10:59.765
<v Speaker 1>you know, every case is like a pie. Investigators have

0:10:59.885 --> 0:11:03.565
<v Speaker 1>part of it, The prosecutor obviously has a huge part

0:11:03.605 --> 0:11:07.725
<v Speaker 1>of it. The medical exam there and the medical professionals

0:11:07.765 --> 0:11:10.725
<v Speaker 1>for instant anthropologies, et cetera have a part of it.

0:11:10.765 --> 0:11:13.325
<v Speaker 1>But you have to take each one of them in perspective,

0:11:13.845 --> 0:11:16.445
<v Speaker 1>you know, And what if you put them all together,

0:11:17.245 --> 0:11:19.725
<v Speaker 1>then what do you have, you know, with all the

0:11:19.765 --> 0:11:23.365
<v Speaker 1>failings and biases and pinions and so forth. But what

0:11:23.405 --> 0:11:26.325
<v Speaker 1>do you have at the at the end of all that,

0:11:26.485 --> 0:11:28.885
<v Speaker 1>of that pie going together? And you know, and so

0:11:29.365 --> 0:11:32.285
<v Speaker 1>I say that in that when you take the first

0:11:32.365 --> 0:11:36.525
<v Speaker 1>or second autopsy, Okay, they found X or Y, fine,

0:11:37.245 --> 0:11:40.965
<v Speaker 1>is there anything beyond with the medical examiner, Let's face it,

0:11:41.045 --> 0:11:44.845
<v Speaker 1>that's a political examination of a body that's not with

0:11:45.045 --> 0:11:51.045
<v Speaker 1>all the facts and circumstances that cops, detectives, prosecutors are

0:11:51.165 --> 0:11:57.045
<v Speaker 1>finding through evidence collected through interviews with people at the sea,

0:11:57.765 --> 0:12:00.805
<v Speaker 1>people who saw her fall, people who thought she was choking,

0:12:01.085 --> 0:12:03.245
<v Speaker 1>people who poured beer on her. If that was the case,

0:12:03.405 --> 0:12:05.805
<v Speaker 1>all of these things, you know, the medical him were

0:12:05.845 --> 0:12:08.245
<v Speaker 1>supposed to stick to his or her lane. This is

0:12:08.285 --> 0:12:11.925
<v Speaker 1>what I found in the autopsy, and it great. And

0:12:11.965 --> 0:12:14.805
<v Speaker 1>then you go from there. So what you have in

0:12:14.925 --> 0:12:20.765
<v Speaker 1>this case is a third autopsy by a sort of

0:12:20.805 --> 0:12:25.245
<v Speaker 1>a seasoned professional and a forensic anthropologist to tell you

0:12:26.125 --> 0:12:28.965
<v Speaker 1>the fact pattern that she was beaten to death with

0:12:29.045 --> 0:12:34.485
<v Speaker 1>something is not there. We'll be right back. We've been

0:12:34.525 --> 0:12:38.245
<v Speaker 1>able to answer some questions about the circumstances surrounding Janie's death.

0:12:38.725 --> 0:12:41.045
<v Speaker 1>Our producer, Gaby and I sorted through what we know,

0:12:41.885 --> 0:12:45.005
<v Speaker 1>what we don't know, and at this point what we

0:12:45.085 --> 0:12:47.525
<v Speaker 1>can't know. One of the things that the family thought

0:12:47.685 --> 0:12:51.765
<v Speaker 1>was suspicious was the fact that Jannie's dad, Ron Ward,

0:12:51.885 --> 0:12:55.085
<v Speaker 1>said that he had seen Jane in a different shirt

0:12:55.365 --> 0:12:57.565
<v Speaker 1>when he saw at the morgue the night that she died,

0:12:57.845 --> 0:13:01.325
<v Speaker 1>versus what he saw in some photos that the investigator,

0:13:01.325 --> 0:13:04.925
<v Speaker 1>Bill Beach had showed him a couple of weeks later.

0:13:05.205 --> 0:13:07.205
<v Speaker 1>We did look into the shirt and we did figure

0:13:07.205 --> 0:13:10.005
<v Speaker 1>out some things about the shirt. So what were some

0:13:10.045 --> 0:13:12.445
<v Speaker 1>of those things. Well, we figured out first of all,

0:13:12.565 --> 0:13:15.765
<v Speaker 1>that Jane stayed the night before the party with her

0:13:15.765 --> 0:13:20.445
<v Speaker 1>friend Leslie, and according to Leslie, Janny borrowed that shirt

0:13:20.445 --> 0:13:24.725
<v Speaker 1>from her, and so she was wearing both. Multiple witnesses

0:13:24.765 --> 0:13:28.165
<v Speaker 1>said that they saw her wearing the black t shirt

0:13:28.245 --> 0:13:32.605
<v Speaker 1>over the white pin striped shirt, because, including ambulance attendants

0:13:32.605 --> 0:13:35.485
<v Speaker 1>who were trying to revive her at the scene, they

0:13:35.525 --> 0:13:39.285
<v Speaker 1>specifically remembered rolling the sleeves up and pulling up the

0:13:39.285 --> 0:13:41.285
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the shirt to expose her stomach, and rolling

0:13:41.325 --> 0:13:44.445
<v Speaker 1>up the sleeves to expose her arms. At some point,

0:13:44.565 --> 0:13:47.965
<v Speaker 1>someone must have removed the white pin striped shirt and

0:13:48.445 --> 0:13:51.485
<v Speaker 1>what happened to that item of clothing is a mystery

0:13:51.565 --> 0:13:54.205
<v Speaker 1>because we know that it was lost by law enforcement

0:13:54.245 --> 0:13:56.885
<v Speaker 1>at some point. And that's just another one of the

0:13:56.885 --> 0:13:59.405
<v Speaker 1>tragedies of this case because one of the biggest questions

0:13:59.445 --> 0:14:02.485
<v Speaker 1>that the family had was why how she got all

0:14:02.525 --> 0:14:05.405
<v Speaker 1>that debris under her clothes and what exactly that was.

0:14:05.605 --> 0:14:08.125
<v Speaker 1>And of course you know, now with forensic testing, who

0:14:08.165 --> 0:14:11.085
<v Speaker 1>knows what could be accomplished, But they lost the evidence. Okay.

0:14:11.125 --> 0:14:13.925
<v Speaker 1>So one of the other big questions that the journalist

0:14:13.965 --> 0:14:16.685
<v Speaker 1>Mike Master said brings up and his column is this

0:14:16.845 --> 0:14:20.245
<v Speaker 1>idea of the ninety missing minutes, And he brings it

0:14:20.325 --> 0:14:22.925
<v Speaker 1>up because there's a police dispatcher named Harold Young who

0:14:22.925 --> 0:14:25.485
<v Speaker 1>said that the truck in the route from the party

0:14:25.485 --> 0:14:29.325
<v Speaker 1>to the bank parking lot did stop at the police station.

0:14:30.165 --> 0:14:33.205
<v Speaker 1>So what have we been able to figure out about this?

