1
00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

2
00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440
Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

3
00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399
Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more

4
00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040
Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

5
00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,520
Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. One place you

6
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:26,320
Speaker 1: might not expect to find mishandling of sexual harassment complaints

7
00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:28,760
Speaker 1: is at the Justice Department, which is responsible for the

8
00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:31,920
Speaker 1: enforcement of law in the country, but the Inspector General

9
00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:34,839
Speaker 1: says the d o J has systemic problems and how

10
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:37,839
Speaker 1: it handles such complaints, and that employees found to have

11
00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:42,240
Speaker 1: acted improperly often do not receive the appropriate punishment. According

12
00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:46,360
Speaker 1: to the Washington Post, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz

13
00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,560
Speaker 1: sends his findings about the prevalence and mishandling of sexual

14
00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:52,480
Speaker 1: harassment at the d o J to Deputy Attorney General

15
00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:56,080
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein on May thirty one. The case is examined

16
00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,480
Speaker 1: by the i G included a U S Attorney, a

17
00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:02,680
Speaker 1: Chief Deputy U. S. Marshall, and SBI Special Agents in Charge,

18
00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:06,520
Speaker 1: among others. Joining me is Debora Cat's founding partner as Cats,

19
00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:10,640
Speaker 1: Marshall and Banks excuse me, Debora. Some of these cases

20
00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:14,560
Speaker 1: involved senior Justice Department officials across the country, not just

21
00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:18,360
Speaker 1: senior attorneys, but even a U. S attorney. What's your

22
00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:23,479
Speaker 1: initial reaction to hearing this, Well, my initial reaction is

23
00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:27,440
Speaker 1: one of horror, of course, but not surprised. Sexual harassment

24
00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:32,679
Speaker 1: is endemic in every sector of our workforce, and you

25
00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,680
Speaker 1: know it's it takes place in the judiciary, we know

26
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:38,840
Speaker 1: it takes place in Congress, and certainly it's no surprise

27
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:41,120
Speaker 1: that it takes place at Department of Justice. What is

28
00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:45,160
Speaker 1: really falling to me in reading the Washington Post report

29
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:51,360
Speaker 1: is how long UH Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein,

30
00:01:51,440 --> 00:01:53,960
Speaker 1: has been sitting on this issue. He received the report

31
00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:59,800
Speaker 1: from Sector General Michael Horowitz in May detailing extremely agreed

32
00:01:59,840 --> 00:02:04,120
Speaker 1: to cases of sexual harassment, and more than that that

33
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:07,800
Speaker 1: the people who properpetrated the harassment went on to win

34
00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:13,280
Speaker 1: bonuses and awards with no kind of disciplinary action. That's

35
00:02:13,320 --> 00:02:17,799
Speaker 1: just absolutely shocking. And now uh we now know that,

36
00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:20,839
Speaker 1: uh Lessina saying he's going to convene a task force

37
00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:22,760
Speaker 1: to look at this. There's something to look at here.

38
00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:26,000
Speaker 1: We know the laws, they're well established. It's time to

39
00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:30,280
Speaker 1: take appropriate decisive action. If we really want to your

40
00:02:30,280 --> 00:02:34,120
Speaker 1: intolerance of sexual harassment, it's times ahead to roll. The

41
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:39,600
Speaker 1: cases involved charges of growthing, stalking, peeping at sexual comments,

42
00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:43,679
Speaker 1: among other things, and at times a perpetrator was transferred

43
00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:49,000
Speaker 1: to another division without anything being said. Is that similar

44
00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:54,919
Speaker 1: to what happens in in corporations and companies across the country.

