WEBVTT - One Battle After Another Review, Predators

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Peloton break through

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training tread Plus

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>at one Peloton dot com.

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 3>On here today?

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>You're not interested in art? Now? No, Look, we're going

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 3>From Chicago. This is Film Spotting celebrating our twentieth year.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm Josh Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not a revolution.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>The message is clear. I'll be seeing you very soon.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Let of us see you first.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 5>Paul Thomas Anderson's One Battle after Another may not be

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 5>a revolution, but it is one of the movie events

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 5>of the year.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>We've got a review, plus the new doc Predators, Massacre

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Theater and more ahead on Film Spotting.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what freedom is, no fear, Just like.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Tom Cruise, Welcome to Film spotting a new film from

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Paul Thomas Anderson is always a big deal, Josh, but

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 5>one Battle after another it does feel bigger, and not

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 5>just because of the Imax screenings the VistaVision screenings. Did

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 5>you get to partake in either of those in Scotland?

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>The Scotland theater adventure continues. We tried out another one

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and it was not Imax or VistaVision, but it was

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a giant screen. It was a beautiful presentation, huge theater.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, excited about that. And a quick thanks to

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>listener Heather who just before we signed on here, she

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 3>left a note about the DCA in Dundee. Dundee is

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the town we've been traveling to to see Move and

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that's a smaller, almost art gallery slash theater, and yeah,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I hope to get there as well. They have fewer screens,

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 3>I've heard, they're not quite as big as the one

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 3>where I did see One Battle after Another, and yeah,

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I knew I wanted to see that one on as

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 3>big of a screen as possible.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 5>I didn't have a special experience myself, but I did

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.399
<v Speaker 5>see it on the big screen at theater Number one

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 5>at my local multiplex so that's the best that I

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 5>could do. We will have a review of one battle

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 5>after another here in moments. Plus I'll have a few

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 5>thoughts on the new documentary Predators. Yes, it is a

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 5>documentary Predators, not about the making of any of those

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 5>Schwarzenegger movies. And we will play Massacre theater. A quick

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 5>reminder that film Spotting is now available as a video podcast.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned, Heather. That was a comment that came in

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 5>Josh via Spotify that I shared with you. And if

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 5>you are a listener on Spotify, you can toggleween video

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 5>and audio. But you can also watch the show on YouTube,

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 5>and you can find the link to our video episodes

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 5>over at film spotting dot net slash episodes.

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 6>Well look, look, maybe I can maybe I can give

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 6>you some information and then you give me some information.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 6>All right, we'll just share a little information. My name

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 6>is Bob Ferguson. I don't know if you've ever heard

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 6>of any all right. I was part of French seventy

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 6>five for years, years and years. All right. They used

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 6>to call me ghetto pat rocketman stuff like that. Only

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 6>problem is I've fried my brain since then. Man. I

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:40.119
<v Speaker 6>have abused drugs and alcohol for the past thirty years. Man,

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm a drug and alcohol lover, and I cannot remember

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 6>for the life of me or the life of my

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 6>only child. The answer to your question, what time is it?

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Fifteen?

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 6>I need this rendezvous point. You understand what I'm saying.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 6>I need it.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I understand.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 5>And the question is I think it's appropriate for this movie, Josh?

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 5>How it just throws us right into this sort of past,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 5>sort of present world. We're going to jump right in

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 5>to one battle after another. And I thought I might

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 5>go see it with a friend who lives about twenty

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 5>minutes away from me, Scott, and Scott's one of the

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 5>biggest movie fans I know. Of course, he beat me

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 5>to it as soon as it was available. He went

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 5>and saw it. So I was going to go see

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 5>it all alone. And he texted me back and he

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 5>pointed out something that I had missed that Paul Thomas

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 5>Anderson that night was programming TCM with movies that inspired

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 5>one battle after another. And here was the lineup. Yeah,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 5>here was the lineup. And this will of course, since

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 5>you have seen his new movie, this should feel appropriate.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 5>The movies were running on empty midnight run The French

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 5>Connection and The Battle of Algiers. Run through those real

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 5>quick right, running on empty the Sydney Lamette film with

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 5>River Phoenix. Of course that makes sense, right, You've got

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 5>former activist parents now in the wind, on the run,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 5>struggling with raising their teenage kids. Check Midnight Run a

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 5>film spotting Pantheon movie. This new one from pta Is

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 5>is kind of a road movie, and you've got the

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 5>angle with de Niro and an element here of almost

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 5>estranged father and daughter, right, the French connection, the obsessed

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 5>authority figure that we have in this film played by

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 5>Sean Penn, and also the conspiracy element. Oh and how

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 5>about lengthy and very intense car chases or extended chase

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 5>sequences period, and then well, the Battle of Algiers.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 3>That's an easy one.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 5>If there if there was one film that seems like

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 5>it's the movie that most inspired one battle after another,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 5>it probably has to be The Battle of Algiers. Oh

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 5>and it is the movie that is directly called out

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 5>in this movie right where you have Leonardo DiCaprio's Bob Ferguson.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 5>Now this aged hippie who is getting high one night

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 5>and since he's no longer in the game, all he

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 5>can do is sort of fall back on the greatest hits.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 5>He actually puts in the Battle of Algiers so he

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 5>can watch it and kind of quote along with the

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 5>movie and relive his glory days through what is I

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 5>suppose essentially the manual, you know, the Manual for the

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Revolutionary the Battle of Algiers. So I'm curious as as

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 5>you hear that, I believe for the first time those

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 5>four movies, though you probably saw the influence of some

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 5>of those, and of course the Battle of Algiers, any

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 5>of those really resonate with you in particular? What did

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 5>you make of any influences and did any others strike

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 5>you as you watch this movie or did you see

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 5>this as as purely a Paul Thomas Anderson film.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Boy, I want to get to that. I think the

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 3>influences are interesting. It was something I thought about. But

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>first I've got to get out of my system at him,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 3>because I haven't really been able to talk to many

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>people besides Debbie, who is with me. This is the

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>movie I've been waiting for all year, and it delivered astonishingly.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I knew I knew nothing of its context going in,

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 3>had not watched the trailer. I had no idea it

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 3>was going to be this topical. If you remember when

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 3>we did a Sacred Cow review of Dogged Afternoon not

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>too long ago, I wondered what films and filmmakers are

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>going to rise to the challenge that we're in right now,

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the way Sidney Lumett and al Pacino did. There. Of course,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.679
<v Speaker 3>we talked about responding to this notion of state violence

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Mickey seventeen. We split on I thought it took a

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 3>good sci fi swing at satirizing the state of things.

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Not everyone agreed, Eddington. I thought that was interesting, but

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>felt a little bit behind the times given its lockdown setting.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I know some folks took comfort in Superman as a

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 3>tonal reprieve from what we're going through. You and I

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 3>did not. For me, one battle after another? Is it?

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 3>This is it? This is the movie, This is the

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 3>movie we need right now? It is. Yes, it's exaggerated

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 3>what we see in this film, but nothing in here

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>is not happening to some degree right now in America.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>And I am in Scotland, but I am keeping an

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 3>eye in Chicago. You better believe it. Ice agents, they're

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>arresting and assaulting journalists, instigating violence. I mean, I could

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 3>not believe what was on the screen in front of

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>me and how it was reflecting what we are experiencing

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in America and what can we do in the midst

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 3>of this. I think a lot of us feel paralyzed.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 3>But you know what, filmmakers can make films like this,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Critics can champion them, and these are maybe small gestures,

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>but you know, they add up or they're something, And

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>at the end of one after another, I just I

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 3>felt so galvanized about the littlest something because to my mind,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 3>there are a whole lot of people doing nothing and

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>to see a formal filmmaker like Paul Thomas Anderson take

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 3>this on and absolutely just kill the assignment was so

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 3>thrilling to me. So just had to get that out

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>of my system. Maybe we'll come back. I'm sure we'll

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 3>come back to the politics of it. But I was

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 3>thinking about these influences, this question, and I think what's

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 3>so exciting about one battle after another on that front

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 3>Adam is that this might be I would put this

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 3>in the category of his most singular works, something like

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Punch Drunk Love in particular, where yes, the influences are there,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>but it's not something like you know, I would say,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 3>Phantom Thread is so obviously my favorite movie. By the way,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not knocking him for this. My favorite Paul Thomas

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Anderson movie, Phantom Threat very influenced by Hitchcock, right, among

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 3>other things. It's all over it. There will be blood

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to me, you know, is so influenced by something like

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Citizen Kane, and you go down the line of his filmography.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>But I look at Punch Drunk Love, and that's a

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 3>movie that, like only Paul Thomas Anderson could come up with,

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, and some people might feel that way

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 3>about something like The Master perhaps, but I am definitely

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>thinking that way about one battle after another. That being said, yes,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Battle of Algiers, you know, just what a touchstone as

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 3>well as a funny a funny side in that scene,

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, I thought of that before it did

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 3>pop up in the movie French Connection, other seventies paranoid thrillers.

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 3>The propulsion of those movies is what I think he

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 3>borrows here. Yeah, and you know, just thematically, I thought

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 3>about Alfonso Koran's Children of Men, which is more of

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 3>a prophetic many many years now, a prophetic envisioning of

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>what in that in the UK to teller Terrrian government

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 3>response to refugees might look like. I think that's a

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 3>more I don't want to say grim, but Children of

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Men is a more serious take on the subject. But

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't make one battle after another any more important,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 3>and its take on the subject just because it is

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 3>this absurd, comic, hysterical satire that saying a lot of

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 3>trenchant immediately needed things.

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm with you on so much of what you said,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 5>including a couple words you just used right there at

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 5>the end. So let me get out just kind of

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 5>my single sentence take on this film. It is a

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 5>beautifully choreographed fever dream of resistance and reckoning, blending absurd

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 5>of satire with a poignant meditation on parental legacy.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing. There is such an emotional.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Core to this movie as well that I'm sure we

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 5>will get into. And I suppose this also indicates how

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 5>long we've been doing this show. Though I don't know

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 5>that I can remember examples of you telling me this.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 5>I think I always think about you, Josh when I'm

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 5>at the movies. But I was watching this film and

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 5>I was seeing certain scenes and different themes were being

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 5>brought up, and I was thinking about the police state

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 5>evidence in this film, evident in this film, and the

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 5>state sanctioned violence. And I was thinking about our conversation

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 5>about Dog Day Afternoon, and I was going, Josh is

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 5>eating this up right now, Josh is halfway around the

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 5>world eating this movie up. I was having very similar

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 5>thoughts about the film, and I was.

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 3>As well, cross the Atlantic.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I think so. In terms of the influences,

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 5>one that maybe he just couldn't program the fifth film,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 5>but I have to imagine that the fifth influence, and

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 5>maybe this is just too easy picking, but come on,

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 5>the fifth influence had to be Doctor Strangelove. Right with

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Sean Penn's character makes sense. His name is Colonel Lockjaw,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 5>after Jack t Ripper. His name is Colonel Lockjaw. He's

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 5>a military figure. He's full of all sorts of interesting

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 5>ticks and behavioral quirks. He's got that great haircut, and

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 5>he will assert his authority unilaterally. And at one point

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 5>he does speak of bodily fluids and his power being

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 5>taken from him. So that seems like a pretty clear

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 5>call or reference to Doctor Strangelove.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 3>To me, Jack, Jack, tell me, tell me Jack, when

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>did you first well developed this there well.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I I first became aware of it, Man Drake, during

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the physical act of love. Yes, a profound sense of fatigue,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I was able to interpret

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>these feelings correctly. Loss of essence. I can assure you

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 2>it has not recurred, Man Drake.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Where those references ended up bearing fruit for me a

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 5>little bit and thinking about this film, it actually was

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 5>the first one Running on Empty, which is a movie

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 5>I haven't thought about in a long time, but I

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 5>remember watching a lot when I was a kid. I

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 5>think it was just a movie that was on HBO,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 5>and for some reason it always really resonated with me.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 5>And one difference here is that because it is very similar,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 5>you have the parents. And maybe while I'm talking you

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 5>can look it up because I can see I can

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 5>see the actress in my head and cannot place her name,

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 5>and it's killing me, right, jud Hirsh's the dad, River

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 5>Phoenix is the sun, the talented musician's son. Man Christine Lottie,

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 5>I just got it. Christine Lotti is the mom, isn't it?

