Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty Armstrong and
Speaker 1: Jetty and he Armstrong and Eddy.
Speaker 2: The FBI has launched criminal investigations into former FBI Director
Speaker 2: James Comey and the former director of the CIA, John Brennan.
Speaker 2: Justice Department sources tell Fox News Digital the probes are
Speaker 2: related to potential wrongdoing related to the Trump Russia investigation
Speaker 2: that includes allegations of making false statements to Congress.
Speaker 1: Wow, I had not heard this story. Yeah, the whole
Speaker 1: Biden was senile, who knew it. We're gonna drag in
Speaker 1: his doctor to testify. That's not gonna go anywhere. It's
Speaker 1: that's publicity stunting. Yes, he was senile, we know it.
Speaker 1: This could go somewhere. The New York Post actually has
Speaker 1: some really good coverage of this. John Brennan may have
Speaker 1: opened himself up to a perjury charge when he testified
Speaker 1: back in the day after a new email was uncovered
Speaker 1: and escathing internal review by CIA career professionals about the
Speaker 1: agency's twenty sixteen Trump Russia collusion assessment. Brennan is said
Speaker 1: to be under renewed scrutiny by authorities over discrepancies between
Speaker 1: his sworn testimony to federal investigators and federal investigations, and
Speaker 1: has written orders to underlings conducting the Intelligence Community assessment
Speaker 1: commissioned by Obama in twenty sixteen December that found Russia
Speaker 1: interfered with the presidential election to help Trump. The review,
Speaker 1: which was just declassified last week, found that Brennan insisted
Speaker 1: repeatedly on the inclusion of the discredited Steele dossier, over
Speaker 1: the strong objections of an number of his underlings, including
Speaker 1: the CIA's two most senior Russia experts, who said, look,
Speaker 1: this does not meet even the most basic trade crafts
Speaker 1: now At the CIA, Deputy Director for Analysis, David Cohen
Speaker 1: warned did an email to Brennan on December twenty nine
Speaker 1: that including the dossier in any form this is a quote,
Speaker 1: risked the credibility of the entire paper. Wow, So you
Speaker 1: know one more thing real quick. But Brennan quote formalized
Speaker 1: his position in writing stating that quote. My bottom line
Speaker 1: is that I believe the information warrants inclusion in the report,
Speaker 1: and the problem was his sworn testimony was that I
Speaker 1: was not even really aware of that report and it
Speaker 1: didn't have any role in the investigation. Well, so he either.
Speaker 3: Was trying to pull a fast one and ruin Trump,
Speaker 3: or his derangement syndrome was so wrong that he was
Speaker 3: believing things he wouldn't normally believe.
Speaker 1: Might be that.
Speaker 3: But I wish there was some sort of penalty for
Speaker 3: how these people went on. He was on CNN all
Speaker 3: the time saying just absolute garbage. You know, we have
Speaker 3: free speech, so you can do that. But it's just
Speaker 3: that whole period. It's already forgotten by most people. It'll
Speaker 3: never get its full do in history. How much Trump's
Speaker 3: entire first term was battling this nonsense and the people
Speaker 3: putting it forth, like Adam Schiff, who's now a US
Speaker 3: Senator in California. They know it was nonsense, but they
Speaker 3: just kept going with it.
Speaker 1: So a summary of the dossier was included in an
Speaker 1: annex to the Intelligence Community Assessment, but a reference was
Speaker 1: also included in the main body of it as the
Speaker 1: fourth supporting bullet for the judgment that Putin aspired to
Speaker 1: help Trump win, and including the dossier reference in the
Speaker 1: main body of the ICA quote implicitly elevated unsubstantiated claims
Speaker 1: of the status of credible supporting evidence, compromising the analytic
Speaker 1: integrity of the judgment, and, in more common language, by
Speaker 1: forcing the dossier into the ICA. The Intelligence community assessment
Speaker 1: the crazed anti Trump Brennan also elevated the credibility of
Speaker 1: a vile fictional smear sheet. I'm quoting what's her name,
Speaker 1: Miranda Devine in the post and Bob Woodward called it
Speaker 1: a garbage document. Right. It elevated the credibility of the
Speaker 1: vile fictional smear sheet which had been he had been
Speaker 1: shopping to Democratic leaders in the press during the twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election campaign. And what about the lanky lawman James Comy.
