1 00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:04,680 Speaker 1: Sound on the insiders, the influencers, the insiders fighting. Has 2 00:00:04,720 --> 00:00:07,840 Speaker 1: commented again and again that he will unite the country. 3 00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: Who would be in saf Biden has to watch in 4 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: terms of moderate detectors. The House has been voting for 5 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:18,000 Speaker 1: this stimulus package basically for months. Bloomberg Sound On with 6 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: Kevin Surrey on Bloomberg Radio. My name is Kevin Cirelli. 7 00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 1: I am the chief Washington correspondent for Bloomberg Television and 8 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Radio. We begin tonight with the big story. 9 00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:34,600 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell reiterated today on Capitol Hill 10 00:00:34,920 --> 00:00:37,360 Speaker 1: that the labor market has a long way to go 11 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:40,879 Speaker 1: as it recovers from jobs lost in the pandemic. I've 12 00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:43,560 Speaker 1: got sound on this from his testimony before the House 13 00:00:43,560 --> 00:00:47,800 Speaker 1: Financial Services Committee. Take a listen. We have ten million 14 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:51,760 Speaker 1: fewer people working on payroll jobs than we had just 15 00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,440 Speaker 1: one year ago today, and that the unemployment rate, the 16 00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 1: reported rates six point three percent. That if you include 17 00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 1: people who were in the labor four sun indeed working 18 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:03,840 Speaker 1: in February, and a couple of other adjustments, you get 19 00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:07,840 Speaker 1: to almost a ten percent unemployment rate. So there's a 20 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:10,360 Speaker 1: lot of slack in the labor market and a long 21 00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:13,959 Speaker 1: way to go to maximum employment. Let's go right to 22 00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:17,720 Speaker 1: Capitol Hill where the Budget Committee Chairman John Yarmouth, a 23 00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:21,280 Speaker 1: Democrat from Kentucky, is joining us. Mr Chairman, thank you 24 00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:24,000 Speaker 1: for joining us. I gotta be candid here. There's a 25 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,960 Speaker 1: real partisan debate that has emerged on minimum wage that's 26 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:32,160 Speaker 1: a part of this one point nine trillion dollars stimulus deal. 27 00:01:32,440 --> 00:01:34,720 Speaker 1: You heard it right there from the Fed chairman, the 28 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 1: need for more economic support. When can that minimum wage 29 00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 1: get raised? Well, we we hope in a in a 30 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:43,679 Speaker 1: couple of weeks, we're going to put it in. I 31 00:01:43,680 --> 00:01:45,679 Speaker 1: mean it's in the House build that we're gonna pass 32 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:49,120 Speaker 1: on Friday night, Uh, taking it to fifteen dollars an 33 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 1: hour by and uh. You know it may face some 34 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:56,200 Speaker 1: challenges in the Senate, but we're gonna we're gonna pass 35 00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 1: it here in the House and see what the Senate 36 00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:02,080 Speaker 1: does with it. When you here, Republicans say that the 37 00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:05,840 Speaker 1: minimum wage is just something that financially the country nor 38 00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 1: small businesses can afford. What is your response to that criticism. Well, 39 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:14,200 Speaker 1: my response is that you know, six eight months ago, 40 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:19,080 Speaker 1: we were paying tribute honoring people like the grocery shelf 41 00:02:19,160 --> 00:02:23,240 Speaker 1: stockers and bus drivers and sanitation workers and and people 42 00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:26,000 Speaker 1: who were doing jobs that we never thought were really critical, 43 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:28,400 Speaker 1: and now we found out that they're critical, and I 44 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:31,120 Speaker 1: think and now it's time that we actually reward them 45 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:34,640 Speaker 1: financially for the important work that they're doing. But beyond 46 00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:38,960 Speaker 1: those people, we haven't raised the federal minimum wage since 47 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 1: two thousand and seven, that was my my first month 48 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:45,679 Speaker 1: on the job here. And meanwhile, most most areas of 49 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: the country are already at ten eleven, twelve dollars an 50 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 1: hour or more. So what we found in places like 51 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:55,519 Speaker 1: Seattle and other places is that when you raise the 52 00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:59,360 Speaker 1: minimum wage, the economy actually prospers. You have so many 53 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:04,079 Speaker 1: more people who are out being spenders and and all 54 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 1: of that money goes back into those economies and it 55 00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:10,960 Speaker 1: ends up being a growth stimulus proposal and not something 56 00:03:10,960 --> 00:03:13,720 Speaker 1: that kills jobs. You know, I was struck by this 57 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:17,520 Speaker 1: that the in addition to the minimum wage, the Republicans 58 00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:20,200 Speaker 1: are also raising the issue that they feel that they 59 00:03:20,200 --> 00:03:22,840 Speaker 1: don't want to have to bail out states that they 60 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 1: argue are controlled by Democrats, and and that and and 61 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:29,359 Speaker 1: that quite frankly, that that they shouldn't be that their 62 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:33,040 Speaker 1: taxpayer constituents shouldn't be on the hook for it. Uh, 63 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:36,240 Speaker 1: what's your you know? Do you agree? I take it 64 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:39,040 Speaker 1: you don't agree with that assessment. No. I had a 65 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:42,120 Speaker 1: meeting the other day with the U S Conference of Mayors, 66 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 1: for instance. There were a lot of Republicans on that 67 00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:47,880 Speaker 1: Zoom meeting, and all of them are very enthusiastic about 68 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:51,360 Speaker 1: this package. People like Jim Justice in West Virginia and 69 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 1: Asa Hutchinson in Arkansas, very very red states. I think 70 00:03:56,840 --> 00:04:00,080 Speaker 1: this is a good idea. They need the help. And know, 71 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 1: I know that the states have differed in how much 72 00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,800 Speaker 1: revenue they have lost, but every state has suffered an 73 00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:09,280 Speaker 1: economic impact. And the money that we're providing here doesn't 74 00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 1: just go to make up for lost revenues. It also 75 00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:16,000 Speaker 1: enables states to do things that helps save businesses and 76 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,440 Speaker 1: helps save institutions in their their community and their state. 