WEBVTT - Halftime Report: A Roundtable Discussion

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Welken to trillions. I'm Joel Weber and I am Eric

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bel Tunis. Eric. I realized recently that, um, you know,

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I've lost sense of time. No no sense of time anymore.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But we're basically halfway through the year and it's been

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a weird year. It felt appropriate that we should do

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a halftime report. Yeah, I mean, so much has happened.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I I almost feel like time has slowed down, like

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>like two or three years has been stuffed into six months.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Even the sell off people were saying that it was

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like two thousand eight squeezed into six weeks. And I

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>think the recovery was, like, you know, the same deal.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Everything just seems to be so condensed, and with the

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>lockdown throw on top of that, I think everybody's very disoriented.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But um, certainly this first half was a lot of

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>et F storylines have have developed a lot to chew on,

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so helpe less make sense of what's been going on.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>We figured we'd lean into Bloomberg Intelligence and your analysts, Eric,

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So we've got your team who's basically had some observations

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>both for the first half and then kind of looking

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead for the second half. So who's all joining us?

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So we have from London or I think he might

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>be in Greece already, but uh, Athanacio, Sarah Fagus otherwise

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>known as Tom Um, James Seffert, who is in Summit,

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, and Morgan Barner who is in d C

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but was just in California. We're all over the place,

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know we are constantly in Twitter, d m

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>s and I v s talking about these issues all

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the time. So basically I asked the Meats to bring

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the big issue they've thought was the big deal from

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the first half, and also maybe something to watching in

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the second half. So um, there's gonna be a lot

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to chew on today just for people listening. You know,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we have all four of us, and there's some vacations

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and whatnots coming up. So we recorded this right in

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the middle of June, so we're gonna go over some numbers.

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>They could be a touch stale, but I think directionally

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be exactly the same this time.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>On Trillions the E t F halftime Report, Morgan, Tom James,

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Trillions again. Hey guys, good to see you

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>guys in this zoom. Uh this is my closet, don't

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys think it has a blared witch vibe in there.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I do, because all you see is the late kind

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of like kind of up in his face, and he's

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>just looks like he is scared and like hiding from

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>something Like it's just feel like a horror movie going on.

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>If you see me looking into the corner, please please

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>call for help. Um okay, James, I want to start

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>with you first half. What do you want to talk about?

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>What was your big takeaway? I mean, the big takeaway

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>is the FED jumping into the e t F market

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>and buying ets. So they basically stepped in and said

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be buying fixed income e T

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>s UM. We call it kitchen sinc Day in Marche. Basically,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>jerol Al just said he was going to be buying

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>things left and right. U and E T s were

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>added to that description. As of June tenth, we know

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that they have somewhere around five point three billion in

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>ETS and we are five point five billion in e

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>t F s UM. They're all fixed income, mostly investment grade,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>but there's some high yield ets in there, and we're

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>also obviously watching to see which ets are specifically buying

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to re release that report um on

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a monthly basis, so we have the most recent data

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>as of May nine. We won't know exactly when the

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>June report will come out, but that they tell us

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>basically everything you could ever want to know with what

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the FED is doing in the e t F market.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people when they hear the FITS buying

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>e t F they think, oh, are we Japan now?

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>The Bank of Japan of the e t F sets

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there just for perspective, that five billion would be point

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>three percent of all e t f s, but it

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is two percent of corporate bondy tfs, and it's about

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of all the flows into corporate bondyts this year.

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So in that niche, the FED is becoming a bigger player.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you looked at the top ten

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>holdings of like an l q D or h y G,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the FED would be on the cusp. It might be,

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, flirting with the top ten holder of these

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>funds already and there's still you know, some time to go.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So one of the observation I had about what James

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is talking about is the portfolio that the e t

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>F s the FED uses was really advanced, in my opinion. Normally,

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>when an institution like a Yale or a I don't know,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey pension uses e t F, they use like

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>one or two liquid ones, you know, for liquidity purposes.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>They're afraid to swim away from those big liquid ones.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And the FED had what thirteen to fifteen e t

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>F some most people would never heard of, probably half

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the list, And I think that really speaks to black

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Rock holding their hand. I mean, they are definitely working