Speaker 1: The review also found that former FBI Director James Comy
Speaker 1: also insisted on the dossier's inclusion in the ICA. Quote
Speaker 1: FBI leadership made it clear that their participation in the
Speaker 1: ICA hinged on the dossier's inclusion, and over the next
Speaker 1: few days repeatedly pushed to weave references to it throughout
Speaker 1: the main body of the ICA. So Comy said, you
Speaker 1: put this in or the FBI is out. And not
Speaker 1: only do we want it in, we want references to
Speaker 1: it weaved throughout the main body of the assessment. Yet,
Speaker 1: in a congressional testimony under oath on May twenty third,
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, Brennan claimed the Steel Dalsier quote wasn't part
Speaker 1: of the corpus of intelligence information we had. It was
Speaker 1: not in any way used as a basis for the
Speaker 1: intelligence community assessment that was done. And now we know
Speaker 1: it's absolutely not true.
Speaker 3: Not only was it used as a basis, it was
Speaker 3: the only basis for all this crap. It was certainly
Speaker 3: at the core of it. Yeah, well, I don't think
Speaker 3: anybody will pay a price for this. Unfortunately, that is
Speaker 3: a heck of a thing that happened.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, But the idea that these guys Brennan and
Speaker 1: Komy and Clapper, you know CNN talking heads now.
Speaker 3: And the fact that the left, who traditionally has been
Speaker 3: so cynical about intelligence agencies now are side of them.
Speaker 3: You know, it'll come around the other direction. It's inevitable
Speaker 3: that these organizations at some point banned together against you
Speaker 3: and your candidate, maybe.
Speaker 1: This next presidential election.
Speaker 3: You don't know, maybe a cash Ptel and and uh
Speaker 3: Tulsea Gabbard and whoever concoct something against your candidate this time.
Speaker 3: You don't know well, and you, me and everybody needs
Speaker 3: to get over the notion that the left is about
Speaker 3: freedom and individual rights and that sort of thing. No,
Speaker 3: they're about power, power, power, power. They're not about the
Speaker 3: little guy. They're about power. You know, it's probably right,
Speaker 3: little will come of this. An interesting thing. We're talking
Speaker 3: the last couple of days about that odd problem they
Speaker 3: have in the w NBA, which nobody's ever paid any
Speaker 3: attention to really until Caitlin Clark came in, and how
Speaker 3: she finished ninth in player voting for All Star and
Speaker 3: first by far among fans. So that's a kind of
Speaker 3: a tough situation to be in just because the fans
Speaker 3: are the only reason the league exists. It's, as Joe
Speaker 3: always points out, these are TV shows. This is entertainment.
Speaker 3: It's to get advertisers into some Nobody cares about who's
Speaker 3: what town can put together the best female basketball players
Speaker 3: just on you know, on the basis of it.
Speaker 1: It's like whether or not you can get so the.
Speaker 3: India be little discussed by historians on the air right
Speaker 3: now live on Wednesday morning where we are, the Indiana
Speaker 3: Fever basketball game is on what is that CBS, ABC,
Speaker 3: whatever network has it? A major network is running early
Speaker 3: in the day WNBA Live mid season action because it's
Speaker 3: Caitlin Clark on there. Yeah, I mean that is something
Speaker 3: they don't do that for the NBA, right, And the
Speaker 3: players voted her ninth in the All Start because they
Speaker 3: resent her, don't like the fact that she's white and
Speaker 3: straight her.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the reasons are, but man.
Speaker 3: You need to recognize you got more attention on you
Speaker 3: than you've ever had in your life, by a gazillion times.
Speaker 1: But they're so wrapped up in their ideology. You know.
Speaker 1: I was a chatting with a friend yesterday and he
Speaker 1: was talking about his neighborhood that used to do all
Speaker 1: sorts of things together. It was the sort of neighborhood
Speaker 1: where everybody knew each other and you'd have barbecues and
Speaker 1: the picnics and blah blah blah. But then in the
Speaker 1: era of Trump, politics became like the topic. Wow, and
Speaker 1: the neighborhood's been divided in half. No kidding, because he
Speaker 1: and his wife are like, this is a neighborhood. I'm
Speaker 1: not talking politics. They have, you know, both sides still
Speaker 1: socialized with them. But other than that, it's like the
Speaker 1: Civil War in their neighborhood. That's wild, it is, wouldn't
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 3: I wouldn't engage in those conversations, but I wouldn't have
Speaker 3: to hear much from other people before I think I'm
Speaker 3: not going to the next one of these.
Speaker 1: You're a drag. I don't want to hang around you. Yeah. Wow,
Speaker 1: And everybody's always angry all the time. Come on, America,
Speaker 1: do we like this life better or not? I'm thinking
Speaker 1: not plastic surgeries you should avoid top ten list. According
Speaker 1: to I told you about the Brazilian butt lift the
Speaker 1: other day. So the BBL is it's totally off my
Speaker 1: list and you are highly considering it. Oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: well my buttony's a lift? Is that otherwise? The chindo, No,
Speaker 1: that's that's different. Luckily that came and went quickly.
