WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Jobs Report, Jay Powell Speaks, Government Spending

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our day

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Break anchors all around the world. It's straight ahead on

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the program, a look at the US labor market with

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the February jobs report.

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephen Carol in London, where we're looking ahead to

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 3>the UK government's budget announcement and a key political moment

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 3>ahead of the elections.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>To you later this year.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look ahead to

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 4>the National People's Congress meetings in Beijing next week. What

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 4>sort of prescriptions will they have to fix the Chinese ECONORESS.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>The business news you need to wrap up.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Your week, Available on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Business Happen

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>everywhere you get your podcasts.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>We begin today's program with a look ahead to the

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>February jobs report here in the US and the state

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of the US labor market.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>For a preview, We're joined by.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee, Bloomberg International Economics and Policy Correspondence. All Right,

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>well after a big upside surprise in January, three hundred

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and fifty three thousand jobs added. What are you expecting

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to see for February.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 6>Sort of a return to what was considered somewhat normal.

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 6>The forecast at this point is for one hundred and

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 6>eighty thousand jobs. That may change ten twenty thousand either

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 6>way as we get more data in between now and

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 6>next Friday, but basically that's roughly where we have been

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 6>for the past year two years. The revisions hired to

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 6>December and January were quite a surprise, and nobody thinks

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 6>that that can be sustained. But if it can, you

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 6>watch the bond markets move.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But the unemployment rate expected to hold steady three point

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. That would be about two years under four percent.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 6>It would be one month over two years. Yes, two

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 6>hours a month, and that is probably well, it's close

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 6>to a record nineteen sixty eight. I think when half

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 6>of American men were serving in Vietnam, so there weren't

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 6>as many people to work. That was the last time

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 6>we saw anything like this. The question is is if

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 6>the unemployment rate stays that low, do we see any

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 6>inflationary impact from that? So we'll be looking at average

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 6>hourly earnings very closely. They were up six tenths of

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 6>a percent in January. Now that there may have been

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 6>some distortions in the data that led to that, but

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 6>they're only expected to be up two tenths of a percent.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 6>So if that's the case for February, then we can

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 6>have big job gains and the FED isn't going to

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 6>worry about it.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, let's face it, there are challenges right

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>now to the labor market, not just AI jobs and

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>automation jobs, but we've seen a lot of corporate layoffs

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>being announced. Big ones Cisco Systems that's four thousand jobs,

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as to Lord three, one hundred, Nike, Expedia. I mean,

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 1>none of these or most of them are not tech companies.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So there is a change going on.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, there's a change going on, but it is not

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 6>going to be as bad as it appears. If we

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 6>see a huge wave of layoffs, that would be one thing.

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 6>But what we're seeing is a lot of companies sort

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 6>of right sizing what they think they need for the

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 6>months going forward. And what happens is that companies always

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 6>announce layoffs either in a press release or they do

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 6>it as part of their earnings, but they don't announce hirings.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 6>And so when you look at what happens, there are

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 6>millions of jobs lost every month and there are millions

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 6>of jobs gained every month, and the number that we

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 6>report is the net difference between the two. So, yes,

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 6>there will be a lot of layoffs going in to

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 6>the data. But is it significantly more than usually happens.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 6>That's going to be the question going forward.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's sort of like Apple.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>They're going to eliminate their EV unit, no electric cars,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but two thousand workers will just work on AI.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 2>We're going to shift right over.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 6>And a lot of the jobs that companies cut are

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 6>cut through attrition anyway, so they're not affecting the unemployment

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 6>rate because people are not all of a sudden unemployed.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Another big event this week you want to talk about,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and that is FED Chairman Jerome Powell is going to

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>be on Capitol Hill.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 6>That's always a big deal for Wall Street. The chairman

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 6>is the one who sets the agenda. Powell basically says

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 6>he's not driving the agenda the way that Alan Greenspan

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 6>did say or Ben bernanke. He's much more collaborative, but

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 6>it is still the Chairman to whom everybody defers, And

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 6>so what Powell says about the economy is going to

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 6>be worth a lot more than what any of these

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 6>other Fed officials, as important and as smart as they are,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 6>have to say. So you're going to have everybody tuning in,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 6>particularly to his opening statement, to see if he makes

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 6>any kind of reference to when or by how much

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 6>they might cut And then they'll be listening for Q

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 6>and A for his reaction to things like layoffs and

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 6>how strong the labor market is, and whether they think

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 6>the January inflation numbers, whether CPIPPI or the PCE really

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 6>reflect what's going on with the strength that they showed.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I know you'll be listening and you can hear

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Palace testimony Wednesday and Thursday live right here on

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Well, our thanks to Michael McKee, Bloomberg International

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Policy Correspondent. And now we moved to the

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>US retail sector and a closely watched fourth quarter earnings

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>report out on Tuesday from Target, whether it may give

0:05:58.000 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>us a more clear picture on the health of the

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>US consumer and how stubbornly high inflation may be affecting spending.

