WEBVTT - COVID-19 Chapter 1: Virology

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>My name is Titiano. I'm from the northeast of Italy.

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I live in a small town in the northeast. I'm

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a school teacher. I teach English in a secondary school here.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>In February there was all the attention was on a

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of tourists going around and so on. Then on

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first, we got our first cases here in Italy.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>They were limited to a small number of towns in

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the north. What happened was that following week it was

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a short Tuesday, so schools were already closed for a

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of days. So over the course of that weekend,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the first ten or so towns were quarantined and all

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the schools in the north were closed. What happened next

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is that the regions asked for and got an extension

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of the closure of the schools. So it's been three

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>full weeks now since schools have closed, and there's another

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>three weeks planned ahead of us. At least I'm at

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>school teacher, so it's been not easy to cope with

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all of this. So the thing is, the schools stopped,

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>but the rest of the country went on. But things

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>started moving fast. So we are now under this lockdown

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>which means that we cannot leave our homes unless it's

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for either work reasons or basic needs. Kind of a

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>soft lockdown, because we can actually move, but we have

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>to provide some sort of declaration of written statement for

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason why we are out of our homes. Until

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the government came out with the lockdown, I think people

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't really appreciate what that meant. And so it was

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just a few days before that that there were still

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>parties going on and restaurants and so on for the

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>let's say, for the lockdown we are under now. So

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if I was to you know, go out small without

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a good reason, So if police is going to stop

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you and check your statement, so if it's for worksons,

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they are going to call your workplace and that so

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a fine or you could face charges. You

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>could go to jail, but that's only for extreme cases

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>after the last regulations. So this past week, I think

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that people are taking the thing more seriously and from

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what I see from my immediate vicinity and people I know,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to embrace the social distancing and so

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we are moving to skype calls with friends and we're

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the indoors life as much as you can,

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and as a school teacher I maybe have a slightly

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>different perspective than most other people because we started from

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning to find ways to still keep doing

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>school in some form, but there wasn't really a plan

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for that, so a lot of it was left to

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>our own you know, creativity and good will to do things.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.799
<v Speaker 1>There are there are still issues with that. The first

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>one is that it's very hard to keep in touch

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>with all our students because of course not everybody is available,

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>not everybody has the same resources, and it's hard and

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's impact families, especially families where the parents are still

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>working and so they need to take care of the children.

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Traditionally here families are very close knit and this was

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>something that often grandparents did. But parents are of course

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most impacted categories for the yeah for

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the virus, so that that has raised some issues. We

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have one of those flash mobs on the balconies every

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>day basically, you know, I mean a small town, so

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of houses around here. Every day

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's someone either playing songs or the other day they

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>were tapping for the people in the medical professions, which

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>are doing a great job and taking Dublin gifts to

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>cover every everything. So that's that's good. There's this other

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that's going on now, which is the kids are

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>making these rainbow paintings and with an action that is basic,

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>everything will be fine in Italian and they are, you know,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>sharing those pictures on the social media. This is bringing

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of you know, good things. I see

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that really people care, people care about their neighborhoods, people

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>care about what's going on. That's a big thing. H

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>h yah m m m hm hm h.

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You just heard from Tiziano, who was kind enough to

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 2>spare us a few minutes to chat about his experiences

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 2>while under lockdown in Italy. Thanks so much for chatting

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 2>with us.

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we really appreciate it.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Hi.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm Erin alman Updyke and.

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to this podcast will kill you?

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes you are?

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You are?

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Welcome to our first ever minisode series, which we're

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>calling Anatomy of a Pandemic, and which is shaping up

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>to be less of minisodes and more like full length ones.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's Maxiodes.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, not sorry, I don't know.

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>It's long strap in.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of information out there, and there's a

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of ground to be covered, so you know, we're

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna do the best we can. And this is this

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>is the first ep episode of six that we're dropping

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>all at once, but throughout this pandemic, as it progresses,

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 2>we're going to keep revisiting different topics or visiting new

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>topics to get you all the information that you could

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 2>ever want about COVID nineteen yep. So we asked everyone

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>out there for questions, and hundreds of you submitted your questions.

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So first of all, thank you so very much because

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>that really helped us to figure out what you wanted

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>to know and how to organize these episodes, and so

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>we are so excited to bring you not one, but

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>six of these episodes where we ask the experts to

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 2>answer your questions.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 3>So today we're starting with chapter one, the virus itself,

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 3>and that's what we're going to cover in this episode.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 3>But before we get started, we have to report, of

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>course that if ever it was quarantin any time, right

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 3>now is most definitely quarantine time.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Most definitely.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 3>Quarantinies have been making the rounds in social media, and

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>first of all, we appreciate everyone shouting us out in that,

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 3>yeah we do. So what are we drinking today?

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Erin, we are drinking what we're just calling Quarantini one,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>because you know, let's keep it simple.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 3>We'll keep it simple. Disclaimer, if you're going to listen

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 3>to all six of these episodes in one sitting, you

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.599
<v Speaker 3>don't need to make all six Quarantinies.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>That's probably a bad idea, I personally, So I'm recording this.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 2>It's eight my time, and I'm drinking coffee.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 3>It's ten am my time. I'm drinking water. But I

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 3>did drink at Quarantini last night while researching.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I drank a couple while taking the pictures of them all.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 2>It's important you gotta taste us.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>So what is Quarantini number one?

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Erin?