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>with someone who knows e t F and so their

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>portfolio to me looks a lot more like an e

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>t F strategist than it does like an institution. Yeah,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and the other thing to highlight here is, as I mentioned,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>they're given there being very transparent here, Like we knew

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be so much transparent, but when

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.119
<v Speaker 1>they released this report at the end of the month

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>of May, we're at that. Maybe they were vocal about this,

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't think they were going to be as

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>transparent as they are. We can see the trade level data,

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what time they bought, these e t F s, who

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>bought it, all these different things, so they're telling you

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>everything that happened, and it's you're looking back and it's

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not live, but you can see exactly what they're doing

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace when it's happened, after it's happened. Okay, Eric,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got a couple of topics from first half that

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we we've talked about a couple of times,

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>but I just feel like it is the zeitgeist of

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the of the year so far. Do you want to

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about them? Yeah, I think I'm becoming associated with

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the E t F jets at this point. Um, I've

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>been obsessed, even addicted, but I admitted, so at least

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there's that, um that you have a problem. Yeah, I

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>do have a problem. Um, this E t F Jets.

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>It's just really I don't know if it's lack of sports,

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>but it's really just captured my attention at big time

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>because you know, when we look at flows into Vanguard

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and black Rock, it's you know, they take the hoover

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and money like giant vacuum cleaners. So anytime a small

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>E t F is able to just sort of go

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>from obscurity into the big time within a couple of

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>weeks or months, it's fascinating. It's it's a rare and

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in Jets's case. Let me give you the numbers here. Um.

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>What stuck out to me was the flow streak. It

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>took in money seventy straight days before finally seeing an outflow.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Seventy days of straight inflows is absurd, especially for an

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>e t F that had thirty million dollars at the

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>beginning of it. I looked at the longest streaks of

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>inflows of all e t f s, and Jets would

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>write number three at seventy days to Vanguard B and

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>d X and v W. Oh, we're number one and

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>two with eighty five and eighty three days. But the

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>whole top ten was Vanguard except for Jets. That is

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>how unusual it is. UM. I also think it's interesting

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that Jets was so bought up after being so bad. Normally,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>when you see retail sort of pile into a theme

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>et F, it's because it's having its shiny object moment,

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it's having a good performance run. This was the opposite.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>This was people buying something beat up. I mean, the

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>evaluation on the airline stocks was really low. It also

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>speaks to this whole robin Hood situation that everybody's obsessed

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with robin Hood being like the face of the day

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>trading retail investor who's board at home with no sports,

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a case we made. Although you know,

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan ran the numbers and they don't have a lot

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of assets. If you look at Jets, we would estimate

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe five to seven percent of Jets is robin Hood,

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but they represent other people on other platforms, so you

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>have a bigger robin Hood effect. And that's definitely bigger

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>than that seven percent, so they're definitely buying it. You know,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's retail because of how small the trades and the

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>flows are UM. And then this retail thing is interesting

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because it basically puts all these small investors on the

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>opposite side of a Buffet trade. You know, Buffet sold

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>his airline stocks on early May. Since then Jets is

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>up up big. As of today, it's about thirty since

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>he sold UM, but it had a rough week last week,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see where this goes. I also think this

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>brings into the fact that Dave Portnoy from Barstool Sports

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>has been really into the airlines, and we looked he

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>put out this sort of hype video that was to

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>an a C d C song. Since that video came

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out Jets. His volume quadrupled and hasn't looked back. So

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think with Robin Hood Dave Portnoy, there's there's Jets,

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sits in the middle of a bunch of major trends

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. So it's it's bigger than just this little

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>engine that could them E t F. It's really to

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>me a huge story and as well a proxy for

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>how fast the economy opens up. A lot of these

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>smaller traders are betting against the expert class and saying no,

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people are going to start flying and moving around faster

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>than you're telling us. And so again there's so much

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>at stake here and it's just totterally fascinating. Okay, Morgan,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you're next on my list. First half big story, what

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was yours? Yeah, not to be confused with jets, but

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>we cover the launch of a new E t F

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>bets b e t Z, which is a round hill

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sports betting and I gaming e t F. This actually

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>was a launch that we predicted on trillions back in

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think last not we congratulations. I was hoping that

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we would see a sports betting et F, in part

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of these companies haven't been public. We

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just saw DraftKings enter the public markets, Flutter Entertainment owned

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>fan duels. So there's now finally enough sort of global

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>exposure in the public market public markets to see and

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>benefit from UM the legalization of sports betting in the US.