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Now for a preview. We're joined by John Edwards. He's

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News US Consumer team leader.

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>John. Thank you for joining us.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 7>Great to be here.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's start with what you expect the headline numbers

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to be from Target in this what's the holiday quarter

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>an all important one?

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, what we're looking for is continued decline in

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 7>same story sales from Target, and they have, you know,

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 7>had that figure going down for some time now. The

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 7>previous quarters report did excite the market, largely because of

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 7>improvements in inventory management. So we'll be watching to see

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 7>if that continues. But you know, the stock is up

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 7>pretty significantly since that report, so expectations are fairly high,

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 7>even though the business continues in some areas to struggle,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, So we do expect those same store sales

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 7>to be down once again, but you know, we'll be

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 7>looking for the trend what they say about, you know,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 7>what they're seeing in terms of continued consumer strength. That

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 7>was you know, certainly something that Walmart pointed to in

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 7>their results recently.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the same source sales drop, not just Target, not

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>just discounters, it's across the board.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 7>Is yeah, yeah, I mean, yeah, we're you know, we're

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing some some retailers managed to uh to bring

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 7>those sales up a little bit. But but yeah, it's uh,

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 7>you know, the consumer is resilient. But but picky is

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 7>is what we're seeing. You know, people are being very

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 7>uh the way Walmart put it was you know, choiceful

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 7>in Uh.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>That's that's a new one. Choiceful wow.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, in in how they approach their their spending. So

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 7>you know they uh, you know, employment remains robust, so

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 7>that's that's a support. But uh, you know, inflation, even

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 7>though it's moderated, remains you know, elevated from you know,

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 7>pre pandemic and people remember what things you know, used

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 7>to cost only you know, three or four years ago.

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 7>So so that's sort of of you know, reins in

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 7>spending a little bit and has people you know, continuing

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 7>to spend but being picky about it. So given that

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 7>target is pretty exposed to you know, those discretionary items,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 7>you know, the sort of general merchandise, that's part of

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 7>where their struggle comes from in terms of bringing those

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 7>same store sales up.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they know their customers though. They are a

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>nimble retailer, and just last week they announced a new

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>springtime clothing collection yep, with most prices under fifty bucks.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 7>Who is it, Diane von Furstenberg.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 7>So, yes, they've had that tradition for some time of

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, enlisting major designers for capsule collections, and that

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 7>has done pretty well for them.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>They also have a new in house brand called deal Worthy. Yeah,

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is hundreds of items, some as low as

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a dollar each.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so you know, they do have that value proposition

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 7>as well. You know, so they certainly try to be

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 7>you know, sort of current and somewhat fashionable, but always

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 7>mindful of, you know, keeping those prices relatively low. Yeah.

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Now, let me ask you about Macy's announcing that over

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the next few years it's going to close one hundred

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and fifty stores, and they're obviously pivoting toward a more

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>upscale consumer, right with Bloomy Dale's Blue Mercury. Are discounters

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like Target Walmart going to be the beneficiary of those closing.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, to some extent, But you know, a lot

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 7>of it depends on, you know, really the mix of

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 7>retail in a given area. It's often there isn't a

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 7>sort of one to one exchange between a you know,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 7>a big traditional department store like a Macy's and you know,

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 7>more of a discount model like a Target or a Walmart.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 7>But yeah, certainly, you know, they can expect to see

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 7>some pick up from from some of those lost shoppers,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 7>but a lot of it and a lot of why

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 7>those stores are closing in the first place is you know,

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 7>a lot of it will just shift on line. And

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, and and certainly you know, Target, Walmart and

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 7>others will hope that some of those online sales they

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 7>pick up as well, but a lot of them will

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 7>continue to go to Amazon. And you know, as as

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 7>we've as we've seen before.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>As we see in our own homes, now that that

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Target has made a big push online, it's also a

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>subscription based plan like Amazon Prime, like Walmart Plus.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>What what's the status on that?

