WEBVTT - 1169 | Kade Anderson Called Up, Worst MLB Contracts, Weekend Preview

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Good by.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Times.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Say your league records bring.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 2>We will sue you to.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>The corner.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome hang out, Welcome back to the Just Baseball Show.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>We are live on a Friday here arm lighton Ryan Finkelstein.

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>We've got some fun topics today because Kate Anderson finally

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>called up for the Mariners. We're gonna talk about just

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>how rare the season that he is having right now

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>in the minor leagues, and how exciting the debut is

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>for the Mariners, and what does this mean about the

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Mariner's rotation moving forward. They've maybe handled the deadline differently.

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about that worst contracts in Baseball,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 2>something that we're working on at just baseball dot Com.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I know Ryan's writing it up. Very excited to get

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>into that. That's always a fun conversation. And then we're

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>going to wrap with Games of the weekend, talk about

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>some of our predictions how we think things shake out,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 2>because there's some wild card implications. But think I started

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>to doubt that we were going to see kan Anderson

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>at all this year, and in the fact that it

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 2>comes in now, it was kind of now or never.

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>If I feel like if it was in the next

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>week or so. There's a lot of implications. We'll talk

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>about it. But where were you at Did you think

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it was actually going to end up happening this year?

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Their rotations so full that I didn't expect it, right,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just they were already rocking the six man rotation

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>prior to the deadline, and then they clear up the

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>guy that I didn't think they were going to be

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>able to trade, Lewise Castillo. So the fact that they

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>traded Castillo kept all the young guys, it's like, all right,

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess they don't need to bring Kate up this year,

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but try to fight a spark at this point right

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the way he's pitching, it makes sense to pull the

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>trigger now, try to just find something.

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>And the slight devil's advocate like of like maybe he

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>might not maybe it may not happen. Was one the

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>team you know, just continues to not play very well.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 2>They're eight games under five hundred at this point and

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>still only four games out of the division, and of

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 2>course the wild card is always an opportunity for everybody there.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 2>And on top of that, you know this team, you

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>still you just sit there and say, well, why can't

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>they have a hot couple of weeks, you know, why

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>can't things happen? But the people what made it maybe

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a little bit uncertain as to whether we'd see him

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>as he's not he doesn't need to be added to

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 2>the forty man anytime soon in terms of Rule five, right,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 2>he was just drafted in twenty twenty five, and if

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 2>you add him to the forty and you don't make

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs or whatever it may be. Remember, when we're

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>locked out here in the offseason, you can no longer

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>have contact with Kate Anderson. So that does impact his

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>development some. But I'm basically having an argument with myself

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 2>here what other development is there to be had with

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Kate Anderson. We're going to talk about that, like he's like,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>looks like a finished product already with what he's been

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>doing in Double A. But that was one, you know,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 2>fair argument, and something that is impacting September call ups

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>across the game is going to be you know, hey,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>if this guy isn't Rule five eligible at the end

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>of the year, do I want to impede my ability

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to have contact with him if and when we're locked

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>out through the offseason and if it goes into February,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 2>like you'll be able to have contact with your minor leaguers,

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 2>get them on their off season regiment you need, you know,

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 2>get them ready to go in spring training, and have

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>everything normal with those guys. Unless you add them to

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the forty prematurely, then you don't have as much impact

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>on your prospects.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That's insane. I didn't even think that this's the like

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a really deep cut on what's going on right now

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on how teams are thinking about this. I almost wonder

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're the I guess to answer this question is

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if you can get to the big leagues, who cares?

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But you almost wonder for a prospect, like would you

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>rather be in contact with your organization to be ready

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for like a full rookie season the next year, or

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you just want to get to the show. Obviously still

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still making your debut. I guess that that Trump's

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so. I would say, you know, it's fine,

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh wait, my boss can't talk to me for for

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>a few months, and I'll just go. All these guys

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 2>have their own training regimen, especially like a Caana Anderson, right, Like,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 2>these are all the guys that are close to the

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 2>big leagues, So like we're going to talk about some

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>other September call ups, like candidates, and this is weighed

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>into why I think certain guys could or could not

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>be added, and like what what are the Mariners need

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>to tell Caid this offseason that he doesn't know? You know,

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>like I think about that, even like with Walker Jenkins

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>with the twins, even though I think he'd be Rule

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 2>five eligible, but like for the sake of argument, the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>only thing that Walker Jenkins needs is to stay healthy.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>And so maybe there's something with the training group or

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 2>whatever to on that side of things. But ultimately, you know,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I think most of those guys that are close to

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 2>big league ready, I'm sure they'd like to have contact

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 2>with some of their resources. Maybe it's different organization by organization.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, if I'm a Brewers prospect, I'd probably love

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 2>to still have contact with my guys over there. Dodgers,

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm sure same thing. But I imagine a lot

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of organizations. These players like they've kind of got things

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>taken care of on their own and they have their

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 2>own system, but for the teams, it's a little bit different.

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>They still want to be able to implement, keep up

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 2>with what's going on and you know, be able to

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>tweak some things maybe in spring training and work with

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 2>them so uh and know what they have. But with

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Caid specifically, this is a guy that I mean, Kate

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Anderson is as polished of a pitching prospect as we

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 2>have ever seen in his first full professional season, and

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>what he's done this year, I think is maybe one

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 2>of the best minor league seasons we've ever seen. Forget

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that this is first minor league season, but just period

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 2>how dominant he's been. Because there's so much context to

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>it too. They throw Kate Anderson straight into Double A

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's a Double A Texas League where he's put

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>up ninety three to the thirds innings, He's pitched to

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a one point zero sixty RA. He has struck out

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and thirty five batters and walked thirteen on

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>his way to a point sixty four win. The crazy

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 2>part about this, on top of the fact that the

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>surface level numbers are absolutely ridiculous, is something I've talked

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>about ad nauseum on the call up think is the

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 2>ball is flying in the minor leagues. You talk to

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>guys around the minor leagues, they'll tell you there's something

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 2>different with the baseball. It's just flying at a different level.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 2>And you see that through the OPS numbers, the home

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>run numbers across minor league baseball, and even see it

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 2>in the Texas League, where offense is always a little

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>bit high. The average ERA in the Texas League is

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 2>five point four, but at the same time you also

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>it's like five. But at the same time you also

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>have OPS up sixty points in this league because of

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 2>the way the ball is flying. Some other leagues have

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the OPS numbers up even more. And in a year

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 2>where it's inflated offense across the board, you have Kate

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Anderson putting up the only season we've ever really seen,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>at least in the last decade. I can look at

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 2>right now where we've seen ninety plus innings at an

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 2>ERA below one point three. That to me is just

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>mind blowing. And when you pair it with the fact

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 2>that offense is really off the charts this year in

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these different leagues, basically every minor league

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 2>league aside from Triple A where they use the big

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 2>league ball, it's pretty crazy and makes it easy to

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>understand why the Mariners feel like this guy can maybe

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 2>help them even if you can only throw every fifth day,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>give them a shot in the arm that they need

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, clearly that's incredible outlier stuff when you're talking about

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>his ERA being four and a half runs better than

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>league average. Yes, obviously come to the big leagues. Don't

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>expect him to pitch you an ERA in the low ones.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But it feels like, you know, especially when you're talking

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about a pitching prospect, there's a pretty good chance, especially

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>when the book's not fully out on these guys, that

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to translate early. Like it's easier to imagine

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the top pitching prospect coming up and giving you a

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>shot in the arm than the top hitting prospect coming

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>up and lifting a lineup. So for the Mariners right now,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>get anything you can, because, like you said, honestly, one

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that I had a side aside him before and

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the wildcard race or the division I was curious, like,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>which is the easier path for them? And right now

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the wildcard is a little bit closer, but it's four

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>games back in the division, three games back in the wildcard.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, he kind of had two cracks at it,

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because the wildcard can get away from you and the

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>division could actually still be in reach. So you know,

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>add a great player to your team, the best that

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you can that's going to translate, and obviously it seems

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to translate pretty pretty comfortably.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 2>The other party, you brought up a thought in my

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>mind where it's like the book's not out really yet,

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, hitters are going to be getting their

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>first look at him. Even if you get like the

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 2>game plan, I just don't know what it would be,

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 2>because what's Mae kan Anderson so much better than everybody

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>else that he's faced in the minor leagues is that

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 2>he can go to anything whenever he wants. Like the

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 2>fastball average is ninety four, but it's got great carry

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to it, so that really sets the tone. But then

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>he's got a slider, a change up in a curveball,

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>all of which he's landing for a strike at a

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 2>high clip, especially the slider and the change up seventy

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>percent strike right on those pitches that he will go

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>to in any count, Like it looks like sometimes he's

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 2>just throwing like a stand in bullpen where oh oh,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 2>he flips in a curve ball and guys like man

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and then and then oh, one flipping in a change up,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 2>and then they'll blow the fastball by you. And then

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>next that bat hole completely flip the script and go fastball, fastball, fastball,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>So like you're just completely in a blender. There's no

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>like sequence that you can start to pick up on

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>with Kid because he has so much confidence in every

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 2>single offering. And yeah, the Texas League is five flat

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 2>this year, and and you're seeing five point four runs

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>per game, and the fact that you know you're getting

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Kid pitching to a one point zero six is just

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 2>crazy crazy stuff. Again where across the minor league, the

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 2>league's home runs in particular are up big time, big

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 2>time in Texas. The Texas League is always a tough place.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>It's it puts me into a thought in tough place

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>for pitchers, it puts me into a thought. Though. Here

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>good the Mariners have moved another arm because remember Louis Castillo. Great,

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 2>you got off of that contract. That was a good trade, right,

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>you get Sir Anthony de Mnguez in kind of this

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>bad contract swap. But Sir Anthony is a little bit

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>more useful for you, probably given the depth that they have,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>given the way that Emerson Hancock is thrown. But remember

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>there was a point where there were reports out there

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>from very credible people saying that Emerson Hancock was very

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>likely to be moved to the deadline. Maybe that was

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>under the presumption that you wouldn't end up moving Louis Castillo.