0:14:33.365 --> 0:14:36.405
<v Speaker 1>It's very confusing. Well, I think the ninety missing minutes

0:14:36.445 --> 0:14:38.685
<v Speaker 1>is like a classic example of something that was it

0:14:38.725 --> 0:14:41.885
<v Speaker 1>was put out there and it's not necessarily correct because,

0:14:42.125 --> 0:14:44.565
<v Speaker 1>first of all, in a lot of the early reports,

0:14:44.605 --> 0:14:47.285
<v Speaker 1>I saw that the time of the sunset was wrong.

0:14:47.965 --> 0:14:50.285
<v Speaker 1>It was it was described as being around six thirty,

0:14:50.285 --> 0:14:52.325
<v Speaker 1>when in fact it was around seven thirty. And everyone

0:14:52.325 --> 0:14:55.085
<v Speaker 1>at the party basically said that they said when people

0:14:55.125 --> 0:14:57.325
<v Speaker 1>when things started happening, when things started to go wrong,

0:14:57.405 --> 0:14:59.445
<v Speaker 1>when all hell broke loose, it was around dusk, which

0:14:59.445 --> 0:15:02.005
<v Speaker 1>would have been around seven thirty, not six thirty. And

0:15:02.285 --> 0:15:06.565
<v Speaker 1>Harold Young made that statement, but he also said that

0:15:06.605 --> 0:15:09.685
<v Speaker 1>he called the ambulance service, and the two people from

0:15:09.685 --> 0:15:12.125
<v Speaker 1>the ambulance service who were interviewed by the police both

0:15:12.165 --> 0:15:14.925
<v Speaker 1>say they never received that call. So their discrepancies in

0:15:14.965 --> 0:15:19.405
<v Speaker 1>Harold Young's statement. And Ron Kim and Sherry, who were

0:15:19.405 --> 0:15:21.365
<v Speaker 1>all in the truck, they all told police that they

0:15:21.405 --> 0:15:26.205
<v Speaker 1>never stopped anywhere, so they are all their statements match. Now,

0:15:26.685 --> 0:15:29.845
<v Speaker 1>could three people have concocted a story, possibly, I mean,

0:15:30.045 --> 0:15:34.165
<v Speaker 1>but their statements do match. And Harold Young GE's an outlier.

0:15:34.245 --> 0:15:36.165
<v Speaker 1>He really is the outlier in that. And I think

0:15:36.205 --> 0:15:37.965
<v Speaker 1>another thing that we found that was really important is

0:15:37.965 --> 0:15:40.765
<v Speaker 1>that there may have been missing time, but I don't

0:15:40.805 --> 0:15:43.445
<v Speaker 1>believe it was ninety minutes. It wasn't hours. You know,

0:15:43.565 --> 0:15:46.845
<v Speaker 1>it may have been half an hour or longer, but

0:15:46.925 --> 0:15:49.405
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't you know, it doesn't seem that it was

0:15:49.485 --> 0:15:51.165
<v Speaker 1>an hour and a half. I think I do think

0:15:51.205 --> 0:15:53.445
<v Speaker 1>that's six thirty times probably could not have been right,

0:15:53.565 --> 0:15:56.365
<v Speaker 1>just based on what everyone at the party. Everyone else

0:15:56.365 --> 0:15:58.885
<v Speaker 1>at the party said they saw. Okay, So another one

0:15:58.925 --> 0:16:01.885
<v Speaker 1>of the big rumors is that she was hit in

0:16:01.925 --> 0:16:04.205
<v Speaker 1>the face with a baseball bat and killed at the

0:16:04.205 --> 0:16:08.485
<v Speaker 1>party by another Marshall High School student. People would often

0:16:08.805 --> 0:16:12.125
<v Speaker 1>say it was Sarah, who was a popular cheerleader who

0:16:12.205 --> 0:16:15.205
<v Speaker 1>came from prominent family in the town. Her dad was

0:16:15.365 --> 0:16:19.045
<v Speaker 1>the judge. But it seems in our investigation that there's

0:16:19.165 --> 0:16:23.285
<v Speaker 1>very little evidence that supports that theory at all. We've

0:16:23.325 --> 0:16:26.005
<v Speaker 1>really looked into this theory and the possibility this could

0:16:26.005 --> 0:16:29.085
<v Speaker 1>have happened, but we just can't find any evidence to

0:16:29.125 --> 0:16:31.205
<v Speaker 1>point to it. I mean, there are a lot of

0:16:31.285 --> 0:16:33.805
<v Speaker 1>rumors about, you know, something that happened to the party,

0:16:33.845 --> 0:16:35.445
<v Speaker 1>but again, when you go back and look at them,

0:16:35.485 --> 0:16:37.605
<v Speaker 1>You look at the statements, you find the people. It

0:16:37.685 --> 0:16:39.805
<v Speaker 1>turns out that, oh it's just something I heard. And

0:16:40.085 --> 0:16:42.565
<v Speaker 1>usually they didn't even hear it secondhand. Usually it's third

0:16:42.565 --> 0:16:45.325
<v Speaker 1>hand or fourth hand. And you know, were there was

0:16:45.365 --> 0:16:47.965
<v Speaker 1>there some truth to it, Yes, I mean Sarah, I

0:16:47.965 --> 0:16:50.285
<v Speaker 1>think because she was a she was a judge's daughter,

0:16:50.565 --> 0:16:54.085
<v Speaker 1>because she did have a temper. She'd admittedly like assaulted

0:16:54.085 --> 0:16:56.125
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other girls, and she got in a

0:16:56.125 --> 0:16:57.925
<v Speaker 1>fight with a boyfriend slapped him in the face. I mean,

0:16:57.925 --> 0:17:01.245
<v Speaker 1>there's there's she had a temper. And also she told

0:17:01.285 --> 0:17:04.005
<v Speaker 1>the police, she lied to the police about who she'd

0:17:04.005 --> 0:17:05.725
<v Speaker 1>come to the party with, and they were inconsist since

0:17:05.725 --> 0:17:08.245
<v Speaker 1>he's in her story. So I can see where that

0:17:08.445 --> 0:17:11.445
<v Speaker 1>all taken together could lead people to conclude she had

0:17:11.445 --> 0:17:13.285
<v Speaker 1>something to do with it. And also a lot of people,

0:17:14.005 --> 0:17:15.605
<v Speaker 1>you know, they just didn't like her. They didn't like her,

0:17:15.605 --> 0:17:18.165
<v Speaker 1>they didn't like her attitude, and that led them to

0:17:18.165 --> 0:17:19.725
<v Speaker 1>believe that she could have had some role in this.

0:17:19.845 --> 0:17:22.845
<v Speaker 1>But again, like none of the forensic evidence points to that,

0:17:23.005 --> 0:17:25.645
<v Speaker 1>not one person that the party said they saw anything

0:17:25.725 --> 0:17:28.485
<v Speaker 1>like that. The one witness that we did find who

0:17:28.565 --> 0:17:31.285
<v Speaker 1>said she saw Jane's struck with a baseball bat. We've

0:17:31.325 --> 0:17:34.285
<v Speaker 1>talked to her, you know about how problematic her testimony is.

