Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio of the
Speaker 1: George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: Arm Strong and Getty and no Key, I'm Strong and Getty.
Speaker 3: President Trump applying real pressure on Prime Minister Netanyao to
Speaker 3: agree to this deal, and it really does feel like
Speaker 3: a potentially game changing moment. You've got these indirect talks
Speaker 3: now underway in Egypt. Egypt Phase one, the President hopes
Speaker 3: could be agreed as early as this week.
Speaker 2: Would mean a ceasefire, the release.
Speaker 3: Of hostages and some Palestinian prisoners, and a partial withdrawal
Speaker 3: of Israeli troops. The key sticking point is going to
Speaker 3: be Phase two, which calls for har Mass to.
Speaker 2: Disarm and relinquish power.
Speaker 3: But I think what's really different this time is President
Speaker 3: Trump's personal engagement forcing both sides to end this war.
Speaker 2: I wanted to play that because I continue to be
Speaker 2: amazed at the mainstream coverage is fawning over this deal
Speaker 2: that Trumps put together and having positive noises about it
Speaker 2: and presenting it as Trump putting a lot of pressure
Speaker 2: on Net and Yahoo and that sort of stuff, as
Speaker 2: opposed to you know, being as Lackey or something which
Speaker 2: used to be the right narrative.
Speaker 1: Right. Yeah, I know this does not describe you, but
Speaker 1: I get a feel from a lot of the media
Speaker 1: coverage of this that they still have some level of
Speaker 1: belief that Hamas is negotiating in good faith, that they
Speaker 1: think Hamas can be reasoned with, that they just have
Speaker 1: some political gripes with Israel and soon we can have
Speaker 1: a two state solution.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was watching David Ignatius of the Washington Post,
Speaker 2: who's one of your big writers, about this sort of thing,
Speaker 2: talk about how people need to recognize Hamas recognizes this
Speaker 2: is basically the negotiation of their surrender. That's what it is,
Speaker 2: and because that is what it is.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, it's refreshing to hear it stated that plainly.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's either you agree to everything that is, everything
Speaker 2: we want pretty much and nothing that you want, or
Speaker 2: we're gonna kill y'all, which would you prefer.
Speaker 1: If somebody could take a minute, maybe Katie could do this.
Speaker 1: Get me the list of Islamist suicide death cult dead
Speaker 1: enders who have ever surrendered. I would love to see
Speaker 1: that list. It will be very very brief. Don't bother Katie.
Speaker 1: That was sarcasm.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 2: Well, the possibility is that the people at the top,
Speaker 2: who have a tendency to live in high rise hotels
Speaker 2: and drive Mercedes, might agree to some sort of surrender
Speaker 2: because they weren't actually out in the street fighting anyway,
Speaker 2: and the soldiers on the bottom won't. But then Israel's
Speaker 2: gonna hunt them down one by one and kill them.
Speaker 1: All, right right, so different angle Free Beacon reporting that
Speaker 1: pro Hamas student groups are planning nationwide protests today to
Speaker 1: celebrate the October seventh anniversary, or the beginning of what
Speaker 1: they describe as the decolonial struggle. And they observe actually
Speaker 1: that anti Israel group starting this semester with a bit
Speaker 1: of a whimper because the universities are afraid of the
Speaker 1: Trump administration, but today could be a turning point. For instance,
Speaker 1: UCLA divest in the schools. Students for Justice in Palestine
Speaker 1: chapter banned from a lot of campuses because they're pro
Speaker 1: terrorist one hundred percent announced their protest by describing Hamas
Speaker 1: as massacre as Palestinians righteously engaged in decolonial struggle. They
Speaker 1: also included a poem honoring the martyrs. The protest will
Speaker 1: involve a floral procession in honor and to remember the
Speaker 1: lives stolen by the Zionist state. The group urges attendees
Speaker 1: to wear masks.
Speaker 2: It would be a lot easier to buy that argument
Speaker 2: if Hamas themselves didn't openly state, now we want Israel
Speaker 2: to go away, we want all Jews to die. We're
Speaker 2: not looking for some sort of two state solution here.
Speaker 1: Well, and as usual, the the philosophy is so incredibly
Speaker 1: half baked that if you poke at it at all,
Speaker 1: it falls apart, as our friend and colleague Tim Sanderfer
Speaker 1: has in these stupid land declarations in the United States. Yes,
Speaker 1: it was the Shoemash tribe. Before them, it was another
Speaker 1: tribe who you know, the next tribe just slaughtered thell
Speaker 1: out of and raped their women and took their babies
Speaker 1: in the.
Speaker 2: Pardon because you know why, because they wanted their land,
Speaker 2: so they took it. Yeah, so they took it.
Speaker 1: And another group did that before and before and before. Look,
Speaker 1: you want to go back to King David in Israel?