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think about it from this lens, like clear

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>the Mariners are focused on making the playoffs here, and

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you've got a lot of people that are trying to

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>keep their jobs, I think from top to bottom. However,

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 2>just for organizational health standpoint, I think they could have

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 2>traded one of these starters to actually get a prospect

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 2>return here and then plug Kate Smith, right, and you

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 2>also have Ryan Sloan for depth too, and that would

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit more of like a bold move.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And also I think that would be another move where

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 2>it's like, Okay, that is a guy I would love

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to have contact with through spring training and stuff like that.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. I think about it in a

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>situation where if the Mariners don't turn things around in

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the next few weeks, they're not going to make the

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>playoffs and they will have now lost out on an

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to cash in on, you know, an Emerson Hancock,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 2>who probably the most likely to be moved there for

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a huge Hall and then of course they could go

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 2>make that trade later. But I just wonder if it'll

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>be the same Hall, especially with all the stuff that

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have going on the off season. I

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 2>just wonder if they should have moved them. I'm curious

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 2>where you stand on that.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason why you kept that rotation together

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is because you figure that is your strength and if

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you are able to, you know, sneak your way in,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what could allow you to actually go on a run.

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So I get it to some respect. But also when

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you see what the Blue Jay's got for Jose Soreano,

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, what would you have gotten for Hancock? What

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>would you have got for George Kirby? And you know

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't have all these guys forever. Like Handcock, you

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>actually have a lot of control over I think Kirby's

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like two more years after this season. So considering what

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you had coming and the ability to still have five

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.599
<v Speaker 1>six ers who are young under control, even if you

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>traded one, you know, especially since they haven't done great

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the deadline, it makes it look worse.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Right if the Mariners came out of the out of

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the deadline and they won a bunch of games, and

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they're signing the playoff spot right now, we're not questioning

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as much. But now as you're looking at it at

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a season where it might actually be a kind of

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a lost year for you and you're trying to get

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>next year you're not gonna get, you wouldn't think the

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>same value for those pitchers this offseason.

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's that's where I just I go back

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 2>and forth. I know you also don't want to signify

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 2>to your team that you're very much trying to invest

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>in right now to uh, you know, you're you're subtracting

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 2>pieces there. But if it would ever be the most

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>palatable swap maybe in the history of like selling moves

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>to to convince a team that you're not fully selling,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 2>is ye removing a starting pitcher for a good return

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and then plugging in the most dominant minor league pitch

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 2>prospect that we've seen in decades. That would probably work.

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And just another number that Podcast p pointed out here,

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>So we have ERA A minus in the minor leagues,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>which basically works like a reverse WRC plus. So like

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the lower the number the better, and you know the

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>gap would be, you know, how much better you are

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 2>than league average. Caen Anderson's eer A minus is twenty four,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 2>like two thousand's Pedro was thirty five, which I think

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>is crazy, absolutely crazy to think about just how much better.

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of similar like Pedro throwing through the

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 2>steroid era where everybody's dras were just you know, ballooned.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 2>This season in the minor leagues has almost been like

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 2>the steroid era, Like there's been jokes it's like there's

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 2>something wrong with the ball where every player is on steroids.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>It's been like the joke about it because of how

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>much offense we've seen through the minor leagues, and like, yeah,

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 2>they got Boston Smith. It's a good point by ten

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>toes down in the last casto tre Boston Smith has

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 2>had a really nice year. I don't know if that's

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 2>a franchise altering prospect or a guy that you're like

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 2>shark being into your plans. Was a nice get in

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 2>a bad contract swap there with Wiscus TiO, But I

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>think about what they could have gotten for some of

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>these other starters, and it becomes, you know, it just

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 2>becomes interesting to think about because now you've got Kate

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>on the forty and you're gonna still often now create

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>space going into next year anyways, and how they go

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 2>about that will be interesting to find out, especially with

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Swoan on his heels as well. Do you have

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>any other thoughts on the Mariners, Like Kate is going

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 2>to give them a little bit of life here one

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>left e in the rotation, I'm gonna be I'm interested

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>to see how they navigate that too, because you know

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>they still have five bodies in there. But at the

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, it's the offense, right, I mean,

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>like the Kate. Even if Kate throws a perfect game

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 2>every fifth day or sixth I don't know how that's

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>going to work. They still have a lot of other

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 2>things they have to sort out well.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And that would have been the other thing too, had

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you made a trade where you got a bad back

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>with control that was close to Bigley Ready or a

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>big like it kind of felt like Hancock would have

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>been the perfect big leaguer for big leaguer type trade.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Now we don't know what was out there, what was

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on the table, and they might have just not gotten

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>any good offers. And there might have even been around

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the league maybe some kind of like eyebrows raised of well,

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>why do you want to trade the guy with that

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>much control a Hancock, Like are you not buying into

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the breakout season? And maybe they just didn't get great

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>offers there and if that's the case, we can't really

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>judge him. I guess the one other thing that came

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to mind as you were talking this through is like

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the notion of you could have called Kate Anderson up

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>after making the trade, Like nothing has changed right for

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Kate Anderson in the last two and a half weeks.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>That makes it different to promote him now than promoting

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>him on August fourth, Right.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the biggest thing that's changed is that some

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>of the other guys are not throwing the way that

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>they want them to, right, Like Brian wu gets to

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 2>start pushback, and and Bryce Miller has, you know, not

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 2>been as good as he has as he was at

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the start of the season. Like that's the biggest thing

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>that's changed at Kate Anderson's the same exact guy, And

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I think Miller's struggles have been the biggest reason why

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 2>You'll get five earned runs last time out five and

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 2>runs before that, four before that, and then you go

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>two starts further back, another five earned run outing there.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's just that's been I think the biggest thing.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 2>And I get it though, because when you were going

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>into the end of July, you started to see Bryce

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Moore slowing down. But remember when he first came back,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>he was dominating, you know, with the best of them.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think they wanted a little bit more clarity there.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>It's tough spot. I don't envy, you know, with the

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Poto and company have had to kind of work with

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>their because I do think they put together a pretty

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>good roster. Just shit hit the fan dude, like who

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>would have thought?

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I thought the Brendan Donovan trade was good. It has not.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>He has not been as available as you'd want. He's

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>only had one hundred fifty fur play appearances year. He's

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 2>been good when he's been on the field. I thought

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>bringing back Josh Naylor was great. He's been very whatever.

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, cal Rawley has had the most mind blowing

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>follow up to an MVP caliber season that we can remember.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>And and then this rotation, which is like you could

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you feel like you could just put your head on

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the pillow and sleep soundly like you put together, You've

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 2>you've cultivated this dream rotation and even Everson Hancock is

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>breaking out like what could go wrong? But it just

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 2>seems like every time one guy gets hot, two other

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>guys slow down, and this rotation just can't quite cook

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>together at the same time. And then Munios. It just

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 2>feels like a parlay of misfortune. Which speaking of this episode,

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say on the top of Protea by BENMGM,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 2>use code just baseball, you get your bonus bet back.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doing this very often. I'm I'm I'm not

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the guy for this, but you get up to fifteen

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred back in bonus bets if you use code just Baseball.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Check that out. Peter's throwing out football bets all that

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>good stuff. Man, I butchered that. Sorry to the folks

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 2>at MGM if they saw that, Uh, you.

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't run what else? Man? It's okay. You're you know, you're, you're,

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you're you're a two guard. We know this, you know.

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm I'm a volume shooter. I'm not dishing it

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>out too much. But usually when Peter, when Peter's ripping

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 2>that read, I am up all of my tabs trying

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to figure out how I can organize all of my notes.

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 2>But just so you know, it's code just baseball, and

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 2>you can get all of your first bet back in

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>bonus bets there with bet MGM. I think a lot

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>of people to that point. Actually, Peter pointed this out

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 2>at the start of the year had Mariners to win

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the division. So if you use that code, at least

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people will be getting that back in

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 2>bonus bets because that was I think one of the

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>most popular bets of the year because it was obvious

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>they were so good on the surface. Any final thoughts

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>on the Mariners before we transition into other quick potential

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 2>September call ups.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Final thoughts is, if you made that bet before the season,

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not over. It's four games back. Like the Mariners

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>can string together two good weeks of baseball, Kyle Rally

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>can remember how to hit, and all of a sudden

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they could be right back in it because it's still

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there for them. With how just wide open the America

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>theye is But that no other final thoughts for me.