0:17:34.325 --> 0:17:38.085
<v Speaker 1>She's had a couple of different stories, and again, if

0:17:38.085 --> 0:17:40.565
<v Speaker 1>she was struck with a baseball bat, you would see

0:17:41.045 --> 0:17:44.205
<v Speaker 1>much more catastrophic injuries to her face. When I talked

0:17:44.245 --> 0:17:47.685
<v Speaker 1>to the neurosurgeon the first autopsy, one of the biggest

0:17:47.685 --> 0:17:49.965
<v Speaker 1>tragedy was such a simple mistake and something that should

0:17:49.965 --> 0:17:52.885
<v Speaker 1>have been corrected really early. Fami Malick referred to the

0:17:52.925 --> 0:17:56.325
<v Speaker 1>injury as a hyper extension injury rather than a hyperflection injury,

0:17:56.685 --> 0:17:59.925
<v Speaker 1>which you know, they're two completely different things. Then you

0:17:59.965 --> 0:18:02.685
<v Speaker 1>have all this confusion about whether her head snapped forward

0:18:02.805 --> 0:18:05.965
<v Speaker 1>or backward, and that led to, you know, the rumors

0:18:05.965 --> 0:18:07.445
<v Speaker 1>that she was hit in the face with something which

0:18:07.445 --> 0:18:09.405
<v Speaker 1>would have snapped her head backward, and that led to

0:18:09.565 --> 0:18:12.085
<v Speaker 1>you know, who could it have been? And the doctor

0:18:12.085 --> 0:18:15.285
<v Speaker 1>branella autopsy. So I just think you can just really

0:18:15.325 --> 0:18:18.725
<v Speaker 1>see how one little simple thing can just have this

0:18:19.005 --> 0:18:21.965
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic effect on an investigation if it's not caught early

0:18:22.045 --> 0:18:24.765
<v Speaker 1>and not dealt with. So throughout this case, a lot

0:18:24.845 --> 0:18:27.485
<v Speaker 1>of what we've seen is that the wards will say

0:18:27.525 --> 0:18:30.165
<v Speaker 1>one thing and then other people will say something else,

0:18:30.405 --> 0:18:33.365
<v Speaker 1>like you know, they said they saw a clear fracture

0:18:33.445 --> 0:18:35.525
<v Speaker 1>in the X ray when they visited the crime lab,

0:18:35.805 --> 0:18:38.165
<v Speaker 1>but then in the X rays that they got sent

0:18:38.245 --> 0:18:43.165
<v Speaker 1>to them a few weeks later showed the spine blocked out. Also,

0:18:43.605 --> 0:18:47.565
<v Speaker 1>they said that they received death threats, And there's just

0:18:47.605 --> 0:18:50.565
<v Speaker 1>sort of some of these these sorts of things that

0:18:51.245 --> 0:18:53.845
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't see. There's doesn't seem to be any way

0:18:54.045 --> 0:18:58.205
<v Speaker 1>to prove one way or another because it is what

0:18:58.325 --> 0:19:02.245
<v Speaker 1>they saw versus what other people heard and saw. Yeah,

0:19:02.285 --> 0:19:04.325
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are some things that we it's

0:19:04.485 --> 0:19:07.205
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to prove one way the other. Like, for example,

0:19:08.245 --> 0:19:10.605
<v Speaker 1>we can never know what Ron actually saw when he

0:19:10.605 --> 0:19:14.445
<v Speaker 1>saw Janie's body. He described it, but obviously we can't

0:19:14.445 --> 0:19:17.685
<v Speaker 1>know that we weren't there, and we also can't know,

0:19:18.085 --> 0:19:20.845
<v Speaker 1>you know, when Ron Amona saw the X rays and

0:19:20.885 --> 0:19:23.245
<v Speaker 1>they say that the X rays they saw later were different,

0:19:23.605 --> 0:19:26.445
<v Speaker 1>We really have no way of knowing that either. But

0:19:26.485 --> 0:19:29.685
<v Speaker 1>what we can say is that they definitely felt that

0:19:29.765 --> 0:19:33.005
<v Speaker 1>the system was not working, and they felt people weren't

0:19:33.045 --> 0:19:35.605
<v Speaker 1>helping them, and they felt that people in power were

0:19:35.605 --> 0:19:39.205
<v Speaker 1>being treated differently, and they also were afraid and they

0:19:39.205 --> 0:19:41.565
<v Speaker 1>were so afraid that they moved and they put their

0:19:41.565 --> 0:19:44.125
<v Speaker 1>other daughter in a different school and said they were

0:19:44.125 --> 0:19:47.445
<v Speaker 1>getting death threats. So there was definitely they seemed to

0:19:47.445 --> 0:19:50.085
<v Speaker 1>feel that there was an atmosphere of fear in the town.

0:19:50.525 --> 0:19:53.045
<v Speaker 1>When we talked to Richard Walter from the Vedok Society,

0:19:53.125 --> 0:19:56.085
<v Speaker 1>he described a similar environment in Marshall, and a lot

0:19:56.085 --> 0:20:00.245
<v Speaker 1>of other people did too. Several reporters said that people

0:20:00.245 --> 0:20:03.205
<v Speaker 1>weren't cooperative or weren't helping. And then there was another

0:20:03.285 --> 0:20:06.205
<v Speaker 1>journalist we talked to who said they received threats too.

0:20:06.365 --> 0:20:09.725
<v Speaker 1>So it's only it's a few people's word, but we

0:20:09.765 --> 0:20:11.645
<v Speaker 1>can't get inside their head and know their experience. We

0:20:11.685 --> 0:20:19.005
<v Speaker 1>can only report what they said to us. One of

0:20:19.045 --> 0:20:22.205
<v Speaker 1>the most frustrating things we can't know is Janey's full

0:20:22.245 --> 0:20:27.125
<v Speaker 1>toxicology report. Some listeners brought up this theory from the beginning.

0:20:27.805 --> 0:20:31.565
<v Speaker 1>Could Janey have been poisoned by accident? At the party,

0:20:32.085 --> 0:20:36.445
<v Speaker 1>the host Jay made PGA that's pure grain alcohol punch,

0:20:37.325 --> 0:20:40.205
<v Speaker 1>and in it he put orange slices that had been

0:20:40.245 --> 0:20:44.405
<v Speaker 1>soaked overnight in rubbing alcohol. Here's his interview with Bill

0:20:44.445 --> 0:20:49.285
<v Speaker 1>Beach again describing the punch. There's been some discussion about

0:20:49.485 --> 0:20:52.565
<v Speaker 1>the fruit that would put in time. Was there any

0:20:53.125 --> 0:20:59.125
<v Speaker 1>special preparations taken of soaked the fruit for to over

0:20:59.205 --> 0:21:03.525
<v Speaker 1>twenty fires reven alcohol? What was the purpose for that?