77 00:04:19,880 --> 00:04:22,360 Speaker 1: So this is this is something that is is way 78 00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 1: beyond just replacing tax revenue. And again, I don't think 79 00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:29,400 Speaker 1: we have red, red roads and blue roads, at least 80 00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:32,279 Speaker 1: I'm not. I haven't seen many or red water systems 81 00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:34,600 Speaker 1: or blue water systems, or red schools or blue schools, 82 00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:37,159 Speaker 1: and and and that's the way we're looking at this. 83 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:41,360 Speaker 1: Every state has been impacted. Sherman Yarmouth. I always find 84 00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 1: this fascinating that you were actually the congressman for Senate 85 00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:48,840 Speaker 1: Majority for Leader McConnell's congressional district. I never knew that 86 00:04:49,320 --> 00:04:54,160 Speaker 1: until my show Fred this morning. How's that relationship? Well, 87 00:04:54,240 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: I've known Mitch for a long time, since nineteen sixty eight. 88 00:04:57,400 --> 00:05:00,840 Speaker 1: I was a Republican actually until nineteen eighty have. We've 89 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 1: obviously gone in very different directions since then. You know, 90 00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:07,840 Speaker 1: we're civil, we get along, but on policy we're we're 91 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:11,120 Speaker 1: poles apart. As you're excited, all right, I gotta ask 92 00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:13,240 Speaker 1: you one more question, just by knowing you're tight on time. 93 00:05:13,279 --> 00:05:16,960 Speaker 1: But before I let you go, could a COVID stimulus 94 00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:19,720 Speaker 1: fine passage along with a budget vote to get into 95 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:25,800 Speaker 1: the wheats here? I'm sorry, Kevin, I missed that, gonnad COVID? 96 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:28,719 Speaker 1: Could it find it? Could it find it with a 97 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:35,600 Speaker 1: budget vote? The time? But yeah, yeah, we're gonna, I mean, 98 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:38,599 Speaker 1: we're we're doing it with the budget reconciliation process. We're 99 00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:41,320 Speaker 1: going to Rules Committee on Friday morning. We're bringing the 100 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:44,159 Speaker 1: budget reconciliation to build the American Rescue Plan to the 101 00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:47,240 Speaker 1: floor Friday night, and uh, we'll pass it and then 102 00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:49,240 Speaker 1: send it along to the Senate. The Senate will do 103 00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:52,440 Speaker 1: with it what it will next week, and presumably we'll 104 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:55,040 Speaker 1: get it back the week of March eight, and then 105 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:58,520 Speaker 1: we'll get it signed into law. All right, we'll leave 106 00:05:58,520 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 1: it there. I know you're busy, and I can hear 107 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:02,680 Speaker 1: it in the background right there on Capitol Hill. That's 108 00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:06,919 Speaker 1: a Budget Committee Chairman John Yarmouth joining us, the Democrat 109 00:06:07,480 --> 00:06:11,440 Speaker 1: from Kentucky. Really, I guess some busy times back there 110 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:14,680 Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill. Let's bring into this conversation. Our team 111 00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:19,480 Speaker 1: are Bloomberg Politics contributor of Rick Davis, who was listening 112 00:06:19,520 --> 00:06:22,479 Speaker 1: to that interview of Rick. I mean you hear it 113 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:25,599 Speaker 1: right there, just the tension on the issue of minimum wage, 114 00:06:25,839 --> 00:06:29,240 Speaker 1: as well as the response that Democrats are amounting to 115 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:32,599 Speaker 1: this ongoing criticism that Republicans don't want to bail out 116 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 1: democratic states. Yeah. I think you picked the one key 117 00:06:36,120 --> 00:06:39,039 Speaker 1: issue within this package that actually is the news item, 118 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:42,400 Speaker 1: and that is that the Republicans want to strip out 119 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:45,919 Speaker 1: this minimum wage uh component to the stimulus package, and 120 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 1: the Democrats are holding firm they see a lot of 121 00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:52,360 Speaker 1: popularity around this package, and and they see an opportunity 122 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:55,280 Speaker 1: to raise the race. I wouldn't be surprised that if 123 00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:58,680 Speaker 1: this gets stripped out in the Senate version, which I 124 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:01,880 Speaker 1: think everybody expects it to be done, that there isn't 125 00:07:01,880 --> 00:07:04,400 Speaker 1: a standalone bill in the House to keep pressing this 126 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:08,200 Speaker 1: issue of minimum wage in the House of Representatives. You know, 127 00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:10,920 Speaker 1: and I was struck by Senator Chuck Schumer today and 128 00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:12,600 Speaker 1: I believe you've got the sound on this and our 129 00:07:12,640 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 1: and our last Senator Chuck Schumer said that Republicans want 130 00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:20,000 Speaker 1: everyone on board to try to sink the latest stimulus bill. 131 00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:23,640 Speaker 1: Here's the sound on that from Schumer. According to report 132 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:27,640 Speaker 1: and CNN, Republican leaders are maneuvering to get every single 133 00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 1: Republican A member to oppose the emerging legislation. Make no mistake, 134 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:37,200 Speaker 1: Republicans opposed the American Rescue Plan to the detriment of 135 00:07:37,240 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 1: the country. Let's bring into this conversation Roger zach him. 136 00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 1: He is the director of the Ronald Reagan Institute and 137 00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:51,239 Speaker 1: the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense and former General 138 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:55,360 Speaker 1: Counsel for the US House Armed Services Committee. Roger, it's 139 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:57,040 Speaker 1: great to have you on the program? What you know 140 00:07:57,120 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 1: you hear that from Schumer. The political battle lines really 141 00:08:00,040 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 1: being drawn out of the likely advancement of this one 142 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,920 Speaker 1: point nine trillion dollars stimulus bill as it heads to 143 00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:12,680 Speaker 1: the Senate next week. Yeah, I mean it's not surprising. UH, 144 00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:16,920 Speaker 1: it's part of in uh. At one point nine trillion dollars, 145 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 1: with a lot of Democratic priorities, you're gonna have Republicans 146 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:26,280 