45
00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:58,440
Speaker 1: You get transferred and no one knows what happened. Yes,

46
00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:02,280
Speaker 1: and this is exactly sexual harassment is allowed to uh

47
00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:07,480
Speaker 1: continue as it has uh where there Uh the individuals

48
00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:12,919
Speaker 1: whore victimized suffered severe career ramifications. I mean their their

49
00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:16,040
Speaker 1: their careers are really painted. But the people who are

50
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:19,440
Speaker 1: perpetrating harassments just get moved on elsewhere, like we saw

51
00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:23,560
Speaker 1: in the priest abuse cases and elsewhere. Um and that

52
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:26,800
Speaker 1: Department of Justice has not seen fit even with this

53
00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:30,880
Speaker 1: Inspector General report, to crack down hard and decisively on

54
00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:33,720
Speaker 1: these individuals who are fans to have engaged in this

55
00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:38,040
Speaker 1: kind of unlawful behavior. To shocking. We're talking eight months

56
00:03:38,080 --> 00:03:41,640
Speaker 1: that d J has had this Inspector General report and

57
00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:46,480
Speaker 1: in August UH wasn't seen had received a letter from

58
00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,520
Speaker 1: women in Department of Justice who also detailed that they

59
00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:52,240
Speaker 1: themselves have been subjected to sexual harassment and that the

60
00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:55,920
Speaker 1: problems in fact are systemic. And again no action has

61
00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:58,280
Speaker 1: been taken other than saying we're going to contain a

62
00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:01,320
Speaker 1: workforce to look at this. That's rights. He so, he

63
00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:04,280
Speaker 1: said he's going to convene, he told. The Justice Department

64
00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:07,640
Speaker 1: spokesman told the Post that rosen Stein had convened a

65
00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:10,600
Speaker 1: working group to look at the issues raised by the report.

66
00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:15,040
Speaker 1: Can this be investigated from inside the department or do

67
00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:18,760
Speaker 1: you need someone outside the department looking in? Well, it's

68
00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:23,320
Speaker 1: already been investigated. That's the purpose of the Inspector General report. Uh.

69
00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:26,000
Speaker 1: The issue is that only the Department of Justice can

70
00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:29,479
Speaker 1: meet at the appropriate discipline. Uh. The IGIEF Office has

71
00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:32,640
Speaker 1: already detailed the egregious abuses. Now it's time for the

72
00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:36,400
Speaker 1: Justice Department to take appropriate disciplinary action. And given the

73
00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:39,960
Speaker 1: gravity of these offenses, it would be shocking to me

74
00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:44,360
Speaker 1: if the appropriate discipline wasn't removal. These are high level

75
00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:48,159
Speaker 1: officials who have significant positions of trust, who are there

76
00:04:48,200 --> 00:04:51,480
Speaker 1: to enforce our nurstion's laws and are victimizing women. This

77
00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:54,839
Speaker 1: is just unacceptable. So the i g S Office said,

78
00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:59,440
Speaker 1: it published summaries of nineteen substantiate allegations of sexual harassment

79
00:04:59,480 --> 00:05:04,920
Speaker 1: and miscon duct from through two sixteen. So they're saying

80
00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:07,960
Speaker 1: that's a small number, but it's the handling of the

81
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:11,240
Speaker 1: allegations that the i G found troubling. So expand upon

82
00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:14,400
Speaker 1: that a little. Sure, Well, if you have a system

83
00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:18,800
Speaker 1: where people who come forward with meritorious cases find that

84
00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:22,800
Speaker 1: the perpetrators suffer no consequences, it sets a tone where

85
00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:25,920
Speaker 1: other individuals will not risk their careers, will not stick

86
00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:28,240
Speaker 1: their next up, next out, because they know that doing

87
00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:31,960
Speaker 1: so will be futile. And if you have a system,

88
00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:36,479
Speaker 1: a system where meritorious cases like these just get swept

89
00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:39,599
Speaker 1: under the carpet, you will create an environment where people

90
00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:42,839
Speaker 1: don't report. So while Rosenstein said he's hardened by the

91
00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:47,120
Speaker 1: small number of UH substantiated cases, that's really not the

92
00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:49,559
Speaker 1: appropriate way to look at it. It's just like saying