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, listen to here if we get any update

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 7>on that. You know, our reporter Jaywon Kang broke the

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 7>news that Target is considering a membership program along those lines,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 7>which could launch as soon as this year. We're not

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 7>sure exactly when, but you know, and they're somewhat you know,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 7>late getting into that market, given that you know, Prime

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 7>is well established and Walmart Plus seems to be doing

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 7>pretty well. But you know it's another way to you know,

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 7>get shoppers to be stickier, keep coming back to your

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 7>locations looking for those membership points.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's great, a lot to look forward to.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to John Edwards, Bloomberg News US Consumer team Leader,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend to look

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead to the UK's tax and spending plans for the

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>coming year. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead at

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Up later on our program we look ahead to a

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>gathering of China's top political advisory body and legislature. But

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>first in the UK, the government preparing to present its

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>tax and.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Spending plans for the coming year.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It could be the Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt's last chance to

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>announce big policy changes before a general election do this year,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but will economic headwinds prevent him from making his mark?

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The key question everyone wants answered, but will he prioritize

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>cutting taxes over bolstering public services and for more, Let's

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak anchor Stephen Carroll.

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Tom The ceremonial red box used to carry the Chancellor's

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>budget speech is being dusted off and speculation is rife

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 3>about its contents. Jeremy Hunt and Prime Minister Rici Soonak

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 3>have been at pains to paint themselves as responsible stewards

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 3>of the UK's public finances, especially after the previous Conservative

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 3>government sparked a crisis in the guilt markets with their

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 3>tax and spending plans. During the Chancellor's last big announcement

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>in November, he promised measures to back British business and

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>soothe the cost of living crisis. This time around, things

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 3>might be working out in his favor. The UK's fiscal watchdog,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 3>responsible for checking the plans, has disclosed its preparing forecast,

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 3>using data that will potentially improve the public finances and

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 3>create more room for things like tax cuts. But Jeremy

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Hunt will still have to balance steps that might please

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 3>voters ahead of an election expected later this year and

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 3>being fiscally responsible ahead of the lobby groups have been

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 3>lining up with their shopping list for the Chancellor. On

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.239
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg UK Politics podcast, we spoke to the manufacturing

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 3>group Make UK. They've laid out a plan for radical

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 3>changes to how the British economy is managed, including splitting

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 3>up the Treasury into separate Economy and Finance ministers. Here's

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>some of what make UK's chief operating officer, Ben Fletcher

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>told us about what they want to hear from the Chancellor.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 8>We are still one of the ten biggest manufacturing nations

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 8>on Earth, and in the last twelve months we've actually

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 8>overtaken France to move from ninth to eighth in the

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 8>Global League table. So British manufacturing is strong, it's healthy,

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 8>and it's a sector that is in a position where

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 8>it can start to grow. What we're looking for, I

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 8>think is a recognition from government that we're a huge

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 8>part of the economy, that there is real potential there,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 8>and we are making some fairly radical requests of government

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 8>and indeed, in what's likely to be an election year

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 8>the opposition parties as well, because what we're saying is

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 8>there's a kind of hidden gem here within the economy.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 8>It could deliver you some really substantial growth. It would

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 8>support a huge number of new businesses and growing businesses.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 8>It would lead to growth in other considery and related sectors.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 8>Like logistics and so on. But what we do need,

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 8>I think, is a bold vision for manufacturing and a

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 8>policy agenda that reflects, that responds to that and really

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 8>seizes the opportunity that we're presented with today.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Is this essentially about just wanting more money from the government.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you're looking for more defense spending, that's

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.119
<v Speaker 3>one way of funneling money into the sector that you represent.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 3>But the UK is never really going to be able

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.479
<v Speaker 3>to compete with it spending from the likes of the US.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 8>It isn't just about money. I think what our central

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 8>ask is for quite some time now and today really

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 8>distills this and brings it together on the back of

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 8>our big national conference. What we're saying is that we

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 8>need a plan, and unlike most of our big competitor

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 8>nations around the world, Britain doesn't have an industrial strategy

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 8>and it doesn't really have a clear plan. Government expenditure

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 8>is always important, and when we think about defense, very

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 8>importantly for our sector, big infrastructure projects as well. Government

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 8>expenditure is vitally important for triggering private sector investment. But

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 8>the really big message of today is that if we're

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 8>going to grow, if we're going to deal with the

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 8>very threatening landscape that we face if we're going to

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 8>continue to be a major manufacturing power. The thing that

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 8>we're going to need from the government, and the message

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 8>that we're sending to the opposition parties is very consistent.