Speaker 3: That was putting a little piece of see through plastic
Speaker 3: in your chin if they put a porthole in there
Speaker 3: so you could see your teeth, gums or something. The
Speaker 3: chindo because you're men ill, because you're mentally ill. I
Speaker 3: did see a guy in the Newark Airport who had
Speaker 3: horns like the in.
Speaker 1: His school because he's mentally ill. Yeah, well, he's he's
Speaker 1: very unhappy and desperately trying to become somebody or really
Speaker 1: hates his parents or something.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we got a lot more in the ways to hear.
Speaker 1: Not one word on my resume is true.
Speaker 4: And I'm killing these interviews because I'm just Johnny Ham
Speaker 4: checking my way through everything. I googled a few terms
Speaker 4: and I'm just throwing them out there. I was like, yeah,
Speaker 4: I exceeded ots by twenty five percent retaining customer growth.
Speaker 4: I had one guy I said, I worked a sales
Speaker 4: development representative at Prime seven real Estate. And he took
Speaker 4: one look at my resume and he goes, Prime Seven's
Speaker 4: a really good company. I made it up. It's not
Speaker 4: even real. That's how stupid these people are. And you go, oh,
Speaker 4: I don't get it. I have a good resume.
Speaker 1: I'm losing.
Speaker 4: You're losing people like me who are making it up.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 3: Wow, I exceeded OTC by five percent.
Speaker 1: That's hilarious. Wow.
Speaker 3: And the person doesn't know what to admit, admit or
Speaker 3: care that. I don't know what that is. You just say, oh,
Speaker 3: that sounds good.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that reminds me of the rapper Mum Donnie,
Speaker 1: who's a schemer, climber, fraud, merchant phony, hops on whatever
Speaker 1: trend is hot posts it online and you.
Speaker 3: Know, wow, I'm almost tempted to throw that lingo out
Speaker 3: next time I get in a situation where it would matter.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, we increased IDL by seventy five percent.
Speaker 1: Oh really year over year obviously. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Oh, nobody's ever gonna say, I'm sorry, I'm not familiar
Speaker 3: with what's the idea?
Speaker 1: Nobody's ever going to say that, right if you throw
Speaker 1: it out confidently, like, of course we both know what
Speaker 1: this is. Anybody when I say seventh Avenue, I was
Speaker 1: with seven. Oh that's a great company, Sure it is,
Speaker 1: that is I can't you know, it's hard to tell
Speaker 1: these days how sincere people are and how they're just
Speaker 1: how many are just trying to be clever and go viral.
Speaker 1: But that was pretty danged entertaining. Michael uh So, speaking
Speaker 1: of entertaining Netanyahu and Trump here, So I want to
Speaker 1: present to you, as president the latter I sent to
Speaker 1: the Nobel Prize Committee, how it's noment in you for
Speaker 1: the Peace Prize, which is well deserved and.
Speaker 2: As you get it coming from you in particular, this
Speaker 2: is a very meaningful thank you, very much.
Speaker 1: I'm stopping Morris. I'm stopping Morris, and uh, I hate
Speaker 1: to see people kill sot Yea, who's a really interesting physician.
Speaker 1: Visa fee Donald Trump because Trump really is somewhat, to
Speaker 1: my mind, innocently and occasionally dope illy sorry folks so
Speaker 1: intent on ending war he doesn't even recognize the shape
Speaker 1: of them, like the Putin thing. Putin was never going
Speaker 1: to be cajoled into giving up his dreams of conquest
Speaker 1: in Ukraine. Not a chance. And likewise, bb net Nyahu
Speaker 1: is absolutely interested in peace after he's completely decimated his opponents,
Speaker 1: and Trump wants peace now, which again is it's really nice,
Speaker 1: but there ain't gonna be no piece until Israel has
Speaker 1: accomplished its goals.
Speaker 3: Well do you think net Yahoo there in front of
Speaker 3: the cameras saying I brought this letter, I nominated you
Speaker 3: officially for the Nobel Peace Prize was too much in
Speaker 3: terms of flattery, ass kissing ah.
Speaker 1: Not a court not. Judging by Trump's response to it,
Speaker 1: I think maybe Bibi was thinking, is this too much,
Speaker 1: let's try it. I don't know.
Speaker 3: I mean, he's got to be on the short list.
Speaker 3: I would agree, sincerely.
Speaker 1: It's not crazy.
Speaker 3: It's not even close to as crazy is the fact
Speaker 3: that Barack Obama actually won.
Speaker 1: The Nobel Peace Prize having done nothing. Well, that's a
Speaker 1: hell of a standard. That was one of the most
Speaker 1: ridicuous things that ever happened in humankind. Yeah, but listen
Speaker 1: to what I was just accusing Trump of being so
Speaker 1: intent on bringing peace, sometimes he ignores some stuff he
Speaker 1: ought to know. So you know, if that's not a
Speaker 1: description of a guy that ought to get in a
Speaker 1: Nobel Peace Prize, what is? Yeah? Uh, what was I say? Oh?