0:21:03.565 --> 0:21:09.645
<v Speaker 1>He seemed like a higher content. Danny koorol rode alcohol out,

0:21:09.965 --> 0:21:13.405
<v Speaker 1>pray pulses or over the Very little alcohol and no

0:21:13.565 --> 0:21:17.125
<v Speaker 1>drugs were found in Janie's system. Her blood alcohol level

0:21:17.205 --> 0:21:21.165
<v Speaker 1>was point zero five. That's about one drink, but that's

0:21:21.245 --> 0:21:26.885
<v Speaker 1>ethyl alcohol. Rubbing alcohol is isopropyl alcohol, and in the

0:21:26.965 --> 0:21:31.405
<v Speaker 1>first autopsy, doctor Malick didn't test for it. One of

0:21:31.445 --> 0:21:34.205
<v Speaker 1>the pathologists who reviewed doctor Malik's work in nineteen ninety

0:21:34.205 --> 0:21:38.045
<v Speaker 1>two pointed out that the toxicology screens were limited to cannabis,

0:21:38.325 --> 0:21:43.485
<v Speaker 1>ethyl alcohol, drugs, and lead. Rubbing alcohol poisoning is rare,

0:21:44.285 --> 0:21:47.405
<v Speaker 1>but it can be fatal. According to the National Library

0:21:47.445 --> 0:21:51.765
<v Speaker 1>of Medicines Hazardous Substances Databank, it's acute potency as a

0:21:51.845 --> 0:21:55.405
<v Speaker 1>central nervous depressant is about twice that of ethanol eight

0:21:55.485 --> 0:21:58.165
<v Speaker 1>ounces as a lethal dose, but as little as one

0:21:58.285 --> 0:22:02.365
<v Speaker 1>hundred millilters or just over three ounces can be fatal.

0:22:03.925 --> 0:22:05.765
<v Speaker 1>So I had her producers Gabby and tay or do

0:22:05.805 --> 0:22:08.965
<v Speaker 1>an experiment. We wanted to see how much fruit Janey

0:22:08.965 --> 0:22:11.285
<v Speaker 1>would have had to consume to ingest eight ounces of

0:22:11.365 --> 0:22:15.525
<v Speaker 1>rubbing alcohol. So they follow Jay's recipe and soak the

0:22:15.565 --> 0:22:19.045
<v Speaker 1>fruit for twenty four hours. Okay, so basically what we've

0:22:19.165 --> 0:22:21.925
<v Speaker 1>done is we have three different oranges. We have an

0:22:21.965 --> 0:22:24.085
<v Speaker 1>orange that's cut into pieces of four, we have eight

0:22:24.165 --> 0:22:27.405
<v Speaker 1>pieces smaller pieces, and then we also have one that's peeled.

0:22:27.685 --> 0:22:30.925
<v Speaker 1>With these three oranges cut into different quantities, we're trying

0:22:30.925 --> 0:22:33.285
<v Speaker 1>to see if it's possible for one orange to absorb

0:22:33.445 --> 0:22:36.525
<v Speaker 1>enough rubbing alcohol to be fatal. Basically, can the oranges

0:22:36.605 --> 0:22:44.885
<v Speaker 1>absorb a lethal dosage of rubbing alcohol? That's a lot

0:22:45.285 --> 0:22:51.005
<v Speaker 1>about rubbing alcohol and not very much orange. It's been

0:22:51.085 --> 0:22:53.605
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours and we take a look at what happened.

0:22:53.725 --> 0:22:56.845
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't look like that much of the rubbing alcohol was

0:22:56.885 --> 0:22:59.405
<v Speaker 1>actually absorbed in them, and that was in our different

0:22:59.485 --> 0:23:03.685
<v Speaker 1>control environments, and it looks like only about three yeah,

0:23:03.685 --> 0:23:08.405
<v Speaker 1>about three ounces was probably absorbed by the fruit pieces.

0:23:08.765 --> 0:23:10.885
<v Speaker 1>We determined that to get to the lethal amount of

0:23:10.925 --> 0:23:15.165
<v Speaker 1>eight ounces, Janie would have had to eat around three oranges.

0:23:15.885 --> 0:23:19.605
<v Speaker 1>That's not impossible to imagine, but that's a lot of oranges,

0:23:19.765 --> 0:23:22.365
<v Speaker 1>especially considering the fact that they smelled so strongly of

0:23:22.445 --> 0:23:26.245
<v Speaker 1>rubby alcohol. But with one hundred millilters, she would only

0:23:26.325 --> 0:23:30.205
<v Speaker 1>have to consume about one orange. In several witness statements,

0:23:30.685 --> 0:23:33.845
<v Speaker 1>partygoers mentioned that Jane was chewing on the pieces of fruit.

0:23:34.765 --> 0:23:38.485
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Ron Rose specifically said she ate a cup

0:23:38.525 --> 0:23:41.965
<v Speaker 1>of the fruit. He said she may have thought that

0:23:42.085 --> 0:23:45.165
<v Speaker 1>this would be weaker than just drinking the punch, and

0:23:45.285 --> 0:23:48.805
<v Speaker 1>in a police report, investigator Bill Beach said that when

0:23:48.885 --> 0:23:51.285
<v Speaker 1>he went up to the cabin that night, he found

0:23:51.325 --> 0:23:53.845
<v Speaker 1>orange piels on either side of where Jane had fallen,

0:23:54.845 --> 0:23:58.445
<v Speaker 1>and though the orange PILs were bagged and logged into evidence,

0:23:59.085 --> 0:24:03.525
<v Speaker 1>they were never tested. In that first autopsy, doctor Malick

0:24:03.565 --> 0:24:06.725
<v Speaker 1>said that Jane had ten ounces of digested food matter

0:24:06.805 --> 0:24:11.085
<v Speaker 1>in her stomach, so Jane was drinking and consuming the

0:24:11.165 --> 0:24:15.285
<v Speaker 1>fruit on a relatively empty stomach. He wrote, though that

0:24:15.405 --> 0:24:19.765
<v Speaker 1>in the stomach tomato particles are encountered, no oranges are noted.

0:24:21.085 --> 0:24:24.405
<v Speaker 1>We reached back out to doctor Grace Duke's, the pathologists

0:24:24.405 --> 0:24:26.485
<v Speaker 1>who had reviewed the three autopsies for us in the

0:24:26.565 --> 0:24:30.365
<v Speaker 1>last episode. First off, we wanted to know if doctor

0:24:30.405 --> 0:24:33.285
<v Speaker 1>Malick could tell the difference between tomatoes and orange particles.

0:24:34.125 --> 0:24:36.445
<v Speaker 1>No one else mentioned tomatoes or a food of any

0:24:36.525 --> 0:24:39.605
<v Speaker 1>kind at the party, And since doctor Malick only did

0:24:39.645 --> 0:24:42.885
<v Speaker 1>a visual inspection of the food particles, could he actually

0:24:42.925 --> 0:24:45.925
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference between tomatoes and oranges that had been

0:24:46.005 --> 0:24:48.925
<v Speaker 1>soaked in the red PGA punch. Sometimes you can tell

0:24:48.965 --> 0:24:51.205
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is, sometimes you can't tell it all.