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 8>We really need a plan because the nations that we're

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 8>competing with do have much clearer plans. That's very important

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 8>for triggering in with investment. It's really important at the

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 8>moment for triggering confidence. And when we think about both

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 8>defense and infrastructure, we think about the challenge of net

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 8>zero and moving our car industry in a massively different direction,

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 8>We're going to need to have really clear skills policies.

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 8>We're going to need a massive investment in people leaving

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 8>school and college the right kind of skills and the

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 8>right kind of qualifications. So whatever set of issues we

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 8>look at, whether it be defense, whether it be challenging

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 8>that zero, whether we think about some of the big

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 8>challenges of automation and digitization, which are going to be

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 8>absolute game changes in British manufacturing, what we need are

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 8>a series of decisions by government that can enable us

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 8>to have the workforce of the future, to allow the

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 8>current workforce to transform but really importantly set a very

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 8>clear message to the big private sector businesses that they

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 8>can have the confidence to invest because if we get

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 8>government spending right, the thing that will absolutely dwarf that

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 8>is private sector investment and we need the right landscape

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 8>for that.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 3>So that would make UK's Chief Operating Officer Ben Fletcher,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 3>speaking of Lizzie Birden and I in the Bloomberg UK

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Politics podcast. To help us look ahead to what to

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 3>expect from the budget is our UK Government reporter Joel

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 3>May's Joe, great to have you with us. First of all,

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 3>how much do we know about how much money Jeremy

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Hunt has to play with in the budgets?

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 9>So we have latest forecasts that the OBI has been

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 9>giving Jeremy Hudh and our latest understanding is that he

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 9>has about thirteen billion pounds to play with. Now that

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 9>is much less than he had at the autumn statement

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 9>in November, and it's near an historic low. So he

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 9>really is starting from a weak position compared to chancellors

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 9>in the past, and that's the framework that he's having

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 9>to wrestle with when coming up with his tax and

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 9>spend decisions.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Fiscal rules here are very important. Because there's sort of

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 3>a guideline for how governments have to make these decisions.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>How important is it that he comes in under that

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:29.719
<v Speaker 3>thirteen billion.

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So the fiscal rule is that you need to

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 9>have national debts falling as a share of the size

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 9>of the economy within five years. It's self imposed rule,

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 9>but markets like it, and it seemed to be the

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 9>test that you need to pass to maintain in credibility

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 9>with markets to respect that rule. And he's at thirteen

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 9>billion now. He would like to do things like cut

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 9>income tax and cut NASH insurance, but each of those

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 9>measures takes him closer and closer to breaking the rule,

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 9>so he has to be careful about that, and we

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 9>think that he's likely to want to maintain a buffer

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 9>of say six billion. You always want to you always

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 9>want to keep something above that that that that zero figure,

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 9>just in case there are sharks, just in case things

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 9>go turn for the worse. So that's why we think

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 9>he'd like to end up. Obviously, the other thing to

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 9>add is that he can boost the headroom, and that's

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 9>what you can do through spending decisions. For example, you

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 9>could say, let's not spend as much in the future

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 9>gives us more money to play with. Now there'll be

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 9>a polity controversial thing to do, but it could boost

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.959
<v Speaker 9>the headroom so he can manipulate that headroom figure. But

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 9>there are difficult choices, and.

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 3>Instantly you've actually put these difficult choices into a game

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>that people can go on the Bloomberg website and play

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 3>and decide how exactly if they were a chancellor for

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the day they do it. Just talk us through how

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the game works.

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, it took me what thirty seconds a minute

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 9>to explain that nature of.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 2>The physical a so now you can try.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So I thought, what better way could we do this? Well,

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 9>let's make a game where you just are thrown into

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 9>the scenario yourself and you have that headroom given to you,

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 9>and you have to make choices. So you're right, We

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 9>have this budget game on bloombog dot com where you

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 9>can decide will you cut income tax, will you cutlash insurance,

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 9>will you cut inheritance tax. You have all these tax

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 9>and spend choices, and at the end of it, you're

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 9>given a result. How would markets react, how would voters

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 9>react to your choices? We use our best kind of

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 9>estimates of what's like to happen and you get a result.

