WEBVTT - Bloomberg Law Brief: SEC Hack Shows Weakness in Edgar (Audio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, now it's time for our daily Bloomberg Law Brief,

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>exploring legal issues in the news. And today Bloomberg Law

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>hos doing grosso at Michael Best discussed the hack of

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>the SEC's EDGAR document filing system, which granted hackers access

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>too closely guarded secrets from American companies. They speak with

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Robert Hawckett, a professor at Cornell University Law School, and

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Peter Henning, a professor Edwayne State University Law School. Peter,

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the you know, most of the EDGAR system is publicly

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>available information. That's kind of the point, but there is

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>part of it that has some confidential information that apparently

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is the subject of this hack. Explain exactly what it

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is that got hacked into here. Well, the security breach

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>came through a portal that the SEC has so that

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>companies that recently went public could essentially take it for

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a test drive and past materials on EDGAR. The requirement

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is that whenever a company makes its disclosure quarterly or

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>annual earnings, that has to do that um immediately and

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>make it available to all investors at the same time.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>So it was a way for them to test it UM.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But there are companies that will make filings. Uh. For example,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I p O s Now you can make what's essentially

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a dark filing. You can put information in there that

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't available to the public, that might have been available

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to the hackers and would give them maybe some insight

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>information about what was going to happen at those companies

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps others if they rummaged around through the system.

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>You just don't know what you're going to find. Bob,

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the attack occurred last year. The SEC just disclosed it

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. Is that against its own advice to companies

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to announce cyber attacks promptly. Well, it's it's it's hard

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to tell the type attrition. I mean, the problem is, um,

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that the SEC is sort of forced start

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>faced with a dilemma. On the one hand, if it

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>reveals information that turns out not to be really that

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>important in the long gre term but sort of stokes

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a panic or stokes sort of excess concern in the

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>short term, Uh, than it might well, you know, sort

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of think better about having disclosed something too quickly. So

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not sure whether to tell anybody right away because

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't want to cause more panic than might be warranted.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, that being said, if it does

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>indeed turn out to be a significant problem, but then

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of course the SEC looks to have egg on its

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>face when it turns out that it knew the information

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>even sooner. In this particular case, I think what's particularly

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>important or maybe worth noting, is that it didn't reveal

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the information until it determines that somebody might actually have

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>used some still gotten information in order to engage in

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>some form of insider trading. And that's something the SEC

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently only just learned. And as Robert Hockett, a professor

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at Cornell University Law School, and Peter Henning, a professor

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at Wayne State University Law School, speaking with Bloomberg Law

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>host June Grasso and Michael Best, you can listen to

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm Wall Street Time here

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and now among the top legals to

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>worries from Bloomberg Law. President Trump has opened himself to

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what could be a new wave of legal challenges with

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a revised travel ban. Two groups that are challenging the

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.119
<v Speaker 1>earlier version of the policy at the Supreme Court say

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>they still see restrictions as targeting Muslims. That's Even though

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the new policy adds two countries with few Muslims, banning

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone from North Korea and some government officials from Venezuela,