0:24:51.605 --> 0:24:54.045
<v Speaker 1>But if she were not chewing well, it'd be fairly

0:24:54.125 --> 0:24:57.085
<v Speaker 1>obvious what was in there, especially if it were a

0:24:57.125 --> 0:25:00.045
<v Speaker 1>mix with just liquid where it could separate out easily.

0:25:00.605 --> 0:25:03.045
<v Speaker 1>If he says that he saw pieces of tomato, I

0:25:03.085 --> 0:25:06.605
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that that would mean something fairly specific to

0:25:06.725 --> 0:25:09.165
<v Speaker 1>a tomato, like either the seeds or a large piece

0:25:09.205 --> 0:25:12.245
<v Speaker 1>of food. In terms of the oranges, it's kind of

0:25:12.325 --> 0:25:15.325
<v Speaker 1>like if you were to again people choose their food

0:25:15.365 --> 0:25:17.605
<v Speaker 1>to varying degrees. It's kind of like if you were

0:25:17.645 --> 0:25:19.845
<v Speaker 1>to put food in a blender and blend it up

0:25:19.845 --> 0:25:21.845
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. If you only blended up a little

0:25:21.925 --> 0:25:24.805
<v Speaker 1>you could definitely still tell that there were orange pieces,

0:25:25.605 --> 0:25:28.525
<v Speaker 1>you know how it has that kind of fibrous look.

0:25:29.245 --> 0:25:31.405
<v Speaker 1>But if it were, you know, if it were chewed

0:25:31.445 --> 0:25:33.645
<v Speaker 1>beyond recognition, or it spent a lot of time in

0:25:33.725 --> 0:25:36.325
<v Speaker 1>her stomach. You would potentially not be able to tell that.

0:25:36.805 --> 0:25:40.405
<v Speaker 1>So the answer is maybe, maybe not. But people frequently

0:25:41.165 --> 0:25:44.965
<v Speaker 1>will report which type of food items they've seen in

0:25:45.085 --> 0:25:48.885
<v Speaker 1>the stomach contents. Doctor Duke's described some of the effects

0:25:49.005 --> 0:25:54.045
<v Speaker 1>of ingesting rubbing alcohol. The thing with rubbing alcohol being

0:25:54.405 --> 0:25:57.765
<v Speaker 1>isoid propyle alcohol rather than ethanol, which is what we

0:25:57.885 --> 0:26:00.845
<v Speaker 1>think of as you know, drinking alcoholic beverages would be

0:26:00.885 --> 0:26:07.445
<v Speaker 1>ethanol isodprople alcohol. The effects of that would essentially be

0:26:07.565 --> 0:26:13.045
<v Speaker 1>the same as ethyl alcohol. There would be the same

0:26:13.205 --> 0:26:18.005
<v Speaker 1>sort of in an inebriated person, you know, impaired balance,

0:26:18.085 --> 0:26:24.605
<v Speaker 1>slurred speech, things like that. The difference is that with

0:26:24.845 --> 0:26:29.165
<v Speaker 1>isopropenol you're going to have more of an intoxicating effect

0:26:29.925 --> 0:26:34.085
<v Speaker 1>than with ethanol. So really the effects you see would

0:26:34.125 --> 0:26:37.365
<v Speaker 1>not be different, they just might be more pronounced in

0:26:37.485 --> 0:26:42.845
<v Speaker 1>someone who's ingested isopropenol. The level of alcohol that is

0:26:42.925 --> 0:26:47.285
<v Speaker 1>fatal in a person varies quite a bit. There are

0:26:47.325 --> 0:26:49.685
<v Speaker 1>some limits that have been set previously as sort of

0:26:49.805 --> 0:26:51.885
<v Speaker 1>the norm, as in, you know, this is a lethal

0:26:52.005 --> 0:26:55.645
<v Speaker 1>level when this is not, but that can vary according

0:26:55.685 --> 0:26:59.325
<v Speaker 1>to tolerance. Most teenagers haven't had enough, you know time

0:26:59.445 --> 0:27:02.365
<v Speaker 1>to build up their tolerance, but it can certainly vary,

0:27:03.405 --> 0:27:06.405
<v Speaker 1>so really the answer is that there's no specific limit.

0:27:07.125 --> 0:27:09.885
<v Speaker 1>With this in mind, Janie could have had even less

0:27:09.925 --> 0:27:12.365
<v Speaker 1>than eight ounces and had enough in her system to

0:27:12.445 --> 0:27:16.205
<v Speaker 1>make her sick. Her mom, Mona, and people who knew

0:27:16.245 --> 0:27:19.165
<v Speaker 1>her so that Jannie wasn't much of a drinker, so

0:27:19.325 --> 0:27:24.165
<v Speaker 1>she most likely had a low tolerance. Isopropyle alcohol has

0:27:24.205 --> 0:27:27.725
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same symptoms as being drunk, drowsiness,

0:27:28.005 --> 0:27:34.045
<v Speaker 1>slurred speech, stumbling, headache, and vomiting. If someone is over intoxicated,

0:27:34.645 --> 0:27:38.285
<v Speaker 1>their heart beat slows down, their breathing becomes more rapid,

0:27:39.045 --> 0:27:43.805
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure drops. They may have seizures or collapse. They

0:27:43.885 --> 0:27:48.005
<v Speaker 1>may experience pulmonary swelling or inflammation of an excess fluid

0:27:48.045 --> 0:27:51.125
<v Speaker 1>in the lungs. This can make breathing difficult and cause

0:27:51.165 --> 0:27:55.445
<v Speaker 1>oxygen deprivation. If not treated in time, it can cause

0:27:55.525 --> 0:28:01.245
<v Speaker 1>cardiovascular collapse and death. The body rapidly absorbs isopropyle alcohol.

0:28:01.885 --> 0:28:04.365
<v Speaker 1>Symptoms are at their height from thirty minutes to two

0:28:04.445 --> 0:28:10.085
<v Speaker 1>hours after consumption. The bottom line is isoproble alcohol hits

0:28:10.205 --> 0:28:14.685
<v Speaker 1>fast and hard. Doctor Mallet noted in his autopsy that

0:28:14.765 --> 0:28:18.005
<v Speaker 1>there was intense congestion in Jennie's lungs and in her liver.

0:28:18.965 --> 0:28:21.525
<v Speaker 1>I wondered if this could be a symptom of alcohol poisoning.

0:28:22.365 --> 0:28:27.205
<v Speaker 1>So those those autopsy findings are not specific to an

0:28:27.365 --> 0:28:31.085
<v Speaker 1>alcohol poisoning. And when you say alcohol poisoning, that just

0:28:31.445 --> 0:28:34.525
<v Speaker 1>that just means over over intoxication, right to the point

0:28:34.565 --> 0:28:37.725
<v Speaker 1>that it's toxic to your body. But there aren't going

0:28:37.805 --> 0:28:44.125
<v Speaker 1>to be necessarily specific findings associated with it. It's essentially

0:28:44.245 --> 0:28:48.925
<v Speaker 1>a It has a CNS depressant effect, and then if

0:28:49.165 --> 0:28:52.925
<v Speaker 1>one were to keep consuming and consuming and consuming, then

0:28:52.965 --> 0:28:57.205
<v Speaker 1>it would potentially cause general, generalized sort of organ failure.