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, I encourage all our listeners to play the game.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's a really interesting exercise because you essentially

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 3>it's because it's yes or no choices, do you want

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 3>to do this? And then you know when you get

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 3>to the end, it decides whether or not you've crashed

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 3>the economy. I think on our team we have about

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 3>a fifty to fifty rate of who's crashed the economy

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 3>and who hasn't, which I think is probably almost I'm

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>not going to make a parallel to previous chancellors and

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 3>how they've performed on this as well, but it says

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 3>it lays out the difficult balance that has to be

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 3>struck at a moment like this. We're also in an

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 3>election year in the UK, so that means that also

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the Chancellor has one eye on what's going to win votes.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Talk us through some of the measures that we do

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 3>think he's going to take when he gets up to

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 3>make that budget speach.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 9>So we think it's very likely you get to prioritize

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 9>personal tax cuts because those are the tax cuts that

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 9>are likely to have most impacts on the popularity of

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 9>the Conservative Party and help them to win the next election,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 9>and so that will take the form of we expect

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 9>an income tax cut of at least one percentage point

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 9>on the basic rate. That would save people about two

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 9>hundred pounds a year for an average earner. He'd like

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 9>to go further. He would like to do say two

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 9>p off income tax, but it all comes down to

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 9>that headline question we've just been talking about. He also

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 9>might cut national insurance, which is a payroll tax, and

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 9>he already reduced NASH insurance by two pence in the

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 9>pounds in the Ausome statement. He might do that again

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 9>because he sees it as a measure which also incentivizes

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 9>people to return to the labor markets. It makes work

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 9>more attractive and that can boost growth as well. He's

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 9>always trying to look at measures that will boost boost

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 9>growth in the economy. That helps his numbers from the

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.479
<v Speaker 9>AVR as well. But then there's also a list of

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 9>things that are kind of on the table but might

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 9>not happen, but might happen. So for example, reporting that

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 9>the non tax status that might be abolished, because that

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 9>would be a move that would raise revenue, it would

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 9>also jam labor to a certain extent because labor are

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 9>assuming that they could use the revenues from scrapping London

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 9>tax status to fund some of their own policies.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 3>So this was the policy that Labor had been talking

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 3>about for quite a long time.

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 9>Exactly.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 3>Special status applied to typically very wealthy individuals who have

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 3>earnings coming from outside the UK and they're able to

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>benefit from a tax advantage, and closing this loophole as Actually,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 3>when you ask Labor politicians as you and I do frequently,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 3>what they're going to do if they win the next election,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 3>it comes up quite frequently is one of the things

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 3>they're going to do to boost tax revenues. So the

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 3>potential that the Conservators could decide to do it before

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 3>them an interesting consideration.

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 9>Yes, exactly, because Labor have repeatedly been saying, oh, we

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 9>would fund you know, more doctors and lots of nice

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 9>things with the revenue raised from scrapping the Nordmon tax status.

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 9>But if the Toys have already done that and have

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 9>spent that money themselves on a tax cir elsewhere, then

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 9>Labor have lost that. So that's why you can see

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 9>there's that there will be a piscal advantage for the

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 9>Tories if they discrap the no on tax status and yeah.

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 3>And the other dilemma here is also the question of

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 3>public services. There's an awful lot of discussion about how

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 3>public services are under pressure, particularly the health service here

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 3>in the UK, and the question of how much money

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 3>these services need also comes into the budget play. And

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 3>boys you mentioned you know the Chancellor can choose to

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>pull back on some spending decisions, that that's something that

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 3>could prove very controversial.

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 9>Yes, And the situation Hunt already has is an autumn

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 9>statement where he baked in spending plans that were already

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 9>seen as rather unlikely and criticized by economists, and the

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 9>argument being, look, you're perhaps unlikely to ever have to

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 9>implement those plans if you don't win the next election,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 9>So there's a very little cost to you to having

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 9>an implausibly low assumption for future public spending. But then

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 9>you use that what's been described by the ABI and

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 9>others as a fiction, use that fiction to create revenue

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 9>now that you can spend on tax cuds.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a.

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Little bit about the politics that comes behind this, because

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 3>even within the Conservative Party, see there's a lot of

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>debate over where the Chancellor should apportion his limited choices,

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 3>as we've been discussing, even within his own supporters.

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 9>Yes, there is. I mean there are those on the

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 9>right of the Conservative Party, those backs of Liz Trusts,

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 9>who would say that you should do things like cut

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 9>inheritance tax for example. That's they say that would be

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 9>a widely popular measure. They also want to go and

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 9>be more aggressive on things like corporation tax and cutting

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 9>that and do more for business and so on. But

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 9>it feels like those in more the center of the party,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 9>those closes to Hunt are more conscious of the electro

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 9>dynamics and thinking that personal tax cuts, that which you

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 9>can sell to your average voter, are perhaps more preferable

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 9>at this time, and therefore we should do that. So

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 9>there are splits within the Tory camp and Hunters decide

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 9>who he's going to go with.