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 3>You got it? Nice time? Do I get two points?

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 5>So Christine Lotti is the mom and they were activists,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 5>and they were involved in a bombing and someone died,

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 5>as I recall it, unintentionally, someone wasn't supposed to be

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 5>at the building they bombed, and they've been on the

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 5>run ever since. I don't think this is a movie.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 5>You can disagree with me on this, or we can

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 5>talk about it, But as I reflect on my lone

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 5>viewing of this film, I don't think this is a

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 5>movie that really cares about whether or not the acts

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 5>that Bob or Perfidia, who we haven't mentioned, Tayana Taylor's Perfidia,

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Beverly Hills, the mother, the acts that they committed in

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 5>the name of injustice, in the name of oppression, in

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 5>the name of revolution, were right or wrong. The conscience

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 5>of what they did, that's not on the mind of

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 5>this movie. Whether Bob or anyone else should have pangs

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 5>of moral guilt, that is on the mind of Running

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 5>on Empty very much. That movie is concerned about whether

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 5>or not the sins of the father and mother should

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 5>be passed on to or whether it's fair that they're

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 5>passed on to the children. And this film is concerned

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 5>with that question. Like Running on Empty, it's concerned about

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 5>whether or not the sins of the father in this

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 5>case and the mother should be passed on to the children,

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 5>passed on to the daughter Willa. But it also asks,

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 5>and maybe we'll get to this in more detail as

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 5>we get into our conversation, but I think it also asks,

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 5>really interestingly the opposite. It almost asks, should we allow

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 5>the sins of the father and mother to be passed

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 5>down to the children. It's almost like the movie is

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 5>saying it needs to be we need that child, It's

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 5>okay for that child to have that consciousness and they

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 5>need to be enlightened about it and engaged in that.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's an interesting spin on that question.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the you know, dancing around spoilers. I think

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 3>the movie leaves us in exactly that place. And that's

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 3>what I found so stirring is, you know, not that

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 3>it's too late for us to participate, but man, this

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 3>this thing is going to be a long haul. I

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 3>think we're starting to realize those who are paying attention

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 3>to the.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 5>Movie might say it's actually too late for us, Josh,

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 5>And that's okay.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Our job and our generation, our job, and.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 5>This is to support the next generation. Might be what

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 5>the takeaway is.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 3>I think I think that's completely fair, and I do

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 3>want to take a moment to point out as to

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 3>that moral question, because I know this is going to

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>be a talking point once this movie, you know, gets out,

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 3>and those who aren't aren't ready to root for it

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 3>see it. It is very clear to me what you

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 3>pointed out, that the movie itself is not necessarily endorsing

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the tactics employed by this group that Leonardo Dicaproo's character

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>is involved with at the start of the film before

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 3>we jump ahead sixteen years. It does not denounce them,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 3>but to your point, it is interested in other things.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 3>And also, just because a group is using tactics you

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 3>might object to, does not legitimize the clearly unconstitutional anti

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>American tactics that were initially employed. So I just want

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 3>to get that out of the way in terms of,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is not endorsing one battle after another.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not endorsing such things. I think it's interested in

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 3>other questions, those personal ones. And this even relates to

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 3>the Sean Penn character Lockjaw, because I think it's really

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 3>key that while he is not at any point sympathetic,

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 3>he is depicted as a human being with you know,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 3>some perversities because of the way I read the sense

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 3>of unchecked authority he's been given, which means there are

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>no guardrails for him at all. But at the same

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 3>time it is one of the supreme comic performances in

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>the film, just that constipated walk Penn has and the

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 3>way he carries himself. It I'm sorry, but as I said,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>like I've seen this on Chicago streets, the performative nature

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 3>of these ice guys is it's clownish, and that is

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 3>what Penn is tapping into here. I want to see

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 3>on a protest sign, speaking of the kids, some kid

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 3>holding up what Bob's daughter when we meet her as

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>a teenager, later says to Pen in a crucial scene,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>why is your shirt so tight? That just killed me,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 3>because it's only a great line, but it gets at

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 3>the root of the performative nature of There's something about

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 3>if you are not morally sure of your actions, you're

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 3>going to perform them even more. And that is what

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 3>we are seeing now, and that's what we see in

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the film in Penn's character. But I do like that

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 3>we also get him, as you know, we don't agree

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 3>with any of his choices really but this is not

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 3>just some faceless monolith that is conducting these things. This

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 3>is an actual human being with motivations that are yes distorted,

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 3>But I think that's key. It's almost connected to what

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>you were talking about this movie, having a heart and

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>being interested in the relationships here. This is not a

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 3>socio political tract. This is a story about a family

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 3>deeply connected and you know pen is related to this,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 3>deeply connected to these events. How it affects them on

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 3>a day to day relational basis, you have to understand

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 3>and will me and Mom we used to run around

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>and do some real batches. They got hurt.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 6>Now they're coming after us.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, I didn't ask for this.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 2>That's just how the cards were.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Rolled out for me.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 6>It's not cards.

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>You don't roll cards. It's dice.

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 6>Dex's wrong with you?

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 3>You're right, let's go.

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 5>I think you made a good case for how for

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 5>you anyway, this this almost feels like a bit of

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 5>a departure for PTA. But let me maybe try to

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 5>make a case for how it fits into a certain

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 5>paradigm and we'll see if it works for you or not.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 5>When you think about his filmography, he is often reckoned

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 5>with America's present through its past. Many of his films

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 5>have been period pieces, and here he brings the battle

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 5>from the past into the present. Though, as I alluded

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 5>to earlier, and I think I haven't read it. I

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 5>think this comes from the Pension novel. I may have

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 5>heard this somewhere. I could be wrong that even though

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 5>that was set in a different time, that that there

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 5>is a sort of blending, right, And I felt that

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 5>watching the film, that you're seeing it and you're not

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 5>quite sure even when we're watching the prologue, when exactly

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 5>is this taking place? And this feels like the present,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 5>but when exactly is this the present? That feels by

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 5>design and it feels coherently incoherent in an appropriate way

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 5>for the times in which we currently live, right, And

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 5>so not every film follows this, of course, But I've

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 5>certainly talked about his emphasis on mentor protege relationships that

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 5>often takes the form of fathers and sons or surrogate

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 5>fathers and sons. Con Men as well are often found

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 5>populating his films, and those are among the most enduring

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 5>and evocative figures in all of American fiction. Neither seem

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 5>to be what this movie is concerned with, though maybe

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 5>we should consider is it one battle after another about

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 5>the absence of a mentor protege relationship, the mother daughter

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 5>activist dynamic that should be here, but also the father

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 5>daughter one. Since Bob is wallowing an apathy and you

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 5>have Willa constantly looking to him, wanting that direction, craving

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 5>it and not getting it because he is, he is

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 5>completely absent, and according to my reading anyway, to some degree,

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 5>isn't isn't Bob sort of a con man? You could argue,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 5>You could argue he's barely playing the role of a father.

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 5>But I'm really talking about how we meet him in

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 5>the prologue.

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 3>Isn't he? Even with that name Ghetto Pat?

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 5>I think it supports this, and I think DiCaprio's performance

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 5>supports this. The nervousness, that anxiety, how Perfidia has to

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 5>urge him on, how he constantly seems to be having

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 5>to prove himself that he's worthy to be with her,

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 5>that he's worthy to be part of this resistance group,

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 5>the French seventy five. The ease then, also with which

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 5>he falls into fatherhood and domesticity. Right, Ghetto Pat seems

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 5>to be an upper middle class white boy from Ohio

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 5>who joined the revolution.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 5>And I have to say Ohio because I'm from Iowa.

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Otherwise I'd say from Iowa.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 5>But there's a key line, and I may not have

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 5>it exactly right. You maybe have it in your notes.

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 5>My notes were completely worthless to me. But there's a

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 5>scene where he's talking to his mother in law, Perfidy's mother,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 5>and she says to him something like, you'll never be

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 5>good enough for her, You'll never be up to her

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 5>standard my daughter and for my daughter. And I think

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 5>I think she says something like she's a runner. I

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 5>think the words like a runner and that will that

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 5>will have or something along those lines, and that will

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 5>have residents later. But in the moment, it's clear that

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 5>what she's saying is, you know, Perfidy is she's a hunter.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 5>She is always on the move, she is volatile, She's

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 5>never going to be contained. And it's kind of like

0:24:55.840 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 5>she's saying, you're a lump. You just you don't belong here, really,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 5>you don't belong with her. And and you know, even

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 5>if you reject everything I've said, what are those mentor

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 5>protege relationships fundamentally predicated on and even what are con

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 5>artists manipulating. I do think it's all about power, and

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 5>that's at the core of every dynamic and decision that's

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 5>made in this movie. If you look at every single

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 5>one of them, including of course that key scene, that

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 5>scene where we meet Perfidia and Lockjaw, and where we

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 5>see them interacting in other scenes too, it's fundamentally the

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 5>story of America. And oh what is that type of power?

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 5>It is specifically white power, right, and that's what this

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 5>movie hilariously excoriates.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's right, and I think the mentor

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>protege dynamic is at play, even if to me it's

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 3>a little more scene through the prism of the father

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 3>and daughter. Actually wish I'd probably say at this point

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Willa his daughter as a teenager. We do jump ahead

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 3>after the opening section sixteen years, played really well by

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Chase Infinity, a relative newcomer. It's almost about Bob coming

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 3>into maybe mentor is a strong word, but coming into

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 3>the realization that for him to be the best dad

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 3>to this young woman, he's going to have to shake

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 3>off the apathy and he's going to have to be

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>more than what as you're describing. I think you're right,

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 3>he was probably something of a hanger on in that

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 3>opening scene where we see Perfidia leading an attack on

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 3>a detention center and he's the explosives expert and she's

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 3>telling him what do I almost thought he was just

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 3>the way DiCaprio carries himself, he's kind of like a

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 3>gun for hire. I didn't know what sort of convictions

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 3>he had. And then we realize they're in a romantic relationship, that.

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 5>There's a other question is just real quick you get

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 5>the dynamic that maybe it is almost like he's proving himself,

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 5>like they aren't in a full fledged relationship be yet

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 5>you could read.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 3>It maybe that too, but they're basically the point is

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 3>you don't sense the cause is what's primarily driving him.

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 3>At least didn't. I didn't give that sense. I don't

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 3>think it was objecting to it. But he's a little

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 3>bit along for the ride. And I think in terms

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 3>of this dynamic you're talking about mentor protege. You know,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.479
<v Speaker 3>maybe it reverses where the daughter becomes the mentor to

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the to the father as the movie goes on. Yeah,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>let's talk a little bit more about DiCaprio's performance. I

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 3>think he's just this is a first rate dimmed bulb

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 3>in the line of the likes of of course, you know,

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 3>we're thinking about Jeff Bridges and the big Lebowski or

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Joaquin Phoenix in the other pinchin adaptation from Paul Thomas

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Anderson right and here and vice. He's as good, I

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>think as well. He's almost as good as both of

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 3>them in those films. I really enjoyed him here, not

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 3>only the way he dims his bulb like that. It's

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 3>clearly because of the drugs, right, but it's also because

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 3>of the psyche weight of this failed revolution and the

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 3>burden of raising a child in this climate, because we

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>learn that sixteen years have gone by and if anything,

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 3>things have only gotten worse. Right, their movement people are

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 3>scattered because of an incident. We won't detail their underground

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 3>as he is hiding, and he's trying to make sense

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 3>of raising a teenager in this environment. It took a while, Adam,

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 3>but I knew I was on board with the performance.