Speaker 1: pushing back. If they wanted to fashion a bipartisan bill, 147 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:30,240 Speaker 1: it would look quite different. Obviously focusing on those areas 148 00:08:30,280 --> 00:08:34,600 Speaker 1: of the spending bill that I go directly to COVID nineteen. UH. 149 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:36,840 Speaker 1: As you get to some of these other areas, the 150 00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:40,800 Speaker 1: connection to code becomes more attenuated, particularly where the money 151 00:08:40,840 --> 00:08:46,320 Speaker 1: won't be spent in some cases out eight uh. And 152 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:49,560 Speaker 1: so the Democrats they have the majorities in both chambers 153 00:08:49,800 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 1: and they're taking advantage of it. Hey, Roger, this Rick Davis, 154 00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:54,920 Speaker 1: and thank you for being on the program and having 155 00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:58,800 Speaker 1: served in the Reagan White House. I I remember the 156 00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:01,640 Speaker 1: President used to say, you know, I go into a 157 00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:04,800 Speaker 1: legislative fight for of what I want, but I'll sign 158 00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:06,679 Speaker 1: a bill for eighty percent of what I can get 159 00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:11,080 Speaker 1: and should there have been a better effort by this 160 00:09:11,120 --> 00:09:15,000 Speaker 1: administration to try and call together what has been UH 161 00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:19,960 Speaker 1: in four previous UH stimulus bills, a bipartisan effort to 162 00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:24,600 Speaker 1: solve this problem economically. Well, yeah, you're channeling Reagan there 163 00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:27,199 Speaker 1: and great to be with you. And and the answer is, 164 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:31,920 Speaker 1: I think from Republican standpoint, absolutely yes. And perhaps I 165 00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:34,880 Speaker 1: wonder if President Biden is thinking the same. He's got 166 00:09:34,880 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 1: other priorities UH for his administration and to come out 167 00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:41,199 Speaker 1: with you know what the Wall Street journals called this 168 00:09:41,280 --> 00:09:44,959 Speaker 1: blowout spending bill. UH, it may limit his ability that 169 00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:48,880 Speaker 1: his President Biden's ability together things done because they seem 170 00:09:48,920 --> 00:09:52,080 Speaker 1: to be going for of what they want. You know. 171 00:09:52,160 --> 00:09:55,680 Speaker 1: I think that point specifically in terms of regardless of 172 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:58,360 Speaker 1: the outcome and it's likely going to pass on this 173 00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:02,600 Speaker 1: economic stimulus pack, the effect of the of what the 174 00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:06,760 Speaker 1: Biden administration is spending on political capital, not just the 175 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:10,400 Speaker 1: top line budget number, but the but the political capital 176 00:10:10,440 --> 00:10:15,600 Speaker 1: that is being expended by this White House, by Democratic leadership, 177 00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:18,800 Speaker 1: is going to play a significant role in the cost 178 00:10:18,880 --> 00:10:21,600 Speaker 1: of negotiations that they are able to do with the 179 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:24,880 Speaker 1: Democratic Socialists and the far left flank of their party 180 00:10:24,920 --> 00:10:29,079 Speaker 1: on issues pertaining to immigration and yes, including to infrastructure. 181 00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:31,880 Speaker 1: But to bring it back to the immediacy of the 182 00:10:31,920 --> 00:10:35,400 Speaker 1: current debate, you know, FED Chairman J. Powell once again 183 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:39,960 Speaker 1: reiterated today in his testimony that that it could take 184 00:10:40,040 --> 00:10:43,760 Speaker 1: more than three years to achieve their inflation goal. And 185 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:47,920 Speaker 1: this inflation debate has really been heating up amongst all 186 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 1: of the policy wonks here in Washington, d C. And 187 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:54,559 Speaker 1: up there on Wall Street. Here's the sound on this 188 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:57,560 Speaker 1: from FED Chairman J. Powell, take a lesson. We want 189 00:10:57,640 --> 00:11:00,880 Speaker 1: inflation to average superman over time. And the reason we 190 00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:03,800 Speaker 1: want that is that we want inflation expectations to be 191 00:11:03,840 --> 00:11:07,559 Speaker 1: anchored right and not excellent below two percent. We believe 192 00:11:07,559 --> 00:11:09,360 Speaker 1: we can do it. Believe we will do it. It 193 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:11,640 Speaker 1: may take more than three years, but you know, we'll 194 00:11:11,720 --> 00:11:15,040 Speaker 1: update that every quarter, we update that assessment and we'll see, 195 00:11:15,520 --> 00:11:20,199 Speaker 1: we'll see how that goes. Rick Davis to to punch 196 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:23,000 Speaker 1: it to you here, I mean, he's pushing back on 197 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:27,120 Speaker 1: concerns of prices rising and overheating. But has he been 198 00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:32,360 Speaker 1: able to divorce himself from the political back and forth 199 00:11:32,679 --> 00:11:35,839 Speaker 1: that is going on over this stimulus. Yeah, I think 200 00:11:36,160 --> 00:11:38,760 Speaker 1: to some degree he's He's coming out of a period 201 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:41,960 Speaker 1: of deflationary activity, right, and that hasn't helped the economy. 202 00:11:42,360 --> 00:11:45,320 Speaker 1: The markets have responded well to what's been happening on 203 00:11:45,360 --> 00:11:47,840 Speaker 1: the stimulus front for the last two years. But I 204 00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 1: think that Chairman Palace just trying to put some rational 205 00:11:50,559 --> 00:11:55,079 Speaker 1: bumpers around this inflation argument. And and for him to 206 00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:57,240 Speaker 1: come out today and say, look, we've got a target 207 00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:59,280 Speaker 1: at two percent and it may take us three years 208 00:11:59,280 --> 00:12:02,280 Speaker 1: to get there, should calm the markets down a bit. 209 00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:06,280 Speaker 1: That that that the that the FED doesn't have a 210 00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:10,080 Speaker 1: perspective on inflation that is going to, you know, let 211 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:12,440 Speaker 1: the markets get out of control. So I think what 212 00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:15,200 Speaker 1: he's trying to do is be respectful the inflation but 213 00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:18,120 Speaker 1: still make the case, as you pointed out earlier, Kevin, 214 00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:21,520 Speaker 1: that um that we need a stimulus. He's been very 215 00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:25,160 Speaker 1: kg about whether or not he wants this stimulus, but 216 00:12:25,400 --> 00:12:28,520 Speaker 1: but he does want more activity, and the unemployment number 217 00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:31,520 Speaker 1: is what he seems to be mostly focused on. And 218 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:33,200 Speaker 1: I can just keep going back to the fact that 219 00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:36,079 Speaker 1: to to your point, the Central Bank is saying, yes, 220 00:12:36,160 --> 00:12:38,760 Speaker 1: we need more stimulus, and even Republicans are talking about 221 00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:41,880 Speaker 1: hundreds of billions of dollars. They differ, of course, in 222 00:12:41,960 --> 00:12:43,800 Speaker 1: terms of that top line number. Much more coming up 223 00:12:43,800 --> 00:13:02,120 Speaker 1: next time, Kevin. So, really, this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg. 224 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 1: Sound on with Bloomberg Radio. My name is Kevin Sireli. 