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Jeremy Pania banged up again and he's such

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a big part for the astros who every time it

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>seems like they're separating themselves, you look again and they're

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>right back at five hundred. That's going to be open,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I think, the rest of the year. So it's going

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 2>to be interesting. There some other quick just notes on

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 2>September call ups, I mentioned Walker Jenkins. I think Walker

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Jenkins is probably another good candidate to potentially get up there.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm just curious. It'll depend on kind of need and

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 2>how they want to go about things. But the Twins

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 2>are another team that's very much in it, and if

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 2>they feel like Walker can help them, like he's a

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 2>guy that I believe will need to be added to

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the forty man roster anyways at the end of the year.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 2>So he's healthy, he's hitting the ball harder than ever,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and I just feel like that's a guy that for

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the Twins. If he's right, you know that the power, speed,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>back to ball combination all three outfield spots could be

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a really useful addition for them. But I wouldn't look

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 2>at outfield right now and say that's where the Twins

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 2>necessarily need some immediate help. I just think, no matter what,

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>when it's all hands on deck, it's probably a guy

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 2>that they could end up bringing up and helping them well.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>With Kate Anderson coming up. Were within the final like

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty days of the season, right where the service time

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're everyone's gonna So yeah, now it's now any everybody's

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in play, especially for these teams, and there's there's so

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>many teams that are in it that this is where

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>there's no deadline, there's no more trades. You're not going

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to find anything else, like this is the chance here

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know what, let's call up this prospect

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't hurt us, and try to see if it

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>puts us over the top. You know, last year, this

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is where where I was talking to myself in a

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Noel McLain's starting game one of a playoff series because

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of how bad the Mets were. But you know, when

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you're when you're in that position, this is where you

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>can find a little bit of hope.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And actually, Walker Jenkins roll five eligible December of twenty seven,

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 2>so this would be a early like put a guy

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 2>onto your forty man and and deal with it situation.

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, the Twins are very focused on making

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs and that's why I think, you know, he

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 2>could be a candidate there. That's kind of gonna be

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the theme with the two other guys that I think

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>could be call ups as well, Ethan Solid. So our

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Top one hundred is coming out next week, Ethan Salas

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>will be in the top ten, and people will probably

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 2>freak out as they always do, because he's for some

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 2>reason a polarizing prospect despite the fact that like well,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 2>and I say some reason I understand why I like he.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>He had all of these expectations. Was thrust it into

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 2>high A, Double A. We've talked about it at blanche

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 2>as like a seventeen year old. It was completely unfair,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and then he got hurt and so you had this

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>like sample size of not that great production but these

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 2>high rankings and people weren't understanding it. But now he's

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>healthy and he's performing, and he mowed his way through

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Double A, and then now he's in Triple A and

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 2>he's continuing to swing the bat really, really well. Sixteen

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>games in Triple A for the Padres top prospect, he's

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 2>hitting three forty four. I understand it's the PCL, but

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 2>he is walking more than he's striking out and as

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 2>a one forty three WRC plus he's producing plus contact

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 2>rates on the season. The power is up. He's an

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>elite defender, and this is another team that they are

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 2>clicking on all cylinders if they're exhaustive. For me, they

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously don't want Campusano catching that much. Do you bring

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 2>a youngster up my other This is my question though,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 2>if we're playing MLB the show, it's a no brainer.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>You're bringing up a guy that, even if he doesn't

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 2>click right away, is going to give you good at bats.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be close to a league

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>average hitter even as he's feeling things out. I think

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be solid, definitely better than for mean,

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>and he's such a good defender that that's going to

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 2>translate right away. The thing is, there's a lot of

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>veteran pictures on this staff. They've clearly thrown it for

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 2>me in for a while at least. There's some new

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>guys though, too, but they're just getting used to for me,

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 2>we bring in another variable for some of these newly

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 2>acquired arms. Do you think a J. Peller cares when

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 2>it comes to maybe just bringing up just a better

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>baseball player.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. For for Proler, I don't think he

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 1>care really. I mean, looka campus ono is still catching,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so if it moves him to DH a little bit

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and then it allows you to not play for me,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to take the offense that you

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>can get right now at the end of the day.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like if if I'm if I'm

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a Padre starting pitcher, all I'm thinking about is how

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>do we get the ball to our bullpen with the lead,

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and if you have a better chance of

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Salaz coming through and putting up a couple of runs

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on the board, I think you're you you can get

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>around being a little more uncomfortable. Also wonder like how

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>much does it matter nowadays, like who knows who's calling

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the pitches? Like I do wonder if if with the

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>art of pitch calling being less and less like important

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>in today's game, with how with you know, pitchers can

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>call their own game if they want to, I do

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that makes the kind of struggles of a

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>catcher breaking through like a little bit easier, and that.

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I think very much is a good case. It also

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>helps that like Ethan Sallas is one of the most

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 2>mature nineteen twenty year olds I've ever talked to, and

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a big reason why they've pushed him

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 2>so so aggressively. He's worked with some of these guys

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>already a bunch, Like I think they're doing everything to

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 2>get him ready, but he has so much. I think

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 2>he's so ahead of his ears in terms of the

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 2>game prep, the way he goes about his business and

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 2>all those little things as well. So I just feel

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 2>like this is probably just something worth monitoring and seeing

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 2>there because Campuzano, like he's still only catching three times

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a week, for means getting in there three times a

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 2>week is a great defender. But again so is Ethan Sallis,

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's a lot of at bats to for me

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and that are still going right now. And as you mentioned,

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 2>you could bump Campusano into the DH role. It's not

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>like Gavin Chets is a lighting the world on fire.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>So something to monitor there. One other that I don't

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>know if it's going to happen because of the forty

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 2>man implications, and I feel like the Guardians may have

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 2>tipped their hand when they went out and acquired Nathaniel Lowe.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 2>But you look at Ralphi Velaskaz and what he's doing.

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 2>He's one of my favorite power bats in the minor leagues,

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and the guy has been on another planet. We talk

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 2>about how the American League is wide open, and this

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 2>is a team that absolutely needs all the offense that

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 2>it can get, and I don't think there's much doubt

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 2>that Ralphi Velaskas could be spark for them. Now, I

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 2>mentioned powers up in the minor leagues, not in Triple A.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Triple A. It's the same deal. It is always because

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>they're using the big league ball. But ralphie Velaskas has

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>thirteen homers in his last eighteen games at Triple A.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 2>That's a hotthand that I would love to bring up.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna exhaust his rookie eligibility. You would just

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>be adding him to the forty prematurely. He's not Roll

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>five eligible until December of next year. I don't think

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I care. I think this is a guy that again

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 2>they the Guardians Bot, which was great to see. So

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>in that mentality, I think you got to bring up

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Ralph of Alaskas. This is another guy like sure, you'd

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>love to have a little bit of contact with him

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 2>in the off season whatever. He's already so close to

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 2>a finished product. And one thing I do see a

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit more of And I wonder if this is

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe them saying, hey, we're trying to get him some

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 2>more action and maybe are considering getting him up to

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the big leagues. He's been playing some left field. Ralphie's

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a sneaky, decent athlete. First, I don't think he'll be

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>good out there immediately, but as long as he can

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 2>make the routine catch and not trip over himself, that

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of bat being added to the fold for the

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Guardians could be exactly the spark they need.

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And you can always, you know, do you run him

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>out there for the first six seven innings, get him

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>three at bats, and if you have a league, you

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>pull the plug, you know. So I think, yeah, if

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you are a team that has a chance here to

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs and you have a guy that is

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big part of your team next year,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the rule five draft eligibility should hold

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you back too much unless you have like an absolutely

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>loaded forty where you really got to be careful. If

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a pretty good understanding that a guy is

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that close to big league ready where they're going to

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>help you next year, call him up now and see

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>if you can give your lineup a shot in the arm,

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>because again, it's the only what place you're going to

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>find it right now, and call him over hot way

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>too long. Like, if you've got a guy rolling, you

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>might as well bring him up as soon as you

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>can and try to catch that lightning in.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 2>A bottle, especially chased the water coming off of a hammy.

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 2>They're probably gonna want him off of his feet still

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 2>here and there. You know, you look at even Travis

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 2>like he's slowed down a good bit since getting up there.

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So you just ride the hot hand and see what

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 2>you can do. I still think this lineup and this

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 2>team is pretty darn talented. They're getting great outings from

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, Parker Messik every fifth day. Gavin Williams give

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you so many flashes. The bullpen's always that bullpen. I

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 2>still think this team can hang around, and well, anyone

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>can hang around, so you might as well give yourself

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a push there. I would love

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 2>to see Michael Arroyo get a crack. I thought that

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 2>that might have got with the Mariners. I thought that

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 2>might have been kind of put on ice with the

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Tailor Ward edition, and who knows, the Mariners might be

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>so desperate they could go to Las Monts and just say, hey, yeah,

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 2>we know you got a sixty two percent contact, right,

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>but we also know you hit the ball one hundred

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 2>eighteen miles an hour. You're on pace for forty homers.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's just get you up here and hope you can

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 2>get hot and just do something for us here. I

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't rule out either of those guys to try to

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>just help this team.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they should have traded Randy at the deadline too, huh.

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 2>They apparently considered that. They apparently considered that. But Randy's

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 2>been like their best bat by by wrs plus one

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine, which is, I know he's good, but like man,

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>for him to be like their best best bat is tough.

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It's this free agent class surprising. That's going to come

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>down to Randy and say I like that. That's that's

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the top of this free agent class. Those guys are

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>having pretty big years in platform years.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy, it's crazy.

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're going to go.

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Into speaking of free agent class, some of the worst

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 2>contracts in Major League Baseball right now. But before that,

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 2>our first break. All right, we're going into the worst

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>contracts in baseball right now you're working on the article

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 2>for Just baseball dot com, excited to check that out

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and get your thoughts, you know, just kind of in

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>more detail on all of them. But we're going to

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 2>go from the worst to the least worst in your

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>eyes here, and I'll give the four to you to

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of explain why, because there's a bunch of contracts

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>that you could point towards them saying these are worse

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 2>deals than maybe some of them, but they're almost over right,

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Like the pain is almost you're almost through it all

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 2>where it's like one or two years we'll have to

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>go like Hobby or Bias this deal or Marcus Semion's deal,

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>But you're almost through the thick of that. So at

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the present moment, those aren't some of the worst contracts

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>in baseball. It's some of the ones that you're gonna name.