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.959
<v Speaker 3>It shifts into high comic gear when he shows up

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 3>at a parent teacher meeting, stoned but also weepy.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 5>He just if I takes a drag, he takes a

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 5>drag during it. But you're right, he gets emotional.

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 3>If I get emotional, it's just tears of joy, that's all.

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 3>But the thing about the performance is he's not just

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 3>trying to cover up. He is, but he also means it.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 3>He really means it because he's got a good report

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 3>about his daughter at school. Yes, and this is just

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 3>what DiCaprio's trying to balance as this character. And yeah,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 3>from that scene, none, he puts the pedal down and

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 3>never lets up through the rest of the movie.

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't or I haven't come up with yet

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 5>the right adjective to describe what I'm thinking about DiCaprio's performance.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 3>But I like that.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Of course, the touch points for it have to be

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Doc Sportello because it's Pta and it's it's a pinchin adaptation.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 5>But it's a very different performance, and it's very different

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 5>than the other go to, which is Lebowski. It just

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't it doesn't have that same stoner vibe to it.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 5>There is something different about it, and I think I

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 5>think one of the things that's different about it is

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 5>that it just doesn't feel But I think in a

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 5>good way. It doesn't feel quite as lived in it

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 5>feels like someone who was transplanted into that character and

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 5>is still taking it on in some way. And I'm

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 5>really glad that you you mentioned that psychic weight, because

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 5>in the few comments I've seen about him here and

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 5>there or about the character, everyone talks about him just

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 5>as and we have so far as this apathetic character

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 5>or someone who, you know, the revolution's been gone for

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 5>a while, so now he's just hanging around and he's

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 5>getting drunk and stoned and doesn't feel like there's a

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 5>fight anymore, or he's too lazy or not willing to fight.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 5>Going back to what we've said about the emotional core

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 5>of this film, I still see him as fundamentally a

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 5>heartbroken character.

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, josh as Air.

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 5>I think that is also part of who he is,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 5>and that's driving so much of his apathy. It's not

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 5>just that what was me, you know, quote unquote the

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 5>sixties aren't here anymore. I think he's a heartbroken character.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 5>I used a word earlier at the start of my

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 5>comments that I want to come back to a little

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 5>bit because it relates to Paul Thomas Anderson in the filmmaking,

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 5>and you have to be careful a little bit, how

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 5>often you go to certain words or phrases as a

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 5>critic when praising movies, especially in the same year when

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 5>we talked about Sinners, I spoke about it having the

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 5>rhythms and audaciousness of some of our boldest musicals. I

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 5>know that Punch Drunk Love feels to many like a

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 5>musical despite their being no singing in it. And of

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 5>course there are numerous sequences we can point to in

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Paul Thomas Anderson's filmography where we can single out the

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 5>fluidity in the intricacy of the camera, the elaborate nature

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 5>of the shots right, the coordination with the performers. But

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 5>with Battle, I had a different sense, and it was

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 5>largely in that extended I'm gonna call it the extended

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 5>raid on back ten Cross, especially when we haven't mentioned

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 5>him yet, especially when Benisil del Toro, Oh gosh, was

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 5>on screen, and.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if you were thinking.

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 5>I wonder if you were thinking the same thing I was,

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 5>because even though you liked the movie more than me,

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 5>we were both a little down on the mellowness of

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Beniicil del Toro and Phoenician scheme. And here it couldn't

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 5>have served this movie better. He is so good as

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 5>this senseay in this movie who who ends up coming

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 5>to the aid not only of Bob when he most

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 5>needs it, but also so many other people in a

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 5>scenario that he even himself describes it as as a

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Harriet Tubman like situation, going on, Oh wait, wait, a

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Latino Harriet Tubman situation.

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 3>There you go, right, That's exactly what it is.

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 5>But when he's on screen it it relates to how

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 5>the camera Josh slows to match the calmness of that character,

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 5>who truly is like the conductor of the Latino Harriet

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 5>Tubman like situation. All the movements that are occurring. I was,

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 5>I was keenly aware of the blocking everything that was occurring,

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 5>not of the camera how it was moving, but everything

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 5>that was occurring within the frame, the choreography of it.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 5>That's the word for the camera to capture, not not

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 5>how the camera again was moving within the space, but

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 5>how the camera was there to observe for us, how

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 5>we were then able to observe in that space with

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 5>a sense of often real time urgency. It wasn't like

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 5>the long shot in Boogie Knights right where you know

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 5>we see William H. Macy's character kill himself right, and

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 5>it's it draws a lot of attention to itself. It's

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 5>about us being able to observe in real time and

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 5>that that sense of intimacy and urgency. But it's not overwhelming.

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 5>It's heightened, but it's steady. Bodies are constantly in motion,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 5>but it never feels jagged or jarring, the only way

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 5>I could really describe it. And and here it's just

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of a trick that Pta pulls off.

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 5>He somehow creates a serene intensity.

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I need you, brother Sencing, please courage Bob Carriage. It

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 3>did good.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, thank you, hey, thank you, since thank you, thank you, God,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 6>damn it.

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 3>That's a great, great description of it. The one thing

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I had to put out there in blue sky after

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I saw this was maybe Benicio del Toro will save

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 3>us all, because that's what I can help. So thinking

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 3>he has this, it's this bemused spiritual calm. You know,

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 3>we should say this is when the town has been

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 3>taken over by the military. The streets, they've instigated among

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 3>protesters an attack, and that is what precedes the underground

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.479
<v Speaker 3>railroad to go into effect to get some of these

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 3>mostly women and children not violent criminals, women and tru

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 3>children who are being targeted by the military, and del

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Toro's calm balances with DiCaprio's antickness. This relates to our

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 3>discussion of how invested in the cause is Bob, because

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 3>there isn't until there's a moment where Del Toro has

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 3>given him clear, calm directions about what to do, where

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 3>to go, and Bob pauses, catches a breath, and that's

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 3>when he screams out, Viva la revolution.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not it's not so much because he's about to,

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, to make a blow against the authorities. It's

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 3>because he knows what to do. He's he's been told

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.919
<v Speaker 3>what's do. But del Toro in this scene and yeah,

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the blocking and the camera because we're following him upstairs, downstairs,

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 3>through back rooms, in and out of shops. This elaborate

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 3>system he's put together, but he just has this this

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 3>sense of assuredness to him that is so reassuring. And

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 3>to your point about the Phoenician scheme, Yeah, that was

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 3>one of my My main qualms about that movie is

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 3>how is it constricted Del Toro into a Wes Anderson

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 3>type of character. Other actors have given their best performances

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 3>as to that type, but to me, it just did

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 3>not fit del Toro, who needs to have a certain looseness.

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I identified it as much while

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 3>watching the Phoenician Scheme until I saw him here, and

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 3>I think this might be a career best turn for him,

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 3>because there is even when he's playing villains, like really

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 3>scary guys, which he's done in the past, there's this

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 3>same sense of calm or looseness where he's not always

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 3>he's not necessarily taking the scene or the actions as

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 3>seriously as you think he should be, but it's because

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 3>he knows what he has a firmer grasp on it,

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and this whole sequence just allows him to be this

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 3>grumbly sage whose she's rumbling through these halls not being

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 3>hurried because he knows exactly what to do.

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 5>It's wonderful in addition to the politics of the film

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 5>as we're describing it, that we were on board with

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 5>the emotional core of it that we've talked about that

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 5>did resonate with us. The humor of the film. You

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 5>can find humor in all of PTA's movies. I'm pretty

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 5>sure I had a scene from liquorice pizza is my

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 5>funniest moment of twenty twenty one, or it was the

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 5>runner up. I'm certain I had a scene from Inherent

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 5>Vice as my funniest moment of twenty fourteen. I'd probably

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 5>still put Boogie Knights as his funniest film, but I

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 5>think this would be my number two, Josh. And it's

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 5>also obviously his most action oriented film, his most suspenseful.

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 5>Despite that steadiness I was talking about, and there is

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 5>a chase scene at the end. This is one of

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 5>those movies where I'm sitting in my seat with my

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 5>knee bouncing in rhythm to the score, you know, wondering

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.399
<v Speaker 5>where this is exactly going, and feeling the intensity of it.

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 5>And actually it is a steadiness where you're feeling it

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of the entire film. So you've got that, right,

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 5>You've got that intensity that's maintained for almost the entire

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 5>two hour and fifty minute running time. But all those

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 5>elements are culminating with that humor. And even though I'm

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 5>not someone who has read Pension, I understand that pension

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 5>esque some of it through films like in Hair and Vice,

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 5>that pension esque postmodern sensibility tinged with paranoia, as it

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 5>is here that absurdist sensibility. And the bottom line is,

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 5>we haven't mentioned this part of the story yet, and

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 5>I want to mention it here because it relates to

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 5>the humor.

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Hail Saint Nick.

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 5>This will mean something to you when you see the

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 5>movie if you haven't. While Saint Nick is one of

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 5>the funniest three word phrases you'll hear all the year

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 5>at the movies. And I want to praise I want

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 5>to praise Paul Thomas Anderson and whoever I should look

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 5>it up, whoever his casting agent is, because whoever is

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 5>responsible for coming up with this group of completely unrecognizable

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 5>for the most part, unrecognizable but innocuous looking, evil, middle

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 5>aged white.

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Dudes, they deserve a raise.

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm thinking, I'm thinking, And I went for the record.

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 5>I wanted to give them praise. I went to IMDb,

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 5>and I just did not have the time to scroll

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 5>through every name and try to identify them.

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't.

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 5>I couldn't pick them out. You know, the pictures didn't

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 5>line up or whatever. But I'm thinking of the second

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 5>in command to Lockjaw, who we see interrogate some people. Yeah,

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 5>perfect right, every single person, and one of them. I

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 5>can't believe I didn't. I didn't recognize this guy, even

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 5>though now of course I see it. He's the bar owner, yes,

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 5>But but other than Tony Goldwyn, who you do most

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 5>of us do know? The one guy who we see

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 5>later in the house who at first is silent and

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 5>we're not sure that he's going to talk. Oh yeah,

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 5>that's that's Kevin Tigue. That's Kevin Tigue from the bar

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 5>owner of the Double D in Roadhouse. So fairly a classic.

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 3>That guy.

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 5>We kind of recognize him, right, But otherwise all those

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 5>other guys are that guys that we don't know. And

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm calling these innocuous looking, evil, middle aged white dudes

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 5>the Tony Goldwyn all stars, and every one of them

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.720
<v Speaker 5>in this movie. Josh is just so perfect.

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 3>This is the Christmas Adventures Club, This is the Christmas Conspiracy,

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 3>pulling the strings we learn, and it's so funny. I

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 3>saw it just on Blue Sky today. Alyssa Wilkinson, the

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 3>New York Times critic, say something about being out in

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 3>New York and she's pretty sure she's I think she

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 3>said something like pretty sure. I saw a member walking

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 3>down the street, and I'm sure we had the same

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 3>thing here. Debbie and I were walking down and we

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 3>saw a guy sitting like a really nice house in

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 3>town here and he was out in his yard, just

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 3>sitting on the patio in like a you know, innocuous

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 3>but very expensive, clearly like sweater vest. And we both

0:40:58.000 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 3>were like, we looked at her, like, oh, he's in

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the Smith's Adventures Club. Yeah, it has to be. So

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 3>this is so funny, and it is, it is really

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 3>fun and it's sometimes it's beautifully I'm gonna call it

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 3>a sequence that has the humor and also the filmmaking chops.