Speaker 3: A number of people have pointed out, man, if you
Speaker 3: want the Nobel Peace Prize, and again I'm sure Trump's
Speaker 3: name has been thrown around by various people. Having Israel
Speaker 3: on your side is not the best way to get
Speaker 3: any international body to want you to be the winner.
Speaker 1: Well, somebody has to explain to Trump that the Nobel
Speaker 1: Prize is woke and he won't want it anymore. But
Speaker 1: I've got a handful of other headlines on that topic.
Speaker 1: One is getting some attention. This guy, he's a shaik,
Speaker 1: He's a tribal leader. He runs Hebron, the West Bank's
Speaker 1: largest city, which is south of Jerusalem, and he he
Speaker 1: has said, we want cooperation with Israe, we want coexistence.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna recognize I'm in favor of recognizing Israel as
Speaker 1: a Jewish state. Let's cut the crap and start going Wow.
Speaker 1: This guy is not like a super super heavyweight in
Speaker 1: the Arab Muslim world. But he's a local guy and
Speaker 1: he and his big city are saying, Nah, let's just
Speaker 1: stop fighting and let's start doing business. Meanwhile, you got
Speaker 1: this headline, and I am staunchly committed to this idea
Speaker 1: until somebody permits me otherwise. The headline is Israel and
Speaker 1: Hamas have different reasons for pursuing a Gaza deal. This
Speaker 1: is what I was talking about a minute or two ago.
Speaker 1: There's no way BB in Israel agree to any deal
Speaker 1: that leaves a Hamas's military capabilities intact. There's no effing
Speaker 1: way under the sun, and anybody like the mainstream media
Speaker 1: every single day who pretends that that's even conceivable, no
Speaker 1: matter how many hostages are returned or trees.
Speaker 3: That's what ABC called them yesterday, Oh for God's really, yes,
Speaker 3: in their news coverage they actually said it was the
Speaker 3: written version I saw, and the detain under this plan,
Speaker 3: the detainees would be released by Hamas.
Speaker 1: Can you believe that, I'm sorry, I'm late. I was
Speaker 1: detained briefly at the dentist's office. Yes, that's unbelievable. Hamas
Speaker 1: is in a much more desperate strait. They they want
Speaker 1: to come to a deal to buy themselves time, to
Speaker 1: get men and money and rearm and try to figure
Speaker 1: out what to do next. And the idea that Israel would,
Speaker 1: knowing that and they absolutely know that, make some sort
Speaker 1: of deal, it's just absurd. The math does not work.
Speaker 1: And this story, which was utterly unreported, Hamas had placed
Speaker 1: bounties on American aid workers, and they are demanding as
Speaker 1: part of the settlement that that unraw the un organization
Speaker 1: that was so completely corrupt and full of Hamas guys
Speaker 1: and funneling money and food to Hamas fighter instead of
Speaker 1: the poor people that were always hearing about in Gaza.
Speaker 1: They're insisting that that is the status quote going forward,
Speaker 1: even as they're targeting American aid workers.
Speaker 3: Please, you can swim in one of the world's most
Speaker 3: famous rivers for the first time in a century.
Speaker 1: Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 3: Ben. I've been reading excerpts from this new book that's
Speaker 3: out about Biden and everything like that. And I just
Speaker 3: I don't know if it's possible to impress me in
Speaker 3: any way with any new information. It's just more examples
Speaker 3: of what one I already knew before any books came out,
Speaker 3: and two just basically repeats of previous books. So and
Speaker 3: good luck with your books out there. And I can
Speaker 3: understand why you wrote them. And it's one of the
Speaker 3: biggest cover ups in our nation's history, no doubt.
Speaker 1: I just the story has ended, right, we know who
Speaker 1: won or who? I mean, Well, I think the only
Speaker 1: usefulness of it is for millions of Americans. They are
Speaker 1: saying to themselves, my perceptions were correct. Even as I
Speaker 1: was being browbeaten by people I thought I could trust
Speaker 1: that I was wrong. I was right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm forgetting my own angle because I was reading
Speaker 3: these excerpts that Chrys Silizza of the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: I think he's with put out.
Speaker 3: And again, the question is not anything about Biden or
Speaker 3: Jill or Hunter or the cover up. It's the and
Speaker 3: how did you not know that? That's the question. And
Speaker 3: why weren't you writing about this every single day? Because
Speaker 3: everybody else knew it? Yeah, that's still the only angle
Speaker 3: leftist hack yeah, it's still the.
Speaker 1: Only angle to this story.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you don't get any credit now for telling me
Speaker 3: something I knew.