93
00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:52,200
Speaker 1: that there were no there were no complaints actually brought

94
00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:55,960
Speaker 1: against Harvey Weinstein. If you have a system, an HR

95
00:05:56,080 --> 00:05:59,719
Speaker 1: system that is ineffective that protects harasses, you're gonna have

96
00:05:59,760 --> 00:06:02,440
Speaker 1: people who don't report. And we don't know what the

97
00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,320
Speaker 1: actual number or the actual incidents of sexual harassment is

98
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:07,719
Speaker 1: its Department of Justice, because we have a system in

99
00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:12,280
Speaker 1: place that doesn't punish perpetrators. Well, also, this was before

100
00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:18,000
Speaker 1: the Weinstein allegations. Those allegations have encouraged women to come forward,

101
00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:23,360
Speaker 1: so there might be more allegations than we're reported in

102
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:27,159
Speaker 1: the Inspector General's report. Oh, absolutely right. We are at

103
00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:29,919
Speaker 1: a moment where people are coming forward in record numbers

104
00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:32,880
Speaker 1: because the presumption now is that victims are telling the

105
00:06:32,920 --> 00:06:37,920
Speaker 1: truth and that perpetrators are typically recentivious, serial harasses, and

106
00:06:38,040 --> 00:06:40,839
Speaker 1: more women are coming forward. But the problem is when

107
00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:44,039
Speaker 1: you have something like the Department of Justice, which is

108
00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:50,240
Speaker 1: a large bureaucracy, and people go into believing that filing

109
00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:54,520
Speaker 1: a claim would be career derailing, they're not going to

110
00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:57,800
Speaker 1: do it when they see that the harassers suffer no ramification.

111
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:01,000
Speaker 1: So that's why it is crucial that Department of Justice

112
00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:04,080
Speaker 1: act decisively now if they want other people to come forward,

113
00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:07,400
Speaker 1: and they have to be a model employer and not

114
00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:10,480
Speaker 1: allow this kind of very egregious I mean, this is

115
00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:14,080
Speaker 1: horrible conduct and the fact that no one suffered any

116
00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:19,160
Speaker 1: consequences is really shocking. And Deborah speaking about the lawyers

117
00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:24,840
Speaker 1: that were seen as um sexual harassers. Is there additional

118
00:07:25,640 --> 00:07:27,360
Speaker 1: Are there additional things that need to be done, for

119
00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:33,440
Speaker 1: example reporting that to the Office of Professional Responsibility to yes,

120
00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:36,720
Speaker 1: So that's an excellent point. And also the Inspector General's

121
00:07:36,760 --> 00:07:40,040
Speaker 1: report noted that some of these maybe criminal offenses. There

122
00:07:40,040 --> 00:07:42,520
Speaker 1: could be you know, these faults or criminal offenses. So

123
00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:45,360
Speaker 1: certainly to the extent that these people are lawyers, the

124
00:07:45,440 --> 00:07:48,480
Speaker 1: Office of Professional Responsibility within d J should have a

125
00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:52,520
Speaker 1: role in taking appropriate action, assuming that the individuals remain

126
00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:56,120
Speaker 1: employed at Department of Justice, and also that these cases

127
00:07:56,120 --> 00:08:01,080
Speaker 1: should be referred for criminal uh prosecution and what what

128
00:08:01,200 --> 00:08:05,400
Speaker 1: has been uh confirmed? They're substantiated by the I is

129
00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:09,240
Speaker 1: assault in a number of these sank. Thank you so much, Deborah.

130
00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:17,080
Speaker 1: That's Deborah Cats of Cats, Marshal and Banks. The Trump

131
00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:21,760
Speaker 1: administration is about rolling back regulations. Remember when President Trump

132
00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:24,960
Speaker 1: issued the two old rules for one new rule executive

133
00:08:25,040 --> 00:08:28,800
Speaker 1: order in February. Well, some states are not following suit.