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Quarantine number one has rum, it has coconut cream, it

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>has lime juice, and and you know, we wanted to

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 2>make these so that hopefully they are things that you

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 2>might have lying around the house, more simple ingredients and

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>so on. But I will suggest if you happen to

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 2>have Apricot licour pop, some of that in there as well.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 3>If your bar card is as well stocked as Aaron Welshit.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Apricot licour is really good in tiki drinks. Yeah, that's

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>all I would say.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 3>I believe you.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>We will post the recipe for that quarantini Quarantini one,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 2>as well as the non alcoholic Placy burrita on all

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of our social media pages and our website. Excellent.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>So, so, way back in February, which feels honestly like

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>an entire lifetime ago, we did a whole episode about

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 2>coronaviruses in general, and so we wanted to give you

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a really quick recap on that. All right, So, coronaviruses

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 2>are not brand new alien viruses. There are large family

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 2>viruses that infect a number of different animals. SARS COVID two,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>which stands for Severe Acute Respiratory syndrome coronavirus number two,

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 2>which is a little bit of a mouthful. This is

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the official name for the virus that causes the disease,

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 2>COVID nineteen. You can break that down to see where

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>that comes from. It's coronavirus disease nineteen COVID nineteen. And

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 2>so this is a virus that is new to humans

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and it emerged, as it turns out, or as it

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 2>likely turns out, in November twenty nineteen. Obviously, this is

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>now a pandemic, and so we are going to talk

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 2>in this episode about the biology of this new virus

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and some of the characteristics that have allowed it or

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>facilitated it to reach pandemic proportions exactly.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 3>So let's do a quick primer about viruses in general,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 3>especially for any new listeners who haven't heard all of

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 3>my many virus spiels many times over. So, viruses are

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 3>essentially just packets of genetic material. They're made of either

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 3>DNA or RNA along with protein. Viruses can't replicate on

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 3>their own, so unlike most bacteria, for example, which can

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 3>multiply just by replicating their DNA and then dividing into two,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 3>viruses have to infect a cell of some kind, a

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 3>host cell, and use that host cellular machinery to actually

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 3>replicate their genetic material. So, in the case of SARS

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 3>covy two, this is an RNA virus. It's a positive

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>strand RNA virus. So that means that once it gets

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>into your cells, that viral RNA is released into our

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 3>human cells, and then our cells do two things with

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 3>this RNA number One, they start copying it directly as

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 3>if it was our own RNA. And number two, what

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 3>RNA does in normal cell is it codes for protein.

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 3>So our cells start to use this viral RNA to

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 3>make the proteins that that viral RNA codes for, and

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>then the replicated RNA plus those proteins get assembled into

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 3>new little virus packets, okay, and those new viruses can

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>then burst forth from the cell and go on to

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 3>infect another cell, either in your body or in another host.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>So that's how RNA viruses work. DNA viruses do essentially

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the same thing, except that in order to make protein

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 3>from DNA, your cells have to first translate it into

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that RNA. So RNA viruses sort of skip that step,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and as you'll hear our expert talk more about, they

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 3>also tend to make more mistakes in that process of replication.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 3>But either way, viruses are using your host machinery to

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 3>do this. They can't replicate outside of host cells.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Cool.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Cool.

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>So in this episode, we talk to a virologist, doctor

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Angela Rasmussen from Columbia University, to answer your questions about

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the biology of this virus, how it works, how it

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>infects your cells, and what markers it uses to get

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 2>into our cells, and then we also chat about its

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 2>mutation rate and what that means for disease severity, to

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>its longevity on surfaces, and whether the existence of multiple

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>strains is a concern.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 3>So she'll introduce herself to you right after this break.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm doctor Angela Rasmussen. I'm on the faculty at the

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Center for Infection and Immunity at the Columbia Mailman School

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 4>of Public Health. I'm a virologist who studies I specialize

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 4>in studying the host response to infection. So when you

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 4>get infected with a virus, your body responds to that

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 4>there's an immune response, an inflammatory response. Sometimes there can

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 4>be metabolic responses and I study those and sometimes those responses,

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 4>depending on what they are, can mean the difference between

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 4>getting rid of an infection and having a mild short

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 4>illness versus having a chronic illness or a more severe disease.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 4>So the viruses that I've been studying lately are ebolavirus,

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 4>MERSED coronavirus, influenza virus, other hemorrhagic fever viruses, and of course,

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 4>now like many of my colleagues, I'm also studying SARS

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 4>coronavirus two our COVID nineteen.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>That is the reason that we've brought you on today.

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 2>So thank you so much, first of all for agreeing

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>to be on the podcast. And yeah, so jumping right

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>into the sarskov two, what are the origins of this virus?

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Where did it come from?

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>So we don't know for sure, and I suspect that

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be my answer to almost every single

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>one of your questions today. But we do know that

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 4>there was a very very similar virus found in a

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 4>bat in a cave in China in twenty seventeen. And

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 4>this virus is a member of the same genus as

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Stars coronavirus or SARS classic and SARS coronavirus to this

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 4>novel coronavirus that we're all dealing with now. There are

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 4>a number of these viruses that have been discovered. They're

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 4>called bat sars like coronaviruses, very clever original name because

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 4>they are very much genetically like SARS coronavirus and now

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 4>SARS coronavirus too. We do know that this virus, probably

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 4>based on our analysis of the genome, evolved from a

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 4>rus one of these batsars like coronaviruses. We don't know

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.719
<v Speaker 4>if there was another animal involved in the spread of

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 4>this virus from its wildlife reservoir the animal that had