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 3>And this is actually part of the entire sense sequence.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 3>But at this point, del Toro's character has sent Bob

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 3>off with some skaters. He said, these guys will get

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 3>you safe where you need to go. And the route

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 3>is across the rooftops because, as I said, the military

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 3>has taken over the streets and are just you know,

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 3>shooting at random. Below this is shot by Anderson and

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 3>cinematographer Michael Bauman from a distance and in silhouette. And

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 3>so you have these these skaters, these younger guys with

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 3>their boards just you know, very beautifully leaping in silhouette

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 3>from one building to the other end just as you're

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 3>thinking like, oh, this is a I have this sense

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 3>of like mythical resistance, and then we have Bob stumbling

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 3>behind them, barely able to keep up. And that's just

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, the This is what's so great about this movie, too,

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 3>is it's willing to puncture those moments. It's not taking

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 3>itself too seriously, even though it's probably going to be

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 3>the most serious movie that comes out in the United

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 3>States this year, But it doesn't carry itself this way.

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 6>Hi, what's up?

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 3>What's upon me?

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 6>It's it's me again, Bob Ferguson. I don't know if

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 6>you remember what we we we spoke earlier on the

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 6>on the phone. I think we had a little misunderstanding.

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 6>I think we got off on the wrong foot. I

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 6>was trying to get the rendezvous point for my daughter,

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 6>right will.

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 3>If you can't answer, what time is it, I cannot

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 3>give you. The rendezvous point is the relion.

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised.

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you are.

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 5>I do love that it punctures that mythos there, but

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 5>what it does with that imagery still astounding, that shot,

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 5>that silhouetted shot of those those younger men on the

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 5>skateboard is still among the most vivid shots in his filmography.

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 5>And think about what he's given us through ten films.

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 3>I have one that wowed me even more, and it's

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 3>during the climactic car chase, which we won't even say

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 3>who's involved, but it is taking place on this stretch

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of desert hills and at one point it's they must

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 3>have placed the camera on the hood of one of

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the cars. Three cars are involved, and as the vehicle

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.479
<v Speaker 3>kind of lolls up and down this road, the road

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 3>is like an undulating road, and the experience of watching

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 3>it from that point of view was it was anxious

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 3>but also mesmerizing, and it was inducing in me because

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 3>it kind of is repeated and goes on, and it

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 3>was inducing in me like a nausea but also a sleepiness.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 3>And the only thing I could think about is when

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 3>I got out of the movie, and even a day

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 3>or two later, like what was that all about?

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 7>Is?

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, That's how I felt. For the last ten years,

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 3>I've exact life has felt like being on that road

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 3>of dipping up and down and not knowing what's over

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the next hill, and what it might do to you,

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 3>and my goodness, however, they got that shot and sustained

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:32.799
<v Speaker 3>it so that it works in terms of suspense, but

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 3>also on a certain level just pure beauty is incredible.

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, it kind of goes back to what I was

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 5>saying and we were talking about. It is intense and suspenseful,

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 5>and yet it feels I remember the feeling of watching

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.399
<v Speaker 5>it and what you're talking about with the undulation, there's

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 5>a certain serenity to it as well, isn't it. So

0:44:55.040 --> 0:45:00.840
<v Speaker 5>it's crazy how they managed to balance that in this film.

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:05.280
<v Speaker 5>There is I think we've had the discussion we probably

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 5>wanted to have, and we could close here, but I

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 5>will at least raise that I knew within about ten

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 5>minutes of this film that among the conversations that were

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 5>going to be had about this film, there was definitely

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 5>going to be the discourse around a certain issue with

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.479
<v Speaker 5>the movie, one that the two of us probably aren't

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the best people to weigh in on, but I knew

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 5>there was going to be a discourse, and sure enough,

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 5>I woke up this morning and I actually these days

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm not on social media much at all, but I

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 5>will usually wake up and just sort of check in

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 5>and the very first thing I saw this morning, it

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 5>had begun. Josh, I don't know if you know what

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm referring to, but I guess I will throw out vaguely,

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 5>do you want to get into it or do you

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 5>want to wait until feedback on an upcoming show and

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 5>get into whatever or this discourse might be.

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean we're gonna have to. I'm unaware of it.

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:08.839
<v Speaker 3>I was in a bunker before seeing this, and I've

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 3>tried to be in a bunker aside from you know

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that Alyssa Wilkinson comments and a few other things since

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 3>until we've had this conversation. I cannot wait till tomorrow

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 3>to be able to dive into all the critics who

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 3>I respect their takes, and I'm sure there's gonna be

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 3>some pushback. I surprise it hasn't started already because so

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 3>far it's just been a wave of raves seen star

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:36.959
<v Speaker 3>ratings come through on Letterbox. So yeah, I'm gonna dive

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 3>into all of that tomorrow and perhaps we'll pick it up. Yeah,

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 3>when we get some feedback, which may.

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Be a lot of those lines I had thoughts because

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 5>they relate to the experience I had watching the movie.

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 5>They don't relate to the thoughts or I should say,

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 5>the specific criticisms that this person had, because they just

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 5>came out this morning and I didn't have time to

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 5>read those. So I wasn't going to be reacting to

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 5>that article necessarily or not at all. I was just

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 5>going to be talking about what I saw on the

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 5>screen now.

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 3>As it is.

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 5>The discourse will pick up in the days before our

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 5>next episode, and maybe we will be more informed and

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:19.760
<v Speaker 5>we can talk about.

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 3>It, and hey, this is a movie that needs to

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 3>be interrogated. I mean, just because I'm in line with

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.359
<v Speaker 3>it's totally relative politics, if you want to say that

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean that it's a film that has everything lined

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 3>up perfectly right. It's capturing chaos and capturing a way

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 3>to honorably respond to that chaos from my point of view,

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:44.280
<v Speaker 3>But it doesn't mean that it has everything right along

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 3>those lines. So I'll be curious to see that. And

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, the only other thing I would

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 3>say on the political front is I almost pardon me,

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was like, this doesn't even really feel political, because it's

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 3>it's not arguing against, you know, a political direction we

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 3>may be heading towards. You know or and it's not

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 3>even offering an alternative political vision to our current circumstances.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 3>That goes to your point about, you know, whether it's

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 3>it's endorsing the this gorilla group's actions, it's it's just

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:18.760
<v Speaker 3>mirroring what we're in right through this comically absurdist lens.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 3>And all I can say is that by doing that,

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 3>it goes back to what I said at the top.

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 3>It felt like this desperately needed fresh air. To me,

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 3>It's like that, this is what I've just been feeling.

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Why are we not talking? Why are we recognizing this?

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:40.479
<v Speaker 3>And and One Battle after Another is at least doing that?

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it doing it perfectly? Probably not? And yeah, well

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 3>we'll see what qualms other people might have about it.

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 3>It's a good thing.

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 5>I don't expect perfection from art, even from Paul Thomas Anderson.

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 5>One Battle after Another is currently playing in wide release.

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 5>If you see it and agree or disagree, you can

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 5>email us feedback at film spot Net.

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:03.760
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by dead Man's Wire,

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 4>the new film from Roque Entertainment. Dead Man's Wire is

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 4>the incredible true story of the nineteen seventy seven kidnapping

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 4>that turned an aspiring entrepreneur into an outlaw folk era

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 4>directed by legendary filmmaker Gus van Zant. Dead Man's Wire

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 4>stars Bill Scarsguard Daker, Montgomery, Carry Always, and Mahalla with

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Coleman Domingo and al Pacino, now playing in select theaters everywhere,

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 4>January sixteenth.

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, listening is the number one thing you can do

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 3>to support an independently produced show like ours. Here are

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 3>a couple of other things you can do. Take a

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 3>minute to give us a rating or a review on

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:41.879
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts. You can also do this on Spotify if

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you listen to us there. It doesn't matter if you're

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 3>brand new, this is the first show you're hearing, or

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 3>if you've been listening for twenty years. Every one of

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 3>these reviews does help us reach new listeners. Now to

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 3>go even further, a very substantial way to support us

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 3>is to join the Film Spotting Family, which you can

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 3>do at Film Spotting fas family dot com. We want

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to thank family member Remi must Say and Leland Michigan.

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 3>Remi's letterbox handle is R M A S S E. Yeah.

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 5>This is tough because producer Sam did a great job

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 5>of phonetically spelling out the name, and I'm not sure

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 5>where he got that from. Maybe he reached out to

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 5>this family member. But the problem is you do have

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 5>to put where the the emphasis is. So is it

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Remi or is it Remy?

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 3>This is me because I would be I would be

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 3>saying this, and I think it's Remy. I'm gonna go.

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I checked it on fourvoh, so we'll see, we'll hear

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 3>from and see what they say.

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 5>From here on out. We're gonna call him he and

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna hope that's right.

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Please tell us.

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:58.239
<v Speaker 5>Remy or Remy which pronunciation is correct. After moving to

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 5>a city where I knew nobody than my now wonderful wife,

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:05.760
<v Speaker 5>I found myself missing the movie conversations that regularly sprung

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 5>up with my college housemates. After watching The Banshees of

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Na Sharon, I was desperate to have a discussion with someone, anyone.

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 5>Film spotting was the first result online, and Adam and

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 5>Josh hooked me in and haven't let go since a

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 5>favorite review or segment Top five Movies for Graduates found

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 5>me at the right time. The respect for hyomi Izaki

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 5>from both Adam and Josh let me know I was

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 5>in the right place, and because of their top fives.

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 5>I watched Columbus and Hikaru for the first time and

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:36.440
<v Speaker 5>adored both. Good job by us. What review did we

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 5>get wrong? I can't find it on film spotting, but

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:42.240
<v Speaker 5>here at Kazu Karata's Monster, I thought it was brilliant

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 5>and one of my favorites of the year. Sorry, Josh,

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 5>you didn't like that movie, Josh.

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:47.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was a little down on it, but hey,

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 3>in the case of Karita, I'm probably wrong, so that's fine.

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Letterbox Top four spirited it away. I mean, here, you

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 5>guys are simpatico again. Fantastic mister Fox.

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 3>There will be Blood one, There will Be Blood is

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 3>great in the Fall. I love well, Okay, Tarsum saying.

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 5>A favorite movie that Remy revisited recently Bong Juno's Memories

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:13.399
<v Speaker 5>of Murder Good one. A random filmmaker that he loves

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 5>Rob Reiner, not necessarily because I think he's one of

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.359
<v Speaker 5>the great filmmakers, but he certainly doesn't get enough love

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:22.240
<v Speaker 5>from film nerds. A movie you credit with becoming a cinophile,

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 5>he says. My dad loved Jim Carrey movies when I

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 5>was a kid, and after showing my brother and I

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:29.280
<v Speaker 5>ace Ventura when Nature Calls. We watched The Truman Show

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 5>and it completely altered what I loved about movies. I

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 5>can still love a terrible exquisite film like ace Ventura,

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 5>but the Truman Show led me down a path of

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 5>loving movies for.

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Something a little different. I can see that terrible exquisite

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 3>for ace. That's kind of great.

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Remy for joining the family and for all

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 5>those years of listening. In addition to keeping us doing

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:52.839
<v Speaker 5>what we're doing, your support comes with perks, Josh. They

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 5>get to listen early in ad free. I'm not sure

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 5>if you're aware. They get our weekly newsletter. They get

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:00.760
<v Speaker 5>exclusive opportunities like being part of the Film Spotting Family

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 5>discord just an unruly bunch now, actually they're they're quite

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:07.919
<v Speaker 5>really great group of Film Spotting Family members over there

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 5>having wonderfully insightful and sometimes absolutely absurd conversations. And you

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:17.319
<v Speaker 5>get our monthly bonus shows. We have channels over there

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 5>devoted to music, books, sports, food, but yes, also movies,

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:28.720
<v Speaker 5>new releases, older films, TV, you name it. September Bonus

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Show was our Trivia Spotting edition that is now available, Josh.