134
00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:32,680
Speaker 1: New York's top financial watchdog has proposed regulations that would

135
00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:35,960
Speaker 1: require sellers of life insurance and annuities to act in

136
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:39,400
Speaker 1: the best interests of clients, joining states such as Nevada

137
00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:42,600
Speaker 1: that have raised standards even as the US government delays

138
00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:45,920
Speaker 1: its fiduciary rule. Joining me is Robert Hockett, a professor

139
00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:50,000
Speaker 1: at Cornell Law School. Bob, the Trump administration has delayed

140
00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,800
Speaker 1: implementation of parts of the Department of Labors fiduciary rule

141
00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:58,520
Speaker 1: that was created during President Barack Obama's presidency. Tell us

142
00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:02,960
Speaker 1: about that rule and where it stands? Now? Sure? Yes? So.

143
00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:05,160
Speaker 1: The idea here is that there are certain products that

144
00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:07,840
Speaker 1: are sold in the financial markets h that are thought

145
00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:11,040
Speaker 1: to be so sensitive and so important to the buyers,

146
00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:14,400
Speaker 1: and at the same time, the transactions and those instruments

147
00:09:14,480 --> 00:09:19,199
Speaker 1: are thought to be so vulnerability raising or vulnerability causing

148
00:09:19,720 --> 00:09:23,360
Speaker 1: UH to buyers that some sort of special obligation should

149
00:09:23,360 --> 00:09:26,120
Speaker 1: be imposed upon the seller to make a point of

150
00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:30,080
Speaker 1: ensuring that whatever product is sold to a given client

151
00:09:30,679 --> 00:09:33,839
Speaker 1: is indeed in the best interest of the client, right uh.

152
00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:37,240
Speaker 1: And we call that the fiduciary rule. The word fiduciary,

153
00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:39,320
Speaker 1: of course, comes from the Latin fee day for faith,

154
00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:44,280
Speaker 1: as in good faith or confidant um. The idea is that, again,

155
00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:46,240
Speaker 1: we want those who buy these products to be able

156
00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:49,640
Speaker 1: to trust seller is kind of more like a close

157
00:09:49,720 --> 00:09:52,280
Speaker 1: friend in selling it to them. Than like an arms

158
00:09:52,559 --> 00:09:57,679
Speaker 1: length uh competitive seller in the market where anything goes. Now,

159
00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:01,839
Speaker 1: that rule was developed um uh in the late in

160
00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:03,599
Speaker 1: the very sort of last months, you might say, of

161
00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:07,640
Speaker 1: the Obama administration. It was to go into effect shortly

162
00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:11,480
Speaker 1: after Mr Trump took office, but his administration immediately delayed

163
00:10:11,960 --> 00:10:15,120
Speaker 1: implementation of the rule, and ever since then it's been

164
00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:16,880
Speaker 1: sort of in abeyance. It's been a in a state

165
00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:19,320
Speaker 1: of limbo um and that's one reason I think the

166
00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:21,040
Speaker 1: State of New York has decided to move forward with

167
00:10:21,080 --> 00:10:24,200
Speaker 1: its own version of the rule. How similar is New

168
00:10:24,280 --> 00:10:28,439
Speaker 1: York's version to the federal version, It seems to be

169
00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:32,920
Speaker 1: essentially identical. The real key point here in both cases

170
00:10:33,400 --> 00:10:36,680
Speaker 1: is that you're you're essentially imposing an obligation or a

171
00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:40,320
Speaker 1: standard on a seller that's actually quite familiar to our law.