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 4>it in the wild to humans. What we do know

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 4>is that this spillover, which is the transmission of a

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 4>virus from its wildlife reservoir into humans, was probably a

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 4>single event, meaning that there weren't multiple instances of animals

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 4>infecting people. After the first patient or patients weren't infected

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 4>with this from whatever animal it came from, it's been

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>transmitted human to human ever since. The reason why it's

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 4>important to understand eventually if this came directly from a

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 4>bat or if it came from a different animal is

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 4>that both STARS classic and MERS coronaviruses were amplified in

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 4>an intermediate species, so both stars and mers are thought

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 4>to have also originated in bats. However, SARS classic was

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 4>transmitted into humans most likely from an animal called a civet,

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 4>and murrs. Coronavirus is known to be transmitted primarily from

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 4>dromedary camels to humans, so we don't know if there

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 4>was another animal in between the bat and the human

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 4>that also was involved in the spillover from its wildlife reservoir.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 2>To follow up on that, So you mentioned that this

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 2>likely came from one spillover event, So from one infected animal,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 2>whether it was a bat or a different intermediate host

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>into a human. How can we tell whether it's one

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>spillover event or multiple.

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you can tell that by looking at the genome.

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 4>And one thing that's been really incredible and also really

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 4>hard to keep up with about this particular epidemic is

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 4>that this is really the first time that we've had

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>sequence data from the virus genome really really soon after

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 4>the first patients were reported, So the first viral sequences

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 4>were uploaded and shared with the international scientific community in

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 4>early January. So we've been able to analyze the genome

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 4>of this virus since before we actually were able to

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.239
<v Speaker 4>even isolate the virus. So we can look at the

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 4>genome of this virus, and we can look at the

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 4>specific individual changes in one isolate of the virus versus another,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 4>and by looking at those changes, we can deduce how

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 4>many different viruses came out of the bats versus went

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 4>from person to person. There are specific genetic signatures that

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 4>are associated in many cases with bat coronaviruses and coronaviruses

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 4>that are transmitted with in bats, including some sequences that

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 4>are part of the envelope glycoprotein which is called spike,

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 4>and that molecule is on the surface of the virus

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 4>and it allows the virus to enter a cell that

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 4>it's going to infect. That protein spike has changes sometimes

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 4>that are specific to bats versus specific to humans, and

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 4>we can look at that as well to determine how

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 4>recently the virus emerged from a bat versus emerged from

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 4>a human.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Awesome, thank you?

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Did that make sense? Okay? Yes, absolutely, okay, good.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 3>So kind of along those lines of the proteins on

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the surface, are those related to how the virus gets

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>in and actually causes disease. What do we know about

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the mechanism of how this virus causes disease in humans?

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 4>So that's a very excellent question because it gets into

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 4>what I study the host response. So there are two

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 4>things to any virus infection. To keep in mind, the

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 4>virus can infect cells, and that determines whether it can

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 4>establish an infection get inside, versus the viruses what we

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 4>call pathogenicity, or ability to cause disease. Not all viruses

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 4>cause severe disease. Some viruses, most viruses that can cause disease,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 4>which we call pathogens. Those pathogens in some people will

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 4>cause very mild disease and in some will cause very

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 4>severe disease, and we're seeing that in terms of the

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 4>fairly broad range of disease presentations of COVID nineteen. So

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 4>the ability to get into the cell is just one part.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 4>And of course, in order to cause disease, a virus

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 4>has to be able to infect the cell. So those

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 4>proteins on the surface of the cell or on the

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 4>surface of the virus particle called spike. Spike binds the

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 4>host cellular receptor, which is in humans. The molecule we

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 4>know about anyways is called ACE two, and ACE two

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 4>is on a variety of different tissues, but there's a

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.239
<v Speaker 4>lot of it in your lungs, which is why this

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 4>causes a pulmonary disease. So certainly in that sense, the

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 4>virus spike protein is involved in determining that this is

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 4>going to be a pulmonary disease. Similarly, we know that

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 4>ACE two is expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, and there

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 4>have been reports that infectious virus has been found in

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 4>the stool of some patients. Also, people have reported diarrhea,

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 4>which may again suggest that the ability to infect the

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 4>intestine because of that receptor binding the spike protein on

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 4>the surface of the virus particle allows this virus to

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 4>cause a gastrointestinal disease. But when you're talking about what

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 4>is the difference between a virus in two different people,

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 4>causing a mild cold like illness in one person versus

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 4>causing severe pneumonia in another, that difference is often related

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 4>to to the host response, and that can be determined

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 4>by a lot of different things. It can be determined

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 4>by genetics, It can be determined by the health state

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 4>of that individual, which we again already know as a

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 4>risk factor because people with pre existing medical conditions are

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 4>more susceptible to severe disease. So really a lot of

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 4>the disease is likely caused by a sort of out

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 4>of control inflammatory response in infected tissues, and that largely

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 4>depends on the person who's infected, as well as their

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 4>overall health condition and sometimes the circumstances in which they're infected.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>That was so.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Beautiful, such a great answer.

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thank you. I get passionate about the host response.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>So recently, there was a paper that was published that

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 2>found that there were two strains of the virus, and

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 2>they named these strains L and S. And these strains,

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 2>according to this paper, seem to differ in their very life,

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 2>one being more aggressive than the other. And this finding

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>has seemed to be a little bit controversial. So can

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 2>you talk about why it is controversial and whether the

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.959
<v Speaker 2>possibility of multiple strains is a real concern and maybe

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 2>whether this finding is actually valid. Are there multiple strains

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>of stars kov two?

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Right? So this definitely gets down into the an inherent

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 4>property of RNA viruses like coronaviruses, and that is that

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>every time the virus copies its own genome in order

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 4>to replicate or make more viruses, the virus makes mistakes.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 4>The enzyme that copies the genome does not have proofreading

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 4>capability the way that the analogous enzymes that we have

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 4>that copy our DNA genomes do, so that means that

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 4>the virus makes mistakes. We call these mutations. Many of

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 4>these mutations are silent, they don't have any effect on

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 4>the way the virus works. Many more of them will

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 4>have a negative effect on the way the virus works

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 4>and make it so that the virus can't work essentially,

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 4>and some of them will confer an advantage. These mutations

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 4>occur randomly, so there has to be a selection pressure

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 4>to maintain mutations from generation to generation. And some of

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 4>these advantages can be an enhancedability to replicate in various

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 4>host cells. It can be the ability to evade the

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 4>host immune response. It can be something that would make

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 4>the virus more capable of infecting cells or capable of

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 4>inducing a response that would lead to more severe disease.

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 4>So right now we don't know what a lot of

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 4>those theoretical mutations would be that could make the virus

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 4>more virulent, capable of infecting more cells, or more pathogenic,

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 4>capable of causing more intense disease. The paper that you

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 4>mentioned is controversial because essentially it's grouping these two viruses

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 4>into what they're calling strains. But what are normal groupings

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 4>of RNA viruses that have replicated in multiple hosts. What

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 4>makes a virus a strain a different strain often depends

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 4>a lot on which virus you're talking about. In this case,

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 4>if we're talking about two different genotypes or virus genomes

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 4>that encode virus genes that result in differential disease or

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 4>more severe disease in one person versus less in another.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Whether that's a strain or not is sort of up

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 4>for debate. What I think is controversial about this paper

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 4>is that essentially they were just grouping a variety of

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 4>different clinical isolates of the virus and then going back

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 4>to the clinical data that have been recorded about those

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 4>patients and making assumptions that these genetic changes is that

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 4>distinguished these two groups were responsible for any differences they

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 4>found in the patient's conditions. That is, it's really hard

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 4>to say, first of all, the group the viruses and

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 4>the L group versus I think, what is it the

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 4>S group. Yeah, the differences between those viruses, they're not

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 4>all it's not just two viruses. They're groups of viruses

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 4>that cluster together when you look at their genomes and

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 4>compare them. So it's really difficult to say that any

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 4>one of the specific genomic changes that are characteristic of

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 4>either group are directly responsible for causing increased or decreased disease.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 4>Severity gotcha.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's possible or likely that there might be multiple

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote strains of this virus, but whether or not

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 2>that translates into any manifestations in terms of disease. Disease

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 2>severity is not yet clear and we probably won't know

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>it for a while.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's fair to say. And this is really also

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 4>a question that needs to be addressed in terms of

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 4>doing experiments to understand what are our features of the

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 4>virus that make it more pathogenic or able to cause disease.

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 4>So the only way to really look at that is

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 4>either through human volunteers or patients who at least could

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 4>be identified very early after infection and then followed over

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 4>time we call longitudinal observations, or by looking in animal

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 4>models to try to understand the various mechanisms of pathogenesis.

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 4>My personal suspicion and again this plays to my bias

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 4>for the host response. But when you're looking at humans

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 4>who are genetically diverse, you will see the same virus,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 4>the same idea dental strain of a virus cause two

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 4>different types of disease and two different individual people. So

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 4>even when you're looking at a fairly large patient population

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 4>and you're just making correlations between certain clinical features that

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 4>were recorded by their doctors during clinical care, as well

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 4>as the genomic sequence of their disease, you're not really

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 4>able to look at any of those mechanisms that might

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 4>distinguish a host from one from another. So you can

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 4>look at the differences in the virus, but you're never

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 4>going to know what's different from one person to the next.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 4>So it's really difficult to conclude, even on a data

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 4>set of hundreds or thousands of patients, that a genetically

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 4>different strain of a virus is the only thing that

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 4>is causing one person's disease to be more severe than another's, Right, Right,

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 4>that makes sense.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Stars as being a much deadlier corona virus. I

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of people that wrote to us express

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 2>their concern about whether this virus SARS covy two might

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 2>mutate into something more deadly, such as SARS classic. You

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 2>mentioned or you talked a bit about the mutation rate

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of this virus and mRNA viruses. Can you say anything

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 2>to our listeners about whether there's a risk of this

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>virus mutating into something more deadly, and especially maybe also

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 2>in the context of control measures or how behavior might

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 2>influence viral evolution.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, So this is a concern, and I think one

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 4>of the reasons is that mutation is a very scary

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 4>sounding word, and it's not been helpful I think that

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of movies are always like, oh my god,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 4>it's mutated and it's now airborne or something, and the

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 4>thing is coronaviruses are RNA viruses. RNA viruses. Mutation is

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 4>an inherent property that they all have because the enzyme

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 4>that replicates the genome is prone to making these mistakes.

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Every RNA virus will have. The normal mutation rate for

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 4>an rnavirus is about one in every thousand units of

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 4>the genome that gets copied is a mistake or mutation.

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Coronaviruses actually have an enzyme that does some limited proofreading,

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 4>so their mutation rate is lower than many other RNA viruses,

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 4>but it's still higher than for enzymes that replicate DNA,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 4>so it still has a relatively high mutation rate, and

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 4>there will be mutations every single time the genome is copied.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 4>In terms of mutating to become more virulent or more lethal,

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 4>it's really really difficult to predict that because mutations don't

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 4>stick around unless there's some sort of selection pressure. It's

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 4>hard to imagine what the selection pressure would be to

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 4>make the virus more lethal. If anything, viruses are selected

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 4>to become less lethal only because viruses can't replicate without

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 4>a host, and if you kill your host before they

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 4>can transmit the virus to another host, that pretty much

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 4>cuts off that virus's evolutionary chain. So I think that

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 4>it's likely certainly that the virus could mutate or has mutated,

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 4>and there will be mutations every time the virus copies

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 4>itself within a single person. Much less is transmitted to

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 4>another person. But it's very difficult to say that the

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 4>virus would be evolving on its own the capacity to

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 4>be more lethal. Now, however, if there is an antiviral

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 4>drug developed, for example, and that targets a specific part

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 4>of a viral protein, then it's possible that that would

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 4>be a selection pressure for the virus to evolve resistance.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 4>That's one example of how viruses can become more lethal

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 4>by evading countermeasures. If there's a vaccine, it's possible that

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 4>the parts of the virus the vaccine recognizes could be

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 4>a pressure for those parts to mutate. The way that

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 4>your immune system works for most vaccines is by making antibodies,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 4>and those antibodies recognize a shape on the surface of

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 4>the virus. So if you think of a virus as

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 4>a three dimensional sort of ball that's covered with spikes.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Antibodies would recognize the shape of those particular spikes. It's

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 4>possible that a virus could evolve a slightly different shaped

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 4>spike that those antibodies from a prior infection or from

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 4>a vaccine would then not be able to recognize. So

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 4>that is another way in which a virus could potentially

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 4>evolve to become more lethal in the sense that it

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 4>would be able to again evade a countermeasure that we

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 4>had developed for it. Will that happen? I don't know.

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 4>A lot of that depends on the types of antivirals

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 4>that we find are able to work against this virus,

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 4>as well as the vaccine strategies that are being tested

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 4>right now, how well they work and how well they

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 4>are able to induce immunity. We do know from some

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 4>other viruses though, that certainly antiviral drug resistance is something

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 4>that happens. We know that from influenza evolving to be

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 4>resistant to osul tamavir or tama flu. We know that influenza,

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 4>normally it's a surface antigens or the proteins that are

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 4>recognized by vaccines change all the time, so that's why

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 4>we have to get a flu shot every year. So

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 4>there are certainly examples in the wild world of virology

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 4>that viruses can do this, But on its own, I

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 4>don't think that there's any particular pressure that I've seen

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 4>anyways that would cause SARS coronavirus to spontaneously evolve greater

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 4>lethality or virulence.

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 3>So, speaking of antivirals, remdesevir is going around the news.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 3>There's potentially trials happening. It seems to be maybe promising

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 3>for looking at treatment for SARS covid or for COVID

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 3>nineteen the disease. Could you tell us a little bit

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 3>about what this drug is and how it works.

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Certainly so. Remdesevir is a nucleoside analog that means that

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 4>it is shaped a lot like the ATC's and g's

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 4>that make up a given virus genome or human genome

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 4>for that matter. When viruses are replicating, the enzymes that

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 4>copy the genetic material is reading the existing genome, so

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 4>it knows where to put which ATC or G. Remdesevir

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 4>works by fooling that enzyme into thinking that it is

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 4>an ATC or G and gets inserted into the genome

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 4>and then with when enough of that happens, the genome

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 4>doesn't work. It's also thought that some of these so

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 4>called nucleoside analog drugs can also activate components of your

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 4>innate anti viral immune system, making yourselves more capable of

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 4>responding to and resisting viral infection. So that's thought to

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 4>be the mechanism of ac action for remdesevir as far

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 4>as I know. So, these these nucleoside analogs don't always

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 4>work for some RNA viruses, but there is data in

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 4>non human primates suggesting that rendesevir is effective at treating

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 4>MRS coronavirus, and now so people have showed I think

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 4>in vitro at least that it's capable of reducing virus

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 4>tiders of STARS coronavirus too. So we do know that

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 4>these nuclear side analogs can be effective against certain RNA

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 4>virus infections. We just won't know if it's effective in

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 4>people until the clinical trials have been completed.

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha. Our sign off for this podcast is wash your hands,

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 2>you filthy animals. We've been saying it for years.

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we started it just kidding.

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So can you tell us why hand washing is

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 2>a great way to reduce the risk of getting a

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 2>respiratory infection.

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's that's a great one. And this is so

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 4>both for enveloped viruses, which coronaviruses are. The envelope that

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about is a membrane that is derived from

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 4>your cells. On the surface of the virus particle. The

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 4>spike protein that I've talked about that's needed to bind

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 4>the receptor and for the virus to enter the cell

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.439
<v Speaker 4>is embedded in this envelope, in the membrane. That's why

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 4>spike is called an envelope glycoprotein because it's part of

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 4>the envelope. So either alcohol based hand sanitizers or soap

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 4>will disrupt that membrane. If you disrupt that membrane, wash

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 4>it away, there's no more spike, the virus can't get

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 4>into your cells. The virus is intactivated. Soapy water is

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 4>more effective than hand sanitizer because that also has the

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 4>added effect of physically washing things off of your hands. So,

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 4>in addition to disrupting the membrane and making any viruses

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 4>or some bacteria or other microorganisms that have a membrane

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 4>that can be disrupted by soaper, hand sanitizer. That's great,

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 4>but in general, there may be other things. There may

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 4>be non envelope viruses on your hands. Soap and water

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 4>washes them away physically so that they're no longer on

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 4>your hands at all, whether it disrupts the envelope or not.