225 00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 1: I'm the chief Washington correspondent for Bloomberg Television and for 226 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,559 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio. Beautiful day here in the Nation's capital. I 227 00:13:15,600 --> 00:13:18,680 Speaker 1: gotta tell you I've got spring fever. You know, I 228 00:13:18,679 --> 00:13:20,720 Speaker 1: I snuck a jog in. Don't tell the boss. On 229 00:13:20,760 --> 00:13:24,760 Speaker 1: my lunch break, Rick Davis is with us Bloomberg Politics contributor, Rick, 230 00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:27,760 Speaker 1: I mean, spring is here. My dad got scheduled for 231 00:13:27,800 --> 00:13:30,080 Speaker 1: a vaccine. There is a light at the end of 232 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:32,800 Speaker 1: the tunnel. We got to inject some optimism out there. 233 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:35,520 Speaker 1: Am I right, my friend, I'm feeling it. I'm feeling it. 234 00:13:35,559 --> 00:13:38,360 Speaker 1: I'm now feeling very guilty. I didn't get outside to run. 235 00:13:38,400 --> 00:13:40,640 Speaker 1: I did run inside this morning, but it was too 236 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:44,120 Speaker 1: cold outside by the time I was up. But I totally, 237 00:13:44,679 --> 00:13:48,440 Speaker 1: I honestly feel like this is a different, uh period 238 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:51,360 Speaker 1: of time where you know, maybe COVID is gonna get tackled. 239 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 1: We've got all these vaccines happening. Good, good work. For 240 00:13:54,280 --> 00:13:57,720 Speaker 1: your father to get get a get a shot. Get this. 241 00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:00,000 Speaker 1: I gotta give credit to my cousin who actually lives 242 00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:01,839 Speaker 1: in Hong Kong. I have a cousin in Hong Kong, 243 00:14:02,080 --> 00:14:04,760 Speaker 1: and uh she was staying up because well, I guess 244 00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:06,680 Speaker 1: she wasn't staying up at the time. Difference worked in 245 00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:09,280 Speaker 1: the favor. She kept hitting, refreshed and then got him 246 00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: in to a place back in Delco where I grew up. 247 00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:14,480 Speaker 1: So anyway, shout out to my cousin for that good news. 248 00:14:14,720 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 1: Good news, more people getting vaccines. Gotta have that optimism. 249 00:14:18,679 --> 00:14:20,520 Speaker 1: It was a better day for me, I guess than 250 00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:22,760 Speaker 1: for the leaders of the Republican Party in the House 251 00:14:22,760 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 1: that they're at their press conference. Uh did you see this, 252 00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:29,520 Speaker 1: Rick Davis. So they gave a press conference Leader McCarthy 253 00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:32,480 Speaker 1: and Congresswoman Liz Cheney, and one of the reporters asked 254 00:14:32,480 --> 00:14:36,680 Speaker 1: about whether or not former President Donald Trump should speak 255 00:14:36,720 --> 00:14:40,920 Speaker 1: at Sea Pack this weekend. If this sound bite doesn't 256 00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:45,880 Speaker 1: illustrate what's happening right now in the Republican Party, I 257 00:14:45,880 --> 00:14:48,760 Speaker 1: don't know what does. Here's the sounds on this exchange. 258 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:51,320 Speaker 1: It really captures it. Here here it is take a 259 00:14:51,360 --> 00:14:57,240 Speaker 1: listen especially how this President Trump should be speeding should 260 00:14:58,160 --> 00:15:03,440 Speaker 1: this weekend Congress ms Cheney, that's up to seat back. 261 00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:06,360 Speaker 1: I've been clear in my views about the President Trump 262 00:15:06,400 --> 00:15:09,640 Speaker 1: and and the extent to which, well, extent which in 263 00:15:09,720 --> 00:15:12,840 Speaker 1: January six, Uh, I don't I don't believe that he 264 00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:14,680 Speaker 1: should be playing a role in the future of the party. 265 00:15:16,120 --> 00:15:20,960 Speaker 1: I mean, Rick Davis. Wow. Wow, You've got Kevin McCarthy 266 00:15:21,040 --> 00:15:25,200 Speaker 1: saying yes, he should speak, Liz Cheney saying no, he 267 00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 1: should not. Yeah. And this comes just a few weeks 268 00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:31,160 Speaker 1: after a vote of confidence within the GOP caucus in 269 00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:34,480 Speaker 1: the House that that kept Liz Cheney in a in 270 00:15:34,520 --> 00:15:38,760 Speaker 1: a seat that of leadership. So I gotta tell you 271 00:15:39,320 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 1: it is is a party that has now got a 272 00:15:41,560 --> 00:15:45,040 Speaker 1: fault line. And that fault line is Donald Trump and 273 00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:47,320 Speaker 1: and and it's and it's even more distinct when you 274 00:15:47,360 --> 00:15:49,960 Speaker 1: move over to how Mitch McConnell, the leader of the 275 00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:53,520 Speaker 1: caucus in the Senate, feels about the same situation. Yeah, 276 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:56,040 Speaker 1: Roger Zackheim's with us. He's the director of the Ronald 277 00:15:56,080 --> 00:16:00,480 Speaker 1: Reagan Institute, Roger Roger, is that the Party of Reagan anymore? 278 00:16:00,880 --> 00:16:05,600 Speaker 1: Or is it a divide between McCarthy and Cheney. Listen, 279 00:16:05,720 --> 00:16:08,360 Speaker 1: the party of Reagan and Lincoln. UH. And I know 280 00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:12,200 Speaker 1: that because speakany Republican and I'll tell you that. But 281 00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: in terms of the future of the party, UH, that's 282 00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:18,760 Speaker 1: the debate, UM, and the clip you shared captured it. 283 00:16:19,160 --> 00:16:24,800 Speaker 1: Whether the Republican Party UH wants have President Trump continues 284 00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:27,480 Speaker 1: to find it where the other Republicans want to move 285 00:16:27,520 --> 00:16:30,680 Speaker 1: on and find other voices to leave the party. UM. 286 00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:32,680 Speaker 1: And that won't be resolved in today's conference. Is going 287 00:16:32,760 --> 00:16:36,920 Speaker 1: to play out UH in the coming weeks, months, and years. Frankly, 288 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:39,880 Speaker 1: so Roger, and we're going to talk about about your 289 00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:43,000 Speaker 1: conversations on the national security front coming up in the 290 00:16:43,040 --> 00:16:45,440 Speaker 1: next half hour, and you just had a brilliant interview 291 00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:49,960 Speaker 1: with Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas for his positions on China, 292 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:53,280 Speaker 1: and we're gonna get to that. But another part of 293 00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:56,640 Speaker 1: your role as the director of the Ronald Reagan Institute 294 00:16:56,680 --> 00:17:00,840 Speaker 1: is you talk with incredibly influential republic kinds. And so, 295 00:17:01,320 --> 00:17:04,440 Speaker 1: how does this party unify ahead of the mid terms 296 00:17:04,720 --> 00:17:08,840 Speaker 1: when the leaders are so bullish on recapturing control of 297 00:17:08,880 --> 00:17:11,680 Speaker 1: the House of Representatives, When you've got such a clear 298 00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:16,080 Speaker 1: divide right now between McCarthy and Cheney, and it's spilling 299 00:17:16,119 --> 00:17:18,840 