172
00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:42,480
Speaker 1: It's quite often imposed in the case of say a

173
00:10:42,559 --> 00:10:46,200
Speaker 1: trustee with in regard to or in relation to the

174
00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:49,679
Speaker 1: beneficiaries of the trust. It's uh. It's commonly placed and

175
00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:52,440
Speaker 1: sort of by operation of law, the managers and the

176
00:10:52,440 --> 00:10:55,199
Speaker 1: board members of corporations when the interests of the shareholders

177
00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,160
Speaker 1: were at stake. So essentially, what this rule does both

178
00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:00,000
Speaker 1: at the federal level and here at the New York's

179
00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:02,839
Speaker 1: eight level, is to sort of import into the matter

180
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:07,520
Speaker 1: of life insurance sales and annuity sales, this very familiar

181
00:11:07,520 --> 00:11:10,240
Speaker 1: standard that's been with us for centuries. In these other

182
00:11:10,280 --> 00:11:12,520
Speaker 1: contexts that are where where trust is thought to be

183
00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:16,800
Speaker 1: especially important. The rule is expected to add to compliance

184
00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:20,040
Speaker 1: costs for firms and life Insurance Council of New York

185
00:11:20,040 --> 00:11:23,000
Speaker 1: and industry groups said that any implemented regulation should be

186
00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:27,400
Speaker 1: uniform across the country, so companies don't face different standards

187
00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:31,480
Speaker 1: in different states. Is that real concern to you? It's

188
00:11:31,559 --> 00:11:34,880
Speaker 1: it's actually a ridiculous claim, um for for two reasons. Right,

189
00:11:34,920 --> 00:11:37,680
Speaker 1: First of all, the compliance cost claim is ridiculous because

190
00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:40,400
Speaker 1: of course, anytime you impose any regulation, there's a compliance cost.

191
00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:44,280
Speaker 1: By definition, right, we make murder very costly by prohibiting it. Right,

192
00:11:44,559 --> 00:11:47,680
Speaker 1: we make fraud very costly by prohibiting it. A compliance

193
00:11:47,720 --> 00:11:49,640
Speaker 1: To say that there's a compliance cost is just to

194
00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:52,080
Speaker 1: say that, you know, of regulation is a regulation that

195
00:11:52,160 --> 00:11:54,240
Speaker 1: it actually says, it's no longer the case that anything

196
00:11:54,320 --> 00:11:57,240
Speaker 1: goes as far as the uniformity matter goes. That's particularly

197
00:11:57,280 --> 00:11:59,960
Speaker 1: comic call. Because we have a statute a federal stat

198
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:02,160
Speaker 1: stood in place, called the mccare and Ferguson Act that

199
00:12:02,280 --> 00:12:05,640
Speaker 1: actually reserves the regulation of insurance companies to the states.

200
00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:09,120
Speaker 1: That's to say, we have abjured UH federal regulation of

201
00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:11,880
Speaker 1: the insurance industry ever since the mid nineteen forties. If

202
00:12:11,880 --> 00:12:14,600
Speaker 1: the industry is actually interested in uniformity, it should be

203
00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:17,560
Speaker 1: calling for a national system or a federal system of

204
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:20,560
Speaker 1: insurance regulation instead of opposing that which they have roots

205
00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:24,280
Speaker 1: kemely done over the last several decades. But how important

206
00:12:24,679 --> 00:12:28,520
Speaker 1: is this rule for consumers? It's I think very important

207
00:12:28,520 --> 00:12:31,320
Speaker 1: for consumers because the problem is that life insurance is

208
00:12:31,400 --> 00:12:33,680
Speaker 1: like many things, like a bank account, some something that

209
00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:37,160
Speaker 1: pretty much every ordinary middle class or you know, non

210
00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:41,640
Speaker 1: actually pretty much every ordinary American needs or or wants,

211
00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:44,360
Speaker 1: And yet the terms of insurance contracts can be quite

212
00:12:44,360 --> 00:12:47,120
Speaker 1: complicated and quite difficult for ordinary people to make sense

213
00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:50,000
Speaker 1: of UH. And for that reason, it's particularly important that

214
00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:53,440
Speaker 1: we hold the sellers of that product to a higher