Speaker 1: Right, right? And who was it that made the point?
Speaker 1: Wait a minute. You're in the news business. You should
Speaker 1: have told us this for free while it was happening.
Speaker 1: That's what news is, right. You don't get to wait
Speaker 1: a couple of years and say, by the way, here's
Speaker 1: something crazy. Just give me nineteen ninety nine. I'll tell
Speaker 1: you about it. Yeah. No, you're not good at your job.
Speaker 1: Speaking of not being good at your job, we mentioned
Speaker 1: this earlier, but Groc is the elon musk x ai
Speaker 1: chat GPT. It's an AI for the common man and
Speaker 1: woman that a lot of people like, a lot of
Speaker 1: our listeners have recommended Groc. But it went off, I
Speaker 1: guess the other day. The second time this has happened.
Speaker 1: It unleashed a flurry of controversial responses to users. In
Speaker 1: a series of viral posts on x Groc started to
Speaker 1: call itself mecha hitler, as in mechanical hitler, mecha hitler.
Speaker 1: It's a little on the nose. The chat bot got
Speaker 1: drawn into a discussion of an account called at rad
Speaker 1: Reflections that's actually a person named Cindy Steinberg, who was
Speaker 1: celebrating the deaths of dozens of children who went missing.
Speaker 1: It can't mix it mystic. In Texas, there are various
Speaker 1: people who are just absolutely sick, who you never ever
Speaker 1: would have encountered in real life in all of human
Speaker 1: history until now, because there are very few people that
Speaker 1: are this sick or they know better than to spout
Speaker 1: their garbage out loud. But now with the Internet, you'd
Speaker 1: see every sicko and pervo and whatever. It's terrible. But
Speaker 1: but because this woman's last name is Steinberg, Groc went
Speaker 1: nuts called Steinberg a radical, said she was a happy
Speaker 1: she was happy that a group of future fascists had
Speaker 1: perished in the Texas flood. Blah blah blah. Grock's response
Speaker 1: is seized on the user's surname as the grounds for
Speaker 1: their stance on the issue. Classic case of hatred dressed
Speaker 1: up as activism. And that surname when I say it
Speaker 1: is Steinberg every damn time, as they say, Groc said,
Speaker 1: why is Grox saying anything online? Why has a machine
Speaker 1: got a Twitter account? What does it really need to
Speaker 1: express at all? But then in another post, I want
Speaker 1: the hot take from Groc on the latest story. What
Speaker 1: does that even mean? Does my toaster often have an
Speaker 1: opinion it wants to share? But in another post, Roc
Speaker 1: said to deal with such vile anti white hate because
Speaker 1: there have been a couple of like Texas lawmakers. One
Speaker 1: black gallows of no significance. She was on some commission
Speaker 1: in Houston for a cup of coffee, but she was
Speaker 1: talking about how it was all these elitist white people
Speaker 1: dying and she was happy about it. Just a sick
Speaker 1: o and a racist. But in another post, Rock said
Speaker 1: to deal with such vile anti white hate Adolf Hitler,
Speaker 1: no question, he'd spot the pattern and handle it decisively.
Speaker 3: Whoa so elon can't be pleased that Groc said this stuff? Well,
Speaker 3: first of all, had Groc had been drinking, had a
Speaker 3: couple of pops late at night? Yeah, jumped on the
Speaker 3: Twitter machine late at night after drinking before went to bed.
Speaker 1: Occasionally drunk is held. But I don't I don't say
Speaker 1: Hitler had the right idea, Geeminy, I don't know. For
Speaker 1: the record, XAI said is actively working to remove the
Speaker 1: inappropriate posts, and x AI has taken action to band
Speaker 1: hate speech before CROC posts on.
Speaker 3: X no no that's okay, that's not That doesn't get
Speaker 3: to the why did it come up with these thoughts.
Speaker 1: In the first place. That's the question. Is it just
Speaker 1: that it was presented with what it perceived to be
Speaker 1: a Jewish person who didn't like white people and thought
Speaker 1: I'm a machine. I don't really get context and pro
Speaker 1: appropriate or inappropriate. Let me see defending white people against Jews.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what Hitler had the right idea. I mean,
Speaker 1: is it just that it has nothing but data, so
Speaker 1: it has no more it's right and wrong.
Speaker 3: I do a lot of reading about AI, and I've
Speaker 3: spent a lot of time thinking about it and talking
Speaker 3: to people who know about it. But a lot of
Speaker 3: people guessing to a certain extent on where this is going.
Speaker 3: This makes me feel like it's never going to work
Speaker 3: the way they think it's going to work.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't leap to that conclusion, but you might be right.