Speaker 1: over where they're standing next to each other on the 300 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:24,879 Speaker 1: same stage socially distance of a press conference for the caucus. Well, 301 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:26,959 Speaker 1: I think you put your finger on it. It's how 302 00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:29,399 Speaker 1: do you win? How do you become majority party? And 303 00:17:29,400 --> 00:17:32,400 Speaker 1: they got very close in the House of Representatives, uh, 304 00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:35,760 Speaker 1: in the last election. Um, and that's what it's going 305 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:39,359 Speaker 1: to define the direction they go elected. Officials want to 306 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 1: be elected, they want to stay elected, they want to 307 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:44,480 Speaker 1: have the government majority. They've failed to do that in 308 00:17:44,520 --> 00:17:48,880 Speaker 1: the last election. And depending on the recipe they put 309 00:17:48,880 --> 00:17:52,720 Speaker 1: together for two will to determine whether it's a party 310 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:56,120 Speaker 1: that double downs on the ideas and principles that were 311 00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:58,600 Speaker 1: advanced in the last administration or if they go in 312 00:17:58,600 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: a different directions. Yeah, I was just gonna yeah, I mean, 313 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:07,560 Speaker 1: you point out the elections of the future. Two are 314 00:18:07,560 --> 00:18:10,200 Speaker 1: going to define a lot of that. And and obviously 315 00:18:10,400 --> 00:18:12,840 Speaker 1: we know Kevin McCarthy is working hard to try and 316 00:18:13,119 --> 00:18:15,760 Speaker 1: get every help he can, and that would include Donald Trump, 317 00:18:15,840 --> 00:18:18,240 Speaker 1: you know, for a Republican majority in the House. But 318 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:20,760 Speaker 1: when you look at the Senate, it's a totally different 319 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:23,879 Speaker 1: picture where you have you know, ten of the thirty 320 00:18:24,119 --> 00:18:26,840 Speaker 1: ten of the fourteen Democratic seats that are up or 321 00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:30,040 Speaker 1: in states that Donald Trump won in two thousand and sixteen, 322 00:18:30,320 --> 00:18:32,399 Speaker 1: and only two of the states that are up for 323 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:37,239 Speaker 1: Republicans twenty in total, Biden one in this last term. So, uh, 324 00:18:37,320 --> 00:18:40,600 Speaker 1: it's a completely different, uh animal of a different color, 325 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:43,720 Speaker 1: so to speak, when it comes to what Republican priorities 326 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:45,840 Speaker 1: are and depending on whether it's a statewide race or 327 00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:48,920 Speaker 1: a district race, and who the primary might be. Uh, 328 00:18:49,280 --> 00:18:51,679 Speaker 1: that's a really great point. I'm curious to see if 329 00:18:51,720 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 1: there's any oxygen in the room for a new type 330 00:18:55,520 --> 00:18:58,720 Speaker 1: of Republican in the party of a new generation when 331 00:18:59,359 --> 00:19:03,840 Speaker 1: you've got so many of these household name politicians drowning 332 00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:06,600 Speaker 1: out so much of the noise. Much more coming up next, 333 00:19:06,600 --> 00:19:08,520 Speaker 1: we go to one of those Republicans on the hill. 334 00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:11,960 Speaker 1: That's coming up next. I'm Kevin Surreally. This is Bloomberg 335 00:19:29,119 --> 00:19:34,200 Speaker 1: broadcasting live from our nation's capital, Bloomberg to New York, 336 00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:39,640 Speaker 1: Bloomberg eleven Frio to San Francisco, Bloomberg to the country, 337 00:19:39,800 --> 00:19:44,200 Speaker 1: Sirius XM General one and around the globe, the Bloomberg 338 00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 1: Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg 339 00:19:48,960 --> 00:19:55,240 Speaker 1: sound on with Kevin Sorelli. Up next on the telephone line, 340 00:19:55,359 --> 00:20:00,440 Speaker 1: you Congressman James Coohmer of Republican representing Kentucky's first congressional district. 341 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:05,520 Speaker 1: He wrote to Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney today urging for transparency 342 00:20:06,080 --> 00:20:11,280 Speaker 1: on Governor Andrew Cuomo. Accompanied by none other than Rick Davis, 343 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:15,880 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Politics contributor, joining us on the telephone line. Congressman 344 00:20:15,960 --> 00:20:20,399 Speaker 1: James Khmer, Republican, representing Kentucky's first congressional district. He's also 345 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:25,600 Speaker 1: the top Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Congressman, 346 00:20:25,600 --> 00:20:27,080 Speaker 1: I want to talk to you about stimulus, but but 347 00:20:27,119 --> 00:20:29,000 Speaker 1: first I want to get to a letter that you 348 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:35,400 Speaker 1: sent UH to UH regarding Governor Andrew Cuomo with regards 349 00:20:35,520 --> 00:20:38,520 Speaker 1: to issuing a subpoena to the chairwoman of the committee, 350 00:20:38,680 --> 00:20:42,320 Speaker 1: Caroline Maloney of New York about transparency as it relates 351 00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:45,680 Speaker 1: to deaths and nursing homes. UH. Have you gotten a 352 00:20:45,720 --> 00:20:48,960 Speaker 1: response yet from the chairwoman. We have not gotten a 353 00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:52,439 Speaker 1: response yet. We sent a letter today. I would be 354 00:20:52,520 --> 00:20:58,200 Speaker 1: surprised that she even responded because the Select subcommittee that 355 00:20:58,359 --> 00:21:02,560 Speaker 1: has been investigating everything related to COVID is a subcommittee 356 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:06,880 Speaker 1: of the full Committee of Oversight. So this subcommittee has 357 00:21:06,920 --> 00:21:12,080 Speaker 1: been on top of all the wrongdoing with respect to 358 00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:17,160 Speaker 1: Cuomo's nursing home policy and transferring COVID possipations and nursing 359 00:21:17,160 --> 00:21:19,359 Speaker 1: homes from day one. In fact, I think this sub 360 00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:23,080 Speaker 1: select subcommittee is the committee that first broke the news 361 00:21:23,200 --> 00:21:27,240 Speaker 1: on that. So, uh, the people of America, especially the 362 00:21:27,280 --> 00:21:31,160 Speaker 1: families in New York have lost loved ones, deserved transparency. 363 00:21:31,240 --> 00:21:34,840 Speaker 1: They deserve to know what actually happened, what was the 364 00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:40,679 Speaker 1: decision making process. Did Governor Cuomo in fact deflate the 365 00:21:40,840 --> 00:21:44,760 Speaker 1: numbers on the actual nursing home death And I think 366 00:21:44,760 --> 00:21:48,600 Speaker 1: that that's something that the Oversight Committee should take up 367 00:21:48,720 --> 00:21:51,280 Speaker 1: since we spent so much time and resources on the 368 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:56,439 Speaker 1: Select Committee. So, uh, Maloney should do this. It's her state, 369 00:21:56,880 --> 00:21:59,840 Speaker 1: it's her committee, and we'll just be waiting to hear 370 00:22:00,320 --> 00:22:04,240 Speaker 1: her response. We're gonna keep a careful eye on that story. 