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of this is going to be mobile driven,

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>tech forward. But launched the et F was really historic

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself, just given the volume that it

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>traded in the first couple of days after launching, I mean,

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it was pre remarkable. Seventeen million trading, seventeen million the

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>first day, I think, fifty million second day. I mean,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a huge launch. And you know, hearkening

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to what Eric just said, a lot of that breadth

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in traded volume think came from, you know, the fact

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that the fund you know, in in around a week

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of training, has over eighteen thousand holders on robin hood,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>which is just pretty remarkable but not shocking when you

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>look at UM. The highest held names in robin hood

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>include you know, some of bets is top holdings like

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings and pen So this is already an audience on

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood that is interested and familiar with UH sports

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>betting companies and names. They may even some some may

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>even say they're betting on stocks as well. So this

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is a really good audience for the for the e

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>t F BETS and the way the ETF is designed,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're seeing give you know, it's harder to

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>bet on individual names. The way the e t F

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is set up, it's sort of dynamically rebounces, got more

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>global names that some US investors may not be familiar with.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So the fact the fact that the e t F

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>has already taken in seventy million also connects with just

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the up tips we've seen in thematic fund flows, i

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>mean eight percent over last year. So thematic products overall

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>our seeing traction and BETS echoes back and to bring

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this to a bigger perspective here also the distribution. You know,

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to launch an e t F right now,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have to peel to this. Like older

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>advisor with who has a lot of rich clients, you know,

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to buy an e t F on

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>day one. They tend to stay away from theme ETFs

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. They don't like new ones with

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>low volume. It's interesting how BETS was able to bypass

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that advisor and go right to the do it yourself

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>smaller retail investor, and that might be a growing channel

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of for issuers to just go right there. Um. We also,

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I Morgan sent me on a TikTok rabbit hole and

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I looked up E t F and bets. Even though

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it just came out, there was two TikTok videos from

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>people on there. So I think it's also this interesting

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>look at younger investors who's seemingly doing their own research

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know, are willing to buy an e t

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>F that's new and from an unknown, relatively unknown issue

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's interesting. Well, that speaks to the moment just

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>going direct to consumer during the middle of the pandemic.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's sort of cut out, cut out all

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the middleman, and just go straight to your people. I

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>also think there's a bigger story of play here as well,

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>because I have a lot of friends I'm in my

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>late twenties who like to bet on sports and stuff

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 1>like that, and they have a lot of them have

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>picked up trading on robin Hood. As we kind of

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about, there's a lot of people in robin Hood

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and I've had friends who've never talked to about investing

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>who reached out to me about this specific e t

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.119
<v Speaker 1>F or gaming e t F video gaming ets specifically

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. So there's definitely a lot of

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>interest coming from as you mentioned, possibly the Barstool Sports

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>founder Portnoy, a few different things, um, where people are

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>very interested in this specific et F and getting more

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>into trading. Sarah Fagus, You're in You're in London still,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>although it looks like Greece. Tell us about your big

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>story from the first half. Yeah, sure, um, And if

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I could just add something really quick from the European

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>perspective on the thematic stuff, I promise I won't say

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you SIT's, but um, if the thematic stuff is really

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting in Europe because it's attracting a lot of retail

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>investors too. It's very much an institutional market here and

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>actually you're seeing a lot of buying on some of

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>these thematic ets, so you're actually seeing a new sort

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of class of investors coming into the market through thematics.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what I wanted to talk about, and

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what I want to look at is active, non transparent ets.