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we should make for a very interesting budget today.

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Joe May is our UK government reporter. Thank you very

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 3>much for joining us with the details of that, and

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of course we will have full coverage of the budgets

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 3>here on Bloomberg. I'm Stephen Carroll in London. You can

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 3>catch us every weekday winning here for Bloomberg Daybreak. Here

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 3>at beginning at six am in London and one am

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Streets.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom, thank you, Steven, And coming up on Bloomberg day

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Break weekend, we look ahead to a gathering of China's

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>top political advisory body and legislature. I'm Tom Busby and

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. I'm Tom Busby in New York with

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>your global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week. China's top political advisory body and

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>legislature gathering for their annual two sessions. What should we

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be watching for during the eight day meeting For more,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Hong Kong and Bloomberg Daybreak Asia hosts

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Brian Curtis and Doug Krisner.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Tom, we look forward to the annual meetings of China's parliament,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 4>the National People's Congress, next week. The NPC will set

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 4>policies that will guide the economy over the next year.

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 4>It's an opportunity for policymakers to do a kind of

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 4>research to shore up confidence in consumers, in businesses and investors.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Now, in terms of what to expect, Bloomberg Intelligence thinks

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 5>the NPC will announce a larger budget deficit for the government.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 5>That means more fiscal spending. In addition, our economists are

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 5>expecting more supportive monetary policy along with additional efforts to

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 5>smooth out the correction of the property market.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 4>And then, as we heard from Catherine Jung at Fidelity,

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 4>there's also messaging.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 10>There's definitely a messaging that seems to be coming from

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 10>the regulators about what they're going to say at the NPC,

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 10>But in reality it's probably going to be this continuation

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 10>of tweaking of accommodative measures. So areas of the economy

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 10>that needs support, such as property, are likely to be

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 10>key in terms of their focus, but really is about

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 10>restoring confidence, especially with the consumer. And then the knock

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 10>on effect would obviously be an impact on corporates in

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 10>the overall market.

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 5>That is Katherine Jung at Fidelity, And as we mentioned earlier,

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 5>restoring confidence may require more deficit spending by the government.

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Jill Diese says that will be key in showing

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 5>how far policymakers are willing to go to revive the economy.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 11>I think what we'd be looking for out of this

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 11>meeting is, you know what they're going to be setting

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 11>that budget at? How much in sovereign debt they plan

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 11>on issuing this year. What exactly that level of calculation

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 11>looks like, because as we know, China is still dealing

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 11>with a lot of serious economic pressures that don't really

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 11>seem to be going away, and they've got to kind

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 11>of manage what that recovery and growth structory looks like.

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 4>In the run up to the NPC meeting, the economy

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 4>did actually see a modest reprieve of late consumption picking

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 4>up slightly during the Lunar New Year holidays. The CSI

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 4>three hundred has bounced about ten to twelve percent, and

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 4>while property is still soft, it weakened in January at

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 4>a slower pace than in December. Well, joining us now

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 4>for a deeper look at the NPC meetings is Jenny

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Marsh Bloomberg, team leader for Greater China ECO GOV. So, Jenny,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 4>let's delve right into a couple of specific items first

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 4>before we get to some of the sort of broader

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 4>takeaways from the meetings, the setting of a growth target,

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 4>what that might be, and then also what sort of

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 4>level of deficit spending might we see as a percentage

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 4>of GDP What can we expect.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 12>So the consensus among most economists right now is that

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 12>they're going to maintain the target of around five percent,

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 12>so it's not going to be below five I think

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 12>is what most people are expecting. The caveat there is that,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 12>you know, it's going to be much harder to achieve

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 12>this year because twenty twenty three had the benefit of

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.719
<v Speaker 12>the low base of you know, previous year when the

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 12>COVID restrictions really impacted activity. So I think it's important

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 12>that the government does keep this around five percent, not

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 12>below five percent, because it's going to be all about confidence.

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 13>You know.

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 12>One of the biggest things that plague the Chinese economy

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 12>last year was a crisis in confidence among investors, you know,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 12>foreign business people and consumers. So they've got to come

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 12>out with a positive message. But at the same time,

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 12>it does have to be realistic because it's going to

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 12>be a lot of work and sort of careful policymaking

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 12>this year to make sure they don't under shoot their

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 12>own target.