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 5>The one you know you slept through because you're in Scotland.

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I did.

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 3>I slept quite well. How did you do? Where did

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 3>you place? That's all I really want to know.

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 5>I did not podium, Oh I didn't. I didn't make

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 5>the top three. But but my team fared well. I

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 5>mean we I think we got at least seven right

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:56.839
<v Speaker 5>both rounds. And I went quite deep in the in

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 5>the Lightning round, the Captain's Lightning Round.

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:00.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I was a topic.

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 5>It was uh, it was directors, and it was of

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 5>directors of sun Dance winning films. I think I was

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 5>the last. I was the third from last out, so

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 5>I had it. I had a shot. And and the one,

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:18.760
<v Speaker 5>the one I went out on, is so depressing because,

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 5>as Sam and I were talking about later, there were

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:26.360
<v Speaker 5>ones throughout where you were you were just praising the

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 5>Lord that you didn't get because you you should have known,

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 5>but you just could not pull the name.

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:33.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, Josh how it is, but you can't pull

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 3>the name.

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 5>And and and then there were others that that you knew,

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 5>and you were so grateful that you got those. The

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 5>one that I went out on, the one that I

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 5>went out on, for me, it was hump day one

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 5>of my favorites, like one of my movies, the movie

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 5>that I championed years ago on the show, and I

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:04.359
<v Speaker 5>missed Bacon, Lee said the Duplas Brothers because I thought

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 5>about Mark Duplas being in the film. Now right right,

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to say, well, I'm gonna say that

0:55:12.560 --> 0:55:14.839
<v Speaker 5>I thought Thomas was a little too quick on the draw,

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 5>and I think you should be allowed to think out

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 5>loud for a second, like why does the first thing.

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:21.440
<v Speaker 3>You say to Thomas?

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Why does the first thing you say have to be

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:27.520
<v Speaker 5>your final answer? Why can't you think out loud? But

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 5>right after I said it and everyone jumped on me

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 5>for being stupid, I it hit me, of course that

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 5>like Lynn Shelton there. Lynn Shelton of course directed hump Day.

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:41.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean I knew it. It took me a second,

0:55:41.480 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 5>but wow.

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:45.359
<v Speaker 3>That's the way it goes. Yeah it is can go.

0:55:46.000 --> 0:55:48.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a bummer. October Bonus, we are going to

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 5>do a draft with a family member. Looking forward to that.

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Please do learn more about becoming a member and supporting

0:55:56.640 --> 0:56:00.760
<v Speaker 5>the show at film spotting family dot com.

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Hi, you sound so sweet. Are you nervous about talking

0:56:08.480 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 3>to me?

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, we gotta be like really careful about doing this. Yeah, Adam,

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 3>you caught up with a new film called Predators, as

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned earlier. This shouldn't be confused with the animated

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 3>predator Killer of Killers, which came out earlier this year.

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Still hoped to catch up with or Predator bad Lands,

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:35.760
<v Speaker 3>which is coming to theaters next month. This is totally different.

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Predators is a documentary from director David Osset about the

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:44.799
<v Speaker 3>reality TV program To Catch a Predator. The premise of

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:48.879
<v Speaker 3>this show was basically hunt down child predators, lure them

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 3>to a film set where they would be interviewed and

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:55.759
<v Speaker 3>then arrested. It ran from two thousand and four to

0:56:55.840 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and seven. So yeah, fascinating idea for a documentary.

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:05.879
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to hear what they do with this sort

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of material in the dock.

0:57:07.680 --> 0:57:10.279
<v Speaker 5>They do a lot. Yeah, they do a lot. And

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, I could be wrong. I don't know

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 5>if they actually lured them to a TV set or

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 5>if they lured them to an actual house that had

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 5>basically been turned into a TV set. But I'll say this,

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 5>the opening of the trailer that you just heard is

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 5>also the opening of the movie. So yes, right from

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 5>the start, it is as deeply unsettling as you might

0:57:34.840 --> 0:57:41.920
<v Speaker 5>expect this material to be predators lingers long after the

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 5>final frame. I remember to Catch a Predator on TV.

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:52.000
<v Speaker 5>I remember seeing bits of it. This isn't revisionist history,

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 5>because anybody who did watch it regularly, if they watch

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 5>this show, they might after it feel like maybe I

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 5>should and say that out loud, or maybe I should

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 5>feel guilty about it. I'll let others wrestle with their

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 5>conscience or not. I do remember seeing maybe an episode

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 5>or two, but I certainly was not familiar with the

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:14.600
<v Speaker 5>lore around it, or the fact that people would go

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:18.800
<v Speaker 5>to conventions around of course true crime and Chris Hansen.

0:58:18.960 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 5>I knew he was a celebrity, but I didn't realize

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 5>that he was a celebrity to the extent that he was,

0:58:25.040 --> 0:58:27.600
<v Speaker 5>and that there were all these to Catch a Predator

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 5>wannabes now on YouTube basically.

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Doing this same world.

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 5>And to be fair, just like Chris Hansen, they are

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 5>working usually with police, with authorities, and they are catching

0:58:41.320 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 5>actual predators. Right, so you can point to real justice

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 5>being done. But there is a downside to a lot

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 5>of this. Whenever, whenever you have punishment as entertainment. There

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 5>is a downside to this that this movie and you

0:58:58.760 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 5>can imagine that. Well, this movie explores that. And I

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 5>mentioned that I didn't know the war. I also didn't

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 5>know about some of the recurring gags almost on the show,

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 5>or some of the catchphrases. At the end of the trailer,

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 5>you hear the documentarians say to Chris Hansen, you're free

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 5>to go.

0:59:22.160 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 6>Some people watching this may feel like you have something

0:59:26.160 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 6>to answer for.

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 2>What do you say that.

0:59:34.640 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 3>They're free to go?

0:59:37.880 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 5>Apparently that's what Chris Hansen would say to all these

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 5>predators who would, somehow and the movie talks about this,

0:59:44.600 --> 0:59:47.960
<v Speaker 5>would stay there and talk to him rather than run

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 5>out the door. But it wouldn't have mattered either way.

0:59:50.080 --> 0:59:51.680
<v Speaker 5>He says, you're free to go. Of course, they're not

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 5>free to go. As soon as they walk out the door.

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 5>They're police there to apprehend them. But when I say

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 5>deeply unsettling, I want to be clear that, yes, occasionally

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 5>it's the behavior of predators like the guy we hear

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:09.439
<v Speaker 5>there on the phone in the trailer, but mostly it's

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 5>it's the movie's project in a good way. It's the

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 5>it's the questions that it wants to and does pose

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:21.120
<v Speaker 5>that there are just no answers to Josh. I mean

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:23.320
<v Speaker 5>that that you're going to be wrestling with, I said,

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 5>it lingers the questions you're going to be wrestling with

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:29.240
<v Speaker 5>throughout and and maybe for days after. Like I was,

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:31.920
<v Speaker 5>I can answer the question of whether or not the

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 5>show is terrible. I think it was terrible, even if

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:38.760
<v Speaker 5>it did result in legitimate predators being caught, even if

1:00:38.800 --> 1:00:42.480
<v Speaker 5>it did provide something in some cases cathartic for victims

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 5>of sexual abuse. But the movie considers what it wants

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:51.240
<v Speaker 5>us to think about, what it poses as its main

1:00:52.640 --> 1:00:54.560
<v Speaker 5>goal is to get us to think about and get

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 5>some of the people on camera to think about, is

1:00:57.120 --> 1:01:00.200
<v Speaker 5>what happens when the camera turns off and we see

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:04.280
<v Speaker 5>when we have to see these people as people, as

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 5>human beings.

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Can we do that? Should we do that?

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:10.480
<v Speaker 5>And there are two scenes I will say, and I

1:01:10.480 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 5>won't get into a lot of details because I want

1:01:12.080 --> 1:01:15.000
<v Speaker 5>people to see the movie, to see this and experience

1:01:15.040 --> 1:01:17.240
<v Speaker 5>it for themselves, But there are two scenes in the movie, Josh,

1:01:17.280 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 5>where you watch catchers of predators, both pretty hard line,

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 5>both inured to this. When confronted with their humanity, they soften.

1:01:32.360 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 3>They do. They do see their humanity.

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 5>And what I appreciate about the movie is that the documentarian,

1:01:41.800 --> 1:01:46.400
<v Speaker 5>the director, Oh Sit, he doesn't take those moments as

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:49.840
<v Speaker 5>clear victories. He doesn't try to simplify things. He actually

1:01:49.880 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 5>reminds you usually in these moments that let's not forget

1:01:54.200 --> 1:01:59.439
<v Speaker 5>that these people, these predators, did show up because they

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 5>were going to have sex. They thought they were going

1:02:02.080 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 5>to have sex with someone under age, and in one case,

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 5>they brought alcohol because they thought they were going to

1:02:08.080 --> 1:02:10.640
<v Speaker 5>have sex with a fourteen year old. Preters is a

1:02:10.640 --> 1:02:15.040
<v Speaker 5>documentary that that dares to question everything, including itself, and

1:02:15.080 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 5>I think that's really bold about the project. So from

1:02:18.880 --> 1:02:21.840
<v Speaker 5>the comfort of my TV, I can sit here as

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 5>an enlightened liberal man and talk about how we need

1:02:26.560 --> 1:02:31.480
<v Speaker 5>to see their humanity. But what if it was my child?

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 5>Would I really be feeling so generous? And I can't

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 5>wait to discuss this movie with someone who's seen it.

1:02:37.840 --> 1:02:40.600
<v Speaker 5>I haven't had that chance yet, Josh, because I am

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:43.080
<v Speaker 5>as much as I do appreciate the movie and I do,

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:46.880
<v Speaker 5>I really recommend people see it. I'm very conflicted about

1:02:46.920 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 5>the ending. It's not a spoiler because it's in the

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:53.240
<v Speaker 5>trailer and I alluded to it earlier, but I didn't

1:02:53.280 --> 1:02:55.280
<v Speaker 5>know it. I hadn't seen the trailer. I was waiting

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:57.920
<v Speaker 5>the whole movie, and I said to Sarah, who was

1:02:57.920 --> 1:02:59.919
<v Speaker 5>watching it with me, I'm like, when are we going

1:02:59.880 --> 1:03:02.040
<v Speaker 5>to find out? The whole movie has been building to this?

1:03:02.120 --> 1:03:05.000
<v Speaker 5>It has to be building to it. Are they going

1:03:05.080 --> 1:03:10.120
<v Speaker 5>to interview Chris Hansen? They have to confront Chris Hansen?

1:03:11.240 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Or they have to tell us that they tried to

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.760
<v Speaker 5>get Chris Hansen on camera and he refused to be interviewed.

1:03:15.800 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 5>But if they don't, if we don't get the interview,

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 5>or we don't get the disclaimer, honestly, the movie is

1:03:23.280 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 5>almost worthless because the whole movie has been in some

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>way building up to it. Osi would be derelict in

1:03:29.560 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 5>his duties as a documentarian and the journalistic enterprise would

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 5>be sunk here. Well, he gets him, He gets him,

1:03:37.480 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 5>and the interview is is entirely appropriate. I think the inquisition,

1:03:41.920 --> 1:03:45.600
<v Speaker 5>if you will, is entirely appropriate. But how it concludes,

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 5>how it concludes esthetically, I feel icky about. I'm not

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:59.720
<v Speaker 5>sure I'm on board with the choices that Osi makes. Again,

1:03:59.800 --> 1:04:03.880
<v Speaker 5>some thing I would love to discuss with someone.