215
00:12:53,480 --> 00:12:56,959
Speaker 1: standard of behavior, a higher standard of cussworthiness then perhaps,

216
00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:01,160
Speaker 1: say the sellers of used cars. No, the proposed rules

217
00:13:01,160 --> 00:13:04,280
Speaker 1: are subject to a sixty day comment period before they're

218
00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:07,680
Speaker 1: officially issued. Is there anything that seems to stand in

219
00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:10,600
Speaker 1: their way. I don't think there is. I mean, the

220
00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:14,000
Speaker 1: comment period is typically just it's meant to enable those

221
00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:16,600
Speaker 1: who are thinking you're putting a rule in place, to

222
00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:19,240
Speaker 1: take account of the various arguments that might be raised

223
00:13:19,280 --> 00:13:21,280
Speaker 1: for it or against it, essentially to make sure that

224
00:13:21,320 --> 00:13:25,240
Speaker 1: they don't overlook any important considerations. In one sense, it's

225
00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:28,360
Speaker 1: the formality, right, It's you basically have to observe that

226
00:13:28,480 --> 00:13:31,800
Speaker 1: particular waiting period. On the other hand, it's subsidificus the

227
00:13:31,840 --> 00:13:35,160
Speaker 1: sense that you know, if people actually make sensible uh

228
00:13:35,200 --> 00:13:39,040
Speaker 1: comments or recommendations or raised legitimate concerns, it gives the

229
00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:41,680
Speaker 1: regulators a chance to sort of reformulate the rule or

230
00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:44,360
Speaker 1: to put in place sort of special safeguards for the

231
00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:47,040
Speaker 1: implementation of the rule or whatever. New York is simply

232
00:13:47,400 --> 00:13:50,000
Speaker 1: going through that standard process that's gone through. You know

233
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:52,280
Speaker 1: that process has gone through in connection with every regulation.

234
00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:55,280
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any specific hold up that's foreseen

235
00:13:55,440 --> 00:14:00,360
Speaker 1: or expected here. And as far as the fiduciary rule

236
00:14:00,440 --> 00:14:06,880
Speaker 1: that the Labor Department has or is watching over, is

237
00:14:06,880 --> 00:14:09,560
Speaker 1: there any likelihood that that will be put into effect?

238
00:14:10,840 --> 00:14:13,480
Speaker 1: So it's so hard to tell. I mean, the way

239
00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:16,480
Speaker 1: this administration seems to be operating thus far is just

240
00:14:16,559 --> 00:14:18,720
Speaker 1: to put things sort of on hold or on the

241
00:14:18,720 --> 00:14:21,680
Speaker 1: back burner, with no indication at all as to whether

242
00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:24,200
Speaker 1: or when the thing might be brought back to the

243
00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:27,080
Speaker 1: front burner. So it's hard to tell what might happen.

244
00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:29,400
Speaker 1: Maybe if Mr Trump notices that his poll members are

245
00:14:29,440 --> 00:14:33,000
Speaker 1: declining among laboring Americans, he'll suddenly play the populist game

246
00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:35,720
Speaker 1: again as he did during the election season. Uh and

247
00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:37,800
Speaker 1: and say, okay, let's put that thing to place. If

248
00:14:37,800 --> 00:14:40,040
Speaker 1: it looks as though he's not suffering any consequences from

249
00:14:40,120 --> 00:14:44,280
Speaker 1: leaving it in advance, and thereby satisfying his real constituents

250
00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:47,120
Speaker 1: the industries that would be regulated, then I can imagine

251
00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:50,240
Speaker 1: that thing sitting there unfold indefinitely. Thanks for listening to

252
00:14:50,240 --> 00:14:53,560
Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

253
00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:57,360
Speaker 1: the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and on Bloomberg dot

254
00:14:57,360 --> 00:15:02,720
Speaker 1: com slash podcasts. I'm June Bass. How this is bloombergom

255
00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:07,840
Speaker 1: or doctor m hm.