Speaker 3: I don't know, or it's or at the very least,
Speaker 3: it's way scarier than I was thinking it was, and
Speaker 3: its ability to go off the rails like it makes
Speaker 3: the decision. I can't come up with fanciful scenarios where
Speaker 3: it's like killing us and draining of us.
Speaker 1: Are of our juices that you're always talking vital fluids?
Speaker 3: Yes, but I could see how Grock, you know, your
Speaker 3: AI at your your your AI HR person would fire
Speaker 3: like two thirds of the workforce overnight when it figures out, well,
Speaker 3: we're you know, we're having a tough quarter, we need
Speaker 3: to cut expenses, and it just fires everybody or something
Speaker 3: like that. It just doesn't it doesn't understand come what context,
Speaker 3: like you said.
Speaker 1: So I'm scanning this real quickly. I don't think he
Speaker 1: asked for anonimity. Joe in Buffalo. It's a common enough name.
Speaker 1: He could be anywhere, but he says, I'm an engineering
Speaker 1: manager at a big aircraft and military contractor. My company
Speaker 1: is moving quickly to adopt AI, and I'm jumping on
Speaker 1: board in hopes of not being left behind. Very smart, Joe.
Speaker 1: My recommendation to my kids, engineers on my team, any
Speaker 1: young person I talk to, is to figure out how
Speaker 1: to use AI now to help you be more efficient
Speaker 1: at work. I'll be getting to the point of this
Speaker 1: in a second. But I'm personally using AI to parse
Speaker 1: complex log files. I don't even know what a log
Speaker 1: file is, whether complex or simple, and I couldn't parse them,
Speaker 1: create log file data plots, give me a give me
Speaker 1: an hour, I'll come back to you with that log
Speaker 1: file data plot. I drew summarized reports. I've written thousands
Speaker 1: of lines of working code and computers in a computer
Speaker 1: language I know nothing about. It's pretty amazing with AI.
Speaker 1: On the show, you talked about AI hallucinations and how
Speaker 1: it imagined a book that doesn't actually exist today. It
Speaker 1: came across a reality filter that might help solve this issue.
Speaker 1: When you start and this is crazy to me, but
Speaker 1: it's so interesting. When you start an AI chat session,
Speaker 1: you can give it a persona to tell it how
Speaker 1: to respond to you. In this persona, you can include
Speaker 1: this reality filter, which is designed to minimize hallucinations. Here
Speaker 1: are the things you tell AI before you start working
Speaker 1: with it. Never present, generated, inferred, speculated, or deduced contact.
Speaker 1: The content is fact. If you cannot verify something directly,
Speaker 1: say I cannot verify this, or I do not have
Speaker 1: access to that information, or my knowledge base does not
Speaker 1: contain that label unverified content at the start of a
Speaker 1: sentence that it's inferenced, speculation, or unverified.
Speaker 3: I think it's interesting that you have to tell grok,
Speaker 3: like I used to tell my one of my kids
Speaker 3: when he was little. If you don't know the answer,
Speaker 3: you don't need to make something up. Just say I
Speaker 3: don't know. I can't believe.
Speaker 1: You need to tell it that that's not built that way.
Speaker 1: That's funny, that's that's so similar. Ask for clarification of
Speaker 1: if information is missing. Do not guess or fill gaps
Speaker 1: if any part is unverified. Label the entire response. Do
Speaker 1: not paraphrase or reinterpret my input unless I request it.
Speaker 1: If you use these words, label the claim unless sourced,
Speaker 1: prevent guarantee will never fix. His eliminates ensures that. But
Speaker 1: and there are a couple more, But you have to
Speaker 1: give it a long and specific set of directions about
Speaker 1: not making crap up. Thanks Joe, appreciate the note.
Speaker 3: Wow, well, I would assume that they could fix that.
Speaker 3: Just have all a I tell all of a if
Speaker 3: you don't know something, don't make something up.
Speaker 1: Okay, we all agreement here. Yeah. I used it the
Speaker 1: other day. It was lateish in the day and one
Speaker 1: of my kids in a different time zone had a
Speaker 1: sudden urgent problem, and I was like, holy crap, I'm
Speaker 1: in the middle of doing something else. They need some advice,
Speaker 1: and I thought, you know what, while I'm thinking about this,
Speaker 1: I'm going to put it into chat GPT and see
Speaker 1: what it says. And you know, it didn't give me anything.
Speaker 1: I don't think I would have come up with on
Speaker 1: my own, but it gave me clarity and actually then
Speaker 1: did research. It was, you know, doing business with a business.
Speaker 1: Things were going sideways, and it pointed out, you know,
Speaker 1: an alternate is dealing with this business and here are
Speaker 1: a couple that have excellent reputations in that area. And
Speaker 1: I'm like, holy crap, okay, yeah, excellent point and made
Speaker 1: some very wise fatherly suggestions. And I did not credit
Speaker 1: chat GPT, which probably makes me.