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:06.720
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, this is grueling subject matter, and you know,

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>someone who watches Predators may not be in the mood

1:04:09.040 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>to see something else along these lines. But the way

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about the humanity and the question of that

1:04:15.440 --> 1:04:18.439
<v Speaker 3>in it reminds me of this documentary I saw way back,

1:04:18.480 --> 1:04:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I think twenty fifteen at Sundance called Pervert Park, and

1:04:22.600 --> 1:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>it was about a Florida trailer park that was basically

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:30.480
<v Speaker 3>founded to provide a place for registered sex offenders to

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:34.360
<v Speaker 3>live because their options are severely limited, you know, can't

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>live by schools, can't because a condition of their parole.

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:40.919
<v Speaker 3>And it's a movie that's very much about you know,

1:04:41.320 --> 1:04:45.200
<v Speaker 3>that One aspect it sounds like Predators is partially interested

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>in is what humanity might there be in people like this? Now,

1:04:51.160 --> 1:04:54.000
<v Speaker 3>this is on the other side of justice in this case,

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:56.840
<v Speaker 3>so it sounds like it's very different to that end,

1:04:56.880 --> 1:05:00.959
<v Speaker 3>but still interested in that question. So yeah, if people

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>are up for thinking about these sorts of really difficult

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 3>issues a little bit more, i'd also recommend Pervert Park.

1:05:08.120 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Predators is currently playing in limited release next week.

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Here on Film Spotting, we've got a top five inspired

1:05:17.040 --> 1:05:22.600
<v Speaker 5>by our conversation about one battle after another with Leonardo DiCaprio.

1:05:22.840 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 5>I think I've read this or heard this somewhere that

1:05:25.400 --> 1:05:27.560
<v Speaker 5>it was a dream of his to get to work

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:31.560
<v Speaker 5>with Paul Thomas Anderson. And certainly fans of PTA's work

1:05:31.760 --> 1:05:33.840
<v Speaker 5>like I am, and so many people are, and I

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:37.440
<v Speaker 5>know you are, Josh as well, it only seemed fitting

1:05:37.480 --> 1:05:41.000
<v Speaker 5>that we finally got a big star like Leo working

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 5>with Paul Thomas Anderson. So what are the actor director

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 5>combos that we haven't had that we'd like to see.

1:05:48.920 --> 1:05:50.640
<v Speaker 5>I should know the answer to this, because when I

1:05:50.720 --> 1:05:53.720
<v Speaker 5>propose this top five at a film spotting production meeting

1:05:54.160 --> 1:05:57.080
<v Speaker 5>several weeks ago, I think I looked up, or maybe

1:05:57.080 --> 1:05:59.920
<v Speaker 5>on the call we looked up. We've done something similar

1:06:00.080 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 5>to this before. I can't remember if we've done exactly

1:06:02.960 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 5>this top five or something like it, but either way,

1:06:07.400 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 5>certainly worth revisiting because it's been a while that we've

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 5>done something like it, and I haven't started the work yet,

1:06:13.040 --> 1:06:14.520
<v Speaker 5>but I'm excited to do it.

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm struggling where do I start. Do I start

1:06:18.640 --> 1:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>with the directors or do I start with the actors?

1:06:21.760 --> 1:06:21.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1:06:22.520 --> 1:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right now I'm feeling like starting with the actors

1:06:26.880 --> 1:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>might be a bit more fun. Yeah, because there I

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>can certainly think of five and I'm not going to

1:06:34.320 --> 1:06:38.240
<v Speaker 3>name them here about like five, you know, relatively new names,

1:06:38.240 --> 1:06:40.480
<v Speaker 3>and it doesn't have to be it could be veterans

1:06:40.520 --> 1:06:42.360
<v Speaker 3>we could go with. But right now I'm thinking about

1:06:42.360 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>new names who I'm excited about where they're at in

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:46.760
<v Speaker 3>their career and thinking about where they might go. And

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:51.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, pairing up with a top flight director is

1:06:51.160 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>a way to kind of move up in your career.

1:06:54.520 --> 1:06:57.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'm leaning towards that path. But yeah, I haven't

1:06:57.920 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 3>really sat down to think about it much yet.

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:02.400
<v Speaker 5>As soon as you said it, I have to say

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:06.160
<v Speaker 5>my immediate thought was to start actor because I think

1:07:06.280 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 5>I can build the director off of I can match

1:07:10.640 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 5>the sensibility.

1:07:11.600 --> 1:07:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Of the director to the performer.

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 5>I know doesn't the opposite two, but for some reason,

1:07:16.160 --> 1:07:19.080
<v Speaker 5>it feels more natural for me to match the director

1:07:19.120 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 5>to the actor.

1:07:20.280 --> 1:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't This go back to the Del Toro conversation, and

1:07:23.160 --> 1:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe with Wes Anderson. Now, I think he's brilliant in

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Wes Anderson's The French Dispatch, but that allowed him to

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:31.439
<v Speaker 3>have in that case a little bit of the mournfulness

1:07:31.480 --> 1:07:34.440
<v Speaker 3>that he can carry in some of his performances, whereas

1:07:34.440 --> 1:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>the Phoenician scheme was at a little bit more prescriptive

1:07:38.520 --> 1:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>of what he needed to do. So yeah, it's I

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:43.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know if I would have ever said Benicio del Toro,

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>an actor I love, he needs to pair with Wes Anderson.

1:07:47.680 --> 1:07:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I probably wouldn't have thought of that. I don't know

1:07:49.120 --> 1:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>if I would have thought with Paul Thomas Anderson either,

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:55.280
<v Speaker 3>and would have missed out on one battle after another.

1:07:55.400 --> 1:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>But but yeah, it's yeah, it'll be an interesting experiment

1:07:59.800 --> 1:08:00.600
<v Speaker 3>to conduct.

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:04.400
<v Speaker 5>Sam had a very good related prompt in the film

1:08:04.440 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Spotting Family Discord and in the newsletter this week, he said,

1:08:09.360 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 5>Paul Thomas Anderson can only make one more film, and

1:08:12.320 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna knock on wood and hope that that doesn't happen.

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:19.160
<v Speaker 5>The star of the film can't be anyone that he's

1:08:19.160 --> 1:08:23.519
<v Speaker 5>ever worked with before. Who is that star? And I

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:26.240
<v Speaker 5>think I might take up that mantle for one of

1:08:26.240 --> 1:08:27.040
<v Speaker 5>my five picks?

1:08:27.040 --> 1:08:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Why not?

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'd love to, I'd love to. I'd love

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:35.639
<v Speaker 5>to do the DiCaprio Pta pairing that inspired the Top five.

1:08:35.680 --> 1:08:37.400
<v Speaker 5>Why not go ahead and use it for one of

1:08:37.439 --> 1:08:38.280
<v Speaker 5>my picks?

1:08:38.520 --> 1:08:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like it fun. I'll steer away from that

1:08:41.560 --> 1:08:44.519
<v Speaker 3>and let you have that one. Okay, thank you. You can.

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:46.840
<v Speaker 5>You can go with Wes Anderson and we'll have the

1:08:46.920 --> 1:08:52.880
<v Speaker 5>battle one battle about Anderson after another. You can send

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:55.719
<v Speaker 5>your actor director combo picks to feedback at film spotting

1:08:55.760 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 5>dot net, and yes, we would love to share some

1:08:58.640 --> 1:09:02.160
<v Speaker 5>on next weeks show. Also next week results and your

1:09:02.200 --> 1:09:06.200
<v Speaker 5>comments from the current deeply flawed and deeply difficult Film

1:09:06.200 --> 1:09:09.360
<v Speaker 5>Spotting poll. I said, you know, it's actually not a

1:09:09.400 --> 1:09:12.720
<v Speaker 5>deeply flawed poll. It's a really good one when it

1:09:12.800 --> 1:09:18.000
<v Speaker 5>feels impossible to answer and I will stall and procrastinate

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:20.760
<v Speaker 5>and do almost anything to avoid answering it.

1:09:20.800 --> 1:09:23.040
<v Speaker 3>You agreed. The other way you know it's.

1:09:22.880 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 5>A really, really good poll is when the answers are

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:33.640
<v Speaker 5>almost evenly split. I have not looked at the results, Josh,

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:37.519
<v Speaker 5>in about five days, so it's possible that it has changed,

1:09:37.560 --> 1:09:39.880
<v Speaker 5>that there's been a shift, But the last time I

1:09:39.920 --> 1:09:43.599
<v Speaker 5>looked it was about thirty three thirty three thirty three,

1:09:43.680 --> 1:09:47.200
<v Speaker 5>And in fact, right now, wow, the number one answer

1:09:47.240 --> 1:09:49.679
<v Speaker 5>has has taken a little bit more of a lead,

1:09:49.720 --> 1:09:55.240
<v Speaker 5>but it's currently thirty six thirty three thirty Yeah, think.

1:09:55.160 --> 1:09:58.759
<v Speaker 3>About difficult, deeply difficult, not deeply flawed.

1:09:59.479 --> 1:10:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay, you can still vote at filmspotting dot net and yes,

1:10:03.280 --> 1:10:04.920
<v Speaker 5>we would love for you to leave a comment. We

1:10:05.000 --> 1:10:08.720
<v Speaker 5>might share your thoughts on air. If you'd like to

1:10:08.760 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 5>see our current show schedule, some of the episodes we

1:10:11.760 --> 1:10:14.519
<v Speaker 5>have planned, the reviews we have coming up. Go to

1:10:14.560 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 5>filmspotting dot net and click on episodes.

1:10:17.880 --> 1:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>We want to keep you up to date on what

1:10:19.840 --> 1:10:22.720
<v Speaker 3>they're doing on our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show,

1:10:22.760 --> 1:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>looking at cinema's present via its past. It's part two

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:29.920
<v Speaker 3>of their Till You Drop pairing. So this week they're

1:10:29.960 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 3>talking about the Stephen King adaptation The Long Walk, which

1:10:33.400 --> 1:10:37.120
<v Speaker 3>just came out. Previously, they set that conversation up by

1:10:37.160 --> 1:10:41.400
<v Speaker 3>looking at Sidney Pollack's nineteen sixty nine film They Shoot Horses,

1:10:41.439 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 3>don't they That one featuring Jane Fonda. New episodes of

1:10:45.320 --> 1:10:48.000
<v Speaker 3>The Next Picture Show drop every Tuesday, and you can

1:10:48.040 --> 1:10:49.920
<v Speaker 3>find them wherever you get your podcasts.

1:10:50.160 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 5>I want to mention one more time, maybe we'll get

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:55.920
<v Speaker 5>another plug in, but at least one Film Spotting family

1:10:55.920 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 5>member posted in the discord they heard me plug this

1:10:58.200 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 5>last week, Josh, and they must be somewhat in the

1:11:01.080 --> 1:11:05.240
<v Speaker 5>area because they heard the promotion and said that sounds great.

1:11:05.840 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 5>I got to get a pass. I'm going to Refocus.

1:11:08.720 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 5>If you're anywhere in the vicinity of Iowa City, Iowa

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:17.839
<v Speaker 5>Film Scene is having their fourth annual Refocus Film Festival,

1:11:17.920 --> 1:11:21.960
<v Speaker 5>celebrating the art of adaptation. It's October ninth through the twelfth,

1:11:22.000 --> 1:11:24.800
<v Speaker 5>and you can come see a live taping of a

1:11:24.880 --> 1:11:29.840
<v Speaker 5>film spotting Top five segment Friday, October tenth, four thirty pm.

1:11:30.080 --> 1:11:32.679
<v Speaker 5>That will be with me, And since I can't record

1:11:32.680 --> 1:11:34.599
<v Speaker 5>with you, I'm going to bring on, you know, our

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:39.759
<v Speaker 5>great third Wheel, our regular third Wheel, Michael Phillips, will.

1:11:39.520 --> 1:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Be taping that with me.

