WEBVTT - Fed 'Takes Back' Last Year's Hike: Invesco's Hooper

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, it certainly was a news

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>filled afternoon yesterday with the FED cutting rates by twenty

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>five basis points, and then the Q and a and

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>presentation by Chairman Pal which calls I think some uncertainty

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>with many investors in the marketplace to try to make

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of it. We welcome our next guest, Christina Hooper.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Christina is a chief global market strategist for Investco based

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>here in York. Christina, you're joining us here on Bloomberg

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Interactor Broker Studio. It's great to see you. What were

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>your takeaways yesterday from yesterday's testimony and Q and a

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and all that. Well, there are a few key takeaways Paul.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it seems that the narrative is that

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the last rate hike of two thousand eighteen was a mistake,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're giving that back, um, but that it doesn't

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean we're going to see any series of rate

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>cuts from here. Maybe one war. But J. Powell was

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>very clear and suggesting that this is an adjustment, not

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a trend, and so that speaks volumes, but it does

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>also cause confusion in markets. I think the other key

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>takeaway was that the FET is confused because there are

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so many different data points swirling around that suggests different things.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>The dichotomy in the US economy strengthen the consumer, strengthened services,

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but of course weakness in manufacturing, which really mirrors what

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing globally. Um. Also just in general, we're seeing

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a strong domestic economy for the most part, but we

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about trade wars, and really there is

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>no playbook for trade wars. So a lot of people

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>said the VODO reserved disappointed markets. Yesterday you did see

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>US so often equities a bit of a sell often bonds.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Today we're seeing bonds rally and we're seeing two year

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>yields come in uh the most in a couple of weeks.

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to figure this out. Why. Well, I think

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there's always that visceral knee jerk reaction, and then markets

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>take time to digest information, so they didn't necessarily get

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted from the press conference. They seemed to

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>get what they wanted from the actual decision, but stock

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>started to go down when the press conference occurred, and

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>so it seems as though they were left feeling a

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>little empty. Because J. Powell UM insisted that this is

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>more of an adjustment rather than a trent. I say,

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this feels like a relationship. You know, they wanted to

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>hear more, something more, what's what's the future? Well, it

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is a relationship. Uh And and luckily though, um J.

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Powell has colleagues on the FED, and so most likely

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see Vice Chair Clara to come out

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and clean up some of the comments and comfort markets. Um,

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a relationship. So, Christina, is there anything that

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>happened yesterday or that will change how you guys view

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace? Maybe? How yet, allocating some capital for the

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>remainder of the year, anything changed from yesterday? Nothing really changes,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>but it does suggest that we are likely to see

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>more dollar strength um, and that really the FED has

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>paved the way for other central banks to start getting

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>more accommodative, so UM on the margins, though really not

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of change UM, just I would expect that

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>stronger dollar. I would expect UM something of a tilt

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>towards UH risk assets performing well in environment where the

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Fed stands ready to be more accommodative if it needs to.

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>UM certainly, and balance sheet normalization a bit early was

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a nod to the doves. So I think this is

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>an environment that all else being equal, favors risk assets.

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>What about emerging markets given the fact that you're expecting

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the dollar to strengthen, So emerging markets could do well

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in this environment in that the Fed has removed UM

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>one key headwind, which is balance sheet normalization. Recall that

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>was creating something of a liquidity suck for emerging market

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that actually this could pave the way

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>UM for for UM emerging markets to perform better. So

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>another news item that seems a narrative that seems to

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be have been addressed a little bit this week, as trade.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>It appears that you know what the U S trade

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>delegation going, and then coming back from Shanghai that it

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>appears that while there doesn't look like there's going to

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be a deal immediately. At least there's just kicked this

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can down the road, and maybe this might even be

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a post election. Is that scenario from a trade perspec

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>enough for the markets right now? I think it's enough.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what we need to do, though, is watch

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>for any signs of a deterioration in the relationship. But luckily,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I think markets have begun to manage their own expectations

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with this. I think there was way too much optimism.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I've always been a real pessimist when it comes to

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the U S. China trade situation, and I think now

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>markets have come to again it's another relationship. Have come