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And normally this probably would have been like one of

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest stories of the year, like leading up in

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year, but just given what happened

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the market, this sort of kind of got put

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to the to the back burner. But there was a

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of ets that launched UH right after the sell

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>off in March, and now we're that was by American Century.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Now we're seeing more firm sort of joined in fidelity,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.719
<v Speaker 1>like Mason Um. And so I think there's two things

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting about this is one of the timing of

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it UM. They sort of avoided some of the big

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>down draft in March, so their performance out of the

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>gate is really good. The the American Century Growth Fund

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is already up thirty percent UM since it launched, so

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really imperative for them to have good performance out

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the gate. UH. And because I think there's gonna

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of scrutiny on these products. They really

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have to show that, Okay, you went through all this

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>effort to hide your holdings and do all this. Now

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you actually have to show that there's value to the structure, right.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's gonna be a lot of pressure

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>on these products to perform really well, and they're off

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>actually to a pretty good start. But I actually think

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. So not only against the going up against

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>regular ETFs, they're going against active ETFs that are fully transparent,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>like cathy Woods funds right here, and they're actually doing

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>really well. Little Kathy at one point had the best

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>performing ETF out there. And so now I actually think

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that presents a problem for these active, non transparent funds

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>because they're you're looking at a fully transparent ETF out

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there that's doing really well. It's almost like, well, why

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>do I need to hide my holdings. You're having one

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's doing really well. So I think that if

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Cathy's funds continue to do really well, so I think

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna provide it's gonna be a headwind for some

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of these funds. But um, I think we're going to

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>see more and more now with the market sort of

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>stable coming into the market. So it's definitely gonna be

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>something that we've watch and I'll continue to watch. And

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think they're stuck in the dead zone.

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you've seen them come out between forty five

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five basis points as a fee, and I

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>don't doesn't look like any of them are taking big swings.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So unless you're dirt cheap or going to create a

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>shiny object moment by being like a Cathy would I

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. Uh, it's it's it's gonna be a

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>tough road in my opinion. Although it looked like American

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Century put its own money in there. They have like

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>two million now in those So if they're able to

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>move money from the mutual funds over, uh, they could

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>save assets potentially for themselves. But I don't know about grassroots. Yeah,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree, Um, I think I'd probably take the under

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on it. It It is actually seeing like real demand from

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>clients outside of just money being moved from from the

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>firms themselves in it. So Tom, when you think about

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>this topic, what do you what are you most looking

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for in the second half. Um, for this, it's gonna

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be they have to really prove their value prop Like

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Eric said, they're more expense if they're going through all

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this to hide their holdings. Um, they really have to.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's gonna it's gonna they're gonna really have

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to show that we are by doing this where we're

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>adding more value than even the e T s that

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>are out on the market. Because I think there there's

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of hurdles that need to get off

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of them, and I'd be interesting to see who else

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>comes into the market. So you have American Century, They're

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously a big name. Fidelity is a huge name. Um,

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'd be willing to see who else gets gets

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>brought into the market here. And I think they're gonna

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be looking obviously what these first entrants are doing. I

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of engauge if some of these other bigger firms

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are gonna you know, some a lot have been filed.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think also market timing plays a role here too.

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>There was like three e t F launched in March,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>then in April all these new ETF started launching, including

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>these active ones. So um, it's also probably interesting like

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a sentiment gauge too to see, Hey, do they maybe

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think that the market has stabilized here and that's why

0:16:53.040 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're starting to roll out some of these products. Okay,

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>let's use this opportunity to transition into a second half preview. So, uh,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we're in the locker room. John plays Uh, James, I'm

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with you. What what's the second half look like? Yeah,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>so this is something that I've been tracking for the

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>past couple of months. We obviously are constantly tracking where

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>money is going in in the asset management industry, mutual

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>funds ets, and the big thing that jumps off the

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>screen is the money that went into money market funds

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in the first half UM. So basically everyone likes to

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>say cash on the sideline, I would I would argue

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the term is overused, but right now there's more cash

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline than UM. They're virtually ever has been

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in the well, not ever has been but since two

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight by different measures. So you look at this,

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we see we saw seven hundred seventeen billion when it'so

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>money market funds in March. Four hundred and ten billion

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>went into money markets in April. It's slowed down, but

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there was still inflows in May at forty two billion UM.