371 00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:07,399 Speaker 1: But let's also now turn to the financial matters of 372 00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:11,640 Speaker 1: the day. Uh, particularly this one point nine trillion dollars 373 00:22:11,640 --> 00:22:14,960 Speaker 1: stimulus plan that is likely going to pass out of 374 00:22:14,960 --> 00:22:17,679 Speaker 1: the House of Representatives on Friday, and then it of 375 00:22:17,680 --> 00:22:20,240 Speaker 1: course goes to the Senate. Are you detailed in the 376 00:22:20,359 --> 00:22:23,760 Speaker 1: Fox News op ed on the COVID spending that this 377 00:22:23,840 --> 00:22:27,359 Speaker 1: is the wrong time, uh, and the wrong plan for 378 00:22:27,400 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: the wrong time. Elaborate why you are against this plan. Well, 379 00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:37,639 Speaker 1: you have already passed four trillion dollars in bipartisans stimulus, 380 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:43,159 Speaker 1: and we've learned recently that almost a trillion dollars of 381 00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:47,879 Speaker 1: that initial fort trillion has been unspent. So if you 382 00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:51,119 Speaker 1: can imagine, four trillion dollars is more money than the 383 00:22:51,160 --> 00:22:55,119 Speaker 1: federal government can even spend. Now the Democrats want to 384 00:22:55,160 --> 00:23:00,560 Speaker 1: pass another two trillion dollars. Only nine of this two 385 00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:04,040 Speaker 1: trillion dollar stimulus plan that the Democrats are trying to 386 00:23:04,080 --> 00:23:08,720 Speaker 1: push through, less than nine is COVID related. That that 387 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:13,120 Speaker 1: deals with putting Kobe shots in in people's arms and 388 00:23:13,119 --> 00:23:16,480 Speaker 1: and testing and things like that. The bill for it's 389 00:23:16,520 --> 00:23:18,760 Speaker 1: a wish list. It's a liberal wish list for polo 390 00:23:18,840 --> 00:23:22,560 Speaker 1: sas three hundred and fifty billion for state local governments, 391 00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:27,640 Speaker 1: So it's rewarding states that kept their state shut down. Uh. 392 00:23:27,680 --> 00:23:29,840 Speaker 1: It's a hundred thirty five million for the national en 393 00:23:29,840 --> 00:23:35,719 Speaker 1: downloads for ART twelve billions for for an aid fifty 394 00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:38,440 Speaker 1: million for planned parents. And these aren't the things that 395 00:23:38,960 --> 00:23:41,800 Speaker 1: I think we need to be borrowing money from our 396 00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:44,520 Speaker 1: children and grandchildren to pay for today. And that's what 397 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:47,679 Speaker 1: I've said about this bill. It's immoral because of what 398 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:52,760 Speaker 1: it does to the national debt that our children and 399 00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:56,920 Speaker 1: grandchildren are going to have to pay for. Money goes 400 00:23:57,000 --> 00:24:00,400 Speaker 1: for individuals. Yes, you know, you point out that you 401 00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:02,560 Speaker 1: you you can't find a trillion dollars worth of the 402 00:24:02,880 --> 00:24:07,040 Speaker 1: four training that's already been allocated UH to COVID relief. 403 00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:09,159 Speaker 1: And I'm curious because we've heard a lot of different 404 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:13,720 Speaker 1: numbers as to what's outstanding from the Trump administration COVID 405 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:17,520 Speaker 1: relief funds. And where is that money? I mean, that's 406 00:24:17,520 --> 00:24:20,440 Speaker 1: the biggest number I've heard out in the public and 407 00:24:20,560 --> 00:24:23,520 Speaker 1: UH and and and is it in accounts that are 408 00:24:23,520 --> 00:24:28,840 Speaker 1: accessible to be applied to the current crisis. It's scattered 409 00:24:28,880 --> 00:24:32,280 Speaker 1: in different funds. You have a lot of unspent PPP funds, 410 00:24:32,359 --> 00:24:37,199 Speaker 1: you have unspent state local funds. The Cares Act was 411 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:43,119 Speaker 1: a broad piece of legislation that was very open ended, 412 00:24:43,800 --> 00:24:49,359 Speaker 1: and a lot of agencies, local municipalities, a lot of 413 00:24:50,240 --> 00:24:53,480 Speaker 1: UH entities that got money from from the Cares Act 414 00:24:53,560 --> 00:24:59,400 Speaker 1: for healthcare related expenses for economic stimulus. They're just hoarding 415 00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:03,000 Speaker 1: that money because they don't need it. And we listed 416 00:25:03,280 --> 00:25:07,480 Speaker 1: in Oversight committee hearing all the different municipalities that were 417 00:25:07,480 --> 00:25:11,760 Speaker 1: represented by Democrat members on the committee, who who represent 418 00:25:11,840 --> 00:25:15,879 Speaker 1: citties that haven't spent thirty five of their COVID funds, 419 00:25:15,880 --> 00:25:18,480 Speaker 1: but yet they're asking for three d and fifty billion 420 00:25:18,600 --> 00:25:23,359 Speaker 1: more in state local funds. It's unneeded. Uh. I fear 421 00:25:23,480 --> 00:25:25,920 Speaker 1: that we keep training money. Not only does it run 422 00:25:25,960 --> 00:25:28,280 Speaker 1: the DAT up on our children grandchildren, also going to 423 00:25:28,359 --> 00:25:31,720 Speaker 1: create inflation. So I think this is bad policy, and 424 00:25:31,880 --> 00:25:35,520 Speaker 1: the American taxpayers deserved and know we're the original for 425 00:25:35,680 --> 00:25:38,640 Speaker 1: trillion to spend. They don't even have that answer. I'm 426 00:25:38,640 --> 00:25:40,960 Speaker 1: going to rip up the script here because I would 427 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: be remiss if I didn't ask you this question. People 428 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:46,280 Speaker 1: when they think of Kentucky, they often think of, you know, 429 00:25:46,400 --> 00:25:50,640 Speaker 1: bourbon right, but you've actually put HEMP and the CBD 430 00:25:50,880 --> 00:25:54,199 Speaker 1: market on the map in Kentucky. You are one of 431 00:25:54,240 --> 00:25:58,760 Speaker 1: the leading Republicans in in in the caucus. Really Congressman 432 00:25:59,119 --> 00:26:02,000 Speaker 1: James Comber, who's at us, who's really pushing for there 433 00:26:02,080 --> 00:26:06,320 Speaker 1: to be more research and development in this UH emerging industry. 434 00:26:06,880 --> 00:26:12,720 Speaker 1: What's the most prescient issue pertaining the hemp industry as 435 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:16,800 Speaker 1: it relates to economic development in your district? Well, in 436 00:26:16,880 --> 00:26:19,200 Speaker 1: my district, there was a lot of hemp grown by 437 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:24,400 Speaker 1: Kentucky farmers for CBD oil, and the FDA will not 438 00:26:24,880 --> 00:26:27,320 Speaker 1: make a decision on which direction they want to go 439 00:26:27,480 --> 00:26:30,199 Speaker 1: with respect to CBD oil. You have a lot of 440 00:26:30,200 --> 00:26:32,960 Speaker 1: CBD oil that's on the market today, and I take 441 00:26:33,040 --> 00:26:35,479 Speaker 1: CBD oil. I've been very public about that. I think 442 00:26:35,560 --> 00:26:42,199 Speaker 1: it's a very good alternative UH medicine type, but it 443 00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:44,400 Speaker 1: needs to be regulated. You have a lot of companies 444 00:26:44,440 --> 00:26:47,640 Speaker 1: that are are good actors, and you have a lot 445 00:26:47,640 --> 00:26:49,960 Speaker 1: of companies that are bad actors that are selling products 446 00:26:50,000 --> 00:26:52,440 Speaker 1: that that really don't have what they what they need. 447 00:26:52,480 --> 00:26:56,320 Speaker 1: So we want to regulate a ute pseudical right. Come 448 00:26:56,320 --> 00:26:58,320 Speaker 1: back on and talk to us more about that, because 449 00:26:58,359 --> 00:27:00,720 Speaker 1: I think that's a that's something an issue you to watch. 450 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:03,600 Speaker 1: That's much more coming up next to me, pivot to geopolitics. 