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to accept um diminished expectations for what could happen between

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the US and China. However, if we see more tariffs

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>than I do, think that will send stocks lower and

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>really shape confidence. So we have the market on the

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>couch speaking with the therapist right now. UM. I do

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>want to know. You know a lot of people were

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about J. Powell and that his performance was not great.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree? No? Actually, UM, what I would say

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>is that, uh, you know, quite often it is hard

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to articulate a decision, uh, particularly one in which um,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>there are so many factors at play. I actually felt

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>for him. Um. I certainly think Janet Yellen probably would

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>have done more in the way of preparation and would

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have been very very scripted in her comments to make

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sure there was nothing offhanded that was mentioned. But when

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about UM J. Powell, he did try to articulate, um,

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the kind of conflicts the FED had in terms of

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what's looking positive and what's looking negative. And also I

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think he really stood up for FED independence as well,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>UM by making that stay. But he of course he does.

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's act to say, yeah, actually we're going

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a cave to what the president says. Lisa. Nothing is

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a given in this environment. So I actually do think

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that he had to to stand up and say that,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and he did, Uh, And I think he was quite

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>clear um not giving in. He could have been much

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>easier for him to say, you know, to to really

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>say nothing about this, but he tried to make sure

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it was viewed as an adjustment because he doesn't want

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to look like he's cow towing to the White House.

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Christine is about thirty seconds left up. We're about halfway

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>through the earning season. What have you seen anything unusual?

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I've seen again that phenomenon that managing expectations can be

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a very good thing because while um earnings estimates were lowered,

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>now they're coming in meeting expectations or in some cases

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>beating them, and that has created something of a positive

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>sentiment in markets. Christina Hooper, thank you so much. We

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>love having you on. Thank you, thank you. Christina Hooper

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is chief Global market strategist for investco Whish overseas nearly

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars. This has been a mixed second quarter

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>earnings period for many company ease, but there is one

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>company that is doing a huge victory lap today and

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that is Shopify, the darling of the Canadian tech world,

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>shares surging at ten today to a new record after

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>reporting better than expected earnings. We're lucky to have with

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>us now the chief operating officer of the firm, Harley Ficklstein.

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>He's uh, He's based in Ottawa, Ontario, in Canada. Harley,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>congratulations and a very good earnings report and obviously the

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>shares are reflecting that. What was the main driver of

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>growth in the second quarter. Thanks so much for the

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>kind words and thanks for having me on your show.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean a couple of things are happening. One is

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I think people are getting to realize what Shopflight actually

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>is doing. UM. I think for a long time we

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>were known as this this very popular e commerce provider

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to help merchants build online stores. And I believe with

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the release of things like Shopslight Capital or point of

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sale offering, which is now in a hundred thousand stores, UH,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>these shop Flight of film and network that we've recently announced,

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>people get into realize that we're actually building here is

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the first global retail operating system for for businesses both

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>big and and and very small. UH. And I think

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the part of that is finally coming to

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people are being to realize that now after uh, sort

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of putting all the pieces together over the last couple

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of years. So hardly in the quarter I'm just looking

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterly numbers, internationals called out as an area

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of growth. What's driving the international growth for you guys?

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think Shopify, just by virtue of the fact

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that we were online, you know, our an internet company,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we've always had merchants in in UH, in a global

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in a global reach. We've had merchants in hunter seventy

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>five countries. UH. Even at the time of our I

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>PO back into thousands fifteen. What's changed though in the

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>last twelve eight months is a couple of things. We

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>realized that even though we have merchants in places like Japan, Singapore,

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in Germany and France, we didn't actually have true product

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>market fit for those merchants, meaning the Shopify admin where

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the merchants run their store, run their businesses, that was

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>only in English, and last year we we translated it

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>into a number of languages. Now it's it's close to

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen languages, so merchants that don't speak English can also

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you Shopify today. We also went ahead and begin to

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>did We did a deeper dive figuring out what are

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the nuances of what merchants need in each particular geography. So,

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, in a place like Germany, credit card penetration

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 1>and credit card usage is not as high as in

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the US, debit cards are a lot more popular. So

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>beyond just the translation, we began to figure out what