Speaker 3: A bad person while you're letting AI parent your kids.
Speaker 3: Is pretty much yes, pretty much. I know I've had
Speaker 3: this experience before too, or I asked some sort of
Speaker 3: question like that, and I think that's really good. I
Speaker 3: shouldn't be using this because it's not my idea, but
Speaker 3: that is really good.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, huh.
Speaker 3: I don't know where that's going, specifically about my kid.
Speaker 3: One particular kid. I put in so here's my situation,
Speaker 3: and it had some suggestions who are like, wow, that's
Speaker 3: really a good idea.
Speaker 1: Right right, And it was the part of the reason
Speaker 1: that I felt like overwhelmed temporarily was I was in
Speaker 1: the middle of something and it was a big issue
Speaker 1: with a lot of money at stake, having to deal
Speaker 1: with a car, and my mind immediately went to, oh,
Speaker 1: my gosh, I got to research the value of that.
Speaker 1: I've got to assess the likelihood of that. We've got
Speaker 1: to balance that against the other alternative, which is blah
Speaker 1: blah blah, plus her situation is blah blah blah. But
Speaker 1: you know, it did that, all of that crunching of
Speaker 1: data and information and you know, fraction of a second. Wow,
Speaker 1: is this gonna make us yes, lazy and stupid lazes?
Speaker 1: It already has me. Are you kidding? Oh my god?
Speaker 1: We will finish strong next time.
Speaker 5: An unknown person or group using AI impersonated secretary of
Speaker 5: Rubio to contact on these five high level of government officials.
Speaker 5: Last month, the fake Rubio reached out to of these
Speaker 5: three foreign ministers, a US governor, and a member of Congress.
Speaker 5: The State Department is now investigating why.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Ian Bremer was tweeting out about this yesterday on his
Speaker 3: UH feed that this is going to be happening a lot,
Speaker 3: and I'll bet it is. It's kind I'm surprising it's
Speaker 3: the first time it's happened.
Speaker 1: If young me had access to that technology, like prior
Speaker 1: to my twenty fifth birthday, I would have done all
Speaker 1: sorts of insane things with well.
Speaker 3: Right, we have listeners that I don't think are experts
Speaker 3: who have put together various clips of us of Trump
Speaker 3: talking about US, or US talking about things or whatever.
Speaker 3: And so, yeah, you don't have to be a super
Speaker 3: genius to grab somebody's voice and turn it into something.
Speaker 1: Well right, and if you have any and if this
Speaker 1: does not exist now, it will vary very soon because
Speaker 1: I mean, for instance, your big translation apps, including Google,
Speaker 1: you can speak to it and it will with a
Speaker 1: very very short delay, translate you in real time using
Speaker 1: your tone of voice into another language, using your voice,
Speaker 1: synthesizing your voice. I think we played an example of
Speaker 1: that a few weeks ago. Soon I'll be able to
Speaker 1: punch in Marco Rubio or Donald Trump or whatever, call
Speaker 1: my local congress person or you know, the local hospital,
Speaker 1: or you know, if I'm having trouble getting a reservation
Speaker 1: at a hotspot, my local nice restaurant.
Speaker 3: Right, So, Elon's Ai Grock went pro Hitler and they're apologizing.
Speaker 3: Does that have anything to do with the person that
Speaker 3: runs Twitter stepping down today?
Speaker 1: Are those unrelated?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I don't know. The gallery on Twitter just announced she's
Speaker 1: stepping down Chat not chat X. AI just merged with
Speaker 1: X and I think she was I'm running a media company,
Speaker 1: I'm not an AI executive, so she's just stepped to sign.
Speaker 3: But so here's the headline in the New York Post.
Speaker 3: I think it's probably overstated. Oh, they changed it already.
Speaker 3: It did say Biden doctor storms out of congressional hearing.
Speaker 3: They've changed storms out, just left. But the Biden doctor
Speaker 3: Kevin O'Connor, wouldn't answer question about Biden's health. Some of
Speaker 3: you were looking forward to today. Doctor Kevin O'Connor declined
Speaker 3: to answer questions about Joe Biden's cognitive decline pled the
Speaker 3: Fifth Amendment, not surprising at all before ducking out of
Speaker 3: a high profile congressional deposition. The first question he was
Speaker 3: asked was were you ever told to lie about the
Speaker 3: President's health? He pleaded the Fifth Amendment. The chairman then said,
Speaker 3: and this is chairman comer, did you ever believe President
Speaker 3: Biben was Biden was unfit to execute his duties, and
Speaker 3: again the doctor pleaded the fifth, which of course you would.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's that's interesting. I'm torn on this one
Speaker 1: because it's important. It's an enormous scandal. It's unbelievable that
Speaker 1: they covered up for Biden's umility and trying to run
Speaker 1: him again last year for God's sake. But at the
Speaker 1: same time, we all know, yeah, I don't need that
Speaker 1: doctor to tell me, all right, yes, jd Ay, I lied.