451 00:27:03,640 --> 00:27:07,080 Speaker 1: That's Congressman James Comber taking us down to Kentucky. I'm 452 00:27:07,160 --> 00:27:22,919 Speaker 1: Kevin CURRELLI, this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg's Sound On 453 00:27:23,280 --> 00:27:28,600 Speaker 1: with Kevin s on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Kevin Currelly, chief 454 00:27:28,600 --> 00:27:32,440 Speaker 1: Washington correspondent for Bloomberg TV and Radio. Accompanied by Rick Davis, 455 00:27:32,440 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Politics contributor, and Roger Zackheim, who is the director 456 00:27:37,520 --> 00:27:40,919 Speaker 1: of the Ronald Reagan Institute. Let's pivoting out to what 457 00:27:41,119 --> 00:27:44,840 Speaker 1: I think is arguably the most important geopolitical story of 458 00:27:45,040 --> 00:27:51,280 Speaker 1: the day. President Biden's signing executive orders to study the 459 00:27:51,400 --> 00:27:55,480 Speaker 1: US dependence upon the global supply chain. He is calling 460 00:27:55,520 --> 00:27:58,720 Speaker 1: for there to be a one day review period. Uh. 461 00:27:58,760 --> 00:28:01,520 Speaker 1: And candidly, this is all about China, UH, and the 462 00:28:01,600 --> 00:28:05,560 Speaker 1: relationship that the United States has on China, particularly as 463 00:28:05,600 --> 00:28:08,399 Speaker 1: we have a shortage on a host of different products, 464 00:28:08,440 --> 00:28:14,520 Speaker 1: including semiconductor chips. This is gonna have massive implications for Japan, Taiwan, 465 00:28:14,920 --> 00:28:18,960 Speaker 1: Australia even to some extent um. And and there are 466 00:28:18,960 --> 00:28:22,080 Speaker 1: our plants, there are auto industry plants, folks that are 467 00:28:22,119 --> 00:28:25,720 Speaker 1: sitting idle across this country right now and threatening to 468 00:28:25,720 --> 00:28:29,040 Speaker 1: put US workers out of work. This is the one area, 469 00:28:29,119 --> 00:28:33,080 Speaker 1: I'll be frank with you, where Republicans and Democrats do 470 00:28:33,240 --> 00:28:37,919 Speaker 1: actually agree that the United States is too dependent upon China. 471 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:41,120 Speaker 1: For its supply chains uh. And whether it's Senator Marsha 472 00:28:41,160 --> 00:28:45,200 Speaker 1: Blackburn of the Republican Party or increasingly Senator Tom Cotton 473 00:28:45,840 --> 00:28:49,800 Speaker 1: of Arkansas or Democrats like Chairman of the Intel Committee, 474 00:28:49,800 --> 00:28:52,760 Speaker 1: Mark Warner, They've been really talking about this for for 475 00:28:52,840 --> 00:28:55,320 Speaker 1: quite some time. I want to go to Roger first, 476 00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:58,640 Speaker 1: because you actually spoke with Senator Cotton just a couple 477 00:28:58,640 --> 00:29:02,720 Speaker 1: of days ago and about these issues. Do you think 478 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:05,840 Speaker 1: that this is just long overdue geopolitical policy that the 479 00:29:05,920 --> 00:29:08,800 Speaker 1: US start to distance itself in order to better positioned 480 00:29:08,800 --> 00:29:15,680 Speaker 1: itself in catastrophic situations from its reliance on China. I mean, 481 00:29:15,720 --> 00:29:19,640 Speaker 1: it's been building for some time now. One of the 482 00:29:19,640 --> 00:29:22,520 Speaker 1: most significant achievements of the Trump administration was to focus 483 00:29:22,560 --> 00:29:27,520 Speaker 1: squarely on the competition is what policymakers call it, with China, 484 00:29:27,840 --> 00:29:29,720 Speaker 1: and so we saw today out of the Biden White 485 00:29:29,760 --> 00:29:34,200 Speaker 1: House was continuity on this issue. Set COVID nineteen is 486 00:29:34,200 --> 00:29:39,520 Speaker 1: only reinforced and made Americans truly internalized what dependency on 487 00:29:39,720 --> 00:29:43,440 Speaker 1: China means and what it could mean to our security. 488 00:29:43,600 --> 00:29:45,560 Speaker 1: The only differences if you read the White House fact 489 00:29:45,600 --> 00:29:50,560 Speaker 1: sheet about this executive order, it doesn't name China as 490 00:29:50,560 --> 00:29:53,720 Speaker 1: you were called the Trump administration. Uh, never missed an 491 00:29:53,760 --> 00:29:58,920 Speaker 1: opportunity to name China. You know, that's name the virus after. 492 00:29:59,120 --> 00:30:05,200 Speaker 1: I believe I'm gonna you know, I think that's it 493 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:07,480 Speaker 1: is fascinating that they have decided. What do you think 494 00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:09,360 Speaker 1: that means? I mean, let me follow up, Roger. Why 495 00:30:09,400 --> 00:30:11,680 Speaker 1: didn't they name China in their fact sheet in a 496 00:30:11,760 --> 00:30:16,160 Speaker 1: policy that is specifically all about China, Because it's not 497 00:30:16,280 --> 00:30:20,840 Speaker 1: just about China. Uh, and it was focusing on America's 498 00:30:21,320 --> 00:30:25,640 Speaker 1: need really too, uh, not just be less dependent, but 499 00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:30,120 Speaker 1: often to onshore within the United States. But it actually 500 00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:33,920 Speaker 1: surprised me. Uh. President Biden spoke at an international conference 501 00:30:34,080 --> 00:30:38,400 Speaker 1: virtually about a week ago or so, and uh, yeah, 502 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:42,240 Speaker 1: I had no issue calling out China. Uh. He talked 503 00:30:42,240 --> 00:30:44,600 Speaker 1: about that it was the competition would continue, that's why 504 00:30:44,600 --> 00:30:48,600 Speaker 1: there's continuity, and also identified areas of cooperation. But it 505 00:30:48,680 --> 00:30:50,880 Speaker 1: is surprising to me that when you're talking about, you know, 506 00:30:50,920 --> 00:30:54,200 Speaker 1: the criticality supply chains and on shoring bringing this manufacturing 507 00:30:54,280 --> 00:30:56,680 Speaker 1: back to the United States at a moment when we're 508 00:30:56,680 --> 00:30:59,440 Speaker 1: still within this global pandemic, and as you reference, we 509 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:01,800 Speaker 1: have NFL afterwards in the auto industry that can get 510 00:31:02,360 --> 00:31:04,640 Speaker 1: the chips they need, Uh, you might as well call 511 00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:07,800 Speaker 1: it out. We all knew who he helps in the room. Yeah, 512 00:31:07,800 --> 00:31:10,000 Speaker 1: And I was gonna say, if we could just dial 513 00:31:10,080 --> 00:31:14,240 Speaker 1: back to what Kevin said earlier about, um, the conversation 514 00:31:14,280 --> 00:31:17,520 Speaker 1: you had with Senator Cotton. I mean, obviously not from 515 00:31:17,560 --> 00:31:22,000 Speaker 1: the same ideological perspective as President, but the paper he 516 00:31:22,040 --> 00:31:25,800 Speaker 1: wrote that you all were discussing beat China targeted decoupling. 517 00:31:26,240 --> 00:31:30,000 Speaker 1: This is exactly what Biden announced today. Decoupling on computer chips, 518 00:31:30,040 --> 00:31:35,280 Speaker 1: decoupling on you know, e V batteries, pharmaceuticals, rare earth minerals, 519 00:31:35,840 --> 00:31:38,920 Speaker 1: all of those are are the things we've become dependent 520 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:43,400 Speaker 1: upon with China. And and it's it's certainly seems to 521 00:31:43,480 --> 00:31:48,400 Speaker 1: me that without saying so, he's he's mimicking the arguments 522 00:31:48,440 --> 00:31:57,400 Speaker 1: being made by a very conservative Senator Tom Cotton. And 523 00:31:57,400 --> 00:32:00,840 Speaker 1: and and you know Tom Cotton is not ment words 524 00:32:00,920 --> 00:32:03,400 Speaker 1: and and the title of his report, UM makes that 525 00:32:03,520 --> 00:32:08,400 Speaker 1: pretty clear beat China. Uh. Tom Cotton was emphasizing this 526 00:32:08,560 --> 00:32:12,479 Speaker 1: area of economic security and dependence on China. And there 527 00:32:12,480 --> 00:32:15,200 Speaker 1: are a lot of Democrats, uh in the Congress, Charlie 528 00:32:15,240 --> 00:32:19,160 Speaker 1: Schummer probably one of the biggest proponents of economic security 529 00:32:19,840 --> 00:32:22,480 Speaker 1: um and for a long time has been talking about 530 00:32:22,520 --> 00:32:26,600 Speaker 1: less dependence and actually saying that trade with China is 531 00:32:26,640 --> 00:32:29,880 Speaker 1: something needs to be addressed and and and being a 532 00:32:29,880 --> 00:32:33,720 Speaker 1: a pure free trader actually undermines our security. So you're right, 533 00:32:33,760 --> 00:32:36,719 Speaker 1: there is by parts of consensus around a lot of this, 534 00:32:36,840 --> 00:32:41,120 Speaker 1: although Tom Cotton uh certainly introduced the logical component where 535 00:32:41,160 --> 00:32:46,080 Speaker 1: he called out China using President Reagan rhetoric as an 536 00:32:46,080 --> 00:32:49,280 Speaker 1: even evil empire. You know. And one of those Democrats 537 00:32:49,280 --> 00:32:53,440 Speaker 1: as Congressman Tom Malinowski. He is a Democrat from New Jersey, 538 00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:58,080 Speaker 1: uh and and actually served in the Obama administration state's apartment. 