1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:04,040
Speaker 1: No one disputes that Michael Draco fatally shot Marcus mcglockton.

2
00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:06,600
Speaker 1: After all, you can see that on the surveillance video

3
00:00:06,640 --> 00:00:10,440
Speaker 1: that ignited a national debate over Florida stand your ground law.

4
00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:14,040
Speaker 1: The question of Draca's manslaughter trial is whether he pulled

5
00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:17,120
Speaker 1: the trigger in fear for his life. Here's what Draco

6
00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:20,880
Speaker 1: told the county Sheriff's in an interview after the shooting.

7
00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:23,439
Speaker 1: I'm thinking he's coming to do the rest of it.

8
00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:25,959
Speaker 1: Did you see him on the fire No, Shara, I

9
00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:28,200
Speaker 1: didn't see him without anything. Okay, what do you mean

10
00:00:28,240 --> 00:00:31,440
Speaker 1: the rest of it? Whatever beating was coming out of that.

11
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:33,559
Speaker 1: So he thought he was going to be jun So

12
00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:38,120
Speaker 1: you're kidding, Okay, all right? So if he got him,

13
00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:41,360
Speaker 1: he had hard to begin with, from blindside, from the gigo.

14
00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:44,400
Speaker 1: What else should I expect? My guest is from a

15
00:00:44,520 --> 00:00:49,720
Speaker 1: federal prosecutor, George Newhouse at Theodore Oorringer. George explained the

16
00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:54,920
Speaker 1: stand your ground law in Florida. Good good morning, tune at.

17
00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:57,720
Speaker 1: The standard ground law in Florida is an unusual statute.

18
00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:01,840
Speaker 1: It basically provides it a person who is not otherwise

19
00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:04,960
Speaker 1: engaged on lawful activity and who is who isn't a

20
00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:07,520
Speaker 1: place where they have a right to be, and who

21
00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:11,240
Speaker 1: is then attacked, as Draca says, he was attacked here,

22
00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:14,520
Speaker 1: it does not have a duty to retreat if that's

23
00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:17,640
Speaker 1: available to him, and he can stand his ground and

24
00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:22,080
Speaker 1: defend himself indeed with force, which in this case was

25
00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:25,200
Speaker 1: of course, deadly force. The use of deadly force has

26
00:01:25,240 --> 00:01:28,800
Speaker 1: to be reasonable under the circumstances. But the key part

27
00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:31,319
Speaker 1: of that law is under the common law, if you

28
00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:34,440
Speaker 1: were attacked and you had an avenue of escape, you

29
00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:37,679
Speaker 1: could retreat safely, you were required to do that, and

30
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:40,000
Speaker 1: you will not be able to interpose a defense of

31
00:01:40,080 --> 00:01:44,200
Speaker 1: self defense. So that's the Florida Statute um and that's

32
00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:48,360
Speaker 1: currently in place. So Drake's attorneys told c an End

33
00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:51,640
Speaker 1: that they won't be using standard ground during the trial,

34
00:01:51,720 --> 00:01:55,360
Speaker 1: but instead they'll argue that he acted in self defense.

35
00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:58,720
Speaker 1: How is that different and why wouldn't they use the

36
00:01:58,760 --> 00:02:03,280
Speaker 1: other law. Well, it's an interesting question because the Florida

37
00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:07,440
Speaker 1: Statute has another interesting provision that actually provides for immunity.

38
00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:10,680
Speaker 1: So if you can, if a defendant can show reasonable

39
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:14,000
Speaker 1: the court reasonable cause that that he was attacked and

40
00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:17,320
Speaker 1: that he responded in the way that he did with

41
00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,440
Speaker 1: the force in order to save himself. In some cases

42
00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:24,120
Speaker 1: you can actually convince the judge to throw the criminal

43
00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:26,840
Speaker 1: case out. It doesn't even go to trial. Um. The

44
00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,080
Speaker 1: reason why they're probably not using it in this case

45
00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:34,840
Speaker 1: was clearly his only defense is self defense, and I

46
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:38,200
Speaker 1: don't think the elements of standard ground apply. The man

47
00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:40,320
Speaker 1: was sitting on the ground. He never got up. He

48
00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:43,360
Speaker 1: just took his gun out and he fired it. And

49
00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:47,600
Speaker 1: we heard in that interview with the county sheriffs he

50
00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:50,040
Speaker 1: said he was afraid he was going to get beaten.

51
00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:53,440
Speaker 1: He didn't say that he was afraid for his life.

52
00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:58,200
Speaker 1: Does that make a difference. It makes a huge difference,

53
00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:02,400
Speaker 1: and you you pinpointed on theness in the defense case. Yes.

54
00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:05,680
Speaker 1: In other words, if you're afraid of being beaten or

55
00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:08,960
Speaker 1: even seriously attacked, UM, you do not have the right

56
00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:12,639
Speaker 1: to in any state, including Florida, to use self defense.

57
00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:15,240
Speaker 1: So someone, as in this case, pushes you to the ground,

58
00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:18,160
Speaker 1: you can't just whip out your firearm, which he had

59
00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:21,120
Speaker 1: a legal right to carry, and fire away. You have

60
00:03:21,280 --> 00:03:24,680
Speaker 1: to be concerned or have reason to believe that deadly

61
00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:27,160
Speaker 1: force is coming next. And there's nothing that I've seen

62
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:30,120
Speaker 1: in the videotape or in the facts that would indicate

63
00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:33,120
Speaker 1: that he had a reasonable concern that his life's either

64
00:03:33,240 --> 00:03:37,520
Speaker 1: life or a serious infliction of dangerous bodily harm or

65
00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:40,280
Speaker 1: protection of others. None of that appears to be the

66
00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:44,120
Speaker 1: case here, So that's his weakness. Prosecutors are going to

67
00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:47,360
Speaker 1: be allowed to call an African American truck driver who

68
00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:50,760
Speaker 1: says that Drake had threatened him and to shoot him

69
00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:54,680
Speaker 1: months earlier in a confrontation over that same parking spot.

70
00:03:55,720 --> 00:04:00,400
Speaker 1: Isn't that very prejudicial? Why would the judge allow that? Well,

71
00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:02,440
Speaker 1: it's not clear that judge will allow it. That kind

72
00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:06,680
Speaker 1: of evidence is called bad prior acts, and generally courts

73
00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:09,520
Speaker 1: exclude bad prior acts for the reason you just mentioned

74
00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:14,160
Speaker 1: you because it is hugely prejudicial. If that evidence is introduced,

75
00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:17,640
Speaker 1: it virtually guarantees of the defendant will be convicted because

76
00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:20,680
Speaker 1: the jury will assume that his actions in this case

77
00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:24,160
Speaker 1: were in accordance with his past, which was he apparently

78
00:04:24,200 --> 00:04:27,200
Speaker 1: had this this thing for this particular parking lot, and

79
00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:30,880
Speaker 1: in fact, they may infer racial animus, and if they

80
00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:34,479
Speaker 1: think that he was doing it for racial reasons, then

81
00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:36,560
Speaker 1: he will almost certainly be convicted, So it will be

82
00:04:36,640 --> 00:04:39,520
Speaker 1: a controversial ruling. My prediction is that the judge lets

83
00:04:39,520 --> 00:04:43,839
Speaker 1: that in. He'll probably plead plead out. You mentioned race

84
00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:47,360
Speaker 1: coming in. You have a white man shooting a black

85
00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:51,279
Speaker 1: man in Florida, and you know we've seen this before.

86
00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,359
Speaker 1: Is race necessarily going to come in? How will the

87
00:04:55,440 --> 00:05:02,240
Speaker 1: judge try to restrict any mention of it. Well, that's

88
00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:05,640
Speaker 1: a great question, because of course there isn't any at

89
00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:08,000
Speaker 1: least that we've seen in the video. Isn't any evidence

90
00:05:08,040 --> 00:05:11,360
Speaker 1: that race was a factor. They've they've gotten this dispute

91
00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:14,760
Speaker 1: over the parking the parking stall, and I think the

92
00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:18,920
Speaker 1: judge will give provide jury with jury instructions that this

93
00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:22,880
Speaker 1: is not about race unless there's evidence indicating that the

94
00:05:22,920 --> 00:05:27,440
Speaker 1: attack was racially motivated. Again, that kind of evidence would

95
00:05:27,480 --> 00:05:31,120
Speaker 1: be again hugely prejudicial. In other words, the defendant would

96
00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:33,400
Speaker 1: would have no chance of prevailing. So the judge will

97
00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:37,640
Speaker 1: tell the jurors this isn't about race. It's about an

98
00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:41,200
Speaker 1: assault and whether or not the defendant Draco has a

99
00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:44,120
Speaker 1: right to interpose the defense of self defense, and that's

100
00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:47,159
Speaker 1: what you should focus on. He'll tell the jurors. We've

101
00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:50,880
Speaker 1: often discussed the most important question for the defense attorney

102
00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:52,839
Speaker 1: and the defendant during a trial is whether or not

103
00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:55,279
Speaker 1: the defendant is going to take the stand in his

104
00:05:55,480 --> 00:05:59,800
Speaker 1: own defense. How will that factor in here? And with

105
00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:04,159
Speaker 1: him putting forward a self defense argument, does it almost

106
00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:08,719
Speaker 1: force him to have to testify to explain himself? Another

107
00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:13,520
Speaker 1: great question. One would think that in this case he

108
00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:17,040
Speaker 1: has to testify because he doesn't testify, he has no

109
00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:20,240
Speaker 1: way of getting bringing his point of view across. The

110
00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:23,880
Speaker 1: juror is going to focus on his mental processes when

111
00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,440
Speaker 1: he pulled the gun and shot, and they need him

112
00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:29,000
Speaker 1: to say I was afraid that I was going to

113
00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:32,479
Speaker 1: be attacked, even though of course the the decedent was

114
00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:36,120
Speaker 1: turning and apparently walking away. But on the other hand,

115
00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:39,640
Speaker 1: if he testifies to that, he will be impeached. The

116
00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:43,440
Speaker 1: prosecutors will ask him about the prior bad acts that

117
00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:46,840
Speaker 1: we just mentioned, and again race will come in, and

118
00:06:47,120 --> 00:06:50,359
Speaker 1: so they defended in this case is in a terrible position,

119
00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:53,599
Speaker 1: is a terrible choice to make, But he would appear

120
00:06:53,640 --> 00:06:57,000
Speaker 1: to have a very tough hill to climb. That was

121
00:06:57,040 --> 00:06:59,600
Speaker 1: my less than a minute here. It seems as if

122
00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:03,760
Speaker 1: it's it's a very difficult uphill battle for the defendant,

123
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:08,160
Speaker 1: what's his best defense. His best offense is that he

124
00:07:08,279 --> 00:07:13,720
Speaker 1: was shocked by because you could see the assault the

125
00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:16,960
Speaker 1: McLaughlin came out and pushed him down violently, that he

126
00:07:17,040 --> 00:07:20,679
Speaker 1: hit the ground, and he was not thinking clearly because

127
00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:23,840
Speaker 1: he had hit the ground, and so he did what

128
00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:27,440
Speaker 1: he thought at the time to be in his self defense.

129
00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:30,640
Speaker 1: And whether that's reasonable or not, the jury will decide.

130
00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:32,360
Speaker 1: But that's what he's got to claim, is that I

131
00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:35,960
Speaker 1: was stunned by this sudden attack. Right, Thanks so much, George,

132
00:07:35,960 --> 00:07:39,600
Speaker 1: as always for your insights. That's former federal prosecutor George

133
00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:41,720
Speaker 1: Newhouse of THEODOREA boring your