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 4>For that reason, washing your hands is by far the

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 4>best thing you can do to reduce your own risk,

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 4>besides practicing, of course, social distancing. Hand washing is better

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 4>than hand sanitizer, although it is important to note that

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 4>for this particular virus, hand sanitizer as long as it's

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent alcohol or more, will work in between hand washes.

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 2>So one of the other questions that we've gotten a lot,

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm also curious to know and have been sort

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.959
<v Speaker 2>of keeping a good amount of skepticism with whatever I read,

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 2>is just how long this virus can survive on different

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 2>kinds of surfaces, so hard surfaces, soft surfaces, And maybe

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 2>how does this compare with some of the other common

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 2>respiratory viruses.

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so a great preprint just came out, Like to

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 4>pitch my collaborators at Rocky Mountain Labs. This is Niltchevan

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Direml who is with Vincent Munster at NIAID. Rocky Mountain

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Labs have just released a preprint with some of their colleagues,

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 4>I believe at Princeton, showing that SARS coronavirus two and

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 4>SARS classic have some different properties as well as some

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 4>similar properties for remaining infectious on various surfaces. So they

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 4>looked at experimentally generated aerosols, which for STARS coronaviruses is

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 4>only an issue for the most part in hospital settings

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 4>where there are aerosol generating procedures. But they showed that

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 4>for both of these the aerosol half life is only

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 4>about three hours. So that's good news in that you know,

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 4>if somebody that you love or care about is working

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 4>in a hospital or an ICU or is getting treated there,

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 4>these aerosols are not going to persist for days at

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 4>a time in the environment. They also looked at survival

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 4>of the virusrus on copper, stainless steel, plastic, and cardboard,

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 4>and the virus lasts the longest on stainless steel and plastic,

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 4>so it lasts forty eight to seventy two hours, and

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 4>it can potentially be there for longer than that. But

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 4>what's important to note is that there was a three

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 4>log reduction, so a thousand times less virus that was

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 4>infectious after seventy two hours. So even though you can

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 4>detect infectious virus on surfaces plastic or stainless steel surfaces,

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 4>after three days, it's a greatly reduced amount of virus

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 4>compared to stars. Classic SARS coronavirus two lasted longer on cardboard. However,

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 4>it didn't last longer than twenty four hours, so before

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 4>everybody gets worried about getting packages in the mail or

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:59.720
<v Speaker 4>opening letters or calling ordering stuff from Amazon. It also

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 4>was essentially undetectable after twenty four hours, so cardboard is

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:08.720
<v Speaker 4>probably not a surface that's going to retain the virus

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 4>for days and days at a time. What we don't

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 4>know is that the effect that temperature and humidity and

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 4>other environmental conditions would have on this, because they didn't

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 4>look at that in this paper. However, the same group

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 4>had previously done work with MRS coronavirus and that showed

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:32.280
<v Speaker 4>that temperature and humidity were also really, really important factors

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the virus being able to persist and

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 4>remain infectious on various surfaces. So my take home from

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 4>this is that I assume that the virus under ideal

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 4>conditions can last for a couple days on surfaces, So

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.959
<v Speaker 4>I just try to again wash my hands and where

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 4>I can disinfect shared communal surfaces like tables. Take precautions

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 4>to avoid being exposed to virus that may be on

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 4>shared surfaces, but it's probably not going to persist in

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 4>the environment for more than a couple days.

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 3>Awesome, And you mentioned that this is a virus that's

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 3>spread by respiratory droplets. What do we know so far

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 3>about the minimum infective dose of this virus.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's a great question, and I that is definitely

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.280
<v Speaker 4>a question for which I will say I don't know, okay,

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 4>And this has been discussed a lot in the context

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 4>of that reduction I was talking about on surfaces after

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 4>sevent you know, forty eight to seventy two hours, depending

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 4>on the material. If you have a thousand times less

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 4>virus after a couple days, is that enough virus to

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 4>establish an infection. It's really hard to say, and probably

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 4>a lot of that also depends on the root of

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 4>infection too. So if you are touching your hands to

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 4>your nose, the inside of your nose, your nostrils is

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 4>a mucous membrane. It's a mucosal surface. Mucus itself acts

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 4>as a barrier that prevents virus particles from coming into

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 4>contact with the cells that are in your nose to

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 4>infect them. That's going to be different than in your

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 4>mouth and in your eyes, and all of these different

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 4>mucosal surfaces that could potentially be infected. There are inherent mechanisms,

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 4>barrier mechanisms that protect those surfaces from being infected. So

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 4>it's not enough to necessarily have one infectious virus particle.

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 4>You may have to have a certain number of those

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 4>infectious virus particles to overcome these other obstacles to infection

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 4>that your body has. We don't really know what that is.

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that anybody has looked at that, And

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 4>because the animal model work is still in development, we

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 4>can't really look at that in the context of a

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 4>controlled experiment where we would be able to look at

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 4>different amounts of virus on different surfaces and see which

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.280
<v Speaker 4>animals got infected and then how sick they got.

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha, gotcha? So in our first episode on coronavirus, we

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 2>ended our interviews by asking our interviewees what about this

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 2>disease concerns you, and what about the response or how

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 2>the epidemic has been progressing reassures you?