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And what this comes up to is there's over five

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there's five trillion dollars in money market securities, which to

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>be what money market securities are there basically cash, commercial

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>paper repurchase agreements, these short term overnight type vehicles, very

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>short term vehicles. And if you look at it as

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of the SMP five market cap right now,

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's at about it was at the end of April.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>It's now around nineteen because the equity market has come

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit, but that's the highest level we've

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>seen since. And then if you look at as a

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>percentage of mutual fund assets, it's at the highest level

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand eleven, so it was up at last

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we checked UM. So there's basically a lot of cash

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines. Now I should also caveat this with

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened in March. The part of the reason why

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>there were such big inflows as all these corporations have

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>these bank loans revolvers are kind of like credit cards

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially for corporations with the bank, and they drew down

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that money and so they took in billions of dollars

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and rather than sit on cash, they put it into

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>these money market funds. So that's big chunk of where

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this money is coming from. But still that's still money

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines UM, and there there's money to be deployed.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Also on e t F s alone, we there's a

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of UM. There's a few et F that's focused

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>on treasuries, so one to three month treasuries less than

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>one year treasuries that are basically similar to money market

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>funds in a in a sense or the way they're

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>being used. They've also seen significant inflows. So there has

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of money on the sidelines. And if

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at fixed income and equity flows, equity flows

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>have been muted. I mean, the equity market is obviously

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>up in April and May, and we haven't really seen

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>anything significant on the equity side of e t F flows.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>The only area that's been significant has been sector bets.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely a lot of money flowing into specific sector

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>e t s, as Tom wrote about last month on

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a research side. But fixed income has taken in a

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. But again, equity has just been kind

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>of muted. It's been not there's nothing really happening on

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that side. And let me just this is an important

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>issue because no flows into equity e t f s

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is unusual for a rally. And there's a couple of theories.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>There's portfolio rebalancing, there's taxation, there's maybe other opportunities, but

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta I mean, Tom's been covering this the most.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I do found myself a little dumbfounded that there hasn't

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>been at least a healthy amount of flows given the rally,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's up what markets up since the low in March. Right,

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely little odd, Like James said, a lot of it,

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>some of it's just shifting, but still like you're just

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>going from a broad sector to like a specific sector

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>et F or from like SMP to like attack. But

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>net net, there's no new flows. I think that's really interesting, right,

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there's not actually new money coming into the market, so um,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that the it's very odd to

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>see the market rally so much not have flows sort

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of follow up behind it. Yeah, and there was there

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>was nine billion that went out of equity e t

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>s in May, so the market was going up and

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>we saw outflows. And we have this one chart that

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we like to show every year. Flows tend to pick

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>up when the equity market does well, so for to

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have a breakdown in that relationship is pretty significant. These

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>e t f s like Voo, which tend to have

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>dri drip retail money coming in, I think they're more

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in models, and I think the models all had signal

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>shifting to pick didn't come when the FED was going

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to start buying those bondy tfs. So I think that's

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>when you saw, uh, some of that too. So I

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes these e t f s that were tended

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>to be always like just used directly by advisors are

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more in these models, which we discussed

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way in the last episode with Tim Clift

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of Investnet. If you're interested, okay, Eric, your second half preview. Yeah,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's on E s G. Which when we did the

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Hester Purse interview with the SEC, you called me an

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>E s G hater and then Magnus cut out my

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>response which didn't make it on the final cut, which was,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a hater per se. I'm just a I'm

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a realist, Like I'm not anti E s G. I'm

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just anti nasty surprise, and I'm also anti hype and

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>bias and there's a lot going a lot of that

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all in this E s G soup. So I'm always

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>watching E s G. Look when I talk about the bias,

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the the articles on E s

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>G recently, all of them will say record flows into

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>E s G. And it's true. E s G've taken

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in thirteen billion this year and they took an eight

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>billion last year. Both of those are records, right, So

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a ton of money for a category that didn't

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have much going on before last year. And I think

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>most people know this, but they just don't say it.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Most of that money, the majority, like in the case

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of this year, about ten billion of it isn't is

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>because of two investors, one big institution in Europe as

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>well as black Rock. Black Rock has moved after Larry

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Fink had that big announcement earlier in the year, they

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>moved E S G U and a couple others into

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>their models that advisors use and that is responsible for

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>most of them. So yes, that money still counts. And

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>believe me, in the Terror Dome, I give credit where

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>it's due. It does count. I just think people are

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>presenting this as millennials have E S G fever. That's