0:28:57.405 --> 0:29:01.645
<v Speaker 1>But it's primarily based in the CNS depressant effect, meaning

0:29:01.845 --> 0:29:07.805
<v Speaker 1>you know, depressed sensorium, which would eventually contribute to decreased breathing,

0:29:08.445 --> 0:29:12.405
<v Speaker 1>which would potentially progress to death based on what doctor

0:29:12.485 --> 0:29:16.005
<v Speaker 1>Dukes is saying. Just like we've seen before, so many

0:29:16.125 --> 0:29:18.925
<v Speaker 1>of Jane's symptoms are not specific to her particular cause

0:29:18.965 --> 0:29:23.445
<v Speaker 1>of death. But rubbing alcohol poisoning is possible, yes, So

0:29:23.805 --> 0:29:25.725
<v Speaker 1>if it were president at a high enough level, it

0:29:25.725 --> 0:29:29.565
<v Speaker 1>would certainly be a potential cause of death. The issue

0:29:29.645 --> 0:29:31.565
<v Speaker 1>is just that we don't have a level reported if

0:29:31.605 --> 0:29:34.085
<v Speaker 1>it were present at all, Doctor Duke said that if

0:29:34.125 --> 0:29:36.965
<v Speaker 1>it were to the point of being lethal, Janie would

0:29:37.005 --> 0:29:41.005
<v Speaker 1>have been visibly intoxicated. In the witness statements, only a

0:29:41.045 --> 0:29:45.325
<v Speaker 1>few people mentioned that Jane seemed drunk. One was Sarah.

0:29:46.365 --> 0:29:49.405
<v Speaker 1>Sarah said that when Janie called her a snob, Jannie

0:29:49.485 --> 0:29:51.885
<v Speaker 1>was stumbling up to her and warned her not to

0:29:51.965 --> 0:29:55.485
<v Speaker 1>eat the fruit. Ron Rose said that Jane appeared to

0:29:55.525 --> 0:29:58.845
<v Speaker 1>be intoxicated shortly before her death. Jay said the same

0:29:58.885 --> 0:30:02.485
<v Speaker 1>thing in his reenactment video. We may never know for

0:30:02.605 --> 0:30:06.325
<v Speaker 1>sure what killed Janie, but we have to look probability,

0:30:07.125 --> 0:30:09.045
<v Speaker 1>and we found some other pieces of evidence in the

0:30:09.085 --> 0:30:15.565
<v Speaker 1>investigation that do suggest rubbing alcohol poisoning. Lividity or darkening

0:30:15.605 --> 0:30:18.285
<v Speaker 1>of the skin due to blood pooling sets in at

0:30:18.325 --> 0:30:21.645
<v Speaker 1>around two hours after death, but more than one person

0:30:21.765 --> 0:30:26.805
<v Speaker 1>noticed that Janey started turning blue almost immediately. One partygoer

0:30:26.925 --> 0:30:31.365
<v Speaker 1>said she started turning a darker color all over. Then

0:30:31.925 --> 0:30:34.205
<v Speaker 1>one of the ambulance attendants who treated Jane at the

0:30:34.245 --> 0:30:37.205
<v Speaker 1>scene in the bank parking lot made the comment, she

0:30:37.365 --> 0:30:40.365
<v Speaker 1>was not as blue as my genes, but she was

0:30:40.445 --> 0:30:45.165
<v Speaker 1>getting blue, turning blue, especially blue coloring of the lips.

0:30:45.485 --> 0:30:49.805
<v Speaker 1>Or cyanosis is an indicator of oxygen deprivation, which is

0:30:49.845 --> 0:30:54.085
<v Speaker 1>one of the symptoms of rubbing alcohol poisoning. Ron Ward

0:30:54.165 --> 0:30:56.445
<v Speaker 1>said that when he saw Jane in the morgue, she

0:30:56.605 --> 0:30:59.965
<v Speaker 1>had blood around her mouth. Blood in the mouth can

0:31:00.045 --> 0:31:03.445
<v Speaker 1>come from gastric distress, which is yet another symptom of

0:31:03.525 --> 0:31:07.445
<v Speaker 1>isoprobe alcohol poisoning. Another thing was that one of the

0:31:07.485 --> 0:31:10.885
<v Speaker 1>ambulance attendants had smelled a faint perfume on Janie. A

0:31:10.965 --> 0:31:14.125
<v Speaker 1>fruity smell can indicate keytnes in the urine, which is

0:31:14.165 --> 0:31:19.165
<v Speaker 1>again another symptom of alcohol poisoning. As we said, alcohol

0:31:19.245 --> 0:31:23.045
<v Speaker 1>poisoning can also lead to cardiovascular collapse, and in the

0:31:23.085 --> 0:31:26.645
<v Speaker 1>third autopsy, doctor Plus did suggest that Janie could have

0:31:26.725 --> 0:31:30.965
<v Speaker 1>died from a heartarrhythmia. If Janie collapsed from alcohol poisoning,

0:31:31.605 --> 0:31:35.125
<v Speaker 1>her condition might have been exacerbated at the party. She

0:31:35.285 --> 0:31:38.565
<v Speaker 1>was lying on the ground gasping for breath when at

0:31:38.645 --> 0:31:42.205
<v Speaker 1>least one person, in an attempt to revive her, threw

0:31:42.285 --> 0:31:45.405
<v Speaker 1>a cup of beer on her. Another person had mentioned

0:31:45.445 --> 0:31:48.765
<v Speaker 1>a cup of water also being thrown on her. This

0:31:48.925 --> 0:31:51.445
<v Speaker 1>could explain the fluid in her lungs that doctor Malick

0:31:51.445 --> 0:31:54.285
<v Speaker 1>had noted in the first autopsy. So if Jannie was

0:31:54.365 --> 0:31:58.725
<v Speaker 1>already suffering from over intoxication and central nervous depression, she

0:31:58.805 --> 0:32:01.205
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been able to expel this fluid from her lungs,

0:32:01.845 --> 0:32:05.925
<v Speaker 1>an she might have experienced some symptoms of drowning. One

0:32:06.045 --> 0:32:08.285
<v Speaker 1>is that your throat closes up to prevent any more

0:32:08.365 --> 0:32:11.405
<v Speaker 1>fluid entering the lungs, and when your throat closes up,

0:32:11.725 --> 0:32:14.885
<v Speaker 1>that can cause hemorrhaging, which was noted in the third autopsy.

0:32:16.085 --> 0:32:19.925
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that at that point she blacked out. I

0:32:20.085 --> 0:32:23.805
<v Speaker 1>hope so, because the alternative is that she was on

0:32:23.925 --> 0:32:27.925
<v Speaker 1>the ground, helpless, paralyzed, and unable to ask for help

0:32:28.685 --> 0:32:31.685
<v Speaker 1>while everyone continued to party around her and pour beer

0:32:31.765 --> 0:32:37.885
<v Speaker 1>down her throat she lay dying. We'll be right back.