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, the second part of the question nothing.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, oh gosh, no, I've been What scares me the

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 5>most by far about this is the federal response here

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 5>in the US.

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 4>It has been unacceptable for a variety of reasons, and

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 4>I suspect that largely because the response has been heavily

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 4>politicized and influenced by considerations that should not be a

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 4>factor in public health responses. Worrying about case numbers from

0:45:56.360 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, an electability point of view is a really,

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 4>really terrible way to approach an effective public health response.

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 4>That concerns me greatly because initially I felt, you know,

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 4>I was concerned about this, but I felt that if

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 4>we were on top of it in terms of surveillance

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:21.240
<v Speaker 4>and testing, then we could really limit and contain spread.

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 4>In January, when there were a few patients coming into

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 4>the United States with travel history who were identified and

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 4>rapidly sequestered, and there didn't seem to be a ton

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.760
<v Speaker 4>of secondary transmission, I felt pretty calm that we were

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 4>responding to this correctly, identifying and isolating patients, which is

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 4>what you should do. Doing contact tracing back when it

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 4>was manageable to do that. Then it turns out through

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 4>genomic analysis that it looks like here in Seattle anyways,

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 4>we've had community transmission since that first patient arrived, and

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:58.879
<v Speaker 4>potentially transmission from other patients who may not have even

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.919
<v Speaker 4>been identified. And some of this has been the absolutely

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 4>unacceptable slow rollout of effective testing and the continued failure

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 4>to adequately increase testing capacity and throughput. I think that

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 4>that has really really harmed our ability to contain this outbreak.

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 4>And while where we can, we should still make efforts

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 4>to contain it by doing contact tracing and isolation and

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:31.919
<v Speaker 4>quarantine on these tried and true public health methods, part

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 4>of our focus now has to be mitigation, and that

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 4>has to be the so called flattening the curve, trying

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to limit and reduce spread or the speed of spread

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 4>to avoid overwhelming hospitals, Trying to make sure that there

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 4>is a safety net in place for people who can't

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:50.919
<v Speaker 4>afford to work from home, who don't have sick leave,

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 4>who may not have adequate insurance. We need to make

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 4>sure that all of those things are addressed so that

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 4>we can at least mitigate the effects that this is

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 4>going to have on our healthcare systems and on our

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 4>public health as a country and really as a as

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 4>a species on this planet. We really need to have

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 4>all hands on deck, including full engagement from the public.

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:17.359
<v Speaker 4>And I'm concerned that with the amount of misinformation that

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 4>our federal leadership has provided, the constant still downplane of

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 4>the seriousness of this situation, I'm very concerned that some

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 4>of these measures won't even work. And I'm not so

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 4>much concerned for myself. I'm not in a high risk category.

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 4>I do have asthma, but I still, you know, I

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.439
<v Speaker 4>don't think that I would be personally likely to die

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 4>from this. But of course I'm concerned about all those

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 4>other people who do have pre existing health conditions, who

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 4>are immunosuppressed, who are older, who have underlying medical conditions

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 4>that would cause them to have a bad outcome, or

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 4>other people who may not even have coronavirus, but are

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 4>unable to access medical treatment that they need for other

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:10.280
<v Speaker 4>things because our hospital systems are overwhelmed. So my concerns, really,

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 4>my concerns about the virus are the least of my

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 4>concerns for this with regard to this public health crisis, awesome.

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Thank you again so much, doctor Rasmussen for joining us.

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:55.879
<v Speaker 2>We really appreciate you taking the time out of your

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 2>busy schedule.

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 3>And it was really lovely chatting with you. Thanks.

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, So we wanted to wrap up each of

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 2>these episodes with a what did we learn section, and

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 2>we wanted to take the top five things, or the

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 2>five key things that we learned from our conversation with

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 2>these experts. So we'll go through each of these five things.

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 2>We've already talked about. This this is this is different

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 2>than our normal episodes, where none of what we're saying

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 2>to each other is a surprise. Yeah, I don't know,

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 2>it's how we had to do it.

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 3>It's how it's I think it's important because, like you know,

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.760
<v Speaker 3>we go over We went over a lot in this episode.

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 3>We're going to go over a lot in every episode,

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 3>and I think that kind of trying to wrap it

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 3>up and see what are the most important points is

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 3>going to be It was helpful for me even to

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 3>go through.

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:48.799
<v Speaker 2>So absolutely, it's it's very easy to get lost in

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the details of this and so let's big picture this situation,

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 3>So one of the biggest things that we learned is

0:50:57.080 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that this particular virus stars covey you because of the

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 3>specific receptors that it uses to get into ourselves, that

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:11.280
<v Speaker 3>ACE two. This virus can and does infect the lower

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 3>respiratory tract. So that's why we are seeing as severe

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 3>of disease in some cases as we're seeing. And that

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:21.879
<v Speaker 3>is something that sets this virus apart from a lot

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 3>of other coronaviruses, the more common ones that circulate and

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 3>cause the common cold. But this is a similarity that

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 3>SARS CoV two shares with its closest relative, if viruses

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 3>have relatives, and that is SARS classic SARS.