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's what they want. I just don't think

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that's true because the grassroot flows just aren't there. Like

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>if you take the Vanguard E t F E S

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>g V, it's taken in seven million this year, or

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>how about Spy the SMP fossil fuel Free E t

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>F that's a hundred million. That's more where the market is.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's just underwhelming again. And I also

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>think this Robin hood situation has shown us that, if anything,

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>millennials and gen z are much more into trading than

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they are into E s G, and I think people

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>might have under estimated how much millennials want to change

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>the world with their investments. Further, E s G U,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the one that black Rock put in the model,

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to me, this is probably the biggest of the biggest

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hope for E s G because remember what g SLC

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the Goldman Sachs Multi Factory t F did to Smart Beta.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>It moves a lot like the SMP and it only

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>charges nine basis points, so an advisor has a story,

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have any tracking error to worry about.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>E s g U is kind of that for E

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>s G charges fifteen basis points and it tracks pretty

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>closely to the market. It's virtually going to give you

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>similar returns. But here's the thing, you're not going to really,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much change are you really an infect here?

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Because E s GU holds x On and Chevron, you

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have smaller waitings, but they still own them. Most people

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>who want E s G to me are looking to

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not hold those companies. So I think this is part

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of the issue with E S G. Why are you

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>investing in it? Are you going to be happy if

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't you know, match the market's performance? But to me,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>E s G U which is you know the one

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that to me is uh, you could replace your S

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred exposure with this or your equity

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and you wouldn't be that much different than the market.

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think for advisors that's a big deal because

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>they don't really want to have to explain to their

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>clients why they've underperformed. Plus they also want everything cheap,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and this one's fifteen BIPs, so there's a there's some

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>bright spots here, don't get me wrong. I just think

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>relative to the media hype, if you look at a

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>chart of E s G mentions, it just keeps going

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>up and up and up and up. The media really

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>wants this to be a thing, and I just you know,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what's that quote in mean girls like you're trying to

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>make fetch happen and it just won't. I think that

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>what he's talked about E S to you. There's also

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>SMPE in the US, in on the US exchanges, which

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is basically smp F s G index, And what these

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>indexes do that there's there's two ways to look at this.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You can either be inclusionary or exclusionary as far as

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>are not concerned, and there's like a scale, so if

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you're exclusionary, you're excluding the worst actors. If you're inclusion

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>or you're going after the companies that are meeting these

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the specific criteria, they're doing everything they can. But the

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>problem in some of this is like there's some of

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>these companies are so big, they're bound to have issues.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So the bet the way that some of these other

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>ones are doing an exclusionary factor where they're just excluding

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>i don't know, controversial weapons, tobacco, and a few other things.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>But then the rest of it is they're trying to

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>give you the same risk return characteristics as the market,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but just taking out the things that are the least

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>E s G the things that are performing the worst

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>by sector. So you're gonna get some oil exposure and

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>just get rid of the companies that are the worst

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on the E s G scale things like that, and

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that gives you a similar risk return profile. And you

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>could argue that it's it's basically a risk metric. You're

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>taking out the risk from environmental issues or social issues

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of governance issue, try to limit them as much as possible,

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And these funds are outperforming the SMP five since their

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>launched in many cases. So it's it's showing that it's working,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's I think that's where there's gonna be a

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more interest. We've seen, as Eric mentioned with g

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>SLC in the smart beta world, the real water down factors,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the one to give you a lot of beta but

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>give you a little bit of the factor the ones

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that advisors like the most. So I think these are

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the most of the I'm the most bullish on this

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the category for gaining significant assets. That said,

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't like when you think about advisers doing that, that's

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>very different than I want to change the world. I mean,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>how many people who go into E s G thinking

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna clean up my portfolio. Then you're like, oh,

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this fun holds xon. By the way, this is where

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you. I don't think like E

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>s G investing is the way to change the world.

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can benefit from the things that

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to happen with governments and regulations and all

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>these different things by avoiding the worst actors. But I

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think just investing in a company is going to

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>make them more E S G friendly, Like theoretically it

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>could happen. Um. I mean, I would argue that you're

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>probably better off getting a bunch of money investing in

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the worst actors and trying to invoke change and we

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of proxy votes potentially, there's all the different ways to

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do this. I just think the most viable asset gathering wise,

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>productive wise for a portfolio is the exclusionary route, where

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a similar return characteristic of the market. Alright,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>second half is upon us, what's your pick to watch?