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>those merchants need there from a payment perspective, from integration perspective.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And then finally we also created and began to develop

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>our international Shopify partner community. We began going to these countries,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and cultivating relationships and partnerships with agencies and freelancers who

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>not only refer merchants to Shopify, and I mentioned on

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the call more than twenty two thousand partners orfer business

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of Shopify in the last twelve months, but beyond that

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>are now building applications and and integrations for merchants in

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>those locations that are particularly relevant to the needs of

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>merchants in places like Japan or Germany or France and

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>all that. All that has led to us having the

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>largest because of international merchants today that we've ever had.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So the numbers are pretty impressive. Revenue grew forty eight

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:10.599
<v Speaker 1>percent according to the statement and analysts for projecting a

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty point five million dollar revenue. Sounds amazing, right, increase,

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yet it is the slowest in shop fives four years

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as a listed company. And I'm wondering whether you're the

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>slowdown is due to just the fact that you're maturing

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>as a company, or whether this has to do with

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>just sort of the global macro backdrop and some of

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>these slow in growth. Yeah, look, we think, you know,

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>growing revenue at our size almost fifty percent, we think

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is really great. We also saw g m V growth

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>beyond so g m V for the for the second

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>quarter was almost fourteen billion, which again is greater than

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh. Frankly, because we're so distributed and we're

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we have merchants all over the world. Um, you know,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously some macro trends will affect us, but but generally

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we think that there's huge opportunities for us, not just internationally,

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>but also with our existing merchants. We've been eight hundred

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand merchants now and figure out ways to expand what

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they use from us, whether it's capital. We've given out

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>more than six thirty million dollars of cash advances to merchants,

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.599
<v Speaker 1>helping them now with filment and shipping, helping them with

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>fraud protection. We think that not only can we get

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>way more merchants, but the merchant we already have, we

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>can also expand the services that we provide for them

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and make Shopify much more relevant to their

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>their their business. Harley, what's the risk to your story?

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the bear case? Look? I think for a while

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>people were a little nervous that some of the merchants

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>coming on to Shopify. We're small businesses and not all

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>some small small businesses succeed. We know that, and actually

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we think that that's okay. The way that we look

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at it from a business perspective is we want to

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>create the largest top of final possible. We want anyone

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that has an aspiration or an ambition to build a

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>startup or a business or a small a small retailer

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to do so on Shopify, and we acknowledge not all

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>will succeed. What's important to us, though, is that the

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>ones that do succeed offset the cost of those that don't,

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and that certainly is happening with us, and we've we've

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>been seeing that for a number of years. And then

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the other piece of it is retail in general is

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>getting far more complicated. So now you're you know, we're

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing companies like Instagram create create new new retail channels.

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing new marketplaces pop up, We're seeing accelerated check

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>out with things like shopify pay and Apple Pay. The

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>more that retail becomes complicated for a small business, we

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>think the value of shop of that increases because shop

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if I can allow you to sell anywhere you want

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>online or offline, or on marketplaces or on Instagram, but

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it all feeds back from one centralized back office. And

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>so I would say that even though complexity and the

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>challenge of a retail needs to grow, we continue to

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>bend that learning curve. And and that's really what we're

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>focused on. We think there's an opportunity for us at

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>a macro global scale to be the entrepreneurship company. There

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't a company out there right now that truly owns entrepreneurship,

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and we think we have the best shot at doing

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>that of anyone UM And and and so that's what we're

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>focused on today. Harley, thank you so much for your

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>comments and reviewing the quarter with us and the kind

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the outlook for the company. Hardly Finglestein, chief operating

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>officer for Shopify, thanks for joining us. I'm just looking

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>at the consensus numbers on the Bloomberg terminal um you know,

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for revenue group about sixty percent last year, gonna

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>grow forecast at over this year and then overt uh

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>next year. And the company has gone from IBATA negative

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to forecast at EBA positive in nineteen. So the company

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>seems to be making the pivot here and clearly the

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>stock up about a d and fifty percent this year.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Investors clearly paying up for this stock. This is Bloomberg.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember a time when people thought that hil bonds

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were gonna lose money, but instead they've just continued their

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>gravy train. This year. You see returns of ten and

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a half percent for the US junk bonds year to date.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>The question did the Fed just give them another leg

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to go? Here? Andrew Feltis is joining us here in

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>our Blomberg Interactive Broker Studios. He's co director of Global

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>High Yield for a Moony Pioneer, which oversees about eighty

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Andrew, wonderful having you. So, what do you

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think what's going to be the full year total return

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for US hiled bonds. That's a loaded question, but here

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of the spread tikings probably occurred, but the

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>faults are low. You're still get a pretty good yield.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're about ten ten and a half

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. Probably will continue to clip that coupon, and

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an environment we're choosing. The right security

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>has gonna matter a lot more, so we think we

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>can add some value in that side. Fourteen fifteen sounds

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about right, Wow, Andrew, what did you did you hear

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>anything yesterday from the FED chairman Pal that makes you

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>change at all? Shade at all? How you guys are

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at the market, So our our concern is more

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>about the market reaction. I think we're consistent with what

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED sees. The economy is in good shape. We

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>don't see a lot of risks here in the us UH.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Internationally there's more risks, and that seems to be hitting

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>trade and other issues. But the curve is inverted, and

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>openly that's going to cause banks to change their behavior

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and that could lead openly to a recession. Now we

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think the FED will probably cut again, but the Fed

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was to keep that curve inverted. The longer it stays inverted,

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the more risk there is of a negative outcome. So

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point we haven't changed our views, but we're

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>monitoring the situation closely. So whenever hil bonds rallied, there

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are the slews of nervous nellies that come out and

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>say the end is nigh and this means that everything

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to go to pot next year when we

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>face a day of reckoning. What gives you comfort that

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not just setting ourselves up for some sort of

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>publicious frabie beer goggle type behavior. Well, that's great question

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>list at least uh The first thing that most comfortable

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with is we're not seeing a lot of excess activity.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So when I do see risky bonds, they tend to

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be getting priced very uh wide, So we're not underwriting

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad deals, and you actually see the

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>average credit qualities improving. There's more double b s, there's

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>less triple cs. We don't see l B o s

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>coming into the market, so quality is very high. Actually,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the average credit ratings the highest we've ever seen it

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in the high yale market. So what does that start

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to cheerating as companies take advantage of this borrowing environment,

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so you'd see you have to see triple cs be

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>able to come into the market, more l B o s,

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>but also the pricing get much lower. And the problem

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is if you do in a triple ce and you've

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta pay ten per cent, you really can't refi a

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>LBO type structure and make money with that type of return.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's really limiting the type of bad deals are

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>getting done in the market. So it gives a sense

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of the new issue market. It seems like if I

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>had any capital needs whatsoever. Uh, you know, I would

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>just love to access the high yield market given where

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>rates are. Are you singing issuance pick up? So we're

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>actually on track for a record month in July. About

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of that comes from one single deal, so

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's a bit of a one off, but generally

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that was the Diamond Sports. So those are the Disney

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Regional Sports and that Cereal. Yeah exactly, and you get

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>now that deal one over great, right, Well, all these

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>deals have done well. All the higher quality deals have

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>done really well. Uh So, if you're a double B company,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>which means you don't have too much leverage, you're in

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>your one notch below investment grade, you can get financed

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>at five to six percent. That's pretty aggressively. The guys

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that they will ultimately lead to a bubble that lead

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you to lose money, and not just on a market

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>market basis, our permanent impairman default Those are the triple

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>see you guys and those you know, you monitor the

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>amount of issuance in there and like what kind of

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>pricing and if people are not being paid for default risk,

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that's when you start getting worried about a bubble, and

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>we just don't see that type of behavior going on.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The market's been very disciplined, so that gives us a

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>certain level of confidence. How do you go about selecting

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>securities in this environment since it does become that, Yeah,

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just rolling up your sleeves and doing hard work,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>so modeling the company's talking to management, understanding the business models.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>And then most importantly, you have to look at covenants,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>right because that's if something goes wrong, the covenants are

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there to protect you in anymore. That's keep hearing exactly,

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's become reality. But it's something you do have

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to because in the next recession those

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>type of things will matter. Any names that you can

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>throw up, I'm not a BA exactly, So what it

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>just gives a sense of kind of leverage where you know,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think about the media industry and that can you

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>can borrow money at you know, five six times leverage

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe even a little bit higher where we're just in

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of leverage in your mind. So you know, first

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all the rating seas have been pretty steady on this.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So if I look at Double be in two thousand nineteen,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>same type of average leverage that you've see in two

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine two eight, so that they have not done

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>what they did in the housing market where they just

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>completely abandoned all standards. So it depends on the business.

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you are a less cyclical business like

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a utility, you can leverage a little bit more than

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you can So single bees are more than that five

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to six territory, while your average double be is going

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to be more than that three to four type area.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>So what's the argument. If credit is good or not bad,

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and the FED is supportive of the market, why not

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just invest in stocks and and rates? Why go to

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>entire bonus? So the beauty of high yield is you

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>get paid to weight. So if we are moving sideways

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>marketing pitch. So if we move sideways in the economy,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not growing profits, We're not growing the top line.

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>These guys can pay their bills. So you clip your

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>cupon and you make your six seven, which is probably

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to what you get an equity these days

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for equities style perform, And look, we want equities outperformed

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>because it makes our job easier. It's another source of

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>capital for our companies. So there's load defaults when equities

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are going up. But equity guys need to grow that

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>top line. They need to have improving profits. Margins are

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at great levels now, but it's really hard to expand margins.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. Now we did the tax reform, that's not

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>off the table. You really need to have growth, and

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we think you're gonna get growth, but it's a much

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>harder environment to get that profit growth. So high yield

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is something that will give you that cupin and really

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 1>help balance your portfolio up anything else, tu, I mean,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this is fixed income, this is high yield. Basically, I'm

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna engaged, just real quick. How long can this

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>go on? The good times? This can go on until

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody makes a mistake. So whether that's the FED, whether

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>that's a fiscal policy, whether that's something on the regulatory front,

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on the trade front, but until uh, someone makes a mistake,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this can go on forever. Probably won't, but I can.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Music is just class, that's right. Andrew Felt is co

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>director of Global high Yield at a Mundy Pioneer. Thank

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us on our Bloomberg Interactive

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio talking all things high yield. And again, I

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>think still if we're hearing from Andrew. Still a constructive market,

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>US four turns in a year that's plaised to be

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the best years since they're recovery from the

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. Well after a two year slowdown, solar energy

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in America is apparently taking off again. To figure out

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there, we welcome Hugh Bromley. Hugh is

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a solar market analyst for Bloomberg New Energy financi joins

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>us here in a Bloomberg eleven three oh studio. Hugh,

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Just give us, if

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you will, kind of the state of the solar energy

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>market in the US right now. Yeah, sures you really

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>think about it as a couple of different markets. First

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of all, the rooftop market homes of businesses buying solar,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's really been slowing down the last couple of years.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>A couple of reasons for that. One. There was a

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a consumer uncertainty on the back of

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>some regulatory change, mostly at the state level. Uh. And

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>then also kind of investor where you know, it's following

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a couple of bankruptcies a few years ago, kind of

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>investors pulling back, questioning their their investments the solar companies

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and saying don't grow so fast. We want to see

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>profits rather than unsustainable growth. Both of those in cumbinations

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>slowed down that rooftop market in utility scale. It's all

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>about subsidy. There was a threat that federal subsidy would

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have been removed a couple of years ago, a lot

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of builder as a result, and then when it finally

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>was extended, this wasn't enough products to build in the

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>last two years. So the market has slowed down just

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>because there's not enough land ready ready to move forward

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>um across the board though, although all those elements, all

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>those market sectors are ready to kind of start to

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>start rebounding now um were the the the consumer unease

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>or or uncertainty is certainly wearing off, and we're starting

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to see many many of the state markets former former

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>large solo markets could cover. So it's interesting to hear

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you talk about and the hardware of this, basically the

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>solar panels for example, and then also the utilities that

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>rely on solar energy. And I'm just I'm wondering how

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>much the success or failure of these companies hinges on

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>subsidies from the government. Or incentive programs versus just being

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>economic at their own rate. Sure, so it's a big

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>question right now because those same federal subsidies that were

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>thought to have that may have expired a few years

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>ago and worltimate extandard are now stepping out of the

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>next few years. A lot of lobbying if it's underway

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>again to extend those those subsidies. But many players would

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>argue they're not required anymore. Certainly for your large utility

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>scale projects that are the supplying supplying our bulk power needs.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Um those projects with the energy from those products could

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>be competitive in many com many cases without subsidy. Certainly,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>project finance heres would love those subducting out of the way.

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>In many cases, they distort pricing, make deals much more

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>complicated to to to to arrange and to transact upon.

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>In small scaling rooftop markets, those vendors, the large venders

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular, have business models that are that are almost

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>entirely reliant on there being a federal tax subsidy, tax incentive,

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and without those they would need really to rethink their

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>business model. Talking about the commercial market, it seems like

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I when I drive down the road and you you know,

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>go by an office park, you'll see this huge solar

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>panel field, I mean just huge. Even Bloomberg Down in

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Princeton we have a great, really cool solar panel field.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what it's called, but um, how prevalent

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is it in the commercial market our business is adopting solar? Well, look,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it really depends on where in the country you are.

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It's such a such part of the policies and incentives

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>are mostly at the state level, and New Jersey being

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the richest richest states for incentive, California, Massachusetts

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>being some of the other really big markets and therefore

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>build but build, you know, the number of panels that

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are installed tends to boom and bust depending on the

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>state of states, of state subsidy um. And for that reason,

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>across the entire country, it hasn't been a big, big market.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe well under one percent half percent of

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>businesses at the moment have have have solar installed on

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>their facilities. There's a whole lot of room to to grow,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but at the moment, pricing gets in the way. It

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is it is expensive, and that's partly partly because of

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>these these incentives that are distorting pricing, and partly because

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>there is just there isn't the presence of of of

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of large national firms in the states where there aren't

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>generous state incenters. So we're talking about companies, solar companies.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's give some names to the Sun Power corp Uh

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and Phase Energy. Are there others that we should be

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at just off the bat, Yeah, sure. So those

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>two firms are done particularly well recently on the back

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of partly regulatory change and a shift in technology preferences

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>towards what they're offering. They're both offering premium equipment and

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Phase some Power produces really high end panels, the panels

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that go on your roof and face produces high ended inverters.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>That's a little device that clips onto the panel that

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>converts the power in from solar power into into what

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you need in your home. They're doing quite well because

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the regulators have kind of shifted the market to war

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the particular product that in Phase is selling further downstreaming.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of opportunity or companies that people like

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch that are the installers themselves, the ones that

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>finance the deals and structure that structured the deals, and

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>in many cases have the crews that come I come

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to your home. That's groups like sun Run, some Power

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as active in that space, Fun Hotel that

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>really struggled, Vivin Solar and and and Tesla. But Tesla

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>is really full back from this sector. Honestly, I do

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder how much the rebound that we're seeing

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>this year is due to just the degree of the

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>pullback in the prior four years, because a global inext

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of solar stocks. Maintain my bloomberk has surged tht so

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>far this year, but it declined for of the past

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>five years. And I do have to wonder some of

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the positioning, how much there is hedge fund involvement sort

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of crowding. Absolutely, I said before that kind of investors

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>pulling back from this space was was a major factor here.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Certainly some sorry Tesla after acquiring Solo City back in

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>back in really slowed down their business model. That the

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>contraction we've seen in Tesla explains a lot of the

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>contraction we've seeing the entire solo market, but not all

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. So the market was still slowing overall. But

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>really where the growth has been is in small local firms.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, two guys in a truck taking market share

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>from these big national players. Not as sexy probably for

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>people looking for an easy share to buy, but definitely compelling.

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Bromley, thank you so much for being with us.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>He Bromley has a solar market analyst with Bloomberg New

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Energy Finance, which does some incredible work looking at all

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of the new energies that are coming up. Really interesting

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to see some of the new technology. Thanks for listening

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa Abramloids. I'm on Twitter at Lisa A. Bramwoids.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>One Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.