Speaker 1: That not far enough? All right, Let's go back to
Speaker 1: Abraham for God's sake. I mean, what is this? Oh,
Speaker 1: what happened briefly in nineteen forty eight is the Brits
Speaker 1: were meddling post World War One in World War Two,
Speaker 1: that must be permanent for all time. I don't even
Speaker 1: that doesn't stand up to the slightest, you know, questioning anyway.
Speaker 1: In the University of Michigan, you got these students allied
Speaker 1: for Freedom inequality, protesting against two years of genocide and
Speaker 1: the university's refusal to divest from the genocidal apartheid state.
Speaker 1: That's hilarious. Yeah, talk to me about the rights of
Speaker 1: Jews and Christians in Islamic states. They're kids, children, Let's see.
Speaker 1: Blah blah blah. Columbia University's got a big one, of
Speaker 1: course they do. The flyer for Columbia's big demonstration included
Speaker 1: a red upside down triangle, a symbol hamas uses to
Speaker 1: denote Israeli targets, and text ratings Strike March, Resist, all
Speaker 1: sorts of stuff going on in New York City, Pennsylvania, Yale,
Speaker 1: George Mason University, George Washington University, Stanford planning a week
Speaker 1: of action in response to two years of genocide and
Speaker 1: Zionist terror, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: So there's a poll. There's a poll out today that's
Speaker 2: getting a tremendous amount of attention by people who want
Speaker 2: this poll to be true that by two thirds of
Speaker 2: Israelis want the war to end pretty much no matter what,
Speaker 2: and also about two thirds of Israelis want net Nyahou
Speaker 2: to resign. I don't know how accurate that issue poll
Speaker 2: is from that particular Israeli newspaper, but that's the poll
Speaker 2: that's making it into our mainstream media today.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'd have to see the specific questioning. I'm not
Speaker 1: shocked about net Nyahou. I mean, he's a controversial figure,
Speaker 1: always has been for a long time. But every time
Speaker 1: you see the end of the war polled among the Israelis,
Speaker 1: it includes and all the hostages returned, and they say yes,
Speaker 1: then the mainstream media conveniently leaves out the fact that
Speaker 1: Hamas will not do that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so that's what are we to happen.
Speaker 1: So all of that is kind of a lead up
Speaker 1: to the greater question to me, And I was surprised
Speaker 1: and pleased to see Gerard Baker, who's one of the
Speaker 1: senior statesmen of the editorial writers for the Wall Street Journal,
Speaker 1: with a piece today and he calls it perilous times
Speaker 1: for optimistic Jews in the UK, and we've talked about
Speaker 1: this the UK and France. Jews all over Europe are
Speaker 1: thinking we're going to have to leave and go to
Speaker 1: America because we're being hounded out. And he opens with
Speaker 1: a famous, very dry joke by Billy Wilder was a Jew.
Speaker 1: The optimists died in the gas chambers. The pessimists have
Speaker 1: pools in Beverly Hills, meaning those who recognized the menace
Speaker 1: and thought this is going to go badly fled Europe,
Speaker 1: and those who thought no, no, no, our neighbors would
Speaker 1: never turn on us ended up in the gas chambers.
Speaker 2: Interesting and Gerard rights.
Speaker 1: For their sake, I hope there aren't many optimistic Jews
Speaker 1: left in Europe. Their thinning ranks will surely have been
Speaker 1: reduced farther by last week's murder of a man at
Speaker 1: the synagogue in Manchester, England, which we talked about in
Speaker 1: the Death of Another Well right, which that story in
Speaker 1: case you didn't hear the very brief version of it.
Speaker 1: This reporter who's Jewish, was in a synagogu that morning
Speaker 1: and a guy next to him said, how long you
Speaker 1: think we've got left in Great Britain where we can
Speaker 1: even live here, and the reporter thought, well, that's a
Speaker 1: little more cynical than I am. Than twenty minutes later
Speaker 1: they get the word there's been a stabbing at a
Speaker 1: different synagogue and everything got shut down, right right, And
Speaker 1: Baker mentions pessimists who will have listened to the rote
Speaker 1: denunciations from political leaders and media figures, the minutes silence
Speaker 1: for the victims at weekend soccer games, the official affirmations
Speaker 1: that Britain is a peaceful, tolerant, multicultural nation, blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: maybe in a pool, and uh okay, so I'll skip
Speaker 1: that part. He mentions the blame for the violence in
Speaker 1: Manchester lies with the assailant, who was an immigrant from Syria.
Speaker 1: The responsibility for the circumstances in which two Jews are
Speaker 1: dead in a Jewish community that has contributed loyally to
Speaker 1: British society for centuries, fears for his existence. The responsibility
Speaker 1: for that lies with the leaders of the British establishment.