0:32:40.005 --> 0:32:42.725
<v Speaker 1>The reason I'm an investigator is because I want to

0:32:42.805 --> 0:32:47.805
<v Speaker 1>answer family's questions. But in Janie's case, I can't definitively

0:32:47.885 --> 0:32:51.725
<v Speaker 1>answer the big question of how she died. Remember Parents

0:32:51.765 --> 0:32:55.365
<v Speaker 1>of Murdered Children. That's the organization where the Wards found

0:32:55.405 --> 0:32:59.245
<v Speaker 1>doctor Burnell and the v doc's Richard Walter. When we

0:32:59.365 --> 0:33:03.005
<v Speaker 1>talked with their executive director, Bev Warnock. We also spoke

0:33:03.045 --> 0:33:07.285
<v Speaker 1>with their volunteer coordinator Sherry Nolan. She became involved with

0:33:07.365 --> 0:33:11.165
<v Speaker 1>the organization when her daughter, who was pregnant, was killed.

0:33:12.565 --> 0:33:14.365
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about and one of my goals as

0:33:14.405 --> 0:33:18.485
<v Speaker 1>an investigator is to help families. But when I mentioned closure,

0:33:19.365 --> 0:33:23.285
<v Speaker 1>she told us that isn't something we or anyone can

0:33:23.365 --> 0:33:26.005
<v Speaker 1>provide for a family. Well, we make sure we don't

0:33:26.085 --> 0:33:28.685
<v Speaker 1>use the word closure. No one likes to hear the

0:33:28.725 --> 0:33:31.645
<v Speaker 1>word closure. We hit someone here that used to say,

0:33:31.925 --> 0:33:34.045
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that closes is the list of the coffin.

0:33:34.805 --> 0:33:37.765
<v Speaker 1>The grief is so devastating to them. You know, it's

0:33:37.805 --> 0:33:40.365
<v Speaker 1>not just have the funeral and then you try to recover.

0:33:40.525 --> 0:33:43.125
<v Speaker 1>They have to go into the justice system, and then

0:33:43.205 --> 0:33:46.045
<v Speaker 1>years later the pearl block system. So it never ends

0:33:46.085 --> 0:33:48.645
<v Speaker 1>for them. It never you know, and it's not something

0:33:48.725 --> 0:33:53.005
<v Speaker 1>you can you know, after a couple Montiers, you know,

0:33:53.125 --> 0:33:55.525
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of feel like you're moving on because

0:33:55.685 --> 0:33:58.085
<v Speaker 1>you can't. You know, your mind is just consumed with

0:33:58.965 --> 0:34:02.045
<v Speaker 1>guilt that you didn't say they loved them before they least,

0:34:02.245 --> 0:34:04.285
<v Speaker 1>or you know, any other kind of guilt. There might

0:34:04.365 --> 0:34:07.765
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of survivors. The healing process is to

0:34:07.885 --> 0:34:10.325
<v Speaker 1>talk about it and to be with other families is

0:34:10.405 --> 0:34:12.445
<v Speaker 1>to be able to talk to them because they understand

0:34:12.525 --> 0:34:14.885
<v Speaker 1>no one else would understand. But we also make it

0:34:15.005 --> 0:34:17.445
<v Speaker 1>very clear that we understand the grief and the pain,

0:34:17.565 --> 0:34:20.685
<v Speaker 1>but we don't understand individually their grief and their pain,

0:34:21.245 --> 0:34:23.925
<v Speaker 1>because no one knows exactly how I feel. It was

0:34:24.005 --> 0:34:27.005
<v Speaker 1>my daughter, my granddaughter, But I understand the pain and

0:34:27.045 --> 0:34:30.285
<v Speaker 1>grief that we all go through, and I never you know,

0:34:30.525 --> 0:34:33.125
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions that survivors ask is when does

0:34:33.165 --> 0:34:35.885
<v Speaker 1>it get better when you get over it. I think

0:34:36.045 --> 0:34:38.685
<v Speaker 1>that they answer that because other people say it, and

0:34:38.885 --> 0:34:41.085
<v Speaker 1>so I always say, it's not that it gets better,

0:34:41.125 --> 0:34:44.525
<v Speaker 1>it's just that it's different. Never say that they'll be healed.

0:34:44.765 --> 0:34:48.205
<v Speaker 1>It's a healing process that will never ask never tell

0:34:48.285 --> 0:34:50.205
<v Speaker 1>them that they'll be over it at any point in time,

0:34:50.245 --> 0:34:53.965
<v Speaker 1>because that grief's journey is a journey that you'll always

0:34:54.005 --> 0:34:57.765
<v Speaker 1>be on. At the beginning of this investigation, I thought

0:34:57.805 --> 0:35:00.485
<v Speaker 1>that people might be more forthcoming because so much time

0:35:00.565 --> 0:35:04.325
<v Speaker 1>is passed. I also thought more people would come forward

0:35:04.405 --> 0:35:07.445
<v Speaker 1>with renewed pressure on the case. But the thing is

0:35:08.165 --> 0:35:10.525
<v Speaker 1>they might have already come forward with everything they know,

0:35:11.565 --> 0:35:14.165
<v Speaker 1>and over the years there has been a lot of

0:35:14.205 --> 0:35:17.325
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the case. It was reopened in two thousand

0:35:17.325 --> 0:35:21.165
<v Speaker 1>and four, reinvestigated, and was a high profile case in

0:35:21.205 --> 0:35:24.205
<v Speaker 1>the state of Arkansas. I wondered if anything could have

0:35:24.285 --> 0:35:27.645
<v Speaker 1>been done for her at the party, could she have survived?

0:35:28.645 --> 0:35:33.045
<v Speaker 1>I asked ABC's FBI consultant Brad Garrett about this in

0:35:33.125 --> 0:35:35.285
<v Speaker 1>all the stories, I mean, do you think that there's

0:35:35.285 --> 0:35:38.205
<v Speaker 1>anything that they could have done more to help her? Well,

0:35:38.965 --> 0:35:42.685
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you talk about people helping other people,

0:35:42.845 --> 0:35:45.085
<v Speaker 1>you have to get to look at it in context.

0:35:45.685 --> 0:35:47.485
<v Speaker 1>Where are you. You're sort of in the middle of

0:35:47.605 --> 0:35:51.205
<v Speaker 1>nowhere in Arkansas, which means, you know, the luxury of

0:35:52.485 --> 0:35:55.245
<v Speaker 1>where you all are, Like I'm in Washington, d C.

0:35:55.805 --> 0:35:58.285
<v Speaker 1>If you started to choke on something, you could probably

0:35:58.325 --> 0:36:01.565
<v Speaker 1>get an ambulance and or the fire department to your

0:36:01.605 --> 0:36:04.405
<v Speaker 1>house in five or six minutes. Probably not realistic. In

0:36:04.845 --> 0:36:08.285
<v Speaker 1>martiall arc and they did in my view, and you

0:36:08.325 --> 0:36:10.725
<v Speaker 1>know other could they have done something at the scene?