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 5>So maybe we can agree that up until this point,

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 5>Beijing has been fairly restrained in trying to provide additional

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 5>stimulus to get the economy going. The question is whether

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 5>or not we begin to see a pivot point at

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 5>the NPC where things are modulated maybe to a higher

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 5>rate than what we have seen in the past. Do

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 5>you think that's likely.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 12>I think they're going to continue on the same course.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 12>I think Premier Le Chang was very clear when he

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 12>was speaking at Davos in January saying, you know, they'd

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 12>reached five point two percent. He front run that number

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 12>for last year, saying they've done it without stimulus. You know,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 12>he seemed very proud of this. So I think, you know,

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 12>that's a very clear signal that they're not going to

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 12>go back to sort of the old playbook of using

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 12>sort of really big broad stimulus. But I think what

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 12>we might see is more targeted help for sectors that

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 12>really need it, so such as property, you know, support

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 12>for local governments by sort of shifting debt from local

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 12>provinces onto the central government's balance sheet. Whether that comes

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 12>in the actual official fiscal deficit target or if they

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 12>do what they did last year where they sort of

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 12>tweak it during the year to sort of put more

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 12>spending on the on the central government's budget remains to

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 12>be seen.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there has been a kind of an incremental move

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 4>up in the level of deficit spending used to be

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 4>three percent with the target then three point two, and

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 4>you hear about three and a half percent or maybe

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 4>even more. I'm curious whether or not our team at

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberry Economics thinks that it would Would it send a

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 4>bad message if it was, say raised to four percent

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 4>or something like that.

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 12>I think four percent would be quite dramatic. Yeah, So

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 12>I don't know if that would send a bad message.

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 12>You know, it would send a signal for sure that

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 12>the government's willing to take on more debt. I mean,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 12>three percent is extremely low deficit ratio target anyway, for

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 12>an economy the size of China's.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to growth, one of the themes that

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 5>we have heard in the past is high quality development,

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 5>and I suspect that we're going to hear that theme reiterated.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 5>And as we know, there have been instances where regulators

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 5>have really been able to kind of clamp down on

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the entrepreneurial spirit as it relates to

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 5>high tech, particularly, and I'm wondering whether we're going to

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 5>see some acknowledgment of overreach maybe and also an admission

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 5>that regulators and authorities need to embrace the entrepreneurial class,

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 5>and this is a really powerful way of driving growth

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 5>going forward.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 12>A high quality development, I think is one of the

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 12>key things sort of to be watching out for. Shi

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 12>Jimping like increased his mentions of the slogan last year,

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 12>I think to one hundred and thirty eight times, which

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 12>was sort of double the previous year, so they're really

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 12>ramping up. But yeah, it's still this kind of fuzzy

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 12>sort of phrase that people don't fully understand what it means.

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 12>It sort of broadly seems to mean that they're okay

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 12>with not prioritizing chasing sort of growth, and they want

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 12>to prioritize slower growth if it's more sustainable and you

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 12>know it isn't going to sort of saddle the country

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 12>with more debt through things like stimulus. I think that

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 12>sort of will leaders to sort of look at for

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 12>signals on you know, green innovation, perhaps evs, more support

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 12>for that supply chain resilience. There's also another phrase I

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 12>think people are going to be watching out for within

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 12>that umbrella, which is new productive forces. And that's a

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 12>saying that she introduced during a trip to Halo Jean

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 12>at the end of last year and then sort of

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 12>since was mentioned in a polyp beer study session, another broad,

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 12>fuzzy phrase, it's sort of hard to pin down. So

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 12>I think any meat that they put on the bone

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 12>within the work report and various other documents that are

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 12>published will be something investors are very very key to

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:58.719
<v Speaker 12>sort of get information on.

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 4>So we talked a couple of times here in this

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 4>discussion about the possibility of more debt. So we're curious

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 4>whether or not that would be at the national or

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 4>the provincial level. We put that question earlier to Bloomberg's

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Jill desis about getting the balance right.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 11>The line that China has to walk this year is

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 11>that they're really concerned about local governments in particular taking

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 11>on more debt than you know, they're able to afford.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 11>There's been a lot of chatter about whether or not

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 11>the central government needs to take a larger role in

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 11>terms of, you know, taking on some of that debt

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 11>and alleviating some of those burdens among local governments.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Again, Jill deesis from the Bloomberg Eco Government team, So, Jenny,

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 4>what's our thinking. Will we see more at the national

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 4>level or will it fall back down to the provincial level.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think the trend that we were seeing

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 12>towards the end of last year was the government was

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 12>shifting to putting at on the national level for the

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 12>reason that, you know, they do not want this problem

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 12>of local governments being in debt and sort of having

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 12>sort of teaching on default to continue. So I think

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 12>that's what most people are expecting. There are sort of

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 12>other risks from that though. I think, you know, we

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 12>wrote last year about the fact that well, that's well

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 12>and good for the government to take on more debt

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 12>to prevent local government sort of going to these hidden

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 12>financing vehicles to finance infrastructure to sort of boost their economies.