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching small caps. I think we're going to see

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>whether sort of a rotation equity leadership actually happens and

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>holes and I want to see whether you know, et

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>F investors are ahead of of a rotation and sort

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of believe that that small cap recovery could be part

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of another leg in a rally here and I think

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seen head funds and other bigger speculators

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>roll back short positions starting in dint. This tend to

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.479
<v Speaker 1>be a bit leaving um and so now Russell two

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand futures are sort of net long um. We've seen

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know, high yields spreads are still relatively high,

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>which is when small caps tend to do better. Um.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And so just looking at the size factor within the

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Russell one thousand, we've seen our strategies team sort of

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>site mid single digit gains attributable to the factor in

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of months. UM, I think that might

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be encouraging some some flows. And then you know they've

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>also are you know, our our strategy counterparts have pointed out,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way that small cap is continuing to

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>trade at fundamental discounts, and and you know, I think

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the next most optimistic investors are looking at small caps.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I w M has actually seen, um,

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a sort of representative ETF tracking the

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Russell two thousand, it's actually seem pretty sizeable outflows. And

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that may be because of how heavily it's used tactically,

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's gotten. You know, small caps in general have

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>seen offsetting inflows UM to the category, and some of

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>those leaders are VB and SPSN, So it's just other

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>small cap ets are kind of leading this. But Tom

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>wrote recently about that this beta small cap segment has

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>taken in really pretty strong flows in June. I think

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's one point six billion as as of today, and

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>invest goes equal weight RSP find this kind of leading

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that category. So we're watching that for the rest of

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the year. And just one thing on the small caps

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>versus large caps. The large caps are dominated by these

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>giant companies. If they ever try to break up some

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, or there's just a shift in the

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>way people shop. I mean you could see small caps.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've just been down and out for ten years,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, nothing stays down and out forever. UM.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe small cap value, which by the way, a lot

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of people are asking, is there a bankruptcy et F

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>because of hurts and stuff? And I think small cap

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>value is as close as you can get or micro caps,

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but I j R. I think is the small cap

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>value in case anybody is interested in that. I mean,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's put that up against SMP five hundred. It is

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just like it is brutal. What what's the ticker for

0:29:56.160 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a bankruptcy e t F bust if they had one? Yeah,

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Tom, bring us home? What's your second half? Pick?

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>What I'm watching? And because we're going into the summer now, um,

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>normally the summer. It's not a secret, it's it's markets

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>really quiet. Et F trading is really quiet during the

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>summer months and the third quarter it's usually like just

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the lowest quarter for trading. But I think this year

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very different. You have everyone continue

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to work from home through the summer. You probably have

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of vacations that either got cut short or

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they're just doing you know, staycations. Now you have the

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>first full summer where like every platform is commissioned free

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>et F Trading, Robin Hood, Schwab, all of those. I

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>think this is gonna be a really busy summer for

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>et F trading. UM some of the stuff that Morgan

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned with the interest in thematics, I think we're I

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think the third quarter, in the summer months are going

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to punch away above their weight this year, just because

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of the environment that we're currently in with just more

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>people working from home and just more attached to their screens.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>This year, what happens if there's a big second wave, uh,

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>then I we'll definitely see I mean, I think we'll

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>see just a lot of market altility, but I think

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely going to see more uh E t F

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>trading in the fourth quarter is normally really busy anyways,

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think this second half of the year is

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be really is gonna put up some pretty

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>big numbers for E t F trading. All right, Tom,

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>James Morgan, thanks so much for joining us on Trillions.

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having us say thanks a lot, Thanks for

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to Trillions until next time. You can find us

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify,

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and wheber else you'd like to listen. We'd love to

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show.

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric fall Tunas. You can find Morgan at

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>M Barnes six, James at j S E y f F,

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Sara Vegas at TA Sarah Vegas Good Luck

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Spelling that. This episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus Hendrickson.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Leady is the head of Bloomberg Podcast by O