Speaker 1: This atrocity indicates the self annihilating multicultural nation build bilding
Speaker 1: they have pursued for decades. Now, that is some strong
Speaker 1: talk for one of the deans of editorial writing at
Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's pretty good.
Speaker 1: This atrocity indicts the self annihilating multicultural nation building they
Speaker 1: have pursued for decades. For a generation or more, leaders
Speaker 1: in governmental and cultural institutions have built and fortified the
Speaker 1: idea that Britain, along with the other countries in Europe,
Speaker 1: is a kind of open door society in which people
Speaker 1: from diverse cultures with no desire or willingness to abide
Speaker 1: by the host nation's civilizational norms should be free to
Speaker 1: live by their own rules. Elite opinion holds that it
Speaker 1: is immoral and often illegal to try to force people
Speaker 1: to conform to Western rules and norms, as Lenin had
Speaker 1: as useful idiots among the capitalist classes. Waves of radical
Speaker 1: enemies of the West's values seize the opportunities supplied by
Speaker 1: these healthfully welcoming elites to create the conditions to destroy them.
Speaker 1: Radical Islamists were the most numerous given the geographic realities
Speaker 1: in Europe. They are also the boldest in their ambitions.
Speaker 1: The authorities, cowed by the cultural injunction that it was
Speaker 1: racist not to tolerate alternative morais and practices, and anxious
Speaker 1: not to be accused of stock stoking Islamophobia stood back
Speaker 1: while grotesque abuses proliferated.
Speaker 2: One more bit, did they have it over there in
Speaker 2: Europe the coexists stickers or is that only an American
Speaker 2: thing that have the star of David on there and
Speaker 2: across and then the Islamic symbol? Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah, if they didn't, they should because they're closer to
Speaker 1: suicide than us. But and another notable few sentences in
Speaker 1: mainstream media, and this is, by the way, I hate
Speaker 1: to depart from the text because it's so good, but
Speaker 1: there are a couple of examples right now where people
Speaker 1: are calling out that young man who went to murder
Speaker 1: Brett Kavanaugh, and the fact that all the mainstream medias
Speaker 1: or media are calling it a woman now because he
Speaker 1: declared I'm a girl now and a lot of mainstream publications,
Speaker 1: including the Journal are say now we're through with that madness.
Speaker 1: It's a man, was a young man who did it.
Speaker 1: He's still a man. Stop it. Really, So the whole
Speaker 1: ultra progressive on the front foot bullying everybody into complying
Speaker 1: with their neo Marxist lunacy. That's over, at least for now. Anyway,
Speaker 1: back to Gerard Baker, because this is important In the
Speaker 1: most notorious of the crimes of multiculturalism, thousands of girls
Speaker 1: thousands friends, mostly white and vulnerable, were raped and abused
Speaker 1: by so called grooming gangs of men in mostly South
Speaker 1: Asian heritage, starting in the nineteen nineties, specifically Pakistanis. For years,
Speaker 1: the local authorities declined to investigate, the police declined to pursue,
Speaker 1: and the media declined to report on the systematic abuse,
Speaker 1: how to fear that it would fuel racism if the
Speaker 1: ethnicity of the abusers was revealed. Not until Andrew Norfolk,
Speaker 1: a brave reporter from The Times, exposed the scale of
Speaker 1: the abuse and the cover up. Beginning in twenty ten,
Speaker 1: was action taken the response to repeated terrorist attacks, and
Speaker 1: he goes through the list, some of which killed many
Speaker 1: many people by the media and politicians on both sides
Speaker 1: often focused as much on warning against Islamophobia as on
Speaker 1: defending against Islamist violence. Finally, people say, you know what
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna speak truth. Oh you're offended. Sorry,
Speaker 1: it's true. I'm saying it.
Speaker 2: Man. This story isn't over. No, no, And I'm glad
Speaker 2: the period was in France and England to watch for
Speaker 2: our cities.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh yeah. Well, and there's a big story
Speaker 1: about a bunch of Democrats going to Arab Fest in Dearborn,
Speaker 1: Michigan saying up with Hamas to get the votes of
Speaker 1: the Muslim majorities there. Yeah, this story is far from over.
Speaker 2: So, Michael, I want to play the clip when you
Speaker 2: come back, you say when Fallon introduced Tea Swizzle on
Speaker 2: The Tonight Show last night, the crowd erupted. Yeah, yeah, man,
Speaker 2: I'm interested phenomenons. I've always been interested in phenomenons. Maybe
Speaker 2: it's because I want us to be and try and
Speaker 2: figure out how to become one. But anyway, we've got
Speaker 2: a lot of news on the way to stay here.
Speaker 1: Please welcome, go on only.
Speaker 4: I mean, we love you too.
Speaker 1: Love, we love you.
Speaker 2: Wow, that is something, So why uh? I think it's
Speaker 2: kind of interesting that our first after giant album comes out,
Speaker 2: her first show is the least controversial one. Jimmy Fallon,
Speaker 2: that's probably not a mistake. Yeah, I don't, I don't know.
Speaker 2: Don't On Kimmel, look like you're supporting him, Colbert, I
Speaker 2: think you want to stay out of it.
Speaker 1: Probably anyway, Yeah, everything she does is brilliantly calculated. So
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's some thinking about that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we got I don't know the ABC news
Speaker 2: report from last night that I saw she's the first
Speaker 2: person ever to have a number one album, number one
Speaker 2: movie or something like that happened over the weekend. I'm
Speaker 2: not exactly sure what that means.
Speaker 1: I'm so uncomfortable with gushing. Yeah, just in general.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it makes me uncomfortable too.
Speaker 1: I mean him just gushing like she's a goddess. This
Speaker 1: is an incredibly capable professional, which is great. Well, she's
Speaker 1: a and people love her. Me.
Speaker 2: She is a cultural phenomenon, no doubt, But right, I
Speaker 2: don't feel the need to gush. Is Taylor Swift's album
Speaker 2: full of white supremacy and homophobia?
Speaker 1: I assume?
Speaker 2: So?
Speaker 1: Yes, I really know.
Speaker 2: I heard this article last day. I I've listened to
Speaker 2: the entire album front to back.
Speaker 1: I know what a funnier joke would have been.
Speaker 2: I certainly hope.
Speaker 4: So.
Speaker 2: Good Lord, who is asking that question? It's nearly reason
Speaker 2: I bought it. So her new album, The Life of
Speaker 2: a show Girl three days old, and the woke are
Speaker 2: tearing it apart, finding offensive lyrics everywhere. Okay, online social
Speaker 2: media critics and influencers of Swift have decided the new
Speaker 2: album is rife with racism and homophobia, as well as
Speaker 2: secret messages of support for the patriarchy, eugenics, and Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: even though she openly voted for Kamala Harris. Forensic investigations
Speaker 2: have been covered dog whistles of all these things, but
Speaker 2: only they're very They're very subtle. Yeah, I'd say that
Speaker 2: this is the examples they gave all None of them
Speaker 2: make any sense to me whatsoever. Like she's got a
Speaker 2: song Ophelia, which is the female character from Hamlet, and
Speaker 2: it's basically if Ophelia hadn't killed herself and a happy ending.
Speaker 2: And I guess the critique there is, Oh, everybody could
Speaker 2: be happy if they could marry the quarterback whatever I mean.
Speaker 1: I love the fact that these people are exposing themselves
Speaker 1: for the lunatics that they are. It's actually kind of
Speaker 1: helpful for the same part of America.
Speaker 2: I like this from some influence who has got like
Speaker 2: a million followers for whatever reason, that Taylor Swift was
Speaker 2: friends with Britney Mahomes, Patrick Mahomes wife. Yes, even though
Speaker 2: Swift endorsed endorsed Kamala Harris, but didn't disavow her friend,
Speaker 2: so it's probably a secret conservative. I like the fact
Speaker 2: that you're supposed to disavow your friends in the modern
Speaker 2: world if they vote for someone else, if you don't
Speaker 2: disavow them, well then you're as bad as they are.
Speaker 1: That probably makes sense to those people.
Speaker 2: And I know it does. I guarantee you it does
Speaker 2: because I know people specifically like that. Unfortunately, it has,
Speaker 2: you know, had effects on my life. I know people
Speaker 2: like that. You're supposed to disavow friends who have different views.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna start tweeting, you know, be cool. If I
Speaker 1: could get my dog's attention without people noticing dot dot Dodd,
Speaker 1: I'm going to start doing dog whistles.
Speaker 2: I think that was a ballot with dog whistles.
Speaker 1: Their minds.
Speaker 2: That's a good one.
Speaker 1: Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 2: Portland's been on fire for years. I think that's all insurrection.
Speaker 2: I really think that's a really criminal insurrection. The word
Speaker 2: insurrection not chosen at random or by accident by Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: has explained here by Jackie Heinrich on Fox President.
Speaker 5: Trump not ruling out invoking the Insurrection Act, which would
Speaker 5: allow National Guard troops to carry out domestic law enforcement activities,
Speaker 5: even against the wishes of local authorities.
Speaker 2: Well, I do it if it was necessary. So far
Speaker 2: it hasn't been necessary.
Speaker 5: Right now, Illinois Governor JB. Pritzker suing to stop the
Speaker 5: guard from deploying to Chicago under more narrow orders of
Speaker 5: protecting federal property, which doesn't require the Insurrection Act.
Speaker 1: But the war of words is escalating.
Speaker 5: Pritzker painting the troops as an unconstitutional invasion and accusing
Speaker 5: the administration of inciting violence. They say they need to
Speaker 5: respond to.
Speaker 6: This escalation of violence is targeted and intentional and premeditated.
Speaker 6: Why to create the pretext for invoking the Insurrection Act
Speaker 6: so that he can send military troops to our city?
Speaker 2: So this is all pretty interesting. A couple of my
Speaker 2: favorite pundits, Charles C. Cook Nash Review and Sarah Isger
Speaker 2: of The Dispatch, have both been pointing out that all
Speaker 2: this talk about all the things Trump might do or
Speaker 2: is hinted at or whatever, so far, he hasn't broken
Speaker 2: the law. And anytime a judge steps in and tells
Speaker 2: me he can't do anything, then he doesn't do it
Speaker 2: until a different judge rules. I mean, he's followed the
Speaker 2: law so far, But It's presented by a lot of
Speaker 2: his opponents as he's just wildly out of control. Mostly
Speaker 2: he threatens things, doesn't do them.
Speaker 1: Right, or that's the term lawless specifically used multiple times.
Speaker 2: But so far he has not been and I thought
Speaker 2: Mark Halprin's analysis of this current insurrection thing was really
Speaker 2: interesting today. Trump's remarks on the Insurrection Actor deliberately calibrated
Speaker 2: to project authority without committing to a specific action. By
Speaker 2: keeping the option on the table, he maximizes pressure on
Speaker 2: governors and local officials while maintaining room to maneuver. This
Speaker 2: is less about immediate deployment and more about establishing deterrence
Speaker 2: and shaping the political environment around domestic unrest, and is
Speaker 2: always stoking TDS Trump derangement syndrome because you can get
Speaker 2: people to overreact so much. What will probably happen next
Speaker 2: is the administration is unlikely to trigger the Insurrection Act,
Speaker 2: but the possibility itself becomes a tool of negotiation. Expect
Speaker 2: governor's legal experts in civil society groups to increase public resistance,
Speaker 2: which could in turn lead to Trump to escalate his rhetoric.
Speaker 2: The ambiguity serves Trump's interest by keeping both allies and
Speaker 2: opponents uncertain, gets everybody all riled up. Sometimes they do
Speaker 2: things that allows him to send in the National Guard
Speaker 2: or whatever. Yeah, that's you're overreacting. What I mean. If
Speaker 2: I was an opponent at Trump, I'm not. But if
Speaker 2: I was an opponent at Trump in one of these
Speaker 2: cities or states, just ignore him instead.
Speaker 1: Of right, although it doesn't help their electoral prospects to
Speaker 1: do that, I don't think. If you're talking about effective leadership,
Speaker 1: you're right, But I don't Davie Spritzker doesn't give a
Speaker 1: damn about anything but the White House.
Speaker 2: I don't think ultimately it's going to help their political
Speaker 2: prospects of the way they're doing it. Now, their side
Speaker 2: is going to start doing like in Portland, start rioting
Speaker 2: and fighting cops. Most people don't like that. Of all
Speaker 2: political stripes don't like that sort of unrest. They just don't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I just think that's that's an interesting point,
Speaker 1: and I agree. I think the JB. Pritzkers of the world,
Speaker 1: like lunkhead Gavin Newsome and some of the other people
Speaker 1: involved here, the Communists of Portland, whatever, they really overread
Speaker 1: the issues. Polling that's been done by the bigfoot media
Speaker 1: that says most Americans are against deploying of the National
Speaker 1: Guard to this city of that city for this purpose
Speaker 1: of that purpose. But as we know about issues polling,
Speaker 1: it's super easy to manipulate the results by just tweaking
Speaker 1: the wording a little bit. And it's absolutely true what
Speaker 1: you said. Ultimately, when people see violence against cops and
Speaker 1: vandalism and angry masked people, can you know, doing what
Speaker 1: Antifa does, they really dislike it. So I just think
Speaker 1: the JB. Pritzkers of the world are putting way too
Speaker 1: much confidence in the polling in the online world as always.
Speaker 2: Yeah, remember when Mayor in Los Angeles Karen Bass finally
Speaker 2: was welcoming of the National Guard troops, because that is
Speaker 2: the way public opinion, public opinion is. I don't really
Speaker 2: like the idea of troops on my streets, but I
Speaker 2: really really, really really don't like the idea of unrest
Speaker 2: on my streets. One just day to day crime. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that one beats out the troops on my street if
Speaker 2: it comes to that, right, If I have to choose
Speaker 2: between the two, I end up with the troops as
Speaker 2: opposed to the unrest.
Speaker 1: It's a great example or illustration of how hard this
Speaker 1: fight's gonna be it'll never end. I suppose to like
Speaker 1: have lessons become learned, like the experience in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: There was your test case. Trump sent in the troops.
Speaker 1: Everybody yelled and screamed, Uh, it's a dictatorship, military dictatorship. Oh,
Speaker 1: I kind of like that.
Speaker 2: I'm not afraid anymore.
Speaker 1: And all the crime is dropped and look the state
Speaker 1: of the National Guards. People are really courteous and they
Speaker 1: smile at you, and everything's really perfectly fine, and nobody's
Speaker 1: really a dictatorship at all. But then you got to
Speaker 1: relearn that in Chicago and Portland and whatever else, the
Speaker 1: same screeches that we heard re Washington, d C now
Speaker 1: are going.
Speaker 2: On in Chicago.
Speaker 1: It's just forgot sake. He's just get.
Speaker 2: Tired of it. So in a different town with unrest Portland,
Speaker 2: you got this guy Nick Sorder. He's a journalist and
Speaker 2: he likes getting close to Antifa. They react and then
Speaker 2: he gets to report on it and no style, Yeah, Andy,
Speaker 2: no style. And here's a little of that. He was
Speaker 2: on Hannity last night.
Speaker 4: Unfortunately, I'm going to get out of the way.
Speaker 2: Get out of the way.
Speaker 4: This is the sidewalk, get out of the way, Okay,
Speaker 4: So you're not You're no longer about to walk down
Speaker 4: the sidewalk in Portland or else. You're gonna get jumped
Speaker 4: and pushed and uh.
Speaker 2: And shoved and assaulted here and we got to revive, right,
Speaker 2: we got it, okay, So so now we're gonna you're
Speaker 2: gonna be, You're gonna be. So that's a heck of
Speaker 2: a journalistic gig. I'm too old and or soft to
Speaker 2: do the whole Uh, you know what sidewalks are for
Speaker 2: the public. Antifa's on the sidewalks, says, I can't walk
Speaker 2: down him. I can walk down him, and I'm gonna
Speaker 2: walk down him and get the crap beaten out of
Speaker 2: me on camera so I can go on hand at
Speaker 2: and show that Antifa is a you know, doing something illegal,
Speaker 2: which they are. But I don't know if I'm willing
Speaker 2: to get whacked in the head over it.
Speaker 1: Before we get back to Nick, because the next clip
Speaker 1: is something else. You've got to understand what they do
Speaker 1: people like this. Do they put you or Nick in?
Speaker 1: What they what?
Speaker 6: Uh?
Speaker 2: Uh? What's this?
Speaker 1: Uh? Salalensky called the decision dilemma where they put a
Speaker 1: hand right in your face, an inch away from your face,
Speaker 1: threatening you, or like Nick, they don't permit you to
Speaker 1: walk down a sidewalk and she stands in your way,
Speaker 1: and if you contact her, they all stream you touched her,
Speaker 1: you assaulted her. You're the violent one, and then they
Speaker 1: attack you or film it and put it on video
Speaker 1: or something. It's called it's straight out of the rules
Speaker 1: for radicals. It's called a decision dilemma. I abhor political violence.
Speaker 1: I actually do. On the other hand, if somebody stages
Speaker 1: that sort of like a second degree assault against you,
Speaker 1: meaning intentionally provoking you so that they can assault you,
Speaker 1: I would like to put them in a stitches dilemma.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just on an individual basis. Here's this same reporter
Speaker 2: talking about trying to walk down the sidewalk in Portland.
Speaker 2: It's so hostile.
Speaker 4: People are very, very aggressive, just my very existences awful
Speaker 4: lot of these Antifa militants. And in both cases you
Speaker 4: saw I was on sidewalk right In the first case
Speaker 4: when I ended up being arrested, after I was punched,
Speaker 4: they broke my camera and then threw me.
Speaker 2: In a hole.
Speaker 4: I was on the sidewalk on the opposite side of
Speaker 4: the street. So apparently on this street there is just
Speaker 4: you're not allowed to use the sidewalk unless you're a
Speaker 4: leftist militant like that is the takeaway from this at
Speaker 4: this point. And in the incident yesterday, I asked the
Speaker 4: police officer that was standing there, can I use this sidewalk?
Speaker 2: They won't let me use the other one? Can I
Speaker 2: use this one? And I did.
Speaker 4: I tried to go through there, and of course you
Speaker 4: saw how that ended up.
Speaker 2: They put me in a hole. That's a good but
Speaker 2: he goes on. Listen to this.
Speaker 4: I have gotten it on video multiple times now with
Speaker 4: people with different people coming up to me saying things like, oh, well,
Speaker 4: you know, if you come around again, you're gona end
Speaker 4: up being Charlie Kirk. I mean, these people celebrate violence,
Speaker 4: and you know, because they walk up and say I'm
Speaker 4: a Nazi, they call everybody on the right of Nazi
Speaker 4: right and that alone. If people genuinely believe that somebody
Speaker 4: is a Nazi, they have no problem with committing violence
Speaker 4: against them.
Speaker 2: It's been like this.
Speaker 4: For the longest time, where they the residents next door
Speaker 4: to this ice facility out here are miserable because they're
Speaker 4: stuck in on these and they can't sleep at night
Speaker 4: because people are screaming in the megaphones at three o'clock
Speaker 4: in the morning.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's not fair.
Speaker 4: And they're afraid to speak out because if they do
Speaker 4: speak out, they're gonna end up.
Speaker 2: Being attacked too.
Speaker 1: Sane America has had enough of insane America and is
Speaker 1: finally pushing back on some fronts in Portland. Good luck
Speaker 1: those poor people who live there.
Speaker 2: It really is Yeah, in general, I mean, this is
Speaker 2: how actual bad guys end up in charge of lots
Speaker 2: of countries. Dictators or whatever. People like law and order.
Speaker 2: They just do when it comes down to it, if
Speaker 2: it's not safe for your kid to walk down the
Speaker 2: street or you to walk down the street, you'll put
Speaker 2: up with a lot of authoritarianism for that to go away.
Speaker 2: And that's just a fact. And so people seeing the
Speaker 2: most people you see the unrest on the streets in
Speaker 2: these cities, they're going to lean toward law and order
Speaker 2: and whoever's behind the trying to straighten it out right.
Speaker 2: And you know, as we've observed many times, if the
Speaker 2: if polite society refuses to do what's right, like you know,
Speaker 2: the the immigration thing in Britain or Germany for that matter.
Speaker 2: For the longest time, the so called mainstream said, no,
Speaker 2: you're not allowed to talk about that.
Speaker 1: You're not allowed to talk about it, and so the
Speaker 1: normal people of those countries embraced the people who were
Speaker 1: willing to talk about it, some of whom are a
Speaker 1: little unsavory by my standards. But you've got to have
Speaker 1: somebody standing up for you. And if the authorities quote
Speaker 1: unquote won't do it, you're going to look for somebody
Speaker 1: to do it, and heads are going to get bashed.
Speaker 2: It's absolutely unavoidable. Why wouldn't Antifa just move out of
Speaker 2: the way and let him walk through and let him
Speaker 2: have to say in nothing to film.
Speaker 1: Well, they're they're militant youngsters on on multiple drugs. I
Speaker 1: mean they're they're they're committed Marxists, but they're also angry
Speaker 1: young radicals. You just want to tear down, you know,
Speaker 1: the system as they see it.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 1: They want violence. They want chaos. They they they that's
Speaker 1: why they got up in the morning is to have
Speaker 1: some chaos.
Speaker 2: I would I would if I had to do it,
Speaker 2: I'd put on a helmet. I would kind of hunch
Speaker 2: over and like running through a cold sprinkler. Okay, here
Speaker 2: I go, and then the beating start. They try to
Speaker 2: go down the sidewalk. I'm not cut out for that work.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I'm glad he is. The whole complicity of
Speaker 1: silence among the mainstream media with repeating of the idiocy
Speaker 1: an Tifa doesn't really exist as an organization. It's it's
Speaker 1: not a thing to be worried about or whatever, because
Speaker 1: they kind of secretly agree with a lot of the
Speaker 1: stuff and it's all going to end badly.
Speaker 2: Apparently the elephants have had it with us. I don't
Speaker 2: know if you've seen the elephant rampage video that's making
Speaker 2: their rounds. Full team coverage of that story, among other
Speaker 2: things we've got on the way. Some interesting economic news
Speaker 2: as always, on where things are headed as we get
Speaker 2: closer to Christmas season. I heard how many days it
Speaker 2: is till Christmas the other day, and it put a
Speaker 2: shock down my spine or something blah, shiver up your
Speaker 2: leg something like that. Are the are the are the
Speaker 2: tariff price is going to hit just in time for Christmas?
Speaker 2: Speculation around that anyway, A lot of things on the
Speaker 2: waistick here, you know, And I were just discussing that
Speaker 2: final play of Monday Night Football last night, or the
Speaker 2: final winning play, Trevor Lawrence falling down twice the quarterback
Speaker 2: for the Jaguars running it in to beat the Chiefs.
Speaker 2: They are Jaguars are four and one. Yeah, so they're
Speaker 2: one of your best teams really.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so it's funny. Yesterday I was talking about
Speaker 1: my wife and I went to a rock and roll
Speaker 1: show over the weekend and it was okay, but just
Speaker 1: the sound wasn't good. And we've been disappointed several times
Speaker 1: in a row now going to see some of our
Speaker 1: favorite musical acts through the years. As they're you know,
Speaker 1: getting older and different venues and stuff like that, we
Speaker 1: thought we got to stop doing it because we keep
Speaker 1: getting disappointed.