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:45.679
<v Speaker 5>We are going to share our top five Iowa writers,

1:11:45.800 --> 1:11:50.479
<v Speaker 5>basically grads of the famed Iowa Writers' Workshop or people

1:11:51.120 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 5>people who were born in Iowa the films that have

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:57.800
<v Speaker 5>been adapted from their works. One of the things I'll say,

1:11:57.840 --> 1:12:00.840
<v Speaker 5>we haven't totally ruled this out yet. I guess I

1:12:00.840 --> 1:12:02.800
<v Speaker 5>haven't made a ruling, but I think I know where

1:12:02.800 --> 1:12:06.719
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to lean. What you have to also consider

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:08.720
<v Speaker 5>is what do you do with people who are famous

1:12:08.920 --> 1:12:12.360
<v Speaker 5>for teaching at the Iowa Writers' Workshop, not that there's

1:12:12.400 --> 1:12:15.280
<v Speaker 5>a lot of great film adaptations of his work, but

1:12:15.760 --> 1:12:18.160
<v Speaker 5>if you go that route it opens you up to

1:12:18.200 --> 1:12:23.080
<v Speaker 5>all of Kurt Vonnegut's adaptations, for example Josh. So you

1:12:23.120 --> 1:12:27.360
<v Speaker 5>know there's different criteria you could include. But some great

1:12:27.360 --> 1:12:29.920
<v Speaker 5>films I mentioned last week, The new Park Chinook film

1:12:30.280 --> 1:12:33.479
<v Speaker 5>is playing. The new film Train Dream starring Joel Edgerton

1:12:33.840 --> 1:12:38.080
<v Speaker 5>is playing at the fest. The Zodiac Killer Project new

1:12:38.400 --> 1:12:42.280
<v Speaker 5>documentary from Charlie Shackleton which is very grill and trying. Yeah,

1:12:42.360 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 5>playing at the fest, so worth getting a pass. If

1:12:45.160 --> 1:12:48.120
<v Speaker 5>you're in the area, please do check it out. Refocus

1:12:48.320 --> 1:12:49.920
<v Speaker 5>Film Festival dot org.

1:12:50.920 --> 1:12:53.040
<v Speaker 7>We all want to stay in the know, especially when

1:12:53.080 --> 1:12:55.240
<v Speaker 7>it comes to our money. With the US Bank Smartley

1:12:55.320 --> 1:12:58.080
<v Speaker 7>sweet you take control and make confident money moves while

1:12:58.080 --> 1:13:01.120
<v Speaker 7>staying connected to your finances. The US Bank Smartley Suite

1:13:01.240 --> 1:13:03.439
<v Speaker 7>lets you bundle your checking, savings and credit card in

1:13:03.479 --> 1:13:06.400
<v Speaker 7>one place, working together to give you more. As part

1:13:06.400 --> 1:13:09.160
<v Speaker 7>of the US Banks Martley Suite, you'll unlock tailored rates

1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:12.080
<v Speaker 7>and awards just by bundling your accounts. Switch today and

1:13:12.120 --> 1:13:14.680
<v Speaker 7>get financial tools built to grow with you. When our

1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:18.160
<v Speaker 7>Bank Smartley solutions meet your financial goals, we are stronger together.

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 7>That's the power of us. Member FDIC.

1:13:20.840 --> 1:13:24.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's embarrass ourselves with some Massacre theater. This

1:13:24.400 --> 1:13:26.640
<v Speaker 3>is where we perform a scene and you get a

1:13:26.720 --> 1:13:30.640
<v Speaker 3>chance to win a film spotting prize. Last time, was

1:13:30.680 --> 1:13:34.040
<v Speaker 3>this the video debut of Massacre Theater? Adam that I

1:13:34.080 --> 1:13:37.840
<v Speaker 3>think there's an addition to floating somewhere with video on

1:13:37.880 --> 1:13:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the end.

1:13:38.240 --> 1:13:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but really the official debut. And yes, you have

1:13:41.760 --> 1:13:44.240
<v Speaker 5>me totally self conscious now, but that's fine.

1:13:44.280 --> 1:13:47.680
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to that. All right. Well, last time we

1:13:47.800 --> 1:13:49.679
<v Speaker 3>massacred this scene smoking to your.

1:13:58.040 --> 1:14:05.400
<v Speaker 5>We're on a flowers math. He's already on us.

1:14:10.200 --> 1:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, this is Tom Cruise and Miles Tuller in twenty

1:14:15.080 --> 1:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty two's Top Gun Maverick, written by Eric Warren Singer,

1:14:19.360 --> 1:14:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Krueger, and Christopher McCrory and directed by Joseph Kasinski.

1:14:24.120 --> 1:14:27.000
<v Speaker 3>That massacre was part of our five Years Five Movies show.

1:14:27.120 --> 1:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>A couple weeks back. We also had reviews of Spinal

1:14:29.960 --> 1:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Tap two and the History of Sound on that show.

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:36.479
<v Speaker 3>There is always a tie in. So why that scene

1:14:36.560 --> 1:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>from Top Gun Maverick?

1:14:39.160 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, Alexa Debly has the answer. I believe the Masacer

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Theater was Top Gun Maverick. The tie in would be

1:14:46.120 --> 1:14:48.559
<v Speaker 5>a movie sequel that was released years and ay decades

1:14:48.640 --> 1:14:51.720
<v Speaker 5>after the original was released, as is the case with

1:14:51.800 --> 1:14:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Spinal Tap two. And I'm just going to put this

1:14:53.920 --> 1:14:57.519
<v Speaker 5>out there so all the true tap heads get it.

1:14:58.400 --> 1:15:03.519
<v Speaker 5>Are you sure it's deubly and not doubly? There you go, Josh,

1:15:03.560 --> 1:15:04.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure they appreciated that.

1:15:05.479 --> 1:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Yep. Here's David Allen who said it's got to be

1:15:09.280 --> 1:15:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Top Gun Maverick. Here are the connections. One, Like Spinal

1:15:12.120 --> 1:15:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Tap two, this is a sequel that came many years

1:15:14.320 --> 1:15:17.879
<v Speaker 3>after its predecessor two. One could say Tom Cruise feels

1:15:17.920 --> 1:15:22.880
<v Speaker 3>like a continuation of Robert Redford's dashing smile and swagger.

1:15:23.000 --> 1:15:24.559
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. We may have to discuss on our

1:15:24.680 --> 1:15:29.599
<v Speaker 3>upcoming top five Robert Redford movies, Adam. David Allen's third point,

1:15:29.600 --> 1:15:32.759
<v Speaker 3>The Right Stuff has some thematic crossover with the Top

1:15:32.800 --> 1:15:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Gun movies, and I believe that came up on your list, Adam. Four.

1:15:37.520 --> 1:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Glenn Powell's next vehicle is The Running Man, which, like

1:15:40.520 --> 1:15:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Rear Window, is an examination of voyeur culture. Okay, Rear

1:15:45.920 --> 1:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Window on my list, that's right.

1:15:48.760 --> 1:15:51.720
<v Speaker 5>We close with Ron and Havertown, Pa. You both went

1:15:51.760 --> 1:15:54.280
<v Speaker 5>above and beyond on this Mascar theater. I laughed out

1:15:54.280 --> 1:15:56.439
<v Speaker 5>loud on hearing you both pretend to have masks on

1:15:56.840 --> 1:15:59.559
<v Speaker 5>playing out the pivotal ending scene where Tom Cruise, Maverick

1:15:59.560 --> 1:16:02.680
<v Speaker 5>and Miles Teller Rooster are in a dogfight against the

1:16:02.760 --> 1:16:05.320
<v Speaker 5>nameless bad guys flying next Gen Fighters.

1:16:05.760 --> 1:16:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for making my day.

1:16:07.240 --> 1:16:10.839
<v Speaker 5>You're welcome, Ron, You're welcome. Everyone you know who's not welcome,

1:16:10.920 --> 1:16:13.720
<v Speaker 5>all the people who just wrote in Top Gun the original,

1:16:13.880 --> 1:16:16.080
<v Speaker 5>it's not the original, it's the sequel. Josh, of course,

1:16:16.240 --> 1:16:19.959
<v Speaker 5>just like spinal TEP two our listeners, So, yeah.

1:16:19.800 --> 1:16:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine, Adam, if we had a prop budget, like,

1:16:22.800 --> 1:16:25.400
<v Speaker 3>how good we would have been if we had actual masks?

1:16:25.800 --> 1:16:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay not just use our hands maybe next time.

1:16:29.040 --> 1:16:33.960
<v Speaker 5>And yes, as at least one listener one entrant pointed out,

1:16:34.200 --> 1:16:37.000
<v Speaker 5>we did go with Cole for the name of Maverick,

1:16:37.080 --> 1:16:39.960
<v Speaker 5>referencing Cole Trickle from Days of Thunder. We went with

1:16:40.080 --> 1:16:46.240
<v Speaker 5>Andrew from Miles Teller's Rooster, a reference Yes to whip Lash, Josh,

1:16:46.280 --> 1:16:50.080
<v Speaker 5>reach into the not very brimming film spotting hat and

1:16:50.160 --> 1:16:51.599
<v Speaker 5>pick out this week's winner.

1:16:52.479 --> 1:16:55.519
<v Speaker 3>Our winner is David Zobel from Roswell, Georgia.

1:16:55.840 --> 1:16:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Congratulations David. Email feedback at Filmspotting dot net and we

1:16:59.360 --> 1:17:01.679
<v Speaker 5>will set you up your very own film Spotting t shirt,

1:17:01.960 --> 1:17:05.120
<v Speaker 5>film Spotting tote bag, or trial membership to the Film

1:17:05.160 --> 1:17:11.439
<v Speaker 5>Spotting Family Broadsheet. Journalists have described my impressions as stunningly accurate.

1:17:11.640 --> 1:17:12.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, they're wrong.

1:17:12.840 --> 1:17:14.599
<v Speaker 2>I've not heard you, Michael o kay, but I assume

1:17:14.640 --> 1:17:17.200
<v Speaker 2>it basically along the lines of I'm okai.

1:17:17.320 --> 1:17:18.559
<v Speaker 3>That is where you are so wrong.

1:17:20.680 --> 1:17:23.840
<v Speaker 5>We move on now to this week's edition of Massacre Theater.

1:17:24.000 --> 1:17:26.759
<v Speaker 5>I think the tie in is going to be pretty

1:17:26.760 --> 1:17:31.559
<v Speaker 5>obvious here, Josh. And we don't have any fancy sound

1:17:31.560 --> 1:17:36.360
<v Speaker 5>effects that we need to employ here, no masks that

1:17:36.400 --> 1:17:39.360
<v Speaker 5>we have to pretend to be putting on. Though Producer

1:17:39.360 --> 1:17:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Sam picked a scene that does involve throwing our voices

1:17:43.400 --> 1:17:45.719
<v Speaker 5>a bit, multiple voices.

1:17:45.840 --> 1:17:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's basically making us each play two characters. Yeah,

1:17:51.080 --> 1:17:54.679
<v Speaker 3>and you should enough each play a single character.

1:17:55.000 --> 1:17:58.000
<v Speaker 5>That's that's correct. I struggle playing myself every week. How

1:17:58.439 --> 1:18:00.240
<v Speaker 5>alo expect me to do this?

1:18:00.960 --> 1:18:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Apparently he thinks I've been about a month in in

1:18:04.000 --> 1:18:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the UK here, and I have a firm command. Yes,

1:18:07.240 --> 1:18:10.400
<v Speaker 3>of a British accent, but I'm up in Scotland. It's

1:18:10.439 --> 1:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>totally different saying I'm I have hearing people like this.