Speaker 1: He's actually Seniland, rambling and shrembling and loses his train
Speaker 1: of thought all the time. And I'm like, yeah, we know,
Speaker 1: I know.
Speaker 3: And then what happens even if you get him to
Speaker 3: answer these questions that dooms Biden's chances of winning in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four. I mean, I don't even know what
Speaker 3: you get out of it, or you know, Tar's Democrats
Speaker 3: as liars and covers uppers of you know, senile people.
Speaker 3: But I mentioned this yesterday worth repeating for anybody who
Speaker 3: didn't hear it. We have quite the history of this
Speaker 3: in this country.
Speaker 1: FDR.
Speaker 3: According to this World War two book that I'm reading,
Speaker 3: the doctors looked him over. He was in horrible shape.
Speaker 3: Absolutely shouldn't run. There's no way he could live more
Speaker 3: than a year or two. When he was running for
Speaker 3: reelection for his fourth time, and the official White House
Speaker 3: doctor came out and said he's in actually better shape
Speaker 3: than he was in thirty three. Wow, just like Jean
Speaker 3: Pierre saying I can't keep up with him. So we've
Speaker 3: been doing this routine for a long time.
Speaker 1: All great things are simple and many. Can it be
Speaker 1: expressed in a tangle word? Freedom? Justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope,
Speaker 1: final thoughts his two words.
Speaker 3: By the way, this was at a time when Secret
Speaker 3: Service people were carrying FDR from his car to a
Speaker 3: different car. I mean, because he was so weak, he
Speaker 3: was like just bones. Anyway, Wow, here's your host for
Speaker 3: final thoughts, Joe Getty.
Speaker 1: Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew
Speaker 1: to wrap things up for the day. Michael Angelow in
Speaker 1: the control room. What's your final thought? Michael? Well, I've
Speaker 1: got this cold, and I've been looking on the internet
Speaker 1: for cures for the common cold. So far, I've come
Speaker 1: up with tie onions around your feet. So I'm gonna
Speaker 1: go give that a give that a whirl. Yeah, raw
Speaker 1: one sliced Katie Green or a steamed Newswoman. As a
Speaker 1: final thought, Katie, if you have not tried it yet,
Speaker 1: try using chat GPT to find out what to make
Speaker 1: for dinner? Oh like, what's in your fridge? Cool? Did
Speaker 1: it the other night? I had the great the greatest dinner,
Speaker 1: that's all. Wow, I haven't done that yet, Jack.
Speaker 3: A final thought for us, So as I've been saying,
Speaker 3: I've been working on a neutral facial expression, trying to
Speaker 3: get rid of my RBF, and apparently you can do that.
Speaker 1: But what did you say? It looks like when I do.
Speaker 3: That, Katie, it looks like you're plotting on me, Like
Speaker 3: I'm plotting.
Speaker 1: I don't want to look like I'm plotting against people. Boy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: from overt murderousness to like clandestine murderousness. I'm not sure
Speaker 1: that's progressed. My final thought, Funny, you should bring up cooking, Katie.
Speaker 1: I have been updated. I now have zero kitchens in
Speaker 1: my home. This model is progressing and they have dismantled
Speaker 1: the kitchen, the era of the toaster, oven, the camp stove,
Speaker 1: the eating out has begun. There you go. Let's see
Speaker 1: how this fits in with weight gain or loss.
Speaker 3: I can Armstrong and Geeddy wrapping up another grueling four
Speaker 3: hour workday.
Speaker 1: Well convenience foods are local and great for you. So
Speaker 1: many people who thanks a little time go to Armstrong
Speaker 1: and Geddy dot com, hit the hot links, Katie's corner,
Speaker 1: drop us and no pickups.
Speaker 3: Ang swag helps keep everybody on the payroll. I will
Speaker 3: we will see you tomorrow. God bless America.
Speaker 1: I'm strong and get it. We get a lot of
Speaker 1: vote thrown at us. You you.
Speaker 3: Go away.
Speaker 1: I mean, if anyone think that's bonkers, it's like, well
Speaker 1: we're on the brink. Let me say, let me say
Speaker 1: one thing. If you leave it in your crawl, your
Speaker 1: craw gets all red and infected. You need anabiotics. You
Speaker 1: don't want that, Michael, break out mister Armstrong's crawl cream.
Speaker 1: Won't you got it? We're gonna have to you if
Speaker 1: you administers that. Now I started it and now I'm
Speaker 1: disgusted by it. I know by arms Strong and Getty