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 12>You know, it comes with greater control for the central government.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 12>So when the government is raising these funds themselves and

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 12>then distributing them out to the provinces, they get to

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 12>decide more who gets what pile of the pot. And

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 12>so there's a risk that when you do that, you

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 12>can disincentivize local officials who no longer you know, have

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 12>this system where if they are working hard and being innovative,

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 12>they're sort of generating their own revenue that perhaps relying

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 12>on handouts from the government. So I think it's a

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 12>good idea in practice, and it's going to sort of

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 12>sort of go some way to sort of address some

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 12>of the risks involved in local government spending. But they

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 12>also have to sort of manage how those funds are

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 12>just out and make sure they keep the local officials

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 12>also motivated.

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 5>So we've talked about the crisis of confidence both among

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 5>consumers and businesses. We know that we know about the

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 5>problem and the property market that's apparent. Chinese stocks have

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 5>been floundering near five year lows, a lot of concern

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 5>about economic growth going forward. We haven't mentioned the deflation

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 5>story that is obviously deep into levels that we haven't

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 5>seen since the global financial crisis. Brian and I were

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 5>talking last week with our own John Liu from our

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 5>bureau in Beijing about whether it's fair to compare what

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 5>China is going through these days with a turmoil that

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 5>was seen back in twenty fifteen. Here's John lu.

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 13>The relationship with the United States is much worse than

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 13>it was in twenty fifteen. That was the Obama administration.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 13>China hosted the G twenty. Barack Obama and Shiji King

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 13>stood up at the G twenty in Hanjo and announced

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 13>that the US and China we're going to cooperate on

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 13>carbon goals. That period of time has ended. At the

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 13>same time, there are other issues. The population China is

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 13>now shrinking. There's a demographic sort of conundrum that is

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 13>much more pronounced now than it was in twenty fifteen.

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's Sean Liu in Beijing. And it does raise

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 4>a point here at Jenny about if the United States

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 4>relationship with China is really winging on the Chinese economy.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, I think when we've conducted surveys among

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 12>investors and economists, it comes up as sort of one

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 12>of the top concerns the geopolitical swings. I would say

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 12>since since the she Biden meeting, things seem to have

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 12>really leveled off and the relationship has improved. But you know,

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 12>there's a US election looming this year, and one of

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 12>the candidates or presumed candidates, is threatening sixty percent tariffs

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 12>on China. So there's a lot of headwinds in the pipeline.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 12>And so for US companies in China, they don't know

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 12>at the moment, and you know what sort of trade

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 12>curves are down the road. So I would say it's

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 12>a year full of unknowns. Right now in terms of

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 12>the US China relationship.

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 5>Are we likely to get any guidance on how much

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 5>more the government is willing to spend for its military budget.

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely, That's one of the things that we'll be working

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 12>looking out for in the work report, and it tends

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 12>to increase every single year. I think China has the

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 12>second highest military budget in the world after the US,

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 12>so we'll certainly be looking out for that, and also

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 12>sort of any language in any of the reports around Taiwan.

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 12>I think last year it was kind of fairly a

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 12>commodative language that we saw, sort of saying that they

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 12>were looking for like peaceful relationships and to sort of

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 12>improve ties in the toy's economies rather than any warmongering talk.

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 12>So we'll also be on the lookout for that as well.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Jenny will have to have you back in the week

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 5>ahead when we start to get details of the NPC meeting.

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 5>That is Bloomberg's Jenny Marsh, the team leader for Greater

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 5>China ECO and GOV. I'm Doug Krisner. You can join

0:36:55.880 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 5>Brian Curtison myself weekdays here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia at

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 5>nine am in Hong Kong eight pm on Wall Street Tom.

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Brian and Doug. And that does it

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>again Monday morning at five am Wall Street time for

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the latest on markets overseas and the news you need

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to start your day. I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us.

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.