Speaker 2: I want to remember when they were great, and we've
Speaker 2: got an email typically because you think they're past their prime,
Speaker 2: these people you've gone to see, uh or just going
Speaker 2: through the motions, Oh they don't care.
Speaker 1: There's that too, because I've had that experience. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't even I wouldn't even say that strongly. It's
Speaker 1: just it's like a shadow of what they used to
Speaker 1: be able to do.
Speaker 2: Didn't you see the Rolling Stones? Once and it seemed
Speaker 2: like nobody cared.
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 1: Actually, the thing about well, yeah, well that's it. It's
Speaker 1: a long answer. The thing about the Rolling Stones is
Speaker 1: that Mick Jaggers one hundred percent committed to entertaining the
Speaker 1: audience every show. He sees that as his job, whereas
Speaker 1: a lot of my favorite bands see their job as
Speaker 1: getting up and playing our songs. And it used to
Speaker 1: be with Wild, Abandon and Passion, and now it's the
Speaker 1: contract says we got to play for an hour twenty
Speaker 1: and goodbye, have a good night anyway. And one of
Speaker 1: our beloved listeners said, hey, I think I was at
Speaker 1: the same show, Paul McCartney in Las Vegas, right, same thing.
Speaker 1: And I was like, no, actually it wasn't at all,
Speaker 1: but that's interesting. And he said he'd never go to
Speaker 1: another stadium show. And I've gotten a bunch of emails
Speaker 1: and texts and questions. My musical heroes, Rush are reuniting
Speaker 1: to the shock of fans without one third of the band,
Speaker 1: Neil Pierre, who died several years ago brain cancer, and
Speaker 1: it was thought they would never ever play again because
Speaker 1: he was irreplaceable. But they're going to and people are going,
Speaker 1: are you going to go to the shows after what
Speaker 1: you said and blah blah blah. The answer is probably
Speaker 1: maybe because a friend of mine is super excited about
Speaker 1: going to see him in Toronto and that sounds like
Speaker 1: a lot of fun to me. So I don't know,
Speaker 1: they're actually playing with a brilliant, brilliant drummer who is
Speaker 1: a German woman. That's right, And I don't know about
Speaker 1: you've been playing the correct time signature is that will
Speaker 1: be consequences. Uh yeah, so that's interesting, you know, to
Speaker 1: each their own. I know the Eagles still musically, oh,
Speaker 1: really fantastic.
Speaker 2: It was fantastic. Joe Walsh was on fire.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And the problem with the McCartney show, according to
Speaker 1: our beloved listener, was that it was just stadium sound.
Speaker 1: Stadium sound is terrible.
Speaker 2: You just.
Speaker 1: If you still like going to those shows and they're
Speaker 1: fun for you, because you can say you saw them,
Speaker 1: and then you're.
Speaker 2: I get nothing out to that. I don't understand that
Speaker 2: the I can say I saw them, I get nothing
Speaker 2: out of that. Either enjoyed the musical experience or I don't.
Speaker 2: I've seen Bob Dylan twice was a complete waste of
Speaker 2: money and time. I wish I had done something else
Speaker 2: that night, even if I had just rearranged my soccer
Speaker 2: for a complete waste of time. I get no benefit
Speaker 2: out of saying I've seen Bob Dylan. I've been in
Speaker 2: the same room as Bob Dylan. Gives me no joy.
Speaker 2: It was worthless. Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I've had a couple of experiences lately seeing bands I've
Speaker 1: never heard of open for the band I was there
Speaker 1: to see, and they were young and passionate and had
Speaker 1: some good songs, and it was really really good. Here's
Speaker 1: when they made the headliners look bad.
Speaker 2: Here's a musical note. I was watching a jazz band
Speaker 2: the other day. I live in a college town, so
Speaker 2: this is the sort of thing that happens down then,
Speaker 2: where it's just a fantastic jazz band playing somewhere. But anyway,
Speaker 2: I was watching that. The one thing I could never
Speaker 2: do musically, no matter how hard I try, is be
Speaker 2: a jazz drummer. How do those people do that? I
Speaker 2: don't even know what they're what they're doing there? How
Speaker 2: do they stay with the beat or whatever. That's the
Speaker 2: most amazing thing in all of music.
Speaker 1: Chant drummers, Yeah, practice practice, Prog rock is a lot
Speaker 1: like that, really, seventeen different time signatures.
Speaker 2: Wow, the way their brains work. Pam Bondi being grilled.
Speaker 2: There's some interesting stuff that's come out of that already,
Speaker 2: and other stuff an hour three. I hope you can
Speaker 2: get it if you don't get the podcasts Armstrong and
Speaker 2: Getty