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 2>One number two. We also learned that this novel virus

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 2>can definitely survive on surfaces for at least some time,

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to provide a link to that paper

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that doctor Rasmussen mentioned on our website and in the

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:54.839
<v Speaker 2>show notes. But what we still don't have a great

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:58.720
<v Speaker 2>handle on is what exactly that means for transmission, because

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 2>we don't know how many viral particles it takes to

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 2>actually make you sick, or how different environmental conditions like

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>temperature and humidity, how these might affect the longevity of

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the virus. But what we'll touch on in another episode

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 2>in more detail, is that we don't even know how

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 2>much virus people are shedding, So really, the best thing

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:21.919
<v Speaker 2>you can do is just kind of assume that your

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 2>saliva and the saliva of everyone around you is infectious.

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So wipe down surfaces, wash your hands before you touch

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 2>your face. These are the basic steps that will protect

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 2>you not only from getting this virus but also from

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:37.399
<v Speaker 2>spreading it to others. And it'll also do those things

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 2>for so many other viruses too.

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely, Number three we also learned I like this one.

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 3>The viruses are not evil creatures intentionally setting out to

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 3>kill you.

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 2>There's no malice.

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 3>There's no malice there.

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:55.760
<v Speaker 2>They're just as far as we're aware.

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess we haven't asked the viruses. But and the

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 3>thing about this is, mutation doesn't have to be a

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 3>scary word. So yes, because this SARS CoV two is

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 3>an RNA virus, it does have a higher mutation rate

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 3>than a DNA virus might, or than a bacterial disease might,

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 3>And certainly it has a higher mutation rate than our

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 3>cells have, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's going to

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.920
<v Speaker 3>mutate to become more virulent or make you more sick,

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:33.280
<v Speaker 3>and it's probably uncommon that it would mutate in really

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 3>drastic ways. There's been a lot of talk about this

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:40.959
<v Speaker 3>is going to mutate to be airborne, and we'll talk

0:53:41.000 --> 0:53:44.280
<v Speaker 3>in more detail in a future episode about what respiratory

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 3>droplet versus airborne transmission really means, but in general, it's

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 3>very uncommon for viruses to mutate in that drastic of

0:53:52.719 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 3>a fashion to change their mode of transmission.

0:53:56.239 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, number four. So the other thing that doctor

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Raspins and helped clarify is that we don't know for

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:08.800
<v Speaker 2>sure yet if there are different strains of this virus.

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 2>But even if there are different strains, we don't know

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 2>if that will actually result in different virulence or infectivity

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 2>between those strains, because so much of what goes into

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:22.240
<v Speaker 2>disease severity is related directly to our individual host response,

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 2>and so it's really hard to tease apart the individual

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 2>effects of certain virus strains and how much a particular

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 2>viral strain is going to affect us or cause disease

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.760
<v Speaker 2>or be more infectious than another. And so that's something

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:39.359
<v Speaker 2>I think is really important to remember as this talk

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 2>of strains comes into the news is that this is

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 2>also something that's going to probably take a bit to

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 2>figure out whether there are any differences in the infectivity

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 2>or virulence among any of the strains that we might detect.

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. And finally, the fifth and I don't know, maybe

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 3>most important thing we've learned from this episode is something

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 3>that all of our listeners already knew, and that is

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 3>wash your hands. Because washing your hands is really effective

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 3>at reducing the spread and the chance that you're going

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 3>to get infected or spread an infection to somebody else.

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Washing your hands really works.

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 2>And alcohol based hand sanitizers also work as well if

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you don't have the availability to wash your hands in

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a certain time. But we do want to note that

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 2>hand washing is better because it actually washes those little

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 2>viruses and bacteria off of your hands, whereas a hand

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 2>sanitizer just kind of leaves a sea of dead bodies

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 2>on your hands, a sea of dead body that sells

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.239
<v Speaker 2>and viral particles.

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, Aaron, Do we have any references that we'd like

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 3>to shout out for this episode?

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 2>We do so, so we've got a couple of papers.

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 2>One is by Van Dormalin at All from obviously twenty

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty because we're talking about SARS CoV two, and we

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:16.440
<v Speaker 2>also have and that's titled Aerosol and Surface Stability of

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 2>SARS CoV two as compared with sars kov one. And

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 2>so this is the one that doctor Rasfusen mentioned that

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:24.799
<v Speaker 2>looked at how well the virus survives on different surfaces.

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And then the other paper that we mentioned in our

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 2>interview that referred to the L and S strains of

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 2>SARS CoV two is by tang at All and that's

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 2>also from twenty twenty and it is titled on the

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Origin and Continuing Evolution of SARS CoV two.

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 3>And as always, we'll post the links to all of

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 3>our sources for this episode and every single episode on

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 3>our website. We're also working on a specific COVID nineteen

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 3>section of our website where you can get answers to

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:59.040
<v Speaker 3>frequently asked questions to share with friends and family.

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And thanks again to doctor Rasmussen for dropping some knowledge

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 2>on us and on all of you out there listening.

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely I will say too if you want like lots

0:57:11.280 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 3>and lots of detail on the virology of this virus.

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 3>There's a whole podcast series called This Week in Virology

0:57:18.040 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 3>that has been doing a lot of updates about COVID

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 3>nineteen and stars CoV two and they have a lot

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of details. It's hosted by a bunch of virologists. Ologies

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 3>also had a great virology episode that interviewed another expert

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 3>about this virus. And there's a whole bunch of other

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 3>podcasts out there too if you just can't get enough.

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Bloodmobile for providing the music for this episode

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 2>in all of our episodes.

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 3>And thank you for listening. We'll see you soon for

0:57:48.360 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 3>chapter two.

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Until next time, wash your hands, you filthy animals.

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>O o oh