0:36:11.565 --> 0:36:15.765
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe not. I mean, if you believe that in

0:36:15.885 --> 0:36:20.005
<v Speaker 1>affect Janie choked to death. If you believe that that,

0:36:20.725 --> 0:36:23.045
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what they could have done unless there

0:36:23.085 --> 0:36:26.325
<v Speaker 1>happened to be a paramedic or an EMT. But you're

0:36:26.325 --> 0:36:28.165
<v Speaker 1>talking a bunch of high school kids. So the odds

0:36:28.205 --> 0:36:31.045
<v Speaker 1>of that weren't great. And so they did really what

0:36:31.485 --> 0:36:33.805
<v Speaker 1>I would think is the next best thing. They didn't

0:36:33.845 --> 0:36:37.005
<v Speaker 1>wait for emergency services to come to them, if in

0:36:37.045 --> 0:36:39.485
<v Speaker 1>fact they even exist. They put them in the back

0:36:39.485 --> 0:36:42.445
<v Speaker 1>of a pickup truck. Now, it was sort of unclear

0:36:42.885 --> 0:36:46.205
<v Speaker 1>about how much of a lag there was between when

0:36:46.245 --> 0:36:49.885
<v Speaker 1>she went down off the porch of this cabin and

0:36:50.005 --> 0:36:52.205
<v Speaker 1>when she was actually taken. You know, I got different

0:36:52.525 --> 0:36:56.045
<v Speaker 1>time periods. But at some point they said, we've got

0:36:56.085 --> 0:36:59.205
<v Speaker 1>to get her to a doctor or to somebody that

0:36:59.525 --> 0:37:07.845
<v Speaker 1>can take a look at her. So what ultimately is

0:37:07.925 --> 0:37:12.925
<v Speaker 1>Jane's story. Janey's story is a tragedy. It's a story

0:37:12.965 --> 0:37:16.125
<v Speaker 1>about a town where there was enough distrust between some

0:37:16.245 --> 0:37:19.565
<v Speaker 1>of its citizens and the authorities that wild rumors could

0:37:19.565 --> 0:37:22.845
<v Speaker 1>be believed. It's also a tragedy that a lot of

0:37:22.885 --> 0:37:25.845
<v Speaker 1>the people in Marshall, Arkansas are tired of hearing about.

0:37:27.045 --> 0:37:30.005
<v Speaker 1>And it's a story about a family who never got answers.

0:37:32.805 --> 0:37:36.365
<v Speaker 1>Jane died in nineteen eighty nine at the age of sixteen,

0:37:37.405 --> 0:37:41.605
<v Speaker 1>and her father, Ron Ward, spent thirty years investigating his

0:37:41.725 --> 0:37:44.925
<v Speaker 1>daughter's death, which was almost twice as long as she

0:37:45.085 --> 0:37:49.685
<v Speaker 1>was alive. Ron is gone now as well, and I

0:37:49.765 --> 0:37:53.765
<v Speaker 1>can't help but admire him. He wanted the truth, He

0:37:53.885 --> 0:37:56.685
<v Speaker 1>wanted to live in a world that had answers and justice.

0:37:57.725 --> 0:38:01.925
<v Speaker 1>He wanted his daughter back. Throughout this season, people have

0:38:02.045 --> 0:38:08.365
<v Speaker 1>continued to reach out to us about unsolved cases. Parents, siblings, friends, spouses.

0:38:09.205 --> 0:38:11.525
<v Speaker 1>They are all desperately trying to find out what happened

0:38:11.565 --> 0:38:14.725
<v Speaker 1>to their loved ones. I think about season one and

0:38:14.765 --> 0:38:18.685
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Gould's father and sister, Larry and Danielle, who were

0:38:18.765 --> 0:38:24.765
<v Speaker 1>still trying to get justice for her. I've learned a

0:38:24.845 --> 0:38:27.725
<v Speaker 1>lot from ren Ward. He shows us that you can

0:38:27.765 --> 0:38:30.325
<v Speaker 1>go a long way if you don't give up. You

0:38:30.365 --> 0:38:34.285
<v Speaker 1>can get a case reinvestigated, a special prosecutor appointed, and

0:38:34.405 --> 0:38:38.725
<v Speaker 1>even another autopsy conducted. You can also get the information

0:38:39.165 --> 0:38:41.845
<v Speaker 1>made public so that other people can come in and

0:38:41.965 --> 0:38:45.845
<v Speaker 1>try to get answers. I've learned the importance of never

0:38:45.965 --> 0:38:49.045
<v Speaker 1>losing faith in the fact that one person can make

0:38:49.045 --> 0:38:54.285
<v Speaker 1>a difference. With enough pressure and time, anything can happen.

0:38:55.005 --> 0:38:56.565
<v Speaker 1>It's a lesson that I'm taking to heart as I

0:38:56.645 --> 0:39:00.965
<v Speaker 1>continue to investigate Rebecca Gould's murder. At the beginning of

0:39:01.005 --> 0:39:04.565
<v Speaker 1>the season we talked about time travel. On that fateful

0:39:04.645 --> 0:39:07.765
<v Speaker 1>night in nineteen eight eighty nine, many of the partygoers

0:39:07.885 --> 0:39:12.125
<v Speaker 1>were teens themselves. Thirty years later, a lot of those

0:39:12.245 --> 0:39:16.085
<v Speaker 1>kids are adults with kids of their own. A lot

0:39:16.165 --> 0:39:18.165
<v Speaker 1>of them have teens who are the same age as

0:39:18.205 --> 0:39:23.245
<v Speaker 1>they were when Jane died, and right now those teens

0:39:23.365 --> 0:39:26.005
<v Speaker 1>might be heading out to parties and cabins in the woods.

0:39:27.325 --> 0:39:40.325
<v Speaker 1>I'm Katherine Townsend and this is Helen Gone. Helen Gone

0:39:40.485 --> 0:39:44.005
<v Speaker 1>is a joint production between School of Humans and iHeartRadio.

0:39:44.805 --> 0:39:48.485
<v Speaker 1>It is written and recorded by me. Catherine Townsend. Taylor

0:39:48.605 --> 0:39:51.885
<v Speaker 1>Church and Gabby Watts are our producers and story editors.

0:39:52.685 --> 0:39:56.405
<v Speaker 1>Executive producers are Brandon Barr, Brian Lavin, and el C.

0:39:56.565 --> 0:39:59.685
<v Speaker 1>Crowley for School of Humans and Connell Byrne and Chuck

0:39:59.765 --> 0:40:04.685
<v Speaker 1>Bryant for iHeart. Our Field producer is Miranda Hawkins. Theme

0:40:04.725 --> 0:40:08.485
<v Speaker 1>and original school are by Ben Sale, available wherever you

0:40:08.565 --> 0:40:12.285
<v Speaker 1>get your music. Please visit us at Helegoon podcast dot

0:40:12.405 --> 0:40:23.765
<v Speaker 1>com or follow us on social media. School of Humans