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 2>And I know there's some other like criteria that kind

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>of builds in there for you.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So when the article comes down, this is good

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>for me because I'm going to workshop it with you

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and I might always change this list

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>before we actually publish it if there's some that I

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>think after we talk it out. It's a lot worse

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>than what I have rank. But there's a section at

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the end that is there's light at the end of

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the tunnel. That's guys. That Again, it's two years left

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on these contracts. So Trevor Story and Hobby Bias done

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the same sixth year, one hundred and forty million dollar deal.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They got a year left on that. Chris Bryant, I

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>thought about still adding it because it's essentially a dead

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>contract at this point. Unfortunately, twenty seven million left for

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>two more years Stanton, that contract's almost over. Marlins gave

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Stan that thirteen Can you believe they were at the

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>end of that thirteen year year? That one?

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 2>That one actually, when you put it that way, like

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I never thought i'd see the end of that contract,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Like it's just one of those we just I know

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>it's young, and just like, ah, that'll be done when

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm forty. Here I am pushing thirty, and it's it's

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>almost done. It's just it's crazy to see the duration

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 2>of a thirteen year deal.

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was the whole thing's, oh, fifteen next year.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's actually not even that bad at this point. Fifteen

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>next year and then a ten million dollar buyout on

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen million dollar club option in twenty twenty eight.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>That was actually intrigued by. I'm like, do the Yankees

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>pick that up? We'll see. And then you got Marcus

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Simeon two years left. Obviously that's not a very good contract.

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I put the JT. Real Muto contract in this section,

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but again only two years left, not that bad. And

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>then there was another section of could be bad, but

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I still think there's too much prime left. So Vladdie endeavors,

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we're the two that I thought about. You got thirteen

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>years left of Vladimir Guerrero Junior. How he's played this season,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd almost put on this list, but we're not that

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>removed from him being the best player on the planet

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>last October. So yeah, I felt like I couldn't put

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it on the list.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 2>No, you got to get him a little bit morely

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 2>away there, Like that was a deal that we were like,

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:11.719
<v Speaker 2>you better give it to him, you better give it

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 2>to himself. I think he gets he gets a bulligin.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, if it's the same story next year, it

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 2>becomes interesting that the Yankees deal with it's the Marlins deal,

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>but the arrangement after the trade with Stanton is interesting.

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, if he if they pick up the club option,

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the Marlins are on the hook for ten of the

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 2>fifteen million in twenty eight Is that how that worthly?

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I think so, because it's just Marlins will retain ten

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>million of each twenty twenty six, twenty twenty seven, and

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty eight for the opts. So I mean, if

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 2>you get stand for five mil to just maybe make

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 2>a playoff run at that point, you just put him

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 2>on the ie olt for four months and hope he

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>gets hot for you at the end of the season.

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Might be might be worth it. But yeah, I think

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the Marlins are probably quaking in their boots at the

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 2>idea of paying ten million dollars. They'd be doing that

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 2>for a player that they have, so for for a

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 2>player that they don't have. That's gotta Be's got to be.

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>When was that trade twenty seventeen?

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, going into twenty eighteen, So.

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Like a trade that you made almost a decade ago

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're still on the hook. Crazy, Yes, And then

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Devers, I mean seven years left. Uh, I don't

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's that bad of a contract, yeat. And then

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I had Lindor on here too, just because you're on

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the back half of the contract. And I think that's

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing going through this exercise. It's a lot

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of like your favorite players on the back half of

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the mega deal that are on this list. And it

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder as we get into this new CBA,

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there's this idea potentially of a like a contract limit length,

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the NBA you can only Why do.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 2>You think they're pitching that? Huh? I think this exercise

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>is basically explaining why huh.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just interesting to think, what would How does that

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>change the structure, because then I think the Kyle Tucker

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Bobashek contracts become a new norm of these

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>players instead of getting the four hundred million dollars ten

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>year deal or trying to get that, it's hey, can

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I get paid sixty million dollars in a season? It

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just becomes a different game of trying to maximize value.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred percent. And this is the thing when

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 2>you signed these big time players like you're you're going

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.479
<v Speaker 2>to kind to pay the price on the back end,

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and that's part of, you know, what comes with the territory.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's why not highlighting maybe some of the deals

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>that are in the final couple seasons of it makes sense.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 2>But sometimes those deals where you knew you were going to,

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, take a hit, like I know in the

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Padres hand it out and this is your worst contract

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>at this point. The worst contract in baseball is Xander

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Bogart's with his seven years remaining. It was an o

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 2>visually eleven year, two hundred and eighty million dollar deal.

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Even at the time, everybody said this contract is nuts, right,

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 2>everybody did. But I think even the Padres they knew

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>that the final three or four years were probably not

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be great. But they probably figured, well, you know,

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 2>by the time we get to twenty thirty one, twenty

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>five million AAV, you'll probably be more like, you know,

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>eighteen relative to what it feels like now. And and

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 2>and also you're you're paying for the prime years. Where

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 2>these contracts become really bad is when you get to

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that falloff right in the first three or four years

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>of the deal. And like we it never really was

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 2>good unfortunately from the jump, but just Bogart's just was

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.959
<v Speaker 2>not quite the guy that he was previously pretty much

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 2>after the first season, and even the first season, it

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 2>was a slight dip offensively, he saw some signs of life,

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 2>but you had injuries, and then since then it's just

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 2>been a struggle both heal he's been on the field.

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like he guysn't fully fully been healthy

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>in terms of like there's been some nagging stuff here

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 2>and there. You know, it's been mostly one hundred and

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 2>eleven to one hundred and thirty six games over the

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 2>last three years, and he's owed a lot of money. Well.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that's interesting to me is like, is

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 2>there something to do with like the numbers four and

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 2>five since twenty five four hundred and fifty four thousand, sorry,

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty five million, four and fifty four thousand, five hundred

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and forty five dollars each year for the most part

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>until the final year it's five hundred and fifty, so

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a little five dollars pay bump in twenty thirty

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 2>three full note trade. Tough deal.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a brutal contract. There's no other way to

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>look at it. And like you said, the thing about

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>this one is as soon as they signed it, we

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>all were like, Xander got what I just don't know,

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>like who had the second bit? Like how did it

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>get to that point, like who was I know the

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox were in it, but they weren't in it

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to that degree. So the first two contracts on this

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>list are Padres and the next one is Manny Machado,

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.479
<v Speaker 1>which you could say, well, at least Machado has still

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>giving you some production. He's still playing good defense at

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>third base, he's hitting his home runs. But I mean

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the ops down to seven to twelve of this season.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And the thing about this contract is it was backloaded too.

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So from this point on Manny Machado, the AAV for

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the full deal, which was eleven year deal, three hundred

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million dollar contract, the AAV for the entire

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>deal just blow a thirty two million per but now

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it jumps to he's making thirty nine million dollars a

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>season for the next seven years. I mean, this is

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>where the Padres in a tough spot because you can't

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>trade either contract that's the left side of your infield

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>for better or worse, and that's what they kind of

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have to just work around. I Mean, the good news

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>is over the next I'd say, what three seasons, you

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>still have a pretty decent chance at these guys being

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 1>relatively productive starters, but it feels like the superstar days

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>might be beyond Machado and anything more than like a

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>batter or replacement level starter might be behind Bogart. So

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's tough when you're a small market team,

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>new ownership, but still a small market team, and each

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>year you're gonna have like sixty five million dollars a

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>year payroll sunk into those two players. It's a lot

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of money.

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, they got a new ownership group, are they small market? Like?

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>How do we define that? To me?

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Like, they're kind of they're still a small market team.

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean they don't their fan base shows up, but

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not like even when the Cardinals were in there,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey they were, they were drawing really well, it's still

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a small market.

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not. They're they're not printing at it at

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the clip that maybe some of the Yankees obviously, or

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers or whatever it may be. Fortunately, they got

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 2>some really wealthy people that are aware of the liabilities

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and are taking it on because the Machado one that

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 2>this is the big thing for me with with Preller

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 2>is like I can I can respect the lack of

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 2>care for risk when it comes to training prospects like,

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I get it, and I actually admire that approach. I

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>think it's fun to try to be different and and

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 2>it's worked for him in plenty of different ways. The

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 2>lack of regard for money is fascinating to me. And

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 2>I know Peter Sider like gave him, you know, a

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 2>little bit of leeway there. I also, but still at

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 2>the same time, like you know that you're going to

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 2>be handcuffing yourself down the line. But our Guards was

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a reckless deal. It's one thing to go reckless contract.

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 2>The Machada one didn't make sense to me because they

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>already had a three hundred million dollar deal with him,

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 2>and there was if I have it correctly, he still

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>was under control for like through twenty twenty eight, right,

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>So you had him through under control through twenty twenty eight,

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and instead you said that's not enough. Let's let's make

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 2>this deal even even more ridiculous and you re extend him.

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 2>And maybe he was asking for that, he was pushing

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 2>for that. I get that, But at the same time,

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>man like you gave him a three hundred million dollar deal.

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 2>It's like Harper's broached the idea of being re extended

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>it didn't happen right, Like sometimes you say, dude, you've

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 2>got three hundred ms. It is what it is. But

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 2>they caved and they re extended him and made it

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 2>inevitable that that deal was going to be terrible for

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.919
<v Speaker 2>them on the backside and even worse, you know, I think,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, with more proximity to where they currently were.

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was the weirdest one. Even though I

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 2>love Machado. I think he's a Hall of Famer and

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 2>he was playing at such a high level at the time,

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 2>but still, I don't get re extending an already huge

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 2>tenure deal was was weird to me. And you never

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 2>see that really.

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't want to make light of the situation,

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that these deals came in when Peter

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Sidler was in the condition he was like it just

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it kind of felt like Machad was one of his guys.

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And I almost like, you will never know, but you

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>almost wonder, like was that a Peter Sidler contract and

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a J. Preller is just kind of like okay, like

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.839
<v Speaker 1>he wants to give his guy this deal. It could

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have been one of those situations or it wasn't Preller led,

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, like the Boguards one, again,

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you still could have spent that money in a different

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>way and you could have you know, definitely gone about

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>things differently. So both of those contracts. It was just

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>a very strange offseason. And I think the craziest part

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is just how quickly it has turned, because, like you said,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>this could have been a conversation that's like ooh, that's bad,

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but we'll worry abou it in twenty twenty nine, and

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>here we are talking about in twenty twenty six.

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:06.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, we got more contracts to talk about.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 2>It's the biggest thing with with the Machado dukes. I

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>think Machado has a lot more going for him right now.

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I have a lot more confidence in Machada giving you

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>with the way he's picked up this year too. I

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 2>think if Minchada had a great year next year, I

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't I wouldn't be surprised at all. Really, I think

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 2>this guy could find a new gear and still turn

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 2>into you know, the slugger that we've maybe a different

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 2>version but through through age thirty four to thirty five

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 2>to thirty six, still be a really productive player. But

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 2>at forty ms a year and it's all the way

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 2>through age forty and twenty thirty three. That extension of

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the extension is is crazy to me.

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder if this is I wonder how the

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>game is going to change to this new CBA and

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to see these deals go away and instead,

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it could become you know, like NBA

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Max level contract type situations where we're going to see

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>guys getting paid way more in their see extended careers.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Has just kind of playing the mercenary one year deals

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>later on if they can still produce. But it feels like,

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is these are the contracts that we

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>grew up on, where guys got these deals, and it's like,

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, you're going to get to see Miguel Caburra

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>play until he's forty. Even if the last couple of

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>years of that don't look so good. There's a lot

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of these deals that are still out there, which brings

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:19.879
<v Speaker 1>me to the next one on this list. The guy

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was not playing well this season, and the only thing

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that gave me comfort not raking him higher than the

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>other two is the fact that last year he was

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>very good. And that's trade turner same exact offseason, eleven

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>year deal, three hundred million dollars, making twenty seven point

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven million per season, and this year the defense

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that was so amazing last year has fallen off a cliff,

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>as has the offense. At least he still gives you

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>some home runs and stolen bases and gives you some

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>things that I'm not going to completely give up on

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Trey Turner. No, potentially, like you said, like the same

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>thing with Machado. If Trey Turner next season was a

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 1>five to six win player, again, it wouldn't surprise me

0:41:58.239 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if he had a year or two of those left.

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 1>But there's seven years on this deal. I think there's

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot more years across those seven

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that aren't good than getting the superstar that he was

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:09.760
<v Speaker 1>last season.

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, another fun you know, numerical deal twenty seven million,

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>two d and seventy two seven and twenty seven dollars.

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>There AAV with a three dollar paid month and twenty

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty three to get it to thirty dollars on the

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.760
<v Speaker 2>round number. But now this is another one where AAV.

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Wise it's not a total nightmare, but you think about

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a guy that, yeah, is having the worst year of

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 2>his career, and you got this many years afterwards for

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have to move him off the position. Like,

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 2>there's no way the trade Turner is going to be

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 2>a short stop next year. There's just no way. And

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 2>if they do that, like you're just you're you're putting yourself,

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, behind the eight ball to start the season. Now,

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 2>could trade Turner go be a great second basement maybe,

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that'll rejuvenate him offensively a little bit too,

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and he could still end up being worthy close to

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 2>his contract. But you're moving and you paid him to

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:05.440
<v Speaker 2>be a shortstop, you're gonna move him off the shortstop.

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they knew that that that was I'm sure they

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 2>imagined that at some point he'd be moving off. Maybe

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 2>not at age thirty three or thirty four, I should

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 2>say since next year, but probably gonna move him off

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and then still you would have but seven years after that,

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a lot, a lot, a lot a lot.

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to compare it to the next one,

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 2>but because the aav is higher and his game is

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 2>predicated on I thought, this isn't The next guy is

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 2>still younger, and it's just like, what's wrong? With him,

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 2>you're just trying to figure it out. It's interesting. But

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 2>like we're gonna get to Austin Riley next, which I

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 2>think is just that one just blows my mind because

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>at the time I was like, heist, you know, like

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 2>not a heist because I think all these deals are equitable,

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 2>but like great value deal for the Braves, But yeah,

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 2>this trade Turner deal, like it's probably only going to

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 2>get worse, right for a guy that's predicated on speed.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 2>He's still fast, but look how much it's doing him

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 2>right now. If other things don't get better and the

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 2>speed starts to dissipate, where's the value going to come from.

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's tough, And like you mentioned Austin Riley's next,

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a good comparison to look at

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the two because with Austin Riley, his defense has also

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>taken a little bit of a hit. But I still

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think he can get back there, and he's going to

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be at third base a trade turner is now a

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:21.879
<v Speaker 1>second baseman, or if they stick him in the outfield, Yeah,

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's going to bring a ton

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 1>of value there where I feel like Riley might still

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 1>be able to readbound a little bit at the hot

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 1>corner and it's just Riley's younger. So he's the most

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>mind boggling of the guys on this list because a

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of these guys are in the same bucket. It's

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>back half of contracts, guys who are in their thirties.

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley, he still has six years left on again

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what looked like a really good deal. There is a

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>club option on that deal without a buyout, so like,

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the financial structure is not that bad. The player has

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just become bad. And I don't really know how this happened,

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but this sample size of Austin Riley not being the

0:44:57.600 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley that got the two wand a million dollar

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>contract has grown to a point that we can't ignore

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it and just push this contract to the side, like

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it's prominent on this list for a reason. He has

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not been good for an extended period here.

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Now you bring up a great point of like he's

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty much now as the season ends in twenty twenty

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 2>four is kind of an in between years, so it's

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 2>hard but like just for the sake of argument year,

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 2>by the time that this season ends, Austin Riley will

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 2>have almost exactly the amount of not good seasons, because

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 2>he's had good seasons. I'm ignoring twenty twenty nineteen and

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty where he's getting his feet under him as

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a young, you know, top prospect. But it was three

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 2>great seasons in twenty twenty one through twenty twenty three,

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 2>and then now it's been three disappointing seasons. The one

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 2>sixteen WRC plus on his way to two and a

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 2>half a f four, like you could palot that, but

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:48.839
<v Speaker 2>then it was worse last year and it's been even

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 2>worse this year. So it's been a steady decline as well.

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 2>As he's twenty nine, like you should be in his prime.

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.359
<v Speaker 2>And this is another example like when everyone always says,

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 2>why would he take this deal? You know, why would

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:04.439
<v Speaker 2>you do that? And Austin Riley was we're talking about

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:06.839
<v Speaker 2>him is like maybe an MVP candidate. You know, after

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 2>building off of his twenty twenty two he had thirty

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 2>eight homers, You're like, what could this guy be? He

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 2>was twenty five, Like what could he be in his

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.799
<v Speaker 2>age twenty six season here? So people were like, why

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 2>would you take that deal? Sure, Austin Riley like, of course,

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 2>first and foremost, he wants to be the player that

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 2>you know he wan he was. And but I'm sure

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 2>he's happy he took the deal, and sure the Braves

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 2>would would take it back at this point, even though

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure they still believe in him. I wouldn't want

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 2>to be on the hook for the rest of this money,

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 2>especially with how careful the Braves typically are. That it

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 2>was a great deal for the Braves to make. It

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 2>was and again for the player security, that's why they

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 2>make these. They take these pre ARB and this was

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:48.239
<v Speaker 2>in pre ARB, but this was arbitration extensions. Hopefully it

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 2>gets better because I am a big fan of Austin Riley.

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I love the way he plays the game and goes

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.919
<v Speaker 2>about his business. It's just it's been tough. And I mean,

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 2>this was potentially gonna be the third straight year after

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 2>hitting thirty three or more homer three straight years, this

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 2>could be the third straight year where he's south of twenty. Yeah.

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've played a game before in the

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>past when I'm covering the Mets where it's like, if

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 1>you could take one contract off the books, which one

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:14.919
<v Speaker 1>would it be? Right now? For the Braves, it would

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 1>be Austin Riley, And you mentioned the free agency. I

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was looking at that he went into this season with

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.760
<v Speaker 1>just over six years of service time, so I'm guessing

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he would have hit free agency after probably the twenty

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty four season, and he had started to climb a

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, so I don't know if he would have

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten He still would have probably done well as a

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>free agent because at that point it was only one

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>year and there was some injuries in twenty twenty four,

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so he still likely gets a good deal, and honestly,

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he might have been able to get something comparative to

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 1>what he signed, but yeah, it's it's falling off a

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 1>cliff for him. So I still think that of all

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the guys on this list, the guy that I think

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd have the most confidence in maybe playing himself off

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of it next year would probably be Riley because the

0:47:56.760 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>other guys are just so much older. Which brings me

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to number five, which Mookie Bets, And at a certain point,

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's still Mookie Bets. It's hard not it's

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>hard to criticize a for the future first ballot Hall

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of Famer, but it's a long contract. There's six years

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>left after this season, and now you start, you have

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, like Mookie Bets is becoming that's a short stop,

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is not giving you much with the bat, which is

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a really wild kind of turn in his career, and

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it still allows him to provide value because the glove

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>is good at short but that's also something that you

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>would think would fall off right six years, Like, how

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>many more years does Mookie Bets have it? Shortstop? Which

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>is can you imagine even us having this conversation three

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago? No?

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:45.439
<v Speaker 2>No, especially because I mean he was so damn good

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 2>in twenty three. I yeah, thirty nine bombs and was

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:53.320
<v Speaker 2>everything looks fantastic. And look, he's always been an outsluged

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 2>exit velocities guy, you know, which is interesting and like

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I would, I'm eager, and he's gonna be part of

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the reason I want to like kind of study in

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 2>on how those types of guys age. You know, part

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 2>of me would think, oh, well, you know, he doesn't

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 2>light it up ev wise, it's all about the angles,

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 2>like that should be a guy that ages well. But

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the other side of it is, well, yeah, he needs

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe every bit of that bat speed that he does

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 2>have to be able to airpole and like he has

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.919
<v Speaker 2>the bet. He is a good swing path and has

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the knack to airpole, but when you start to lose

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 2>the bat speed from already a below average rate, even

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to airpole at the consistent clip just makes your

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 2>margin for error become so razor thin. That's something I

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 2>got to look more into. But Mookie Betts is the

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 2>reason why I am because you just wonder, like, with

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a lighter batspeed guy that has been so airpole dependent,

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 2>when you start to slow down a little bit, what

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 2>does that do to you? And if that is the

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 2>reason why, like he just has not been productive. I

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 2>looked at last year or was it twenty four where

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 2>he was just so sick and just like lost so

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.760
<v Speaker 2>much weight, and it was last year last year, couldn't

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.760
<v Speaker 2>shake it. I felt like that justified the slow start.

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 2>And then you saw him finish strong and still came

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 2>up big and big moments. But this year has been

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 2>his worst year of his career. And and yeah, he

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 2>just I think he You got to give Mooie the

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 2>benefit of the doubt a little bit, but it's still

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 2>another one where it's like, I don't know, maybe these

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 2>long postseasons like hes you got to remember two he's

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 2>played so many games, you know, with with the runs

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 2>that the Dodgers are making, and you know, also I

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 2>always go back to the fact that they wanted to

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 2>put him in the right field to preserve his legs

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 2>right and and keep him fresh. And then all of

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, it's, ah, shit, we need a shortstop. But

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 2>forget that whole thing that we said. And now he's

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:38.319
<v Speaker 2>been playing a lot of shortstop going deep into the postseason,

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.439
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of high leverage, you know, just high

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 2>effort moments, and I wonder if that's just starting to

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 2>wear on him a little bit too.

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I guess the problem is Tommy I've

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>been hasn't stayed healthy. But you would just wander, like

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:53.720
<v Speaker 1>next year, why not just in spring shating and say

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to figure out shortstop. You're gonna play second base,

0:50:56.640 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's how you're going to spend the next

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:02.359
<v Speaker 1>six years of this deal, because Mookie Bets could be

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a great defensive second basement and way less wear and

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 1>tear on him, where maybe you get a little more

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>out of him offensively. But yeah, it's he's thirty four

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>years old next season. And the interesting thing too, that

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at is I'm surprised that the walk grate

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>has has kind of dropped off because Mookie Bets getting

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on base at a two ninety one clip, Like, I

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think I ever was going to see that.

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 2>You know what I think that is pictures going after him,

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and they're they're not worried about thirty five thirty nine Homer.

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Mookie Bets. They're going after him. And I know he's

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 2>got sixteen and ninety one games this year, but at

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, I just I don't think

0:51:42.520 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you were was worried about a to ninety one OBP

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:48.719
<v Speaker 2>to thirty seven batting average. Mookie Betsy killing you and

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 2>especially with nobody on podcast. He brought up a great

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 2>point though, bats beat's actually up a mile per hour

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 2>this year. So I got to go back to the

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 2>drawing board and try to figure out what's up with

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Mookie here, and you know why we've seen this kind

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 2>of this drop off this season. But another guy that

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't blink if he's better next year. A couple more

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:13.280
<v Speaker 2>rapid fire To wrap up, we got five more names.

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Yep, Aaron Nola number six on this list. Seven year,

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy two million dollars deal twenty four

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:23.439
<v Speaker 1>point five to seven million dollars per year, four years left,

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but the last two, the first two on this deal,

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe the second and third years on this

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>deal have not been very good for Aaron Nola. At

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>least he still gives you innings like that. That's why

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>he ended up falling a little bit lower. Has at

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:36.360
<v Speaker 1>least been.

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Shot in the last few starts too all of a sudden,

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, how sustainable is.

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I will say, for whatever it's worth. Leo Morgenstern has

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>not given up on Aaron Nola. I know that for

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a fact. He doesn't understand why he's given up so

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>many home runs, but he's he's still a believer, So

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that Nola, I don't think with to spend too much

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>time there. You know, we'll see if he pitches better

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>across the next four years. Number seven on the list

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker. This one is just how can you not

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>put with the production they've gotten out of him and

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 1>how much he's getting paid, how can you not put

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 1>him on this list? It's a short enough contract that

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously he hasn't opted for next season where it shouldn't

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>hold the Dodgers up too much long term obviously, and

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you still feel like there's a chance that Kyle Tucker

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>next year can also hit himself off of this list.

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just been a really rough first season with the Dodgers.

0:53:30.040 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, and when you get the all time AAV number

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and how rough it's been, like, yeah, it's a little recentcy,

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 2>but like relevant recency here without Battlesman, plus of the

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 2>tax penalties that they had to pay on top of that,

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 2>like they deemed him worth it. I mean, he's definitely

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 2>not been worth even without the penalties, so that one's

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 2>shorter term. But this would derail any other franchise right now,

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:54.200
<v Speaker 2>which I understand is a big argument of what people

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 2>are making about this CBA, you know, needing to change

0:53:57.040 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 2>in general. But we got a lot more going on,

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and with the Dodgers is way about my pay grade

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.799
<v Speaker 2>that I'm very interested to hear more about in the

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 2>coming weeks or days or whatever it may be. But

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 2>you go to the rivals with the Giants too, and

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, I thought this deal wouldn't be

0:54:12.520 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 2>that bad. It's terrible.

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Willie Damas, I almost forgot to put her on the list.

0:54:17.520 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 1>That was what I had this morning, like I got

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to check before we go live with this am I

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>forgetting anybody And Willie Domas definitely deserves to him on

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this list with the season he's having. I will say,

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he still hit twenty home runs as a Giant, so

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not awful. That's why he finds himself lower on

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:35.839
<v Speaker 1>this list. He's actually kind of like the lowest name

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:38.920
<v Speaker 1>as far as the long term, huge money deals that

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we have here. Five years left. Last season he's still

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>after really slow starting his first year with the Giant, Giants,

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>found his way to being a four win player. I

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>think the thing that makes this contract look a little

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>bit scary is the defense is starting to fall off.

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's what's more nerve racking about it. Because

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if he was still playing good defense, hitting you twenty

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:00.880
<v Speaker 1>home runs like a low hundred a low seven hundred

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ozps wouldn't be the end of the world. Could have

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just be like one bad year. But if he's not

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a good defender at short and they

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:09.399
<v Speaker 1>got to move him off that position and you still

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have five years left at twenty six million per for

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, that's not a great contract.

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:17.239
<v Speaker 2>No, not not very good. The defense is gonna be

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:19.239
<v Speaker 2>the big variable. Another guy could bounce back next year

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and be better defensively. It's just this year it's just

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 2>been a complete fuff. He's always kind of been back

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:27.520
<v Speaker 2>and forth on it too, which is weird. One of

0:55:27.600 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 2>my favorites in Lawrence Butler being on here is tough.

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:34.440
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, just how immediate at least it's nine

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 2>point four million dollars aav You know, in the seven year,

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:40.240
<v Speaker 2>sixty five point five million dollar deal, there's a club

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 2>option with a buyout, yeah, after five. But man, I

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:47.919
<v Speaker 2>just I would have thought that this would at least

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:52.160
<v Speaker 2>be a pretty decent deal. You made swing adjustments that

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I was bought into that had him just really raking,

0:55:56.000 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and it's just been completely completely lost for him, and

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 2>it's been tough to watch. Well.

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The thing too, is when you structure a prior of extension,

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean most teams do it this way where you

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:11.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of are fixing the costs, but you're locking them

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>into a similar payment structure. So right now he's making

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:16.759
<v Speaker 1>three point six. By the end of this thing, he's

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:19.759
<v Speaker 1>making sixteen point four, So you know, you get to

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of this deal's Lawrence Butther doesn't figure it out,

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, in twenty thirty one, you're still on the

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:27.800
<v Speaker 1>hook here and you can't really get off the contract.

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, these are deals where like right now,

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence Butler, he's not getting paid to the point where

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hurting the a's in the present and the long

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 1>term luxury tax implications if that matters to the ages

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and if it matters in the new CBA, Yeah, nine

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Again, it's not a backbreaker, it's just if

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't figure it out, you are now locked into

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:51.320
<v Speaker 1>six years trying to figure this thing out with him still.

0:56:51.360 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is is tough, but at least he's got

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:56.120
<v Speaker 2>time and I still think he's got the talent. That's

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 2>one that could still turn around, because he doesn't need

0:56:58.239 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to be a superstar for that deal to be worth it. Last,

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 2>but certainly not least as Anthony Santan there with the

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays.

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, five years, nine to two and a half million

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 1>dollars luxury tax hit because of all the deferred money

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and everything comes out to about fifteen million dollars per

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:18.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point six to be exact. But the crazy part

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>about this contract because they were doing the luxury tax game.

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Santander will be on the Blue Jays paybooks until

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty forty six. Twenty forty six, that's twenty years from

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:33.800
<v Speaker 1>now for a guy who has barely played at all

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in a Blue Jay's uniform and there are still three

0:57:37.440 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>years left in this deal. The hope would be at

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.720
<v Speaker 1>some point you get some level of production from Anthony Santander.

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, it's that's that's gonna be the Blue

0:57:47.320 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Jays version of the Bye Bonilla Day. And as a

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Mets fan, I'll tell you how annoying it is that

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 1>every year I get like fifteen text messages I buy

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Bania gifts running to get his cash. It's gonna be Santander.

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're a Blue Jays fan, Yeah.

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I could definitely see that. Hopefully, I mean, you

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 2>can come back healthy, back from the shoulder injury, and

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:08.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe you get something next year. But also

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 2>there's a chance that that could go down, as you know,

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the worst deals that the Jays have ever

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:15.160
<v Speaker 2>really had, though, So look out for the article. We

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 2>might see some things shuffle around, maybe a late insertion there,

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 2>so it'll be fun on that front. But we are

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 2>going to get to the games of the weekend here

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the weekend preview, but before that, one more quick break.

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 2>So I never point guard the games of the weekend,

0:58:35.880 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 2>So apologies in advance if I butcher the living hell

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 2>out of this, because usually I'm just sitting there waiting

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 2>for them to get my prediction on it. But we

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.680
<v Speaker 2>do have some fun games today as we're recording this

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:48.440
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, one that's already going to be starting by

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the time people are listening to this. But holy banger,

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 2>we've got Chris Sale versus Jacob Mizrawski Braves Brewers at

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 2>four eastern. What's your call here? I think this is

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be of a showdown pitching wise.

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I just got the under right, what's it gonna.

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Be like five and a half runs?

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, that's crazy. I guess I would. I would

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:16.280
<v Speaker 1>probably go with miz But I mean, that's just the

0:59:16.320 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>game you want to watch.

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 2>That's God, That's a game that I will be the

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 2>second we record the call up. After this, I will

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 2>be seated finishing up the top one hundred ride ups

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 2>and watching that pitching matchup. We get another fun one

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 2>at seven Eastern Tonight Giants, Red Sox Logan Web opposite

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 2>of Sonny Gray, who again, I know records don't matter

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:37.920
<v Speaker 2>that much. I'm gonna respect a fifteen and three record

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 2>from Sunny Gray two six five. Alright. I know we've

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 2>talked about Sonny Gray on here. I don't think he's

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 2>getting enough pub for how freaking great he has been

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 2>this season. And Logan Web is a walking quality start.

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, if it was anybody but Logan Web, I

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:56.320
<v Speaker 1>think it'd be an easy pick on the Red Sox.

0:59:56.360 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, another great pitching matchup and Sunny Gray. Interesting

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>thing with him is he's got a thirty million dollar

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>option for next season, and I'm just curious, like, what

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what matters to Somendy Gray at this point? Do you

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:10.439
<v Speaker 1>like where you're at you just want to opt into

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that or are you thinking like you want to sign

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>another three year deal because I think the way it's pitching,

1:00:16.160 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he can get another three year deal and I'll take

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>him to win today as well.

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think his agent's going to be praying that

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>he opts out. But you know, Sonny just seems to

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>be kind of cool with with you know, where he's

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>at and not wanting to bounce around that much anymore.

1:00:29.160 --> 1:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>And I respect that he's got a family and all

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 2>that stuff, and he talked about that a little bit

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:34.920
<v Speaker 2>when they were when the Red Sox were really bad,

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>in terms of like, hey, will, would you wave your

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>no trade cause or whatever it may be. We're going

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 2>to jump into the third ball game here. We've got

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Rays versus Orioles. And this is another fun one because

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>it's Trevor Rodgers opposite of Freddie Peralta Freddy. It's been

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a bad year for him, but I do think it's

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 2>been much better, at least in the last outing. The

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Rays already had a plan, they made some tweaks for him,

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>and he's immediately immediately been better in terms of like

1:01:12.800 --> 1:01:14.760
<v Speaker 2>when I watched it, I thought the strike throwing was better.

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I thought the stuff looked a little bit better. I

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>think they had him working out the stretch a little

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>bit more, some usage tweaks. I'm very interested to see

1:01:20.040 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 2>if Freddy's follow up is as good as it was.

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>And then Trevor Rodgers has just been really solid overall.

1:01:25.480 --> 1:01:27.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, after a bit of a slow start.

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a big thing with him pitching out of

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the stretch is it improved his extension on his fastball,

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>which was a big thing. It was like, how did

1:01:34.280 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Peralta put on a Mets uniform and lose like

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>half a foot of an extension just in just a year.

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So if they can figure that out, he's going to

1:01:43.840 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>be a lot better. Definitely rooting for him to figure

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>things out. Also pretty rough that he gets to a

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>new situation off of the first half that he had

1:01:51.600 --> 1:01:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and he had a pitching corps for the first game

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty rough on him. But I definitely would

1:01:57.040 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>not count him out to figure things out, and I

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>also wouldn't amount to win today.

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's one. I'm just I'm very focused on like

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the follow up, you know, and just just what kind

1:02:07.600 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of Freddy they get there. We go to Saturday. Saturday

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>games are actually we have a couple more on on

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Friday as well. Make sure I don't miss any more

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:21.520
<v Speaker 2>on the Friday slate. I'm looking at now, I think

1:02:21.560 --> 1:02:23.520
<v Speaker 2>we're going We're gonna go to Saturday. I'm sorry, We're

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:26.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna go to Saturday. We got a fun one in

1:02:27.040 --> 1:02:32.960
<v Speaker 2>New York Blue Jays versus Yankees, Dylan Cees versus Ryan Weathers,

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>who's been throwing the crap out of the baseball as well.

1:02:36.400 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Cease is on a hunt for the cy Young. Ryan

1:02:39.080 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Weathers is again throwing really well of late. The Jays

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>have a little bit of wife all of a sudden,

1:02:43.320 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>theyre always gonn play Yankees tough.

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>See I Dylan Sees is one of those guys where

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, you know, it's it's almost like getting

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the career achievement oscar type dealer's just like I want

1:02:55.720 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to see him get get to the finish line on

1:02:58.160 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a thy Young race and win it, because he should

1:03:00.320 --> 1:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have won one a couple of years ago, if not

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for Justin Verlander, if memory serves, and so to see

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>him finally put it together like he's he's got it

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in sights. So I feel like this is the chance

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>for a Seas to sprint through the finish line. Who

1:03:14.080 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be playing in October? So I mean, for

1:03:17.160 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Cease right now, he's just got to be thinking, you

1:03:19.840 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>got what like seven starts left to win a cy Young's.

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It's right there for him. So I'll take him to

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>show up in a big moment because this is one

1:03:27.720 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of those starts too that can really kind of swing

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a race because there's gonna be a lot of eyes

1:03:31.720 --> 1:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on him at Yankee Stadium, you know, making this start,

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So this would be a chance for him to definitely

1:03:36.800 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>improve that case.

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am interested to see that. And again, it's

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>fun that the Yankees, like teammates could kind of like

1:03:42.320 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 2>help help Cam Schwitzler potentially win that Cy Young Award

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 2>by just getting to cease who they did not see

1:03:50.080 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>or they didn't not too long ago since they saw him.

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Jared Jones versus Trek Scoobel on Saturday Padre or pyris

1:03:57.840 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>excuse me versus Dodgers anytimes Scooble's throwing um seated, especially

1:04:02.480 --> 1:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>since he's joined the Dodgers, where it just still seems

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:06.160
<v Speaker 2>like he's finding his footing a little bit. Jared Jones

1:04:06.160 --> 1:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>has been this Checko and Hyde where you've had these

1:04:07.720 --> 1:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>dominant outings and then not quite as dominant. Last one

1:04:10.480 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>was dominant, And I think he's going to rise to

1:04:12.200 --> 1:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the occasion against the Dodgers, but it's a pretty tall

1:04:14.800 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 2>occasion to fully rise up to.

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're waiting for that game right where school will

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely dominate in the Dodgers uniform and then you know,

1:04:23.840 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we can have fans freak out again about the Dodgers

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>earning baseball. I think this would be the time for it,

1:04:29.800 --> 1:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right where Schooble like punches twelve, just has one of

1:04:33.320 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>those starts like he's kind of due for that first

1:04:36.320 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>really dominant outing, and I think that Pirates lineup is

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a nice opportunity for that to happen.

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:46.840
<v Speaker 2>We go to Sunday a reminder that this the weekend

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Preview is always brought to you by our friends at Picket.

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Be short to download the Picket app when you sink

1:04:52.680 --> 1:04:54.959
<v Speaker 2>your sports book, and you can get anywhere from three

1:04:55.040 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 2>dollars to one hundred dollars when you sink it. It's

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the best way to track all of your hicks, you know,

1:05:01.320 --> 1:05:03.280
<v Speaker 2>like if you are trying to keep up with what

1:05:03.320 --> 1:05:05.280
<v Speaker 2>you're doing, what you're winning with, what you're not. I

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 2>retroactively did it and told me kind of like, hey,

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you are really bad at your picks. You know when

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>you live bet you're good in the first five innings.

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Things like that are super super helpful. So I think

1:05:18.040 --> 1:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that's a fun way if you're a better to download it.

1:05:20.040 --> 1:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>But also like even if you're not that active in it,

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>you get a free opportunity to get either three or

1:05:24.920 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred hours once you sink a sports book, so

1:05:26.920 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>might as well try to get the free money and

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>give it a shot. The link is in the episode

1:05:30.400 --> 1:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>description to check it out. It's a really useful app there.

1:05:34.560 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>And we like our friends at pickets go to Sunday

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Cubs Mariners, Shoudy Managa, Bryce Miller Showda didn't have his

1:05:45.160 --> 1:05:46.960
<v Speaker 2>best last time, if I remember correctly, I need to

1:05:46.960 --> 1:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>double check that. But Bryce Miller, we definitely know has

1:05:49.920 --> 1:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>not had his best. It's in Seattle at least. But man, like,

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 2>if I'm a struggling pictcher, I don't know if I

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>want to see the Cubs line up right now.

1:05:57.960 --> 1:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>No, it'd be hard for me to pick against the

1:06:00.080 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>US right now in that particular matchup. Yeah, they're rolling,

1:06:03.840 --> 1:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>so I think the matter of the ballpark, I think

1:06:07.600 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they can put up some runs and we'll see if

1:06:09.440 --> 1:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Shoda's quietly pretty solid this season. Like I feel like

1:06:12.240 --> 1:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Shoda doesn't get talked about at all anymore. He's gonna

1:06:15.240 --> 1:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be a free age in next season too, and I

1:06:17.000 --> 1:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think he's done enough here where he should be all

1:06:19.320 --> 1:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to get a solid enough contract he's in a much

1:06:21.840 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>better stand, and I think he would have been had

1:06:23.680 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>he entered the market last year, at.

1:06:25.240 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Least for how much because he was so good, and

1:06:27.800 --> 1:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>then for how much flak he caught last year when

1:06:30.000 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't good. I feel like he's definitely not getting

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>enough love for how solid again he's been this year.

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>To your point, like, I don't think that Shoda is

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a front line starter, and maybe when he first came

1:06:40.320 --> 1:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>up we thought he might be, but you could do

1:06:42.680 --> 1:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot worse for your number three or four starter

1:06:45.000 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>than Showda in.

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Monaga and especially I mean players coming over from Japan,

1:06:49.040 --> 1:06:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Like we have more information than ever, but there's still

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:53.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of a black box component to it, Like look

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>at tattooa in my to get what you got in

1:06:55.680 --> 1:06:58.000
<v Speaker 2>year one? Then year two was a three seven three,

1:06:58.000 --> 1:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>but it was a much more turbulent three seven three.

1:07:00.120 --> 1:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>This year is a three seven seven, but it's been

1:07:01.800 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a way more steady three seven seven, where you're just

1:07:04.960 --> 1:07:06.720
<v Speaker 2>you're not getting many of those bull up starts. Maybe

1:07:06.760 --> 1:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>you don't get the seven shoddy that you would get

1:07:09.400 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>mixed in here and there. But I just feel like

1:07:10.880 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 2>he's been so much more consistent and a big reason why,

1:07:13.280 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, an anchor for this cub's rotation that before

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>they addressed it has not been you know, as as

1:07:19.400 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 2>solidified as as some of the others. So speaking of

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>an anchor, Nick Martinez has been an anchor for the

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Rays and he's opposite of Shane Boss, who's looked like

1:07:31.400 --> 1:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>a great addition all of a sudden for the Orioles.

1:07:34.320 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I know it was a good trade regardless, but just

1:07:36.040 --> 1:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the way that he's been throwing of late. You always

1:07:38.320 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 2>get the revenge game opportunity for Shane Boz against the Rays.

1:07:41.600 --> 1:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>But Nick Martinez I don't know how he does. It's

1:07:44.200 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>six innings of like one k no run ball, so

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>he's a walking quality start Shane Boss has been of

1:07:50.200 --> 1:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>late two you get the revenge game component. I think

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:54.800
<v Speaker 2>this is gonna be a fun one.

1:07:55.160 --> 1:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of fun. I wonder with how the Boss

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>trade has worked out, as all the prospects that came

1:08:02.000 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>over really pinning out immediately for the Rays, Like, is

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this a game where the race jump all over Shane

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Boz and that narrative kind of continues, or does Shane

1:08:10.920 --> 1:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Boz push back on it and show why the Oarls

1:08:13.360 --> 1:08:15.439
<v Speaker 1>gave up so much to get him. I mean, look,

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the Oriols still have a chance here, Like Pete Alonso

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is carrying that lamp right now, one of the hottest

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hitters in baseball, and they are right in the mix

1:08:23.080 --> 1:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that they have not had a good season.

1:08:25.320 --> 1:08:28.559
<v Speaker 1>So you know, a guy like Shane Boz locking into

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the best version of himself across the final month and

1:08:31.160 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a half, that can carry you in this race. Like

1:08:34.160 --> 1:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the Orioles don't need that much to hang in it,

1:08:36.600 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>but they do need to avoid getting beat up on

1:08:39.360 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>by the race this weekend, so that'll be a very

1:08:42.000 --> 1:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>fun matchup for sure.

1:08:43.400 --> 1:08:45.240
<v Speaker 2>If this season, teams have seen a lot of each other.

1:08:45.280 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>The Orioles did just beat up the Rays a little bit,

1:08:48.280 --> 1:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and they have this season, so it'll be interesting to

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>see how it continues here. I think we get a

1:08:52.240 --> 1:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>good one from Boz. I think it would be a

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>fun pitchers tool, but I think Boz pitchers with some

1:08:55.400 --> 1:08:57.639
<v Speaker 2>fire under him, and it's gonna be fun to watch

1:08:57.640 --> 1:09:01.960
<v Speaker 2>this definitely circled ballgame for me. That'll do it for

1:09:02.080 --> 1:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the Just Baseball Show here on Friday. I hope you

1:09:04.880 --> 1:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>all enjoyed it and keep an eye out for Fink's

1:09:08.800 --> 1:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>article on the worst contracts. Also, we have some other

1:09:12.720 --> 1:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>fun stuff coming up because we got the Top one

1:09:14.840 --> 1:09:18.799
<v Speaker 2>hundred coming out next week. We've got Michael McGreevy, Cardinals pitcher,

1:09:18.920 --> 1:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>coming on the show as well, very excited about that,

1:09:21.439 --> 1:09:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and then Robert Murray joining us from Fansided as well.

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>So plenty going on next week, Plenty to look forward to.

1:09:27.680 --> 1:09:31.639
<v Speaker 2>But that is it for today's episode. Any final thoughts thing.

1:09:32.920 --> 1:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm a little disappointed we didn't get to

1:09:35.360 --> 1:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the Noel McLain versus Potential Bullpen game in Chicago on Sunday.

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a good matchup. That's Fay.

1:09:40.680 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>He's throwing the ball. Well, man, he's throwing the ball. Well,

1:09:43.240 --> 1:09:47.599
<v Speaker 2>I've got my cards. That is Bowman first is him hitting,

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:50.920
<v Speaker 2>which I think is so cool. They did go down

1:09:51.000 --> 1:09:53.439
<v Speaker 2>in value, but I think they're going back up now

1:09:53.439 --> 1:09:54.479
<v Speaker 2>and I'm feeling good about it.

1:09:54.840 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I did want to get some of my propaganda on

1:09:57.320 --> 1:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the show today, So can I just say this, If

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Noel mcla repeats his last seven starts what he did

1:10:02.800 --> 1:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>last seven, or his final seven, he's going to end

1:10:04.840 --> 1:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the year to three one, five era and two hundred

1:10:07.200 --> 1:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and six strikeouts at one hundred and eighty three innings

1:10:08.920 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pitch and no one is talking about him in the

1:10:11.080 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Rookie of the Year. So I got a word in

1:10:13.160 --> 1:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on the show to just yeah, hey, don't forget about McClain.

1:10:16.840 --> 1:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>And unfortunately, like we said going into the year, like

1:10:19.400 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 2>we would take the field or like we would take

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:24.639
<v Speaker 2>probably the two Mets versus the field in the nl

1:10:24.880 --> 1:10:27.519
<v Speaker 2>is just because he had BENJ. McLain. Both had great

1:10:27.600 --> 1:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>years and it's still not going to land great shout

1:10:30.320 --> 1:10:33.639
<v Speaker 2>in the live chat as well, how could I omit this?

1:10:34.640 --> 1:10:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the game of the weekend. We get to see

1:10:37.439 --> 1:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>you on Saturday, Cubs versus Kate Anderson making his MLB debut.

1:10:43.280 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Can't miss that. So of course that we talked so

1:10:46.120 --> 1:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>much about it on the first segment, I almost forgot

1:10:48.439 --> 1:10:50.360
<v Speaker 2>to mention it in the Games of the Weekend. That's

1:10:50.400 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna be fun at seven o'clock Eastern, they're gonna be

1:10:53.200 --> 1:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>on Fox toore. We getting the network NLB debut for

1:10:55.800 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Kate Anderson. That's ridiculous and help probably shove. So I'm

1:11:00.160 --> 1:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with a shove outing from him there, and

1:11:03.000 --> 1:11:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I think he rises to the occasion on

1:11:04.680 --> 1:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Network TV.

1:11:05.920 --> 1:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Here you go, Here you go. I think that's gonna

1:11:08.080 --> 1:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be wonder a watch for sure.

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 2>That'll do it. Thank you all for listening, have a

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>great weekend, and we will talk to you next week.