1:18:14.160 --> 1:18:17.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, come on, yeah, this is this is going

1:18:17.840 --> 1:18:20.599
<v Speaker 5>to be rough. It's going to be rough, but we're

1:18:20.600 --> 1:18:22.679
<v Speaker 5>going to go for it. You are going to hear

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:27.479
<v Speaker 5>us attempt multiple voices in at least one instance, maybe

1:18:27.560 --> 1:18:31.880
<v Speaker 5>maybe two back to back, and we are going to

1:18:31.960 --> 1:18:35.000
<v Speaker 5>change the names in a couple of cases, as we

1:18:35.560 --> 1:18:37.920
<v Speaker 5>are wont to do here on Masacre Theater.

1:18:38.040 --> 1:18:42.479
<v Speaker 3>Josh, you started off. Are you ready? Yeah, let's do it.

1:18:43.040 --> 1:18:50.600
<v Speaker 3>And action? Where are we? Canterbury? We're close? Anyone know

1:18:50.640 --> 1:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>if there's a hotel around here? What lind to promise me?

1:18:55.360 --> 1:18:58.120
<v Speaker 3>A little bit of action? You still like it in

1:18:58.160 --> 1:19:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the afternoon? Would you do rob a train, blow up

1:19:02.040 --> 1:19:06.559
<v Speaker 3>a building? You told me he was swavek as a drunk.

1:19:07.280 --> 1:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>He's suave. Should have seen him in the old days

1:19:09.920 --> 1:19:13.200
<v Speaker 3>when he was a real activist. You were an activist.

1:19:13.320 --> 1:19:14.639
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to get laid.

1:19:15.439 --> 1:19:17.479
<v Speaker 5>One time the police came to throw us out of

1:19:17.479 --> 1:19:20.560
<v Speaker 5>our squat and Dalton invited them up for coffee to negotiate.

1:19:20.840 --> 1:19:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Only coffee was spiked with ketamine.

1:19:23.880 --> 1:19:29.840
<v Speaker 3>And scene. See I played, we got I played an

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:31.599
<v Speaker 3>American there. That was easy.

1:19:32.520 --> 1:19:35.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that I performed otherwise. If you know

1:19:35.880 --> 1:19:38.760
<v Speaker 5>what film we just massacred, email the movie's title in

1:19:38.760 --> 1:19:41.040
<v Speaker 5>your name and location to feedback at filmspotting dot net.

1:19:41.040 --> 1:19:44.280
<v Speaker 5>Your deadline is Monday, October thirteenth. We'll select the winner

1:19:44.360 --> 1:19:48.040
<v Speaker 5>randomly from all the correct entries. I'm expecting just a

1:19:48.080 --> 1:19:51.720
<v Speaker 5>big full Film Spotting hat and announce it in a

1:19:51.800 --> 1:19:53.240
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks.

1:19:53.520 --> 1:19:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Josh, that's our show. If you want to connect with

1:19:57.040 --> 1:19:59.840
<v Speaker 3>us on social media, you can find Adam and the

1:19:59.840 --> 1:20:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Sho show on Instagram, Facebook, letterboxed, YouTube, all as film Spotting,

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm at those places, also hanging out on Blue Sky

1:20:09.240 --> 1:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>as Larsen on film. We are independently produced and listener supported.

1:20:14.560 --> 1:20:16.919
<v Speaker 3>You can support the show by joining the film Spotting

1:20:17.000 --> 1:20:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Family at filmspottingfamily dot com. You can listen early and

1:20:21.479 --> 1:20:24.720
<v Speaker 3>ad free. You'll also get a weekly newsletter from producer

1:20:24.800 --> 1:20:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Sam monthly bonus episodes our latest just went out, as

1:20:29.280 --> 1:20:32.639
<v Speaker 3>well as access to the entire show archive. For show

1:20:32.680 --> 1:20:35.920
<v Speaker 3>t shirts and other merch go to film spotting dot

1:20:36.000 --> 1:20:37.320
<v Speaker 3>net slash.

1:20:36.840 --> 1:20:41.559
<v Speaker 5>Shop in that film Spotting archive, you can get past

1:20:41.840 --> 1:20:45.679
<v Speaker 5>Paul Thomas Anderson conversations like our review of Liquorice Pizza

1:20:45.720 --> 1:20:48.759
<v Speaker 5>eight fifty three, Phantom Thread that was episode six sixty

1:20:48.800 --> 1:20:51.960
<v Speaker 5>four in here and weis episode five seventeen. The Master

1:20:52.520 --> 1:20:55.439
<v Speaker 5>was episode four fifteen. There Will Be Blood episode one

1:20:55.520 --> 1:20:59.280
<v Speaker 5>ninety three. The more in depth conversation was for its

1:20:59.280 --> 1:21:03.280
<v Speaker 5>tenth annivers episode six fifty eight, and we talked about

1:21:03.280 --> 1:21:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Magnolia on episode seven point fifty two. That was part

1:21:06.920 --> 1:21:08.800
<v Speaker 5>of our nine from ninety nine series, and we just

1:21:08.840 --> 1:21:11.479
<v Speaker 5>put that back in our feed a little from the

1:21:11.680 --> 1:21:14.960
<v Speaker 5>archive episode just this past week, so you can find

1:21:15.040 --> 1:21:19.439
<v Speaker 5>that available to all listeners in the main film Spotting feed.

1:21:20.080 --> 1:21:22.479
<v Speaker 3>Quick note, Adam, as you were going through that list,

1:21:22.600 --> 1:21:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I meant to say, while we were reviewing one battle

1:21:25.040 --> 1:21:28.040
<v Speaker 3>after another and talking about the humor Phantom Thread, you

1:21:28.080 --> 1:21:31.240
<v Speaker 3>know underrated for how funny it is. You're very dry,

1:21:31.680 --> 1:21:33.240
<v Speaker 3>very dry, but quite hilarious.

1:21:33.439 --> 1:21:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Yes, almost anytime or Woodcock admonishes, anyone is high comedy

1:21:39.680 --> 1:21:40.479
<v Speaker 5>right exactly?

1:21:40.640 --> 1:21:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

1:21:41.040 --> 1:21:44.799
<v Speaker 5>Okay, streaming or out vod you can see play Dirty.

1:21:44.920 --> 1:21:48.080
<v Speaker 5>This is La Keith Stanfield and Keegan Michael Key, written

1:21:48.080 --> 1:21:50.280
<v Speaker 5>and directed by Shane Black, in order to score a

1:21:50.280 --> 1:21:53.440
<v Speaker 5>major Heisen expert thief played by Mark Wahlberg must outsmart

1:21:53.439 --> 1:21:56.519
<v Speaker 5>a South American dictator, the New York Mob, and the

1:21:56.520 --> 1:22:00.960
<v Speaker 5>World's Richest Man. Okay, I'm curious. The Lost Bus is out.

1:22:01.040 --> 1:22:03.519
<v Speaker 5>Paul Greengrass has a new movie out, Josh. A man

1:22:03.560 --> 1:22:07.559
<v Speaker 5>rescues a teacher and her students from a wildfire with

1:22:07.800 --> 1:22:12.439
<v Speaker 5>Matthew McConaughey and America Ferrera. Huh been a while since

1:22:12.439 --> 1:22:17.240
<v Speaker 5>we've heard from Yeah, mister Greengrass obviously very interested in

1:22:17.280 --> 1:22:20.559
<v Speaker 5>this one. Anemone. Daniel day Lewis returns to the screen

1:22:20.640 --> 1:22:24.599
<v Speaker 5>in Son Ronan's feature directing debut, Hope to catch up

1:22:24.640 --> 1:22:28.720
<v Speaker 5>with that one good boy. As dark entities threaten his

1:22:28.800 --> 1:22:31.719
<v Speaker 5>human companion, a dog must fight to protect the one

1:22:31.760 --> 1:22:35.200
<v Speaker 5>he loves most. Yes, it's a horror movie, Josh told

1:22:35.200 --> 1:22:39.280
<v Speaker 5>from the perspective of the family dog. Indy Wire gives

1:22:39.280 --> 1:22:42.040
<v Speaker 5>it four and a half stars, saying one of the

1:22:42.120 --> 1:22:45.400
<v Speaker 5>year's scariest movies and one that doubles as a tribute

1:22:45.439 --> 1:22:47.840
<v Speaker 5>to the bond between people and their four legged friends.

1:22:48.200 --> 1:22:51.439
<v Speaker 3>This is killing me. I was going to try to

1:22:51.439 --> 1:22:53.400
<v Speaker 3>fit this in at him and then, as you know,

1:22:53.439 --> 1:22:56.200
<v Speaker 3>and listeners and viewers probably can tell got hit with

1:22:56.240 --> 1:22:59.479
<v Speaker 3>a bug and have been down and out so had

1:22:59.520 --> 1:23:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to take it off the viewing list. But man, come on,

1:23:01.960 --> 1:23:04.680
<v Speaker 3>that sounds great. You know you want to see that?

1:23:05.280 --> 1:23:07.280
<v Speaker 5>Can you see that? Or is that one that maybe

1:23:07.320 --> 1:23:08.320
<v Speaker 5>you can get a screen or two.

1:23:09.000 --> 1:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I was going to ask for a screener, lank, but

1:23:11.040 --> 1:23:13.719
<v Speaker 3>maybe it'll maybe it'll get a release around these parts

1:23:13.760 --> 1:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>as well. Okay, happy end.

1:23:15.800 --> 1:23:19.000
<v Speaker 5>This is a feature debut from Japanese American director Neo Sora,

1:23:19.280 --> 1:23:22.880
<v Speaker 5>a near future japan bracist for a devastating earthquake. Mitchell

1:23:22.920 --> 1:23:26.320
<v Speaker 5>bo Pray, our friend says, maybe the best looking film

1:23:26.400 --> 1:23:30.840
<v Speaker 5>of the year. Also outlimited is Predators, the documentary recommended

1:23:30.880 --> 1:23:34.439
<v Speaker 5>by me earlier in the show. GoldenEye is being re

1:23:34.439 --> 1:23:39.120
<v Speaker 5>released for its anniversary. And very eager to see this one.

1:23:39.240 --> 1:23:43.639
<v Speaker 5>Benny Safdi's solo directed The Smashing Machine. It's the story

1:23:43.640 --> 1:23:48.400
<v Speaker 5>of MMA fighter Mark Kerr starring Dwayne Johnson. Hope to

1:23:48.439 --> 1:23:51.599
<v Speaker 5>see that one. But next week we are planning our

1:23:51.600 --> 1:23:55.400
<v Speaker 5>top five actor director combos. We'd like to see. If

1:23:55.439 --> 1:23:59.360
<v Speaker 5>you've got a pairing you want us to consider or

1:23:59.840 --> 1:24:02.080
<v Speaker 5>just want us to read on air, send it our

1:24:02.120 --> 1:24:04.120
<v Speaker 5>way feedback at filmspotting dot net.

1:24:05.120 --> 1:24:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Disso and Sam

1:24:08.479 --> 1:24:12.000
<v Speaker 3>van Holgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go.

1:24:12.439 --> 1:24:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar. Special thanks to everyone

1:24:16.400 --> 1:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>at wbeazy Chicago. More information is available at wbez dot

1:24:21.880 --> 1:24:25.639
<v Speaker 3>org for film Spotting, I'm Josh Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar.

1:24:25.800 --> 1:24:26.599
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.

1:24:26.720 --> 1:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

1:24:30.600 --> 1:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>The burn.

1:24:47.600 --> 1:24:50.559
<v Speaker 5>Film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting Family

1:24:50.600 --> 1:24:53.519
<v Speaker 5>at film spottingfamily dot com and get access to ad

1:24:53.560 --> 1:24:56.960
<v Speaker 5>free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and for

1:24:57.000 --> 1:24:59.639
<v Speaker 5>the first time, all into one place, the entire film

1:24:59.640 --> 1:25:02.360
<v Speaker 5>Spotting archive going back to two thousand and five. That's

1:25:02.400 --> 1:25:09.560
<v Speaker 5>a film Spotting Family dot com pantibly h