539 00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:01,560 Speaker 1: He's actually been at the or front. He's the first Democrat, 540 00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:04,040 Speaker 1: I believe in in this Congress to say that the 541 00:33:04,120 --> 00:33:09,240 Speaker 1: United States ought not to participate in the upcoming Winter 542 00:33:09,400 --> 00:33:13,160 Speaker 1: Olympic Games. Uh. And there have been a host of 543 00:33:13,160 --> 00:33:15,960 Speaker 1: of different Republicans who have already come out and said 544 00:33:16,000 --> 00:33:20,480 Speaker 1: that the United States should not participate in the Winter 545 00:33:20,560 --> 00:33:23,760 Speaker 1: Olympic Games, which of course Beijing is hosting, because of 546 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:26,920 Speaker 1: China's human rights abuses and a host of other issues. 547 00:33:27,600 --> 00:33:31,280 Speaker 1: Another one of those Republicans is Congressman John Katko, a 548 00:33:31,320 --> 00:33:35,320 Speaker 1: Republican of New York. When you talk to whether it's 549 00:33:35,600 --> 00:33:38,640 Speaker 1: Tom Senator cotton On on the right, or even Secretary 550 00:33:38,640 --> 00:33:43,320 Speaker 1: of State Tony B. Lincoln UH in the Biden administration, Roger, 551 00:33:43,920 --> 00:33:48,320 Speaker 1: it's it's quite clear that there's this developing framework and 552 00:33:48,320 --> 00:33:51,200 Speaker 1: and it's the one area that the previous administration would 553 00:33:51,240 --> 00:33:55,320 Speaker 1: have with this current one in agreement of developing an 554 00:33:55,320 --> 00:33:59,840 Speaker 1: alliance in the West with regards to cybersecurity, with regard 555 00:34:00,080 --> 00:34:04,520 Speaker 1: to promoting UH techno democracies as the blink in States 556 00:34:04,520 --> 00:34:09,360 Speaker 1: Department has dubbed it, and getting our allies to to 557 00:34:09,560 --> 00:34:13,000 Speaker 1: participate in in clean so called as the Trump administration 558 00:34:13,080 --> 00:34:17,879 Speaker 1: labeled it, five gen networks, and promoting continuity that would 559 00:34:17,880 --> 00:34:22,000 Speaker 1: allow for that type of assurance amongst our allies that 560 00:34:22,040 --> 00:34:27,120 Speaker 1: we're all reliance upon the same type of cyber protections. 561 00:34:27,520 --> 00:34:31,600 Speaker 1: Do you think that this executive order today is a 562 00:34:31,640 --> 00:34:36,239 Speaker 1: part of that broader strategy, Roger, without question. I mean, 563 00:34:36,239 --> 00:34:38,560 Speaker 1: they're going to study this for a hundred days, but 564 00:34:38,719 --> 00:34:42,719 Speaker 1: it's pretty clear the direction are going. This kind of 565 00:34:42,760 --> 00:34:48,239 Speaker 1: overlap between America UH needs for mass security and American 566 00:34:48,280 --> 00:34:52,279 Speaker 1: manufacturing is something that the Biden administration wants to get 567 00:34:52,280 --> 00:34:56,600 Speaker 1: its arms around and will develop policies UH that can 568 00:34:56,760 --> 00:35:00,800 Speaker 1: make us less dependent. Uh. They will u as allies 569 00:35:00,840 --> 00:35:04,280 Speaker 1: and make allies part of the solution, which is important. 570 00:35:04,360 --> 00:35:08,440 Speaker 1: And the difference here is between democratic countries, countries that 571 00:35:08,480 --> 00:35:11,880 Speaker 1: embrace freedom, countries that are open. Uh. They will be 572 00:35:11,880 --> 00:35:14,120 Speaker 1: on our side, and we need to make sure we 573 00:35:14,200 --> 00:35:18,480 Speaker 1: have economically sound approaches to work with them to relieve 574 00:35:18,520 --> 00:35:21,840 Speaker 1: not only our dependency in China, let's relieve their dependency 575 00:35:21,840 --> 00:35:24,640 Speaker 1: on China. We're not talking about exporting soybeans, you know, 576 00:35:24,920 --> 00:35:28,120 Speaker 1: that's not the problem, or even you know, uh kind 577 00:35:28,120 --> 00:35:31,600 Speaker 1: of low end manufacturing goods. It's the stuff that really 578 00:35:31,600 --> 00:35:35,799 Speaker 1: will determine who will be uh the economic powerhouse and 579 00:35:36,000 --> 00:35:40,080 Speaker 1: by extension, the national security powerhouse for the century. That's 580 00:35:40,080 --> 00:35:42,840 Speaker 1: what's that stage here, Rick Davis. I mean when you 581 00:35:42,840 --> 00:35:45,840 Speaker 1: when you listen to Sir Roger Zackheim, who of the 582 00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:49,480 Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan Institute, UH discussed that. I mean, there really 583 00:35:49,560 --> 00:35:52,880 Speaker 1: is from a geopolitical sense, continuity of where Republicans and 584 00:35:52,920 --> 00:35:56,120 Speaker 1: Democrats are in terms of the desired outcome, but there 585 00:35:56,239 --> 00:35:59,319 Speaker 1: is massive difference in terms of the rhetorical approaches that 586 00:35:59,400 --> 00:36:02,040 Speaker 1: both are the part these take. Who is set to 587 00:36:02,200 --> 00:36:07,640 Speaker 1: gain internationally from this as we have covered it, UH, 588 00:36:07,920 --> 00:36:12,360 Speaker 1: wanting to decouple on in certain industries from China. Is 589 00:36:12,360 --> 00:36:16,160 Speaker 1: it Japan for example, is it Australia for example? Well, 590 00:36:16,160 --> 00:36:19,359 Speaker 1: I think Roger makes a good point about alliances and 591 00:36:19,600 --> 00:36:23,240 Speaker 1: in the West. UH, when you start talking about trusted foundery, 592 00:36:23,280 --> 00:36:25,799 Speaker 1: you know what are the products we're going to care about. 593 00:36:25,920 --> 00:36:29,000 Speaker 1: We are the biggest consumer in the world. Uh. And 594 00:36:29,080 --> 00:36:32,319 Speaker 1: so when we turn to our Western allies and say, 595 00:36:32,360 --> 00:36:34,640 Speaker 1: you know what we would prefer either, if we can't 596 00:36:34,680 --> 00:36:36,600 Speaker 1: make it at home, we'd buy it from you. So 597 00:36:36,719 --> 00:36:40,960 Speaker 1: do we trust the manufacturing processes for chips in Australia 598 00:36:41,040 --> 00:36:43,920 Speaker 1: and do they have the capacity to service our needs? 599 00:36:44,120 --> 00:36:48,080 Speaker 1: Let's buy their Europe is exactly the same situation. Here's 600 00:36:48,080 --> 00:36:53,560 Speaker 1: how we can circle the Western nations liberal democracies alliance 601 00:36:53,960 --> 00:36:58,279 Speaker 1: around uh industry, giving preference to those companies that don't 602 00:36:58,360 --> 00:37:02,560 Speaker 1: have China exposure, and therefore isolate China on the economic 603 00:37:02,719 --> 00:37:06,520 Speaker 1: terms that we can probably handle over the next ten years. 604 00:37:07,160 --> 00:37:08,880 Speaker 1: All Right, We're gonna have to leave it there. Bloomberg 605 00:37:08,920 --> 00:37:13,080 Speaker 1: Politics contributor Rick Davis and Roger Zackheim, director of the 606 00:37:13,160 --> 00:37:15,800 Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan Institute, be sure to go to their website 607 00:37:15,800 --> 00:37:20,040 Speaker 1: to check out his conversation with Senator Tom Cotton. February 608 00:37:20,160 --> 00:37:23,480 Speaker 1: is Black History Month, and Bloomberg Radio is celebrating pivotal 609 00:37:23,480 --> 00:37:26,480 Speaker 1: moments in US Black history each day. Here with today's 610 00:37:26,760 --> 00:37:30,760 Speaker 1: installments is Bloomberg's Nita Young On This Day in Black History. 611 00:37:30,800 --> 00:37:34,400 Speaker 1: In eighteen sixty four, Rebecca Lee Crumpler becomes the first 612 00:37:34,480 --> 00:37:37,239 Speaker 1: Black woman to receive an m d degree. To put 613 00:37:37,239 --> 00:37:40,200 Speaker 1: that into perspective, in eighteen sixty there were only three 614 00:37:40,320 --> 00:37:43,400 Speaker 1: hundred women out of fifty four thousand, five and forty 615 00:37:43,400 --> 00:37:46,359 Speaker 1: three physicians in the United States. None of them were 616 00:37:46,400 --> 00:37:51,040 Speaker 1: African American. Crumpler first worked as a nurse in Charlestown, Massachusetts, 617 00:37:51,080 --> 00:37:54,240 Speaker 1: before she was accepted into the New England Female Medical College. 618 00:37:54,640 --> 00:37:57,200 Speaker 1: It was during a time when male physicians claimed women 619 00:37:57,200 --> 00:38:00,319 Speaker 1: did not have the physical strength to practice medicine. In 620 00:38:01,080 --> 00:38:04,640 Speaker 1: three Crumpler released book of Medical Discourses, which was one 621 00:38:04,680 --> 00:38:07,800 Speaker 1: of the first medical books written by an African American. 622 00:38:08,440 --> 00:38:11,120 Speaker 1: That's today in Black history. I'm really need a young 623 00:38:11,480 --> 00:38:15,239 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio and that does it for me. My name 624 00:38:15,320 --> 00:38:19,040 Speaker 1: is Kevin Surreley. I'm the chief Washington correspondent for Bloomberg 625 00:38:19,080 --> 00:38:22,799 Speaker 1: TV and for Bloomberg Radio coming up. All throughout the week, 626 00:38:22,840 --> 00:38:26,640 Speaker 1: we're going to continue to talk about that economic stimulus bill. 627 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:29,360 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg